The URL can be used to link to this page

20190820 Regular City Council Meeting - Packet (2)California Public Records Act ("PRA"): In compliance with the PRA, the documents pertaining to agenda items, including attachments, which are presented to the City Council in open session are available for public inspection. They may be inspected during regular business hours in the Office of the City Clerk at Vernon City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue; Vernon, California 90058, no appointment necessary, and on the City's website at www.cityofvemon.org. Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"): In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 583-8811. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service. Agenda City of Vernon OF V Regular City Council Meeting oak Tuesday, August 20, 2019, 09:00 AM City Hall, Council Chamber 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California Melissa Ybarra, Mayor Leticia Lopez, Mayor Pro-Tem William Davis, Council Member Carol Menke, Council Member Vacant, Council Member CALL TO ORDER & FLAG SALUTE CHANGES TO THE AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT At this time the public is encouraged to address the City Council on any matter that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The public will also be given a chance to comment on matters which are on the posted agenda during City Council deliberation on those specific matters. PUBLIC HEARING 1. City Administration Adoption of the Citywide Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Recommendation: A. Find that adoption of the resolution proposed in this staff report is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because adoption of the budget is the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(4). Further, even if adoption of the budget were considered a "project," it would be exempt from CEQA review in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have a significant effect on the environment; and Page 1 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 B. Conduct a Public Hearing; and C. Adopt a resolution approving the citywide balanced budget for Fiscal Year 2019/2020, with estimated budgeted revenues and expenditures of $329,670,129. 1. Public Hearing Notice - FY 2019/2020 City Wide Budget Adoption 2. A Resolution Approving a Citywide Budget for FY 2019/2020 3. Public Works Reorganization PRESENTATION 2. Human Resources Employee Service Pin Awards for July 2019 Recommendation: No action required by City Council. This is a presentation only. 1. Service Pin List for July 2019 Human Resources Recognition of Various Fire Safety Retired Employees Recommendation: A. Acknowledge and present proclamations to the following retired Fire Safety employees, in recognition of their dedicated service to the City of Vernon: 1. Fire Captain Stephen G. Agon 2. Fire Captain David A. Moore 3. Fire Captain Rory J. Moore 4. Fire Captain Steven M. Ruffoni 5. Fire Engineer Christopher M. Hanson 6. Fire Engineer David E. Koltvet 7. Fire Engineer Jeffrey S. Neely 8. Fire Engineer Michael D. Rogers 9. Fire Engineer Jeffrey S. Smith 10. Firefighter/Paramedic Thomas J. Egan 11. Firefighter Douglas C. Barker 12. Firefighter Barry A. Schoolmeester Proclamations for Twelve Employees Retired in June 2019 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are to be approved with one motion. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar by any member of the Council. Those items removed will be considered immediately after the Consent Calendar. 4. City Clerk Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on August 6, 2019 Page 2 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and File 1. 2019-08-06 City Council Minutes Finance/ Treasury Approval of City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 Covering the Period of July 01 through July 31, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 which totals $3,620,402.88 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of direct deposits, checks and taxes totaling $2,882,978.59. 2) Checks and electronic fund transfers (EFT) paid through Operating bank account totaling $737,424.29. 1. City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 6. Finance/ Treasury Approval of Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 Covering the Period of July 30 through August 12, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 which totals $3,426,429.33 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of electronic payments totaling $2,593,187.24. 2) Ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $785,962.22. 3) Authorization to issue pending checks totaling $47,279.87. 4) Voided check No. 603548 totaling $88.12. 1. Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 7. Fire Department Fire Department Activity Report for the Period of July 16 through July 31, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and file. 1. Fire Department Activity Report - 07/16/19 to 07/31/19 Police Department Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report Recommendation: A. Find that granting authority to execute and submit the above referenced agreement and related documents is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Page 3 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 review, because it is a continuing administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Approve the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report, in substantially the same form as submitted herewith; and C. Authorize the Police Chief and City Administrator to execute the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report and submit to the Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury on behalf of the City of Vernon. 1. 2019 Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report 9. Police Department Vernon Police Department Activity Log and Statistical Summary for the period of July 1 through July 15, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and file. 1. Police Department Activity Report - 07/01/19 to 07/15/19 10. Public Works Award of Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. for City Contract No. CS-1110: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Recommendation: A. Find that the approval of the proposed services agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. to prepare a citywide accessibility evaluation and transition plan is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in accordance with Sections 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) and 15306 (Information Collection); and B. Approve a Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc., in substantially the same form as attached herewith, for an amount not to exceed $139,930.00 for the preparation of a Citywide Accessibility Evaluation and Transition Plan; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute a Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. for a one-year term and an effective date of August 20, 2019. 1. Services Agreement for CS -I 110: ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan 11. Public Works Reject all Bids Received for City Contract No. CS-1055: Remodel of 3361 Fruitland Avenue Recommendation: A. Find that the subject Capital Improvement Project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section Page 4 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 15301, Existing Facilities, part (a), because the project is merely to make interior or exterior alterations involving partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances; and B. Reject all bid proposals received for City Contract No. CS-1055: Remodel of 3361 Fruitland Avenue. NEW BUSINESS 12. City Administration Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County Recommendation: A. Find that the approval of Amendment No. 1 with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review, because it is an administrative action that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and, therefore, does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County ("LA County Fire"), in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, for an amount not -to -exceed $100,000; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 1 with LA County Fire for the purpose of initiating a Municipal Services Review to be performed by the Los Angeles County Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO"). 1. Amendment No. 1 to Reimbursement Agreement with LA County Fire 2. LA County Fire Transition Process in Brief 13. Fire Department Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement between the City of Vernon and JSB Fire Protection, LLC Recommendation: A. Find that the approval proposed action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement with JSB Fire Protection, LLC, (Contract No. FD-0224), in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, increasing the existing not -to -exceed amount of $78,000.00 by an additional $85,000.00, for a total contract value of $163,000.00; and Page 5 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 1 with JSB Fire Protection, LLC to cover the cost of anticipated fire plan checks through the remainder of the contract term. 1. Amendment No I - JSB Services Agreement 14. Public Works Award of a Professional Services Agreement to Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High - Speed Rail Project Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the proposed action is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in accordance with Section 15306, because the scope of the agreement consists of research and analysis, which will not result in a serious or major disturbance to any environmental resource and which will not commit the City to any project; and B. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. ("Mott MacDonald"), in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, for Technical, Engineering, and Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Professional Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $155,875.50 for Phase I of the Agreement and in an amount not to exceed $228,895.37 for Phase II of the Agreement, for a total cost of $384,770.87. 1. Professional Services Agreement with Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. 15. Public Utilities Award of Services Agreement to Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Recommendation: A. Find that the proposed action is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15306, because the scope of the agreement consists of research, analysis, and resource evaluation activities which will not result in serious or major disturbances to environmental resources and which will not commit the City to any project; and B. Approve a Services Agreement with Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, in an amount not to exceed $375,000 for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Services Agreement with Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC with an effective date of September 1, 2019. 1. Proposed Services Agreement with Richard C. Slade & Associates for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Page 6 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 ORAL REPORTS City Administrator Reports — brief reports on activities and other brief announcements by the City Administrator and Department Heads. CLOSED SESSION 16. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Potential Initiation of Litigation. Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) Number of potential cases: 1 17. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representative: Carlos Fandino, City Administrator Employee Organizations: Teamsters Local 911, IBEW Local 47, Vernon Professional Firefighters Association, and Vernon Fire Management Association, 18. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (2) Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Bicent (California) Malburg LLC et al. v. City of Vernon et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case Nos. 19STCV08859 and 19STCP02411 City of Vernon v. Bicent (California) Malburg LLC et al. JAMS Reference No. 1220062657 ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Vernon City Hall, located at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California, and on the City's website, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Dated this 15th day of August 2019. Deborah A. Harrington, Interim City Clerk Page 7 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda August 20, 2019 Bicent (California) Malburg LLC et al. v. City of Vernon et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case Nos. 19STCV08859 and 19STCP02411 City of Vernon v. Bicent (California) Malburg LLC et al. JAMS Reference No. 1220062657 ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the City of Vernon City Hall, located at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California, and on the City's website, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting set forth on this agenda. Dated this 15th day of August 2019. Deborah A. Harrington, Interim City Clerk Page 8 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-378-2019 Submitted by: Diana Figueroa Submitting Department: City Administration Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Adoption of the Citywide Budget for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Recommendation: A. Find that adoption of the resolution proposed in this staff report is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA'), because adoption of the budget is the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(4). Further, even if adoption of the budget were considered a `project," it would be exempt from CEQA review in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have a significant effect on the environment; and B. Conduct a Public Hearing; and C. Adopt a resolution approving the citywide balanced budget for Fiscal Year 2019/2020, with estimated budgeted revenues and expenditures of $329,670,129. Background: A thoughtful, conscientious approach has been employed by City leaders to prepare a sensible fiscal year ("FY) 2019/2020 budget for City Council approval. With a focus on fiscal accountability, sustainability, and operational efficiency in the proposed budget, staff has achieved a balance between the integral components of City functions and its existing financial constraints. On June 4 and June 18, 2019, the City s Department Directors presented the proposed FY 2019/2020 budgets for their respective departments to the City Council (with the exception of the Public Works and Fire Departments). Additionally, the City Administrator delivered a budget overview presentation that encapsulated the City's overall financial position, identified challenges (e.g. the City's structural deficit), and articulated relevant strategies to address budgetary issues facing Vernon in the short and long term. The collective presentations included, among other things, information on the City's fiscal policy, budget process, organizational charts, historical budget comparisons (Citywide and department specific), FY 2018/2019 highlights, and goals for the new fiscal year. All focused on the core elements of the City's budget structure: Salaries/Benefits, Supplies/Services, and Capital Outlay. The FY 2019/2020 proposed budget was brought to City Council for adoption at its July 2, 2019 meeting. Adoption was proposed with a recommendation to approve a citywide budget that incorporated the previous year FY 2018/2019 approved budgets for the Public Works and Fire departments, as ongoing labor negotiations and organizationaUstaffing assessments were yet to be finalized. At that time, conclusive information required to intelligently formulate a sound budget for either department was not available. City Council expressed its need to have the budget particulars for every department finalized in order to consider budget adoption. Accordingly, City staff utilized the time since the July 2nd City Council meeting to conclude negotiations with the City's labor groups and further assess proposed expenditures in all other areas of the City's operations. At the first City Council meeting in August, staffbrought forward for approval several items that addressed budgetary unknowns. On August 6, 2019, City Council heard an in-depth presentation from the Director of Public Works that addressed a possible reorganization of the department and the budgetary impacts of such restructuring. As staff continues citywide efforts to streamline and modernize processes, and implement strategies to maximize organizational efficiencies, the Public Works Department has proposed a Building Division reorganization (Attachment 3 provided for reference) that includes a recommendation for contractor -led plan review and inspections, consistent with the departmental presentation delivered at the August 6, 2019 City Council meeting. As such, costs associated to the department's reorganization have been incorporated into the final FY 2019/2020 Budget proposed for City Council approval at its August 20, 2019 meeting. The City continues to explore with labor groups any potential options for impacted employees to transfer into other City departments where there may be vacancies, as the City is sensitive to the effects of such a reorganization. The various changes being proposed result in an overall annual net decrease of approximately $1.1 million in the Public Works Department budget. Additionally, City Council determined a direction for the Fire Department at its August 6, 2019 meeting that allowed City staff to proceed with the preparation of a Fire Department budget that reflects the desired implementation of a transition to the Los Angeles County Fire District for the provision of fire protection, paramedic, and incidental services in the City of Vernon. City Council took a large step forward in their approval of an agreement to proceed with the transfer of Vernon Fire Services to a Los Angeles County Fire Service model. The process to facilitate the transfer will be a fairly lengthy one, as there are a number of steps that still remain on the horizon prior to the transition taking effect. In order to accommodate the pre -transition phase and all costs associated, City staff has prepared a budget that reflects six months of Vernon Fire expenditures and six months of LA County Fire expenditures. The goal of including a combination of each is to provide an accurate representation of the FY 2019/2020 costs to be incurred by the City. Budget Updates All other fiscal adjustments that have occurred since the budget proposal on July 2nd are summarized below. -Salaries/Benefits Expenditures There were no revisions to Salaries/Benefits since the July 2nd budget proposal, except for those previously referenced for the Public Works and Fire Departments. -Supplies/Services Expenditures Vernon Public Utilities (' VPU') is diligent in their pursuit to secure the most economical resources to ensure that customers have access to reliable, affordable utilities. As a result of this consistent effort, the Resource Planning Division was able to procure FY 2019/2020 natural gas supply for significantly lower prices than originally forecasted in its initial proposed budget. VPU staff were able to secure a $7.9 million reduction in fuel costs. As a result of this reduction, customers will see a decrease in charges. Additionally, the Gas Division reduced its natural gas expenses by approximately $200,000. However, since both expenses and revenues were reduced by an equal amount, there is no change to the proposed Gas Division budget. VPU's budget has been modified to reflect the aforementioned changes. -Capital Outlay VPU's Water Division moved a $600,000 On Call Pump and Motor Repair cost from its Repair and Maintenance category to its Capital expenditures. This administrative change has no impact on the department's overall budget, as there was no increase or decrease, but rather only a reassignment of the lime item. Conclusion The difference in the total monetary impact from the time of the proposed budget presentation on July 2, 2019, equates to an overall decrease in the City budget in the amount of approximately $9.6 million, with an overall budget of revenues and expenditures of $329,670,129. Consistent with City Administration goals and City Council's direction, staff is cominitted to streamlining costs, increasing efficiencies Citywide, and is dedicated to securing the City's long-term future. Management is confident that it has delivered on its commitment by proposing integral structural changes to the City organization and a corresponding budget that will allow for sustainability. It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the fiscal year 2019/2020 Citywide Budget. Although the City faces a multitude of budgetary challenges, effective strategies are continuously being explored. Efforts to further improve operational efficiencies with a focus on cost controls will continue throughout fiscal year 2019/2020 and into the distant future. Fiscal cal Impact: There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of the fiscal year 2019/2020 budget, as it is an administrative activity. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Public Hearing Notice - FY 2019/2020 City Wide Budget Adoption • 2. A Resolution Approving a Citywide Budget for FY 2019/2020 • 3. Public Works Reorganization City of Vernon PLACE: 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 (323) 583-8811 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED CITY WIDE BUDGET The City of Vernon will conduct a Public Hearing, which you may attend. DATE & TIME: PURPOSEISUBJECT: Vernon City Hall City Council Chamber 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Tuesday, August 20, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard) Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW: All relevant documents will be made available for inspection by the public at the Vernon City Hall, City Clerk Department, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and will be made available on the City's website at: http://www.cityofvemon.org�government/public-meetings/city-council Please send your comments or questions to. - Carlos Fandino, City Administrator City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058 (323) 583-8811 ext. 228 Email: cfandino@ci.vernon.ca.us PROPOSED CEQA FINDING: Staff plans to recommend that the Vernon City Council determine that the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget will not have a significant effect on the environment and that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Adoption of the budget is aligned with the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is, therefore, not a "project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(4). Further, even if adoption of the budget was considered a "project," it would be exempt from CEQA review in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have a significant effect on the environment. If you challenge the adoption/approval of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget or any provision thereof in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon at, or prior to, the meeting. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): In compliance with ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 583-8811 ext. 546. The hearing may be continued or adjourned or cancelled and rescheduled to a stated time and place without further notice of a public hearing. r _ , Dated: e4klmv Deborah Harrington, Inf 'm City Clerk CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU DAILYJOURNAL CORPORATION Mailing Address: 915 E FIRST ST, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 Telephone (800) 788-7840 / Fax (800) 464-2839 Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com Deborah Harrington CITY OF VERNON CITY CLERK 4305 SANTA FE AVE VERNON, CA 90058 COPY OF NOTICE Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE Ad Description Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are): 08/08/2019 An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice. ..00000,,,,==a. PRE# 3281493 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED CITY WIDE BUDGET The City of Vernon will conduct a Public Hearing, which you may attend. PLACE: Vernon City Hall City Council Chamber 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 DATE & TIME: Tuesday, August 20, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. (or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard) PURPOSE/SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW: All relevant documents will be made available for inspection by the public at the Vernon City Hall, City Clerk Department, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and will be made available on the City's website at: http://www.cityofvernon.org/governmenVpu bl ic- meeti ngs/city-council Please send your comments or questions to: Carlos Fandino, City Administrator City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058 (323) 583-8811 ext. 228 Email: cfandino@ci.vernon.ca.us PROPOSED CEQA FINDING: Staff plans to recommend that the Vernon City Council determine that the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget will not have a significant effect on the environment and that it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Adoption of the budget is aligned with the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is, therefore, not a "project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(4). Further, even if adoption of the budget was considered a "project," it would be exempt from CEQA review in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have a significant effect on the environment. If you challenge the adoption/approval of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget or any provision thereof in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon at, or prior to, the meeting. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): In compliance with ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in the meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 583- 8811 ext. 546. The hearing may be continued or adjourned or cancelled and rescheduled to a stated time and place without further notice of a public hearing. Dated: 815119 /S/ Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk 818119 PRE-3281493# HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON APPROVING A BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 WHEREAS, on June 5, 2018, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Resolution No. 2018-18 approving a budget for the fiscal year 2018-2019; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon wishes to establish a new budget to anticipate the requirements for fiscal year 2019-2020 for the different departments of the City of Vernon; and WHEREAS, on June 4th, June 18th, and August 6, 2019, all City Department Heads, with the exception of the Fire Chief, presented to the City Council the proposed budgets for their respective departments for Fiscal Year 2019-2020; and WHEREAS, on August 6, 2019, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Resolution No. 2019-29, approving and authorizing the execution of an agreement to delegate fire protection, paramedic and incidental services to the Los Angeles County Fire District (the "LACFD Agreement"); and WHEREAS, by virtue of the City's entry into the LACFD Agreement, the budget for the Fire Department has been adjusted to reflect costs accordingly; and WHEREAS, the expenditures proposed in the budget are well under the limitations imposed pursuant to the Gann Initiative for Fiscal Year 2019-2020; and WHEREAS, the budget maintains the proper balance between revenues and expenditures, and establishes well thought out priorities; and WHEREAS, approval of the budget is in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon finds that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because adoption of the budget is the creation of a government funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(4). Further, even if adoption of the budget were considered a "project," it would be exempt from CEQA review, in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby approves the budget as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, to anticipate the requirements for fiscal year 2019-2020 for the different departments of the City of Vernon. SECTION 4: The anticipated revenues for the fiscal year 2019-2020 are set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. SECTION 5: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that certain items provided for in individual department budgets are in the nature of community promotion and education, and the City Council of the City of Vernon further finds and determines that the same are in the best interests of the City of - 2 - Vernon, and necessary for the further development of the City and constitute a reasonable expenditure of public funds. SECTION 6: The Interim City Clerk, or the Interim City Clerk's designee, of the City of Vernon is hereby directed to file this Resolution (along with each exhibit) with the County Auditor of Los Angeles County, located at the following address, within sixty (60) days after July 1, 2019: County of Los Angeles Office of Auditor/Controller Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 SECTION 7: The Interim City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the Interim City Clerk, of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the Interim City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Council of this City. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2019. ATTEST: Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Byun, Senior Deputy City Attorney - 3 - Name: Title: Mayor / Mayor Pro-Tem STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. , was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Tuesday, August 20, 2019, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon. Executed this day of August, 2019, at Vernon, California. (SEAL) - 4 - Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk EXH I BIT A CITY OF VERNON EXPENDITURE BUDGET 2019-2020 DEPARTMENT SALARIES BENEFITS CITY COUNCIL CITY ADMINISTRATION CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMUNITY PROMOTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUB -TOTAL ADMIN HEALTH/ENVIRONMENTAL CTRL SUB -TOTAL HEALTH POLICE FIRE SUB -TOTAL SAFETY ADMIN-ENGR-PLANNING BUILDING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CITY GARAGE CITY WAREHOUSE CITY HOUSING CITY BUILDINGS SUB -TOTAL COMM SER TOTAL GENERAL FUND TOTAL GENERAL FUND SUPPLIES/ CAPITAL SERVICES OUTLAY TOTAL $ 146,349 $ 61,579 $ 39,984 $ - $ 247,912 570,062 295,607 78,871 - 944,540 785,281 342,808 427,500 - 1,555,589 363,910 141,725 93,000 - 598,635 1,334,418 562,287 1,458,294 - 3,354,999 620,442 2,435,017 426,440 - 3,481,899 - - 500,000 - 500,000 - - 500,000 - 500,000 607,879 236,904 1,261,225 312,000 2,418,008 4,428, 341 4,075,927 4,785,314 312,000 13,601,582 540,226 255,017 627,626 11,000 1,433,869 540,226 255,017 627,626 11,000 1,433,869 6,765,061 4,440,220 469,426 120,200 11,794,907 5,326,889 3,521,026 8,447,176 365,800 17,660,891 12,091,950 7,961,246 8,916,602 486,000 29,455,798 1,909,563 921,941 2,326,780 3,680,000 8,838,284 159,277 80,783 747,150 - 987,210 446,080 242,850 5,840 - 694,770 - - 51,230 - 51,230 378,818 169,580 274,500 45,000 867,898 157,490 82,921 10,950 70,000 321,361 177,657 93,979 134,200 370,000 775,836 416,338 192,360 773,050 689,000 2,070,748 3,645,223 1,784,414 4,323,700 4,854,000 14,607,337 $ 20,705,740 $ 14,076,604 $ 18,653,242 $ 5,663,000 $ 59,098,586 $ 20,705,740 $ 14,076,604 $ 18,653,242 $ 5,663,000 $ 59,098,586 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 CITY OF VERNON EXPENDITURE BUDGET 2019-2020 SUPPLIES/ DEPARTMENT SALARIES BENEFITS SERVICES RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND UTILITIES WATER FUND WATER OPERATIONS RECYCLED WATER SUB -TOTAL WATER LIGHT & POWER FIELD OPERATIONS SYSTEM DISPATCH STATION A TRANS/DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CUSTOMER SERVICE ADMINISTRATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT SUB -TOTAL L & P GAS FIBER -OPTICS TOTAL UTILITIES GRAND TOTAL - - 5,698,006 1,511,156 694,320 7,589,986 1,511,156 694,320 7,589,986 692,033 245,899 510,228 1,888,740 695,700 797,804 - - 635,045 - - 7,182, 204 - - 283,090 256,716 132,024 8,848,257 1,017,052 441,981 58,450,677 1,114,091 439,050 344,000 1,050,237 408,596 133,995,816 35,912 13,624 1,100,000 6,054,781 2,376,874 212,147,121 577,531 242,417 12,693,267 68,097 30,801 324,186 8,211,565 3,344,412 232,754,560 $ 28,917,305 $ 17,421,016 $ 257,105,808 CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL - 5,698,006 8,252,000 18,047,462 8,252,000 18,047,462 536,000 1,984,160 340,000 3,722,244 60,000 695,045 - 7,182, 204 255,000 538,090 110,000 9,346,997 360,000 60,269,710 9,275,000 11,172,141 - 135,454,649 - 1,149, 536 10,936,000 231,514,776 1,125,000 14,638,215 250,000 673,084 20,563,000 264,873,537 $ 26,226,000 $ 329,670,129 EXHIBIT "A" Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B CITY OF VERNON ESTIMATED REVENUES 2019-2020 GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE GENERAL FY2020 400110 SECURED PROPERTY TAX -CURRENT $ 3,863,645 400210 PRIOR YEAR SECURED $ (8,658) 400310 REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX $ 237,548 400311 BNSF $ 624,792 400500 PROPERTY TAX -INTEREST & PENALTIES $ 7,576 400610 PROP "A" FUNDS $ 4,340 400630 PROP "C" FUNDS $ 3,600 400700 HOMEOWNERS' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION $ 16,883 400820 PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENTATION FUND $ 1,840 400900 PARCEL TAXES - WAREHOUSE $ 11,825,874 400950 PARCEL TAXES - SAFETY $ 2,145,162 401000 UTILITY USERS TAX $ 12,000,000 401200 SALES AND USE TAX $ 7,854,000 401206 MEASURE R LOCAL RETURN $ 2,700 401207 MEASURE M LOCAL RETURN $ 3,060 401208 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHAB - SB1 $ 3,459 401209 TDA ARTICLE 3 $ 5,000 401600 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - SB2557 $ (35,541) 401650 STATE FEE - SB1186 $ 750 407500 GAS TAX 2103 $ 1,783 407510 GAS TAX 2105 $ 1,163 407600 GAS TAX 2106 $ 5,487 407700 GAS TAX 2107 $ 1,527 407800 GAS TAX 2107.5 $ 1,000 410100 BUSINESS LICENSES $ 6,000,000 410210 BUILDING PERMITS $ 700,000 410211 FIRE PERMIT FEES $ 27,500 410212 ALARM PERMITS $ 14,500 410240 PUBLIC HEALTH PERMITS $ 1,100,000 410250 HEALTH PERMIT LATE FEES $ 12,000 410270 FILMING PERMITS $ 4,000 410271 SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT FEES $ 500 410280 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $ 9,500 410290 ISSUANCE FEE $ 19,000 410300 FRANCHISES AND AGREEMENTS $ 115,008 410310 SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE FEES $ 1,200,000 410320 SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE LATE FEES $ 12,000 410330 FRANCHISE FEES, PRIOR YEARS $ - 410400 CLOSURE REVIEW FEES $ 5,000 410410 PLAN CHECK REVIEW FEES $ 100,000 410430 ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE INSPECTION $ 70,000 410440 FIRE PREVENTION FEES / BUILDING $ - 410450 FIRE CODE CONSTRUCTION PERMITS $ - 410460 ANNUAL BUSINESS FIRE RE-INSPECITON $ 1,750 410470 FIVE YEAR SPRINKLER SYSTEM TESTING $ 3,750 410480 FALSE ALARM FEES $ 27,750 410490 FIRE EXTINGUISHER TRAINING $ 250 420100 VEHICLE CODE FINES $ 60,000 420110 OTHER VEHICLE FINES $ 20,000 420120 DUI EMERGENCY RESPONSE $ - 420130 VEHICLE INSPECTION FEE $ 4,000 420510 PARKING CITATIONS $ 30,000 420515 FRANCHISE TOWING FEES $ 15,000 420520 COMMUNITY SERVICES INCOME $ 37,000 420525 IMPOUNDED VEHICLE RELEASE FEES $ 3,000 420530 DUI VEHICLE RELEASE FEES $ 3,000 420535 REPOSSESSED VEHICLE RELEASE FEE $ 300 430110 INVESTMENT INCOME $ 85,000 431000 RENTS $ 528,920 440100 GRANT REVENUE $ 2,897,031 441010 COPS - SLESF FUNDS $ - 441014 OVERTIME REIMBURSEMENT REVENUE $ 441015 TASK FORCE REIMBURSEMENT REVENUE $ EXHIBIT "B" Page 1 of 2 CITY OF VERNON ESTIMATED REVENUES 2019-2020 GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPE GENERAL 442001 MOTOR VEHICLE IN -LIEU TAX 450110 FIRE SERVICE 450120 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEES 458000 GENERAL CITY ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 459030 GROUP MEDICAL REVENUE 461100 MISCELLANEOUS AND PENALTIES 466000 P.O.S.T. REIMBURSEMENT 466200 PLAN CHECK FEES 466220 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS FEE 466230 ANNUALFEE 466600 COPIES AND PUBLICATIONS 466700 BACKFLOW CERTIFICATES 466900 MISCELLANEOUS 467000 STRIKE TEAM REIMBURSEMENT 467100 EMS REIMBURSEMENT 467300 BOOKING FEE REIMBURSMENT 468400 VARIANCES 469300 RESERVE APPLIED 499700 CREDIT FOR GARAGE WORK ORDERS 600910 OTHER INCOME 630055 LIGHT AND POWER IN -LIEU TAX 670010 SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS 690100 OPERATING TRANSFER IN TOTAL GENERAL FUND FIDUCIARY FUND 022 RDA/SUCCESSOR AGENCY TAX INCREMENT SUB -TOTAL FIDUCIARY FUND TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL TYPE FUNDS PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES WATER DEPARTMENT 020 WATER - REVENUES 020 WATER - PROCEEDS FROM LONG-TERM DEBT 020 WATER - RESERVES APPLIED LIGHT AND POWER 055 LIGHT AND POWER - REVENUES 055 LIGHT AND POWER - RESERVES APPLIED FIBER -OPTICS 057 FIBER -OPTICS - REVENUES 057 FIBER -OPTICS - RESERVES APPLIED GAS UTILITY 056 GAS -REVENUES 056 GAS - RESERVES APPLIED SUB -TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS FY2020 8,500 10,000 70,000 3,665,551 228,257 45,500 325,000 7,000 1,000 18,650 18,051 125,000 72,500 4,500 (2,862,565) 375,000 387,920 4,925,975 5,698,006 5,698,006 64,796,593 8,573,244 1,500,000 7,974,218 222,206,778 9,307,997 983,220 (310,136) 14,081,125 557,090 $ 329,670,129 EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 2 GENERAL FUND Department 01 1.1041 Building Regulations and Planning STATUS QU REORGAI� OVERVIEW OF EXPENDITURES: OVERVIEW OF EXPENDITURES: (Reg ular/OT/Retirement/Insurance) SALARIES/BENEFITS $ 1,150,492 (Regular/OT/Retirement/Insurance) SALARIES/BENEFITS $ 240,060 (Supplies/Uniforms/Prof. Services) SUPPLIES/SERVICES $ 344,250 (Supplies/Uniforms/Prof. Services) SUPPLIES/SERVICES $ 747,150 CAPITAL $ - CAPITAL $ - TOTALS $ 1,494,742 TOTALS $ 987,210 )IMPACTED AREAS IMPACTED AREAS SALARIES/BENEFITS FTE Salaries EMPLOYEE TITLE FTE Salaries Assistant Planner 1 $ 86,774 Assistant Planner 1 $ 87,608 Building and Planning Manager (Vacant) 1 $ 138,576 Building and Planning Manager (Vacant)* 0 $ - Building Inspector, Senior 1 $ 125,789 Building Inspector, Senior* 0 $ Code Enforcement Technician (Vacant) 1 $ 52,228 Code Enforcement Technician (Vacant)* 0 $ Electrical Inspector, Senior 1 $ 111,363 Electrical Inspector, Senior* 0 $ Permit Technician 2 $ 133,140 Permit Technician* 1 $ 68,811 Plumbing & Mechanical Inspector, Sr 1 $ 112,863 Plumbing & Mechanical Inspector, Sr* 0 $ - Overtime $ 15,000 Overtime* $ 2,000 Payout (vacation & sick excess hours) $ 14,000 Payout (vacation & sick excess hours)* $ 858 Benefits (Retirement/Group Insurance Premiums/ Medicare) $ 360,542 Benefits (Retirement/Group Insurance Premiums/ Medicare) $ 80,783 TOTALS 7 $ 1,150,492 TOTALS 2 $ 240,060 SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan $ 50,000 Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan $ 25,000 On -Call Structural Plan Check Services $ 100,000 On -Call Structural Plan Check Services* $ - Strong Motion Instrumentation Plans/Seismic Haz. Mapping $ 15,000 Strong Motion Instrumentation Plans/Seismic Haz. Mapping $ 15,000 On -Call Plan Check & Inspection Services $ 15,000 On -Call Plan Check & Inspection Services* $ - Housing Element Update $ 25,000 Housing Element Update $ 25,000 File Scanning $ 50,000 File Scanning $ 50,000 Code Enforcement $ 50,000 Code Enforcement $ - Plan Check/Inspection/Planning $ - Plan Check/Inspection/Planning* $ 620,750 Revolving Fund $ 5,000 Revolving Fund $ 5,000 Maps $ 1,000 Maps $ 1,000 Office Supplies $ 4,000 Office Supplies* $ 800 Uniforms $ 400 Uniforms* $ 200 Advertisement/Promotion $ 2,500 Advertisement/Promotion $ 2,500 Vehicle Expenses $ 5,500 Vehicle Expense* $ - Travel $ 2,000 Travel* $ - Membership Dues $ 850 Membership Dues* $ 200 Books & Publications $ 10,000 Books & Publications* $ 2,000 Training $ 8,000 Training* $ - $ (507,532) $ (910,432) TOTALS $ 344,250 TOTALS $ 747,450 $ 403,200 *Changes made due to proposed reorganization With the implementation of contracted Plan Check/Inspection/Planning Services to augment the Building and Planning Division, Public Works will absorb existing service costs for On -Call Structural Plan Check and Inspection Services while adding the benefit of technology to the operation. The difference between existing contract service costs and proposed equates to $505,750. In addition to mitigating costs in salaries/benefits, Public Works is also able to reduce expenditures in its supplies/services. An overall reduction of $507,532 will be realized in the Building Regulations and Planning Division of Public Works. Current Building Permit Process (New Construction) ECHANICAL/ PLUMBING STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT CLIENT SUBMITS PLANS PERMIT TECHNICIAN rMNNER (cup, VARIANCE, ZONING, PARKING) BUILDING PERMIT TECHNICIAN ELECTRICAL CASP CONSULTANT ERMIT ISSUED TO CLIENT NGINEERING GRADING/LID *Average time frame to issue New Development permits is 10-12 weeks permit applications may vary. Reorganized Building Permit Process (New Construction) CLIENT SUBMITS PLANS PERMIT TECHNICIAN PLANNER (CUP, VARIANCE, ZONING, PARKING) CONSULTANT PERMIT TECHNICIAN RMIT ISSUED TO CLIENT The right sizing of the Building Division using a consultant to provide all plan review and inspection service will benefit anyone building in Vernon through streamlining the permit processes by eliminating the multiple person reviews that we are currently using (see graphic). Streamlining will reduce redundant and conflicting plan review comments, improve the quality of plan reviews and inspections, and decrease review times for complex projects. Currently there are two positions in the Engineering Section that have become have recently become vacant through promotions and transfers, and a third position that has been temporary reassigned to Street Maintenance. Using a consultant to provide all plan review and inspection services eliminates the grading and low impact development plan review and inspection work currently being performed by the Engineering Section allowing the engineers to instead focus on the maintenance and betterment of City facilities and infrastructure, resulting in the permanent right sizing of the Engineering Section. The Warehouse Division will be right sized through a change in processes and the use of technology. The right sizing of the Warehouse Division and of the Engineering Section allows additional employees to be assigned to Street Maintenance and provides for a second Graffiti Abatement Crew. *Projected Average time frame to issue New Development permits is 6-9 weeks. City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-351-2019 Submitted by: Veronica Avendano Submitting Department: Human Resources Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Employee Service Pin Awards for July 2019 Recommendation: No action required by City CounciL This is a presentation only. Background: Submitted herewith is a list of employees who are eligible to receive their service pin based on the number of service years with the City of Vernon. Fiscal Impact: None. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Service Pm List for July 2019 2019 SERVICE PIN LIST JULY ANNIVERSARY EMPLOYEE'S NAME DEPARTMENT TITLE D.O.H YEARS Sergio A. Canales Public Works Assistant Planner 7/4/1999 20 Jeremy A. Cross Police Police Sergeant 7/12/2004 15 Paul J. Hallenberg Fire Firefighter/Paramedic 7/19/2004 15 Jonathan D. Sudduth Fire Firefighter/Paramedic 7/19/2004 15 Jonathan E. Van Oeffelen Fire Firefighter 7/19/2004 15 Stephanie D. Aceves Police Police Dispatcher 7/14/2014 5 Hem P. Patel ICity Attorney ICity Attorney 7/21/2014 5 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-358-2019 Submitted by: Lisette Grizzelle Submitting Department: Human Resources Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Recognition of Various Fire Safety Retired Employees Recommendation: A. Acknowledge and present proclamations to the following retired Fire Safety employees, in recognition of their dedicated service to the City of Vernon: I . Fire Captain Stephen G. Agon 2. Fire Captain David A. Moore 3. Fire Captain Rory J. Moore 4. Fire Captain Steven M. Ruffoni 5. Fire Engineer Christopher M. Hanson 6. Fire Engineer David E. Koltvet 7. Fire Engineer Jeffrey S. Neely 8. Fire Engineer Michael D. Rogers 9. Fire Engineer Jeffrey S. Smith 10. Firefighter/Paramedic Thomas J. Egan 11. Firefighter Douglas C. Barker 12. Firefighter Barry A. Schoolmeester Background: Historically, the City Council has issued proclamations in honor of retired City employees. The proclamations commend the employees for their years of service and dedication to the City, acknowledge their contributions to projects or programs, and recognize significant achievements attained throughout the employee's career. Proclamations are being presented to the following employees that retired during the month of June 2019: - Fire Captain Stephen G. Agon, Hired on August 17, 1987 - Retired on June 8, 2019 - Fire Captain David A. Moore, Hired on May 16, 1988 - Retired on June 17, 2019 - Fire Captain Rory J. Moore, Hired on June 26, 1989 - Retired on June 29, 2019 - Fire Captain Steven M. Ruffoni, Hired on May 16, 1988 - Retired on June 29, 2019 - Fire Engineer Christopher M. Hanson, Hired on January 7, 1991 - Retired on June 28, 2019 - Fire Engineer David E. Koltvet, Hired on September 12, 1994 - Retired on June 8, 2019 - Fire Engineer Jeffrey S. Neely, Hired on September 12, 1994 - Retired on June 22, 2019 - Fire Engineer Michael D. Rogers, Hired on February 26, 1990 - Retired on June 29, 2019 - Fire Engineer Jeffrey S. Smith, Hired on January 7, 1991 - Retired on June 29, 2019 - Firefighter/Paramedic Thomas J. Egan, Hired on November 2, 1992 - Retired on June 29, 2019 - Firefighter Douglas C. Barker, Hired on November 2, 1992 - Retired on June 20, 2019 - Firefighter Barry A. Schoolmeester, Hired on February 26, 1990 - Retired on June 18, 2019 All twelve of the aforementioned Fire Safety Personnel members meet the eligibility requirements under CalPERS to retire from the City of Vernon effective as of the retirement date listed above for each employee. Proclamations will be mailed to each respective employee as they are not able to attend the August 20th Council Meeting. Fiscal Impact: There is no additional fiscal impact on the current operating budget as a result of this recommended action. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Proclamations for Twelve Employees Retired in June 2019 I f r ,j g f A PROCLAMATION OF THE 'MAYOR AND THE CITYCO OF THE CITY OF T ERRNON COMMENDING STEPHEN G. AGON FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SE,R LICE TO THE CITE' OF VERNON WHEREAS, Stephen G. Agon (".Stephen Agon') has been employed 6y the Ciy of Vernon since August 17, 1987, and has faithfully served the City of Vernon for over 31 years; and W'HERFAS, Stephen Agon has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 8, 2019, as a .Fire Captain; and WIHF.RF.AS, during the course of his employment with the City of Vernon, Stephen Agon held the positions of - Firefighter, .Fire Engineer and Fire Captain; and W'HERE.AS, Stephen Agon completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) certification in July of2011; and W'HERE.-IS, Stephen.Agon was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and lx'HF.RE, IS, during his long and distinguished career with the Ciy of Vernon, Stephen Agon has anon the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and WIHERF.AS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Stephen Agon for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish Stephen good health upon his retirement and for continued success in life's• pursuits; and WHF'RF.AS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Stephen Agon for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of -his contributions and achievements. NO W1, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON, ON .BEHALF O.F FFS EMPLOYEES, RE, SIDENTS,AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS STEPHEN G. AGON .FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO STEPHEN G. AGON BY THIS HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE. CITY OF VERNON THIS 20"' DAY OF AUG UST TWO THO USAND AND NINETEEN. y�I A PROCLAMATION OF THE ?VIA OR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T ERNON COMMENDING DAVID A. MOORS FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF VERNON WIHEREAS, David A. Moore (`David Moore"' .has been employed by the Ciy of - Vernon sin . e Mav 16, 1988, and has,Oith. fully served the City of Z'ernon for over 3 1 years, and WIHERF.AS, David Moore .has retired fiom the Ciy of I "ernon effective June 17, 2019, as a Fire Captain; and WIHERF.AS, during the course o f his employment with the City of -Vernon, David Moore held the positions of Fir�flghter, Engineer, Acting Captain and .Fire Captain; and WIHEREAS, David Moore completed Hatiardous Materials training to . ome a Hatiardous Materialf Specialist, and completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) certification to become an Urban Search and Rescue Specialist; and WIHEREAS, David Moore also received certifications as a Firefighter I & A Company Officer and Engine Bossy and WLHERF:AS, as a Fire Captain, David Moore created the Departments Multi Casualy Incident Procedure Manual, Ground Ladder Policies, and was assigned the `B-Shift" Training 0 ffzcer; and WIHEREAS, David Moore was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and WIHEREAS, during his long and distinguished career with the City o f L ernon, David Moore has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and .his many contributions .o the City; and WIHEREAS, it is an .honor to express our appreciation to David Moore for his exemplary service to the City of l ernon and wish. David good health upon his- retirement and fbr continued success in l fe x pursuits and WIHEREAS, the Mayor and the Ciy Council o f the Ciy of - Vernon, on behalf of -its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commen'and thank David Moore for .his many of service to teCiy and invite recognition of •his contributions and achievements. NOWT, THEREFORE., THE MAYOR AND THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON; ON BEHALF OF ITS EM13LOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS DAVID A. MOORS .FOR .HIS MA1V'Y YEARS OF SF.Rf/7CE TO THE THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO DAL'ID A. MOORE BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARR,4 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF L'ERNON THIS 20TH DAY OFAITGIIST TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN CITY OF VERNON Tpu—jfss I "IBAVAA, Mayor A PROCLAMATION OF THE MA OR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMENDING RORYJ. MOORS FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITE' OF VERNOA WUERF.AS, Rory J. Moore (gory Moore') has been employed by the City of L ernon sine, Jun, _ 6, 1989, and has• faithfully served the City of I "ernon for over 30 years and WHEREAS, Rory Moore has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 29, 2019, as a Fire Captain; and IYIHF.RF.AS, during the course of his employment with the City of Vernon, Rod Moore held the positions of Firefighter, .'feting Fngineer, Engineer and Captain; and IYIHERF.AS, prior to working for the City of Vernon, Rory Moore worked forArcadiul Monrovia ambulance for fouryears and attended Mount SAC Community College where he obtained an Associate of Science Degree; and IVHERF.AS, Rory Moore completed Hazardous Materials training to become a Matiardous Materials Specialist, and completed I Wan Search and Rescue (USAR) centfcation to become an Urban Search and Rescue Specialist; and ia'HEREAS, Rory Moore also received certifications as a Firefighter I & II, Company Officer and Engine Boss and iVFIEREAS, as a Fire Ca Rory Moore worked on the Apparatus Committee and managed the .Fire Apparatus e,�' Equipment Program; and 1 VHEREAS, Rory Moore was dedicated to providing continuous service and. exempl f ed true public service to our community; and 6VHERF.AS, during his long and distinguished career with the City of L'ernon, Rory Moore has anon the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and I,VHEREAS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Rory Moore for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish Roy good health upon his retirement and for continued success in life s pursuits and IVHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees; residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Rory Moore for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NOW1, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CO UNTCIL OF THE CITY OF P`ERNON, ON BEELILF OF ITSEMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BI7SINESSES .H171REBY COMMENDS RORY J. MOORE FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICt: TO THE CITY. THIS PROCI-4MATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO RORY J. MOORE- BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR ME.LISSA YBARRA .FOR AND ON BE.H. __ ELF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VF.RNON THIS 20TH DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN. CITY OF VERNON M .,LISSA MY4, Mayor A PROCLAMATION OF THE MA I `OR AND THE CIT-1' COUNCIL OF THE CITE' OF VERNON COMMENDING STEIWNM. RUFFONI FOR HIS 1VL4M ' l WARS OF SER T YCE TO THE CITY OF VERNON WINEKEAS, Steven M. Ruffoni ('Steven Rg#oni') has been employed by the City of T ernon cin.e May 16, 1988, and has faithfully served the City of Vernon for over 31 years; and WIHERE 1S, Steven Ruffoni has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 29, 2019, as a Firr Captain; and IVHEKEAS, during the course of his employment with the City of Vernon, Steven Ruffoni held the positions of Firefighter, Engineer and Fire Captain; and 1VHEKEAS, Steven Ruffoni completed Hazardous Materials training to become a Hazardous Materials Specialist, and completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAF) certification to become a Urban Search and Rescue Specialist; and WI`HERE_AS, Steven Ruffoni also received certifications as a Firefighter I e'er II, Company Officer and Engine Boss; and TVHEREAS, as a Fire Captain, Steven Ruffoni excelled as a Ha.Zardous Materials Captain and provided exceptional service to our business community, was the Vernon Fire/Police liaison, member of the Core Values Committee, started the Firefighters Reading to Kids program and the Firefighters for Perfect Attendance program at Vernon City Elementary School; and 1VHEREAS, during his long and distinguished career with the City of Vernon, Steven Ruffoni has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and 1 VHERE_-gS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Steven Ruffoni for his exempiary service to the City of L'ernon and wish Steven good health upon his retirement and for continued success in life's pursuits; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the Ci y of T 'ernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Steven Ruffoni for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NOW1, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T TRNON, ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS STE VEN M RUF1,ONI FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO STE VEN M RUFFONI BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON THIS 20"T DAY OF AUGUST TW 0 THOUSAND AND NINETEEN CITY OF T TENON Of AMWAA Vv- A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMENDING CHRISTOPHER M. HANSON FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITE" OF VERNON iVHEREAS, Christopher M. Hanson ("Christopher Ilanson') has been employed by the City of Vernon since January 7, 1991, and has faithfully served the City of � Vernon for over 28 years; and WIHEREAS, Christopher Hanson has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 28, 2019, as a Fire Engineer; and 1 VHERE 1S, during the course of his employment with the City of I ernon, Christopher Hanson held the positions of Fir fighter, _ acting Engineer, and Engineer; and INHERE IS, as an active member of the Fire department, Christopher Hanson was a founding member of Vernon Fire DepartmentArson Investigation Team; any WIHEREA.S, Christopher Hanson completed Ha�Zardouj 'Materials training to become a Ha.Zardous Materials Specialist, and completed Urban Search and Res,.ue ( S 4 R) �erlifzcabon to become an Urban Search and Rescue Specialist; and WTIERE IS, Christopher Hanson was dedi.ated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and WHERE IS, during his long and distinguished career with the City of Vernon, Christopher Hanson has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and WWEKEAS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Christopher Hanson Jor his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish Christophergood health upon hi., retirement and for continued success in life's pursuits; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Christopher Hanson for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON, ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS CHRISTOPHER M. HANSON FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERL 7CE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO CHRISTOPHER M. HANSON BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF V_ERNON THIS 20T1-'DAY OF AUGUST TV/O THO USAND AND NINETEEN CITY OF l ERNON By, w- ew� M LISSA YTAARA, Mayor f � r A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMENDING DAVID E. KOLT'VET FOR HIS _'MANY I EARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF VERNON IVHE-REAS, David E. Koltvet (`David Koltvet') has been employed by the Ciy of Vernon since September 12, 1994, and has faith• fully served the City of'Vernon for over 24 years; and WVHEREAS, David Koltvet .has retired from the GO of Vernon eeaive June 8, 2019, as a Fire Engineer; and I-VHEREAS, during the course oj'his employment with the City oj• L ernon, David Koltvet held the positions o f'-Firefigh. ter and -Fire Engineer; and WHEREAS, prior to being hired by the I ernon .Fire Department, David Koltvet obtained an Associate oj'Science Degree in Machine Tool Technology and spent 13 years working as a Machinist; and WHEREAS, David Koltvet completed Hatiardous Materials training to become a Haardous Materials Specialist, and completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) certijication to become a Urban Search. and Rescue Specialist; and W'HERF.AS, David Koltvet s skills as a Machinist, Firefighter and USAR Specialist were put to work for the majority of his career while working on the Fire Department 3 USAR team, most significantly during his deployment at the Montecito Mud slide incident in January 2018; and WHEREAS, David Koltvet was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and IVHEREAS, during .his long and distinguished career with the City of Vernon, David Koltvet has wan the deepest respect of .his colleagues th. rough .his leadersh. ip and Yis many contributions to th. e City; and WHEREAS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to David Koltvet for .his exemplary service to the City oj• Vernon and wish David good health upon .his retirement and for continued success in l fe pursuits? and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council oj'the City oj•� ernon, on behalf'oj'its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank David Koltvet jor .his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NOW, THERF:.FORE, THE. MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON; ON BEHALF Or ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND B USINESSES .HEREBY COMMENDS DAIiID E. KOLTVET FOR HIS MANY YEARS O-F SERI'ICE TO THL- CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO DAVID E. KOLTL'ET BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA .FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOFL/ERNON THIS 20THDAY O-FAUGUST Tfr/O THOUSAND AND NINETEEN: CITY OF VERNON By: 9 &"-6- Z� M :LISSA YEAR , Mayor of A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITE' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMENDINGJEFFREYS. NEELYFOR HIS MANY I EARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF VERNON W1HEREAS, Jeffrey S. Neey (`Jef rey Neely') has- been employed by the City of hernun sin:. September 12, 1994, and h. as faithfully served the City of I, 'ernon for over 24 years; and WHEREAS, Jeffrey Neely has retired from the City ofVernon effective June 22, 2019, as a Fire Engineer; and WHEREAS, during the course of his employment with the City of Vernon, Jeffrey Neely held the positions of'Firefighterand Fire Engineer; and IVFIF.REAS, prior to being hired by the Vernon Fire Department, Jeffrey Neely attended Cerritos College in 1988 and graduated from Rio Hondo Fire Academy Class- # 33 in 1990; and IVHEREAS, Jury Neely completed I Iatiardous Materials trttining to become a Hatiardous Materials Specialist, and completed Urban Search and Resme (USAR) certification to become an I Trban Search and Rescue Specialist with a specialty in Heavy Equipment Rescue Specialist; and. WHEREAS, jeftg Neely s skills in construction and I ISAR were put to work for the majority o f ' .his career working on the department's USAR team; and WHEREAS, Jeffrey Neely was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and WHEREAS, during .his long and distinguished career with the City of Vernon, J�ry Neely has, won the deepest respect of his colleagues through .his leadership and .his many contributions to the City; and IVHERF_AS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Jgrey Neely for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish J reygood health upon his retirement and for continued success in lif s pursuits and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of th. e City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Jeffrey Neely for .his manyyears of'service to the City and invite recognition of ' .his contributions and achievements. NO IV, THERE -FORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CO UNCIL OF THE CITY OF V T,RNON, ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND .B USINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS JEFFREY S. NEELY FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERI 7CF. TO THE CITY. THIS PROCL.ANIATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO JEFFREY S. NEELY BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I/ERNON THIS 20TH DAY O-FAI TGUST TIVO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN: CITY OF IiERNON By M I IISSA I B 1 1, Mayor Of A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAI'OR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TWRNON COMMENDING MICHAEL D. ROGERS FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF VERNON IVHERF.AS, Michael D. Rogers (`Michael Rogers') has been employed by the Gity of Vernon since Pedruan 26, 1990, and has faithfully served the Ciiy of L rernon for nearly 30 years; and and 1-VHF.REAS, Michael Rogers has retired from the City of Z'ernon- effective June 18, 2019, as a .Fire Engineer; WHEREAS, during the course of his employment with the City of Vernon, Michael Rogers held the positions of Firefighter and Fire Engineer; and WHEREAS, Michael Rogersgraduated from Rio Hondo Fire Academy Class # 23 in 1986 and in 2002 earned an Associates o) -Science in Fire T. echnology from Rio Hondo College; and WHEREAS, Michael Rogers completed Hazardous Materiu'r training to become a .Hazardous Materials Specialist, and completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) certification to become an I rrban Search and Rescue Specialist with a specialty in Heavy Equipment Rescue Specialist; and iVHEREAS, aftergraduating from the fire academy, Michael Rogers worked in the construction industry where he obtained vital knowledge and skills which were put to work during his fire service career, most specifically, while working on the .Fire Department's [ISAR team; and WHEREAS, Michael Rogers also received certifrcations as a I-irefighter I e'er II, Certified .Fire Ofuar and DML' Training Instructor; and IVHEREAS, as a Fire Engineer, Michael Rogers- assisted with the fire pump test procedures, fire inventory management, and served as Physical.Fitness- Coordinator; and WHEREAS, Michael Rogers was- dedicated to providing continuous service and exempl fed true public service to our community; and 1VHERF.AS, during his long and distinguished career with the Ciiy of Vernon, Michael Rogers has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and WIHERE.AS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Michael Rogers for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish Michaelgood health upon his retirement and for continued success in life s pursuits; and I-VHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Michael Rogers for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NOW THE RF..FORE, ]—HE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O.F VERNON, ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYrES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS MICHAEL D. ROGERS .FOR HIS M.-INY YEARS O.F SERVICE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO MICHAEL D. ROGERS BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA .FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VF.RNON THIS 20111 DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN. CITY OF VERNON MELISSA YBA , Mayor A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMENDING JEFFREY S. SMITH FOR HIS MANY l EARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITI' OF VERNON WHEREAS, Jeffrey S. Smith (`Jffrey Smith") has been employed by the Citv of I ernon since January 7, 1991, and has faithfully served the City of L ernon for over 28 years; and WHEREAS, Jeffrey Smith has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 29, 2019, as a Fire Engineer; and WHEREAS, during the course of his employment with the City of Vernon, Jeffrey Smith held the positions of Firefighter and Engineer; and WHEREAS, prior to Being hired by the i ernon Fire Department, Jffry Smith worked forAME Ambulance as a Paramedic whicl proided service to the City of Vernon; and WHEREAS, Jeffrey Smith completed Ha.Zardous 'Materials training to become a Hazardous Materials Specialist, and completed Urban S,.arch and Rescue (USAR) certification to become an Urban Search and fescue Specialist; and WHEREAS, J ffry Smith utili.Zed his skills as an I -rban Search and Rescue Specialist and he,�ed manage the Fire Department's USAR apparatus and equipment; and WIHEREAS, Jeffry Smith was dedicaaed to providing continuous service and exemplified true publi- service to our community; and WITIE.REAS, during his long and distinguished career with the C atv of Vernon, Jeffrey Smith has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his menu contributions to the ('ity; and WIHEREAS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to J ffry Smith for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish J ffrey good health upon his retirement and for continued success in liii `s pursuits; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of I 'ernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Jeffrey Smith for his manvyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements 1'V01 /, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LTRNON, ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS JEFFREY S. SMITH FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CTTY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO JEFFREY S. SMITH BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON THIS 20TH DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN CITY OF T ERNON � Bv�- M :LISS 4 YBAJMA,1Mayor A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I E NON COMMENDING THOMAS J. EGAN FOR HIS MAN1' YEARS OF SER LICE TO THE CIT.1' OF VERNON IVHEREAS, Thomas f. Egan ("Thomas Egan') has been employed by the City of Vernon since November 2, 1992, and has faithfully served the City of Vernon for nearly 27years; and WITIEREAS, Thomas Egan has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 29, 2019, as a Firefighter/Paramedic•; and WHEREAS, during the course o f his employment with the City of Vernon, Thomas J. Egan held the positions of .Firefighter, Acting Engineer, and Firefighter/Paramedic; and WHEREAS, prior to being hired by the L "ernon.Fire Department, Thomas Egan served as a Paid Call .Firefighter f or the Orange Coun y Fire Authority, and graduated from Crafton Hills Fire Academy Class # 18 in 1998; and WHERFAS, Thomas Egan completed .Hatiardous Materials training to become a I latiardous Materials Specialist, completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) certification to become an Urban Search and Rescue Specialist, completed Paramedic training to become a California State certified Paramedic and completed training in filming safety to become a certified .Film Safety Officer; and IVHF.RF.AS, during his career, Thomas Egan, assisted with annual live f re training from 1999 to 200', was a member of California Regional Task .Force 2, he ped with several recruit fare academies; was awarded l ernon Fire Department .Firefighter of the Year in 2005, served as an adjunct instructor at Eio ,Hondo Fire Academy, and provided essential training to the City newly promoted Firefighter/Paramedics; and . IVHF.RF:AS, Thomas Egan was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and WHEREAS, during his long and distinguished career with the City of I ernon, Thomas Egan has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and VHERF.AS it is an honor to express our appreciation to Thomas Egan for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish Thomasgood health upon his retirement and for continued success in life s pursuits; and IVf fEREr IS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of 1 ernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Thomas Egan for his mapyy ears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NO IF, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON, ON .BEH. __ 9LF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSESHEREBY COMMENDS THOMAS J. EGAN .FOR .HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO THOMAS J. EGAN BY THE. HONORABLE - MAYOR MEI.ISSA YBARKA .FOR AND ON' BE HALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE. CITY OF V ERNON THIS 20TH DAY OF AUG UST TVO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN. CITY OF VT-RNON By: G� G M 1 U SA YB I15UJ, Mayor A PR0CLA.'VIATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COL NCIL OF THE CITY OF I ERNON COMMENDING DOl GLAS C. BARKER FOR HIS MANY I EARS OF SER Z ICE TO THE CITY OF VERNON WIHERFAS, Douglas C. Barker (`2)ouglas Barker') has been employed by the City of L'ernon since November 2, 1992, and has, faithfully served the City of Vernon for over 26 years; and WIHEREAS, Douglas Barker has retired from the City of Vernon effective June 20, 2019, as a Firefi r; and WHEREAS, Douglas Barker completed Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) certification in 2013; and WHEREAS, Douglas Barker was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and IL''HERF.AS, during his long and distinguished career with the Ci y of Vernon, Douglas .Barker has Avon the deepest re3pect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contHhutions to the City; and WIIIERF.AS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Douglas Barker for his exemplary service to the Ci y of Vernon and wish Douglas good health upon his retirement and for continued success in life's pursuits; and WIHERF-'AS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank Douglas .Barker for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of his contributions and achievements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL O.F THE CITY OF L ERNON, OIN .BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS 4ND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMENDS DO UGLAS C-BARKER FOR HIS MANY YF IRS OF SERVICE TO THE. CITY. THIS PROCLAM ITION IS BEING PRESENTED TO DO UGLAS C. BARKER BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR MELISSA YBARRA FOR _ AND ON .BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P RNON THIS 201-H DAY OF 1I TGUST TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN CI iY OF VERNON By--- ELISSA YTLARRA, Mayor A� A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COI =1NVCIL OF THE CITY OF TWRNON COMMENDING BARRYA. SCHOOL MEESTER FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SER T 7CE TO THE CITY OF VERNON VHERFAS, Barry A. Schoolmeester (`Barry Schoolmeester') has been employed by the City of T, m n since February 26, 1990, and has faithfully served the City of L'ernon for over 29years, and iVHERFAS, Barry Scboolmeester has retired_ from the City of Vernon ffecti )e Jane 18, 2019, as x Firefighter; and W'HERF.AS, Barry Schoolmeester was dedicated to providing continuous service and exemplified true public service to our community; and WHEREAS, during his long and distinguished career with the City of Vernon, Barry Schoolmeester has won the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership and his many contributions to the City; and i.VHEREAS, it is an honor to express our appreciation to Barry Schoolmeester for his exemplary service to the City of Vernon and wish Barry good health upon his retirement and for continued success in life s pursuits,• and 1-VHERF.AS, the Mayor and the City Council of the City of Vernon, on behalf of its employees, residents and businesses, wish to commend and thank .Barry Schoolmeester for his manyyears of service to the City and invite recognition of •his contributions and achievements, NOV, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR. AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I'ERNON; ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES FIERE.BY COMMENDS B. IRRYA.. SCHOOLMEESTER FOR HIS M14NY YEARS OF SERT17CE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO BARRYA. SCHOOLMEESTER BY THE HONOR4BLE MAYOR ME, LISSA YBARRA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON' THIS 20TH DAY OFAUGUST TW10 T. HOUSAND AND NINE 1 ET ' CITY OF VERNON ME SSA. YBA , ,Waver MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF VERNON HELD TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 2019, IN COUNCIL CHAMBER OF CITY HALL LOCATED AT 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA CALL TO ORDER & FLAG SALUTE The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Mayor Ybarra. Fire Chief English led the Flag Salute. Members Present: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke Members Absent: None CHANGES TO THE AGENDA Interim City Clerk Harrington announced there were no changes to the agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT Aviv Halimi, Command Packaging, said a few words in support of the Vernon Fire Department and their excellent level of service. Mr. Halimi stated his support in favor of the City of Vernon contracting fire services with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County. Marissa Olguin, Vernon Chamber of Commerce, made comments as to the vote that will change Vernon's history. She elaborated that the Vernon Chamber of Commerce strongly supports the City's decision to transition its fire services to Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County. PUBLIC HEARING A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Shewak & Lajwanti Holdings, LLC to Construct and Operate a Retail -Commercial Center Located at 3165 Slauson Avenue Recommendation: A. Conduct a Public Hearing; and B. Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit to allow Shewak & Lajwanti Holdings, LLC to construct and operate a retail -commercial center, subject to the conditions of approval for the property located at 3165 Slauson Avenue Mayor Ybarra opened the Public Hearing at 9:07 a.m. Director of Public Works Wall reported on the proposed Conditional Use Permit for Shewak & Lajwanti Holding, LLC. Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Council Member Davis inquired as to the conditions of the permit and the railroad tracks behind the building. Director Wall responded accordingly. Public Comment: Michael Caley, Architect for the project, introduced himself and offered to answer questions regarding the project. Mayor Ybarra closed the Public Hearing at 9:11 a.m. It was moved by Council Member Davis and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to: Adopt a resolution approving a conditional use permit to allow Shewak & Lajwanti Holdings, LLC to construct and operate a retail -commercial center, subject to the conditions of approval, for the property located at 3165 Slauson Avenue. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None PRESENTATION 2. Recognition of Retired Employee - Martin J. Sanchez, Street Maintenance Worker Recommendation: A. Acknowledge and present a proclamation to retired employee Martin J. Sanchez, Street Maintenance Worker, in recognition of his dedicated service to the City of Vernon. Interim City Clerk Harrington read the Proclamation of Recognition to retired employee Martin J. Sanchez. Mayor Ybarra presented the Proclamation to retired employee Martin J. Sanchez, Maintenance Worker. Martin J. Sanchez said a few words to thank everyone for their support. 3. Swear -In Ceremony Recommendation: No action is required by City Council. This is a presentation only. Police Chief Miranda introduced the new Police Officers and said a few words. Interim City Clerk Harrington administered the Oath of Allegiance to Officer Alfonso Madrigal and Officer Nicholas Mannino. Ms. Rachel Loera pinned the badge on Officer Alfonso Madrigal. Mr. Alan Mannino pinned the badge on his son, Officer Nicholas Mannino. 4. Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Public Works Reorganization/Budget Study Session Page 2 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Recommendation: No action required by City Council. This is a presentation only. Director of Public Works Wall conducted the Public Works Reorganization/Budget Study Session PowerPoint Presentation. Council Member Menke inquired as to the combined compensation cost for the two vacant inspector positions, contracting agency fees, total cost of the fees collected by the Building Department, and the contract labor. Director of Public Works Wall responded accordingly. A dialogue ensued between City Council and staff as to any studies conducted by the department, unforeseen increase or decrease of the service level, service calls, additional costs relating to use of new software, budget for new software, and any employee pay reductions due to reorganization and reclassifications. City Administrator Fandino stated it was important to receive City Council comments for staff in preparation of the budget to be presented at the next City Council Meeting. Mayor Ybarra recessed the meeting at 9:44 a.m. Mayor Ybarra reconvened the meeting at 9:53 a.m. Public Comment: Marisa Olguin, Vernon Chamber of Commerce, commended the City Council for their level of engagement during the Public Works PowerPoint presentation. She further commented that she trusts the process and endorses the City's commitment to provide swift and excellent customer MAIR[KNI CONSENT CALENDAR No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Council Member Davis and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to approve Consent Calendar Items 5 through 15. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 5. Claim for Damages from Noe Carrera received on July 15, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and File 6. Claim for Damages from Natalie E. Lloyd received on July 22, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and File 7. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting Held on July 16, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and File Page 3 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 8. Approval of Federal Funds for Street Improvements Account Warrant Register No. 29 Covering the Period of July 09 through July 29, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve Federal Funds for Street Improvements Account Warrant Register No. 29 which totals $8,754.60 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of electronic payments totaling $8,754.60. 9. Approval of Operating Account Warrant Register No. 27 Covering the Period of July 09 through July 29, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve Operating Account Warrant Register No. 27 which totals $13,808,325.86 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of electronic payments totaling $13,230,468.15. 2) Ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $577,857.71. 10. Approval of RDA Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 54 Covering the Period of June 25 through July 29, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve RDA Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 54 which totals $2,669.04 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of electronic payments totaling $2,669.04. 11. Fire Department Activity Report for the Period of July 1 through July 15, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and file. 12. Council Conference Attendance Report Recommendation: A. Find that receiving this Council Conference Attendance Report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review, because it is an administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Receive and file. 13. Vernon Police Department Activity Log and Statistical Summary for the period of June 16 through June 30, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and file. 14. Allowed Pumping Allocation Lease with the City of Long Beach Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the proposed action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines § 15378. Page 4 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 B. Approve a lease of 1,000 acre-feet of Allowed Pumping Allocation from the City of Long Beach for fiscal year 2018-2019; and C. Approve a lease of 1,000 acre-feet of Allowed Pumping Allocation to the City of Long Beach for fiscal year 2019-2020; and D. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Water Rights License and Agreements for the abovementioned leases with the City of Long Beach. 15. Public Works Department June 2019 Monthly Building Report Recommendation: A. Receive and File. NEW BUSINESS 16. A Resolution Approving and Authorizing an Agreement with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County for the Provision of Fire Protection, Paramedic and Incidental Services in the City of Vernon Recommendation: A. Find that the adoption of the proposed resolution is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review, because it is an administrative action that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and, therefore, does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Adopt a resolution approving and authorizing an agreement with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County ("LA County Fire") for the provision of fire protection, paramedic, and incidental services in the City of Vernon. City Administrator Fandino reported on the proposed Resolution and provided a PowerPoint presentation as to the safety, affordability, options, and changes needed to sustain the Fire Protection Services. Mayor Ybarra inquired as to the distance and relocation area of the Fire Department Hazardous Material Squads. Roland Sprewell, Battalion Chief, Central Regional Operations Bureau responded accordingly. Mayor Ybarra inquired as to the Fire District intended use of Fire Station No. 78. Debbie Aguirre, Chief of Staff responded accordingly. A dialogue ensued between City Council and staff as to the quality of service that will be provided by the LA County Fire, cost of service, call volume, mutual aid agreements, and the City's obligation as to all outstanding payments and leases associated with all fire equipment conveyed to the LA County Fire District. Public Comment: Page 5 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Susie Ybarra, City of Vernon resident, commented that the City Council needs to know all the facts relating to the City's budget, schedules, costs, and administrative fees before making a decision. Ms. Sam Peterson, Safety Manager and James Davidian, Manager of Plant Engineering of Farmer John, commended the Vernon Fire Department for their service and expressed support of keeping existing fire staff and maintaining existing response time. Marisa Olguin, Vernon Chamber of Commerce, commented that the Vernon Chamber of Commerce fully supports the City's decision to contract with the LA County Fire. She further expressed concerns as to the additional compensation being sought by Fire Personnel as a supplemental requirement of the agreement negotiations. Juliet Goff, Kal-Plastics, commended City Council as to their approach of balancing the City's budget. She further expressed support of the City's decision to contract with LA County Fire for fire services. Bryant Bailey, Pablo Paper Plant Manager, thanked the Vernon Fire Department for their service. He also expressed support for the City's decision to contract with the LA County Fire for fire services. Dean Richens, President Vernon Professional Firemen's Association, commented that reducing Fire Department Personnel was unsafe. Mr. Richens noted that contracting with LA County Fire for fire service is a viable option. Carlos Rubio, Teamsters Bargaining Unit Local 911, beseeched City Council to reach a balanced approach to the current labor negotiations with the represented. Jonathan Sudduth, Director of Vernon Firemen's Association Local 2312, spoke about all the challenges the City of Vernon is experiencing due to the shortage of personnel, employee retirement benefits, and ongoing agreement negotiations with respect to the contract with LA County Fire. Bryan Dome, Captain Vernon Fire Department, Executive Board Member, Vernon Firemen's Association Local 2312, made remarks as to the matrix studies, major life and health safety issues associated with the job, ongoing Fire Bargaining Unit's negotiations, and contracting of fire services with LA County Fire. Robert M. Wexler, Attorney at Law, representative of the Vernon's Professional Firemen's Association, commented that the transitioning of the Vernon Fire Department to LA County Fire will not create any reduction in the quality of services. He further elaborated that the transitioning of Vernon Fire to LA County is necessary and advisable. David Lazar, retired Battalion Chief, Vernon Fire Department, supported the City Council to approve the agreement to contract with LA County Fire and asked for fair negotiation as to the firefighter's retirements. Page 6 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Todd Schoenig, Battalion Chief, Vernon Fire Department, commented that the reduction of fire personnel proposed by the staffing models presented by the City will decrease the quality of service provided and increase the safety issues. Mayor Ybarra supported striking from the contract Fire Station 78 and authorize City Administrator to continue negotiations as to the use of Fire Station 78 with LA County Fire and to move forward with the rest of the recommendations. It was moved by Mayor Ybarra and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to: A. Find that the adoption of the proposed resolution is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review, because it is an administrative action that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and, therefore, does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; B. Adopt a resolution approving and authorizing an agreement with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County ("LA County Fire") for the provision of fire protection, paramedic, and incidental services in the City of Vernon, and C. Authorized the City Administrator to continue negotiations with LA County Fire on the use of Fire Station 78. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 17. Appointment of Eligible Individuals to Serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee Recommendation: A. Find that the appointment of eligible individuals to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") review, because it is an administrative action that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Appoint a current City Council Member to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee in a City Council Seat with a term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021; and C. Appoint an eligible individual to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee in Vernon Area Representative Seat No. 2 with a term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021; and D. Appoint an eligible individual to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee in Vernon Area Representative Seat No. 3 with a term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021; and E. Ratify the Mayor's appointment of Mark Gonzalez to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee to fill an unexpired term in a Legislative Representative Seat until the term expires on June 30, 2020. Page 7 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 City Administrator Fandino reported on the proposed appointment of eligible individuals to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee. It was moved by Mayor Ybarra and seconded by Council Member Davis to appoint Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee in a City Council Seat with a term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None It was moved by Mayor Ybarra and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to appoint Michael Gavina to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee in Vernon Area Representative Seat No. 2 with a term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None It was moved by Mayor Ybarra and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to appoint Steven Froberg to serve on the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee in Vernon Area Representative Seat No. 3 with a term of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2021. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None It was moved by Mayor Ybarra and seconded by Council Member David to appoint Mark Gonzalez to serve on the the Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee to fill an unexpired term in a Legislative Representative Seat until the term expires on June 30, 2020. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 18. A Resolution Adopting an Amended and Restated Citywide Fringe Benefits and Salary Resolution in Accordance with Government Code Section 20636(b)(1) and Repealing All Resolutions in Conflict Therewith Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution amending and restating the Citywide Fringe Benefits and Salary Resolution, to reflect the following provisions: 1) Amend Section 4: Compensatory Time 2) Amend Section 6: Vacation 3) Amend Section 7: Sick Leave Page 8 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 4) Amend Section 10: Jury Duty 5) Amend Section 14: Vision Insurance 6) Amend Section 15: Life Insurance 7) Amend Section 17: California Public Employees Retirement System (Ca1PERS) Contribution 8) Amend Section 20: Bilingual Pay 9) Amend Exhibit A Classification and Compensation Plan Director of Human Resources Earl reported on the proposed Resolution Adopting an Amended and Restated Citywide Fringe Benefits and Salary Resolution in Accordance with Government Code Section 20636(b)(1) and Repealing All Resolutions in Conflict Therewith. No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Council Member Davis and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution amending and restating the Citywide Fringe Benefits and Salary Resolution, to reflect the following provisions: 1) Amend Section 4: Compensatory Time 2) Amend Section 6: Vacation 3) Amend Section 7: Sick Leave 4) Amend Section 10: Jury Duty 5) Amend Section 14: Vision Insurance 6) Amend Section 15: Life Insurance 7) Amend Section 17: California Public Employees Retirement System (Ca1PERS) Contribution 8) Amend Section 20: Bilingual Pay 9) Amend Exhibit A Classification and Compensation Plan. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 19. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Management Association Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution approving the 2019-2022 Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Management Association Page 9 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Director of Human Resources Earl reported on the proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Management Association No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Council Member Menke and seconded by Council Member Davis to: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution approving the 2019-2022 Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Management Association. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 20. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution approving the 2019-2022 Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association. Director of Human Resources Earl reported on the proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association. No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Council Member Menke and seconded by Council Member Davis to: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution approving the 2019-2022 Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None Page 10 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 21. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Teamsters Local 911 Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution approving the 2019-2022 Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Teamsters Local 911. Director of Human Resources Earl reported on the proposed Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving the Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Teamsters Local 911. No Public Comment provided. Council Member Menke inquired as to the removal of the binding arbitration language. Director Earl responded accordingly. It was moved by Council Member Davis and seconded by Council Member Menke to: A. Find that approval of the attached resolution in this staff report is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and B. Adopt the attached resolution approving the 2019-2022 Memorandum of Understanding by and between the City of Vernon and the Teamsters Local 911. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 22. A Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Master Services Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Centurylink Communications, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions In Conflict Therewith Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the proposed action in this staff report is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because it is a governmental administrative activity that will not have any effect on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as that term is defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Adopt a Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Master Services Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Centurylink Communications, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions In Conflict Therewith. Page 11 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Interim General Manager of Public Utilities Alemu reported on the proposed Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Master Services Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Centurylink Communications, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions In Conflict Therewith. Mayor Ybarra inquired as to the network range and the cost for the internet services. Interim General Manager of Public Utilities Alemu responded accordingly. A dialogue ensued between City Council and staff as to the any increase cost for internet consumers, internet speed and impact on surrounding businesses and residents, and total monthly fees. No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Council Member Menke and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to: A. Find that approval of the proposed action in this staff report is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because it is a governmental administrative activity that will not have any effect on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as that term is defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Adopt a Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Master Services Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Centurylink Communications, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions In Conflict Therewith. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 23. A Resolution Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Service Level Performance Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Broadband, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions in Conflict Therewith Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the proposed action in this staff report is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because it is a governmental administrative activity that will not have any effect on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as that term is defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the execution of a Service Level Performance Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Broadband, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions in Conflict Therewith. Interim General Manager of Public Utilities Alemu reported on the Resolution approving and authorizing the execution of a service level performance agreement for upstream internet access services with Broadbrand, LLC. No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez and seconded by Council Member Davis A. Find that approval of the proposed action in this staff report is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because it is a governmental administrative activity that will not have any effect on the environment and is therefore not a "project" as that term is defined Page 12 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the execution of a Service Level Performance Agreement for Upstream Internet Access Services with Broadband, LLC, and Repealing All Resolutions in Conflict Therewith. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None 24. Approval of Agreement Regarding the Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California by and between the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the City of Vernon Recommendation: A. Find that the proposed action — i.e., entering into an agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific") is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) part (d) and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) part (d), because the Project is merely to upgrade existing equipment and add an additional appurtenant equipment; and B. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California ("Agreement") by and between Union Pacific and the City of Vernon ("City"). Director of Public Works Wall reported on the proposed Approval of Agreement Regarding the Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California by and between the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the City of Vernon. No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Council Member Davis and seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez to: A. Find that the proposed action — i.e., entering into an agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific") is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) part (d) and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) part (d), because the Project is merely to upgrade existing equipment and add an additional appurtenant equipment; and B. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California ("Agreement") by and between Union Pacific and the City of Vernon ("City"). Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None Page 13 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 25. The Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California by and between the City of Vernon and Marquez Produce, Inc. Recommendation: A. Find that the proposed action — i.e., entering into an agreement with Marquez Produce, Inc. ("Marquez Produce") is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) part (d) and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) part (d), because the Project is merely to upgrade existing equipment and add an additional appurtenant equipment; and B. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California ("Agreement") by and between City of Vernon ("City") and Marquez Produce. Director of Public Works wall reported on the proposed Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California by and between the City of Vernon and Marquez Produce, Inc. No Public Comment provided. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tempore Lopez and seconded by Council Member Menke to: A. Find that the proposed action — i.e., entering into an agreement with Marquez Produce, Inc. ("Marquez Produce") is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) part (d) and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) part (d), because the Project is merely to upgrade existing equipment and add an additional appurtenant equipment; and B. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Public At -Grade Crossing, 25th Street, DOT 747602G, MILE POST .652, Alameda Ind. Ld, City of Vernon, Los Angeles County, California ("Agreement") by and between City of Vernon ("City") and Marquez Produce. Motion carried, 4 - 0. Yes: Melissa Ybarra, Leticia Lopez, William Davis, Carol Menke No: None ORAL REPORTS Police Chief Miranda reported on the following: on July 26th, Vernon PD Officers detained and arrested 3 suspects for vandalism and trespassing; on July 31 st, Vernon PD arrested a suspect for reckless driving; on August 1st, Vernon PD Officers arrested a suspect for attempted burglary; on August 4th, Vernon PD arrested a suspect for DUI and resisting arrest; and noted on August 6th National Night Out Event will be held and everybody is welcome to attend. Interim Manager of Public Utilities Alemu reported on the following: several outages throughout the City; Vernon's Resource Planning Division procured natural gas supply for lower prices; the City received an official letter from California Energy Commission advising that the City of Page 14 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Vernon is deemed in compliance with the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPD) procurement requirements for compliance period 2 (2014-2016); and on August 141h, the Energy Commission will consider and may adopt the Vernon Public Utilities Integrated Resource Plan consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill 350. City Administrator Fandino reported on the following: Vernon FD responded to a structure fire in the area of Downey and District (photo displayed on TV monitor); August 1 ", Vernon FD Haz Mat 77 responded to a reported large liquid tote on the sidewalk, samples were taken and after testing determined that the tote contained used power steering fluid (Photo displayed on TV monitor); Administrator Fandino announced that he will not to be able to attend the Family Game Night Event scheduled for Thursday in City Hall and Mayor Ybarra will be hosting the event on his behalf. Mayor Ybarra recessed the meeting at 12:30 p.m. Mayor Ybarra reconvened the meeting at 12: 33 p.m. CLOSED SESSION City Council entered Closed Session at 12:33 p.m. 26. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation. Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Number of potential cases: 1 27. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Designated Representative: Carlos Fandino, City Administrator Employee Organizations: Teamsters Local 911, IBEW Local 47, Vernon Professional Firefighters Association, Vernon Fire Management Association, Vernon Police Management Association, and Vernon Police Officers' Benefit Association 28. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Name of Case: Christian N. Moscoso vs. City of Vernon Page 15 of 16 Regular City Council Minutes August 6, 2019 Workers Compensation Appeals Board Case Nos. ADJ10013898 and ADJ10884450 29. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (2) Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Bicent (California) Malburg LLC et al. v. City of Vernon et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case Nos. 19STCV08859 and 19STCP02411 City of Vernon v. Bicent (California) Malburg LLC et al. JAMS Reference No. 1220062657 At 2:03 p.m. City Council exited Closed Session. City Attorney Patel reported that four cases were discussed with the City Council with no reportable action taken. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, at 2:04 p.m., Mayor Ybarra adjourned the meeting. ATTEST: Deborah A. Harrington Interim City Clerk Page 16 of 16 Melissa Ybarra Mayor City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-382-2019 Submitted by: John Lau Submitting Department: Finance/ Treasury Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Approval of City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 Covering the Period of July 01 through July 31, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 which totals $3,620,402.88 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of direct deposits, checks and taxes totaling $2,882,978.59. 2) Checks and electronic fund transfers (EFT) paid through Operating bank account totaling $737,424.29. Background: Section 2.13 of the Vernon Municipal Code indicates the City Treasurer, or an authorized designee, shall prepare warrants covering claims or demands against the City which are to be presented to City Council for its audit and approval Pursuant to the aforementioned code section, the City Treasurer has prepared City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 covering claims and demands presented during the period of July 01 through July 31, 2019, drawn, or to be drawn, from East West Bank for City Council approval Fiscal cal Impact: None. ATTACHMENTS • 1. City Payroll Warrant Register No. 758 Raquel Franco 1 8/14/2019 2:48 PM PAYROLL WARRANT REGISTER City of Vernon No. 758 Month of August 2019 I hereby Certify: that claims or demands covered by the above listed warrants have been audited as to accuracy and availability of funds for payments thereof; and that said claims or demands are accurate and that funds are available for payments thereof. Masami Higa ` Assistant Finance Di Date: Page 1 of 1 This is to certify that the claims or demands covered by the above listed warrants have been audited by the City Council of the City of Vernon and that all of said warrants are approved for pay- ments DATE DATE Payroll Warrant Register Memo.xls : Warrant Payrolls reported for the month of July: 06/09/19 - 06/22/19, Paydate 07/04/19 06/09/19 - 06/22/19, Paydate 07/04/19 06/23/19 - 07/08/19, Paydate 07/18/19 06/23/19 - 07/08/19, Paydate 07/18/19 06/23/19 - 07/08/19, Paydate 07/18/19 Payment Method Date Payment Description Amount CHECKS 07/03/19 Net payroll, checks $ 18,635.78 ACH 07/03/19 Net payroll, direct deposits 816,189.52 ACH 07/03/19 Payroll taxes 227,849.08 CHECKS 07/03/19 Net payroll, direct deposits 171,069.73 ACH 07/03/19 Payroll taxes 78,847.19 CHECKS 07/18/19 Net payroll, checks 19,613.40 ACH 07/18/19 Net payroll, direct deposits 858,252.89 ACH 07/18/19 Payroll taxes 259,325.27 ACH 07/18/19 Net payroll, direct deposits 289,267.04 ACH 07/18/19 Payroll taxes 134,403.99 CHECKS 07/18/19 Net payroll, checks 282.70 ACH 07/18/19 Net payroll, direct deposits 6,304.20 ACH 07/18/19 Payroll taxes 2,937.80 Total net payroll and payroll taxes 2,882,978.59 ACH 07/03/19 ICMA 37,386.30 ACH 07/03/19 CalPERS 245,185.58 ACH 07/03/19 California State Disbursement Unit 2,862.44 603387 07/03/19 Franchise Tax Board 989.41 603403 07/03/19 U.S. Dept of Education 408.74 ACH 07/03/19 IBEW Dues 3,388.72 ACH 07/03/19 Vernon Firemen's Association 2,753.00 ACH 07/03/19 Vernon Police Officers' Benefit Association 2,070.76 ACH 07/03/19 ICMA 50,964.92 ACH 07/18/19 ICMA 39,197.53 ACH 07/18/19 CalPERS 260,140.54 ACH 07/18/19 California State Disbursement Unit 2,862.44 ACH 07/18/19 Teamsters Local 911 2,592.00 603460 07/18/19 Franchise Tax Board 989.41 603472 07/18/19 U.S. Dept of Education 408.74 ACH 07/18/19 Vernon Firemen's Association 2,753.00 ACH 07/18/19 Vernon Police Officers' Benefit Association 2,070.76 ACH 07/18/19 ICMA 80,400.00 Payroll related disbursements, paid through Operating bank account 737,424.29 Total net payroll, taxes, and related disbursements $ 3,620,402.88 Page 1 of 1 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-385-2019 Submitted by: John Lau Submitting Department: Finance/ Treasury Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Approval of Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 Covering the Period of July 30 through August 12, 2019 Recommendation: A. Approve Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 which totals $3,426,429.33 and consists of the following: 1) Ratification of electronic payments totaling $2,593,187.24. 2) Ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $785,962.22. 3) Authorization to issue pending checks totaling $47,279.87. 4) Voided check No. 603548 totaling $88.12. Background: Section 2.13 of the Vernon Municipal Code indicates the City Treasurer, or an authorized designee, shall prepare warrants covering claims or demands against the City which are to be presented to City Council for its audit and approval Pursuant to the aforementioned code section, the City Treasurer has prepared Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 covering claims and demands presented during the period of July 30 through August 12, 2019, drawn, or to be drawn, from East West Bank for City Council approval Fiscal cal Impact: None. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Operating Account Warrant Register No. 28 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 I hereby certify that claims and/or demands included in above listed warrant register have been audited for accuracy and availability of funds for payments and that said claims and/or demands are accurate and that the funds are available for payments thereof. Masami Higa Assistant Finance Director Date: This is to certify that the claims or demands covered by the above listed warrants have been audited by the City Council of the City of Vernon and that all of said warrants are approved for payments except Warrant Numbers: Void Checks: 603548 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 002242 - CA DEPARTMENT OF TAX & 011.200250 $ 264.79 2Q19 Use Tax Payment FEE ADM 020.200250 $ 2,470.58 2Q19 Use Tax Payment 055.200250 $ 8,492.31 2Q19 Use Tax Payment 056.200250 $ 139.68 2Q19 Use Tax Payment 057.200250 $ 2,506.86 2Q19 Use Tax Payment 011.1004.530034 $ 0.78 2Q19 Use Tax Rounding Adjustment PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 063019 063019 063019 063019 063019 063019 07/30/2019 8616 $ 13,875.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 1 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE 002412 - CALIFORNIA ISO 055.9200.500150 $ 11,140.63 Recalculation Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500170 $ 99.35 Recalculation Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500190 $ 77.02 Recalculation Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500210 $ 0.51 Recalculation Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500150 $ -1,053.81 Recalculation Charges 04/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500190 $ -1,762.81 Recalculation Charges 04/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500210 $ -4.20 Recalculation Charges 04/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500151 $ 2.94 Recalculation Charges 04/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500170 $ 29,208.42 Recalculation Charges 04/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500150 $ 100,997.24 Initial Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500210 $ 15,751.06 Initial Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500170 $ -15,889.81 Initial Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 055.9200.500190 $ -18,259.87 Initial Charges 07/19 201907233142629 118 PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 07/30/2019 8617 $ 120,306.67 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 2 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 002242 - CA DEPARTMENT OF TAX & FEE ADM 055.200230 $ 79,883.39 Electrical Energy Surcharge 03/19 - 071619 07/31/2019 8618 $ 79,883.39 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 3 of 44 ELECTRONIC VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER 004840 - A.M. ORTEGA CONSTRUCTION, INC CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ACCOUNT INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 056.5600.595200 $ 790.34 Gas Construction & Repair Support INVOICE 732748 056.5600.595200 $ 4,946.03 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733274 056.5600.595200 $ 5,142.94 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733276 056.5600.595200 $ 9,138.73 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733280 056.5600.595200 $ 5,529.99 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733282 056.5600.595200 $ 8,855.83 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733283 056.5600.595200 $ 11,715.93 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733285 056.5600.595200 $ 1,773.04 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733287 056.5600.595200 $ 6,979.79 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733288 056.5600.595200 $ 6,688.80 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733289 056.5600.595200 $ 4,937.39 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733290 056.5600.595200 $ 5,175.83 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733293 056.5600.595200 $ 5,848.58 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733294 056.5600.595200 $ 5,583.67 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733341 056.5600.595200 $ 7,294.80 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733342 056.5600.595200 $ 6,168.79 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733343 056.5600.595200 $ 5,248.79 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733344 056.5600.595200 $ 8,484.03 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733353 056.5600.595200 $ 6,647.60 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733354 056.5600.595200 $ 5,175.83 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733357 056.5600.595200 $ 6,874.78 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733358 056.5600.595200 $ 5,175.83 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733359 PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 4 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 004840 - A.M. ORTEGA 056.5600.595200 $ 5,175.83 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733360 CONSTRUCTION, INC 056.5600.595200 $ 5,175.83 Gas Construction & Repair Support 733361 056.5600.595200 $ 12,862.08 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734408 056.5600.595200 $ 4,607.96 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734409 056.5600.595200 $ 2,323.30 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734410 056.5600.595200 $ 2,323.30 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734423 056.5600.595200 $ 720.52 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734424 056.5600.595200 $ 2,323.30 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734425 056.5600.595200 $ 5,146.56 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734426 056.5600.595200 $ 3,018.10 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734427 056.5600.595200 $ 2,750.07 Gas Construction & Repair Support 734428 07/31/2019 8619 $ 180,604.19 001413 - BLX GROUP, LLC 055.9000.595200 $ 9,025.00 Financial Advisory Services 419872040042519 07/31/2019 8620 $ 9,025.00 003441- ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 011.4031.840000 $ 667.09 Monthly Lease Charges 06/19 2629 07/31/2019 8621 $ 667.09 004500 - ICE US OTC COMMODITY 055.9200.596200 $ 1,250.00 OTC Commission Adjustment 619001688088 MARKETS, 07/31/2019 8622 $ 1,250.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 5 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 006198- JRM 055.8100.596200 $ 055.8100.596200 $ 003053 - LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, 057.1057.500173 $ LLC 54,290.67 Security Services 3444 52,594.67 Security Services 3494 4,667.73 Upstream Internet Access Services 82250625 005658 - POWER SETTLEMENTS 055.9200.596200 $ 6,250.00 Software Services Fee 07/19 CONSULTING & 055.9200.596200 $ 6,250.00 Software Services Fee 08/19 055.9200.596200 $ 23,750.00 SettleCore Perpetual License Fee 001581- THE GAS COMPANY 055.9200.550022 $ 139,239.23 Period: 06/19 001206 - DELL MARKETING LP 011.9019.520010 $ 3,689.28 Dell Latitude 3500- 011.9019.520010 $ 744.64 Non -Taxable from above line item.- 011.9019.520010 $ 48.00 Environmental Fee 011.9019.520010 $ 355.04 Sales Tax 9.5% 000059 - SO CAL EDISON 055.9200.500170 $ 62,480.00 Victorville Lugo Vernon 07/19 055.9200.500170 $ 24,669.00 Laguna Bell 07/19 055.9200.500170 $ 147,680.00 Mead Laguna Bell 07/19 VERN44 VERN45 VERNPLFI 07/31/2019 8623 $ 106,885.34 07/31/2019 8624 $ 4,667.73 07/31/2019 8625 $ 36,250.00 071119 07/31/2019 8626 $ 139,239.23 10323027165 011.0013859 10323027165 011.0013859 10323027165 011.0013859 10323027165 08/01/2019 8627 $ 4,836.96 7501023668 7501023669 7501023670 08/01/2019 8628 $ 234,829.00 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 6 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 002190 - OFFICE DEPOT 011.1026.520000 $ 53.82 Supplies 011.1026.520000 $ 5.11 Sales Tax 9.5% 000059 - SO CAL EDISON 011.1043.560000 $ 85.16 Period: 07/19 001581- THE GAS COMPANY 011.1033.560000 $ 106.98 Period: 06/19 011.1033.560000 $ 38.24 Period:06/19 011.1048.560000 $ 29.51 Period:06/19 011.1033.560000 $ 5.00 Period:06/19 011.1049.560000 $ 714.71 Period:06/19 011.1049.560000 $ 354.15 Period:06/19 011.1043.560000 $ 177.08 Period:06/19 020.1084.560000 $ 177.07 Period:06/19 056.5600.560000 $ 19.99 Period:06/19 INVOICE P.O.# 331123558001 331123558001 071719 071219 071219(2) 071219(3) 071219(4) 071519 071519(2) 071519(2) 071519(2) 071519(3) PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/01/2019 8629 $ 58.93 08/01/2019 8630 $ 85.16 08/01/2019 8631 $ 1,622.73 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 7 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 001481 - VERIZON WIRELESS 055.9000.560010 $ 684.79 Period: 05/19 055.8000.560010 $ 1,317.88 Period:05/19 055.8200.560010 $ 1,485.21 Period:05/19 056.5600.560010 $ 202.67 Period:05/19 011.9019.560010 $ 107.62 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 186.50 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 1,226.90 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 571.22 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 1,565.08 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 1,888.67 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 357.40 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 470.60 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 1,173.77 Period:06/19 011.9019.560010 $ 99.96 Period:06/19 001617 - UPS 011.1041.520000 $ 29.75 Period: 07/19 INVOICE 060719_MULTIPLE( 2) 060719_MULTIPLE( 2) 060719_MULTIPLE( 2) 060719_MULTIPLE( 2) 070719_MULTIPLE 070719_MULTIPLE 070719_M U LTI P LE 070719_MULTIPLE 070719_M U LTI PLE 070719_M U LTI P LE 070719_MULTIPLE 070719_MULTIPLE 070719_MULTIPLE 070719 MULTIPLE 933312299 rAll rvm u P.O.# DATE 08/02/2019 08/05/2019 )AYMENT PAYMENT NUMBER AMOUNT 8632 $ 11,338.27 8633 $ 29.75 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 8 of 44 ELECTRONIC VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER 002412 - CALIFORNIA ISO CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 055.9200.500150 $ 46,042.40 Initial Charges 07/19 055.9200.500210 $ 16,673.69 Initial Charges 07/19 055.9200.500170 $-32,517.44 Initial Charges 07/19 055.9200.500190 $-7,610.64 Initial Charges 07/19 055.9200.500150 $ 32,092.05 Recalculation Charges 07/19 055.9200.500190 $ 422.64 Recalculation Charges 07/19 055.9200.500210 $ 180.56 Recalculation Charges 07/19 055.9200.500170 $-371.88 Recalculation Charges 07/19 001928 - ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS 011.9019.860000 $ 18,412.50 CIS Infinity Upgrade 002426 - CH2M HILL ENGINEERS, INC 055.9000.596200 $ 8,519.95 Env Support Services 005034 - KRONOS INCORPORATED 011.9019.860000 $ 314.43 Software & Hardware Usage Fees 011.9019.860000 $ 314.42 Software & Hardware Usage Fees 011.9019.590110 $ 4,156.76 Kronos Support Service for PD Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM INVOICE 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 201907303142702 808 XT00138663 697275CH010 11473418 11473418 11474420 PAYMENT P.O.# DATE 08/06/2019 8634 $ 54,911.38 08/06/2019 8635 $ 18,412.50 08/06/2019 8636 $ 8,519.95 08/06/2019 8637 $ 4,785.61 Page 9 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2029 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 005872 - PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, 011.1033.850000 $ 165,145.95 Rental Payment LLC 005433 - RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 011.1048.596200 $ 8,591.69 Re: Housing Issues 011.1024.593200 $ 556.50 Re: Torres / Ong Litigation 005069 - TRITECH SOFTWARE 011.9019.860000 $ 4,700.00 IQ Analytics Software SYSTEMS 011.9019.590110 $ 64,566.36 Software Support 001658 - WATER REPLENISHMENT 020.1084.500110 $ 159,652.05 Groundwater Production & Assessment DISTRICT 003266 - AON RISK INSURANCE 011.1004.503035 $ 27,516.00 Commercial Property Coverage SERVICES WE 011.1004.503035 $ 152,164.00 Commercial Property Coverage 011.1004.503035 $ 46,068.75 Excess Liability Coverage 011.1004.503035 $ 33,692.30 Excess Liability Coverage 011.1004.503035 $ 154,416.10 Commercial Property Coverage 002533 - BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 055.9000.592010 $ 1,100.00 Depository Agent & Audit Confirmation INVOICE P.O.# 508216 839441 843354 243535BJL 243535JL 071519 8200000262383 8200000262401 8200000262403 8200000262418 8200000262536 2522211816 PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/06/2019 8638 $ 165,145.95 08/06/2019 8639 $ 9,148.19 08/06/2019 8640 $ 69,266.36 08/06/2019 8641 $ 159,652.05 08/08/2019 8642 $ 413,857.15 08/08/2019 8643 $ 1,100.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 10 of 44 ELECTRONIC VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER 000267 - BROADBAND LLC ACCOUNT NUMBER 057.1057.500173 $ CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 INVOICE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 4,250.00 Internet Access Services INVOICE 815192003744 PAYMENT PAYMENT P.O.# DATE NUMBER 08/08/2019 8644 $ PAYMENT AMOUNT 4,250.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 11 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 004594 - DION & SONS, INC 011.1033.570000 $ 1,168.91 Unleaded Fuel- 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 0.46 FET Exempt 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 0.37 CA Lead Poisoning 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 217.68 State Excise Tax 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 7.50 Environmental Compliance Fee 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 9.95 Fuel Surcharge 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 1.80 Lab Tax .13% 731702 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 64.24 Fuel Sales Tax 4.50% 731702 011.1033.570000 $ 871.68 Diesel Fuel- 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 0.64 FET Exempt 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 1.09 AB32 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 7.50 Environmental Compliance Fee 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 9.95 Fuel Surcharge 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 1.29 Lab Tax 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 122.58 State Excise Tax 731703 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 134.57 Clear Diesel Sales Tax 731703 011.1033.570000 $ 1,638.40 Diesel Fuel- 731704 011.0013910 011A033.570000 $ 0.34 FET Exempt 731704 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 2.05 AB32 731704 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 7.50 Environmental Compliance Fee 731704 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 9.95 Fuel Surcharge 731704 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 3.75 Lab Tax 731704 011.0013910 011.1033.570000 $ 230.40 State Excise Tax 731704 011.0013910 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 12 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 004594 - DION & SONS, INC 011.1033.570000 $ 251.04 Clear Diesel Sales Tax 731704 08/08/2019 8645 $ 4,763.64 000209 - MERRIMAC ENERGY GROUP 011.1033.570000 $ 3,862.11 Diesel Fuel- 2192090 011.0013863 011.1033.570000 $ 7.33 AB32 Fee 2192090 011.0013863 011.1033.570000 $ 3.40 Federal Oil Spill Tax 2192090 011.0013863 011.1033.570000 $ 572.40 State Diesel Tax 2192090 011.0013863 011.1033.570000 $ 1.59 Lust Fee 2192090 011.0013863 011.1033.570000 $ 590.86 Clear Diesel Sales Tax 2192090 011.120030 $ 2,185.34 Diesel Fuel. 2192334 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 4.13 AB32 Fee 2192334 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 1.92 Federal Oil Spill 2192334 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 322.56 State Diesel Excise Tax 2192334 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 0.90 Lust Fee 2192334 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 334.32 Clear Diesel Sales Tax 2192334 011.120030 $ 8,386.25 Unleaded Fuel. 2192335 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 12.51 CA Enviro/Fed Oil Spill Tax 2192335 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 5.33 CA Childhood Lead Fee 2192335 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 13.79 AB32 2192335 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 1,681.52 State Gasoline Excise Tax 2192335 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 3.56 Lust Fee 2192335 011.0013946 011.120030 $ 454.63 Fuel Sales Tax 4.50% 2192335 08/08/2019 8646 $ 18,444.45 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 13 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT :' INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# 005925 - SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 011.9019.590110 $ 31,078.68 Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector B10207753 011.0013897 011.9019.590110 $ 478.00 OverlandCare Bronze - Extended service B10270609 011.0013905 011.9019.590110 $ 478.00 OverlandCare Bronze - Extended service B10270609 011.0013905 011.9019.520010 $ 3,214.60 Meraki MR42 Cloud Managed AP— B10270823 011.0013914 011.9019.520010 $ 438.75 Meraki MR Enterprise License, 1YR— B10270823 011.0013914 011.9019.520010 $ 305.39 Sales Tax 9.5% B10270823 004527 - WITTMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC 011.1033.596200 $ 1,088.75 Billing Services 1903069 011.1033.596200 $ 1,563.16 Billing Services 1906069 003143 - AFLAC 011.210223 $ 12,369.79 Supplemental Ins - August 648803 003142 - COLONIAL LIFE 011.210223 $ 6,892.60 Supplemental Ins - August 77136470701906 001635 - EMPLOYMENT 011.1060.502070 $ 1,800.00 Unemployment Insurance Benefit Charge— L0181761888 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 011.1060.502070 $ 5,850.00 Unemployment Insurance Benefit Charge— L0181761888 YMENT PAYMENT DATE NUMBER 08/08/2019 8647 $ 35,993.42 08/081/2019 8648 $ 2,651.91 08/07/2019 8649 $ 12,369.79 08/07/2019 8650 $ 6,892.60 08/09/2019 8651 $ 7,650.00 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 14 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 002190- OFFICE DEPOT 011.1002.520000 $ 73.56 Supplies 326076725001 011.1002.520000 $ 8.29 Supplies 326076805001 011.9019.520000 $ 14.32 Supplies 326076805001 011.1002.520000 $ 0.79 Sales Tax 9.5% 326076805001 011.9019.520000 $ 1.36 Sales Tax 9.5% 326076805001 011.1046.520000 $ 160.24 Supplies 329626106001 011.1049.520000 $ 144.47 Supplies 329627763001 08/09/2019 8652 $ 403.03 001481 - VERIZON WIRELESS 055.9000.560010 $ 270.99 Period: 06/19 070719_MULTIPLE( 2) 055.8000.560010 $ 1,304.60 Period:06/19 070719_MULTIPLE( 2) 055.8200.560010 $ 1,670.32 Period:06/19 070719_MULTIPLE( 2) 056.5600.560010 $ 201.50 Period:06/19 070719_MULTIPLE( 003407 - VERNON POLICE OFFICERS BENEFIT 005323 - IBEW LOCAL 47 1 08/12/2019 8653 $ 3,447.41 011.210250 $ 1,993.04 Police Association Member Dues: Payment Ben217790 08/01/2019 8654 $ 1,993.04 020.210250 $ 178.65 IBEW Dues: Payment Ben217792 055.210250 $ 2,975.66 IBEW Dues: Payment Ben217792 056.210250 $ 402.08 IBEW Dues: Payment Ben217792 08/01/2019 8655 $ 3,556.39 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 15 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE 003141 - VERNON FIREMENS 011.210250 $ 2,753.00 Fire House Fund: Payment Ben217796 ASSOCIATION 003168 - ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 011.210220 $ 105,229.68 Deferred Compensation: Payment Ben217784 457 020.210220 $ 1,546.50 Deferred Compensation: Payment Ben217784 055.210220 $ 8,192.94 Deferred Compensation: Payment Ben217784 056.210220 $ 1,340.65 Deferred Compensation: Payment Ben217784 057.210220 $ 20.00 Deferred Compensation: Payment Ben217784 011.210220 $ -80,400.00 Deferred Compensation: Payment— Ben217784 011.210220 $ 19,743.83 Deferred Compensation: Payment— Ben217784 003146 - CITY OF VERNON, FSA 011.100013 $ 288.30 FSA - Dependent: Payment Ben217788 ACCOUNT 011.100013 $ 253.47 FSA - Medical: Payment Ben217788 P.O.# PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/01/2019 8656 $ 2,753.00 08/01/2019 8657 $ 55,673.60 08/01/2019 8658 $ 541.77 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 16 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 000714 - CALPERS 011.210240 $ 204,499.14 PERS Contributions: Payment Ben217786 020.210240 $ 9,471.20 PERS Contributions: Payment Ben217786 055.210240 $ 32,998.22 PERS Contributions: Payment Ben217786 056.210240 $ 3,721.41 PERS Contributions: Payment Ben217786 057.210240 $ 87.68 PERS Contributions: Payment Ben217786 011.210240 $ 177.63 PERS Survivor's Benefit: Payment Ben217786 020.210240 $ 14.31 PERS Survivor's Benefit: Payment Ben217786 055.210240 $ 32.93 PERS Survivor's Benefit: Payment Ben217786 056.210240 $ 3.72 PERS Survivor's Benefit: Payment Ben217786 057.210240 $ 0.19 PERS Survivor's Benefit: Payment Ben217786 011.210240 $ 308.85 PERS Buy-back: Payment Ben217786 011.210240 $ 19,729.10 P/P: 07/01-07/20 - Retirement— Ben217786 011.210240 $ 12.00 P/P: 07/01-07/20 - Retirement— Ben217786 011.1004.530034 $ -0.01 P/P: 07/01-07/20 - Retirement— Ben217786 08/06/2019 8659 $ 271,056.37 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 17 of 44 ELECTRONIC VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER 004075 - THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ACCOUNT NUMBER INVOICE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 011.210210 $ 212,685.59 Federal Withholding: Payment 020.210210 $ 5,875.72 Federal Withholding: Payment 055.210210 $ 21,620.79 Federal Withholding: Payment 056.210210 $ 2,789.67 Federal Withholding: Payment 057.210210 $ 74.60 Federal Withholding: Payment 011.210210 $ 41,996.44 Medicare: Payment 020.210210 $ 1,614.42 Medicare: Payment 055.210210 $ 5,539.26 Medicare: Payment 056.210210 $ 612.06 Medicare: Payment 057.210210 $ 16.34 Medicare: Payment 011.210210 $ 506.26 Social Security Tax: Payment 011.210210 $ -93,690.63 Federal Withholding: Payment- 011.210210 $ -15,543.98 Medicare: Payment" 011.210210 $ 44,928.84 Federal Withholding: Payment- 011.210210 $ 4,863.48 Medicare: Payment Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 Ben217780 ENT NUM 08/02/2019 8660 $ 233,888.86 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 18 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001635 - EMPLOYMENT 011.210210 DEVELOPMENT DEPT 020.210210 055.210210 056.210210 057.210210 011.210210 011.210210 004074 - STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 011.210260 011.210260 011.210260 011.210260 055.210260 $ 76,343.40 State Withholding: Payment Ben217782 $ 2,151.95 State Withholding: Payment Ben217782 $ 8,751.92 State Withholding: Payment Ben217782 $ 1,099.06 State Withholding: Payment Ben217782 $ 24.34 State Withholding: Payment Ben217782 $-28,107.18 State Withholding: Payment— Ben217782 $ 13,478.45 State Withholding: Payment— Ben217782 08/02/2019 8661 $ 73,741.94 $ 969.23 Child Support: Payment Ben217794 $ 1,402.15 Child Support: Payment Ben217794 $ 69.23 Child Support: Payment Ben217794 $ 53.07 Child Support: Payment Ben217794 $ 368.76 Child Support: Payment Ben217794 08/05/2019 8662 $ 2,862.44 TOTAL ELECTRONIC $ 2,593,187.24 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 19 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 000005 - A THRONE CO, INC 011.1043.520000 $ 111.33 Portable Restrooms 589100 08/01/2019 603525 $ 111.33 006636 - MARK AUMENTADO 020.1084.900000 $ 76.75 Reimb. County Administrative Fees 072919 08/01/2019 603526 $ 76.75 006054 - BEARCOM 011.1033.594000 $ 1,581.66 SC Service Agreement 4852155 08/01/2019 603527 $ 1,581.66 001721- CALOX, INC 011.1033.590000 $ 15.00 Oxygen Bottle Refill 597243 08/01/2019 603528 $ 15.00 001401 - CENTRAL BASIN MWD 020.1084.500130 $ 322,171.77 Potable Water Breakdown VERJUN19 08/01/2019 603529 $ 322,171.77 003846 - CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK 011.1031.594200 $ 6,924.64 Prisoner Booking Log 19663 08/01/2019 603530 $ 6,924.64 005113 - COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH 011.1003.596300 $ 4,073.00 Re: Election Advice 39453 & WHATLE 006360- COMMUNITY PARTNERS 000947 - DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 011.1021.797000 $ 020.1084.550000 $ 020.1084.550000 $ 35,000.00 CommUNITY Fund Grant 96.60 Publication Services 96.60 Publication Services 071719 B3269766 B3269775 08/01/2019 603531 $ 4,073.00 08/01/2019 603532 $ 35,000.00 08/01/2019 603533 $ 193.20 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 20 of 44 EARLY CHECKS VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER 002566 - DEWEY PEST CONTROL 011.1048.596200 $ 011.1048.596200 $ 011.1048.596200 $ 011.1048.596200 $ 011.1048.596200 $ 011.1049.590000 $ 011.1049.590000 $ 011.1049.590000 $ 005220 - DIGITAL EMS SOLUTIONS INC. 011.1033.590110 $ 004181- FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 020.210260 $ 055.210260 $ 004239 - HSA BANK 011.1031.502030 $ CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 INVOICE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE 60.00 Pest Control Services 12763027 100.00 Pest Control Services 12763033 95.00 Pest Control Services 12763034 135.00 Pest Control Services 12763035 75.00 Pest Control Services 12763036 62.00 Pest Control Services 12763037 67.00 Pest Control Services 12763038 42.00 Pest Control Services 12763039 1,856.85 Electronic Patient Care Reporting 197 148.41 Garnishment: Payment Ben217778 841.00 Garnishment: Payment Ben217778 750.00 Initial Contribution / Z. Vazquez 072519 PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/01/2019 603534 $ 636.00 08/01/2019 603535 $ 1,856.85 08/01/2019 603536 $ 989.41 08/01/2019 603537 $ 750.00 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 21 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT IN VUICt VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 003122 - J & H AUTO BODY 011.1046.520000 $ 98.60 Paint & material 011.1046.590000 $ 139.20 Paint labor 011.1046.590000 $ 571.20 Body shop labor 011.1046.520000 $ 10.11 Sales Tax 10.25 011.1046.520000 $ 234.00 Parts to repair 011.1046.520000 $ 144.00 Paint and material 011.1046.590000 $ 162.00 Paint labor 011.1046.590000 $ 201.60 Body shop labor 011.1046.520000 $ 38.75 Sales Tax 10.25 011.1046.520000 $ 554.18 Parts to repair 011.1046.520000 $ 140.80 Paint and material 011.1046.590000 $ 158.40 Paint labor 011.1046.590000 $ 298.80 Body shop labor 011.1046.520000 $ 71.24 Sales Tax 10.25 INVOICE P.O.# 15815 011.0013836 15815 011.0013836 15815 011.0013836 15815 15819 011.0013837 15819 011.0013837 15819 011.0013837 15819 011.0013837 15819 15820 011.0013837 15820 011.0013837 15820 011.0013837 15820 011.0013837 15820 000121- LU'S LIGHTHOUSE, INC 011.1046.520000 $ 15.00 7441 miniature lamps / bulbs 011.1046.520000 $ 40.50 7444NA miniature lamps / bulbs 011.1046.520000 $ 5.27 Sales Tax 9.5% PAYMENT CHECK DATE NUMBER 08/01/2019 1142662 011.0013817 1142662 011.0013817 1142662 08/01/2019 603538 $ 2,822.88 603539 $ 60.77 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 22 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE 000084 - MATERIAL HANDLING 011.1046.520000 $ 20.48 NIS 25320-75AOE brake light switch 1127483 SUPPLY, INC 011.1046.520000 $ 5.78 NIS 46584-50100 brake light switch 1127483 011.1046.520000 $ 2.50 Sales Tax 9.5% 1127483 000561 - MR. HOSE, INC 011.1046.520000 $ 105.19 A-T4012D-12FJ-12FJ45-55.00 hydraulic 157467 011.1046.520000 $ 108.46 T4012D-123F1-12RJ90-52 hydraulic hose 157467 011.1046.520000 $ 21.37 Sales Tax 10.00 157467 006486 - QUENCH USA, INC 011.1049.520000 $ 2,329.07 Water Filtration Units INV01872524 002860 - SANTA ANA COLLEGE 011.1033.596700 $ 4,784.00 Registration / Wellness Program 071819 000380 - STACY MEDICAL CENTER 011.1031.596200 $ 1,035.00 Medical Services 521132748 PAYMENT P.O.# DATE 011.0013835 011.0013835 08/01/2019 011.0013838 011.0013838 CHECK PAYMENT NUMBER AMOUNT 603540 $ 28.76 08/01/2019 603541 $ 08/01/2019 603542 $ 08/01/2019 603543 $ 08/01/2019 603544 $ 235.02 2,329.07 4,784.00 1,035.00 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 23 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 005556 - SWEINHART ELECTRIC CO 011.1049.590000 $ 771.21 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 1,284.00 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 698.38 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 1,085.21 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 983.69 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 776.10 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 1,074.12 Major Service on EPS 011.1049.590000 $ 904.00 Major Service on EPS 004441 - U.S. DEPT OF EDUCATION 011.210260 $ 408.74 Garnishment: Payment 000353 - V&V MANUFACTURING, INC 011.1031.540000 $ 234.22 Police Badges 004252 - WHITTIER POLICE 011.1031.570000 $ 500.00 Mutual Aid Vehicle Maintenance DEPARTMENT 001088 - WON DOOR CORPORATION 011.1049.590000 $ 448.00 Maintenance Installation INVOICE 20511 20512 20514 20516 20518 20520 20522 20533 Ben217776 48350 19MAV001 242808 006638 - ARION GLOBAL, INC 011.1033.520000 $ 79.20 Recycling Service 13787 PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/01/2019 603545 $ 7,576.71 08/01/2019 603546 $ 408.74 08/01/2019 603547 $ 234.22 08/01/2019 603549 $ 500.00 08/01/2019 603550 $ 448.00 08/06/2019 603551 $ 79.20 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 24 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 006305 - ASTRO PLUMBING SUPPLY 011.1049.520000 $ 627.25 Plumbing & Building Hardware.- S1319655001 011.0013211 CO 011.1049.520000 $ 1,309.03 Plumbing & Building Hardware.- S1319914001 011.0013211 08/06/2019 603552 $ 1,936.28 002889 - AT&T MOBILITY 011.9019.560010 $ 46.23 Period: 06/09/19 - 07/08/19 83217648OX07162 000395 - CAEHA 011.1060.595200 $ 8,926.02 Temporary Staffing 011.1060.595200 $ 18,848.67 Temporary Staffing 011.1060.595200 $ 3,870.89 Temporary Staffing 011.1060.595200 $ 6,193.43 Temporary Staffing 000778 - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 011.1033.560000 $ 102.33 Period: 07/19 011.1043.560000 $ 42.45 Period:07/19 001473 - CITY OF DOWNEY 011.1060.595200 $ 5,533.75 Animal Control Services- 019 11267 11293 11322 11338 072319 072319(2) 233465 000310 - CRAIG WELDING SUPPLY, CO 011.1047.520000 $ 196.05 Welding Supplies- 631662 011.0013213 08/06/2019 603553 $ 46.23 08/06/2019 603554 $ 37,839.01 08/06/2019 603555 $ 144.78 08/06/2019 603556 $ 5,533.75 08/06/2019 603557 $ 196.05 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 25 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001336 - CURRENT WHOLESALE 011.1049.520000 $ 1,462.00 Electrical & Hardware Supplies— 258458 011.0013212 ELECTRIC SUP 011.1049.520000 $ 18.17 Electrical & Hardware Supplies— 258459 011.0013212 011.1048.520000 $ 25.69 Electrical & Hardware Supplies— 258460 011.0013212 011.1049.520000 $ 250.68 Electrical & Hardware Supplies— 258497 011.0013212 011.1049.520000 $ 295.36 Electrical & Hardware Supplies— 258498 011.0013212 011.1048.520000 $ 40.61 Electrical & Hardware Supplies— 258531 011.0013212 08/06/2019 603558 $ 2,092.51 000533 - DALE'S TRANSPORT 011.1043.520000 $ 35.00 Truck Wash/Steam Out Services— 272342 011.0013899 011.1043.520000 $ 45.00 Truck Wash/Steam Out Services— 272343 011.0013899 08/06/2019 603559 $ 80.00 000970 - DANGELO CO 011.120010 $ 2,817.81 Water Parts— S1370699001 011.0013214 08/06/2019 603560 $ 2,817.81 006536 - EDERBEAN FACE ART 011.1021.550000 $ 300.00 2 Artist for Face Painting & Balloon 8082019001 011.0013968 08/06/2019 603561 $ 300.00 004868 - ENDURO PIPELINE SERVICES, 056.5600.900000 $ 34,250.00 Vernon Transmission Line 8338SB INC. 001956 - IGNACIO ESTRADA III 011.1031.596500 $ 209.20 Sherman Block SLI Class 437-3 08/06/2019 603562 $ 34,250.00 070919 08/06/2019 603563 $ 209.20 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 26 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 000524 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS 011.120010 $ 4,385.48 Water Parts— 678845 011.0013219 08/06/2019 603564 $ 4,385.48 001359 - FIREFIGHTERS' SAFETY 011.1033.540000 $ 249.54 Safety Work Boots 27545 CENTER 08/06/2019 603565 $ 249.54 004438 - FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL, 011.1049.590000 $ 650.00 Designated Operator 30 Day Inspections 14998 INC 011.1049.590000 $ 2,693.40 Service Call 15050 08/06/2019 603566 $ 3,343.40 005825 - FRONTIER 011.9019.560010 $ 55.01 Period: 07/16/19 - 08/15/19 071619 08/06/2019 603567 $ 55.01 006210 - HP YOUTH FOOTBALL & 011.1021.797000 $ 20,000.00 CommUNITY Fund Grant 073119 CHEER ASSO 08/06/2019 603568 $ 20,000.00 005660 - INNERCITY STRUGGLE 011.1021.797000 $ 45,000.00 CommUNITY Fund Grant 073119 08/06/2019 603569 $ 45,000.00 000829 - IRON MOUNTAIN 011.9019.560010 $ 769.76 Storage Services 201912682 08/06/2019 603570 $ 769.76 006639 - IWT PROPERTIES, LLC 011.1040.400900 $ 18,770.20 Ref. 1st&2nd Parcel #6304023002— 071819 08/06/2019 603571 $ 18,770.20 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 27 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 000138 - LACPCA 011.1031.596700 $ 200.00 Registration Fee / A. Miranda 000804 - LB JOHNSON HARDWARE CO 011.1049.520000 $ 56.94 Plumbing & Building Hardware— #1 011.1049.520000 $ 80.61 Plumbing & Building Hardware- 011.1049.520000 $ 16.51 Plumbing & Building Hardware- 011.1046.520000 $ 100.72 Plumbing & Building Hardware- 011.1049.520000 $ 5.95 Plumbing & Building Hardware- 003342 - LIBERTY MANUFACTURING, 011.1031.590000 $ 345.00 Range Maintenance INC 001150 - MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY 011.1049.520000 $ 448.94 Electrical & Building Supplies — COMPANY 011.1049.520000 $ 380.08 Electrical & Building Supplies- 011.120010 $ 385.73 Electrical & Building Supplies- 011.1049.520000 $ 1,708.61 Electrical & Building Supplies- 006124 - ANTHONY MIRANDA 011.1031.596500 $ 93.00 LACPCA September 2019 Strategic INVOICE P.O.# 071819 102123 102381 102414 102431 102513 1764 97310079 97419291 97419292 98757639 071819 011.0013208 PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/06/2019 603572 $ 200.00 011.0013208 011.0013208 011.0013208 011.0013208 08/06/2019 603573 $ 260.73 08/06/2019 603574 $ 345.00 011.0013218 011.0013218 011.0013218 011.0013218 08/06/2019 08/06/2019 603575 $ 2,923.36 603576 $ 93.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 28 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 006203 - MRC SMART TECHNOLOGY 011.9019.590110 $ 12,744.98 Managed Print Services IN1147924 SOLUTIONS 08/06/2019 603577 $ 12,744.98 006618 - NEOLOGY, INC 011.9019.520010 $ 215.42 Ref #:2410 2353 011.0013867 011.9019.520010 $ 215.42 Ref # 2353 003106 - OCEAN BLUE 011.111100 $ 2,037.48 Hazardous Materials Disposal ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 000629 - OPEN ACCESS TECHNOLOGY 055.9200.596200 $ 817.25 Charges: January -June 2020— INTL, I 005719 - OPPORTUNITY FUND 011.1021.797000 $ 45,000.00 CommUNITY Fund Grant NORTHERN CA 001943 - PLUMBING & INDUSTRIAL 011.1049.520000 $ 11.33 Plumbing & Building Hardware — SUPPLY 011.1049.520000 $ 138.88 Plumbing & Building Hardware- 011.1049.520000 $ 48.76 Plumbing & Building Hardware- 011.1049.520000 $ 11.99 Plumbing & Building Hardware— 2410 32149 148192 071719 011.0013867 08/06/2019 603578 $ 430.84 055.0002734 08/06/2019 603579 $ 2,037.48 08/06/2019 603580 $ 817.25 08/06/2019 603581 $ 45,000.00 S1218297001 011.0013209 S1220043001 011.0013209 S1220798001 011.0013209 S1221090001 011.0013209 08/06/2019 603582 $ 210.96 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 29 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 005634 - PROYECTO PASTORAL 011.1021.797000 $ 50,000.00 CommUNITY Fund Grant 001808 - DANITA ROBERTSON 011.1031.596700 $ 25.00 CLEARS Training Registration 005577 - SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 011.1026.596200 $ 1,900.00 WRIB Membership Renewal HR 001017 - SPRINT 011.9019.560010 $ 34.41 Period: 06/19 005556 - SWEINHART ELECTRIC CO 011.1049.590000 $ 1,284.00 Major Service on EPS 006640 - ZULEIMA VAZQUEZ 011.1031.596700 $ 28.00 CLEARS Training Registration 001481 - VERIZON WIRELESS 011.9019.560010 $ 826.30 Period: 06/19 000743 - XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES, 011.9019.590110 $ 3,219.30 Lease Payment LLC 005544 - 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC 011.9019.590110 $ 1,080.00 TRACKING SERVICE " Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM INVOICE P, 071719 073019 GX35919 PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 08/06/2019 603583 $ 50,000.00 08/06/2019 603584 $ 25.00 08/06/2019 603585 $ 1,900.00 677975318212 08/06/2019 603586 $ 34.41 19750 08/06/2019 603587 $ 1,284.00 073019 08/06/2019 603588 $ 28.00 9833791879 08/06/2019 603589 $ 826.30 1699071 08/06/2019 603590 $ 3,219.30 INV723764 011.0013972 08/08/2019 603591 $ 1,080.00 Page 30 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 FARty rmFrviz ACCOUNT.- INVOICE VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER '' AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE 004681 - AEG SOLUTIONS, INC 055.9100.520000 $ 742.56 Item: PB2434M- 75758 055.9100.520000 $ 35.00 Freight 75758 055.9100.520000 $ 70.54 Sales Tax 9.5% 75758 000589 - AGENCIES TOOL CENTER, INC 011.1046.520000 $ 137.99 12504 1/2" drive torque wrench 24619G 011.1046.590000 $ 14.74 Freight 24619G 011.1046.520000 $ 13.11 Sales Tax 9.5% 24619G 004026 - AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS 011.1046.520000 $ 149.62 Universal undercover led insert amber 11826 ENTERPR 011.1046.520000 $ 149.62 Universal undercover led insert white 11826 011.1046.520000 $ 62.50 Ignition delay module 11826 011.1046.520000 $ 31.25 75 amp hd relay 11826 011.1046.520000 $ 21.25 8 position fuse block 11826 011.1046.520000 $ 27.35 50a cb hi aml man sp vlt sfc 11826 011.1046.520000 $ 31.25 Miscellaneous hardware 11826 011.1046.590000 $ 1,071.20 Labor to install 4 corner strobes and 11826 011.1046.520000 $ 47.28 Sales Tax 10.00 11826 PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 055.0002733 055.0002733 08/08/2019 603592 $ 848.10 011.0013918 011.0013918 08/08/2019 011.0013919 011.0013919 011.0013919 011.0013919 011.0013919 011.0013919 011.0013919 011.0013919 603593 $ 165.84 08/08/2019 603594 $ 1,591.32 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 31 of 44 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER 001624 - ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, 011.1033.850000 $ INC 011.1033.850000 $ 011.1033.850000 $ 011.1033.850000 $ 001948 - AT&T 011.9019.560010 $ 011.9019.560010 $ 011.9019.560010 $ 055.9000.560010 $ 011.9019.560010 $ 011.9019.560010 $ 056.5600.560010 $ 056.5600.560010 $ 011.9019.560010 $ 011.9019.560010 $ 005666 - BADGE FRAME, INC 011.4031.850000 $ 000439 - BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 020.1084.560000 $ CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 INVOICE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# 102.90 Ringers 327 ESG Barrier ONE Gloves " 216315 011.0013689 3,201.60 Lion CVBM-K7 7 Oz. Natural PBI Max 216315 011.0013689 1,820.40 Lion PVFM-K7 7 Oz. Natural PBI Max 216315 011.0013689 486.87 Sales Tax 9.5% 216315 20.63 Period: 06/06/19 - 07/05/19 13285824 2,582.20 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299518 18.97 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299519 228.06 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299520 2,057.18 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299521 989.22 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299522 593.33 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299523 20.63 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299622 1,030.05 Period: 06/10/19 - 07/09/19 13299954 18.97 Period: 06/15/19 - 07/14/19 13341034 2,833.83 Badges 34667 50.00 Permit 19071738 LYMENT CHECK PAYMENT DATENUMBER AMOUNT 08/08/2019 603595 $ 5,611.77 08/08/2019 603596 $ 7,559.24 08/08/2019 603597 $ 2,833.83 08/08/2019 603598 $ 50.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 32 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE `NUMBER AMOUNT 004163 - CENTRAL FORD 011.1046.520000 $ 011.1046.590000 $ 011.1046.520000 $ 003405 - COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLY 057.1057.520000 $ CORP 057.1057.520010 $ 057.1057.520010 $ 057.1057.520010 $ 000916 - COUNTY CLERK, COUNTY OF 011.1041.410280 $ LA 001444 - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 011.1004.596200 $ 005949 - COVERT LAW ENFORCEMENT 011.9019.590110 $ 55.19 9L3Z-1A189-A low air tire sensor 87.00 Labor to diagnose and repair 5.66 Sales Tax 10.25 2,557.99 Communication Supplies- 105.12 Communication Supplies- 615.50 Communication Supplies- 735.84 Communication Supplies- 2,429.75 Notice of Determination- 8,840.22 LAFCO Charges FY 2019-20 125.00 Milestone XProtect Express 2019 R1— C47591 011.0013924 C47591 011.0013924 C47591 634359 057.0000078 640262 057.0000078 649145 057.0000078 678947 057.0000078 080619 08/08/2019 603599 $ 147.85 08/08/2019 603600 $ 4,014.45 08/08/2019 603601 $ 2,429.75 071719 08/08/2019 603602 $ 8,840.22 INVO502 011.0013967 08/08/2019 603603 $ 125.00 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 33 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001336 - CURRENT WHOLESALE 055.8200.520000 $ 2,161.18 Electrical Supplies— 258830 055.0002667 ELECTRIC SUP 055.8200.520000 $ 1,014.82 Electrical Supplies— 258831 055.0002667 055.8200.520000 $ 2,424.60 Electrical Supplies— 258832 055.0002667 020.1084.520000 $ 10,807.65 Electrical Supplies— 258833 011.0013313 055.8200.520000 $ 1,583.94 Electrical Supplies— 258834 055.0002667 08/08/2019 603604 $ 17,992.19 000947 - DAILY JOURNAL 011.1003.596300 $ 294.00 Publication Services B3269135 CORPORATION 005874 - DOUBLETREE BY HILTON 011.1026.596900 $ 004868 - ENDURO PIPELINE SERVICES, 056.5600.900000 $ INC. 001580 - FRY'S ELECTRONICS, INC 020.1084.520000 $ 000899 - GALLS, LLC 011.1033.850000 $ 011.1033.850000 $ 2,400.00 1st Dep. EE Recognition Holiday Event— 5,000.00 Vernon Transmission Line 141.24 Computer Related Equipment- 243.70 SKU# TT851 MDNV- 23.15 Sales Tax 9.5% 08/08/2019 603605 $ 294.00 080519 08/08/2019 603606 $ 2,400.00 8416S 08/08/2019 603607 $ 5,000.00 18145344 055.0002663 08/08/2019 603608 $ 141.24 12805231 011.0013628 12805231 08/08/2019 603609 $ 266.85 Printed:8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 34 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001668 - LORENZO GAYTAN 011.1026.596800 $ 451.74 Tuition Reimbursement 042919 011.1026.596800 $ 405.00 Tuition Reimbursement 042919(2) 011.1026.596800 $ 405.00 Tuition Reimbursement 062719 011.1026.596800 $ 355.21 Tuition Reimbursement 062719(2) 08/08/2019 603610 $ 1,616.95 000077 - GOLDEN BELL PRODUCTS, 011.1043.590000 $ 18,669.00 Sewer Manhole Roach Eradication 16779 INC 08/08/2019 603611 $ 18,669.00 003490 - H&H WHOLESALE PARTS 011.1046.520000 $ 293.76 ACD 10-9246 dexos 5w30 full synthetic 11N0291955 011.0013921 011.1046.520000 $ 27.91 Sales Tax 9.5% 11N0291955 08/08/2019 603612 $ 321.67 001221 - HERNDON RECOGNITION 011.1026.596900 $ 1,326.80 Merchandise Charges 3347476R1 COMPANY 08/08/2019 603613 $ 1,326.80 000686 - IGOE & COMPANY, INC 011.1026.594200 $ 75.00 Participation Fee 197825 08/08/2019 603614 $ 75.00 003122 - 1 & H AUTO BODY 011.1046.520000 $ 119.00 Paint & material 15851 011.0013923 011.1046.590000 $ 168.00 Paint labor 15851 011.0013923 011.1046.590000 $ 144.00 Body shop labor 15851 011.0013923 011.1046.520000 $ 12.20 Sales Tax 10.25 15851 08/08/2019 603615 $ 443.20 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 35 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 006377 - LOGMEIN USA, INC 011.9019.590110 $ 1,782.00 Rescue Assist Remote Support Concurrent 1207633737 011.0013964 08/08/2019 603616 $ 1,782.00 003256 - LUDLUM MEASUREMENTS, 011.1033.596200 $ 121.28 Part Number M2241-2 w/44-2 w/44-9-18 473168 011.0013809 INC 08/08/2019 603617 $ 121.28 001150 - MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY 055.8400.590000 $ 1,513.06 Hardware Supplies— 97325739 055.0002676 COMPANY 055.8400.590000 $ 778.34 Hardware Supplies— 97449777 055.0002676 08/08/2019 603618 $ 2,291.40 006586 - OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 011.1026.597000 $ 93.50 Medical Services 64782342 CENTERS OF 011.1026.597000 $ 63.00 Medical Services 64841933 08/08/2019 603619 $ 156.50 006612 - QUALIFIED MOBILE, INC 011.1046.590000 $ 493.00 Car Wash Services 259547 08/08/2019 603620 $ 493.00 001703 - ROYAL INDUSTRIAL 055.8000.590000 $ 371.51 Electrical Parts— 9066531697 055.0002677 SOLUTIONS 055.8000.590000 $ 113.28 Electrical Parts— 9066531698 055.0002677 08/08/2019 603621 $ 484.79 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 36 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECKS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001522 - TENNANT SALES & SERVICE 011.1046.520000 $ 390.50 1057710 ISO 100 hydraulic oil— 916410586 011.0013839 CO 011.1046.520000 $ 37.10 Sales Tax 9.5% 916410586 08/08/2019 603622 $ 427.60 005338 - TNT FIREWORKS 011.1033.410211 $ 500.00 Ref. Fireworks Stand Deposits 072319 08/08/2019 603623 $ 500.00 003177 - WILMINGTON INSTRUMENT 056.5600.520000 $ 539.78 Calibration Services— 1083921N 056.0000517 COMPANY, 08/08/2019 603624 $ 539.78 TOTAL EARLY CHECKS S 78S.962.22 Page 37 of 44 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 WARRANTS ACCOUNT -- INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 006308 - ANAYA SERVICE CENTER 011.1046.520000 $ 53.95 111025701 gasket 31939 011.0013929 011.1046.520000 $ 21.90 111029401 gasket 31939 011.0013929 011.1046.520000 $ 16.95 5150 coolant 31939 011.0013929 011.1046.590000 $ 210.00 labor 31939 011.0013929 011.1046.520000 $ 8.82 Sales Tax 9.5% 31939 011.1046.520000 $ 288.95 19153713 electric fuel pump 31966 011.0013934 011.1046.590000 $ 120.00 Labor to diagnose and repair 31966 011.0013934 011.1046.520000 $ 27.45 Sales Tax 9.5% 31966 08/20/2019 603625 $ 748.02 005078 - BURKE, WILLIAMS & 011.1024.593200 $ 1,484.00 Professional Services 243049 SORENSEN, ILL 08/20/2019 603626 $ 1,484.00 004320 - AARON CASS 011.1033.596700 $ 445.00 Reimb. AH 330 & IAFF Course 072419 08/20/2019 603627 $ 445.00 001095 - CHEM PRO LAB, INC 011.1049.590000 $ 314.00 Water Treatment Service 651792 08/20/2019 603628 $ 314.00 003846 - CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK 011.1031.594200 $ 7,333.72 Prisoner Booking Log 19666 08/20/2019 603629 $ 7,333.72 004787 - CLEAR INVESTIGATIVE 011.1048.466900 $ 50.00 Background Check 121185 ADVANTAGE, 08/20/2019 603630 $ 50.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 38 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 WARRANTS ACCOUNT , INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 003088 - CLINICAL LAB OF SAN 020.1084.500140 $ 621.00 Lab Services 969683 BERNARDINO 08/20/2019 603631 $ 621.00 006032 - RAYMOND DE NUS 011.1033.596700 $ 275.00 Reimb. S-230 Crew Boss Course 072419 08/20/2019 603632 $ 275.00 000411 - BRYAN DOME 011.1033.596700 $ 275.00 Reimb. S-215 Fire Operations Course 072419 08/20/2019 603633 $ 275.00 001746 - ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO 011.1033.520000 $ 2,022.36 Badges 145414IN 011.1033.520000 $ 211.88 Badges 145437IN 08/20/2019 603634 $ 2,234.24 004438 - FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL, 011.1049.590000 $ 650.00 Designated Operator 30 Day Inspections 15085 INC 08/20/2019 603635 $ 650.00 000399 - GARVEY EQUIPMENT 011.1033.520000 $ 1,875.20 Product Number: 36RDR-72— 121506 011.0013777 COMPANY 011.1033.520000 $ 149.52 Product Number: 33RS3-72— 121506 011.0013777 011.1033.520000 $ 192.35 Sales Tax 9.5% 121506 08/20/2019 603636 $ 2,217.07, 000252 - JACK'S MUFFLER SERVICE 011.1046.520000 $ 380.00 551076 drivers side catalytic converter 7775 011.0013932 011.1046.590000 $ 100.00 Labor to replace drivers side catalytic 7775 011.0013932 011.1046.520000 $ 38.95 Sales Tax 10.25 7775 08/20/2019 603637 $ 518.95 Printed:8/14/2019 2:S0:59PM Page 39 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 WARRANTS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 005340 - LA POOL GUYS 011.1049.590000 $ 375.00 TDS Drain 2678 08/20/2019 603638 $ 375.00 006617 - LENSMASTER, INC 011.1002.595210 $ 300.00 Creative Fee, Executive Portrait 1113 011.0013973 08/20/2019 603639 $ 300.00 001060 - LIFE -ASSIST, INC 011.1031.520000 $ 850.00 Item No. GL0104L— 934272 011.0013959 011.1031.520000 $ 1,700.00 Item No. GL0104XL— 934272 011.0013959 011.1031.520000 $ 242.25 Sales Tax 9.5% 934272 08/20/2019 603640 $ 2,792.25 006422 - MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC 011.1049.590000 $ 3,582.00 Landscape Maintenance 85458 08/20/2019 603641 $ 3,582.00 000833 - CHADRICK MCGOVNEY 011.1033.596700 $ 275.00 Reimb. S-230 Crew Boss Course 072419 08/20/2019 603642 $ 275.00 000610 - NICK ALEXANDER 011.1046.520000 $ 275.00 materials 3692 011.0013928 RESTORATION 011.1046.590000 $ 245.00 labor 3692 011.0013928 011.1046.520000 $ 28.19 Sales Tax 10.25 3692 08/20/2019 603643 $ 548.19 004111- PACIFIC COMMERCIAL TRUCK 011.1046.590000 $ 55.00 Labor 25157 011.0013926 BODY, 08/20/2019 603644 $ 55.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 40 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 WARRANTS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001751- CRAIG PELTIER 011.1033.596700 $ 89.18 Reimb. Drone Operations Course 072419 08/20/2019 603645 $ 89.18 006416 - PRIORITY BUILDING 011.1049.590000 $ 9,005.38 Janitorial Services 08/19 65278 SERVICES, LL 08/20/2019 603646 $ 9,005.38 006612 - QUALIFIED MOBILE, INC 011.1046.590000 $ 697.00 Car Wash Services 259834 011.1046.590000 $ 374.00 Car Wash Services 260101 011.1046.590000 $ 612.00 Car Wash Services 260339 08/20/2019 603647 $ 1,683.00 006642 - DEVINA REYNOLDS 011.1033.596700 $ 475.53 Reimb. Vertical Ventilation & Forcible 072419 08/20/2019 603648 $ 475.53 000171 - SHOETERIA 011.1043.520000 $ 163.34 Steel Toe Work Boots 143970IN 08/20/2019 603649 $ 163.34 000718 - TYLER SHOOK 011.1033.596700 $ 275.00 Reimb. S-230 Crew Boss Course 072419 08/20/2019 603650 $ 275.00 004225 - MANUEL VAZQUEZ 011.1033.596700 $ 65.00 Reimb. Haz Mat Specialist Certification 072419 08/20/2019 603651 $ 65.00 005699 - WEBCO LB, LLC 011.1043.590000 $ 10,250.00 Street Sweeping Service 07/19 LB4806 08/20/2019 603652 $ 10,250.00 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 41 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 WARRANTS ACCOUNT INVOICE PAYMENT CHECK PAYMENT VENDOR NAME AND NUMBER NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION INVOICE P.O.# DATE NUMBER AMOUNT 001628- WECK LABORATORIES, INC 020.1084.500140 $ 180.00 Water Quality Testing & Reporting W9G1398COVERN ON 08/20/2019 603653 $ 180.00 TOTAL WARRANTS $ 47,279.87 Printed:8/14/2019 2:S0:S9PM Page 42 of 44 RECAP BY FUND FUND ELECTRONIC TOTAL 011-GENERAL 020 - WATER 055 - LIGHT & POWER 056 - NATURAL GAS 057 - FIBER OPTIC GRAND TOTAL TOTAL CHECKS TO BE PRINTED 29 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 EARLY CHECK TOTAL WARRANT TOTAL GRAND TOTALS $ 1,319,343.83 $ 395,259.87 $ 46,478.87 $ 1,761,082.57 183,152.45 333,589.02 801.00 517,542.47 887,906.54 12,695.14 0.00 900,601.68 191,136.68 40,403.74 0.00 231,540.42 11,647.74 4,014.45 0.00 15,662.19 $ 2,593,187.24 $ 785,962.22 $ 47,279.87 $ 3,426,429.33 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 43 of 44 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 28 AUGUST 20, 2019 VOID LIST CHECK NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT 603548 VELEZ $ 88.12 Printed: 8/14/2019 2:50:59PM Page 44 of 44 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-356-2019 Submitted by: Adriana Ramos Submitting Department: Fire Department Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Fire Department Activity Report for the Period of July 16 through July 31, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and file. Background: Attached is a copy of the Vernon Fire Department Activity Report which covers the period of July 16, 2019 through July 31, 2019. This report covers hours for Fire Prevention, Training, Pre -Incident, Periodic Testing, Public Service Programs and Routine Maintenance. Fiscal Impact: None. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Fire Department Activity Report - 07/16/19 to 07/31/19 ACTIVITY TYPE FIRE PREVENTION: Regular Inspections (#): Re -Inspections (#): Spec. Haz. Inspections (#): VERNON FIRE DEPARTMENT COMPANY ACTIVITIES July 16, 2019 to July 31, 2019 Total Inspections: Total Staff Hours: This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 12 933 75 741 0 95 7 121 2 27 1 15 14 1055 83 877 42 1505 96 1315 *Reduction in activity due to transitioning to electronic inspection reporting system. Annual Business Fire Inspections 1200 1000 800 600 — 400 200 0 Last Year To Date This Period Last Year PRE -INCIDENT (HOURS): Planning District Familiarization PERIODIC TEST (HOURS): Hose Testing Pump Testing Total Hours: Total Hours: This 1_ )ate This Year This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 99 1292 114 1275 106 1367 113 1283 205 2659 227 12558 This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 0 9 0 4 0 27 4 21 0 36 4 125 Page 1 TRAINING (HOURS): Firefighting Hazardous Materials Safety Apparatus Operations Equipment Operations CPR First Aid 23 Total Hours: PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS (HOURS): School Programs Fire Brigades Emergency Preparedness ROUTINE MAINTENANCE (HOURS): Station Apparatus Equipment Total Hours: Total Hours: This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 101 1450 124 1664 47 543 51 449 132 1798 123 1716 134 1781 125 1777 131 1762 127 1761 14 61 23 48 33 466 35 490 592 7861 608 7905 Fire Training Hours ■ Firefighting ■ Hazardous Materials ■ Safety ■ Apparatus Operations ■ Equipment Operations ■ CPR ■ First Aid This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 0 54 2 24 0 11 0 10 15 189 4 171 15 254 6 205 This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 131 1630 126 1741 135 1648 129 1728 136 1688 130 1748 402 4966 385 5217 Personnel Activity Total By Hours: 1 1256 1 17281 1 1326 1 17225 Page 2 EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITY BY TYPE: Fires Overpressure rupture, explosion, overheat- No Fire Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Hazardous Condition (No Fire) Service Call Good Intent Call False Alarm & False Call Severe Weather & Natural Disaster Special Incident Type TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS Rescue & Emergency--- 48.89 °I — - Rescue & Emergency... 44.29 °I This Period Last Year Last Year To Date This Period This Year To Date 5 6 1 14 0 0 0 2 39 67 39 62 1 5 1 8 5 6 5 2 4 11 4 22 20 48 20 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 74 144 70 140 Emergency Activity: July 16, 2019 to July 31, 2019 False Alarm & False Call /a Good Intent Call 11.11% iverpressure rupture.... .220A rdous Condition (No Fire) 0 Fires 13-33°I 1.43% 1 0.00% 0 55.71% 39 1.43% 1 7.14% 5 5.71 % 4 28.57% 20 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 100.00% 70 Emergency Activity: Fiscal Year 19/20 False Alarm & False Call 1 l6 5-71 % Service Call I.43% Special Incident Type 4.71 V. Good Intent Call 15.7t% rpressure rupture, --- is Condition (No Fire) 10.00% 14 1.43% 2 44.29% 62 5.71 % 8 1.43% 2 15.71% 22 20.71% 29 0.00% 0 0.71 % 1 100.00% 140 Page 3 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-355-2019 Submitted by: Robert Sousa Submitting Department: Police Department Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report Recommendation: A. Find that granting authority to execute and submit the above referenced agreement and related documents is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA') review, because it is a continuing administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a 'project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Approve the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report, in substantially the same form as submitted herewith; and C. Authorize the Police Chief and City Administrator to execute the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report and submit to the Department of Justice and the Department of Treasury on behalf of the City of Vernon. Background: When local police agencies work with federal agencies to enforce federal criminal laws, the agency may apply for an equitable share of any forfeited proceeds. The Vernon Police Department ("VPD') currently receives an equitable share of forfeited proceeds from investigations conducted by an investigator assigned to the Southwest Borders Initiative Taskforce (SWBI). In order to receive such proceeds, the VPD must execute an equitable sharing agreement and certify that the forfeited proceeds received are allocated as required by federal statutes and regulations established by the U.S. Department of Treasury and the U.S. Department of Justice. These laws and regulations require the VPD to do the following: • Forfeited funds or property must be kept separate from state or other forfeitures • Submit a federal Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification annually with both agencies • A record shall be maintained of the funds or property and any expenditures • Funds exceeding $100,000 shall be audited annually The Department of Justice implemented an on -]me reporting process to streamline the annual reporting of finds received by local agencies. The reporting process requires the Agency Head (Police Chief) and the Governing Body Head (City Administrator) to certify that the City understands its obligations under the agreement and to certify that the reported financial information regarding the VPD's receipt and expenditure of the finds is accurate. The VPD has implemented procedures in compliance with the outlined laws and regulations. Forfeited proceeds received through the equitable share program vary from year to year as funds are based on the resolution of specific court cases. When received, funds are placed in a specific VPD asset forfeiture account. The Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification Report has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's office. Fiscal Impact: There is no direct fiscal impact by the execution of the Federal Equitable Share Agreement and Annual Certification Report. ATTACHMENTS • 1. 2019 Equitable Sharing Agreement and Annual Certification Report OMB Number 1123-0011 Expires: December 31, 2021 Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification NCIC/ORI/Tracking Number: CA0197300 Agency Name: City Of Vernon Police Department Type: Police Department Mailing Address: 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Agency Finance Contact Name: Miranda, Anthony Phone: (323)587-5171 Jurisdiction Finance Contact Name: Miranda, Anthony Phone: (323)587-5171 ESAC Preparer Name: Melgar, Angela Phone: (323)583-8811 Email: amiranda@covpd.org Email: amiranda@covpd.org Email: amelgar@ci.vernon.ca.us FY End Date: 06/30/2019 Agency FY 2020 Budget: $11,794,907.00 Annual Certification Report Summary of Equitable Sharing Activity Justice Funds Treasury Funds 2 1 Beginning Equitable Sharing Fund Balance $758,275.89 $48,008.93 2 Equitable Sharing Funds Received $79,579.67 $0.00 3 Equitable Sharing Funds Received from Other Law Enforcement Agencies and Task Force $0.00 $0.00 4 Other Income $0.00 $0.00 5 jInterest Income $2,243.88 $0.00 6 Total Equitable Sharing Funds Received (total of lines 1-5) $840,099.44 $48,008.93 7 Equitable Sharing Funds Spent (total of lines a - n ) $365,342.95 $0.00 8 Ending Equitable Sharing Funds Balance difference between line 7 and line 6 $474,756.49 $48,008.93 1Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Program participants are: FBI, DEA, ATF, USPIS, USDA, DCIS, DSS, and FDA 2Department of the Treasury Asset Forfeiture Program participants are: IRS, ICE, CBP and USSS. Summary of Shared Funds Spent Justice Funds Treasury Funds a Law Enforcement Operations and Investigations $24,243.74 $0.00 b Training and Education $0.00 $0.00 c Law Enforcement, Public Safety, and Detention Facilities $0.00 $0.00 d Law Enforcement Equipment $341,099.21 $0.00 e ljoint Law Enforcement/Public Safety Equipment and Operations $0.00 $0.00 f Contracts for Services $0.00 $0.00 Law Enforcement Travel and Per Diem $0.00 $0.00 h Law Enforcement Awards and Memorials $0.00 $0.00 i Drug, Gang, and Other Education or Awareness Programs $0.00 $0.00 j IMatching Grants $0.00 $0.00 k ITransfers to Other Participating Law Enforcement Agencies $0.00 $0.00 1 Support of Community -Based Programs $0.00 m Non -Categorized Expenditures $0.00 $0.00 In Salaries $0.00 $0.00 Total $365,342.95 $0.00 Date Printed: 07/29/2019 Page 1 of 5 Equitable Sharing Funds Received From Other Agencies Transferring Agency Name Justice Funds Treasury Funds ncome Other Income Type Justice Funds Treasury Funds ng Grants Matching Grant Name Justice Funds Treasury Funds Transfers to Other Participating Law Enforcement Agencies Receiving Agency Name Justice Funds Treasury Funds Support of Community -Based Programs Recipient Justice Funds Non -Categorized Expenditures Description Justice Funds Treasury Funds Salaries Salary Type Justice Funds Treasury Funds Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. We try to create accurate and easily understood forms that impose the least possible burden on you to complete. The estimated average time to complete this form is 30 minutes. If you have comments regarding the accuracy of this estimate, or suggestions for making this form simpler, please write to the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section at 1400 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20005. Privacy Act Notice The Department of Justice is collecting this information for the purpose of reviewing your equitable sharing expenditures. Providing this information is voluntary; however, the information is necessary for your agency to maintain Program compliance. Information collected is covered by Department of Justice System of Records Notice, 71 Fed. Reg. 29170 (May 19, 2006), JMD-022 Department of Justice Consolidated Asset Tracking System (CATS). This information may be disclosed to contractors when necessary to accomplish an agency function, to law enforcement when there is a violation or potential violation of law, or it accordance with other published routine uses. For a complete list of routine uses, see the System of Records Notice as amended by subsequent publications. Single Audit Information Independent Auditor Name: Isidro Conde Company: Vasquez & Company LLP Phone: (213)873-1700 Email: c_conde@vasquezcpa.com Date Printed: 07/29/2019 Page 2 of 5 Were equitable sharing expenditures included on your jurisdiction's prior fiscal year's Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA)? YES ❑ NO X❑ Prior year Single Audit Number Assigned by Harvester Database: Date Printed: 07/29/2019 Page 3 of 5 Affidavit Under penalty of perjury, the undersigned officials certify that they have read and understand their obligations under the Guide to Equitable Sharing for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies (Guide) and all subsequent updates, this Equitable Sharing Agreement, and the applicable sections of the Code of Federal Regulations. The undersigned officials certify that the information submitted on the Equitable Sharing Agreement and Certification form (ESAC) is an accurate accounting of funds received and spent by the Agency. The undersigned certify that the Agency is in compliance with the applicable nondiscrimination requirements of the following laws and their Department of Justice implementing regulations: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794), and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in any federally assisted program or activity, or on the basis of sex in any federally assisted education program or activity. The Agency agrees that it will comply with all federal statutes and regulations permitting federal investigators access to records and any other sources of information as may be necessary to determine compliance with civil rights and other applicable statutes and regulations. Equitable Sharing Agreement This Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement, entered into among (1) the Federal Government, (2) the Agency, and (3) the Agency's governing body, sets forth the requirements for participation in the federal Equitable Sharing Program and the restrictions upon the use of federally forfeited funds, property, and any interest earned thereon, which are equitably shared with participating law enforcement agencies. By submitting this form, the Agency agrees that it will be bound by the Guide and all subsequent updates, this Equitable Sharing Agreement, and the applicable sections of the Code of Federal Regulations. Submission of the ESAC is a prerequisite to receiving any funds or property through the Equitable Sharing Program. 1. Submission. The ESAC must be signed and electronically submitted within 60 days of the end of the Agency's fiscal year. Electronic submission constitutes submission to the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. 2. Signatories. The ESAC must be signed by the head of the Agency and the head of the governing body. Examples of Agency heads include police chief, sheriff, director, commissioner, superintendent, administrator, county attorney, district attorney, prosecuting attorney, state attorney, commonwealth attorney, and attorney general. The governing body head is the head of the agency that appropriates funding to the Agency. Examples of governing body heads include city manager, mayor, city council chairperson, county executive, county council chairperson, administrator, commissioner, and governor. The governing body head cannot be an official or employee of the Agency and must be from a separate entity. 3. Uses. Shared assets must be used for law enforcement purposes in accordance with the Guide and all subsequent updates, this Equitable Sharing Agreement, and the applicable sections of the Code of Federal Regulations. 4. Transfers. Before the Agency transfers funds to other state or local law enforcement agencies, it must obtain written approval from the Department of Justice or Department of the Treasury. Transfers of tangible property are not permitted. Agencies that transfer or receive equitable sharing funds must perform sub -recipient monitoring in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations. 5. Internal Controls. The Agency agrees to account separately for federal equitable sharing funds received from the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury, funds from state and local forfeitures, joint law enforcement operations funds, and any other sources must not be commingled with federal equitable sharing funds. The Agency certifies that equitable sharing funds are maintained by the entity that maintains the Agency's appropriated or general funds and agrees that the funds will be subject to the standard accounting requirements and practices employed by the Agency's jurisdiction in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Guide, any subsequent updates, and the Code of Federal Regulations, including the requirement to maintain relevant documents and records for five years. The misuse or misapplication of equitably shared funds or assets or supplantation of existing resources with shared funds or assets is prohibited. The Agency must follow its jurisdiction's procurement policies when expending equitably shared funds. Failure to comply with any provision of the Guide, any subsequent updates, and the Code of Federal Regulations may subject the Agency to sanctions. 6. Single Audit Report and Other Reviews. Audits shall be conducted as provided by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. The Agency must report its equitable sharing expenditures on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) under Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number 16.922 for Department of Justice and 21.016 for Department of the Treasury. The Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury reserve the right to conduct audits or reviews. Date Printed: 07/29/2019 Page 4 of 5 7. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Information provided in this Document is subject to the FOIA requirements of the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury. Agencies must follow local release of information policies. 8. Waste, Fraud, or Abuse. An Agency or governing body is required to immediately notify the Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section of the Department of Justice and the Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture of the Department of the Treasury of any allegations or theft, fraud, waste, or abuse involving federal equitable sharing funds. Civil Rights Cases During the past fiscal year: (1) has any court or administrative agency issued any finding, judgment, or determination that the Agency discriminated against any person or group in violation of any of the federal civil rights statutes listed above; or (2) has the Agency entered into any settlement agreement with respect to any complaint filed with a court or administrative agency alleging that the Agency discriminated against any person or group in violation of any of the federal civil rights statutes listed above? ❑ Yes ® No Agency Head Name: Miranda, Anthony Title: Chief of Police Email: amiranda@covpd.org Signature: Date: To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided on this ESAC is true and accurate and has been reviewed and authorized by the Law Enforcement Agency Head whose name appears above. Entry of the Agency Head name above indicates his/her agreement to abide by the Guide, any subsequent updates, and the Code of Federal Regulations, including ensuring permissibility of expenditures and following all required procurement policies and procedures. Governing Body Head Name: Fandino Jr., Carlos R. Title: City Administrator Email: cfandino@ci.vernon.ca.us Signature Date: To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Agency's current fiscal year budget reported on this ESAC is true and accurate and the Governing Body Head whose name appears above certifies that the agency's budget has not been supplanted as a result of receiving equitable sharing funds. Entry of the Governing Body Head name above indicates his/her agreement to abide by the policies and procedures set forth in the Guide, any subsequent updates, and the Code of Federal Regulations. ❑ I certify that I have obtained approval from and I am authorized to submit this form on behalf of the Agency Head and the Governing Body Head. Date Printed: 07/29/2019 Page 5 of 5 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-343-2019 Submitted by: Danita Robertson Submitting Department: Police Department Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Vernon Police Department Activity Log and Statistical Summary for the period of July 1 through July 15, 2019 Recommendation: A. Receive and file. Background: The Vernon Police Department's activity report consists of activity during the specified reporting period, including a summary of calls for service, and statistical information regarding arrests, traffic collisions, stored and impounded vehicles, recovered stolen vehicles, the number of citations issued, and the number of reports filed. Fiscal cal Impact: None. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Police Department Activity Report - 07/01/19 to 07/15/19 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Department Activity Report Jurisdiction: VERNON Department Complaint Type Description VPD First Date: 07/0112019 Last Date: 07/15/2019 All Units Primary Unit 10-6 OFFICER IS 10-6 C7,961,962,10-10, WASH, EQUIPA 154 141 10-96C 10-96 CHARLES (CITY HALL SECURITY CHECK) 3 10-96H PICK UP THE JAIL PAPER WORK FROM HP ,,AIL 2 2 10.96M 10-96 MARY (MAIL DETAIL) 4 4 140 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 2 1 166 COURT ORDER VIOLATION 9 2 20001R INJURY HIT AND RUN REPORT 1 - 20002 NON -INJURY HIT AND RUN 5 2 20002R NON -INJURY HIT AND RUN REPORT 9 5 211S SILENT ROBBERY ALARM 14 4 245R ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON REPORT 4 1 261 RAPE 5 1 415 DISTURBING THE PEACE 24 8 417 BRANDISHING A WEAPON 3 1 422 TERRORIST THREATS 2 1 459 BURGLARY 3 1 459A AUDIBLE BURGLARY ALARM 168 100 459R BURGLARY REPORT 2 2 459S SILENT BURGLARY ALARM 2 1 459V BURGLARY TO A VEHICLE 2 1 459VR BURGLARY TO A VEHICLE REPORT 5 4 484 PETTY THEFT 2 1 484R PETTY THEFT REPORT 17 10 487 GRAND THEFT 3 1 487R GRAND THEFT REPORT 4 4 5150 SUBJECT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES 5 1 586 PARKING PROBLEM 25 594 VANDALISM 6 2 594R VANDALISM REPORT 10 7 602 TRESPASS 32 16 901T INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION 20 6 901TR INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT 6 2 902T NON -INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION 42 19 909T TRAFFIC HAZARD 6 5 911 911 MISUSE / HANGUP 6 3 911A CONTACT THE REPORTING PARTY 8 6 917A ABANDONED VEHICLE 2 2 925 SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 40 20 927 UNKNOWN TROUBLE 14 5 A484 ATTEMPT PETTY THEFT 1 1 ASTVFD ASSIST VERNON FIRE DEPARTMENT 27 17 BOSIG BROKEN SIGNAL OR LIGHT 3 1 BOVEH BROKEN DOWN VEHICLE 10 9 CITCK CITATION CHECK 3 2 CIVIL CIVIL MATTER 2 1 CODE5 SURVEILLANCE/STAKE-OUT 3 1 COP COP DETAIL 8 6 0711612019 05:24:18 Page I of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Department Activity Report First Date: 07/01/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/15/2019 Department Complaint All Units Primary Unit Type Description VPD DEMOSTRA DEMONSTRATION 3 3 DIET DETECTIVE INVESTIGATION 14 6 DETAIL DETAIL 7 7 DPTAST DEPARTMENTAL ASSIST 12 6 DUI DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 3 1 FILING OFFICER IS 10-6 REPORT WRITING 87 82 FU FOLLOW UP 11 8 GTA GRAND THEFT AUTO 2 1 GTAR GRAND THEFT AUTO REPORT 5 4 HBC HAILED BY A CITIZEN 5 5 LOCATE LOCATED VERNON STOLEN VEHICLE 1 1 LPR LICENSE PLATE READER 16 6 MR60 MISC REPORT 1 1 MUTUAL AID MUTUAL AID 2 1 PAFD PUBLIC ASSIST -FIRE 1 1 PANIC ALARM PANIC ALARM/DURESS ALARM 23 6 PAPD PUBLIC ASSIST -POLICE 4 3 PATCK PATROL CHECK 166 155 PEDCK PEDESTRIAN CHECK 53 32 PLATE LOST OR STOLEN PLATES REPORT 2 2 PRSTRAN PRISONER TRANSPORTED 9 8 REC RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE 3 2 RECKLESS DF RECKLESS DRIVING (23103) 4 3 REPO REPOSSESSION 2 2 RR RAIL ROAD PROBLEM 5 2 SRMET SRMET DETAIL 63 62 SUBPOENA SUBPOENA SERVICE 1 1 SUICIDAL SUE SUICIDAL SUBJECT 2 1 TRAFFIC STOP TRAFFIC STOP 110 95 UNATTACHED UNATTACHED TRAILER 2 1 VCK VEHICLE CHECK 68 59 VEH RELEASE VEHICLE RELEASE 2 1 WARRANT WARRANT ARREST 5 3 WELCK WELFARE CHECK 1 l Department: 1423 1027 Overall: 1423 1028 0711612019 05:24:18 Page 2 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Activity Report Period Ending: 07/15/19 TRAFFIC COLLISIONS NO. PROPERTY RECOVERED TOTAL 15 VEHICLES: $106,500.00 NON -INJURY 8 INJURY 7 Persons Injured 8 Pedestrian Fatalities City Property Damage Hit & Run (Felony) Hit & Run (Misdemeanor) 5 VEHICLES STORED PROPERTY RECOVERED FOR Unlicensed Driver OTHER DEPARTMENTS Abandoned/Stored Vehicle 16 VEHICLES: $19,000.00 Unattached Trailer 1 Traffic Hazard CITATIONS Citations Iss (Prisoner Release) 27 Citations Iss (Other Violations) Parking 73 Hazardous 18 Non -Hazardous 31 Citations Iss (Moving) 49 Citations Iss (Total) 122 CASES CLEARED BY ARREST AR19-244 CR19-1045 11364 HS AR19-254 CR19-1062 11364 HS AR19-246 CR19-1050 11377 HS AR19-257 CR19-1066 273.6(A) PC AR19-247 CR19-1051 11364 HS AR19-259 CR19-1074 459 PC AR19-248 CR19-1052 664/459 PC AR19-262 CR19-1090 261.5(D) PC AR19-250 CR19-1053 11364 HS AR19-264 CR19-1103 11377 HS AR19-251 CR19-1054 11364 HS AR19-265 CR19-1104 11377 HS AR19-252 CR19-1058 11377 HS AR19-266 CR19-1106 273.6(A) PC VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR PERSONS ARRESTED PERIOD ENDING: 07115/2019 ADULT FELONY ARRESTS AND DISPOSITIONS MALE FEMALE TOTAL ASSAULT W/DEADLY WEAPON BURGLARY ATTEMPTED 1 1 2 BURGLARY COMMITTED 2 2 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE/INJURY 2 2 GRAND THEFT AUTO UNLAWFUL INTERCOURSE W MINOR 1 1 WARRANT VERNON CASE WARRANT OUTSIDE AGENCY 1 1 TOTAL FELONY ARRESTS 7 1 8 ADULT MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS AND DISPOSITIONS MALE FEMALE TOTAL BATTERY COURT ORDER VIOLATION 2 2 DOMESTIC BATTERY DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE 2 2 IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE REQUIRED 1 1 PETTY THEFT - ATTEMPTED POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 4 4 POSSESS NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 5 5 RESISTING ARREST TRESPASSING VANDALISM WARRANT VERNON CASE) 8 8 WARRANT (OUTSIDE AGENCY) 1 1 TOTAL MISD. ARRESTS 1 23 0 23 JUVENILES DETAINED --- FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR MALE FEMALE TOTAL BURGLARY RESISTING ARREST ROBBERY VANDALISM WARRANT TOTAL JUVENILES DET. 0 0 TOTAL FELONY ARRESTS (ADULT) TO DATE: TOTAL MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS (ADULT) TO DATE: TOTAL JUVENILES DETAINED (FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR) TO DATE: 64 201 1 TOTAL ARRESTS AND DETAINED JUVENILES (FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR) TO DATE: 266 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/01/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/01/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713026 RPT 07/01/2019 02:37:53 RANCHO FOODS Department OCA Number RMS Juris 484R 2528E 37TH, VERNON VPD CR20191022 CA0197300 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA '40W 02:39:31 02:39:59 02:45:40 03:09:32 20190713034 RPT 20190713039 1015 RPT CCN CITY VI 20190713061 RPT 20190713062 RPT 07/01/2019 03:37:35 T-MOBILE (877) 653-7911 901T 3121 BANDINI BL, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191023 CA0197300 VPD CORTEZ,JUSTIN *41 E 03:39:53 03:39:54 03:42:37 04:35:25 VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR 32W 03:39:59 03:42:24 04:17:08 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA 40W 03:40:01 03:43:01 04:35:25 MR C TOW MR C TO 03:45:21 03:45:58 03:54:47 04:35:26 07/01/2019 05:28:42 DANNY 902T BANDINI BL // SOTO, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191024 CA0197300 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA "40W 05:29:43 05:30:13 05:33:46 06:45:45 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 25E 05:29:44 05:30:15 05:31:38 07:37:31 VPD 41 07:06:36 07:13:38 VPD CORTEZ,JUSTIN 41 E 05:30:27 05:31:36 07:10:33 VPD CHAVEZ,JERRY,J S1 05:32:51 06:04:28 USTOW US TOW 05:39:39 05:39:40 05:47:52 07:02:53 07/01/2019 09:44:34 LA FAYETTE TEXTILES 484R 2051 E 55TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191026 CA0197300 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI *32E 09:47:42 09:47:43 09:49:57 10:39:17 07/01/2019 09:53:09 FASHION NOVA 594R 2801 E 46TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191025 CA0197300 0710212016 05:07:0( Page 1 of 3 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/01/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/01/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713062 RPT 07/01/2019 09:53:09 FASHION NOVA Department OCA Number RMS Juris 594R 2801 E 46TH, VERNON VPD CR20191025 CA0197300 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO *41 09:53:50 09:53:51 09:59:49 10:42:58 20190713064 RPT 07/01/2019 10:47:16 ALL SIZE FOAM Department OCA Number RMS Juris 459R 4702E 50TH, VERNON VPD CR20191029 CA0197300 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI '32E 10:53:04 10:55:44 12:03:38 20190713065 RPT 07/01/2019 10:51:34 VIG FURNITURE 484R 3251 E SLAUSON AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191028 CA0197300 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO *41 10:57:52 10:57:52 11:12:35 12:05:57 20190713066 RPT 07/01/2019 10:58:07 T-MOBILE (877) 653-7911 902T PACIFIC BL // SANTA FE AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191027 CA0197300 VPD MARTINEZ,GABR 'S5 11:00:51 11:00:51 11:02:59 11:36:19 VPD CAM,PATRICK 40W 11:01:48 11:06:47 11:14:55 11:36:19 20190713067 RPT 07/01/2019 11:36:04 MR60 6190ROBERT 6190 B OYLE AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191030 CA0197300 VPD CAM,PATRICK '40W 11:38:47 11:38:48 11:45:18 12:08:19 20190713072 RPT 14:32:40 O VER3501 ASTVFD ASTV D E 2 3501 E 26TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191031 CA0197300 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI '32E 14:36:38 14:37:19 14:43:12 16:14:06 VPD CAM,PATRICK 40W 14:37:42 14:44:10 16:14:07 VPD MARTINEZ,GABR S5 14:37:45 14:45:36 16:14:07 20190713076 0710212016 05:07:0( Page 2 of 3 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/01/2019 Last Date: 07/01/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713076 RPT 07/01/2019 16:51:47 RAY BARRERAS 20002R E 26TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191032 CA0197300 VPD CAM,PATRICK '40W 16:57:11 16:57:12 17:20:56 17:48:14 20190713083 RPT 07/01/2019 18:33:02 JULIO CESAR MONTANO 20002R FRUITLAND AV // MAYWOOD AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191033 CA0197300 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO *41 18:35:09 18:35:10 18:38:49 19:04:05 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI 32E 18:45:39 18:48:34 19:04:04 20190713087 1015 07/01/2019 19:47:43 GUILLERMO RPT 20002 S BOYLE AV // FRUITLAND AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191034 CA0197300 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA '40E 19:49:02 19:54:23 22:16:04 VPD CORTEZ,JUSTIN 1Z8 19:54:22 19:54:27 19:55:50 VPD OURIOUE,CARLO 32 19:49:04 19:54:25 21:22:29 VPD MADRIGAL,MARI/ 41 W 19:55:04 21:13:26 0710212016 05:07:0( Page 3 of 3 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/02/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/02/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713115 RPT 07/02/2019 04:26:28 ACME CONSTRUCTION 415 2500 S ALAMEDA, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191035 CA0197300 VPD MADRIGAL,MARI/ *41 W 04:28:22 04:28:21 05:23:52 VPD OURIQUE,CARLO 32 04:28:24 04:38:00 05:36:22 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 40E 04:37:18 04:43:58 05:22:59 20190713117 1015 RPT 20190713131 RPT 20190713148 RPT 20190713155 RPT 20190713162 07/02/2019 06:06:59 PATRICIA 925 4520 52D DR, VERNON VPD VELEZ,MARISSA '40E VPD OURIQUE,CARLO 32 VPD MADRIGAL,MARI/ 41 W VPD CERDA,EUGENIO MET1 07/02/2019 08:15:54 FASHION NOVA PLATE 2801 E 46TH, VERNON VPD CAMRATRICK *21 07/02/2019 11:16:54 JOSE HERNANDEZ 484R 3200 E SLAUSON AV, VERNON VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR "40W 06:09:38 06:13:24 06:24:46 06:42:20 06:09:39 06:13:27 06:36:42 06:41:07 Department OCA Number VPD CR20191036 08:20:43 Department OCA Number VPD CR20191037 11:18:47 11:24:31 07/02/2019 11:48:54 JORGE GARCIA 902T LEONIS BL H DOWNEY RD, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR20191038 VPD CAM,PATRICK *21 11:52:19 11:52:19 11:53:53 VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR 32E 11:53:54 11:54:48 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO 41 E 11:58:26 07:32:23 06:53:08 06:52:54 07:06:49 RMS Juris CA0197300 08:37:41 RMS Juris CA0197300 11:55:04 RMS Juris CA0197300 12:15:43 12:04:20 12:25:28 0710312016 05:04:11 Page 1 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/02/2019 Last Date: 07/02/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713162 RPT 07/02/2019 14:15:57 DAVID KAHEN Department OCA Number RMS Juris 20002R E 49TH // EVERETT CT, VERNON VPD CR20191039 CA0197300 VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR '32E 14:18:32 14:42:19 15:10:30 20190713184 RPT 07/02/2019 19:09:49 GRACIELA REYES 459VR S 2ND // ANDERSON, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191040 CA0197300 VPD '32W 19:14:38 19:25:43 19:50:33 0710312016 05:04:11 Page 2 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/03/2019 Last Date: 07/03/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713220 RPT 07/03/2019 08:17:44 VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 484R S ATLANTIC BL // DISTRICT BL, VERNON Department OCA Number RMSJuris VPD CR20191041 CA0197300 VPD '40E 08:18:55 08:19:09 08:31:46 09:16:23 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH 31 E 08:25:44 08:35:13 09:46:28 20190713237 SUP 07/03/2019 10:10:24 DYNASTY 140 2646 DOWNEY RD, VERNON VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO '40E 10:11:49 10:12:16 VPD CERDARAIJUR 41 W 10:12:14 10:20:17 10:51:21 0710412016 05:43:& Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/04/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/04/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Dep Caller Address Officer Unit Dispatch Unit Time Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713287 1015 07/04/2019 05:44:30 SL HOME FASHIONS 459A 5601 DOWNEY RD, VERNON VPD CAM,PATRICK *41 05:46:45 05:49:48 07:00:29 VPD MADRIGAL,MARI/ 32E 06:01:46 06:04:53 06:50:17 20190713296 RPT 07/04/2019 08:30:57 HUGO OR 902T BANDINI BL // SOTO, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191043 CA0197300 VPD CORTEZ,JUSTIN '25W 08:31:28 08:31:48 08:33:47 09:39:28 VPD DOCHERTYNICH 31 08:35:28 09:00:37 VPD CAM,PATRICK 41 E 08:33:16 08:35:30 08:51:43 20190713297 1015 07/04/2019 08:51:11 HPPD RPT 901 TR 6190 S BOYLE AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191042 CA0197300 VS CITY VPD CAM,PATRICK *41 E 08:51:47 08:54:49 12:07:52 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH 31 09:00:42 10:51:04 20190713313 1015 07/04/2019 15:11:37 VS TRAFFIC STOP S SANTA FE AV // 48TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191044 CA0197300 RPT VPD CORTEZ,JUSTIN '25W 15:11:37 16:26:37 VPD CAM,PATRICK 41 E 15:19:13 15:55:37 20190713334 1015 07/04/2019 20:09:06 PEDCK E 52D // CUDAHY, VERNON VPD OURIQUE,CARLO '32E 20:09:06 20:48:10 20190713346 0710512016 01:26:1E Page 1 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/04/2019 Last Date: 07/04/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713346 1015 07/04/2019 22:17:54 PATCK 4310 MAYWOOD AV, VERNON VPD OURIQUECARLO '32E VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII 40W 22:17:55 22:35:09 22:35:51 23:05:50 0710512016 01:26: U Page 2 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/05/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/05/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713362 RPT 07/05/2019 1015 PEDCK 01:44:59 FRUITLAND AV // CUDAHY, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR20191045 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII '40W 01:44:59 02:56:05 20190713380 RPT 07/05/2019 05:45:02 LA FIBER Department OCA Number RMS Juris 459R 4920 S BOYLE AV, VERNON VPD CR20191046 CA0197300 VPD OURIQUE,CARLO '32E 05:46:51 05:47:45 05:56:08 06:27:35 20190713398 REPO 07/05/2019 11:20:59 COAST LINE RECOVERY REPO 5080 S ALAMEDA, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191047 CA0197300 VPD RECORDS BURE/ 'RECD 11:21:39 11:36:24 20190713408 RPT 07/05/2019 15:40:16 HENRY GONZALEZ Department OCA Number RMS Juris GTAR 2665 SANTA FE, VERNON VPD CR20191048 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO '40W 15:42:20 15:42:26 16:07:40 16:22:44 20190713409 ASST 07/05/2019 15:47:18 BELL POLICE RPT WARRANT 6326 PINE AVE, VERNON 1015 VPD NEWTON,TODD *31 E 16:07:55 16:22:40 18:06:16 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII 32 17:44:18 17:54:32 18:01:35 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 40W 17:39:36 18:06:16 20190713417 VOID 07/05/2019 19:09:30 SHAGAL RPT REC 2034 E 27TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191049 CA0197300 VREC VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII '32W 19:15:59 19:16:53 19:22:18 20:13:27 MR C TOW MR C TO 19:57:11 19:59:47 20:08:50 20:13:27 0711612016 09:32.0 Page 1 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/05/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/05/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713435 VS 07/05/2019 23:44:13 RPT VCK SEVILLE AV // FRUITLAND AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS J300 VPD CR20191050 CA0197300 1015 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII "32W 23:44:13 00:33:40 VPD OURIOUE,CARLO 40E 23:44:44 01:01:36 MR C TOW MR C TO 00:21:54 00:22:33 00:30:09 00:33:58 0711612016 09:32.0 Page 2 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/06/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/06/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713442 RPT 07/06/2019 1015 PATCK 01:43:36 2828 S ALAMEDA, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR20191051 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII '32W 01:43:36 02:59:40 VPD CORTEZ,JUSTIN 26 01:58:32 02:08:45 VPD OURIOUE,CARLO 40E 02:10:46 02:59:40 20190713471 20190713491 1015 07/06/2019 12:42:33 BNA COLOR RPT 925 5000 E DISTRICT BL, VERNON VPD NEWTON,TODD '32W VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG 25E VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 41 1015 07/06/2019 19:04:08 RPT PEDCK DOWNEY RD // 45TH, VERNON VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII *26 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 26E VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 41 20190713516 1015 07/06/2019 23:05:56 RPT PEDCK DOWNEY RD H BANDINI BL, VERNON VPD LUCAS,JASON *26E Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191052 CA0197300 12:44:14 12:47:43 16:03:59 12:50:33 12:54:05 16:03:58 12:50:35 12:52:13 14:38:09 Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191053 CA0197300 19:04:08 19:42:38 19:42:54 20:16:15 19:21:51 19:23:53 19:42:04 Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191054 CA0197300 23:05:56 23:57:07 0711612016 10:11:3( Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/07/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/07/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713548 VREC 07/07/2019 08:33:45 D t t OCA Nub RMS J VS REC E 49TH // EVERETT CT, VERNON .1'.r men m er uras VPD CR20191055 CA0197300 RPT VPD VALENZUELA,FEI *32E 08:33:45 09:08:10 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 41 08:33:47 08:34:04 20190713552 VI 07/07/2019 10:02:00 RPT VCK EVERETT AV // DISTRICT BL, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191056 CA0197300 CITE VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *41 10:02:00 10:39:27 20190713555 RPCB 07/07/2019 12:04:01 TRACTOR AND AUTO RESTORATION RPT GTAR 3121 FRUITLAND AV, VERNON VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *41 12:05:51 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI 32E 20190713573 RPT 07/07/2019 19:24:55 FASHION NOVA 1015 602 2801 E 46TH, VERNON VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA *40E 19:26:01 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII 26W 19:26:04 Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191057 CA0197300 12:05:51 14:27:45 12:10:51 15:42:46 13:30:14 12:10:49 13:48:22 15:42:46 Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191058 CA0197300 19:27:09 19:29:04 20:29:01 19:27:14 19:29:14 20:53:17 0710812016 05:15:4( Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/08/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/08/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713599 1015 07/08/2019 01:11:08 RPT TRAFFIC STOP E SLAUSON AV // SANTA FE AV, VERNON VPD VASQUEZ,LUIS/O 'T8 20190713614 RPCB 07/08/2019 06:30:09 SOUTHLAND PAPER BOX RPT GTAR 4201 FRUITLAND AV, VERNON VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR '32E 07:02:33 20190713616 RPT 07/08/2019 06:58:35 US GROWERS 487R 2825 E 44TH, VERNON VPD VALENZUELA,FEI *25E 20190713620 RPT 07/08/2019 07:31:55 UNITED FINISHING 484R 5111 HAMPTON, VERNON VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG "20W 09:22:39 20190713642 RPT 07/08/2019 11:01:22 1015 PEDCK 3390 E SLAUSON AV, VERNON VPD VALENZUELA,FEI *25E VPD MARTINEZ,GABR S5 20190713662 VREC 07/08/2019 14:22:00 VAN LINGENS/ CHP SOUTH LA LOCATE HOLMES // 58TH PLACE, LOS ANGELES 20190713663 1015 07/08/2019 14:29:13 BELL PD WARRANT 6326 PINE, BELL 01:11:15 02:18:42 Department OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191060 CA0197300 07:02:37 07:14:42 08:51:58 Department OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191059 CA0197300 07:02:27 07:07:39 07:49:57 Departmeni OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191061 CA0197300 07:40:29 07:45:27 10:21:14 Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191062 CA0197300 11:01:22 11:46:21 11:01:29 11:46:22 0710912016 04:59:11 Page 1 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/08/2019 Last Date: 07/08/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Dep Caller Address Officer Unit Dispatch Unit Time Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713663 1015 07/08/2019 14:29:13 BELL PD WARRANT 6326 PINE, BELL VPD VALENZUELA,FEI '25E 14:38:31 14:38:37 14:57:10 15:43:50 20190713665 RPT 07/08/2019 14:48:05 SONYA 901T S SANTA FE AV // 52ND, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191063 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,PAULJR '40W 14:48:55 14:49:12 14:50:42 15:57:05 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG 20W 15:00:37 15:03:38 VPD CAM,PATRICK 26W 14:51:51 15:57:04 20190713667 RPT 1015 20190713670 RPT 20190713682 RPT 1015 VI 07/08/2019 15:34:55 EAST LA LASO 902T S ATLANTIC BL H DISTRICT BL, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR20191064 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO `41 E 15:35:56 15:39:49 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI 25E 15:45:31 15:45:32 15:56:10 07/08/2019 16:41:02 OLD MASTER PRODUCTS 484R 5051 E SLAUSON AV, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number VPD CR20191065 VPD CERDA,PAULJR "40W 17:15:05 17:30:01 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI 25E 18:03:40 07/08/2019 22:35:10 PASSERBY 242 2638 E VERNON AV, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number VPD CR20191066 VPD CR20191067 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO '32E 22:36:48 22:37:32 VPD MADRIGAL,MARI/ 40W 22:38:09 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA 41 22:36:56 22:39:42 VPD ONOPA,DANIEL S7 23:06:43 23:09:29 USTOW US TOW 23:46:05 23:46:07 23:51:04 RMS Juris CA0197300 16:48:08 RMS Juris CA0197300 18:39:59 18:39:43 RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 01:02:33 01:31:33 00:20:17 01:25:55 18:24:24 02:08:24 0710912016 04:59:11 Page 2 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/09/2019 Last Date: 07/09/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713688 RPT 07/09/2019 02:23:33 BLUE PRINT STUDIOS 459VR 2827 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191068 CA0197300 VPD MADRIGALMARI/ '40W 02:26:56 04:18:06 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA 41 02:26:58 02:47:24 20190713708 RPT 07/09/2019 09:29:28 NAPOLEON 902T BANDINI BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191069 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,PAULJR *26E 09:37:06 09:42:20 10:38:50 20190713724 RPT 07/09/2019 14:50:49 10-6 3254 E 26TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191070 CA0197300 VPD MARTINEZ,GABR 'S5 14:50:49 15:03:47 VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR 40W 14:55:40 15:03:47 20190713730 RPT 07/09/2019 16:03:36 E 927 49TH // ALAMEDA, VERNON E 49TH // Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191071 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,PAULJR *26E 16:04:38 16:04:50 16:13:57 16:40:10 VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR 40W 16:22:29 16:44:44 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO 41 16:26:06 17:40:11 VPD MARTINEZ,GABR S5 16:06:14 17:05:03 20190713739 RPT 07/09/2019 23:11:54 J AND J SNACK FOODS SUICIDAL SUB 5353 DOWNEY RD, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number RMS.1uris VPD CR20191072 CA0197300 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA *40 23:12:54 23:18:08 23:29:40 VPD QUINONES,ANA 25E 23:13:16 23:18:19 00:06:43 0711012016 05:10:1! Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/10/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/10/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713782 RPT 07/10/2019 09:22:46 PROFESSIONAL PRODUCE Department OCA Number RMS Juris 459VR 2570E 25TH, VERNON VPD CR20191073 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,PAULJR '40W 09:25:46 09:25:47 09:38:09 10:24:26 20190713786 1015 07/10/2019 09:49:51 FERNANDO 459 2221 E 55TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RPT VPD CR20191074 VPD ENCINAS,ANTHO '41 W 09:50:41 09:51:04 09:54:07 VPD CROSS,JEREMY 5D30 09:53:11 VPD MARTINEZ,GABR S5 09:50:44 09:51:06 09:54:33 20190713791 RPT 07/10/2019 10:42:37 487R 4383 FRUITLAND AV, VERNON Departmem OCA Number VPD CR20191075 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALE� `26E 10:43:42 10:43:44 10:50:31 20190713799 VI 07/10/2019 11:37:31 CALTEX PLASTICS CITE 917A 2110 E 51 ST, VERNON Departmem OCA Number VPD CR20191076 RPT VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR '40W 11:39:38 11:41:25 MR C TOW MR C TO 11:46:51 11:47:06 11:54:32 RMS Juris CA0197300 12:13:51 10:16:08 12:13:51 RMS Juris CA0197300 RMS Juris CA0197300 12:15:20 12:13:30 12:13:30 0711112016 04:49:3i Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/11/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/11/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713828 RPT 07/11/2019 05:12:29 CONTINENTAL FOOD SERVICES 487R 2528 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191077 CA0197300 VPD QUINONES,ANA *41W 05:14:34 05:21:52 06:03:17 20190713849 RPT 07/11/2019 10:34:34 PRICE POWER INTL 594R 4724 S BOYLE AV, VERNON S/A B Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191078 CA0197300 VPD DOCHERTYNICH '22E 10:38:23 10:38:46 10:45:24 11:11:55 20190713863 RPT 07/11/2019 13:07:42 CALIFORNIA STYLE DYNAMICS 487R 2407 E 38TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191079 CA0197300 VPD ZOZAYA,OSCAR '26W 13:11:51 13:12:26 13:16:01 14:07:54 20190713864 RPT 07/11/2019 13:19:23 JETRO CASH AND CARRY GTAR 2300 E 57TH, VERNON Departmem OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191080 CA0197300 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALE� '20W 13:20:59 13:21:00 13:29:24 14:28:33 20190713869 RPT 07/11/2019 14:00:05 POPCORNOPOLIS 484R 3200 E SLAUSON AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191081 CA0197300 VPD DOCHERTYNICH '22E 14:01:59 14:02:01 14:16:35 14:49:51 VPD DOCHERTYNICH 22 14:04:31 14:17:18 20190713889 RPT 07/11/2019 19:12:15 VERNON POST OFFICE 459VR 5121 HAMPTON, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191082 CA0197300 VPD OURIQUE,CARLO '26W 19:13:35 19:13:53 19:16:07 19:45:46 20190713898 1015 07/11/2019 21:39:00 LA METRO JAIL RPT WARRANT 180 N LOS ANGELES ST, LOS ANGELES Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191084 CA0197300 0711212016 05:04:41 Page 1 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/11/2019 Last Date: 07/11/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713898 1015 07/11/2019 21:39:00 LA METRO JAIL RPT WARRANT 180 N LOS ANGELES ST, LOS ANGELES Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191084 CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII '40E 21:41:02 22:15:57 21:52:53 23:14:36 20190713899 RPT 07/11/2019 21:52:26 PATCK 2424 E 26TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191083 CA0197300 VPD OURIQUECARLO '26W 22:10:29 21:52:26 22:48:35 20190713902 RPT 07/11/2019 22:50:41 T-MOBILE (877) 653-7911 901 T BANDINI BL // SOTO, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191085 CA0197300 VPD OURIQUECARLO '26W 22:51:48 22:53:34 23:15:29 VPD QUINONES,ANA 41 22:51:51 22:53:13 23:08:42 VPD ONOPA,DANIEL S7 22:57:03 23:06:39 0711212016 05:04:41 Page 2 of 2 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/12/2019 Last Date: 07/12/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address 20190713929 VS CITE RPT 20190713949 RPT 20190713953 RPT 20190713961 RPT RPT VI 20190713962 Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 07/12/2019 07:36:04 VCK PACIFIC BL // LEONIS BL, VERNON VPD CERDA,EUGENIO "26W Department OCA Number VPD CR20191086 07:36:04 RMS Juris CA0197300 08:21:05 07/12/2019 09:49:55 VERNON CHAMBER 594R 2724 LEONIS BL, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS.Iuris VPD CR20191087 CA0197300 VPD LANDA,RAFAEL *25E 09:51:52 09:52:08 09:52:36 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 26W 10:04:26 10:29:54 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH 32E 09:52:33 09:59:00 10:28:11 07/12/2019 10:26:48 KEITH WHITWORTH 5150 3560 E VERNON AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191088 CA0197300 VPD LANDA,RAFAEL '25E 10:29:03 10:29:14 10:32:25 17:38:54 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH 32E 10:52:39 10:53:08 VPD NEWTON,TODD/F 41W 10:29:06 10:29:19 10:39:50 13:03:57 VPD SANTOS,DANIEL S2 10:36:19 12:47:24 VPD ESTRADA,IGNACI S3 10:36:32 12:47:27 07/12/2019 13:02:15 TEMPO 261 2137 E 55TH, VERNON Departmem OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191090 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO '26W 13:03:48 13:03:49 13:08:30 17:38:31 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH 32E 15:26:08 15:36:40 VPD NEWTON,TODD/F 41 W 15:25:31 15:25:32 13:25:27 16:08:57 13:59:24 20:07:01 VPD SANTOS,DANIEL S2 13:11:27 13:16:42 16:51:37 VPD ESTRADA,IGNACI S3 13:11:29 13:27:20 16:51:39 0711412016 04:46.2, Page 1 of 3 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/12/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/12/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713962 RPT 07/12/2019 13:22:31 5024LUXXEL D 484R 5024 epartment OCA Number RMS Juris AMPTON, VERNON VPD CR20191089 CA0197300 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH '32E 13:25:40 13:25:56 13:39:19 14:18:24 20190713964 VREC 07/12/2019 13:55:21 LAPD LOCATE 219 E 82ND, LOS ANGELES VPD RECORDS BURE/ 'RECD 20190713966 RPT 07/12/2019 15:35:23 STEWART OR 20002 S SOTO // 44TH, VERNON VPD DOCHERTY,MICH '32E 15:36:45 20190713969 RPT 07/12/2019 16:29:11 YOUNG LABEL 594R 3720 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON VPD DOCHERTY,MICH '32E 20190713972 RPT 07/12/2019 17:12:29 SOPHIA CRU 901T 5000 E DISTRICT BL, VERNON VPD LUCAS,JASON *40 17:14:59 20190713973 RPT 07/12/2019 17:26:56 ALDO ALDAY RPT 902T 4950 E DISTRICT BL, VERNON VPD DOCHERTYNICH *32E 18:02:27 VPD LUCAS,JASON 40 20190713975 RPT 07/12/2019 18:05:16 20001 R E 26TH H MINERVA, VERNON 13:57:31 14:19:26 Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191091 CA0197300 15:36:46 15:39:10 16:04:21 Departmem OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191093 CA0197300 17:26:42 17:30:26 18:02:20 Department OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191092 CA0197300 17:15:01 17:17:42 17:59:21 Department OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191094 CA0197300 18:02:35 18:03:23 18:03:21 18:08:22 18:51:21 Department OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191095 CA0197300 0711412016 04:46.2, Page 2 of 3 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/12/2019 Last Date: 07/12/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190713975 RPT 07/12/2019 18:05:16 20001 R E 26TH // MINERVA, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191095 CA0197300 VPD DOCHERTYNICH '32E 18:11:31 18:51:41 18:59:00 20190713981 RPT 07/12/2019 20:08:24 SPRINT 866-398-3284 CITY 901 T E DISTRICT BL // CORONA AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191097 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,PAULJR '32E 20:09:03 20:09:42 20:12:49 23:36:36 VPD QUINONES,ANA 26 20:10:18 20:12:45 21:52:17 VPD CHAVEZ,JERRY,J S1 20:34:11 20:43:34 20:43:38 20190713982 RPT 07/12/2019 20:13:49 SPRINT 866-398-3284 901T S BOYLE AV // FRUITLAND AV, VERNON Departmem OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191096 CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON/RE *40 20:15:02 20:19:16 23:08:43 VPD NEWTON,TODD/F 41 W 20:19:09 20:21:44 21:18:06 VPD CHAVEZ,JERRY,J S1 20:15:46 20:16:18 20:34:08 VPD SANTOS,DANIEL S2 20:15:40 20:15:48 20190713991 REPO 07/12/2019 23:39:55 RPT REPO 5300 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON Departmem OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191098 CA0197300 VPD RECORDS BURE/ 'RECD 23:45:24 02:30:31 0711412016 04:46:2, Page 3 of 3 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/13/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/13/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190714002 RPT 07/13/2019 01:12:00 VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 245R S ALAMEDA // 51 ST, VERNON Department OCA Number RMSJuris VPD CR20191099 CA0197300 VPD QUINONES,ANA *26 01:14:20 01:17:29 01:55:15 VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR 32E 01:14:30 01:16:51 01:37:14 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII 40 01:20:42 01:29:17 01:29:22 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII 40W 01:29:21 04:29:00 20190714017 RPT 07/13/2019 08:48:12 GREEN FARMS 902T 2380 E 57TH, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191100 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *41 W 08:49:14 08:50:06 08:50:17 VPD NEWTON,TODD/F 26E 08:50:13 08:52:50 09:22:09 20190714025 RPT 07/13/2019 11:47:21 SIMLY FRESH FOOD 594R 4383 EXCHANGE AV, VERNON Departmem OCA Number RMS.Iuris VPD CR20191101 CA0197300 VPD DOCHERTY,MICH "32W 11:47:24 12:19:52 20190714049 RPT 07/13/2019 19:00:51 PATCK 2900 AYERS AV, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number RMS .Iuris VPD CR20191102 CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON/FII *25 19:02:10 19:02:32 20190714066 1015 07/13/2019 21:49:05 RPT PEDCK 2150E 37TH, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191103 CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON *40 21:49:05 23:51:56 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 32W 21:54:53 22:21:26 0711412016 04:44:5! Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's Jurisdiction: VERNON First Date: 07/14/2019 Last Date: 07/14/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Caller Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190714074 1015 07/14/2019 RPT PATCK 00:53:23 2462 E 28TH, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR20191104 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD LUCAS,JASON *40 00:53:24 01:45:52 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 32W 00:54:57 01:09:27 20190714104 RPT 07/14/2019 12:29:02 SIMPLY FRESH 594R 4383 EXCHANGE AV, VERNON VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *26E 12:39:52 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI 40E * Denotes Primary Unit qMq Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191105 CA0197300 12:43:09 12:46:55 12:40:38 13:08:02 12:40:35 12:46:58 13:08:03 0711512016 04:53:3i Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/15/2019 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/15/2019 Call Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Dep Caller Address Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute Unit Time OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20190714145 1015 07/15/2019 05:49:04 17/ RPT 5610 ALCOA AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191106 CA0197300 VPD CR20191107 CA0197300 VPD MADRIGAL,MARI/ *41 E 05:51:25 05:56:54 07:06:41 VPD VELEZ,MARISSA 32 05:51:27 05:53:40 07:17:45 VPD 32W 07:06:48 07:17:43 07:57:27 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHA 40W 05:57:03 06:01:32 06:24:57 VPD CHAVEZ,JERRY,J S1 05:57:42 06:02:39 06:24:03 20190714152 RPT 07/15/2019 06:56:16 LINK GTA 4889 LOMA VISTA AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191108 CA0197300 VPD *25E 06:58:50 07:07:49 07:56:49 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG 26E 07:00:05 07:03:51 08:02:21 20190714165 RPT 07/15/2019 10:14:58 VERDUGO CITE 901T 5600 S ALAMEDA, VERNON S/A 100 Departmeni OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191109 CA0197300 VPD CAM,PATRICK 25E 10:16:03 10:18:31 10:31:49 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG 26E 10:17:16 10:20:47 10:32:35 VPD VALENZUELA,FEI 32W 10:15:32 10:16:02 10:18:34 10:56:06 20190714190 VREC 07/15/2019 16:49:31 LAPD HOLLENBECK LOCATE 2742 LANFRANCO ST, LOS ANGELES 20190714194 RPT 07/15/2019 18:41:41 JOSE QUIROZ 902T E 50TH // DISTRICT BL, VERNON Departmeni OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR20191110 CA0197300 VPD "32E 18:45:28 18:50:29 18:52:52 19:39:50 0711612016 04:56:3 Page 1 of 1 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-367-2019 Submitted by: Margarita Beltran Submitting Department: Public Works Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Award of Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. for City Contract No. CS-1110: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Recommendation: A. Find that the approval of the proposed services agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. to prepare a citywide accessibility evaluation and transition plan is exempt under the California. Environmental Quality Act ("CEQN) in accordance with Sections 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) and 15306 (Information Collection); and B. Approve a Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc., in substantially the same form as attached herewith, for an amount not to exceed $139,930.00 for the preparation of a Citywide Accessibility Evaluation and Transition Plan; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute a Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. for a one-year term and an effective date of August 20, 2019. Background: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted by the Federal Government in 1990, requires that each public agency evaluate its services, policies, and practices to determine whether they are accessible by those with disabilities. Each public agency is required to adopt a transition plan that documents current conditions and outlines planned future accessibility improvements. Although the City of Vernon has performed some of the required groundwork, it has not yet completed a draft or adopted a final transition plan. On April 30, 2019, the Public Works Department issued a request for proposals (RFP) to Planning and Engineering firms seeking professional services to conduct a citywide accessibility evaluation, and prepare a transition plan. The City received proposals from the following consultants: 1. Owen Group Limited Partnership 2. Minagar & Associates, Inc. 3. Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. The proposals were evaluated by the Public Works staff in accordance with Section 2.17.08 of the City of Vernon Municipal Code. Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. was selected as the most qualified firm based on responsiveness to the RFP, professional qualifications and experience. The Public Works Department recommends that Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. be retained to perform the Citywide Accessibility Evaluation and Transition Plan. The proposed services agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorneys office. Fiscal cal Impact: The Public Works Department has allocated $200,000 in the proposed FY 2019-2020 budget for the ADA transition plan. The proposed agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. has a not to exceed amount of $139,930.00; therefore, sufficient fiends are available. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Services Agreement for CS- 1110: ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ADA SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN COVER PAGE Contractor: Responsible Principal of Contractor: Notice Information - Contractor: Notice Information - City: Commencement Date: Termination Date: Consideration: Records Retention Period Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Ian Blakey, Project Manager Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 Attention: Ian Blakey Phone: (800) 533-8771 City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: Dan Wall, Director of Public Works Telephone: (323) 583-8811 ext. 305 Facsimile: (323) 826-1435 August 20, 2019 August 19, 2020 Total not to exceed $139,930.00 (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit C Three (3) years, pursuant to Section 11.20 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR ADA SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN This Contract is made between the City of Vernon ("City"), a California charter City and California municipal corporation ("City"), and Sally Swanson Architects, Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"). The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1.0 EMPLOYMENT OF CONTRACTOR. City agrees to engage Contractor to perform the services as hereinafter set forth as authorized by the City Council on August 20, 2019. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. 2.1 Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the Request for Proposals issued on or about April 30, 2019, Exhibit "A", and Contractor's proposal to the City ("Proposal") dated May 8, 2019, Exhibit "B", both of which are attached to and incorporated into this Contract, by reference. 2.2 All services shall be performed to the satisfaction of City. 2.3 All services shall be performed in a competent, professional, and satisfactory manner in accordance with the prevailing industry standards for such services. 3.0 PERSONNEL 3.1 Contractor represents that it employs, or will employ, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Contract. 3.2 Contractor shall not subcontract any services to be performed by it under this Contract without prior written approval of City. 3.3 All of the services required hereunder will be performed by Contractor or by City -approved subcontractors. Contractor, and all personnel engaged in 2 the work, shall be fully qualified and authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services and shall be subject to approval by the City. 4.0 TERM. The term of this Contract shall commence on receipt of a written notice to proceed, and it shall continue until the services per the awarded contract are completed which may not exceed a period of one year from the commencement date, unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions thereof. 5.0 COMPENSATION AND FEES. 5.1 Contractor has established rates for the City of Vernon which are comparable to and do not exceed the best rates offered to other governmental entities in and around Los Angeles County for the same services. For satisfactory and timely performance of the services, the City will pay Contractor in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5.2 Contractor's grand total compensation for the entire term of this Contract, shall not exceed $139,930.00 without the prior authorization of the City, as appropriate, and written amendment of this Contract. 5.3 Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all necessary and incidental labor, material, supplies, facilities, equipment, and transportation which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Contract. Materials shall be of the highest quality. The above Contract fee shall include all staff time and all clerical, administrative overhead, insurance, reproduction, telephone, air travel, auto rental, subsistence, and all related costs and expenses. 5.4 City shall reimburse Contractor only for those costs or expenses specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by Contractor: 5.4.1 The actual costs of subcontractors for performance of any of the services that Contractor agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with this Agreement. 5.4.2 Approved reproduction charges. 5.4.3 Actual costs and/or other costs and/or payments specifically authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. 5.5 Contractor shall not receive any compensation for extra work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "extra work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized extra work shall be paid in accordance with the payment schedule as set forth in Exhibit "C," if the extra work has been approved by the City. 5.6 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services by this Agreement. 6.0 PAYMENT. 6.1 As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to the City an invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses, and authorized extra work actually performed or incurred according to said schedule. 6.2 Each such invoice shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including a detailed description of the services completed, the number of hours spent, reimbursable expenses incurred and any extra work performed. 0 6.3 Contractor shall also submit a progress report with each invoice that describes in reasonable detail the services and the extra work, if any, performed in the immediately preceding calendar month. 6.4 Contractor understands and agrees that invoices which lack sufficient detail to measure performance will be returned and not processed for payment. 6.5 City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days after the City approves the invoice. 6.6 Payment of such invoices shall be payment in full for all services, authorized costs, and authorized extra work covered by that invoice. 7.0 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY. City shall cooperate with Contractor as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor to perform its services; and will give any required decisions as promptly as practicable so as to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Contractor's services. 8.0 COORDINATION OF SERVICES. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants, and other staff at all reasonable times. 9.0 INDEMNITY. Contractor agrees to indemnify City, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein "claims or liabilities"), including but not limited to professional negligence, that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the work, operations or activities of Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein, or arising from the acts or omissions of Contractor hereunder, or arising from Contractor's performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, except to the extent such claims or liabilities arise from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, elected officials, agents or employees. 10.0 INSURANCE. Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain policies of insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth below, for the duration of the Contract, including any extensions thereto. The policies shall state that they afford primary coverage. i. Automobile Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit, including owned, hired, and non -owned liability coverage. ii. Contractor agrees to subrogate automobile liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under the performance of the services. iii. General Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate written on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Comprehensive General Liability "occurrence" form or its equivalent for coverage on an occurrence basis. Premises/Operations and Personal Injury coverage is required. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the policy as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of this Contract. (1) If Contractor employs other contractors as part of the services rendered, Contractor's Protective Coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein. (2) Contractor agrees to subrogate General Liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under the performance of the services. iv. Professional Errors and Omissions coverage in a sum of at least $1,000,000, where such risk is applicable. Applicable aggregates must be identified and claims history provided to determine amounts remaining under the aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such coverage for at least one (1) year after the termination of this Agreement. V. Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers' compensation for injuries on the job. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain workers' compensation insurance in accordance with the laws for California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners: (1) Provide copy of permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or (2) Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimal limit of $1,000,000 per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from performance of this Contract; or (3) Provide a "waiver" form certifying that no employees subject to the Labor Code's Workers' Compensation provision will be used in 7 performance of this Contract. vi. Each insurance policy included in this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to City. vii. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A-VIII. viii. Prior to commencement of performance, Contractor shall furnish City with a certificate of insurance for each policy. Each certificate is to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificate(s) must be in a form approved by City. City may require complete, certified copies of any or all policies at any time. ix. Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach. In such event, Contractor shall immediately notify City and cease all performance under this Contract until further directed by the City. In the absence of satisfactory insurance coverage, City may, at its option: (a) procure insurance with collection rights for premiums, attorney's fees and costs against Contractor by way of set-off or recoupment from sums due to Contractor, at City's option; (b) immediately terminate this Contract and seek damages from the Contract resulting from said breach; or (c) self -insure the risk, with all damages and costs incurred, by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including attorney's fees and costs, being collectible from Contractor, by way of set-off or recoupment from any sums due to Contractor. 11.0 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 11.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 11.1.1 It is understood that in the performance of the services herein provided for, Contractor shall be, and is, an independent contractor, and is not an agent, officer or employee of City and shall furnish such services in its own manner and method except as required by this Contract, or any applicable statute, rule, or regulation. Further, Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons employed by Contractor in the performance of the services hereunder. City assumes no liability for Contractor's actions and performance, nor assumes responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied or explicit, by or for Contractor. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payment of its employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever. 11.1.2 Contractor acknowledges that Contractor and any subcontractors, agents or employees employed by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of the City, and that they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation insurance benefits. 11.2 CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT. Except as the City may authorize in writing, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of or bind the City in any capacity whatsoever as agents or otherwise. 11.3 OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All documents and materials furnished by the City to Contractor shall remain the property of the City and shall be returned to the City upon termination of this Agreement. All reports, drawings, plans, specifications, computer tapes, floppy disks and printouts, studies, memoranda, computation sheets, and other documents prepared by Contractor in furtherance of the work shall be the sole property of City and shall be delivered to City whenever requested at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall keep such documents and materials on file and available for audit by the City for at least three (3) years after completion or earlier termination of this E Contract. Contractor may make duplicate copies of such materials and documents for its own files or for such other purposes as may be authorized in writing by the City. 11.4 CORRECTION OF WORK. Contractor shall promptly correct any defective, inaccurate or incomplete tasks, deliverables, goods, services and other work, without additional cost to the City. The performance or acceptance of services furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from the obligation to correct subsequently discovered defects, inaccuracy, or incompleteness. 11.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS. Contractor shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Contractor, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Contractor occurs, then Contractor shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Contractor professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 11.6 WAIVER. The City's waiver of any term, condition, breach, or default of this Contract shall not be considered to be a waiver of any other term, condition, default or breach, nor of a subsequent breach of the one waived. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. 11.7 SUCCESSORS. This Contract shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and/or assigns. 11.8 NO ASSIGNMENT. Contractor shall not assign or transfer this 10 Contract or any rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the City and approval by the City Attorney, which may be withheld in the City's sole discretion. Any unauthorized assignment or transfer shall be null and void and shall constitute a material breach by the Contractor of its obligations under this Contract. No assignment shall release the original parties from their obligations or otherwise constitute a novation. 11.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State, County and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which are, as amended from time to time, incorporated herein and applicable to the performance hereof, including but without limitation, the Vernon Living Wage Ordinance. Violation of any law material to performance of this Contract shall entitle the City to terminate the Contract and otherwise pursue its remedies. Further, if the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules, and regulations Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. 11.10 ATTORNEY'S FEES. If any action at law or inequity is brought to enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled. 11.11 INTERPRETATION. 11.11.1 Applicable Law. This Contract shall be deemed a contract and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Contractor agrees that the State and Federal courts which sit in the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies and disputes arising hereunder, and submits to the jurisdiction thereof. 11.11.2 Entire Agreement. This Contract, including any exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous 11 negotiations, representations, understandings, correspondence, documentation, and agreements (written or oral). 11.11.3 Written Amendment. This Contract may only be changed by written amendment signed by Contractor and the City Administrator or other authorized representative of the City, subject to any requisite authorization by the City Council. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Contract shall be of no force or effect. 11.11.4 Severability. If any provision in this Contract is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Contract, and the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Contract. 11.11.5 Order of Precedence. In case of conflict between the terms of this Contract and the terms contained in any document attached as an Exhibit or otherwise incorporated by reference, the terms of this Contract shall strictly prevail. The terms of the City's Request for Proposals shall control over the Contractor's Proposal. 11.11.6 Duplicate Originals. There shall be two (2) fully signed copies of this Contract, each of which shall be deemed an original. 11.11.7 Construction. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 11.12 TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is strictly of the essence of this contract and each and every covenant, term, and provision hereof. 11.13 AUTHORITY OF CONTRACTOR. The Contractor hereby 12 Represents and warrants to the City that the Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Contract, and its execution of this Contract has been duly authorized. 11.14 ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES. Any dispute for under $25,000 arising out of or relating to the negotiation, construction, performance, non-performance, breach, or any other aspect of this Contract, shall be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association at Los Angeles, California and judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The City does not waive its right to object to the timeliness or sufficiency of any claim filed or required to be filed against the City and reserves the right to conduct full discovery. 11.15 NOTICES. Any notice or demand to be given by one party to the other must be given in writing and by personal delivery or prepaid first-class, registered or certified mail, addressed as follows. Notice simply to the City of Vernon or any other City department is not adequate notice. If to the City: City of Vernon Attention: Public Works Department Dan Wall, Director of Public Works 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 If to the Contractor: Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) Attention: Ian Blakey, Project Manager 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 Any such notice shall be deemed to have been given upon delivery, if personally delivered, or, if mailed, upon receipt, or upon expiration of three (3) business days from the date of posting, whichever is earlier. Either party may change the address 13 at which it desires to receive notice upon giving written notice of such request to the other party. 11.16 NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Contractor and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right or remedy in, under, or to this Agreement. 11.17 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (Without Cause). City may terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time, for any cause or without cause, upon fifteen (15) calendar days' written notice to Contractor. If the Contract is thus terminated by City for reasons other than Contractor's failure to perform its obligations, City shall pay Contractor a prorated amount based on the services satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the effective date of termination. Such payment shall be Contractor's exclusive remedy for termination without cause. 11.18 DEFAULT. In the event either party materially defaults in its obligations hereunder, the other party may declare a default and terminate this Contract by written notice to the defaulting party. The notice shall specify the basis for the default. The Contract shall terminate unless such default is cured before the effective date of termination stated in such notice, which date shall be no sooner than ten (10) days after the date of the notice. In case of default by Contractor, the City reserves the right to procure the goods or services from other sources and to hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs occasioned to the City thereby. Contractor shall not be held accountable for additional costs incurred due to delay or default as a result of Force Majeure. Contractor must notify the City immediately upon knowing that non- performance or delay will apply to this Contract as a result of Force Majeure. At that time Contractor is to submit in writing a Recovery Plan for this Contract. If the Recovery Plan is not acceptable to the City or not received within 10 days of the necessary notification 14 of Force Majeure default, then the city may cancel this order in its entirety at no cost to the City, owing only for goods and services completed to that point. 11.19 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Termination for cause shall relieve the terminating party of further liability or responsibility under this Contract, including the payment of money, except for payment for services satisfactorily and timely performed prior to the service of the notice of termination, and except for reimbursement of (1) any payments made by the City for service not subsequently performed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and (2) costs incurred by the City in obtaining substitute performance. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require, at no additional cost to City, that Contractor provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 11.19.1 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 11.20 MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS. The City, or its authorized auditors or representatives, shall have access to and the right to audit and reproduce any of the Contractor's records to the extent the City deems necessary to insure it is receiving all money to which it is entitled under the Contract and/or is paying only the amounts to which Contractor is properly entitled under the Contract or for other purposes relating to the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination of the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain all such records in the City of Vernon. If not, the Contractor shall, upon request, promptly deliver the records to the 15 City of Vernon or reimburse the City for all reasonable and extra costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than the City of Vernon, including, but not limited to, such additional (out of the City) expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditors, travel, lodging, meals, and overhead. 11.21 CONFLICT. Contractor hereby represents, warrants, and certifies that no member, officer, or employee of the Contractor is a director, officer, or employee of the City of Vernon, or a member of any of its boards, commissions, or committees, except to the extent permitted by law. 11.22 HEADINGS. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 11.23 ENFORCEMENT OF WAGE AND HOUR LAWS. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. The Contractor, or subcontractor, if any, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by the respective Contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Sections 1810 through 1815 of the California Labor Code as a penalty paid to the City; provided, however, work performed by employees of contractors in excess of 8 hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1'/2 times the basic rate of pay. 11.24 LIVING WAGES Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D". Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City 16 11.25 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Contract, it and any other parties with whom it may subcontract shall adhere to equal employment opportunity practices to assure that applicants, employees and recipients of service are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sex, age, medical condition, sexual orientation or marital status. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. Contractor further agrees to comply with The Equal Employment Opportunity Practices provisions as set forth in Exhibit "E". [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement as of the Commencement Date stated on the cover page. City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation 0 Carlos Fandino, City Administrator ATTEST: Sally Swanson Architects, Inc., a California corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Byun, Senior Deputy City Attorney 18 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 19 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals City of Vernon Request for Proposals (RFP) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan City Contract No. CS-1110 OF E,�p it FOU LY City of Vernon Public Works Department 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058 Phone: (323) 583-8811 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT The City of Vernon is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced Consultants for the preparation of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self Evaluation and Transition Plan for City facilities (including but not limited to fire stations and parking lots), streets, intersections and sidewalks, etc. Services to be conducted include field investigations within City's right-of-way to provide the basis of identification, prioritizing, budgeting, and implementation of plans in order to assist the City in its efforts to comply with accessibility requirements as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and State of California Accessibility Requirements. The City will select one firm, based on demonstrated competence and a cost-effective approach to design, conduct, and assist in the ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan. At minimum, the firm selected to perform the evaluation shall be CASp (CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner) certified. 2. BACKGROUND The City of Vernon was founded in 1905, is approximately 5.2 square miles in size and is located approximately 5 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles California. Over its long history, Vernon has been developed as an industrial community. At the turn of the 20th century the lands that make up Vernon were comprised largely of farmlands. The presence of three major rail lines in the area led influential business and property owners to encourage the railroad companies to run spur lines onto the farmlands. These rail extensions enabled the creation of an "exclusively industrial" city. By the 1920's, Vernon was attracting large stockyards and meatpacking facilities. In the 1930's, Vernon became the location of choice for many heavy industrial plants. As economic conditions changed over the decades, these large scale industrial operations have relocated out of Southern California and Vernon has attracted smaller, lighter industrial facilities. The City's business friendly environment, low cost utilities and key location for trucking and rail transport continue to position Vernon as an ideal location for industrial uses. City Government: The City Council consists of five members, elected at -large, who serve five-year staggered terms. The City Council annually appoints a Mayor and a Mayor Pro Tern from its own membership to serve one-year terms. Labor Force: Vernon has approximately 280 employees, and its departments include a Fire Department, Police Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, Public Utilities Department and Health and Environmental Control Department. Present bargaining units recognized include the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association, Vernon Police Management Association, Vernon Firemen's Association, the Vernon Fire Management Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 47, and Teamsters Local 911. 3. KEY DATES 1. Issue Date: April 30, 2019 2. Deadline for Request for Information: May 6nd, 2019 Page 2 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals 3. Proposal Due Date: May 1311, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. 4. Tentative Consultant Interviews: May 161h, 2019 5. Anticipated Project Award Date: June 41h, 2019 4. SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED The City of Vernon is seeking the services of a highly qualified consulting firm to develop and evaluate an inventory of applicable facilities located in the public right-of-way areas within the City boundary. These facilities include all City streets, sidewalks, access ramps, City Hall, City owned apartment Building, Police Department, Maintenance Yards, Power Plant, City parking lots and public access areas in Fire Stations 76, 77, 78, & 79. Services will also include the evaluation of the access to Los Angeles River Bike Path, railroad crossings, crosswalks and review of existing City projects and current City Standard Plans. The consultant shall provide all necessary services to perform the following tasks: Task 1 — Project Management The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of meeting agendas, sign -in sheets, recording the meeting minutes and distributing minutes in a timely manner. Task 1.1 — Project Kickoff Meeting: Appropriate City of Vernon staff and the selected consultant will conduct a kickoff meeting to discuss the evaluation that will be performed and the overall form of the ADA Transition Plan, project management and project expectations including: invoicing, progress reports, points of contact, level of detail during the inventory phase and other relevant project information. Task 1.2 — Project Schedule: Prepare a project schedule which shall be updated monthly. Task 1.3 — Programming and Development: Monthly Meetings will be held between City staff and consultant at key milestones during plan development to refine project tasks and schedules and to make sure the project remains on time and within budget. The consultant shall prepare, update, and provide staff with a punch list prior to the meeting. Task 1.4 — Invoicing: Prepare monthly invoices and progress reports. Deliverables: ✓ Project kickoff meeting and meeting summary to be provided within 2 days after kickoff meeting. ✓ List of points of contacts shall be received at project kickoff meeting. ✓ Meeting agendas to be provided at least 1 day before scheduled meeting. ✓ Meeting minutes to be provided within 2 days after scheduled meeting. ✓ Monthly and quarterly progress reports and invoices. ✓ Project Schedule shall be received monthly. Page 3 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals Task 2 — Review and evaluate City's policies and programs This task includes the review and evaluation of current City policies, programs and facilities that may impact people with disabilities. This includes the review of citywide activities that involve the public, facilities owned by the City and/or facilities located in the public right-of-way, plans for public infrastructure improvements, current City Standard Plans and programs. Deliverables: ✓ Summary of findings Task 3 — Inventory Report, Classification and cost estimates of non -compliant barriers Task 3.1 — Inventory Report: This task includes a visual inventory of City facilities and areas of public right-of-way. Inventory will include public offices, place of public meetings, parking lots, sidewalks, curb ramps, and transit stops/stations. The field survey shall include the collection and documentation of each element found to be inaccessible and/or appears to be non- compliant. City facilities and areas of public right-of-way include but is not limited to the following: Curb Ramps Approximately 1,970 Signalized intersections 42 Centerline miles 49.1 miles Buildings 10 Parks 0 Task 3.2 — Classification of non -compliant barrier: To assist the City in determining how to prioritize and plan for future projects, once the Inventory Report has been developed, each non -compliant barrier shall be classified by severity rating. Task 3.3 — Cost Estimates: The contractor shall develop cost estimates for the required improvements for each non- compliant barrier. Task 3.3 — Classification of non -compliant barrier: To assist the City in determining how to prioritize and plan for future projects, once the Inventory Report has been developed, each non -compliant barrier shall be classified by severity rating. Task 3.4 — Prioritized Capital Improvement Program: The Contractor shall develop a Capital Improvement Program based on the severity ratings of each non -compliant barrier to assist the City in prioritizing yearly capital projects. Deliverables: ✓ Inventory Report which includes the following: Page 4 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals - As -built dimensions as it relates to ADA access - Barrier severity classification - Reference to code defining the barrier to access - Proposed solution(s) to eliminate the barrier - Individual detailed cost estimate for each solution - Digital photograph(s) of each barrier to access - Reference drawing/map showing the location of the barrier ✓ Development of the classifications and assigning a classification to each non- compliant barrier. ✓ Prioritized Capital Improvement Program ✓ The reports shall be submitted as a hardcopy and electronic formats. They will become the property of the City of Vernon for future reference and updated as needed. Task 4 — Development of Draft ADA Transition Plan The Consultant shall develop a draft ADA Transition Plan for City buildings and public right-of-way based upon guidance from City staff. The Transition Plan shall include, but is not limited to the following components: - Background of the ADA requirements - Overview of current standards and best management practices - Inventory Reports and findings of existing facilities - Methodology for prioritization of barrier remediation - Recommendations to obtain and maintain ADA compliance based on classification of barriers - Implementation phasing schedule - Procedures and forms for monitoring implementation Deliverables: ✓ Provide a draft ADA Transition Plan to City for review and comments. ✓ Consultant shall prepare and deliver a presentation of the draft ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan to City Council. ✓ Prioritization of all recommended capital projects ✓ Implementation schedule Task 5 — Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan The Consultant shall update the draft Transition Plan based on the provided comments and provide the final self -evaluation and transition plan. Said plan shall include a section identifying sources of potential funding for the implementation of the proposed Transition Plan. The final transition plan shall be submitted in a format that allows for editing as the City moves to become fully accessible. This phase includes the development of a presentation to City Council or to City management. The presentation will include results of field evaluations, findings and recommendations. Deliverables: ✓ Deliver a final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. ✓ Section on potential funding sources Page 5 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals ✓ Final Database and Project Map — electronic file(s). ✓ Consultant shall prepare and present a presentation of the Final ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan to City Council for adoption. 5. QUALIFICATIONS & CRITERIA A. Qualifications: The City of Vernon will select one firm for all of the outlined Scope of Services on the basis of qualifications, experience, and cost. The following are the minimum qualifications to be used to evaluate responses to this Request for Proposals: Capacity/Capability: (a) Key personnel relevant experience, certification and capability of individuals and outside consultants (i.e CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner Certification). (b) Diversity of skills — Architectural, civil engineering, traffic engineering, knowledge and experience conducting ADA self -evaluations and developing Transition Plans, and familiarity with State regulations governing the transportation planning process. (c) Total number of firm employees in project technical disciplines proposed for this project and current workload of those individuals Technical Ability and Understanding of Requirements (a) Technical approach proposed for meeting tasks (b) Understanding and experience in meeting tasks (c) Understanding of study requirements and experience with similar studies. (d) Project schedule (e) Personnel assigned to tasks (f) Quality of examples of previous work Project Organization and Management (a) Project team (b) Management procedure — work reports (c) Quality control B. Selection Criteria: The City will conduct a comprehensive, fair, and impartial evaluation of proposals received in response to this RFP. All proposals received will be reviewed and evaluated by a committee of qualified personnel. The name, information, or experience of the individual members will not be made available to any proposer. The Evaluation Committee will first review and screen all proposals submitted, except for the cost proposals, according to the minimum qualifications set forth above. The following criteria will be used in reviewing and comparing the proposals and in determining the highest scoring bid: 1. 40% Qualifications, background and prior experience of the firm in the Service Area(s) being proposed, experience of key staff assigned to oversee services provided to Vernon, evaluation of size and scope of similar work performed and success on that work. 2. 30% Cost and fees to the City for handling matters. Cost is not the sole Page 6 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals determining factor but will be taken into consideration. Proposer must offer services at a rate comparable to the rate proposer offers to other governmental entities for similar work. Offering a higher rate to the City than the comparable rate is grounds for disqualification of the Proposer. If rates differ for different types or levels of service, or for different Service Areas, the Proposer should so state. 3. 10% Responsiveness to the RFP, and quality and responsiveness of the proposal. 4. 20% References including past performance of proposer. 6. FORMAT AND DELIVERY OF RESPONSE Respondents are asked to submit one (1) unbound original, seven (7) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (via email to mbeltran@ci.vernon.ca.us) of their proposals in sufficient detail to allow for a thorough evaluation and comparative analysis. The proposal should include, at a minimum, the following information in sectionalized format addressing all phases of the work in the RFP. A. Format: Limit your proposal to 25 typed 8.5" X 11" pages, or fewer, on white bond paper of at least 20-pound weight single sided. You may attach a firm brochure if you wish, but it must be as a separate attachment and independent from the required elements noted above. 1. Use a conventional typeface with a minimum font size of 12 points. Use a 1" margin on all boarders. 2. Organize your submittal in the order described below. 3. Prominently label the package: "City of Vernon ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan" and include the name of the primary contact for the respondent. Deliver the response to: City of Vernon Attention: Public Works Department Margarita Beltran, Assistant Engineer 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 4. Responses are due on or before 3:00 p.m. on May 13', 2019. Late response will not be accepted. 5. If you have any questions about this RFP, please contact Margarita Beltran at (323) 583-8811 ext. 377. Please note that any questions asked and any response provided by Vernon will be sent to every person who will be submitting a proposal, to the extent the City is aware of them. B. Cover Letter: All proposals shall include a cover letter which states that the proposal Page 7 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals shall remain valid for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. If the proposal contemplates the use of sub -contractors, the sub- contractors shall be identified in the cover letter. If the proposal is submitted by a business entity, the cover letter shall be signed by an officer authorized to contractually bind the business entity. With respect to the business entity, the cover letter shall also include: the identification of the business entity, including the name, address and telephone number of the business entity; and the name, title, address and telephone number of a contact person during the proposal evaluation period. C. Introduction: Present an introduction of the proposal and your understanding of the assignment and significant steps, methods and procedures to be employed by the proposer to ensure quality deliverables that can be delivered within the required time frames and your identified budget. D. General Scope of Work: Briefly summarize the scope of work as the proposer perceives or envisions it for each Service Area proposed. E. Work Plan: Present concepts for conducting the work plan and interrelationship of all projects. Define the scope of each task including the depth and scope of analysis or research proposed. F. Fees and costs: Although an important aspect of consideration, the financial cost estimate will not be the sole justification for consideration. Negotiations may or may not be conducted with the proposer; therefore, the proposal submitted should contain the proposer's most favorable terms and conditions, since selection and award may be made without discussion with any firm. All prices should reflect "not to exceed" amounts per item. Proposer must offer services at a rate comparable to the rate proposer offers to other governmental entities for similar work. Offering a higher rate to the City than the comparable rate is grounds for disqualification of the Proposer. G. Ability of the Proposer to Perform: Provide a detailed description of the proposer and his/her/its qualifications, including names, titles, detailed professional resumes and past experience in similar work efforts/products of key personnel who will be working on the assignment. Provide a list of specific related work projects that have been completed by the proposer which are directly related to the assignment described in this RFP. Note the specific individuals who completed such project(s). Identify role and responsibility of each member of the project team. Include the amount of time key personnel will be involved in the respective portions of the assignment. Respondents are encouraged to supply relevant examples of their professional product. Provide a list of references. The selected firm shall not subcontract any work under the RFP nor assign any work without the prior written consent of the City. H. Affidavit of Non -Collusion. Proposer must submit a completed and signed, "Affidavit of Non -Collusion." (Copy attached as Exhibit A). 7. ADDENDA, CHANGES, AND AMENDMENTS TO THIS SOLICITATION Page 8 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals At any time prior to the due date for responses, the City may make changes, amendments, and addenda to this solicitation, including changing the date due to allow respondents time to address such changes. Addenda, changes, and amendments, if made, will be posted on the City's planet bids website at: www.cityofvernon.org/planetbids, which is deemed adequate notice. It is the responsibility of all perspective respondents to register on the City's planet bids website to ensure receipt of any addendum (a) prior to submittals. The City reserves the right to reject as nonresponsive any proposal that fails to include the information required by any amendments and/or addenda posted on the City's planet bids website. 8. CONDITIONS FOR RESPONSES TO RFP The following conditions apply to this RFP process: A. Nothing contained in this RFP shall create any contractual relationship between the respondent and the City. B. This RFP does not obligate the City to establish a list of service providers qualified as prime contractors, or award a contract to any respondent. The City reserves the right to amend or cancel this RFP without prior notice, at any time, at its sole discretion. C. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by any individual or organization in connection with this RFP. D. No conversations or agreements with any officer, agent, or employee of the City shall affect or modify any terms of this RFP. Oral communications or any written/e-mail materials provided by any person other than designated contact staff of City shall not be considered binding. E. The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to accept or reject any or all Proposals without prior notice and to waive any minor irregularities or defects in a Proposal. The City reserves the right to seek clarification on a Proposal with any source. F. The dates, times, and sequence of events related to this RFP shall ultimately be determined by the City. The schedule shown above is subject to change, at the sole discretion of the City, although the City will attempt to follow it and, if it must be altered, will attempt to provide reasonable notice of the changes. G. Respondents shall not issue any news release pertaining to this RFP, or the City without prior written approval of the City. H. All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public record upon delivery to the City. Page 9 of 35 April 2019 City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals 9. RIGHT BY THE CITY TO WITHDRAW THIS REQUEST The City may, at its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, withdraw this solicitation at any time. 10. LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE The selected consultant shall pay qualifying employees a wage of not less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. The consultant shall also provide qualifying employees at least twelve days off per year for sick leave, vacation or personnel necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. There shall be a prohibition on an employer retaliation against an employee's complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D" of the standard form contract, attached hereto as Exhibit B. Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 11. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Prior to the award of any work hereunder, City and proposer shall enter into the written contract for services attached hereto as Exhibit B. Proposers responding to this RFP are strongly advised to review all the terms and conditions of the Contract. The term of the Contract shall not exceed three (3) years. Page 10 of 35 April 2019 EXHIBIT B PROPOSAL 20 SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. Statement of Qualifications to the City of Vernon for an ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan City Contract No. CS-1110 May 8, 2019 SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. (SSA) wo 800.533.8771 2600 WEST OLIVE AVE, 5TH FLOOR I BURBANK, CA 91505 WWW.SWANARCH.COM �oF vEA May 8, 2019 Ms. Margarita Beltran, Assistant Engineer City of Vernon Public Works Department 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California 90058 Re: City of Vernon, California, Public Works Department, Requestfor Proposals (RFP) forAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan, City Contract No. CS-1110 Dear Ms. Beltran and Colleagues, Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) a California licensed and certified WBE, SBE and DBE firm, is pleased to present our proposal to the City of Vernon to provide consulting services to prepare an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. A concentration of in-house staff resources, hands-on management and ADA access compliance experience and methodology will generate the highest value of services to the City of Vernon. SSA's proposal will remain valid for a period of not less than one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of submittal (May 13th, 2019). SSA is in receipt of City of Vernon Addendum No. 1 issued May 8, 2019. Firm Description Thirty-nine years ago Sally Swanson Architects started, and has continued, as a pioneering firm with a passion for creating accessible environments. Our belief is thatthe best access compliance begins with a deep knowledge of ADA compliance and combines it with a strong design understanding. Bridging the strict requirements of California ADA codes as well as the requirements of place - making design, we collaborate with our clients to create environments that mitigate barriers. We cover the broadest spectrum of projects. Relevant Projects Recent similar ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plans include those for the Cities of Alameda, Belmont, Bellflower, Camarillo, Oxnard, Santa Ana, Daly City, Richmond, El Cerrito, Emeryville, Salinas, Sunnyvale, San Carlos, Mountain View, Monterey, Oakley, San Marcos, Clovis and Woodland in California; as well as the Counties of San Bernardino, Kings and Stanislaus, California. Project Leadership The project will be conducted by Ian Blakey, ICC, CASp who will provide a hands-on approach to every aspect of the project, complemented by his expertise, understanding and capabilities garnered from his portfolio of related ADA accessibility assessment projects. SSA works collaboratively with the client and all stakeholders to deliver professional services. Our dedicated in-house team is prepared to work closely with appropriate City of Vernon staff to provide a uniquely comprehensive perspective on accessibility issues. SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. Of YEA G� 1 Recommendations by Cities, Counties and Public Agencies SSA has earned an excellent record throughout the firm's 39 years in providing access compliance services. We encourage you to contact the references we have provided to learn how SSA has inspired, gained and maintained the confidence of its clients throughout California and across the U.S. Goal Documentation — A Strong Team SSA will meet all work performance requirements with our dedicated in-house staff. They are keen to begin work with the City of Vernon. Identification of the Business Entity Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 800 533 8771 Officer Authorized to Contractually Bind the Business Entity This cover letter is being signed by Sally Swanson, AIA, CEO and Principal -in -Charge who is the officer authorized to contractually bind the business entity. Identification of the Project Contact Person Ian Blakey, ICC, CASp Project Manager Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 800 533 8771 Why choose SSA? A dedicated, knowledgeable and enthusiastic long-term, in-house team with unparalleled depth of experience. Thank you very much for your consideration. We look forward to the next steps in the selection process. Sincerely, Sally Swanson, AIA SALLY SWA ARCHITECTS,, INC. INC. Recommendations by Cities, Counties and Public Agencies SSA has earned an excellent record throughout the firm's 39 years in providing access compliance services. We encourage you to contact the references we have provided to learn how SSA has inspired, gained and maintained the confidence of its clients throughout California and across the U.S. Goal Documentation — A Strong Team SSA will meet all work performance requirements with our dedicated in-house staff. They are keen to begin work with the City of Vernon. Identification of the Business Entity Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 800 533 8771 Officer Authorized to Contractually Bind the Business Entity This cover letter is being signed by Sally Swanson, AIA, CEO and Principal -in -Charge who is the officer authorized to contractually bind the business entity. Identification of the Project Contact Person Ian Blakey, ICC, CASp Project Manager Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 800 533 8771 Why choose SSA? A dedicated, knowledgeable and enthusiastic long-term, in-house team with unparalleled depth of experience. Thank you very much for your consideration. We look forward to the next steps in the selection process. Sincerely, Sally Swanson, AIA SALLY SWA ARCHITECTS,, INC. INC. FIRM PROFILE Firm Name Southern California Office: Website Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. Years in business: 39 years 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 586 Burbank, CA 91505 Telephone: 800.533.8771 / Fax: 415.445.3055 www.swanarch.com Primary Contact: Ian Blakey, ICC, CASp, Project Manager P. 800.533.8771, Ext. 109 email: IBaakey@swanarch.com Type of organization: California Corporation, Incorporated Nov. 19, 2001 Name of Owner: Owner/Founder/Principal-in-Charge: Sally Swanson, AIA Staff: SSA's professional staff of 19 includes: • 4 State of California Certified Access Specialists 1 Policy Specialist • 3 ICC Certified Accessibility Inspectors/Plan Examiners 2 GIS Specialists • 3 technical staff surveyors/accessibility consultants 3 licensed architects • 3 Support Staff: Marketing, Finance, Admin License/Registration: CA Architect License #C12746 (Sally Swanson) / CA Business Certificate #379994 Firm Certifications: Woman -owned Business Enterprise (WBE) Small Business Enterprise (SBE); Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Federal Tax I.D.: #01-0600856 Business License: #C2275182 Project Understanding Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) understands that the City of Vernon is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced Consultants for preparation of an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan for City facilities (including, but not limited to fire stations and parking lots), streets, intersections and sidewalks, etc. The services to be conducted include field investigations within the City's right-of-way that will provide the basis of identification, prioritizing, budgeting, and implementation of plans in order to assist the City in its efforts to comply with accessibility requirements as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and State of California Accessibility Requirements. The City will select one firm, and the firm selected will be CASp (California Access Specialist) certified. Anticipated project award date is June 4th, 2019. The City of Vernon was founded in 1905, is approximately 5.2 square miles in size and is located approximately 5 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, California. The City Council consists SALLY SWAN -SON ARCHITECTS, INC. of five members, elected at -large, who serve five-year staggered terms. The City Council annually appoints a Mayor and a Mayor Pro Tern from its own membership to serve one-year terms. The City of Vernon has approximately 280 employees, and its departments include a Fire Department, Police Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, Public Utilities Department and Health and Environmental Control Department. Proposal Overview SSA's proposal documents the firm's 39 years of ADA access expertise during which time the firm has conducted accessibility surveys and created ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plans for over 100 clients, which include dozens of cities, counties and public agencies, providing a full -range of services necessary to ensure client compliance with the myriad federal and state disabled access regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), State Title 24 Building Code, U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board Proposed Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right -of -Way, Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) and the Federal ADA Accessibility Guidelines and Standards (ADAAG & ADAS). Methodology The City of Vernon proposed Scope of Work as outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP) is quite clear and SSA will meet or exceed all requirements of the contract. The Work Plan is quite flexible and will be tailored precisely to fit the City's needs and resources. SSA will provide all services in-house that are required to complete the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan (project). SSA will develop and evaluate an inventory of applicable facilities located in the public right- of-way areas within the City boundary. These facilities include all City streets, sidewalks, access ramps, City Hall, City -owned apartment building, Police Department, Maintenance Yards, Power Plant, City parking lots and public access areas in Fire Stations 76, 77, 78, and 79. Services will also include the evaluation of the access to the Los Angeles River Bike Path, railroad crossings, crosswalks and review of existing City projects and current City Standard Plans. Critical Elements Following are the elements and benefits of the City of Vernon manageable and living ADA Transition Plan document. The methodology will "ensure quality deliverables that can be delivered within the required time frames and the identified budget". The Access Compliance Survey will provide the City with: • A list of existing accessibility barriers describing each barrier and recommendation of a removal solution • A preliminary cost estimate for removal of each barrier • A priority assigned to each barrier • A schedule for barrier removal • Designation of a person responsible for barrier removal • The ability to "check -off" mitigated barriers • The ability to easily demonstrate steps taken toward removal of all barriers to access SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY The project work will be collaborative between the City of Vernon and Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) staff. Certified Access Specialist Ian Blakey, ICC, CASp will manage the project and be the single point -of -contact with the City of Vernon. SSA will provide all necessary services to perform the following tasks: Task 1 — Project Management Per the RFP, SSA will be responsible for the preparation of meeting agendas, sign -in sheets, recording the meeting minutes and distributing minutes in a timely manner. a. Project Kickoff Meeting: Appropriate City of Vernon staff and SSA will conduct a kickoff meeting to discuss the evaluation that will be performed and the overall form of the ADA Transition Plan, project management and project expectations including: invoicing, progress reports, points of contact, level of detail during the inventory phase and other relevant project information. b. Project Schedule and Monthly Update: SSA will prepare a project schedule that will be updated monthly. C. Programming and Development including Monthly Meetings: Monthly Meetings will be held between City staff and SSA at key milestones during plan development to refine project tasks and schedules and to make sure the project remains on time and within budget. SSA will prepare, update, and provide City staff with a punch list prior to the meeting. d. Monthly Invoicing and Progress Reports: SSA will prepare monthly invoices and progress reports. Task 1— Deliverables: • Project kickoff meeting and meeting summary to be provided by SSA to the City within 2 days after kickoff meeting. • List of points of contacts will be provided at project kickoff meeting. • Meeting agendas to be provided to the City by SSA at least 1 day before scheduled meeting. • Meeting minutes to be provided to the City by SSA within 2 days after scheduled meeting. • Monthly and quarterly progress reports and invoices to be provided to the City by SSA. • Project Schedule to be received monthly. Task 2 — Review and evaluate City's Policies and Programs Per the RFP, this task includes the review and evaluation of current City policies, programs and facilities by SSA that may impact people with disabilities. This includes the review of Citywide activities that involve the public, facilities owned by the City and/or facilities located in the public right-of-way, plans for public infrastructure improvements, current City Standard Plans and programs. SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. 2 GENERAL SCOPE4 a. SSA will hold an Orientation Meeting with Department staff to explain the Self - Evaluation process, procedures and schedule. b. SSA will identify, review and evaluate current City policies, practices and services (estimated departments: 7). C. SSA will prepare reports to document barriers within programs, policies, practices, services and communications. d. SSA will present reports including suggested changes and record feedback from the City's project team. Task 2 — Deliverables: Summary of findings Task 3 — Inventory Report, Classification and Cost Estimates of Non -Compliant Barriers Per the RFP, the Inventory Report will include a visual inventory of City facilities and areas of public right-of-way. The Inventory will include public offices, place of public meetings, parking lots, sidewalks, curb ramps, and transit stops/stations. The field survey will include the collection and documentation of each element found to be inaccessible and/or appears to be noncompliant. City facilities and areas of public right-of-way include but are not limited to the following: Curb Ramps Approximately 1,970 Signalized intersections 42 Centerline miles 49.1 miles Buildings 10 Parks 0 Classification of non -compliant barrier: To assist the City in determining how to prioritize and plan for future projects, once the Inventory Report has been developed, each non -compliant barrier will be classified by severity rating. Prioritized Capital Improvement Program: SSA will develop a Capital Improvement Program based on the severity ratings of each non -compliant barrier to assist the City in prioritizing yearly capital projects. a. SSA will conduct Data Collection at City public rights -of -way — Sidewalk (estimated sidewalk: 100 miles). b. SSA will conduct Data Collection at City public rights -of -way — Curb ramps (estimated curb ramps: 1,970). C. SSA will conduct Data Collection at City public rights -of -way — Pedestrian signals (estimated pedestrian signals: 336). d. SSA will conduct Data Collection at City public rights -of -way — Transit stops (estimated transit stops: 80). e. SSA will conduct Data Collection at City facilities — (estimated buildings: 10). f. SSA will prepare Inventory Reports for City public rights -of -way including Classification and Capital Improvement Program. g. SSA will prepare inventory reports for City facilities including Classification and Capital Improvement Program. r SALLY SWANSON l� ARCHITECTS, INC. SSA will present Public rights -of -way and Facilities Inventory reports and record feedback from the City's project team. Task 3 — Deliverables: Inventory Report which includes the following: -As-built dimensions as it relates to ADA access -Barrier severity classification -Reference to code defining the barrier to access -Proposed solution(s) to eliminate the barrier -Individual detailed cost estimate for each solution -Digital photograph(s) of each barrier to access -Reference drawing/map showing the location of the barrier Development of the classifications and assigning a classification to each non, -compliant barrier. Prioritized Capital Improvement Program. The reports will be submitted as a hardcopy and electronic formats. They will become the property of the City of Vernon for future reference and updated as needed. Task 4 — Development of Draft ADA Transition Plan Per the RFP, SSA will develop a draft ADA Transition Plan for City buildings and public right-of-way based upon guidance from City staff. The Transition Plan will include, but is not limited to the following components: -Background of the ADA requirements -Overview of current standards and best management practices -Inventory Reports and findings of existing facilities -Methodology for prioritization of barrier remediation -Recommendations to obtain and maintain ADA compliance based on classification of barriers -Implementation phasing schedule -Procedures and forms for monitoring implementation a. SSA will develop the Draft ADA Transition Plan including priorities, implementation, schedule and executive summary. b. SSA will present the Draft ADA Transition Plan and Record Feedback from the City's project team. C. SSA will present the Draft ADA Transition Plan and Record Feedback from the City Council. d. SSA will present the Draft ADA Transition Plan and Record Feedback from the Public. Task 4 — Deliverables: • Provide a draft ADA Transition Plan to City for review and comments. • SSA will prepare and deliver a presentation of the Draft ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan to City Council. • Prioritization of all recommended capital projects. • Implementation schedule. SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. r Task 5 — Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Per the RFP, SSA will update the Draft Transition Plan based on the provided comments and provide the Final Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. This Transition Plan will include a section identifying sources of potential funding for the implementation of the proposed Transition Plan. The Final Transition Plan will be submitted in a format that allows for editing as the City moves to become fully accessible. This phase includes the development of a presentation to City Council or to City management. The presentation will include results of field evaluations, findings and recommendations. a. SSA will update the Draft Transition Plan and Develop the Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan including Funding Sources. b. SSA will process the Public rights -of -way Data and integrate into Geographic Information System (GIS). C. SSA will present the Geodatabase and record feedback from the City's project team. d. SSA will incorporate all changes and develop the Final Geodatabase. e. SSA will develop an electronic database or other approved software to monitor and update the barrier removal progress. f. SSA will present the electronic database and record feedback from the City's project team. g. SSA will incorporate all changes and develop the Final Tracking System. h. SSA will attend and present the Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan to City Council for Adoption. Task 5 - Deliverables: • Deliver a Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. • Section on potential funding sources. • Final Database and Project Map — electronic file(s). • SSA will prepare and present a presentation of the Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan to City Council for adoption. Final note on SSA's Proposed Scope of Work Execution Strategy: The strength of any prospective execution strategy is in the structure it provides. SSA's time -tested process has been proven to be immensely successful, but "one size may not fit all." By this we mean we will tailor the specifics to serve the needs and resources of the City of Vernon and its stakeholders, whether that means adapting the schedule/work plan to allow for unforeseen local circumstances or fine-tuning ways to communicate the process with all concerned. SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. ID Task Name Duration start Finish 2019 May Jun Jul Aug Sepl Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1 Task 1. Project Management 174 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 1/31/20 614 2 Anticipated Project Award Date 0 days Tue 6/4/19 Tue 6/4/19 3 Project Kickoff Meeting 9 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 6/14/19 4 Project Schedule and Monthly Update 174 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 1/31/20 5 Programming & Development including Monthly Meetings 174 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 1/31/20 6 Monthly Invoicing & Progress Reports Task 2. Review and Evaluate City's Policies and Programs Orientation Meeting with Department Staff to Explain Self -Evaluation Process, Procedure & Schedule Identify, Review & Evaluate Current City Policies, Practices & Services (Estimated Departments: 7) Completion of Self -Evaluation Prepare Reports to Document Barriers within Programs, Policies, Practices, Services & Communications Completion of Self -Evaluation Reports Present Self -Evaluation Reports & Record Feedback from the City's Project Team Task 3. Inventory Report, Classification and Cost Estimates of Non -Compliant Barriers Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Sidewalk (Estimated Sidewalk: 100 Miles) Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Curb Ramps (Estimated Curb Ramps: 1,970) Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Pedestrian Signals (Estimated Pedestrian Signals: 336) Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Transit Stops (Estimated Transit Stops: 80) Data Collection at City Facilities - (Estimated Buildings: 10) Completion of Public Rights -of -Way Survey & City Facilities Survey Prepare Inventory Reports for City Public Rights -of -Way Prepare Inventory Reports for City Facilities Completion of Public Rights -of -Way and City Facilities Inventory Reports Present Inventory Reports & Record Feedback from the City's Project Team Task 4. Development of Draft ADA Transition Plan Develop the Draft ADA Transition Plan Including Priorities, Implementation, Schedule & Executive Summary Completion of Draft ADA Transition Plan Present the Draft ADA Transition Plan & Record Feedback from the City's Project Team Present the Draft ADA Transition Plan & Record Feedback from the City Council Present the Draft ADA Transition Plan & Record Feedback from the Public Task 5. Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Update Draft Transition Plan & Develop Final ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan Including Funding Sources Completion of Final ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan Process Public Rights of Way Data & Integrate into Geographic Information System (GIS) Completion of Draft Geodatabase Present Geodatabase & Record Feedback from the City's Project Team Incorporate All Changes & Develop Final Geodatabase Completion of Final Geodatabase Develop an Electronic Database or Other Approved Software to Monitor & Update Barrier Removal Progress Completion of Draft Electronic Database Present Electronic Database & Record Feedback from the City's Project Team Incorporate All Changes & Develop Final Tracking System Completion of Final Tracking System 174 days Tue 6/4/19 Fri 1/31/20 7 8 85 days Mon 6/17/19 Fri 10/11/19 10 days Mon 6/17/19 Fri 6/28/19 30 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 8/9/19 0 days Fri 8/9/19 Fri 8/9/19 35 days Mon 7/15/19 Fri 8/30/19 0 days Fri 8/30/19 Fri 8/30/19 30 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 10/11/19 75 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 10/11/19 30 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 8/9/19 30 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 8/9/19 30 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 8/9/19 30 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 8/9/19 30 days Mon 7/1/19 Fri 8/9/19 0 days Fri 8/9/19 Fri 8/9/19 35 days Mon 7/15/19 Fri 8/30/19 35 days Mon 7/15/19 Fri 8/30/19 0 days Fri 8/30/19 Fri 8/30/19 30 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 10/11/19 80 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 12/20/19 50 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 11/8/19 0 days Fri 11/8/19 Fri 11/8/19 30 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 12/20/19 30 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 12/20/19 30 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 12/20/19 110 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 1/31120 50 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 1/17/20 0 days Fri 1/17/20 Fri 1/17/20 50 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 11/8/19 0 days Fri 11/8/19 Fri 11/8/19 30 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 12/20/19 50 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 1/17/20 0 days Fri 1/17/20 Fri 1/17/20 50 days Mon 9/2/19 Fri 11/8/19 0 days Fri 11/8/19 Fri 11/8/19 30 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 12/20/19 50 days Mon 11/11/19 Fri 1/17/20 0 days Fri 1/17/20 Fri 1/17/20 $/9 8130 0 8/9 8/30 0 +1/8 1/17 1118 1/17 +1/a 1/17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 zs z7 z8 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 az a3 44 Attend & Present Final ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan to City Council for Adoption 10 days Mon 1/20/20 Fri 1/31/20 Project: City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan Preliminary Milestone Schedule Task 0 Summary External Milestone ♦ Deadline Split Project Summary ^ Inactive Task Milestone ♦ External Tasks Progress Date: Fri 5/10/19 Sally Swanson Architects Pagel oft CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM SUMMARY The SSA team has been assembled to bring together our qualified staff to successfully fulfill the goals and objectives of the City of Vernon. Our in-house team has decades of expertise and direct experience with conducting ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan projects. CASp staff includes Ian Blakey who is dedicated to the team for the project term. Name Role Responsibilities Sally Swanson, AIA Principal -in -Charge Ms. Swanson will oversee the project team to assure that the necessary resources for the project are accessible to the team and that the City's goals for the project are being met. Ian Blakey, ICC, Project Manager Mr. Blakey will be the day-to-day Project Manager CASp and point -of -contact with the City of Vernon. Michael Paravagna ADA Policy Specialist Mr. Paravagna will evaluate the City of Vernon's policies, procedures and practices; report of findings on discrimination or accessibility issues; prepare compliance recommendations of policy updates; provide staff training. NicoBorchowiec GIS Specialist Ms. Borchoweic will assist with the GIS taskforthe City of Vernon's project. She will be involved with data collection technologies and data integration, analysis of field data, development of required barrier prioritization, and data quality control. Sivaji Muggari, ICC Facilities Surveyor Mr. Muggari will conduct the facility assessments with regard to the ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan throughout the project term. Stefan Voge PROW Surveyor Mr. Voge will monitor the new field assessments/ data collection with regard to the ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan and assist with report production. Various --hnical Various SSA staff will assist with Technical tasks associated with the ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. Percentage Sally Swanson 1% of Project Ian Blakey 10% Commitment Michael Paravagna 6% Nico Borchowiec 13% Sivaji Muggari 6% Stefan Voge 36% Various Technical Staff 28% SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. SALLY SWANSON, AIA Principal -in -Charge License: Architect, CA, 1982, #C12746 Education: M.A. in Urban Design & Planning, Cc Environmental Studies, University of Washingto University of Illinois Experience: Ms. Swanson, Principal of Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. has over 39 years of experience in architecture, planning and accessible design and has managed her own award —winning firm since 1980. Ms. Swanson and her team have provided Transition Plans, Self -Evaluations, cost estimates, preliminary plans, and design and construction documents to help various public clients achieve compliance with Federal and California standards. She has considerable experience working on transition plans for cities and counties throughout the State of California and beyond. Sally Swanson has earned an excellent reputation with these clients, as well as with the Department of General Services, the Division of the State Architect, the California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office, and O.S.H.P.D. She has also assisted many California schools and colleges to obtain available state and local funding. Ms. Swanson is recognized as a leader in access compliance. Working closely with the disabled community, she was instrumental in the development of the building code requirements for California's Title 24 disabled access regulations. She has worked with many of the organizations that helped create and pass the Americans with Disabilities Act. In her design work she strives to enable persons with disabilities while maintaining the architectural integrity of each project she undertakes. Ms. Swanson works closely with all her clients, establishing effective communication that lasts through the life of a project. She helps her clients clearly define their specific needs and future goals, translating this information into a built environment that is both functional and aesthetically pleasing. She works extremely well, not only with her clients, but also with the entire project team, her staff, enforcing agencies, consultants, builders and stakeholder communities. Ms. Swanson was recently appointed a member of the DSA Advisory Board Access subcommittee and named one of the Top 100 Bay Area Woman Business Owners by the San Francisco Business Times. Project Experience: Cities: Emeryville, Alameda, Bellflower, Danville, Lincoln, Lemoore, Monterey, Orinda, Rancho Cordova, Richmond, Sanger, San Carlos, Santa Ana, San Marcos, Santa Clara, Solana Beach, Sunnyvale, Tulare, Turlock, CA; Rio Rancho and Santa Fe, NM; Bend, OR; Mesa, AZ Counties: Kings, Kern, Marin, Mendocino, Placer, San Mateo, Sacramento, Sonoma, Stanislaus, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, CA; Brown County, WI and St. Louis County, MO Special Districts and Transit: California Department of Transportation (CalTrans); Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART); Kings County Association of Governments; Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority; CDCR, Marin Municipal Water District SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. v Ian Blakey, ICC, CASp Project Manager Certifications & Affiliations: International Code Council (ICC) Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner (#8323183); California Certified Access Specialist (CASp #643) Education: Bachelor of Science, Geography, University of Oregon ADA Experience: Mr. Blakey has worked in the field of ADA for his entire career. He is particularly knowledgeable about the California Building Codes, Title 24, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Fair Housing Act regulations. Mr. Blakey's specialization involves the extensive research and coordination necessary to advise consumers, employers, business owners, architects, municipalities and the legal community. He has participated in access consulting for over 100 firms. In addition, Mr. Blakey has surveyed over 1300 facilities for access compliance issues. He has also served in the capacity of Expert Witness with regard to Mediation and Settlement Conference work. Mr. Blakey possesses personal disability knowledge as he combines his expertise in the field of ADA access with his daily observations and practical experience assisting an individual with disabilities — this combination provides a technical and real -world knowledge to his clients. ADA Project Experience: Cities and Counties: City of Mesa, Arizona Special Districts and Transit: California Department of Transportation (CalTrans); Mule Creek State Prison Infill Project ADA checklist, Plymouth, CA Higher Education: San Mateo Community College District, Cerritos Community College District INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL IAN BLAKEY Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner �I ON INTERNATIONAL RN CODE COUNCIL ®DSA TM1is is tov I, Mal Ian Blakey Havine 8iven zatizfadorY eemonRr tl of comnelenre of Me laws ane reg 1Mi mantlatine rwMiscnminalmg access to Me envirommenl by persons wiM eisabllRies. iz —by gr gr sWMs as a Certified Access Specialist SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. Jr n MICHAEL PARAVAGNA Senior Policy Specialist � t,r• Education: M.S. in Rehabilitation Counseling, CSU Sacramento; B.A. in — Psychology/Sociology, CSU San Jose; Graduate of the National Executive Leadership Institute, University of Oklahoma Credentials: California Community College Instructor - Special Education; California Community College Counseling Experience: With 44 years of experience and 13 years of experience with Sally Swanson Architects, Mr. Paravagna has prepared self -evaluation reports of findings and recommendations of policies, procedures and practices as they pertained to respective Title II programs, services and activities. He served in the capacity of a staff trainer for Santa Fe, Richmond, Alameda, Sausalito and Mt San Antonio Community College. As a staff trainer, he trained City staff on the changes in the law as it pertained to employment, communication, policy updates, procedural changes and obligations under the ADA. He led trainings on all aspects of disability civil rights in the delivery of programs, services and activities. Mr. Paravagna serves as manager for the Los Angeles Community College District's ADA implementation program, monitoring accessibility access requirements in a $6.1 billion dollar construction project, rewriting the Self -Evaluations for 9 community college campuses and designing training and guidance documents on a variety of ADA related matters. Other experience includes: served as City-wide ADA Coordinator for Sacramento, California; served as Chief of the California Department of Rehabilitation's Disability Access Section, that was designated by Governor Wilson in 1992 to lead the State's effort in implementation of the ADA; served the California State Architect, as member of the Detectable Warning Advisory Committee and the Certified Access Specialist Program Implementation Committee; was a lead trainer for the World Institute on Disability. Mr. Paravagna serves as trainer for the National Association of ADA Coordinators (NAADAC) at national events and is a member of the Board of Directors for the NAADAC. Recognition and Memberships: • Appointed by Governor Schwarzenegger in May 2008 to California Building Standards Commission, responsible for representing the interests of persons with disabilities in Cali- fornia • Disabled In State Service - Recognition for Outstanding Service Former Member: • California Round Table on Outdoor Recreation and Tourism • California State Historic Building Safety Board • National Rehabilitation Association, East Bay Chapter • California Universal Access Work Group SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. v NICO BORCHOWI GIS Specialist Certifications: San Francisco State University, Geographic Information Science (GIS) Education: Bachelors of Science Degree in Environmental Science with a Minor in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), University of Wisconson-Stout; Associates of Arts and Science (AAS) in Architectural Drafting and Architectural CAD/CADD, Dunwoody College of ; Technology Experience: Nico Borchowiec joined SSA with a background in architectural drafting and GIS mapping. At SSA, Nico specializes in project management, data management and collection processes for ADA Transition Plans. Nico's recent work at SSA includes conducting field surveys for the Cities of Belmont and Sunnyvale, and Alameda County for their ADA Transition Plans. Nico has recently completed a GIS certificate at the San Francisco State University. ADA Project Experience: Special Districts: San Francisco Department of Building Inspection - Ordinance Inspections Cities: Emeryville, Sunnyvale, Oakley, Danville, Elk Grove, CA; Counties: Alameda and Sacramento, CA Stefan Voge PRoW Surveyor Education: Bachelor of Science, Anthropology/Geography, Minor in Spanish, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain — Study Abroad Experience: Mr. Voge is an Access Surveyor with SSA. His technical experience includes an internship in the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Division of a central California municipality in which he collected, 4 updated and analyzed GIS data, as well as created and updated city planning easements and downtown parking plans. Mr. Voge has additional experience analyzing and manipulating spatial data and producing interactive GIS maps. He is also experienced with remote sensing in which he processed, classified, and analyzed digital images and created modified images that displayed the change in water cover over time. Mr. Voge is also skilled at creating research design and methods for conducting a survey; analyzing responses of surveys using statistical software (SPSS) and presenting the results. ADA Project Experience: Cities: City of Mesa, AZ Counties: County of Sacramento and County of Alameda, CA SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. SIVAJI MUGGARI, ICC Facilities Surveyor Certifications: ICC-Cer Education: Master of Science, Construction Management, Cal State University, Fullerton, CA; Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi University, Hyderabad, India Affiliations: Member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) - India Section Experience: Since joining SSA in 2016, Mr. Sivaji has become a specialist in the survey of public right-of-way (PRoW). An educated Civil Engineer, he is highly motivated to pursue the most efficient process for conducting surveys. His knowledge of Risk Management, contract and construction documents, progress reports, supervision of pre -construction and construction activities, and preparation of cost estimates are essential to SSA's business practice. Sivaji's personal attributes of confidence, positivity and an ability to work under pressure make him a proactive team player. Project Experience: Counties: Stanislaus, CA; Sacramento, CA; Alameda, CA Cities: Belmont and Sunnyvale, CA; Rio Rancho, NM; Mesa, AZ Special Districts: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Education: Cerritos College INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL SI AJI RAJA PY UGGARI 77- fn-arn.ir r_r C.A,-C ..c4nramr Ou- -1. —hiiiAid na—dyin iH,e rarlr!f#r 4.1 �o-ts�oca¢i.} drsn li,i I 4�o q dF.s req.,rTA A e1r 7nae m-Im..1 Cade C'..I I111 Liv—ILifi.Ur;rnrFl,r 9Ihr flied -We. i 6+ 9oil jades uair d`OhYa then in eff -r. and A Al —hp i.r,eed Ale l— fianri—� Accessibility Inspectorlplans Examiner ,Gi& Ln duq d�i'v 4r Jumary 19_ N I & C—Lir Ee Nr.. HSMH" Il` ahJ .iL B—d A U.re ..., SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. + � j REFERENCES Client: City of Emeryville Project Type: ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan; ADA Surveys; Transition Plan Updates Contact: Ryan O'Connell, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer City of Emeryville, Public Works 510.596.4346 roconnell@emeryville.org Client: City of Salinas, CA Project Type: Access Surveys & Reports; ADA Transition Plan & Self -Evaluation; ADA Upgrades; ADA Training Workshops; On -Call Access Consulting Contact: Eda Herrera, Public Works Director City of Salinas City Hall 831.758.7438 eda@ci.salinas.ca.us Client: City of Richmond, CA Project Type: ADA Self -Evaluation; ADA Transition Plan Contact: Bruce Soublet, Assistant City Attorney City of Richmond City Hall 510.620.6509 bruce soublet@ci.richmond.ca.us Client: City of San Marcos, CA Project Type: ADA Transition Plan & Self -Evaluation Contact: Julie Magee, Acting City Manager City of San Marcos 760.744.1050 jmagee@san-marcos.net Client: City of Bellflower, CA Project Type: ADA Transition Plan & Self -Evaluation; Staff Training Contact: Catherine J. Jun, Management Analyst II City of Bellflower 562.804.1424 ext. 2270 cjun@bellflower.org SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. City of Emeryville ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan; Barrier Surveys and Transition Plan Update Location Date of Project Emeryville, CA 2017 - Present Type of Project: ADA Transition Plan & Self -Evaluation Barrier Surveys Transition Plan Updates Project Value: Estimated: $154,790 Final: Project On -going Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, Principal -in -Charge Nico Borchoweic, Project Manager Owner: City of Emeryville, Public Works 1333 Park Ave, Emeryville, CA 94608 Contact: Ryan O'Connell, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer 510.596.4346 roconnell@emeryville.org Scope of Work/ Project Description: SSA is currently conducting a Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan forthe City of EmeryviIle Previously, SSA conducted two series of ADA compliance surveys for the City of Emeryville in SF's East Bay: in 2001 and again in 2009. Both surveys covered the City's Public Rights -of -Way, which now runs 15.36 miles and includes 398 corners requiring accessible ramps. SSA updated the City's ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan which included ADA compliance review of the City's streets, sidewalks and curbs. SSA also provided access compliance design services for the City of Emeryville Corporation Yard. SSA designed and prepared plans and specificiations to ensure the building complied with all accessibility requirements for the disabled community. SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. r i` City of Salinas ADA Transition Plan Location: Salinas, CA Date of Project: 2014 - Present Type of Project: Access Surveys & Reports ADA Transition Plan & Self -Evaluation ADA Upgrades ADA Training Workshops On -call Consultant Project Value: Estimated: $52,227 Final: Project On -going Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, Principal -in -Charge Ian Blakey, Project Manager Shao Chen, Surveyor Owner: City of Salinas City Hall, Public Works 200 Lincoln Ave, Salinas, CA 93901 Contact: Eda Herrera, Public Works Director 831.758.7438 eda@ci.salinas.ca.us Scope of Work/ Project Description: SSA currently has an on -call access contaract with the City of Salinas. SSA prepared a Transition Plan Update for the City of Salinas that was in need of significant updates to meet current ADA Standards. Many of the City's properties/facilities were analyzed and assessed in the current Plan. Secondly, the City has purchased new properties and developed park areas that needed to be analyzed to determine if upgrades were to meet minimum accessibility requirements. The City's sidewalk system (including pedestrian access ramps) 260 miles of public streets in Salinas that were analyzed for compliance. Assisting with self -evaluation of policies, buildings and public right-of-way deficiencies, and to develop a new City of Salinas ADA transition plan. SSA also provided training workshops regarding mainte- nance, emergency management and accessibility aware- ness. SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. City of Richmond ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Location: City of Richmond Contra Costa County, CA Date of Project: 2008 - Present (On -Call) Type of Project: ADA Self -Evaluation ADA Transition Plan Project Value: Estimated: $298,950 Final: Project On -going Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, Principal -in -Charge Shao Chen, Project Manager Owner: City of Richmond City Hall 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA 94804 Contact: Bruce Soublet, Assistant City Attorney 510.620.6509 bruce_soublet@ci.richmond.ca.us Scope of Work/ Project Description: Commencing in 2008, SSA assisted the City of Richmond with a comprehensive update of its ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan. This included a thorough review and upgrade of the City's Emergency Management Plan. SSA also assisted the Richmond City Attorney's Office with an ongoing settlement agreement pertaining to City-wide ADA issues. Unique Challenges: City-wide PROW + Emergency Services. Outcome / Solutions: 1. Synchronize barrier mitigation with pavement management program. 2. Identify items to be included into recurring maintenance work schedule. 3. Provide on -going technical assistance to City Attorney's office. MM SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. City of San Marcos ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Location: City of San Marcos, CA County of San Diego Date of Project: 2010-2012; Type of Project: ADA Self -Evaluation ADA Transition Plan Project Value: $249,248 Project Relevance: Surveys of pedestrian facilities within the public rights -of -way, and programs within City parks and buildings. Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, Principal -in -Charge Owner: City of San Marcos 1 Civic Center Dr, San Marcos, CA 92069 Contact: Julie Magee Acting City Manager 760. 744. 1050 JMagee@san-marcos.net Description: Previously, SSA assisted the City in conducting surveys of pedestrian facilities within the public rights -of -way using sidewalk profiling technology as well as programs within City parks and buildings. Currently, SSA is providing the city ADA on -call services. Outcome: The surveys identified physical barriers in each facility that limit accessibility and compared the facility to State Building Codes and ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). SSA also analyzed 117 bus stops for ADA deficiencies. A review of City documents, that includes public policy issues, evaluated current levels of program accessibility. L SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. City of Bellflower Revised and Restated ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Location: Bellflower, CA Date of Project: 2015 Type of Project: ADA Self -Evaluation ADA Transition Plan Staff Training Project Value: $75,000 Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, Principal -in -Charge Shao Chen, Surveyor Owner: City of Bellflower 16600 Civic Center Dr, Bellflower, CA 90706 Contact: Catherine J. Jun Management Analyst II Public Works Department 562.804.1424 ext. 2270 cjun@bellflower.org Project Description: SSA performed and delivered a revised and restated ADA Self - Evaluation and Transition Plan for the City of Bellflower's facilities, public rights -of -way, programs, and policies. The nature of the scope of work was to ensure the City is in compliance with the Title II of the ADA, including specifically, Section 35.150(d) in conducting a self -evaluation and preparing an updated transition plan. The elements included ADA Self -Evaluation; Barrier Asssessment; A revised and Restated ADA Self -Evaluation and Assessment Plan; Public Participation and Outreach; Project Database and Mapping; and City Staff Training. SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals EXHIBIT A AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } COUNTY OF } Sally Swanson being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That helshe is the CEO (Title of office if a corporation, 'sole owner,' 'Partner,'orotherpropertitle) of Sally Swanson Architects, Inc_ (hereinafter called 'Contractor') who has submitted to the City of Vernon a Bid for the construction of the AAA Evaluation & Transition Plan; 2. That said Bid is genuine; that the same is not sham; that all statements of fact therein are true; 3. That said Bid is not made in the interest or behalf of any person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation not named or disclosed; 4. That Contractor did not, directly or indirectly induce, solicit, agree, collude, conspire or contrive with anyone else to submit a false or sham bid, to refrain from bidding, or withdraw his/her bid, to raise or fix the Bid price of Contractor or of anyone else, or to raise or fix any overhead profit, or cost element of Contractor's price or the price of anyone else; and did not attempt to induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of Vernon, or of any other Bidder, or anyone else interested in the proposed Contract; 5. That the Contractor has not in any manner sought by collusion to secure for himself an advantage over any other Bidders or induce action prejudicial to the interests of the City of Vernon or of any other Bidder, or anyone else interested in the proposed Contract; 6. That the Contractor has not accepted any bid from any Subcontractor or material supplier through any bid depository, the bylaws, rules or regulations of which prohibit or prevent the Contractor from considering any bid from any Subcontractor or material supplier, which is not processed through said bid depository, or which prevent any Subcontractor or material supplier from bidding to any Contractor who does not use the facilities of or accept bids from or through such bid depositary; 11! !I! !I! !I! !I! SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. City of Vernon ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Request for Proposals 111 1/1 1/1 7. That the Contractor rid not, directly or indirectly, submit the Contractors Bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any i ndividua] or group of i ndividuals, except to the City of Vernon, or to any person or persons who have partnership or other financial interest with said Contractor in hislher business. I ded are under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this day at 8th of May Burbank CA Month/Year City State Sally Swanson Contractor (Please Print) Contractor's Signature CEO & Principal -in -Charge Title CONTRACTOR'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED SALLY SWINC ARCHITECTSTS,, INC. EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE 21 CITY OF VERNON - ADA SELF -EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN - COST PROPOSAL - SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. (SSA) Tasks Labor ODC's Total Task # Task Description p Principal- in -Charge Project Manager ADA Policy Specialist Facility Surveyor GIS Specialist PROW Surveyor Technical Staff Total Hours Total Labor Costs Other Direct Costs Total Fee Sally Swanson Ian Blakey Michael Parava na Sivaji Muggari Nico Borchowiec Stefan Vo e Various Car & Gas (Weekly Rate $300@ Car & Gas (Daily Rate $g5@ Meals & Incidental Exp (daily Rate @ $20) Profiler (Monthly Rate @ $4 500) Hard Co Copy Printing ($Sheet)er $225 $155 $140 $120 $95 $80 $80 1 Project Management a. Project Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 6 $1,040.00 $65.00 $1,105.00 b. Project Schedule and Monthly Update 16 16 $2,480.00 $2,480.00 c. Programming & Development including Monthly Meetings 16 16 $2,480.00 $520.00 $3,000.00 d. Monthly Invoicing & Progress Reports 16 16 $2,480.00 $2,480.00 Subtotal: 2 50 2 0 0 0 0 54 $8,480.00 $0.00 $585.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,065.00 2 Review and Evaluate Cit 's Policies and Programs a. Orientation Meeting with Department Staff to Explain Self -Evaluation Process, Procedure & Schedule 4 4 8 $1,180.00 $65.00 $1,245.00 b. Identify, Review & Evaluate Current City Policies, Practices & Services Estimated Departments: 7 2 24 40 66 $6,870.00 $130.00 $40.00 $7,040.00 c. Prepare Reports to Document Barriers within Programs, Policies, Practices, Services & Communications 1 2 24 40 67 $7,095.00 $7,095.00 d. Present Reports Including Suggested Changes & Record Feedback from the Cit 's Project Team 2 2 1 4 $590.00 $590.00 Subtotal: 1 10 54 0 0 0 80 145 $15,735.00 $0.00 $195.00 $40.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,970.00 3 Inventory Report, Classification and Cost Estimates of Non -Compliant Barriers a. Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Sidewalk Estimated Sidewalk: 100 Miles 2 2 160 164 $13,300.00 $1,200.00 $400.00 $4,500.00 $19,400.00 b. Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Curb Ramps Estimated Curb Ramps: 1,970 2 2 240 244 $19,700.00 $1,800.00 $600.00 $22,100.00 c. Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Pedestrian Signals Estimated Pedestrian Signals: 336 2 2 40 44 $3,700.00 $300.00 $100.00 $4,100.00 d. Data Collection at City Public Rights -of -Way - Transit Stops Estimated Transit Stops: 80 2 2 40 44 $3,700.00 $300.00 $100.00 $4,100.00 e. Data Collection at City Facilities - Estimated Buildings: 10 2 80 82 $9,910.00 $600.00 $200.00 $10,710.00 f. Prepare Inventory Reports for City Public Rights -of -Way Including Classification & Capital Improvement Program 1 2 2 2 80 87 $7,285.00 $7,285.00 g. Prepare Inventory Reports for City Facilities Including Classification & Capital Improvement Program 1 2 2 40 45 $3,975.00 $3,975.00 h. Present PRoW & Facilities Inventory Reports & Record Feedback from the City's Project Team 2 2 $310.00 $1,250.00 $1,560.00 Subtotal: 2 16 0 82 10 482 120 712 $61,880.00 $4,200.00 $0.00 $1,400.00 $4,500.00 $1,250.00 $73,230.00 4 Development of Draft ADA Transition Plan a. Develop the Draft ADA Transition Plan Including Priorities, Implementation, Schedule & Executive Summary 2 8 80 90 $8,090.00 $8,090.00 b. Present the Draft ADA Transition Plan & Record Feedback from the Cit 's Project Team 2 2 4 $590.00 $65.00 $655.00 c. Present the Draft ADA Transition Plan & Record Feedback from the City Council 2 2 4 8 $910.00 $65.00 $975.00 d. Present the Draft ADA Transition Plan & Record Feedback from the Public 16 16 32 $4,720.00 $65.00 $4,785.00 Subtotal: 2 28 20 0 0 0 84 134 $14,310.00 $0.00 $195.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,505.00 5 Final ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan a. Update Draft Transition Plan & Develop Final ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan Including Funding Sources 1 8 40 49 $4,665.00 $4,665.00 b. Process Public Rights of Way Data & Integrate into Geographic Information System (GIS) 2 120 122 $11,710.00 $11,710.00 c. Present Geodatabase & Record Feedback from the Cit 's Project Team 2 2 4 $500.00 $500.00 d. Incorporate All Changes & Develop Final Geodatabase 2 40 42 $4,110.00 $4,110.00 e. Develop an Electronic Database or Other Approved Software to Monitor and Update Barrier Removal Progress 2 24 26 $2,230.00 $2,230.00 f. Present Electronic Database & Record Feedback from the Cit 's Project Team 2 2 4 $470.00 $470.00 oil q. Incorporate All Chan es & Develop Final Tracking System 2 16 18 $1,590.00 $1,590.00 h. Attend & Present Final ADA Self -Evaluation & Transition Plan to City Council for Adoption 4 4 8 16 $1,820.00 $65.00 $1,885.00 Subtotal: 1 24 4 0 162 0 901 281 $27,095.00 $0.00 $65.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27,160.00 Grand Total: 1 81 1281 801 821 1721 4821 3741 1326 $127,500.00 $4,200.001 $1,040.001 $1,440.001 $4,500.001 $1,250.001 $139,930.00 SSA, Inc. 5/10/2019 EXHIBIT D LIVING WAGE PROVISIONS Minimum Living Wages: A requirement that Employers pay qualifying employees a wage of no less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. Paid and Unpaid Days Off: Employers provide qualifying employees at least twelve compensated days off per year for sick leave, vacation, or personal necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. No Retaliation: A prohibition on employer retaliation against employees complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Employees may bring an action in Superior Court against an employer for back pay, treble damages for willful violations, and attorney's fees, or to compel City officials to terminate the service contract of violating employers. 22 EXHIBIT E EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES PROVISIONS A. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Agreement, the contractor and each subcontractor shall adhere to equal opportunity employment practices to assure that applicants and employees are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex, or age. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. B. Contractor agrees that it shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for applicants for employment placed by or on behalf of Contractor, state that it is an "Equal Opportunity Employer" or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex or age. C. Contractor agrees that it shall, if requested to do so by the City, certify that it has not, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminated against applicants or employees because of their membership in a protected class. D. Contractor agrees to provide the City with access to, and, if requested to do so by City, through its awarding authority, provide copies of all of its records pertaining or relating to its employment practices, except to the extent such records or portions of such records are confidential or privileged under state or federal law. E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as to require or permit any act which is prohibited by law. 23 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-374-2019 Submitted by: Felix Velasco Submitting Department: Public Works Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Reject all Bids Received for City Contract No. CS-1055: Remodel of 3361 Fruitland Avenue Recommendation: A. Find that the subject Capital Improvement Project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities, part (a), because the project is merely to make interior or exterior alterations involving partitions, phxmbing, and electrical conveyances; and B. Reject all bid proposals received for City Contract No. CS-1055: Remodel of 3361 Fruitland Avenue. Background: On April 17, 2019, the Public Works Department advertised the notice inviting sealed, competitive bids for the renovations of the single family home located at 3361 Fruitland Avenue ("the Property). The specifications included the standard terms and conditions for the contract that have been approved by the City Council The bid proposals for City Contract No. CS-1055 Remodel of 3361 Fruitland Avenue, were received and opened on May 2, 2019. The calculated bid results were as follows: SS+K Construction $298,200 C-1 Construction Corp. $373,600 Interior Plus $411,753 Since the lowest bid received of $298,200 exceeds the budgeted amount of $150,000, the Public Works Department recommends that all bids be rejected. The Notice Inviting Bids was for a complete remodel of the Property similar to the recent remodels completed at other City -owned dwellings. The Public Works Department will seek to re-evaluate the need for a complete remodel at the Property and reduce the scope of work to complete the recommended repairs and be able to lease the unit to the public. Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact is associated with the rejection of all bid proposals received for City Contract No. CS- 1055. ATTACHMENTS City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-383-2019 Submitted by: Diana Figueroa Submitting Department: City Administration Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County Recommendation: A. Find that the approval of Amendment No. 1 with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA') review, because it is an administrative action that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and, therefore, does not constitute a "project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County ("LA County Fire'), in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, for an amount not -to -exceed $100,000; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 1 with LA County Fire for the purpose of initiating a Municipal Services Review to be performed by the Los Angeles County Local Agency Formation Corns ission ("LAFCO'). Background: On September 19, 2018, City Council authorized the City Administrator to enter into negotiations with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County ("LA County Fire'). Following City Council's authorization, in October 2018, the City Administrator executed a Reimbursement Agreement in the amount of $24,000 with LA County Fire to conduct a comprehensive conversion cost survey. LA County Fire began a lengthy, detailed survey of Vernon Fire's infrastructure, equipment, vehicles, training, and communications (among other things), and assessed the compatibility of each with the LA County Fire operation. City Council determined a direction for the Fire Department at its August 6, 2019 meeting that allowed City staff to proceed with the preparation of Fire Department transition to the Los Angeles County Fire District for the provision of fire protection, paramedic, and incidental services in the City of Vernon. City Council took a large step forward in their approval of an agreement that will transition Vernon Fire Services to a Los Angeles County Fire Service model. The process to facilitate this transfer will be a fairly lengthy one, as there are a number of steps that still remain on the horizon prior to the conversion taking effect. One of the immediate next steps for the City includes a Municipal Services Review ('MSR'). The MSR is a requirement of LAFCO who will ultimately authorize the annexation of Vernon into the Los Angeles County Fire District. Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with LA County Fire will allow for the commencement of the MSR. The City anticipated the expense associated to the performance of the MSR and did include this expenditure in its analysis of cost estimates for the LA County Fire model. A third party consultant will be selected via a Request for Proposals ('RFP') process conducted by LAFCO who will carry out the review in accordance to LAFCO's specific requirements. The review process is estimated to take anywhere from 4- 6 months to be finalized by the consultant. An MSR is a necessary component of the LAFCO evaluation process and must be completed prior to the submission of the City/LA County Fire application to the agency to request annexation. With City Council's recent adoption of Resolution 2019-29, the City Administrator will diligently proceed with all remaining steps to affect a smooth transition to LA County Fire for the provision of Fire Services in Vernon. Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with LA County Fire, which has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorneys Office, will enable the City to take an important step in the conversion process. Fiscal Impact: Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement with LA County Fire is not -to -exceed $100,000, with a total contract value not -to -exceed $124,000. City staff estimates that the cost for a consultant to perform the Municipal Services Review on behalf of LAFCO will be approximately $75,000. This amount has been included in the proposed Fire budget for FY 2019/2020. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Amendment No. 1 to Reimbursement Agreement with LA County Fire • 2. LA County Fire Transition Process in Brief 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMENDMENT NO. 1 AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND THE CITY OF VERNON This is the first AMENDMENT to the Reimbursement Agreement dated October 10, 12018, between the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, hereinafter referred to as the "FIRE DISTRICT," and the City of Vernon, hereinafter referred to as the I "CITY". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the CITY and the FIRE DISTRICT are in negotiations for the FIRE DISTRICT's provision of fire protection, hazardous materials, emergency medical, and all related services (collectively hereinafter referred to as "fire services") to the CITY; WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has determined that a municipal service review (MSR) is required before annexation of the CITY to the FIRE DISTRICT can be considered by LAFCO; and WHEREAS, the CITY is interested in proceeding as expeditiously as possible through the negotiations process, and to position the CITY to annex into the FIRE DISTRICT as quickly as possible should their CITY COUNCIL opt to do so. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1) The FIRE DISTRICT will request LAFCO to proceed with the MSR as soon as possible. 2) The CITY will be responsible for the cost of the MSR, not to exceed $100,000. While LAFCO has indicated that it estimates the CITY's cost would be $75,000, the actual cost is not known at this time. 3) Upon receiving an invoice for the MSR from LAFCO, the CITY shall make payment directly to LAFCO for the invoiced cost of the MSR (not to exceed $100,000) within 30 calendar days. W 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4) All other terms and conditions of the Reimbursement Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by each Party on the day and year written below, and is effective and operative upon the date that it is fully executed by both parties whichever date of execution by either party is later. CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY By Daryl L. Osby, Fire Chief DATE APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARY C. WICKHAM County Counsel By Christina Angeles, Principal Deputy FlPlanningjVernonl Vemon Reimbursement Agmt — Amend #1 (7-16-2019) CITY OF VERNON By Carlos R. Fandino, Jr., City Administrator ATTEST: By Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Hema Patel, City Attorney -2- � oe osapo o� ° FIRE Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (Fire District) t Feasibility Study Process in Brief 4RT Step 1 City City Council requests proposal for services from the Fire District. Step 2 Fire District Provides a questionnaire to the City to complete. Step 3 City Completes questionnaire and returns to the Fire District. Step 4 Fire District Evaluates information provided by the City. If it appears there are mutual benefits, prepares a feasibility study for the Board of Supervisors' consideration. If there are no apparent benefits, notifies the City that a Fire District contract is not viable. Step 5 Board of Reviews feasibility study and if supported, authorizes the Fire Chief Supervisors of the Fire District to provide a copy of the study to the City and to commence negotiations if the City requests to continue the process. Step 6 City Considers results of the feasibility study and determines if the City would like to proceed with negotiations. If so, the City Council must execute a Reimbursement Agreement for the surveying of City facilities/ equipment/vehicles (cost is $12,000 for the first station, and $6,000 for every fire station in the city thereafter; for example 3 stations would be $24,000) and other miscellaneous costs. Step 7 City & District Proceed with negotiations of a service agreement. The Fire District will survey City Fire Dept. vehicles, equipment, and facilities and provide an estimated "conversion" cost to the City during negotiations. Step 8 City Council Approve negotiated service agreement and any other documents required to proceed with annexation to the Fire District. Step 9 Board Makes application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the annexation of the City to the Fire District. Step 10 LAFCO Considers annexation application, holds a public hearing, and approves the annexation. Provides a certificate of completion for the annexation on a date mutually acceptable to the City and the Fire District. Step 11 Board of Approves the service agreement with the City. Supervisors Step 12 Fire District Transition service to Fire District service. and City At any step, a city can unilaterally opt to stop the process. However, if a city were to terminate the process after initiating negotiations, it would be obligated to pay any amounts owed pursuant to the reimbursement agreement. Rev. Sept. 2018 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-361-2019 Submitted by: Adriana Ramos Submitting Department: Fire Department Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement between the City of Vernon and JSB Fire Protection, LLC Recommendation: A. Find that the approval proposed action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA') review, because it is an administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a `project" as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; and B. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement with JSB Fire Protection, LLC, (Contract No. FD-0224), in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, increasing the existing not -to -exceed amount of $78,000.00 by an additional $85,000.00, for a total contract value of $163,000.00; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 1 with JSB Fire Protection, LLC to cover the cost of anticipated fire plan checks through the remainder of the contract term. Background: On August 1, 2017, the City of Vernon entered into a three-year services agreement with JSB Fire Protection, LLC. ("JSB'), (Contract No. FD-0224), to provide On -Call Fire Protection Systems Plan Check Services. The three-year contract amount was set at a not -to -exceed amount of $78,000.00. That service contract is set to expire on July 31, 2020. The Vernon Fire Department is responsible for ensuring that fire protection and life safety systems are maintained in the City. At the time when the City entered into the services agreement with JSB, staff projected a fiscal cost of $26,000.00 per year, since in fiscal year 2016/17 the cost ofplan checks was $26,780.85 and $42,567.49 was collected in revenues. Over the last two fiscal years, there has been a vast increase in fire plan checks, particularly in fire alarm systems, fire sprinklers systems, and high pile storage due to new projects in warehousing and storage facilities. While the increase of fire plan checks resulted in an increase in the revenue collected in plan check fees, the increase also caused the funds allocated for this agreement to have depleted in less than two fiscal years. During fiscal year 2017/18, there was a cost of $37,244.80 in plan checks. During fiscal year 2018/19, the plan check cost went up to $49,646.70. The high volume of fire plan checks is reflective through the revenue budget, which substantiates that during the 2017/18 fiscal year, $74,311.41 was collected in plan check fees and in the 2018/19 fiscal year, $86,099.70 was collected in plan check fees. Based on the fire plan check services cost over the last two fiscal years and with the recent retirement of the department's Senior Fire Code Inspector, staff is proposing to add an additional $85,000.00 to cover the cost of anticipated plan checks through the end of the contract. Amendment No. 1 would increase the contract cost from $78,000.00 to $163,000.00. Pursuant to Vernon Municipal Code Section 2.17.02(B), since the total contract dollar amount would be in excess of $100,000.00, the proposed amendment requires approval from City Council Therefore, the Fire Department respectfully recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Services Agreement with JSB to increase funds to the contract, as this will cover anticipated fire plan check costs through the end of the service contract which expires on July 31, 2020. With the recent approval of an agreement with the Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County ("LA County Fire'), when the transition to LA County Fire occurs, the City can terminate its services with JSB upon fifteen (15) calendar days' written notice to JSB pursuant to Section 10.17 of the services agreement. The amendment has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's office. Fiscal cal Impact: Amendment No. 1 would increase the agreement amount by $85,000.00, resulting in a new total contract amount of $163,000.00. Funds for this agreement have been proposed in the 2019/20 fiscal year budget. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Amendment No 1 - JSB Services Agreement AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND JSB FIRE PROTECTION, LLC REGARDING ON -CALL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS PLAN CHECK SERVICES This Amendment ("Amendment No. 1 ") to that certain Agreement for on -call fire protection systems plan check services dated August 1, 2017, (the "Agreement"), is made as of , 2019 by and between the City of Vernon, a California charter city and municipal corporation (the "City"), and JSB Fire Protection, LLC ("Contractor"), a limited liability company. WHEREAS, the City and Contractor are parties to a written Agreement dated August 1, 2017, under which Contractor provides on -call fire protection systems plan check services; and WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to amend the Agreement to increase the total not to exceed amount by an additional $85,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Amendment No. I agree as follows: 1. Effective as of , 2019, the total amount not to exceed for the period of August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2020 shall not exceed a total amount of $163,000.00. 2. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. The provisions of this Amendment No. 1 shall constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter included in this Amendment No. I and shall supersede any other agreement, understanding, or arrangement, whether written or oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Amendment No. I, with the exception of joint representation and/or conflict waiver agreements related to matters handled by Contractor. 4. The person or persons executing this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of each of the parties warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Amendment No. 1 on behalf of that party and has the authority to bind that party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment No. I as of the date stated in the introductory clause. [SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE] CITY OF VERNON, a California charter city and municipal corporation Carlos Fandino, City Administrator ATTEST: JSB Fire Protection, LLC, a limited liability company By: Name: Title: By: Name: Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Zaynah Moussa, Senior Deputy City Attorney -2- City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-359-2019 Submitted by: Brandon Araujo Submitting Department: Public Works Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Award of a Professional Services Agreement to Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the proposed action is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA') in accordance with Section 15306, because the scope of the agreement consists of research and analysis, which will not result in a serious or major disturbance to any environmental resource and which will not commit the City to any project; and B. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. ("Mott MacDonald'), in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, for Technical, Engineering, and Environmental Impact Report ('EM) Documents Review Services for the California. High -Speed Rail Project; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Professional Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $155,875.50 for Phase I of the Agreement and in an amount not to exceed $228,895.37 for Phase II of the Agreement, for a total cost of $384,770.87. Background: The California. High -Speed Rail Authority ("Authority) is responsible for the planning, design, construction and operation of a statewide high speed train system which, when constructed, will be capable of reaching speeds of 220 miles per hour. At ultimate build out, the system would extend from Sacramento to San Diego for a distance of about 800 miles, with up to 24 stations at full build out. The initial segment, from Merced to Fresno, is currently under construction. The other three corridors listed below are in the Environmental/Engineering study phase: 1) Fresno to Bakersfield 2) Los Angeles to Anaheim 3) San Francisco to San Jose The Authority is currently proposing that the segment from Los Angeles to Anaheim be constructed along the existing Burlington Northern Santa Fe corridor which passes through the City of Vernon. To aid the City in reviewing the technical, engineering, and other related documents release by the Authority, staff seeks the assistance of a third -party consultant that specializes in the design of high-speed rail systems. The City Administrator authorized issuance of the Request for Proposals ("RFP") for Professional Services on or around March 12, 2019 and the City issued the RFP soon thereafter. The City advertised the RFP on its website. In addition, pursuant to Section 2.17.15 of the Vernon Municipal Code, six firms that specialize in reviewing similar documents were directly notified of the RFP. Mott MacDonald responded to the RFP on or around April 11, 2019. It was the only proposal the City received. Upon review of Mott MacDonald's proposal, a reference check, and the City's experience working with Mott MacDonald on the California High Speed Technical Advisory Connnittee, Public Works staffrecomrnend the selection of Mott MacDonald for this Professional Services Agreement. The Professional Services Agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney's office. Fiscal Impact: The total cost of the Professional Services Agreement is $384,770.87. The total cost is divided into two phases. The cost of the first phase is $155,875.50. This cost is fully reimbursable by the California High -Speed Rail Authority in accordance with Agreement No. HSR15-191 al executed on June 25, 2019. This amount is included in the City's 2019-2020 proposed budget. The cost of the second phase is $228,895.37 and is an additive item at the City's option. This cost is not reimbursable by the California High -Speed Rail Authority. This amount can be included in the City's 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 budgets if the City elects to pursue this phase of the agreement. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Professional Services Agreement with Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND MOTT MACDONALD GROUP, INC. FOR TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND EIR DOCUMENTS REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT Contractor: Responsible Principal of Contractor: Notice Information - Contractor: Notice Information - City: Commencement Date: Termination Date: Consideration: COVER PAGE Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. Daniel Tempelis, Senior Vice President Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. 1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attention: Richard Carney, Project Manager Phone: (818) 506-8088 Facsimile: (818) 506-8044 City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: Daniel Wall Director of Public Works Telephone: (323) 583-8811 ext. 305 Facsimile: (323) 826-1435 August 20, 2019 August 19, 2022 Phase I: Total not to exceed $155,875.50 (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit C-1 Phase II (Additive): Total not to exceed $228,895.37 (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit C-2 Records Retention Period Three (3) years, pursuant to Section 11.20 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND MOTT MACDONALD GROUP, INC. FOR TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND EIR DOCUMENTS REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT This Contract is made between the City of Vernon ("City"), a California charter City and California municipal corporation ("City"), and Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Contractor") The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1.0 EMPLOYMENT OF CONTRACTOR. City agrees to engage Contractor to perform the services as hereinafter set forth as authorized by the City Council on June 4, 2019. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. 2.1 Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the Request for Proposals ("RFP") issued on or about March 14, 2019, Exhibit "A", and Contractor's proposal to the City ("Proposal") dated April 11, 2019, Exhibit "B", both of which are attached to and incorporated into this Contract, by reference. 2.2 All services shall be performed to the satisfaction of City. 2.3 All services shall be performed in a competent, professional manner, and in accordance with the prevailing industry standards for such services performed under similar circumstances at the time, and in the general vicinity where the services are performed ("Standard of Care") 3.0 PERSONNEL. 3.1 Contractor represents that it employs, or will employ, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Contract. 3.2 Contractor shall not subcontract any services to be performed by it under this Contract without prior written approval of City. 3.3 All of the services required hereunder will be performed by Contractor or by City -approved subcontractors. Contractor, and all personnel engaged in the work, shall be fully qualified and authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services and shall be subject to approval by the City. 2 4.0 TERM. The term of this Contract shall commence on August 20, 2019, and it shall continue until August 19, 2022 unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions thereof. 5.0 COMPENSATION AND FEES. 5.1 Contractor has established rates for the City of Vernon which are comparable to and do not exceed the best rates offered to other governmental entities in and around Los Angeles County for the same services. For satisfactory and timely performance of the services, the City will pay Contractor in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Exhibits "C-1" and "C-2" for Phases I and II of the RFP, respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5.2 Contractor's grand total compensation for the performance of Phase I of the RFP for the entire term of this Contract, shall not exceed $155,875.50 without the prior authorization of the City, as appropriate, and written amendment of this Contract. Contractor's grand total compensation for the performance of Phase 11 of the RFP, an additive item initiated at the City's option, for the entire term of this Contract, shall not exceed $228,895.37 without the prior authorization of the City, as appropriate, and written amendment of this Contract. 5.3 Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all necessary and incidental labor, material, supplies, facilities, equipment, and transportation which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Contract. Materials shall be of the highest quality. The above Contract fee shall include all staff time and all clerical, administrative, overhead, insurance, reproduction, telephone, air travel, auto rental, subsistence, and all related costs and expenses. 5.4 City shall reimburse Contractor only for those costs or expenses specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by Contractor: 3 5.4.1 The actual costs of subcontractors for performance of any of the services that Contractor agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with this Agreement. 5.4.2 Approved reproduction charges. 5.4.3 Actual costs and/or other costs and/or payments specifically authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. 5.5 Contractor shall not receive any compensation for extra work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "extra work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized extra work shall be paid in accordance with the payment schedule as set forth in Exhibits "C-1" and/or "C-2," whichever is applicable, if the extra work has been approved by the City. 5.6 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services by this Agreement. 6.0 PAYMENT. 6.1 As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to the City an invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses, and authorized extra work actually performed or incurred according to said schedule. 6.2 Each such invoice shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including a detailed description of the services completed, the number of hours spent, reimbursable expenses incurred and any extra work performed. 4 6.3 Contractor shall also submit a progress report with each invoice that describes in reasonable detail the services and the extra work, if any, performed in the immediately preceding calendar month. 6.4 Contractor understands and agrees that invoices which lack sufficient detail to measure performance will be returned and not processed for payment. 6.5 City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days after the City approves the invoice. 6.6 Payment of such invoices shall be payment in full for all services, authorized costs, and authorized extra work covered by that invoice. 6.7 Invoices shall include the following information: 1) Names of the Contractor's personnel performing work 2) Dates of project work 3) All costs shall be assigned to a Task. Itemized costs shall include identification of each employee or subcontractor staff that provided services during the period of the invoice, the number of hours and hourly rates for each employee or subcontractor staff member, authorized travel expenses with receipts, receipts for authorized materials or supplies, and subcontractor invoices. 4) The Contractor shall submit written progress reports with each set of invoices to allow the City to determine if the Contractor is performing to expectations, is on schedule, is within funding cost limitations, to communicate interim findings, and to afford occasions for airing difficulties respecting special problems encountered so that remedies can be developed. 7.0 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY. City shall cooperate with Contractor as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor to perform its services; and will give any required decisions as promptly as practicable so as to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Contractor's services. 5 8.0 COORDINATION OF SERVICES. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants, and other staff at all reasonable times. 9.0 INDEMNITY. Contractor agrees to indemnify City, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein "claims or liabilities"), including but not limited to professional negligence, that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity to the extent such claims or liabilities are caused by Contractor's negligent errors or omissions in the performance of its services under this Agreement, except to the extent such claims or liabilities arise from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, elected officials, agents or employees. 10.0 INSURANCE. Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain policies of insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth below, for the duration of the Contract, including any extensions thereto. The policies shall state that they afford primary coverage. i. Automobile Liability with minimum limits of $1,000,000 combined single limit, including owned, hired, and non -owned liability coverage. ii. Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation for automobile liability against the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from losses arising from services performed by or activities or operations of Contractor under this Agreement. This language shall be included in Contractor's Automobile Liability policy. iii. General Liability with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate written on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Comprehensive General Liability "occurrence" form or its equivalent for coverage on an occurrence basis. Premises/Operations and Personal Injury coverage is required. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the policy as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of ON this Contract. (1) If Contractor employs other contractors as part of the services rendered, Contractor's Protective Coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein. (2) Contractor agrees to waive all rights of subrogation for General Liability against the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from losses arising from services performed by or activities or operations of Contractor under this Agreement. This language shall be included in Contractor's General Liability policy. iv. Professional Errors and Omissions coverage in a sum of $1,000,000 and in the aggregate, where such risk is applicable. Applicable aggregates must be identified and claims history provided to determine amounts remaining under the aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such coverage for at least one (1) year after the termination of this Agreement. V. Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers' compensation for injuries on the job. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain workers' compensation insurance in accordance with the laws for California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners: (1) Provide copy of permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or (2) Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimal limit of $1,000,000 per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from performance of this 7 Contract; or (3) Provide a "waiver" form certifying that no employees subject to the Labor Code's Workers' Compensation provision will be used in performance of this Contract. vi. Each insurance policy included in this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to City. vii. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A-VIII. viii. Prior to commencement of performance, Contractor shall furnish City with a certificate of insurance for each policy. Each certificate is to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificate(s) must be in a form approved by City. In the event of litigation or formal legal action against the City alleging negligence, City may require complete, certified copies of Contractor's insurance policies, which may be requested through the discovery process. ix. Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach. In such event, Contractor shall immediately notify City and cease all performance under this Contract until further directed by the City. In the absence of satisfactory insurance coverage, City may, at its option: (a) procure insurance with collection rights for premiums, attorney's fees and costs against Contractor by way of set-off or recoupment from sums due to Contractor, at City's option; (b) immediately terminate this Contract and seek damages from the Contract resulting from said breach; or (c) self -insure the risk, with all damages and costs incurred, by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including attorney's fees and costs, being collectible from Contractor, by way of set-off or recoupment from any sums due to Contractor. 11.0 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 11.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 11.1.1 It is understood that in the performance of the services herein M provided for, Contractor shall be, and is, an independent contractor, and is not an agent, officer or employee of City and shall furnish such services in its own manner and method except as required by this Contract, or any applicable statute, rule, or regulation. Further, Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons employed by Contractor in the performance of the services hereunder. City assumes no liability for Contractor's actions and performance, nor assumes responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied or explicit, by or for Contractor. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payment of its employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever. 11.1.2 Contractor acknowledges that Contractor and any subcontractors, agents or employees employed by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of the City, and that they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation insurance benefits. 11.2 CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT. Except as the City may authorize in writing, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of or bind the City in any capacity whatsoever as agents or otherwise. 11.3 OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All documents and materials furnished by the City to Contractor shall remain the property of the City and shall be returned to the City upon termination of this Agreement. Subject to Contractor's receipt of payment for its Services, all reports, drawings, plans, specifications, computer tapes, floppy disks and printouts, studies, memoranda, computation sheets, and other documents prepared by Contractor in furtherance of the work shall be the sole property of City and shall be delivered to City whenever requested at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall keep such documents and materials on file and available for audit by the City for at least three (3) years after completion or earlier termination of this Contract. Contractor may make duplicate copies of such materials and documents for its own files or for such other purposes as may be authorized in writing by the City. 11.4 CORRECTION OF WORK. Subject to the Standard of Care, Contractor shall promptly correct any defective, inaccurate or incomplete tasks, deliverables, goods, services and other work, without additional cost to the City. The performance or acceptance of services furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from the obligation to correct subsequently discovered defects, inaccuracy, or incompleteness. 11.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS. Contractor shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Contractor, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Contractor occurs, then Contractor shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Contractor professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 11.6 WAIVER. The City's waiver of any term, condition, breach, or default of this Contract shall not be considered to be a waiver of any other term, condition, default or breach, nor of a subsequent breach of the one waived. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. 11.7 SUCCESSORS. This Contract shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and/or assigns. 11.8 NO ASSIGNMENT. Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Contract 10 or any rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the City and approval by the City Attorney, which may be withheld in the City's sole discretion. Any unauthorized assignment or transfer shall be null and void and shall constitute a material breach by the Contractor of its obligations under this Contract. No assignment shall release the original parties from their obligations or otherwise constitute a novation. 11.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State, County and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which are, as amended from time to time, incorporated herein and applicable to the performance hereof, including but without limitation, the Vernon Living Wage Ordinance. Violation of any law material to performance of this Contract shall entitle the City to terminate the Contract and otherwise pursue its remedies. Further, if the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules, and regulations Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. 11.10 ATTORNEY'S FEES. If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled. 11.11 INTERPRETATION. 11.11.1 Applicable Law. This Contract shall be deemed a contract and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Contractor agrees that the State and Federal courts which sit in the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies and disputes arising hereunder, and submits to the jurisdiction thereof. 11.11.2 Entire Agreement. This Contract, including any exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings, correspondence, documentation, and agreements (written or oral). 11 11.11.3 Written Amendment. This Contract may only be changed by written amendment signed by Contractor and the City Administrator or other authorized representative of the City, subject to any requisite authorization by the City Council. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Contract shall be of no force or effect. 11.11.4 Severability. If any provision in this Contract is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Contract, and the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Contract. 11.11.5 Order of Precedence. In case of conflict between the terms of this Contract and the terms contained in any document attached as an Exhibit or otherwise incorporated by reference, the terms of this Contract shall strictly prevail. The terms of the City's Request for Proposals shall control over the Contractor's Proposal. 11.11.6 Duplicate Originals. There shall be two (2) fully signed copies of this Contract, each of which shall be deemed an original. 11.11.7 Construction. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 11.12 TIME. Time is a material condition of this contract and each and every covenant, term, and provision hereof. 11.13 AUTHORITY OF CONTRACTOR. The Contractor hereby represents and warrants to the City that the Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Contract, and its execution of this Contract has been duly authorized. 11.14 DISPUTES. Any dispute for under $25,000 12 arising out of or relating to the negotiation, construction, performance, non-performance, breach, or any other aspect of this Contract, shall be settled by non -binding mediation in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association at Los Angeles, California. The City does not waive its right to object to the timeliness or sufficiency of any claim filed or required to be filed against the City and reserves the right to conduct full discovery. 11.15 NOTICES. Any notice or demand to be given by one party to the other must be given in writing and by personal delivery or prepaid first-class, registered or certified mail, addressed as follows. Notice simply to the City of Vernon or any other City department is not adequate notice. If to the City: If to the Contractor: City of Vernon Attention: Daniel Wall, Director of Public Works 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Mott MacDonald Group, Inc. Attention: Richard Carney, Project Manager 100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Any such notice shall be deemed to have been given upon delivery, if personally delivered, or, if mailed, upon receipt, or upon expiration of three (3) business days from the date of posting, whichever is earlier. Either party may change the address at which it desires to receive notice upon giving written notice of such request to the other party. 11.16 NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Contractor and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right or remedy in, under, or to this Agreement. 11.17 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (Without Cause). City may 13 terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time, for any cause or without cause, upon fifteen (15) calendar days' written notice to Contractor. If the Contract is thus terminated by City for reasons other than Contractor's failure to perform its obligations, City shall pay Contractor a prorated amount based on the services satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the effective date of termination. Such payment shall be Contractor's exclusive remedy for termination without cause. 11.18 DEFAULT. In the event either party materially defaults in its obligations hereunder, the other party may declare a default and terminate this Contract by written notice to the defaulting party. The notice shall specify the basis for the default. The Contract shall terminate unless such default is cured before the effective date of termination stated in such notice, which date shall be no sooner than ten (10) days after the date of the notice. In case of default by Contractor, the City reserves the right to procure the goods or services from other sources and to hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs occasioned to the City thereby. Contractor shall not be held accountable for additional costs incurred due to delay or default as a result of Force Majeure. Contractor must notify the City immediately upon knowing that non-performance or delay will apply to this Contract as a result of Force Majeure. At that time Contractor is to submit in writing a Recovery Plan for this Contract. If the Recovery Plan is not acceptable to the City or not received within 10 days of the necessary notification of Force Majeure default, then the city may cancel this order in its entirety at no cost to the City, owing only for goods and services completed to that point. 11.19 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Termination for cause shall relieve the terminating party of further liability or responsibility under this Contract, including the payment of money, except for payment for services satisfactorily and timely performed prior to the service of the notice of termination, and except for reimbursement of (1) any payments made by the City for service not subsequently performed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and (2) costs incurred by the City in obtaining substitute performance. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require, at no additional cost to City, that Contractor provide all 14 finished or unfinished documents, data, and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 11.19.1 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 11.20 MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS. The City, or its authorized auditors or representatives, shall have access to and the right to audit and reproduce any of the Contractor's records to the extent the City deems necessary to insure it is receiving all money to which it is entitled under the Contract and/or is paying only the amounts to which Contractor is properly entitled under the Contract or for other purposes relating to the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination of the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain all such records in the City of Vernon. If not, the Contractor shall, upon request, promptly deliver the records to the City of Vernon or reimburse the City for all reasonable and extra costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than the City of Vernon, including, but not limited to, such additional (out of the City) expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditors, travel, lodging, meals, and overhead. 11.21 CONFLICT. Contractor hereby represents, warrants, and certifies that no member, officer, or employee of the Contractor is a director, officer, or employee of the City of Vernon, or a member of any of its boards, commissions, or committees, except to the extent permitted by law. 11.22 HEADINGS. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this 15 Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 11.23 ENFORCEMENT OF WAGE AND HOUR LAWS. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. The Contractor, or subcontractor, if any, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by the respective Contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Sections 1810 through 1815 of the California Labor Code as a penalty paid to the City; provided, however, work performed by employees of contractors in excess of 8 hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1'/2 times the basic rate of pay. 11.24 LIVING WAGES. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D". Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 11.25 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Contract, it and any other parties with whom it may subcontract shall adhere to equal employment opportunity practices to assure that applicants, employees and recipients of service are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sex, age, medical condition, sexual orientation or marital status. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. Contractor further agrees to comply with The Equal Employment Opportunity Practices provisions as set forth in Exhibit "E". [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement as of the Commencement Date stated on the cover page. City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation M Carlos Fandino, City Administrator ATTEST: Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Byun, Senior Deputy City Attorney Mott MacDonald Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 17 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS i lm City of Vernon Request for Proposals (RFP) Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project 'IF o'F E��P City of Vernon Public Works Department 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058 Phone: (323) 583-8811 Issue Date: March 14, 2019 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals INTRODUCTION The City of Vernon (hereinafter referred to as "City") is requesting proposals for consulting services for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project ("Project"). The California High -Speed Rail Authority ("Authority") is responsible for the planning, design, construction, and operation of the first high-speed rail system in the nation. The Authority intends to operate a high-speed rail system that will run from San Francisco to Los Angeles at speeds over 200 miles per hour by 2029. Additionally, the Authority is working with regional partners to implement a state-wide rail modernization plan that will invest billions of dollars in local and regional rail lines to meet California's 21st century transportation needs. The Los Angeles to Anaheim route is proposed to run through the City replacing what is now 26th Street The City will select one consultant based on demonstrated competence. The selected consultant shall: coordinate with the City and the Authority, review preliminary documents to identify the Project's impacts on the City, communicate these impacts to the City, and, at the City's option, review and comment on the draft and final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") and identify mitigation measures for inclusion in the administrative record BACKGROUND The City was founded in 1905, is approximately 5.2 square miles in size, and is located approximately 5 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles California. Over its long history, Vernon has been developed as an industrial community. At the turn of the 20th century the lands that make up Vernon were comprised largely of farmlands. The presence of three major rail lines in the area led influential business and property owners to encourage the railroad companies to run spur lines onto the farmlands. These rail extensions enabled the creation of an "exclusively industrial" city. By the 1920's, Vernon was attracting large stockyards and meatpacking facilities. In the 1930's, Vernon became the location of choice for many heavy industrial plants. As economic conditions changed over the decades, these large-scale industrial operations have relocated out of Southern California and Vernon has attracted smaller, lighter industrial facilities. The City's business -friendly environment, low-cost utilities and key location for trucking and rail transport continue to position Vernon as an ideal location for industrial uses. City Government: The City Council consists of five members, elected at -large, who serve five- year staggered terms. The City Council annually appoints a Mayor and a Mayor Pro Tern from its own membership to serve one-year terms. Labor Force: Vernon has approximately 280 employees, and its departments include a Fire Department, Police Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, Public Utilities Department and Health and Environmental Control Department. Present bargaining units recognized include the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association, Vernon Police Management Association, Vernon Firemen's Association, the Vernon Fire Management Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 47, and Teamsters Local 911. 2. KEY DATES: 2 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals a) Issue Date: March 14, 2019 b) Deadline for Requests for Information: March 28, 2019 c) Response to Requests for Information: April 4, 2019 d) Proposal Due: April 11, 2019 e) Interview (if applicable) Tentative f) Award (if applicable) Tentative 3. CONTRACT TYPE The contract for this scope of work will be Actual Cost -Plus -Fixed Fee as defined by the Caltrans Local Assistance Program Manual ("Caltrans LAPM"). 4. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION A) All questions must be submitted in writing to the City no later than 5:00 pm, March 28, 2019. Responses to verbal questions will not be given. B) Requests for clarifications, questions and comments must be clearly labeled, "Written Questions Re: Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project." The City is not responsible for failure to respond to a request that has not been labeled as such. C) Any of the following methods of delivering written questions are acceptable as long as the questions are received no later than the date and time specified above: U.S. Mail or Personal Courier: Attention: Brandon Araujo, P.E. Public Works Department City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California 90058 Facsimile: 323-826-1435 Attention: Brandon Araujo, P.E. Public Works Department Email: baraujo@ci.vernon.ca.us D) Responses from the City to Requests for Information will be delivered to all interested parties to the extent the City is aware of them no later than April 4, 2019. 5. SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED 3 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals The City is seeking the services of a highly -qualified consultant with extensive experience in reviewing EIRs and the technical and engineering documents that support them. The consultant will review the technical and engineering documents provided by the Authority prior to the release of the draft and final EIRs. The consultant, may also, at the City's option, review the draft and final EIRs themselves once they are released. The emphasis of the consultant's work shall be on how the Project will impact the City either positively or negatively. The City has multiple concerns with the Project including: • The Project's proposed permanent right-of-way acquisition requiring the displacement of several large businesses in Vernon and the demolition of multi- million dollar structures exposing the City to the loss of property and sales taxes, and other revenue sources generated from these operations; • The permanent traffic impacts caused by the proposed realignment of 26th Street • The possibility of increased freight activity on 46th Street crossing Pacific Boulevard • Impacts on existing freight rail operations which could in turn adversely impact the City's traffic transportation system; • Construction impacts, including staging plans, traffic detour plans, and utility relocations; • Coordination with other significant regional improvement projects in or around the City. Preliminary Engineering for Project Definition ("PEPD") plans for the corridor, as they relate to the City, are included in Attachment "A" of the RFP. The following tasks are proposed: Phase 1: Tasks identified in Phase 1 shall take place prior to the release of the draft EIR. Task 1.1: Kick -Off Meeting and Project Coordination Consultant shall attend a kick-off meeting with members of the City's staff to discuss the City's initial concerns with the project. Consultant shall attend meetings with City staff to discuss identified concerns. Consultant shall attend and participate at meetings held between the Authority and the City, Technical Advisory Committee meetings, among other meetings, on an as -needed basis. Consultant shall represent the City at events the City is unable to attend. The Consultant, however, shall not make any decisions on behalf of the City without prior written approval. Consultant shall also make presentations to the City's appropriate governing bodies if necessary. Deliverables: Kick-off meeting agenda provided to the City no later than 24 hours in advance, Kick-off meeting minutes provided to the City no later than 5 business days after the meeting, minutes for meetings the City is unable to attend provided to the City no later than 5 business days after the meeting, presentation materials provided to the City no later than 7 calendar days than the date of presentation Task 1.2: Comments on Technical and Engineering Documents 4 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals Consultant shall provide comments on technical/preliminary engineering documents that are provided by the Authority. These comments shall identify the specific impacts the proposed project will have on the City and its operations, offer possible solutions to minimize or eliminate those impacts, and recommend actions the City and the Authority should take to mitigate those impacts. In addition, the Consultant shall identify areas that should require further study. Potential areas of impact include but are not limited to the following: Aesthetics Air Quality Bio Resources Cultural Resources Economic (both local and regional) Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Material Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Noise Public Services Transportation/Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Vibration Documents that may be provided by the Authority include but are not limited to the following: preliminary plans for California High -Speed Rail from Los Angeles to Anaheim rail alignment, roadway realignment, roadway and intersection reconstruction, transportation system enhancements, utility relocations, bridges, structures, drainage systems. Documents may also include technical studies on the potential areas of impact listed above and the Authority's preliminary findings. Deliverables: Comments on the documents released by the Authority provided to the City no later than two business days prior to the Authority's requested date of response Task 1.3: Conflict Identification Report Consultant shall identify potential conflicts with City -owned property and utilities including but not limited to right-of-way, transportation network and elements thereof, water, gas, electric, communication, sewer, storm drain utilities. This document shall be based on the plan view of the City's base map of existing utilities provided to the Consultant by the City. The consultant shall identify these items, participate in discussions with the Authority about these items, and review the Authority's plans to address these items including proposed mitigation measures. The Consultant shall evaluate the proposed mitigation measures included in the Authority's documents and provide the City feedback on these measures, including a review of the implementation schedule for these planned measures. Deliverables: Report that identifies potential conflicts, reviews the Authority's plan to address these conflicts and mitigation measures proposed delivered to the City no later than thirty calendar days prior to the release of the draft EIR. 5 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals Task 1.4: Additional Tasks as Defined by the Proposer The Consultant shall identify additional tasks that he/she believes is necessary to perform a complete and thorough review of the documents and reports provided by the Authority prior to the release of the draft EIR. These tasks are subject to review and approval of both the City and the Authority. Deliverables: As indicated in the Proposer's response and as agreed upon by both the City and the Authority Phase 2: Tasks identified in Phase 2 shall take place after the release of the draft EIR. Phase 2 tasks are additive to the Agreement at the City's option. Task 2.1: Project Coordination Consultant shall attend meetings with City staff to discuss identified concerns. Consultant shall attend and participate at meetings held between the Authority and the City, among other meetings, on an as -needed basis. Consultant shall represent the City at events the City is unable to attend. The Consultant, however, shall not make any decisions on behalf of the City without prior approval. Consultant shall also make presentations to the City's appropriate governing bodies if necessary. Deliverables: Meeting agenda provided to the City no later than 24 hours in advance, meeting minutes provided to the City no later than 5 business days after the meeting, minutes for meetings the City is unable to attend provided to the City no later than 5 business days after the meeting, presentation materials provided to the City no later than 7 calendar days than the date of presentation Task 2.2: Comments on the Draft and Final EIR Consultant shall provide comments on the draft and final Environmental Impact Reports that are provided by the Authority that identify the specific impacts the proposed project will have on the City and its operations, offer possible solutions to minimize or eliminate those impacts, and recommend actions the City and the Authority should take to mitigate those impacts. In addition, the Consultant shall identify areas that should require further study. Potential areas of impact include but are not limited to the following: Aesthetics Air Quality Bio Resources Cultural Resources Economic (both local and regional) Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Material Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use Noise Public Services Transportation/Traffic ON City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals Utilities and Service Systems Vibration Deliverable: Comments on the both the draft and final Environmental Impact Reports and related documents that identify specific impacts on the City and its operations, offer possible solutions to those impacts, and recommend specific actions to mitigate those impact. The identification of areas of further study shall also be made, if applicable. A comment matrix shall be prepared to track all issues and the current status of those issues. Drafts of the deliverables are due to the City halfway through the public comment period. Final draft of the deliverables is due to the City seven (7) calendar days prior to the end of the public comment period. Task 2.3: Additional Tasks as Defined by the Proposer The Consultant shall identify additional tasks that he/she believes is necessary to perform a complete and thorough review of the draft and final Environmental Impact Reports. These tasks are subject to review and approval of both the City and the Authority. Deliverables: As indicated in the Proposer's response and as agreed upon by both the City and the Authority. 6. THE PROPOSAL The proposal should include, at a minimum, the following information in sectionalized format addressing all phases of the work in the RFP: A. Cover Letter: Present an introduction of the proposal and your understanding of the assignment and significant steps, methods, and procedures to be employed to ensure quality deliverables will be received by the City within the required time frames. The cover letter shall state that the proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. If the proposal contemplates the use of subcontractors, the subcontractors shall be identified. If the proposal is submitted by a business entity, the cover letter shall be signed by an officer authorized to contractually bind the business entity. With respect to the business entity, the cover letter shall also include: the identification of the business entity, including the name, address and telephone number of the business entity; and the name, title, address and telephone number of a contact person during the proposal evaluation period. B. Scope of Work: Define the scope of each task including the depth and scope of analysis or research proposed. Discuss specific administrative and operations expertise to be used. For each task, list the responsible party. subcontracted, identify the subcontractor listed in the technical proposal. Provide a budget for each task. 7 If the task is proposed to be No work shall be subcontracted unless City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals Identify each task's deliverable. Discuss methods, specific techniques, and procedures to be employed to ensure quality deliverables will be delivered within the required time frame and within your identified budget. C. Project Manager and Personnel: Name the project who will be the primary point of contact for the project and list his/her qualifications, roles, and responsibilities. For each key team member listed, provide a description of their qualifications, including their title, licenses, and professional resumes noting past experiences in similar work efforts. D. References and Previous Experience: The proposal should provide at least three (3) clients for whom the proposer has performed work of similar nature to this request. For those clients, identify the specific work projects that were completed by the proposer which are directly related to the assignment described in this RFP. Note the specific individuals who completed those projects. E. Fees and Costs: A fee proposal shall be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. Cost proposals shall be submitted on the "Cost Proposal — Labor Hour Worksheet" attached herein as Attachment "B". In addition, each cost proposal shall be summarized on Exhibit 10-H1 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual attached herein as Attachment "C" of this RFP. If you have any questions regarding these attachments, please send them in writing to the City. The City will respond to all questions per Section 4 of this RFP. The fee proposal submitted shall contain the proposer's most favorable terms and conditions. Proposer must offer services at a rate comparable to the rate proposer offers to other governmental entities for similar work. Offering a higher rate to the City than the comparable rate is grounds for disqualification of the Proposer. The selected firm shall not subcontract any work under the RFP nor assign any work without the prior written consent of the City. The final fee will be negotiated upon selection of the consultant. If the City is unable to negotiate a favorable price, then the next highest -rated consultant may be contracted for the work. F. Affidavit of Non -Collusion: Proposer must submit a completed and signed "Affidavit of Non -Collusion." See Attachment "D" for a copy of the affidavit. 7. FORMAT AND DELIVERY OF PROPOSAL Respondents are asked to submit three (3) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (via email to baraujo(a-)ci.vernon.ca.us) of their proposals in sufficient detail to allow for a thorough evaluation and comparative analysis. W City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals Limit your proposal to twenty-five (25) typed 8.5" X 11" pages, or fewer, on white bond paper of at least 20-pound weight single sided. Use a conventional typeface with a minimum font size of 12 points. Use a 1" margin on all borders. 2. Organize your submittal in the order described above. 3. Prominently label the package: "Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project" and include the name of the primary contact for the respondent. Deliver the response to: City of Vernon Attention: Daniel Wall, Director of Pubic Works 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 4. Responses are due on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 11, 2019. Late responses will not be accepted. 8. QUALIFICATIONS & CRITERIA A. Qualifications: The City will select one consultant for all of the outlined Scope of Services on the basis of qualifications and experience. The following are the minimum qualifications to be used to evaluate responses to this Request for Proposal: • Experience reviewing EIRs for large-scale infrastructure projects, identifying impacts, and proposing potential mitigation measures • Experience effecting change in large-scale infrastructure projects through the identification of impacts and the proposal of mitigation measures • A demonstrated familiarity with the California High -Speed Rail Authority's Los Angeles to Anaheim segment • Competency in the following areas of study: ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality Biological Resources ❑ Business Re -location costs ❑ Construction Cost Estimating ❑ Civil Engineering C Cultural Resources ❑ Economic Impacts (both local and regional) ❑ Geology and Soils L Hazards and Hazardous Material ❑ Hydrology and Water Quality - Job displacement impacts M City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Land Valuation ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Public Services Rail Engineering and Operations Structural Engineering F Transportation/Traffic Roadway Geometric design ❑ Utilities/Service Systems B. Selection Criteria: The City will conduct a comprehensive, fair, and impartial evaluation of proposals received in response to this RFP. All proposals received will be reviewed and evaluated by a committee of qualified personnel. The name, information, or experience of the individual members will not be made available to any Proposer. The Evaluation Committee will first review and screen all proposals submitted, except for the cost proposals, according to the minimum qualifications set forth above. The following criteria will be used in reviewing and comparing the proposals and in determining the highest scoring proposal: Criterion Weight Qualifications, background, and prior experience of the firm, experience of key staff assigned to oversee services provided to the City, evaluation 35% of size and scope of similar work performed, and success on that work. Quality and responsiveness of the proposal. 20% References including past performance of Proposer. 20% Cost and fees to the City for handling matters. Cost is not the sole determining factor but will be taken into consideration. Proposer must offer services at a rate comparable to the rate proposer offers to other governmental entities for similar 15% work. Offering a higher rate to the City than the comparable rate is grounds for disqualification of the proposer. If rates differ for different types or levels of service, the proposer should so state. If the City decides an interview is necessary, up to three of the highest rated proposers will be invited to attend a mandatory interview with the City's 10% Evaluation Committee and will be asked a series of questions in order to elicit the proposer's understanding of the scope of services and their 10 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ability to communicate this understanding effectively. Only those proposers invited to an interview will be considered for contract award. All other proposers will be not be considered further in the evaluation process. 9. ADDENDA, CHANGES, AND AMENDMENTS TO THIS SOLICITATION At any time prior to the due date for responses, the City may make changes, amendments, and addenda to this solicitation, including changing the date due to allow respondents time to address such changes. Addenda, changes, and amendments, if made, will be posted on the City's website (www.cityofvernon.org), which is deemed adequate notice. A Proposer may make a request to the City's Contract Administrator to be placed on a list of persons to receive notice of any such addenda, changes, or amendments. The preferred manner of communications is via e-mail due to its timeliness. Proposers shall acknowledge receipt of addenda (if any) on the cover letter of their proposals. Failure to acknowledge receipt of all addenda may cause a proposal to be deemed non- responsive. 10. CONDITIONS FOR RESPONSES TO RFP The following conditions apply to this RFP process: A. Nothing contained in this RFP shall create any contractual relationship between the respondent and the City. B. This RFP does not obligate the City to establish a list of service providers qualified as prime contractors, or award a contract to any respondent. The City reserves the right to amend or cancel this RFP without prior notice, at any time, at its sole discretion. C. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by any individual or organization in connection with this RFP. D. No conversations or agreements with any officer, agent, or employee of the City shall affect or modify any terms of this RFP. Oral communications or any written/e-mail materials provided by any person other than designated contact staff of City shall not be considered binding. E. The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to accept or reject any or all Proposals without prior notice and to waive any minor irregularities or defects in a Proposal. The City reserves the right to seek clarification on a Proposal with any source. F. The dates, times, and sequence of events related to this RFP shall ultimately be determined by the City. The schedule shown above is subject to change, at the 11 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals sole discretion of the City, although the City will attempt to follow it and, if it must be altered, will attempt to provide reasonable notice of the changes. G. Respondents shall not issue any news release pertaining to this RFP or the City without prior written approval of the City. H. All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public record upon delivery to the City. 11. RIGHT BY THE CITY TO WITHDRAW THIS REQUEST The City may, at its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, withdraw this solicitation at any time. 12. LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE The selected consultant shall pay qualifying employees a wage of not less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. The consultant shall also provide qualifying employees at least twelve days off per year for sick leave, vacation or personnel necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. There shall be a prohibition on an employer retaliation against an employee's complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D" of the standard form contract. The standard form contract is attached hereto as Attachment "E". Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 13. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Prior to the award of any work hereunder, City and Proposer shall enter into the written contract for services attached hereto as Attachment "E". Proposers responding to this RFP are strongly advised to review all the terms and conditions of the Contract. The term of the Contract shall not exceed three (3) years. 12 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION 31 L O SAN F PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION (PEPD) CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT TONGVA SUBDIVISION LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM VOLUME 3 GENERAL & GRADE SEPARATIONS SAN LOS PROJECT LOCATION CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT MAP SAN D ro e�RBgti STATION TAT NOoN STATION EQUATION Los OOOBAC � ANGELES SBN 136+31.75 AHEAD SBN 1355+51.19 BACK= 0 f �SOC 1355+00.00 AHEAD ♦' MONTEBELLQ 9r p �o o PICO HITTIE R I V RA o LOS ANGELES US-101 ��, 1-5 0. �s��o00 J�u UNION STATION r COM C - 00 �� G FULLERTON(51 /� Q o - Sowo� LA MIRADA < ARTIC �� _ EL SANTA FE 1� a STATION BEGIN WORK � LA RIVER STA 190+00.00� BELL - SPRIN S as w M REa' VERNON V GARDENS DO�yNEY ��m x s� '\ -lam ��-� ig�� END WORK �NORWALK ;�P�� SOC STA 1613+67.84 o� LOS ANGELES mm \BU NA1 22 COUNTY PARK ANAHEIM CERRITOS ORAI lll__**? COUNTY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LOCATION MAP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY M.1MAMAWAL PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT �DNTRACT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL M. MAMAWAL FOR INTERNAL J LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY S 1 T� V 100 RECORD SET GE-A0301 J. SWANSON SCALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREE7SUITE 315° CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION NO SCALE J. sWANSON NOT FOR LOS nHceITwsYcneo°n-zsss DaTE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUTHOR/TY PROJECT LOCATION MAP SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 S IL r r Y r r CV—T1017 �i r 01' CV—T101 I 5F NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 200 0 200 400 I"=200' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY � rvw a. PEPD wrv�a�rvu. M.MAMAWyAL CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSZ6-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL "-IT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. H CKED BY FORINTERNAL 100RECORD SET CV—T0016 CHECK1,E,D BY USE ONLY J.SWANSON SCALE IN CHARGE I°s—TT SEV ", SUITE also CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION J. Sy�ANSON NOTFOR os nRce wsYcn soon-zsss _ 1 = 200' JR ,CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEDRA&AUTHORITY GRADE SEPARATION S DOWNEY RD_SHEET No. DATE03/09/18 ORIENTATION MAP REV DATE BY CRK dPP DESCRIPTION \��0 tht ` 22+0p r - \ �k EXIST -- CRTY OW 14 1-4 ofp� — — + 29+00 26+00 — �— — _ zci 25+00_� I- U \ _�I S DO�NEY RD a _ S DO RD S DOyy�yNNEY RD 17+99 POT EXIST E 2'6TH ST 32+21.95 POT �-L -- ---- -- - - -- 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 DESIGNED BY A. CHIANG PEPD SUBMITTAL FORINTERNAL USE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY A. CHIANG CHECKED BY M. SATISH 31 IN CHARGE J. $ ANON DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION DATE 03/09/18 _ CRC;( � � i Yr / �0S CITY OF 'ice �/ �i� ooxoti� VERNON /�ok�\ PLAN \�\ ul LLI ------------- _____________________J___________�_____J_____J______�_____�__ �V J Lu N +00 26+00 27+00 28+00 sTv 100 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/.4 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-25 01 ]-2556 1-11Gh'-SPEE0RAIL AUTHOR/TY 29+00 30+00 1. FOR TRACT INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOR RIGH SEE VOLUME OF -WAY INFORMATION, 1. 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR SEE VOLLI AD�G4INFORMATION, 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR FOR INTERNALS USE TIONLY FR 40 0 40 80 I"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 1"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION GRADE SEPARATION - S DOWNEY RD PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 1 OF 2 HSR06-0005 Eiffel AS S DATE SEE CV-T1025 / —EXIST PULP STATION S DOtNEY RD 30+90.14 POT EXIST ROADWAY 26TH ST 29+94.59 POT BRIDGE (26TH-K'ST� SEE ST101 � ��30+ i� 1+00 °°3 +00 Nt0 JW / W 2 N / / OOX .ti 0 �R +; do Zn on �N DESCRIPTION w4r%w m4 m3 m2 JCL m1 lead C NEW LEAD F EB \-EXIST' RR BRIDGE SEE ST-K1016 — — -S DO{�tVEY RD 31+65.48 POT = m4 21177+33.08 POT PLAN (I T �\ / RR Row ♦ .� ` / PROP RR BRIDGE / SEE ST-K016BB \ F / \ EXIST \ ROW CITY 1r a — _ 34+00- 35+00 36+00 S DO NE Y R - CITY F 37+00 38+ CITY OF L S ANGELES / — — — 1 S OyyNEY RD 32+88.36 P T Q NEy� LEAD 216+42.33 POT CITY EXIST Row --- --- -- -- PROP RR BR F E D; ; / / ✓ iiI '----- ---- '------ RR DRIDQE ST-1(101.6 Ln m i. --- ---- ----- 1 ------------------- PROP_ RR; TOP OF F ;ST-It101f ` KTR AY'— TOP OFSFTGT RR 10 26TH T); FTG SEE-------------- ;ST-K1016; 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 DESIGNED BY PROFILE A. CHIANG PEPD DR A N By SUBMITTAL ry T A. CHIANG FORT L CHECKED Y USE ONLY T 100 SATISH N CHARGE 1055 S SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 LNOTFOR OS ANGELES, 1A9T J. S ANSON -w_ CAL/FOR/V/4 DATE CONSTRUCTION h/Gh-SPEEO/AIL AUTF/OR/TY 03/09/18 37+00 38+00 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACT INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2• FOR RIGH SEE VOLUME 1. OF -WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR SEE GRADING4INFORMATION, VOLUME6. FOR SEE DRAINAGE4 INFORMATION, VOLU ME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TIO FOT FOR INTERNAL NLY R 40 0 40 80 AHORIZ SCALE SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 1"=4' VERT I SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. RECORD SET CV-T1017 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SOLE GRADE SEPARATION - S DOWNEY RD AS SHOWN SHEET O. PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 2 OF 2 �- 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION SEE VOLUME 1. ' 2. FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. B . � ,130 f CV -. �y 1!A - 3. FOR BRIDE INFORMATION, C3 SEE VOLUME 3. "+ 4. FOR UTIL TY INFORMATION, cc�jC, SEE VOLU�E 4. tv..... # f EXIST ' 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, # r, SEE VOLUME 4. 29+00 zc� 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. _ S Ln p a 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. 21+ a 2e p0 R - * 24+0� o ox o`N .ri I i o � EYXIST CIT /R \ EXISTJ / CRI T YC. i y y / �gS EXIST TRAM MI SIION 1f / /// ooti TOWER 138KV L�C, / i / fL m4 \ ys, m 3 m 2 d m 1 •� s /S / / lead SA �PUPRO — CL NEW LEAD N / 0S SEE VOLUME 1 D / K Qp Al ox / .. !i / , > m b t Q� / 4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RR ROW � r EXIST FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY �. �� k` 50 0 50 100 SEE CV-T1038"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESK ED BY CO TR CT 0. A. CHANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No CHECKED BY USE ONLY STV 10o RECORD SET CV- T1018 M. SATCHARGE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE w + IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V1A SHOWN ° NOT FOR Los nNCELEs, cn Soon-zsss A S S H 0 j. SWANSON GRADE SEPARATION - S DOWNEY RD SHEET NO. ° DATE coNsreucTlON � h'/Gh'-SPEEOR,4/LAUTh'Of7/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 1 OF 2 EXIST PUMP STATION BRIDGE (26THD'ST� SEE ST-K101 #f r 26THTST / ! 0 i ti J -i-• G -- C)— ,n — NGD 30+00 //3 +00 �/ °°300 �fy CL m4 m3 m2 CL m 1 CL Ieod CL NEW LEAD ,XIST RR BRIDGE 5 TRACKS) SEE iT-K1016 — — 1. FOR SEE TRACK INFORMATION, 1. \ VOLUME ' •�� 2. FOR SEE RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, VOLUME 1. \. 3. FOR SEE BRIDGE INFORMATION, 3. VOLUME \4. FOR SEE UTIL TY INFORMATION, VOLU�E 4. \ 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, x SEE VOLUME 4. \ 1 6 SEE VOLUNMEG4 INFORMATION, \� Y } 7. FOR SYST M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. w"m RR ROW * / i Y 1 TRC K P RIDGE T-K1016 4 \ O� EXIST ROSY / ' f✓� v 34+00 — +� 35+00 — / / ` — — — _ 6+00 N S DONNE Y RD 3-- 31+00 S a \\ 38+00 a0+00 - - -41 +00. - - —42+00 - - p ! ' ,....,....,...,...,..- 1-00 —S GRA]yDE "' ---�-- -- - _ - VISTA RAVE ��1 / � A / ROy�Y / o�� I—r—� O / / / I (, / 00 / 7 TF__� i ----- Q i TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 WIM11MA A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING ND. CHECKED BY USE ONLY STV 100 RECORD SET CV-T1019 M. SATISH SCALE IN CHARGE 1 W.—W.T. STREET. sDITEa,so PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ° NOTFOR cos nNCELEs, cn eomT-zsss CALK OR/V/A AS SHOWN ,1. S ANSON ,Gwm GRADE SEPARATION - S DOWNEY RD SHEET NO. DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEED RA/L AUTHOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 1 1 IMPACT PLAN 7 2 SHEET OF IST TY XIST :ITY 39'* S DOWNEY 75'+ XIST 5" 27.5" 6.5'1 6.5" 27.5' 5.5" SW 2 LANES SB 2 LANES NB A OG S DOWNEY RD T01 _E 26TH ST ——------� EXIST CONDITION STA 25+00 rB CV-T1018 AS SHOWN - 54'* S DOWNEY 74 '± IST TY 5" 28' 1 28' 1 11 SW 1 2 LANES SB MEDIAN 2 LANES SB 1 S DOffY RD TO OG OG'_10,- -— _\ �E 26TH ST OG OG J � --———-- —— ---- EXIST CONDITION STA 27+00 C CV-T1018 AS SHOWN - 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 FOE GRADINGVOLUME4INFORMATION, 6 FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 10 0 10 20 a I"=10' HORIZ 0 SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY CONTRACT 40. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY STV 100 RECORD SET CV-T 3016 M. SATISH CC/ PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE + IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL/FOR/V1A SHOWN 1Ri' NARGESWAN NOTFOR LOSANCELEs.c!",7zsss AS DATE CONSTRUCTION = h'/Gh'-SPEEORA/LAUTh'OR/TY GR+ADE�`�`SEPARATION - S DOWNEY RqD SHEET NO. DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 CROSS SECTION SHEET 1 OF I — U E U 3 E U BVC STA 215+17.18 ELEV 197.94' \ n 300.00 VC b R/C = +0.015% / STA PROFILE GRADE (M4) NO SCALE BB 1 26'-8" EB PROP T/R O3 T Y P 63'-4" BENT 2 63'-4" EXIT/R RAILING & CHAIN LINK FENCE 0 goy 1i��,o„y I \\ I 4 5 I I APPROX OG ��\ i O NS/FS I 7- - - - - - - - - J --I a -� ZJTJUZIU APPROX s1 la ABUT 1 FG=OG 1--24" 0 BENT 2 ABUT 3 CIDH PILE TYP DATUM ELEV = 150 216+00 217+00 BB 83.05 LT STA 215+77.22 RIGHT SHIFTED MIRROR ELEVATION T/R ELEV 200.80' 1"=20'-0" o� 0 EXIST \, FREIGHT \\ \\ \ RR BRIDGED •\ \� 216+00 `;\ I BB STA 216+68. ` LEV 197.11' \ _Y m \ '47049'51 SKEW \ \ EB STA 218+17.18 ELEV 196.65' 82.93 LT STA 217+03.99 T/RxtLEV 20,0.15' �,_PROPOSED FREIGHT RR BRIDGE \ 21 8+00 \\ \ \ \D 22'-0" -2"± MIN ROPOSED FREIGHT RR BRIDGE CL (N) YARD 8'-8" TRACK I 101'-10"± MIN 77'— 8"± EXIST RAILROAD BRIDGE MP NO. 144.50 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-6" 15'-3" 8'-4" CL YARD M1 CL M2 CL M3 C M4 TRACK F-1 3' STEEL "I" GIRDERS ITH CONIC ECK I F-1 F-1 OAPPROX --------- -----L----—I-------I_I_____I I I I -- -- -- -- --�U TYPICAL SECTION 1' = 1 o'-o" FOUNDATION: NOTE: O ABUTMENTS: ASSUME 24" 0 CIDH L = 60' CL BNSF YARD NEW UTILITY DUCT BENT: 180 KIPS (A SERVICE TRACK (NEW) O WINGWALL ASSUME 24" 0INAL IDH L = 80' BNSF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT (TO BE DETERMINED) 500 KIPS aNO� TRACK PAINT O PAINT "BR. N0. 144.50" TRAFFIC (PER DAY): O5 PAINT "SOUTH DOWNEY ROAD UNDERPASS" ADTzo,o: N/A M1 ADTzoao: N/A EXISTING UTILITIES: A❑ EXIST 10" GAS, SC GAS, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) CL M2 EB STA 217+95.55 © EXIST 6" GAS, SC GAS, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) ELEV 196.69' © EXIST 8" OIL, EXXON MOBIL, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) \ CL M3 D❑ EXIST 26" GAS, SC GAS, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) E❑ EXIST 6" GAS, SC GAS, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) \ CL M4 EXIST WATER LINE, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) — EXIST33\BRIDGE © EXIST 48" STORM DRAIN, SC GAS, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) O. \. TO REMAIN86 H❑ EXIST OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) D\ I❑ EXIST TELE COMMUNICATION LINE, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) �J EXIST SEWER LINE, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) \\\''•° \\ \� C ❑K EXIST 6" GAS, SC GAS, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) D\ \ \ D\ LEGEND: \ rI \' _« _ F a INDICATES DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC \� - - _ \ �� INDICATES EXIST POINT OF MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (15'-0"±) \ INDICATES POINT OF MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (16'-61 10 0 10 20 FORECAST (PER DAY): CL DOWNEY ROAD TRAIN VOLUME • 118 FREIGHT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 203020 0 20 40 60 METROLINK I I I I 40 AMTRAK NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 30 HST I"=20' F 0 R INTERNAL USE ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY ..6 SARETSKY PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT N. HST DRAWN . S SUBMITTAL W..IT. LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. D. SARETSKY FORINTERNALTT100 ST—K1016 CHEM. RO USE ONLY 1 RECORD SETM. RODRIGUEZ G� SCALE 1 STREETSUITE3150 CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENT AS SHOWN IN CHARGE NOTFOR ELES, CA 9001 T-2556 J. SWANSON GRADE SEPARATION - SOUTH DOWNEY ROAD DATE CONSTRUCTION ° wm H/GH-SPEEDRAIZAUTHOR17Y SHEET No. REV DATE BY SUB APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 1 GENERAL PLAN ® u -- --7777— -- PROPOSED II HSR R/W ee1 \; \ PLAN 1"=20'-O" 0 E 0 3 E TRACK TO BE REMOVED EXISTT R� R/W PROPOSED BNSF RCB CULVERT [ BNSF YARD TRACK (EXIST) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (EXIST) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (EXIST) RR DRAINAGE ---EXIST DOUBLE RCB CULVERT CL BNSF YARD TRACK (EXIST) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) EXIST RR DRAINAG OPEN CHANNEL CULVERT TO BE ROVED (TYP) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) FT CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) CL BNSF YARD TRACK (NEW) NOTE: lO STRUCTURE APPROACH SLAB LEGEND: - - INDICATES EXISTING ® INDICATES LIMITS OF EXIST OPEN CHANNEL LINNG REMOVAL �• INDICATES DIRECTION OF FLOW (M) PROPOSED ALIGNMENT TRAFFIC (PER DAY): TRAIN VOLUME : 118 FREIGHT 2030 60 METROLINK 40 AMTRAK 30 HST �VTYP EXIST RR DRAINAGE OPEN CHANNEL EXIST MAINTENANCE— CULVERT TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1. ASS BU LT WAS NOT AVAILABLE AT TIME OF SHEET DEVELOPMENT BEM ACCESS REOVED BOX CULVERT TO = EDGE OF BOX CULVERT � EXIST OPEN CHANNEL 2. FOR UTILITY DRAINAGE CONNECTION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS STA 258+96.55 T/R ELEV 179.36' 1 0 + TYP GO � M1 PROPOSED SHARED RCB CULVERT M2 CM3 10 0 10 20 oil C M4 EXIST HSR/ 258+00 259+00 260+00 RR R/W � _ _ _ _ EDGE OF BOX CULVERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY _ \STA 259+17.05 20 0 20 40 CL LA —A M4 STA 259+06.80 FLAN '-SEE "T/R ELEV 179.25' LONGITUDINAL SECTION" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1"m20' CL PROPOSED BOX CULVERT 1 "=20'-0" ON DRW ST—K1018 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DesDNED BY SARETSKY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT O PEPD HSR06-0005 DRAW; . S SUBMITTAL gW � 100 LOS ANGELERS TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. D. SARETSKY FORINTERNAL ST—K1017 CHECKED BY USE ONLY RECORD SE M. RODRIGUEZ SCALE IN CHARGE 1055WE5T SEVENTH STREET. 5U1TE3150 CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENT AS SHOWN NOTFOR LosnruceLes. cn soon-zsss REV DATE BY $DB Al" DESCRIPTION E• sWnNsoN �,„_„��.�mre) GRADE SEGENERA�NPLANRAI OFG CHANNEL DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDR,4/L AUTHOR/TY SHEET No. 03/09/18 U E 0 E U 5'- TY PARAPET TYP EXISTINVERCHANNEL EVC STA 246+17.23 LEV 185.88' DATUM ELEV = 130' M4 I T/R -0.51 TOP OF RAIL PROFILE (LA —A SB) NO SCALE �_ EXIST CHANNEL LLLV 1 Q± I I TYPICAL SECTION 1 " = 10'-0" 70'- 8" 15'-0" 15'-0" 7'-6" CL M 3 M2 M 1 I I } I I 32'-10"± .0 (, X W LU _ = J U W a z �a +I U OTOP ENOCHAI BVC STA 273+39.81 LEV 172.02' +OFTEXISCH TTOPENRCHANN LION 5'-4" 273'-10" MEASURED ALONG CL EXIST CHANNEL NOTE: lO STRUCTURE APPROACH SLAB O NEW UTILITY DUCT LEGEND: - -' INDICATES EXISTING ® INDICATES LIMITS OF EXIST OPEN CHANNEL LINING REMOVAL NOTES: 1. AS -BUILT WAS NOT AVAILABLE AT TIME OF SHEET DEVELOPMENT. 2. DESIGN IS PENDING EXISTING INVERT ELEVATION AND ADDITIONAL SURVEY. 3. DESIGN IS PENDING A FULL HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS. 170'-4" 7'-6" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 7'-6" (L BNSF YARD TRK I (L BNSF I YARD TRK I (L BNSF I YARD TRK I CL BNSF I YARD TRK I CL BNSF I YARD TRK I (L BNSF I YARD TRK I CL BNSF I YARD TRK I (L BNSF I YARD TRK I (L BNSF I YARD TRK I (L BNSF I YARD TRK I BNSF I YAR I PL BNSF TRK I YARD TRK I REMOVE EXIST OPEN CHANNEL TO_BE'UNSTRUCTEb-ONVPROPOSED LULVLMI LINING AND CONSTRUCT BOX BOX CULVERT CULVERT TYP TYP 10 0 10 20 LONGITUDINAL SECTION * MATCH EXIST INVERT ELEV SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 20 0 20 40 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r 20' F O R INTERNAL USE ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNEDD. SARETSKY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT ND. PEPD H SR06- 0005 DRA N BY SUBMITTAL ry LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. D. SARETSKY FOR INTERNAL `TT, 100 ST-K1018 CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,A`J 1 V RECORD SET M. RODRIGUEZ ?/6wclw SCALE INC„ARGE f055 WES ANGVLS STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL/FOR/V1A PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENT AS SHOWN J . 5 ANSON NOT FOR OS ANGEES, w9001 T-2556 - DATE � CONSTRUCTION � H/GH-SPEEDRA/LAUTHOR/TY GRADE SEPARATION DRAINAGE CHANNEL SHEET NO. REV DATE BT SUB APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 GENERAL PLAN 2 OF 2 I I I I CALTR R /W �710 FREEWAY (� YARD TRACK CL YARD TRACK C YARD TRACK CL BNSF SIDING TRACK CL BNSF LEAD TRACK — —_ m1 TO BE REMOVED __�__� CE m2 TO BE REMOVED -- CL m3 TO BE REMOVED — M4 —w---w---w-- w--w---w 26TH STREET —w---w---w— w— —w---� TO BE RELOCATED 323+93.73± V 1 59.50' GENERAL NOTES: BRIDGE #53-840 DESIGN DATE: MAY 18, 1953 DESIGN: AASHTO DATED 1949 ITH SUBSOUENT REyISIONS AND BRIDGE DEPARTM NT SUPPLEMENTS DATED 1949 LIVE LOADING: H2O-S16-44 REINFORCED CONCRETE: Fc = 20'2000 00 PSI, N = 10 STRUCTURAL STEEL: Fs = 16,000 PSI FOOTING PREASURE: 3 TONS PSF PILE LOADING: 32 TONS REINFORCMENT: BARMDEFORMATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO CENTER WIDENING: SEPTEMBER 27, 1965 RAILING MODIFICATIONS: NOVEMBER 26, 1979 SEISMIC RETROFIT' MAY 4, 1998 DESIGN: RIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS (1TO HNERMSANDREVISIONSBYCALTANS) SEISMIC LOAD: CALTRANS ARS SPRECTRA CURVE B FOR T S .7 SEC CURVE C FOR T > .7 SEC A = 0.5g LIVE LOADING: PERMIT D-44 ESIGN LOADING E AND REINFORCED CONCRETE: EXISTING: fy = 44,000 PSI f c = 3,I 850 PS1955 f'c = 4,500 PS1964 NEW CONSTRUCTION: f C 60,050 PSII STRUCTURAL STEEL: NEW CONSTRUCTION: fy = 36,000 PSI PILE LOADING BENTS: 45 TONS 16" CIDH CONIC PILES LEGEND: INDICATES POINT OF MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (24'-0") a INDICATES DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC — — - INDICATES EXISTING (M) PROPOSED ALIGNMENT (m) EXISTING ALIGNMENT EXISTING UTILITIES: A❑ EXIST RCB STORM DRAIN, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) © EXIST OH ELECTICAL LINE, BNSF (PROTECT IN PLACE) © EXIST OVERHEAD ELECTICAL LINE, SCE (RELOCATE) D❑ EXIST WATER LINE, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) E❑ EXIST OIL LINE, EXXON MOBIL (PROTECT IN PLACE) F❑ EXIST WATER LINE, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) © EXIST STORM DRAIN, CITY OF VERNON (PROTECT IN PLACE) H❑ EXIST GASOLINE LINE, CRIMSON (RELOCATE) I❑ EXIST GAS LINE, SCG (RELOCATE) T/R ELEV 159.50 PLAN 1"=20'-0" 20 1 21 40 1 I I I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i _20' F O R INTERNAL USE ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY oesD. PEPD SARETSKY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRA NO. R06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL EST LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. SARETSKY FORINTERNAL T, l00 ST-K1021 CHECKED BY USE ONLY V RECORD SET SCALE M. RODRIGUEZ ?6�lrvcal PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENT AS SHOWN IN CHARGE f055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/A J. SWANSON NOT FOR GS ANGELES, CA 9001 T-2556 DATE CONSTRUCTION ..,�.,.m,.Gwm H/GH-SPEED EXISTING INTERSTATE 710 (HOBART YARD) OH 5NEET No. REV DATE BY SUB APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 GENERAL PLAN 1 OF 2 BRIG EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST ABUT 1 I BENT 2 I BENT 3 I BENT 4 I BENT 5 I 50'-3%"± I 85'-43/4"± 1 104'-1"± 1 117'-21/4"± I 117'-2�/4"± I I I INTERSTATE 710 (BR. NO. 53-840) I I --�-- -- --�-- -- -- -- r- --�-- -- -----r---- -- -- -- -- ----- __- - __- - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - __- - __- - _ TRACKS TO BE REMOVED C BNSF LEAD C jM4 * 3 C * 2 C * 1 C m3 rL m2 Z ml (L BNSF � EX BNSF SIDE EX YARD C EX YARD TRACK I TRACKI�I I I (E) ABUT 1 1 1 15'-O" 15'-0" 15'-0" Q 1 I I 11.5'± LEAD25'± 25'± I I APPROX OG �-FG APPROX OG = FG = FG (E) BENT 2 (E) BENT 3 (E) BENT 4 (E) BENT 5 ELEVATION NOTE: 1"=30'-O'' * M1 - M4 TRACK ARE ANGLED AT 70 AWAY FROM BENT 3. NO PIER PROTECTION NECESSARY FOR Ml. EXISTING FOUNDATION DATA LOCATION OF BOTTFOOTING ELEV LE DIIFIED AMETER (SERVNCE LOADING TIP CELEV ABUT LEFT 171.5± 16" 32 TONS 125± 1 RIGHT 170.5± 16" 32 TONS 125± LEFT 145± 16" 32 TONS 118± BENT 2 CENTER 144± 16" 45 TONS 115± RIGHT 145± 16" 32 TONS 118± LEFT 146± 16" 32 TONS 121± BENT 3 CENTER 145± 16" 45 TONS 116± RIGHT 146.5± 16" 32 TONS 121± LEFT 146± 16" 32 TONS 120± BENT 4 CENTER 145± 16" 45 TONS 115± RIGHT 146.5± 16" 32 TONS 120± LEFT 1 145± 16" 1 32 TONS 118± BENT 5 1 CENTER 1 145± 16" 1 45 TONS 1 115± RIGHT 1 144± 16"1 32 TONS 1 118± LEGEND: - - - INDICATES EXISTING FEATURES (M) PROPOSED ALIGNMENT (m) EXISTING ALIGNMENT INDICATES POINT OF MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (24'-0" MIN) 30 0 30 60 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I"=30' F O R INTERNAL U S E ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY oco D. wSARETSKY PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT w7'S06-0005 — DRAWN BYS SUBMITTAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. D. SARETSKY FOR INTERNAL rTT , 1O 0 CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,A`J 1 V RECORD SET ST-K1022 M. RODRIGUEZ i orb i SCALE NIN CHARGE O55WESTSEVENTHSTREET,SUITE3150 GW(hl CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENT AS SHOWN J. SWANSON NOT FOR LOS ANGELES, CA 9001 T-2556 DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GH-SOEEDRA/ZAUTHOR17Y EXISTING INTERSTATE 710 (HOBART YARD) OVERHEAD SHEET ND. REV DATE BY SUB APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 GENERAL PLAN 2 Orr2 U E 0 3 E O JEW 1 Fn#4 s ti�HcTp , i H -' : 6� Vp - NEW ,TRACK- 4*11C 1 - T 1025 CV-T3025 E 26TH ST ♦ Tom# 7;. x, :.. CV-T3027 REALIGNED _ ♦♦♦ F 26T H . .+L 4 r .' " t -�� ly ♦♦♦♦♦ V �C�H%$T ♦♦w C V- T 1 04 1 " . chi �!- j.w. i ♦4V-T1028. ♦♦♦♦ CV-T10'2,,. M + 01 e< ♦♦♦ ♦ i\ 1►� : MFR+...... nz� LLI 04 ♦ / ♦ \ 1►♦♦ CV T1043 to r y i I ♦♦ I�{ ' I h ~ F" _ ♦♦/CS T1 32 ♦IP 26rH ♦♦♦♦ \ a '. 13 t �' t ' It \ ♦♦ VgC4 1045 • Sj ,�►♦♦ CV-T Hr - - I ' - CV-T1038 RN 4 -�.f' ' 45 �: S'4lY Y•; �:-:. Ll!•S}y L4tlYi sh.�� -��. ♦♦♦ZF Y,k�-T'.. YQ♦ , ovie - - - ♦CV-T 026 ♦ CV-T104 ♦♦ • - �T ��x �`�—� - _ Q� V-�03 ♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦ Fly *1 CV-T1034♦ ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ CV-T1046 4 $T ANN r . V CV T 03 E 26TH ST \ �� ♦♦♦ r r`* REALIGNED Q ♦♦ r`� _ -+ -FERN= BELL -�-'�/ ` , � � _ TION FOR INTERNAL FOR SUSE CONLY 500 0 500 1000 SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY M AMAWAL PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT RACTY�DNTHSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL �ry T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. MEMAMAYVQL FOR INTERNAL `'T \ T �oo RECORD SET CV-T0025 CHECKED BY USE ONLY •A\J 1 V J.S'WANSON SCALE IN CHARGE IPTSEVENTH STRECT, suirE also CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION J. Sy�QNSON NOT FOR osnHGe wsYcneoon-zsss - 1 " = 500 DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEDRA/L AUTHOR/TY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 ORIENTATION MAP THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA IND NO CHECKED BY USE ONLY 10 0 RECORD SET CV- T 1025 M. SATISH SCALE IN CHARGE 1�SS WESTSEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3,5� eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION J. SWANSON NOTFOR I.SA.cE�EsV AWl)n-zsss CAL /FOR/V/.4 ROAD�yAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SREEA SHOWN ° DA T E CONSTRUCTION IIIGF/-SPEED RAIL AUTHOR/TY REy DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 1 OF 13 EXIST Rf� R0� 222+00 3'i 223+@0 1 \ S?Y Z4+00 50Y 225+00 -SBY 226+00 _ SBY 227+00 -00 35+00 N °' a 36+00 E 26TH ST N N X ST CITY - \ - I /IL� \ alra 37±00 38+0 1 + 1 O— �O L(-1d ln0 \ lOU aD[CI O x= + M + M p \ \ CITY OF VERNON / PLAN —< < w< _____________________________________________________________�_____. Z� �r 2 <v*w T �� 42+00 41+ 1 �_ r R A6T + M E 26�jH ST 40+97.21 PROP C yy�� = EYY pUpPRR 26TH ST NCIOSSANG - D ISIONRO - -- - -- --------------- 'PG . CL LEAD � M1 Z M2 � CL M 3 � o ro CL M4 + Q �N SBY 237+pp �p r UPRR sBv w> SAN >EDRO 4 z_U Lu p JW �— =VT 1y U -o r + N M O F N � PROP CITY ROW 0 0 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACI(, INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOR RIGH SEE VOLUME 1. OF -WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR SEE GRADING4INFORMATION, VOLUME6. FOR SEE DRAINAGE4 INFORMATION, VOLU ME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TIO FOT FOR INTERNAL USE NLY R 40 0 40 80 I"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE 11 S67047'18"E 176.36' �2 S61042'16"E 584.05' CURVE DATA NO R I A I T I L 10 1000.00' 06005'02" 1 53.14' 1 106.18' o �17 170 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 44+00 PROFILE DESIGNED BY 0. A. CHIANG CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DD NTRACT PEPD HSR06-0005 DRd N er SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING O. CHECKED BY USE ONLY ESTV 100 RECORD SET CV-T1026 M. SATISH SCALE o rl IN CHARGE f055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, S-PIT33150 CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ,� J. s ANSON NOTFOR OSANGEE, w9001T-256 ROADVyAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET o- SHOWN ° DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEOi7AIL AUTHOR/TY q 54 RE, DATE Br CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03�09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 2 OF 13 RELOCAT EXIST TRANSMISSION �\ TOWER 1 8 kv) +00 � — 49 — \\ 41+00__�-- - y 46+0 SBY 234+00 56Y 235+00 _ 5 6+0 11 2 +0 SBY 238+00 SBY 239+00 +00 ao_ W> jw p 2 + + 3 + + — +n—() 50+OQ+ 2V, o � N IL .T 0 55 +' BNSFTTRU7+2-' rC 11\Ir 1C AI�d 0 m F. z Ca ASS, PLAN 1_0� . NOTES: 1. FOR TRACT INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOR SEE VOLUME RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, 1. 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR SEE GRADING4INFORMATION, VOLUME6. FOR SEE DRAINAGE4 INFORMATION, VOLU ME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TIO FOT FOR INTERNAL NLY R 40 0 40 80 I"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE 2 S61042'16"E 584.05' E S57052'30"E 1348.41' —i --'- — — — — —� 190 190 o �-•�� o 0 0 o N N ;a0 a0 N� N� o � w> w> --B-----iZV ----- �------B-----i-----i----- :------B-----i-----i----- �------e-----i-----i----- �------B-----:-----i----- �------B-----�----- �-----'------B-----�----- �-----'------B-----�----- �-----'------�-----�----- �-----'------B-----�-----i-----'------'r-----i----- :-----'------'-----i-----i------ ------'r-----i-----i-----'------ ZU- JW JW W W a 2 n 2N ,H H im •a a 180 180 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............................ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... io �------------ _____ ---------------------------------------- ------ ------ ------------ ______ ------ ___________ ____ 4 4 ?a 17 170 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 PROFILE DESIGNED By No. A. CHIANG CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT GD NTRACT PEPD HSR06-0005 Dad N er SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 0. CHECKED By USE ONLY ESTHPITF3150 100 RECORD SET CV-T1027 M. SATISH SCALE oAV IN CHARGE f055 WESTSEVENTH STREET, . Lam' CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ,� J. S ANSON NOT FOR OSANGEE, w9001T-256 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET o. SHOWN ° DATE CONSTRUCTION A11G1-1-Sa6F,0RAIL AUTHOR/TY 54 REy D4iE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION 03�09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 3 OF 13 PLAN �.......................'-----' '-----'------F---- ' = = ';.........---F------------------'----- ; ' ...... M4;T/R; -T--T-T-- - - , Q ------------.... 1 Ii i i i i i LPG, - --I_ - Iv.,VA . , � ;o ; ........... ......................................... - - - --......... 0 ;0 0 -- ----------•-----------------•-----•----- ......• •-----• ------• • ------ ------• •-----•---- -I-----• • ------ -------• •-----• ----- ----- OTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2• FOE VOLUME F. INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4• 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6• FOE V AINAGE4 INFORMATION, SELUME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR INTERNAL USE FOR SCONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE 31 S57052'30"E 1348.41' 141 S67044'03"E 532.81' CURVE DATA NO R I A I T L 101 600.00' 09051'34" 1 51.75' 103.25' 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 P R + 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+00 64+00 DESIGNED BY ALE CONTRACT . A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAW BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL �T%0a'001 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 0. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1to RECORD SET CV-T1028 17<M. SATISH PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITIONSDALE I CHARGE 10.55 WEST SEVENTH STREET, CAL /FO/R/V/ANOT FOR LOSANGELES,GA8001] AS SH0 N J. s ANSON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET 0. L DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA/Z AUTHOR/TY REY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPT" 03/09/18 1 1 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 4 OF 13 CD 0 Q ,ow N a0 0 0 4 NI- 65+00 W> o- JW N a - H5+21.56 PROP KNUCKLE PER CITY STD TYP R=45' _ O• I PROP BNSF S BOUNDARY = DRAINAGE CHANNEL + I Q _ 0 PROP CL 26TH ST 10w o I o 0 0 0 o I 5 + + + + M N a + PROP KNUCKLE PER +.7.48 - - - (- -� -T- CITY STD TYP R=45' PI E 6TH ST - o(RE IIGNFD) o I PR rvAY - -- - -PLAN- - -- -- -- - P� ERT o SEE ST-K1019 . . ' ; .... '-----=------==-----'-----=------;-..........;.....:... t ' ;---- ; ,---- ;.....,.....:......,.. -- a....- 4 T/R ; -- ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- ----- ----- - + OG, DRA AGE - - - —� HA 0 — — -- — _4-_---_---_---_------,.... T ____ _ _—�F�T� + — — ��. . -- -�_-vtuar� o FIG i JI x' PROP BOX CULVERT- I SCE ST-K10,19 I ................... -- -r -I, NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOE VOLUME F. INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4• 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6. FOE V AINAGE4 INFORMATION, SELUME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR INTERNAL USE FOR SCONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NOI BEARING DISTANCE 4 S67044'03"E 532.81' L5jj S22015'57"W 225.93' 6 S67051'33"E 1087.83' 64+00 65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 P R6 + 70+00 71+00 72+00 73+00 74+00 DESIGNED BY ALE CONTRACT . A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL �Tj T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING D. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1 �/ 1�� RECORD SET CV-T1029 Ma SATISH gq/tQi PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION17< A SCALE I CHARGE 10.55 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 31 0 CAL /FOR/V/.4 NOT FOR LOSANGELES,GA_1T-3558 AS SHO N J. s ANSON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET D. L DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA/L AUTHOR/TY REY DATE BY CXK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 5 OF 13 w PROP BNSF ROP BNSF S BOUNDARY 70 "i BOUNDARY E TY T = _i 30" 30' CITY OF VERNON -m z oc~i1 F E 2N6TH ST 78+ 3POT Z I DIANA ST 14+60.56 POT — i Ay7 PROP _ PROP CL PROP CITY 1 26TH ST CITY o ROW ; 00 �_ �- '� ROW CD �m j p CD + N �0 CoM V1� 6 7 + a No w> + + + 78+ 0 + + + +00 E 6TH ST o o =:E:�- z' JW xN col I VLAa �............... ;---- ....�.....,.....;... = = = = = ....,.....;.....:... t ----;.....,...........-.- 1....- 0 0 „ .r. y. -----r- - - -- W 2 n id �~ ., 170 PG 0 0 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOE VOLUME 1WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4• 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FORT INTERFOR NAILSUSECONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 III=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE [6j S67051'33"E 1087.83' 7 S67051'33"E 1206.95' 74+00 75+00 76+00 77+00 78+00 P R + 80+00 81+00 82+00 83+00 84+00 DESIGNED BY ALE CONTRACT A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT IyN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 DRAW A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL q.V. LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA I G D. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 0 RECORD SET CV-T103O M. SATISHPRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITIONSDALE I CHARGE 10.55 WEST SEVECAL /FOR/V/.4 NOT FOR LOSANGELES,OA8001T-H558 AS SH0 N J. s ANSON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET 0. L DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA/Z AUTHOR17-Y %Y DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTICIN 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 6 OF 13 O 0 Coo M Qo N� W> ZU JW W UN H- �.................t----- ------'-------L----------;-----;-----;-....�.....I......----- I-------•------==-----=-----=------;-..........;.........---;-----a---- ;---- '------;-----; ;-----'---- ;.....,.....:........ °---- ;------------; I....- j; �-M4 T4----------- -------------------:-----�---- ----- ---------'----- ------ ----- ---- ---------------- ---- -----a------- ----- ---- ----------------- ---- ---- ---- ------- ---------------- '------ ----- 1 — , --, ----T ---, 0 + W> ZC-? NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOE VOLUME F. INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4, 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6. FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR INTERNAL USE FOR SCONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE ❑7 S67051'33"E 1206.95' CURVE DATA R A T L 3 tNO 500.00' 22027'31" 99.27' 195.99' 4 500.00' -22031'05" 99.54' 196.51' 84+00 85+00 86+00 87+00 88+00 P R + 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 DESIGNED BY ALE CONTRACT . A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL J A. ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING D. 17< ACHECKED BY USE ONLY 1 �/ 1�� RECORD SET CV-T1031 M. SATISH gq/tQi PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE -IF'-CHARGE 1- WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE M 0 CAL /FOR/V/.4 NOT FOR LOS ANGELES, GA 8001]-3Q AS SHO N A s ANsoN ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET D. L DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA& AUTHOR/TY n REY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPT" 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 7 OF 13 PROP BNSF / S BOUNDARY EXIST R TYP DEMOCEXIST K SEE CITY OF VOL 1 TYP / E 26TH ST 95+69.68 POT -w VERNON IR r = SPUR POC Q� PROP PROP j PROP O1iJ CITY 26TH f w o oROW + ++ tr^ 3 a•I 6 c) V OM QO O O n nB qc,+nh + + + + + - - - 1' 102+00 inln~ I— — _+ — — t — — — — — — — I — — — ?` o o i E 6TH ST o o JW 4 r�"1 N M N JW Lu W 2N 2N U / T X�IEE E SPUR PO 95+8 0 V TYP 7 / PLAN ' ;-----;-----; ....�.....I......----- = = = = = ..........:.....:... t ;-----'---- ;.....,.....:......'.. --- - - -- I.....;----- 0 PG QO _____-_____ -______._____�..... �.....:......a-� ------------------- ____ _ __ 1 —1-- W� . . T�OSL_____I __ w - u NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2• FOE VOLUME 1WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4• 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6• FOE V AINAGE4 INFORMATION, SELUME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR INTERNAL USE FOR SCONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE IF-8]l S67047'59"E 957.96' CURVE DATA NO R I A T L 1()41 500.00' -22031'05" 99.54' 196.51' 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 P R9 + 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 DESIGNED BY OALE CONTRACT . A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL �Tj T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 40. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1 �/ 1�0 RECORD SET CV-T1032 M. SATISH gq/tQi PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE —IF'—CHAR 10.55 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 31 0 CAL /FOR/V/.4 NOT FOR LOS ANGELES, GA 8001]-2558 AS SHO N nTES ANSON CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA/LAIITHOR/TY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT- E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET 0. c REY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPT" 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 8 OF 13 PROP CIT c c c V PROP CITY ROW Lnm PLAN S:Bp�j�N ? ? ? ? ? i i ? ? ? �............... t �EAC I -.... '------=-----:-----=-- = -....,.....;.....:... t ;.....,.....:........ a.... PL 'o " + !,I - - $_ : ................ ------ ----------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ...... I ------ ------ ------ ----------- I ------- I ------- I ...... I I ..... ------------- ----------- ��M M p . . . . . . . OG V1~ I t PG NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOE VOLUME F. INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6. FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR INTERNAL USE FOR SCONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE 81 S67047'59"E 957.96' 191 S67047'59"E 2183.28' 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 P 1R0 + 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 LE DESIGNED BY CO TR . A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL CTj J LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 40. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1J 1 �/ 1�� RECORD SET CV-T1033 M. SATISH gq/tQi PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE I CHARGE 1PMTEET-STREET , SUITE 31 0 CAL h 0/?/V/A NOT FOR LOSANGELES,GA8001]-2558 AS SHO N J. s ANSON �� ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET o. L DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA& AUTHOR/TY n REY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTIOA 03/09/18 1 1 1 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 9 OF 13 O 0 -� PROP CITY ROW BNS 7PROP F S BOUNDARY CITY OF VERN0N PROP CL 26TH ST r I PROP CITY 0 Row M N� �M O Q + + +00 124+00M N NI O O JW M N W SN U --------------- PLAN - - -- ' -----; ;----- ; .... I------=------==-----=-----=------;-..........;.........---;-----a---- ;---- '------;-----; ;.....,.....:.....-.- '------; °---- ;----------- ; I....- OG U H NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOE VOLUME 1WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4, 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6. FOE V LUNMEGE4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOR INTERNAL USE FOR SCONLY 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 III=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO BEARING DISTANCE 121 S67047'59"E 2183.28' 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 P R + 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 LE DESIGNED BY CO TR A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A- CHIANG FOR INTERNAL �Tj T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 40. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1�0 RECORD SET CV- T1034 M. SATISH gq/tQi PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE DRi I CHARGE 1PMTEET-STREET , SUITE 31 0 CAL /FOR/V/.4 NOT FOR LOSANGELES,GA80.1T-2558 AS SHO N J. s ANSON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET 0. L DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA& AUTHOR/TY REY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTIOA 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 10 OF 13 PROP BNSF S BOUNDARY VIERNON PROP PROP j CITY 26TH ST R0w 0 9 N O 124 + r� o o �p�?76THI m I 4' 36' PROP CUL-DE- PER CITY STD PROP DRIVEw TYP E AYERSSAVE 15+ IN —E +69. PLAN ��m =_ = i s - ' ; -....=------=-----=-----'-- = ; - t °----- ;----------- ; a..... ; ---- - 4. T/R - X PG; —-------- ------ OG 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 DESIGNED BY A. CHIANG DATE I BV I CHK I APP I DESCRIPT" PEPO SUBMITTAL /y T FOR INTERNAL \ T 100 USE ONLY ,►J1 1 V 1F�T�EMT.M=EN,SUITE 31 0 CAL /FOR/V/A NOT FOR LOS ANGELES,GA800,]-2UT CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA/L AUTHOR/TY NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2• FOE VOLUME 1WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4• 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6• FOE VOLUNMEGE4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYSTM INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FOT INTERNAILUSE FOR SCONLY R 40 0 40 80 1"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"'4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY LINE DATA NO I BEARING DISTANCE S67047'59"E 2183.28' CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA I D D. RECORD SET CV—T1035 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET SHO N PLAN AND PROFILE — SHEET 11 OF 13 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 i DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL _ A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL MM=.� LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIMDRA Mc No. Iff CHECKED BY USE ONLY 100 RECORD SET CV-T1036 NSII;AESATea�/� PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SGALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVCAL /PORN/,4 N NOT FOR �osnNCE�Es,cn�oon-xsss AS SHOWN J. s ANSON ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET D. t DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GH-SPEED RA/L AUTHOR/TY u REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTON 03/09/18L PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 12 OF 13 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN By SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA INc No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-T1037 M. CHARGE STv eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/.4 SHOWN ° NOT FOR �osnrucE�Es,cneootT-zsss AS J. S ANSON H/GHSPEEDRA/LAUTHOR/TY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET No. REy DdiE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION DATE CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 13 OF 13 03/09/18 00 27+60 28+00 29+00 1 CL NEW LEAD CL EXIST LEAD CL EXIST BNSF M1 CL EXIST BNSF M2 CL EXIST BNSF M3 CL EXIST BNSF M4 o RR/CITY ROW - - 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 0 34+00 N a I I C I 't\ 35+00 36+ E 26TH ST 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1,WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. \ 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. y 6 FOE VOLUNMEGE4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. t I 0 XIIS TYP 6 3100 N 38+ _ — 39 v�~o JW PROP 26TH SI S fL� -- r � O �O 4Ja I TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 "=50' HORIZ A. CHIANG PEru CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY N '00RECORD SET CV-T1038 M. SATISH SCALE IN CHARGE -P-1L.T. STREET. SUITE 3,5� e PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION J. SWANSON NOT FOR os"cE�EsVcneoo"-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEEAN SHOWN. ° DATE CONSTRUCTION h/Gh SPEEORA/Z AUTHOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 0 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 1 OF 9 1. FOR TRAC�(I INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. _= 2. FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, M f SEE VOLU E 4. 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. +� 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. ^\ 7. FOR SYST M INFORMATION, f SEE VOLU�E 4. OVERPASSCK BNSF HOBART YARD V CV T C NEW BNSF M1 3025 NEW BNSF M2 I \ o >e:72e*ao \ o - SLY 229+00 + er z3o+oo W BNSF M MN77- �1 SBY 232+00 — va~o 40. \ 42+00 43+00 + 9 +5)Qo' 46+00 — 47+00 — +00 49+00 ST } SBY .239+0p — -- -- -- ��-- -- � � sav-- -- -- — -- -- -- -- RE OC E EX ST 4 L I E } o +1 z3s+oo TRANNSI ISSION xcwi, - - / 6 T $ — I_ :o �� z36+o _ - - TOWER 138 kv) `Bi 232+oG f - PROP RELO, ATFM EXIST ' E GRA E 26TH S I TO ER S�1 38Sk�N -- -- -- c_ CT ABTA€, — pro r - LANI — ti ao IFY Inca � v,� ' SAEUPRR PEDRO N, r SEE VOL 1 JW W � �• 2t/1 UPRR SA� PEDRO 1 SE OL- - I 0 a I I FORT INTERNAILUSE SCONLY o= ' r 50 0 50 100 I"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY PEPD DESIGNED BY CO TR 06-0005 O CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING D. CHECKED BY USE ONLY STv 100 RECORD SET CV-T1039 IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE/� NOTFOR LOS ANGELE.' CA 9001 T-2556 CAL/PORN/A ^S SHOWN IL 0 a DATE CONSTRUCTION"`Wm h7GAASREEL7RAIL AUTF/ORVY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET O. REV 04iE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION I M P A C T PLAN SHEET 2 OF 9 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACT INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. ' 2 FOR SEE VOLUME RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, 1. — — — — — — — — — 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E . 00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 +— + + + + + + + q, FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, u � — — — M SEE VOLU E 4. — — — — — — — — — — 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. ]ST C&G EXIST 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, CITY SEE VOLUME 4. wool CITYT RO 7. FOR SYST M INFORMATION, *oo R/W SEE VOLU�E 4. BY 4j+0D f -- SBY 242ip0 . E F YWS ARD sev 43+-00mm E 1 TYP N L o . '00 SBY 245+00 � • +1 >OY 241,00Y _ !I �� Ln OP 65+00 o R F 'I S o PROP BNSF tea, S BOUNDARY �o N� C NEW BN PRO 25 t' * 1 a 1 NEW 26TH S$ PROP KNUCKLE PER Jw , CITY STD TYP R=45" CL NEW 8 E S 30' 30 ROP DRIVE Y 1 1 1 VOCR CROP - I � R Roy o y 1 o O CD _P aL ~~ C[T TYP�2- JW t W a — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — U rD VEWA-_ sop 0 im Ki o NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 I"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DES I ED BY 0 O A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRe N BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY STv 100 RECORD SET CV- T1040 M. IN CHARGEISH 1055WEST SEVENTH STREE,SUITE3150 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE N I. S ANSON NOT FOR LOS ANGELES, CA9001T-2556 CAL/FOR/V/.4 _ As SHOWN ;a De. CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEDi7A/[AUTHOR/TY ROADWAY IMP/R�OVEMENT E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET o. REy DATE BY CHI APP DESCRIPTION 03/pg/Ig IMPART PLAN SHEET 3 OF 9 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. -i - + + + + - + - - + - - + - - + + + + 4. FOR UTIL TY INFORMATION, T E 26To BE HA AT SEE VOLU�E 4. - - - - - - - - - - - 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. • • _ 6 FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. v, t 1 a SF YARD TRACKS 1 TYP e I .ur IAL SBY 255+00 25 + + h S. 260+00 SBY 262i B" 264i JO �2i SBY 267+00 SBY 268+00 0 . ;' J 5 i. - _ E oT C - I Bg55 I �!- SRBOUNDARY V 0I �. E o CV T3025 o ;;� CV-T3025 I�op PROP ROy�Y 1 PROP BOX CULVERT 25' 25' o o PR �T I o SEE ST-K1019 0,o M b� l 4 OoN ol I 1 cnr— .N M + CD + + + + - N a 78+90zqjQo + N a + z� o o -E 6TH ST o 1 E 226TH ST o �w Jw N M N REALIG ED N =� w L U =N f ti JOIN EXIST } ~ TYP c� o r 7EXIST R TR KS Q CITY QQF � � a ��::� '� • I 1 I I YAW o ERN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION o= o - - -_ I FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY + 50 0 50 100 I"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY 40. A. CHIANG CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT cD NTRACT PEPD HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL N 1 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA IND ND. CHECKED BY USE ONLY S 100 RECORD SET CV-T1041 M`""FISH ,� -TW TSOT„STREET,SU,TE„so CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE SHOWN = FRE J. S ANSON NOTFOR Los INGEEs cn soon-zsssDATE coNsreucTlDN,vrcwsPEEORaic aurvrRirr ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 4 OF 9 CITY OF y VERNON -k 0 CD M aD^ v O ao N a A4a CC— z' o � JW W 2l/, U H � J DATE PROP #� ROWY PROP fy. `26TH ST Tt 26T DESCRIPTION A. CHIANG DRAWN BY A. CHIANG CHECKED BY M. SATISH IN CHARGE J. SWANSC DATE 03/09/18 s SBY 27WO SBY 275+00 SBY 276+0& SBY 274N SBY 279+7J SBY 219+90 1 �� F• - PROP BNSF ...:"'' S BOUNDARY -.. + + I+ — — — — — I T NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, — — — 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. + + 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 SEE VOLUME DING4INFORMATION, 6 FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. �NE� BNSFTYARDTRACKSYP EE CL NEW BNSF M1 CL NEW BNSF M2 DEMOVEXIST TYPTRACK It NEW BNSF M3 Z SEE CL NEW BNSF M4 i + ti Cn M Q W > o zc� N J W xcwi) U '_D0 VOLITTTYPACK$, EXIST TRACKS JEE XIST TRACKS SEE VOL 1 TYP VOL 1 TYP - PEPD SUBMITTAL FORIL USE ONLY rT 10o SUIT,sooss WEST STREET �� NOTFOR LOS ANGeE. CA90017-2556 CAL/FOR/V/A CONSTRUCTION h/hS,_ RA/Z AUTHOR/TY / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 10.0 I"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY TR CT CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DOHSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No• RECORD SET SCALE V-T1042 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION AS SHOWN ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. IMPACT PLAN - SHEET 5 OF 9 O 0 + + + + + + + + + + + +107+00 bL VACAIL iX z I I I Ir. / I EENE�OBN1FTYPRD T t ACKS � I - E" [d3+nC SBY 284*00 SBY 285+00 SBY 286+00 SBY 287+00 SBY 288+00 53-00 S SBY 292+00 SBY 293,0C Sal = SG" 2 i 41 — -- -- n — — -- -- -- — — -- I � VIERNONF � NEW BNSF M1 PROP CUL-DE-SAC PER CITY STD NEW BNSF M2 CL NEW BNSF M3 .,CROP it PROP BNSF * 25'�25' C NEW BNSF M4 ROW S BOUNDARY J + PROPQ � - - o • + 26TH ST ~+ a� + c 1 1 4+00 I �� O �O N MEil 111 � • O� •K�r- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ++ 1 Z EXIST,R s O U JOIN EXIST TYP-_� S M-< l TYP EX ST LEAD TRACKS LLJs is m� SE VOL 1 TYP 1 * * 4 _ NOD i Pi 1. FOR TRACT INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2. FOR SEE VOLUME RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, 1. 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. SEE VOAD�EG4INFORMATION, 6. FOR SEE DRAINAGE4 INFORMATION, VOLU ME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. FORT INTERNAILSUSECONLY 50 0 50 100 I"=50' HORIZ A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT noolipM DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 i A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 40. CHECKED BY USE ONLY W.E.Tv100 RECORD SET CV-T1043 NcHeA ISH _ASTREE,SUITE3150 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE NOTFOR LGS ANGELES, CA 9001 ]-2556 CAL/FORK/A AS SHOWN J. s ANsoN�,cwm ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET O. DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/GAI-SOEEDRAIL AUTHOR/TY a REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 1 10 1 IMPART PLAN SHEET 6 OF 9 0 0 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 111+00 11 + + + + + + tt + tt + t + 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 6 FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, EEXIST X7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. AIL No M— — � � EEEVOBNiFTYARD (RACKS I — a r ROP ' {* OWt, --{-- - PROP ---1 26TH T 0 0 .� TYPST R EXIST LEAD TRW a SEE VOL 1 TYP 0 0 -tuu 1tl1 .1— lb, SUS— SbY SV'+VU r VI T Y CO g 5 SRBOU06 F NEW BNSF M1 Z NEW BNSF M2 CL NEW BNSF M3 Z NEW BNSF M4 --- - - - _ - - — (REA6IGNEDI - - - - - - - - �■ •�II�II��■ III■ • M • •�• • ■ ■ III■ ■ I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION o= - FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY - 50 0 50 100 I"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY CO TR CT 0. A. CHANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY NN-EE.IIITE�M�(ea"O;�_o RECORD SET CV-T1044 M`"°�EISH osswEsrCAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITIONS�dLgs SHOWN ,1. s ANSON NOTFORROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. ° DATE CONSTRUCTION h/Gh SPEEORA/L AUTHOR/TY '� REV OdiE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 7 OF FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. ?. FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. I. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. I. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOE GRADINGVOLUPE4INFORMATION, FOE DRAINAGEVOLUPE4 INFORMATION, FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL N.LIITE 1 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA ING No. CHECKED BYUSE ONLY S 100RECORD SET CV—T1045 IN CH"FISH osswESTSEENTHSTREE,3,so CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITIONSo��gs SHOWN j. SWANSONNOTFOR ANTE E„ooT-z5�ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. ° DATE CONSTRUCTION h/Gh SPEEORA/L AUTHOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 8 OF 9 SEE 1-710 PROJECT IMPACT TBD SEE 1-710 PROJECT II I I—— —� I i I I- I I ——� II 0 o y M� �w 13 + 36+0 =N — SBY ace+0' U SBY 323i 00 I � a I — — I I I L -- -- - I I� I I I I . I I I I I I F I SEE 1-710 PROJECT SEE CV-T1022 3 / ODIFY EXIST / \ R BRIDGE SE� ST-K1031 / RR PROP RE%A IING 4ALL SEE VOLUME 2 T _ _ f� EXIST CEAD— — It M2 0 It 45pY 32°+00 SBY 3`C 0 SRY .r SBY 33"t SBY 3N4 00 SBY 338-00 SPY 322i CO av z.i .GO— -�—I- (TO. BE VACATED) SPROP BOUNB RY PROPERT TAKE (BY 1-71( PROJ CT) FA RELLOC TE PUMP v 140+00 141+00 142+00 �CVAT10 iSEE C[TYT� PROP CUL-DE Spp R/� Q� ER CITY STD R=3T� R ADWpAY BRIDGEEp / O PENNINGNT PROPERTY BY I-710 PROJECT � s SEE 1-710/ PROJECT PROPER71PROJECT) Y TAKE (B ] 0 SEE CV-T1022 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 FOE GRADINGVOLUME4INFORMATION, 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 M.'11=11L A A. CHIANG PEru CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 w F DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL �� LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL CHECKED BY USE ONLY '00 RECORD SET CV-T1046 MCH°`FISH 'W-ESTSEVENTHSTHEET.SURE3,So CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SDeLgs SHOWN ° NOT FOR cos INCELEs cn soon-z"s J. SWANSON coNsreucTloN "m ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. DATE 111Gff--SPEEDRA/L AUTHOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 9 OF 9 �w 13 + 36+0 =N — SBY ace+0' U SBY 323i 00 I � a I — — I I I L -- -- - I I� I I I I . I I I I I I F I SEE 1-710 PROJECT SEE CV-T1022 3 / ODIFY EXIST / \ R BRIDGE SE� ST-K1031 / RR PROP RE%A IING 4ALL SEE VOLUME 2 T _ _ f� EXIST CEAD— — It M2 0 It 45pY 32°+00 SBY 3`C 0 SRY .r SBY 33"t SBY 3N4 00 SBY 338-00 SPY 322i CO av z.i .GO— -�—I- (TO. BE VACATED) SPROP BOUNB RY PROPERT TAKE (BY 1-71( PROJ CT) FA RELLOC TE PUMP v 140+00 141+00 142+00 �CVAT10 iSEE C[TYT� PROP CUL-DE Spp R/� Q� ER CITY STD R=3T� R ADWpAY BRIDGEEp / O PENNINGNT PROPERTY BY I-710 PROJECT � s SEE 1-710/ PROJECT PROPER71PROJECT) Y TAKE (B ] 0 SEE CV-T1022 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 FOE GRADINGVOLUME4INFORMATION, 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 M.'11=11L A A. CHIANG PEru CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 w F DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL �� LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL CHECKED BY USE ONLY '00 RECORD SET CV-T1046 MCH°`FISH 'W-ESTSEVENTHSTHEET.SURE3,So CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SDeLgs SHOWN ° NOT FOR cos INCELEs cn soon-z"s J. SWANSON coNsreucTloN "m ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. DATE 111Gff--SPEEDRA/L AUTHOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 9 OF 9 Ag DATE DESCRIPTION ---------------------- PROP I RRROCWTY I ———————————-----i-- PEDRO fv�3 Mf4 S BDIVIS ON I I I 15' 22'± 10'± 1 I+ •5. FENCETYP N I RI �— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T RAIL DETAILS SEE7 VOLUME 1 TYP A. CHIANG DRe N BY A. CHIANG CHECKED BY M. SATISH J. PEPD SUBMITTAL FORINTERNAL USE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROP Ri CITY ROW I 30' WC IS LE REOUESTNAS BUILTPL OT AN BLAN PROP OR FIELD SHOTS TO VERIFY c PROP E 26TH EXIST BNSF CITY — ST — /TRUCK OVERPASS ROW EX m 30' 20' �I 1 20 1 LANE y4B i L E EB p I I In— PG I I �J GID TRAFFIC PROP RRIER PER RAISED .2.8.2-C MEDIAN E 26TH ST PROP CONDITION STA 45+50 (SBN STA 233+54) CV-T1039 AS SHOWN 30' PROP c E 26TH ST I 5' 20' 1 PRQP 1 LANE WB OG S 1Vl 30' 20' 1 LANE EB 4 rF 5' !, 14'± OG I PROP CITY Rot EX Iel d lead 7'± .. 7'± I. 1 1 '± PROP-1""' ROP RIGID TRAFFIC N a TYPCE STRIPED BARRIER PER 1.5' MEDIAN TM.2.8.2-C E 26TH ST PROP CONDITION STA 75+00 (SBN STA 260+50) �1 CV-T1041 AS SHOWN PROP PROP PROOP IT E 26TH ROtl ROW T I I lead 111. 30' I 30' 25'± 5' 20' 1 ' PROP 1 LANE WB 1 L JVl I OG 4PER1.5' AR PROP RIGID FENCE STRIPED BARRTYP MEDIAN TM... E 26TH ST PROP CONDITION STA 80+00 (SBN STA 265+50) E CV- T1041 AS SHOWN - sTv 100 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, 3150 Lam' CAL/FOR/V/.4 LOS ANGELES, CA 9001T-'_ 1-11Gh'-SPEE0RAIL AUTHOR/TY 1. FOR TRACE( INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2• FOR SEE VOLUME RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, 1. 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5• FOR SEE GRADING4INFORMATION, VOLUME6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY CONTRACT 0. CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 40. RECORD SET CV-T3025 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE ,,� ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET No. SHOWN CROSS SECTION - SHEET 1 OF 3 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY A. CHIANG PEru CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM ORA INc No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY S '00 RECORD SET CV-T3026 M. SATISH - SCALE IN CHARGE 1�SS WESTSEVENTH STREET. SUITE 3,5� e PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ° NOTFOR LosnrucELEs.cn000n-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 AS SHOWN j. SWANSON ,vrc11_S,0 Raic aurvoRirr ROADWAY IMPROV/E+MENT - E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET NO. REy DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION DATE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION SHEET 2 OF 3 03/09/18 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 10 0 10 20 I"=10' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY A. CHIANG PEru CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM ORA INc No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY NTV '00 RECORD SET CV—T3027 MCHeGEIs" tosswEsrsE�ENTHSrHEET,sI,ITE3so PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE ° NOTFOR LosnNCELEs,cneootT-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 AS SHOWN J. S ANSON h'/Gh'-SPEE0 ORA/LAUThOR/TY ROADWAY IM`�P`RO`V/E+ ENT — E 26TH ST (VERNON) SHEET No. �RE DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION DATE CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION SHEET 3 OF 3 03/09/18 U E 0 3 E 0 *4rot f J Nr f T HGtil OAI 6 P0) N of f or` r4 / \ v. . r \ft4o, cv-rio47 fJ STREET'.. l \ CV- T,04& \ \' \� 40 40• ' •,o � cv-r, 049 -. / \CV-T1055 CV-TIO50 CV-T1051 / \ CV- T1052'.I \ w i•1. �\ r CV- T1053 J / z Ld � CV-LLI T1054 I E4G� �o / - - W — _ _ qp / a / 1 I `�- I oLu / L o -�' ' ; • TRACKS, { / >rW = �_ is - - I ° 7 \ } NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY I"=200' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGM.MAMAWAL PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT �DNTRACT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL �ry T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. MECKEDBYQL FOR INTERNAL `'T\T �oo RECORD SET CV-T0047 CHECKED BY USE ONLY 'A\J 1 V J.S'1QNSON SCALE IN CHARGE '°sswEST SEVENTR STREC' suirE also CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION J. SINQNSON NOT FOR osnHGe wsYcn�oon-zsss _ 1 " = 200 CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR,4/LAUTHOR/TY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT ACCESS RD (VERNON) SHEET No. DATE ON ORIENTATION MAP REV DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEru CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL DRAWING No. A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM CHECKED BY USE ONLY S 100 RECORD SET CV-T1047 M. SATISH — SCALE IN CHARGE W`ENTH STREET. S TE3 e� PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION L J. SWANsON NOTFOR LosnNceLescn000nCAL/PORN/A AS SHOWN DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-SPEEORA/LAUTh'OR/TY GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SHEET NO. DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 1 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPS CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA ING NO CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-T1048 M. SATISH WWESTSEVENTH �� SCALE IN CHARGE 1STREET. SUITE 350 eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION L NOTFOR LOSANCELEs.c11*17-25M CAL/FOR/V/.4 GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SHEEANSHOWN J.SWANSONTE coNsreu crl oN _ F//GF/-SPEED RAIL AUPIOR/TY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 2 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPS CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA INO NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY '00 RECORD SET CV-T1049 M. SATISH SCALE IN CHARG J. SWANSON E 1�SS WESTSEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3,5� eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION LREV NOTFOR Los^rucELEs.cneoon-zsss CAL/FOR/V/A GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SREEANSHOWN TE CONSTRUCTION IIIGF/-SPEED RAILAUPIOR/TY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 3 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA ING NO CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-T1050 M. SATISH �� SCALE IN CHARGE 1�SS WESTSEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION L NOTFOR LOSANIELEs.c11*17-25M CAL/FOR/V/.4 GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SREEANSHOWN JSWANSONTE coNsreu crl oN _ F//GF/-SPEED RAIL AUPIOR/TY DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 4 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA ING NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-T1051 M. SATISH �� SCALE IN CHARGE 1�SS WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 all PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ° NOTFOR LOSANIEEs.c11*17-25M CAL /FOR/V/.4 GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SREEAN SHOWN J. SWANSON ° DA T E CONSTRUCTION _ F//GF/-SPEED RAIL AUPIOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 5 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN By SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-T1052 M. CHARGE STv eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE h IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/.4 SHOWN ° NOT FOR LosnNCELEs,cneootT-zsss AS SHO i. s ANsoN GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SHEET NO. ° DATE CONSTRUCTION m�Gwm F//GF/-SPEEDRA/L AUPIOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 6 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN By SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-Ti 053 M. CHARGE STv eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE h IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/.4 SHOWN ° NOT FOR LosnNCELEs,cneootT-zsss AS SHO i. s ANsoN GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SHEET NO. ° DATE CONSTRUCTION m�Gwm F//GF/-SPEEDRA/L AUPIOR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 7 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA ING NO �. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1OO RECORD SET CV-T1054 M. SATISH �� SCALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREETSSUITE 3150 all PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ° NOT FOR LosnNCELEs.cneoon-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SHEEAN SHOWN J. SWANSON ° DATE CONSTRUCTION _ F//GF/-SPEED R,4/L AUTh'OR/TY REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03'09/18 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 8 OF 8 THIS SHEET WAS NOT USED AND LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 A. CHIANG FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA ING NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 100 RECORD SET CV-T1055 M. SATISH M` SCALE IN CHARGE 1�SS WESTSEVEHTH STREET, 3,5� eat PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION ° NOTFOR Los^rucELEs.cneoon-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 GRADE SEPARATION - ACCESS RD (PUBLIC) (VERNON) SHEET AS . SHOWN J. SWANSON ° DATE CONSTRUCTION _ IIIGF/-SPEED RAILAUPIOR/TY REy DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 1 OF 1 E 0 3 E 0 ! •I \ r r � 1 F/ 0 W . Z� r-4 LV- I .SUZ1 I • -< ♦♦ ♦ Zp �` rV. Ln ,r`' t. ,.r,►.— F—yPENNINGTON ♦♦♦ I �� y t._ WAY r �I. ♦ , A _ I ST-K1031 ♦♦ ♦ <q = f ►- 11 r ST-K1032— A6 Cy-T1022 I ♦♦♦ NEW I TRACK { \ NN jo. - i �•. = k+ ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY y # 200 0 200 400 i =zoo SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY MSMAMAWAL PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL EST LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. CHECKEDBY AL FORINTERNAL v 100 RECORD SET CV—T0021 CHECKED BY USE ONLY i.syyQNsoN 055WESTSEVENT„STREET,SUITE],50 ea" PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE IN CHARGE NOT FOR L05ARGELEs.CA9oon-z556 CAL/FOR/V/A 1 �� - 200' A s1yQNsoN CONSTRUCTION w H/GHSPEEDRA/LAUThOR/TY GRADE SEPARATION — ATLANTIC BLVD SHEET No. DATE CONSTRUCTION ORIENTATION MAP REV DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION PROP PROPERTY TAKE SEE 1-710 PROJECT (BY 1-710 PROJECT) SEE CV-T1046 + * v M1 !!NW2� o r I ♦ EXIST TY�• • 1 �� CROW y \ `'pA M4� BB MEDIAN - ATLAfVTIC BLVD 49+69.20 POT = 1 y - E 26TH ST 143+35.�6 POC a ---------- - 43+00 w I + M a I o 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00. 1 49+00 — — — — � II ATLANTIC BLVD M I� r EXIST RR ROW m3 � m2 eiad lead 1 CL LEAD -- EB — - MODIFY EXIST R BRIDGE SEE ST-K1031 ar 0\A\52+0000 �\\\\X=i�:_ PROP PUMNX\' 55 'i .• `� / L-- oa—J STATION >VERIATSRQADQNTIBRIDGEE �2 . RELOCATE PSTATIAA IC BLVD, 50+54.26 P // Q ESS RD M4 33jtr.5.ajjW _ SEE CV-T1046 11^'G'v (PE TI,R . R# T NOTES: 1. FOR TRACT INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2• FOR SEE VOLUME RIGHT-OF-WAY INFORMATION, 1. 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5. FOR SEE GRADING4INFORMATION, VOLUME6. FOR SEE DRAINAGE4 INFORMATION, VOLU ME7. FOR SYST5M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. - TIO FOT FOR INTERNAL NLY R E 40 0 40 80 I"=40' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 4 0 4 8 I"=4' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 710 D FF R P = - ------ ------ (SEE [-7;10 P OJEQT) ---- — = ---------------- i i - - - - - - - - Y X -; ; ' R BRIDGE '_K103)-- -�-- - -------� EXIST RQAE :(PENN► w '-ExiS'T-1lR'-B11tDGE---------- ------- - ---- ----- --- -- --- T- 0 ----- ----- -- ----- TOP .OF KTG SEE ; S K1 3L ----- -----' - ---- -- ---- )DGE ^ MODIFY 'EXIST FTG- ----------------------------- •RR $RIDG�-------------------------------- ------------------------ SEE ST-K1031 42+00 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 PROFILE DESIGNED BY CONTRACT 40. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL A. ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. CHECKED BY USE ONLY opV 100 RECORD SET CV-T1021 SATISH Sc LE INCH4RCE f055WESTET,SUITE3150 CAL/FOR/V/.4PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION.1. S ANSON NOTFOR LOS,017-25M AS SHOWN DATE CONSTRUCTION .�,.cwm h'/Gh'-SPE6F,0RAILAUTF/OR/TY GRADE SEPARATION - ATLANTIC BLVD SHEET O- REy DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/Dy�18 PLAN AND PROFILE - SHEET 1 OF 1 PROP PROPERTY TAKE BY 1-710 PROJECT) IW 1-710 PROJECT h PROP PROPERTY TAKE (BY 1-710 PROJECT uL-Z) R=35 � = 1046 00 �..... 4� � mwmm-m�m-m a Q M 48+00 - —c° M V- S� 00 I W I o I I I 49+00 �I. 5I o J/ a� p K.. STATI( IDLE;,, / / A�PUBLIC�D 4 ��.,�• S \ rL M4 i /A� r \ 4�/ SEE CV-T1046 52+00 - 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 - -- H ATLANTIC BLVD EXIST CITY �- \ ROW \ RELOCATE PUMP STATION r \ CL LEAD tl \� \� M1 C M3 \ \ J6 \ O \ \ m \ SEE CV-T1055 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 FOE GRADINGVOLUME4INFORMATION, 6 FOE DRAINAGEVOLUME4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 WIM11MA A. CHIANG PEvu CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAIIN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL �J LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRA'NGNo• IL 0 CHECKED BY USE ONLY N Tv 100 RECORD SET CV—T1022 M. SATISH SCALE IN CHARGE 1�SS WESTSEVENTH STREET, sG1TE3,so PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION v J. SWANSON NOTFOR LosnRCELEs.cneomT-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 AS SHOWN DATE CONSTRUCTION= mm h'/Gh'-SPEEOR,4/L AUTh'Of7/TY GRADE SEPARATION — ATLANTIC BLVD SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPT104 03/09/18 IMPACT PLAN SHEET 1 OF 1 NOTES: EXIST EXIST CITY ROVE ATLA�TIC1 BLVD � CITY ROW . FOR TRA C INFORMATION, K 72'+ 70'+ SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FR INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1,WAY 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, -- SEE VOLUME 3. \ 45'-49' 38'------- 4. FOR UTIL TY INFORMATION, 5" 9' 34" 4.75' 34' 5' i SEE VOL U�E 4. Shy 2 LANES SB 2 LANES NB Shy 5. FOR GRADING INFORMATION, 4 SEE VOLUME 4. OG — 6. FOR DRAINAGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. EXIST CONDITION STA 50+00 B CV-T1022 AS SHOWN - ATLANTIC BLVD MODIFY EXIST RR BRIDGE SEE ST-K103 4 T/R PROP PUMP 49" 38' STATION k - — FILL 5" 34' 1' 1 34' Shy 2 L NES SB 2 LANES NB Sys�FG QCOLUMN EE N �� L�r PROP b WALL TYP NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r PROP UG SD L= �� FOOR INTERNAL UOSE ON 20Y STORAGE MODIFY EXIST RR BRIDGE IS PROJECTED I"=IO' HORIZ AT STA 50+40 SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY PROP CONDITION IO 0 Io 20 STA 50+00 CV-T1022 AS SHOWN - I"=10' VERT SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY CONTRACT 40. A. CHIANG PEPO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL A. CHIANG FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY STV 101 � RECORD SET CV—T3021 MCHeGE15H osswEsrsEENTHSAREE�,SUITEIM PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE m rO3 $ ANSON NOT FOR LOS ANGELES, On 9001T-zsss CALK 0/?IV/A AS SHOWN CONSTRUCTION m�Gwm h'/Gh'-SPEEORA/LAUTh'OR/TY GRADE SEPARATION — ATLANTIC BLVD SHEET NO. REy OdiE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 09/1g ''RC1`'`' SECTION SHEET OF I FOUNDATION: / ABUTMENT: ASSUME 24" 0 CIDH L = 60' B %- 180 KIPS Q SERVICE C BENTS: ASSUME 24" 0 CIDH L = 80' 500 KIPS CA SERVICE / ATLA I B NOTES: A RAIL/F� B F 1D APPROACH SLAB T Y P iZ --- --`---- EXIST RAILROAD BRIDGE LEGEND: EXIST RR R/W-� BNSF FREIGHT 1 a INDICATES DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC T--EXIST RR R/W - - INDICATES EXISTING BRIDGE FEATURES C BNSF FREIGHT 2 ® LIMITS OF EXIST BRIDGE REMOVAL INDICATES PROPOSED ATIANTIC BLVD POINT OF MINIMUM VERITICAL BNSF FREIGHT 3 CLEARANCE (15'-0" MIN) 28055"31%� // // ./ �� m1 TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING UTILITIES: ------- ---- - --------------------- CM1 / / A❑ EXIST 12" WATER, CALIF SERVICE WATER (PROTECT IN PLACE) // _ _ _ - �� m2 TO BE RELOCATED © EXIST 12" WATER, CALIF SERVICE WATER (PROTECT IN PLACE) L LM2 / © EXIST OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 66KV, SCE (RELOCATE) BB STA 331+20.64 /__ / --_----___/_______ _-_________- -- m3 TO BE RELOCATED D❑ EXIST 8" OIL LINE, EXXON MOBIL (RELOCATE) T/R ELEV 158.38' / CL M3 E❑ EXIST GAS LINE, CRIMSON (RELOCATE) 332 0 �/ //' C — F❑ EXIST 8" GAS LINE, SCG (PROTECT IN PLACE) Q 331+00 333+00 __ - M4 - m4 © EXIST 8" OIL LINE, EXXON MOBIL, (PROTECT IN PLACE) D H� EXIST 12" WATER, CALIF SERVICE WATER (PROTECT IN PLACE) -- ;!!1!: _ - EXIST 3" GASOLINE LINE, CRIMSON, (PROTECT IN PLACE) } EB A 332 80.14 EXIST RR R/W ) / -, w /,/'�/U C T/I� EV 1,8.38' EXIST RR R/W l❑ PROPOSED UTILITY RELOCATION. SEE VOL. 4 UT-D1525 — C PENNINGTON WAY 01 AU TRAFFIC (PER DAY): ADT2010: NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME ADTzo30: NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME FORECAST (PER DAY): TRAIN VOLUME 118 FREIGHT 2030 60 METROLINK 40 AMTRAK } SHARED TRACK 30 HST 2I I 0 0 20I 40I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -20' F O R INTERNAL U S E ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY M oesDBY SARETSKY PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT . HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL W..IT. LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. D. SARETSKY FORINTERNAL4�1' �00 ST-K1031 CHECKED BY USE ONLY RECORD SET SCALE E M. RODRIGUEZ PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENTAS SHOWN IN CHARGE fSTREET, CAL /FOR/VIALOS ANGELES, CA 9001 T-25 E _ E SWANSoN CONSTRUCTION "m H/GH-SPEEDRA/LAUTHOR/TY GRADE SEPARATION - ATLANTIC BLVD SHEET NO. E REV DATE BY SUB APP DESCRIPTION DATE03/09/18 GENERAL PLAN 1 OF 2 EVC STA 298+61.08 ELEV 162.58' TA 365+13.19 ELEV 94.87' 1OTYP =ia►401il PROFILE GRADE (M4) No Scale BB 1 59'-6" 35'-0" 44'-9" 43'-9" CL BENT 2 � BENT 3 1\\ I Q FG 3 4 NS/FS ABUT 1 ---------------- TYPKWAY BENT 2 BENT 3 EB 36'-0" BENT 4 T/R i TYP / BENT 4 ABUT 5 )TYP 24" CIDH PILE TYP DATUM ELEV = 110' BN 331+00 BN 332+00 BN 333+00 MIRROR ELEVATION - FREIGHT RR 1 '=20'-O 120'-0" MIN 107'-9" 12`3" 15`0" 14'-6" 15'-6" 14'-0 MIN PROP WIDEN FREIGHT RR GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NO AS -BUILT PLANS WERE AVAILABLE FOR THIS SUBMITTAL. 2. ONLY FACADE OF BRIDGE IS SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 3. OCS POLES SPAN THE LENGTH OF BRIDGE AND ARE NOT SHOWN ON TYPICAL SECTION. NOTES: 1n STRUCTURE APPROACH SLAB O PARAPET O3 PAINT "BR. NO. XX-XXX" O4 PAINT "ATLANTIC BLVD UNDERPASS" O5 WINGWALL O6 SLOPE PAVING O7 NEW UTILITY DUCT LEGEND: — — INDICATES EXISTING FEATURES ® LIMITS OF EXIST BRIDGE REMOVAL Q INDICATES POINT OF MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE (15'-0" MIN) 14'-0" 21'-6" 13'-3'' 1 1 '-0'' 9 23'-0" PROP HST BRIGE o CLFR 1 FIR 2 FR3 CM1 M2 CLM3 rLM4 EXIST o TYP 2 BRIDGERR I I 7 a IIIIII UII ILIIII IIIIIIII S 3'-6" STEEL GIRDER W/ CIP CONIC DECK PROPOSED BRIDGE NORTH TYP �nnnnnnnnnnnnI o PROPOSED BRIDGE SOUTH CONIC MEDIAN ---------------------------------------- U i D- -- - -- - -- —-- nor- rU��i-------uLu 24" CIDH HURT P I L E ---"Lj yff — TYP 10 0 10 20 a TYPICAL SECTION SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 1 10 _0 20 0 20 40 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1"=20' F O R INTERNAL U S E ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DesDO. . BY SARETSKY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT O PEPD HSR06-0005 DRAWN BYS SUBMITTAL �� 100 LOS ANGELERS TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. D. SARETSKY FORINTERNAL r ST-K1032 CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,►.1J RECORD SE SCALE E M. RODR1cuEz e� PRIMARILY ENGINEERING PROJECT DOCUMENT AS SHOWN O IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/.4 NOTFORLOS ANGELES. CA 9W,T.255G GRADE SEPARATION - ATLANTIC BLVD L J. SWANSON CONSTRUCTION „_, m h'/Gh-SPEEDR4/LAUTHOR/TY SHEET NO. E REV DATE BY SUB APP DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 GENERAL PLAN 2 OF 2 0 + M U lfl O + J + \U')i \\ Al v UU H I U7 oi a" I I NEW BNSF � + 'Ln _ ALABAR LEAD r Ln aD O O + ti (n tp + S _ O C18 V) _ U.� --r l -'�_+ SEVILLE AVE. GRADE CROSSING - - — 0+00 1 I ��- -�- -46TH STREET - - 1 - - •� i1 - -1 PACIFIC AVE. GRADE CROSSING _ _ ► r -- - - 00.36 SS 649'51�0.26 E 1 08.88 0 ' CHAMBERS FIRE' m _ _ _ _ _ REALIGNED- - U v a d ! 1 / 1 i 1 J T ! r J J 7 J Alm sI+ BNSF SPUR TRK EX TRK N90000'00"E 224.91� PLAN �_ EX BNSF Illm SPUR TRACK - I T 50— 100 i LE�OR FULL SIZE ONLY SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY 240 240 230 -----t- - - �- �- - - ------I T-------I ------L----- -- ,w---- �- �- - - �- �-----�-----=------�----- T-------I T----- ------------ 1 ao------- ----------------- _ ,----- ------ ------------ ----------------- ------------ -----_---- ----- ----------------- ------------ - ----- ----------------- ------------ -- - -- ----- -----------'------ ----- ----- ----- r ------------------------------------ -- -- - ' c� v z r r r ----------------------- - -- -- - - -- -- --z ---- r ---------- ----- ----- -- - ------ ------ -- ---- 230 220 ----- ----- ----- ------ ----------- a c - -- -- -- �--- . -- r-= " • nr N ----- ----------------- ----- ------ r- -- -- -- �- -- - ry-- ----- ----- ---- -- - . -- -- -- - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - -- -- -- -- -- . - - - . -- --- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- --- - -- -- - - -- -- .......... _ti o O yr -- --- -- -- -- --- -- - -- -- N `n T i n -----,------'-- -' -----'-----,------'------ --......'� . -- --......220 -----------' -'- LM OT o ---- ;z °' --- - - - - j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - + -- -- o- - ©' ~ a, _O ^----' -- -- -----------' '� O ----' - - -- - - - -- - ---- ��______ 210 _________________ ��______� OaD .......... -'•'•''a........................ I�i >ioa ��______�_____._____�0? . -- a -- -- . -- __ __ __ __ __ __ __ . . -- __ __ __ __ __ __ ___ __ -- __ ___ __ __ __ ___ , -- - -- -- -- --........................ yr a r-----'-------------------------------------------- __ --_ __ __ -_ ___ -_ , Na ___ __ '� __._____�_____ a Co -- -- 210 a ej a N N v l z to I I ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ---- ----------------- ---- ----------------, RSF _ _TRA' , ----- ---------------- x !- N- J N T LL R KS J 1 Lo 200 o J____ -. . . -- -- ..---.----............. -- ---- -- - -- .----..----.--------------- .-------- _____ _____ ______ 200 ------------ --r-T---_.----�- ----- ----------------------- -- ------ ---- -- - - 190 OG--AONGL TRACK 190 IAgp_I'Qxl_ ----- ----- L---------------------- L ---------------------- L ---------------- ----- ----- --------------- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- --------------- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------------- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ------ - -- - - --160 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 DRAFT DATE 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT HSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. RECORD SET TT-D1777 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE As SHOWN BNSF MALABAR CONNECTOR - PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 40. STA S100+00 TO STA S113+04,91 PROP RR RO TYpp \ SEE NOTE 2 HEREON ERI$T 77� ORR T Q O- ODIFYEXXIS EXIST GRADE CROSSING �IRR PREEMPTION TBD) 4 60'' STREET PARKING 4 I w >I • I Q w I > w to NEW GRADE RCROSSEEPTIppNG 20' 20' & TRAFFIC �IGfVAL -�\ I TBD TYP S - - - E 46TH ST L N a — pp I SEERNOTER2RO�REON CHAMBERS ST I I ip rm PROP PROPERTY TAKE SEE NOTE 2 HEREON w PROP BNSF SPUR EXIST RR RO TYP SEERNOTER2ROEREON PBNSF MALABARNP LEAD DEMOYEXIST for 1 A i� I IODIFY EXIST I GRADE CROSSING I I � � i / I �I I I I y it I / I� I RR PREEMPTIO & /I TRAFFIC SIGNAL I TBD TYP 1 NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 FOE GRADINGVOLUME4INFORMATION, 6 FOE VOLUNMEGE4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. i' ♦♦ SEE RR NOTE ROW HEREON I TION FOT FOR INTERNAL Y 50 0 50 100 "=50' HORIZ CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM ORA iNG No. BEHTM RECORD SET CV-T1777CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITIONSOAEgs SHOWN DRAFT- WEST SEVNTSTSUITE 3150 oSAN�EES. A9oo,T-2556 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 46TH ST 111Gh'-SPEED RA/Z AUTHOR/TY (VERNON) SHEET No. REV DATE 9V IMPACT PLAN — SHEET 1 OF 1 PRPER CITY''S SAC TD HISTONNRICALppRR_ PROTECTII LPLACE 109L wmdw a C. rl I 10 ■ 20'20' TNER IINAT STREET & / PER CITY S $1DG SIGN 4 # • F A N If z oa b N E 49TH ST NOTES: 1. FOR TRACK INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 1. 2 FOE VOLUME 1 WAY INFORMATION, 3. FOR BRIDGE INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 3. 4. FOR UTILITY INFORMATION, SEE VOLUME 4. 5 FOE VOLUR D� G4INFORMATION, 6 FOE VOLUNMEGE4 INFORMATION, 7. FOR SYST�M INFORMATION, SEE VOLU E 4. �D s� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e= FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 I"=50' HORIZ SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY CT CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT EGHSR06-0005 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. DRAFTNETV'00RECORD SET CV-T1778 CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION S��Lgs SHOWN 1055 WEST SEVNTH STREET, SUITE 3150 oSAN�EE, 4wmoo'T-z5� ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT — E 49TH ST h'ZGIASPEEO RAZZ AUTHOR/TY (VERNON) SHEET No. DATE By IMPACT PLAN - SHEET 1 OF 1 L O CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT MAP SAN FRANCISCO- \ PIERCED SAN .I SE FRESNO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION (PEPD) BAKERSFIE Pd CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS A GELES PROJECT ANAHE TONGVA SUBDIVISION LOCATION SAN D LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM VOLUME 4 GENERAL, UTILITIES, GRADING AND DRAINAGE, TRACTION POWER, & COMMUNICATION TOWERS roe�RBgti STATIONOON STATION EQUATION Los ooBACK � ANGELES SBN 136+31.75 AHEAD SBN 1355+51.19 BACK= 0 f �SOC 1355+00.00 AHEAD ♦' MONTEBELLQ 9r p �o o PICO HITTIE _ R 1 V RA o LOS ANGELES US-101 � ��, � 1-5 0. �A00 UNION STATION COM C - -mr� G FULLERTON /� Q 0 (51 0 0� LA MIRADA < ARTIC �� _ EL SANTA FE 1� a STATION BEGIN WORK � LA RIVER STA 190+00.00BELL - SPRIN S as w M REa' VERNON V GARDENS DO�yNEY ��m x �� - s� '\ -lam ��-� �� END WORK ,NORWALK �� ;�P�� SOC STA 1613+67.84 LOS ANGELES mm \BU NA1 22 COUNTY PARK ANAHEIM CERRITOS ORAI lll__**? COUNTY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LOCATION MAP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY M"'MAMAWAL. PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT �Vry�HSRU-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL M. MAMAWAL FOR INTERNAL T� J LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY S 1 V 100 RECORD SET GE-A0401 J. S�yANSON SCALE IN CHARGE 105-TT 5EVENTHSTREETV TE 3150 CAL/FOR/V/A PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION NO SCALE J. SWANSON NOT FOR os nHcE Es "soon-zsss DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR,4/LAUTHOR/TY PROJECT LOCATION MAP SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 0 0 N IW NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 I"=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DesicNv BY RACELIS PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL V. RACELIS FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. C T� J �O O CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,A\J 1 V RECORD SET UT-D1 514 C. IN CHARGE LIU 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOTFOR os nHceLes. cn soon-zsss 1 = 50' DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/GKSOEEDRA/LAL/Th'OR/TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 1 1 STA SBN 178+50 TO STA SBN 192+50 0 a rrr F 1 / I� �OZ rk NEW BNSF LEAD CL EX BNSF LEAD C EX BNSF M1 CL EX BNSF M2 �7 CL EX BNSF M3 EXIST ROW O CL EX BNSF M4 LOS A CL EX IND TRACK — 0 wI z� J =Z U F� 193+00SBY 194-00 SBY SBY 197+00 SBY 199+00 SBY SBY 201+00 SBY 202+00 SBY 203+00 4.204+00 SBY 205+00 SBY 206+ _ ifT as � o Ld z� w V7 — ' = Z U — mw \ I I $ *r r '*X a w � N 4s k '1 I I I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 1"=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIG"v BY RACELIS PEPD SUBMITTAL FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION /ry T T `'T \ / 100 ,A\! 1 V 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE". � LOS ANIEIEs.CA soon-zsss w51Y1n� m CAL/FOR/V/,4 H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUThOR/TY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN p �` p STA SUN 192+50 TO STA 206+50 CONTRACT DRAIN BY V. RACELIS DRAWING No. UT-D1515 CHECKED BY C. LIU SCALE 1 — 50' IN CHARGE D. LEON REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION DATE SHEET NO. 03/09/18 JDN 0 a DL NEW BNSF LEAD %4 \ EXIST RR Row \ I- o \ z� Ld z� _j \ J U Z SBY 208+00 SOY 209+00 SBY 10+00 SBY 211+00 SBY 212+00 SBY 213+00 SBY 214+00 SBY 215+00 SBY 216+00 SBY 217+00 V SBY 218+00 SBY 219+00 SBY Z20400 = z U— H� aa 4 <� acf w w V) o _ y — — w — Ld x INDUSTRIAL ' SID NSF NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 1"750' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY °ESI`v BY RACELIS PEPD SUBMITTAL FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY MTEZOO CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SETc.LIu CONTRACT DRAWN BY V. RACELIS DRAWING NO. UT-D1516 CHECKED BY SCALE NOT FOR coNsreucrloN 055WEST5EENTHSTREET3,so� Los n..EYes. cn soon-zsss w °m CAL/FOR/V/,4 H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUTHOR/TY PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN STA SBN 206+50 TO STA SBN 220+50 1„ = 50' IN CHARGE D. LEON REV dPP �DIIE03/09/18 SHEET NO. DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION \ - NEW BN�� ►,��"F� It EX BNSF E BNSF \\ CL EX BNSF W HOBART \ YARD � \ rCL EX BNSF M2 1.0 0 W I Z F- SBY 221.00 SBY 222-00 SBY 223+00 SBY 2� J 2 U Z as <Y — — W ° o I I � � �� 'cam. ire ��w!••a�� :.e a G� PROP ELEC -�J (OH) 66 KV �LJS r__ 1 �\ •r��ra.►��.r��raxt�� PROP ELEC (OH) 138 KV _ O� — ---- O CL EX SAN PEDRO CE NEW UPRR SUBDIVISION a SAN PEDRO SUBDI CONNECTORN I � I n r I PRC OIL OIL GAS CL NEW BNSF M1 C NEW BNSF P2 CL NEW BNSF M3 CL NEW BNSF M4 �KtALIGNEC •I EX ST RR ROW o BN%F HOBART YARD �RO Dy�AY,OVERPASS SBY 2JJ•00 - - — — SBY 7J4s01 TOWER 14 Aw is 00 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DEsIcV RACELIS PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL V. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL �T� J 100 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1 �/ RECORD SET UT-D1517 C. IN CHARGE LIU 1055-T SEVENTH STREET TE 3150 CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE 1" - 50' NOT FOR cos nHGeLes. cn soon-zsss — D. LEON H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUTHOR/TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN DATE CONSTRUCTION SHEET N0. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 d STA SBN 220+50 TO STA SBN 234+50 LJ LJ 0 ON 7; 0 W I zF-- J UK U — �i as 0 w LLI N NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 0 rz50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY N M DESIGNED RACELIS PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT V. HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL V. RACELIS FORINTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING 40. J �O O CHECKED BY USE ONLY 1 V RECORD SET UT -DI 518 INCRC. LIU '055WESTSEVENTHSTREET,SUITE315° CAL/FOR/V/A PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOTFOR cosnRceLEs soon-zsss 1 = 50� DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEDRA/L AUTh'OR/TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN SHEET NO. REV DATE BY CRK APP DESCRIPTION TION 03/09/18 STA SBN 234+50 TO STA SBN 248+50 Ln LIU 4 O O O J 7 C7 U — �i Q Q W � � W SBY 2150.00 IST BNSF RRXROW HOBART YARD= E 26TH STA (TO BE VACATED )-- BNSF M4 f NEj BNSF UPRR SAN TRACKS TYP SUBDIVISION I SBY 251+00 SBY 252.00 SBY 253+ SBY 254+02 256+00 --1---_E_2_6T-----M---1---�—� II: (REALI NED) f III;! 1 II I I - I I�� 1 I:II I II`i III! LGASOLINE ENCH IlA I III IL I IIII • L ___..o_..o_ ..o— ..00 ..o_ ..o ..o_ ..c T L.�— —_.�-- -- ._. _. --; _--...o ___o _.g-- �_.. / —�—,<h---h--=----_----�_-----h--=�•E 26TH. S T_, (REALIGNED) 1 0 (Ni IP LJ �I J � - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - =Z U — �i Q Q W W I I I I I I I I PROP �SEEHVOL 3 I _ I PROP CULVERT jr- t SLAB SEE VOL 3 PROP ELEC - (OH) 66 KV P _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 rz50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY RACELIS PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING N0. V. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL `'T \ TQlea"T 0RECORD SET UT-D1519 CHECKED BY USE ONLY •AJ IN CHARGEC. LIU 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREET, 5U1TE CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOTFOR Soy ANGELES, CA90017-2556 111 = 50• H/GHSPEEOR4/LAZI71 TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN DATE CONSTRUCTION SHEET N0. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBN 248+50 TO STA SBN 262+00 c '+ EXIST BNSF —RR ROW — — — HOBART - -YAR — rn Ln w � —�.s� -—ta.��. +mom--inv—�a �an� - w.��s--�—_.— +a.�� — ta.t - aam-�• �n.� - gal ----a. �s�.�--s _s_— —_•—iali�� iG�r iTD�s ^T C7 �� — -----�_----- — �v� �w .w-- (TO BE VACATED)____'t-- , w41 w In I I X _�E �. NEW I CL N BNSF TRAC S TYP N L(l w I w Ln E`. 1 R I. 111 TLl! OLTD it 141 k. - PIIj I A E GAS 4" I- GAS 8" y... x CATER ATER 4" 1 + J I Y � III �rw k LA t 3mr, ka! PPROPBJOINT1.IRENCHOIL j OIL 8" fy" GASOLINE 6" PROP26TH 5T ' '"-!-d"rt•4''A;., IIIII GAS 8 SEE VOL 3 II +I¢Iw ATER 2" ..o___..o___..o___..o___..o _ __ ` �..o___•.a___..o___..a___..o___..o___..o___..o___ . ______..o___..o___.•o___..o_r—••o__ ..a---..o---••^---..o---..o : � ..o__..0---"0---..o---..o---..o---..0---"0-- -----..o---..o---..o---..0---"0---..o__�..o---'R-- —..o _..ar— ------..o---••^ -- --- --- ------'•0---� ^--- --- --- ------..o---••^ -.o;__...o;__...g--...�__... — '::o:=— Ny _•.o;—'I`...g--•+g--...e__...�_...o;__...o;--...o: ' __..�__...o;__...o;__...�__...a--...�--...a__...e— — ••gam — -- °.e__...�--... — =• = _� _ =• _•— --; •�—_•'— _� —•= _•= _ �_ _;o;--•;•�— _.c_._.c—.—.a_._.c�._.c�—.c_._ f� .c_._•c—. _.c_._.c_. _.c_._.�._.c—._.c_. ��'�._._.c_._.c—._.c�._.c_.—.c_._.c_._.o_._.a_._.c .c_._.c_:�. '•�.c_:_.c—.—.c_ •c�.o...� .�o...m ..o ••cg '—.c--c .e'.o i..m..o c...m'cc' _c—•c__•c c c :I (REAL ED) I' hi W.:-..•: dil — -- -- -- -- -- PIP Y NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 I"=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY PEPD CONTRACT NO. V. RACELIS CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN Br SUBMITTAL � [�I LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. V. RACELIS FORINTERNAL41—ea- IN 1�0 CHECKED BY USE ONLY j� 1 RECORD SET UT-Dt520 CHARGELIU 056 L. T MENTH STREETCAL/FOR/V/.4PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOT FOR LOSAHGEEEES,CA001T-t " - 50 ' .d ILA h161ASOEEORA/LAUTHOR1TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN DATE03/09/18 CONSTRUCTION STA SBN 262+00 TO STA SBN 275+50 SHEET No. REV DdTE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION 0 (V Ln W I ZF- J =0 - - U— aa -- 0 W W --.4 tw - E 26TH ST - - - - ® (TO BE VACATED)° SF IN "Wl B I IA K�B YP A N N un W I Z H — 7 J ® _ =0 Z as W W N PROP 26TH �T / u SEE VOL 3 ..0•0---..0---..0---..0---••4---••4---••0---••0---..4---..4--..0---••0---••4---••0---••4---••4---••4---••4---••4---••4---••0---..0---• �..—.4—.— --—- —.4—.—.4—.—.4—.—.L—. —.4�.�.4� _�--_----a=--�- a-E 26TH ST-i-=-#---+=--h------------------t-=----�_----_�------------�-- / (REALIGNED) ----------------- V —01 7 IF I i NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 rz50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY RACELIS PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL /ry T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. V. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL `'T \ T loo RECORD SET UT-D1 521 C. CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,A\J 1 V IN CHARGELIU 1055 WEST SEVENTH STREE75U1TE 315° CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOT FOR L05nRGeLes.cneo°n-z556 1 = 50 H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUThOR/TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN DATE CONSTRUCTION SHEET N0. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBN 275+50 TO STA SBN 289+00 PROP JOINT TRENCH OIL 8" OIL 8" GASOLINE 6" GAS 8" WATER 12" G — 4 PROP ELEC (OH) 66 / / EXIS RR 3p N l!i � —TSV——To.V—�sT,✓u �.—�—ia�n�—_a— Tone.— Ms.� J _ H� Q Q - mer -- - -- w w N kl BNSF HOBART 26 CIS I II CL M2 NE SF C NE�y BNSF TRAC S K ,rTYP _. CL IN BNSF M3 LdW BNSF M4 I 1 I --_ PROP CUL-DE-SAC- I'I PER CITY STD SEE VOL 3 -•... - ` ' I . PROP SEWER �I:k V,. - STUB EX 15" VCP®N - PROP BJ INT TRENCH ��- -=- 1� it 1 it I - =01 L 8" ... ........ #t GASOLI E 6" PROP R I GAS 8" 1 26TH T + ^ F+ ill WATER 1,2" SEE VOL 3 p— ..0---••0---••0---..0— ..0---••0---..0-- •0---..0---••0——••0---••0---••0---••0---••0---••0---..0---..0 -- --- --- --- — —---••0---..0--- --- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- - --�1 0— —---..0---••0---..0---..0— ..0---..0---..0--r • 0---..0---..0——••0---••0---••0---..0---..0---..0---..0---..0— _ __ __ — _••0---..0---..0---..0--- ..0 ..0 ..0 ..0 _---__--- --- .•0---••0---••0---••0---..0---••0---••0---..0— .0 i 1 ••0 ••o ..o ..a ..0 ••0 ..g�•g�...R��...6��...6��...6��...0i �...6��...03��..,y� •••Oi��...0i��..Oi��.••Oi��... f4��•••g��•••Oi��•••6��•••6��•••04 •• •• .. ��...4I��...R� — —• 4�• .4—.—.4—.—.4—.—.4—.—.G—• •—.—.—.0—. •0 �•4—•—.E—• .4—.—.4—.—.4—.—.4—.—. —. —.—. —.—.0— -- —•—•—•4—•.q��...6��. •—g. —=—. —.—. —. —= —. —.••OS��•••6��..•0:��.Oi��••.OS��•..Oi��...6 — 4 4 4 . .4...6 • ..�6 . OS 4—.—.4—. ...6 ...g ...6 ..46—•4—.—•4—•—•4—.—.0—.—.4—.—•G—.—.4—.—.4—.—.L—.—.G Ci Oi •L� 4 0 • •4 0 4 G ---�- �_---_---_�-- f=-----=---t=----f---f---�---a---A-- e--E 26 T H S T-A---A---A---A---A---A---�-- +------------f------------+- Ijll (REALIGNED) aft ill - E 66 KV NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 I"=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY RACELIS PEPS CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT ODNTRAOT No. MENIPM DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 �T V. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. '00Cq RECKED BY USE ONLY.RECORD SET UT-D1522 4CHARGELIU I c CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOT FOR LOSAHGEEEES,CA�9001T-2666 1 " — 50' R.dAF o IPROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN DATE h/Gh'-SPEEDRA/L AUTHORITY REV DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 CONSTRUCTION STA SBN 289+00 TO STA SBN 302+50 SHEET No. W I Z_ H J � 0 2 Z U— H < as MIX 0 W W V) M NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY N N 50 0 50 100 I SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY m � DESIGNED BY CONTRACT NO. V. RACELIS PEPS CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 �T V. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. q 100CRECKED BY USE ONLY.RECORD SET UT-Dl523 RAAF ,N CHA LIU 1056 WEST SEVESUITE 3IW c CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOT FOR LOSAHGE ES,CA�9001T-2666 " - 50' PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN H161ASPEEDRA/LAUTHOR17Y DATE CONSTRUCTION � SHEET No. 0 REV DATE BY CHK APP I DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBN 302+50 TO STA SBN 316+00 M N Lo w W N I — — — PROP ELEC�� I �, -- — (OH) 66 KV NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 50 0 50 100 TnTsmimmmimmilli I"=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY RACELIS PEPS CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT No. DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL HSR06-0005 ry LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING N0. V. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL t•Tj J 100 CHECKED BY USE ONLY R,A F 1,A1J ■1 V RECORD SET UT-D1524 IN CHARGELIU 1056 WEST 0SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3160' CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE D. LEON NOT FOR LOSAHGE ES,CA�9001T-2666 - 5O' h/Gh'-SPEEDRA/L AUTHOR/TY PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN DATE CONSTRUCTION � SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBN 316+00 TO STA SBN 329+50 v CL NEW YARD LEAD EX BNSF LEAD �� C NEW YARD LEAD \ ExIST � � EX YARD LEAD C REALIGNED BNSF M1 \ Q PROP ELE4f- AZ�l CL REALIGNED BNSF 0 �`��* IF r• ' (OH) 66 KRR ROW CL NEW BNSF �(4 PROP SD a N 18 RC N Ln / Ul 0 W I _ _ _ W I J J CD U U Z SBY 330.00 -SBY 331.00 / SB 37 .00 Y 33A00 SBY 334.00 SBr 335.00 SBY 336.00 SBr 337.00 SB 33A.00 SBr 339.00 SBY 340.00 SBY 341•DO SBY 3/ U Z U U — I— E a F- � VERNON 4 <PROP OIL 8" �_ (PROP OIL 8" E W -- w Ld F r �.�___ �manra� —�•_--r�=Tdr�_.r�=Zn+�_.ru�v+lm9�++�++ 5t9�++�4eu�+�++Pa•++�n0.T��4 VW1 \ lo- _� —, _.+�.r�•E—/ tt �.�.— PROP GAS 8"+ u x 1 'i+ FNHj \ \v PROP SD PROP RETAINING PROP OIL /l/C 24" RCP T. y�AL 8" T�'Y ' PROP ELEC Y PROP'PUMP ir (OH) STATION & P. t UG TORAGE'IF 1 PROP EL C 0 JOINT 'TENCH / (OH) 66 V wm WA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTE: FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1. UTILITY CONFLICTS ON CROSSING STREET AT THIS GRADE SEPARATION LOCATION 50 0 50 100 ARE ALSO SHOWN ON GRADE SEPARATION DRAWING ST-K1031. I"z5O' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DEsiDNV BY RACELIS PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT CONTRACT DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. Y. RACELIS FOR INTERNAL UT-D1525 CHECKED BY USE ONLY ST`T ZOO RECORD SET C. LIU 0sswssrssysNrHSTREET5U1TE3150 ea�t2 CAL/FOR/V/,4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SALE 1" 50' IN CHARGE NOT FOR cos nHceLes. cn soon-zsss D. LEON PROPOSED UTILITIES RELOCATION PLAN CONSTRUCTION w ,.m H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUTHOR/TY SHEET NO. DATE03/09/18 STA SBN 329+50 TO STA SBN 342+00 REV DATE BY CHK dPP DESCRIPTION a — - Sa s a INASHINGTON BLVD\ _ r- - —SC1 --SO — -- EXISTING RCP a A (LACFCD PROJ B[-5206) (L \1 A \ IA EXISTING— A 4�� 1� IP 1O'WX12'H RCB (LACFCD BI-5206) m 0-97 +� 0�///� \ r EXISTING ROW !1 EX. BNSF LEAD \ \ \ \ CL EX. BNSF M1 \ \ vvvv \ EX. BNSF M2 \ (L EX. BNSF M3 rL EX. BNSF M4 \ \ \ \ 0 0 \ \ \ w I z> \ \ JU \ \ \ UZ SBY 2 +00 SBY 21 5+00 \ o\\ \ SBY 220+00 aLu w EXIST SD PUMP STATION EX BNSF INDUSTRIAL SIDING i I �lsn\ S\ \ \\ \ NOTES: EXISTING / 42" RCP X STING (LACFCD BI 588) 42" RCP \s� v �� v / (LACFCD BI-588)- 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY GNEDNo. DESR$'WONc PEPD SUBMITTAL FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �oo 1PlIE—MEE-H.—El , SUITE 3150 LosnHCELEs,cn�oon-zsss CAL /FOR/V/�I H/GHSPEEOR4/L AUThOR/TY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION GRADING AND DRAINAGE p STA SBY 206+50 TO STA SBY 220+50 RACT DRAWN BY Q DRAWING 40. CV-G1516 H KED BY CHECKED BY M. sarisH SCALE 1 " 50' IN CHARGE �' sWQNsoN REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION DATE 03/09/18 SHEET No. EXISTING 14'X7' RCB (COLA PLAN 29541) EXIST SCE TRANSMISSION TOWER PROPOSED RELOCATED SCE TRANSMISSION TOWER t� —CL NEW BNSF LEAD PROPOSED 1 R" PFRFhRATFII n 40 s Q s EXIST SCE TRANSMISSION TOWER 00 w w V1 NOTES: 1- INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESR$'WONc RACT PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT No. DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL W.—El LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. D. KED BY A FORT ONLY L 100RECORD SET CV-G1517 CHECKED BY USE ONLY M. sarisH PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH , SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/,4 J. SWANSON NOT FOR �osnHCELwsYcn�oon-zsss 1 — 50' DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR,4/LAUTHOR/TY GRADING AND DRAINAGE SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBY 220+50 TO STA SBY 234+50 �I\V�VJLV I V JVUVI\HIIl NOTES: L W Ld N 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. I''=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY CONTRACT N. R. yyoNc PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING NO. D. BARRAZA FOR INTERNAL CT` T �O0 CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,S 1 V �RECORD SET CV-G1518 M. SATISN riG!/Uel� SCALE IN CHARGE 1055WESTSEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL/FOR/V/.4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION NOT FOR LOSANGELES, CA 9001T-2556 1 II = 50' J. SWANSON �� wm GRADING AND DRAINAGE DATE CONSTRUCTION h'/Gh'-S,0=RA/LAUTHOi7/TY SHEET No. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBY 234+50 TO STA SBY 248+50 HOBART YARD a 0 �o c 0 GO NOTES: - -� _- *� �� r jII�II III _. EX. BNSF LEAD EXISTING EXISTING OW 14' W x 8.5' H RCB (LACFCD PROJ DD]-26) \ - - TOP OF BOX (177.5+) —� �- II e EXISTING 20"-2" W x 4'H RCB IIII � I (OWNERSHIP TBD) I nll I ' EXISTING 24" RCP (CITY OF VERNON) �• I mil I c° m l l -- -- -- — -- -- -- — -- -- -- — -- — — -- -- -- -- 26TH ST TO V C TED) 'NEW B SF HOB RT o II STORAGE YARD TRKS -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- — -- -- -- -- o _ II c --SD -- SD S -- S Y 0 —� -- �S c __ _ :- SD -. '.--- SLT`� �` _ D - �D -- SC �D 8 SBrD �- -- SD I � NEW BNSF M1 ��. I NEW BNSF M2 NEW BNSF M3 + III I CL NEW BNSF M4 JOIN EXISTING 14'W x 8.5'H RCB 'IIII (LACFCD PROJ DDI-26) lell EXISTI G CONCRETE OP -- -_ TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL_ TO BE REMOVED SHIP TBD) -- SD -- , T -- SD --------- -- SD -- SD �JOW EXISTING CONCRETE OPEN TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNE (OWNERSHIP TBD) I —PROPOSED RCB CULVERT EXTENSION (SEE DWG UT—D1519) I ¢ A 1 + � II nll � I �I PROP. 18" PERFORATED SUBDRAINS I ui w IN 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. 4. FOR RCB STRUCTURAL DESIGN SEE DWG ST—K1017 AND ST—K1018."=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY R DESIGNEDCONTRACT PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT �DNTHSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL M.-LE1 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. D. KED BY A FORINTERNAL �ooRECORD SET CV—G1519 CHECKED BY USE ONLY M. sansH PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH , SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/,4 J. SWANSON NOT FOR cos nHCELwsYcn soon-zsss 1 " — 50' DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR,4/LAUTHOR/TY GRADING AND DRAINAGE SHEET NO. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SBY 248+50 TO STA SBY 262+00 a — YARD —R -- HOBART T EX. BNSF LEAD ri i' EXISTING ROW (1 EXISTING 24'' RCP — z (CITY OF (CITY VERNON) Ld J - JU =Z H U- F< Q Q MCC -0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W W Ld ui N 26TH ST TO BE VACATED) E BNSF HOBART STORAGE YARD TRKS 1 � O 1 7 Q -- SD -- I --- SD -- SD -- SD -- -- SD -- SD -- I -- -- SD -- SD -- - SD -- SD -- D -- SD -- SD �gYsV00 I � I F F BNSF M1 -- �.� BNSF M2 BNSF EWBNS�F3M4 .L. PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED SUBDRAINS SUBDRAINS NOTES: 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESR$'WONc GNED�DNTHSR06-0005 PEPD SUBMITTAL FORI ONLY L USE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 100 1PlIE-MEY-H.-LET , SUITE 3150 os nHCELwsYcn soon-zsss re) CAL /FOR/V/,4 H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUThOR/TY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION GRADING AND DRAINAGE STA SBY 262+00 TO STA SBY 275+50 RACT DRAWN BY D. Q DRAWING No. CV-G1 520 BY CHECKED BY CHECKED M. san sH SCALE 1 — 50' IN CHARGE J. SWANSON REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION Da' 03/09/18 SHEET NO. a HOBART YARD �� EV• BNSF LEAD EXISTING 2 'RCP EXISTING ROW � �� EXISTING 42" RCP (CITY OF VERNON) (CITY OF VERNON) O _ _ _L N N Un WI WI JV ^U J U� ~� as as -- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- WF L� W l to \--NEW BNSF HOBART -- STORAGE YARD TRKS I I -- S -- SD -- SD - SD -- SD -- SD -- SD - SD -- SD -- SD -- SD « -- SD --------- -- SD -- S -- S -- S -- S SBY 777 -- - SD, ter- C SBY- �5 17(r -- D -- -- D — PSUBDRAIEDDrNEW BNSF M11. �PROPO`;ED18 NS „4 i "CL NEW BNSF M2 76 Tv NEW BNSF M3 NEW BNSF M4 EXISTING SPUR TRACK TO BE REMOVED NOTES: 1• INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. I''=50' SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY R. WONG PEPO SUBMITTAL USE ONLY FOR INTERNALWWESTSEVENTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION T` T loo 1 V � tSTREET, SUITE 3150 t G! Uel LOSANGELES,CA 9001T-2556 wm CAL/FOR/V/.4 (4PRELIMINARY h'/Gh'-SPEEDRA/LAUTHOR1TY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SET ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION GRADING AND DRAINAGE STA SBY 275+50 TO STA SBY 28(�"+00 CONTRACT N. HSR06-0005 DRAWN BY BARRAZA DRAWING NO. CV-G1521 H CHECKED BY M. SATISN SCALE 1 �� = 50' IN CHARGE j. SWANSON� REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION DATE 03/09/18 SHEET No. a HOBART YARD CL EX. BNSF LEAD EXISTING ROW EXISTING 24" RCP (CITY OF VERNON) N y M N M .. tP W ._ Z> U - WI Z> ~u J J =Z UZ 1- 3- as as 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- 0 - w - - w - \ 26 H V -- - -- III -- - -- - --am"I BNSF - �a -- -- H I, -- - ---------�-- -- - III y ---- ______- _- -- 1 60 I ---SD---- D --- _ -- SC -- SD - ---------------- SD -- SD -- SD - -- SD _ I Y=-I,6 0 - _ .D� -- D -- SD D +4 SD - 5---_�09 S SD � ��SD -- SD - - -- SD 1 -- 4 NEk- NSF M],a PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED NEW BNSF M2 SU[DRAINS CL NEW BNSF MLI _ 1 f I 9 ?1 NEW BNSF M4 + Z Z O M,JOIN EXISTING 42" RCP (CITY OF VERNON) PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED SUBDRAINS NOTES: 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESR$'WONc GNED�DNTHSR06-0005 PEPD SUBMITTAL FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �ry T T `'T \ / 100 ,A\! 1 V 1P-TSEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 os nHCELwsYcn soon-zsss CAL h 0/?IV/A ire) H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUThOR/TY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SET PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION GRADING AND DRAINAGE STA SBY 289+00 TO STA SBY 302+50 RACT DRAWN BY D. Q DRAWING No. CV-G1 522 CHECKED BY CHECKED BY M. sansH SCALE 1 — 50' IN CHARGE J. SWANSON REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION DATE 03/09/18 SHEET NO. a HOBART YARD —: Il EX. BNSF LEAD -- _ EXISTING DOUBLE EXISTING 24" RCP 12' X 6.5' RCB (CITY OF VERNON) EXISTING ROW (LACFCD DDI-23) II II N Lo In W Z> Z> JU JU _ C7 CD rZ � as Hi as �0 0 �Cl� 0 Aj oA w w-- -- - - - - - - - n 26TH ST TO BE VACATED) — -- -- -- — Y— -- — -- -- iL -- -- — — — �- Ap -NEW BNSF HOBART STORAGE YARD TRKS 1 v I.I . z. ZNH _ so— - 5 � I e I �--SD 160 — I SD 4 SD so sD ---- SD -- SD --- SD --SD -- SD _-SD I -- SD Ld -- ---- SD -- D \V I PROP. 1 8" PERFORATED —PROP. 18" PERFORATED Iw SUBDRAINS NEW BNSF M1� SUBDRAINS I� rL NEW BNSF M2 i IQ I NEW BNSF M3 NEW BNSF M411 I, JOIN II EXISTING DOUBLE I 12' X 6.5' RCB (LACFCD DDI-23) NOTES: 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESIGNED BY R. WONG PEPD SUBMITTAL USE ONLY1 FORINTERNALW—T NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �T� T '00 V ,EHTH BTREET, B°ATE 3'so osnNceLwsYcneoon-zsss CAL/FOR/V/.4 (40 h'/Gh'-SR,=RA/LAUTHOi7/TY CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM RECORD SETCV-G1523 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION GRADING AND DRAINAGE STA SBY 302+50 TO STA SBY 31 6+00 CONTRACT NO. HSR06-0005 r DRAWN BY D. BARRAZA DRAWING NO. CHECKED BY M. SATISR SCALE 1 " = 50 IN CHARGE J. SWANSON REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION DATE 03/09/18 SHEET NO. / CL NEW YARD PROPOSED 18" PERFOF JOIN EXISTING DOUBLE 12'-9" W X 7'-6" H RCB (LACFCD DDI-26) (SEE DWG ST—G1028) PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED SUBDRAINS CL NEW BNSF M4 NOTES: 1- INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESR$'WONc RACT PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT GNED�DNTHSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL W.-LE1 LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. D. KED BY Q FORI ONLY L 100RECORD SET CV—G1 524 CHECKED BY USE ONLY M. sansH PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE IN CHARGE 1055 WEST SEVENTH , SUITE 3150 CAL /FOR/V/,4 J. SWANSON NOT FOR �osnHCELwsYcnoon-zsss 1 — 50' DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUTHOR/TY p GRADING AND DRAINAGE SHEET NO. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SDY 31 6+00 TO STA SDY 329+50 N L PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED SUBDRAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN? 0V (CITY OF COMMERCE) / �� / CL EX. BNSF LEAD NEW YARD LEAD / CL EX. BNSF M1 �CL EX YARD LEAD I Z Q, AFL EX. BNSF M2 EXISTING ROW I /'I Av EX.'BNSF M3 CL NE BNSF M4 G2001 Q II N � I / U WI Z> U J =Z U- <o,CITY OF VE vw E.te*�H ST. \ o / oV� PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (SEE DWG ST-131028) ACCESS ROAD_____-- ------ -- _�PR_IV�TE� -� -- -- _-- fjo 6 ED RETAINING WALL (SEE DWG ST—G1029) I. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN RELOCATION ._ / (SEE DWG UT—D1525) \ PROPOSED 18" PERFORATED SUBDRAIN \ In N —Q U WI —U J =Z U- -- S_D - --SD -- S ------------- Y W I �9 e / EXISTING 36" RCP I EXISTING (CITY OF VERNON) 63" RCP (LACFCD PROJ MTD-618) I NOTES: 1. INTRUSION BARRIER WILL BE PROVIDED AT RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2. CONTOUR GRADING ALONG THE HST TRACKS IS BASED ON THE TOP FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY OF SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BALLAST IS NOT INCLUDED. 3. FOR RETAINING WALL INFORMATION SEE RETAINING WALL PLANS IN 50 0 50 100 VOLUME 2. SCALE APPLICABLE FOR FULL SIZE ONLY DESR$'WONc RACT PEPD CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED TRAIN PROJECT GNED�DNTHSR06-0005 DRAWN BY SUBMITTAL �ry T T LOS ANGELES TO ANAHEIM DRAWING No. H KED BY Q FORI ONLY L `'T \ / 100 RECORD SET CV-G1 525 CHECKED BY USE ONLY ,A\! 1 V M. san sH PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT DEFINITION SCALE IN CHARGE 1P—TSEVENTH STREET, SUITE 3150 CAL h 0/?IV/A J. SWANSON NOT FOR cos nHCELwsYcn soon-zsss 1 �� — 50' DATE CONSTRUCTION H/GHSPEEOR4/LAUTHOR/TY p GRADING AND DRAINAGE SHEET NO. REV DATE BY CHK APP DESCRIPTION 03/09/18 STA SDY 329+50 TO STA SDY 342+00 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ATTACHMENT B COST PROPOSAL — LABOR HOUR WORKSHEET 14 CITY OF VERNON Cost Proposal - Labor Hour Worksheet Project Name: Technical, Engineering, EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Task No. Task Description Position A Position B Position C Position D Position E Position F Position G Total Task Hours Total Task Fee Position A's Billing Rate Position B's Billing Rate Position C's Billing Rate Position D's Billing Rate Position E's Billing Rate Position F's Billing Rate Position G's Billing Rate Phase 1: Prior to the Release of the Draft EIR 1.1 Kick -Off Meeting and Project Coordination 1.2 Comments on Technical and Engineering Documents 1.3 Conflict Identification Report 1.4 Additional Tasks as Identified by the Consultant Phase 2: Prior to the Release of the Draft EIR 2.1 1 Project Coordination 2.2 lComments on the Draft and Final EIR 2.3 lAdditional Tasks as Identified by the Consultant Total Labor Hours Other Direct Costs (e.g. travel/mileage costs) Project Total City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ATTACHMENT C EXHIBIT 10-1-11, COST PROPOSAL, FROM THE CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES MANUAL 15 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page I of 3 ACTUAL COST -PLUS -FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES) Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant ❑ Subconsultant ❑ 2' Tier Subconsultant Consultant Project No. DIRECT LABOR Contract No. Date Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total (Project Manager) $ $ (Sr. Civil Engineer) $ $ (Envir. Scientist) $ $ Inspector)" $ $ LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: %) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ Overhead (Rate: %) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: %) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + 0)] x fixed fee %] $ 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) — ITEMIZE (Add additional Dalres if necessarv) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage Costs $ $ Equipment Rental and Supplies $ $ Permit Fees $ $ Plan Sheets $ $ Test $ $ 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: $ Subconsultant 2: $ Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(1)+(m)] $ TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 9 January 2018 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3 ACTUAL COST -PLUS -FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES) 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Total Hours per Avg 5 Year Subtotal per Cost Cost Proposal Hourly Contract Proposal Rate Duration $250,000.00 5000 = $50.00 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $50.00 + 2% _ $51.00 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $51.00 + 2% _ $52.02 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $52.02 + 2% _ $53.06 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $53.06 + 2% _ $54.12 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Completed Total Hours per Cost Total Hours per Each Year Proposal Year Year 1 20.0% * 5000 = 1000 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 40.0% * 5000 = 2000 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 15.0% * 5000 = 750 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 15.0% * 5000 = 750 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 10.0% * 5000 = 500 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total 5000 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per (calculated above) (calculated above) Year Year 1 $50.00 * 1000 = $50,000.00 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $51.00 * 2000 = $102,000.00 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $52.02 * 750 = $39,015.00 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $53.06 * 750 = $39,795.30 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 $54.12 * 500 = $27,060.80 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $257,871.10 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $250,000.00 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary = Transfer to Page 1 Increase $7,871.10 NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology) 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 9 January 2018 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifyinir Name: Signature Email: Address: Title *: Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): Phone Number: *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract: Page 3 of 9 January 2018 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ATTACHMENT D AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION 16 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION CONTRACTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) being first duly sworn deposes and says that he/she is (Insert "Sole Owner", "Partner", "President', "Secretary", or other proper title) of (Insert name of Proposer) who submits herewith to the City of Vernon a proposal; That all statements of fact in such proposal are true; That such proposal was not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation; That such proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; That said Proposer has not, directly or indirectly by agreement, communication or conference with anyone attempted to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Vernon, or of any other Proposer or anyone else interested in the proposed contract; and further That prior to the public opening and reading of proposals, said Proposer: a. Did not directly or indirectly, induce or solicit anyone else to submit a false or sham proposal; b. Did not directly or indirectly, collude, conspire, connive or agree with anyone else that said Proposer or anyone else would submit a false or sham proposal, or that anyone should refrain from proposing or withdraw his proposal; c. Did not, in any manner, directly or indirectly seek by agreement, communication or conference with anyone to raise or fix the proposal price of said Proposer or of anyone else, or to raise of fix any overhead profit or cost element of this proposal price, or of that of anyone else; d. Did not, directly or indirectly, submit his/her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to nay corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any individual or group of individuals, except the City of Vernon, or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with Proposer in his/her business. I certify under penalty of perjury that the above information is correct 17 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals Title: Date: 18 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals ATTACHMENT E STANDARD FORM CONTRACT 19 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND [CONTRACTOR'S NAME] FOR TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND EIR DOCUMENTS REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT Contractor: Responsible Principal of Contractor: Notice Information - Contractor: Notice Information - City: Commencement Date: Termination Date: Consideration: COVER PAGE [insert name of contractor] [insert name, title] [insert name of contractor] [insert street address] [insert city, state, zip code] Attention: [insert name, title] Phone: [insert phone number] Facsimile: [insert fax number] City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: [insert department head] [insert department head title] Telephone: (323) 583-8811 ext. [insert] Facsimile: [insert fax number] [insert commencement date] [insert termination date] Total not to exceed $[insert amount] (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit C Records Retention Period Three (3) years, pursuant to Section 11.20 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND [CONTRACTOR'S NAME] FOR TECHNICAL, ENGINEERING, AND EIR DOCUMENTS REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT This Contract is made between the City of Vernon ("City"), a California charter City and California municipal corporation ("City"), and [Contractor's Name], a [State incorporated in] corporation ("Contractor") The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1.0 EMPLOYMENT OF CONTRACTOR. City agrees to engage Contractor to perform the services as hereinafter set forth as authorized by the City Council on 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. 2.1 Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the Request for Proposals issued on or about , Exhibit "A", and Contractor's proposal to the City ("Proposal") dated , Exhibit "B", both of which are attached to and incorporated into this Contract, by reference. 2.2 All services shall be performed to the satisfaction of City. 2.3 All services shall be performed in a competent, professional, and satisfactory manner in accordance with the prevailing industry standards for such services. 3.0 PERSONNEL. 3.1 Contractor represents that it employs, or will employ, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Contract. 3.2 Contractor shall not subcontract any services to be performed by it under this Contract without prior written approval of City. 3.3 All of the services required hereunder will be performed by Contractor or by City -approved subcontractors. Contractor, and all personnel engaged in the work, shall be fully qualified and authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services and shall be subject to approval by the City. 2 4.0 TERM. The term of this Contract shall commence on [state date], and it shall continue until [state date which may not be more than three years from the commencement date], unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions thereof. 5.0 COMPENSATION AND FEES. 5.1 Contractor has established rates for the City of Vernon which are comparable to and do not exceed the best rates offered to other governmental entities in and around Los Angeles County for the same services. For satisfactory and timely performance of the services, the City will pay Contractor in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5.2 Contractor's grand total compensation for the entire term of this Contract, shall not exceed [state amount] without the prior authorization of the City, as appropriate, and written amendment of this Contract. 5.3 Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all necessary and incidental labor, material, supplies, facilities, equipment, and transportation which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Contract. Materials shall be of the highest quality. The above Contract fee shall include all staff time and all clerical, administrative, overhead, insurance, reproduction, telephone, air travel, auto rental, subsistence, and all related costs and expenses. 5.4 City shall reimburse Contractor only for those costs or expenses specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by Contractor: 5.4.1 The actual costs of subcontractors for performance of any of the services that Contractor agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with this Agreement. 5.4.2 Approved reproduction charges. 3 5.4.3 Actual costs and/or other costs and/or payments specifically authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. 5.5 Contractor shall not receive any compensation for extra work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "extra work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized extra work shall be paid in accordance with the payment schedule as set forth in Exhibit T," if the extra work has been approved by the City. 5.6 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services by this Agreement. 6.0 PAYMENT. 6.1 As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to the City an invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses, and authorized extra work actually performed or incurred according to said schedule. 6.2 Each such invoice shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including a detailed description of the services completed, the number of hours spent, reimbursable expenses incurred and any extra work performed. 6.3 Contractor shall also submit a progress report with each invoice that describes in reasonable detail the services and the extra work, if any, performed in the immediately preceding calendar month. 4 6.4 Contractor understands and agrees that invoices which lack sufficient detail to measure performance will be returned and not processed for payment. 6.5 City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days after the City approves the invoice. 6.6 Payment of such invoices shall be payment in full for all services, authorized costs, and authorized extra work covered by that invoice. 6.7 Invoices shall include the following information: 1) Names of the Contractor's personnel performing work 2) Dates of project work 3) All costs shall be assigned to a Task. Itemized costs shall include identification of each employee or subcontractor staff that provided services during the period of the invoice, the number of hours and hourly rates for each employee or subcontractor staff member, authorized travel expenses with receipts, receipts for authorized materials or supplies, and subcontractor invoices. 4) The Contractor shall submit written progress reports with each set of invoices to allow the City to determine if the Contractor is performing to expectations, is on schedule, is within funding cost limitations, to communicate interim findings, and to afford occasions for airing difficulties respecting special problems encountered so that remedies can be developed. 7.0 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY. City shall cooperate with Contractor as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor to perform its services; and will give any required decisions as promptly as practicable so as to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Contractor's services. 8.0 COORDINATION OF SERVICES. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants, and other staff at all reasonable times. 5 9.0 INDEMNITY. Contractor agrees to indemnify City, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein "claims or liabilities"), including but not limited to professional negligence, that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the work, operations or activities of Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein, or arising from the acts or omissions of Contractor hereunder, or arising from Contractor's performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, except to the extent such claims or liabilities arise from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, elected officials, agents or employees. 10.0 INSURANCE. Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain policies of insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth below, for the duration of the Contract, including any extensions thereto. The policies shall state that they afford primary coverage. i. Automobile Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit, including owned, hired, and non -owned liability coverage. ii. Contractor agrees to subrogate automobile liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under the performance of the services. iii. General Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate written on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Comprehensive General Liability "occurrence" form or its equivalent for coverage on an occurrence basis. Premises/Operations and Personal Injury coverage is required. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the C. policy as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of this Contract. (1) If Contractor employs other contractors as part of the services rendered, Contractor's Protective Coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein. (2) Contractor agrees to subrogate General Liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under the performance of the services. iv. Professional Errors and Omissions coverage in a sum of at least $1,000,000, where such risk is applicable. Applicable aggregates must be identified and claims history provided to determine amounts remaining under the aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such coverage for at least one (1) year after the termination of this Agreement. V. Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers' compensation for injuries on the job. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain workers' compensation insurance in accordance with the laws for California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners: (1) Provide copy of permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or (2) Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimal limit 7 of $1,000,000 per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from performance of this Contract; or (3) Provide a "waiver" form certifying that no employees subject to the Labor Code's Workers' Compensation provision will be used in performance of this Contract. vi. Each insurance policy included in this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to City. vii. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A-VIII. viii. Prior to commencement of performance, Contractor shall furnish City with a certificate of insurance for each policy. Each certificate is to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificate(s) must be in a form approved by City. City may require complete, certified copies of any or all policies at any time. ix. Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach. In such event, Contractor shall immediately notify City and cease all performance under this Contract until further directed by the City. In the absence of satisfactory insurance coverage, City may, at its option: (a) procure insurance with collection rights for premiums, attorney's fees and costs against Contractor by way of set-off or recoupment from sums due to Contractor, at City's option; (b) immediately terminate this Contract and seek damages from the Contract resulting from said breach; or (c) self -insure the risk, with all damages and costs incurred, by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including attorney's fees and costs, being collectible from Contractor, by way of set-off or recoupment from any sums due to Contractor. 11.0 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 11.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 11.1.1 It is understood that in the performance of the services herein M provided for, Contractor shall be, and is, an independent contractor, and is not an agent, officer or employee of City and shall furnish such services in its own manner and method except as required by this Contract, or any applicable statute, rule, or regulation. Further, Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons employed by Contractor in the performance of the services hereunder. City assumes no liability for Contractor's actions and performance, nor assumes responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied or explicit, by or for Contractor. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payment of its employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever. 11.1.2 Contractor acknowledges that Contractor and any subcontractors, agents or employees employed by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of the City, and that they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation insurance benefits. 11.2 CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT. Except as the City may authorize in writing, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of or bind the City in any capacity whatsoever as agents or otherwise. 11.3 OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All documents and materials furnished by the City to Contractor shall remain the property of the City and shall be returned to the City upon termination of this Agreement. All reports, drawings, plans, specifications, computer tapes, floppy disks and printouts, studies, memoranda, computation sheets, and other documents prepared by Contractor in furtherance of the work shall be the sole property of City and shall be delivered to City whenever requested at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall keep such documents and materials on file and available for audit by the City for at least three (3) years after completion or earlier termination of this Contract. Contractor may make duplicate copies of such materials and documents for its own files or for such other purposes as may be authorized in writing by the City. 11.4 CORRECTION OF WORK. Contractor shall promptly correct any defective, inaccurate or incomplete tasks, deliverables, goods, services and other work, without additional cost to the City. The performance or acceptance of services furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from the obligation to correct subsequently discovered defects, inaccuracy, or incompleteness. 11.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS. Contractor shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Contractor, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Contractor occurs, then Contractor shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Contractor professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 11.6 WAIVER. The City's waiver of any term, condition, breach, or default of this Contract shall not be considered to be a waiver of any other term, condition, default or breach, nor of a subsequent breach of the one waived. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. 11.7 SUCCESSORS. This Contract shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and/or assigns. 11.8 NO ASSIGNMENT. Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Contract 10 or any rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the City and approval by the City Attorney, which may be withheld in the City's sole discretion. Any unauthorized assignment or transfer shall be null and void and shall constitute a material breach by the Contractor of its obligations under this Contract. No assignment shall release the original parties from their obligations or otherwise constitute a novation. 11.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State, County and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which are, as amended from time to time, incorporated herein and applicable to the performance hereof, including but without limitation, the Vernon Living Wage Ordinance. Violation of any law material to performance of this Contract shall entitle the City to terminate the Contract and otherwise pursue its remedies. Further, if the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules, and regulations Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. 11.10 ATTORNEY'S FEES. If any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled. 11.11 INTERPRETATION. 11.11.1 Applicable Law. This Contract shall be deemed a contract and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Contractor agrees that the State and Federal courts which sit in the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies and disputes arising hereunder, and submits to the jurisdiction thereof. 11.11.2 Entire Agreement. This Contract, including any exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings, correspondence, documentation, and agreements (written or oral). 11 11.11.3 Written Amendment. This Contract may only be changed by written amendment signed by Contractor and the City Administrator or other authorized representative of the City, subject to any requisite authorization by the City Council. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Contract shall be of no force or effect. 11.11.4 Severability. If any provision in this Contract is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Contract, and the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Contract. 11.11.5 Order of Precedence. In case of conflict between the terms of this Contract and the terms contained in any document attached as an Exhibit or otherwise incorporated by reference, the terms of this Contract shall strictly prevail. The terms of the City's Request for Proposals shall control over the Contractor's Proposal. 11.11.6 Duplicate Originals. There shall be two (2) fully signed copies of this Contract, each of which shall be deemed an original. 11.11.7 Construction. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 11.12 TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is strictly of the essence of this contract and each and every covenant, term, and provision hereof. 11.13 AUTHORITY OF CONTRACTOR. The Contractor hereby represents and warrants to the City that the Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Contract, and its execution of this Contract has been duly authorized. 11.14 ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES. Any dispute for under $25,000 12 arising out of or relating to the negotiation, construction, performance, non-performance, breach, or any other aspect of this Contract, shall be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association at Los Angeles, California and judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The City does not waive its right to object to the timeliness or sufficiency of any claim filed or required to be filed against the City and reserves the right to conduct full discovery. 11.15 NOTICES. Any notice or demand to be given by one party to the other must be given in writing and by personal delivery or prepaid first-class, registered or certified mail, addressed as follows. Notice simply to the City of Vernon or any other City department is not adequate notice. If to the City: City of Vernon Attention: Daniel Wall, Director of Public Works 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 If to the Contractor: Any such notice shall be deemed to have been given upon delivery, if personally delivered, or, if mailed, upon receipt, or upon expiration of three (3) business days from the date of posting, whichever is earlier. Either party may change the address at which it desires to receive notice upon giving written notice of such request to the other party. 11.16 NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Contractor and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right or remedy in, under, or to this Agreement. 11.17 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (Without Cause). City may 13 terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time, for any cause or without cause, upon fifteen (15) calendar days' written notice to Contractor. If the Contract is thus terminated by City for reasons other than Contractor's failure to perform its obligations, City shall pay Contractor a prorated amount based on the services satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the effective date of termination. Such payment shall be Contractor's exclusive remedy for termination without cause. 11.18 DEFAULT. In the event either party materially defaults in its obligations hereunder, the other party may declare a default and terminate this Contract by written notice to the defaulting party. The notice shall specify the basis for the default. The Contract shall terminate unless such default is cured before the effective date of termination stated in such notice, which date shall be no sooner than ten (10) days after the date of the notice. In case of default by Contractor, the City reserves the right to procure the goods or services from other sources and to hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs occasioned to the City thereby. Contractor shall not be held accountable for additional costs incurred due to delay or default as a result of Force Majeure. Contractor must notify the City immediately upon knowing that non-performance or delay will apply to this Contract as a result of Force Majeure. At that time Contractor is to submit in writing a Recovery Plan for this Contract. If the Recovery Plan is not acceptable to the City or not received within 10 days of the necessary notification of Force Majeure default, then the city may cancel this order in its entirety at no cost to the City, owing only for goods and services completed to that point. 11.19 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Termination for cause shall relieve the terminating party of further liability or responsibility under this Contract, including the payment of money, except for payment for services satisfactorily and timely performed prior to the service of the notice of termination, and except for reimbursement of (1) any payments made by the City for service not subsequently performed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and (2) costs incurred by the City in obtaining substitute performance. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require, at no additional cost to City, that Contractor provide all 14 finished or unfinished documents, data, and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 11.19.1 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 11.20 MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS. The City, or its authorized auditors or representatives, shall have access to and the right to audit and reproduce any of the Contractor's records to the extent the City deems necessary to insure it is receiving all money to which it is entitled under the Contract and/or is paying only the amounts to which Contractor is properly entitled under the Contract or for other purposes relating to the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination of the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain all such records in the City of Vernon. If not, the Contractor shall, upon request, promptly deliver the records to the City of Vernon or reimburse the City for all reasonable and extra costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than the City of Vernon, including, but not limited to, such additional (out of the City) expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditors, travel, lodging, meals, and overhead. 11.21 CONFLICT. Contractor hereby represents, warrants, and certifies that no member, officer, or employee of the Contractor is a director, officer, or employee of the City of Vernon, or a member of any of its boards, commissions, or committees, except to the extent permitted by law. 11.22 HEADINGS. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this 15 Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 11.23 ENFORCEMENT OF WAGE AND HOUR LAWS. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. The Contractor, or subcontractor, if any, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by the respective Contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Sections 1810 through 1815 of the California Labor Code as a penalty paid to the City; provided, however, work performed by employees of contractors in excess of 8 hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1'/2 times the basic rate of pay. 11.24 LIVING WAGES. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D". Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 11.25 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Contract, it and any other parties with whom it may subcontract shall adhere to equal employment opportunity practices to assure that applicants, employees and recipients of service are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sex, age, medical condition, sexual orientation or marital status. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. Contractor further agrees to comply with The Equal Employment Opportunity Practices provisions as set forth in Exhibit "E". [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement as of the Commencement Date stated on the cover page. City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation M Carlos Fandino, City Administrator ATTEST: Maria E. Ayala, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Hema Patel, City Attorney [CONTRACTOR'S NAME, a [State incorporated in] corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 17 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS i lm EXHIBIT B PROPOSAL 19 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE 20 EXHIBIT D LIVING WAGE PROVISIONS Minimum Living Wages: A requirement that Employers pay qualifying employees a wage of no less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. Paid and Unpaid Days Off: Employers provide qualifying employees at least twelve compensated days off per year for sick leave, vacation, or personal necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. No Retaliation: A prohibition on employer retaliation against employees complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Employees may bring an action in Superior Court against an employer for back pay, treble damages for willful violations, and attorney's fees, or to compel City officials to terminate the service contract of violating employers. 21 EXHIBIT E EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES PROVISIONS A. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Agreement, the contractor and each subcontractor shall adhere to equal opportunity employment practices to assure that applicants and employees are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex, or age. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. B. Contractor agrees that it shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for applicants for employment placed by or on behalf of Contractor, state that it is an "Equal Opportunity Employer" or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex or age. C. Contractor agrees that it shall, if requested to do so by the City, certify that it has not, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminated against applicants or employees because of their membership in a protected class. D. Contractor agrees to provide the City with access to, and, if requested to do so by City, through its awarding authority, provide copies of all of its records pertaining or relating to its employment practices, except to the extent such records or portions of such records are confidential or privileged under state or federal law. E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as to require or permit any act which is prohibited by law. 22 EXHIBIT B PROPOSAL 144 M MOTT M MACDONALD Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project April 11, 2019 Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Contents A. Cover Letter 1 B. Scope of Work 3 B.1 Phase 1 — Prior to release of Draft EIR 3 B.2 Phase 2 — After release of Draft EIR 6 B.3 Our approach to project management and quality control 8 B.4 Provide a budget for each task 8 C. Project Manager and Personnel 9 D. References and Previous Experience 13 E. Fees and Costs 22 F. Affidavit of Non -Collusion 23 Appendix A — Resumes A. Cover Letter Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project A. Cover Letter Daniel Wall Dear Daniel, Director of Public Works City of Vernon Mott MacDonald, LLC (Mott MacDonald), fully understands the 4305 Santa Fe Avenue City of Vernon's (City) concerns regarding the impacts associated Vernon, CA 90058 with the California High -Speed Rail (CHSR) proposed project footprint. The proposed CHSR and BNSF footprint has a significant permanent right-of-way acquisition requirement, and has the potential to introduce permanent traffic impacts, have direct economic impacts associated with the relocation of commercial properties, will likely introduce increased freight activity, will have significant construction impacts, and may have long-term impacts on existing freight operation. Mott MacDonald We have an established reputation in public transportation delivery 1000 Wilshire Boulevard from planning to implementation, and from major projects to Suite 400 stakeholder and city coordination and support. We have a long Los Angeles CA 90017 history of high-speed rail (HSR) project development delivery, both United States of America in Southern California and internationally. We are currently T +1 (818) 506 8088 supporting the Cities of Norwalk and Commerce by providing mottmac.com specialist HSR planning and engineering services, and undertaking the review of HSR engineering and environmental information prior to release of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). We recently completed the conceptual preliminary engineering and supported environmental clearance for the corridor civil engineering, systems engineering, and station design for three of CHSR Project's eight segments: Fresno to Bakersfield, Bakersfield to Palmdale, and Palmdale to Los Angeles. We have also supported the Cities of Palo Alto, Gilroy, Merced, as well as Tulare County Association of Governments with station area planning and design. In addition to HSR experience, Mott MacDonald has considerable planning, design, and project implementation experience within the LOSSAN corridor working closely with Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) on their rail improvement and grade separation program. From this, we are familiar with existing passenger and freight operators, and their business objectives and goals. Our proposal presents an understanding of the assignments and project requirements, as well as our proposed steps, methods, and procedures to be employed to ensure quality deliverables so we fully meet and exceed the City's expectations. Mott MacDonald proposes Richard Carney, CEng, as our team's Project Manager. Richard possesses a strong knowledge of the CHSR Project, and of the challenges of coordinating with the CHSR Authority (CHSRA). He has provided Project Management consulting services to the City of Norwalk and has led a team of engineering and environmental specialists in review of CHSR engineering design and technical studies. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 2 For the Palmdale to Los Angeles Section of the CHSR Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Support Project, Richard served as the Project Manager responsible for delivering the preliminary engineering design, environmental impact assessment, and stakeholder/community outreach services. Mott MacDonald has earned a reputation for always having open communication with our Clients, our responsiveness, and our reputation of meeting key project milestones and deadlines. Mott MacDonald thrives in working in a collaborative team environment and serving as an extension of our Client staff. To strengthen Mott MacDonald's range of services, we are including the following subconsultant team members, whose respective areas of expertise further benefit the City. periodContatt person during evduation Mott MacDonald, LLC Richard Carney, Principal Project Manager 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 400, Los Angeles, CA 90017 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 400, Los Angeles, CA 90017 818.506.8088 323.313.2243 Terry A. Hayes Associates, Inc. (TAHA) Peter Feldman, Senior Planner 3535 Hayden Ave., Ste. 350, Culver City, CA 90232 3535 Hayden Ave., Ste. 350, Culver City, CA 90232 310.839.4200 310.839.4200 ext. 106 FPL and Associates, Inc. (FPL) 30 Corporate Park, Ste. 401, Irvine, CA 92606 949.252.1688 Paleo Solutions, Inc. (Paleo Solutions) 911 S. Primrose Ave., Unit N, Monrovia, CA 91016 526.818.7713 Fong -Ping Lee, President 30 Corporate Park, Ste. 401, Irvine, CA 92606 949.252.1688 ext. 210 Geraldine Aron, CEO 911 S. Primrose Avenue, Unit N, Monrovia, CA 91016 526.818.7713 TAHA's expertise comes from having successfully managed the environmental document preparation, while effectively completing technical and specialized analyses including documents related to HSR and transit station developments. FPL brings traffic and civil engineering expertise, with regional rail project experience from new Metrolink stations, work at Los Angeles Union Station, double -track improvements, and "on -call" grade crossing safety improvements for SCRRA. Paleo Solutions has provided paleontological and cultural resources consulting services for numerous Los Angeles County transportation -related projects including the CHRSA's Palmdale to Burbank Section Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/EIR. I, Daniel Tempelis, certify the information presented in our proposal is accurate and complete. We acknowledge receipt of Addendum 1, and our proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. Daniel Tempelis, PE Senior Vice President, Southwest Division Manager 1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90017 818.736.4343 1 daniel.tempelis@mottmac.com B. Scope of Work Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 3 B. Scope of Work Mott MacDonald is uniquely qualified to undertake the Scope of Services requested by the City. Our team possesses three key qualifications allowing to fully respond to the City's needs. We have the engineering expertise gained from a portfolio of international HSR engineering, environmental, and planning projects. We have the project understanding gained not only from more than 10 years of experience working on the CHSR Project, but we also have the local knowledge gained from supporting the Gateway Cities since 2016 along the LOSSAN Corridor — undertaking a program of railroad improvement and grade separation work for OCTA. The following is our approach to supporting the City. B.1 Phase 1 — Prior to release of Draft EIR Task 1.1 — Kick-off Meeting and Project Coordination The objective of the kick-off meeting with City project representatives will be to introduce our team and explain our approach to the project. We will provide an agenda for this meeting and include the following discussion topics: • Current understanding of the CHSR Project, funding, implementation and schedule, statewide and specific to LOSSAN Corridor and the City. Achieve consensus on key priorities for the City. Explain Mott MacDonald's approach and methodology. Define the planned timescale and milestones for key study outputs. We will provide materials such as a PowerPoint, and any pertinent CHSR Project documentation in advance of this meeting to enable the City to engage and brief its staff prior to the kick-off. Our Project Manager, Richard, will also be on hand to attend City Council Meetings (if needed), and to support staff and answer any questions that may arise at these meetings. Deliverables: Agenda; Presentation material; CHSRP report or memos (if needed) Task 1.2 — Comments on the Preliminary Engineering for Project Definition 1.2a — Administration Following the project kick-off meeting, we will produce an inventory of all information and materials the CHSR Team has provided to the City, and/or has been made available to the Gateway Cities during the Technical Advisory Committee JAC) and coordination meetings that have taken place over the past three years. The inventory will record the source of the information, the date, and any version information. We will maintain this inventory during the life of the project, and provide this to the City as, and when, it is updated. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 4 We will also develop a City -specific comment and disposition matrix. This will capture all comments and responses that have been communicated between City and CHSR Project previously (understood to date back to 2008). The matrix will be used to capture all comments and Requests for Information (RFIs) that emerge during the project and track CHSR responses, requests for follow-up information, and comments status. As part of the TAC meetings, we will share these comments with the TAC to maintain an integrated and overarching TAC comments log. This has the benefit of enabling the CHSR general responses to corridor -wide issues that have been provided to the TAC, to be shared and used by the City. Deliverables: Incoming document inventory; Comments and Responses Matrix 1.2b — Inventory and Gap Analysis Our engineering team will undertake a completeness review of the Preliminary Engineering for Project Definition (PEPD) drawing set, and any ancillary reports or presentations the CHSR Team has provided. The review will use the California High Speed Rail System, Technical Memorandum; PEPD Definition Guidelines TM0.11, as the baseline for completeness as well as our industry knowledge and understanding of good practice. This gap analysis will identify and record any significant omissions from the PEPD drawing set. We will support the City by drafting RFIs and making requests at meetings with the CHSR Team. Deliverables: Technical Memo explaining any gaps in the current information provided by CHSR Team 1.2c — Technical Review Our priority in Phase 1 will be to undertake an impact analysis of the currently proposed CHSR Project footprint and underlying preliminary engineering. We will commence with a technical review of the PEPD drawing set, and all relevant ancillary reports. Our scope will include railroad, roadway, traffic, structures, and utilities design. The main objective of the technical reviews will be to determine: • Compliance with Federal, State, County, and City standards and guidelines. • Completeness as appropriate for the current project phase, and in accordance with CHSR guidelines, requirements, and good industry practice. • Accuracy in identifying any errors in the design. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Task 1.3 — Conflict Identification Report From this, we will develop a clear understanding of the basis for the proposed CHSR and BNSF right-of-way limits, and clearly understand and define the proposed impacts to the City's right-of-way, public works and utilities, and the proposed modifications to roadway, structures, public spaces and utilities infrastructure. Key areas of interest will be: The rationale for the BNSF facilities expansion south of Hobart Yard, and the consequential commercial property impacts and the realignment of 26th Street. • The traffic impacts associated the reconfiguration of 26th Street. The traffic impacts associated with the construction of Malabar Lead (a new BNSF track adjacent to 46th Street). • The schedule, staging, and constructability of CHSR and BNSF tracks and associated grade separations. • Coordination with other major projects within the City's jurisdiction. • Opportunities to optimize the HSR designs and minimize the impact to the City. We would also identify wider opportunities or benefits to the City associated with CHSR Project. Our approach to this analysis will be to bring together all the strategic, right-of-way, and design information of the project to one place. We will then develop a business case analysis based on that information. Our steps to a business case will be as follows: �. Identify and measure the costs of the project within the City, monetizing wherever possible. 2. Identify and measure the benefits of the project (not just direct benefits, but indirect and non -monetary benefits). 3. If required, adjust monetized costs and benefits for: — Distributional impacts (the effects of proposals on different sections of society) — Relative price movements 4. Adjust for the timing of the incidence of costs and benefits by discounting them, to obtain their present values. 5. Adjust for risk and optimism bias, and consider the impacts of changes in key variables, and of different future scenarios. 6. Consider unvalued impacts (both costs and benefits), using weighting and scoring techniques if appropriate. This Formative evaluation can demonstrate economic impacts (positive or negative), and the extent to which the CHSR Project is achieving its objectives. Summative evaluation provides a final picture of Vernon. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 6 Deliverable: Conflict identification report capturing and defining — CHSR's application of TM03.1 Basis of Design for Blended Operation in the Glendale to Anaheim Corridor. Rationale and extent of impact to City's right-of-way. Requests for additional information necessary to enable the City to properly complete its review of the CHSR Project DEIS Proposal. Identify opportunities to minimize impacts to the City. Identify wider opportunities or benefits to the City associated with CHSR Project. Task 1.4 — Other Services to be Determined In addition to the scope items identified by the City, we can also provide visualization materials quickly and efficiently to enhance the PEPD, and assist City staff and elected officials in fully understanding the CHSR concepts. We are able to coordinate outreach with LOSSAN, BSNF, SCRRA and Amtrak through our established working relationships with the railroads and its stakeholders within Southern California. Deliverable (if needed): Visualizations of grade separations and/or railroad and roadway impact sites; Coordination of stakeholder meetings, agenda, and minutes 13.2 Phase 2 — After release of Draft EIR Task 2.1 —Administration Task 2.1 not part of scope. Deliverable: Not part of scope. Task 2.2 — Review and Comment on DEIR We will approach the DEIR review on a discipline -specific basis, and our Mott MacDonald Team has been developed to address the review of all relevant technical studies within the DEIR/DEIS. We fully Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 7 recognize the time critical nature of this and the need to work closely with the City to provide a comprehensive review within the 45-day (or 60-day) comment period. An early element of this review will be to assess the defined Project Alternatives to determine whether they are consistent with all the coordination undertaken by CHSR Project Team leading to DEIR/DEIS, and are also consistent with the information provided, including but not limited to the PEPD and publicly available outreach material. Key elements of the alternatives design will be: Implementation of the proposed blended system (HSR and Amtrak/Metrolink shared passenger services). Grade separations (South Downey Road, Atlantic Boulevard). Roadway modifications (26th Street, and 46th Street). Rail yard and main line track layouts. We will review each of the technical studies in detail to fully understand the defined impacts, the environmental consequences of the proposed alternatives, and any avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures proposed to address adverse effects. Our review of the DEIR/DEIS will focus on identifying inconsistencies in the analysis of each of the environmental topic areas defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), technical omissions, and areas of concern with the City. We will review all the technical reports prepared for the proposed project to verify the analysis was prepared in a manner consistent with the CEQA Guidelines and applicable Federal regulations (23 CFR Part 771 Environmental Impact and Related Procedures). Our review will also include a review of any proposed mitigation measures, and their applicability to resources within the City with a focus on feasibility, efficacy, and potential secondary impact concerns for the City. Prior to submitting formal comments, we will meet with City staff to discuss our initial findings, and identify any specific City resources of concern to further focus our review. After the meeting, we will prepare formal written comments of our review. In addition to developing editorial text to be used throughout the document, issues to which we will pay close attention in our review will include the following: Quality of the data used in the DEIR/DEIS. Methodology used to conduct the analyses within the DEIR/DEIS. Assumptions made in conducting the analyses. Accuracy of the environmental analysis. Reasonableness, nexus, and feasibility of proposed mitigation measures. Consistency throughout the document. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 8 Deliverable: Draft EIR Review Report detailing our approach, findings, and suggested next steps Task 2.3 — Possible Additional Tasks In addition to the DEIR/DEIS review, the Mott MacDonald Team can provide a broad range of additional engineering, planning, and environmental services. These include developing design alternatives for any aspect of the engineering, assisting City staff in identifying opportunities and benefits from the HSR Project, and/or other grant funding, preparation of grant applications, presentation materials, and visualizations to support petitions. 13.3 Our approach to project management and quality control Mott MacDonald's time -proven Quality, Environmental and Safety Policy and Procedures under our corporate Business Management Systems (BMS) will be utilized across the entire team. This system is certified ISO 9001:2015, an international standard for quality management with both internal and external audits validating the implementation and adherence to our established processes. The implementation of our quality management approach will minimize risk, deliver the highest quality output and ensure that our team works in a safe and sustainable way throughout the project life. The quality control procedures we use to check and verify accuracy and consistency will be maintained and are available to the City for inspection. Each of our submittals requires a quality control certification, and a quality assurance certification, which will be attached to each design deliverable. Mott MacDonald will lead all tasks, and be the sole point of contact between the Consultant Team and the City. Our subconsultants each have specific technical fields of expertise and responsibilities, and their input will be led by our Project Manager, Richard, who will also ensure the team's effort is properly coordinated, and the technical reviews undertaken on behalf of the City are appropriately represented at the Gateway Cities TAC. 13.4 Provide a budget for each task We have provided a budget for each of the above referenced tasks in the financial proposal, which is presented in a separate sealed envelope with the title "Cost Proposal." C. Project Manager and Personnel Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 9 C. Project Manager and Personnel Our Project Manager, Richard Carney, CEng, will serve as the primary point of contact for the project. He has a broad portfolio of local and international rail experience delivering HSR engineering/environmental projects for both corridor and stations, and will leverage his expertise from lessons learned on previous HSR projects with his emphasis on client care, technical innovation, and track and railroad civil engineering delivery projects. Richard's recent rail experience includes development of designs on each segment of the UK's HSR projects (London to Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds), as well as the CHSRA's Palmdale to Los Angeles to Anaheim segments. As the Engineering Manager and Project Manager for the Palmdale to Los Angeles segment, Richard was responsible for the delivery of the engineering design, environmental impact assessment, and stakeholder/community outreach services. He is also serving as the City of Norwalk's consultant, and leads a team of engineering and environmental specialists in the review of HSR engineering design and technical studies. The review includes civil, systems, construction, and operational aspects of the project. He supports the Gateway Cities Council of Governments at monthly Technical Advisory meetings and workshops. Richard has proven past success supporting local agencies, ensuring they receive the improved localized mobility, economic benefits, and community -based station plans that are paramount to their Cities. To best meet the needs of the City, Richard has formulated the following criteria as the basis of our organizational approach in building a team: Technical expertise and ability to work in a collaborative team environment. Availability of key personnel to commit the time needed to meet the schedule and budget. Past performance experience on CHSR system, with the gateway Cities and of similar work and projects. Our key personnel assigned to this contract designated in Figure CA: Team organization chart, possess the necessary qualifications and expertise to deliver the tasks assigned, and will be available for the duration of the required services. No person designated as "key" shall be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 10 C7..... _ f% .4. T......... High -Speed Rail Richard Carney' Class t Rail Paul Wilson Roadway Mike Oldroyd Structures Farhad Nourbakhsh, PE Traffic Alex Zupanski, PE, TE' Senior Planner Maggie Cheung Planner Darlene Gonzalez, AICP, ENV SP Senior Planner Peter Feldman 3 Senior Planner Teresa Li Cultural Resources Geraldine Aron Z Courtney Richards Z GIS/Mapping Darlene Gonzalez, AICP, ENV SP Legend All Staff are Mott MacDonald unless otherwise noted. 1. FPL and Associates, Inc. 2. Paleo Solutions, Inc. 3. Terry A. Hayes and Associates 'Key Personnel The following highlights our key team members' qualifications, and past experiences in similar work efforts. Full resumes for our key team members, and our project team can be found in Appendix A — Resumes. Richard Carney, Project Manager Richard's 29 years of experience in project management and en design has been gained exclusively on rail development projects US, UK, and Asia. From his early career working in the public sector for London Underground, Ltd., to his project leadership roles on large capital improvement programs, he has gained a breadth of railroad civil and systems engineering knowledge and skills such including engineering design, engineering management, project management, and capital program management. Richard possesses expertise on a broad range of international transport projects including HSR, intercity commuter rail, urban metro, and light rail transit (LRT) projects at all delivery phases from planning and preliminary design to design -build and operation and maintenance. His key skills include HSR planning and design, rail systems design, railroad survey and civil engineering design, and station area planning. CHSR, CHSRA, Palmdale to Los Angeles, CA: Engineering Manager and Project Manager HSR Technical/Engineering Design Reviews and Project Management Services, City of Norwalk and Gateway Cities Council of Governments, Norwalk, CA: Project Manager UK High -Speed 2, HS2 Limited, West Midland to Leeds, UK: Engineering Manager Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 11 Rob Ball, PE, Principal -in -Charge With over 40 years of experience in the implementation of major rail transportation projects, Rob is a seasoned engineer who has worked on a wide -range of HSR, domestic rail transit/commuter rail/railroad, and international transit projects utilizing design - build, turnkey/private public partnership (P3), construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC), and conventional project delivery methods. Most recent assignment includes serving as Deputy Director for Engineering and Construction on the $64 billion CHSR Program, where his responsibilities included preparation of programmatic technical requirements and standards, providing construction support to three major design - build contracts, and working with the CHSRA in the development and delivery of an operable segment between Silicon Valley to Central Valley. • CHSR, CHSRA, Sacramento, CA: Deputy Director • CHSR, CHSRA, Sacramento, CA: Director of Alternative Program Delivery for Program Management Team • Anaheim -Las Vegas Super Speed Train, California/Nevada Bi-State Commission, California and Nevada: Civil Engineering Advisor Eric Banghart, AICP, Planning Lead Eric has over 12 years of progressively responsible experience i transportation and station planning through managing planning F developing station area plans; first/last mile improvement plans; interpreting ridership, traffic, and operations modeling data, and developing public transit operation plans. As a Transportation Planner for the CHSR Los Angeles to Anaheim segment, Eric led the development of the project definition, alternatives analyses, and supporting environmental planning tasks, preliminary engineering, and public outreach for the EIR/EIS phase. Eric is serving as the Planning Lead for the City of Norwalk's involvement in the development of a HSR station, overseeing planning topics related to multimodal connections, first/last mile connectivity, and reviewing environmental impact reports. He was also the Deputy Project Manager responsible for leading the project management tasks and transportation planning analysis for a new HSR station in downtown Merced. • CHSR, CHSRA, Los Angeles to Anaheim, CA: Transportation Planner • City of Norwalk HSR Technical/Engineering Design Reviews and Project Management Services, City of Norwalk, Norwalk, CA: Planning Lead • Merced HSR Station Area Plan, City of Merced, Merced, CA: Deputy Project Manager Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 12 Sam Silverman, Environmental Science Sam has 17 years of experience preparing air quality, greenhou analysis, and noise analyses for commercial, residential, and inc development along with transportation projects. His thorough knowledge of air quality analysis methodology includes comprehensive familiarity with the regional and localized estimation methodology set forth by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, application of various computer models, health risk assessments, and construction and operation emission inventories. His knowledge of noise analysis methodology includes noise monitoring, noise models (Traffic Noise Model), and stationary source analyses. • Metrolink Station Location Studies, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager • Airport Metro Connector, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager • Crenshaw Transit Corridor, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Air Quality and Noise Analysis Joey Mendoza, Right -of -Way Joey has 30 years of experience and expertise in all aspects of right-of- way and real estate acquisition practices, specializing in transportation, transit and corridor -oriented projects from the early inception of the initial planning phase, through environmental approval, engineering design, construction coordination, and project closeout. His areas of expertise include overall project management, budgeting, and project cost estimating; schedule preparation; document management; risk management; partial and full -take acquisitions; commercial, residential, and industrial relocation assistance projects; eminent domain support, and appraisal and appraisal review and property management. Joey has served as Right -of -Way Program Manager on numerous major transportation projects including transit, highway, and design -build. He has the technical expertise and administrative guidance to develop and manage right-of-way programs for large-scale, multi -faceted infrastructure projects. �V5�' • 1-405 Improvement, OCTA, Orange County, CA: Program Manager SR 91 Corridor Improvement, RCTC, Corona, CA: Program Manager • SR 91 HOV Gap Closure, RCTC, Riverside County, CA: Program Manager D. References and Previous Experience Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 13 D. References and Previous Experience The best measure of the Mott MacDonald Team's performance is the feedback we receive from our Clients. The following table provides a list of Clients for whom each of our team members have performed similar services, along with contact information. We encourage you to contact these references to learn more about our team's past performance, and review the following project sheets for further details of the assignments performed. Mott MacDonald CHSRA Stuart Mori, Senior Transportation Planner 916.669.6632 City of Norwalk CHSRA HSR Preliminary Engineering/EIS Support Norwalk/Santa Fe • Richard Carney • Rob Ball • Eric Banghart • Paul Wilson • Farhad Nourbakhsh • Richard Carney William Zimmerman, City Engineer Springs CHSRA Station • Eric Banghart 562.929.5727 Coordination/Planning • Darlene Gonzalez Orange County Transportation Authority OCTA Grade Separation • Joey Mendoza Rose Casey, Capital Programs Director, Program Highway Programs 714.560.5729 TAHA CHSRA CHSRA HSR Palmdale • Terry A. Hayes Mark McLoughlin, Director to Burbank 800.630.1039 City of Norwalk Michael Garcia, Director 562.929.5744 Metro Kate Amissah, Project Manager 213.922.1203 FPL and Associates, Inc. Metro Milind Joshi, Project Manager 213.418.3211 Trammell Crow Company Alex Valente, Vice President 310.363.4701 Norwalk HSR Station Metrolink Location Studies • Terry A. Hayes • Teresa Li • Sam Silverman • Sam Silverman Rail -to -Rail Active -Alex Zupanski Transportation - _ Alan Lee Segment A 1101 N. Main Street (Chinatown Lofts) • Alan Lee City of Huntington Beach Edinger Avenue Bridge • Alex Zupanski Bill Janusz, Principal Civil Engineer Replacement Over 714.536.5431 Bolsa Chica Channel Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 14 Paleo Solutions, Inc. Circlepoint Alex Casbara, Associate Planner 408-816-8224 JACOBS Jason Walsh, Senior CEQA/NEPA Environmental Planner 808-344-2061 City of Menifee Lisa Gordon, Planning Manager 951.723.3739 CHSRA, Palmdale to • Geraldine Aron Burbank Segment • Courtney Richards EIR/EIS North SR 55 • Evelyn Chandler Improvement (1-5 to SR • Geraldine Aron 91) PR/ED • Courtney Richards • Liz Denniston Archaeological and • Evelyn Chandler Paleontological Review . Geraldine Aron Services • Courtney Richards M As an award -winning, full service engineering firm, Mott MacDonald has a reputation for technical excellence, innovation, Mdedication and client responsiveness on some of the world's most MOTT prominent projects. Ranked 17th in Engineering News Record's MACDONALD 2018 Top Global Design Firms and 7th in Mass Transit and Rail, Mott MacDonald provides the full suite of engineering planning and design for transportation and transit infrastructure projects, bid - phase services, program/project management, construction oversight and construction management, as well as design support during construction for design -bid -build, design -build, and P3 projects. We have consistently achieved major successes in the fields of rail and transit, rail maintenance and storage facilities, tunnels and underground structures, highways, bridges, aviation, ports and harbors, water and water resources, wastewater, environment, architecture, and municipal engineering. We are an employee owned, financially independent company, with a record of strong and consistent financial performance. Our employee -owned model enables us to make Sacramento investment decisions in ways we believe best benefit our Sa Fra isco Stockton employees and our clients, free from any external stakeholder Palo Al Modesto an Jose influence. Merced Gilroy Mott MacDonald has actively engaged on HSR projects statewide and throughout the world. As a multi -disciplinary Fresno transportation planning and civil infrastructure Kings/Tulare engineering firm, with rail and transit origins dating Bakersfield back to the initial construction of London's first Palmdale underground line over 100 years ago, Mott -� Burbank MacDonald gives you the depth and breadth of Los Angoelealk 0 San Bernardino NN Riverside experience to support any aspect of planning, O Mott MacDonald's Ana im design, engineering, environmental, and Experience 0 San Diego stakeholder/community activities required to Stations Proposed deliver successful, sustainable HSR systems. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 15 We have been involved in the track alignment, engineering work, and station design for three of the eight sections for the CHSR Project, covering 230 miles of the HSR system — more than any other consulting firm. Through these contracts with the CHSRA, Mott MacDonald has worked closely with the corridor cities with multi -modal connections, and understand the planning and community coordination necessary to develop success. Since the conclusion of Mott MacDonald's work with the CHSRA, we have shifted to supporting local jurisdictions with HSR coordination, project management, technical and engineering review, environmental impact analysis/mitigation, design review, traffic modeling, station area planning, and alternative analysis. Overall, Mott MacDonald has planned, designed, and managed some of the most prominent public transportation projects in the world including multimodal projects for HSR, light rail transit (LRT), street cars, commuter rail, heavy rail, bus, and bus rapid transit within urban environments. Through this extensive experience and our focus on local support to CHSRA cities, Mott MacDonald can respond quickly and cost-effectively to any project demand. Below is a summary of Mott MacDonald's key relevant transit services. • Rail and track alignment design • Rail civil engineering design • Rail systems specification/design • Rail operations modeling/timetabling • Roadway geometry/road systems design • Engineering 3D CADD, modeling, and BIM • 3D visualization • Plans, specifications, and estimate • Project lifecycle scheduling corridor studies • Station and transit planning • Multimodal planning • Corridor studies • Circulation elements • Site selection/planning • Bicycle/pedestrian planning • Transit funding/procurement • Streetscape/urban design • Travel demand modeling • Freight movement studies • Transportation specific plans • Travel survey • Regional planning • Toll/revenue studies • Traffic control planning • Traffic simulation • Generation studies • Express lanes • Transit hub development • Systems management • Land planning • Trip reduction programs Mott MacDonald's experience and proven ability to perform the required work is further strengthened by our subconsultant team members: Terry A. Hayes and Associates, FPL and Associates, Inc., and Paleo Solutions. The following projects highlight not only Mott MacDonald's previous experience, but our team's qualifications and experiences completing quality deliverables similar to those requested by the City in support of reviewing EIRs, technical and engineering documents, and coordinating with the CHSRA. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 16 Firm Mott MacDonald Project CHSR Preliminary Engineering/EIS Support Client CHSRA Location Palmdale to Los Angeles, CA Expertise • Coordination with Cities and operational railroad (passenger and freight) • HSR infrastructure • Railroad engineering design with a shared corridor • Railroad, civil, structural, geotechnical, and traffic engineering services CHSR Preliminary Engineering/EIS Support r - but Mott MacDonald was the prime consultant for the Palmdale to Los Angeles segment of the CHSR Project between 2008 and 2015, responsible for 65 miles of preliminary engineering design for one of the project's most difficult geographic segments. We provided project management of the DEIR/DEIS technical studies, and evaluation and solutions for developing HSR within a shared corridor. The challenges included crossing the San Gabriel and Verdugo mountains, the seismic conditions within the Los Angeles area and passing through the dense urban corridor of the San Fernando Valley and into Downtown Los Angeles. Our team prepared preliminary engineering design, systems, and stations for project development including track alignment, systems station, grade separations, Metrolink double tracking, tunneling, structures, roadways, and rail storage and maintenance facilities. We provided Project Management of the DEIR/DEIS technical studies and extensive community outreach within the corridor and San Fernando Valley. Mott MacDonald evaluated and provided solutions for developing HSR within a shared corridor through the San Fernando Valley between Sylmar and the Los Angeles River, just north of Union Station. The concepts included dedicated electrified HSR tracks operating in a shared right-of-way with Metro, Amtrak, and UPRR/BNSF. This required the development of 17 preliminary grade separation designs, right-of-way acquisition assessments, and fully supporting CHSRA with their stakeholder coordination and community outreach. Our coordination activities included Metro and SCRRA, and operational railroads UPRR and BNSF, the corridor cities (from Palmdale to Los Angeles, and throughout the San Fernando Valley), transport agencies (Caltrans and Burbank Airport), and numerous public and provide utility suppliers. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 17 Firm Mott MacDonald Client City of Norwalk Location City of Norwalk and Santa Fe Springs, CA Expertise • HSR planning and engineering • Station design • Economic analysis • Alternatives design • Visualization CHSR — Technical and Environmental Reviews (Norwalk Station; Los Angeles to Anaheim Segment) California is planning and implementing a statewide HSR system connecting San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Anaheim, and San Diego. In Southern California and south of Los Angeles the proposed alignment will operate within the LOSSAN Corridor. Although the HSR alignment will be located within an existing rail corridor, significant additional infrastructure and modifications to the existing road and rail systems are needed to provide a safe and reliable rail system. This includes construction of new grade separations, relocating roadways and utilities, and building new rail facilities and passenger stations. Although this has the potential to generate significant local economic social benefits, the project also has large potential environmental impacts. Though the Gateway Cities are key stakeholders in the CHSR Project, these cities also need to fully understand project impacts to inform their constituents and to be able to make informed decisions about the city of Norwalk (City) and its relationship with the project. Mott MacDonald is providing technical and planning services to the City. The objective is to evaluate the CHSR Project alternatives and identify the associated impacts and conflicts the project will have on the City. These would include the location and characteristics of the HSR station, and the impacts the locations and layout of the station may have on the local rail and roadway/traffic. We have been able to provide alternative analysis design that has less impact to the City. The CHSR Project will release a Draft EIR for the Los Angeles to Anaheim Segment, in late 2019 or early 2020. Prior to this, the City will be fully appraised of the engineering proposals, and the impacts and opportunities that the project will present. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 18 Firm Mott MacDonald Client OCTA Location Orange County, CA Expertise • Coordination with Cities, BNSF, UPRR, SCRRA, FHWA, Orange County, Caltrans, and local agencies • Regional rail engineering • Management of seven grade separation projects • Railroad, civil, structural, geotechnical, and traffic engineering OCTA Grade Separation Program Mott MacDonald is OCTA's Program Manager for their $4.3 billion highway and grade separation program comprised of design and construction of major roadway widenings, grade separations, rail bridges, interchange, and local street improvements, BNSF coordination, and maintenance and operations facilities across Orange County. Since 2004, Mott MacDonald has supported OCTA with management of their program with a fully integrated program management team, who also provide planning, preliminary engineering, cost, scope control, and scheduling, cost estimating, and construction management services. We provide full-time staff and on -call specialists who bring expertise in railroad engineering, civil, structural, geotechnical, and electrical engineering design, right-of-way, constructability, value engineering, permitting, design reviews, quality control review, and construction claims analysis. As an extension of the owner, Mott MacDonald oversees all coordination with Orange County, Caltrans, FHWA, Cities, BNSF, UPRR and SCRRA railroads, and local agencies, while administering the procedures as set forth by OCTA. Mott MacDonald has supported OCTA with the $635 million OC Bridges Grade Separation Program including design, bid support and project management of seven grade separation projects along the BNSF Railway Orangethorpe Corridor in the cities of Anaheim, Placentia, and Fullerton. Implementation of grade separation projects is scheduled to be completed in 2018, and will alleviate current and potential traffic impacts and hazards posed by existing at -grade rail crossings along the Orangethorpe Corridor. The project features include undercrossing and overcrossing bridge structures, railroad shooflies, detour and bypass roadways, pump stations, connector roads, improvements to city streets, retaining walls, sound walls, and landscaping. OCTA Rail Capital Projects are implemented in partnership with SCRRA. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 19 Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. (TAHA), an S-Corporation, founded in 1984, is a specialized environmental consulting firm UAA providing environmental planning and environmental assessment a� ...... t;.1 P1... — services. With a staff of 12 planners, environmental professionals, and administrative support, TAHA is a certified MBE, DBE, and Community Business Enterprise. TAHA has prepared hundreds of CEQA and NEPA environmental documents and technical studies for federal, State, and local governments. TAHA has successfully managed environmental document preparation while effectively completing technical and specialized analyses, including documents related to HSR and transit station developments. .� High -Speed Rail — Palmdale to Burbank, CHSRA, Los Angeles, CA: TAHA prepared the Land Use and Station Planning, Agricultural Resources and Forestry, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space EIS/EIR sections. The proposed project includes a HSR system that is coordinated with the State's existing transportation network, which includes intercity rail and bus lines, regional commuter rail lines, urban rail and bus transit lines, highways, and airports. The high- speed intercity train service is anticipated to serve more than 800 miles of tracks throughout California. This project covers the HSR Palmdale to Burbank segment, and analyses two potential corridors. Key issues included land use, agriculture, forestry, and utilities. Norwalk High -Speed Rail Station, City of Norwalk, Norwalk, CA: TAHA worked with the City of Norwalk (City) to review the CHSR designs within the city and identify strategies to address environmental concerns posed by the City. TAHA prepared an Environmental Benefits Memorandum identifying the potential environmental benefits of placing the proposed CHSR, as well as the existing BNSF and Metrolink tracks, in a 35-foot-deep to 55-foot deep trench. Key topics addressed include aesthetics (visual character and lighting), land use, and noise. TAHA's work has been completed within the agreed upon schedule and budget. Metrolink Location Studies, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: TAHA prepared feasibility studies to identify environmental constraints to project implementation. Metro seeks to improve access to Metrolink commuter train stations from populated areas, job centers and/or transit connections, thereby encouraging increased transit use. The technical analysis focused on traffic, noise, air quality, land use, historic resources, floodplains, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, and socioeconomics. TAHA characterized existing conditions, described potential constraints relates to environmental approvals, and identified promising concepts for further environmental study. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 20 FPLFPL and Associates, Inc. (FPL), was established in 1988, and has since been providing traffic and civil engineering services to a and Associates, Inc. variety of public agency and private clients. FPL's diverse experience participating in transportation projects from the planning phase through design and construction brings value to clients by ensuring documents prepared prior to final design are able to factor in and mitigate potential issues that a contractor might encounter during construction. FPL's combined traffic and civil engineering expertise allows a better approach to traffic bottlenecks. FPL's regional rail project experience includes new Metrolink stations, work at Los Angeles Union Station, double -track improvements, and "on -call" grade crossing safety improvements for SCRRA. FPL is a certified SBE, U/DBE, and MBE with a staff of 30. Rail -to -Rail Active Transportation Corridor — Segment A, Metro, Los Angeles, CA: The project creates an off-street facility and community resource for pedestrians and bicyclists through the heart of South Los Angeles, connecting residential neighborhoods to schools, transit (Blue, Silver, and Crenshaw Lines), and other destinations. This project will convert an abandoned railroad corridor into a trail. FPL is responsible for the civil and traffic engineering design requiring approval from numerous City of Los Angeles agencies. FPL was tasked to take the engineering documents that had been prepared in the environmental phase and develop them to the level of being contractor -friendly in anticipation of the project being delivered under the design -build method. 1101 North Main Street (Chinatown Lofts), Trammell Crow Company, Downtown Los Angeles, CA: For this mixed used project in the Chinatown neighborhood, FPL was brought in by the developer/owner to serve as a civil engineering "advisor" on an on - call basis to supplement the engineering team in place given the right-of-way, procedural, and documentation complexities of the project. FPL reviewed a variety of project documents, in addition to coordinating with a number of City of Los Angeles staff to obtain helpful information that facilitated the progress of the project. Edinger Avenue Bridge Replacement over Bolsa Chica Channel, City of Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach and Seal Beach, CA: The existing deteriorated timber bridge - overcrossing the Bolsa Chica Channel is being replaced with a precast concrete bridge. Under FPL's "on -call" transportation engineering contract with the City of Huntington Beach, FPL was tasked with providing plan review of multiple submittals of the County of Orange's engineering consultant's bridge construction traffic control plans. Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project • Paleo Solutions, Inc. (Paleo Solutions), was established in 2004 to provide paleontological and cultural resource services throughout the western US, providing the capabilities, staffing, and -il7P11 financial stability of a national firm. As a small, disadvantaged, 5, woman owned corporation, Paleo Solutions employs 54 scientists across fours offices, and offers extensive cultural resources and paleontological experience, broad functional capabilities, the largest paleontology consulting staff in the US, and key relationships with agency leaders and Native American tribes. Since 2011, Paleo Solutions has provided paleontological and cultural resources consulting services for numerous Los Angeles County transportation -related projects. EIR/EIS Paleontology Preparation for CHSR — Palmdale to Burbank, CHSRA, Los Angeles, CA- As Paleontology Lead, Paleo Solutions is completing a CEQA/NEPA level paleontological study to support development of the EIR/EIS. Following a review of previous environmental work, Paleo Solutions completed a Paleontological Memo Report with assessment of the current work and recommendations for additional paleontological tasks. Record searches were conducted to determine if previous fossil localities are known within or near the project alignment for each alternative. Paleontological surveys were completed in 2016 with the results of the survey, records search, and background research compiled into a final Paleontological Resources Technical Report. North SR 55 Improvement from 1-5 to SR 91 Project Report and Environmental Documentation, OCTA, Oranqe County, CA: Paleo Solutions provided cultural and paleontological resources services in support of this project. The total length of the Area of Potential Effect (APE) is 7.5 miles, and the total area of the APE is 820.7 acres. The paleontological study was comprised of a Paleontological Identification Report/Paleontological Evaluation Report (PIR/PER) consistent with the CEQA, and included conducting an analysis of existing paleontological data. The cultural study included a records search. A geoarchaeological assessment was conducted to assess the potential to affect buried archaeological resources. Impacts to archaeological resources were assessed with recommended mitigation measures provided. Hrcnaeologicai ana vaieontological Review services, UILy V1 Menifee, Menifee, CA: Paleo Solutions is reviewing paleontological resource impact mitigation reviews, paleontological resources assessments reports, paleontological monitoring reporting, and cultural resources assessment reports for the City. The firm has had its contract renewed for the past four years. E. Fees and Costs Mott MacDonald I Proposal for Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project 22 E. Fees and Costs Our fee proposal is located within a separate sealed envelope with our submittal per the requirements addressed on the "Cost Proposal — Labor Hour Worksheet" from Attachment B included with the RFP. Our cost proposal is also summarized on Exhibit 10-H1 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual from Attachment C included with the RFP, which was completed by all of our team members. F. Affidavit of Non - Collusion 23 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION CONTRACTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA )SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) Daniel Tempelis _ being first duly sworn deposes and says that he/she is Senior Vice President, Southwest Division Manager (Insert "Sole Owner", "Partner", "President", "Secretary", or other proper title) of Mott MacDonald, LLC (Insert name of Proposer) who submits herewith to the City of Vernon a proposal; That all statements of fact in such proposal are true; That such proposal was not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation; That such proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; That said Proposer has not, directly or indirectly by agreement, communication or conference with anyone attempted to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Vernon, or of any other Proposer or anyone else interested in the proposed contract; and further That prior to the public opening and reading of proposals, said Proposer: a. Did not directly or indirectly, induce or solicit anyone else to submit a false or sham proposal; b. Did not directly or indirectly, collude, conspire, connive or agree with anyone else that said Proposer or anyone else would submit a false or sham proposal, or that anyone should refrain from proposing or withdraw his proposal; c. Did not, in any manner, directly or indirectly seek by agreement, communication or conference with anyone to raise or fix the proposal price of said Proposer or of anyone else, or to raise of fix any overhead profit or cost element of this proposal price, or of that of anyone else; d. Did not, directly or indirectly, submit his/her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to nay corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any individual or group of individuals, except the City of Vernon, or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with Proposer in his/her business. I certify under penalty of perjury that the above information is correct 17 24 City of Vernon Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the California High -Speed Rail Project Request for Proposals RI M-31 WIN J M__ �Mw M =_ Title: Senior Vice President, Southwest Division Manager Date: Anril11.2019 18 Appendix A - Resumes Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Contents Geraldine Aron Rob Ball Eric Banghart iv Richard Carney vii Maggie Cheung ix Peter Feldman A Darlene Gonzalez xii Teresa Li AV Joey Mendoza xv Farhad Nourbakhsh xvii Mike Oldroyd xix Courtney Richards xxi Sam Silverman xxii Dave Warnock xxiii Paul Wilson xxv Alex Zupanski xxvii Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Geraldine Aron Cultural Resources Personal summary Education: MS, Geological Sciences BS, Geological Sciences Cartography and GIS Geraldine has more than 21 years of experience as a professional paleontologist in natural resources management. She meets the professional standards as a Principal Investigator for the Society of Vertebrate Paleontologists, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), United States Forest Service (USFS), San Bernardino County, Orange County, Riverside County, San Diego County, and other agencies that retain a professional list for qualified paleontologists. She has authored hundreds of technical reports, which include paleontological assessments, DEIRs, EIR/EIS, Paleontological Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, document reviews, and survey Systems reports for CEQA/NEPA compliance. Geraldine has worked on well over 500 projects throughout California, Montana, Wyoming, New Mexico, Utah, and Colorado. Experience and skills • Experience Conducting Peer Reviews of Paleontological Reports California High -Speed Rail Experience with two EIR/EIS sections (San Francisco to San Jose and San Jose to Merced and Palmdale to Burbank) and construction experience (Construction Package 4 and Construction Package 2-3) Selected projects On -Call Peer Review, City of Menifee, Menifee, CA: Principal Investigator responsible for overseeing and participating in paleontological and cultural resources third party -peer reviews of over 20 projects at the request of the City of Menifee for telecommunication and commercial and residential development projects. Topock Compressor Station, Pacific Gas & Electric: Principal Investigator/Project Manager responsible for providing a memorandum summarizing the results that included an understanding of CERCLA. Paleo Solutions provided third party review of paleontological documents to ensure adequacy of use in preparation of environmental documents. Documents included a report titled Paleontological Resources Management Plan, Topock Groundwater Remediation Project, San Bernardino County California and Mohave County, Arizona, prepared for Pacific Gas and Electric. Clean Water Campus EIR: Principal Investigator/Project Manager responsible for overseeing an analysis of existing paleontological data including a geologic map review, a literature search, and an institutional record searches. Co-authored the Paleontological Technical Report, and performed a technical review of the Cultural Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Resources Survey Report. The LA Sanitation (LASAN) Clean Water Campus proposed to construct a clean water campus to support LASAN staff on a vacant parcel in the corner of Humboldt Street and North San Fernando Road within the City of Los Angeles. The new clean water campus is a six story 150,000 SF LEED Platinum office building with a new 1,000 parking structure which replaced the old 200 parking space structure. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Rob Ball, PE Rob is an accomplished project manager with more than 40 years Principal -in -Charge of experience in the implementation of major rail transportation Personal summary projects, and is a seasoned engineer who has worked on a wide - Education: range of domestic rail transit/commuter rail/railroad, HSR, and international transit projects utilizing design -build, turnkey/private MBA public partnership (P3), construction manager/general contractor BEng, Civil (CM/GC), and conventional project delivery methods. Registrations: Experience and skills PE, CA #C41744 As Vice-President/Project Principal for Mott MacDonald, Rob oversees and participates in many of the major transit pursuits and projects within Southern California and brings significant expertise through a long and challenging career working in a highly visible transportation field. Most recent assignment includes working as Deputy Director for Engineering and Construction on the $64 billion California HSR (CHSR) Program, where his responsibilities included preparation of programmatic technical requirements and standards, providing construction support to three major design -build contracts, and working with the California High -Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) in the development and delivery of an operable segment between Silicon Valley to Central Valley. Selected projects CHSR, CHSRA, Sacramento, CA: Deputy Director responsible for engineering and construction support for Rail Delivery Partner (RDP), and leading a multi -discipline HSR engineering group on development of updated design criteria and engineering standards for new design -build civil infrastructure procurements, design support to Central Valley construction contracts on interpretation of design requirements, review of RFIs, requests for design variances, issuance of design directives to construction management teams, due diligence checks on design -build submittals to programmatic requirements, development, and refinement of scope and responsibilities for Independent Checking Engineers on design - build contracts. Provided support to track and systems interfaces with civil infrastructure. Provided support and technical guidance to regional management teams and their regional consultants, who are responsible for environmental clearance and preliminary engineering for project development. Maintained a close interface with other functional areas including environmental, right-of-way, rail, systems, operations, and system integration teams, and participated as a member of a HSR implementation strategy group Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes for support of the bi-yearly legislative mandated HSR Business Plan. Position based in Sacramento. CHSR, CHSRA, Sacramento, CA: Director of Alternative Program Delivery for Program Management Team (PMT) responsible for providing oversight on several functional areas including engineering, environmental, right -of way, procurement and contracts, and design -build construction support. Provided oversight and coordination of the PMT's engineering group based in San Francisco with direction and feedback to task leads. Position was based in Sacramento and provided a close interface with the Functional Task Managers from both the PMT and CHSRA from the aspect of program delivery. Provided technical and procurement support in the development of CHSRA's early construction packages in the Central Valley. Anaheim -Las Vegas Super Speed Train, California/Nevada Bi- State Commission, California and Nevada: Civil Engineering Advisor responsible for a major engineering firm under contract to the California/Nevada Bi-State Commission on the evaluation of a franchise proposal to be awarded for a HSR line between Anaheim, California, and Las Vegas, Nevada. Metrolink Commuter Rail Implementation, SCRRA, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties, CA: Project Manager for a major engineering firm working as part of the consultant team responsible for planning, design, and construction management of multiple commuter rail lines throughout the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Orange. Assignments included major design components, specifications, permitting, preparation of exhibits, and legal exhibits for grade crossing applications to CPUC, and extensive liaison with local cities along the corridors. City of Indio Rail Passenger Station, City of Indio, Indio, CA: Project Manager responsible for acting as the City of Indio's liaison with Amtrak and UPRR to negotiate restoring an Amtrak station stop at a new transportation center under development. Prepared project agreement and preliminary track and station layouts. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Eric Banghart, Eric is an urban planner with over 12 years of progressively AICP responsible experience in transportation and environmental Planning Lead planning through managing planning projects; developing technical Personal summary planning reports; interpreting ridership, traffic, and operations Education: modeling data, and developing public transit operation plans. MA, Urban Planning Experience and skills BA, Environmental He has worked with clients such as the California High -Speed Rail Studies Authority (CHSRA), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), San Bernardino County Registrations: Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority, Certified Planner, and Los Angeles World Airports, as well as various cities and American Institute of counties statewide. Eric has been heavily involved in public Certified Planners, outreach efforts for several transportation, land use, Title VI, and AICP CEQA/NEPA projects within California. He also possesses demonstrated proficiency in ArcGIS software. .ielected projects California High -Speed Rail (CHSR), CHSRA, Los Angeles to Anaheim, CA: Transportation Planner responsible for leading the development of the project definition, alternatives analyses and supporting environmental planning tasks, preliminary engineering, and public outreach for the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) phase of the project to construct a 30-mile HSR line between Union Station in Los Angeles and the Anaheim Regional Intermodal Transportation Center in Anaheim within the Los Angeles to Anaheim Segment of the overall project. City of Norwalk HSR Technical/Engineering Design Reviews and Project Management Services, City of Norwalk, Norwalk, CA: Planning Lead responsible for the City of Norwalk's (City) involvement in the development of a high-speed rail station. The City received funding from the CHSRA and appointed Mott MacDonald to undertake detailed technical reviews and evaluation of the State's planning and design of the proposed high-speed rail station at Norwalk. Oversees planning topics to multimodal connections, first -/last -mile connectivity, and reviewing environmental impact reports. Merced HSR Station Area Plan, City of Merced, Merced, CA: Deputy Project Manager responsible for leading the project management tasks and transportation planning analysis for a new high-speed rail station in the downtown area of Merced. As part of the state-wide HSR system, the Merced Station is intended to support access to the surrounding catchment area by providing Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes multi -modal feeder bus and regional rail facilities. The City of Merced HSR Station Area Plan furnished the necessary data, analysis, and stakeholder perspectives required to establish a preferred alternative to prepare for the future station in downtown Merced. Cross Valley Rail Corridor Plan, Tulare County Association of Governments, Tulare County and Kings County, CA: Project Manager responsible for a new 80-mile rail corridor connecting with the proposed CHSR station to the cities in the San Joaquin Valley. The overall goal of the plan will be to identify a vision for how the Cross Valley Corridor will serve as a regional transit option providing surrounding communities with convenient transit service and hubs, and plan how the future Kings and Tulare Regional HSR Station will serve as a connector to the entire State of California. The planning study analyzed the feasibility of FRA-compliant passenger rail service in an existing freight corridor through the Counties of Tulare and Kings. Planning efforts also took into consideration first -last mile connections for each of the proposed stations along the corridor. Kings Area Rural Transit Station Site Selection, Kings County Association of Governments, Hanford, CA: Project Manager responsible for leading the site selection and conceptual design of a new multi -modal transit terminal station in the downtown area of Hanford. As part of the statewide HSR system, the Hanford KART Station is intended to support access to HSR for the substantial surrounding catchment area by providing multi -modal feeder bus and future regional rail facilities. In addition to transit services the site is being planned as a mixed -use center with commercial, government and residential activities all occurring on the site. The goal is to create a new activity center for the City that is fully supported by active and public transit amenities. Metrolink Stations Assessment and Improvement Plan, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Planning Lead responsible for the examination of 18 Metrolink stations within Los Angeles County. The Station Assessment study examined everything from ADA compliance, state of good repair, and first -last mile improvements. Led the team for analyzing the team based on Metro's First -Last Mile (PATH) policies. vi Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Richard Carney, Richard's 29 years of experience in project management and CEna engineering design has been gained exclusively on rail Project Manager; development projects in the US, UK, and Asia. From his early Engineering; High- career working in the public sector for London Underground, Ltd., Speed Rail to his project leadership roles on large capital improvement Personal summary programs, Richard has gained a breadth of railroad civil and Education: systems engineering knowledge and skills such as railroad civil and MSc, Rail Systems systems engineering design, engineering management, project management, and capital program management. He possesses Post Graduate expertise on a broad range of international transport projects that Diploma in Civil include HSR, intercity commuter rail, urban metro, and LRT Engineering projects at all delivery phases from planning and preliminary design Graduate Diploma to design -build and operation and maintenance. Mine Surveying Experience and skills HND Mine Surveying Richard's recent rail experience includes development of designs Registrations: on each segment of the UK's HSR projects, as well as the CEng, Charted California High -Speed Rail Authority's (CHSRA) California HSR Engineer (CHSR) Palmdale — Los Angeles — Anaheim Corridor. He has also led the track and OCS configuration designs for the UK's West Coast Mainline Project, delivering over 450 track miles of track and OCS upgrade on an operational mainline railroad. Selected project! CHSR, CHSRA, Palmdale to Los Angeles, CA: Engineering Manager and Project Manager responsible for the delivery of the engineering design, environmental impact assessment, and stakeholder/community outreach services for the Palmdale to Los Angeles Segment of the overall CHSR Project. This 62-mile HSR project involves a dedicated HSR corridor supporting speeds up to 250 mph, and presents significant challenges including the crossing of multiple geological faults, challenging topography, shared corridor design and grade separation in the San Fernando Valley, mitigation of significant environmentally sensitive resources, and managing an innovative and proactive outreach strategy. The project location includes densely developed areas in the Los Angeles Basin and San Fernando Valley, and through the seismically active areas in the San Gabriel Mountains. The project also delivered station planning and design within the cities of Palmdale and Burbank. At completion, the project achieved sufficient level of design and environmental evaluation to complete an Alternatives Analysis and provide the basis of an Environmental Impact Report. Vii Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes HSR Technical/Engineering Design Reviews and Project Management Services, City of Norwalk and Gateway Cities Council of Governments, Norwalk, CA: Project Manager responsible for acting as the City of Norwalk's (City) consultant and leads a team of engineering and environmental specialists in the review of HSR engineering design and technical studies. The review includes civil, systems, construction, and operational aspects of the project. Supports the Gateway Cities Council of Governments at monthly Technical Advisory meetings and workshops. The City is a major stakeholder in the development of a HSR station within its planning jurisdiction. The City has received funding from the CHSRA and has appointed Mott MacDonald to undertake detailed technical reviews and evaluation of the State's planning and design of the proposed HSR station at Norwalk. The output from this project will inform the City of the benefits and impacts associated with the station and enable City Staff to inform its elected officials, Board Members, and the City's Community. The review will also influence the content of the CHSRA's Environmental Impact Report prior to its formal release for public and stakeholder comment. UK High -Speed 2, HS2 Limited, West Midland to Leeds, UK: Engineering Manager responsible for the route design and civil engineering development for over 200 miles of 250-mph HSR alignment connecting the UK's midland city of Birmingham to Manchester and Leeds. Based in London, the role included design management, delivery of preliminary engineering, technical assurance assessments, engineering coordination, and managing the interface with the environmental consultants, preparation for stakeholder and public consultation, and preparing engineering documentation for the Parliamentary Hybrid Bill. HSR Corridor 3, India's Ministry of Railways, India: Engineer Manager responsible for developing over 600 miles of 200-mph high-speed route alignment design. This role included defining design standards, procuring survey, developing route option designs using local design teams, defining option selection criteria, and reporting recommended routes and design to the client. The project included five station layout designs in the cities of Delhi, Agra, Lucknow, Varanasi, and Patna. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Maggie Cheung Maggie is a transportation planner and a specialist in traffic and Senior Planner pedestrian movement studies, providing services to both public and Personal summary private sector clients. She has amassed 12 years of experience in Education: transportation modeling and planning involving train and metro stations, highways, city master plans, urban realm, and buildings. MSc, Transport and With in-depth knowledge of a range of simulation software, Maggie Business has been the project manager and workstream lead of pedestrian Management movement modeling in many high -profile domestic and BA, Geography international transportation projects. Experience and skills An accredited user of the Legion modeling software suite, Maggie maintains proficiency in VISSIM and SATURN, and has the ability to undertake Legion and VISSIM audits. She has a sound understanding of micro -simulation and strategic modeling techniques including matrix development, demand forecasting, network coding, base model calibration, and validation and outputs analysis. She is familiar with commonly used design and modeling standards for railroads, highways, and buildings, and understands planning procedures and environmental constraints. Her recent work has included leading international pedestrian movement assessment workstreams or standalone projects, ensuring technical outputs and reports are understood by both team members and non -technical audiences. Selected projects Vermont Bus Rapid Transit Project Phase II, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles County, CA: Transportation Planner responsible for supporting this conceptual study to analyze the feasibility of BRT conversion to rail in the Vermont north -south -corridor, the second busiest corridor in Los Angeles County. Supported the study with analysis of estimated run times for the modes and alignments under consideration, ensuring maintenance and servicing facilities could be appropriately sized for each option. Los Angeles -Glendale -Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles County, CA: Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the study with analysis and project management support. This study evaluates the feasibility for providing up to two additional stations in the city of Glendale, and up to two additional stations in the city of Los Angeles, as well as providing increased passenger rail service throughout the day on the corridor. ix Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Traffic Operations Modeling of Proposed Interchange on SR 46, City of Paso Robles, CA: Traffic modeler responsible for developing Synchro and SIDRA models as well as HCS analysis as part of the wider design team delivering a PA/ED report to Caltrans District 5. The modeling examined base case (no build) and two layout scenarios for 2025 (opening year) and 2045 (forecast year). Croydon Town Centre VISSIM Modeling, Transport for London, UK: Traffic Modeler responsible for updating the existing VISSIM models of the study area with the latest available traffic count data to assess the impact of a proposed development by Westfield in Croydon City Centre Worked extensively on matrix estimation, model development, and model calibration and validation to refresh the models for the AM, PM, and Saturday periods. In line with Transport for London (TfL's) VISSIM Modeling Audit Process guidelines, network performance indicators such as journey times and turning flows were extracted for calibration and validation. Traffic Assessment of Croydon Tramlink to Sutton Light Rail Transit with Increased Service Frequency, Transport for London, UK: Traffic Modeler responsible for developing VISSIM models to assess the impact of increased services as the Kingston Road/Hartfield Road junction is one such junction part of the proposals for increased frequencies on Line 4 of the Croydon Tramlink and also an extension of services to Sutton. This will have impacts on vehicular traffic as the trams have priority over general traffic. A base model was developed in line with VMAP guidelines, for the AM -peak and PM -peak in VISSIM to evaluate proposed junction layout improvements, and also proposed increases in tram frequencies and the addition of services to Sutton. Network performance indicators such as journey times and turning flows were extracted from the base and proposed models for comparison and 3D videos were also produced. Traffic Modeling of Proposed Road Layout for Ground Transportation Center, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, NY and NJ: Traffic Modeler responsible for developing a VISSIM model to support the wider design team to assess the operations of the proposed layout of the drop-off/pick up areas for the different types of vehicles including private car and transportation network carriers such as Uber/Lyft. With the projected growth in passenger numbers, the modeling work will identify areas where more capacity may be required in terms of curb length and test potential operations plans. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Peter Feldman Peter has nine years of experience as an environmental planner Senior Planner and project manager in preparing California Environmental Quality Personal summary Act/National Environmental Policy Act (CEQA/NEPA) documents, Education: community impact assessments (CIAs), and Section 4(f)/6(f) documentation. He incorporates a multitude of data sources in BA, Political Science conducting community -based analyses including, but not limited to, US Census, American Community Survey, transit modeling, and regional growth forecasts. His responsibilities at TAHA include project management, environmental justice/Title VI, Section 4(f), traffic and transportation. Selected projects California High -Speed Train from Los Angeles to Anaheim, California High -Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), State of California: Technical Reports and EIR Section Writer responsible for evaluating project impacts on neighborhoods and communities, demographic characteristics as well as environmental justice impacts as part of the CIA and socioeconomic EIR sections. The CHSRA is proposing high-speed train service for travel between major metropolitan areas of California. The service would run from Los Angeles, Orange County, and San Diego in the south to the San Francisco Bay Area and Sacramento in the north. This system is forecast to carry more than 100 million passengers annually by the year 2030. California High -Speed Train from San Jose to Merced, CHSRA, State of California: Primary Section Author responsible for alternatives analysis and preparation of the Section 4(f)/6(f), and the parks and recreation chapters of the EIR/EIS for the HSR segment between San Jose and Merced. Assisted in preparation of a project -level EIR/EIS for this section of the proposed California HSR Project. Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA: Responsible for assisting with the preparation of the Environmental Assessment providing management support and Quality Assurance/Quality Control. TAHA prepared an Environmental Assessment to restore streetcar service in Downtown Los Angeles. By connecting residential and employment areas, shopping districts, civic resources, cultural institutions, historic districts and landmarks, and entertainment venues, and by providing connectivity to other transit services, the project would improve mobility and accessibility with a new transportation mode for people who live and work in the downtown area, as well as for visitors. A Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Darlene Gonzalez, Darlene is an urban planner with more than four years of AICP, ENV SIP experience in both geographic information systems (GIS) and Planner; transportation planning. GIS/Mapping Experience and skills Personal summary Darlene has expertise in developing technical reports; creating Education: maps, and visual aids; analyzing and interpreting transit operations Master of Urban and performance data, and developing special rail and bus operations Planning plans in cooperation with the California -High Speed Rail Authority BA, Urban Studies (CHSRA), SCRRA, San Bernardino County Transportation Registrations: Authority, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency, and the Orange Certified Planner, County Transportation Authority. American Institute of Selected projects Certified Planners, Merced HSR Station Area Plan, City of Merced, Merced, CA: AICP Transportation Planner responsible for conducting research and Envision transportation planning analysis for a new HSR station in the Sustainability downtown area of Merced. The Merced Station will be a multi - Professional (ENV modal transportation hub to support HSR, bus, regional rail, and SP) active transportation. The City of Merced HSR Station Area Plan will furnish the necessary data, analysis, and stakeholder perspectives required to establish a preferred alternative to prepare for the future HSR station in downtown Merced. Cross Valley Rail Corridor Plan, Tulare County Association of Governments, Tulare County and Kings County, CA: Transportation Planner responsible for assisting with the project management tasks and transportation planning analysis for a new 80-mile rail corridor connecting with the proposed CHSR station to the cities in the San Joaquin Valley. The overall goal of the Plan will be to identify a vision for how the Cross Valley Corridor will serve as a regional transit option providing surrounding communities with convenient transit service and hubs, and plan how the future Kings and Tulare Regional HSR Station will serve as a connector to the entire State of California. The planning study analyzes the feasibility of FRA-compliant passenger rail service in an existing freight corridor through the Counties of Tulare and Kings. Planning efforts will also take into consideration planning for various other modes of transportation such as walking, cycling, and automobiles throughout the region and proposed stations. Kings Area Rural Transit Station Site Selection Study, Kings County Association of Governments, Hanford, CA: Transportation Planner responsible for the development of station location screening methodology to identify and evaluate potential XII Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes transit station sites. The Kings Area Rural Transit (KART) Station is an existing bus transit center in downtown Hanford. Current site is constrained by the adjacent railroad and surrounding businesses and will be relocated to enhance transit efficiency and connectivity, support economic development, and increase access to nearby social services in Hanford. Site selection analysis is dependent upon locational attributes, stakeholder preference, transit operability, environmental considerations, costs, and multimodal connectivity. Metrolink Rail Operations, Orange County, CA: Transportation Analyst responsible for supporting the rail operations in Orange County by analyzing ridership and operational performance data. Orange County is served by four passenger rail lines over 12 stations. Provided reports on special event rail services, and conducted various analyses to improve first/last mile connections for multiple stations. Metrolink Station Location Study, Metro, Los Angeles, CA: GIS Lead and Transportation Planner responsible for supporting the feasibility of relocating three existing Metrolink stations within Los Angeles County and the creation of a new station on the Metrolink Riverside Line. Scope of work involves identifying first -/last -mile opportunities, bus operations enhancements, TOD opportunities, and rail -to -bus interface improvements. The data collection, outreach efforts with affected stakeholders, and analyses will guide potential future improvements between multiple transit services throughout Los Angeles County. Metrolink Stations Assessment and Improvement Plan, Metro, Los Angeles, CA: GIS Lead and Transportation Planning Support responsible for the development of transit connectivity plans for 19 Metrolink Station in Los Angeles County. Scope of work involved developing an improvement plan to increase ridership and safety through upgrades for active transportation, multi -modal connectivity, and wayfinding. The data collection, analysis, and ultimate improvement recommendations were focused on providing an enhanced rider experience that promotes an increase in Metrolink safety and ridership. AN Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Teresa Li Teresa has experience in the creation and review of technical Senior Planner analyses, reports, presentations, and coordination with government Personal summary agencies and clients. She has prepared every type of CEQA/NEPA Education: documents for residential, commercial, mixed -use, transportation, transit -oriented development, and institutional projects, and MA, Urban Planning sustainability, community, and transit plans. Her primary BA, Urban Studies & responsibilities at TAHA include project management, Planning environmental justice/socio-economics, land use, sustainability, population, employment and housing, and CEQA/NEPA documentation. Selected projects Norwalk High -Speed Rail (HSR) Station, Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs, CA: Responsible for preparing the Environmental Benefits memorandum. TAHA prepared an Environmental Benefits memorandum identifying the potential environmental benefits of placing the proposed California HSR, as well as the existing BNSF and Metrolink tracks, in a 35-foot-deep to 55-foot deep trench. Key topics that were addressed include aesthetics (visual character and lighting), land use, and noise. Hollywood Community Plan Update, Hollywood, CA: Responsible for writing the summary, project description, aesthetics, biological resources, and geology and soils sections of the EIR. TAHA is preparing an EIR for the Hollywood Community Plan Update. The proposed project would increase reasonably foreseeable housing, population, and employment as compared to the existing community plan. Responsible for Quality Assurance/Quality Control. West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for preparing a memorandum that documents existing land use conditions along the project corridor. TAHA is preparing an EIR/EIS. The proposed project is a proposed light rail transit line that would extend approximately 20 miles from Downtown Los Angeles through southeast Los Angeles County. Xlv Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Joey Mendoza Joey has 30 years of experience and expertise in all aspects of Right -of -Way right-of-way and real estate acquisition practices. He specializes in Personal summary transportation-, transit-, and corridor -oriented projects from the Education: early inception of the initial planning phase, through environmental approval, engineering design, construction coordination, and General, Business project closeout. His areas of expertise include overall project Administration and management, budgeting, and project cost estimating; schedule Management preparation; document management; risk management; partial and Registrations: full -take acquisitions; commercial, residential, and industrial California relocation assistance projects; eminent domain support; and Department of Real appraisal and appraisal review and property management. Estate — Broker No. Experience and skills 01144860 Joey has served as Right -of -Way Program Manager on numerous major transportation projects including highway, transit, and design - build projects throughout California, Nevada, Texas, and Arizona. He has the technical expertise and administrative guidance to develop and manage right-of-way programs for large-scale, multi- faceted infrastructure projects. Joey possesses knowledgeable and understanding of federal, state, and local laws, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the design -build and alternative delivery process, risk management, and FTA, FHWA, and state Department of Transportation (DOT) procedures. Selected projects 1-405 Improvement, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA: Program Manager responsible for the development, implementation, and overall delivery of the necessary right-of-way to construct this 16-mile design -build project of the 1-405 between SR 55 and 1-605. The project consisted of 305 partial acquisitions affecting residential, commercial, retail, motels, public facilities, federal lands, and a regional shopping mall, which required right-of-way certification and release to the design -build contractor in segmented parcel groups. The right-of-way program under Joey's leadership included real estate appraisals, appraisal reviews, parcel mitigation planning, property negotiations, title and escrow, relocation assistance, condemnation coordination, certification, scheduling, cost estimating, risk management, and project closeout. SR 91 Corridor Improvement, Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), Corona, CA: Program Manager responsible for planning, management, and implementation of a wide array of right-of-way activities during the environmental phase including strategic planning, cost estimating, and market trend analysis, risk Xv Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes identification and management, public outreach, design -build procurement process, corridor analysis, and early and advance acquisition. Included full implementation and oversight of the right- of-way process, policy development, and coordination with State and Federal regulatory agencies. This high -profile, politically sensitive design -build project involved over 450 partial and full acquisitions with varying degree of difficulty and approximately 250 residential and business relocations. This design -build project widened approximately 16 miles of active highway through the urbanized area of Corona and the County of Riverside. McCarran Boulevard Widening, Nevada Department of Transportation, Reno, NV: Principal -in -Charge responsible for the appraisal and acquisition of 250 temporary and permanent property rights from residential, commercial, and public lands to construct roadway improvements and sound walls along McCarran Boulevard in Reno. This 4.5-mile roadway is part of the National Highway System and the State Highway System. These designations require additional coordination with Nevada Department of Transportation, city of Reno, the city of Sparks, Truckee Meadows Flood Management Project, as well as other entities. SR 91 High -Occupancy Vehicle Gap Closure, RCTC, Riverside County, CA: Program Manager responsible for this seven -mile freeway widening project through the developed corridor of Downtown Riverside. The right-of-way associated with this project consisted of significant partial acquisitions affecting commercial, retail, and public agency facilities, acquisition of railroad properties, and relocation of several complex businesses. Responsibilities included overall management and implementation of the right-of- way delivery process, as well as coordination with the various disciplines for project design, right-of-way engineering, appraisal, environmental, RCTC counsel, and Caltrans functional leads. XVI Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Farhad Farhad is an experienced, proven project manager and structural Nourbakhsh, PE, engineer with over 30 years of experience in designing and PhD managing transit and transportation projects including high-speed Structures rail (HSR), light rail transit (LRT), and freight structures of various Personal summary sizes within the US and worldwide. He specializes in segmental Education: pre -stressed bridges, large underground structures, and PhD, Civil construction sequencing schemes. His intimate knowledge of Engineering various delivery methods and experience working on both the owner's and the contractor's side will enable him to provide BEng, Civil valuable insight for this project. Engineering Registrations: Experience and skills PE, CA #C61106 Farhad has experience in all facets of transportation project development and implementation, from planning and environmental studies, to conceptual and detailed design, to construction. His strengths are in managing multi -discipline design teams, design - build projects, alternate concept development, problemsolving, and providing an efficient and high quality of service to clients. Farhad has expertise in making the most efficient use of restricted right-of- way, and dealing with multiple stakeholders and multi -disciplinary teams members. Selected project California HSR Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Support, Palmdale to Los Angeles Section, CHSRA, CA: Responsible for peer review of elevated structures for the 62-mile, $5.4 billion, CHSR Project's Palmdale to Los Angeles section, which traverses extremely difficult mountainous terrain and geology between Palmdale and the San Fernando Valley, and densely urban centers from Sylmar to Los Angeles Union Station. The $42 billion, 800-mile HSR mega -project will extend from the San Francisco Bay Area and Sacramento to Los Angeles, Orange County, and San Diego. Taiwan HSR — C295, Taiwan HSR Consortium, Taiwan: Project Director responsible for this $700 million contract. Contract C295 is 17 miles out of 185-mile, 1.5-hour link between Kao-hsiung and Taipei. This section, on typical 100-foot spans on rigid twin -wall piers, includes long -span river crossings erected in balanced cantilever and 1,640-foot-long station area consisting of multi -box girders. In charge of managing work allocated to US offices and coordinating with company's Bangkok office. Provided assistance to project office in Bangkok for claim negotiations with client. Mid -Coast Corridor Transit, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego, CA: Task Manager XVII Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes responsible for Independent Cost Estimates to support SANDAG in GMP negotiations with the CMGC contractor and Systems Design Reviews. The Mid -Coast Trolley Project will extend light rail service 11 miles from Old Town Transit Center to the University City community and includes nine stations. Silicon Valley Rapid Transit, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, San Jose, CA: Silicon Valley Berryessa Extension Aerial Guideway Lead responsible for development of alternatives to convert or replace an existing single track UPRR bridge with structure(s) to provide a guideway to support two Bay Area Rapid Transit tracks, as well as a crossing over Silver Creek. Honolulu High -Capacity Transit Corridor Project, West Oahu/Farrington Highway, City of Honolulu, HI: Structural and Geotechnical Manager responsible for management of segmental viaduct, aerial stations, and retained structure designs to support preparation of technical and price proposals. The $500 million, design -build contract pursuit included the initial 6.8 miles of the proposed 20-mile rail line in Honolulu. Worked closely with Contractor to develop alternative technical concepts to maximize project savings based on Contractor's expertise and risk tolerance. Supplemental Engineering Services — Task Order 1, Metro Orange Line Improvements (Grade Separations and Gated Intersections Design), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA: Structural Lead responsible for bus rapid transit (BRT) and pedestrian/bike bridge structures. Tasks include design of track improvements on the Metro Blue and Expo LRT lines, as well as improvements to the Metro Orange Line (MOL) BRT. Improvements on the MOL include grade separation of the BRT line over roadways as well as a first ever implementation of crossing gates at BRT busway intersections with roadways. The design will accommodate the future conversion of the busway to an LRT operation. East Link Corridor, South Bellevue to Overtake Transit Center, Sound Transit, Seattle, WA: Aerial Guideway Lead responsible for final design of this seven -mile LRT line including three miles of elevated guideway, two long -span crossing over 1-90 and 1-405, and two elevated stations. xviii Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Mike Oldroyd, PE Michael has 20 years of experience in project management, Roadway highway/roadway design, railroad design, construction Personal summary management, and inspection. He has experience working with Education: local, state, and federal governments on high profile projects in California, Utah, Texas, Nevada, Montana, and Idaho. He has BS, Civil Engineering worked in most all facets of a project including as Design Engineer, ACEC Leadership Inspector, Field Engineer, Project Manager, and Resident Engineer Institute Training on various projects. Given this experience, Michael is very familiar UDOT Construction with processes, manuals and standards in both design and Engineering construction. Management Fxperience and skills Training (CEMT) Michael's strengths include understanding and meeting project PM Plus -Project schedules and milestones; effective leadership skills incorporating Management team building, communication, and goal setting; commitment to Program Training delivering a successful project from concept through construction; Registrations: understanding of local, state, and federal processes, manuals and PE, UT #343843- standards for successful project delivery; communicating project 2202 and client goals to project team; coordinating resources and tasks to meet project milestones; thorough reviews of construction documents for contract compliance; ability to foresee potential "roadblocks" and proactively resolve them; strict adherence to quality management plans and checklists, and cost control. Selected projects SR 39 Dual Lefts at Washington Boulevard, Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), Roy, Weber County, UT: Project Manager responsible for the project that consisted of roadway design/intersection configuration: widen the intersection at SR 39 (12th Street) and US-89 (Washington Boulevard) to accommodate dual left turning movements in each direction. Project corridor carries heavy commercial, residential, and commuter traffic through the heart of one of Ogden's most active business and residential areas and is increasing in demand as new shopping centers, and retail stores continue to move into the area. With the increase of traffic at this intersection, UDOT has frequently experienced queue spillover during peak hours on the southbound to eastbound and the eastbound to northbound left turn movements. These stopped vehicles fill the turn pocket and extend into the through lanes causing problems with through vehicle capacities. Construction bid documents were prepared. 1-84; MP 0-40, Median Cable Barrier, UDOT, Box Elder, UT: Project Manager responsible for this pool project to provide UDOT with complete biddable construction documents according to the XIX Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes activities outlined in UDOT's Purple Book Design Process. The project consists of constructing a Median Cable Barrier from approximately MP11.5 to MP15.5 and from approximately MP25 to MP29 to address errant vehicles crossing the median. US-89; Clear Zone Improvements, UDOT, Morgan, Weber, and Davis Counties, UT: Project Manager. Widen shoulders to standard width and install a closed drainage system on US-89 along a dugway between milepost 407 and milepost 409. Design for this project was completed on an accelerated schedule using Bentley OpenRoads software. The existing open drainage system is failing, resulting in severe erosion along the fill slopes. The closed drainage system was designed to prevent further erosion and reduce spread within the roadway. SR 45; MP 14 to Glen Bench Road, UDOT, Uintah County, UT: Responsible for roadway design activities consist of generating a project footprint (using aerial photography), writing special provisions, generating summary of items, detailed stationing report and Engineer's estimate (using PDBS), and Measurement and Payment Document. Project plans consist of a location map, typical sections, and/or detail sheets, and 8'/2 inch-by-11 inch plan sets to include in the advertising package. Project will be to rehabilitate SR 45 from approximately MP 14 to Glen Bench Road, and address safety issues. The anticipated rehabilitation is to rotomill 1.5 inches of existing asphalt and replace with new HMA and micro -seal. Included rehabilitation of pavement, the project will identify/improve safety issues such as sub -standard guardrail, and striping within the project limits. 1-15 Corridor Expansion Project (1-15 CORE), UDOT, Utah County, UT. Quality Assurance Firm (QAF) Discipline Lead responsible for performing reviews to ensure contract compliance, and providing comments on design plan submittals for 35%, 60%, and 100% milestone reviews. Reviews were performed for the design drawings, calculations, specifications, and plans for a variety of disciplines. Discipline Specific Breakout meetings were held to gain the necessary understanding /knowledge of the project and to provide feedback to designers related to Design Quality Assurance findings. xx Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Courtney Richards Courtney is a qualified Principal Paleontologist with extensive Cultural Resources research, field and laboratory experience throughout California and Personal summary across the western US. With more than 16 years of professional Education: experience, she maintains a comprehensive understanding of MS, Biological CEQA and NEPA regulations as they relate to paleontology, Sciences including Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference — Chapter 8, Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit BS,Federal Earth and Space Administration (FTA), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Society Science Sci of Vertebrate Paleontology, Riverside County, San Diego County, Los Angeles County, California High -Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), and other various laws (federal, state, and local) as well as regulations governing paleontological resources. She is an expert at Caltrans and local project sponsors reporting, including Paleontological Identification Reports, Paleontological Evaluation Reports, Paleontological Mitigation Plans, and Paleontological Mitigation Reports. Experience and skills • Experience Conducting Peer Reviews of Paleontological Reports California High -Speed Rail (CHSR) Experience with two EIR/EIS sections (San Francisco to San Jose and San Jose to Merced and Palmdale to Burbank) and construction experience (Construction Package 4 and Construction Package 2-3) Selected project! CHSR: Palmdale to Burbank Segment EIR/EIS, CHSRA, State of California: Primary Author responsible for a Paleontological Resources Technical Report to describe, identify, and evaluate paleontological resources that may be affected by the Palmdale to Burbank Section, which consists of new rail alignment construction with three different proposed alternatives, including State Route 14 Corridor, East Corridor 1, and East Corridor 2. The Paleontological Resource Assessment met all requirements of NEPA and CEQA and followed guidance established by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology and met the requirements outlined in the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standard Environmental Reference (SER) Environmental Handbook, Volume 1, Chapter 8. Environmental Services for the San Francisco to San Jose and San Jose to Merced Project Sections: Principal Investigator responsible for overseeing a paleontological records and literature search, attending frequent team conference calls for quality control, drafting weekly and monthly monitoring reports, and is the primary author of Paleontological Technical Report and the paleontological section of the EIR/EIS. XXI Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Sam Silverman Sam has 17 years of experience preparing air quality, greenhouse Environmental gas analysis, and noise analyses for commercial, residential, and Sciences industrial development along with transportation projects. His Personal summary thorough knowledge of air quality analysis methodology includes Education: comprehensive familiarity with the regional and localized estimation methodology set forth by the South Coast Air Quality Management MS, Environmental District (SCAQMD), application of various computer models Health (CaIEEMod, EMFAC, AERMOD, Caline-4, and CAL3QHC), health BS, Environmental risk assessments (HRAs), and construction and operation emission Studies inventories. Sam's knowledge of noise analysis methodology includes noise monitoring, noise models (Traffic Noise Model), and stationary source analyses. Selected projects Metrolink Station Location Studies, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager responsible for overseeing the preparation of feasibility studies to identify environmental constraints to project implementation. The technical analysis focused on traffic, noise, air quality, land use, historic resources, floodplains, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, and socioeconomics. Airport Metro Connector, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Project Manager responsible for overseeing the preparation of an EIR and Categorical Exclusion for a new intermodal transit station located along the Crenshaw/LAX Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project. Key issues included displacement, circulation, and construction impacts. Crenshaw Transit Corridor, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for managing the preparation of the air quality and noise analysis. TAHA prepared an EIR/EIS for the Crenshaw Tranist Corridor Project. The Corridor extends approximately ten miles from Wilshire Boulevard on the north to El Segundo Boulevard on the south. Westside Extension Transit Corridor, Metro, Los Angeles County, CA: Responsible for preparing the energy analysis for the EIS/EIR for Metro's Westside Extension Transit Corridor in the West Los Angeles area. The Westside Extension would extend the Metro Purple Line to Westwood with possible extension to Santa Monica. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Dave Warnock, PE Dave has over 32 years of extensive experience designing and Peer Review managing a wide variety of transportation -related projects Personal summary throughout the western US. His experience includes the design and Education: construction management of roadway, track, structures, and support facilities for commuter rail, freight railroads, and light rail. BS, Civil Engineering He has led the completion of projects using design -bid -build, AS, Engineering design -build, and construction manager/general contractor delivery Registrations: (CM/GC) methods. PE, CA #C44256 Experience and skills Dave has acquired extensive project management skills in developing and managing railroad and transit projects. He has proven experience with the detailed coordination and cost-efficient advancement of design activities for numerous significant projects, focusing on technical accuracy and quality in addition to managing project scope, schedule, and budget. .ielected projects On -Call Engineering Services, SCRRA/Metrolink, Counties of San Bernardino, Los Angeles, and Orange, CA: Senior Project Manager responsible for managing the design of track and structure plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E), coordinating production work by engineers and drafting staff, preparing conceptual plans for tracks and related facilities, and reviewing track designs prepared by others. Specific projects include development of engineering standard plans, design of over 400 feet of railroad flyover bridge with approach embankments, layout of a seven -track night layover facility, development of bid plans for relaying rail and reconstructing grade crossings between Pomona and San Bernardino, development of PS&E for a one -mile station track (Norwalk), including a 200-foot grade separation of Imperial Highway, and development of PS&E for the addition of 15 miles of second main track (Orange County). FrontRunner Commuter Rail System, Provo to Salt Lake, Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Salt Lake City, UT: Project Manager/Project Principal responsible for the preparation of preliminary and final construction plans for a 45-mile commuter rail system. In addition to approximately 60 miles of track, the design included 62 structures and 52 roadway at -grade crossings. The bulk of this design work had to be accomplished in approximately 18 months to facilitate the construction start. A portion of the core staff for the project was located in the Client program office, with additional support staff assigned from more than 15 other locations across the country. The construction delivery method for this XXIII Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes project is CM/GC, requiring constant interaction between the design team, and the construction contractors management team throughout the design process. Commuter Rail System, Pleasant View/Weber County to Salt Lake, UTA, Salt Lake City, UT: Project Director/Project Manager responsible for the preparation of construction plans and specifications for approximately 40 miles of commuter rail. Services included an EIS and preliminary engineering, as well as construction support. Included 46 miles of new track, a 0.5-mile railroad bridge structure over UPRR tracks and the Weber River, 37 roadway at -grade crossings, and over 200 drainage structures. Commuter Rail On -Call Engineering Services, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), San Jose to Gilroy, CA: Project Manager responsible for on -call engineering services in support of commuter rail improvements. Included design of various improvements to the commuter rail (Caltrain) tracks, stations, and maintenance facilities. Projects completed include secondary main track, bridge rehabilitation and construction, signal modifications, and retaining wall and drainage facilities design and construction. Supplemental Engineering Services — Task Order 1, Metro Orange Line Improvements (Grade Separations and Gated Intersections Design), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA: Project Manager responsible for the performance of a variety of survey and engineering design tasks. Tasks include design of track improvements on the Metro Blue and Expo LRT lines, as well as improvements to the Metro Orange Line (MOL) bus rapid transit (BRT). Improvements generally aimed at increasing the speed of trains and buses along fixed routes. Improvements on the MOL include grade separation of the BRT line over roadways, and a first ever implementation of crossing gates at BRT busway intersections with roadways. Improvements are designed to accommodate the future conversion of the busway to an LRT operation. Mid -Jordan Transit Corridor Light Rail, UTA, Murray City, Midvale, West Jordan, and South Jordan, Salt Lake County, UT: Engineering Manager responsible for the completion of the Final EIS, and preparation of a Fundamental Design Report for the locally -preferred alternative (LPA) of LRT. The 10.5-mile corridor extends east to west from an existing TRAX station and terminates near the center of the Kennecott Daybreak Development. Upon completion, Project Director responsible for providing staffing and management support for a design -build contract. xxiv Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Paul Wilson, PEng Paul has 27 years of progressively responsible project Class Rail 1 management experience working on Class I, commuter, HSR, and Personal summary LRT projects across North America. He has served as a senior Education: project manager responsible for business development, project management, and leadership of Mott MacDonald's Rail and Transit BSc, Engineering practice in Southern California. BA, Economics Experience and skills Registrations: Paul previously spent 13 years with the Canadian Pacific PEng, ON Railway responsible for project, design, and construction #100068873 management for major capital projects, holding several positions including Manager of Structures in Chicago, Illinois. He brings significant experience in alternate delivery models for major capital projects including design -build project delivery, and specialized training and expertise in railway bridge inspections, railway bridge repair, and railway track design and maintenance. Selected projects California High -Speed Rail, California High -Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), Bakersfield to Los Angeles, Fresno to Palmdale, and Palmdale to Burbank, CA: Design Manager for the Bakersfield to Los Angeles Segment responsible for leading the conceptual design of a 120-mile segment of HSR (250-mph) between Bakersfield and Los Angeles. Work included horizontal and vertical alignment design in accordance with design criteria set out by the CHSRA and identification of tunnel and elevated structure locations. Design Manager for the Fresno to Palmdale and Palmdale to Burbank Segment responsible for coordinating alignment, structures, utilities, roadworks (including grade separations), and land takes analysis during the environmental foot printing exercise. Working to resolve alignment issues along the SR 14, SFW, and AC corridors. Developed a thorough understanding of the alignment alternatives proceeding through the SAA process, and the "in -progress," and draft 30% preliminary engineering design deliverables. Supported the environmental and outreach teams by attending public meetings, and provided technical information and exhibits as required. Supplemental Engineering Services — Task Order 1, Metro Orange Line Improvements (Grade Separations and Gated Intersections Design), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Los Angeles, CA: Contract Manager responsible for the execution of the entire three-year, $15 million on -call contract support Metro's Major Capital Project Engineering Group. Currently leading the largest Task Order: Metro Orange Line Improvements XXv Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Project, which includes capital upgrades to "ready," the existing BRT line for future LRT conversion. Includes two grade separated stations, and the installation of railroad style gates at 35 intersections to improve safety and travel times. West Light Rail Transit, City of Calgary, Calgary, AB: Engineering Manager responsible for the development of the reference concept drawings and design -build specifications for all disciplines during preliminary design and procurement. Included pre -design for the horizontal and vertical alignment, tunnels, an elevated guideway, track structure, traction power, SCADA, and six stations. Ensured infrastructure was constructed according to the IFC designs produced by the design -build contractor. Managed a project team of technical specialists performing design submission reviews for the design -build contract during construction. Change Control Committee member providing change management and financial control of the design -build contract. Downtown Los Angeles Street Car Preliminary Engineering, Los Angeles Streetcar, Inc. (LAST), Los Angeles, CA: Engineering Manager responsible to work with LASI, and the City of Los Angeles' Bureau of Engineering and Department of Transportation to establish a Basis of Design for the streetcar and complete the preliminary engineering effort and cost estimates. These deliverables formed the basis of a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) application package for Small Starts funding. Developed and managed an integrated team consisting of 14 specialty subconsultant firms and provided deliverables on time and within budget. Specific responsibilities include: • Integration of streetcar design with urban streetscape projects. This required the use of a tight turning radius (66 feet) and curved special track work to minimize right-of-way needs and maximize yard storage capacity. • Evaluation of appropriate rail sections. • Vehicle interface issues resolution to accommodate both low floor streetcars and city buses at shared platforms. • Selecting Stop amenities. • Utility coordination using a Protect -in -Place approach avoiding relocation. • A wireless technologies review, in conjunction with OCS and train signal (MUTCD) requirements, and joint -use OCS and street lighting poles. • Bicycle pathway accommodation through intersections and along the street. XXVI Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Alex Zupanski, PE, Alex is a CA MUTCD expert with extensive experience working on TE joint jurisdiction projects that require review and approval for a Traffic variety of agencies. In addition, Alex has strong communications Personal summary skills and is especially adept at explaining technical issues to non - Education: engineers. Overall, Alex's involvement on projects ensures that MS, Transportation quality deliverables will be delivered expeditiously. Engineering, Selected projects BS, Civil Engineering City of Huntington Beach "On -Call" Edinger Avenue Bridge Registrations: Replacement Over Bolsa Chica Channel Plan Review, City of PE, CA #C59351 Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach, CA: Traffic Engineer specifically requested by the City of Huntington Beach (City) TE, CA #2400 responsible for assisting with reviewing multiple rounds of traffic control plans prepared by the engineering consultant for the subject bridge replacement project. The bridge replacement project is owned by the County of Orange, while the project is located partially in Huntington Beach, and partially in the Seal Beach. As a part of the plan review process, met with the City, the County of Orange, and the County's engineering consultant. Rail -to -Rail — Segment A, Metro, Los Angeles, CA: Traffic Design Lead responsible for traffic signal, street lighting, and street improvement plans, beginning from assessing traffic and civil engineering plans that were prepared for the environmental document to preparing final design to facilitate construction. This project will convert abandoned railroad tracks into a bike trail that will connect travellers to the Blue, Silver, and Crenshaw Lines. The project involves design for 20+ intersections. Review and approval agencies include Metro, the County of Los Angeles, and the City of Los Angeles. FPL's quality plans have been key for expediting agency review and approval. City of Los Angeles "On -Call" Venice Dual Force Main, City of Los Angeles, Marina del Rey and Playa del Rey, CA: Traffic Design Lead responsible for overseeing the preparation of the TMP and the design of traffic control, signing and striping, temporary and permanent traffic signal, and street lighting plans for both County and City review and approval. In severe wet weather conditions, peak flows to the County of Los Angeles's Venice Pumping Plant exceed the capacity of the only force main carrying wastewater away from the plant. The resultant risk is that wastewater could spill onto local streets and surface waters. The 50-year-old force main sewer can handle only 60 percent of the plant's peak capacity, is in constant use, and cannot be shut down for inspection or maintenance. This poses a reliability problem for the City of Los XXVII Technical, Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Services for the CHSR Project Appendix A — Resumes Angeles. Thus, the City is adding a second, larger force main sewer to operate in tandem with the existing one, to be installed using microtunnelling. Given the controversy of the final alignment of the new sewer line, was asked to join the City at multiple public outreach events and a permit hearing to meet with local residents and officials and address their concerns about the impacts of construction traffic to their neighborhoods. mottmac.com EXHIBIT C-1 PHASE PAYMENT SCHEDULE W Cost Proposal - Labor Hour Worksheet Phase 1 m o Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 City of Vernon Technical Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Cost Proposal PHASE 1 - 2019 COSTS Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ® Prime Consultant ❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Mott MacDonald LLC Project No. Contract No. Date 4/9/2019 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Project Principal Rob Ball 12.00 $ 126.28 $ 1,515.36 Project Manager Richard Carney 120.00 $ 100.16 $ 12,019.20 Specialist Paul Wilson 60.00 $ 99.77 $ 5,986.20 Senior Engineer Michael Oldroyd 56.00 $ 73.70 $ 4,127.20 Senior Engineer Farhad Nourbakhsh 56.00 $ 113.45 $ 6,353.20 Senior Planner Eric Banghart 4.00 $ 68.83 $ 275.32 Specialist Joey Mendoza 100.00 $ 103.50 $ 10,350.00 Planner Maggie Cheung 24.00 $ 47.19 $ 1,132.56 Planner Darlene Gonzalez 24.00 $ 32.89 $ 789.36 CADD Support Craig Jurkiewicz 32.00 $ 50.93 $ 1,629.76 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) INDIRECT COSTS c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 44,509.50 d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 57.60% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 25,637.47 f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 95.50% ) included g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 42,506.57 h) General & Admin (Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: $ 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) 68,144.04 11,266.35 Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage (IRS Rate) 2500.00 Miles $ 0.580 $ 1,450.00 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 1,450.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: $ - Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 1,450.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 125,368.89 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 Consultant Mott MacDonald Project No. CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Contract No. Date 4/9/2019 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1 st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 44,178.16 488 = $ 90.53 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation % Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 90.53 + 3% _ $ 93.24 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 93.24 + 3% _ $ 96.04 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 96.04 + 3% _ $ 98.92 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 98.92 + 3% _ $ 101.89 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00 % 488.0 = 366.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00% 488.0 = 122.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00 % 488.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 488.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00 % 488.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 488.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 90.53 366 = $ 33,133.62 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 93.24 * 122 = $ 11,375.88 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 96.04 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 98.92 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 44,509.50 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 44,178.16 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 331.34 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying: Name: Daniel Tempelis, PE Signature: Title *: Sr. Vice President Date of Certification: 5/8/2019 Email: dan.tempelis@mottmac.com Phone number: 818-736-4343 Address: 1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 * An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract: Page 3 of 3 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant X❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: FPL and Associates, Inc. (2019) Project No. Anical, Engineering, and EIR Rev Contract No. Date DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total PIC; Transportation Engineer Fong -Ping Lee, PhD, P.E., T.E. 64.00 $ 80.00 $ 5,120.00 Traffic Engineer Alex Zupanski, P.E., T.E. 10.00 $ 76.29 $ 762.90 Civil Engineer Alan Lee, P.E., T.E. $ 61.21 $ - Transpotation Engineer Alex Eapen, P.E., ENV SP 4.00 $ 60.00 $ 240.00 Design Engineer Eddie Tang, EIT 18.00 $ 66.52 $ 1,197.36 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 7,320.26 b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ 54.90 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 7,375.16 INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: ) f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 178.46% ) included h) General & Admin (Rate: ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ - g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 13,161.71 i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 13,161.71 FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: $ 2,053.69 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional napes if necessarv) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage (IRS rate) 1250.00 Mile $ 0.580 $ 725.00 $ $ 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 725.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Jerry C. Porter Consulting LLC Subconsultant 2: Subconsultant 3: Subconsultant 4: m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS $ n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 23,315.56 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultants annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Consultant FPL and Associates, Inc. (2019) Project No. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Contract No. Date 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year ofthe contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 7,320.26 96 = $ 76.25 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 76.25 + 3 % _ $ 78.54 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 78.54 + 3% = S 80.90 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 80.90 + 3 % _ $ 83.32 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 83.32 + 3 % _ $ 85.82 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00% 96.0 = 72.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00 % 96.0 = 24.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00% 96.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 96.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00% 96.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 96.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 76.25 72 = $ 5,490.20 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 78.54 24 = $ 1,884.97 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 80.90 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 83.32 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 7,375.16 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 7,320.26 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 54.90 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Pan 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Pan 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Pan 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistentiy and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and slate requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and stale requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caitrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or Subconsuttant Certifyincr Name: FPL and Associates, Inc. (sub) Title *: President Signature: Date of Certification: 4/9/2019 Email: fplee@fplandassociates.com Phone number: 949-252-1688 Address: " An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subccnsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. List services the consultant is providmg under the proposed contract: Page 3 of 3 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant X❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Paleo Solutions, Inc. (2019) Project No. Contract No. Date 3/29/2019 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Program Manager Geraldine Aron, M.S. $ 80.77 $ Principal Archaeologist Evelyn Chandler, M.A. $ 59.42 $ - Principal Paleontologist Courtney Richards, M.S. 8.00 $ 43.83 $ 350.64 Field Director/Safety Officer Jeff Hathaway, M.S., PG $ 35.00 $ - Project Manager Liz Denniston, M.A., RPA $ 42.31 $ Assistant Project Manager Meghan Lamb, M.A., RPA $ 33.65 $ Senior Paleontologist Mathew Carson, M.S. $ 34.62 $ Senior Archaeologist Kristina Lindgren, M.A. $ 30.70 $ Paleontologist Joey Raum, B.S. $ 29.24 $ Field Technician TBD $ 25.00 $ GIS Manager Barbara Webster, M.A. $ 31.92 $ LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 350.64 b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ 2.63 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 353.27 INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 74.87% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 264.49 f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 76.72% ) included g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 271.03 h) General & Admin (Rate: 21.99% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ 77.68 j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 613.21 FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + 0)] x fixed fee: $ 96.65 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Personal Vehicle Mileage 1250.00 MI $ 0.580 $ 725.00 Record Search Fees LS $ - Parking LS $ 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 725.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: $ - Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ - n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 1,788.12 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Consultant Paleo Solutions. Inc. Project No. 0 Contract No. Date 3/27/2019 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for list year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 350.64 8 = $ 43.83 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 43.83 + 3% _ $ 45.14 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 45.14 + 3% _ $ 46.50 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 46.50 + 3% _ $ 47.89 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 47.89 + 3% _ $ 49.33 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00% 8.0 = 6.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00 % 8.0 = 2.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00% 8.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 8.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00% 8.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 8.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 43.83 6 = $ 262.98 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 45.14 * 2 = $ 90.29 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 46.50 * 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 47.89 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 * 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 353.27 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 350.64 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 2.63 Transfer to Pagel NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs Identified on the cost proposal(s) In this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terns and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts d, 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Destgn Related Service B. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in comp] iancewith applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local gova mmants are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or SubconMdtant Certifying: Name' Geraldine Aron Title ': Chief Executive Officer Signature: Date ofCertification:63l1312019 Email: oeraldineApaleosolutions.com Phone number: 562-818-7713 Address: 911 S. Primrose Ave.. Unit N. Monrovia, CA 91016 ' An indMdual execrative orflnancial officer of the consultant's orsuboonsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has aulhority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cast proposal for the contract. twist services the con sunant is provrorng unaer ineproposea contract: Paleontologlea I & Archaeological Consulting Services Page 3 at b Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant X❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Terry Hayes Associates (2019) Project No. Contract No. Date 4/11/2019 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total CEO Terry A. Hayes $ 106.61 $ - Senior Associate Sam Silverman 8.00 $ 68.99 $ 551.92 Senior Planner Teresa Li 0.00 $ 58.00 $ - Senior Planner Kevin Ferrier $ 55.55 $ - Senior Planner Peter Feldman 32.00 $ 44.13 $ 1,412.16 Senior Planner Allyson Dong $ 40.74 $ - Assoc. Env. Scientist Anders Sutherland $ 47.46 $ Planner Kieran Bartholow $ 26.75 $ Assistant Planner Andy Uk $ 24.39 $ LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 28.37% ) f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 86.54% ) included h) General & Admin (Rate: ) c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 1,978.81 e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 561.39 g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 1,712.46 i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + Q)] x fixed fee: $ 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) 2,273.85 425.27 Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage (IRS rate) 1250.00 Miles $ 0.580 $ 725.00 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 725.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: $ - Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ - n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 5,402.93 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Consultant Terry Haves Associates Project No. Contract No. Date 4/11/2019 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 1,964.08 40 = $ 49.10 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 49.10 + 3% _ $ 50.58 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 50.58 + 3% _ $ 52.09 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 52.09 + 3% _ $ 53.66 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 53.66 + 3% _ $ 55.26 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00% 40.0 = 30.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00 % 40.0 = 10.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00% 40.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 40.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00% 40.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 40.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 49.10 30 = $ 1,473.06 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 50.58 10 = $ 505.75 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 52.09 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 53.66 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 * 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 1,978.81 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 1,964.08 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 14.73 Transfer to Pagel NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying: Name: Terry A. Haves, AICP Title ": Chief Executive Officer f 1' Signature: � � try date of Certification: April 11.2019 �T Email: taha(a)webtaha.com Phone number: (310) 839-4200 Address: 3535 Hayden Avenue, Suite 350, Culver City, CA 90232 An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract: Environmental Services Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT C-2 PHASE II (ADDITIVE ITEM, AT CITY'S OPTION) PAYMENT SCHEDULE 223 Cost Proposal - Labor Hour Worksheet Phase 2 O y L Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 City of Vernon Technical Engineering, and EIR Documents Review Cost Proposal PHASE 2 - 2020 RATES Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ® Prime Consultant ❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Mott MacDonald LLC Project No. Contract No. Date 4/9/2019 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Project Principal Rob Ball 0.00 $ 130.07 $ - Project Manager Richard Carney 80.00 $ 103.16 $ 8,253.18 Specialist Paul Wilson 32.00 $ 102.76 $ 3,288.42 Senior Engineer Michael Oldroyd 32.00 $ 75.91 $ 2,429.15 Senior Engineer Farhad Nourbakhsh 32.00 $ 116.85 $ 3,739.31 Senior Planner Eric Banghart 40.00 $ 70.89 $ 2,835.80 Specialist Joey Mendoza 80.00 $ 106.61 $ 8,528.40 Planner Maggie Cheung 40.00 $ 48.61 $ 1,944.23 Planner Darlene Gonzalez 0.00 $ 33.88 $ - CADD Support Craig Jurkiewicz 40.00 $ 52.46 $ 2,098.32 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) INDIRECT COSTS c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 33,365.18 d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 57.60% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 19,218.35 f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 95.50% ) included g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 31,863.75 h) General & Admin (Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: $ 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) 51, 082.10 8,444.73 Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage (IRS Rate) 2500.00 Miles $ 0.580 $ 1,450.00 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 1,450.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: $ - Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 1,450.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 94,342.01 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 Consultant Mott MacDonald Project No. CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Contract No. Date 4/9/2019 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1 st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 33,116.81 376 = $ 88.08 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation % Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 88.08 + 3% _ $ 90.72 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 90.72 + 3% _ $ 93.44 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 93.44 + 3% _ $ 96.24 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 96.24 + 3% _ $ 99.13 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00 % 376.0 = 282.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00% 376.0 = 94.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00 % 376.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 376.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00 % 376.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 376.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 88.08 * 282 = $ 24,837.61 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 90.72 94 = $ 8,527.58 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 93.44 * 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 96.24 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 33,365.18 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 33,116.81 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 248.38 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying: Name: Daniel Tempelis, PE Signature: Title *: Sr. Vice President Date of Certification: 5/8/2019 Email: Dan.Tempelis@mottmac.com Phone number: (818)736-4343 Address: 1000 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90017 * An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract: Page 3 of 3 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant X❑ Subconsultant ❑ 2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: FPL and Associates, Inc. (2020) Project No.:hnical, Engineering, and EIR Rev Contract No. Date DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total PIC; Transportation Engineer Fong -Ping Lee, PhD, P.E., T.E. 108.00 $ 82.40 $ 8,899.20 Traffic Engineer Alex Zupanski, P.E., T.E. 20.00 $ 78.58 $ 1,571.57 Civil Engineer Alan Lee, P.E., T.E. $ 63.05 $ - Transpotation Engineer Alex Eapen, P.E., ENV SP 12.00 $ 61.80 $ 741.60 Design Engineer Eddie Tang, EIT 20.00 $ 68.52 $ 1,370.31 LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 12,582.69 b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ 94.37 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 12,677.06 INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ - f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 178.46% ) included g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 22,623.47 h) General & Admin (Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(a) + (g) + (i)] $ FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + 0)] x fixed fee: $ I) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional Daaes if necessary) 22,623.47 3,530.05 Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage (IRS rate) 1250.00 Mile $ 0.580 $ 725.00 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 725.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Jerry C. Porter Consulting LLC Subconsultant 2: Subconsultant 3: Subconsultant 4: m)TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 39,555.58 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Consultant FPL and Associates, Inc. (2020) Project No. Technical, Engineering, and EIR Contract No. Date 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year ofthe contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 12,582.69 160 = $ 78.64 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 78.64 + 3 % _ $ 81.00 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 81.00 + 3% = S 83.43 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 83.43 + 3 % _ $ 85.93 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 85.93 + 3 % _ $ 88.51 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00% 160.0 = 120.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00 % 160.0 = 40.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00% 160.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 160.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00% 160.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 160.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 78.64 120 = $ 9,437.01 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 81.00 40 = $ 3,240.04 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 83.43 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 85.93 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 12,677.06 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 12,582.69 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 94.37 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: 1, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable. Wowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements_ Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and stale requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rale(s), Prime Consultant or 5ubconsultant Ceftifainct: Name: FPL and Associates, Inc. (sub) Title ': President Signature: Date of Certification: 4/9/2019 Email: fplee@fplandassociates.com Phone number: 949-252-1688 Address: `An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultanl's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. Page 3 of 3 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant X❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Paleo Solutions, Inc. (2020) Project No. Contract No. Date 3/29/2019 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total Program Manager Geraldine Aron, M.S. 120.00 $ 83.19 $ 9,983.17 Principal Archaeologist Evelyn Chandler, M.A. $ 61.20 $ - Principal Paleontologist Courtney Richards, M.S. 120.00 $ 45.14 $ 5,417.39 Field Director/Safety Officer Jeff Hathaway, M.S., PG $ 36.05 $ - Project Manager Liz Denniston, M.A., RPA $ 43.58 $ Assistant Project Manager Meghan Lamb, M.A., RPA $ 34.66 $ Senior Paleontologist Mathew Carson, M.S. $ 35.66 $ Senior Archaeologist Kristina Lindgren, M.A. $ 31.62 $ Paleontologist Joey Raum, B.S. $ 30.12 $ Field Technician TBD $ 25.75 $ GIS Manager Barbara Webster, M.A. $ 32.88 $ LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 15,400.56 b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ 115.50 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 15,516.06 INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 74.87% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 11,616.88 f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 76.72% ) included g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 11,903.92 h) General & Admin (Rate: 21.99% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ 3,411.98 j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 26,932.78 FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + Q)] x fixed fee: $ 4,244.88 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Personal Vehicle Mileage 1250.00 MI $ 0.580 $ 725.00 Record Search Fees LS $ - Parking LS $ 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 725.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: $ - Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ - n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 47,418.73 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Consultant Paleo Solutions. Inc. Project No. 0 Contract No. Date 3/27/2019 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 15,400.56 240 = $ 64.17 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 64.17 + 3% _ $ 66.09 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 66.09 + 3% _ $ 68.08 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 68.08 + 3% _ $ 70.12 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 70.12 + 3% _ $ 72.22 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00% 240.0 = 180.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00 % 240.0 = 60.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00% 240.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 240.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00% 240.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 240.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 64.17 180 = $ 11,550.42 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 66.09 60 = $ 3,965.64 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 68.08 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 70.12 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 * 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 15,516.06 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 15,400.56 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 115.50 Transfer to Pagel NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs Identified on the cost proposal(s) In this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terns and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts d, 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Destgn Related Service B. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in comp] iancewith applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local gova mmants are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or SubconMdtant Certifying: Name' Geraldine Aron Title ': Chief Executive Officer Signature: Date ofCertification:63l1312019 Email: oeraldineApaleosolutions.com Phone number: 562-818-7713 Address: 911 S. Primrose Ave.. Unit N. Monrovia, CA 91016 ' An indMdual execrative orflnancial officer of the consultant's orsuboonsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has aulhority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cast proposal for the contract. twist services the con sunant is provrorng unaer ineproposea contract: Paleontologlea I & Archaeological Consulting Services Page 3 at b Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H1 Cost Proposal Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed ❑ Prime Consultant X❑ Subconsultant ❑2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Terry Hayes Associates (2020) Project No. Contract No. Date 4/11/2019 DIRECT LABOR Classification/Title Name Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total CEO Terry A. Hayes $ 109.81 $ - Senior Associate Sam Silverman 40.00 $ 71.06 $ 2,842.39 Senior Planner Teresa Li 160.00 $ 59.74 $ 9,558.40 Senior Planner Kevin Ferrier $ 57.22 $ - Senior Planner Peter Feldman 160.00 $ 45.45 $ 7,272.62 Senior Planner Allyson Dong $ 41.96 $ - Assoc. Env. Scientist Anders Sutherland $ 48.88 $ Planner Kieran Bartholow $ 27.55 $ Assistant Planner Andy Uk $ 25.14 $ LABOR COSTS a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $ 19,673.41 b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $ 147.55 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $ 19,820.96 INDIRECT COSTS d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 28.37% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $ 5,623.21 f) Overhead & G&A (Rate: 86.54% ) included g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $ 17,153.06 h) General & Admin (Rate: ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $ - j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] $ 22,776.27 FIXED FEE 10.00% k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + Q)] x fixed fee: $ 4,259.72 1) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Description of Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Mileage (IRS rate) 1250.00 Miles $ 0.580 $ 725.00 1) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $ 725.00 m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Subconsultant 2: $ - Subconsultant 3: $ Subconsultant 4: $ m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS'COSTS $ - n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(I) + (m)] $ 725.00 TOTAL COST [(c) + 0) + (k) + (n)] $ 47,581.95 NOTES: 1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals. 2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans. 3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. Page 1 of 3 CALCUATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES Consultant Terry Haves Associates Project No. Contract No. Date 4/11/2019 1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal Rate Duration $ 19,673.41 360 = $ 54.65 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation Year 1 $ 54.65 + 3% _ $ 56.29 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 56.29 + 3% _ $ 57.98 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 57.98 + 3% _ $ 59.72 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 59.72 + 3% _ $ 61.51 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate 3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours Total Hours Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal per Year Year 1 75.00% 360.0 = 270.0 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 25.00 % 360.0 = 90.0 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 0.00% 360.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 0.00% 360.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 0.00% 360.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5 Total 100% Total = 360.0 4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above) Year 1 $ 54.65 270 = $ 14,755.06 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 56.29 90 = $ 5,065.90 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 57.98 0 = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 59.72 * 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 * 0 = $ Estimated Hours Year 5 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation = $ 19,820.96 Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation = $ 19,673.41 Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase = $ 147.55 Transfer to Page 1 NOTES: 1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2 % x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology). 3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3 Page 2 of 3 Certification of Direct Costs: I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements: 1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) 2. Terms and conditions of the contract 3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts 4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures 5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service 6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement. Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s). Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying: Name: Terry A. Haves, AICP Title ": Chief Executive Officer f 1' Signature: � � try date of Certification: April 11.2019 �T Email: taha(a)webtaha.com Phone number: (310) 839-4200 Address: 3535 Hayden Avenue, Suite 350, Culver City, CA 90232 An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract. List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract: Environmental Services Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT D LIVING WAGE PROVISIONS Minimum Living Wages: A requirement that Employers pay qualifying employees a wage of no less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. Paid and Unpaid Days Off: Employers provide qualifying employees at least twelve compensated days off per year for sick leave, vacation, or personal necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. No Retaliation: A prohibition on employer retaliation against employees complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Employees may bring an action in Superior Court against an employer for back pay, treble damages for willful violations, and attorney's fees, or to compel City officials to terminate the service contract of violating employers. 238 EXHIBIT E EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES PROVISIONS A. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Agreement, the contractor and each subcontractor shall adhere to equal opportunity employment practices to assure that applicants and employees are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex, or age. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. B. Contractor agrees that it shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for applicants for employment placed by or on behalf of Contractor, state that it is an "Equal Opportunity Employer" or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex or age. C. Contractor agrees that it shall, if requested to do so by the City, certify that it has not, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminated against applicants or employees because of their membership in a protected class. D. Contractor agrees to provide the City with access to, and, if requested to do so by City, through its awarding authority, provide copies of all of its records pertaining or relating to its employment practices, except to the extent such records or portions of such records are confidential or privileged under state or federal law. E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as to require or permit any act which is prohibited by law. 239 City Council Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. COV-377-2019 Submitted by: Mark Aumentado Submitting Department: Public Utilities Meeting Date: August 20, 2019 SUBJECT Award of Services Agreement to Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Recommendation: A. Find that the proposed action is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15306, because the scope of the agreement consists of research, analysis, and resource evaluation activities which will not result in serious or major disturbances to environmental resources and which will not commit the City to any project; and B. Approve a Services Agreement with Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, in substantially the same form as submitted herewith, in an amount not to exceed $375,000 for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services; and C. Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Services Agreement with Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC with an effective date of September 1, 2019. Background: Vernon Public Utilities (VPU) owns and operates eight active water production wells, one standby well, and fourteen booster pumps located at three booster plants. The aforementioned facilities are used to provide potable water to customers throughout VPU's water service area. However, due to the overall age and deferred maintenance, many of the facilities have deteriorated and are in need of repairs in order to mitigate both mechanical and capacity failure. Beginning in July 2019, VPU Water Division staff initiated a comprehensive three-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The goals of the CIP are to eliminate dependence on imported water, to achieve a sustainable water supply and to bolster the water distribution system in order to maintain a high level of reliability to meet current demands, fixture growth, and respond to emergency conditions. Accordingly, a Request for Proposals for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services ("RFP') was prepared in order to assist Water Division staff on an as -needed basis with well repair, well rehabilitation, construction of new wells, and investigative reports concerning professional hydrogeological services. Historically, staff has identified various vendors through an informal selection process to perform similar professional hydrogeological services as these services became necessary. Contracting a vendor in advance to perform professional hydrogeological services on an as -needed basis will grant staff access to a practical resource, enabling staff to complete projects more effectively and efficiently when water system issues arise and/or regulatory requirements necessitate hydrogeological evaluations. The RFP was issued July 1, 2019. In an effort to maximize the diversity of the business firms notified, specifically small business firms, VPU utilized two local newspapers and notified 302 vendors on PlanetBids likely to submit a qualifying proposal PlanetBids is a free online platform available to all interested vendors, making it readily accessible to a variety ofbusiness types. On July 18, 2019, the proposal deadline, staff received five proposals. An evaluation team was created to review and evaluate the proposals based on responsiveness and the criterion listed within the RFP. The evaluation team utilized a zero -to -ten scoring scale to evaluate the proposals, with a score of ten being a perfect score. In accordance with the overall evaluation results, the proposers were ranked as follows: 1. Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC — 8.53 2. Advisian, (Worley Group) — 8.15 3. Thomas Harder & Co. — 7.85 4. Leighton Consulting, Inc. — 6.85 5. Rubicon Engineering Corporation (Non-Reponsive) VPU staff recomrnends the selection of Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC for award of the proposed services agreement based on their proposal and the selection criterion which include the firm's technical competence, past perfonmnce history, staffing capability, and cost effectiveness. The City has contracted RCS in the past and has been satisfied with their performance and deliverables. The proposed Agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney's office. Fiscal Impact: If approved, the Agreement will be effective September 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022 at an annual not -to -exceed amount of $125,000.00 and a total not -to -exceed amount of $375,000.00 over the entire term. VPU has budgeted $125,000.00 for professional hydrogeological services in the Public Utilities Water Division Budget for fiscal year 2019-2020 under the account number 020.1084.595200. VPU will budget for this expense accordingly in the subsequent two fiscal years. ATTACHMENTS • 1. Proposed Services Agreement with Richard C. Slade & Associates for On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC FOR ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES Contractor: Responsible Principal of Contractor: Notice Information - Contractor: Notice Information - City: Commencement Date: Termination Date: Consideration: COVER PAGE Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC Richard C. Slade, President Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC 14051 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 300 Sherman Oaks, CA 91401-5083 Attention: Richard C. Slade, President Phone: (818) 506-0418 Facsimile: (818) 506-1343 City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: Abraham Alemu, Interim General Manager of Vernon Public Utilities Telephone: (323) 583-8811 ext. 250 Facsimile: (323) 826-1408 September 1, 2019 June 30, 2022 Total not to exceed $375,000.00 (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit C Records Retention Period Three (3) years, pursuant to Section 11.20 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC FOR ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES This Contract is made between the City of Vernon ("City"), a California charter City and California municipal corporation ("City"), and Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, a California limited liability company ("Contractor") The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1.0 EMPLOYMENT OF CONTRACTOR. City agrees to engage Contractor to perform the services as hereinafter set forth as authorized by the City Council on August 20, 2019. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. 2.1 Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the Request for Proposals issued on or about July 1, 2019, Exhibit "A", and Contractor's proposal to the City ("Proposal") dated July 16, 2019, Exhibit "B", both of which are attached to and incorporated into this Contract, by reference. 2.2 All services shall be performed to the satisfaction of City. 2.3 All services shall be performed in a competent, professional, and satisfactory manner in accordance with the prevailing industry standards for such services. 3.0 PERSONNEL. 3.1 Contractor represents that it employs, or will employ, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Contract. 3.2 Contractor shall not subcontract any services to be performed by it under this Contract without prior written approval of City. 3.3 All of the services required hereunder will be performed by Contractor or by City -approved subcontractors. Contractor, and all personnel engaged in the work, shall be fully qualified and authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services and shall be subject to approval by the City. 2 4.0 TERM. The term of this Contract shall commence on September 1, 2019, and it shall continue until June 30, 2022, unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions thereof. 5.0 COMPENSATION AND FEES. 5.1 Contractor has established rates for the City of Vernon which are comparable to and do not exceed the best rates offered to other governmental entities in and around Los Angeles County for the same services. For satisfactory and timely performance of the services, the City will pay Contractor in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5.2 Contractor's grand total compensation for the entire term of this Contract, shall not exceed $375,000.00 without the prior authorization of the City, as appropriate, and written amendment of this Contract. 5.3 Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all necessary and incidental labor, material, supplies, facilities, equipment, and transportation which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Contract. Materials shall be of the highest quality. The above Contract fee shall include all staff time and all clerical, administrative, overhead, insurance, reproduction, telephone, air travel, auto rental, subsistence, and all related costs and expenses. 5.4 City shall reimburse Contractor only for those costs or expenses specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by Contractor: 5.4.1 The actual costs of subcontractors for performance of any of the services that Contractor agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with this Agreement. 5.4.2 Approved reproduction charges. 3 5.4.3 Actual costs and/or other costs and/or payments specifically authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. 5.5 Contractor shall not receive any compensation for extra work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "extra work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized extra work shall be paid in accordance with the payment schedule as set forth in Exhibit "C," if the extra work has been approved by the City. 5.6 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services by this Agreement. 6.0 PAYMENT. 6.1 As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to the City an invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses, and authorized extra work actually performed or incurred according to said schedule. 6.2 Each such invoice shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including a detailed description of the services completed, the number of hours spent, reimbursable expenses incurred and any extra work performed. 6.3 Contractor shall also submit a progress report with each invoice that describes in reasonable detail the services and the extra work, if any, performed in the immediately preceding calendar month. 4 6.4 Contractor understands and agrees that invoices which lack sufficient detail to measure performance will be returned and not processed for payment. 6.5 City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days after the City approves the invoice. 6.6 Payment of such invoices shall be payment in full for all services, authorized costs, and authorized extra work covered by that invoice. 7.0 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY. City shall cooperate with Contractor as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor to perform its services; and will give any required decisions as promptly as practicable so as to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Contractor's services. 8.0 COORDINATION OF SERVICES. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants, and other staff at all reasonable times. 9.0 INDEMNITY. Contractor agrees to indemnify City, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein "claims or liabilities"), including but not limited to professional negligence, that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the work, operations or activities of Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein, or arising from the acts or omissions of Contractor hereunder, or arising from Contractor's performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, except to the extent such claims or liabilities arise from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, elected officials, agents or employees. 10.0 INSURANCE. Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain policies of insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth below, for the duration of the Contract, including any extensions thereto. The policies shall state that they afford primary 5 coverage. i. Automobile Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit, including owned, hired, and non -owned liability coverage. ii. Contractor agrees to subrogate automobile liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under the performance of the services. iii. General Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate written on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Comprehensive General Liability "occurrence" form or its equivalent for coverage on an occurrence basis. Premises/Operations and Personal Injury coverage is required. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the policy as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of this Contract. (1) If Contractor employs other contractors as part of the services rendered, Contractor's Protective Coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein. (2) Contractor agrees to subrogate General Liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under ON the performance of the services. iv. Professional Errors and Omissions coverage in a sum of at least $1,000,000, where such risk is applicable. Applicable aggregates must be identified and claims history provided to determine amounts remaining under the aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such coverage for at least one (1) year after the termination of this Agreement. V. Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers' compensation for injuries on the job. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain workers' compensation insurance in accordance with the laws for California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners: (1) Provide copy of permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or (2) Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimal limit of $1,000,000 per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from performance of this Contract; or (3) Provide a "waiver" form certifying that no employees subject to the Labor Code's Workers' Compensation provision will be used in performance of this Contract. vi. Each insurance policy included in this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to City. vii. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A-Vill. viii. Prior to commencement of performance, Contractor shall furnish City with a certificate of insurance for each policy. Each certificate is to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificate(s) must be in a form approved by 7 City. City may require complete, certified copies of any or all policies at any time. ix. Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach. In such event, Contractor shall immediately notify City and cease all performance under this Contract until further directed by the City. In the absence of satisfactory insurance coverage, City may, at its option: (a) procure insurance with collection rights for premiums, attorney's fees and costs against Contractor by way of set-off or recoupment from sums due to Contractor, at City's option; (b) immediately terminate this Contract and seek damages from the Contract resulting from said breach; or (c) self -insure the risk, with all damages and costs incurred, by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including attorney's fees and costs, being collectible from Contractor, by way of set-off or recoupment from any sums due to Contractor. 11.0 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 11.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 11.1.1 It is understood that in the performance of the services herein provided for, Contractor shall be, and is, an independent contractor, and is not an agent, officer or employee of City and shall furnish such services in its own manner and method except as required by this Contract, or any applicable statute, rule, or regulation. Further, Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons employed by Contractor in the performance of the services hereunder. City assumes no liability for Contractor's actions and performance, nor assumes responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied or explicit, by or for Contractor. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payment of its employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever. 11.1.2 Contractor acknowledges that Contractor and any subcontractors, W agents or employees employed by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of the City, and that they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation insurance benefits. 11.2 CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT. Except as the City may authorize in writing, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of or bind the City in any capacity whatsoever as agents or otherwise. 11.3 OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All documents and materials furnished by the City to Contractor shall remain the property of the City and shall be returned to the City upon termination of this Agreement. All reports, drawings, plans, specifications, computer tapes, floppy disks and printouts, studies, memoranda, computation sheets, and other documents prepared by Contractor in furtherance of the work shall be the sole property of City and shall be delivered to City whenever requested at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall keep such documents and materials on file and available for audit by the City for at least three (3) years after completion or earlier termination of this Contract. Contractor may make duplicate copies of such materials and documents for its own files or for such other purposes as may be authorized in writing by the City. 11.4 CORRECTION OF WORK. Contractor shall promptly correct any defective, inaccurate or incomplete tasks, deliverables, goods, services and other work, without additional cost to the City. The performance or acceptance of services furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from the obligation to correct subsequently discovered defects, inaccuracy, or incompleteness. 11.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS. Contractor shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Contractor, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to M Contractor occurs, then Contractor shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Contractor professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 11.6 WAIVER. The City's waiver of any term, condition, breach, or default of this Contract shall not be considered to be a waiver of any other term, condition, default or breach, nor of a subsequent breach of the one waived. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. 11.7 SUCCESSORS. This Contract shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and/or assigns. 11.8 NO ASSIGNMENT. Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Contract or any rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the City and approval by the City Attorney, which may be withheld in the City's sole discretion. Any unauthorized assignment or transfer shall be null and void and shall constitute a material breach by the Contractor of its obligations under this Contract. No assignment shall release the original parties from their obligations or otherwise constitute a novation. 11.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State, County and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which are, as amended from time to time, incorporated herein and applicable to the performance hereof, including but without limitation, the Vernon Living Wage Ordinance. Violation of any law material to performance of this Contract shall entitle the City to terminate the Contract and otherwise pursue its remedies. Further, if the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules, and regulations Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. 11.10 ATTORNEY'S FEES. If any action at law or in equity is brought to 10 enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled. 11.11 INTERPRETATION. 11.11.1 Applicable Law. This Contract shall be deemed a contract and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Contractor agrees that the State and Federal courts which sit in the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies and disputes arising hereunder, and submits to the jurisdiction thereof. 11.11.2 Entire Agreement. This Contract, including any exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings, correspondence, documentation, and agreements (written or oral). 11.11.3 Written Amendment. This Contract may only be changed by written amendment signed by Contractor and the City Administrator or other authorized representative of the City, subject to any requisite authorization by the City Council. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Contract shall be of no force or effect. 11.11.4 Severability. If any provision in this Contract is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Contract, and the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Contract. 11.11.5 Order of Precedence. In case of conflict between the terms of this Contract and the terms contained in any document attached as an Exhibit or otherwise incorporated by reference, the terms of this Contract shall strictly prevail. The terms of the City's Request for Proposals shall control over the Contractor's Proposal. 11 11.11.6 Duplicate Originals. There shall be two (2) fully signed copies of this Contract, each of which shall be deemed an original. 11.11.7 Construction. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 11.12 TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is strictly of the essence of this contract and each and every covenant, term, and provision hereof. 11.13 AUTHORITY OF CONTRACTOR. The Contractor hereby represents and warrants to the City that the Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Contract, and its execution of this Contract has been duly authorized. 11.14 ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES. Any dispute for under $25,000 arising out of or relating to the negotiation, construction, performance, non-performance, breach, or any other aspect of this Contract, shall be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association at Los Angeles, California and judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The City does not waive its right to object to the timeliness or sufficiency of any claim filed or required to be filed against the City and reserves the right to conduct full discovery. 11.15 NOTICES. Any notice or demand to be given by one party to the other must be given in writing and by personal delivery or prepaid first-class, registered or certified mail, addressed as follows. Notice simply to the City of Vernon or any other City department is not adequate notice. 12 If to the City: City of Vernon Attention: Abraham Alemu, Interim General Manager of Vernon Public Utilities 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 If to the Contractor: Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC Attention: Richard C. Slade, President 14051 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 300 Sherman Oaks, CA 91401-5083 Any such notice shall be deemed to have been given upon delivery, if personally delivered, or, if mailed, upon receipt, or upon expiration of three (3) business days from the date of posting, whichever is earlier. Either party may change the address at which it desires to receive notice upon giving written notice of such request to the other party. 11.16 NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Contractor and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right or remedy in, under, or to this Agreement. 11.17 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (Without Cause). City may terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time, for any cause or without cause, upon fifteen (15) calendar days' written notice to Contractor. If the Contract is thus terminated by City for reasons other than Contractor's failure to perform its obligations, City shall pay Contractor a prorated amount based on the services satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the effective date of termination. Such payment shall be Contractor's exclusive remedy for termination without cause. 11.18 DEFAULT. In the event either party materially defaults in its obligations hereunder, the other party may declare a default and terminate this Contract by written notice to the defaulting party. The notice shall specify the basis for the default. The Contract shall terminate unless such default is cured before the effective date of termination stated in such 13 notice, which date shall be no sooner than ten (10) days after the date of the notice. In case of default by Contractor, the City reserves the right to procure the goods or services from other sources and to hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs occasioned to the City thereby. Contractor shall not be held accountable for additional costs incurred due to delay or default as a result of Force Majeure. Contractor must notify the City immediately upon knowing that non-performance or delay will apply to this Contract as a result of Force Majeure. At that time Contractor is to submit in writing a Recovery Plan for this Contract. If the Recovery Plan is not acceptable to the City or not received within 10 days of the necessary notification of Force Majeure default, then the city may cancel this order in its entirety at no cost to the City, owing only for goods and services completed to that point. 11.19 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Termination for cause shall relieve the terminating party of further liability or responsibility under this Contract, including the payment of money, except for payment for services satisfactorily and timely performed prior to the service of the notice of termination, and except for reimbursement of (1) any payments made by the City for service not subsequently performed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and (2) costs incurred by the City in obtaining substitute performance. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require, at no additional cost to City, that Contractor provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 11.19.1 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 11.20 MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS. The City, or its authorized auditors or representatives, shall have access 14 to and the right to audit and reproduce any of the Contractor's records to the extent the City deems necessary to insure it is receiving all money to which it is entitled under the Contract and/or is paying only the amounts to which Contractor is properly entitled under the Contract or for other purposes relating to the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination of the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain all such records in the City of Vernon. If not, the Contractor shall, upon request, promptly deliver the records to the City of Vernon or reimburse the City for all reasonable and extra costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than the City of Vernon, including, but not limited to, such additional (out of the City) expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditors, travel, lodging, meals, and overhead. 11.21 CONFLICT. Contractor hereby represents, warrants, and certifies that no member, officer, or employee of the Contractor is a director, officer, or employee of the City of Vernon, or a member of any of its boards, commissions, or committees, except to the extent permitted by law. 11.22 HEADINGS. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 11.23 ENFORCEMENT OF WAGE AND HOUR LAWS. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. The Contractor, or subcontractor, if any, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by the respective Contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Sections 1810 through 1815 of the California Labor Code as a penalty paid to the City; provided, however, work performed by employees of contractors in excess of 8 hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon 15 compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1'/2 times the basic rate of pay. 11.24 LIVING WAGES. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D". Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 11.25 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Contract, it and any other parties with whom it may subcontract shall adhere to equal employment opportunity practices to assure that applicants, employees and recipients of service are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sex, age, medical condition, sexual orientation or marital status. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. Contractor further agrees to comply with The Equal Employment Opportunity Practices provisions as set forth in Exhibit "E". [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement as of the Commencement Date stated on the cover page. City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation By: Carlos Fandino, City Administrator ATTEST: Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Byun, Senior Deputy City Attorney Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, a California limited liability company By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 17 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS i lm City of Vernon Request for Proposals (RFP) On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services 6 - F • City of Vernon Public Utilities Department 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058 Phone: (323) 583-8811 Key RFP Dates Issue Date: Monday, July 1, 2019 Written Questions: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 11:00 AM Response to Questions: Thursday, July 11, 2019 Proposals Due: Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 2:00 PM City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT The City of Vernon is requesting proposals from qualified consultants to conduct on -call hydrogeological services for the purposes of well design and subsurface investigation. The City will select up to two firms, based on demonstrated competence and a cost effective approach to providing professional hydrogeological services. The initial term of the Agreement resulting from this proposal shall be three (3) years from the date the City executes the Agreement. 2. BACKGROUND The City of Vernon was founded in 1905, is approximately 5.2 square miles in size and is located approximately 5 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles California. Over its long history, Vernon has been developed as an industrial community. At the turn of the 201h century the lands that make up Vernon were comprised largely of farmlands. The presence of three major rail lines in the area led influential business and property owners to encourage the railroad companies to run spur lines onto the farmlands. These rail extensions enabled the creation of an "exclusively industrial" city. By the 1920's, Vernon was attracting large stockyards and meatpacking facilities. In the 1930's, Vernon became the location of choice for many heavy industrial plants. As economic conditions changed over the decades, these large scale industrial operations have relocated out of Southern California and Vernon has attracted smaller, lighter industrial facilities. The City's business friendly environment, low cost utilities and key location for trucking and rail transport continue to position Vernon as an ideal location for industrial uses. The City is beginning the implementation of a comprehensive water system improvement program, with the goal of reducing its dependence on imported water sources and achieving a sustainable water supply to meet the City's future water needs. Among the projects and initiatives to reach self-sufficiency, the City has identified the need for two new water wells and two major rehabilitations to existing wells. As a part of this program, the City desires to retain the professional hydrogeological services for the purposes of well design and subsurface investigation, in addition to general groundwater management advice. City Government: The City Council consists of five members, elected at -large, who serve five-year staggered terms. The City Council annually appoints a Mayor and a Mayor Pro Tern from its own membership to serve one-year terms. Labor Force: Vernon has approximately 280 employees, and its departments include a Fire Department, Police Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, Public Utilities Department and Health and Environmental Control Department. Present bargaining units recognized include the Vernon Police Officers Benefit Association, Vernon Police Management Association, Vernon Firemen's Association, the Vernon Fire Management Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 47, and Teamsters Local 911. Page 2 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES REQUIRED The City of Vernon is seeking services from a highly qualified consulting firm to perform professional hydrogeological services as listed in this section. Firms should consider these services as the minimum necessary for an agreement resulting from this RFP. Consultant scope of services may include, but not be limited to: Groundwater Studies and Models o Hydrogeological assessments and analyses o Groundwater flow and solute transport models o Groundwater basin models o Fate transport studies o Water System Assessment Water Supply Wells o Well Siting and specifications o Well operation modeling and scenario development o Design o Rehabilitation o Assessment o Construction/Project Inspection o Well development • Groundwater Consulting o Conjunctive use, storage, and recovery o Groundwater management programs o Water quality o Source Water Assessments Groundwater Sustainability and Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Compliance o Groundwater sustainability Plans (GSP) o SGMA Compliance o Hydrogeological assessments and investigations o Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) Program reports o Sustainable yield/perennial yield o Urban groundwater management plans The City's usage of on -call hydrogeological services is on an as -needed basis, such that if the demand is not there, then the services will not be requested. For each on -call service request, the Consultant and the City shall agree upon the specific scope of work and cost for that service request. The City has the right to retain other consulting firms at its sole discretion when the City believes there will be an economic or other significant advantage for doing so. Services for each request shall be provided on a negotiated fee basis, per work order. No minimum amount of the work is guaranteed under the Agreement. Compensation will be based on time and materials with a not -to -exceed limit agreed upon by both the Consultant and City before work begins. Page 3 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals 4. QUALIFICATIONS & CRITERIA A. Qualifications: The City of Vernon will select one firm for all of the outlined Scope of Service on the basis of qualifications, experience, and cost. The following are the minimum qualifications to be used to evaluate responses to this Request for Proposals: Work shall be supervised by a registered California Certified Hydrogeologist (CHG) with at least five (5) years of experience providing similar services is required to oversee the work, stamp, and sign all project related documents. B. Selection Criteria: The City will conduct a comprehensive, fair, and impartial evaluation of proposals received in response to this RFP. All proposals received will be reviewed and evaluated by a committee of qualified personnel. The name, information, or experience of the individual members will not be made available to any proposer. The Evaluation Committee will first review and screen all proposals submitted, except for the cost proposals, according to the minimum qualifications set forth above. The following criteria will be used in reviewing and comparing the proposals and in determining the highest scoring bid: 1. 45% Technical Competence/Past Performance Record/Financial Stability/Quality Level of the Firm's previous projects of comparable complexity, scale and nature; training and proven expertise in the area of work required; Efficiency and timeliness in completion of projects. Experience in projects completed for public entities. Review of sub - consultants. 2. 20% Staffing Capability to meet project timeliness: The capability to perform the work within the desired time frame. The ability and past experience in assembling a highly qualified team of sub -consultants. 3. 10% Quality Control: The Consultant's listed work shall be such as to ensure that the distinctive goals established for each component are met. Brief descriptions of previous project experiences should be used as examples of how quality control was achieved with former clients. 4. 25% Cost of Services, Cost Control and Reporting: The Consultant's overall operation should encourage cost effective work and services. Cost control, performance within budget allocations, prudent accounting practices, management and clear communication with City staff are essential to the success of this project. A brief description of previous project experiences should be used as examples of how this was achieved with former clients. Proposal shall include key examples of the firm's accuracy in cost estimating. C. Consultant Selection Process: All proposals will be evaluated by a review group selected for this project. Each member will assess and rate each proposal based on the information submitted. A short list of firms may be selected and interviewed. The review group will score the firms and the highest ranking firm will be notified to begin agreement negotiations and enter into an agreement. If an agreement cannot be reached, the City will begin negotiations with the second highest ranking firm. The Page 4 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals City of Vernon may select up to two (2) firms. The City of Vernon has the sole authority to select the consulting firm and reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. The City reserves the right to approve all sub -consultants and/or engineers proposed to be retained by the prime consultant. Upon signing of the Agreement, no change in proposed personnel or sub -consultants can be made without the City's review and written authorization. By submitting a response to this RFP, prospective consultants waive the right to protest after award or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this RFP. The City reserves the right to select any number of finalists. In addition, the City reserves the right to issue written notice to all participating firms of any changes in the proposal submission schedule, should the City determine in its sole and absolute discretion that such changes are necessary. The City reserves the right to request additional information from any proposing firm. All original work products, including computer files, shall remain the property of the City. D. Final Selection: The responsible proposer(s) whose proposal is the most advantageous to the City, taking to consideration all the evaluation factors will be recommended for the agreement award. Notwithstanding the Evaluation Team's selection, the City reserves the right to award this RFP and the resultant agreement in any manner it deems to be in the best interest of the City and make the selection based on its sole discretion. The City is the sole and exclusive judge of quality and compliance with proposal specifications in any of the matters pertaining to this RFP. E. Agreement Award and Execution: Selection of a proposer or proposers with whom the City enters into agreement negotiations with or a recommendation of an award by the Evaluation Team or any other party does not constitute an award of agreement. The City may negotiate with the selected Proposer to acquire the combination of functionality that best meets the City's needs. Alternatively, the City of Vernon reserves the right to enter into an agreement without further discussion of the submitted proposal. Therefore, the Proposal should be initially submitted on the most favorable terms the proposing party can offer. The City's proposed agreement for Professional Services is provided in Exhibit B. Please review the Agreement prior to submitting a proposal. The City of Vernon intends to use the Agreement as the baseline agreements with the successful proposer(s). The foregoing should not be interrupted to prohibit either party from proposing additional agreement terms and conditions during the negotiation of the final agreement. The RFP document and the successful party or parties' proposal response, as amended by agreement between the City of Vernon and the successful party or parties, may become part of the Agreement documents. Additionally, the City of Vernon may verify the successful party or parties' representation that appear in the proposal. Failure of the successful party or parties to perform as represented may result in elimination of the successful party or parties form further negotiation or in Agreement cancellation or termination. Page 5 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals No oral explanation or instruction of any kind or nature whatsoever given before the award of an Agreement to a Vendor shall be binding. The City of Vernon shall not be bound, or in any way obligated, until the City has awarded the Agreement and all documents have been executed. The proposing party may not incur any chargeable costs prior to final Agreement execution. 5. FORMAT AND DELIVERY OF RESPONSE Respondents are asked to submit one (1) unbound original, one (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic copy (via email to maumentado@ci.vernon.ca.us) of their proposals in sufficient detail to allow for a thorough evaluation and comparative analysis. The proposal should include, at a minimum, the following information in sectionalized format addressing all phases of the work in the RFP. A. Format: Limit your proposal to 30 typed 8.5" X 11" pages, or fewer, on white bond paper of at least 20-pound weight single sided (excluding cover letter and attachments). You may attach a firm brochure if you wish, but it must be as a separate attachment and independent from the required elements noted above. 1. Use a conventional typeface with a minimum font size of 12 points. Use a 1" margin on all boarders. 2. Organize your submittal in the order described above. 3. Prominently label the package: "On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services" and include the name of the primary contact for the respondent. Deliver the response to: City of Vernon Attention: Abraham Alemu, Interim General Manager of Public Utilities 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 1. Responses are due on or before 2:00 p.m. on July 18, 2019. Late response will not be accepted. 2. If you have any questions about this RFP, please contact Mark Aumentado at (323) 583-8811 ext. 309 or Joanna Moreno at ext. 888. Please note that any questions asked and any response provided by Vernon will be sent to every person who will be submitting a proposal, to the extent the City is aware of them. B. Cover Letter: All proposals shall include a cover letter which states that the proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. If the proposal contemplates the use of sub -contractors, the sub- contractors shall be identified in the cover letter. If the proposal is submitted by a business entity, the cover letter shall be signed by an officer authorized to contractually bind the business entity. With respect to the business entity, the cover letter shall also include: the identification of the business entity, including the name, Page 6 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals address and telephone number of the business entity; and the name, title, address and telephone number of a contact person during the proposal evaluation period. C. Organization and Approach: Describe the roles and organization of your proposed team for this project. Indicate the composition of sub -consultants and number of project staff, number of years in the business, facilities available, location where the work will be performed, and experience of your team as it relates to this project. If two or more firms are involved in an association or a joint venture for this Project, provide information concerning past associations and outline the working relationship between the firms, e.g., indicate where management responsibility resides and where quality control and production coordination will be performed. Describe your project and management approach. Provide a detailed description of how the team and scope of work will be managed. D. General Scope of Work: Consultants should consider the Scope of Services outlined herein as a minimum guide for submission. Suggestions for optional services to better accomplish the City's objectives will be considered but should be priced separately from the price provided for the Basic Services described in this RFP. a. Include a detailed Scope of Work Statement describing all services to be provided; b. Describe project deliverables for each phase of your work; and c. Describe cost control and budgeting methodology if selected as the successful consultant. E. Ability of the Proposer to Perform: Provide a detailed description of the proposer and his/her/its qualifications, including names, titles, detailed professional resumes and past experience in similar work efforts/products of key personnel who will be working on the assignment. Provide a list of specific related work projects that have been completed by the proposer which are directly related to the assignment described in this RFP. Identify role and responsibility of each member of the project team. Include the amount of time key personnel will be involved in the respective portions of the assignment. Respondents are encouraged to supply relevant examples of their professional product. Provide a list of references. The selected firm shall not subcontract any work under the RFP nor assign any work without the prior written consent of the City. F. References: Provide a minimum of four (4) projects, one for each of the services listed in this RFP, within the past five (5) years. Projects must note the specific individuals who completed such project(s). Include a telephone number and the name of key contacts for each project. G. Fees and Costs: Pursuant to Section 2.17.08 of The Code of the City of Vernon, California, proposing Consultants shall submit with their proposal a separate sealed envelope marked "CONFIDENTIAL FEE PROPOSAL OF [NAME OF PROPOSER]" and shall include the following (which will be utilized in the negotiations with the successful Proposer): Page 7 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals Hourly rates of personnel to be assigned to the Project a. Staffing plans shall be in the form of a table/chart for the scope and durations specified indicating, at a minimum, the level of effort (full time equivalent) and hourly rate for each proposed Project position of proposer and its Consultants on a month -by -month basis, for the Scope of Services established in this RFP. b. Estimated reimbursable cost schedules shall depict only those expenditures that are exclusive to and in support of the City's project and as described in the Proposers' submittal. The proposed estimated reimbursable cost schedule shall include a detailed list/table of reimbursable by task category. H. Affidavit of Non -Collusion. Proposer must submit a completed and signed, "Affidavit of Non -Collusion." (Copy attached as Exhibit A). 7. ADDENDA, CHANGES, AND AMENDMENTS TO THIS SOLICITATION At any time prior to the due date for responses, the City may make changes, amendments, and addenda to this solicitation, including changing the date due to allow respondents time to address such changes. Addenda, changes, and amendments, if made, will be posted on the City's website (www.cityofvernon.org), which is deemed adequate notice. A proposer may make a request to the City's project coordinator to be placed on a list of persons to receive notice of any such addenda, changes, or amendments. The preferred manner of communications is via e-mail due to its timeliness. 8. CONDITIONS FOR RESPONSES TO RFP The following conditions apply to this RFP process: A. Nothing contained in this RFP shall create any contractual relationship between the respondent and the City. B. This RFP does not obligate the City to establish a list of service providers qualified as prime contractors, or award an Agreement to any respondent. The City reserves the right to amend or cancel this RFP without prior notice, at any time, at its sole discretion. C. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by any individual or organization in connection with this RFP. D. No conversations or agreements with any officer, agent, or employee of the City shall affect or modify any terms of this RFP. Oral communications or any written/e-mail materials provided by any person other than designated contact staff of City shall not be considered binding. E. The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to accept or reject any or all Proposals without prior notice and to waive any minor Page 8 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals irregularities or defects in a Proposal. The City reserves the right to seek clarification on a Proposal with any source. F. The dates, times, and sequence of events related to this RFP shall ultimately be determined by the City. The schedule shown above is subject to change, at the sole discretion of the City, although the City will attempt to follow it and, if it must be altered, will attempt to provide reasonable notice of the changes. G. Respondents shall not issue any news release pertaining to this RFP, or the City without prior written approval of the City. H. All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public record upon delivery to the City. 9. RIGHT BY THE CITY TO WITHDRAW THIS REQUEST The City may, at its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, withdraw this solicitation at any time. 10. LIVING WAGE ORDINANCE The selected Consultant shall pay qualifying employees a wage of not less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. The Consultant shall also provide qualifying employees at least twelve days off per year for sick leave, vacation or personnel necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. There shall be a prohibition on an employer retaliation against an employee's complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D" of the Standard Form Services Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit B. Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 11. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Prior to the award of any work hereunder, City and proposer shall enter into the written Agreement for services attached hereto as Exhibit B. Proposers responding to this RFP are strongly advised to review all the terms and conditions of the Agreement. The term of the Agreement shall not exceed three (3) years. Page 9 of 11 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals EXHIBIT A AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION Page 10 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION BY CONTRACTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) being first duly sworn deposes and says that he/she is (Insert "Sole Owner", "Partner", "President, "Secretary", or other proper title) of (Insert name of bidder) who submits herewith to the City of Vernon a bid/proposal; That all statements of fact in such bid/proposal are true; That such bid/proposal was not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation; That such bid/proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; That said bidder has not, directly or indirectly by agreement, communication or conference with anyone attempted to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Vernon, or of any other bidder or anyone else interested in the proposed contract; and further That prior to the public opening and reading of bids/proposals, said bidder: a. Did not directly or indirectly, induce or solicit anyone else to submit a false or sham bid/proposal; b. Did not directly or indirectly, collude, conspire, connive or agree with anyone else that said bidder or anyone else would submit a false or sham bid/proposal, or that anyone should refrain from bidding or withdraw his/her bid/proposal; C. Did not, in any manner, directly or indirectly seek by agreement, communication or conference with anyone to raise or fix the bid/proposal price of said bidder or of anyone else, or to raise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of his/her bid/proposal price, or of that of anyone else; d. Did not, directly or indirectly, submit his/her bid/proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any individual or group of individuals, except the City of Vernon, or to any person or persons who have a partnership or other financial interest with said bidder in his/her business. I certify under penalty of perjury that the above information is correct Title: Date: March 2013 City of Vernon On -Call Professional Hydrogeological Services Request for Proposals EXHIBIT B STANDARD FORM SERVICES AGREEMENT Page 11 of 11 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND [CONTRACTOR'S NAME] FOR ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES Contractor: Responsible Principal of Contractor: Notice Information - Contractor: Notice Information - City: Commencement Date: Termination Date: Consideration: COVER PAGE [insert name of contractor] [insert name, title] [insert name of contractor] [insert street address] [insert city, state, zip code] Attention: [insert name, title] Phone: [insert phone number] Facsimile: [insert fax number] City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: Abraham Alemu Interim General Manager of Vernon Public Utilities Telephone: (323) 583-8811 ext. 250 September 1, 2019 June 30, 2022 Total not to exceed $375,000 (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit C Records Retention Period Three (3) years, pursuant to Section 11.20 SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND [CONTRACTOR'S NAME] FOR ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES This Contract is made between the City of Vernon ("City"), a California charter City and California municipal corporation ("City"), and [Contractor's Name], a [State incorporated in] corporation ("Contractor") The City and Contractor agree as follows: 1.0 EMPLOYMENT OF CONTRACTOR. City agrees to engage Contractor to perform the services as hereinafter set forth as authorized by the City Council on 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. 2.1 Contractor shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the Request for Proposals dated , Exhibit "A", and Contractor's proposal to the City ("Proposal") dated , Exhibit "B", both of which are attached to and incorporated into this Contract, by reference. 2.2 All services shall be performed to the satisfaction of City. 2.3 All services shall be performed in a competent, professional, and satisfactory manner in accordance with the prevailing industry standards for such services. 3.0 PERSONNEL. 3.1 Contractor represents that it employs, or will employ, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform the services under this Contract. 3.2 Contractor shall not subcontract any services to be performed by it under this Contract without prior written approval of City. 3.3 All of the services required hereunder will be performed by Contractor or by City -approved subcontractors. Contractor, and all personnel engaged in the work, shall be fully qualified and authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services and shall be subject to approval by the City. 2 4.0 TERM. The term of this Contract shall commence on September 1, 2019, and it shall continue until June 30, 2022, unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions thereof. 5.0 COMPENSATION AND FEES. 5.1 Contractor has established rates for the City of Vernon which are comparable to and do not exceed the best rates offered to other governmental entities in and around Los Angeles County for the same services. For satisfactory and timely performance of the services, the City will pay Contractor in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 5.2 Contractor's grand total compensation for the entire term of this Contract, shall not exceed $375,000 without the prior authorization of the City, as appropriate, and written amendment of this Contract. 5.3 Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all necessary and incidental labor, material, supplies, facilities, equipment, and transportation which may be required for furnishing services pursuant to this Contract. Materials shall be of the highest quality. The above Contract fee shall include all staff time and all clerical, administrative, overhead, insurance, reproduction, telephone, air travel, auto rental, subsistence, and all related costs and expenses. 5.4 City shall reimburse Contractor only for those costs or expenses specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by Contractor: 5.4.1 The actual costs of subcontractors for performance of any of the services that Contractor agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with this Agreement. 5.4.2 Approved reproduction charges. 3 5.4.3 Actual costs and/or other costs and/or payments specifically authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement. 5.5 Contractor shall not receive any compensation for extra work performed without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "extra work" means any work that is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of execution of this Agreement. Compensation for any authorized extra work shall be paid in accordance with the payment schedule as set forth in Exhibit "C," if the extra work has been approved by the City. 5.6 Licenses, Permits, Fees, and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain, at Contractor's sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and which arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services by this Agreement. 6.0 PAYMENT. 6.1 As scheduled services are completed, Contractor shall submit to the City an invoice for the services completed, authorized expenses, and authorized extra work actually performed or incurred according to said schedule. 6.2 Each such invoice shall state the basis for the amount invoiced, including a detailed description of the services completed, the number of hours spent, reimbursable expenses incurred and any extra work performed. 6.3 Contractor shall also submit a progress report with each invoice that describes in reasonable detail the services and the extra work, if any, performed in the immediately preceding calendar month. 4 6.4 Contractor understands and agrees that invoices which lack sufficient detail to measure performance will be returned and not processed for payment. 6.5 City will pay Contractor the amount invoiced within thirty (30) days after the City approves the invoice. 6.6 Payment of such invoices shall be payment in full for all services, authorized costs, and authorized extra work covered by that invoice. 7.0 CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY. City shall cooperate with Contractor as may be reasonably necessary for Contractor to perform its services; and will give any required decisions as promptly as practicable so as to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of Contractor's services. 8.0 COORDINATION OF SERVICES. Contractor agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants, and other staff at all reasonable times. 9.0 INDEMNITY. Contractor agrees to indemnify City, its officers, elected officials, employees and agents against, and will hold and save each of them harmless from, any and all actions, suits, claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein "claims or liabilities"), including but not limited to professional negligence, that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the work, operations or activities of Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors, or invitees, provided for herein, or arising from the acts or omissions of Contractor hereunder, or arising from Contractor's performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, except to the extent such claims or liabilities arise from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, elected officials, agents or employees. 10.0 INSURANCE. Contractor shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain policies of insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth below, for the duration of the Contract, including any extensions thereto. The policies shall state that they afford primary 5 coverage. i. Automobile Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit, including owned, hired, and non -owned liability coverage. ii. Contractor agrees to subrogate automobile liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under the performance of the services. iii. General Liability with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate written on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Comprehensive General Liability "occurrence" form or its equivalent for coverage on an occurrence basis. Premises/Operations and Personal Injury coverage is required. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the policy as additional insureds as respects liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of this Contract. (1) If Contractor employs other contractors as part of the services rendered, Contractor's Protective Coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein. (2) Contractor agrees to subrogate General Liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney's fees ("Claims"), which are attributable to any act or omission by the City under ON the performance of the services. iv. Professional Errors and Omissions coverage in a sum of at least $1,000,000, where such risk is applicable. Applicable aggregates must be identified and claims history provided to determine amounts remaining under the aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such coverage for at least one (1) year after the termination of this Agreement. V. Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers' compensation for injuries on the job. In addition, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain workers' compensation insurance in accordance with the laws for California for all of the subcontractor's employees. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners: (1) Provide copy of permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or (2) Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimal limit of $1,000,000 per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from performance of this Contract; or (3) Provide a "waiver" form certifying that no employees subject to the Labor Code's Workers' Compensation provision will be used in performance of this Contract. vi. Each insurance policy included in this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to City. vii. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A-Vill. viii. Prior to commencement of performance, Contractor shall furnish City with a certificate of insurance for each policy. Each certificate is to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificate(s) must be in a form approved by 7 City. City may require complete, certified copies of any or all policies at any time. ix. Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach. In such event, Contractor shall immediately notify City and cease all performance under this Contract until further directed by the City. In the absence of satisfactory insurance coverage, City may, at its option: (a) procure insurance with collection rights for premiums, attorney's fees and costs against Contractor by way of set-off or recoupment from sums due to Contractor, at City's option; (b) immediately terminate this Contract and seek damages from the Contract resulting from said breach; or (c) self -insure the risk, with all damages and costs incurred, by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including attorney's fees and costs, being collectible from Contractor, by way of set-off or recoupment from any sums due to Contractor. 11.0 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 11.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 11.1.1 It is understood that in the performance of the services herein provided for, Contractor shall be, and is, an independent contractor, and is not an agent, officer or employee of City and shall furnish such services in its own manner and method except as required by this Contract, or any applicable statute, rule, or regulation. Further, Contractor has and shall retain the right to exercise full control over the employment, direction, compensation and discharge of all persons employed by Contractor in the performance of the services hereunder. City assumes no liability for Contractor's actions and performance, nor assumes responsibility for taxes, bonds, payments, or other commitments, implied or explicit, by or for Contractor. Contractor shall be solely responsible for, and shall indemnify, defend and save City harmless from all matters relating to the payment of its employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, including compliance with social security, withholding and all other wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, exactions, and regulations of any nature whatsoever. 11.1.2 Contractor acknowledges that Contractor and any subcontractors, W agents or employees employed by Contractor shall not, under any circumstances, be considered employees of the City, and that they shall not be entitled to any of the benefits or rights afforded employees of City, including, but not limited to, sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay, Public Employees Retirement System benefits, or health, life, dental, long-term disability or workers' compensation insurance benefits. 11.2 CONTRACTOR NOT AGENT. Except as the City may authorize in writing, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of or bind the City in any capacity whatsoever as agents or otherwise. 11.3 OWNERSHIP OF WORK. All documents and materials furnished by the City to Contractor shall remain the property of the City and shall be returned to the City upon termination of this Agreement. All reports, drawings, plans, specifications, computer tapes, floppy disks and printouts, studies, memoranda, computation sheets, and other documents prepared by Contractor in furtherance of the work shall be the sole property of City and shall be delivered to City whenever requested at no additional cost to the City. Contractor shall keep such documents and materials on file and available for audit by the City for at least three (3) years after completion or earlier termination of this Contract. Contractor may make duplicate copies of such materials and documents for its own files or for such other purposes as may be authorized in writing by the City. 11.4 CORRECTION OF WORK. Contractor shall promptly correct any defective, inaccurate or incomplete tasks, deliverables, goods, services and other work, without additional cost to the City. The performance or acceptance of services furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from the obligation to correct subsequently discovered defects, inaccuracy, or incompleteness. 11.5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS. Contractor shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Contractor, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to M Contractor occurs, then Contractor shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings, estimates and other Contractor professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction. 11.6 WAIVER. The City's waiver of any term, condition, breach, or default of this Contract shall not be considered to be a waiver of any other term, condition, default or breach, nor of a subsequent breach of the one waived. The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. 11.7 SUCCESSORS. This Contract shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and/or assigns. 11.8 NO ASSIGNMENT. Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Contract or any rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the City and approval by the City Attorney, which may be withheld in the City's sole discretion. Any unauthorized assignment or transfer shall be null and void and shall constitute a material breach by the Contractor of its obligations under this Contract. No assignment shall release the original parties from their obligations or otherwise constitute a novation. 11.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State, County and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, which are, as amended from time to time, incorporated herein and applicable to the performance hereof, including but without limitation, the Vernon Living Wage Ordinance. Violation of any law material to performance of this Contract shall entitle the City to terminate the Contract and otherwise pursue its remedies. Further, if the Contractor performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules, and regulations Contractor shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. 11.10 ATTORNEY'S FEES. If any action at law or in equity is brought to 10 enforce or interpret the terms of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such party may be entitled. 11.11 INTERPRETATION. 11.11.1 Applicable Law. This Contract shall be deemed a contract and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Contractor agrees that the State and Federal courts which sit in the State of California shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies and disputes arising hereunder, and submits to the jurisdiction thereof. 11.11.2 Entire Agreement. This Contract, including any exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings, correspondence, documentation, and agreements (written or oral). 11.11.3 Written Amendment. This Contract may only be changed by written amendment signed by Contractor and the City Administrator or other authorized representative of the City, subject to any requisite authorization by the City Council. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Contract shall be of no force or effect. 11.11.4 Severability. If any provision in this Contract is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Contract, and the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Contract. 11.11.5 Order of Precedence. In case of conflict between the terms of this Contract and the terms contained in any document attached as an Exhibit or otherwise incorporated by reference, the terms of this Contract shall strictly prevail. The terms of the City's Request for Proposals shall control over the Contractor's Proposal. 11 11.11.6 Duplicate Originals. There shall be two (2) fully signed copies of this Contract, each of which shall be deemed an original. 11.11.7 Construction. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning. There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 11.12 TIME OF ESSENCE. Time is strictly of the essence of this contract and each and every covenant, term, and provision hereof. 11.13 AUTHORITY OF CONTRACTOR. The Contractor hereby represents and warrants to the City that the Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity, and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Contract, and its execution of this Contract has been duly authorized. 11.14 ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES. Any dispute for under $25,000 arising out of or relating to the negotiation, construction, performance, non-performance, breach, or any other aspect of this Contract, shall be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association at Los Angeles, California and judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrators may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The City does not waive its right to object to the timeliness or sufficiency of any claim filed or required to be filed against the City and reserves the right to conduct full discovery. 11.15 NOTICES. Any notice or demand to be given by one party to the other must be given in writing and by personal delivery or prepaid first-class, registered or certified mail, addressed as follows. Notice simply to the City of Vernon or any other City department is not adequate notice. 12 If to the City: City of Vernon Attention: Abraham Alemu Interim General Manager of Vernon Public Utilities 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 If to the Contractor: Any such notice shall be deemed to have been given upon delivery, if personally delivered, or, if mailed, upon receipt, or upon expiration of three (3) business days from the date of posting, whichever is earlier. Either party may change the address at which it desires to receive notice upon giving written notice of such request to the other party. 11.16 NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS. This Agreement is entered into for the sole benefit of City and Contractor and no other parties are intended to be direct or incidental beneficiaries of this Agreement and no third party shall have any right or remedy in, under, or to this Agreement. 11.17 TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE (Without Cause). City may terminate this Contract in whole or in part at any time, for any cause or without cause, upon fifteen (15) calendar days' written notice to Contractor. If the Contract is thus terminated by City for reasons other than Contractor's failure to perform its obligations, City shall pay Contractor a prorated amount based on the services satisfactorily completed and accepted prior to the effective date of termination. Such payment shall be Contractor's exclusive remedy for termination without cause. 11.18 DEFAULT. In the event either party materially defaults in its obligations hereunder, the other party may declare a default and terminate this Contract by written notice to the defaulting party. The notice shall specify the basis for the default. The Contract shall 13 terminate unless such default is cured before the effective date of termination stated in such notice, which date shall be no sooner than ten (10) days after the date of the notice. In case of default by Contractor, the City reserves the right to procure the goods or services from other sources and to hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs occasioned to the City thereby. Contractor shall not be held accountable for additional costs incurred due to delay or default as a result of Force Majeure. Contractor must notify the City immediately upon knowing that non-performance or delay will apply to this Contract as a result of Force Majeure. At that time Contractor is to submit in writing a Recovery Plan for this Contract. If the Recovery Plan is not acceptable to the City or not received within 10 days of the necessary notification of Force Majeure default, then the city may cancel this order in its entirety at no cost to the City, owing only for goods and services completed to that point. 11.19 TERMINATION FOR CAUSE. Termination for cause shall relieve the terminating party of further liability or responsibility under this Contract, including the payment of money, except for payment for services satisfactorily and timely performed prior to the service of the notice of termination, and except for reimbursement of (1) any payments made by the City for service not subsequently performed in a timely and satisfactory manner, and (2) costs incurred by the City in obtaining substitute performance. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require, at no additional cost to City, that Contractor provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 11.19.1 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 11.20 MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS. The City, or its authorized auditors or representatives, shall have access 14 to and the right to audit and reproduce any of the Contractor's records to the extent the City deems necessary to insure it is receiving all money to which it is entitled under the Contract and/or is paying only the amounts to which Contractor is properly entitled under the Contract or for other purposes relating to the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain and preserve all such records for a period of at least three (3) years after termination of the Contract. The Contractor shall maintain all such records in the City of Vernon. If not, the Contractor shall, upon request, promptly deliver the records to the City of Vernon or reimburse the City for all reasonable and extra costs incurred in conducting the audit at a location other than the City of Vernon, including, but not limited to, such additional (out of the City) expenses for personnel, salaries, private auditors, travel, lodging, meals, and overhead. 11.21 CONFLICT. Contractor hereby represents, warrants, and certifies that no member, officer, or employee of the Contractor is a director, officer, or employee of the City of Vernon, or a member of any of its boards, commissions, or committees, except to the extent permitted by law. 11.22 HEADINGS. Paragraphs and subparagraph headings contained in this Agreement are included solely for convenience and are not intended to modify, explain or to be a full or accurate description of the content thereof and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. 11.23 ENFORCEMENT OF WAGE AND HOUR LAWS. Eight hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. The Contractor, or subcontractor, if any, shall forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by the respective Contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Sections 1810 through 1815 of the California Labor Code as a penalty paid to the City; provided, however, work performed by employees of contractors in excess of 8 hours per day, and 40 hours during any one week, shall be permitted upon 15 compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than 1'/2 times the basic rate of pay. 11.24 LIVING WAGES. Contractor, and any Subcontractor(s), shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance. The current Living Wage Standards are set forth in Exhibit "D". Upon the City's request, certified payroll records shall promptly be provided to the City. 11.25 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Contract, it and any other parties with whom it may subcontract shall adhere to equal employment opportunity practices to assure that applicants, employees and recipients of service are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sex, age, medical condition, sexual orientation or marital status. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. Contractor further agrees to comply with The Equal Employment Opportunity Practices provisions as set forth in Exhibit "E". [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement as of the Commencement Date stated on the cover page. City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation By: Carlos Fandino, City Administrator ATTEST: Maria E. Ayala, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Brian Byun, Senior Deputy City Attorney [CONTRACTOR'S NAME, a [State incorporated in] corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 17 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS i lm EXHIBIT B PROPOSAL 19 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE 20 EXHIBIT D LIVING WAGE PROVISIONS Minimum Living Wages: A requirement that Employers pay qualifying employees a wage of no less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. Paid and Unpaid Days Off: Employers provide qualifying employees at least twelve compensated days off per year for sick leave, vacation, or personal necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. No Retaliation: A prohibition on employer retaliation against employees complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Employees may bring an action in Superior Court against an employer for back pay, treble damages for willful violations, and attorney's fees, or to compel City officials to terminate the service contract of violating employers. 21 EXHIBIT E EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES PROVISIONS A. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Agreement, the contractor and each subcontractor shall adhere to equal opportunity employment practices to assure that applicants and employees are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex, or age. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. B. Contractor agrees that it shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for applicants for employment placed by or on behalf of Contractor, state that it is an "Equal Opportunity Employer" or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex or age. C. Contractor agrees that it shall, if requested to do so by the City, certify that it has not, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminated against applicants or employees because of their membership in a protected class. D. Contractor agrees to provide the City with access to, and, if requested to do so by City, through its awarding authority, provide copies of all of its records pertaining or relating to its employment practices, except to the extent such records or portions of such records are confidential or privileged under state or federal law. E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as to require or permit any act which is prohibited by law. 22 EXHIBIT B PROPOSAL 19 a RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS In Response to Request for Proposals from the CITY OF VERNON For ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES July 16, 2019 14051 BURBANK BLVD., SUITE 300, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: (818) 506-0418 • NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: (707) 963-3914 W W W.RCSLADE.COM 0 RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS July 17, 2019 City of Vernon Attention: Abraham Alemu, Interim General Manager 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Re: Request for Proposals to Provide Job No. 364-LASOC Professional Hydrogeological Services to the City of Vernon (City) Dear Mr. Alemu; Responding to City's recent Request for Proposals (RFP), dated Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, Consulting Groundwater Geologists (RCS), is pleased to present this proposal and statement of qualifications (SOQ) for on -call professional hydrogeological services to the City of Vernon (City). These services would consist of providing City with assistance in regard to various types of hydrogeological services on an as -needed basis by the City. RCS is a leading groundwater resources firm in Southern California and is fully capable and desirous of providing on -call services to City in our specific hydrogeologic areas of expertise. After review of the RFP, it appears RCS is readily available to provide hydrogeologic consulting as described in Section 3 of the RFP and for specific items in that section, as discussed herein. Mr. Richard C. Slade has more than 50 years of groundwater experience in southern California. In addition, since 1983 when he founded Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC in Studio City, California, Mr. Slade serves as its President and Principal Groundwater Geologist. Currently the company maintains a full-time professional staff of eight degreed geologists. Seven of these professionals are fully licensed as Professional Geologists, and have experience in all elements of: groundwater basin evaluations; groundwater resource development; water quality evaluations; water well feasibility, siting and preliminary design; preparing Technical Specifications and Line Item Bid Sheets for municipal -supply wells; monitoring of well construction; conducting and analyzing aquifer (pumping) tests; groundwater monitoring; subsurface drilling exploration and sampling; evaluating existing wells for their rehabilitation potential; and field monitoring of well rehabilitation operations by various contractors. Mr. Slade has been recognized by several legal court systems as an expert in hydrogeology. Further, in December 2009, Mr. Slade was selected by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County as the Watermaster for the Upper Los Angeles River Area (ULARA). As a result, he has added another dimension to his expertise and has become familiar with additional regulatory and political issues associated with such items as: groundwater basin management; the supply, usage, water quality, and flow of groundwater; the need for recharging groundwater basins with recycled water, etc. We trust you will find that our experience, qualifications and personnel are fully capable of meeting City's requirements for the selection of a professional hydrogeologic consultant on an as -needed basis for future projects involving our particular areas of expertise. Related categories in the development of groundwater resources for which RCS has considerable 14051 BURBANK BLVD., SUITE 300, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: (818) 506-0418 • NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: (707) 963-3914 W W W.RCSLADE.COM Request for Proposals to Provide Professional Hydrogeological Services to the City of Vernon experience include: Feasibility Studies for new wells; Design Services (Technical Specifications and Line Item Bid Sheets for new water wells and groundwater monitoring wells, and for well rehabilitation); and Construction Management (field monitoring of the construction of new wells and/or the rehabilitation of existing wells). Particularly important to the City's as -needed services is that the RCS firm have established a long-term and proven record of experience on a wide variety of successful groundwater projects directly for and within the City. Because of our local experience, we have amassed a significant library and database involving driller's logs, geologic logs, electric logs, water levels and water quality for water wells, deep groundwater monitoring wells, and wildcat oil/gas wells throughout the City's sphere of influence. We also regularly utilize online data bases to supplement our current library of records on wells, water levels and water quality. As requested in the RFP, the terms of this "proposal" shall remain valid for a period of not less than 90 days from the date of this submittal. For the RFP-listed projects, it is unlikely that RCS will use any subconsultants or subcontractors on any of the projects, unless specifically requested by the City. Also, attached to this proposal and following this cover letter is our signed, "Affidavit of Non -Collusion by Contractor" RCS and its groundwater geologists appreciate receiving your RFP and very much look forward to the opportunity of working with City staff on future projects involving our expertise in hydrogeology, groundwater resources, groundwater quality, and water wells. We trust you will find that our local experience with the City, along with our hydrogeologic qualifications and personnel are fully capable of meeting City's needs for a consultant to provide vital on -call hydrogeologic services on an as -needed basis by the City. Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please call our firm at 818.506.0418 Respectfully submitted, RICI;ARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC Richard C. Slade, President and Principal Groundwater Geologist AFFIDAVIT OF NON -COLLUSION BY CONTRACTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Mr. Richard C. Slade and says that he/she is Sole Owner and President being first duly sworn deposes (Insert "Sole Owner', 'Partner", 'President, "Secretary", or other proper title) of Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, Consulting Groundwater Geologists (Insert name of bidder) who submits herewith to the City of Vernon a bid/proposal; That all statements of fact in such bid/proposal are true; That such bid/proposal was not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation; That such bid/proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; That said bidder has not, directly or indirectly by agreement, communication or conference with anyone attempted to induce action prejudicial to the interest of the City of Vernon, or of any other bidder or anyone else interested in the proposed contract; and further That prior to the public opening and reading of bids/proposals, said bidder: a. Did not directly or indirectly, induce or solicit anyone else to submit a false or sham bid/proposal; b. Did not directly or indirectly, collude, conspire, connive or agree with anyone else that said bidder or anyone else would submit a false or sham bid/proposal, or that anyone should refrain from bidding or withdraw his/her bid/proposal; C. Did not, in any manner, directly or indirectly seek by agreement, communication or conference with anyone to raise or fix the bid/proposal price of said bidder or of anyone else, or to raise or fix any overhead, profit or cost element of his/her bid/proposal price, or of that of anyone else; d. Did not, directly or indirectly, submit his/her bid/proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulge information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, artnership, comp ,association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to an I ividual or group of individuals, except the City of Vernon, or to any person or persons wh ve a partnership or other financial interest with said bidder in his/her business. information is correct Title: President & Principal Groundwater Geologist 11.2019 March 2013 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeological Services to the City of Vernon TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 — COMPANY BACKGROUND, QUALIFICATIONS & ORGANIZATION..............1-1 RCSCompany Background.................................................................................................1-1 Other Pertinent Organizational Details.................................................................................1-2 Typical RCS Services for Municipal -Supply Water Wells....................................................1-3 Typical RCS Services for Groundwater Basin Studies........................................................1-5 SECTION 2 — RCS PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES........................................................2-1 GeneralScope of Work........................................................................................................2-1 ProjectDeliverables.............................................................................................................2-2 Budgeting and Cost Control Methodology...........................................................................2-2 SECTION 3 — KEY RCS PERSONNEL/PROJECT TEAM........................................................3-1 SECTION 4 — COMPANY EXPERIENCE..................................................................................4-1 SECTION 5 — SCHEDULE OF CHARGES/RATE SHEET........................................................5-1 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeological Services to the City of Vernon SECTION 1 COMPANY BACKGROUND, QUALIFICATIONS & ORGANIZATION RCS COMPANY BACKGROUND Mr. Richard C. Slade has over 50 years of hydrogeologic experience in California, the last 36 of which have been as Owner, President and Principal Groundwater Geologist of Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC (RCS), Consulting Groundwater Geologists. Mr. Slade maintains licenses as a Registered Geologist and Certified Engineering Geologist in California. The RCS firm has eight full-time professional employees, including: • Two project -level senior hydrogeologists, Mr. Earl LaPensee and Mr. Anthony Hicke. Both are Professional Geologists and Certified Hydrogeologists in California. Mr. LaPensee has been with RCS since 1989, whereas Mr. Hicke has been with RCS since 2001. • Five staff/field-level geologists (Messrs. Chris Wick, Joe Amar, Sean Fulcher, Geza Demeter, and Edward Linden) to provide as -needed field and office support services on groundwater projects. These five men are also degreed geologists; Mr. Wick and Mr. Amar have been with RCS for approximately 10 years and 5 years, respectively, while Mr. Fulcher and Mr. Demeter started with the firm in 2017. Mr. Linden, who has a few years of groundwater experience, started working with RCS in 2019. Messrs. Wick, Amar, Fulcher, and Demeter are also licensed Professional Geologists. RCS' specific areas of hydrogeologic expertise and services include • evaluating downwell conditions in existing water wells; • reviewing video log surveys and other available data (such as historic water level and pumping data) for existing wells; • providing evaluations, cost estimates, Technical Specifications, and field monitoring services for the rehabilitation or destruction of existing wells; • preparing protocol for rehabilitation of existing wells; • conducting field monitoring during well rehabilitation; • groundwater resource development via siting, specifying, and designing of new water wells for both municipal -supply and agricultural -supply; • conducting detailed correlations of geophysical electric logs, as available from water wells, groundwater monitoring wells and oil wells, in order to help define the thickness, depth, and continuity of key potential aquifers in the subsurface; • preparing Technical Specifications and detailed line item bid sheets for the preliminary design and cost analysis of new wells and monitoring wells; • providing detailed geologic logs of drill cuttings generated during pilot hole drilling for new water wells and groundwater monitoring wells; 1-1 Request for Proposals to Provide �jt•� As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon �— • providing experienced geologists to field monitor the drilling, final design, construction and testing of new water wells and groundwater monitoring wells; • assessing groundwater quality; • groundwater basin management and water well feasibility studies; • conducting pumping tests and providing technical analyses of pumping test data • evaluating groundwater contamination • providing independent reviews of technical reports prepared by others; and • providing expert witness services in hydrogeology. • The following flow chart shows the current organization of the company with regard to its professional and field staff: OTHER PERTINENT ORGANIZATION DETAILS The overall manager will be Mr. Richard Slade, who will be the main point of contact for the firm. However, Mr. LaPensee and Mr. Hicke will also serve in their roles as additional project mangers for any City project. At times, Mr. Wick and Mr. Amar may also be deployed during certain tasks to provide additional day-to-day project support for your as -needed City projects. Because of the size of the company, any RCS staff assigned to any City project, will not be 1-2 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon substituted with other staff on a project. Once a Contract has been executed by the City, then RCS will inform the City in advance, should any RCS Staff need to be changed for any City project. All RCS employees are based out of our local Sherman Oaks office within the southern portion of the San Fernando Valley. The resumes of the key staff are provided in the Appendix and describe their respective qualifications, experience level, and work history with RCS, as well as with other prior firms. Currently, the workload of each individual is generally moderate to busy, but City can certainly be accomodated whenever a project is granted to RCS by City. It should be noted that the RCS employees act as a team and there may be more than one individual sharing the workload to bring a project to completion. Any of the key staff members may be located by telephoning the Sherman Oaks office at 818.506.0418. E-mail addresses for the key staff members are provided at the top of each resume. Our attached documents also specifically identify our prior groundwater projects directly for and within the City. 1-3 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon TYPICAL RCS HYDROGEOLOGIC SERVICES FOR MUNICIPAL -SUPPLY WATER WELLS The firm of Richard C. Slade and Associates LLC, Consulting Groundwater Geologists, has been retained by a large number of water agencies, cities, water districts and private water companies to develop their local groundwater resources; a number of these clients lie within the Central and West Coast basins. The types of services provided to these agencies have depended on the needs of the client but have tended to include such tasks as: New Wells Hydrogeologic Evaluation and Well Siting ■ Research of published geologic maps and reports; ■ Evaluate site geology and watershed conditions; ■ Evaluate surface and subsurface geologic conditions; ■ Identify groundwater flow directions; ■ Perform site reconnaissance visits; ■ Review driller's logs and casing records; ■ Evaluate and correlate electric logs from well to well; ■ Monitor water levels in wells; ■ Assess potential water quality problems; ■ Monitor field water quality parameters in existing wells; ■ Conduct pumping (aquifer) tests in wells; ■ Evaluate potential water level drawdown interference between pumping wells; ■ Review down -hole videos of wells; ■ Evaluate water quality in onsite and offsite wells; ■ Locate nearby offsite wells; ■ Determine feasibility of siting and constructing new water wells; ■ Determine the feasibility of rehabilitating or destroying existing wells; ■ Prepare preliminary design reports with conclusions and recommendations regarding feasibility of developing local groundwater supplies. ■ Prepare for and make verbal or written presentations to City Councils, County Planning Commissions and/or Boards of Supervisors Prepare Technical Specifications ■ identify the location and depth for new onsite wells; ■ assess site logistics for well construction; ■ determine drilling methodology; ■ evaluate conditions for discharge of fluids under NPDES permit regulations; ■ prepare detailed technical specifications and line item estimates of the probable cost for drilling and constructing new wells; ■ assist in bidding process. 1-4 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon Field Monitorina Services ■ geologically log drill cuttings from pilot hole; ■ evaluate the electric log of the pilot hole; ■ select depth zones and monitor aquifer zone isolation testing for water quality in selected aquifers ■ provide final recommendations for placement of all well casing, perforations, gravel pack and cement seals; ■ monitor installation of the recommended casing, gravel pack, and cement seal; ■ monitor well development by mechanical and pumping methods; ■ conduct pumping (aquifer) tests; ■ monitor water levels and utilize water level pressure transducers; ■ identify sampling/laboratory protocol for groundwater sampling; ■ monitor spinner log survey and depth discrete -sampling ■ determine water quality parameters to test for in the laboratory; ■ recommend pumping rate & depth setting for permanent pump; ■ provide a final report to document well construction & testing activities. Existing Wells Well Evaluation for Rehabilitation/Destruction ■ review driller's logs and previous well rehabilitation; ■ review and analysis of water level, water quality and operational pumping data; ■ view and assess downwell conditions via video surveys; ■ perform site visit to assess onsite conditions for well rehabilitation/destruction equipment ■ identify down -hole well problems and develop guidelines for rehabilitating existing wells; ■ prepare recommendations for well rehabilitation/destruction. Technical Specifications/Guidelines ■ determine preliminary well rehabilitation/destruction tasks and options; ■ evaluate conditions for discharge of fluids under NPDES permit regulations; ■ prepare detailed technical specifications and line item estimates of the probable cost for rehabilitation/destruction of wells; ■ assist in the bidding process. Field Monitoring Services ■ monitor/observe removal of pump; ■ perform sampling of scale/biofilm on pump column and casing and submit to laboratory for scale identifications and speciation of biological growth; 1-5 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon ■ observe downwell video surveys and evaluate; ■ recommend changes to preliminary well rehabilitation/destruction tasks based on video survey findings; ■ observe contractor operations during well rehabilitation/destruction; ■ prepare summary reports documenting well rehabilitation/destruction work on wells. 1-6 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeological Services to the City of Vernon SECTION 2 RCS PROPOSED GENERAL SCOPE OF SERVICES GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK It is understood that the City is seeking hydrogeological services as described in Section 3 of the RFP. The hydrogeological services that RCS can provide the City consist of the following: 1. Groundwater Studies and Models ■ Hydrogeological Assessments and Analyses 2. Water Supply Wells ■ Well Siting and specifications ■ Well operation modeling and scenario development ■ Design ■ Rehabilitation ■ Assessment ■ Construction/Project Inspection ■ Well development 3. Groundwater Consulting ■ Conjunctive use, storage, and recovery ■ Groundwater management programs ■ Water quality ■ Source Water Assessments 4. Groundwater Sustainability and Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Compliance ■ Groundwater sustainability Plans (GSP) ■ SGMA Compliance ■ Hydrogeological assessments and investigations ■ Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) Program Reports ■ Sustainable yield/perennial yield It is also understood by RCS, as described in the City's RFP, that the City's usage of on -call hydrogeological services is on an as -needed basis, such that if the demand is not there, then the services will not be requested. Also, it is further understood, as noted in the RFP, that for each on -call service request, the Consultant and the City shall agree upon the specific scope of work and cost for that service request and that the City has the right to retain other consulting firms at its sole discretion when the City believes there will be an economic or other significant advantage for doing so. Services for each City request shall be provided on a negotiated fee basis, per work order. No minimum amount of the work is guaranteed under the Agreement. 2-1 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon Compensation will be based on time and materials with a not -to -exceed limit agreed upon by both the Consultant and City before work begins. PROJECT DELIVERABLES The deliverables on each project will vary and is dependent upon the needs of the City at the time. Generally, such deliverables could consist of the following: o Technical Memoranda. Usually provided for well and hydrogeologic evaluations that are limited in scope and/or budget. o Preliminary Design Reports. Generally provided for water -supply wells, when a greater amount of detail is needed in an evaluation of hydrogeologic conditions, providing detailed analysis of hydrogeologic data and establishing the drilling, testing, pre -design, and development parameters for a well. o Technical Specifications. These are the actual construction documents that RCS will provide to the City for bidding purposes. These documents are necessary and essential for the City to obtain competitive bids on a project and offer construction protection for the City. Such documents are prepared by RCS for both well construction, rehabilitation and destruction of wells. o Summary Reports. Summary of Operations Reports are typically prepared by RCS for the express purpose of documenting and summarizing Contractor, City and Consultant activities during the construction, rehabilitation and/or destruction of a well or wells. These provide a permanent record to the City of the work conducted. o Groundwater Basin Reports. Such reports are comprehensive and provide all the data, interpretations and conclusions with specific regard to hydrogeological evaluations of a groundwater basin. It is envisioned that the City will likely not need such a document, as they encompass areas extending beyond City boundaries. Each of the above reports will be provided by RCS to the City in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). RCS will also provide paper copies of these documents to the City in amounts specified to be in each proposal. BUDGETING AND COST CONTROL METHODOLOGY RCS will provide the City will reasonable and realistic budgets for each project proposed upon, as requested by the City. If RCS is then selected as the successful consultant for any projects regarding hydrogeological evaluations, assessments and preparation of construction documents, RCS generally provides the City with a not -to -exceed fee, unless City staff requests additional out -of -scope work on such projects. However, for those projects involving monitoring of Contractor activities associated with the construction, rehabilitation and destruction of water -supply wells, such activities are outside the direct control of both RCS and/or the City and hence, there may be times where extra funds are expended that were not foreseen in the original budget prepared for the City prior to work. 2-2 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon Examples of this may be unusually slow drilling, drill or pump rig breakdowns, slow operations during actual construction, rehabilitation and/or destruction operations, delays in mobilizing to the site by the contractor, etc. In those circumstances, RCS will notify the City of the potential of any changes in its scope of services, resulting in increases in its personnel costs, and will provide additional costs to the City on the project or negotiate with the City to change its scope of services, if feasible, to help defray any increase in costs. 2-3 Richard C Slade PG, CEG Earl F. LaPensee PG, CHG PG, CHG PG, CEG, will serve as an overall project manager and lead for any groundwater projects. Mr, Slade is President and Principal Groundwater Geologist for Richard C. Slade & Associates LLC, Consulting Groundwater Geologist (RCS). RCS was founded by Mr. Slade in 1983 and the company has operated out of offices in the San Fernando Valley since that time. Mr. Slade has 50 years of groundwater experience in Southern California and has Hived and/or worked in the San Fernando Valley as a groundwater geologistfor his entire professional career. Mr. Slade has a 8S and an MS degree in Geology from UCLA and USC, respectively, and maintains a professional license in geology in California. Mr. Slade has either conducted and/or managed/supervised more than 700 groundwater projects in a large number of groundwater basins throughout California, including virtuaIIV every recognized groundwater basin in Southern California that has active water wells. In December 1008, RCS was selected by the Superior Court to be the Watermaster for the Upper Los Angeles River Area �ULARA). Earl LaPensee, PG, CHg, has been with RCS since 1989 and is a Senior Groundwater Geologist and Project Manager. Since that time, Mr. LaPensee has conducted a large number of diverse groundwater projects including; the siting, design, construction monitoring and aquifer testing of over 300 municipal -supply and irrigation water wells; analyses of aquifer systems in numerous groundwater basins (involvingthe definition of geologic/hydrogeelogicconditions, wafer level and wafer qualify culldi Hulls, groundwater underflow, calculation of groundwater in storage and changes in storage). A primary focus in these projects has been on the characterization of aquifer systems (determination of physicaIparameters such as trans missivity and storativity) and spatial delineation of natural groundwater chemistry (especially with regard to trace element concentrations) and conta minant che mistry, evaluation of water level trends over time, definition of groundwater flow directions, and the use and correlation of geophysical electric logs from water wells and oil wells to help define aquifer continuity and extent. Mr. LaPensee is very familar with the Dyetracer method and downwell, depth-speciric water quality sampling and will serve as a project manager, will oversee the work and conduct a review of the results and interpretation, Anthony Hicke, PG, CHg, began working with RCS in 2001, and is a Senior groundwater' Geologist and Project Manager with the company. While at RCS, Mr. Hicke has par LicipaLed in a number L)f basin -wide groundwater studies, in which Lasks have included: review and analysis of geologic references and extensive electronic geologic databases; analysis of long-term water level data and their relation to precipitation data; review and analysis of water quality data; pumping data analysis, including the analysis of rates and volumes; and performing groundwater in storage calculations. In addition to his hydrogeologic work, Mr. Hicke functions as the in-house information technology manager. For previous basin study projects, Mr. Hicke has managed an FTP- based repository for electronic data transfer, and managed multiple large databases of water level data, geologic data, and GIS data. Further, Mr. Hicke has many years' experience with the Mapinto GIS software package, and is skilled at creating maps using GIS software, and facilitating the exchange of GIS data with clients. Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeological Services to the City of Vernon SECTION 4 COMPANY EXPERIENCE & RECORD OF PAST PERFORMANCE RCS has already provided hydrogeological services to the City on other, past projects since 2008 and is continuing to provide such services to the City. As such, City staff is aware of our past performance and ability to conduct hydrogeological services. Nonetheless we herein provide details on the City projects, as well as other projects performed for other cities, and contact information are provided on separate sheets for each of these projects, in the Appendix. KEY PERSONNEL PARTICIPATION IN SIMILAR PROJECTS NAMES OF SIMILAR PROJECTS KEY PERSONNEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 Richard C. Slade Principal Project Manager Earl Project Project Project Project Project LaPensee Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager Anthony Project Hicke Manager NO. DESCRIPTION OF SIMILAR PROJECTS City of Vernon: RCS has provided hydrogeologic services to the City since 2007. These services generally consisted of initial well siting and design for proposed (at that time) Well No. 21; evaluations of selected City wells, 1 rehabilitation and testing of a few existing City wells, including Smurfit Well No. 9 (which was later renamed to Well No. 21). RCS has also provided services for the preliminary and final design of proposed City Well Nos. 22 and 23. Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency: Starting in 1987, RCS has provided continuous hydrogeological services to this agency and all its subdivision water purveyors with specific regard to groundwater basin analysis, perennial 2 yield studies, siting, construction, rehabilitation and destruction of shallow alluvial and deep aquifer system water -supply wells (both potable and agricultural use), and groundwater contamination studies. Currently, we are assisting the agency with the hydrogeologic portion of the sustainable groundwater management act (SGMA) program compliance. 4-1 Request for Proposals to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the City of Vernon City of South Gate: Since 2002 RCS has assisted the City in the preliminary design, bidding and construction of two City wells, Nos. 28 and 29. The most 3 recent well construction was Well No. 29 completed in 2016. Currently RCS is assisting the City with Well No. 30, which is currently in its initial feasibility, siting and design stages. City of Santa Fe Springs: Since 2005 RCS has performed a hydrogeologic evaluation of the area and the siting and preliminary design of several well sites. Currently RCS is involved with the packer testing, including time series 4 sampling, of an existing well to characterize the downwell flow regime and groundwater conditions in the well. The purpose of the testing is to determine if any of the perforated sections in the well can be isolated to produce groundwater without needing to treat specific constituents of concern (such as colored water). City of Beverly Hills Well Siting, Design & Construction Projects: Since 2007, RCS services for this City have involved characterizing the groundwater basin, evaluating sources of groundwater supplies for the City, siting and construction monitoring of potable water supply wells throughout 5 the City. Currently, RCS is performing a potable water -supply well design and construction project in the La Brea subarea in an unadjudicated northern portion of the Central Basin Groundwater Basin. Our prior/ongoing work involves the siting of new wells, preparing Preliminary Design reports and Technical Specifications, and technical oversight activities during the construction of new wells in the subarea. City of Santa Monica Well Siting, Design and Construction Projects: In 2011, RCS commenced the development of a conceptual groundwater model for the Santa Monica Groundwater Basin, the siting of potable water -supply wells 6 and completing the design and construction of two new water -supply wells and the destruction of an older existing well. Currently, RCS is still assisting the City with on -call services, which at this time, involves the design and eventual construction of two new additional wells, the rehabilitation of another well, and the destruction of one additional existing well. NOTE: See Appendix for individual information sheets providing the details and contact information on the above projects. 4-2 Statement of Qualifications to Provide As -Needed Professional Hydrogeologic Consulting Services to the ��— City of Vernon SECTION 5 FEES & COSTS RCS is unable to provide exact costs for the outlined RFP Scope of Services, because of many unknown related to the extent, duration and capacity of the different work tasks. However, such costs would be provided to the City for each project when specific work tasks have been identified. Nonetheless, RCS is providing its current Fee Schedule under separate cover, as directed by the City under Section 5, Item G on page 7 of the RFP. Note that our current Schedule of Charges is dated November 2018 and is subject to change once in November of each year. 5-1 .f APPENDIX KEY STAFF RESUMES PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Major fields of hydrogeologic emphasis for Mr. Slade include groundwater resource development (basin -wide studies, and water well design and construction), and aquifer analysis. Principal projects have involved, evaluations of entire groundwater basins, aquifer test analyses, assessment of water quality problems and groundwater degradation, design of water wells for municipal supply, well rehabilitation assessments, monitoring of all phases of water well construction, locating and designing groundwater monitoring networks, and providing expert witness testimony for groundwater litigation. Considerable work has also been performed for numerous vineyards and wineries in both the Central Coast and Northern California regions; types of work have included feasibility studies for determining final locations for new wells, designing new wells, monitoring of the construction of new wells, working with drilling contractors, evaluating down -hole problems (such as sanding) in existing wells, and developing protocol for water well rehabilitation. Hydrogeologic studies have also involved evaluation of hazardous wastes such as acid mine drainage, leachate from sanitary landfills, and groundwater degradation resulting from leaking underground storage tanks HIGHLIGHTS containing various chemicals and organic compounds. Numerous groundwater studies and monitoring projects have involved volatile organics (TCE, PCE, etc.) and subsurface gasoline spills. Hydrogeologic assessments and definition of appropriate mitigation measures for environmental impact analyses have been provided also. Important to Mr. Slade's broad background is the experience gained while being a participant with other geologists on international geologic study tours to Europe, Iceland and Scandinavia, the former Soviet Union, South America, the People's Republic of China, Africa, New Zealand and Australia. Local groundwater and surface water features, large faults and landslides, mines, and oilfields were visited in these countries. In December 2008, based on the recommendation of the Administrative Committee (the water managers for the cities of Burbank, Glendale, Los Angeles and San Fernando, and the Crescenta Valley Water City), the Superior Court of Los Angeles County selected Mr. Slade as the new Watermaster for the entire Upper Los Angeles River Area (ULARA). Mr. Slade represents only the third Watermaster of ULARA since the date of the original adjudication of the region in January 1979. EXPERIENCE HISTORY RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC, CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS. Independent consulting practice established in 1983 to provide technical, professional, and direct personal services to the groundwater industry. Hydrogeologic projects have included groundwater resource development; locating and designing water wells; assessing potential degradation resulting from hazardous waste sites and sanitary landfills; conducting water level and water quality monitoring from monitoring networks; defining aquifer characteristics from long-term aquifer tests in active wells; observation and monitoring of water well construction; providing expert witness testimony for a variety of groundwater cases; and providing hydrogeologic elements and mitigation measures for environmental assessments. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 1970-1983. Joined the firm in 1970 as an engineering geologist and hydrogeologist. Advanced to Associate in 1975. Participated in and supervised geotechnical and hydrogeologic projects of various complexities, from the feasibility level through final design. His investigation and reports have analyzed faults and seismicity, earth materials, and groundwater problems for such facilities as dams, reservoirs, treatment plants, tunnels, industrial and residential buildings, sanitary landfills and groundwater basins. Major experience has involved field mapping, logging of bore holes, monitoring of groundwater observation holes, data analyses, and report writing. Since 1972, Mr. Slade was the responsible hydrogeologist for several major groundwater basin projects including locating and designing of new wells and well redevelopments, calculations of groundwater in storage, determination of aquifer parameters, and evaluation of dewatering criteria. Several studies utilized emplacement of deep exploratory drill holes, analyses of geologic and geophysical data, and monitoring and analyses of groundwater levels, quality and pollution, and assessment of leachate and gases at existing landfills. In addition, he conducted and supervised groundwater pollution studies and evaluation of several active and proposed sanitary landfill sites; he has supervised geologic and hydrogeologic studies for the evaluation and abatement of acid mine drainage from a large, inactive sulfur mine; and he has participated in assessing groundwater, geologic, and geotechnical parameters which affect sewer infiltration and inflow. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles, 1967-1970. Performed hydrologic and hydrogeologic studies along pipeline and tunnel routes for State Water Project, conducted field mapping and exploration along tunnel routes, conducted and supervised aquifer tests for calculations of dewatering parameters for tunnel routes and dam sites. Served as Resident Geologist in charge of tunnel mapping and tunnel conditions for the Newhall and Castaic tunnels, excavated by tunnel boring machines. EARL F. LAPENSEE, SENIOR GROUNDWATER GEOLO� PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. LaPensee has been a Groundwater Geologist/Hydrogeologist with the firm since 1989. Major projects while with the firm have included the hydrogeologic assessment and analysis of groundwater basins in southern and northern California and the exploration for and development of groundwater in those basins. Mr. LaPensee's current focus has been on projects involving the development of groundwater in southern California groundwater basins encompassing the siting, design and technical oversight of construction for municipal- and irrigation -supply water wells. In addition, Mr. LaPensee has also provided technical oversight in the siting, design and testing of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells and groundwater monitoring wells for hazardous waste sites. To perform an analysis of groundwater basins and hazardous waste sites, Mr. LaPensee uses several data elements in the evaluation process such as: • Geology and hydrogeology. • Water -level and water -quality data. • Driller's logs of wells. HIGHLIGHTS • Surface geophysical surveys (when deemed appropriate). • Downhole geophysical surveys (electric logs) and electric log correlation of aquifer systems. • Downhole flowmeter (spinner) surveys. These elements are synthesized in groundwater projects to aid in the selection of suitable well sites and test drilling methods; determine depths of well drilling; outline types of testing to be performed in test hole drilling; select suitable types of well casing and other well construction materials; outline appropriate mechanical, chemical, and pumping development methods; define aquifer testing protocol; formulate groundwater sampling methods using accepted protocol for such contaminants as hydrocarbons, metals, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and; estimate key aquifer parameters and production capabilities based on the resulting drilling and testing data EXPERIENCE HISTORY RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC, CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS, August 1989 to present. Employment position is of Senior Groundwater Geologist with major responsibilities as a project manager directed towards groundwater evaluation, exploration, and development projects. The areas of responsibilities in these projects encompass: preparation of proposals and cost estimates for various types of hydrogeologic projects; preparation of technical specifications for new well projects and well rehabilitation; providing technical and administrative oversight of well drilling and rehabilitation, construction, development, and testing activities on well projects, and; the preparation and completion of final project reports. APPLIED GEOSYSTEMS, 1988 to 1989, Project Geologist. Responsibilities encompassed the overview and management of commercial hazardous waste site investigations, including the installation of vadose-zone and groundwater monitoring wells, aquifer testing, and computer manipulation and modeling of aquifer test data. ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 1987 to 1988. Associate Geologist. Responsibilities encompassed the assessment and investigation of Federal and California Superfund sites (soil and groundwater), including the installation of groundwater monitoring wells, aquifer testing, geophysical surveying (utilizing ground penetrating radar, electro-magnetic, and resistivity methods), and computer modeling of geophysical data. McKESSON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, 1986 to 1987. Staff Hydrogeologist. Responsibilities encompassed site assessment and investigation (soil and groundwater) of commercial and industrial hazardous waste sites. This included the installation of vadose-zone and groundwater monitoring wells, aquifer testing, and computer processing of geophysical data. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Major areas of groundwater work for Mr. Hicke while an employee at Richard C. Slade & Associates, LLC, HIGHLIGHTS include project management for numerous groundwater development projects, including well construction projects, groundwater basin evaluations, creation ofEducation hydrogeologic conceptual models, and aquifer testing University of California, Los studies throughout California. In addition, Mr. Hicke Angeles. B.S., Geology serves as the lead geologist during the creation, • " "' management and utilization of large electronic Registration/Certification databases of subsurface geologic data for use in Certified . •logist • preparing Hydrogeologic Evaluations of California Professional Geologist, State Groundwater basins, and calculation of estimates of of California, 2006, underflow and groundwater in storage for those basins. Mr. Hicke is also project manager overseeing preparation of groundwater availability studies for various agricultural clients, as well as the preparation of technical documents intended to support the creation of Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs). Mr. Hicke has many years' experience using the Mapinfo GIS software package to create maps from these data sets, for use in the Hydrogeologic Evaluations. Mr. Hicke also provides technical and administrative oversight during well construction and aquifer testing projects. Since Mr. Richard Slade's appointment as the Upper Los Angeles River Area Watermaster in December 2008, Mr. Hicke has performed the duties of the Assistant ULARA Watermaster. Mr. Hicke helps to collect and analyze data for the various annual reports and review documents prepared by the Watermaster. EXPERIENCE HISTORY RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC, CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS. October 2001 to present. Duties include: project management and technical analysis for the creation of a hydrogeologic conceptual model for a southern California coastal groundwater basin; estimation and calculation of various hydrogeologic aspects of groundwater basins to support the creation of groundwater budgets, including groundwater in storage, and inflow/outflow of groundwater; management during multi -well design and construction projects in the Central Valley and High Desert areas of California; field monitoring of all elements of the drilling and construction of municipal -supply and irrigation -supply water wells; providing technical and administrative oversight of well drilling, construction, development, and testing activities on production well and monitoring well projects; geologic logging of numerous boreholes in the High Desert areas of southern California, including the pilot boreholes for both production and monitoring wells; field monitoring of water quality and water level data during construction and testing of new water wells; planning and administration of long term aquifer tests, including the utilization of pressure transducers in a variety of hydrogeologic settings; preparation of hydrogeologic feasibility reports for sites throughout California; computer analyses of data and considerable computer work on map and data presentation using a Geographic Information System (GIS). Other significant responsibilities include: collection and analyses of basic groundwater data; computerized analyses of data; computerized mapping and graphics work; and troubleshooting problems with computers and/or with field water level/water quality monitoring equipment. RALPH STONE AND COMPANY, INC., April 2000 to October 2001. Employment position was as a Staff Geologist with responsibilities that included organization of site investigations, geologic logging of boreholes, data collection, preparing maps and cross sections, and lab testing of soil. Prior work includes numerous seismic hazard (seismically induced landslide and liquefaction) analyses for homes in the Santa Monica Mountains, as well as the cities of Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Culver City, Malibu, and Santa Monica. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS WATER -SUPPLY WELL EVALUATIONS, TESTING AND DESIGNS CITY OF VERNON, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA 2007 TO PRESENT RCS has provided hydrogeological services to the City with regard to well designs and evaluations, testing of existing wells Key Project Work and preparation of bidding documents for the construction of new • Developed preliminary and wells. final designs for Well No. 21. In 2007, RCS conducted evaluation and design services for then • Performed downwell flow City Well No. 21. However, this well was not constructed and profiling and depth specific instead the City decided to evaluate and test Smurfit Well Nos. 9 sampling of existing Smurfit and 10. Downhole flow profiling and depth specific sampling was Well Nos. 9 & 10. performed in each well and it was found that Smurfit Well No. 9 • Conducted packer testing of would serve as a candidate for the City to acquire that well. Smurfit Well No. 9. This well Subsequent packer testing of the well revealed that the well could later renamed Well No. 21 serve as a potable water supply with a permanent packer installed • Prepared a Preliminary at a depth that would isolate the upper perforation intervals. The Design Report and Technical City acquired the well and later renamed it Well No. 21. Specifications for Well Nos. 22 and 23. In addition, RCS has performed additional evaluations and assisted in the limited rehabilitation for existing City Wells, namely Project Manager: Richard Slade Well Nos. 5, 11 and 17. Currently, RCS is assisting the City in the Key Staff: Earl LaPensee final design of proposed Well Nos. 22 and 23, which are Reference: scheduled to be constructed at some future date. Joanna Moreno City Engineer City of Vernon (323) 583-8811 VARIOUS & CONTINUING HYDROGEOLOGICAL SERVICES SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER AGENCY (SCVWA) LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA 1987 TO PRESENT Starting in 1987, RCS commenced hydrogeological services with a complete evaluation of the hydrogeology and groundwater Key Project Work resources of the entire Santa Clara River Valley Groundwater • Developed initial conceptual Basin, including an initial perennial yield study. This work model of the entire culminated in an extensive document describing in detail the groundwater basin, through hydrogeologic conditions of the basin. available E-logs of both water wells and oil wells. This original work involved providing a detailed conceptual model . Conducted the first of subsurface hydrogeologic conditions in the groundwater basin, perennial yield study of the and extensively documented the: locations of known water wells; groundwater basin. definition of groundwater flow directions and current water quality; identifying the base of fresh water; calculating groundwater in Selected sites for future storage; defining aquifer parameters; evaluating water levels vs wells trends in historic rainfall; and preparing several cross sections Prepared Technical using detailed correlations of E-logs from several water wells and Specifications for a new numerous oil wells. A perennial yield study (now termed wells, and sustainable yield) was also performed to determine the future rehabilitation/destruction of availability of groundwater supplies for the City. existing wells. Following the initial hydrogeologic characterization of the ' Monitored the construction, groundwater basins, RCS performed numerous well siting, rehabilitation and destruction of wells. construction, destruction and rehabilitation project within the Santa Clarita Valley. In addition, our ongoing services to SCVWA Project Manager: Richard Slade consist of providing support to the agency with regard to the Key Staff: Earl LaPensee, California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring Anthony Hicke (GASGEM) system. Further, we are also engaged with tasks Reference: related to Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Steve Cole support, in conjunction with other firms, as part of a team effort. Assistant General Manager Currently, RCS is in the initial design stages of two deep (3,000- Santa Clarita Valley Water foot) water supply wells, in which are services will consist of a Agency preliminary design report, preparation of technical specifications (661) 259-2737 and monitoring the drilling and construction of these two wells. scole@scvwa.org Anticipated date of completion for the project is in 2020. WELL FEASIBILITY, SITING & CONSTRUCTIONS CITY OF SOUTH GATE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA 2002 TO PRESENT Key Project Work Since 2002, RCS has assisted the City in the siting, preliminary design and construction of two City Wells, Nos. • Evaluated water levels and 28 and 29. In each of these projects, RCS reviewed groundwater flow directions, available and analyzed historic data on hydrogeologic and water quality in the area conditions, well construction, water levels and groundwater of the sites. quality in an evaluation of each of the two well sites for a • Sites generally located municipal -supply water well. Currently, RCS is assisting the proximal to hazardous waste City is the feasibility, siting and preliminary design of sites. proposed Well No. 30. • Provided preliminary well design recommendations, and assisted City in bidding process. • Need for deep cement seals to mitigate pollutants from entering the well was established in the preliminary design stages. • No deleterious substances detected in final wellblend samples. Project Manager: Richard C. Slade Key Staff: Earl LaPensee, Chris Wick. Reference: Ana Ananda City Engineer City of South Gate 323-357-9657 aananda@sogate.org RCS prepared preliminary design reports and assisted the City in the preparation of Technical Specifications and bidding documents. Each of the two completed wells were constructed to depths of 1,100 ft capable of pumping rates of 2,500 gpm. Key to the siting of these wells was their proximity to hazardous waste sites and the need for deep cement seals during construction to mitigate/exclude potential contaminants from entering the wells. Resulting analysis of the final wellblend groundwater samples from each of the two constructed wells revealed that no contaminants of concern were detected, and the water could be served for potable purposes without treatment. J WELL FEASIBILITY & SITING STUDY CITY OF SANTA FE SPRINGS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA 2016 TO PRESENT Key Project Work • Evaluated water levels and groundwater flow directions, and water quality in the area of the sites. • Performed capture zone modeling/analysis at each site at the targeted pre -design pumping rates. • Recommended a site which exhibited the least impact on a nearby contaminant plume. • Provided preliminary drilling depths and well design recommendations. Project Manager: Richard C. Slade Key Staff: Earl LaPensee, Chris Wick. Reference Al Fuentes Program Manager City of Santa Fe Springs (562) 868-0511 alfuentes@santafesprings.org On -going work includes downwell profiling and packer testing of an existing City well to determine the zones from which water of non - potable quality is entering the well. The City of Santa Fe Springs lies with the Central Groundwater Basin. In 2016, the City was seeking to expand its production capabilities with the siting and design of a new municipal -supply water well. A total of three City - selected well sites were evaluated to determine their hydrogeologic feasibility for this new well. RCS reviewed available and analyzed historic data on hydrogeologic conditions, well construction, water levels and groundwater quality in an evaluation of each of the three sites feasibility to support a municipal -supply water well. Key to this study was the potential impact of a nearby major contaminant plume on a new well. Capture zone modeling was used to determine if pumping at target design rates at any of the sites would have any impact on this contaminant plume. Preliminary locations and drilling depths for new City wells were also identified. Based on the recommendations of RCS, the City selected a potential well site that was shown, by capture zone analysis, to have the least potential impact on the contaminant plume, during future pumping of the well. FINAL UPDATED DRAFT, GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, HOLLYWOOD GROUNDWATER BASIN, CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA. 2010-2011; OTHER BASINWIDE PROJECTS IN PROGRESS Basic purposes of this study, conducted in 2010-2011, were Key Project Work to define the hydrogeologic framework of the Hollywood Reviewed City's and RCS's in-house Groundwater Basin and to assess the physical and databases of driller's logs in the operational conditions of the City's existing wells, Nos. 2, 3, 4, Hollywood Basin and in north part of 5 and 6. the Central Groundwater Basin. RCS reviewed geologic data, driller's logs of all current and historic City wells, water level records and water quality data, and correlated geophysical data (E-logs) to help define hydrogeologic conditions in the Hollywood Groundwater Basin and into the Central Basin to the south. RCS incorporated its local and long-term knowledge from prior work involving subsurface hydrogeologic conditions throughout the Hollywood and Central Basin areas. The main thrust of the study was the preparation of a detailed Groundwater Management Plan (GMP) for the Hollywood Groundwater Basin. This GMP addressed a number of hydrogeologic conditions within the Hollywood Basin, including: defining the extent and thickness of aquifer systems; assessing basin -wide water level changes and water quality conditions; evaluating the hydraulic properties of the aquifer systems; and providing recommendations for groundwater monitoring. RCS also conducted an evaluation of the physical condition of the City's existing water -supply wells, performed an assessment of shallow aquifer systems underlying the City for the siting of shallow water -supply wells, and carried out a preliminary well design and test hole drilling program for a proposed new well. Basin Boundaries & La Brea Subarea • Provided detailed and independent geologic analyses and correlation of available E-logs of water wells, City - owned monitoring wells, and oil/gas wells. • Developed groundwater contour maps and provided spatial analysis of water quality data and pumping data • Developed a hydrogeologic conceptual model of the groundwater basin. • Prepare Groundwater Management Plan Project Manager: Richard Slade Key Staff: Anthony Hicke, Earl LaPensee Reference: Vincent Chee City of Beverly Hills (310) 285-2521 Email: vchee@beverlyhills.org --- -- o«mo o 7—r 1 5 -----, ' �-�' ONGOING CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SHALLOW GROUNDWATER AQUIFER SYSTEM, CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA. 2007-2017 Beginning in 2007 and extending into 2017, RCS performed a characterization of the shallow groundwater aquifer systems with the object of allowing the City to eventually utilize this source as a potential supply for groundwater, because this shallow groundwater is separate from that being extracted on a regular basis by the City's deep water wells. Our studies initially started with a review of local subterranean garage dewatering sumps and determining amount of flows and potentially water quality Key Project Work conditions, as available through the LARWQCB's NPDES program. • Reviewed and visited 17 subterranean dewatering sites and one natural Based on review of nearby dewatering sumps in subterranean garages at 331 and 407 Maple Dr and after observing and sampling the groundwater flowing into these sumps, it was determined that the shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the City's Maple Yard might be a suitable location for new shallow water -supply wells for the City. These wells would derive their supply primarily from the shallow aquifer system(s) to a depth of 200 ft and, thus, this potential supply would not impact the groundwater supplies available to the City's existing deep wells. Consequently, RCS prepared both a Preliminary Design Memorandum and developed a set of Technical Specifications for the construction of two new shallow wells. Construction of the two shallow wells commenced in December 2015 with the drilling and installation of their respective conductor casings. Initial data indicate that groundwater was encountered at a depth of 42 to 48 ft. Actual drilling, construction, development and testing of the well at each site began in January 2016, and was completed later that year. spring site. • Measured/calculated average flow rates at each site to initially determine if the sites were potential candidates as a possible water -supply source. • Two sites (331 and 407 Maple Dr) had flow rates of 100 to 300 gpm. • Sampled the two sites for California Title 22 water quality constituents. Results indicated that the groundwater could be potable, with treatment. Construction of two new shallow water -supply wells, completed in 2016. Project Manager: Richard Slade Key Staff: Anthony Hicke, Earl LaPensee Reference: Vincent Chee ROBERTSON CORPORATE YARD TEST HOLE DRILLING FOR THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS IN WEST HOLLYWOOD, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA (2009) Between 2008 and 2010, RCS performed a Phase 1 evaluation of the hydrogeologic conditions in and around the City's Robertson Corporate Yard, followed by a Phase 2 study consisting of the drilling and down -hole testing of an exploratory test hole at this City -owned site. The purpose of this work was to evaluate potential water quality and quantity for a possible new well at this property. RCS initially reviewed geologic data, driller's logs of all existing and historic City wells, water level records and water quality data, and correlated geophysical data (E-logs) of City wells and wildcat oil/gas wells during its Phase 1 effort in order determine site -specific hydrogeologic conditions beneath the Corporate Yard. ah Key Project Work • Provided detailed hydrogeologic analyses of the site showing the feasibility of constructing a well at the site. Drilled a test hole to a depth of 850 ft and conducted isolated aquifer zone testing at five specific depths in the test hole. Results of isolated aquifer zone testing revealed higher TDS concentrations at depth. • RCS subsequently recommended the Based on RCS' evaluation, it was considered construction of a well at the site to a hydrogeologically feasible, although somewhat risky, to depth of 520 ft capable of producing construct a well at the site. Consequently, RCS up to 500 gpm, with TDS ranging recommended the drilling of an exploratory test hole to between 500 and 700 mg/L. better define site -specific hydrogeologic conditions. Drilling and subsequent isolated aquifer zone testing of the test hole Project Manager: Anthony Hicke to a depth of 850 ft revealed a potential pumping rate of up Key Staff: Richard Slade, Earl LaPensee to 500 gpm, with high concentrations of total dissolved Reference: solids (TDS) between 490 and 1,800 milligrams per Liter Vincent Chee (mg/L), and even hydrogen sulfide. Based on the results of Current Consultant to City testing, it was recommended that a well could be (310) 285-2521 constructed at the site to a shallower depth (approximately 520 ft) that could produce groundwater with a TDS ranging from only 500 to 700 mg/L. �000®0® ®®a®00® ��0aaaaa •rrrnrr-��•: CONCEPTUAL GROUNDWATER BASIN MODEL AND ASSESSMENT OF AVAILABLE GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES, SANTA MONICA GROUNDWATER BASIN CITY OF SANTA MONICA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA 2011 TO PRESENT Key Project Work The City of Santa Monica overlies the Santa Monica Groundwater Basin (SMGB) which is composed of five • Developed conceptual subbasins; namely the Arcadia, Olympic, Coastal, Charnock, model 5 groundwater and Crestal subbasins. In the past few years, the City subbasins within SMGB, developed a stated goal of achieving self-sufficiency from including E-log correlations imported water supplies by 2020. To help achieve this goal, • Prepared a Sustainable Yield the City retained RCS to begin the process of developing an Study to determine the aggressive well site evaluation and well construction program. basin capacity for future The goal is to increase its current groundwater production water supplies. capacity from 9 to 13 MGD by 2020. • Prepared Technical Specifications for a new The initial RCS project involved providing a detailed well; log cuttings, provide conceptual model of subsurface hydrogeologic conditions in final design, monitor each groundwater subbasin, including: locations of known construction and testing; water wells; definition of groundwater flow directions and • Selected sites for future current water quality; identifying the base of fresh water; wells calculating groundwater in storage; defining aquifer parameters; evaluating water levels vs trends in historic Project Manager: Earl LaPensee rainfall; and preparing several cross sections using detailed Key staff: Anthony Hicke, Chris correlations of E-logs from several water wells and numerous Wick, Richard Slade oil wells. Preliminary locations and drilling depths for new City Reference: wells were also identified. A sustainable (perennial) yield Chris Aquillon study was also performed to determine the future availability Water Resources Engineer of groundwater supplies for the City. Additional work included City of Santa Monica preparation of Technical Specifications and Line Item Bid (310) 458-8235 Sheets for a new City well. RCS geologists were present in Chris.Aquillon@smgov.net the field to: log the drill cuttings; evaluate the new E-logs; conduct isolated aquifer zone testing; prepare the Final design of the well for the City; and monitor well construction development and testing of the new well. Building on our previous work, the ongoing RCS services for the next several years will include: preparing a groundwater monitoring program for the Santa Monica Basin; helping to provide strategies for a sustainable groundwater management plan; selecting and finalizing locations for several new City wells in the basin; monitoring the drilling, construction, development and testing of each new well; conducting an updated evaluation of the perennial yield of each subbasin; continuing to update our conceptual hydrogeologic model of each subbasin, if/as needed, based on newly -generated subsurface data; and helping to verify that the City maintains compliance with new groundwater legislation like CASGEM and SGNIA. EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE 20 0 RICHARD C. SLADE & ASSOCIATES LLC CONSULTING GROUNDWATER GEOLOGISTS SCHEDULE OF CHARGES November 2018 Professional Services Principal Groundwater Geologist Senior Groundwater Geologist Staff Groundwater Geologist Field Groundwater Geologist Clerical Field Equipment Charges Pressure Transducers (water level & barometric pressure monitoring during pumping tests) Electric Tape Water Level Probe Field Water Quality Probe (T, pH, EC) Hourly Rates Litigation, Depositions and Testimony $290.00 $240.00 $178.00 $125.00 $ 94.00 $ 50.00/wk $ 25.00/day $ 50.00/day Depositions and trial testimony are charged at twice the hourly rate (4-hour minimum/day). Travel Time and Mileage Travel time for meetings and/or to job sites will be charged at our standard hourly rates. Mileage is charged at the current IRS rate. Administrative Fee In-house costs for phone, e-mail, fax, regular postage, printing, copying, binding, and records retention, unless otherwise provided for in our project proposal Scope of Services. Administrative Fee = total project labor charges multiplied by 2.5%. Outside Services All services not ordinarily furnished by RCS, including subcontracted services (i.e., water quality laboratory testing), delivery services, reproduction and printing, etc, are billed at cost + 15%. Reproduction costs for large format printing, and/or high volume reproduction and binding of hard copy reports performed in-house by RCS staff, will be billed at rates similar to comparable outside services. Conditions RCS reserves the right to update this Schedule of Charges on January 1 of each year (the beginning of our Fiscal Year). Invoices are issued at our option on a monthly basis or when the work is completed. A service charge of 1'/2% will be payable on any amount not paid within 30 days. Any attorney fees or other costs incurred in collecting delinquent charges shall be paid by the client. Client will furnish rights -of -way to land as required for field visits and field operations, such as sampling or testing of water wells. 14051 BURBANK BLVD., SUITE 300, SHERMAN OAKS, CALIFORNIA 91401 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: (818) 506-0418 • NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: (707) 963-3914 W W W.RCSLADE. COM EXHIBIT D LIVING WAGE PROVISIONS Minimum Living Wages: A requirement that Employers pay qualifying employees a wage of no less than $10.30 per hour with health benefits, or $11.55 per hour without health benefits. Paid and Unpaid Days Off: Employers provide qualifying employees at least twelve compensated days off per year for sick leave, vacation, or personal necessity, and an additional ten days a year of uncompensated time for sick leave. No Retaliation: A prohibition on employer retaliation against employees complaining to the City with regard to the employer's compliance with the living wage ordinance. Employees may bring an action in Superior Court against an employer for back pay, treble damages for willful violations, and attorney's fees, or to compel City officials to terminate the service contract of violating employers. 21 EXHIBIT E EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PRACTICES PROVISIONS A. Contractor certifies and represents that, during the performance of this Agreement, the contractor and each subcontractor shall adhere to equal opportunity employment practices to assure that applicants and employees are treated equally and are not discriminated against because of their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex, or age. Contractor further certifies that it will not maintain any segregated facilities. B. Contractor agrees that it shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for applicants for employment placed by or on behalf of Contractor, state that it is an "Equal Opportunity Employer" or that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, handicap, sex or age. C. Contractor agrees that it shall, if requested to do so by the City, certify that it has not, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminated against applicants or employees because of their membership in a protected class. D. Contractor agrees to provide the City with access to, and, if requested to do so by City, through its awarding authority, provide copies of all of its records pertaining or relating to its employment practices, except to the extent such records or portions of such records are confidential or privileged under state or federal law. E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed in any manner as to require or permit any act which is prohibited by law. 22