Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
20240917 Regular City Council Meeting - Packet
Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 17, 2024 Page 1 of 6 Agenda City of Vernon Regular City Council Meeting Tuesday, September 17, 2024, 9:00 AM City Hall, Council Chamber 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California Judith Merlo, Mayor Melissa Ybarra, Mayor Pro Tem Leticia Lopez, Council Member Jesus Rivera, Council Member Crystal Larios, Council Member The public is encouraged to view the agenda and meeting at CityofVernon.org/publicmeetings. You may address the Council in the Council Chambers, via mail or email to PublicComment@cityofvernonca.gov, include the meeting date and item number in the subject line (mail and/or email must be received at least two hours prior to the start of the meeting). CALL TO ORDER FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT At this time the public is encouraged to address the City Council on any matter that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The public will also be given a chance to comment on matters which are on the posted agenda during City Council deliberation on those specific matters. PRESENTATIONS 1. Employee Service Pin Awards Recommendation: Recognize July and August 2024 Employee Service Pin Award recipients. 2. Proclamation Recognizing Retiring Employee - Michael A. Earl Recommendation: Acknowledge and present a proclamation to retiring employee Michael A. Earl, Director of Human Resources, in recognition of his dedicated service to the City of Vernon. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 17, 2024 Page 2 of 6 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are to be approved with one motion. Items may be removed from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration. Removed items will be considered immediately following the Consent Calendar. 3. Meeting Minutes Recommendation: Approve the August 20, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes. 4. Claims Against the City Recommendation: Receive and file the claim submitted by Art Marachelian. 5. Operating Account Warrant Register Recommendation: Approve Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135, for the period of July 21, 2024 through August 17, 2024, totaling $20,174,890.73 and consisting of ratification of electronic payments totaling $19,337,258.45 and ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $837,632.28. 6. Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register Recommendation: Approve Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69, for the period of December 31, 2023 through August 17, 2024 and consisting of ratification of electronic payments totaling $5,000. 7. Fire Department Activity Report Recommendation: Receive and file the July 2024 Fire Department Activity Report. 8. Police Department Activity Report Recommendation: Receive and file the July 2024 Police Department Activity Report. 9. Public Works Department Monthly Report Recommendation: Receive and file the July 2024 Building Report. 10. Report on Vehicle Purchase Approved by the City Administrator Recommendation: Receive and file report on City Administrator approved vehicle purchase of one 2025 Ford Explorer ST from South Bay Ford for a total amount of $64,131.59. 11. Amendment No. 3 to Services Agreement with Granicus, LLC (Contract No. IT-0181) Recommendation: A. Find that the best interests of the City are served by the direct award of an extension of the Services Agreement with Granicus, LLC without a competitive process pursuant to Vernon Municipal Code Section 3.32.110 (B)(2) and (3), as it would not be cost-effective to consider a transition to a new agenda management software; and Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 17, 2024 Page 3 of 6 B. Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Services Agreement with Granicus, LLC, in substantially the same form as submitted, for agenda automation, meeting management, video streaming, and Laserfiche integration for a total amount not-to-exceed $22,058.83, for a one-year term. 12. Amendment No. 2 to the Attorney Services Agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP for Specialized Outside Legal Services Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Attorney Services Agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP (Burke Williams), in substantially the same form as submitted, to increase the total not-to-exceed amount by an additional $125,000. 13. Order Form and Services Agreement with Governmentjobs.com, Inc. (DBA “NEOGOV”) Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute a NEOGOV Order Form for the purchase of Insight Enterprise Subscription, Candidate Text Messaging, Governmentjobs.com Subscription, and Perform Subscription for a three-year term at a total cost not-to-exceed $81,170.85, subject to the terms of the NEOGOV Services Agreement. 14. Conflict of Interest Code (Statement of Economic Interests) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-019 amending the City of Vernon Conflict of Interest Code and repealing Resolution No. 2024-01. 15. Agreement with the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority (SEAACA) for Animal Control Services Recommendation: A. Find that it is commercially unreasonable to rebid the proposed agreement with SEAACA every three years as SEAACA is a public agency providing animal control services in the Southeast area; and B. Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute an Agreement with SEAACA, in substantially the same form as submitted, for animal control services for a total amount not-to-exceed $150,000, for a 5-year term. 16. 2025 Calendar Year Medical, Dental, Vision, Life, and Employee Assistance Program Benefit Proposals for City Employees and Retirees Recommendation: Approve the acceptance of the 2025 Calendar Year Medical, Dental, Vision, Life, and Employee Assistance program proposals and authorize the City Administrator to execute 2025 calendar year carrier agreements with Blue Shield of California, Anthem, MetLife, EyeMed, Lincoln Financial, and Anthem PRISM EAP. 17. Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) for Safe, Clean Water Program Funds (Measure W) Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute a Transfer Agreement between the City of Vernon and the District, in substantially the same form as submitted, to receive Measure W funds for a 4-year term. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 17, 2024 Page 4 of 6 18. Addendum No. 1 to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Grant Program Agreement with AltaMed Health Services Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Addendum No. 1 to the SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement with AltaMed Health Services, in substantially the same form as submitted, to incorporate the City's insurance requirements. 19. Purchase Contract with D&R Office Works, Inc. for Furniture and Workspace Storage Recommendation: A. Approve the issuance of a Purchase Contract with D&R Office Works, Inc. (D&R) for the purchase of furniture items and workspace storage for the Police Department, for a total amount not-to-exceed $17,197; and B. Authorize a contingency amount of eight percent (8%) or $1,376 for unforeseen price increases or substitutions due to inventory availability, and grant authority to the City Administrator to issue Change Orders for an amount up to the contingency amount, if necessary. 20. I-710 South Corridor Status Update Recommendation: Receive and file the report on the I-710 South Corridor Project. 21. Encumbering Funds for City Contract No. 20240038, City Hall Roof Replacement Recommendation: Authorize the Finance Department to encumber $121,900 from Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 to FY 2024-25 for City Contract No. 20240038 City Hall Roof Replacement with Southland Roofing Inc. NEW BUSINESS 22. League of California Cities 2024 Annual Conference Voting Delegate and Alternate Recommendation: Appoint a voting delegate and alternate to represent the City of Vernon at the General Assembly, convening during the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, scheduled October 16-18, 2024 in Long Beach, CA. 23. Appointment of Gigi Decavalles-Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-020 affirming the appointment of Gigi Decavalles-Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer of the City of Vernon and approving and ratifying the execution of a related temporary at-will employment agreement. ORAL REPORTS 24. City Administrator Reports on Activities and Other Announcements 25. Council Reports on Activities (including AB 1234), Announcements, or Directives to Staff Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 17, 2024 Page 5 of 6 CLOSED SESSION 26. Public Employment Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Administrator 27. Public Employee Annual Performance Evaluation Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) Title: City Attorney CLOSED SESSION REPORT ADJOURNMENT On September 12, 2024, the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Regular and Adjourned Regular meeting agendas may be amended up to 72 hours and Special meeting agendas may be amended up to 24 hours in advance of the meeting. Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 17, 2024 Page 6 of 6 Guide to City Council Proceedings Meetings of the City Council are held the first and third Tuesday of each month at 9:00 a.m. and are conducted in accordance with Rosenberg's Rules of Order (Vernon Municipal Code Section 2.04.020). Copies of all agenda items and back-up materials are available for review in the City Clerk Department, Vernon City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California, and are available for public inspection during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Agenda reports may be reviewed on the City's website at www.cityofvernon.org or copies may be purchased for $0.10 per page. Disability-related services are available to enable persons with a disability to participate in this meeting, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In compliance with ADA, if you need special assistance, please contact the City Clerk department at CityClerk@cityofvernon.org or (323) 583-8811 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to assure arrangements can be made. The Public Comment portion of the agenda is for members of the public to present items, which are not listed on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. The City Council cannot take action on any item that is not on the agenda but matters raised under Public Comment may be referred to staff or scheduled on a future agenda. Comments are limited to three minutes per speaker unless a different time limit is announced. Speaker slips are available at the entrance to the Council Chamber. Public Hearings are legally noticed hearings. For hearings involving zoning matters, the applicant and appellant will be given 15 minutes to present their position to the City Council. Time may be set aside for rebuttal. All other testimony shall follow the rules as set for under Public Comment. If you challenge any City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised during the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. Consent Calendar items may be approved by a single motion. If a Council Member or the public wishes to discuss an item, it may be removed from the calendar for individual consideration. Council Members may indicate a negative or abstaining vote on any individual item by so declaring prior to the vote on the motion to adopt the Consent Calendar. Items excluded from the Consent Calendar will be taken up following action on the Consent Calendar. Public speakers shall follow the guidelines as set forth under Public Comment. New Business items are matters appearing before the Council for the first time for formal action. Those wishing to address the Council on New Business items shall follow the guidelines for Public Comment. Closed Session allows the Council to discuss specific matters pursuant to the Brown Act, Government Code Section 54956.9. Based on the advice of the City Attorney, discussion of these matters in open session would prejudice the position of the City. Following Closed Session, the City Attorney will provide an oral report on any reportable matters discussed and actions taken. At the conclusion of Closed Session, the Council may continue any item listed on the Closed Session agenda to the Open Session agenda for discussion or to take formal action as it deems appropriate. City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Michael Earl, Director of Human Resources Department:Human Resources Submitted by:Veronica Avendano, Human Resources Specialist Subject Employee Service Pin Awards Recommendation Recognize July and August 2024 Employee Service Pin Award recipients. Background The following employees are eligible to receive their service pin based on the number of service years with the City of Vernon: THIRTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE Ruben Herrera, Warehouse Worker, Hired August 1989 TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE Sergio Canales, Assistant Planner, Hired July 1999 Cerissa M. Diaz, Police Dispatcher, Lead, Hired August 1999 FIFTEEN YEARS OF SERVICE Ruben Rodriguez, Power Resources Settlement Analyst, Senior, Hired August 2009 TEN YEARS OF SERVICE Lisa H. Umeda, Utilities Compliance Administrator, Hired August 2014 Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments None. . . Item 1 Page 1 of 1 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Department:Human Resources Submitted by:Lilia Hernandez, Assistant to the City Administrator Subject Proclamation Recognizing Retiring Employee - Michael A. Earl Recommendation Acknowledge and present a proclamation to retiring employee Michael A. Earl, Director of Human Resources, in recognition of his dedicated service to the City of Vernon. Background Historically, the City Council has issued proclamations in honor of retiring City employees. Michael A. Earl, Director of Human Resources will be retiring from the City of Vernon on September 30, 2024, after providing over seven (7) years of service to the City. Mr. Earl was hired as the Director of Human Resources on October 24, 2016. Prior to working for the City of Vernon, Mr. Earl worked for various other public agencies. He held the position of Human Resources Manager with the City of Santa Monica from 2009 – 2016. Michael worked in the capacity of Personnel & Risk Management Director with the City of Hermosa Beach from 1997 – 2009. From 1993 – 1997, he worked for the City of South Gate as Assistant to the City Manager. Michael also worked for the City of El Cajon and held the positions of Management/Personnel Analyst from 1991 – 1993 and Personnel Analyst from 1988 – 1991. As Director of Human Resources for the City of Vernon, Mr. Earl has led his team with thoughtfulness, conviction, and an attentive eye on functional and operational aspects of the Department. Under his leadership, the Department has achieved many accomplishments in the areas of recruitment, streamlining of consulting services, employee performance evaluations, employee benefits administration, mandated employee trainings, labor contract negotiations, and development and implementation of personnel policies and procedures. Mr. Earl is committed to supporting employees as well as the City’s interests and approaches difficult situations with tact, diplomacy and professionalism. During his career with the City of Vernon, Michael A. Earl has earned the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership, sound advice, and guidance in human resources strategies. Mr. Earl is a dedicated employee and will be missed. Mr. Earl was hired on October 24, 2016, and meets the eligibility requirements under CalPERS to retire from the City effective September 30, 2024. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Proclamation – Michael A. Earl . . Item 2 Page 1 of 1 ~ A L I ~ Q R N I A A PROCLAMATION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMENDING MICHAEL A. EARL FOR HIS MANY YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF VERNON WHEREAS, Michael A. Earl, has been a dedicated employee of the City of Vernon for over seven years and faithfully performed his duties as a public servant since being hired on October 24, 201 b; and WHEREAS, Michael meets the eligibility requirements under CaIPERS to retire from the City of Vernon effective September 30, 2024; and WHEREAS, prior to his career with the City of Vernon, Michael worked for several other public agencies. Michael started his public service career with the City of EI Cajon in 1988 as a Personnel Analyst and promoted to Management/Personnel Analyst from 1991 - 1993. He then worked for the City of South Gate as Assistant to the City Manager from 1993 - 1997. Michael promoted to Personnel &Risk Management Director with the City of Hermosa Beach and served in this role from 1997 - 2009. From 2009 - 2016, he worked for the City of Santa Monica as a Human Resources Manager. Lastly, he has served as Director of Human Resources with the City of Vernon since October 24, 2016; and WHEREAS, Michael has led the Human Resources Department with thoughtfulness, enduring conviction, and an attentive eye on the functional and operational aspects of the department such as budget management, adherence to processes and procedures, and recruitment and retention activities. Michael has remained committed to supporting employees and continuing efforts to recognize their valuable contributions to the City. Michael exemplifies tact, diplomacy and professionalism; and WHEREAS, as the Director of Human Resources, Michael achieved many notable accomplishments including: implementing recruitment processes and efficiencies and formalizing recruitment brochures; reducing the City's reliance on external labor and employment consulting services; implementing an automated employee performance evaluation system, serving as the trainer/instructor for mandated employee trainings; leading two series of three-year labor contract negotiations; and developing, refining, and implementing various personnel policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, as a Human Resources professional, Michael has been a member of several organizations in the field of personnel management including the Southern California Personnel Management Association, California Public Employers Labor Relations Association (CALPELRA), and the International Public Management Association for Human Resources (IPMA-HR); and WHEREAS, during his long and distinguished career in public service, Michael has earned the deepest respect of his colleagues through his leadership, sound advice, and extensive knowledge and guidance in the field of Human Resources. Mr. Earl is an exemplary employee and will truly be missed; and WHEREAS, we congratulate and express our appreciation to Michael for his commendable service to the City of Vernon and wish Michael good health upon his retirement and for continued success in life's pursuits. NOW, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON, ON BEHALF OF ITS EMPLOYEES, RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES HEREBY COMMEND AND THANK MICHAEL A. EARL FOR HIS YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY. THIS PROCLAMATION IS BEING PRESENTED TO MICHAEL A. EARL BY THE HONORABLE MAYOR JUDITH MERLO FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON THIS 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FOUR. `- CITY OF VERNON <.- -~~ ~ ,1~ gY; JUDITH MERLO, Mayor . . Item 2 Page 1 of 1 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Department:City Clerk Submitted by:Sandra Dolson, City Clerk Specialist Subject Meeting Minutes Recommendation Approve the August 20, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes. Background Staff has prepared and submits the minutes for approval. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. August 20, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes . . Item 3 Page 1 of 1 MINUTES VERNON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2024 COUNCIL CHAMBER, 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Ybarra called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. FLAG SALUTE The Vernon Police Department Honor Guard presented the colors and led the Flag Salute. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Melissa Ybarra, Mayor Pro Tem Jesus Rivera, Council Member Crystal Larios, Council Member ABSENT: Judith Merlo, Mayor Leticia Lopez, Council Member STAFF PRESENT: Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Mark Austin, Legal Counsel Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Jessica Alcaraz, Financial Services Administrator Fredrick Agyin, Health and Environmental Control Director Michael Earl, Human Resources Director Robert Sousa, Police Chief Dan Wall, Public Works Director Todd Dusenberry, Public Utilities General Manager Richard Corbi, Public Utilities, Planning and Analysis Manager APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA MOTION Council Member Larios moved and Council Member Rivera seconded a motion to approve the agenda. The question was called and the motion carried 3-0, Mayor Merlo and Council Member Lopez absent. PUBLIC COMMENT None. . . Item 3 Page 1 of 5 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 August 20, 2024 PRESENTATIONS 1. Swearing-In Ceremony for New Police Officer in the Police Department Police Chief Sousa presented the staff report and Interim City Clerk Harrington administered the Oath of Office to Police Officer Bonnie Lee. 2. Employee Service Pin Awards Human Resources Director Earl announced the July 2024 Employee Service Pin Award recipients and Council recognized Police Dispatcher, Stephanie D. Aceves; and Police Officer Cynthia G. Maciel for their service years with the City of Vernon. 3. City Administrator Report Interim City Administrator Calleros presented the staff report and accompanying PowerPoint on various topics including New Business Welcome, City Rebranding, Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Applications, Gas Division Safety Award, Development Projects, Community Partnerships, and Outreach Events. CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION Council Member Rivera moved and Council Member Larios seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The question was called and the motion carried 3- 0, Mayor Merlo and Council Member Lopez absent. The Consent Calendar consisted of the following items: 4. Meeting Minutes Recommendation: Approve the August 6, 2024 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes. 5. Operating Account Warrant Register Recommendation: Approve Operating Account Warrant Register No. 134, for the period of June 30 through July 20, 2024, totaling $11,721,582.88 and consisting of ratification of electronic payments totaling $11,477,736.45 and ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $243,846.43. 6. Fire Department Activity Report Recommendation: Receive and file the June 2024 Fire Department Activity Report. 7. Police Department Activity Report Recommendation: Receive and file the June 2024 Police Department Activity Report. 8. Authorize the Issuance of a Purchase Order for Motorola Public Safety Radios and Accessories Recommendation: Approve and authorize issuance of a purchase order to Motorola Solutions Inc. for the purchase of Motorola public safety radios and accessories for a total amount not-to-exceed $89,428. . . Item 3 Page 2 of 5 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 5 August 20, 2024 9. Resolution Approving Authority to File Applications for Grant Funds from the Los Angeles County Regional Park and Open Space District for Measure A Funding. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-018 to apply for and accept Measure A Funds. 10. Services Agreement With Bob Murray & Associates for Executive Recruitment Services Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Bob Murray & Associates, in substantially the same form as submitted, for Executive Recruitment Services for a total amount not-to-exceed $113,000, for a one-year term. 11. Haaker Equipment Company 2025 Vactor Truck Purchase Recommendation: A. Approve and authorize issuance of a Purchase Order (PO) for the purchase of one new 2025 CNG Vactor Truck from Haaker Equipment Company for a total amount not-to-exceed $757,716.28; and B. Authorize a contingency amount of $22,283.72 should the purchase of a comparable Vactor Truck be necessary due to limited inventory, and grant authority to the City Administrator to issue a Change Order to the PO to Haaker Equipment Company for an amount up to the contingency amount if necessary. 12. Extension of Franchise Granted to Pacific Pipeline System, Inc. Recommendation: A. Find that the proposed action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, because it consists of the maintenance, repair or minor alteration of existing facilities and equipment and involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use; and B. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-017 finding and determining that the public interest and necessity require the time extension of Ordinance No. 1046 Granting a Franchise to Pacific Pipeline System, Inc. to maintain and operate a pressurized steel pipeline and appurtenances in and under Alameda Street. 13. Change Order No. 20 to Amended and Restated Services Agreement with Siemens Energy Inc. Recommendation: A. Find that approval of the proposed action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, because it is a government fiscal activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a “project” as defined by CEQA Guidelines section 15378; to the extent the Purchase Contracts with Siemens Energy, Inc. provides for facility and equipment maintenance or repairs, such work is categorically exempt from CEQA review, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15301, because the project consists of the maintenance, repair or minor alteration of existing structures, facilities, or equipment, and involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use; and B. Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Change Order No. 20 to the Amended and Restated Services Agreement with Siemens Energy, Inc. (Siemens Energy), in substantially the same form as submitted, to revise the Projected Schedule Outage Plan, Payment Schedule, Cancellation Schedule, Upgrade Schedule, Dehumidifier Upgrade, Burner 26 Upgrade, Gearset Upgrade, Starter Motor Upgrade, amend the termination date of the agreement, and add a blanket Purchase Contracts schedule.. . Item 3 Page 3 of 5 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 August 20, 2024 NEW BUSINESS 14. Vernon Public Utilities Financial Reserves Policy Public Utilities General Manager Dusenberry presented the staff report and Public Utilities Planning and Analysis Manager Richard Corbi along with Tony Georgis of NewGen Strategies presented a PowerPoint presentation. MOTION Council Member Larios moved and Council Member Rivera seconded a motion to approve and adopt the Vernon Public Utilities Financial Reserves Policy. The question was called and the motion carried 3-0, Mayor Merlo and Council Member Lopez absent. ORAL REPORTS 20. City Administrator Reports on Activities and Other Announcements. Interim City Administrator Calleros announced Council has received an invitation from the Maywood City Council to attend their Centennial Celebration. City Hall will be closed on Labor Day, September 2, 2024. The next City Council meeting will be held on September 17, 2024. 21. City Council Reports on Activities (including AB 1234), Announcements, or Directives to Staff. None. CLOSED SESSION RECESS Mayor Pro Tem Ybarra recessed the meeting to Closed Session at 9:33 a.m. 17. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Significant exposure to litigation (1 potential matter) 18. Conference with Real Property Negotiators Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 4528 Bandini Boulevard, Vernon, CA 90058 Agency Negotiation: Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Negotiating Party: Zeem Solutions, LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment . . Item 3 Page 4 of 5 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 August 20, 2024 RECONVENE At 9:54 a.m., Mayor Pro Tem Ybarra adjourned the Closed Session and reconvened the regular meeting. CLOSED SESSION REPORT Legal Counsel Austin reported that Council took no reportable action. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Ybarra adjourned the meeting at 9:54 a.m. _____________________________ JUDITH MERLO, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ YONNIE PARKER, Deputy City Clerk (seal) . . Item 3 Page 5 of 5 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Department:City Clerk Submitted by:Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk Subject Claims Against the City Recommendation Receive and file the claim submitted by Art Marachelian. Background The City received the following claim and pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.32,040, the claim is being presented to the City Council as soon after filing of the claim with the City as practical. Name of Claimant Amount Demanded Date Received Art Marachelian Undetermined August 27, 2024 Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Art Marachelian Claim . . Item 4 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 4 Page 1 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 2 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 3 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 4 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 5 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 6 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 7 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 8 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 9 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 10 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 11 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 12 of 13 . . Item 4 Page 13 of 13 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Jessica Alcaraz, Financial Services Administrator Department:Finance Submitted by:Angela Melgar, Finance Manager Subject Operating Account Warrant Register Recommendation Approve Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135, for the period of July 21, 2024 through August 17, 2024, totaling $20,174,890.73 and consisting of ratification of electronic payments totaling $19,337,258.45 and ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $837,632.28. Background Vernon Municipal Code Section 2.32.060 indicates the City Treasurer, or an authorized designee, shall prepare warrants covering claims or demands against the City which are to be presented to City Council for its audit and approval. Pursuant to the aforementioned code section, the Deputy City Treasurer has prepared Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135 covering claims and demands presented during the period of July 21 through August 17, 2024, drawn, or to be drawn, from East West Bank for City Council approval. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact of approving Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135, totals $20,174,890.73. The Finance Department has determined that sufficient funds to pay such claims/demands, are available in the respective accounts referenced on Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135. Attachments 1. Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135 . . Item 5 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT FINANCE/TREASURY DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: September 11, 2024 Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: RE: Joaquin Leon, Deputy City Treasurer Operating Account Warrant Register for City Council Agenda of September 17, 2024 It is recommended that the attached Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135 be approved at the City Council meeting of September 17, 2024. Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135 totals $20,174,890.73, and covers claims and demands presented for July 21, 2024 to August 17, 2024, drawn or to be drawn, from East West Bank. The following list details the components of Operating Account Warrant Register No. 135: 1. Ratification of electronic payments totaling $19,337,258.45 2. Ratification of the issuance of early checks totaling $837,632.28 . . Item 5 Page 1 of 76 OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER City of Vernon No.135 I hereby Certify: that claims or demands covered by the above listed warrants have been audited as to accuracy and availability of funds for payments thereof; and that said claims or demands are accurate and that funds are available for payments thereof. This is to certify that the claims or demands covered by the above listed warrants have been audited by the City Council of the City of Vernon and that all of said warrants are approved for pay- ments except Warrant Numbers: DATE DATE 9/11/2024Date: Page 1 of 1 Operating Account Warrant Register Cover - 135 : Warrant . . Item 5 Page 2 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 EARLY CHECKS TOTAL:837,632.28 672.00VENDOR - 3037 - CAL AIR RESOURCES BOARD PAYMENT # 613157 7/22/2024 Line Item Amount 672.00 Invoice 071624 Description Account PO or Contract CUPA SURCHARGE FEE 2023-2024 4TH QTR 011-000-000-240020 Invoice Total:672.00 VENDOR - 5366 - BLACK & WHITE EMERGENCY VEHICLES,PAYMENT # 613158 PO or Contract 240418 7/23/2024 Line Item Amount 800.00 4,428.33 Invoice 5493 Description LIGHTBAR INSTALLATION LIGHTBAR INSTALLATION LIGHTBAR INSTALLATION LIGHTBAR INSTALLATION Account 011-030-300-527000 011-030-300-527000 011-030-300-527000 011-030-300-527000 5493 5493 5493 240418 2,085.38 240418 1,498.30 240418 44.65 Invoice Total:4,428.33 VENDOR - 7699 - AGA ENGINEERS, INC Invoice Description 24197IN PAYMENT # 613159 PO or Contract 20240158 7/25/2024 Line Item Amount 500.00 500.00 Account ON-CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES 011-040-430-529215 Invoice Total:500.00 VENDOR - 7746 - ARCHITERRA, INC Invoice Description 32468 CITY HALL PLAZA DESIGN PAYMENT # 613160 PO or Contract 20240265 7/25/2024 Line Item Amount 3,490.75 3,490.75 Account 011-040-415-660000 Invoice Total:3,490.75 VENDOR - 5078 - BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP Invoice Description 324078 LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT # 613161 PO or Contract LD-0044-1 7/25/2024 Line Item Amount 5,967.50 25,182.00 Account 011-010-115-529200 Invoice Total: LD-0044-1 5,967.50 324456 324457 324458 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 011-010-115-529200 011-010-115-529200 011-010-115-529200 162.50 Invoice Total: LD-0044-1 162.50 5,711.50 Invoice Total: LD-0044-1 5,711.50 7,839.50 Page 1 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 3 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:7,839.50 97.50324460 324461 324462 LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 011-010-115-529200 011-010-115-529200 011-010-115-529200 LD-0044-1 Invoice Total: LD-0044-1 97.50 162.50 162.50 5,241.00 5,241.00 Invoice Total: LD-0044-1 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5229 - EHS INTERNATIONAL, INC PAYMENT # 613162 PO or Contract 20240393 7/25/2024 1,320.00 2,590.98 Invoice 320659 Description Account Line Item Amount TRAFFIC CONTROL/FLAGGER SAFETY REFRESHER 058-070-700-529670 1,320.00 Invoice Total:1,320.00 VENDOR - 6696 - ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC PAYMENT # 613163 PO or Contract 250043 7/25/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 126036908 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 1,872.57 1,872.57 247.07 247.07 471.34 471.34 Invoice Total: 250043167174386 167174390 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: 250043 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5355 - ENTERPRISE Invoice PAYMENT # 613164 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 224.84 2,219.00 16,345.00 Description Account Line Item Amount 36354759 CAR RENTAL 055-050-586-529500-224.84 Invoice Total:224.84 VENDOR - 7273 - F. D. THOMAS, INC PAYMENT # 613165 PO or Contract 20240125 7/25/2024 Invoice Description INSULATION SERVICES Account Line Item Amount 50364D04 055-050-586-529005-2,219.00 Invoice Total:2,219.00 VENDOR - 7784 - GRUTMAN LAW APC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613166 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Account Line Item Amount Page 2 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 4 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 1820 LEGAL SERVICES 011-010-115-529200 20240341 16,345.00 Invoice Total:16,345.00 VENDOR - 1355 - HACH COMPANY Invoice Description 14075711 TEMPERATURE SENSOR PAYMENT # 613167 PO or Contract 240079 7/25/2024 996.66 75.00 Account Line Item Amount 055-050-586-520235-996.66 Invoice Total:996.66 VENDOR - 686 - IGOE & COMPANY INCORPORATED PAYMENT # 613168 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Invoice 330065 Description Account Line Item Amount FSA ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 011-010-120-529220 75.00 Invoice Total:75.00 VENDOR - 7646 - INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PAYMENT # 613169 PO or Contract 20230278 7/25/2024 7,344.75 86.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount INV003250 SHIELD SUITE SUBSCRIPTION 011-010-110-529110 7,344.75 Invoice Total:7,344.75 VENDOR - 3668 - IVETTE ALFARO Invoice Description 070824 LIVESCAN REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT # 613170 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-120-529215 86.00 Invoice Total:86.00 VENDOR - 7862 - JASON MCCRAW Invoice Description 060724 LIVESCAN REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT # 613171 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 62.00 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-120-529215 62.00 Invoice Total:62.00 VENDOR - 7737 - JESUS RIVERA Invoice PAYMENT # 613172 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 107.31 10,750.00 Description Account Line Item Amount 071024 REIMB. INTERNET CHARGES 03/24-05/24 059-450-800-450050 107.31 Invoice Total:107.31 VENDOR - 7842 - JK SEVA, INC Invoice PAYMENT # 613173 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount Page 3 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 5 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 55252 TELESTAFF CLOUD UPGRADE 011-010-110-529110 20240446 10,750.00 Invoice Total:10,750.00 VENDOR - 7866 - JOSE ROMERO Invoice PAYMENT # 613174 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 52.00 200.00 Description Account Line Item Amount 061824 LIVESCAN REIMBURSEMENT 011-010-120-529215 52.00 Invoice Total:52.00 VENDOR - 7542 - KNC STRATEGIC SERVICES CORP PAYMENT # 613175 PO or Contract 20230187 7/25/2024 Invoice 1188 Description Account Line Item Amount CYBER SECURITY CONSULTING 011-010-110-529110 200.00 Invoice Total:200.00 VENDOR - 7742 - KOA CONSULTING, INC PAYMENT # 613176 PO or Contract 20240262 7/25/2024 4,540.00 417.30 Invoice Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 06/2024 Account Line Item Amount K1230107 095-095-905-705000-4,540.00 Invoice Total:4,540.00 VENDOR - 610 - LEONARDO GOMEZ VAZQUEZ PAYMENT # 613177 PO or Contract 250069 7/25/2024 Invoice Description REUPHOLSTER SERVICES REUPHOLSTER SERVICES Account 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-529000 Line Item Amount 120 120 132.30 285.00 417.30 250069 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 2732 - LEXIPOL, LLC Invoice PAYMENT # 613178 PO or Contract 20250023 7/25/2024 8,499.15 5,543.37 Description Account Line Item Amount INVCOR112353 LAW ENFORCEMENT WELLNESS APP 84 011-030-300-529215 8,499.15 Invoice Total:8,499.15 VENDOR - 7774 - MUNIQUIP SOCAL, LLC PAYMENT # 613179 PO or Contract 240394 7/25/2024 Invoice 106996 Description Account Line Item Amount DOSING PUMP 058-070-700-529000 5,543.37 Invoice Total:5,543.37 Page 4 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 6 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 6586 - OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CA Invoice Description 83340829 MEDICAL SERVICES PAYMENT # 613180 7/25/2024 Line Item Amount 2,523.00 Account PO or Contract Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 011-010-120-529700 165.00 165.00 83407691 83482412 83557267 MEDICAL SERVICES MEDICAL SERVICES MEDICAL SERVICES 011-010-120-529700 011-010-120-529700 011-010-120-529700 1,627.00 1,627.00 165.00 165.00 566.00 566.00 VENDOR - 7840 - PAUL FLORES Invoice PAYMENT # 613181 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 138.00 16,335.13 612.50 Description Account Line Item Amount 060724 LIVESCAN REIMBURSEMENT 011-010-120-529215 138.00 Invoice Total:138.00 VENDOR - 1931 - REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLK PAYMENT # 613182 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Invoice 242014 Description Account Line Item Amount ELECTION PREPARATION SERVICES 011-010-125-529300 16,335.13 Invoice Total:16,335.13 VENDOR - 7057 - SDI PRESENCE, LLC Invoice Description 16439 ERP IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTANT PAYMENT # 613183 PO or Contract FI-0034 7/25/2024 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-110-529210 612.50 Invoice Total:612.50 VENDOR - 4229 - SMARDAN SUPPLY CO PAYMENT # 613184 PO or Contract 240075 7/25/2024 1,861.50 2,497.85 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount S4113770001 PARTS & SUPPLIES 056-060-600-529000 1,861.50 Invoice Total:1,861.50 VENDOR - 6305 - STARBOARD TACK SUPPLY INC PAYMENT # 613185 PO or Contract 240057 7/25/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount S1409810001 INSPECTION CAM KIT 011-040-415-522000 276.26 Invoice Total:276.26 Page 5 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 7 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 S1409810002 PARTS & SUPPLIES S1409810003 PARTS & SUPPLIES S1411756001 M12 STICK TRANSFER PUMP S1412066001 STEP BIT KIT 011-040-415-522000 011-040-415-522000 011-040-415-522000 011-040-415-522000 240057 655.47 655.47 655.47 655.47 400.96 400.96 509.69 509.69 Invoice Total: 240057 Invoice Total: 240057 Invoice Total: 240057 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7696 - TESLA, INC PAYMENT # 613186 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 7.04 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 3000P0109926 VEHICLE CHARGING ENERGY FEE 144 011-040-400-529500 7.04 Invoice Total:7.04 VENDOR - 7626 - TRIDEN GROUP CORPORATION PAYMENT # 613187 PO or Contract 20240203 7/25/2024 2,000.00 3,491.96 437.50 Invoice 27470R Description TGVCISO SERVICES Account Line Item Amount 011-010-110-529210 2,000.00 Invoice Total:2,000.00 VENDOR - 1481 - VERIZON WIRELESS PAYMENT # 613188 PO or Contract 250050 7/25/2024 Invoice Description MOBILE PHONES Account Line Item Amount 9000339517 011-010-110-522010 3,491.96 Invoice Total:3,491.96 VENDOR - 3584 - WILLIAMS SERVICE CORPORATION Invoice Description 647625 STORAGE SERVICES PAYMENT # 613189 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-125-529215 437.50 Invoice Total:437.50 VENDOR - 6372 - XPRESS WASH, INC Invoice Description 18342 CAR WASH SERVICES PAYMENT # 613190 PO or Contract 20240053 7/25/2024 3,542.00 Account Line Item Amount 011-040-420-527000 3,542.00 Invoice Total:3,542.00 Page 6 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 8 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 6339 - SUNRISE FOOD SERVICE, INC PAYMENT # 613191 8/1/2024 Line Item Amount 40,645.65 10,110.85 Invoice 070324 Description Account PO or Contract CUSTOMER INCENTIVE PROGRAM 055-050-595-529702 40,645.65 Invoice Total:40,645.65 VENDOR - 4026 - AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS PAYMENT # 613192 PO or Contract 240523 8/1/2024 Invoice 20390 Description Account Line Item Amount STROBES, SAFETY LIGHTS, & SIREN INSTALLATION 011-040-420-522000 1,609.45 20390 STROBES, SAFETY LIGHTS, & SIREN INSTALLATION 011-040-420-529000 240523 1,140.00 Invoice Total: 250052 2,749.45 1,951.95 1,520.00 3,471.95 1,609.45 2,280.00 3,889.45 20402 20402 AUTO PARTS & ACCESSORIES AUTO PARTS & ACCESSORIES 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-529000 250052 Invoice Total: 25005220403 20403 AUTO PARTS & ACCESSORIES AUTO PARTS & ACCESSORIES 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-529000 250052 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 2889 - AT&T MOBILITY PAYMENT # 613193 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 46.23 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 832176480X04 ACCT 832176480 PERIOD 3/9-4/8/24 162024 011-010-110-526010 46.23 Invoice Total:46.23 VENDOR - 6054 - BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC PAYMENT # 613194 PO or Contract 250124 8/1/2024 1,200.75 Invoice 5755807 Description Account Line Item Amount INSTALL MOTOROLA ANTENNA, WHIP ALL 011-030-300-529000 870.00 BAN 5755807 INSTALL MOTOROLA ANTENNA, WHIP ALL 011-030-300-529000 BAN 250124 330.75 Invoice Total:1,200.75 VENDOR - 3088 - CLINICAL LAB OF SAN BERNARDINO INC. Invoice Description 2401137VER01 TEST WATER SAMPLES PAYMENT # 613195 PO or Contract LP-0634 8/1/2024 750.00 Account Line Item Amount 750.00058-070-700-529225 Page 7 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 9 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:750.00 VENDOR - 310 - CRAIG WELDING SUPPLY, CO Invoice Description 652688 PAYMENT # 613196 PO or Contract 240040 8/1/2024 454.88 24,231.32 42,860.88 Account Line Item Amount GLOVES 055-050-586-529003-454.88 Invoice Total:454.88 VENDOR - 1027 - D&R OFFICE WORKS, INC PAYMENT # 613197 PO or Contract 20240346 8/1/2024 Invoice 132300 Description Account Line Item Amount FURNITURE FOR STREET DEPT 011-040-430-660015 24,231.32 Invoice Total:24,231.32 VENDOR - 7815 - ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC, INC Invoice Description 11627 PAYMENT # 613198 PO or Contract 20240173 8/1/2024 Account Line Item Amount HSIP - CYCLE 9 - PROGRESS PAYMENT #1 011-595-430-660000 42,860.88 Invoice Total:42,860.88 VENDOR - 7351 - GOLIATH GRAFFIX, LLC PAYMENT # 613199 PO or Contract 240355 8/1/2024 34,835.76 Invoice 4635 Description Account Line Item Amount INSTALLATION OF WRAP 055-050-595-529215 15,700.00 15,700.00 3,335.76 3,335.76 15,800.00 15,800.00 Invoice Total: 2403554808 4816 BANNER AND VINYL DECAL GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICES 055-050-595-529215 055-050-595-529215 Invoice Total: 240355 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7784 - GRUTMAN LAW APC Invoice Description 1811 PAYMENT # 613200 PO or Contract 20250076 8/1/2024 6,685.00 Account Line Item Amount LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 011-010-115-529200 5,530.00 5,530.00 1,155.00 1,155.00 Invoice Total: 202500761821011-010-115-529200 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 768 - HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LTD PAYMENT # 613201 8/1/2024 2,559.88 Page 8 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 10 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 2,559.88INV00182896 KOP KIT 058-070-700-529000 240208 Invoice Total:2,559.88 VENDOR - 4306 - HERNANDEZ SIGNS, INC Invoice Description 5990 PAYMENT # 613202 PO or Contract 240484 8/1/2024 5,815.70 Account Line Item Amount SIGNS SIGNS 055-050-555-529000 2,894.06 2,894.06 2,921.64 2,921.64 Invoice Total: 2501046010055-050-555-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6308 - HI TECH ENTERPRISE Invoice Description 40277 40277 PAYMENT # 613203 PO or Contract 250086 8/1/2024 1,561.59 Account 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-529000 Line Item Amount WATER PUMP 481.59 1,080.00 1,561.59 WATER PUMP 250086 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 4239 - HSA BANK Invoice PAYMENT # 613204 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 1,203.92 Description Account Line Item Amount 17665 JULY 2024 CONTRIBUTION 011-000-000-210221 1,203.92 Invoice Total:1,203.92 VENDOR - 7444 - J.D.M.L., INC Invoice PAYMENT # 613205 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 21,326.25 Description Account Line Item Amount VER22377R CONTRACT RETAINAGE RELEASE LP-0737 058-000-000-200400-4,706.00 Invoice Total:4,706.00 VER22377R(2) CONTRACT RETAINAGE RELEASE LP-0737 058-000-000-200106- VER22377R(2) CONTRACT RETAINAGE RELEASE LP-0737 058-000-000-200106- VER22377R(2) CONTRACT RETAINAGE RELEASE LP-0737 058-000-000-200106- VER22377R(2) CONTRACT RETAINAGE RELEASE LP-0737 058-000-000-200106- 9,692.28 3,494.89 2,195.93 1,237.15 16,620.25Invoice Total: Page 9 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 11 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 1792 - LA COUNTY ASSESSOR OFFICE PAYMENT # 613206 8/1/2024 Line Item Amount 50.00 19,667.24 300.00 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract 24ASRE233 PARCEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 6/1-6/30/24 011-010-110-529110 IT-0153 50.00 Invoice Total:50.00 VENDOR - 2732 - LEXIPOL, LLC Invoice PAYMENT # 613207 PO or Contract 20250023 8/1/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount INVLEX112361 LEXIPOL SUBSCRIPTION 19 011-030-300-529215 19,667.24 Invoice Total:19,667.24 VENDOR - 138 - LOS ANGELES COUNTY POLICE CHIEFS'PAYMENT # 613208 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 Invoice 073024 Description Account Line Item Amount LACPCA 2024 STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP 011-030-300-529670 300.00 Invoice Total:300.00 VENDOR - 309 - NAPA AUTO PARTS PAYMENT # 613209 PO or Contract 250045 8/1/2024 727.37 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 2248238692 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 254.97 254.97 472.40 472.40 Invoice Total: 2500452248238848011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 1943 - PLUMBING & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613210 PO or Contract 240026 8/1/2024 1,478.79 Account Line Item Amount S1295697001 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 058-070-700-529000 1,478.79 Invoice Total:1,478.79 VENDOR - 7770 - RICHARD HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC PAYMENT # 613211 PO or Contract 20240323 8/1/2024 16,917.68 Invoice VER2406 Description Account Line Item Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 06/2024 055-050-595-529215 16,917.68 Invoice Total:16,917.68 Page 10 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 12 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 7317 - SCHROEDER VALVE & REPAIR INC Invoice Description 24166 LP SAFETY VALVE UNIT PAYMENT # 613212 8/1/2024 Line Item Amount 4,500.00 Account PO or Contract 20240408055-050-586-520231-1,500.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 Invoice Total: 2024040924167CYCLE VALVE INSPECTION 055-050-586-529008- Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7057 - SDI PRESENCE, LLC Invoice Description 16157 ERP IMPLEMENTATION CONSULTANT PAYMENT # 613213 PO or Contract FI-0034 8/1/2024 787.50 641.11 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-110-529210 787.50 Invoice Total:787.50 VENDOR - 6305 - STARBOARD TACK SUPPLY INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613214 PO or Contract 240057 8/1/2024 Account Line Item Amount S1412428001 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 011-040-415-522000 527.48 527.48 113.63 113.63 Invoice Total: 240057S1413459001 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 011-040-410-522000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6997 - TRINITY CONSULTANTS, INC PAYMENT # 613215 PO or Contract 20230057 8/1/2024 16,240.94 Invoice 1450052 Description Account Line Item Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 011-020-200-529225 945.01 945.01Invoice Total: 202300761450100 1450130 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 011-020-200-529225 011-020-200-529225 2,910.93 2,910.93 12,385.00 12,385.00 Invoice Total: 20230057 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7311 - U.S. ARMOR CORPORATION Invoice Description 46579 BULLETPROOF VEST PAYMENT # 613216 PO or Contract 250121 8/1/2024 954.72 Account Line Item Amount 011-030-300-524000 954.72 Invoice Total:954.72 VENDOR - 1481 - VERIZON WIRELESS Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613217 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 27,609.23 Account Line Item Amount Page 11 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 13 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 9968703643 ACCT 342151654-00002 011-010-110-526010 IT-0159-1 27,609.23 Invoice Total:27,609.23 VENDOR - 7746 - ARCHITERRA, INC Invoice Description 32571 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE PAYMENT # 613218 PO or Contract 20240265 8/13/2024 14,241.75 22,307.00 Account Line Item Amount 011-040-415-660000 14,241.75 Invoice Total:14,241.75 VENDOR - 7879 - ASCEND ANALYTICS, LLC Invoice Description INV15775 INV15775 PAYMENT # 613219 PO or Contract 20250044 8/13/2024 Account 055-050-590-529215 055-050-590-529215 Line Item Amount Setup Fee 10,000.00 12,307.00 22,307.00 Quarter 1 - Year 1 - Basic License 20250044 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 4448 - BATTERY SYSTEMS, INC PAYMENT # 613220 PO or Contract 250040 8/13/2024 980.69 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 3896240716084 AUTO PARTS 7 011-040-420-522000 276.38 Invoice Total: 250040 276.38 704.31 704.31 4227900 AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6054 - BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC PAYMENT # 613221 PO or Contract PD-0186 8/13/2024 867.63 Invoice 5765855 Description Account Line Item Amount RADIO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 011-030-300-529000 867.63 Invoice Total:867.63 VENDOR - 5366 - BLACK & WHITE EMERGENCY VEHICLES,PAYMENT # 613222 PO or Contract 240515 8/13/2024 22,807.98 Invoice 5557 Description Account Line Item Amount INSTALL EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT UNIT 51 - VIN GA65506 011-030-300-660015 4,000.00 18,807.98 22,807.98 5557 INSTALL EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT UNIT 51 - VIN GA65506 011-030-300-660015 240515 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 4163 - CENTRAL FORD AUTOMOTIVE, INC.PAYMENT # 613223 8/13/2024 1,896.36 Page 12 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 14 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice 46484 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 1,142.35AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 250041 Invoice Total: 250041 1,142.35 240.23 240.23 382.08 382.08 131.70 131.70 46594 46600 47130 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: 250041 Invoice Total: 250041 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 1108 - CITY OF BELL Invoice PAYMENT # 613224 PO or Contract 20240022 8/13/2024 7,716.50 9,226.91 Description Account Line Item Amount 202457 SALVATION ARMY BED PROGRAM APR- JUN 2024 011-010-160-529715 7,716.50 Invoice Total:7,716.50 VENDOR - 3846 - CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK PAYMENT # 613225 PO or Contract PD-0181 8/13/2024 Invoice 22152 Description Account Line Item Amount HUNTINGTON PARK JAIL - INMATE BOOKINGS 011-030-300-529220 4,361.77 Invoice Total:4,361.77 22156 HUNTINGTON PARK JAIL - INMATE BOOKINGS 011-030-300-529220 PD-0181 4,865.14 Invoice Total:4,865.14 VENDOR - 7441 - CLARA GAZCON Invoice Description 061924 ATTENDANCE STIPEND - GVC PAYMENT # 613226 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 100.00 890.00 390.00 Account Line Item Amount 011-020-200-529675-100.00 Invoice Total:100.00 VENDOR - 7605 - COATING SPECIALISTS & INSPECTION PAYMENT # 613227 PO or Contract 20230219 8/13/2024 Invoice 15674 Description Account Line Item Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 04/2024 058-070-700-660000 890.00 Invoice Total:890.00 VENDOR - 7605 - COATING SPECIALISTS & INSPECTION PAYMENT # 613228 8/13/2024 Page 13 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 15 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice 15766 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 390.00PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4/29-5/26/2024 058-070-700-660000 20230219 Invoice Total:390.00 VENDOR - 310 - CRAIG WELDING SUPPLY, CO Invoice Description 652985 PAYMENT # 613229 PO or Contract 250065 8/13/2024 2,197.63 2,038.03 Account Line Item Amount TIG TORCH 055-050-586-529003-2,197.63 Invoice Total:2,197.63 VENDOR - 1336 - CURRENT WHOLESALE ELECTRIC Invoice Description 284532 PAYMENT # 613230 PO or Contract 240024 8/13/2024 Account 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 Line Item Amount PARTS PARTS 519.00 0.09284532240024 Invoice Total: 240024 519.09 1,448.00 0.23 284534 284534 PARTS PARTS 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 240024 Invoice Total: 240024 1,448.23 70.12284537 284537 PARTS & SUPPLIES PARTS & SUPPLIES 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 240024 0.59 Invoice Total:70.71 VENDOR - 1027 - D&R OFFICE WORKS, INC PAYMENT # 613231 PO or Contract 20240355 8/13/2024 13,209.96 1,150.00 1,250.00 Invoice 132568 Description Account Line Item Amount OFFICE FURNITURE & INSTALLATION 055-050-580-522000 13,209.96 Invoice Total:13,209.96 VENDOR - 7694 - DISCOUNT TWO WAY RADIO Invoice Description SI211873 PAYMENT # 613232 PO or Contract 240453 8/13/2024 Account Line Item Amount RADIO REPAIR 055-050-586-529000-1,150.00 Invoice Total:1,150.00 VENDOR - 6567 - DONALD C. LACHER PAYMENT # 613233 PO or Contract 20240126 8/13/2024 Invoice Description BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SERVICE Account Line Item Amount 1,250.00VPD24006011-030-300-529215 Page 14 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 16 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:1,250.00 VENDOR - 5874 - DOUBLETREE BY HILTON Invoice Description 080124 3RD DEPOSIT - EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 011-010-120-529690 PAYMENT # 613234 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 1,875.00 Account Line Item Amount 1,875.00 Invoice Total:1,875.00 VENDOR - 7291 - ELECTRONIC BALANCING COMPANY, INC PAYMENT # 613235 PO or Contract 20240337 8/13/2024 1,412.00 922.64 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount EB178802 VIBRATION ANALYSIS / SURVEY 055-050-586-529000-1,412.00 Invoice Total:1,412.00 VENDOR - 6696 - ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO, INC PAYMENT # 613236 PO or Contract 250043 8/13/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 109976192 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 388.08 388.08 140.33 140.33 30.43 Invoice Total: 250043126064765 126072390 167175354 167175752 167176084 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: 250043 Invoice Total: 250043 30.43 240.35 240.35 82.33 Invoice Total: 250043 Invoice Total: 250043 82.33 41.12 Invoice Total:41.12 VENDOR - 7344 - ENVIRO FLOW, INC Invoice Description 2410982 PAYMENT # 613237 PO or Contract 20240211 8/13/2024 9,810.00 Account Line Item Amount LACSD COMPLIANCE CONSULTING SERVICE 055-050-586-529235-4,860.00 Invoice Total: 20240275 4,860.00 4,950.00 4,950.00 2410983 HYDRAULIC CALIBRATION TEST 055-050-586-520232- Invoice Total: Page 15 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 17 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 997 - FORD OF MONTEBELLO, INC PAYMENT # 613238 8/13/2024 Line Item Amount 1,155.89 1,654.58 86.00 Invoice 543806 Description Account PO or Contract 250053AUTO PARTS MIRROR ASY 011-040-420-522000 1,155.89 Invoice Total:1,155.89 VENDOR - 7886 - FRUITLAND BOYLE INVESTMENTS, LLC PAYMENT # 613239 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 Invoice 072924 Description Account Line Item Amount CUSTOMER INCENTIVE PROGRAM 055-050-595-529702 1,654.58 Invoice Total:1,654.58 VENDOR - 7888 - GENEVIEVE LASTRA Invoice Description 080624 LIVE SCAN REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT # 613240 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-120-529215 86.00 Invoice Total:86.00 VENDOR - 7784 - GRUTMAN LAW APC Invoice Description 1810 LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT # 613241 PO or Contract 20240341 8/13/2024 12,880.00 577.22 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-115-529200 12,880.00 Invoice Total:12,880.00 VENDOR - 1355 - HACH COMPANY Invoice Description 14098236 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS PAYMENT # 613242 PO or Contract 250064 8/13/2024 Account Line Item Amount 055-050-586-520235-577.22 Invoice Total:577.22 VENDOR - 7749 - ICC GENERAL CODE, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613243 PO or Contract 20240309 8/13/2024 535.00 Account Line Item Amount PG000036842 CODIFICATION SERVICES 011-010-125-529215 535.00 Invoice Total:535.00 VENDOR - 7749 - ICC GENERAL CODE, INC PAYMENT # 613244 PO or Contract 20240309 8/13/2024 1,280.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount GC00125186 CODIFICATION SERVICES 011-010-125-529215 1,280.00 Invoice Total:1,280.00 Page 16 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 18 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 6108 - IMPRESSIONS IN THREAD, INC. Invoice Description 9508 PAYMENT # 613245 8/13/2024 Line Item Amount 2,740.84 147.00 Account PO or Contract 240504UNIFORMS011-040-405-522000 2,740.84 Invoice Total:2,740.84 VENDOR - 7646 - INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS PAYMENT # 613246 PO or Contract 20230278 8/13/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount INV003296 SUBSCRIPTION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT SOFTWARE 011-010-110-529110 147.00 Invoice Total:147.00 VENDOR - 4143 - INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC PAYMENT # 613247 PO or Contract CS-1442 8/13/2024 3,542.90 Invoice 174124 Description Account Line Item Amount PLAN CHECK SERVICES 11/23 011-040-405-529225 750.00 750.00Invoice Total: CS-1442189010 91081 92375 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 10/23 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 08/23 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 10/23 011-040-405-529225 011-040-405-529225 011-040-405-529225 825.00 Invoice Total: CS-1442 825.00 1,717.90 1,717.90 250.00 Invoice Total: CS-1442 Invoice Total:250.00 VENDOR - 3420 - JEFF FRAGA Invoice PAYMENT # 613248 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 20.78 250.00 Description Account Line Item Amount 062524 J. FRAGA - TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FY2023-2024 011-010-120-529680 20.78 Invoice Total:20.78 VENDOR - 7836 - JOE MAR POLYGRAPH PAYMENT # 613249 PO or Contract 20230053 8/13/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 202407026VPD POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION 011-030-300-529215 250.00 Invoice Total:250.00 VENDOR - 4093 - JOHN RODRIGUEZ PAYMENT # 613250 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 4,794.50 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount Page 17 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 19 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 71724 71724 TRANSMISSION REBUILD TRANSMISSION REBUILD 011-040-420-522000 250127 250127 2,194.50 2,600.00 4,794.50 011-040-420-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7884 - JUAN CONTRERAS Invoice Description 072324 PAYMENT # 613251 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 138.00 Account Line Item Amount LIVE SCAN REIMBURSEMENT LIVE SCAN REIMBURSEMENT 011-010-120-529215 69.00 69.00 69.00 69.00 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 072324(2)011-010-120-529215 VENDOR - 7542 - KNC STRATEGIC SERVICES CORP PAYMENT # 613252 PO or Contract 20230187 8/13/2024 112.50 Invoice 1214 Description Account Line Item Amount CYBER SERCURITY CONSULTING 011-010-110-529210 112.50 Invoice Total:112.50 VENDOR - 7488 - LA AUTO BODY Invoice PAYMENT # 613253 PO or Contract 250025 8/13/2024 1,878.29 Description Account 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-529000 Line Item Amount 2711 2711 COLLISION REPAIR S300 COLLISION REPAIR S300 1,108.29 770.00250025 Invoice Total:1,878.29 VENDOR - 3272 - LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES, INC PAYMENT # 613254 PO or Contract 20230162 8/13/2024 29.14 Invoice 11365546 Description Account Line Item Amount TRANSLATION SERVICES 011-030-300-529220 29.14 Invoice Total:29.14 VENDOR - 7878 - LIGHTCATS PRODUCTIONS PAYMENT # 613255 PO or Contract 250119 8/13/2024 500.00 Invoice 110001 Description Account Line Item Amount FACE PAINTERS FOR NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 011-010-160-525000 500.00 Invoice Total:500.00 VENDOR - 7572 - MEGGER SYSTEMS & SERVICES INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613257 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 205.19 Account Line Item Amount Page 18 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 20 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 5690017297 DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES 055-050-550-529000 20240316 205.19 Invoice Total:205.19 VENDOR - 6722 - MUNISERVICES, LLC PAYMENT # 613258 PO or Contract FI-0042 8/13/2024 9,071.62 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount INV06018931 SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES 4Q23 011-010-130-529215 3,227.57 3,227.57 3,901.50 3,901.50 1,942.55 1,942.55 Invoice Total: FI-0043INV06018992 UUT AUDITING SERVICES 04/24-06/24 INV06019154 SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES 1Q24 011-010-130-529225 011-010-130-529215 Invoice Total: FI-0042 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 309 - NAPA AUTO PARTS PAYMENT # 613259 PO or Contract 250045 8/13/2024 1,250.21 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 2248237902 AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO SUPPLIES AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 372.22 372.22 282.60 282.60 234.42 234.42 148.90 148.90 17.96 17.96 32.41 32.41 39.41 39.41 37.02 37.02 46.69 46.69 38.58 38.58 Invoice Total: 2500452248238669 2248239324 2248239413 2248239690 2248240369 2248240462 2248240493 2248240610 6265298160 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: 250045 Invoice Total: Page 19 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 21 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 5250 - NORMAN A. TRAUB ASSOCIATES Invoice Description 230632 ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION SERVICE 011-030-300-529215 PAYMENT # 613260 8/13/2024 Line Item Amount 3,044.24 615.53 Account PO or Contract 20240145 3,044.24 Invoice Total:3,044.24 VENDOR - 5934 - O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC PAYMENT # 613261 PO or Contract 240015 8/13/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 3049122895 SPARK PLUGS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS CORE CHARGE CORE CHARGE 011-040-420-522000 44.65 44.65 105.71 105.71 118.97 118.97 43.81 43.81 31.59 31.59 10.95 10.95 10.95 10.95 64.41 64.41 82.13 82.13 10.95 10.95 10.95 10.95 40.79 40.79 39.67 39.67 Invoice Total: 2400153049122898 3049445817 3049450758 3049451435 3049451565 3049452750 3049452973 3049456675 3049461632 3049462748 3049467036 3049470578 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-522000 Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: 240015WINDOW REGULATOR ASSEMBLY CORE CHARGE Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: 240015CORE CHARGE Invoice Total: 240015CORE CHARGE Invoice Total: 240015OIL PRESSURE SWITCH AUTO PARTS Invoice Total: 240015 Invoice Total: Page 20 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 22 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 1943 - PLUMBING & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613262 8/13/2024 Line Item Amount 59.56 Account PO or Contract 240026S1296704001 PARTS & SUPPLIES 058-070-700-529000 59.56 Invoice Total:59.56 VENDOR - 470 - POSITIVE LAB SERVICE PAYMENT # 613263 PO or Contract 20240041 8/13/2024 2,563.60 Invoice B23J042 Description Account Line Item Amount LAB SERVICE LAB SERVICES LAB SERVICES LAB SERVICES LAB SERVICES 055-050-586-520232-114.24 114.24 1,027.92 1,027.92 115.24 115.24 624.00 624.00 682.20 682.20 Invoice Total: 20240041B23K010 B23L029 B24A191 B24E242 055-050-586-520232- 055-050-586-520232- 055-050-586-520232- 055-050-586-520232- Invoice Total: 20240041 Invoice Total: 20240041 Invoice Total: 20240041 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7716 - CATHERINA ZEMBER Invoice Description SI03112 CALIBRATION SERVICES PAYMENT # 613264 PO or Contract 20240237 8/13/2024 354.80 615.69 98.82 Account Line Item Amount 055-050-555-529225 354.80 Invoice Total:354.80 VENDOR - 7716 - CATHERINA ZEMBER Invoice Description SI03113 CALIBRATION SERVICES PAYMENT # 613265 PO or Contract 20240237 8/13/2024 Account Line Item Amount 055-050-555-529225 615.69 Invoice Total:615.69 VENDOR - 7716 - CATHERINA ZEMBER Invoice Description SI03111 CALIBRATION SERVICES PAYMENT # 613266 PO or Contract 20240237 8/13/2024 Account Line Item Amount 055-050-555-529225 98.82 Invoice Total:98.82 VENDOR - 7153 - PROFORMA PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613267 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 1,094.92 Account Line Item Amount Page 21 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 23 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 B735003312A FILE FOLDER JACKET ENVELOPES 011-030-300-522000 250096 1,094.92 Invoice Total:1,094.92 VENDOR - 7720 - PT EVENTS INC PAYMENT # 613268 PO or Contract 20240233 8/13/2024 1,652.50 250.00 654.40 146.17 Invoice 1640 Description TABLE & TENT RENTAL Account Line Item Amount 055-050-586-529005-1,652.50 Invoice Total:1,652.50 VENDOR - 7656 - QUALITY PHYSICALS LLC PAYMENT # 613269 PO or Contract 20240068 8/13/2024 Invoice 33466 Description Account Line Item Amount DRUG & ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 011-010-120-529700 250.00 Invoice Total:250.00 VENDOR - 1457 - QUINN COMPANY PAYMENT # 613270 PO or Contract 250048 8/13/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount PC811018631 PARTS & SUPPLIES 011-040-420-522000 654.40 Invoice Total:654.40 VENDOR - 3908 - RAFAEL A. LOPEZ PAYMENT # 613271 PO or Contract 250044 8/13/2024 Invoice 10135 Description Account Line Item Amount NEW TIRE 011-040-420-522000 71.17 71.17 75.00 75.00 Invoice Total: 25004410252FLAT REPAIR 011-040-420-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6717 - RONIT DAHAN-EDRY Invoice Description 061924 ATTENDANCE STIPEND - GVC PAYMENT # 613272 PO or Contract 8/13/2024 100.00 346.08 Account Line Item Amount 011-020-200-529675-100.00 Invoice Total:100.00 VENDOR - 5296 - SPECIALTY APPAREL PAYMENT # 613273 PO or Contract 250098 8/13/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 6150003586 UNIFORMS 011-020-200-522000 346.08 Invoice Total:346.08 Page 22 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 24 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 380 - STACY MEDICAL CENTER PAYMENT # 613274 8/13/2024 Line Item Amount 1,718.10 201.93 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract 521154589 PRE-BOOKING PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 011-030-300-529215 20230054 1,718.10 Invoice Total:1,718.10 VENDOR - 1973 - STEVEN J. BURRIS Invoice Description 78324 PAYMENT # 613275 PO or Contract 250047 8/13/2024 Account Line Item Amount UNIT 284 FRONT WHEEL ALIGN & CASTER 011-040-420-522000 51.93 150.00 201.93 BUSHING 78324 UNIT 284 FRONT WHEEL ALIGN & CASTER 011-040-420-529000 BUSHING 250047 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6997 - TRINITY CONSULTANTS, INC PAYMENT # 613276 PO or Contract 20230057 8/13/2024 9,871.89 Invoice 1450772 Description Account Line Item Amount PROFESSIONAL SVCS 05/29 - 06/26/2024 011-020-200-529225 9,346.89 9,346.89 232.50 232.50 292.50 292.50 Invoice Total: 202300571454991 1455001 PROF SVCS 07/01-07/26/24 011-020-200-529225 011-020-200-529225 Invoice Total: 20230057PROFESSIONAL SVCS 07/01 - 07/26/2024 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 2308 - WORLD OIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613277 PO or Contract 20240132 8/13/2024 5,970.84 Account Line Item Amount I50001092840 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 055-050-586-526000-1,731.00 1,731.00 4,239.84 4,239.84 Invoice Total: 20240132I50001092841 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 055-050-586-526000- Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6659 - ZETCOR USA, INC PAYMENT # 613278 PO or Contract 240506 8/13/2024 2,820.72 Invoice 232306 Description Account Line Item Amount WELL#21 AIR CONDITION DUCT WORK 058-070-700-529000 2,820.72 Invoice Total:2,820.72 VENDOR - 450 - C. WELLS PIPELINE MATERIALS, INC PAYMENT # 613279 8/15/2024 14,106.62 Page 23 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 25 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 14,106.62SINV242354DUCTILE PIPE 058-070-700-529000 240480 Invoice Total:14,106.62 VENDOR - 256 - CALPORTLAND COMPANY Invoice Description 96436718 1/2 SAND SACK SLURRY PAYMENT # 613280 PO or Contract 20240059 8/15/2024 2,036.35 Account Line Item Amount 058-070-700-529000 1,438.78 1,438.78 597.57 Invoice Total: 20240059964367201/2 SACK SAND SLURRY 058-070-700-529000 Invoice Total:597.57 VENDOR - 4163 - CENTRAL FORD AUTOMOTIVE, INC. Invoice Description 47695 PAYMENT # 613281 PO or Contract 250041 8/15/2024 442.75 Account Line Item Amount AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 442.75 Invoice Total:442.75 VENDOR - 7815 - ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC, INC Invoice Description 11863 PAYMENT # 613282 PO or Contract 20240173 8/15/2024 62,983.52 Account Line Item Amount HSIP - CYCLE 9 - PROGRESS PAYMENT #2 011-595-430-660000 62,983.52 Invoice Total:62,983.52 VENDOR - 7891 - HANNIA CONTRERAS Invoice Description 081424 LIVE SCAN REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT # 613283 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 62.00 8,405.28 500.00 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-120-529215 62.00 Invoice Total:62.00 VENDOR - 2208 - HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO PAYMENT # 613284 PO or Contract LP-0766 8/15/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount INV130348 SUPPLY AQUEOUS AMMONIA - MGS 055-050-586-520235-8,405.28 Invoice Total:8,405.28 VENDOR - 7863 - INSTANT SIGNS CYPRESS, LLC PAYMENT # 613286 PO or Contract 20240434 8/15/2024 Invoice 3530 Description Account Line Item Amount 500.00PLAQUE INSTALL AT MAYWOOD PARK 011-010-160-529715 Page 24 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 26 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:500.00 VENDOR - 4143 - INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC PAYMENT # 613287 PO or Contract CS-1442 8/15/2024 11,100.00 63,385.80 Invoice 264136 Description Account Line Item Amount PLAN CHECK SERVICES 1/24 011-040-405-529225 11,100.00 Invoice Total:11,100.00 VENDOR - 7782 - ITT GOULDS PUMPS INC PAYMENT # 613288 PO or Contract 240433 8/15/2024 Invoice 527465 Description Account Line Item Amount PUMP INSPECTION & REPAIR 055-050-586-529000-3,750.00 3,750.00Invoice Total: 240472528040CIRCULATING WATER PUMP REPAIR 055-050-586-529000-59,635.80 59,635.80Invoice Total: VENDOR - 3668 - IVETTE ALFARO Invoice Description 050324 I. ALFARO - FY2023-2024 TUITION REIMB PAYMENT # 613289 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 850.52 300.00 Account Line Item Amount 011-010-120-529680 850.52 Invoice Total:850.52 VENDOR - 7542 - KNC STRATEGIC SERVICES CORP PAYMENT # 613290 PO or Contract 20230187 8/15/2024 Invoice 1197 Description Account Line Item Amount CYBER SERCURITY CONSULTING 011-010-110-529110 300.00 Invoice Total:300.00 VENDOR - 7837 - MONTROY SUPPLY COMPANY, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613291 PO or Contract 240497 8/15/2024 25,157.63 671.47 Account Line Item Amount 10002682400 WOOD SHOP EQUIPMENT PRINTER 011-040-430-660015 25,157.63 Invoice Total:25,157.63 VENDOR - 1943 - PLUMBING & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY PAYMENT # 613292 PO or Contract 250011 8/15/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount S1297432001 SOFT COPPER TUBE 058-070-700-529000 671.47 Invoice Total:671.47 VENDOR - 7798 - RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP, LLP PAYMENT # 613293 8/15/2024 24,000.00 Page 25 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 27 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice 12545 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 12,000.00LEGISLATIVE & REGULATORY ADVOCACY 011-010-105-529215 20240425 Invoice Total: 20240425 12,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 12754 LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ADV 011-010-105-529215 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6305 - STARBOARD TACK SUPPLY INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 613294 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 1,070.23 1,715.25 9,337.70 Account Line Item Amount S1412639001 TANKLESS WATER HEATER 011-040-410-522000 1,070.23 Invoice Total:1,070.23 VENDOR - 7298 - YONNIE PARKER PAYMENT # 613295 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 Invoice 072324 Description Account Line Item Amount EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 011-010-125-529670 1,715.25 Invoice Total:1,715.25 PAYROLL CHECKS Invoice 7/25/2024 Description Account PO or Contract Invoice Total: Line Item Amount 072524 PAYROLL CHECKS 011-000-000-210110 9,337.70 9,337.70 PAYROLL CHECKS Invoice 8/8/2024 7,931.47 Description Account PO or Contract Invoice Total: Line Item Amount 080824 PAYROLL CHECKS 011-000-000-210110 7,931.47 7,931.47 Page 26 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 28 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 ELECTRONIC TOTAL:19,337,258.45 315,548.00VENDOR - 2517 - SCPPA Invoice PAYMENT # 17698 7/23/2024 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount PV0725 PV0725 PV0725 JULY 2024 CAPACITY JUNE 2024 ENERGY PSF 055-050-590-520180 055-050-590-520150 055-000-000-122100 253,092.00 52,456.00 10,000.00 315,548.00Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7225 - TWIN EAGLE HOLDINGS N.A., LLC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17699 PO or Contract 7/24/2024 6,232.50 712,152.06 61,148.74 Account Line Item Amount 446096 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 6,232.50 Invoice Total:6,232.50 VENDOR - 6262 - MERCURIA ENERGY AMERICA, LLC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17700 PO or Contract 7/24/2024 Account Line Item Amount 4457638 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 712,152.06 Invoice Total:712,152.06 VENDOR - 2227 - US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PAYMENT # 17701 PO or Contract 7/23/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount GG1766EI0524 MAY 2024 055-050-590-520150 370.62 370.62Invoice Total: GG1766W0624 JUNE 2024 CAPACITY GG1766W0624 MAY 2024 ENERGY 055-050-590-520180 055-050-590-520150 33,180.97 27,597.15 Invoice Total:60,778.12 VENDOR - 1994 - BP ENERGY COMPANY PAYMENT # 17702 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 3,150.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount Page 27 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 29 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 21350204 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 3,150.00 Invoice Total:3,150.00 VENDOR - 2060 - CALPINE CORPORATION Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17703 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 4,171.25 2,478.75 Account Line Item Amount 120249 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 4,171.25 Invoice Total:4,171.25 VENDOR - 7262 - CITADEL ENERGY MARKETING, LLC PAYMENT # 17704 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 109835 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 2,478.75 Invoice Total:2,478.75 VENDOR - 4116 - EDF, INC. Invoice PAYMENT # 17705 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 150.00 Description Account Line Item Amount 3973593 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 150.00 Invoice Total:150.00 VENDOR - 6086 - MACQUARIE ENERGY NORTH AMERICA PAYMENT # 17706 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 922,500.00 162,694.10 326,157.79 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount GASI00194236 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520160 922,500.00 Invoice Total:922,500.00 VENDOR - 2517 - SCPPA Invoice PAYMENT # 17707 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount PHL0724 JULY 2024 055-050-590-520154 162,694.10 Invoice Total:162,694.10 VENDOR - 1581 - THE GAS COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17708 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Account Line Item Amount 071224 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-525022 326,157.79 Page 28 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 30 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:326,157.79 7/26/2024VENDOR - 6890 - ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC PAYMENT # 17709 PO or Contract 18,500.01 15,592.50 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 2537487 HEALTH BENEFITS BROKERAGE & CONSULTING SERVICES 011-010-120-529220 HR-0032 18,500.01 Invoice Total:18,500.01 VENDOR - 7393 - APPLY THE PRESSURE GROUP PAYMENT # 17710 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 109 113 114 GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES 011-040-430-529215 20240066 Invoice Total: 20240066 5,208.75 5,208.75 5,625.00 5,625.00 4,758.75 4,758.75 GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SERVICES 011-040-430-529215 011-040-430-529215 Invoice Total: 20240066 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 4303 - ATHENS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC PAYMENT # 17711 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 7,558.75 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount IVC36472 WORKERS' COMP TPA MONTHLY FEES 011-010-120-529220 7,558.75 Invoice Total:7,558.75 VENDOR - 7026 - BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS, INC PAYMENT # 17712 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 10,767.00 Invoice 23243 23314 Description Account Line Item Amount TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 011-040-430-529000 20240283 Invoice Total: 20240283 3,696.00 3,696.00 7,071.00 7,071.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 011-040-430-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5490 - CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 PAYMENT # 17713 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 1,699.74 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 4195738387 UNIFORM SERVICES 055-050-586-524000-LP-0663 224.31 Page 29 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 31 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 4195738387 4195738387 4195738387 4195738387 UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES 056-060-600-524000 LP-0663 LP-0663 61.61 124.91 14.36 058-070-700-524000 055-050-550-524000 055-050-555-524000 LP-0663 LP-0663 215.93 641.12 220.60 57.81 Invoice Total: LP-06634196462474 4196462474 4196462474 4196462474 4196462474 UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES 055-050-586-524000- 056-060-600-524000 058-070-700-524000 055-050-550-524000 055-050-555-524000 LP-0663 LP-0663 124.86 14.36LP-0663 LP-0663 179.58 597.21 217.63 68.73 Invoice Total: LP-06634197187554 4197187554 4197187554 4197187554 4197187554 UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES 055-050-586-524000- 056-060-600-524000 058-070-700-524000 055-050-550-524000 055-050-555-524000 LP-0663 LP-0663 124.86 14.36LP-0663 LP-0663 180.42 606.00 (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) (7.51) Invoice Total: LP-06639276850024 9276850033 9276850040 9276850048 9276850052 9276850054 9276850059 9276850065 9276850073 CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT 055-050-586-524000- 055-050-555-524000 056-060-600-524000 056-060-600-524000 055-050-555-524000 055-050-586-524000- 055-050-586-524000- 055-050-555-524000 056-060-600-524000 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: LP-0663 Invoice Total: Page 30 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 32 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 9277022589 CREDIT 055-050-555-524000 LP-0663 (77.00) Invoice Total:(77.00) VENDOR - 7326 - COSCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC PAYMENT # 17714 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 120.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 1000671351 MONITORING SERVICES 055-050-586-520231-20240086 120.00 Invoice Total:120.00 VENDOR - 1206 - DELL MARKETING LP PAYMENT # 17715 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 14,927.90 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 10755550452 DELL DESKTOPS FOR IT 10755550452 DELL DESKTOPS FOR IT 10755550452 DELL DESKTOPS FOR IT 011-010-110-522010 011-010-110-522010 011-010-110-522010 240513 240513 45.00 13,761.43 1,121.47240513 Invoice Total:14,927.90 VENDOR - 7145 - DUNCAN WEINBERG GENZER &PAYMENT # 17716 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 34,166.50 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 45361LSG PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 05/2024 055-050-580-529200 LP-0662 Invoice Total: LP-0662 17,400.00 17,400.00 16,766.50 16,766.50 45713LSG PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 06/2024 055-050-580-529200 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6519 - EN ENGINEERING, LLC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17717 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 2,784.00 456.15 Account Line Item Amount 419129 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 06/2024 055-050-580-529225 20240064 2,784.00 Invoice Total:2,784.00 VENDOR - 7353 - EXTENDED OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC PAYMENT # 17718 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 20548 ADDITIONAL PRI LINE AGREEMENT JULY 2024 011-010-110-529110 20240378 456.15 Invoice Total:456.15 Page 31 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 33 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 399 - GARVEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17719 7/26/2024 Line Item Amount 963.76 4,935.00 1,501.00 Account PO or Contract 162453 PARTS & SUPPLIES 011-040-420-522000 250042 963.76 Invoice Total:963.76 VENDOR - 3917 - GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC PAYMENT # 17720 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 18877 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FEE 011-010-110-529110 250075 4,935.00 Invoice Total:4,935.00 VENDOR - 7107 - GEOTAB USA, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17721 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Account Line Item Amount 390321 IN390321 GEOTAB GPS SERVICES GEOTAB GPS SERVICES 011-040-420-529000 20240030 Invoice Total: 20240030 750.50 750.50 750.50 750.50 011-040-420-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7400 - GLOBAL TEST SUPPLY, LLC PAYMENT # 17722 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 1,360.00 813.85 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 48158400 CALIBRATION SERVICES 056-060-600-529000 20240177 1,360.00 Invoice Total:1,360.00 VENDOR - 1712 - GRAINGER, CO Invoice PAYMENT # 17723 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount 827336504 9125961855 9126257097 9132338337 CREDIT FOR RETURNED PARTS WEB SLING, FLAT EYE, 6 FT, CAP CORDLESS TUBE CUTTER KIT PARTS: WIRE ROPE SLING 055-050-555-529000 240035 Invoice Total: 240042 (878.92) (878.92) 226.31 226.31 368.26 368.26 227.88 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 Invoice Total: 240042 Invoice Total: 240042 Page 32 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 34 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:227.88 870.32 870.32 9166732637 PARTS & SUPPLIES 055-050-586-529000-240035 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5350 - HAUL-AWAY RUBBISH SERVICE CO., INC PAYMENT # 17724 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 11,216.83 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 46X00108 WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES 011-040-415-529215 20240297 Invoice Total: 20240297 124.00 124.00 46X00109 46X00110 46X00111 46X00115 46X00116 WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES 011-040-415-529215 011-040-410-529215 011-040-430-529215 011-040-415-529215 011-040-415-529215 2,584.93 2,584.93 124.00 Invoice Total: 20240297 Invoice Total: 20240297 124.00 386.00 Invoice Total: 20240297 386.00 253.00 Invoice Total: 20240297 253.00 7,744.90 7,744.90Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5108 - JEMMOTT ROLLINS GROUP, INC PAYMENT # 17725 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 5,500.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount JUNE24 VERNON COMMUNITY FUND ADMINISTRATION 011-010-140-529215 20240111 5,500.00 Invoice Total:5,500.00 VENDOR - 6520 - MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC PAYMENT # 17727 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 531.77 71.54 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 771115548 CYLINDER RENTAL 055-050-586-529000-LP-0790 531.77 Invoice Total:531.77 VENDOR - 4856 - MELISSA YBARRA Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17728 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Account Line Item Amount 071024 REIMB. INTERNET CHARGES 04/24-05/24 059-450-800-450050 71.54 Page 33 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 35 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:71.54 VENDOR - 7321 - NALCO COMPANY LLC PAYMENT # 17729 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 22,230.52 22,193.03 120.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 6670658914 WATER TREATMENT SERVICES MGS 055-050-586-520235-LP-0765 22,230.52 Invoice Total:22,230.52 VENDOR - 5504 - NTS MIKEDON, LLC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17730 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Account Line Item Amount 858620 WELDED STEEL PLATES & EYEBOLTS 056-060-600-529000 240470 22,193.03 Invoice Total:22,193.03 VENDOR - 870 - PARNASA TOV INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17731 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 Account Line Item Amount 1333 CAR WASH SERVICES 06/2024 055-050-555-527000 240135 120.00 Invoice Total:120.00 VENDOR - 7425 - RICHARD CORBI Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17732 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 157.58 Account Line Item Amount 061824 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT - SCPPA MEETINGS 055-050-580-529500 129.31 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 129.31 071524 MOODY'S CA INFRASTRUCTURE ABIDES EVENT 5/9/24 055-050-580-529500 28.27 28.27 VENDOR - 5925 - SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP PAYMENT # 17733 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 20,478.97 2,979.27 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount B18543515 EVERBRIDGE SOFTWARE RENEWAL 011-010-110-529110 250003 20,478.97 Invoice Total:20,478.97 VENDOR - 5423 - SOLARWINDS, INC PAYMENT # 17734 7/26/2024 Page 34 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 36 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice IN643263 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 2,979.27SOLARWINDS SOFTWARE RENEWAL 011-010-110-529110 250021 Invoice Total:2,979.27 VENDOR - 1695 - VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17735 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 1,010.69 Account Line Item Amount 73997413 74039920 AGG & ASPHALT AGG & ASPHALT 058-070-700-529000 240048 Invoice Total: 240048 506.99 506.99 503.70 503.70 058-070-700-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 894 - WHENEVER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC PAYMENT # 17736 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 3,159.84 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 343384 SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE 011-010-110-529110 250068 Invoice Total: 250068 574.88 574.88 343385 343386 SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE SATELLITE PHONE SERVICE 011-010-110-529110 011-010-110-529110 011-010-110-529110 574.88 Invoice Total: 250068 574.88 574.88 Invoice Total: 250020 574.88 77381179875 GLOBALSTAR SERVICE 1,435.20 1,435.20Invoice Total: VENDOR - 3266 - AON RISK INSURANCE SERVICES WEST,PAYMENT # 17771 PO or Contract 7/31/2024 92,500.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 8200000360409 SERVICE FEE 011-010-130-520035 20250061 92,500.00 Invoice Total:92,500.00 VENDOR - 3266 - AON RISK INSURANCE SERVICES WEST, Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17772 PO or Contract 7/31/2024 4,925,016.84 Account Line Item Amount 8200000362157 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE LIABILITY 011-010-130-520035 64,468.93 Page 35 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 37 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:64,468.93 8200000362337 EXCESS WORKERS COMPENSATION COVERAGE 011-010-130-520035 011-010-130-520035 011-010-130-520035 011-010-130-520035 011-010-130-520035 011-010-130-520035 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 183,311.85 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 183,311.85 8200000362344 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 122,094.40 122,094.40 8200000362655 E&O - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY EXCESS COVERAGE 64,879.71 64,879.71 8200000362663 EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE 8200000362664 EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE 8200000362708 EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE 8200000362726 EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE 8200000362793 EXCESS EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE 8200000362808 EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE 8200000362822 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 8200000362828 EXCESS EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE 288,858.00 288,858.00 149,088.00 149,088.00 104,361.60 104,361.60 292,459.58 292,459.58 41,295.78 41,295.78 334,576.63 334,576.63 86,677.39 86,677.39 51,614.59 51,614.59 8200000362870 E&O - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY PRIMARY 011-010-130-520035 COVERAGE 151,324.16 151,324.16 8200000362898 EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE 011-010-130-520035 188,030.34 Page 36 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 38 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:188,030.34 8200000363033 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 8200000363043 TERRORISM COVERAGE 055-050-586-520035- 011-010-130-520035 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-580-520035 703,462.64 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 703,462.64 59,401.33 59,401.33 8200000363084 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 8200000363276 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 9900000363003 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 9900000363211 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 140,898.41 140,898.41 687,989.17 687,989.17 282,360.32 282,360.32 927,864.01 927,864.01 VENDOR - 3266 - AON RISK INSURANCE SERVICES WEST,PAYMENT # 17773 PO or Contract 7/31/2024 132,629.02 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 8200000358981 CRIME - PRIMARY COVERAGE 011-010-130-520035 2,220.38 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 2,220.38 8200000362343 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 8200000362345 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT COVERAGE 8200000362810 EXCESS EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE 8200000362815 EXCESS EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE 011-010-130-520035 011-010-130-520035 055-050-586-520035- 055-050-586-520035- 31,964.80 31,964.80 28,333.60 28,333.60 20,648.08 20,648.08 5,164.50 5,164.50 Page 37 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 39 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 8200000362816 EXCESS EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE 8200000363025 CYBER LIABILITY COVERAGE 055-050-586-520035-10,318.69 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 10,318.69 011-010-130-520035 33,978.97 33,978.97 VENDOR - 3037 - CAL AIR RESOURCES BOARD PAYMENT # 17774 PO or Contract 7/31/2024 161,821.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount INVCOI241003 AB 32 COST OF IMPLEMENTATION FEE 14 (MGS) 055-050-586-520232-85,952.00 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 85,952.00 INVCOI245008 AB 32 COST OF IMPLEMENTATION FEE (GAS) 056-060-600-520230 75,869.00 75,869.00 VENDOR - 1701 - FUJITSU NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS PAYMENT # 17775 PO or Contract 7/31/2024 137,217.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 92047450 FIBER OPTICS NETWORK SYSTEM 059-080-800-660000 20230184 137,217.00 Invoice Total:137,217.00 VENDOR - 3285 - ALEXY ESCOBEDO Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17776 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 40.00 Account Line Item Amount 061924 POST FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 011-030-300-529500 40.00 Invoice Total:40.00 VENDOR - 1479 - BLOOMBERG FINANCE, LP PAYMENT # 17777 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 7,500.00 190.28 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 5608251772 BLOOMBERG SUBSCRIPTION 011-010-130-529225 20230190 7,500.00 Invoice Total:7,500.00 VENDOR - 6661 - CYNTHIA MACIEL Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17778 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 Account Line Item Amount Page 38 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 40 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 061724 TRAINING COORDINATOR COURSE 011-030-300-529500 190.28 Invoice Total:190.28 VENDOR - 947 - DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION PAYMENT # 17779 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 650.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount B3832802 PUBLICATION SERVICES 011-010-125-525000 380.00 380.00 95.00 95.00 90.00 90.00 85.00 85.00 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: B3834142 B3834146 B3834154 PUBLICATION SERVICES PUBLICATION SERVICES PUBLICATION SERVICES 011-010-125-525000 011-010-125-525000 011-010-125-525000 VENDOR - 7309 - FAZE 1 CORP Invoice PAYMENT # 17780 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 2,550.00 4,018.61 270.00 Description Account Line Item Amount 2460 EMERGENCY SEWER CLEAN-UP 011-040-430-529000 2,550.00 Invoice Total:2,550.00 VENDOR - 524 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS PAYMENT # 17781 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 28174 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 058-070-700-529000 240025 4,018.61 Invoice Total:4,018.61 VENDOR - 996 - GABRIEL MARTINEZ Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17782 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 Account Line Item Amount 062524 POST MANAGMENT COURSE CLASS 24-01 011-030-300-529500 270.00 Invoice Total:270.00 VENDOR - 6061 - GREGORY GARCIA Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17783 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 227.80 Account Line Item Amount Page 39 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 41 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 050724 CLETS T4T TRAINING FOR TRAINERS 011-030-300-529500 227.80 Invoice Total:227.80 VENDOR - 804 - LB JOHNSON INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17784 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 1,425.21 Account Line Item Amount 128718 PARTS & SUPPLIES 058-070-700-529000 240043 Invoice Total: 240103 240.88 240.88 66.98 66.98 28.86 28.86 64.53 64.53 71.40 71.40 8.72 128770 129039 129501 130024 130111 132005 132006 132038 132331 132347 132698 PARTS & SUPPLIES 055-050-555-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 Invoice Total: 240043REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE PARTS & SUPPLIES Invoice Total: 240043 Invoice Total: 240043PARTS & SUPPLIES Invoice Total: 240043PARTS & SUPPLIES Invoice Total: 240043 8.72 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE PARTS & SUPPLIES 23.07 23.07 9.84 Invoice Total: 240043 Invoice Total: 240043 9.84 52.49 52.49 398.71 398.71 411.59 411.59 48.14 48.14 Invoice Total: 240043 Invoice Total: 240043PARTS & SUPPLIES Invoice Total: 240043PARTS & SUPPLIES Invoice Total: VENDOR - 2361 - LITTLEJOHN REULAND CORP Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17785 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 4,823.96 Account Line Item Amount 65201 MOTOR REPAIR 055-050-586-529000-20240325 2,297.98 Invoice Total:2,297.98 Page 40 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 42 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 65346 MOTOR REBUILD 055-050-586-529000-20240348 2,525.98 Invoice Total:2,525.98 VENDOR - 1150 - MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY PAYMENT # 17786 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 94.13 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 25388959 HEX DRIVE SCREWS & STUD ANCHORS 058-070-700-529000 240044 94.13 Invoice Total:94.13 VENDOR - 839 - MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC PAYMENT # 17787 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 5,930.18 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 242967 SERVICE CALL (S/O 12496)056-060-600-529000 20240097 Invoice Total: 20240097 1,115.62 1,115.62 2,216.98 2,216.98 2,597.58 2,597.58 242968 243427 MISC ITEMS & SERVICES MISC ITEMS & SERVICES 056-060-600-529000 056-060-600-529000 Invoice Total: 20240097 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 16 - MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC PAYMENT # 17788 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 9,590.97 5,412.99 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 8281927227 8281927227 MOTOROLA APX 8500 RADIO MOTOROLA APX 8500 RADIO 011-030-300-522000 011-030-300-660015 240332 240332 515.09 9,075.88 9,590.97Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6687 - NEXTDAY DELIVERY SERVICE, LLC PAYMENT # 17789 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 Invoice 3067 836555 Description Account Line Item Amount POSTAGE REPLENISHMENT 011-010-130-522000 FI-0041 Invoice Total: FI-0041 5,000.00 5,000.00 412.99PRESORT MAILING SERVICES 011-010-130-522000 Invoice Total:412.99 VENDOR - 3346 - RAFAEL CORTES JR Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17790 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 1,107.65 Account Line Item Amount Page 41 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 43 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 080124 EE COMPUTER LOAN 011-000-000-110021 1,107.65 Invoice Total:1,107.65 VENDOR - 3900 - RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17791 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 425.00 Account Line Item Amount 248783 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU 6/30/2024 095-095-905-705020-425.00 Invoice Total:425.00 VENDOR - 6340 - S & J SUPPLY COMPANY, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17792 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 1,704.41 Account Line Item Amount S10021654300 PARTS & SUPPLIES 3 058-070-700-529000 240160 1,704.41 Invoice Total:1,704.41 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON PAYMENT # 17793 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 244,306.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 7501678013 LETTER AGREEMENT 055-050-585-660000 20240441 244,306.00 Invoice Total:244,306.00 VENDOR - 6132 - TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION PAYMENT # 17794 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 932.40 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 3007960977 MAINTENANCE SERVICES 7/2024 - 9/2024 055-050-570-529215 20240334 932.40 Invoice Total:932.40 VENDOR - 449 - UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SO PAYMENT # 17795 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 681.32 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 232426403 232426403 232426403 232426403 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 055-050-565-529000 056-060-600-529000 058-070-700-529000 059-080-800-529000 240244 240244 37.87 37.90 37.90 37.90 151.57 240244 240244 Invoice Total: Page 42 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 44 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 620240799 620240799 620240799 620240799 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 DIG ALERT NOTIFICATIONS 6/2024 055-050-565-529000 240302 240302 132.43 132.44 132.44 132.44 529.75 056-060-600-529000 058-070-700-529000 059-080-800-529000 240302 240302 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 3601 - UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA,PAYMENT # 17796 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 351.08 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount INV4551539 PORTABLE RESTROOM & SINK 6/6 - 7/3/2024 055-050-550-529000 20240118 122.54 Invoice Total:122.54 INV4552789 PORTABLE RESTROOM & SINK 6/6 - 7/3/24 055-050-550-529000 20240118 228.54 Invoice Total:228.54 VENDOR - 3407 - VERNON POLICE OFFICERS BENEFIT Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17797 PO or Contract 8/1/2024 2,631.33 Account Line Item Amount 17663 VERNON POLICE ASSOCIATION PAYROLL 011-000-000-210250 WARRANT 240725 2,631.33 Invoice Total:2,631.33 VENDOR - 2412 - CALIFORNIA ISO PAYMENT # 17798 PO or Contract 8/2/2024 172,618.25 Invoice Description Account 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520210 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520170 Line Item Amount 2024073031651 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 55374 2024073031651 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 55374 2024073031651 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 55374 2024073031651 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 55374 2024073031651 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 55374 2024073031651 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 55374 (4,054.96) (0.24) 50.53 2,964.98 (3,523.97) 530.70 Page 43 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 45 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 2024073031651 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 55374 2024073031651 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 55374 055-050-590-520210 12,906.95 163,744.26 172,618.25 055-050-590-520150 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 4075 - THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PAYMENT # 17800 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 144,109.75 Invoice Description Account 011-000-000-210210 055-000-000-210210 056-000-000-210210 058-000-000-210210 059-000-000-210210 Line Item Amount 17664 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 86,507.80 48,184.07 2,971.61 6,395.64 50.63 17664 17664 17664 17664 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 Invoice Total:144,109.75 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17803 PO or Contract 7/31/2024 241,248.21 Description Account Line Item Amount 17657 17657 17657 17657 17657 17657 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 011-000-000-210240 055-000-000-210240 056-000-000-210240 058-000-000-210240 059-000-000-210240 011-000-000-210240 161,190.40 64,006.86 3,619.40 9,516.92 87.23 2,827.40 241,248.21Invoice Total: VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17804 PO or Contract 7/30/2024 496,630.00 Description Account 011-010-100-512020 011-010-105-512020 Line Item Amount 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 2,285.00 19,716.19 Page 44 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 46 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 011-010-110-512020 14,898.89 6,704.50 13,806.30 9,137.98 31,089.01 29,797.77 21,454.39 17,481.36 14,104.28 5,860.23 7,598.43 8,492.36 36,849.91 6,803.82 46,285.87 1,589.21 10,180.91 24,533.50 23,093.27 67,144.31 19,616.87 011-010-115-512020 011-010-120-512020 011-010-125-512020 011-010-130-512020 011-030-300-512020 011-020-200-512020 011-040-400-512020 011-040-405-512020 011-040-410-512020 011-040-415-512020 011-040-420-512020 011-040-430-512020 055-050-550-512020 055-050-555-512020 055-050-570-512020 055-050-575-512020 055-050-580-512020 055-050-585-512020 055-050-586-512020- 055-050-590-512020 Page 45 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 47 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 1000000175881 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL MISC 99 (CLASSIC & PEPRA) 055-050-595-512020 4,916.63 18,275.97 34,714.40 198.64 056-060-600-512020 058-070-700-512020 059-080-800-512020 Invoice Total:496,630.00 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17805 PO or Contract 7/30/2024 150.92 443,033.17 290,358.42 1,172.58 Description Account Line Item Amount 1000000175882 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL 49 PROSECUTOR (CLASSIC) 011-010-115-512020 150.92 Invoice Total:150.92 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17806 PO or Contract 7/30/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount 1000000175882 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL FIRE 39 (CLASSIC) 011-030-305-512020 443,033.17 Invoice Total:443,033.17 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17807 PO or Contract 7/30/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount 1000000175882 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL (POLICE 10 CLASSIC) 011-030-300-512020 290,358.42 Invoice Total:290,358.42 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17808 PO or Contract 7/30/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount 1000000175882 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL FIRE (PEPRA) 011-030-305-512020 20 1,172.58 Invoice Total:1,172.58 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS PAYMENT # 17809 7/30/2024 844.50 Page 46 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 48 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 844.501000000175882 MONTHLY EXPENSE OF UAL (POLICE 29 PEPRA) 011-030-300-512020 Invoice Total:844.50 VENDOR - 2412 - CALIFORNIA ISO PAYMENT # 17810 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 31,209.64 Invoice Description Account 055-050-590-520180 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520210 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520210 055-050-590-520150 Line Item Amount 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 08/23 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 08/23 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 08/23 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 08/23 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 62983 2024080631652 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 62983 2024080631652 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 62983 2024080631652 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 62983 2024080631652 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 62983 2024080631652 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 62983 (107,312.45) 30,808.66 735.90 624.26 (1,722.34) (449.87) (132.05) 25.38 2,094.72 4,294.46 15,150.95 87,092.02 31,209.64Invoice Total: VENDOR - 4303 - ATHENS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC PAYMENT # 17811 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 7,558.75 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount IVC36138 JULY 2024 TPA - WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 011-010-120-529220 7,558.75 Page 47 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 49 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:7,558.75 8/9/2024VENDOR - 7667 - C&L REFRIGERATION CORPORATION PAYMENT # 17812 PO or Contract 1,691.09 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 250656A 250656A BACKUP BLOWER MOTOR & WHEEL BACKUP BLOWER MOTOR & WHEEL 055-050-586-529000- 055-050-586-529004- 240516 240516 372.09 1,319.00 1,691.09Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6870 - CARLOS SALDANA Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17813 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 75.07 Account Line Item Amount 071124 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 011-030-300-527000 75.07 Invoice Total:75.07 VENDOR - 1401 - CENTRAL BASIN MWD PAYMENT # 17814 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 22,188.22 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount VERJUN24 VERJUN24 POTABLE WATER - JUNE 2024 POTABLE WATER - JUNE 2024 058-070-700-520130 055-050-586-520135- 6,451.00 15,737.22 22,188.22Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5490 - CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 PAYMENT # 17815 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 933.51 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 4194988143 4194988143 4194988143 4194988143 UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 011-040-430-524000 011-040-415-524000 011-040-420-524000 011-040-435-524000 CS-1397 CS-1397 66.37 13.08 CS-1397 35.15 CS-1397 196.34 310.94 90.42 Invoice Total: CS-13974195738141 4195738141 4195738141 4195738141 UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 011-040-430-524000 011-040-415-524000 011-040-420-524000 011-040-435-524000 CS-1397 13.08 CS-1397 35.15 CS-1397 174.63 313.28 13.08 Invoice Total: CS-13974197187363UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 011-040-415-524000 Page 48 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 50 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 4197187363 4197187363 4197187363 UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 011-040-420-524000 CS-1397 CS-1397 29.26 92.32011-040-430-524000 011-040-435-524000 CS-1397 174.63 309.29Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5490 - CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 PAYMENT # 17816 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 1,536.73 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 4196462267 4196462267 4196462267 4196462267 UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE 011-040-420-524000 011-040-415-524000 011-040-430-524000 011-040-435-524000 CS-1397 CS-1397 35.15 13.08 CS-1397 88.08 CS-1397 175.80 312.11 217.59 63.77 Invoice Total: 20250073 20250073 20250073 20250073 20250073 Invoice Total: 20250073 20250073 20250073 20250073 20250073 Invoice Total: 4197819288 4197819288 4197819288 4197819288 4197819288 UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES 055-050-586-524000- 056-060-600-524000 058-070-700-524000 055-050-550-524000 055-050-555-524000 124.91 14.36 176.58 597.21 218.76 63.77 4198605668 4198605668 4198605668 4198605668 4198605668 UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES 055-050-586-524000- 056-060-600-524000 058-070-700-524000 055-050-550-524000 055-050-555-524000 124.91 14.36 205.61 627.41 VENDOR - 3975 - CNS ENGINEERS, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17817 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 38,270.85 Account Line Item Amount 801776 801776 CONSULTING SERVICES CONSULTING SERVICES 011-040-430-660000 011-595-430-660000 CS-0099 CS-0099 4,389.67 33,881.18 38,270.85Invoice Total: VENDOR - 2051 - EFRAIN SANDOVAL Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17818 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 317.32 Account Line Item Amount Page 49 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 51 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 062724 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT (SCPPA MEETING 6/26/24) 055-050-590-529500 317.32 Invoice Total:317.32 VENDOR - 399 - GARVEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17819 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 99.11 Account Line Item Amount 162588 AUTO PARTS 011-040-420-522000 250042 99.11 Invoice Total:99.11 VENDOR - 4840 - GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTING Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17820 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 25,320.47 Account Line Item Amount 789374 789375 SERVICES AGREEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 056-060-600-529000 20240134 Invoice Total: 20240134 17,113.60 17,113.60 8,206.87 8,206.87 056-060-600-529000 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 1729 - GOVCONNECTION, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17821 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 8,900.00 Account Line Item Amount 75315090 SUBSCRIPTION- INFOWATER SOFTWARE 058-070-700-522010 240447 8,900.00 Invoice Total:8,900.00 VENDOR - 3606 - INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC PAYMENT # 17822 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 451.90 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 1101183267 ADDITIONAL OFFICE 365 LICESNSES 011-010-110-529110 25000020230086 Invoice Total: 180.70 180.70 271.20 271.20 1101183270 ADDITIONAL OFFICE 365 LICESNSES 011-010-110-529110 25000120230086 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5108 - JEMMOTT ROLLINS GROUP, INC PAYMENT # 17823 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 5,500.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount JULY24 VERNON COMMUNITY FUND ADMINISTRATION 011-010-140-529215 20240111 5,500.00 Page 50 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 52 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:5,500.00 8/9/2024VENDOR - 2169 - KONECRANES, INC PAYMENT # 17824 PO or Contract 810.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 155023649 INSPECTION SERVICES 5/2024 055-050-570-529000 20240116 810.00 Invoice Total:810.00 VENDOR - 804 - LB JOHNSON INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17825 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 2,861.67 Account Line Item Amount 129156 SUPPLIES BATTERIES SUPPLIES TOOLS 055-050-570-522000 240103 Invoice Total: 240103 206.96 206.96 175.11 175.11 131.38 131.38 54.71 54.71 22.87 22.87 140.14 140.14 295.58 295.58 21.89 21.89 25.62 129584 130195 130621 130654 130849 131028 131447 131666 131755 131800 131908 131953 055-050-555-522000 055-050-570-522000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 055-050-555-529000 055-050-555-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 055-050-560-522000 055-050-560-522000 055-050-555-529000 Invoice Total: 240103 Invoice Total: 240043 Invoice Total: 240043TOOLS Invoice Total: 240103TOOLS Invoice Total: 240103STAFF TOOLS TOOLS Invoice Total: 240043 Invoice Total: 240043PARTS Invoice Total: 240043 25.62 44.87PARTS Invoice Total: 240103 44.87 94.13 94.13 92.94 92.94 377.74 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES STAFF TOOLS Invoice Total: 240103 Invoice Total: 240103 Page 51 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 53 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:377.74 42.68131954 132690 459495 821704 PARTS PARTS TOOLS PARTS 055-050-570-529000 058-070-700-529000 055-050-555-529000 058-070-700-529000 240103 Invoice Total: 240043 42.68 592.08 592.08 532.50 532.50 10.47 Invoice Total: 240103 Invoice Total: 240043 Invoice Total:10.47 VENDOR - 1150 - MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17826 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 4,132.51 Account Line Item Amount 25087745 PARTS 055-050-586-529000-240126 Invoice Total: 240126 1,454.50 1,454.50 1,420.56 1,420.56 936.26 25180443 26559503 27467859 27983030 PARTS 055-050-586-529000- 055-050-586-529000- 055-050-586-529000- 055-050-586-529000- Invoice Total: 240126PARTS Invoice Total: 240126 936.26 PARTS 218.59 Invoice Total: 240126 218.59 CUTOFF WHEEL 102.60 Invoice Total:102.60 VENDOR - 209 - MERRIMAC PETROLEUM, INC. Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17827 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 27,833.04 1,825.10 Account Line Item Amount 2232966 FUEL 011-000-000-120030 250094 27,833.04 Invoice Total:27,833.04 VENDOR - 4111 - PACIFIC COMMERCIAL TRUCK BODY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17828 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 Account Line Item Amount 30211 30211 RETROFIT TRAILER RETROFIT TRAILER 011-040-420-522000 011-040-420-529000 250087 250087 485.10 1,340.00 1,825.10Invoice Total: Page 52 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 54 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 6884 - RELX, INC Invoice PAYMENT # 17829 8/9/2024 Line Item Amount 208.00 Description Account PO or Contract 3095251919 SUBSCRIPTION 07/24 011-010-115-529600 LD-0045 208.00 Invoice Total:208.00 VENDOR - 6340 - S & J SUPPLY COMPANY, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17830 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 4,735.48 Account Line Item Amount S10023139700 PARTS & SUPPLIES 1 058-070-700-529000 240027 4,735.48 Invoice Total:4,735.48 VENDOR - 2079 - SO CAL JOINT POLE COMMITTEE PAYMENT # 17831 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 2,626.91 Invoice 22164 22228 Description Account Line Item Amount JOINT POLE COMMITTEE 055-050-585-529215 1,559.90 1,559.90 1,067.01 1,067.01 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: JOINT POLE COMMITTEE 055-050-585-529215 VENDOR - 3775 - STAPLEMAN MEDIA SERVICES, INC.PAYMENT # 17832 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 240.35 188.16 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 27734 STAFF BUSINESS CARDS 011-020-200-522000 250105 240.35 Invoice Total:240.35 VENDOR - 3601 - UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17833 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 Account Line Item Amount 11413876991 PORTABLE RESTOOM 6/18 - 7/15/2024 058-070-700-529000 20240117 188.16 Invoice Total:188.16 VENDOR - 1658 - WATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT PAYMENT # 17834 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 167,550.30 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount Page 53 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 55 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 63024 GROUNDWATER PROD & ASSESSMENT - JUNE 2024 058-070-700-520110 167,550.30 Invoice Total:167,550.30 VENDOR - 7663 - WEST SOTO STREET PARTNERS PAYMENT # 17835 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 500.00 1,086.38 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 071924 RENTAL SERVICES - 8/2024 055-050-595-529703-20240080 500.00 Invoice Total:500.00 VENDOR - 3146 - CITY OF VERNON, FSA ACCOUNT PAYMENT # 17851 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 17662 FSA AMOUNTS, WARRANT 240725 011-000-000-100013 1,086.38 Invoice Total:1,086.38 VENDOR - 3146 - CITY OF VERNON, FSA ACCOUNT PAYMENT # 17860 PO or Contract 8/8/2024 1,086.38 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 18466 FSA AMOUNTS, WARRANT 240808 011-000-000-100013 1,086.38 Invoice Total:1,086.38 VENDOR - 2517 - SCPPA Invoice PAYMENT # 17865 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 321,540.00 Description Account Line Item Amount PV0824 PV0824 PV0824 AUGUST 2024 CAPACITY JULY 2024 ENERGY PSF 055-050-590-520180 055-050-590-520150 055-000-000-122100 253,092.00 58,448.00 10,000.00 321,540.00Invoice Total: VENDOR - 3266 - AON RISK INSURANCE SERVICES WEST, Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17866 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 143.10 Account Line Item Amount 8200000363748 COMMERCIAL PROPERTY COVERAGE 055-050-580-520035 143.10 Invoice Total:143.10 Page 54 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 56 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 1444 - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PAYMENT # 17867 8/15/2024 Line Item Amount 1,396,939.25 1,384,560.75 5,000.00 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract C0012257 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 08/2024 011-030-305-529215 1,396,939.25 Invoice Total:1,396,939.25 VENDOR - 1444 - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PAYMENT # 17868 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount C0012278 FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 09/2024 011-030-305-529215 1,384,560.75 Invoice Total:1,384,560.75 VENDOR - 956 - CROSSPOINT NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.PAYMENT # 17869 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount IN2024219 MISC MITEL PHONE SUPPORT 011-010-110-529110 240345 5,000.00 Invoice Total:5,000.00 VENDOR - 947 - DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION PAYMENT # 17870 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 180.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount B3840903 PUBLICATION SERVICES 011-010-125-525000 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: B3840904 PUBLICATION SERVICES 011-010-125-525000 VENDOR - 6698 - MARCUS FINO Invoice PAYMENT # 17871 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 419.80 92.91 Description Account Line Item Amount 06182024 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 011-030-300-529500 419.80 Invoice Total:419.80 VENDOR - 1150 - MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17872 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 Account Line Item Amount 29466794 PARTS & SUPPLIES 055-050-586-529000-250058 92.91 Invoice Total:92.91 Page 55 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 57 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 5392 - TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 PAYMENT # 17873 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 Line Item Amount 3,087.00 Invoice Description Account 011-000-000-210250 055-000-000-210250 058-000-000-210250 17667 JULY 2024 TEAMSTERS ASSOCIATION 2,352.00 315.00 DUES 17667 17667 JULY 2024 TEAMSTERS ASSOCIATION DUES JULY 2024 TEAMSTERS ASSOCIATION DUES 420.00 Invoice Total:3,087.00 VENDOR - 2227 - US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PAYMENT # 17874 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 180.21 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount GG1766EI0624 JUNE 2024 055-050-590-520150 180.21 Invoice Total:180.21 VENDOR - 7541 - MISSIONSQUARE RETIREMENT PAYMENT # 17875 PO or Contract 7/25/2024 29,056.98 Invoice Description Account 011-000-000-210220 055-000-000-210220 056-000-000-210220 058-000-000-210220 059-000-000-210220 Line Item Amount 17668 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 13,684.19 13,730.69 650.00 17668 17668 17668 17668 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240725 942.10 50.00 Invoice Total:29,056.98 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17876 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 239,972.59 Description Account Line Item Amount 18464 18464 18464 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 011-000-000-210240 055-000-000-210240 056-000-000-210240 160,480.03 66,074.73 3,697.67 Page 56 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 58 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 18464 18464 18464 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 CALPERS PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 058-000-000-210240 9,627.93 94.35059-000-000-210240 011-010-130-523034 (2.12) Invoice Total:239,972.59 VENDOR - 1635 - EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17878 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 52,274.73 27,982.56 65,952.62 Account Line Item Amount 18465 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 011-000-000-210210 28,869.07 19,688.31 1,543.82 2,146.04 27.49 240808 18465 18465 18465 18465 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 055-000-000-210210 240808 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 056-000-000-210210 240808 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 058-000-000-210210 240808 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 059-000-000-210210 240808 Invoice Total:52,274.73 VENDOR - 7541 - MISSIONSQUARE RETIREMENT PAYMENT # 17880 PO or Contract 8/8/2024 Invoice Description Account 011-000-000-210220 055-000-000-210220 056-000-000-210220 058-000-000-210220 059-000-000-210220 Line Item Amount 18470 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 13,740.56 12,797.21 450.00 18470 18470 18470 18470 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 944.79 50.00 Invoice Total:27,982.56 VENDOR - 714 - CALPERS Invoice PAYMENT # 17881 PO or Contract 7/23/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount Page 57 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 59 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 1000000176137 REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 76 011-010-105-512020 65,952.62 Invoice Total:65,952.62 VENDOR - 1635 - EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT PAYMENT # 17882 PO or Contract 8/7/2024 589.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount L1975253840 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFIT CHARGE 011-040-415-513070 589.00 Invoice Total:589.00 VENDOR - 1635 - EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT PAYMENT # 17883 PO or Contract 7/26/2024 47,032.06 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 17658 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 011-000-000-210210 240725 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 055-000-000-210210 240725 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 056-000-000-210210 240725 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 058-000-000-210210 240725 26,840.99 17,130.97 1,058.05 1,977.63 24.42 17658 17658 17658 17658 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYROLL WARRANT 059-000-000-210210 240725 Invoice Total:47,032.06 VENDOR - 4075 - THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY PAYMENT # 17890 PO or Contract 8/9/2024 157,733.95 Invoice Description Account 011-000-000-210210 055-000-000-210210 056-000-000-210210 058-000-000-210210 059-000-000-210210 Line Item Amount 18468 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 91,576.58 55,435.78 3,824.75 6,838.62 58.22 18468 18468 18468 18468 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 FWH, SSW, AND MEDICARE PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 Invoice Total:157,733.95 Page 58 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 60 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 7246 - ADRIANO MARKI Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17891 8/16/2024 Line Item Amount 808.89 Account PO or Contract 021424 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT STEAM LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 055-050-586-529500-600.65 600.65 28.24 Invoice Total: Invoice Total: Invoice Total: 080624 080724 055-050-586-529670- 055-050-586-529670- 28.24 180.00 180.00 VENDOR - 7393 - APPLY THE PRESSURE GROUP PAYMENT # 17892 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 5,175.00 595.54 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 115 ON CALL GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SVCS 011-040-430-529215 20240066 5,175.00 Invoice Total:5,175.00 VENDOR - 5490 - CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 PAYMENT # 17893 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 4199317222 4199317222 4199317222 4199317222 4199317222 UNIFORM SERVICES 055-050-586-524000- 056-060-600-524000 058-070-700-524000 055-050-550-524000 055-050-555-524000 20250073 20250073 217.59 63.77UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES 20250073 124.91 14.3620250073 20250073 174.91 595.54Invoice Total: VENDOR - 1206 - DELL MARKETING LP PAYMENT # 17894 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 14,676.38 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 10761371318 SPARE DELL LAPTOPS FOR IT 10761371318 SPARE DELL LAPTOPS FOR IT 011-010-110-522010 011-010-110-522010 240512 240512 65.00 14,611.38 14,676.38Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6714 - DUTHIE ELECTRIC SERVICE PAYMENT # 17895 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 1,194.13 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount Page 59 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 61 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 S129488 SERVICE CALL 058-070-700-529000 20240424 1,194.13 Invoice Total:1,194.13 VENDOR - 1936 - EMPIRE CHEMICAL CO., INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17896 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 4,973.90 Account Line Item Amount S6567689001 CLEANING SUPPLIES S6567689001 CLEANING SUPPLIES 011-040-435-522000 011-040-435-522000 250125 250125 599.88 4,374.02 4,973.90Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7353 - EXTENDED OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC PAYMENT # 17897 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 457.20 750.50 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 20826 ADDITIONAL PRI LINE AGREEMENT 011-010-110-529110 20240378 457.20 Invoice Total:457.20 VENDOR - 7107 - GEOTAB USA, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17898 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 Account Line Item Amount IN394543 GEOTAB GPS SERVICES 011-040-420-529000 20240030 750.50 Invoice Total:750.50 VENDOR - 1712 - GRAINGER, CO Invoice PAYMENT # 17899 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 15,545.74 Description Account Line Item Amount 9012227733 9014252929 9064693428 9086140150 9109146895 9116972093 RETROFIT KITS 011-040-415-522000 240117 Invoice Total: 240117 3,908.83 3,908.83 4,704.19 4,704.19 331.77 331.77 TOOLS & SUPPLIES RUBBER BOOTS TRAFFIC CONES CAUTION SIGNS RUBBER BOOTS 011-040-415-522000 055-050-586-520231- 055-050-555-529000 055-050-586-520231- 055-050-560-529000 Invoice Total: 240035 Invoice Total: 240114 878.92 878.92Invoice Total: 240035 191.60 Invoice Total: 240114 191.60 178.24 Page 60 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 62 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:178.24 3,010.46 3,010.46 (1,505.23) (1,505.23) 252.91 9143479427 9153830634 9166512617 9179483863 9193325967 9209752832 STORAGE TANK 058-070-700-529000 058-070-700-529000 056-060-600-522000 055-050-560-529000 011-040-415-522000 011-040-415-522000 240042 Invoice Total: 240042PARTIAL CREDIT FOR INV. 9143479427 MISC SUPPLIES Invoice Total: 240071 Invoice Total: 250099 252.91 INDICATOR HOLDER PARTS & SUPPLIES 1,021.53 1,021.53 222.48 Invoice Total: 250090 Invoice Total: 250090 222.48 PARTS & SUPPLIES 2,350.04 2,350.04Invoice Total: VENDOR - 5323 - IBEW LOCAL 47 Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17900 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 4,218.58 Account 055-000-000-210250 056-000-000-210250 058-000-000-210250 Line Item Amount 18469 IBEW MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 3,868.29 183.9318469 18469 IBEW MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 IBEW MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION PAYROLL WARRANT 240808 166.36 Invoice Total:4,218.58 VENDOR - 1956 - IGNACIO ESTRADA III Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17901 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 752.80 Account Line Item Amount 061924 2023-2024 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 011-010-120-529680 752.80 Invoice Total:752.80 VENDOR - 6886 - JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17902 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 12,028.90 Account Line Item Amount D3775700012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU 6/28/2024 055-050-580-529225 D3775700012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU 6/28/2024 056-060-600-529225 20240020 20240020 1,634.50 767.00 Page 61 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 63 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 D3775700012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU 6/28/2024 058-070-700-529225 20240020 20240020 293.00 8,762.65 571.75 D3775700012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU 6/28/2024 055-050-586-529235- D3775700012 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THRU 6/28/2024 055-050-560-529215 20240020 Invoice Total:12,028.90 VENDOR - 5034 - KRONOS INCORPORATED PAYMENT # 17903 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 15,724.80 Invoice 12122433 12276297 Description Account Line Item Amount KRONOS TELESTAFF SOFTWARE - IT 011-010-110-529110 20240444 Invoice Total: 20240445 9,484.80 9,484.80 6,240.00 6,240.00 TELESTAFF CLOUD SAAS & EQUIPMENT 011-010-110-529110 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6520 - MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC PAYMENT # 17904 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 4,708.42 Invoice Description CYLINDER RENTAL SPECIALTY GASES Account Line Item Amount 0030014007 055-050-586-529000-LP-0790 Invoice Total: LP-0790 61.32 61.32 30005153 055-050-586-529000-4,647.10 4,647.10Invoice Total: VENDOR - 1150 - MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY PAYMENT # 17905 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 264.49 17,280.00 75,667.50 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 29463154 THREADED THERMOMETER 055-050-586-529000-250058 264.49 Invoice Total:264.49 VENDOR - 7088 - MONDAY.COM LTD PAYMENT # 17906 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount IN2401014879 PROJECT MGMT SOFTWARE 011-010-110-660005 20240442 17,280.00 Invoice Total:17,280.00 VENDOR - 5614 - NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SERVICES,PAYMENT # 17907 8/16/2024 Page 62 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 64 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice 1856 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 9,226.88PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 058-070-700-660000 058-070-700-660000 058-070-700-529000 055-050-585-660000 20240224 202402241856 1856 1856 712.50 1,425.0020240224 20240224 64,303.12 75,667.50Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6340 - S & J SUPPLY COMPANY, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17908 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 852.21 Account Line Item Amount S10021654300 CTS PJ BALL AMS 4 058-070-700-529000 240160 852.21 Invoice Total:852.21 VENDOR - 6198 - S&S LABOR FORCE, INC PAYMENT # 17909 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 24,924.50 Invoice 16000 16002 Description Account Line Item Amount SECURITY SERVICES - CITY HALL 07/24 011-040-415-529215 20230234 Invoice Total: 20230234 12,252.50 12,252.50 12,672.00SECURITY SERVICES - EXTRA PATROL 07/24 011-040-415-529215 Invoice Total:12,672.00 VENDOR - 7361 - SIEMENS ENERGY, INC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17910 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 221,074.51 Account Line Item Amount 6018501 CUSTOMER SUPPORT AGREEMENT 055-050-586-529225-20240106 221,074.51 Invoice Total:221,074.51 VENDOR - 3775 - STAPLEMAN MEDIA SERVICES, INC.PAYMENT # 17911 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 120.17 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 27745 BUSINESS CARDS - L.GRIZZELLE 011-010-120-522000 250122 120.17 Invoice Total:120.17 VENDOR - 3601 - UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA,PAYMENT # 17912 8/16/2024 267.14 Page 63 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 65 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 267.14INV4543456PORTABLE RESTROOM 06/24 - 4990 SEVILLE 055-050-550-529000 20240118 Invoice Total:267.14 VENDOR - 7343 - USIPCOMMUNICATION, LLC Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17913 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 17,577.73 Account Line Item Amount IN233093 IN233108 INTERNET PROVIDER INTERNET PROVIDER 059-080-800-520173 20240299 Invoice Total: 20240332 9,271.99 9,271.99 8,305.74 8,305.74 059-080-800-520173 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 6070 - VERITIV OPERATING COMPANY PAYMENT # 17914 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 4,724.22 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 6950775520 FUEL CHARGE FUEL CHARGE 011-040-435-522000 8.27 8.27Invoice Total: 6950838145 011-040-435-522000 011-040-435-522000 8.27 Invoice Total: 240502 8.27 74541659710 RECYCLED COPY PAPER 4,707.68 4,707.68Invoice Total: VENDOR - 3407 - VERNON POLICE OFFICERS BENEFIT PAYMENT # 17915 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 2,631.33 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 18467 VERNON POLICE ASSOCIATION PAYROLL 011-000-000-210250 WARRANT 240808 2,631.33 Invoice Total:2,631.33 VENDOR - 1552 - HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PAYMENT # 17916 PO or Contract 7/22/2024 11,903.79 Invoice Description Account 058-070-700-522000 058-070-700-529000 Line Item Amount 061724_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 061724_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 24005320240035 24005320240035 1,381.02 10,522.77 Page 64 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 66 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:11,903.79 7/22/2024VENDOR - 1552 - HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PAYMENT # 17917 PO or Contract 697.20 Invoice Description Account 056-060-600-522000 056-060-600-529000 Line Item Amount 062724_MULTI SUPPLIES 24007720240035 24007720240035 Invoice Total: 131.92 565.28 697.20 PLE 062724_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE VENDOR - 1552 - HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PAYMENT # 17918 PO or Contract 7/22/2024 2,181.51 Invoice Description Account 055-050-586-522000- 055-050-586-529000- 055-050-586-529003- Line Item Amount 061824_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 061824_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 061824_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 24008020240035 24008020240035 24008020240035 Invoice Total: 979.09 326.86 875.56 2,181.51 VENDOR - 1552 - HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Invoice Description PAYMENT # 17919 PO or Contract 7/22/2024 1,976.77 8,775.89 Account Line Item Amount 062924_MULTI VPU T&D - SUPPLIES PLE 055-050-555-529000 24010220240035 1,976.77 Invoice Total:1,976.77 VENDOR - 1481 - VERIZON WIRELESS PAYMENT # 17920 PO or Contract 7/24/2024 Invoice Description Account 011-010-110-526010 011-010-110-526010 011-010-110-526010 Line Item Amount 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE IT-0159-1 IT-0159-1 IT-0159-1 3,396.35 815.10 1,126.36 Page 65 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 67 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE 011-010-110-526010 IT-0159-1 IT-0159-1 1,712.54 52.30011-010-110-526010 011-010-110-526010 011-010-110-526010 011-010-110-526010 011-010-110-526010 IT-0159-1 36.48 IT-0159-1 210.22 239.63 1,186.91 8,775.89 IT-0159-1 IT-0159-1 Invoice Total: VENDOR - 1481 - VERIZON WIRELESS PAYMENT # 17921 PO or Contract 7/24/2024 2,771.31 Invoice Description Account 055-050-550-526010 055-050-580-526010 056-060-600-526010 Line Item Amount 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE(2) 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE(2) 060724_MULTI PERIOD: 05/08/24-06/07/24 PLE(2) IT-0159-1 IT-0159-1 1,700.43 673.08 IT-0159-1 397.80 Invoice Total:2,771.31 VENDOR - 2412 - CALIFORNIA ISO PAYMENT # 17971 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 536,139.57 Invoice Description Account 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520240 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520170 Line Item Amount 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 04/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 05/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 05/24 43743 (74,425.33) (1,959.92) 216.42 36.26 (412.89) (121.66) Page 66 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 68 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 05/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 07/22 055-050-590-520190 (37.24) (477.50)055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520210 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520170 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520180 055-050-590-520190 055-050-590-520210 055-050-590-520240 055-050-590-520150 055-050-590-520170 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 07/22 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 07/22 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 08/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 08/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 08/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 08/24 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 10/22 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 10/22 43743 2024081331653 REVISED CHARGES 10/22 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 43743 2024081331653 INITIAL CHARGES 07/24 43743 5,106.18 15,384.67 (203.76) 311.90 2,303.95 15,664.62 (23.10) 3,767.99 60,330.10 (3,082.60) 896.54 13,954.47 29,809.79 111,270.32 357,830.36 536,139.57Invoice Total: VENDOR - 7703 - SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY PAYMENT # 17988 PO or Contract 8/16/2024 124,821.73 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount B0F690 B0F690 RETIREE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 RETIREE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 011-010-120-513035 011-010-120-529215 123,995.73 826.00 Page 67 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 69 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:124,821.73 8/16/2024VENDOR - 7703 - SELF INSURED SERVICES COMPANY PAYMENT # 18041 PO or Contract 334,315.50 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount B0F68Z ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 011-000-000-210221 011-000-000-210222 011-000-000-210223 011-000-000-210230 011-010-105-529215 011-010-120-529215 011-010-125-529215 011-010-130-523034 011-010-130-529215 011-020-200-529215 011-030-300-529215 011-040-400-529215 011-040-405-529215 011-040-415-529215 011-040-430-529215 055-000-000-210221 055-000-000-210222 055-000-000-210223 055-000-000-210230 055-050-555-529215 055-050-570-529215 055-050-575-529215 055-050-580-529215 055-050-585-529215 055-050-586-529215- 055-050-590-529215 055-050-595-529215 056-000-000-210221 056-000-000-210222 056-000-000-210223 192,792.98 12,974.52 6,934.80 2,559.85 32.11 B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z 1,445.95 3.38 855.48 20.28 15.21 99.71 11.83 10.14 10.14 32.11 80,224.38 5,787.47 5,384.77 948.85 20.28 1.69 5.07 11.83 13.52 32.11 10.14 1.69 4,705.66 304.72 357.31 Page 68 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 70 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z B0F68Z ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 ACTIVE MEDICAL PREMIUMS 08/24 056-000-000-210230 76.56 5.07056-060-600-529215 058-000-000-210221 058-000-000-210222 058-000-000-210223 058-000-000-210230 058-070-700-529215 059-000-000-210221 059-000-000-210223 059-000-000-210230 16,636.49 1,083.30 609.16 242.82 18.59 33.94 0.09 1.50 Invoice Total:334,315.50 VENDOR - 1552 - HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES PAYMENT # 18011 PO or Contract 8/2/2024 6,918.69 Invoice Description Account 011-040-415-522000 011-040-410-522000 011-040-435-522000 Line Item Amount 062524_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 062524_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 062524_MULTI SUPPLIES PLE 24012920240035 24012920240035 24012920240035 Invoice Total: 5,036.08 1,856.18 26.43 6,918.69 VENDOR - 3049 - PETRELLI ELECTRIC, INC PAYMENT # 18039 PO or Contract 8/15/2024 1,809,899.46 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 240222 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 ELECTRIC SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 07/24 PRIME DATA CENTER 011-010-110-529210 011-040-430-529000 055-050-550-529000 055-050-565-529000 055-050-585-660000 056-060-605-529702 058-070-700-529000 059-080-800-529000 055-000-000-111100 055-000-000-111100 055-000-000-111100 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 LP-0761-1 5,751.34 30,032.32 172,437.12 469,148.45 850,249.61 12,881.73 12,091.57 5,638.65 240222 240222 240222 240222 240222 240222 240222 240222 240222 240222 219,056.15 26,500.57 6,111.95 CORESIGHT DATA CENTER GOODMAN DATA CENTER Page 69 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 71 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice Total:1,809,899.46 8/5/2024VENDOR - 778 - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE Invoice Description PAYMENT # 18060 PO or Contract 79.01 100.73 18.35 22.68 33.25 37.16 Account Line Item Amount 062424 ACCT 8369059794 06/24 011-040-430-526000 79.01 Invoice Total:79.01 VENDOR - 778 - CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE PAYMENT # 18042 PO or Contract 8/5/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 062424(2)ACCT 0863577777 06/24 011-040-430-526000 100.73 Invoice Total:100.73 VENDOR - 1581 - THE GAS COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 18043 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 Account Line Item Amount 071024 ACCT 02840008003 07/24 011-030-305-526000 18.35 Invoice Total:18.35 VENDOR - 1581 - THE GAS COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 18044 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 Account Line Item Amount 071124 ACCT 102200333 011-056-060-526000 22.68 Invoice Total:22.68 VENDOR - 1581 - THE GAS COMPANY Invoice Description PAYMENT # 18045 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 Account Line Item Amount 070124 ACCT 1271000800 011-040-415-526000 33.25 Invoice Total:33.25 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18046 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 Description Account Line Item Amount 062424 ACCT 700268089452 055-050-555-526000 37.16 Invoice Total:37.16 Page 70 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 72 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18047 8/6/2024 Line Item Amount 53.32 67.42 Description Description Description Description Description Description Account PO or Contract 071624 ACCT 700505913951 011-040-415-526000 53.32 Invoice Total:53.32 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18048 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 Account Line Item Amount 073024 ACCT 700268089452 011-040-415-526000 67.42 Invoice Total:67.42 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18049 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 77.75 Account Line Item Amount 062724 ACCT 700294961280 011-040-430-526000 77.75 Invoice Total:77.75 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18050 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 89.23 Account Line Item Amount 070124 ACCT 700294961280 011-040-430-526000 89.23 Invoice Total:89.23 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18051 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 548.88 556.68 Account Line Item Amount 070224 ACCT 700388948624 011-0410-430-526000 548.88 Invoice Total:548.88 VENDOR - 59 - SO CAL EDISON Invoice PAYMENT # 18052 PO or Contract 8/6/2024 Account Line Item Amount 070124(2)ACCT 700356726234 055-050-590-526010 556.68 Invoice Total:556.68 Page 71 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 73 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 VENDOR - 249 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION PAYMENT # 18053 8/5/2024 Line Item Amount 144.16 21.55 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract 858534071 PERIOD: 08/24 055-050-580-522000 144.16 Invoice Total:144.16 VENDOR - 249 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION PAYMENT # 18054 PO or Contract 8/5/2024 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 856422351 PERIOD: 07/24 011-010-120-522000 21.55 Invoice Total:21.55 VENDOR - 249 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION PAYMENT # 18055 PO or Contract 8/5/2024 21.20 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 855804265 PERIOD: 07/24 011-010-105-522000 21.20 Invoice Total:21.20 VENDOR - 249 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION PAYMENT # 18056 PO or Contract 8/5/2024 2.43 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 967657074 PERIOD: 06/24 011-010-120-522000 2.43 Invoice Total:2.43 VENDOR - 5594 - US BANK CORPORATE Invoice Description PAYMENT # 18059 PO or Contract 8/5/2024 108,298.57 Account Line Item Amount 072624 PURCHASE CARD STATEMENT 07/24 999-000-000-200105 108,298.57 Invoice Total:108,298.57 VENDOR - 2242 - CA DEPARTMENT OF TAX & FEE PAYMENT # 18058 PO or Contract 7/23/2024 264.00 Invoice Description Account Line Item Amount 072224 FY 2024 DIESEL FUEL EXCISE TAX 011-040-420-527000 264.00 Invoice Total:264.00 VENDOR - 2242 - CA DEPARTMENT OF TAX & FEE PAYMENT # 18057 7/25/2024 77,191.00 Page 72 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 74 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 Invoice 072324 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 77,191.00ELECTRICAL ENERGY SURCHARGE 04/24- 055-000-000-200230 06/24 Invoice Total:77,191.00 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT Invoice 7/25/2024 720,154.06 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 072524 072524 072524 072524 072524 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT 011-000-000-210110 055-000-000-210110 056-000-000-210110 058-000-000-210110 059-000-000-210110 448,449.85 221,241.15 14,374.46 35,839.45 249.15 Invoice Total:720,154.06 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT Invoice 8/8/2024 793,214.20 Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 080824 080824 080824 080824 080824 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT 011-000-000-210110 055-000-000-210110 056-000-000-210110 058-000-000-210110 059-000-000-210110 502,520.74 234,998.32 18,499.05 36,927.09 269.00 Invoice Total:793,214.20 Page 73 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 75 of 76 CITY OF VERNON OPERATING ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 135 DATE 9/17/2024 FUND 011 - GENERAL EARLY CHECKS TOTAL 532,951.35 242,181.08 1,861.50 ELECTRONIC TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 8,198,345.67$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,665,394.32 10,777,698.71 220,794.62 402,777.31 161,869.92 425.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 055 - LIGHT & POWER 11,019,879.79 222,656.12 458,768.35 161,977.23 4,965.00 056 - NATURAL GAS $ 058 - WATER $55,991.04 059 - FIBER $ 095 - SEWC JPA $ 107.31 4,540.00 999 - POOLED/TREASURY 108,298.57 19,337,258.45 108,298.57 20,174,890.73Total$837,632.28 Page 74 of 74 . . Item 5 Page 76 of 76 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Jessica Alcaraz, Financial Services Administrator Department:Finance Submitted by:Angela Melgar, Finance Manager Subject Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register Recommendation Approve Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69, for the period of December 31, 2023 through August 17, 2024 and consisting of ratification of electronic payments totaling $5,000. Background Vernon Municipal Code Section 2.32.060 indicates the City Treasurer, or an authorized designee, shall prepare warrants covering claims or demands against the City which are to be presented to City Council for its audit and approval. Pursuant to the aforementioned code section, the Deputy City Treasurer has prepared Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69 covering claims and demands presented during the period of December 31, 2023 through August 17, 2024, drawn, or to be drawn, from East West Bank for City Council approval. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact of approving Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69, totals $5,000. The Finance Department has determined that sufficient funds to pay such claims/demands, are available in the respective accounts referenced on RDA Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69. Attachments 1. Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69 . . Item 6 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT FINANCE/TREASURY DEPARTMENT DATE: September 11, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Joaquin Leon, Deputy City Treasurer RE: Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register for City Council Agenda of September 17, 2024 It is recommended that the attached Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69 be approved at the City Council meeting of September 17, 2024. Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69 totals $5,000.00, and covers claims and demands presented for December 31, 2023 to August 17, 2024, drawn or to be drawn, from East West Bank. The following list details the components of Redevelopment Agency Obligation Retirement Account Warrant Register No. 69: 1. Ratification of electronic payments totaling $5,000.00 . . Item 6 Page 1 of 4 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT ACCOUNT City of Vernon No.69 I hereby Certify: that claims or demands covered by the This is to certify that the claims or demands above listed warrants have been audited as to accuracy covered by the above listed warrants have been and availability of funds for payments thereof; and that audited by the City Council of the City of Vernon said claims or demands are accurate and that funds are and that all of said warrants are approved for pay- available for payments thereof.ments except Warrant Numbers: Joaquin Leon DATE Deputy City Treasurer DATE Date: . . Item 6 Page 2 of 4 5,000.00 8/6/2024 5,000.00 Invoice Description Account PO or Contract Line Item Amount 41994101022624 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE SERVICES 090-090-900-529220 20240248 5,000.00 Invoice Total: 5,000.00 VENDOR - 1413 - BLX GROUP, LLC PAYMENT # 17799 ELECTRONIC TOTAL: CITY OF VERNON RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 69 DATE 9/17/2024 . . Item 6 Page 3 of 4 EARLY CHECKS TOTAL ELECTRONIC TOTAL GRAND TOTAL $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ - $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 CITY OF VERNON RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT ACCOUNT WARRANT REGISTER NO. 69 DATE 9/17/2024 FUND 090 - RDA Total JA . . Item 6 Page 4 of 4 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Department:City Administration Submitted by:Diana Figueroa, Senior Management Analyst Subject Fire Department Activity Report Recommendation Receive and file the July 2024 Fire Department Activity Report. Background Attached is a copy of a Fire Department Activity Report which covers the period of July 1 through July 31, 2024. The report is provided by Los Angeles County Fire and consists of incident details and a summary for the month. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Fire Department Activity Report – July 2024 . . Item 7 Page 1 of 1 1 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CITY OF VERNON FIRE STATISTICAL REPORT JULY 2024 AT-A-GLANCE: . . Item 7 Page 1 of 12 2 FIRES: Incident Date/Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Basic Exposure (FD1.6) Basic Incident Full Address Basic Incident Type Code And Description (FD1.21) Basic Property Pre-Incident Value (FD1.37) Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Contents Pre-Incident Value (FD1.38) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) Basic Primary Station Name (FD1.4) Basic Incident Address Favorite Address Postal Code (FD1.78) Basic Person Involved Postal Code (FD3.18) Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON Basic Incident Postal Code (FD1.19): 90058 07/02/2024 LAC24228254 0 3560 East VERNON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained LAC013 07/04/2024 LAC24230400 0 East 54TH Street and BICKETT ST VERNON CA 90058 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other LAC013 07/10/2024 LAC24238544 0 3569 East VERNON Avenue and S DOWNEY RD VERNON CA 90058 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other LAC052 07/14/2024 LAC24244431 0 2276 East 16TH Street and 25TH ST VERNON CA 90058 143 - Grass fire LAC019 Count: 4 . . Item 7 Page 2 of 12 3 TRANSPORTS: Disposition Incident Patient Disposition (eDisposition.12) Number of Incidents (ALS) Patient Treated, Transported 7 Canceled (Prior to Arrival At Scene) 2 Canceled on Scene (FD Not Needed) 10 Canceled on Scene (Unable to Locate Patient) 1 Care Transferred to BLS 23 CPR Attempted & Terminated (TOR) (814 Sxn II)) or DNR 1 Patient Refusal (AMA) - (No Transport) 8 TYPES AND TOTALS: Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Fire Initial Cad Incident Type Description (FD1.86) Basic Incident Type Code And Description (FD1.21) Number of incidents Property Loss Content Loss Acres Burned Basic Incident Type Category (FD1.21): (None) Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON 911 911 1 ALRA ALRA 3 ALRWF ALRWF 2 FLOOD FLOOD 1 MISC1 MISC1 1 Total: 8 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 8 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Basic Incident Type Category (FD1.21): 1 - Fire Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON GRS GRS 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other 1 MISC1 MISC1 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 SHED SHED 143 - Grass fire 1 STRC STRC 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other 1 Total: 4 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 4 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Basic Incident Type Category (FD1.21): 3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON 911 911 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 ABDB ABDB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 INCIDENT SUMMARY . . Item 7 Page 3 of 12 4 Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Fire Initial Cad Incident Type Description (FD1.86) Basic Incident Type Code And Description (FD1.21) Number of incidents Property Loss Content Loss Acres Burned ARREST ARREST 320 - Emergency medical service, other 1 ASSLT ASSLT 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 BLEEDB BLEEDB 300 - Rescue, EMS incident, other 1 CP CP 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 DB DB 300 - Rescue, EMS incident, other 1 DIAA DIAA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2 ELEC ELEC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 EMS EMS 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4 EYE EYE 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 INJA INJA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4 INJB INJB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4 SICKA SICKA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 3 TCA TCA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 TCA TCA 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 2 TCA TCA 324 - Motor vehicle accident with no injuries. 1 TCB TCB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 TCB TCB 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 2 TCP TCP 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 1 UNC UNC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 5 Total: 39 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 39 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Basic Incident Type Category (FD1.21): 5 - Service Call Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON HYD HYD 520 - Water problem, other 1 Total: 1 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 1 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 INCIDENT SUMMARY . . Item 7 Page 4 of 12 5 Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Fire Initial Cad Incident Type Description (FD1.86) Basic Incident Type Code And Description (FD1.21) Number of incidents Property Loss Content Loss Acres Burned Basic Incident Type Category (FD1.21): 6 - Good Intent Call Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON 911 911 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 1 ALRA ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 8 ALRAR ALRAR 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 3 ALRWF ALRWF 600 - Good intent call, other 2 ALRWF ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 8 EMS EMS 600 - Good intent call, other 1 EMS EMS 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2 GRS GRS 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2 INJA INJA 600 - Good intent call, other 1 INVO INVO 600 - Good intent call, other 1 INVO INVO 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 1 PA PA 600 - Good intent call, other 1 TCA TCA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 1 TCB TCB 600 - Good intent call, other 1 WIRES WIRES 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 1 Total: 34 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 34 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Basic Incident Type Category (FD1.21): 7 - False Alarm & False Call Basic Incident City Name (FD1.16): VERNON ALRA ALRA 700 - False alarm or false call, other 3 ALRAR ALRAR 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 ALRWF ALRWF 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 INVI INVI 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 POLE POLE 700 - False alarm or false call, other 1 Total: 7 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 7 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 93 Total: $0 Total: 0 Total: 0 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 INCIDENT SUMMARY . . Item 7 Page 5 of 12 6 CITY DETAILS: Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/01/24 LAC24226065 ALRWF 600 - Good intent call, other 3351 East SLAUSON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 3351 East SLAUSON Avenue E13 07/01/24 LAC24226076 MISC1 East 37TH Street and BANDINI BLVD VERNON CA 90058 East 37TH Street and BANDINI BLVD E52 07/01/24 LAC24226300 INJB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2325 East 55TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2325 East 55TH Street E52 07/01/24 LAC24226312 DB 300 - Rescue, EMS incident, other 3341 East 50TH Street VERNON CA 90058 3341 East 50TH Street S13 07/02/24 LAC24227350 INJA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4328 South ALCOA Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4328 South ALCOA Avenue S13 07/02/24 LAC24227884 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 3501 East VERNON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 3501 East VERNON Avenue E164 07/02/24 LAC24228254 MISC1 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained East VERNON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 East VERNON Avenue E13 07/03/24 LAC24228426 EYE 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 3278 East SLAUSON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 3278 East SLAUSON Avenue E13 07/03/24 LAC24228908 EMS 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury South SANTA FE Avenue and E VERNON AV VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and E VERNON AV S13 07/04/24 LAC24230400 GRS 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other East 54TH Street and BICKETT ST VERNON CA 90058 East 54TH Street and BICKETT ST Q13 07/04/24 LAC24231334 GRS 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 5601 BICKETT Street VERNON CA 90058 5601 BICKETT Street 07/05/24 LAC24231748 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4401 South DOWNEY Road VERNON CA 90058 4401 South DOWNEY Road Q13 07/05/24 LAC24232126 INJB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 5300 South BOYLE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 5300 South BOYLE Avenue Q13 07/05/24 LAC24232402 ABDB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4400 South SOTO Street VERNON CA 90058 4400 South SOTO Street E52 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 6 of 12 7 Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/06/24 LAC24233396 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4825 DISTRICT Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 4825 DISTRICT Boulevard E163 07/06/24 LAC24234028 INJA 600 - Good intent call, other 2575 South SANTA FE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 2575 South SANTA FE Avenue E52 07/07/24 LAC24235519 EMS 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2410 East 38TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2410 East 38TH Street 07/08/24 LAC24235753 POLE 700 - False alarm or false call, other South SANTA FE Avenue and 25TH ST VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and 25TH ST 07/08/24 LAC24236002 ALRA 3055 East 44TH Street VERNON CA 90058 3055 East 44TH Street 07/08/24 LAC24236165 SICKA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4201 DISTRICT Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 4201 DISTRICT Boulevard S13 07/09/24 LAC24237306 ALRWF 2050 East 51ST Street VERNON CA 90058 2050 East 51ST Street E52 07/09/24 LAC24237351 FLOOD 2705 East LEONIS Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 2705 East LEONIS Boulevard 07/09/24 LAC24237471 ALRA 2705 East LEONIS Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 2705 East LEONIS Boulevard E52 07/09/24 LAC24237562 CP 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4301 South SANTA FE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4301 South SANTA FE Avenue S164 07/09/24 LAC24237926 TCA 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 123 South BOYLE Avenue and E 50TH ST VERNON CA 90058 123 South BOYLE Avenue and E 50TH ST S13 07/10/24 LAC24238514 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4520 EVERETT Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4520 EVERETT Avenue E13 07/10/24 LAC24238544 STRC 150 - Outside rubbish fire, other 3569 East VERNON Avenue and S DOWNEY RD VERNON CA 90058 3569 East VERNON Avenue and S DOWNEY RD Q13 07/10/24 LAC24238619 911 5212 South SANTA FE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 5212 South SANTA FE Avenue E52 07/10/24 LAC24238633 ALRA 2340 East 52ND Street VERNON CA 90058 2340 East 52ND Street E52 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 7 of 12 8 Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/10/24 LAC24238658 TCB 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries East LEONIS Boulevard and S DOWNEY RD VERNON CA 90058 East LEONIS Boulevard and S DOWNEY RD S13 07/10/24 LAC24239005 ALRAR 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 5050 EVERETT Court VERNON CA 90058 5050 EVERETT Court 07/10/24 LAC24239115 ALRAR 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4525 DISTRICT Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 4525 DISTRICT Boulevard 07/12/24 LAC24241926 EMS 600 - Good intent call, other South SOTO Street and E VERNON AV VERNON CA 90058 South SOTO Street and E VERNON AV E52 07/12/24 LAC24242079 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4383 East EXCHANGE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4383 East EXCHANGE Avenue 07/13/24 LAC24242678 ALRA 700 - False alarm or false call, other 6131 MALBURG Way VERNON CA 90058 6131 MALBURG Way E13 07/13/24 LAC24243399 EMS 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 61 61ST Street and STATE ST VERNON CA 90058 61 61ST Street and STATE ST S13 07/13/24 LAC24243537 DIAA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2424 East 26TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2424 East 26TH Street E52 07/14/24 LAC24244409 INJB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2661 East 46TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2661 East 46TH Street E52 07/14/24 LAC24244431 SHED 143 - Grass fire 2276 East 16TH Street and 25TH ST VERNON CA 90058 2276 East 16TH Street and 25TH ST E164 07/14/24 LAC24244740 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4460 South PACIFIC Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 4460 South PACIFIC Boulevard E52 07/15/24 LAC24245230 911 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 5353 South DOWNEY Road VERNON CA 90058 5353 South DOWNEY Road E13 07/15/24 LAC24245639 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4383 East EXCHANGE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4383 East EXCHANGE Avenue 07/15/24 LAC24245900 UNC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury East VERNON Avenue and S ALAMEDA ST VERNON CA 90058 East VERNON Avenue and S ALAMEDA ST E52 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 8 of 12 9 Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/15/24 LAC24246117 TCA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 27TH ST VERNON CA 90058 1 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 27TH ST E52 07/15/24 LAC24246210 ASSLT 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury South ALCOA Avenue and E SLAUSON AV VERNON CA 90058 South ALCOA Avenue and E SLAUSON AV E13 07/16/24 LAC24246826 INJA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2200 East 55TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2200 East 55TH Street E52 07/16/24 LAC24246916 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2050 East 51ST Street VERNON CA 90058 2050 East 51ST Street 07/17/24 LAC24248228 ALRA 700 - False alarm or false call, other 2500 South ALAMEDA Street VERNON CA 90058 2500 South ALAMEDA Street E52 07/18/24 LAC24249142 UNC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 East 46TH Street and SAINT CHARLES ST VERNON CA 90058 1 East 46TH Street and SAINT CHARLES ST E52 07/18/24 LAC24249204 ALRWF 600 - Good intent call, other 2050 East 51ST Street VERNON CA 90058 2050 East 51ST Street E52 07/18/24 LAC24249526 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2050 East 51ST Street VERNON CA 90058 2050 East 51ST Street E52 07/18/24 LAC24249646 SICKA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4305 South SANTA FE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4305 South SANTA FE Avenue 07/19/24 LAC24250216 EMS 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 5601 BICKETT Street VERNON CA 90058 5601 BICKETT Street 07/19/24 LAC24250479 TCA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route Fwy SB 710 NO ATLANTIC Boulevard and Atlantic VERNON CA 90058 Fwy SB 710 NO ATLANTIC Boulevard and Atlantic Q3 07/20/24 LAC24251474 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 5300 South BOYLE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 5300 South BOYLE Avenue 07/20/24 LAC24251681 DIAA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1234 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 49TH ST VERNON CA 90058 1234 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 49TH ST E52 07/21/24 LAC24253226 911 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4800 DISTRICT Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 4800 DISTRICT Boulevard E13 07/22/24 LAC24254377 ALRWF 700 - False alarm or false call, other 2929 East 44TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2929 East 44TH Street CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 9 of 12 10 Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/22/24 LAC24255279 EMS 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4460 South PACIFIC Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 4460 South PACIFIC Boulevard E52 07/23/24 LAC24255424 PA 600 - Good intent call, other FRUITLAND Avenue VERNON CA 90058 FRUITLAND Avenue E13 07/23/24 LAC24255791 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2555 East CHAMBERS Street VERNON CA 90058 2555 East CHAMBERS Street 07/23/24 LAC24255833 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 3365 East SLAUSON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 3365 East SLAUSON Avenue 07/23/24 LAC24256265 INJA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2727 East VERNON Avenue VERNON CA 90058 2727 East VERNON Avenue S13 07/25/24 LAC24258085 ALRA 700 - False alarm or false call, other 2419 East 28TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2419 East 28TH Street E52 07/25/24 LAC24258156 TCA 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries South SANTA FE Avenue and E 28TH ST VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 28TH ST E52 07/25/24 LAC24258210 TCP 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries South SANTA FE Avenue and E 26TH ST VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 26TH ST E52 07/25/24 LAC24258888 INVO 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route South SANTA FE Avenue and E 27TH ST VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 27TH ST E17LFD 07/26/24 LAC24259896 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2721 East 45TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2721 East 45TH Street 07/26/24 LAC24260129 TCA 324 - Motor vehicle accident with no injuries. East 48TH Street and S SANTA FE AV VERNON CA 90058 East 48TH Street and S SANTA FE AV E52 07/26/24 LAC24260130 UNC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4400 South ALCOA Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4400 South ALCOA Avenue Q13 07/26/24 LAC24260367 HYD 520 - Water problem, other South SANTA FE Avenue and E 26TH ST VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 26TH ST 07/27/24 LAC24261648 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 5010 LOMA VISTA Avenue VERNON CA 90058 5010 LOMA VISTA Avenue 07/27/24 LAC24261754 INVO 600 - Good intent call, other BANDINI Boulevard and S SOTO ST VERNON CA 90058 BANDINI Boulevard and S SOTO ST E52 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 10 of 12 11 Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/27/24 LAC24261893 ALRAR 700 - False alarm or false call, other 2419 East 28TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2419 East 28TH Street E52 07/28/24 LAC24262489 ELEC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 3809 South SOTO Street VERNON CA 90058 3809 South SOTO Street E52 07/28/24 LAC24262980 GRS 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4713 South DISTRICT Boulevard and LOS ANGELES RIVER VERNON CA 90058 4713 South DISTRICT Boulevard and LOS ANGELES RIVER E27 07/29/24 LAC24263435 ALRAR 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2970 East 50TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2970 East 50TH Street 07/29/24 LAC24263479 UNC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2150 East 37TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2150 East 37TH Street E52 07/29/24 LAC24263582 INJB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury South SANTA FE Avenue and S PACIFIC BLVD VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and S PACIFIC BLVD E52 07/29/24 LAC24263656 INJA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 5831 South SANTA FE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 5831 South SANTA FE Avenue E52 07/29/24 LAC24263880 INVI 700 - False alarm or false call, other 2164 25TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2164 25TH Street E52 07/30/24 LAC24264646 TCB 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury East VERNON Avenue and S SOTO ST VERNON CA 90058 East VERNON Avenue and S SOTO ST E52 07/30/24 LAC24264912 BLEEDB 300 - Rescue, EMS incident, other 3737 South SOTO Street VERNON CA 90058 3737 South SOTO Street Q13 07/30/24 LAC24265015 TCB 600 - Good intent call, other 3211 East 44TH Street VERNON CA 90058 3211 East 44TH Street E52 07/30/24 LAC24265404 EMS 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 2101 East 38TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2101 East 38TH Street E52 07/30/24 LAC24265657 ALRA 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2419 East 28TH Street VERNON CA 90058 2419 East 28TH Street E52 07/30/24 LAC24265689 TCB 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 3398 East LEONIS Boulevard VERNON CA 90058 3398 East LEONIS Boulevard E513 07/31/24 LAC24265915 SICKA 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 5383 South ALCOA Avenue VERNON CA 90058 5383 South ALCOA Avenue E513 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 11 of 12 12 Alarm Date Time Basic Incident Number (FD1) Cad Initial Cad Incident Type Description Incident Type Address Basic Incident Full Street Address Basic First Arrived At Scene Apparatus ID Basic Property Losses (FD1.35) Basic Content Losses (FD1.36) 07/31/24 LAC24265976 ALRWF 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 4510 South ALAMEDA Street VERNON CA 90058 4510 South ALAMEDA Street 07/31/24 LAC24266340 WIRES 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route South SANTA FE Avenue and E 27TH ST VERNON CA 90058 South SANTA FE Avenue and E 27TH ST E52 07/31/24 LAC24266540 ALRWF 4611 East 48TH Street VERNON CA 90058 4611 East 48TH Street E513 07/31/24 LAC24266947 UNC 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 4800 South SANTA FE Avenue VERNON CA 90058 4800 South SANTA FE Avenue E52 Count: 92 CITY OF VERNON STATISTICS JULY 2024 CITY DETAILS . . Item 7 Page 12 of 12 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Robert Sousa, Chief of Police Department:Police Submitted by:Donna Aggers, Records Manager Subject Police Department Activity Report Recommendation Receive and file the July 2024 Police Department Activity Report. Background The Vernon Police Department’s activity report consists of activity during the specified reporting period, including a summary of calls for service, and statistical information regarding arrests, traffic collisions, stored and impounded vehicles, recovered stolen vehicles, the number of citations issued, and the number of reports filed. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. July 2024 Police Department Activity Report . . Item 8 Page 1 of 1 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Department Activity Report First Date: 07/01/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/31/2024 Department Complaint Description All Units Primary Unit Type VPD 10-6 OFFICER IS 10-6 C7,961,962,10-10, WASH, EQUIPM 10-96 CHARLES (CITY HALL SECURITY CHECK) PICK UP THE JAIL PAPER WORK FROM HP JAIL & SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COURT ORDER VIOLATION REPORT INJURY HIT AND RUN 229 5 213 510-96C 1096H & AR 140 16 4 14 4 166R 20001 20002 20002R 211R 211S 242 3 1 3 1 NON-INJURY HIT AND RUN NON-INJURY HIT AND RUN REPORT ROBBERY REPORT 9 4 17 4 9 1 SILENT ROBBERY ALARM BATTERY 10 6 3 2 242R 273.5R 314 BATTERY REPORT 3 1 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORT INDECENT EXPOSURE 8 2 6 3 415 DISTURBING THE PEACE BRANDISHING A WEAPON TERRORIST THREATS REPORT ARSON REPORT 49 15 3 14 3417 422R 451R 459A 459R 459S 459V 459VR 476R 484 1 3 2 AUDIBLE BURGLARY ALARM BURGLARY REPORT 410 9 216 4 SILENT BURGLARY ALARM BURGLARY TO A VEHICLE BURGLARY TO A VEHICLE REPORT FRAUD REPORT 15 3 10 1 2 2 10 4 8 PETTY THEFT 1 484R 487R 503R 5150 586 PETTY THEFT REPORT 3 2 GRAND THEFT REPORT 25 8 15 2EMBEZZLEMENT REPORT SUBJECT WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES PARKING PROBLEM 4 1 146 4 131 4586E 594 PARKING ENFORCEMENT VANDALISM 10 18 85 4 3 594R 602 VANDALISM REPORT 11 39 2 TRESPASS 647F 901 DRUNK IN PUBLIC UNKNOWN INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION NON-INJURY TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT TRAFFIC HAZARD 4 1 901T 901TR 902T 902TR 909E 909T 911 20 18 66 10 2 6 7 35 5 1 6 5 911 MISUSE / HANGUP 4 3 911A 917A 920PR 925 CONTACT THE REPORTING PARTY ABANDONED VEHICLE 28 5 16 5 LOST PROPERTY REPORT SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 4 75 3 30 08/14/2024 12:33:50 Page 1 of 3 . . Item 8 Page 1 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Department Activity Report First Date: 07/01/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/31/2024 Department Complaint Description All Units Primary Unit Type VPD 927 UNKNOWN TROUBLE 3 4 1 1A487ATTEMPT GRAND THEFT ATTEMPT GRAND THEFT AUTO REPORT ASSIST FIRE DEPARTMENT BROKEN SIGNAL OR LIGHT BROKEN DOWN VEHICLE CITATION CHECK AGTAR ASSISTFD BOSIG BOVEH CITCK CIVIL 2 2 52 5 21 4 39 3 25 2 CIVIL MATTER 2 2 CODE5 COP SURVEILLANCE/STAKE-OUT COP DETAIL 6 1 1 1 DET DETECTIVE INVESTIGATION DETAIL 59 9 26 9DETAIL DPTAST DUI DEPARTMENTAL ASSIST DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE DUST FOR PRINTS 31 12 5 16 5 DUST 2 FILING FU OFFICER IS 10-6 REPORT WRITING FOLLOW UP 133 46 4 131 25 1GTAGRAND THEFT AUTO GTAR HBC GRAND THEFT AUTO REPORT HAILED BY A CITIZEN 15 14 1 10 8 ILLDPG RPT JAILPANIC KTP ILLEGAL DUMPING REPORT TEST THE JAIL PANIC ALARM BUTTON KEEP THE PEACE 1 1 1 6 2 LOCATE LOJACK LPR LOCATED VERNON STOLEN VEHICLE / PLATES VI LOJACK HIT 2 1 8 5 LICENSE PLATE READER MISSING PERSON REPORT MISC REPORT 4 3 MISPR MR60 3 1 1 1 PANIC ALARM PANIC ALARM/DURESS ALARM 7 2 PAPD PUBLIC ASSIST-POLICE 17 552 37 1 9 PATCK PEDCK PLATE PRSTRAN REC PATROL CHECK 446 18 1 PEDESTRIAN CHECK LOST OR STOLEN PLATES REPORT PRISONER TRANSPORTED RECOVERED STOLEN VEHICLE IN THE FIELD 7 7 35 4 10 4RECKLESS DR RECKLESS DRIVING (23103) REPO REPOSSESSION 9 8 ROADRAGE RR ROAD RAGE 5 2 RAIL ROAD PROBLEM SPEED CONTEST OR SPEEDING (23109) 8 6 SPEED 2 1 SPEEDTRAILE TO BE USED WHEN THE TRAILERS ARE DEPLOYE SRMET SRMET DETAIL 5 3 8 8 TRAFFIC STOP TRAFFIC STOP 289 6 203 6UNATTACHED UNATTACHED TRAILER VCK VEH RELEASE VEHICLE RELEASE VMCVIO VERNON MUNICIPAL CODE VIOLATION VEHICLE CHECK 70 14 1 52 11 1 08/14/2024 12:33:50 Page 2 of 3 . . Item 8 Page 2 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Department Activity Report First Date: 07/01/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/31/2024 Department Complaint All Units Primary Unit Type Description VPD WARRANT WELCK WARRANT ARREST WELFARE CHECK 3 63 2 28 Department: Overall: 3009 1988 19893009 08/14/2024 12:33:50 Page 3 of 3 . . Item 8 Page 3 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Activity Report Period Ending: 7/31/24 TRAFFIC COLLISIONS TOTAL NON-INJURY INJURY Persons Injured Pedestrian NO. 41 26 15 20 1 PROPERTY RECOVERED VEHICLES: $ 204,300.00 Fatalities 0 City Property Damage Hit & Run (Felony) Hit & Run (Misdemeanor) 3 1 9 VEHICLES STORED Unlicensed Driver/Impounded Vehicle Unattached Trailer PROPERTY RECOVERED FOR OTHER DEPARTMENTS VEHICLES: $ 40,000.00 28 0 Abandoned/Stored Vehicle Traffic Hazard 10 0 CITATIONS Citations Iss (Prisoner Release) Citations Iss (Other Violations) Parking Hazardous Non-Hazardous Citations Iss (Moving) Citations Iss (Total) 37 0 95 56 21 77 172 CASES CLEARED BY ARREST AR24-234 AR24-235 AR24-237 AR24-238 AR24-241 AR24-242 AR24-243 AR24-245 AR24-246 AR24-247 AR24-248 AR24-249 AR24-251 AR24-253 CR24-1043 487(A) PC CR24-1050 148(A) PC CR24-1056 11364(A) HS CR24-1060 602(O)(1) PC CR24-1069 594(A)(1) PC CR24-1069 594(A)(1) PC CR24-1070 273.5(A) PC CR24-1074 11377(A) HS CR24-1088 11377(A) HS CR24-1092 148(A) PC CR24-1093 381(B) PC CR24-1095 422 PC AR24-256 CR24-0261 487(A) PC CR24-1114 11364(A) HS CR24-1126 14601.2(A) VC CR24-1136 11364(A) HS CR24-1142 273.5(A) PC CR24-1145 11377(A) HS CR24-1155 11377(A) HS CR24-1156 11364(A) HS CR24-1146 487(A) PC CR24-1168 14601.1(A) VC CR24-1165 487(A) PC CR24-1176 487(A) PC CR24-1193 10851(A) VC AR24-257 AR24-258 AR24-260 AR24-263 AR24-264 AR24-266 AR24-267 AR24-268 AR24-269 AR24-271 AR24-273 AR24-274CR24-1099 273.5(A) PC CR24-1106 11377(A) HS. . Item 8 Page 4 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR PERSONS ARRESTED PERIOD ENDING: 7/31/2024 ADULT FELONY ARRESTS AND DISPOSITIONS MALE FEMALE TOTAL ARSON ASSAULT 1 BURGLARY (& ATTEMPTED) CARRY LOADED FIREARM PERSON/VEH CORPORAL INJURY ON SPOUSE/COHABITANT CHILD ABUSE/CHILD ENDANGERMENT DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE w/ INJURY EMBEZZLEMENT 1 2 EVADING 1 GRAND THEFT: AUTO (& ATTEMPTED) GRAND THEFT: PROPERTY (& ATTEMPTED) HIT/RUN 1 5 KIDNAPPING POSSESSION OF STOLEN PROPERTY RAPE RESISTING/OBSTRUCTING ROBBERY SEXUAL BATTERY SODOMY VANDALISM WARRANT (VERNON) WARRANT (OUTSIDE AGENCY) WEAPONS 2 TOTAL FELONY ARRESTS 10 2 12 ADULT MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS AND DISPOSITIONS MALE FEMALE TOTAL ASSAULT CARRY LOADED FIREARM PERSON/VEH DISPLAY UNLAWFUL VEH REGISTRATION DRIVING WITH SUSPENDED LICENSE DRUNK IN PUBLIC 2 9DUI 2 FAIL TO SIGN CITATION ILLEGAL DUMPING MAIL THEFT MUNICIPAL CODE - DRINKING IN PUBLIC OPERATE VEHICLE W/O INTERLOCK DEV PETTY THEFT POSSESSION OF NARCOTICS POSSESSION OF PARAPHERNALIA POSSESSION OF STOLEN PROPERTY POSSESSION OF SUBT SIMILAR TO TOLUENE RECKLESS DRIVING RESISTING/OBSTRUCTING SPEED CONTEST THREATS 5 3 1 1 1 1 THROW SUBSTANCE AT VEHICLE TRESPASSING UNDETECTABLE FIREARM VANDALISM 1 11 VEHICLE TAMPERING VIOLATE COURT ORDER WARRANT (OUTSIDE AGENCY) WARRANT (VERNON)3 WEAPONS TOTAL MISD. ARRESTS 26 5 31 JUVENILES DETAINED --- FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR MALE FEMALE TOTAL BURGLARY CARRY LOADED FIREARM IN PUBLIC ROBBERY VANDALISM WARRANT 0 0 0 0 0 0TOTAL JUVENILES DET.0 0 TOTAL FELONY ARRESTS (ADULT) TO DATE: TOTAL MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS (ADULT) TO DATE: TOTAL JUVENILES DETAINED (FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR) TO DATE: 109 165 1 TOTAL ARRESTS AND DETAINED JUVENILES (FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR) TO DATE:275 . . Item 8 Page 5 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/01/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/01/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713031 07/01/2024 00:55:48 BOVEH RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1041 RMS Juris CA0197300E 37TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNON1015 VI VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *40W 31 00:55:51 00:55:48 00:59:50 00:57:28 01:32:37 02:10:42 03:57:53 VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD RAMOS,JOSE VIRTELSTOW 00:55:53 02:50:07 01:56:21 43E 03:26:59 02:45:14 02:45:33 S5 VIERTELTOW 01:46:32 01:46:33 20240713045 07/01/2024 05:39:15 902T MARIA LEONIS BL // DOWNEY RD, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1042 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *43E 05:41:40 31 05:42:01 05:54:45 05:43:36 05:57:20 06:18:48 06:18:48 20240713087 07/01/2024 11:58:33 487R RPT LINEAGE Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002100 E 55TH, VERNON CR24-1043 VPD FINO,MARCUS VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *32W 43 12:01:14 12:01:19 12:08:00 12:08:02 12:35:01 12:35:02 20240713091 07/01/2024 12:35:59 TRAFFIC STOP 1015 S SANTA FE AV // 55TH, VERNONRPT VS CITE VPD FINO,MARCUS VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD CERDA,EUGENIO MR C TOW *32W 12:36:05 12:36:26 12:48:06 13:38:17 12:43:48 17:45:12 17:45:13 43 12:36:07 12:36:12 13:27:59 12:42:08 14:13:40 44E 14:02:12 MR C TOW 13:27:53 XSVPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR 14:02:18 20240713097 07/02/2024 05:30:00 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 6 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/01/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/01/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713097 07/01/2024 13:38:12 MDS MODULAR AND DATA SERVICES 4441 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300487RCR24-1044 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *44E 14:02:34 14:02:34 14:06:39 14:28:47 20240713098 07/01/2024 14:10:48 487R BROADLEAF USA 5600 S ALAMEDA, VERNON S/A 100 *43 RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1045 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH 14:13:42 14:23:09 15:06:27 20240713102 07/01/2024 15:23:31 476R RANDALL FOODS 2900 AYERS AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1048 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43 15:24:55 15:27:39 15:27:29 44E 15:34:46 16:23:25 16:15:58 16:16:04 20240713103 07/01/2024 15:26:35 487R RPT Department OCA Number VPD 15:27:30 RMS Juris CA01973004501 E 50TH, VERNON VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH CR24-1047 *43 15:42:58 20240713105 07/01/2024 15:56:12 920PR RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973003030 S ATLANTIC BL, VERNON *B2 CR24-1046 VPD MANNINO,NICHOL 15:56:40 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/02/2024 05:30:00 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 7 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/02/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/02/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713145 07/02/2024 07:03:41 TRAFFIC STOP CITE Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300S SANTA FE AV // VERNON AV, VERNONVI VPD CR24-1049 RPT VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD CEDENO,RUTH *44 2P8 07:03:43 07:16:49 08:00:43 07:13:48 08:07:56 20240713167 07/02/2024 10:14:39 415 AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840 2468 E 26TH, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300RPTVPDCR24-1050 VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD FINO,MARCUS *43W 10:15:08 31E 44 10:15:09 5d32 5d35 l3 10:15:29 10:15:54 10:15:31 10:19:29 10:18:55 10:18:40 10:26:27 10:26:28 10:23:22 11:22:15 10:51:31 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD SWINFORD,PHILL VPD MANNINO,NICHOL VPD MARTINEZ,GABRI 12:51:23 10:52:58 11:17:44 11:16:47 20240713170 07/02/2024 11:33:52 GTAR AUSTIN TRUCKING 4528 BANDINI BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1051 VPD FINO,MARCUS *31E 11:35:07 11:46:59 12:18:46 16:34:07 20240713181 07/02/2024 15:33:00 594R RPT Department OCA Number VPD 15:34:22 RMS JurisE SLAUSON AV // ALCOA AV, VERNON CR24-1052 CA0197300 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD FINO,MARCUS *44 15:43:14 31E 15:39:32 15:53:00 20240713188 07/02/2024 18:48:35 GTAR RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973002801 E 46TH, VERNON VPD CR24-1053 VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD ESCARPE,ALAN *43W 40W 18:49:21 18:49:46 18:49:43 19:38:14 07/03/2024 01:30:43 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 8 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/02/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/02/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713198 07/02/2024 22:27:24 HPPD 5970 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300902TR1015 VI VPD CR24-1054 VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD *32E 22:30:55 40W 22:30:57 43 00:44:12 S2 22:31:32 22:31:37 22:33:12 22:36:19 22:34:02 22:36:22 23:42:48 VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD ONOPA,DANIEL 23:46:26 23:56:29 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/03/2024 01:30:43 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 9 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/03/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/03/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713205 07/03/2024 00:03:52 BRANDON DOWNEY RD // LEONIS BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300BOVEHVSCR24-1055 VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR MR C TOW *40W 00:06:19 00:06:44 00:15:43 00:11:58 00:21:23 01:06:32 MR C TOW 00:15:41 01:20:25 20240713211 07/03/2024 04:48:25 CHPVREC LOCATE 60 FWY // ROSEMEAD, ROSEMEAD 20240713244 07/03/2024 11:46:31 417 T-MOBILE USA, INC.1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1056 RMS Juris CA01973002222 E 38TH, VERNONRPT VPD FINO,MARCUS VPD RAMOS,SALVADO *32W 40 11:48:44 11:49:30 11:50:44 11:56:07 11:52:02 13:17:37 11:48:51 12:42:13 12:36:30 13:17:49 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD ESTRADA,IGNACI 44 S1 20240713246 07/03/2024 12:33:14 20002R WESTAIR ENGINEERING 5820 S ALAMEDA, VERNON *40 12:54:08 RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1057 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD FINO,MARCUS 12:54:09 13:00:46 13:17:43 13:41:11 13:41:1132W 20240713252 07/03/2024 13:59:15 UNATTACHEDTR RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002104 E 57TH, VERNONVI CR24-1059 VPD CEDENO,RUTH VIRTELSTOW *2P8 13:59:16 15:23:47 16:07:39 VIERTELTOW 14:29:34 14:29:36 18:40:06 20240713260 07/03/2024 15:27:27 911A SUP 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON 07/04/2024 04:53:39 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 10 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/03/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/03/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713260 07/03/2024 15:27:27 911A SUP 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON VPD RAMOS,SALVADO *40 15:32:30 15:32:31 15:42:14 16:41:19 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/04/2024 04:53:39 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 11 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/04/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/04/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713303 07/04/2024 08:59:03 PATCK RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300E VERNON AV // DOWNEY RD, VERNON1015 CR24-1060 VPD FINO,MARCUS *32E 40 09:06:43 09:21:10 09:11:30 09:24:44 09:17:53 09:06:59 10:22:13 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD REDONA,BRYAN/S 09:24:30 10:02:0644W 20240713331 07/04/2024 16:52:37 BOVEH RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300DOWNEY RD // 45TH, VERNONVS CR24-1061 VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD *32E 16:52:37 17:27:03 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/05/2024 00:20:23 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 12 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/05/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/05/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713380 07/05/2024 03:57:09 TRAFFIC STOP 1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1062 RMS Juris CA0197300LEONIS BL // SOTO, VERNONRPT VI VIERTEL VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *32E 31W 03:57:09 04:05:45 08:12:28 04:44:42 20240713412 07/05/2024 12:27:22 ASSISTFD BAG HOUSE AND INDUSTRIAL 5300 S BOYLE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1063 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43E 12:28:39 12:28:39 12:30:10 12:30:43 12:35:30 13:17:10 13:17:12 12:56:46 VPD REDONA,BRYAN/S VPD LUCAS,JASON 44 5D31 5D35 14:33:43 14:33:43 14:33:43VPD MANNINO,NICHOL 20240713413 07/05/2024 12:44:26 ICON SPORTS 4575 LOMA VISTA AV, VERNON VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43E 12:56:51 RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300476RCR24-1064 12:56:52 13:01:03 14:32:04 16:13:10 17:32:38 20240713415 07/05/2024 14:08:39 PLATE UNKRPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973004415 BANDINI BL, VERNON CR24-1065 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO *40W 14:11:35 20240713419 07/05/2024 16:31:20 DPTAST RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973007015 RITA AVE, VERNON *40W 16:32:57 CR24-1066 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 16:32:57 16:48:47 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/06/2024 00:05:10 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 13 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/06/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/06/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713441 07/06/2024 00:19:10 925 VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 3600 S SOTO, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 01:11:17 VPD CR24-1067 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *40E 31 00:20:40 00:21:48 00:37:14 00:30:57 00:22:24 02:28:25 02:28:25VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD VPD RAMOS,JOSE 32W S5 00:38:11 00:21:01 02:28:26 07:08:49 20240713449 07/06/2024 05:02:56 DUI T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 E SLAUSON AV // BOYLE AV, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number RMS JurisVIMR C TO VPD CR24-1068 CA0197300 RPT VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD *40E 05:03:30 31 05:03:32 32W 05:03:50 05:03:53 05:04:11 05:07:18 05:07:31 05:07:16 06:22:37 06:40:58 20240713476 07/06/2024 15:29:28 PATCK 1015 CITE RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973004949 E DISTRICT BL, VERNON VPD CR24-1069 VPD REDONA,BRYAN/S VPD SALDANA,CARLO *44 15:29:28 15:30:03 16:47:35 40E 16:45:47 20240713484 07/06/2024 19:00:11 415 CIRCLE K 2575 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300RPTVPDCR24-1070 VPD *31E 19:02:03 19:02:05 19:02:08 19:08:01 20:09:50 VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD VPD 32 40W S5 21:33:04 22:18:23 20:18:22 23:32:57 VPD RAMOS,JOSE 20240713491 07/06/2024 23:02:24 20002R RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300PACIFIC BL // 46TH, VERNON VPD CR24-1071 07/07/2024 00:04:25 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 14 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/06/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/06/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713491 07/06/2024 23:02:24 20002R RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 23:13:06 PACIFIC BL // 46TH, VERNON VPD CR24-1071 VPD RAMOS,JOSE *S5 31E 32 23:02:24 23:08:44 23:03:51 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD 23:38:40 23:38:4023:02:38 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/07/2024 00:04:25 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 15 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/07/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/07/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713502 07/07/2024 01:46:47 TRAFFIC STOP 1015 Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300SOTO // SLAUSON, VERNONRPT VI VPD CR24-1072 VPD HERNANDEZ,RUD VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *32 31E 01:46:47 01:50:24 01:48:04 03:34:16 02:35:45 02:45:4040W 20240713516 07/07/2024 09:14:06 487R AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840 S SANTA FE AV // 54TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 09:18:05 VPD CR24-1073 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *40W 44 09:17:44 09:18:03 09:22:24 09:49:23 20240713542 07/07/2024 16:56:52 TRAFFIC STOP VI Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300E VERNON AV // DOWNEY RD, VERNONRPT 1015 CITE VPD CR24-1074 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *44 40W 43E 16:56:52 17:11:24 18:42:29 20:14:16 17:57:35 17:57:39 17:58:50 20240713551 07/07/2024 19:40:36 AGTAR WESTGATE MFG 2458 E 28TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPD 19:44:34 CR24-1075 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN *44W 19:44:02 19:44:35 20240713558 07/07/2024 21:04:15 MR60 RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris71 FWY // MISSION BLVD, POMONA *44W VPD CR24-1076 CA0197300 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN 21:04:45 21:09:18 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/08/2024 00:04:56 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 16 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/08/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/08/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713598 07/08/2024 07:53:39 ASSISTFD VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 2700 S INDIANA, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300VSCR24-1077 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *32E 07:53:59 07:55:22 07:57:18 08:10:03 07:57:46 10:43:21 08:54:54 08:54:59 08:10:57 08:04:13 11:20:13 11:35:41 VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD GAYTAN,LORENZ VPD NEWTON,TODD VPD MARTINEZ,GABRI VPD ENCINAS,ANTHON VIRTELSTOW 2P8 11:35:44 09:28:51 11:10:51 09:56:36 09:56:39 11:35:39 11:15:25 11:35:30 40 07:54:36 44 5D30 5D33 L3 S3 07:56:08 11:01:11VIERTELTOW 11:01:09 20240713607 07/08/2024 11:24:13 140 FASHION NOVASUP 2801 E 46TH, VERNON VPD FLORES,TERESA *47W 11:33:01 11:40:21 11:48:34 20240713621 07/08/2024 15:38:24 476R T AND T FOODSRPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973003080 E 50TH, VERNON CR24-1078 VPD FLORES,TERESA VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *47W 44 15:41:01 15:41:51 15:41:42 15:51:24 17:17:54 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/09/2024 00:01:04 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 17 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/09/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/09/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713680 07/09/2024 08:28:03 JOSE MANCIA BANDINI BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300902TCR24-1080 VPD FLORES,TERESA *47W 32E 40 08:31:00 08:49:01 08:38:32 08:54:19 08:58:17 09:04:35 09:04:34 09:04:35 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD GODOY,RAYMON 20240713681 07/09/2024 08:51:06RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300902TRFRUITLAND AV // PACIFIC BL, VERNON VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD CR24-1079 08:56:13 09:02:54 12:27:31 20240713709 07/09/2024 12:14:04 REPO REPO EG MEATS 4350 ALCOA AV, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1081 VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD 12:18:01 20240713714 07/09/2024 14:19:25 20002 ALEXANDERRPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S ATLANTIC BL // BANDINI BL, VERNON CR24-1082 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD GODOY,RAYMON *32E 14:26:56 40 14:44:14 14:37:56 15:15:03 14:28:46 15:15:05 20240713724 07/09/2024 17:38:23 901TR RPT T-MOBILE USA, INC. S BOYLE AV // 50TH, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1083 RMS Juris CA0197300CITY OR VPD FLORES,TERESA VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR *47W 17:38:47 17:42:03 17:44:04 17:41:17 17:56:22 17:47:22 18:29:19 32E 18:41:23 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO MR C TOW 44 17:39:31 17:51:54 18:29:21 18:35:40 18:08:41 MR C TOW 17:51:41 S3VPD ENCINAS,ANTHON 20240713727 07/10/2024 00:11:28 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 18 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/09/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/09/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713727 07/09/2024 19:01:28RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300REPO4601 E DISTRICT BL, VERNONREPO CR24-1084 VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD 19:03:34 19:09:11 20240713732 07/09/2024 20:44:46 UNATTACHEDTR VI Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973006116 MALBURG WY, VERNONRPT CR24-1085 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX *43E 20:44:46 21:05:05 21:24:34 MR C TOW MR C TOW 20:58:20 20:58:21 20:56:06 21:25:24 VIRTELSTOW VIERTELTOW 20:56:05 20:58:23 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/10/2024 00:11:28 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 19 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/10/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/10/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713783 07/10/2024 10:10:26 901T T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 LEONIS BL // DOWNEY RD, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 11:23:15 VS VPD CR24-1086 VPD GODOY,RAYMON *44W 40 10:10:59 10:13:58 10:12:03 10:14:46 10:16:48 10:12:37 10:18:36 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD FLORES,TERESA VPD ENCINAS,ANTHON 11:31:42 43E S3 11:33:30 11:22:50 20240713790 07/10/2024 12:21:51 415 REYNALDOS MEXICAN FOOD 3301 E VERNON AV, VERNON MET Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300RPTVPDCR24-1087 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD FLORES,TERESA VPD ENCINAS,ANTHON *40 12:22:57 43E S3 12:23:27 12:23:48 12:30:37 12:25:21 13:03:57 14:16:29 14:16:30 13:42:46 20240713831 07/10/2024 22:45:40 PEDCK RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300BANDINI BL // DOWNEY RD, VERNON1015 CITE VPD CR24-1088 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON *31E 40 22:46:22 22:45:41 22:54:01 23:41:28 23:41:2822:46:23 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/11/2024 00:42:58 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 20 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/11/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/11/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713839 07/11/2024 01:33:58 20002R VICENTE GASPAR GIFFORD AV // FRUITLAND AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number CR24-1089 RMS Juris VPD CA0197300 02:05:48 02:23:36 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX *40 01:35:35 31E 01:38:23 01:36:31 01:38:24 01:46:07 20240713867 07/11/2024 08:57:25 594R MARTIN VASQUEZ (CITY CREW) 5100 SANTA FE, VERNON *40 08:59:31 43W 47E RPT Department OCA Number CR24-1090 RMS Juris CA0197300VPD VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 08:59:32 09:00:56 09:00:10 09:08:34 09:03:30 09:07:35 09:35:50 VPD CAM,PATRICK 09:56:41 VPD GODOY,RAYMON 09:35:52 20240713884 07/11/2024 12:45:51 415 AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840 2640 E 26TH, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300RPTCR24-1092 VPD GODOY,RAYMON *31E 12:47:27 12:47:32 16:52:54 13:20:31 12:56:22 12:56:16 18:14:58 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD 40 12:47:31 16:01:42 17:07:15 20:56:41 15:39:50 15:39:57 15:39:48 47 47E L3 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD MARTINEZ,GABRI VPD ESTRADA,IGNACI VPD ENCINAS,ANTHON 17:07:13 13:22:09 12:56:29 12:56:27 S1 S3 20240713885 07/11/2024 12:58:18 20002R RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1091 RMS Juris CA01973003340 LEONIS BL, VERNONCITY VPD CAM,PATRICK *43W 13:02:28 13:02:39 13:06:42 14:11:21 20240713913 07/11/2024 22:47:59 TRAFFIC STOP 1015 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300E DISTRICT BL // DOWNEY RD, VERNONRPT CR24-1093 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *47E 32W 22:47:59 22:51:20 23:24:34 23:24:3322:50:57 07/12/2024 00:06:09 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 21 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/12/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/12/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713927 07/12/2024 07:32:23 901TR LASO - EAST L.A. S DISTRICT BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1094 VPD CAM,PATRICK VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR *40E 43 07:35:00 07:51:23 07:44:49 08:11:54 08:11:54 20240713939 07/12/2024 10:26:24 422R VERNON VILLAGE PARK 4675 52D DR, VERNON S/A 211 *43 10:29:39 RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1095 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD REDONA,BRYAN VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 10:29:40 10:38:00 10:30:20 11:06:29 11:15:40 31W XS 11:40:40 11:34:19 20240713946 07/12/2024 13:24:08 CODE5 VERNON VILLAGE APARTMENTS 4675 52D DR, VERNON S/A 211 1015 RPT VPD MANNINO,NICHOL VPD REDONA,BRYAN *5D35 31W 40E 43 13:24:08 13:44:29 13:30:38 13:43:22 13:40:08 13:49:08 17:05:05 17:05:04 VPD CAM,PATRICK 15:36:23 15:15:20VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD LUCAS,JASON VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 5D31 XS 17:05:05 13:40:12 15:49:21 15:48:49 20240713950 07/12/2024 15:27:13 594R RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300S SOTO // BANDINI BL, VERNON *43 15:49:11 VPD CR24-1096 VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR VPD CAM,PATRICK 15:57:44 16:04:55 16:26:06 40E 16:27:36 20240713964 07/12/2024 22:00:59 VCK VI Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1097 RMS Juris CA0197300E 37TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNONRPT VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *43W 32E 22:00:59 22:05:47 22:48:36 22:40:47 07/13/2024 00:05:46 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 22 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/13/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/13/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240713978 07/13/2024 02:11:10 902T AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840 3846 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1098 RMS Juris CA0197300RPT VI VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *43W 02:12:04 02:13:33 02:14:27 02:15:12 02:38:06 03:35:30 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON VIRTELSTOW 32E 04:54:36 40 02:13:46 02:20:28 03:03:19 03:34:12VIERTELTOW 02:20:25 20240713980 07/13/2024 03:02:12 273.5 AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840 2111 E 51ST, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300RPTCR24-1099 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON *40 43W S5 03:03:26 03:36:04 03:04:39 03:05:13 03:36:37 04:03:53 VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD RAMOS,JOSE 05:01:43 04:03:58 20240714003 07/13/2024 12:19:30 902T RPT T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S ATLANTIC BL // DISTRICT BL, VERNON CR24-1100 VPD REDONA,BRYAN *31E 12:22:06 12:30:40 13:12:50 13:29:31 20240714004 07/13/2024 12:21:18 140 ENVIROKLEAN RESTAURANT SERVICES 6011 MALBURG WY, VERNONSUP VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR *43 12:22:42 12:27:45 20240714013 07/13/2024 16:46:46 902T RPT VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S ATLANTIC BL // DISTRICT BL, VERNON CR24-1101 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD REDONA,BRYAN *32W 31E 16:48:42 16:59:14 16:53:10 16:49:15 17:54:26 17:54:2616:49:12 20240714019 07/14/2024 05:41:10 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 23 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/13/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/13/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714019 07/13/2024 20:05:45 CIRCLE K 2599 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300484CR24-1102 VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL *32W 31 20:06:36 20:06:37 20:09:51 20:09:54 20:09:53 20:11:30 20:16:02 22:33:51 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD RAMOS,JOSE 20:40:18 40E S5 20:40:20 20:40:23 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/14/2024 05:41:10 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 24 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/14/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/14/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714035 07/14/2024 00:17:55 TRAFFIC STOP VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD ESCARPE,ALAN CITE Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S SOTO // BANDINI BL, VERNONVOID CR24-1103 *40E 31 00:17:55 01:04:41 00:18:02 00:28:38 20240714036 07/14/2024 00:24:03 TRAFFIC STOP 1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1104 RMS Juris CA0197300S SANTA FE AV // FRUITLAND AV, VERNONRPT VI VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD ESCARPE,ALAN *32W 31 00:24:03 00:30:57 01:06:30 03:21:36 04:40:37 00:28:52 04:14:53 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD RAMOS,JOSE 40E S5 01:40:01 04:40:38 04:40:38 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/15/2024 00:29:53 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 25 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/15/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/15/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714107 07/15/2024 01:38:46 PEDCK 1015 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300E 30TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNONRPT CR24-1106 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *32 01:38:46 01:38:49 02:17:11 40W 02:09:36 20240714114 07/15/2024 05:26:46 902T AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1107 RMS Juris CA0197300BANDINI BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNONOR VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *43E 05:27:50 05:27:58 05:37:36 05:33:17 05:33:43 06:57:52 32 06:16:23 06:16:1340W05:28:43 20240714125 07/15/2024 08:53:06 ATP LOGISTICS 4577 MAYWOOD AV, VERNON VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *43 08:54:53 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300GTARCR24-1108 08:55:23 08:56:51 09:01:31 40E 09:04:33 09:55:03 20240714129 07/15/2024 09:46:40 901TR VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300BANDINI BL // SIERRA PINE AV, VERNONOR CR24-1109 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *32W 09:47:29 09:47:57 09:55:13 09:54:10 09:51:48 09:49:56 09:58:32 09:59:27 10:03:21 10:45:46 40E 43 11:13:00 11:13:01 11:13:01 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR XS 20240714147 07/15/2024 16:20:02 ASSISTFD LACO FIRE E VERNON AV // ALAMEDA, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1110 RMS Juris CA01973001015 VI VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *43 16:20:32 32W 40E 16:22:47 16:22:26 17:23:23 18:28:38 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 16:21:36 19:36:36 19:17:16 07/16/2024 05:40:49 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 26 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/15/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/15/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714147 07/15/2024 16:20:02 LACO FIRE E VERNON AV // ALAMEDA, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1110 RMS Juris CA0197300ASSISTFD1015 VI VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR XS 16:21:04 17:05:21 20240714153 07/15/2024 19:31:59 901T VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 2645 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1111 RMS Juris CA0197300CITY VI VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *43W 38E 44 19:32:46 19:34:09 19:34:11 19:35:14 19:36:10 19:39:27 20:33:59 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX 20:29:15 20:29:53 20240714158 07/15/2024 20:30:20 211R RPT AT&T MOBILITY 800-635-6840 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300ALCOA AV // SLAUSON AV, VERNON CR24-1112 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *44 38E 43W S2 20:31:36 20:35:51 20:35:52 20:31:43 20:37:03 20:41:24 20:41:26 20:40:15 21:41:01 21:41:01 21:12:46 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD ONOPA,DANIEL 21:12:11 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/16/2024 05:40:49 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 27 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/16/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/16/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714190 07/16/2024 07:59:08 HAWTHORNE PD 12501 HAWTHORNE AV BLVD, VERNON RPT WARRANT1015 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *44E 08:35:10 07:59:10 10:30:29 20240714210 07/16/2024 11:18:12 DET VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON 1015 RPT VPD LUCAS,JASON VPD FLORES,TERESA/ *5D31 31W 11:18:12 11:29:36 11:38:54 12:08:03 20240714222 07/16/2024 14:41:19 20002R UNKNOWN 2590 HARRIETT, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1113 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *31W 14:43:05 44E 15:37:32 15:37:3214:43:50 15:00:43 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/17/2024 00:06:42 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 28 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/17/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/17/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714253 07/17/2024 04:09:42 PEDCK RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1114 RMS Juris CA0197300S 2ND // SLAUSON AV, VERNON1015 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *43W 44 04:09:47 04:12:21 05:44:23 05:44:23 20240714282 07/17/2024 09:49:52 920PR LA COUNTY FIRE STN 52 4301 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1115 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD FLORES,TERESA/ *44 09:51:15 43E 10:05:19 09:51:41 10:05:20 09:52:00 10:08:18 11:06:24 14:55:36 20240714311 07/17/2024 14:03:17 902T RPT MC DONALDS Department OCA Number VPD 14:04:51 RMS Juris CA01973003737 S SOTO, VERNON CR24-1116 VPD CAM,PATRICK *40W 14:04:50 14:07:40 20240714324 07/17/2024 16:49:38 TRAFFIC STOP CITE Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300LEONIS BL // BOYLE AV, VERNONVI CR24-1117 VPD FLORES,TERESA/*43E 32 16:49:38 17:14:25 17:43:37 VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 16:50:49 16:50:37 17:29:20 17:14:2744 20240714335 07/17/2024 19:49:48 20002R RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S DISTRICT BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNON CR24-1118 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR *40W 43E 44 19:49:48 19:54:08 20:06:22 19:50:56 20:56:57 21:07:05 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD ONOPA,DANIEL 20:02:27 20:52:41 20:56:54S2 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/18/2024 00:15:31 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 29 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/18/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/18/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714361 07/18/2024 07:54:56 451R UNITED STEEL FENCE 3451 E 26TH, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1119 RMS Juris CA0197300RPT VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD CAM,PATRICK *32 07:57:39 43E 07:58:00 08:06:06 08:38:11 08:50:31 08:50:19 20240714376 07/18/2024 09:30:54 902T VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 S ATLANTIC BL // DISTRICT BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1120 VPD REDONA,BRYAN VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD CAM,PATRICK *40W 09:31:32 09:32:04 09:33:29 2P8 43E 09:35:08 09:36:50 10:21:10 09:32:28 10:20:59 20240714399 07/18/2024 13:40:31 REPO T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 2430 E 49TH, VERNON REPO Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300RPTCR24-1121 VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD 13:44:57 14:06:25 15:57:22 20240714401 07/18/2024 14:03:36 503R EG MEATS 4350 ALCOA AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1122 VPD CAM,PATRICK *43E 32 14:20:13 14:36:39 14:35:03 14:43:00 14:42:58 14:26:05 14:26:08 14:42:50 VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD REDONA,BRYAN VPD GAYTAN,LORENZ VPD NEWTON,TODD VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 15:45:38 40W 5D30 5D33 XS 14:48:11 15:38:39 15:57:23 15:57:2314:20:18 14:36:18 20240714407 07/18/2024 15:38:46 5150 VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1123 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD REDONA,BRYAN *2P8 32 15:40:47 15:45:38 15:45:42 16:11:13 16:10:56 19:59:1640W15:41:59 07/19/2024 00:43:33 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 30 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/18/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/18/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714407 07/18/2024 15:38:46 VERIZON WIRELESS 1-800-451-5242 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973005150CR24-1123 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO XS 15:47:27 16:12:22 20240714409 07/18/2024 16:35:20 901T RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris4310 BANDINI BL, VERNON CR24-1124 CA0197300 16:39:11 17:47:57 VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD CAM,PATRICK *32 16:37:09 16:37:10 16:39:1643E 16:41:59 20240714411 07/18/2024 17:06:07 487R STERICYCLERPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002775 E 26TH, VERNON CR24-1125 VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *32 17:25:57 18:28:59 20240714417 07/18/2024 19:06:18 TRAFFIC STOP CITE Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1126 RMS JurisE 37TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNON1015 RPT CA0197300 19:51:01 19:51:05 VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *32 19:50:53 19:06:23 19:08:28 19:13:26 VPD 32W 19:50:54 38E 19:50:54 20:04:21 19:35:36VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL 20240714429 07/18/2024 23:07:38 VCK VM Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S BOYLE AV // 50TH, VERNON VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL *38E VOID CR24-1127 23:07:38 23:29:16 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/19/2024 00:43:33 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 31 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/19/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/19/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714459 07/19/2024 09:12:35 REPO REPO Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973005720 S 2ND, VERNON VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD RPT VPD CR24-1128 09:14:57 10:11:50 20240714464 07/19/2024 11:32:13 LOJACK VS Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973004460 PACIFIC BL, VERNONRPT VPD CR24-1129 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD FLORES,TERESA *MET1 43E 44 11:33:34 11:52:47 11:44:30 11:36:45 11:55:38 12:37:56 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD OURIQUE,CARLO 11:33:42 11:49:48 11:53:02S7 20240714465 07/19/2024 12:08:56 487R REASON BRAND CLOTHES 6250 S BOYLE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 14:26:51 VPD CR24-1131 VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD FLORES,TERESA *44 12:14:07 43E 12:14:08 12:27:15 12:52:1512:38:01 14:36:26 13:50:38 20240714467 07/19/2024 13:12:41 20002R RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300S ALAMEDA // VERNON, VERNON VPD REDONA,BRYAN *40W 13:24:24 RPCB VPD CR24-1130 13:24:25 13:26:02 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/20/2024 00:03:12 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 32 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/20/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/20/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714515 07/20/2024 08:53:14 HBC VOID Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973004355 DOWNEY RD, VERNON VPD OURIQUE,CARLO *S7 40 08:53:35 43E VPD CR24-1132 08:53:14 09:01:29 09:05:27 09:18:20 09:18:20 09:18:20 VPD REDONA,BRYAN 08:55:19 08:55:17VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 20240714521 07/20/2024 12:08:04 REC RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973004820 ALCOA AV, VERNON VPD CR24-1133 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43E 12:08:49 12:08:49 12:11:01 12:18:07 12:15:17 14:03:01 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD REDONA,BRYAN VPD LUCAS,JASON 31W 40 12:24:45 12:11:50 12:13:43 14:03:01 14:03:02 14:03:02 5D31 S7VPD OURIQUE,CARLO 12:16:42 20240714529 07/20/2024 19:23:38 20001R BELEN S DISTRICT BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1134 VPD REDONA,BRYAN *31E 19:24:37 38 19:24:43 40W 19:24:39 19:24:41 19:32:36 19:32:38 19:25:23 21:02:18 VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD RAMOS,JOSE 19:24:44 19:59:53 19:59:56 20:01:12S5 20240714530 07/20/2024 20:09:18 602 1015 2221 E 55TH, VERNON VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT *40W 20:12:58 38 20:12:59 S5 20:13:07 20:13:11 20:22:14 20:22:16 20:21:02 21:19:05 VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD RAMOS,JOSE 21:04:08 21:01:28 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/21/2024 00:06:12 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 33 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/21/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/21/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714577 07/21/2024 09:45:11 UNATTACHEDTR VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR VI Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 12:10:07 4371 E 49TH, VERNONRPT VPD CR24-1135 *40E 09:45:12 20240714581 07/21/2024 10:44:10 VCK RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973006200 MALBURG WY, VERNON1015 CITE VPD CR24-1136 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43 10:44:10 11:49:05 20240714583 07/21/2024 12:07:46 459R KING MEATS 4215 EXCHANGE AV, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 RPCB VREC OR VPD VPD CR24-1137 CR24-1138 VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *40E 31W 43 12:10:08 15:27:30 12:13:17 15:21:48 12:15:48 12:59:57 12:17:53 13:00:00 17:16:18 17:16:15 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD OURIQUE,CARLO 18:51:40 S7 16:28:02 20240714593 07/21/2024 18:54:44 MISPR RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 19:04:37 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNONVI VPD CR24-1140 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *31W 38W 40E 19:03:52 19:04:35 20:45:22 VPD 21:15:24 20:58:02VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B 20:33:50 20240714597 07/21/2024 19:52:08 902TR RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 20:18:12 2052 E VERNON AV, VERNON VPD CR24-1139 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON *26E 19:53:09 19:53:09 19:56:42 20:17:25 19:53:34 40E 44 20:18:11 20:25:24 07/22/2024 01:44:42 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 34 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/21/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/21/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714602 07/21/2024 22:57:31 BOVEH RPT ARLENE HERNANDEZ DOWNEY RD // FRUITLAND AV, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973001015 VI VPD CR24-1141 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON *44 22:59:50 22:59:56 23:00:05 23:06:22 23:04:25 23:04:09 23:01:22 00:40:54 VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD RAMOS,JOSE 38W 22:59:54 00:51:30 23:21:15 40E S5 01:40:44 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/22/2024 01:44:42 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 35 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/22/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/22/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714615 07/22/2024 07:32:41 ALEX DIAZ E 46TH // SOTO, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1142 RMS Juris CA0197300273.5RRPT VS VPD FLORES,TERESA/*32E 2P8 07:33:18 07:35:12 07:38:39 07:49:48 07:38:53 07:36:30 08:46:01 08:38:41 VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH MR C TOW 08:57:31 08:57:3140W09:16:37 07:53:1843 MR C TOW 08:33:55 08:08:55 07:41:01 08:57:32 VIRTELSTOW VIERTELTOW 08:07:52 XS 08:34:00 08:46:50VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR 07:45:33 20240714628 07/22/2024 10:43:20 CRYSTAL ART GALLERY 2430 E 49TH, VERNON VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD FLORES,TERESA/ RPT Department OCA Number VPD 10:45:31 RMS Juris484RCR24-1144 CA0197300 10:47:50 12:19:19 *43 32E 10:47:54 10:51:58 20240714629 07/22/2024 10:45:39 476R CALIFORNIA ALUMINUM CO INC 2955 E VERNON AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1143 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *40W 10:47:15 10:53:05 11:21:49 20240714644 07/22/2024 14:08:08 487R YBARRA PIPE YARD 4355 DOWNEY RD, VERNON VOID Department OCA Number VPD VPD RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 CR24-1146 CR24-1153 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD FLORES,TERESA/ *43 14:16:50 14:44:36 15:22:54 15:22:5432E14:17:02 14:19:00 20240714645 07/22/2024 14:18:53 594 1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1145 RMS Juris CA0197300S SOTO // VERNON AV, VERNONRPT CITE 07/24/2024 00:09:24 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 36 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/22/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/22/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714645 07/22/2024 14:18:53 594 1015 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1145 RMS Juris CA0197300S SOTO // VERNON AV, VERNONRPT CITE VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR *XS 32E 14:18:53 14:26:27 14:26:29 14:58:39 14:38:57VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 14:19:00 14:20:2340W 15:10:28 20240714668 07/22/2024 19:47:06 TRAFFIC STOP RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1147 RMS Juris CA019730026TH ST // PENNINGTON WAY, VERNONCITE VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX *47 19:47:07 21:01:18 20240714679 07/22/2024 23:41:35 VCK RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300S SANTA FE AV // FRUITLAND AV, VERNON CR24-1148 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX *XS 44W 47 23:41:35 23:42:51 00:27:16 23:41:44 23:42:28 00:33:21 02:02:20 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/24/2024 00:09:24 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 37 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/23/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/23/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714689 07/23/2024 03:47:40 REC SUPERIOR FARMS 3653 SIERRA PINE AV, VERNON VREC Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300RPTCR24-1149 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *43E 03:48:35 03:53:25 04:01:53 04:13:42 04:02:25 05:09:12 05:09:13 05:09:13 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VIRTELSTOW 47 VIERTELTOW 03:57:47 XS 03:57:47 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON 04:14:17 20240714705 07/23/2024 08:46:14 GTAR TOPNET INC 2965 E VERNON AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD VPD RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 CR24-1150 CR24-1151 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR *32W 2P8 XS 08:47:41 08:50:09 08:54:18 09:26:41 11:07:55 13:18:34 10:00:55 20240714726 07/23/2024 11:59:03 REPO YUN EXPRESS 5215 S BOYLE AV, VERNON REPO Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1152 RMS Juris CA0197300 VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD 11:59:30 12:39:51 16:11:46 20240714743 07/23/2024 15:56:10 487R YBARRA PIPE YARD 4355 DOWNEY RD, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1154 VPD FLORES,TERESA/*32W 15:56:25 20240714756 07/23/2024 20:58:54 DUST VREC MINERVA // 26TH, VERNONRPT VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX MR C TOW *43 20:58:54 21:21:22 22:51:08 40E 21:00:27 21:02:25 21:11:10 22:51:10MR C TOW 21:02:24 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/24/2024 00:08:56 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 38 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/24/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/24/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714778 07/24/2024 04:49:46VREC Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1155 RMS Juris CA0197300REC2618 DELTA AVE, ROSEMEAD1015 RPT VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX MR C TOW *40E MR C TOW 05:46:25 04:54:55 05:46:27 05:15:16 06:35:17 08:56:39 08:56:39 20240714787 07/24/2024 07:59:39 A487 EDWIN E VERNON AV // SOTO ST, VERNON 1015 Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300RPTCR24-1156 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CEDENO,RUTH *44 2P8 43W XS 08:01:43 08:06:24 08:04:58 08:06:13 09:39:54 09:15:42 VPD CAM,PATRICK 08:01:45 08:31:30 08:27:04 09:38:50VPD RAMOS,SALVADO 20240714804 07/24/2024 10:13:31 586 RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300E VERNON AV // SEVILLE AV, VERNONDA CR24-1157 VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD RAMOS,SALVADO *2P8 XS 10:13:31 11:05:42 11:38:16 11:00:45 11:25:19 20240714808 07/24/2024 11:10:22 DET HPPD 6542 MILES, HUNTINGTON PARK 1015 RPT VPD NEWTON,TODD VPD LUCAS,JASON VPD MANNINO,NICHOL *5D33 5D31 5D35 11:10:51 11:10:41 11:10:47 11:10:22 11:10:32 11:45:47 11:45:47 11:45:48 20240714809 07/24/2024 11:10:55 484R STYLE MELODY INC 5500 S BOYLE AV, VERNON *32E RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1159 VPD GODOY,RAYMON 11:12:20 11:18:57 11:55:39 20240714811 07/25/2024 00:00:23 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 39 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/24/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/24/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714811 07/24/2024 11:31:05 UNK 3220 E 26TH, VERNON VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD REPO Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300REPOCR24-1158 11:34:35 12:12:04 20240714820 07/24/2024 13:55:45 DUST LASO EAST LAVREC 2041 SAYBROOK, COMMERCERPT * Denotes Primary Unit 07/25/2024 00:00:23 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 40 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/25/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/25/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714857 07/25/2024 04:34:16 901T T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 2850 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1160 RMS Juris CA0197300VS OR VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR *43W 04:35:20 04:43:46 04:37:47 04:37:58 04:37:42 04:55:03 04:37:54 05:51:34 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD LANDA,RAFAEL MR C TOW 32 05:38:06 40E 05:37:41 05:38:22 05:37:57 05:38:27 44 04:35:22 04:43:04 04:36:33 MR C TOW 04:43:03 S6VPD HERNANDEZ,EDW 20240714862 07/25/2024 06:26:19 901T RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002455 E 26TH, VERNON CR24-1161 VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR *43W 32 06:27:51 06:28:30 06:28:35 06:31:04 06:29:35 06:32:46 06:58:08 06:58:08VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD LANDA,RAFAEL 44 06:53:51 20240714875 07/25/2024 08:30:42 GTAR RPT Department OCA Number CR24-1162 RMS Juris CA01973004210 CHARTER AV, VERNON *44E VPD VPD CAM,PATRICK 08:51:39 09:18:51 10:05:08 20240714878 07/25/2024 09:22:06 487R YBARRA PIPE YARD 4355 DOWNEY RD, VERNON *47 09:35:50 RPT Department OCA Number CR24-1163 RMS Juris CA0197300VPD VPD RAMOS,SALVADO VPD CAM,PATRICK 09:35:51 10:05:17 09:42:41 10:06:08 10:28:11 44E 10:48:19 20240714880 07/25/2024 09:59:45 487R VOIP TCS 800-959-3749 2300 E 57TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD VPD RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 CR24-1164 CR24-1165 VPD MARTINEZ,GABRI *L3 10:03:31 10:03:32 10:08:42 10:27:12 07/26/2024 04:49:16 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 41 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/25/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/25/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714880 07/25/2024 09:59:45 VOIP TCS 800-959-3749 2300 E 57TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1164 VPD CR24-1165 RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 487R VPD GODOY,RAYMON 43W 10:06:16 12:29:30 15:36:08 10:09:10 10:49:24 20240714888 07/25/2024 11:47:29 594R CASUAL PERFORMANCERPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973004309 EXCHANGE AV, VERNON VPD CR24-1166 VPD CAM,PATRICK *44E 12:29:29 12:33:24 13:17:33 20240714897 07/25/2024 15:34:43 901TR RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300S ATLANTIC BL // DISTRICT BL, VERNON VPD CR24-1167 VPD CAM,PATRICK *44E 15:56:22 17:32:27 20240714917 07/25/2024 20:48:47 901 RPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1168 RMS Juris CA0197300S ATLANTIC BL // DISTRICT BL, VERNON1015 VM VPD LANDA,RAFAEL VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *47 20:49:25 21:07:18 26E 20:49:59 20:52:18 20:53:18 22:29:58 22:45:03 22:15:50VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VIRTELSTOW 32E 38W 20:51:01 21:07:11 22:45:19 VIERTELTOW 21:05:46 22:44:57 20240714925 07/25/2024 23:28:21 VCK RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300AYERS AV // BANDINI BL, VERNONVS CR24-1169 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VIRTELSTOW *26E 23:28:21 23:58:49 23:48:08 VIERTELTOW 23:29:46 23:30:35 00:12:07 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/26/2024 04:49:16 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 42 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/26/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/26/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714936 07/26/2024 01:42:30 TRAFFIC STOP CENTRAL VALLEY HIDE 3768 BANDINI BL, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973001015 VI VPD CR24-1170 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *26E 38W 43 01:42:30 01:50:12 01:47:20 02:47:13 05:40:54 VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD CERDA,PAUL,JR MR C TOW 04:42:18 03:06:10 03:05:59 01:42:35 02:39:58MR C TOW 02:39:44 20240714948 07/26/2024 07:50:21 902T RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 07:53:26 S DISTRICT BL // ATLANTIC BL, VERNON VPD CR24-1171 VPD CAM,PATRICK VPD REDONA,BRYAN *44E 07:51:15 40 07:51:16 07:53:24 08:00:16 08:23:42 08:57:13 20240714950 07/26/2024 08:25:49 20002 T-MOBILE USA, INC. PACIFIC BL // 45TH, VERNON *31W 08:28:13 40 RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris VPD CR24-1172 CA0197300 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD REDONA,BRYAN 08:28:14 08:34:04 08:29:01 08:44:07 20240714958 07/26/2024 09:39:46 REC 1015 FIRESTONE // OLD SCHOOL RIVER RD, DOWNEVI RPT VPD ESCARPE,ALAN VPD LUCAS,JASON *31W 09:41:52 09:41:53 09:46:12 09:55:24 09:55:22 10:49:15 14:06:58 13:28:45 5D31 5D35 09:46:38 09:46:40 10:03:36 14:48:28 14:48:29VPD MANNINO,NICHOL VIRTELSTOW VIERTELTOW 10:03:20 20240714972 07/26/2024 15:26:06 902T LA COUNTY FIRE E 48TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNON *31W RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1173 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN 15:28:00 15:29:18 15:54:53 07/27/2024 01:34:45 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 43 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/26/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/26/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240714972 07/26/2024 15:26:06 902T LA COUNTY FIRE E 48TH // SANTA FE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1173 VPD REDONA,BRYAN VPD CAM,PATRICK 43 44E XS 15:28:02 15:29:16 15:29:26 15:29:49 15:30:48 15:36:39 15:54:54 15:54:54 15:54:55VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR 20240715003 07/26/2024 22:58:13 TRAFFIC STOP RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300DOWNEY RD // LEONIS BL, VERNONVI VPD CR24-1174 1015 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD GODOY,RAYMON VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT MR C TOW *32W 22:58:14 23:12:17 23:03:31 23:49:39 23:58:26 00:02:54 1T8 26E 23:00:33 22:58:16 23:46:37 23:48:25 00:42:18 23:16:21 38 01:27:42 MR C TOW 23:47:50 00:09:46 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/27/2024 01:34:45 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 44 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/27/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/27/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715026 07/27/2024 06:40:55 594R T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 4212 E 26TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1175 VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL *26E 06:43:10 32W 06:43:45 06:45:19 06:43:47 06:49:10 06:49:23 06:46:18 07:02:36 07:30:49 VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 07:14:33 38 06:43:12 44E 07:19:42 07:25:56 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/28/2024 00:09:30 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 45 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/28/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/28/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715057 07/28/2024 01:17:23 BNSF 4210 E 26TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300487R1015 VI VPD CR24-1176 CITE VPD SILVA-BARAJAS,B *26E 01:18:48 31W 38 01:18:50 XS 01:19:25 01:22:03 01:56:03 01:24:12 01:27:57 04:37:17 04:37:18 VPD HERNANDEZ,MEL VPD GONZALEZ,BRITT VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON 03:25:53 02:46:25 03:39:34 01:19:27 01:20:28 20240715070 07/28/2024 11:10:54 594R RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 17:57:03 4355 DOWNEY RD, VERNONCITY VPD CR24-1177 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *44E 11:11:46 11:18:27 20240715073 07/28/2024 12:10:50 415 RPT STARBUCKS 3809 S SOTO, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1178 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *32 12:12:44 12:12:46 12:12:59 12:14:22 12:14:59 12:13:41 12:18:53 12:16:41 15:56:39 15:56:39 15:56:39 15:56:40 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD CERDA,EUGENIO VPD HERNANDEZ,EDW 43W 12:12:45 44E S6 20240715076 07/28/2024 17:54:42 902T T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 E 26TH // SIERRA PINE AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1179 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *32 17:55:35 17:56:06 43W 17:55:59 18:18:45 17:56:54 18:47:01 20240715080 07/28/2024 18:58:37 459R RPT RANCHO FOODS 2528 E 37TH, VERNON Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300 19:50:03 VPD CR24-1180 VPD *47 19:07:03 19:11:14 19:15:23VPD ESCARPE,ALAN 31E 19:11:18 19:49:59 07/29/2024 01:25:58 Page 1 of 1 . . Item 8 Page 46 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/29/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/29/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715098 07/29/2024 00:00:06 REC VREC WASHINGTON // ALAMEDA, LOS ANGELES VPD ESCARPE,ALAN *31E 00:11:45 47 00:11:46 00:11:48 00:25:46 00:21:01 00:21:04 00:38:04 01:22:55 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON MR C TOW 00:54:57 00:54:55MR C TOW 00:25:12 20240715111 07/29/2024 06:30:47 REC VI 1209 S MONTEBELLO AVE, MONTEBELLOVREC VPD GAYTAN,LORENZ VPD SWINFORD,PHILL *5D30 5D32 06:30:51 07:23:01 07:23:03 10:08:21 10:11:54 10:11:54 10:11:54 10:11:55 06:33:52 06:33:55VPD NEWTON,TODD MR C TOW 5D33 MR C TOW 20240715114 07/29/2024 06:46:10 594R ODYSSEY ADS LOGISTICS 5764 ALCOA AV, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD VPD RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 VOID CR24-1181 CR24-1184 VPD *47E 06:54:17 07:18:46 07:32:48 07:14:04 09:16:41 09:07:34 08:31:39 20240715117 07/29/2024 07:11:36 459R JC SALESRPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA01973002840 E 26TH, VERNON VPD CR24-1183 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *44 07:23:31 20240715118 07/29/2024 07:19:21 459VR COMMERCIAL TIRE CO 3366 LEONIS BL, VERNON *43W RPT Department OCA Number RMS Juris CA0197300VPDCR24-1182 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 07:34:49 20240715131 07/29/2024 08:56:04 459R MODERNICARPT Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1185 RMS Juris CA01973002901 SACO, VERNON 07/30/2024 00:01:32 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 47 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/29/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/29/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715131 07/29/2024 08:56:04 MODERNICA 2901 SACO, VERNON VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH VPD CERDA,EUGENIO RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300459RCR24-1185 *44 09:08:25 09:17:55 09:08:50 43W 09:27:52 10:24:22 20240715150 07/29/2024 12:21:31 MOCHI ICE CREAM 5563 ALCOA AV, VERNON VPD FLORES,TERESA/ *47E RPT Department OCA Number CR24-1186 RMS Juris CA0197300476RVPD 12:37:18 12:43:18 13:22:46 20240715151 07/29/2024 12:37:36 594R JUCO INCRPT Department OCA Number VPD VPD RMS Juris CA0197300 CA0197300 2164 E 25TH, VERNON CR24-1187 CR24-1188 VPD FLORES,TERESA/*47E 13:22:53 13:30:49 14:41:41 20240715161 07/29/2024 14:27:09 594R ROSE AND SHOREPATM Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973005151 ALCOA AV, VERNONRPT CR24-1189 VPD VELASQUEZ,RICH *44 14:31:42 14:56:33 16:14:35 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/30/2024 00:01:32 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 48 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/30/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/30/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715191 07/30/2024 01:13:43 LARRY S INDIANA // 26TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300459VCR24-1190 VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX *44E 32W 47 01:15:44 01:26:29 01:26:47 01:19:46 02:01:04 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN 01:43:35 01:54:52VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON 01:15:46 20240715207 07/30/2024 05:46:35 901T T-MOBILE USA 888-662-4662 OPT 4 E VERNON AV // SOTO ST, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1191 VPD ESCARPE,ALAN *32W 44E 47 05:46:57 05:48:53 05:46:59 05:50:34 05:49:52 05:48:56 06:42:53 06:42:54VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON 06:24:05 20240715209 07/30/2024 07:01:22 901TR MARQUEZ PRODUCE 1890 E 25TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1192 VPD *26W 07:03:51 07:10:51 08:19:56 20240715225 07/30/2024 09:25:52 REC UNKNOWNVREC Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1193 RMS Juris CA01973001955 E 48TH, VERNON1015 RPT VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43 09:26:59 09:27:32 09:31:02 09:31:14 10:23:09 09:31:09 10:53:47 09:30:17 13:46:01 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CEDENO,RUTH VPD GODOY,RAYMON VIRTELSTOW 26W 11:02:52 2P8 10:28:14 09:57:19 12:51:40 10:07:40 31E 09:27:36 10:29:55VIERTELTOW 10:23:43 XSVPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR 20240715246 07/30/2024 12:01:59 902T RPT LINEAGE 3211 E 44TH, VERNON Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300ORCR24-1194 VPD CEDENO,RUTH *2P8 12:04:32 12:13:05 12:51:33 07/31/2024 00:02:24 Page 1 of 3 . . Item 8 Page 49 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/30/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/30/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715246 07/30/2024 12:01:59 902T LINEAGE 3211 E 44TH, VERNON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300ORCR24-1194 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ MR C TOW 26W 12:06:22 12:43:31 12:05:22 12:14:14 12:57:01 12:14:01 12:58:57 12:58:57MR C TOW 12:43:30 XSVPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR 12:33:51 20240715252 07/30/2024 13:37:37 AJAX FORGE 1956 E 48TH, VERNON VPD GODOY,RAYMON RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300487RCR24-1195 *31E 13:40:34 13:59:08 14:27:19 20240715256 07/30/2024 14:25:17 WARRANT 1015 VERNON POLICE 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *26W 43 14:34:30 15:15:03 16:25:36 15:15:06 20240715264 07/30/2024 16:02:37 LOCATE PITTSBURG PDVREC CAMPBELL // LAKE, PITTSBURG 20240715267 07/30/2024 17:15:15 GTAR VERNON POLICERPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002305 E 49TH, VERNON CR24-1196 VPD CERDA,EUGENIO *43 17:15:15 18:09:16 20240715268 07/30/2024 17:59:25 WELCK COMPLETE GARMENT E 38TH // ROSS, VERNON 1098 Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1197 RMS Juris CA0197300RPT VPD GODOY,RAYMON *31E 18:01:35 18:02:08 18:09:19 18:10:55 18:04:02 18:11:00 18:16:16 VPD FLORES,TERESA/ VPD CERDA,EUGENIO 26W 18:09:40 43 19:44:37 18:09:2918:41:51 07/31/2024 00:02:24 Page 2 of 3 . . Item 8 Page 50 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/30/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/30/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715268 07/30/2024 17:59:25 WELCK COMPLETE GARMENT1098 Department OCA Number VPD RMS JurisE 38TH // ROSS, VERNONRPT CR24-1197 CA0197300 18:16:25 18:33:13 VPD HERNANDEZ,EDW VPD VILLEGAS,RICHAR s6 18:11:16 18:09:57 18:11:29 18:11:24XS 20240715285 07/30/2024 22:14:12 20001 TOYOTA TELEMATICS CALL CENTER 3398 LEONIS BL, VERNON VI Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1198 RMS Juris CA0197300VS RPT VPD ESCOBEDO,ALEX VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *44E 22:15:01 22:16:12 22:15:03 22:25:10 22:16:59 22:22:48 22:18:27 22:38:14 23:31:22 23:31:22 32W 23:10:42 VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON VIRTELSTOW 47 22:43:36 VIERTELTOW 22:25:09 * Denotes Primary Unit 07/31/2024 00:02:24 Page 3 of 3 . . Item 8 Page 51 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/31/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/31/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715306 07/31/2024 05:22:53 487R CCN Department OCA Number VPD CR24-1199 RMS Juris CA0197300E 38TH // ROSS, VERNONRPT VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD MADRIGAL,ALFON *32W 05:23:54 47 05:23:55 05:24:30 05:28:13 05:28:15 06:34:41 05:41:05 20240715311 07/31/2024 06:25:17 REPO CORE MARKREPO Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002311 E 48TH, VERNON CR24-1200 VPD RECORDS BUREA *RECD 06:43:33 07:13:18 09:35:04 20240715314 07/31/2024 07:45:05 920PR UNK 6119 MALBURG WY, VERNON *2STOF RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1201 VPD REYNA,JOSE S 07:46:08 20240715317 07/31/2024 08:18:11 REPO NEW CHEF FASHION 3223 E 46TH, VERNON REPO Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CR24-1202 VPD DISPATCH VPD RECORDS BUREA *DISP RECD 08:18:42 08:25:49 08:25:51 09:08:31 13:36:35 20240715327 07/31/2024 11:59:14 487R YBARRA SUBSTATION 4355 DOWNEY RD, VERNON *43E RPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA0197300CITYCR24-1203 VPD GODOY,RAYMON 11:59:48 12:14:03 20240715345 07/31/2024 17:27:41 GTAR ESPIRIT TRADINGRPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973002050 E 52D, VERNON CR24-1205 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *43 17:29:59 17:39:35 18:16:32 20240715346 08/01/2024 00:11:55 Page 1 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 52 of 53 VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT Call Log Report Type All Unit Times and Location with OCA's First Date: 07/31/2024 Jurisdiction: VERNON Last Date: 07/31/2024 CallerCall Number Disp Ten Received Code Complaint Address Unit Time Dep Officer Unit Dispatch Enroute OnScene Depart Arrive Remove Comp 20240715346 07/31/2024 17:54:38 902T VERNON TRUCK WASHRPT Department OCA Number VPD RMS Juris CA01973003308 BANDINI BL, VERNONOR CR24-1204 VPD CAM,PATRICK *26E 43 17:56:21 18:16:39 18:16:20 17:57:27 18:16:18 18:50:36 VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG VPD HERNANDEZ,EDW 18:17:10 18:42:32S6 20240715362 07/31/2024 22:19:08 LOCATE VREC 4305 S SANTA FE AV, VERNON VPD RECORDS BUREA VPD HERNANDEZ,MIG *RECD 43 22:25:17 23:00:56 22:55:19 22:57:10 * Denotes Primary Unit 08/01/2024 00:11:55 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 8 Page 53 of 53 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel S. Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works Department:Public Works Submitted by:Rosa Garibay, Permit Technician Subject Public Works Department Monthly Report Recommendation Receive and file the July 2024 Building Report. Background The attached building report consists of total issued permits, major projects, demolition permits, new building permits and certificates of occupancy status reports for the month of July 2024. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Public Works Department July 2024 Building Report . . Item 9 Page 1 of 1 Construction Value Number of Permits Permit Fees Collected Year to Date Fees Year to Date Permits Construction Value Number of Permits Permit Fees Collected Year to Date Fees Year to Date Permits Permit Difference Valuation Difference July 2,812,203$ 36 42,235$ 42,235$ 36 20,962,819$ 103 199,111$ 199,111$ 103 186%645% August 3,884,905$ 35 45,085$ 87,320$ 71 September 52,180,758$ 39 476,571$ 563,891$ 110 October 11,919,321$ 48 145,152$ 709,043$ 158 November 6,103,993$ 33 72,324$ 781,367$ 191 December 5,288,826$ 20 59,013$ 840,380$ 211 January 4,501,970$ 21 57,986$ 898,366$ 232 February 10,465,911$ 46 125,280$ 1,023,646$ 278 March 2,865,552$ 28 44,377$ 1,068,023$ 306 April 3,286,416$ 29 51,064$ 1,119,087$ 335 May 13,333,422$ 43 130,368$ 1,249,455$ 378 June 2,875,862$ 38 49,627$ 1,299,082$ 416 FY 2023/2024 FY 2024/2025 Year to Date Monthly Report Summary City of Vernon Building Division 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 $- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 July August September October November December January February March April May June Monthly FY 2022/2023 Fees Collected FY 2023/2024 Fees Collected FY 2023/2024 Number of Permits 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 $- $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 Year to Date FY 2023/2024 Permit Fees Collected FY 2024/2025 Permit Fees Collected FY 2023/2024 Year to Date Permits . . Item 9 Page 1 of 34 PERMIT ISSUANCE SUMMARY (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) FOR CITY OF VERNON Permit Type Permit Work Class*Permits Issued Square Feet Valuation Fees Paid Certificate of Occupancy $5,632.00 $0.00 0 5Certificate of Occupancy $5,632.00 $0.00 0 5CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TOTAL: Commercial $2,437.28 $150,000.00 1,567 1Remodel $2,437.28 $150,000.00 1,567 1COMMERCIAL TOTAL: Contractor Declaration $0.00 $225,000.00 0 19Contractor Declaration $0.00 $225,000.00 0 19CONTRACTOR DECLARATION TOTAL: Demolition $5,632.19 $330,000.00 12,863 3Demolition $5,632.19 $330,000.00 12,863 3DEMOLITION TOTAL: Electrical $10,141.21 $376,783.00 0 12Electrical $10,141.21 $376,783.00 0 12ELECTRICAL TOTAL: Engineering $11,882.00 $916,553.00 0 13Encroachment Regular $6,117.00 $0.00 0 6Encroachment Utility $9,356.00 $200,000.00 0 1Grading $27,355.00 $1,116,553.00 0 20ENGINEERING TOTAL: Industrial $111,183.00 $15,000,000.00 57,770 1New Construction $368.69 $2,500.00 0 1Remodel $111,551.69 $15,002,500.00 57,770 2INDUSTRIAL TOTAL: Industrial Wastewater $360.00 $0.00 0 2Industrial Wastewater $360.00 $0.00 0 2INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TOTAL: Landscape $828.00 $0.00 0 1Landscape $828.00 $0.00 0 1LANDSCAPE TOTAL: Mechanical $25,001.91 $2,642,888.00 0 7Mechanical $25,001.91 $2,642,888.00 0 7MECHANICAL TOTAL: Miscellaneous $4,778.69 $508,450.00 0 9Miscellaneous $4,778.69 $508,450.00 0 9MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL: Owners Declaration $0.00 $6,500.00 0 9Owners Declaration $0.00 $6,500.00 0 9OWNERS DECLARATION TOTAL: Plumbing $4,883.69 $592,945.00 0 11Plumbing $4,883.69 $592,945.00 0 11PLUMBING TOTAL: * Double-click the Permit Work Class Name while in the browser to see Permit details for that Work Class. Page 1 of 24305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 2 of 34 PERMIT ISSUANCE SUMMARY (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Permit Type Permit Work Class*Permits Issued Square Feet Valuation Fees Paid Roofing $375.09 $11,200.00 0 1Roofing $375.09 $11,200.00 0 1ROOFING TOTAL: Special Event $134.00 $0.00 0 1Special Event Permit $134.00 $0.00 0 1SPECIAL EVENT TOTAL: $199,110.75 $20,962,819.00 72,200 103GRAND TOTAL: * Double-click the Permit Work Class Name while in the browser to see Permit details for that Work Class. Page 2 of 24305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 3 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) FOR CITY OF VERNON CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY COO-2023-0071 Type: Certificate of Occupancy District: Vernon Main Address:2305 E 52Nd St Status: Finaled Workclass: Certificate of Occupancy Project: Parcel: 6308016012 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 09/11/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/16/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/13/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: 11/01/2023 Fee Total: $885.00 Finaled Date: 07/16/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Application Reviewed By:: Denise Palomares Business License #: GBL-000308-2023 Construction Type: V-B Zone: I OCC Class: F-1 Type of Use: Manufacturing of leather belts Variance: No CUP: No Building Vacant ~ 2 YR: No Parcel: 6308016012 Square Footage: 10000 Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Comments: 9/27/2023-SITE VISIT CONDUCTED, NEW TENANT MOVING INTO PORTION OF BUILDING ARE SCHEDULED TO MOVE IN OCTOBER 1ST. LEFT CONTACT INFO BUT WILL LOOP BACK. GC Approved for OCC: Nov 1 2023 12:00AM Business License Application Number: GBL-000308-2023 Business Address: 2305 EAST 52nd STREET VERNON CA 90058 Business Name: STREETS AHEAD INC Type of Business Operation: Corporation Previous Use: LIGHT LEATHER WOMANS BELT MANUFACTURING Proposed Use: LIGHT LEATHER WOMANS BELT MANUFACTURING Describe Operation: Manufacturing of leather belts Number of Stories: 2 Ground Floor (Sq. Ft.): 6000 Mezzanine / Second Floor (Sq. Ft.): 4000 Total Sq. Ft. of Building to be occupied.: 10000 Total Sq. Ft. of Building: 16681 Men: 6 Women: 6 Is the building presently occupied?: Yes Are you occupying the entire building?: No General office ONLY?: No Will more than 20% of build be utilized incidental: No Retail or Commercial use, Bar, Restaurant, Fuel St: No Trade School?: No Hazardous waste facility?: No Trash-to-energy facility?: No Refinery, Petroleum related use or Petroleum Stora: No Public storage (including mini-storage) Facility?: No Power Plant or Cogeneration facility?: No Recycling facility?: No Freight or Truck terminal including Truck Parking?: No Operation that involves slaughtering of animals?: No Operation that involves manufacturing of manure?: No Operation that involves the rendering of animals?: No Operation of a junk or salvage yard, including an: No Contractor yard (outdoor or indoor storage of equi: No Will your facility generate excess litter that wil: No Will your operation have any outside storage?: No Will you be occupying a building or portion of a b: No Will your operation create noise in excess of 75 D: No Will your operation create vibration in excess of: No Will your business use any radioactive materials o: No Will radioactivity, when measured at the lot line,: No Will you operate any electrical or electromagnetic: No Will your operation include the storage of or invo: No Will you have bulk storage of flammable liquids or: No Will your storage height be over l2-feet from the: No Will your operation utilize more then 500 acre fee: No Will you have refrigerated trucks parked onsite in: No Will your business discharge an industrial waste s: No Will the facility have any of the following equipm: No Will any of the following operations be performed?: No Description: Manufacturing of leather belts COO-2023-0133 Type: Certificate of Occupancy District: Vernon Main Address:4536 District Blvd. Status: Issued Workclass: Certificate of Occupancy Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 12/28/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: 04/03/2024 Fee Total: $885.00 Finaled Date: 07/23/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Page 1 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 4 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Application Reviewed By:: Rosa Garibay Business License #: GBL-000496-2023 Construction Type: III-B Zone: I OCC Class: F-1 Variance: No CUP: No Parcel: Square Footage: 0.00 Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Approval Date: Jan 9 2024 12:00AM Health Department Comments: garment permit received 01/09/2023 GC waiting for inspection workflow to be active. Business License Application Number: GBL-000496-2023 Business Address: 4536 District Blvd Business Name: Mother Maker LLC Type of Business Operation: LLC Previous Use: WAREHOUSE OF FABRICS / TRIMS Proposed Use: Sewing of apparel Describe Operation: Sewing of apparel Number of Stories: 1 Ground Floor (Sq. Ft.): 10000 Mezzanine / Second Floor (Sq. Ft.): 0 Total Sq. Ft. of Building to be occupied.: 10000 Total Sq. Ft. of Building: 10000 Men: 19 Women: 20 Is the building presently occupied?: Yes Are you occupying the entire building?: No General office ONLY?: No Will more than 20% of build be utilized incidental: No Retail or Commercial use, Bar, Restaurant, Fuel St: No Trade School?: No Hazardous waste facility?: No Trash-to-energy facility?: No Refinery, Petroleum related use or Petroleum Stora: No Public storage (including mini-storage) Facility?: No Power Plant or Cogeneration facility?: No Recycling facility?: No Freight or Truck terminal including Truck Parking?: No Operation that involves slaughtering of animals?: No Operation that involves manufacturing of manure?: No Operation that involves the rendering of animals?: No Operation of a junk or salvage yard, including an: No Contractor yard (outdoor or indoor storage of equi: No Will your facility generate excess litter that wil: No Will your operation have any outside storage?: No Will you be occupying a building or portion of a b: No Will your operation create noise in excess of 75 D: No Will your operation create vibration in excess of: No Will your business use any radioactive materials o: No Will radioactivity, when measured at the lot line,: No Will you operate any electrical or electromagnetic: No Will your operation include the storage of or invo: No Will you have bulk storage of flammable liquids or: No Will your storage height be over l2-feet from the: No Will your operation utilize more then 500 acre fee: No Will you have refrigerated trucks parked onsite in: No Will your business discharge an industrial waste s: No Will the facility have any of the following equipm: No Will any of the following operations be performed?: No Description: manufacturing COO-2024-0168 Type: Certificate of Occupancy District: Vernon Main Address:5993 Malburg Way Status: Finaled Workclass: Certificate of Occupancy Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 02/26/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: 07/24/2024 Fee Total: $885.00 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Application Reviewed By:: Rosa Garibay Business License #: GBL-000638-2024 Construction Type: III-B Zone: I OCC Class: S-1 Variance: No CUP: No Parcel: Square Footage: 0.00 Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Comments: 3/11/2024- NEGATIVE DEC SENT 3/12/2024- NEGATIVE DEC SIGNED Business License Application Number: GBL-000638-2024 Business Address: 5993 Malburg Way Business Name: Japan Supreme Engine Type of Business Operation: LLC Previous Use: NA Proposed Use: Warehousing of auto parts Describe Operation: Warehousing of auto parts Number of Stories: 1 Ground Floor (Sq. Ft.): 6113 Total Sq. Ft. of Building to be occupied.: 6113 Men: 3 Women: 0 Is the building presently occupied?: No Are you occupying the entire building?: No General office ONLY?: No Will more than 20% of build be utilized incidental: No Retail or Commercial use, Bar, Restaurant, Fuel St: No Trade School?: No Hazardous waste facility?: No Trash-to-energy facility?: No Refinery, Petroleum related use or Petroleum Stora: No Public storage (including mini-storage) Facility?: No Power Plant or Cogeneration facility?: No Recycling facility?: No Page 2 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 5 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Freight or Truck terminal including Truck Parking?: No Operation that involves slaughtering of animals?: No Operation that involves manufacturing of manure?: No Operation that involves the rendering of animals?: No Operation of a junk or salvage yard, including an: No Contractor yard (outdoor or indoor storage of equi: No Will your facility generate excess litter that wil: No Will your operation have any outside storage?: No Will you be occupying a building or portion of a b: No Will your operation create noise in excess of 75 D: No Will your operation create vibration in excess of: No Will your business use any radioactive materials o: No Will radioactivity, when measured at the lot line,: No Will you operate any electrical or electromagnetic: No Will your operation include the storage of or invo: No Will you have bulk storage of flammable liquids or: No Will your storage height be over l2-feet from the: Yes Will your operation utilize more then 500 acre fee: No Will you have refrigerated trucks parked onsite in: No Will your business discharge an industrial waste s: No Will the facility have any of the following equipm: No Will any of the following operations be performed?: No Description: Warehousing of Imported Japanese car Engines and Transmissions. COO-2024-0224*Type: Certificate of Occupancy District: Vernon Main Address:6190 Boyle Avenue Status: Expired Workclass: Certificate of Occupancy Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/22/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/10/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 08/05/2024 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: 06/18/2024 Fee Total: $2,092.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Application Reviewed By:: Rosa Garibay Business License #: GBL-000859-2024 Construction Type: III-B Zone: I OCC Class: S-1 Variance: No CUP: No Parcel: Square Footage: 0.00 Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Approval Date: Jun 18 2024 12:00AM Health Department Comments: 06/10/2024- SITE EVAL SCHEDULED FOR 6/17/2024 10 AM Business License Application Number: GBL-000859-2024 Business Address: 6190 S. Boyle Ave. Vernon, CA 90058 Business Name: Karis, Inc. Type of Business Operation: Corporation Previous Use: Warehouse Proposed Use: Warehousing and distribution of general merchandise Describe Operation: Warehousing and distribution of general merchandise Number of Stories: 2 Ground Floor (Sq. Ft.): 88042 Mezzanine / Second Floor (Sq. Ft.): 4350 Total Sq. Ft. of Building to be occupied.: 92392 Total Sq. Ft. of Building: 165790 Men: 24 Women: 6 Is the building presently occupied?: No Are you occupying the entire building?: No General office ONLY?: No Will more than 20% of build be utilized incidental: No Retail or Commercial use, Bar, Restaurant, Fuel St: No Trade School?: No Hazardous waste facility?: No Trash-to-energy facility?: No Refinery, Petroleum related use or Petroleum Stora: No Public storage (including mini-storage) Facility?: No Power Plant or Cogeneration facility?: No Recycling facility?: No Freight or Truck terminal including Truck Parking?: No Operation that involves slaughtering of animals?: No Operation that involves manufacturing of manure?: No Operation that involves the rendering of animals?: No Operation of a junk or salvage yard, including an: No Contractor yard (outdoor or indoor storage of equi: No Will your facility generate excess litter that wil: No Will your operation have any outside storage?: No Will you be occupying a building or portion of a b: No Will your operation create noise in excess of 75 D: No Will your operation create vibration in excess of: No Will your business use any radioactive materials o: No Will radioactivity, when measured at the lot line,: No Will you operate any electrical or electromagnetic: No Will your operation include the storage of or invo: No Will you have bulk storage of flammable liquids or: No Will your storage height be over l2-feet from the: Yes Will your operation utilize more then 500 acre fee: No Will you have refrigerated trucks parked onsite in: No Will your business discharge an industrial waste s: No Will the facility have any of the following equipm: No Will any of the following operations be performed?: No Description: Distribution of General Grocery COO-2024-0228 Type: Certificate of Occupancy District: Vernon Main Address:4201-4215 District Blvd. Status: Finaled Workclass: Certificate of Occupancy Project: Parcel: 6304028015 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/04/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/16/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/13/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: 07/16/2024 Fee Total: $885.00 Finaled Date: 07/17/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Page 3 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 6 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Application Reviewed By:: Rosa Garibay Business License #: GBL-000853-2024 Construction Type: III-B Zone: I OCC Class: S-1 Variance: No CUP: No Parcel: 6304028015 Square Footage: 0.00 Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Comments: 06/10/2024- ND SENT Business License Application Number: GBL-000853-2024 Business Address: 4201 - 4215 District Blvd Business Name: Industrias T.TAiO LLC Type of Business Operation: LLC Previous Use: Warehouse and distribution of toiletries Proposed Use: Warehouse and distribution of toiletries Describe Operation: Warehouse and distribution of toiletries Number of Stories: 1 Ground Floor (Sq. Ft.): 11000 Total Sq. Ft. of Building to be occupied.: 11000 Total Sq. Ft. of Building: 11000 Men: 4 Women: 6 Is the building presently occupied?: No Are you occupying the entire building?: Yes General office ONLY?: No Will more than 20% of build be utilized incidental: No Retail or Commercial use, Bar, Restaurant, Fuel St: No Trade School?: No Hazardous waste facility?: No Trash-to-energy facility?: No Refinery, Petroleum related use or Petroleum Stora: No Public storage (including mini-storage) Facility?: No Power Plant or Cogeneration facility?: No Recycling facility?: No Freight or Truck terminal including Truck Parking?: No Operation that involves slaughtering of animals?: No Operation that involves manufacturing of manure?: No Operation that involves the rendering of animals?: No Operation of a junk or salvage yard, including an: No Contractor yard (outdoor or indoor storage of equi: No Will your facility generate excess litter that wil: No Will your operation have any outside storage?: No Will you be occupying a building or portion of a b: No Will your operation create noise in excess of 75 D: No Will your operation create vibration in excess of: No Will your business use any radioactive materials o: No Will radioactivity, when measured at the lot line,: No Will you operate any electrical or electromagnetic: No Will your operation include the storage of or invo: No Will you have bulk storage of flammable liquids or: No Will your storage height be over l2-feet from the: No Will your operation utilize more then 500 acre fee: No Will you have refrigerated trucks parked onsite in: No Will your business discharge an industrial waste s: No Will the facility have any of the following equipm: No Will any of the following operations be performed?: No Description: Offices, Internet orders hub and warehouse for distribution of Toiletries such as loofahs, sponges and personal care, beauty and wellness items PERMITS ISSUED FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 5 COMMERCIAL COM2024-0045 Type: Commercial District: Vernon Main Address:2555 Chambers Street Status: In Review Workclass: Remodel Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 01/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/15/2024 Sq Ft: 1,567 Expiration: 01/13/2025 Valuation: $150,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $2,437.28 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Approval Date: Apr 9 2024 12:00AM Description: Office remodel and second floor office, restroom addition PERMITS ISSUED FOR COMMERCIAL: 1 CONTRACTOR DECLARATION CONT-2024-0347 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:1942 E 46Th Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/01/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/01/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/03/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: License Class: General Page 4 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 7 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Contractors State License No.: 727690 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Sep 30 2024 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000911-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Sep 30 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: State Fund Policy Number: 9279091-24 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): None Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes CONT-2024-0348 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2450 Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/01/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/01/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/03/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Duplicate Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: C36 Contractors State License No.: 309863 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Nov 30 2024 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000008-2023 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: INsurance Company of the West Policy Number: WSD503141208 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): None Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes CONT-2024-0349 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2450 Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/01/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/01/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/03/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: PLB-2024-0087 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: C36 Contractors State License No.: 309863 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Nov 30 2024 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000008-2023 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: INsurance Company of the West Policy Number: WSD503141208 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): None Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes CONT-2024-0350 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:4201 District Boulevard Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/02/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/02/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/03/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: ELE-2024-0167 License Class: C 10 Contractors State License No.: 985298 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jul 31 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000913-2024 Page 5 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 8 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Sep 30 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: No Carrier: Na Policy Number: Na Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes CONT-2024-0351 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2600 S Santa Fe Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/03/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/03/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: PLB-2024-0088 License Class: C-36 Contractors State License No.: 774031 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jan 31 2026 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000848-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Sep 30 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Security National Insurance Company Policy Number: SWC1483190 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: plumbing permit CONT-2024-0352 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:6031 Malburg Way Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/05/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/05/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/08/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: C61/D24 Contractors State License No.: 1062365 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jan 30 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000600-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: EPIC Policy Number: UB4P329316 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Permitting of Existing Storage Racks CONT-2024-0353 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:4801 E 50Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/08/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $25,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/08/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Page 6 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 9 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Related applications: MEC-2024-0046 is currently in review. It details the full mechanical installation details for the two new blower fans that require power supply. Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: Class B Contractors State License No.: 1005084 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jun 30 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000603-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: XL Specialty Insurance Co Policy Number: CWG740998403 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): N/A Lender''s Address: N/A Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Power will be supplied to two newly install 3HP blower fans. Conduit and wire will be installed from existing distribution panels to the new fans. CONT-2024-0354 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2750 E 37Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/09/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/09/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/09/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: DEM-2024-0029 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: B Contractors State License No.: 766707 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jul 31 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000889-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Insurance Company of the West Policy Number: WVE507429000 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): None Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes CONT-2024-0355 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2100 E 38Th Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/11/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/11/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: contractor Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: C-10 Contractors State License No.: 664299 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Feb 28 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-012406 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: OAK RIVER INSURANCE Policy Number: ROWC330686 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): N/A Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Install 60A circuit feeder for a Wattco heating unit @ 480 volts, 3phase. Page 7 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 10 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) CONT-2024-0356 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:5126 Florinda Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Temple City, CA 91780 Application Date: 07/15/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/15/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/15/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: License Class: B Contractors State License No.: 404982 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jun 30 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000928-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Sep 30 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: No Carrier: na Policy Number: na Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: COM2024-0045 CONT-2024-0357 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2003-2033 E Ave E Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Los Angeles, CA 90020 Application Date: 07/16/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/16/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/16/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: IND-2024-0092 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: B Contractors State License No.: 1029145 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jul 31 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-00283-2023 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: State Compensation Insurance Fund Policy Number: 9324114-2023 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Demo existing basement walls and doors. Refurbish basement into 2 separate freezer spaces. CONT-2024-0358 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:3275 E Vernon Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/17/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/18/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: PLB-2024-0098 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: A Contractors State License No.: 1003016 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Apr 30 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000934-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: WestCap Insurance Company Policy Number: WC666172 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): None Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Page 8 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 11 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Description: Sewer lateral install CONT-2024-0359 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2424 E 28Th Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/17/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/18/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Elec 2024-0141 Misc 2024-0149 Plb 2024-0082 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: B Contractors State License No.: 744877 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jul 31 2026 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL000932-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Oct 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Clear springs property & casualty Policy Number: CWC02265301 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): None Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes CONT-2024-0360 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:6180 Alcoa Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/18/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $100,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/18/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: License Class: B, C20, C38 Contractors State License No.: 825297 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Oct 31 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-010065 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Sentinel Insurance Co LTD Policy Number: 72WEABD5W99 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: INSTALL NEW EVAPS AND CONDENSERS CONT-2024-0361 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:4320 Maywood Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/18/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/18/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: C36 Contractors State License No.: 1083688 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Nov 30 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000939-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Sep 30 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Ace American Insurance Company Policy Number: WLR_C57327431 Performance of the work: No Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Page 9 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 12 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: plumbing permit to replace toilets to commercial toilets CONT-2024-0362 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2035 E Vernon Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/22/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/22/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/22/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: IND-2024-0093 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: B Contractors State License No.: 1029145 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jul 31 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000283-2023 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: Yes Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: State Compensation Insurance Fund Policy Number: 9324114-2023 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Tenant Improvements: Conversion of existing warehouse to freezer, cooler, processing rooms, office and restrooms. CONT-2024-0363 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2757 Leonis Boulevard Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: 6308002012 Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/29/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/29/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $100,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: ELE-2023-0013 License Class: A C10 C31 Contractors State License No.: 201042 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Jun 30 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000078-2023 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Cypress Insurance Company (CA) Policy Number: GRWC528115 Performance of the work: No Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Shell electrical for new industrial warehouse building (70000sqft) CONT-2024-0364 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:3824 S. Santa Fe Ave, Unit #6 Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/30/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: ELE-2024-0164 Licensed Contractor's Declaration: Yes License Class: B Contractors State License No.: 1031780 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Oct 31 2025 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CLB-000584-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Dec 31 2024 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: Hartford Underwriters Ins Co Policy Number: 46WNS48800 Performance of the work: Yes Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): none Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Page 10 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 13 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Rebuild of warehouse due to fire damage CONT-2024-0365 Type: Contractor Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2328 E Vernon Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Contractor Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/31/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/31/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/31/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: ROF-2024-0045 License Class: C39 Contractors State License No.: 1096901 Contractors State License Expiration Date: Sep 29 2024 12:00AM City of Vernon License Number: CBL-000968-2024 City of Vernon License Expiration Date: Jul 30 2025 12:00AM Maintain a Certificate of Consent to Self-Insure: No Maintain a workers' compensation insurance: Yes Carrier: STATE COMP Policy Number: 9349453 Performance of the work: No Lender''s Name (If None, so Indicate): Lender''s Address: Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: No PERMITS ISSUED FOR CONTRACTOR DECLARATION: 19 DEMOLITION DEM-2024-0027 Type: Demolition District: Vernon Main Address:2050 E 51St Street Status: Issued Workclass: Demolition Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/12/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/02/2024 Sq Ft: 4,000 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $10,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $572.48 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: removing non-load bearing wall How much soil is exposed?: None Disturbed Acres: 0 Is it more than 5000 Sq. Ft. Redevelopment: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: removing some offices by removing some non-load bearing walls DEM-2024-0028 Type: Demolition District: Vernon Main Address:3883 & 3855 Soto St Soto St Status: Issued Workclass: Demolition Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/09/2024 Sq Ft: 4,126 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $185,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $2,759.79 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: na How much soil is exposed?: None Disturbed Acres: 0 Is it more than 5000 Sq. Ft. Redevelopment: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Page 11 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 14 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Description: NOTE: BUILDING HAS 2 ADDRESSES 3855 & 3883 SOTO STREET. 3883 AREA: 1 DEMO OF OLD BOILER AND BOILER FEEDWATER TANK THAT IS NOT IN SERVICE. 2 DEMO OF (4) OLD REFERGERATION COMPRESSORS THAT ARE NOT IN SERVICE. 3 DEMO OF NON LOADING BEARING INSULATED WALLS AS NOTED. 4 DEMO OF INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT MEZZANINE AREA APROX 4,390 SQUARE FEET 5 DEMO OF (2) FREESTANDING REFERGERATION COIL SUPPORTS NOT IN SERVICE. 3855 AREA: 6 DEMO OF FREEZER FLOOR AND REMOVAL OF RACKING AND BOLLARDS IN FREEZER AREA. 7 DEMO OF INTERIOR FENCE AND CURB AT DOCK AREA DEM-2024-0029 Type: Demolition District: Vernon Main Address:2750 E 37Th St Status: Issued Workclass: Demolition Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/09/2024 Sq Ft: 4,737 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $135,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $2,299.92 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: na How much soil is exposed?: None Disturbed Acres: 0 Is it more than 5000 Sq. Ft. Redevelopment: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: 2750 E. 37TH STREET 1. DEMO 4,465 S.F. AREA OF INTERIOR, NON-LOAD BEARING INSULATED METAL PANEL WALLS AND CEILINGS INSIDE THE EXISTING HAM SLICING ROOM 2. DEMO OF FREE-STANDING STEEL STRUCTURE INSIDE THE HAM SLICING ROOM 3. DEMO OF INSPECTOR'S OBSERVATION PLATFORM APPROX. 272 S.F. 4. NO DEMO ON MEZZANINE OFFICES. PERMITS ISSUED FOR DEMOLITION: 3 ELECTRICAL B-2022-5327 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:2459 E Vernon Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/11/2022 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $5,000.00 Last Inspection: 07/10/2024 Fee Total: $736.38 Finaled Date: 07/11/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2023-5726, 27,28,29 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Add 40 LED fixtures and replace 10 not working outlets, 2 fans batch ELE-2023-0020 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:4010 E 26Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: 5243021021 Vernon 90023 Application Date: 05/23/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $50,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $817.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Approval Date: May 23 2023 12:00AM Page 12 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 15 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Health Department Comments: NOT APPLICABLE Description: remove and replace 4000A main ELE-2023-0030 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:4915 Pacific Boulevard Status: Issued Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: 6308010022 Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/14/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $39,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.99 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Approval Date: Jun 15 2023 12:00AM Health Department Comments: NOT APPLICABLE Description: replace stolen electrical riser feeders. Replace 800A trip unit with 500A trip unit. Install (3) 3" GRC riser conduits in ceiling space and stub out of building with weather heads. (2) of the (3) conduits to have 500A paralleled conductors. 3rd conduit to be spare for future. ELE-2023-0058 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:3336 Fruitland Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: 6310002015 Vernon 90058 Application Date: 08/24/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $100,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,978.23 Finaled Date: 07/23/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Rehabilitation of existing 2500A Meter Main Service & UPGS ELE-2023-0088 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:2801 E 46Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 12/05/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $120,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $2,161.55 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: 1600A 277/480v service upgrade & extend existing concrete pad ELE-2024-0141 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:2424 E 28Th Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/02/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $3,000.00 Last Inspection: 07/31/2024 Fee Total: $275.73 Finaled Date: 08/01/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Building & Plumbing Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Seal all unused openings in electrical panels and boxes ELE-2024-0160 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:2100 E 38Th Street Status: Approved Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/10/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $10,118.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $595.37 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Page 13 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 16 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Related applications: Installation of electric water heater element and control panel. 480V, 3 PH ,60 A. Will install 60-amp breaker on panel LD1. New power line and conduit. Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Installation of electric water heater element and control panel. 480V, 3 PH ,60 A. Will install 60 amp breaker on panel LD1. ELE-2024-0167 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:4201 District Boulevard Status: Finaled Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/20/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $4,500.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $413.09 Finaled Date: 07/16/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: ELE-2024-0167 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: installallation of 40 led lights and 5 new circuits ELE-2024-0168 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:5353 S Downey Road Status: Fees Paid Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/25/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/16/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/13/2025 Valuation: $1,400.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $184.15 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: MISC-2024-0153 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: sign electrical permit ELE-2024-0171 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:4801 E 50Th St Status: Issued Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: 6304014012 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/28/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $25,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $915.76 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: MEC-2024-0046 is currently in review. It details the full mechanical installation details for the two new blower fans that require power supply. Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Power will be supplied to two newly install 3HP blower fans. Conduit and wire will be installed from existing distribution panels to the new fans. ELE-2024-0172 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:6180 Alcoa Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/29/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/29/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $10,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $572.48 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: new electrical for refrigerated area Page 14 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 17 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) ELE-2024-0180 Type: Electrical District: Vernon Main Address:2000 E 25Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Electrical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/10/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/25/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/21/2025 Valuation: $8,765.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $333.48 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Replaced fluorescent fixtures Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Replaced round LED lights in office areas PERMITS ISSUED FOR ELECTRICAL: 12 ENGINEERING E-2023-0178 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:2801 Leonis Blvd Status: Issued Workclass: Grading Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 12/27/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/25/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/21/2025 Valuation: $200,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $9,356.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Related applications: New Building Permit Number of plan sheets in review: 16 Square footage (acres) of area being disturbed?: 120661 Is this an acre or more?: Yes If applicable what type of LID: Proximity to LA River (Miles): Discharge Number: 419C398535-551718 Post Construction BMP''s: LID: Yes Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No No Fee Permit: No Director Approval: No Stormwater Observation Report Received: No Description: Grading of appr. 120,661 sf of industrial site for cold storage facility. E-2024-0180 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:6199 Malburg Way Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 01/09/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: May 13 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: May 13 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONContractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 800-611-1911 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: PERMIT NEEDED FOR TO PLACE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE IN RELATION TO ROAD CLOSURE ON RANDOLPH ST, WITHIN CITY OF VERNON RIGHT OF WAY FOR REPLACEMENT OF POLE ON RAILROAD PROPERTY. **NIGHT WORK REQUESTED** ADDRESS USED WAS NEAREST ADDRESS IN CITY OF VERNON. E-2024-0189 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:3165 Boyle Ave Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 01/25/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/09/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Apr 15 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Apr 24 2024 12:00AM Is Annual Permit?: No Name: Towers Communications Inc.Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Page 15 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 18 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Modification to existing small cell wireless facility in public right-of-way. Remove and replace the existing antenna with new antenna. Remove and replace existing shroud with new shroud. Other ancillary equipment modifications. Please see DCs for full scope. E-2024-0218 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:6160 Malburg Way Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 03/15/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: May 9 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: May 9 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: RODOLFO MAGANA Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 562-756-4332 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: ROAD CLOSURE NEEDED TO PARK TRUCKS TO REPLACE POLE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. TC PER ATTACHED PLAN. 1 NIGHT OF WORK. TD2146367 E-2024-0239 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address: Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: 6303016001 Application Date: 04/18/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $3,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $493.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: May 27 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: May 29 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: Wiring Connection Inc.Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 818-232-6746 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: Yes Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Charter Spectrum proposes to place ±862' of new fiber on (9) existing utility poles, excavate to place (2) anchors on existing utility poles #3000VP and #6848EV. Traffic Control per: 2014 MUTCD (TA-6) Construction Duration: 3 days Contractor: Wiring Connection Inc. E-2024-0267 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:5801 Alcoa Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Utility Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/30/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jun 14 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Aug 1 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: 0 Is Annual Permit?: No Utility Company: AT&T Name: TBD Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Page 16 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 19 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: POLE# 4949VP, RE-ATTACH AERIAL CABLE AND PLACE EXTENSION ARM AFTER VERNON REPLACED THE POLE - 1 DAY - E218-A02SQE6 REL 0-1 E-2024-0269 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:2860 S Alameda Street Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Utility Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/31/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,489.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jun 30 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Aug 30 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: 0 Is Annual Permit?: No Utility Company: AT&T Name: TBD Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: MANHOLE & POLE ACCESS FOR PLACING AND SPLICING FOR CABLES (2444 S ALAMEDA ST UP TO 2860 S ALAMEDA ST) - 4 DAYS - G401-A02RDV4 REL 0-3 BAU E-2024-0279 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:4651 Bandini Boulevard Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Utility Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/12/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 10 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Aug 12 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: 0 Is Annual Permit?: No Utility Company: AT&T Name: TBD Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: ACCESS POLE 4437VP TO REATTACH FACILITIES PERMANENTLY TO NEW POLE - 1 DAY - E310-A02V655 REL 0 BAU E-2024-0281 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:2536 Alameda Street Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Utility Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/14/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jun 21 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jul 22 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: 0 Is Annual Permit?: No Utility Company: AT&T Name: TBD Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: ACCESS NEEDED TO SB# 17477 TO SPLICE EXISTING FIBER CABLE - 1 DAY - G401-A02V97W REL 0-1 DAMAGE (LOCATED ON E. 25TH ST, N/O STREET, E/O C/L OF S. ALAMEDA ST) E-2024-0284 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:1840 E 27Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Utility Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/19/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 19 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Aug 19 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: 0 Is Annual Permit?: No Utility Company: AT&T Name: TBD Page 17 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 20 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: PLACING AERIAL FIBER ALONG REAR LEAD TO 2910 ROSS ST (POLES: P.9252EV, P.3639VP, P.2412VP, P.2432VP, P.1921VP) - 2 DAYS - G401-A02V0MS REL 1-1 ASE E-2024-0287 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:1925 E Vernon Ave Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/25/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,821.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jun 27 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jul 2 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: Langan CA. Inc Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Performing survey work at the intersection of Vernon and Alameda. Traffic control operation will be provided to support the survey work E-2024-0291 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:5110 District Blvd District Blvd Blvd E Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Maywood, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/02/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $1.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 12 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jul 12 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: Unlimited Environmental Inc. - Walter Mejia Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 9515884322 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Block Right Turn Lane on Dirstrict Blvd before S Atlantic Blvd Approx 200LF E-2024-0294 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:5383 Alcoa Ave Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: 6310008016 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/03/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/10/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 15 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Sep 1 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: TBD Is Annual Permit?: No Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: Yes Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Page 18 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 21 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Description: LOCATION: In front of 5383 Alcoa Ave | DESCRIPTION: Replace 6" valve E-2024-0295 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address: Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Application Date: 07/03/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/10/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 15 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Sep 1 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: TBD Is Annual Permit?: No Name: VPU - Gas Division Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: Yes Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: LOCATION: On the S/W corner of slauson and Malburg Way | DESCRIPTION: Replace 6" valve E-2024-0296 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:4701 S Santa Fe Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Utility Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/08/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/10/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 15 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Aug 22 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: 0 Is Annual Permit?: No Utility Company: VPU Name: Ryan Hendrickson Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 6618031904 No Fee Permit: Yes Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: 16KV UG Work to Facilitate Data Center Development at 4701 S Santa Fe E-2024-0297 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:2727 S Santa Fe Ave S Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/09/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/29/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $835,552.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 8 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jan 30 2026 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: B241770911 Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: Beard Electric Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 5627553187 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: Yes Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: Yes Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Installation of VPU Service Meter for charging customers Electric Vehicle fleet E-2024-0298 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:2840 E 26Th St Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: 6303003014 Vernon, CA 90023 Application Date: 07/10/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/10/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Page 19 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 22 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 22 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Aug 12 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: TBD Is Annual Permit?: No Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: Yes Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Install 2" service. E-2024-0301 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:3425 E Vernon Ave Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/29/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $50,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 22 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jul 24 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: N/A Dosh Permit Number: N/A Is Annual Permit?: No Name: TROY'S PAINTING Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 949-456-0104 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Our contracted painters need to block one lane of westbound Vernon Avenue (timing flexible) to paint the building. E-2024-0303 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:3225 E Washington Blvd. Blvd E, 3225 Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/18/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/31/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $5,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,157.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 30 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jul 30 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: N/A Dosh Permit Number: N/A Is Annual Permit?: No Name: United Pumping Service, Inc.Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 626-961-9326 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Annual industrial sewer line jetting cleaning E-2024-0305 Type: Engineering District: Vernon Main Address:3094 E Vernon Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Encroachment Regular Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/18/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/25/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/21/2025 Valuation: $23,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,469.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Yesenia Barajas Additional Info: Estimated Date of Commencement: Jul 24 2024 12:00AM Estimated Date Of Completion: Jul 25 2024 12:00AM Dig Alert Number: Dosh Permit Number: Is Annual Permit?: No Name: C below Contractor''s 24 HR Contact Number:: 909-701-8480 Railroad Crossing, Conveyor, & Tunnels Across St: No Railroad Tracks, Pipeline or Conduits: No Pipelines, Conduits, or Metering Manhole Across St: No Building Footing, Traffic Sensor, Sign, Monitoring: No Asphalt Pavement: No Concrete Pavement and Driveway: No Concrete Curb and Gutter: No Trench Excavations: No Page 20 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 23 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Monument Replacement: No No Fee Permit: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: Pothole at 8 location to identify utility depth PERMITS ISSUED FOR ENGINEERING: 20 INDUSTRIAL B-2022-5328 Type: Industrial District: Vernon Main Address:2459 Vernon Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Remodel Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/11/2022 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $2,500.00 Last Inspection: 07/10/2024 Fee Total: $368.69 Finaled Date: 07/11/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2023-5726, 27,28,29 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Remove exisitng cooler walls IND-2023-0045 Type: Industrial District: Vernon Main Address:2801 Leonis Blvd Status: Issued Workclass: New Construction Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 11/30/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/29/2024 Sq Ft: 57,770 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $15,000,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $111,183.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Landscape, Fire Sprinklers and Underground Fire Protection as separate permit applications. School Development Fee Paid: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Health Department Comments: 12/5/2023 - EMAIL DAWN TO SUBMIT APPLICABLE AND PAYMENT. 12/19/2023 - PLAN APPROVAL EMAILED TO PROJECT PROPONENT. Description: New industrial building of appr. 57,770sf cold storage facility, offices, cold dock and associated site work. PERMITS ISSUED FOR INDUSTRIAL: 2 INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER IWW-2024-0023 Type: Industrial Wastewater District: Vernon Main Address:5000 District Blvd Status: Finaled Workclass: Industrial Wastewater Project: Parcel: 6304011005 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/08/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $180.00 Finaled Date: 07/08/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Tennant Name: Tennant Phone: Description: We are submitting a revised permit application. Page 21 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 24 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) IWW-2024-0025 Type: Industrial Wastewater District: Vernon Main Address:2619 E 37Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Industrial Wastewater Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/29/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $180.00 Finaled Date: 07/08/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Tennant Name: Tennant Phone: Description: Industrial wastewater discharge permit, LA County Sanitation District existing sewer connection, point of discharge - local sewer on 37th Street. PERMITS ISSUED FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER: 2 LANDSCAPE LAN2023-0002 Type: Landscape District: Vernon Main Address:2801 Leonis Blvd Status: Issued Workclass: Landscape Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 12/12/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/29/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $828.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Sergio Canales Additional Info: Property Owner: 2801-2833 Leonis Blvd, LLC Address of owner: 8895 Research Drive Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Owner Phone Number: 2137032028 Owner Email: kjackson@camfieldpartners.com Applicant: Dawn Martinez Address of Applicant: 8895 Research Drive Suite 200 Applicant Phone Number: 213-703-2028 Applicant Email: projects@anvil-construction.com Water Supply Type: Potable Type of Water Service: Dedicated Water Meter How much soil is exposed?: More Than 1 Acre Square footage (acres) of area being disturbed?: 112272 Total Landscape Area: (sq ft): 3467 Description: Landscape for IND 2023-0045 PERMITS ISSUED FOR LANDSCAPE: 1 MECHANICAL B-2021-5000 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:2850 50Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: 6303029902 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 10/14/2021 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 04/12/2022 Valuation: $10,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Mechanical - well no. 22 equipping and site improvements FW #B-2021-5002 MEC-2024-0041 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:4651 Bandini Boulevard Status: Issued Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 03/19/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/01/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $2,245,888.00 Last Inspection: 08/01/2024 Fee Total: $18,083.82 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: IND-2024-0053 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: 56,000 SF Box-in-a-Box Cold Storage Retrofit Page 22 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 25 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) MEC-2024-0043 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:3300 E 50Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/01/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/15/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/13/2025 Valuation: $270,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $3,541.18 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: COM2024-0056 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Installation of (8) new fan coils and (8) condensing units on roof and all associated ductwork, air distribution & piping. Installation of (1) new ductless split system & associated piping. Installation of (5) new exhaust fans with associated duct and air distribution. MEC-2024-0045 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:6180 Alcoa Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/28/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $100,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,978.23 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: INSTALL NEW EVAPS AND CONDENSERS MEC-2024-0060 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:4317 S Downey Road Status: Issued Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/10/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $5,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $458.88 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: MEC-2024-0062 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: (2) Natural gas fired water heaters MEC-2024-0062 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:4317 S Downey Road Status: Issued Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/15/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $4,500.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $413.09 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: MEC-2024-0062 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Installation of 2 gas powered pressure washers MEC-2024-0065 Type: Mechanical District: Vernon Main Address:4317 S Downey Road Status: Issued Workclass: Mechanical Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/19/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $7,500.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $526.71 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: MEC-2024-0062 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Installation of Kaeser air compressor and dryer PERMITS ISSUED FOR MECHANICAL: 7 MISCELLANEOUS Page 23 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 26 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) B-2021-4994 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:4550 Maywood Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: 6304022045 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 10/13/2021 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $2,500.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $91.19 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Plan structural review of roof load for fire sprinkler upgrade. B-2021-5002 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:2850 50Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: 6303029902 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 10/14/2021 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $400,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Well no.22 equippning and site imrpovements B-2022-5329 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:3874 Santa Fe Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: 6302018017 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/11/2022 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $2,800.00 Last Inspection: 07/11/2024 Fee Total: $412.81 Finaled Date: 07/12/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2023-5726, 27,28,29 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Add rollup door MISC-2024-0149 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:2424 E 28Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: 6302005007 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/08/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $5,000.00 Last Inspection: 07/31/2024 Fee Total: $458.88 Finaled Date: 08/01/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Elec 2024-0141 Misc 2024-0149 Plb 2024-0082 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Installation of 2 new beams in ceiling opening MISC-2024-0150 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:4701 S Santa Fe Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/09/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/22/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $23,900.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,076.03 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: MISC-2024-0150 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Light Pole Anchorage and Footing Page 24 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 27 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) MISC-2024-0171 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:3300 E 50Th St Status: Issued Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/19/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/27/2025 Valuation: $19,850.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $801.34 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: DEM-2024-0026 Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Asbestos Abatement MISC-2024-0172 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:5353 S Downey Road Status: Issued Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/20/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $4,200.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $385.62 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: N/A Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: ADD 2 ILLUMINATED SIGNS TO BUILDING 166" X 30" - 35 SQ FT. EACH MISC-2024-0173 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:6031 Malburg Wy Status: Finaled Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: 6310027045 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 06/26/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $45,000.00 Last Inspection: 07/17/2024 Fee Total: $1,260.95 Finaled Date: 07/18/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Permitting of Existing Storage Racks MISC-2024-0177 Type: Miscellaneous District: Vernon Main Address:2840 E 26Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Miscellaneous Project: Parcel: Vernon 90023 Application Date: 07/11/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/11/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/07/2025 Valuation: $5,200.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $291.87 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: remove and repair concrete trench 30'x2' In office and replace asphalt trench 50'x2' parking area PERMITS ISSUED FOR MISCELLANEOUS: 9 OWNERS DECLARATION OWN-2024-0027 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2450 E Vernon Ave Status: Issued Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: 6308006019 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/01/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/01/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $6,500.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: contractors declaration completed Owner Builder Declaration1: No Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: No Sec.: N/A Reason for Exemption: N/A Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Page 25 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 28 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Replace two stolen backflow devices OWN-2024-0028 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2050 E 51St Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/02/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/02/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/02/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: DEM-2024-0027 Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: No Sec.: n/a Reason for Exemption: n/a Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes OWN-2024-0029 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2459 Vernon Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/08/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/08/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2023-5726, 27,28,29 Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: Yes Sec.: 7044 Reason for Exemption: OWNER BUILDER Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: b-2022-5326, 27, 28, 29 OWN-2024-0030 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2000 E 25Th Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/16/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/16/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/25/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: ELE-2024-0180, PLB-2024-0106 Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: Yes Sec.: 2.42 Reason for Exemption: Owner/builder Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Page 26 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 29 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Description: As owner builder we replaced old office fluorescent fixtures with new LED round slimline lights. OWN-2024-0031 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2638 E Vernon Avenue Status: Void Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/17/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/17/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2020-4394 Plumbing Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: Yes Sec.: 7044 Reason for Exemption: The equipment was installed in 2020, we are just pulling the permit. Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Spiral freezer permit. OWN-2024-0032 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2638 E Vernon Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/17/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/17/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/17/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2020-4394 Plumbing Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: Yes Sec.: 7044 Reason for Exemption: Permit for Spiral freezer that was installed in 2020. Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: No Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Spiral Freezer permit. OWN-2024-0033 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2000 E 25Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/22/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/22/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Additional Info: Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: Yes Sec.: 7044 Reason for Exemption: Owner/builder Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Electrical permit to add LED round office lights Page 27 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 30 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) OWN-2024-0034 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:4317 S Downey Road Status: Finaled Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/22/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/22/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/23/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: MEC-2024-0062 Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: No Sec.: 1 Reason for Exemption: Not exempt Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: See attached owners declaration for projects located at 4317 S Downey Road for LA Food Grade Wash OWN-2024-0035 Type: Owners Declaration District: Vernon Main Address:2000 E 25Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Owners Declaration Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/23/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Additional Info: Related applications: 2000 25th Street Owner Builder Declaration1: Yes Owner Builder Declaration2: Yes Owner Builder Declaration3: Yes Sec.: 7044 Reason for Exemption: Owner Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification1: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification 2: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification3: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification4: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification5: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification6: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification7: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification8: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification9: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification10: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification11: Yes Owner's Acknowledgement and Verification12: Yes Description: Replaced bathroom fixtures PERMITS ISSUED FOR OWNERS DECLARATION: 9 PLUMBING B-2020-4394 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2638 Vernon Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: 6308005015 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 12/07/2020 Zone: Issue Date: 07/17/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/13/2025 Valuation: $26,650.00 Last Inspection: 08/06/2024 Fee Total: $952.07 Finaled Date: 08/07/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2020-4394 Plumbing Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Plumbing for new spiral freezer project. Drainage waste and vent. New floor sinks, gas lines, air lines, water lines and condensate lines B-2021-4999 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2850 50Th St Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: 6303029902 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 10/14/2021 Zone: Issue Date: 07/30/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 04/12/2022 Valuation: $500,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $0.00 Finaled Date: 07/30/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Page 28 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 31 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Well No. 22 equipment and site improvements | FW #B-2021-5002 B-2022-5326 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2459 E Vernon Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/11/2022 Zone: Issue Date: 07/08/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $500.00 Last Inspection: 07/10/2024 Fee Total: $295.15 Finaled Date: 07/11/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: B-2023-5726, 27,28,29 Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Change (2) toilets and 2 sinks - like for like PLB-2023-0026 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2020 E 25Th Street Status: Issued Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: 6302009018 Vernon 90058 Application Date: 08/14/2023 Zone: Issue Date: 07/25/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/21/2025 Valuation: $575.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $184.15 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Replaced water heater Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: Yes Health Department Approval Date: Aug 16 2023 12:00AM Health Department Comments: PLAN CHECK NOT APPLICABLE Description: Replace water heater PLB-2024-0082 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2424 E 28Th Street Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 05/02/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $7,000.00 Last Inspection: 07/31/2024 Fee Total: $503.83 Finaled Date: 08/01/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: Electrical & Building Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Make all Plumbing systems operational Make all fixtures operational or properly abandoned Install approved seismic straps on gas water heater(s) PLB-2024-0087 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2450 E Vernon Ave Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: 6308006019 Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/14/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/03/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 12/30/2024 Valuation: $6,500.00 Last Inspection: 08/06/2024 Fee Total: $503.83 Finaled Date: 08/07/2024 Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Replace two stolen backflow devices PLB-2024-0088 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:2600 S Santa Fe Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/21/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/09/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $12,000.00 Last Inspection: 07/11/2024 Fee Total: $618.25 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Page 29 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 32 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Related applications: Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: To install an electric water heater one floor sinks one hand sync a twelve-foot trench drain inside unit PLB-2024-0089 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:3041 Bandini Blvd. Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 05/29/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/09/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/06/2025 Valuation: $220.00 Last Inspection: 08/01/2024 Fee Total: $184.15 Finaled Date: 08/02/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: upgrading toilet to commercial standard grade. Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Upgrading toilets to commercial stander PLB-2024-0098 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:3275 E Vernon Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 06/20/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $8,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $526.71 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: PLB-2024-0098 Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: lateral replacement from 6" to 8" approx 55' by excavaction from property to city connecton. Poss saddle replacement (only if needed - dbd upon excavation) PLB-2024-0101 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:4501 S Santa Fe Avenue Status: Issued Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/01/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/20/2025 Valuation: $30,000.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $1,003.55 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Related applications: E-2024-0264 Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Relocation of exterior sewer main line PLB-2024-0107 Type: Plumbing District: Vernon Main Address:4320 Maywood Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Plumbing Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/11/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/18/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 01/14/2025 Valuation: $1,500.00 Last Inspection: 07/23/2024 Fee Total: $184.15 Finaled Date: 07/23/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Industrial Wastewater Permit: No Director Approval: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Health Department Approval: No Description: Replace two residential toilets with new commercial toilers PERMITS ISSUED FOR PLUMBING: 11 ROOFING ROF-2024-0045 Type: Roofing District: Vernon Main Address:2328 E Vernon Avenue Status: Finaled Workclass: Roofing Project: Parcel: Vernon 90058 Application Date: 07/11/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/31/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 02/10/2025 Valuation: $11,200.00 Last Inspection: 08/13/2024 Fee Total: $375.09 Finaled Date: 08/13/2024 Assigned To: Denise Palomares Additional Info: Related applications: Is Building unreinforced structure? URM: No Is there more than one building on this property?: No 3. Will the entire building be reroofed?: Yes Will some or all of the existing roove be removed: No Page 30 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 33 of 34 PERMITS ISSUED BY TYPE (07/01/2024 TO 07/31/2024) Describe asbestos removal process if applicable.: 5. Are there any property line wall or firewalls?: No Describe new roof assembly.: Class A What is the existing roof deck?: Synthetic How will the roof covering be fastened?: Owens corning ICC ER 3229 Work performed in public right of way?: No Director Approval: No Health Acknowledgement: No Fire Acknowledgement: No Description: TEAR OFF EXISTING ROOF INSTALL NEW SHINGLES 28 SQ PERMITS ISSUED FOR ROOFING: 1 SPECIAL EVENT SPEV-2024-0024*Type: Special Event District: Vernon Main Address:4700 S Boyle Ave Status: Expired Workclass: Special Event Permit Project: Parcel: Vernon, CA 90058 Application Date: 07/10/2024 Zone: Issue Date: 07/23/2024 Sq Ft: 0 Expiration: 07/24/2024 Valuation: $0.00 Last Inspection: Fee Total: $134.00 Finaled Date: Assigned To: Rosa Garibay Additional Info: Type Of Event: Warehouse Sale Description Of Event: Warehouse Sale Start Date: Jul 26 2024 12:00AM End Date: Jul 28 2024 12:00AM Time Of Event: 7AM Date of Inspection: Jul 25 2024 12:00AM Time of inspection: 12PM Total anticipated number of attendees: 1000 Will Food Be served: No Will Alcohol Be Served?: No Will tents/canopies be used that exceed 400 sqft: No Description of tents/canopies: Does the event location have sufficient restrooms?: Yes Will decorations be used?: No If Yes, Please list what type: Contact for Decorations: Phone: Will Candles/open flame devices be used?: No If yes, please list what type:: Health Department Approval: No Description: WAREHOUSE SALE PERMITS ISSUED FOR SPECIAL EVENT: 1 GRAND TOTAL OF PERMITS: 103 * Indicates active hold(s) on this permit Page 31 of 314305 South Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058August 15, 2024 . . Item 9 Page 34 of 34 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Department:City Administration Submitted by:Lilia Hernandez, Assistant to the City Administrator Subject Report on Vehicle Purchase Approved by the City Administrator Recommendation Receive and file report on City Administrator approved vehicle purchase of one 2025 Ford Explorer ST from South Bay Ford for a total amount of $64,131.59. Background Historically, the City has purchased vehicles through Sourcewell, a government agency and purchasing cooperative offering hundreds of competitively solicited cooperative purchasing contracts that other government agencies can utilize for procurement. However, in recent years, vehicle purchases through Sourcewell have been extremely challenging due to limited available inventory, long lead times for production, and a high demand for vehicles from other public agencies. As a result, staff have looked to purchase vehicles directly from dealerships while making an effort to obtain the best price for the City. Purchases from dealerships are also challenging as inventory is low, demand is high, and dealerships do not offer the convenience of holding vehicles to allow staff time to seek City Council approval of vehicle purchases. In June 2024, after researching twenty-six (26) local dealerships, Vernon Public Utilities (VPU) staff identified five dealerships that listed a desired vehicle model, a 2025 Ford Explorer ST, on their websites. The purchase of the new vehicle was necessary, as VPU needed to replace a 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe (City Vehicle ID L1008) with over 250,000 miles that was no longer a reliable vehicle for their fleet. In order to obtain a competitive price for the City, staff contacted the five dealerships and requested quotes for the desired vehicle. Subsequently, VPU requested approval from the City Administrator for the purchase of a 2025 Ford Explorer ST from South Bay Ford for a total amount of $64,131.59. The City Administrator approved the purchase, as South Bay Ford offered the lowest quote and could deliver the vehicle in approximately 30-40 days. The 2025 Ford Explorer ST purchased by the City was delivered the first week of September 2024. Given the challenges associated with vehicle purchases, staff is working on amendments to the Vernon Municipal Code purchasing ordinance to facilitate future vehicle purchases. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact is $64,131.59. Sufficient funds are available in Electric Fund, Administration Department, Capital Outlay Account No. 055-050-580-660000 for the current fiscal year. Attachments None. . . Item 10 Page 1 of 1 8 0 3 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Department:City Administration Submitted by:Sara Sandoval, Senior Administrative Assistant Subject Amendment No. 3 to Services Agreement with Granicus, LLC (Contract No. IT-0181) Recommendation A. Find that the best interests of the City are served by the direct award of an extension of the Services Agreement with Granicus, LLC without a competitive process pursuant to Vernon Municipal Code Section 3.32.110 (B)(2) and (3), as it would not be cost-effective to consider a transition to a new agenda management software; and B. Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Services Agreement with Granicus, LLC, in substantially the same form as submitted, for agenda automation, meeting management, video streaming, and Laserfiche integration for a total amount not-to-exceed $22,058.83, for a one-year term. Background On June 27, 2022, following an informal selection process through which staff evaluated several available agenda management software systems, the City entered into a service agreement with Granicus, LLC (formerly PrimeGov) for agenda automation, meeting management, video streaming, and Laserfiche Integration (Agreement). The contract was awarded pursuant to informal selection purchasing requirements, as the anticipated cost was less than $50,000. The Agreement expired on June 30, 2023; however, the terms included an option to renew for two additional one-year periods. On November 29, 2022, Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Granicus was approved for $50,390 in order to move forward with camera installation and the meeting automation necessary for public meeting broadcasts. On August 30, 2023, Amendment No. 2 was approved to extend the term of the Agreement for one year through June 2024 at a cost of $21,008.40. Staff are now requesting approval of Amendment No. 3 with Granicus, LLC (Granicus) to extend the existing term of the Agreement for an additional year, through June 30, 2025, in the amount of $22,058.83. It is recommended that Council find that it is in the best interest of the City to award the requested extension without a competitive selection process, as staff initially solicited proposals and conducted a thorough evaluation of available agenda management software systems for the initial contract award. Additionally, given the significant investment already made in the implementation of Granicus software and broadcast equipment integrated with Granicus, it would not be cost-effective to consider a transition to a new agenda management software. Pursuant to VMC Section 3.32.030(A), City Council approval is required if, the total value over the lifetime of the contract exceeds $100,000. With the approval of Amendment No. 3, the total value of the contract with Granicus will be $115,455.23. The proposed amendment has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. Fiscal Impact. . Item 11 Page 1 of 2 8 0 3 The fiscal impact is not-to-exceed $22,058.83. Sufficient funds are available in General Fund, IT Department, Repairs and Maintenance Account No. 011-010-110-529110 for the current fiscal year. Attachments 1. Amendment No. 3 with Granicus, LLC . . Item 11 Page 2 of 2 . . Item 11 Page 1 of 7 . . Item 11 Page 2 of 7 . . Item 11 Page 3 of 7 . . Item 11 Page 4 of 7 Solution Description . . Item 11 Page 5 of 7 . . Item 11 Page 6 of 7 . . Item 11 Page 7 of 7 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Zaynah Moussa, City Attorney Department:City Attorney Submitted by:Eva Muro, Legal Analyst Subject Amendment No. 2 to the Attorney Services Agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP for specialized outside legal services Recommendation Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Attorney Services Agreement with Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP (Burke Williams), in substantially the same form as submitted, to increase the total not-to-exceed amount by an additional $125,000. Background The City Attorney’s Office is staffed by the City Attorney and one Legal Analyst. For litigation and specialized legal matters, the City Attorney utilizes the assistance of outside counsel on an as-needed basis. On May 17, 2022, City Council approved an Attorney Services Agreement for litigation and specialized legal services with Burke Williams (Agreement). On September 5, 2023, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to increase the total amount not-to-exceed amount by an additional $125,000. Burke Williams was selected after a November 2021 comprehensive competitive selection (Request for Proposals) process, in accordance with City purchasing procedures and good governance contracting principles. The term of the Agreement between the City and Burke Williams is May 20, 2022 through May 19, 2025. The City Attorney’s Office anticipates conducting a new RFP process for outside legal services in or around November 2024, in compliance with Vernon Municipal Code Section 3.32.220(B) which requires that professional service agreements be rebid every three years unless commercially unreasonable to do so. The City Attorney’s Office estimates costs for outside legal services each fiscal year and seeks contract approval or amendment consistent with budget allocations approved by City Council. Based on pending legal matters assigned to Burke Williams and projected costs for Fiscal Year 2024-25, staff is requesting authority to enter into Amendment No. 2, which maintains all existing terms under the current Agreement and increases the not-to-exceed amount by $125,000, bringing the total contract amount to $400,000. Pursuant to Section 3.32.030(A), City Council approval is required for the proposed amendment as the total value of the contract exceeds $100,000. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact is not-to-exceed $400,000 in the three-year contract term. Sufficient funds are available in General Fund, City Attorney Department Professional Services – Legal Account No. 011-010-115-529200 for the current fiscal year. Attachments 1. Burke Williams Amendment No. 2 . . Item 12 Page 1 of 1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE ATTORNEY SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP FOR SPECIALIZED OUTSIDE LEGAL SERVICES This Amendment No. 2 (Amendment) to the Agreement for specialized outside legal services dated May 20, 2022, (Agreement), is made as of September 17, 2024, by and between the City of Vernon, a California charter city and municipal corporation (City), and Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, (Associate Counsel), a limited liability partnership. The City and Associate Counsel agree as follows: RECITALS A. The City and Associate Counsel are parties to a written Agreement dated May 20, 2022, as amended, under which Associate Counsel provides specialized outside legal services. B. The City and Associate Counsel desire to amend the Agreement to increase the total not to exceed amount by an additional $125,000. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Amendment agree as follows: 1. Effective as of September 17, 2024, the total amount not to exceed for the period of May 20, 2022 through May 19, 2025 shall not exceed a total amount of $400,000. 2. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. The provisions of this Amendment shall constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter included in this Amendment and shall supersede any other agreement, understanding, or arrangement, whether written or oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Amendment. 4. The person or persons executing this Amendment on behalf of each of the parties warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Amendment on behalf of that party and has the authority to bind that party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. . . Item 12 Page 1 of 2 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Amendment No. 2 Page 2 of 2 _______________________ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date stated in the introductory clause. City of Vernon, a California Charter City and California municipal corporation _______________________________ DANIEL CALLEROS, Interim City Administrator ATTEST: ________________________________ YONNIE PARKER, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _______________________________ ZAYNAH N. MOUSSA, City Attorney Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, a limited liability partnership By: Name: Title: Mark J. Austin Partner . . Item 12 Page 2 of 2 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator Department:City Administration Submitted by:Sara Sandoval, Senior Administrative Assistant Subject Order Form and Services Agreement with Governmentjobs.com, Inc. (DBA “NEOGOV”) Recommendation Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute a NEOGOV Order Form for the purchase of Insight Enterprise Subscription, Candidate Text Messaging, Governmentjobs.com Subscription, and Perform Subscription for a three-year term at a total cost not-to-exceed $81,170.85, subject to the terms of the NEOGOV Services Agreement. Background In June 2015, the City's Human Resources (HR) Department selected NEOGOV as the most suitable system in accordance with competitive bidding and selection criteria set forth in the City’s purchasing requirements for the City to facilitate electronic job application submissions and tracking. NEOGOV met the needs of the Department in terms of pricing and capabilities and, specifically, NEOGOV provided application customization, separate applications for recruitment specifically linked to each recruitment by the HR Administrator (essential for the City's application needs between safety, miscellaneous, and volunteer positions within the City), better reporting capabilities, and a more user-friendly interface. Since then, the City has effectively utilized the NEOGOV Service for employee recruitment and has integrated the use of NEOGOV's Performance Evaluation and On-boarding features. The Insight Enterprise Software License and the GovemmentJobs.com Subscription License are used for online application submission and tracking. The Performance Evaluation features are to process new employees and to conduct and record the performance evaluations of current employees respectively. More recently, HR staff added the Candidate Text Messaging module that provides the ability to communicate with candidates via text messaging in addition to the current communication via email and telephone. Based on the existing use of NEOGOV for the processes noted above, NEOGOV is the sole source for procuring and implementing the desired Candidate Text Messaging feature. HR staff has worked with the City's purchasing division to ensure compliance with the City's purchasing ordinance and practices. The proposed Services Agreement with NEOGOV will establish a three-year agreement for the Insight Enterprise Software License, GovemmentJobs.com Subscription License, Performance Evaluation License, and Candidate Text Messaging feature. Pursuant to the Vernon Municipal Code (VMC) Section 3.32.110 (A)(2), this purchase is exempt from competitive bidding as the NEOGOV Software bundle is a sole source product that can only be obtained directly from NEOGOV. City Council approval is required pursuant to VMC Section 3.32.030(B) if, in the 12 months preceding the effective date of the proposed new, renewed, or otherwise amended contract, the City has paid or awarded the proposed vendor more than $100,000. With the approval of this Order Form and accompanying agreement for the desired . . Item 13 Page 1 of 2 services over the next three years, the total value of contract awards to NEOGOV will be $116,043.15. The proposed NEOGOV Order Form and Services Agreement have been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney's Office. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact is not-to-exceed $81,170.85. Sufficient funds are available in General Fund, IT Department, Repairs and Maintenance Account No. 011-010-110-529110 for the current fiscal year and will be budgeted in subsequent years. Attachments 1. NEOGOV Order Form and Services Agreement . . Item 13 Page 2 of 2 NEOGOV ORDER FORM NEOGOV: GovernmentJobs.com, INC. (dba “NEOGOV”) 2120 Park Place, Suite 100 El Segundo, CA 90245 billing@neogov.com Customer Name & Address: Vernon, City of (CA) 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Quote Creation Date:03/06/2024 Contact Name: Lilia Hernandez Quote Expiration Date:30 days from Quote Creation Contact Email:lhernandez@cityofvernon.org Payment Terms Annual. Net 30 from NEOGOV invoice.FTE: Subscription Start Date: 06/21/2024 Subscription Term (months): 36 Fee Summary Service Description Term Term Fees Perform Subscription (PE)06/30/2024 - 07/01/2024 $72.50 Prorated Total:$72.50 Insight Enterprise Subscription (IN)07/02/2024 - 07/01/2025 $8,478.60 Candidate Text Messaging 07/02/2024 - 07/01/2025 $824.27 GovernmentJobs.com Subscription (GJC)07/02/2024 - 07/01/2025 $1,978.17 Perform Subscription (PE)07/02/2024 - 07/01/2025 $14,091.00 2024 Total:$25,372.04 Insight Enterprise Subscription (IN)07/02/2025 - 07/01/2026 $9,029.71 Candidate Text Messaging 07/02/2025 - 07/01/2026 $877.84 GovernmentJobs.com Subscription (GJC)07/02/2025 - 07/01/2026 $2,106.75 Perform Subscription (PE)07/02/2025 - 07/01/2026 $15,006.91 2025 Total:$27,021.21 Insight Enterprise Subscription (IN)07/02/2026 - 07/01/2027 $9,616.64 Candidate Text Messaging 07/02/2026 - 07/01/2027 $934.90 GovernmentJobs.com Subscription (GJC)07/02/2026 - 07/01/2027 $2,243.70 Perform Subscription (PE)07/02/2026 - 07/01/2027 $15,982.36 2026 Total:$28,777.60 Total:$81,170.85 A.Terms and Conditions 1.Agreement. This Ordering Document and the Services purchased herein are expressly conditioned upon the acceptance by Customer of the terms of the NEOGOV Services Agreement affixed hereto. Unless otherwise stated, all capitalized terms used but not defined in this Order Form shall have the meanings given to them in the NEOGOV Services Agreement. 2.Effectiveness & Modification. The Effective Date shall be the Subscription Start Date. This Order Form may not be modified or amended except through a written instrument signed by the parties. 3.Summary of Fees. Listed above is a summary of Fees under this Order. Once placed, your order shall be non-cancelable and the sums paid nonrefundable, except as provided in the Agreement. 4.Order of Precedence. This Ordering Document shall take precedence in the event of direct conflict with the Services Agreement, applicable Schedules, and Service Specifications. B.Special Conditions (if any). 1 Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 1 of 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Order has been executed by such party’s duly authorized signatory as of the date set forth below, and such duly authorized signatory consents to the Agreement. Customer Governmentjobs.com, Inc. (DBA “NEOGOV”) Entity Name: Signature: Print Name: Date: 2 Signature: Title: Date: Print Name: Signature: Title: Date: Print Name: 1:25 pm, Aug 14 2024 Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 CFO Alex Chun 8/21/2024 | 10:33:27 AM PDT 8/21/2024 | 12:51:00 PM PDT Chief Customer Officer Sandy Miranda Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator City of Vernon Attest: ___________________________________ Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk ___________________________________ Date Approved as to Form: ___________________________________ Zaynah N. Moussa, City Attorney ___________________________________ Date . . Item 13 Page 2 of 16 SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE I, David Eisler, Secretary of Governtmentjobs.com, Inc. d/b/a NEOGO V (“NEOGOV”), do hereby certify that the Board of Directors of NEOGOV have approved that each of the following persons is authorized to execute and sign customer sales contracts for and on behalf of NEOGOV and each of its subsidiaries including PowerDMS, Inc., Cuehit, Inc., Ragnasoft LLC (D/B/A/ PlanIT Schedule), and Design PD, LLC (D/B/A Agency360): NEW SALES CONTRACTS Approval Limit (Annual Recurring Revenue) Position Title(s) $50,000 Accounting Manager $100,000 Accounting Director (Mike Burns) $1,000,000 CFO (Alex Chun) $1,000,000+ CEO (Shane Evangelist) (1) Signatory authority may be delegated to the next highest position of authority via email approval RENEWAL CONTRACTS Approval Limit (Annual Recurring Revenue) Position Title(s) $25,000 Renewal Sr. Manager (Amy Prins) $50,000 Chief Customer Officer (Sandy Miranda) $100,000 Chief Operating Officer (Aaron Coleman) $100,000+ CFO/CEO (Alex Chun/Shane Evanglelist) (1) Signatory authority may be delegated to the next highest position of authority via email approval IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my name on behalf of NEOGOV on the 18th day of March 2024. By: David Eisler Secretary NEOGOV DocuSign Envelope ID: AD297289-DC3B-468F-9C46-FF65B8A115EA . . Item 13 Page 3 of 16 1 SERVICES AGREEMENT V071423 You agree that by placing an order through a NEOGOV standard ordering document such as an “Order Form”, “Service Order,” “Ordering Document,” “SOW” or other document mutually agreed by the parties detailing the services, pricing and subscription term (each, an “Order Form” for purposes of this Agreement), you agree to follow and be bound by the terms and conditions set forth herein. “Governmentjobs.com”, “NEOGOV”, “we”, and “our” means Governmentjobs.com, Inc. (D/B/A/ NEOGOV), for and on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries PowerDMS, Inc., Cuehit, Inc., Ragnasoft LLC (D/B/A/ PlanIT Schedule), and Design PD, LLC (D/B/A Agency360) (collectively, “NEOGOV” and, where applicable, its other affiliates; “Customer”, “you”, “your” means the NEOGOV client, customer, and/or the subscriber identified in the Order Form). “Services Agreement” or the “Agreement” shall be used to collectively refer to this NEOGOV Services Agreement, documents incorporated herein including the applicable Order Form, each Addendum (as applicable), and Special Conditions (if any). “Addendum” means each Addendum set forth either as an Exhibit hereto or otherwise made available at https://www.neogov.com/service-specifications (the “NEOGOV Site”) and, as applicable, made a part of this Agreement. “Special Conditions” means individually negotiated variations, amendments and/or additions to this Service Agreement of which are either drafted, or incorporated by reference, into the Order Form. 1.Provision of Services. Subject to the terms of this Agreement NEOGOV hereby agrees to provide Customer with access to its SaaS Applications and Professional Services (each defined below) included or ordered by Customer in the applicable Order Form (collectively referred to as the “Services”). Customer hereby acknowledges and agrees that NEOGOV’s provision and performance of, and Customer’s access to, the Services is dependent and conditioned upon Customer’s full performance of its duties, obligations and responsibilities hereunder. This Agreement entered into as of the earlier of: (i) date of your signature on an applicable Order Form; or (ii) use of the Services commences (the “Effective Date”). The Agreement supersedes any prior and contemporaneous discussions, agreements or representations and warranties. 2.SaaS Subscription. a)Subscription Grant. “SaaS Applications” means each proprietary NEOGOV web-based software-as-a-service application that may be set forth on an Order Form and subsequently made available by NEOGOV to Customer, and associated components as described in any written service specifications made available to Customer by NEOGOV (the “Service Specifications”). Subject to and conditioned on Customer’s and its Authorized Users’ compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, NEOGOV hereby grants to Customer a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, and non- sublicensable right to (i) onboard, access and use, and to permit Authorized Users to onboard, access and use, the SaaS Applications specified in the Order Form solely for Customer’s internal, non-commercial purposes; (ii) generate, print, and download Customer Data as may result from any access to or use of the SaaS Applications; and (iii) train Authorized Users in uses of the SaaS Applications permitted hereunder (these rights shall collectively be referred to as the “SaaS Subscription”). “Authorized Users” means (1) Customer employees, agents, contractors, consultants (“Personnel”) who are authorized by Customer to access and use the Services under the rights granted to Customer pursuant to this Services Agreement and (2) for whom access to the Services has been purchased hereunder. You shall not exceed the usage limits (if any) as detailed in the user tier in the applicable Order Form. You may not access the SaaS Applications if you are a direct competitor of NEOGOV or its affiliates. In addition, you may not access the SaaS Applications for purposes of monitoring their availability, performance, or functionality, or for any other benchmarking or competitive purposes. You shall be responsible for each Authorized User’s access to and use of the SaaS Applications and compliance with applicable terms and conditions of this Agreement. b)Subscription Term. Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Order Form, SaaS Subscriptions shall commence on the Effective Date and remain in effect for twelve (12) consecutive months, unless terminated earlier in accordance with this Agreement (the “Initial Term”). Thereafter, SaaS Subscriptions shall automatically renew for successive twelve (12) month terms, up to a maximum of three (3) years, (each a “Renewal Term” and together with the Initial Term, collectively, the “Term”) unless a party delivers to the other party, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or the applicable Renewal Term, written notice of such party’s intention to not renew the SaaS Subscriptions, or unless terminated earlier in accordance with this Agreement. The Term for the Services is a continuous and non-divisible commitment for the full duration regardless of any invoice schedule. The purchase of any Service is separate from any other order for any other Service. Customer may purchase certain Services independently of other Services. Your obligation to pay for any Service is not contingent on performance of any other Service or delivery of any other Service. 3.Customer Responsibilities. Customer will not, and will ensure its Authorized Users do not (a) make any of the Services available to anyone other than Authorized Users or use any Services for the benefit of anyone other than Customer and its Authorized Users, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties, (b) sell, resell, license, sublicense, distribute, make Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 4 of 16 2 available, rent or lease any of the Services, or include any of the Services in a service bureau or outsourcing offering, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties, (c) use the Services to store or transmit infringing, libelous, or otherwise unlawful or tortious material, or to store or transmit material in violation of the privacy rights, publicity rights, copyright rights, or other rights of any person or entity, (d) use the Services to store or transmit code, files, scripts, agents or programs intended to do harm, including, for example, viruses, worms, time bombs and Trojan horses, (e) interfere with or disrupt the integrity or performance of the Services (including, without limitation, activities such as security penetration tests, stress tests, and spamming activity), (f) attempt to gain unauthorized access to the Services or its related systems or networks, (g) disassemble, reverse engineer, or decompile the Services, or modify, copy, or create derivative works based on the Services or any part, feature, function or user interface thereof, (h) remove the copyright, trademark, or any other proprietary rights or notices included within NEOGOV Intellectual Property and on and in any documentation or training materials, or (i) use the Services in a manner which violates the terms of this Agreement, any Order Form or any applicable laws. 4. Professional Services. “Professional Services” shall mean professional services purchased by Customer as detailed in an applicable Order Form or NEOGOV Scope of Work (SOW) describing the work to be performed, fees, and any applicable milestones, dependencies, and other technical specifications or related information. Professional Services may include training, implementation, and best practices of and concerning the SaaS Applications. Professional Services are subject to the terms of the Professional Services Addendum made available on the NEOGOV Site and made a part hereof and may be subject to additional terms pursuant to an SOW and Service Specifications describing, if applicable, the work to be performed, fees, and any applicable milestones, dependencies, and other technical specifications or related information. Order Forms or SOWs must be signed by Customer before NEOGOV shall commence work. If Customer executes a separate SOW, this Agreement and documents incorporated herein (including but not limited to the Professional Services Addendum) shall control in the event of a conflict with the terms of the SOW. All Professional Services purchased by Customer must be utilized within twelve (12) months of the date of the applicable Order Form or SOW. 5. Payment Terms. a) Fees. Customer shall pay all Subscription, Onboarding and Set-Up fees (“Subscription Fees”) and Professional Service fees (“Professional Service Fees”, collectively the “Fees”) as set forth in an Order Form within thirty (30) days of the date of NEOGOV’s invoice. Fees shall be invoiced annually in advance and in a single invoice for each Term. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in an Order Form, all payments due under an Order Form are expressed in and shall be paid in U.S. dollars. Invoices shall be delivered to the stated “Bill To” party on the Order Form. Unless explicitly provided otherwise, once placed the Order Form is non-cancellable and sums paid nonrefundable. Any invoiced amount that is not received by NEOGOV when due as set forth in an Order Form will be subject to a late payment fee of 1.5% per month or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is lower. If any amount owing by Customer is more than 30 days overdue, NEOGOV may, without limiting its other rights and remedies, suspend the Services until such amounts are paid in full. If Subscription Fees are based upon the Authorized User or employee count as may be specified in an Order Form, Customer shall owe NEOGOV supplemental Subscription Fees to the extent Customer exceeds the number of Authorized Users or employees set forth in the Order Form. Except as otherwise specifically stated in the Order Form, NEOGOV may change the charges for the Services with effect from the start of each Renewal Term by providing Customer with new pricing at least thirty (30) day notice prior to commencement of a Renewal Term. The new pricing shall be deemed to be effective if Customer (a) returns an executed Order Form to NEOGOV, (b) remits payment to NEOGOV of the fees set forth in the invoice referencing the new pricing, or (c) the Customer or any of its Authorized Users access or use the Services after the expiration of the previous Term. b) Taxes. Customer will pay all taxes, duties and levies imposed by all federal, state, and local authorities (including, without limitation, export, sales, use, excise, and value-added taxes) based on the transactions or payments under this Agreement, except those taxes imposed or based on NEOGOV’s net income or those exempt by applicable state law. Customer shall provide NEOGOV with a certificate or other evidence of such exemption within ten (10) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement and thereafter upon NEOGOV’s request therefor. c) Purchase Orders. Any reference to a purchase order in an Order Form or any associated invoice is solely for Customer's convenience in record keeping, and no such reference or any delivery of services to Customer following receipt of any purchase order shall be deemed an acknowledgement of or an agreement to any terms or conditions referenced or included in any such purchase order. If a purchase order is delivered by Customer in connection with the purchase of Services, none of the terms and conditions contained in such purchase order shall have any effect or modify or supersede the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NEOGOV’s failure to object to terms contained in any such purchase order shall not be a waiver of the terms set forth in this provision or in this Agreement. 6. Term and Termination. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 5 of 16 3 a)Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in effect until all SaaS Subscriptions have expired and/or both parties have achieved full performance of Professional Services, unless it is terminated earlier in accordance with this Agreement. b)Termination for Cause; Effect of Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement immediately if the other is in material breach of this Agreement and such breach is not cured within thirty (30) days following non-breaching party’s written specification of the breach. NEOGOV may suspend the Services or terminate this Agreement immediately in the event the Services or Customer’s use of the Services provided hereunder pose a security risk to the Services, NEOGOV or any third party, or become illegal or contrary to any applicable law, rule, regulation, or public policy. Upon expiration or any termination of this Agreement, Customer shall cease all use and refrain from all further use of the Services and other NEOGOV Intellectual Property. Additionally, Customer shall be obligated to pay, as of the effective date of such expiration or termination, all amounts due and unpaid to NEOGOV under this Agreement. Unless otherwise specified, following 90 days after expiration or termination of the Agreement NEOGOV may remove Customer Data from NEOGOV Services and without Customer consent or notice. 7.Audit Rights. Upon reasonable notice, NEOGOV or its agent shall have the right to audit Customer’s records relating to its compliance with this Agreement. Customer shall cooperate fully with this audit. If any audit conducted under this Section indicates that any amount due to NEOGOV was underpaid, Customer shall within three (3) business days pay to NEOGOV the amount due. All expenses associated with any such audit shall be paid by NEOGOV unless the audit reveals underpayment in excess of five percent (5%), in which case Customer shall pay such expenses as well as any amount due to NEOGOV. 8.Maintenance; Modifications; Support Services. a)Maintenance, Updates, Upgrades. NEOGOV maintains NEOGOV’s hardware and software infrastructure for the Services and is responsible for maintaining the NEOGOV server operation and NEOGOV database security. NEOGOV may in its sole discretion, periodically modify, Update, and Upgrade the features, components, and functionality of the Services during the Term. “Update” means any update, bug fix, patch or correction of the Services or underlying NEOGOV software that NEOGOV makes generally available to its customers of the same module, excluding Upgrades. Updates are automatic and available upon Customer’s next login to the Services following an Update at no additional cost to Customer. “Upgrade” means any update of the Services or underlying NEOGOV software such as platform updates, and major product enhancements and/or new features that NEOGOV makes commercially available. NEOGOV shall have no obligation to provide Upgrades to customers and retains the right to offer Upgrades free of cost or on a per customer basis at additional cost. NEOGOV shall have no liability for, or any obligations to, investments in, or modifications to Customer’s hardware, systems or other software which may be necessary to use or access the Services due to a modification, Update, or Upgrade of the Services. b)Program Documentation; Training Materials. “Program Documentation” shall mean all user guides, training, and implementation material, and Service descriptions provided by NEOGOV to Customer in connection with the Services. NEOGOV hereby grants to Customer a non-exclusive, non-sublicensable, non-transferable license to use, print, and distribute internally via non-public platforms, the Program Documentation during the Term solely for Customer's internal business purposes in connection with its use of the Services. Primary training of NEOGOV Services is conducted by self- review of online materials. NEOGOV’s pre-built, online training consists of a series of tutorials to introduce the standard features and functions (the “Training Materials”). The Training Materials may be used as reference material by Customer Personnel conducting day-to-day activities. c)Implementation. For Services requiring implementation, NEOGOV implementation supplements the Training Materials and is conducted off-site unless otherwise agreed in the Order Form. For an additional fee as detailed on an applicable Order Form, NEOGOV personnel will provide consultation on best practices for setting up the Services, answer Customer questions during the implementation period, and use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure Authorized User Admins grasp the system. The length of the implementation time is dependent on the type of Service and the Customer’s responsiveness. NEOGOV is not responsible or liable for any delay or failure to perform implementation caused in whole or in part by Customer's delay in performing its obligations hereunder and, in the event of any such delay, NEOGOV may, in its sole discretion, extend all performance dates as NEOGOV deems reasonably necessary. d)Support. Phone support for the Services is available to Customer Monday through Friday, excluding NEOGOV holidays. Customer may submit a request for online support for the Services 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and the NEOGOV support desk will acknowledge receipt of the request within a reasonable time. The length of time for a resolution of any problem is dependent on the type of case. e)Limitations. Unless otherwise specified in the Order Form, this Agreement does not obligate NEOGOV to render any maintenance or support services that are not expressly provided herein, including, but not limited to data uploads, manual Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 6 of 16 4 data entry, migration services, data conversion, refinement, purification, reformatting, SQL dump, or process consultation. 9. NEOGOV Intellectual Property. NEOGOV shall exclusively own all right, title and interest in and to all pre-existing and future intellectual property developed or delivered by NEOGOV including all Services, products, systems, software (including any source code or object code) or Service Specifications related thereto, Updates or Upgrades, trademarks, service marks, logos and other distinctive brand features of NEOGOV and all proprietary rights embodied therein (collectively, the “NEOGOV Intellectual Property”). This Agreement does not convey or transfer title or ownership of the NEOGOV Intellectual Property to Customer or any of its users. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NEOGOV. Other than recommendation use or as required by law, all use of NEOGOV trademarks must be pre-approved by NEOGOV prior to use. Trademarks shall include any word, name, symbol, color, designation or device, or any combination thereof that functions as a source identifier, including any trademark, trade dress, service mark, trade name, logo, design mark, or domain name, whether or not registered. 10. Data Processing and Privacy. a) Customer Data. “Customer Data” shall mean all data that is owned or developed by Customer, whether provided to NEOGOV by Customer or provided by a third party to NEOGOV in connection with NEOGOV’s provision of Services to Customer, including Personnel data collected, loaded into, or located in Customer data files maintained by NEOGOV. NEOGOV Intellectual Property, including but not limited to the Services and all derivative works thereof, NEOGOV Confidential Information, and Platform Data do not fall within the meaning of the term “Customer Data”. Customer exclusively owns all right, title, and interest in and to all Customer Data. Customer grants NEOGOV a license to host, use, process, display, create non-personal derivative works of, and transmit Customer Data to provide the Services. NEOGOV reserves the right to delete or disable Customer Data stored, transmitted or published by Customer using the Services upon receipt of a bona fide notification that such content infringes upon the intellectual property rights of others, or if NEOGOV otherwise reasonably believes any such content is in violation of this Agreement. b) Platform Data. “Platform Data” shall mean any anonymized data reflecting the access to or use of the Services by or on behalf of Customer or any user, including statistical or other analysis and performance information related to the provision and operation of the Services including any end user visit, session, impression, clickthrough or click stream data, as well as log, device, transaction data, or other analysis, information, or data based on or derived from any of the foregoing. NEOGOV shall exclusively own all right, title and interest in and to all Platform Data. Customer acknowledges NEOGOV may compile Platform Data based on Customer Data input into the Services. Customer agrees that NEOGOV may use Platform Data to the extent and in the manner permitted under applicable law. Such anonymized data neither identifies Customer or its users, nor can Customer or any its users can be derived from such data. c) Data Processing Agreement. To the extent Customer uses the Services to target and collect personal information from users located in the European Union, European Economic Area, or Switzerland (the “EU”) or the United Kingdom (“UK”), or has Authorized Users accessing the Services from the EU or UK, the terms of the NEOGOV Data Processing Addendum (“DPA”) made available on the NEOGOV Site is hereby incorporated herein by reference and made part of this Agreement. d) Data Responsibilities. i) NEOGOV will maintain administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for protection of the security, confidentiality and integrity of the Customer Data. Those safeguards will include, but will not be limited to, measures for preventing access, use, modification or disclosure of Customer Data by NEOGOV personnel except (a) to provide the Services and prevent or address service or technical problems, (b) as compelled by applicable law, or (c) as Customer expressly permits in writing. Customer acknowledges and agrees that it is commercially reasonable for NEOGOV to rely upon the security processes and measures utilized by NEOGOV’s cloud infrastructure providers. ii) Customer is solely responsible for the development, content, operation, maintenance, and use of Customer Data, including but not limited to compliance with applicable laws. NEOGOV will have no responsibility or liability for the accuracy of the Customer Data prior to receipt of such data into the Services. Without limiting the foregoing, Customer shall be solely responsible for and shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations relating to (a) the accuracy and completeness of all information input, submitted, or uploaded to the Services, (b) the privacy of users of the Services, including, without limitation, providing appropriate notices to and obtaining appropriate consents from any individuals to whom Customer Data relates; and (c) the collection, use, modification, alteration, extraction, retention, copying, external storage, disclosure, transfer, disposal, and other processing of any Customer Data. NEOGOV is not responsible for lost data caused by the action or inaction of Customer or Authorized Users. Unless Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 7 of 16 5 otherwise mutually agreed in writing, Customer shall not maintain any financial, health, payment card, or similarly sensitive data that imposes specific data security or data protection obligations within the Services. Customer shall provide and institute all appropriate tools and procedures required to ensure the security of its own information system and, more specifically, to prevent, detect and destroy the occurrence of any viruses. e)Breach Notice. NEOGOV will notify Customer of unauthorized access to, or unauthorized use, loss or disclosure of Customer Data within its custody and control (a “Security Breach”) within 72 hours of NEOGOV’s confirmation of the nature and extent of the same or when required by applicable law, whichever is earlier. Each party will reasonably cooperate with the other with respect to the investigation and resolution of any Security Breach. If applicable law or Customer’s policies require notification of its Authorized Users or others of the Security Breach, Customer shall be responsible for such notification. f)Data Export, Retention and Destruction. Customer may export or delete Customer Data from the Services at any time during a Subscription Term, using the existing features and functionality of the Services. Customer is solely responsible for its data retention obligations with respect to Customer Data. If and to the extent Customer cannot export or delete Customer Data stored on NEOGOV’s systems using the then existing features and functionality of the Services, NEOGOV will, upon Customer's written request, make the Customer Data available for export by Customer or destroy the Customer Data. If Customer requires the Customer Data to be exported in a different format than provided by NEOGOV, such additional services will be subject to a separate agreement on a time and materials basis. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, NEOGOV will have no obligation to maintain or provide any Customer Data more than ninety (90) days after the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Customer acknowledges that it is solely responsible for determining any retention requirements with respect to the Customer Data as required by applicable law and NEOGOV disclaims all liability in connection with such determination. In addition, to the extent Customer requests that NEOGOV retain Customer Data beyond the expiration of the retention period required by applicable law, rule or regulation, NEOGOV disclaims all liability in in connection with retaining such Customer Data including but not limited to any claims related to loss or destruction of such Customer Data. 11.Third Party Services. The Services may permit Customer and its Authorized Users to access services or content provided by third parties through the Services (“Third Party Services”). Customer agrees that NEOGOV is not the original source and shall not be liable for any inaccuracies contained in any content provided in any of the Third Party Services. NEOGOV makes no representations, warranties or guarantees with respect to the Third Party Services or any content contained therein. NEOGOV may discontinue access to any Third Party Services through the Services if the relevant agreement with the applicable third party no longer permits NEOGOV to provide such access. If loss of access to any Third Party Services (to which Customer has a subscription under this Agreement) occurs during a Subscription Term, NEOGOV will refund to Customer any prepaid fees for such Third Party Services covering the remainder of the Subscription Term. 12.Nondisclosure. a)Definition of Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” means all information disclosed by a party (“Disclosing Party”) to the other party (“Receiving Party”), whether orally or in writing, that is designated as confidential or that reasonably should be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and the circumstances of disclosure. Customer's Confidential Information includes its Customer Data. NEOGOV Confidential Information includes the NEOGOV Intellectual Property and the Services. The Confidential Information of each party includes the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all Order Forms (including pricing), as well as business and marketing plans, technology and technical information, product plans and designs, and business processes disclosed by such party. However, Confidential Information does not include any information that (a) is or becomes generally known to the public without breach of any obligation owed to the Disclosing Party, (b) was known to the Receiving Party prior to its disclosure by the Disclosing Party without breach of any obligation owed to the Disclosing Party, (c) is received from a third party without breach of any obligation owed to the Disclosing Party, or (d) was independently developed by the Receiving Party. b)Obligations. The Receiving Party will: (i) use the same degree of care it uses to protect the confidentiality of its own confidential information of like kind (but not less than reasonable care); (ii) not use any Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party for any purpose outside the scope of this Agreement and (iii) except as otherwise authorized by the Disclosing Party in writing, limit access to Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party to those of its employees and contractors who need access for purposes consistent with this Agreement and who have signed confidentiality agreements with the Receiving Party containing protections not less protective of the Confidential Information than those herein. c)Exceptions. The Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party to the extent compelled by law to do so, provided the Receiving Party gives the Disclosing Party prior notice of the compelled disclosure (to the Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 8 of 16 6 extent legally permitted) and reasonable assistance, at the Disclosing Party's cost, if the Disclosing Party wishes to contest the disclosure. d) Equitable Relief. The parties recognize and agree there is no adequate remedy at law for breach of the provisions of the confidentiality obligations set forth in this Section 12, that such a breach would irreparably harm the Disclosing Party and the Disclosing Party is entitled to seek equitable relief (including, without limitation, an injunction) with respect to any such breach or potential breach in addition to any other remedies available to it at law or in equity. 13. Representations, Warranties, and Disclaimers. a) Mutual Representations. Each party represents and warrants to the other party that (i) it has full power and authority under all relevant laws and regulations and is duly authorized to enter into this Agreement; and (ii) to its knowledge, the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by such party does not conflict with any agreement, instrument or understanding, oral or written, to which it is a party or by which it may be bound, nor violate any law or regulation of any court, governmental body or administrative or other agency having jurisdiction over it. b) Service Performance Warranty. NEOGOV warrants that it provides the Services using a commercially reasonable level of care and skill and in a professional manner in accordance with generally recognized industry standards for similar services. c) No Other Warranty. EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS WARRANTY SECTION, THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS, AND CUSTOMER’S USE OF THE SERVICES IS AT ITS OWN RISK. NEOGOV DOES NOT MAKE, AND HEREBY DISCLAIMS, ANY AND ALL OTHER EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE, AND ANY WARRANTIES ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. NEOGOV DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, ERROR-FREE, OR COMPLETELY SECURE, OR THAT ANY ERROR WILL BE CORRECTED. d) Disclaimer of Actions Caused by and/or Under the Control of Third Parties. NEOGOV DOES NOT AND CANNOT CONTROL THE FLOW OF DATA TO OR FROM THE NEOGOV SYSTEM AND OTHER PORTIONS OF THE INTERNET. SUCH FLOW DEPENDS IN LARGE PART ON THE PERFORMANCE OF INTERNET SERVICES PROVIDED OR CONTROLLED BY THIRD PARTIES. AT TIMES, ACTIONS OR INACTIONS OF SUCH THIRD PARTIES CAN IMPAIR OR DISRUPT CUSTOMER’S CONNECTIONS TO THE INTERNET (OR PORTIONS THEREOF). ALTHOUGH NEOGOV WILL USE COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE EFFORTS TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE TO REMEDY AND AVOID SUCH EVENTS, NEOGOV CANNOT GUARANTEE THAT SUCH EVENTS WILL NOT OCCUR. ACCORDINGLY, NEOGOV DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL LIABILITY RESULTING FROM OR RELATED TO SUCH EVENTS OR WITH RESPECT TO ANY THIRD PARTY SERVICES. e) No Medical Advice. Through certain Services, NEOGOV may make certain telehealth related information available to Customer and/or facilitate user access to telemedicine, expert medical services, and/or emergency medical services. NEOGOV is independent from healthcare providers who provide telemedicine services and is not responsible for such healthcare providers’ acts, omissions or for any content or communications made by them. The Services do not provide medical advice and do not create a healthcare provider/patient relationship between Customer and NEOGOV or otherwise. Any Services, or content accessed from the Services, are for informational purposes only and do not constitute medical advice. Customer should seek professional medical advice, diagnosis, and/or treatment for any and all medical conditions, whether as a result of using Services or otherwise. NEOGOV IS NOT RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR ANY ADVICE, COURSE OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS OR ANY OTHER TREATMENT OR INFORMATION THAT CUSTOMER OR ITS USERS MAY OBTAIN THROUGH THE USE OF THE SERVICES. 14. Indemnification. a) Customer Indemnity. To the extent permitted by applicable law, Customer will defend and indemnify NEOGOV from and against any claim, demand, suit or proceeding made or brought against NEOGOV (i) by a third party alleging that any Customer Data infringes or misappropriates such third party's intellectual property rights, (ii) in connection with Customer’s violation of any applicable laws, or (iii) any claim or allegation by any third party resulting from or related to Customer’s or any of its Authorized User’s breach of Section 3 of this Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 9 of 16 7 b) NEOGOV Indemnity. Subject to subsections 14(b)(i) through 14(b)(iii) and 14(c) of this Section, if a third party makes a claim against Customer that any NEOGOV intellectual property furnished by NEOGOV and used by Customer infringes a third party’s intellectual property rights, NEOGOV will defend the Customer against the claim and indemnify the Customer from the damages and liabilities awarded by the court to the third-party claiming infringement or the settlement agreed to by NEOGOV. i) Alternative Resolution. If NEOGOV believes or it is determined that any of the Services may have violated a third party’s intellectual property rights, NEOGOV may choose to either modify the Services to be non-infringing or obtain a license to allow for continued use. If these alternatives are not commercially reasonable, NEOGOV may end the subscription or license for the Services and refund a pro-rata portion of any fees covering the whole months that would have remained, absent such early termination, following the effective date of such early termination. ii) No Duty to Indemnify. NEOGOV will not indemnify Customer if Customer alters the Service or Service Specifications, or uses it outside the scope of use or if Customer uses a version of the Service or Service Specifications which has been superseded, if the infringement claim could have been avoided by using an unaltered current version of the Services or Service Specifications which was provided to Customer, or if the Customer continues to use the infringing material after the subscription expires. NEOGOV will not indemnify the Customer to the extent that an infringement claim is based upon any information, design, specification, instruction, software, data, or material not furnished by NEOGOV. NEOGOV will not indemnify Customer for any portion of an infringement claim that is based upon the combination of Service or Service Specifications with any products or services not provided by NEOGOV. NEOGOV will not indemnify Customer for infringement caused by Customer’s actions against any third party if the Services as delivered to Customer and used in accordance with the terms of the Agreement would not otherwise infringe any third-party intellectual property rights. iii) Exclusive Remedy. This Section provides the exclusive remedy for any intellectual property infringement claims or damages against NEOGOV. c) Indemnification Procedures. In order to receive the indemnities described hereunder, the indemnified party must: (i) promptly notify the indemnifying party, in writing, of any claim; (ii) cooperate reasonably with indemnifying party, at the indemnifying party’s expense, in the defense and/or settlement thereof; and (iii) allow the indemnifying party to control the defense and/or settlement thereof except that the indemnifying party may not, without the indemnified party’s prior written consent, enter into any settlement that does not unconditionally release the indemnified party from liability. The indemnified party shall have the right to participate in any defense of a claim and/or to be represented by counsel of its own choosing at its own expense, provided that ultimate control of such defense shall remain solely with the indemnifying party. 15. Limitations of Liability. a) EXCLUSION OF DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR ITS SUBJECT MATTER UNDER ANY LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY, INCLUDING BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, AND OTHERWISE, INCLUDING FOR ANY: (a) LOSS OF PRODUCTION, USE, BUSINESS, REVENUE, OR PROFIT OR DIMINUTION IN VALUE; (b) IMPAIRMENT, INABILITY TO USE OR LOSS, INTERRUPTION OR DELAY OF THE SERVICES; (c) LOSS, DAMAGE, CORRUPTION OR RECOVERY OF DATA, OR BREACH OF DATA OR SYSTEM SECURITY; (d) COST OF REPLACEMENT GOODS OR SERVICES; (e) LOSS OF GOODWILL, LOSS OF BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY OR PROFIT, OR LOSS OF REPUTATION; OR (f) CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, SPECIAL, ENHANCED, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH PERSONS WERE ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES OR SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES WERE OTHERWISE FORESEEABLE, AND NOTWITHSTANDING THE FAILURE OF ANY AGREED OR OTHER REMEDY OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. b) CAP ON MONETARY LIABILITY. EXCEPT FOR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF LIABILITY WHICH CANNOT BE LAWFULLY EXCLUDED OR LIMITED, OR CUSTOMER’S OBLIGATIONS TO MAKE PAYMENT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, THE TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY OF EITHER PARTY FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER PARTY UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER ARISING UNDER OR RELATED TO BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY, OR ANY OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF ALL PAYMENTS ACTUALLY RECEIVED BY NEOGOV FROM CUSTOMER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT IN THE 12 MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE DATE OF THE EVENT INITIALLY GIVING RISE TO SUCH LIABILITY. THE EXISTENCE OF ONE OR MORE CLAIMS WILL NOT ENLARGE THE LIMIT. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 10 of 16 8 16. Reimbursement of Costs in Third Party Litigation. With respect to any litigation or other court proceeding involving Customer and a third party, if any subpoena or other legally binding request related to such litigation or court proceeding is served to NEOGOV requesting copies of documents maintained by NEOGOV or otherwise requesting NEOGOV to appear as a witness in any capacity or provide testimony with respect to Customer’s documentation, Customer shall reimburse NEOGOV for its out-of-pocket costs associated with compliance with such request, including but not limited to NEOGOV’s reasonable attorneys’ fees. 17. Text Message Communications. NEOGOV may offer Personnel the opportunity to receive text messages regarding job application or hiring process reminders, applicant status updates, or other human resource related notices. Since these text message services depend on the functionality of third-party providers, there may be technical delays on the part of those providers. NEOGOV may make commercially reasonable efforts to provide alerts in a timely manner with accurate information, but cannot guarantee the delivery, timeliness, or accuracy of the content of any alert. NEOGOV shall not be liable for any delays, failure to deliver, or misdirected delivery of any alert; for any errors in the content of an alert; or for any actions taken or not taken by you or any third party in reliance on an alert. NEOGOV cannot vouch for the technical capabilities of any third parties to receive such text messages. To the extent you utilize text messaging features, NEOGOV shall not be responsible for your use of such features, and you shall indemnify NEOGOV with respect to any damages resulting from your use including but not limited any violations of applicable law. NEOGOV MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS, STATUTORY, OR IMPLIED AS TO: (i) THE AVAILABILITY OF TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; (ii) ANY LOSS, DAMAGE, OR OTHER SECURITY INTRUSION OF THE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; AND (iii) ANY DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION TO THIRD PARTIES OR FAILURE TO TRANSMIT ANY DATA, COMMUNICATIONS, OR SETTINGS CONNECTED WITH THE SERVICES. 18. Publicity. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Order Form, NEOGOV may identify Customer as one of its customers and use Customer’s logo for such purposes, subject to any trademark usage requirements specified by Customer. 19. Force Majeure. Except for Customer’s payment obligations to NEOGOV, neither party shall be liable for any damages, costs, expenses or other consequences incurred by the other party or by any other person or entity for any act, circumstance, event, impediment or occurrence beyond such party’s reasonable control, including, without limitation: (a) acts of God; (b) changes in or in the interpretation of any law, rule, regulation or ordinance; (c) strikes, lockouts or other labor problems; (d) transportation delays; (e) unavailability of supplies or materials; (f) fire or explosion; (g) riot, pandemic, military action or usurped power; (h) actions or failures to act on the part of a governmental authority; (i) internet service interruptions or slowdowns, vandalism or cyber-attacks, or (j) any other cause beyond the reasonable control of such party. 20. Independent Contractor; No Third Party Beneficiary; Fulfillment Partners. The relationship of the parties shall be deemed to be that of an independent contractor and nothing contained herein shall be deemed to constitute a partnership between or a joint venture by the parties hereto or constitute either party the employee or agent of the other. Customer acknowledges that nothing in this Agreement gives Customer the right to bind or commit NEOGOV to any agreements with any third parties. This Agreement is not for the benefit of any third party and shall not be deemed to give any right or remedy to any such party whether referred to herein or not. NEOGOV may designate any third-party affiliate, or other agent or subcontractor (each a “Fulfillment Partner”), without notice to, or the consent of, Customer, to perform such tasks and functions to complete any Services. 21. Entire Agreement; Amendment; Addendum. This Services Agreement, the Exhibits hereto, each Addendum (as may be applicable pursuant to the terms therein) and documents incorporated herein, the applicable Order Form, and Special Conditions (if any) constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior or contemporaneous oral and written statements of any kind whatsoever made by the parties with respect to such subject matter. It is expressly agreed that the terms of this Agreement and any NEOGOV Order Form shall supersede the terms in any non-NEOGOV purchase order or other ordering document. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any conflict of terms shall be resolved by giving priority in accordance with the following order: 1) Special Conditions (if any), 2) NEOGOV Order Form, 3) the NEOGOV Services Agreement, and 4) incorporated documents (including the Exhibits and each applicable Addendum). This Agreement supersedes the terms and conditions of any clickthrough agreement associated with the Services. This Agreement may not be modified or amended (and no rights hereunder may be waived) except through a written instrument signed by the parties to be bound. If you are subscribing for the HRIS or PowerEngage Platform, you hereby specifically agree to the terms of the applicable Addendum set forth on the NEOGOV Site. 22. General. a) Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of California, without giving effect to conflict of law rules. Any legal action or proceeding relating to this Agreement shall be instituted only in any state or federal court in Los Angeles, California. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 11 of 16 9 b) Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable, such provision shall be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that the remainder of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. Provisions that survive termination or expiration are those relating to, without limitation, accrued rights to payment, acknowledgements and reservations of proprietary rights, confidentiality obligations, warranty disclaimers, and limitations of liability, and others which by their nature are intended to survive. c) Notices. All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given either when personally delivered, one (1) business day following delivery by recognized overnight courier or electronic mail, or three (3) business days following deposit in the U.S. mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. All such communications shall be sent to (i) Customer at the address set forth in the Order Form and (ii) NEOGOV at the address specified in the applicable Order Form. d) Waiver. The waiver, express or implied, by either party of any breach of this Agreement by the other party will not waive any subsequent breach by such party of the same or a different kind. e) Electronic Delivery. Delivery of a copy of this Agreement or an Order Form bearing an original signature by electronic mail or by any other electronic means will have the same effect as physical delivery of the paper document bearing the original signature. f) Assignment. Customer may not assign this Agreement without the express written approval of NEOGOV Any attempt at assignment in violation of this Section shall be null and void. g) Construction. The parties intend this Agreement to be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction or interpretation against the party drafting an instrument or causing any instrument to be drafted. The exhibits, addendum, schedules, attachments, and appendices referred to herein are an integral part of this Agreement to the same extent as if they were set forth verbatim herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 12 of 16 10 Exhibit A Government Customer Addendum If Customer is a Government Customer, the following Government Customer Addendum (“Government Addendum”) forms part of the Services Agreement, and in the case of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms and provisions of this Addendum and any other provision of the Services Agreement, the terms of this Government Addendum shall control. For purposes hereof, a “Government Customer” means a Customer which is a (a) U.S. Federal agency, (b) state government, agency, department, or political subdivision (including a city, county or municipal corporation), or (c) instrumentality of any of the foregoing (including a municipal hospital or municipal hospital district, police or fire department, public library, park district, state college or university, Indian tribal economic development organization, or port authority). 1. Applicability. The provisions of this Addendum shall apply only if Customer is a Government Customer under the Services Agreement. 2. Termination for Non-Appropriation of Funds. If Customer is subject to federal, state or local law which makes Customer’s financial obligations under this Services Agreement contingent upon sufficient appropriation of funds by the applicable legislature (or other appropriate governmental body), and if such funds are not forthcoming or are insufficient due to failure of such appropriation, then Customer will have the right to terminate the Services Agreement at no additional cost and with no penalty by giving prior written notice documenting the lack of funding. Customer will provide at least thirty (30) days advance written notice of such termination. Customer will use reasonable efforts to ensure appropriated funds are available. It is expressly agreed that Customer shall not activate this non-appropriation provision for its convenience or to circumvent the requirements of this Agreement, but only as an emergency fiscal measure during a substantial fiscal crisis, which affects generally its fiscal operations. If Customer terminates the Services Agreement under this Section 2, Customer agrees not to replace the Services with functionally similar products or services for a period of one year after the termination of the Services Agreement. 3. Indemnification. If Customer is prohibited by federal, state or local law from agreeing to hold harmless or indemnify third parties, Section 14(a) and the indemnification provision included in Section 17 of the Services Agreement shall not apply to Customer, to the extent disallowed by applicable law. 4. Open Records. If the Customer is subject to federal or state public records laws, including laws styled as open records, freedom of information, or sunshine laws (“Open Records Laws”) the confidentiality requirements of Section 12 of the Services Agreement apply only to the extent permitted by Open Records Laws applicable to the Customer. This Section is not intended to be a waiver of any of the provisions of the applicable Open Records Laws, including, without limitation, the requirement for the Customer to provide notice and opportunity for NEOGOV to assert an exception to disclosure requirements in accordance with the applicable Open Records laws. 5. Cooperative Purchasing. As permitted by law, it is understood and agreed by Customer and NEOGOV that any (i) federal, state, local, tribal, or other municipal government (including all administrative agencies, departments, and offices thereof); (ii) any business enterprise in which a federal, state, local, tribal or other municipal entity has a full, majority, or other controlling interest; and/or (iii) any public school (including without limitation K-12 schools, colleges, universities, and vocational schools) (collectively referred to as the “New Entity”) may purchase the Services specified herein in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that each New Entity will establish its own contract with NEOGOV, be invoiced therefrom and make its own payments to NEOGOV in accordance with the terms of the contract established between the New Entity and NEOGOV. With respect to any purchases by a New Entity pursuant to this Section, Customer: (i) shall not be construed as a dealer, re-marketer, representative, partner or agent of any type of NEOGOV, or such New Entity; (ii) shall not be obligated, liable or responsible for any order made by New Entities or any employee thereof under the agreement or for any payment required to be made with respect to such order; and (iii) shall not be obliged, liable or responsible for any failure by any New Entity to comply with procedures or requirements of applicable law or to obtain the due authorization and approval necessary to purchase under the agreement. Termination of this Agreement shall in no way limit NEOGOV from soliciting, entering into, or continuing a contractual relationship with any New Entity. Any New Entity who purchases Services under this Section hereby represents that is has the authority to use this Services Agreement for the purchase and that the use of the Services Agreement for the purchase is not prohibited by law or procurement regulations applicable to the New Entity. 6. Subcontractors. For purposes of this Agreement, including any subsequent documentation requested by Customer pursuant to this Agreement, the term "subcontractors" shall exclude subcontractors (i) who perform routine software development and maintenance services which are not specific to the Customer, (ii) subcontractors who will not have any Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 13 of 16 11 access to Customer Data, and (iii) subcontractors who have access to Customer Data solely within NEOGOV's or Customer's systems. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 14 of 16 12 Exhibit B Integration Terms Addendum NEOGOV offers integrations and platform APIs for integrations to third party systems (“Integration Services”). Customer may use only those Integration Services purchased or subscribed to as listed within the NEOGOV Order Form. The following terms (the “Integration Terms Addendum”) shall apply to the extent that Customer utilizes a system integration between the Services and either: (a) an affiliated integrated service, including those found at https://api.neogov.com/connect/marketplace.html and/or https://apidocs.powerdms.com (“Affiliated API”) or to the extent that Customer utilizes a system integration between the Services and an unaffiliated third-party service (“Customer Application”) integrated using NEOGOV’s open API (“Open API”). Integration Services are not available for HRIS Services and this Exhibit B shall not apply to HRIS Services. 1. Provision of Integrations. Subject to and conditioned on compliance with all terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, NEOGOV hereby grants Customer a limited, revocable, non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicensable license during the applicable Term to use and/or access the Affiliated API as described in this Agreement, or the Open API for communication between Customer’s human resource related third application(s) that will interoperate with NEOGOV Services (collectively these uses shall be referred to as the “API” or “Integration”). Customer acknowledges there are no implied licenses granted under this Agreement. NEOGOV reserves all rights that are not expressly granted. Customer may not use the API for any other purpose without our prior written consent. Customer may not share the API with any third party, must keep the API and all log-in information secure, and must use the API key as Customer sole means of accessing the API. 2. Integration Intellectual Property. All right, title, and interest in the API and any and all information, data, documents, materials, inventions, technologies, know-how, descriptions, requirements, plans, reports, works, intellectual property, software, hardware, systems, methods, processes, and inventions, customizations, enhancements, improvements and other modifications based on or derived from the API are and will remain, as appropriate, with NEOGOV. All right, title, and interest in and to the third-party materials, includingall intellectual property rights therein, are and will remain with their respective third-party rights holders subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable third-party license agreements. Customer has no right or license with respect to any third-party materials except as expressly licensed under such third-party license agreements. 3. Integration Terms of Use. Except as expressly authorized under this Agreement, you may not remove any proprietary notices from the API; use the API in any manner or for any purpose that infringes, misappropriates, or otherwise violates any intellectual property rightor other right of any person, or that violates any applicable law; combine or integrate the API with any software, technology, services, or materials not authorized by NEOGOV; design or permit Customer Application(s) to disable, override, or otherwise interfere with any NEOGOV-implemented communications to end users, consent screens, user settings, alerts, warning, or the like; use the API in any of Customer Application(s) to replicate or attempt to replace the user experience of the Services; or attempt to cloak or conceal Customer identity or the identity of Customer Application(s) when requesting authorization to use the API. 4. Customer Integration Responsibilities. Customer, Customer developed web or other software services or applications, and Customer third-party vendors that integrate with the API (collectively the “Customer Applications”), shall comply with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and all guidelines, standards, and requirements that may be posted on https://api.neogov.com/connect/index.html and/or https://apidocs.powerdms.com from time to time. In addition, Customer will not use the API in connection with or to promote any products, services, or materials that constitute, promote, or are used primarily for the purpose of dealing in spyware, adware,or other malicious programs or code, counterfeit goods, items subject to U.S. embargo, unsolicited mass distribution of email (“spam”),multi-level marketing proposals, hate materials, hacking, surveillance, interception, or descrambling equipment, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, or otherwise offensive content, stolen products, and items used for theft, hazardous materials, or any illegal activities. 5. Cooperation. If applicable, Customer shall timely provide such cooperation, assistance, and information as NEOGOV reasonably requests to enable the API. NEOGOV is not responsible or liable for any late delivery or delay or failure of performance caused in wholeor in part by Customer’s delay in performing, or failure to perform, any of its obligations under this Agreement. NEOGOV will provide Customer maintenance and support services for API issues arising from the information technology designed, developed, and under then current control of NEOGOV. NEOGOV shall have no obligation to provide maintenance or support for issues arising from the inaction or action of Customer or third parties of which are outside NEOGOV control. 6. Provision of Open API. In the event license fees or other payments are not due in exchange for the right to use and access the Open API, you acknowledge and agree that this arrangement is made in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, including, without limitation, the disclaimers, exclusions, and limitations of liability set forth herein. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 15 of 16 13 Notwithstanding the foregoing, NEOGOV reserves the right to charge for access with effect from the start of each Renewal Term by giving Customer at least ninety (90) day notice prior to commencement of a Renewal Term. 7. API Key. In order to use and access the Open API, you must obtain an Open API key through the registration process. Customer agreesto monitor Customer Applications for any activity that violates applicable laws, rules and regulation, or any terms and conditions of this Agreement, including any fraudulent, inappropriate, or potentially harmful behavior. This Agreement does not entitle Customer to any support for the Open API. You acknowledge that NEOGOV may update or modify the Open API from time to time and at our sole discretion and may require you to obtain and use the most recent version(s). You are required to make any such changes to Customer Applications that are required for integration as a result of such Update at Customer sole cost and expense. Updates may adversely affect how Customer Applications communicate with the Services. 8. Efficient Processing. You must use efficient programming, which will not cause an overwhelming number of requests to be made in too short a period of time, as-determined solely by NEOGOV. If this occurs, NEOGOV reserves the right to throttle your API connections,or suspend or terminate your access to the Open API. NEOGOV shall use reasonable efforts to provide Customer notice and reasonable time to cure prior to taking such actions. 9. Open API Limitations. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL NEOGOVBE LIABLE TO CUSTOMER OR TO ANY THIRD PARTY UNDER ANY TORT, CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICTLIABILITY, OR OTHER LEGAL OR EQUITABLE THEORY FOR ANY DIRECT, LOST PROFITS, LOST OR CORRUPTED DATA, COMPUTER FAILURE OR MALFUNCTION, INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, OR OTHER SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE OPEN API; OR ANY DAMAGES, IN THE AGGREGATE, IN EXCESS OF FIFTY DOLLARS, EVEN IF NEOGOV HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGES AND WHETHER OR NOT SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE OR NEOGOV WAS ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. ANY CLAIM YOU MAY HAVE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT MUST BE BROUGHT WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER THE OCCURRENCE OF THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO SUCH CLAIM. 10. Open API Termination. Notwithstanding the additional Termination rights herein, NEOGOV may immediately terminate or suspend Customer access to Open APIs in our sole discretion at any time and for any reason, with or without notice or cause. In addition, your Open API subscription will terminate immediately and automatically without any notice if you violate any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: 174CAA71-E311-45B0-AF1F-7F096D202D47 . . Item 13 Page 16 of 16 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Department:City Clerk Submitted by:Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Subject Conflict of Interest Code (Statement of Economic Interests) Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 2024-019 amending the City of Vernon Conflict of Interest Code and repealing Resolution No. 2024-01. Background The Political Reform Act (Government Code Section 87300) requires every local government agency to review its Conflict of Interest Code biennially to determine its accuracy and provide a report to its governing body identifying changes or alternatively periodically when required amendments are necessary. The Code designates which public officials, employees, commissioners, committee members and consultants are required to file a Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700). The Code also designates all positions that make or participate in making governmental decisions that may have a foreseeable material effect on a filer’s financial interest and requires full disclosure for all designated positions. On January 16, 2024, the Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-01 amending its Conflict of Interest Code. The current code requires amendments due to title changes, position additions, or deletions. The proposed Resolution incorporates the recommended changes. The attached Conflict of Interest Code Positions list (attachment 2) reflects current positions, with any updates to the positions declared in tracked-changes (redlined) format. The individuals serving in positions designated in the Conflict of Interest Code are required to file a Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) annually to reflect activity for each previous calendar year, utilizing the City’s electronic filing system. The proposed Resolution includes the following updates since the Conflict of Interest Code’s last adoption in January 2024: Finance Department: •Risk Manager (added) Health & Environmental Control: •Environ. Health Program Administrator (removed) Human Resources: •Human Resources program Manager (added) •Senior Legal and Policy Advisor (removed) Public Utilities: •Assistant General Manager – Generation and Operations (removed) •Material Control Administrator (removed) •Principal Electrical Engineer (removed) Public Works Department: •Building and Planning Manager (removed) •Building and Planning Operations Supervisor (added) •Principal Civil Engineer (removed). . Item 14 Page 1 of 2 •Public Works Inspector (removed) •Public Works Inspector, Senior (removed) •Public Works Project Coordinator (removed) Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 2024-019 2. Conflict of Interest Code Positions Redline . . Item 14 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AMENDING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR ALL AGENCIES, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL, AND OFFICIALS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01 SECTION 1. Recitals. A. On January 16, 2024, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Resolution No. 2024- 01 amending its Conflict of Interest Code for all agencies, boards, commissions, committees, designated City personnel and officials affiliated with the City, incorporating by reference the standard model Conflict of Interest Code of the Fair Political Practices Commission and repealing all resolutions in conflict therewith. B. The Political Reform Act, Government Code Sections 81000, et seq., requires state and local government agencies to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code and to conduct a biennial review of its code. C. Government Code Section 87306 requires every agency to amend its Conflict of Interest Code when necessitated by changed circumstances, including the creation of new positions, deletion of old positions and relevant changes in the duties assigned to existing positions. D. Section 3 of this Resolution accurately sets forth those positions which should be designated and the categories of financial interests, which should be made reportable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 3. The following positions are required to provide full disclosure pursuant to Government Code Section 87200: •City Attorney •City Council •City Manager/Administrator •City Treasurer Additionally, the City requires full disclosure for the positions listed below, which make or participate in making decisions that may foreseeably have a material effect on financial interests. Full Disclosure includes all interests in real property in the City of Vernon, as well as investments, business positions, and sources of income, including gifts, loans, and travel payments. . . Item 14 Page 1 of 4 Resolution No. 2024-019 Page 2 of 4 _________________________________ 1 0 8 6 Administration Department: •Administrative Assistant (Confidential) •Administrative Assistant, Senior (Confidential) •Assistant to the City Administrator •Deputy City Administrator •Executive Assistant to the City Administrator •Information Technology Analyst, Senior •Information Technology Manager •Information Technology Project Manager •Public Information Officer City Attorney Department: •Deputy City Attorney •Legal Analyst •Senior Deputy City Attorney City Clerk Department: •City Clerk •Deputy City Clerk Citywide: •Management Analyst •Principal Management Analyst •Procurement Specialist •Senior Management Analyst Commissions and Committees: Members, Directors, Legal Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary •Board of Library Trustees •Green Vernon Commission •Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency •Vernon Business and Industry Commission •Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee •Vernon Housing Commission Consultants: •Consultant filling a designated position •The City Administrator, or designee, shall determine, in writing, that a particular consultant, although a “designated position,” is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this section. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon the description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The determination is a public record and must be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. Finance Department: •Accountant •Accountant, Senior •Assistant Finance Director •Assistant Buyer •Business and Account Supervisor •Buyer •Deputy City Treasurer •Finance Manager •Finance Specialist •Finance Specialist, Senior •Financial Services Administrator •Payroll Analyst •Risk Manager Health & Environmental Control: •Deputy Director of Health & Environ. Control •Director of Health & Environ. Control •Environ. Health-Hazardous Materials Specialist I •Environ. Health-Hazardous Materials Specialist II •Environ. Health-Hazardous Materials Specialist Trainee •Environ. Health Technician •Health Officer . . Item 14 Page 2 of 4 Resolution No. 2024-019 Page 3 of 4 _________________________________ 1 0 8 6 Human Resources Department: •Director of Human Resources •Human Resources Analyst •Human Resources Analyst, Senior •Human Resources Program Manager • Police Department: •Police Captain •Police Chief •Police Lieutenant Public Utilities: •Assistant Civil Engineer – Public Utilities •Assistant General Manager of Public Utilities •Assistant Resource Scheduler •Associate Electrical Engineer •Associate Resource Scheduler •Business and Account Supervisor •Chief Utilities Dispatcher •Civil Engineer – Public Utilities •Control Room Operator, Senior •Customer Relations and Marketing Manager •Customer Service Manager •Electrical Engineer •Electric Operations Supervisor •Electric Service Planner •Gas Systems Field Supervisor •Gas Systems Manager •Gas Systems Superintendent •General Manager of Public Utilities •Integrated Resources Manager •Key Accounts Administrator •Maintenance Manager •Operations Manager •Planning and Analysis Manager •Plant Engineer •Power Resources Settlement Analyst •Power Resources Settlement Analyst, Senior •Principal Resource Planner •Principal Resource Scheduler/Trader •Resource Planner •Resource Scheduler •Utilities Compliance Administrator •Utilities Compliance Analyst •Utilities Dispatcher, Senior •Utilities Engineering Manager •Utilities Operations Manager •Utilities Operations Supervisor •Utilities Strategic Planning Coordinator •Utilities Program Analyst •Utility Program Administrator •Utilities Project Coordinator •Water Administrator •Water Project Coordinator •Water Project Specialist •Water Superintendent •Water Supervisor Public Works Department: •Assistant Engineer •Assistant Planner •Associate Engineer •Building and Planning Operations Supervisor •Building Inspector •Building Inspector, Senior •Civil Engineer •Code Enforcement Officer •Deputy Director of Public Works •Director of Public Works •Electrical Inspector •Electrical Inspector, Senior •Facilities Maintenance Supervisor •Fleet Supervisor •Plumbing and Mechanical Inspector •Plumbing & Mechanical Inspector, Senior •Project Engineer •Public Works Superintendent •Street Maintenance Supervisor SECTION 4. The Political Reform Act requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate Conflict of Interest Codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard Conflict of Interest Code, that can be incorporated by reference and which may be . . Item 14 Page 3 of 4 Resolution No. 2024-019 Page 4 of 4 _________________________________ 1 0 8 6 amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act after public notice and hearings. The terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 18730, and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, are hereby incorporated by reference. These provisions constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Vernon. The City of Vernon is considered the "agency" within the purview of this code. SECTION 5. Designated positions must file Statements of Economic Interests with the City Clerk’s Office utilizing the City’s electronic filing system. The City Clerk will perform the duties of Filing Officer for the City of Vernon. SECTION 6. Any change provided for in this Conflict of Interest Code will not affect or excuse any offense or act committed or done or omission or any penalty or forfeiture incurred or accruing under any other Conflict of Interest Code; nor will it affect any prosecution, suit or proceeding pending or any judgment rendered in connection with any other Conflict of Interest Code. SECTION 7. All resolutions or parts of resolutions, specifically Resolution No. 2024-01, not consistent with or in conflict with this resolution are hereby repealed. SECTION 8. The Deputy City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED September 17, 2024. _____________________________ Judith Merlo, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ YONNIE PARKER, Deputy City Clerk (seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ ZAYNAH N. MOUSSA, City Attorney . . Item 14 Page 4 of 4 Redline – Conflict of Interest Code September 2024 Administration Department: •Administrative Assistant (Confidential) •Administrative Assistant, Senior (Confidential) •Assistant to the City Administrator •Deputy City Administrator •Executive Assistant to the City Administrator •Information Technology Analyst, Senior •Information Technology Manager •Information Technology Project Manager •Public Information Officer City Attorney Department: •Deputy City Attorney •Legal Analyst •Senior Deputy City Attorney City Clerk Department: •City Clerk •Deputy City Clerk Citywide: •Management Analyst •Principal Management Analyst •Procurement Specialist •Senior Management Analyst Commissions and Committees: Members, Directors, Legal Counsel, Treasurer and Secretary •Board of Library Trustees •Green Vernon Commission •Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency •Vernon Business and Industry Commission •Vernon CommUNITY Fund Grant Committee •Vernon Housing Commission Consultants: •Consultant filling a designated position •The City Administrator, or designee, shall determine, in writing, that a particular consultant, although a “designated position,” is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this section. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon the description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The determination is a public record and must be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. Finance Department: •Accountant •Accountant, Senior •Assistant Finance Director •Assistant Buyer •Business and Account Supervisor •Buyer •Deputy City Treasurer . . Item 14 Page 1 of 3 Redline – Conflict of Interest Code September 2024 •Finance Manager •Finance Specialist •Finance Specialist, Senior •Financial Services Administrator •Payroll Analyst •Risk Manager Health & Environmental Control: •Deputy Director of Health & Environ. Control •Director of Health & Environ. Control •Environ. Health Program Administrator •Environ. Health-Hazardous Materials Specialist I •Environ. Health-Hazardous Materials Specialist II •Environ. Health-Hazardous Materials Specialist Trainee •Environ. Health Technician •Health Officer Human Resources Department: •Director of Human Resources •Human Resources Analyst •Human Resources Analyst, Senior •Human Resources Program Manager •Senior Legal and Policy Advisor Police Department: •Police Captain •Police Chief •Police Lieutenant Public Utilities: •Assistant Civil Engineer – Public Utilities •Assistant General Manager – Generation and Operations •Assistant General Manager of Public Utilities •Assistant Resource Scheduler •Associate Electrical Engineer •Associate Resource Scheduler •Business and Account Supervisor •Chief Utilities Dispatcher •Civil Engineer – Public Utilities •Control Room Operator, Senior •Customer Relations and Marketing Manager •Customer Service Manager •Electrical Engineer •Electric Operations Supervisor •Electric Service Planner •Gas Systems Field Supervisor •Gas Systems Manager •Gas Systems Superintendent •General Manager of Public Utilities •Integrated Resources Manager •Key Accounts Administrator •Maintenance Manager •Material Control Administrator . . Item 14 Page 2 of 3 Redline – Conflict of Interest Code September 2024 •Operations Manager •Planning and Analysis Manager •Plant Engineer •Power Resources Settlement Analyst •Power Resources Settlement Analyst, Senior •Principal Electrical Engineer •Principal Resource Planner •Principal Resource Scheduler/Trader •Resource Planner •Resource Scheduler •Utilities Compliance Administrator •Utilities Compliance Analyst •Utilities Dispatcher, Senior •Utilities Engineering Manager •Utilities Operations Manager •Utilities Operations Supervisor •Utilities Strategic Planning Coordinator •Utilities Program Analyst •Utility Program Administrator •Utilities Project Coordinator •Water Administrator •Water Project Coordinator •Water Project Specialist •Water Superintendent •Water Supervisor Public Works Department: •Assistant Engineer •Assistant Planner •Associate Engineer •Building and Planning Manager •Building and Planning Operations Supervisor •Building Inspector •Building Inspector, Senior •Civil Engineer •Code Enforcement Officer •Deputy Director of Public Works •Director of Public Works •Electrical Inspector •Electrical Inspector, Senior •Facilities Maintenance Supervisor •Fleet Supervisor •Plumbing and Mechanical Inspector •Plumbing & Mechanical Inspector, Senior •Principal Civil Engineer •Project Engineer •Public Works Inspector •Public Works Inspector, Senior •Public Works Project Coordinator •Public Works Superintendent •Street Maintenance Supervisor . . Item 14 Page 3 of 3 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Freddie Agyin, Director of Health and Environmental Control Department:Health and Environmental Control Submitted by:Veronica Petrosyan, Deputy Director of Health and Environmental Control Subject Agreement with the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority (SEAACA) for Animal Control Services Recommendation A. Find that it is commercially unreasonable to rebid the proposed agreement with SEAACA every three years as SEAACA is a public agency providing animal control services in the Southeast area; and B. Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute an Agreement with SEAACA, in substantially the same form as submitted, for animal control services for a total amount not-to-exceed $150,000, for a 5-year term. Background The Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) is requesting approval to execute an agreement with SEAACA for on-call animal control support services. The Director of DHEC serves as the City of Vernon Animal Control Officer, overseeing the enforcement of the City’s animal control laws. Since 1980, the City has contracted with SEAACA, an independent unit of government (Joint Powers Authority), to provide on-call animal-control support services. The most recent agreement with SEAACA was approved on July 2, 2019 and was for a 5-year term beginning July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2024. The proposed agreement with SEAACA, is exempt from competitive bidding in accordance with Vernon Municipal Code (VMC) Section 3.32.110(A)(5), which provides an exemption for “contracts with governmental entities for supplies, equipment or services.” SEAACA is a governmental entity that provides a unique service that is commercially unreasonable to rebid every three years. Accordingly, the proposed agreement stipulates a 5-year term (July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2029). City Council approval of the proposed Agreement is required based on the total contract amount exceeding $100,000 pursuant to VMC Section 3.32.040(A) and based on the 5-year term, as pursuant to VMC Sections 3.32.220(B) and 3.32.110 (B)(3), only Council has the authority to make the finding that it is “commercially unreasonable” to rebid this contract in three years. The proposed agreement also allows for annual fee adjustments with the consent of both parties. In accordance with VMC Section 3.32.220(C), SEAACA’s fees are equivalent to its direct costs for providing services, and potential fee increases would be limited to a pass-through of increased costs charged to the contractor. The proposed agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office. Fiscal Impact . . Item 15 Page 1 of 2 The fiscal impact is estimated at $150,000. Sufficient funds are available in the General Fund, Health Department, Professional Services Technical Account No. 011-020-200-529225 for the current fiscal year and will be budgeted in subsequent years. Attachments 1. SEAACA Agreement . . Item 15 Page 2 of 2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ VERNON 2024 - 2025 1 8/5/2024 AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into this 1st day of July 2024 by and between the SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY, whose address is 9777 SEAACA Street, Downey, California 90241 (herein "SEAACA") and the CITY OF VERNON, a California Municipal corporation, whose address is 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058 (herein "CITY"), (cumulatively the “Parties”). RECITALS A.SEAACA is a public agency organized by the cities of Downey, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Bell Gardens, Montebello, Paramount, Santa Fe Springs and South El Monte pursuant to the provisions of Section 6500 et seq. of the California Government Code for the purpose of providing animal control services within the boundaries of those cities and such other municipal corporations as are approved by SEAACA: B.SEAACA has performed animal control services for the CITY during the fiscal years 1980- 1981 through 2023-2024 in accordance with Agreements, and the CITY and SEAACA desire to continue the contractual relationship. C.Both CITY and SEAACA have authorized entering into this Agreement by formal action of their respective governing bodies, taken at properly noticed public meetings. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION I. SEAACA AGREES: 1.To perform the following services for CITY: a.The impounding and picking up of stray, sick or injured animals from the public streets and private property; b.The enforcement of applicable leash law requirements; c.The operation of animal control shelters; d.The enforcement of applicable rabies vaccination requirements; e.The enforcement of applicable standards for animal care; f.The enforcement of applicable State statutes and ordinances, and such other services as are customarily rendered by SEAACA. 2.To provide kennel and animal shelter services to CITY at 9777 SEAACA Street, Downey, California. At that facility SEAACA shall accept all animals delivered for impound from CITY on a 24-hour-a-day, seven-days-a-week basis. 3.During the course of this Agreement, CITY shall be provided animal control services as needed and pursuant to a request for emergency or routine services by the CITY or its Police Department or CITY Residents. 4.That if requested in writing by CITY, additional hours of patrol and called for services, as described herein, may be performed by SEAACA when SEAACA determines that such additional services will not interfere with the maintenance level of the animal control services provided elsewhere by SEAACA. CITY will pay for such additional services in such amounts as are agreed to by SEAACA and CITY. 5.To maintain its kennels and animal shelter in a humane manner and keep said premises in. . Item 15 Page 1 of 6 _______________________________________________________________________________________ VERNON 2024 - 2025 2 8/5/2024 a sanitary condition at all times; to comply with all applicable laws of the State of California; and to give the prescribed notices and humane methods for the care and destruction of any animal coming under its jurisdiction. 6. At CITY's request, as set forth in this section, to inspect and canvass all properties within the CITY to determine the location at which animals are present, provided, however, SEAACA shall not be involved in the actual issuance of licenses for any such animals. If CITY desires this service, it agrees to give SEAACA thirty (30) days written notice prior to the start of the Fiscal Year in which the inspection and canvass is to be performed. Fiscal Year shall be the period from July 1 through June 30. If CITY requests this inspection and canvass, it further agrees to pay to SEAACA the amount that will be calculated and presented to the CITY fifteen (15) days prior to the start of the Fiscal Year. SECTION II. CITY AGREES: 1. To cooperate and assist SEAACA in performing its obligations hereunder. 2. To pay SEAACA during the first year of this Agreement in accordance with the schedule of fees outlined in the attachment, Exhibit "A", (hereinafter “Fee Schedule”) setting forth Field, Shelter and medical fees and billed to CITY periodically, said sum to be paid within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. The Fee Schedule shall be adjusted annually by mutual agreement of the Parties. Prior to the end of each year of this Agreement the Parties shall commence negotiations for the Fee Schedule to apply for the next fiscal year. If the Parties are unable to agree upon a Fee Schedule, the Parties may terminate this Agreement. Each Fee Schedule after the first year of this contract shall be reduced to writing and signed by all Parties. If payment is not delivered to SEAACA within thirty (30) days after CITY's receipt of invoice, payment shall be considered to be delinquent and SEAACA is entitled to recover interest thereon. Said interest shall be at the rate of 1% per calendar month or any portion thereof on delinquent funds. If such payment is not delivered to SEAACA within the time set forth hereinabove, SEAACA may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of the CITY on deposit or to the credit of SEAACA, without giving further notice to CITY of SEAACA's intent to do so. 3. To furnish to SEAACA at CITY's own cost and expense, any notices, forms, or other documents of a similar nature which are to be issued in the name of the CITY. SECTION III. THE PARTIES AGREE: 1. That the services to be performed by SEAACA shall only encompass those duties and functions of SEAACA which are rendered by it, and which is authorized to provide pursuant to the provisions of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and the statutes of this State. 2. That the rendition of services performed hereunder, the standard of performance and other matters incidental to the performance of such services and control of personnel so employed shall remain in SEAACA. In the event that a dispute arises between SEAACA and the CITY as to the extent of the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder or the manner of the performance of such services, the determination thereof shall be made by SEAACA. 3. That for the purpose of performing all functions, SEAACA shall furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, equipment and supplies necessary to provide the level of services to be rendered hereunder. . . Item 15 Page 2 of 6 _______________________________________________________________________________________ VERNON 2024 - 2025 3 8/5/2024 4. That all persons employed by SEAACA in the performance of this Agreement shall be SEAACA employees and no CITY employee as such shall be taken over by said SEAACA, and no person employed hereunder shall have any CITY pension, civil service, or any status or right. For the purpose of performing such services and functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof where necessary, every SEAACA officer and employee engaged in the performance of any service hereunder shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of said CITY while performing services for said CITY, which services are within the scope of this Agreement. SECTION IV. INDEMNIFICATION 1. That CITY shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, or other compensation for any SEAACA personnel performing services hereunder for said SEAACA, or any liability other than that provided for in this Agreement. Except as herein otherwise specified the CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any SEAACA employee for injury or sickness arising out of his/her employment. 2. That SEAACA, its officers and employees, shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts of said CITY or of any officer or employee thereof, nor for any defective or dangerous condition of the property of the CITY, and CITY shall hold SEAACA and its officers and employees harmless from, and shall defend SEAACA and the officers and employees thereof against any claim for damages resulting there from. 3. That CITY, its officers and employees shall not be deemed to assume any liability for intentional or negligent acts of SEAACA or of any officer or employee thereof, and SEAACA shall hold CITY and its officers and employees harmless from and shall defend CITY and the officers and employees thereof against any claim for damages resulting there from. SECTION V. INSURANCE SEAACA is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (California JPIA) and participates in self-insurance and commercial insurance programs administered by the California JPIA for its members. Primary Liability Program, including Automobile Liability Coverage Limit is $2,000,000 per occurrence, Annual Aggregate Limit shall be $2,000,000; Workers’ Compensation Program Coverage Limits shall be Statutory, Employers Liability is $1,000,000. SECTION VI. TERM That the term of this Agreement shall be for the period of five years, July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029, inclusive, unless the Agreement is terminated as herein provided. CITY AND SEAACA may extend this agreement for an additional five-year period by mutual written agreement. Should SEAACA default during the term of this Agreement in the performance of its obligations as set forth herein and fail to cure said default within fifteen (15) days' written notice to do so, then CITY may terminate this Agreement, and upon payment to SEAACA of monies owing to SEAACA for satisfactory performances rendered pursuant to this Agreement and through the date of said termination, thereafter, there shall be no obligation of the CITY to SEAACA. Should CITY fail to pay the sums owing to SEAACA as provided hereunder or otherwise default in any provision of this Agreement and fail to cure said default within fifteen (15) days' written notice to . . Item 15 Page 3 of 6 _______________________________________________________________________________________ VERNON 2024 - 2025 4 8/5/2024 do so then SEAACA may terminate this Agreement and upon the effective date of the termination, there shall be no further obligation of SEAACA to the CITY. Such termination shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights SEAACA may have against CITY for any sums due to SEAACA under the terms of this Agreement. SECTION VII. AMENDMENT This Agreement shall not be amended, or any provision or breach hereof waived, except in writing signed by the parties expressly referring to this Agreement. SECTION VIII. NOTICE That any notice required to be sent hereunder shall be deemed received if addressed to the address of the parties as set forth hereunder and deposited, postage prepaid, in the United States Post Office, or to such other address as the parties may, from time to time, in writing, furnish to the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF VERNON by order of its City Council caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk, and SEAACA, by order of its Commission, has caused this Agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of said Commission and attested by the Executive Director of said Commission. . . Item 15 Page 4 of 6 _______________________________________________________________________________________ VERNON 2024 - 2025 5 8/5/2024 AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHEAST AREA ANMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL AND SHELTERING SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 -Signature Page- CITY OF VERNON BY: ____________________________________ Judith Merlo, Mayor SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY BY: ____________________________________ Tony Ayala, Chairperson ATTEST: _________________________________ Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: ________________________________ Zaynah N. Moussa, City Attorney ATTEST: _____________________________ Denise Woodside, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: _____________________________ Scott Nichols, SEAACA Attorney . . Item 15 Page 5 of 6 _______________________________________________________________________________________ VERNON 2024 - 2025 6 8/5/2024 EXHIBIT A FEES SCHEDULE: JULY 1, 2024, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025 AGREEMENT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL AND SHELTERING SERVICES - CITY OF VERNON ITEM UNIT COST Field Officer Service, per hour $102.08 Shelter of live animals; per animal, per day $ 21.10 Special holding, quarantine impounds; Per animal, per day $ 34.04 Veterinary medical services, per impound $110.00 Impoundment of livestock, per animal $185.00 Use of special equipment, per hour $125.00 . . Item 15 Page 6 of 6 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Michael Earl, Director of Human Resources Department:Human Resources Submitted by:Lisa Wirtz, Human Resources Analyst Subject 2025 Calendar Year Medical, Dental, Vision, Life, and Employee Assistance Program Benefit Proposals for City Employees and Retirees Recommendation Approve the acceptance of the 2025 Calendar Year Medical, Dental, Vision, Life, and Employee Assistance program proposals and authorize the City Administrator to execute 2025 calendar year carrier agreements with Blue Shield of California, Anthem, MetLife, EyeMed, Lincoln Financial, and Anthem PRISM EAP. Background Each year, with the assistance of the City’s insurance benefits brokerage and consulting firm, currently Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., the City reviews its various lines of coverage for employees and retirees to ensure the City is continuously receiving competitive rates. Blue Shield of California currently provides four (4) medical plans for employees and early retirees. For calendar year 2025, Blue Shield of California submitted a proposal with the desired benefits and coverage at competitive rates. The Access+ HMO 15, TRIO ACO HMO 15, PPO Combined Deductible and the HDHP PPO Savings Embedded plans were negotiated between the carrier and broker with a final renewal rate increase of 3%. Blue Shield of California has continuously provided the City with competitive rates while maintaining the same level of coverage for employees and retirees. In 2024, the renewal for all Blue Shield plans came in at a 6% increase. The City’s final negotiated renewal premium rate increases continue to remain below the market trend for comparable plans in the state of California. In addition, Blue Shield of California has continuously provided a wellness stipend of between $25,000 an $30,000 for which the City may use to offset the cost of providing a variety of programs and services. For 2025, Blue Shield of California has increased the wellness stipend to $40,000. Furthermore, Blue Shield of California is offering a Special Premium Arrangement equal to 25% of the first month’s gross premium, not to exceed $101,918, which will be applied as a credit towards the City’s invoice. It is recommended that the City continue to contract with Blue Shield of California for the 2025 calendar year. Anthem currently provides two (2) Medicare plans for retirees. For calendar year 2025, Anthem submitted a proposal with the desired benefits coverage at competitive rates consistent with the Medicare plan market. Regulatory changes for both medical and prescription drug coverage in this market has resulted in larger premium increases for 2025 than historically seen with Medicare plans. The Anthem Medicare HMO was negotiated with a final rate increase of 26.9% and the Anthem Medicare PPO was negotiated at a final rate increase of 21.3%. Anthem has continuously provided the City with competitive rates while maintaining the same level of coverage for Medicare-eligible retirees. It is recommended that the City continue to contract with Anthem for the 2025 calendar year. MetLife currently provides two (2) dental plans for employees and retirees. For 2025, MetLife submitted a proposal with the desired benefits and coverage at competitive rates. The Dental . . Item 16 Page 1 of 2 HMO plan is in a rate guarantee with no increase for the 2025 calendar year. For the Dental PPO plan, MetLife has proposed an increase of 6%. It is recommended that the City continue to contract with MetLife for the 2025 calendar year. EyeMed currently provides vision insurance benefits for City employees. There is no change in premiums for the 2025 plan year. It is recommended that the City continue to contract with EyeMed to provide vision insurance benefits for 2025. Mutual of Omaha is our current provider for the City’s Basic Life Insurance, Voluntary Life Insurance, and Voluntary Long Term Disability benefits for employees and eligible dependents. Alliant Insurance Services presented two (2) additional carriers that provided competitive quotes. Lincoln Financial offered to match our existing plan design as Mutual of Omaha provides at a cost savings of 16.9% in Basic Life Insurance premiums with a three (3) year rate guarantee. In addition, Lincoln includes a benefit enhancement allowing for two (2) incremental increases in voluntary coverage above the Guaranteed Issue amount and without requiring Evidence of Insurability (EOI). It is recommended that the City change life insurance carriers and contract with Lincoln Financial for the 2025 calendar year. The City also provides an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) benefit provided through Anthem PRISM EAP. The renewal for the EAP provides the same coverage with no increase in premiums for 2025. It is recommended that the City continue to contract with Anthem PRISM EAP for the 2025 calendar year. Fiscal Impact The total annual estimated premium for all lines of coverage is $5,449,457. The amount will vary based on enrollment of employees and retirees and their plan selections. Furthermore, the total annual premium is offset by employee and retiree contributions. Below is a breakdown of the approximate cost per line of coverage: Blue Shield of California: $4,892,052 Anthem: $249,647 MetLife: $253,526 EyeMed: $46,267 Lincoln: $3,666 Anthem PRISM EAP: $4,299 Sufficient funds for this expenditure are available in the Insurance Premiums – Medical Account for each City Department’s Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget and will be subsequently budgeted for the remainder of the renewal period. Attachments 1. Benefit Renewal Confirmation Documents . . Item 16 Page 2 of 2 701 B Street, 6th Floor, San Diego,CA 92101 September 10, 2024 Danita Mitchell Blue Shield Please accept this as formal confirmation to Blue Shield on behalf of the City of Vernon for their medical plans. PLAN AND RATE CONFIRMATION Line of Coverage: Access + HMO 15, Trio ACO HMO 15, PPO, HDHP PPO Policy #: W0065496 Rate Guarantee: 1 year rate guarantee (1/1/2025 – 12/31/2025) Renewing as is with the following changes: - ALL Rx Riders, All PPO Savings Plans: o Brand Drugs with generic equivalents or biosimilar drugs - To encourage the use of generic and biosimilar drugs, a member must pay the difference between the brand drug and its generic equivalent or biosimilar drug plus the applicable copay of the brand drug when the member or provider requests the brand drug. - Rx Home Delivery - Amazon Rx Home delivery will be replacing CVS Caremark as our mail order partner. Impacted members will be notified fall of 2024. - Full PPO Savings Two-Tier Embedded Deductible 2800/3300/5200 with $0 HDHP Preventive Drug Benefit o In accordance with IRS guidelines,the High Deductible Health Plan deductible will be increased to the minimum value of $1,650 per individual and $3,300 per family. The out-of-pocket maximum has also been raised to align with these minimum deductible values. Blue Shield Access + HMO 15: EE Only: $902.87 EE + SP: $1701.90 EE + Child(ren): $1543.59 EE + Family: $2399.29 Blue Shield TRIO ACO HMO 15: EE Only: $682.78 EE + SP: $1502.10 EE + Child(ren): $1229.00 EE + Family: $2116.60 Blue Shield PPO: EE Only: $998.62 EE + SP: $2196.99 EE + Child(ren): $1797.53 EE + Family: $3095.76 . . Item 16 Page 1 of 9 701 B Street, 6th Floor, San Diego,CA 92101 Blue Shield HDHP PPO: EE Only: $698.97 EE + SP: $1542.16 EE + Child(ren): $1261.06 EE + Family: $2174.54 Special Premium Arrangement SPA in the amount equivalent to 25% of first month’s gross premium (premium + producer service fee) not to exceed $101,918 from 1/1/2025 through 12/31/2025 policy year. Dollars will be paid by BSC directly to the group in the form of a credit to billed premium. However, if the group terminates with Blue Shield prior to 12/31/2025, the group will be required to remit all the money associated with the SPA at the time of termination. Wellness Allowance $40,000 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES COMMISSION CONFIRMATION Net Commissions Once the below items are available, please provide: • SBCs • Electronic Versions of Enrollment Materials (anything that would normally be included in an open enrollment packet so the group can have it electronically – employee enrollment and change forms, etc.) • Final Sold Plan Summaries • Contracts • Contact Sheet for Employer Use If all the above is confirmed by you, please sign this letter below. Sincerely, Paul Cocanour Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. ____________________________________ _________________________________ Date . . Item 16 Page 2 of 9 September 11, 2024 Peter Cassidy Anthem Please accept this as formal confirmation to Anthem on behalf of the City of Vernon for their Medicare plans. PLAN AND RATE CONFIRMATION Line of Coverage: Anthem Advantage HMO and Anthem LPPO $10P High plans. Policy #: CAEGR030 Guarantee: 1 year rate guarantee (1/1/2025 – 12/31/2025) Renewing as is with no benefit changes. Anthem Advantage HMO: Medicare HMO PEPM: $435.03 Anthem LPPO: Medicare PPO PEPM: $524.96 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES COMMISSION CONFIRMATION Net of commissions Once the below items are available, please provide: • SBCs • Electronic Versions of Enrollment Materials (anything that would normally be included in an open enrollment packet so the group can have it electronically – employee enrollment and change forms, etc.) • Final Sold Plan Summaries • Contracts • Contact Sheet for Employer Use If all the above is confirmed by you, please sign this letter below. Sincerely, Paul Cocanour Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. ____________________________________ ___9/11/24______________________ Date . . Item 16 Page 3 of 9 Please accept this as formal confirmation to MetLife on behalf of the City of Vernon for their Dental PPO plan. PLAN AND RATE CONFIRMATION Line of Coverage: MetLife Dental PPO Policy #: 5956024 Rate Guarantee: 1 year rate guarantee (1/1/2025 12/31/2025) Renewing as is with no plan changes. EE only: $64.48 EE + Spouse: $127.07 EE + Child(ren): $155.63 EE + Family: $237.42 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES COMMISSION CONFIRMATION Net Commissions (please confirm)- Correct Once the below items are available, please provide: SBC- These are only updated when there have been changes to the plans. Electronic Versions of Enrollment Materials (anything that would normally be included in an open enrollment packet so the group can have it electronically employee enrollment and change forms, etc.) Since the group is on a file feed all eligibility updates should be fed over directly on the file feed. Attached are EE facing flyers. Final Sold Plan Summaries- Attached Contracts- We only provide updated contracts when there have been changes to the plans and even then we would only provide a certificate rider. Since there are no changes for 2025 the current contracts remain valid. Contact Sheet for Employer Use- Attached If all the above is confirmed by you, please sign this letter below. . . Item 16 Page 4 of 9 . . Item 16 Page 5 of 9 . . Item 16 Page 6 of 9 . . Item 16 Page 7 of 9 . . Item 16 Page 8 of 9 . . Item 16 Page 9 of 9 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Freddie Agyin, Director of Health and Environmental Control Department:Health and Environmental Control Submitted by:Veronica Petrosyan, Deputy Director of Health and Environmental Control Subject Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) for Safe, Clean Water Program Funds (Measure W) Recommendation Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute a Transfer Agreement between the City of Vernon and the District, in substantially the same form as submitted, to receive Measure W funds for a 4-year term. Background In November 2018, the Los Angeles County voters approved Measure W, the Safe, Clean Water Program. This initiative aims to enhance local water supply, improve water quality, and safeguard public health. Additionally, the SCWP assists municipalities in meeting the requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. According to Section 16.04.A.2 of the District Code, 40% of annual SCWP tax revenues will be allocated to municipalities within the District. The distribution will be proportional to the amount of revenue collected in each municipality. Furthermore, Section 16.05.A.1 mandates that municipalities must establish a Transfer Agreement with the District before receiving SCWP funds. On August 6, 2024, the City Council approved to execute Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 between the City of Vernon and the District to receive annual Safe, Clean Water Program funds (Measure W) for a 4-year term (Attachment 2). Subsequent to the approval, the City received a revised agreement from the District which added Section VII - Execution of Agreement to outline the signature requirements. The updated version of the agreement must be executed by the City to receive SCWP funds. The updated Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 has been reviewed and approved as-to-form by the City Attorney’s Office. Fiscal Impact Entering into this Transfer Agreement will result in an estimated $925,000 in revenue to the General Fund, which will be allocated annually through the budget process to the Public Works and Health Departments. Attachments 1. Updated Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 2. August 6, 2024 Agenda Report . . Item 17 Page 1 of 1 TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND VERNON AGREEMENT NO. 2024MP81 SAFE, CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – MUNICIPAL PROGRAM This Transfer Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Agreement,” is entered into as of by and between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "District," and Vernon, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality." WHEREAS, District, pursuant to the Los Angeles Region Safe, Clean Water (SCW) Program ordinance (Chapter 16 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code) and the SCW Program Implementation Ordinance (Chapter 18 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code), administers the SCW Program for the purpose of funding Projects and Programs to increase stormwater and urban runoff capture and reduce stormwater and urban runoff pollution in the District; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.04.A.2. of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, forty percent (40%) of annual SCW Program tax revenues shall be allocated to Municipalities within the District, in the same proportion as the amount of revenues collected within each Municipality, to be expended by those cities within the cities' respective jurisdictions and by the County within the unincorporated areas that are within the boundaries of the District, for the implementation, operation and maintenance, and administration of Projects and Programs, in accordance with the criteria and procedures established in this Chapters 16 and 18 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.05.A.1. of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, prior to their receipt of SCW Program funds, Municipalities must enter into an agreement with the District to transfer SCW Program funds; WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors has approved a standard template Agreement, as required by and in accordance with Section 18.09 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, for the transfer of SCW Program funds to Municipalities. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, mutual representations, covenants and agreements in this Agreement, the District and the Municipality, each binding itself, its successors and assigns, do mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS The definitions set forth in Sections 16.03 and 18.02 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code shall apply to this Agreement. In addition, the following definitions shall also apply: “Agreement” means this Transfer Agreement, including all exhibits and attachments hereto. “Annual Plan” means the plan referred to in Section 18.09.B.5 of the Code that includes the contents specified in Exhibit A. "Code" means the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code. “Days” means calendar days unless otherwise expressly indicated. “Fiscal Year” means the period of twelve (12) months terminating on June 30 of any year. “Safe Clean Water (SCW) Program Payment” means the Municipality's annual allocation of SCW Program funds as described in Section 16.04.A.2. of the Code disbursed by the District to the Municipality. “Year” means calendar year unless otherwise expressly indicated. II. PARTY CONTACTS The District and the Municipality designate the following individuals as the primary points of contact and communication regarding the Municipal Program and the administration and implementation of this Agreement. Los Angeles County Flood Control District Municipality: Vernon Name: Haris Harouny Name: Address: 900 S Fremont Ave, Alhambra, CA 91803 Address: Phone: (626) 300-2620 Phone: Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 1 of 14 July 1, 2024 Veronica Petorsyan 4305 Santa Fe Ave, Vernon, CA 90058 (323) 826-1448 . . Item 17 Page 1 of 14 Email: hharouny@dpw.lacounty.gov Email: Either party to this Agreement may change the individual identified as the primary point of contact above by providing written notice of the change to the other party. III.EXHIBITS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The following exhibits to this Agreement, including any amendments and supplements hereto, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement: EXHIBIT A – ANNUAL PLAN CONTENTS EXHIBIT B – GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS EXHIBIT C – NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS (Best Management Practices) EXHIBIT D – OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT IV.MUNICIPAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION A.The Municipality shall annually prepare and submit to the District, an Annual Plan. The Annual Plan shall be submitted not later than 90-days prior to the start of the Fiscal Year for which the Plan is prepared. B.The Municipality shall utilize the SCW Program Payments in compliance with Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. C.The Municipality shall comply with the terms and conditions in Exhibits B, C, and D, of this Agreement, and all applicable provisions of Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code, specifically including, without limitation, Section 18.06. V.SCW PROGRAM PAYMENTS TO MUNICIPALITIES A.SCW Program Payments will generally be available for disbursement by December 31, provided a duly executed transfer agreement is in effect and subject to the Municipality's compliance with the conditions described in paragraph B, below; however the District may, in its discretion, change the date and number of the actual disbursements for any Fiscal Year based on the amount and timing of revenues actually collected by the District. B.The District shall disburse the Municipality's SCW Program Payment upon satisfaction of the following conditions: (1) the District has received the Annual Progress/Expenditure Report required pursuant to Section 18.06.D of the Code; (2) the District has received Municipality's Annual Plan for that Fiscal Year, and (3) the Municipality has complied with the audit requirements of Section B-6 of Exhibit B. C.Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no disbursement shall be made at any time or in any manner that is in violation of or in conflict with federal, state, County laws, policies, or regulations. D.All disbursements shall be subject to and be made in accordance with the terms and conditions in this Agreement and Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. VI.TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall expire at the end of the 2027-28 Fiscal Year. The parties shall thereafter enter into a new agreement based on the most recent standard template agreement approved by the Board. VII.EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be executed simultaneously or in any number of counterparts, including both counterparts that are executed manually on paper and counterparts that are in form of electronic records and are executed electronically, whether digital or encrypted, each of which shall be deemed an original and together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The District and the Municipality hereby agree to regard facsimile/electronic representations of original signatures of authorized officers of each party, when appearing in appropriate places on this Agreement and on any addenda or amendments thereto, delivered or sent via facsimile or electronic mail or other electronic means, as legally sufficient evidence that such original signatures have been affixed to this Agreement and any addenda or amendments thereto such that the parties need not follow up facsimile/electronic transmissions of such documents with subsequent (non- facsimile/electronic) transmission of “original” versions of such documents. Further, the District and the Municipality: (i) agree that an electronic signature of any party may be used to authenticate this Agreement or any addenda or amendment thereto, and if used, will have the same force and effect as a manual signature; (ii) acknowledge that if an electronic signature is used, the other party will rely on such signature as binding the party using signature, and (iii) hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this agreement based on the foregoing forms of signature. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 2 of 14 vpetrosyan@cityofvernon.org . . Item 17 Page 2 of 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. By: Name: Title: Date: LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: By: Name: Title: Date: Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 3 of 14 ATTEST: ___________________Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________Zaynah N. Moussa,City Attorney Daniel Calleros Interim City Administrator . . Item 17 Page 3 of 14 EX H IB IT A – AN N U AL P L AN C ON T EN TS A -1. D escription of all projects anticipated to be funded using the S C W P rogram P ayment. Include a discussion of how the projects will result in the achi evement of one or more S C W P rogram Goals, i ncluding quantitative targets and corresponding metrics for subsequent reporti ng of all applicable parameters. A -2. D escription of all programs anticipated to be funded using the S C W P rogram P ayment. Include a discussi on of how the programs will result in the achievement of one or more S C W P rogram Goals; including quanti tative targets and corresponding metri cs for subsequent reporting of all applicable parameters. A -3. D escription of all operation and maintenance activities anti cipated to be funded using the S C W P rogram P ayment. Include a di scussion of how those activi ties will result in the achievement of one or more S C W P rogram Goals. A ddi tional operati on and maintenance activiti es, even if funded by other sources, should be referenced to provide an overview of anticipated overall project approach. A -4. D escription of the stakeholder and community outreach/engagement acti vities anticipated to be funded with the S C W P rogram P ayment, including discussion of how local N GOs or C B Os will be involved, if applicable, and if not, why. A dditional outreach/engagement activities, even if funded by other sources, should be referenced to provide an overview of anticipated overall project approach. A -5. D escription of post-construction monitoring for projects completed using the S C W P rogram P ayment. A dditional post-construction monitoring acti vities, even if funded by other sources, should be referenced to provide an overview of anticipated overall project approach. A -6. P rovide the status of any projects that have been awarded (or are seeking award of) Institute for S ustainable Infrastructure (IS I) verification, i f applicable. A -7. P rovide the budget for the acti vities described in provisions A 1 through A -5 S C W P rogram P ayment. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 4 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 4 of 14 E X H IB IT B – GE N E R AL TE R MS AN D C ON D IT ION S B -1. A ccounting and D eposit of F unding D isbursement 1.S C W P rogram P ayments di stributed to the Municipality shall be held i n a separate interest-bearing account and shall not be combined with other funds. Interest earned from each account shall be used by the Municipality only for eligi ble expenditures consistent with the requirements of the S C W P rogram. 2.The Municipali ty shall not be entitled to interest earned on undisbursed S C W P rogram P ayments; interest earned prior to disbursement is property of the D istrict. 3.The Municipali ty shall operate in accordance with Generally A ccepted A ccounting P rinciples (G A A P ). 4.The Municipali ty shall be strictly accountable for all funds, receipts, and disbursements for their S C W P rogram P ayment. B -2. A cknowledgement of C redit and S i gnage The Municipality shall include appropriate acknowledgement of credit to the D istrict’s S afe, C lean Water P rogram for i ts support when promoting acti vities funded with S C W P rogram funds or using any data and/or information developed S C W P rogram funds. When the S C W P rogram P ayment is used, in whole or in part, for construction of an infrastructure P roject, signage shall be posted in a prominent location at P roject site(s) or at the Municipality’s headquarters and shall include the S afe, C lean Water P rogram color logo and the following disclosure statement: “F undi ng for thi s project has been provided in full or in part from the L os A ngeles C ounty F lood C ontrol D istrict’s S afe, C lean Water P rogram.” A t a minimum the sign shall be 2’ x 3’ in size. The Muni cipali ty shall also include in each of its contracts for work under this A greement a provision that i ncorporates the requi rements stated within this paragraph. W hen the S C W P rogram P ayment is used, in whole or i n part, for a scientifi c study, the Municipali ty shall include the following statement in the study report: “F unding for this study has been provi ded in full or in part from the L os A ngeles C ounty F lood C ontrol D istri ct’s S afe, C lean Water P rogram.” The Municipali ty shall also include in each of its contracts for work under this A greement a provision that incorporates the requirements stated within this paragraph. B -3. A cquisition of Real P roperty - C ovenant A ny real property acquired i n whole or in part with S C W P rogram funds shall be used for P rojects and P rograms that are consistent with the S C W P rogram Goals and wi th the provisions of C hapter 16 and 18 of the C ode. A ny Municipality that acquires the fee title to real property using, in whole or i n part, S C W P rogram funds shall record a document in the office of the Regi strar-Recorder/C ounty C lerk containing a covenant not to sell or otherwise convey the real property without the prior express wri tten consent of the D istrict, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. B -4. A mendment E xcept as provided in S ection II of the A greement, no amendment or variation of the terms of this A greement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties. No oral or written understanding or agreement not incorporated in this A greement is binding on any of the parties. B -5. A ssignment The Municipality shall not assign this A greement. B -6. A udit and Recordkeeping 1.The Municipali ty shall retain for a period of seven (7) years, all records necessary in accordance with Generally A ccepted A ccounting P rinci ples to determine the amounts expended, and eli gibility of P rojects implemented using S C W P rogram P ayments. The Municipality, upon demand by authorized representatives of the D i strict, shall make such records avai lable for examination and review or audi t by the D istrict or its authori zed representatives. Records shall include accounting records, wri tten policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files, i ncluding documentation covering negotiated settlements, i nvoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary to substantiate charges related to S C W P rogram P ayments and expenditures. 2.The Municipali ty is responsible for obtaining an i ndependent audit to determi ne compliance with the terms and conditions of this A greement and all requirements applicable to the Municipality contained i n chapters 16 and 18 of the C ode. Municipality shall obtain an independent audit of their S C W P rogram P ayments every three (3) years. A udits shall be funded with Municipal P rogram funds. 3.Municipality shall file a copy of all audit reports by the ninth (9 ) month from the end of each three (3) year period th Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 5 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 5 of 14 to detail the preceding three (3) years of expenditures. A udit reports shall be posted on the D istrict’s publi cly accessible website. D ue date example below. Every Third Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Audit Begins Audit Report Due to District 2023-24 7/1/2027 No later than 3/31/2028 4.Upon reasonable advanced request, the Municipality shall permit the C hief E ngineer to examine the infrastructure P rojects using S C W P rogram P ayments. The Municipality shall permi t the authorized D istrict representative, i ncluding the A uditor-C ontroller, to examine, review, audi t, and transcribe any and all audit reports, other reports, books, accounts, papers, maps, and other records that relate to the S C W P rogram P ayments. E xamination activities are considered D istrict administration of the S C W P rogram. 5.E xpenditures determi ned by an audit to be in violation of any provision of C hapters 16 or 18 of the C ode, or of this A greement, shall be subject to the enforcement and remedy provisions of S ection 18.14 of the C ode. B -7. Availabi lity of F unds D istrict’s obligation to disburse the S C W P rogram P ayment is contingent upon the availability of sufficient funds to permit the disbursements provided for herein. If sufficient funds are not available for any reason including, but not limited to, failure to fund allocations necessary for disbursement of the S C W P rogram P ayment, the D istrict shall not be obligated to make any disbursements to the Municipality under this A greement. This provision shall be construed as a condition precedent to the obligation of the D istrict to make any disbursements under this A greement. Nothing i n this A greement shall be construed to provide the Municipality with a right of priori ty for disbursement over any other Municipality. If any di sbursements due to the Municipality under this A greement are deferred because sufficient funds are unavailable, it is the intention of the D istrict that such disbursement wi ll be made to the Municipality when sufficient funds do become available, but this intention is not binding. If this A greement’s funding for any F iscal Year is reduced or deleted by order of the B oard, the D istrict shall have the option to either cancel this A greement wi th no liability occurring to the D istrict or offer an amendment to the Muni ci pality to reflect the reduced amount. B -8. C hoice of L aw The laws of the S tate of C alifornia govern this A greement. B -9. C laims A ny claim of the Muni cipality is limi ted to the rights, remedies, and claims procedures provi ded to the Municipality under this A greement. Municipal expenditures of a S C W P rogram P ayment that involves the D istrict shall utilize a separate and specific agreement to that P roject that includes appropriate indemnificati on supersedi ng that in this A greement. B -10. C ompliance with S C W P rogram The Municipality shall comply with and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all provisi ons of C hapters 16 and 18 of the C ode. B -11. C ompliance with L aw, Regulations, etc. The Municipality shall, at all times, comply with and requi re its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, guidelines, regulations, and requirements. B -12. C onti nuous Use of Munici pal P rojects; L ease or D isposal of Munici pal P rojects The Municipality shall not abandon, substantially discontinue use of, lease, or dispose of all or a significant part or porti on of any P roject funded i n whole or in part with S C W P rogram P ayments during the useful life (defined as 30 years unless specified otherwise in annual plans and subsequent reports) of the P roject wi thout prior written approval of the D istrict. S uch approval may be condi tioned as determined to be appropriate by the D i strict, i ncluding a condition requiring repayment of a pro rata amount of the S C W P rogram P ayments used to fund the P roject together with interest on said amount accrui ng from the date of lease or disposal of the P roject. B -13. D isputes S hould a dispute arise between the parties, the party asserting the dispute wi ll notify the other parti es in writing of the dispute. The parties will then meet and confer within 21 calendar days of the notice in a good faith attempt to resolve the dispute. If the matter has not been resolved through the process set forth in the precedi ng paragraph, any party may initiate mediati on of the dispute. Mediation will be before a retired judge or mediation service mutually agreeable to the parties. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 6 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 6 of 14 A ll costs of the mediation, including mediator fees, will be paid one-half by the D istri ct and one-half by the Munici pality. S C W P rogram P ayments shall not be used to pay for any costs of the mediation. The parties will attempt to resolve any dispute through the process set forth above before fili ng any action relating to the dispute in any court of law. B -14. F inal Inspecti on and C erti fi cation of Registered P rofessional Upon completi on of the design phase and before construction of a project, the Municipality shall provide certification by a C alifornia Registered P rofessional (i.e., P rofessional C i vil E ngineer, E ngineering Geologist) that the design has been completed. Upon completi on of the project, the Municipality shall provide for a final inspection and certification by a C aliforni a Registered P rofessional (i.e., P rofessional C ivil E ngineer, E ngineering Geologist), that the P roject has been completed in accordance with submitted final plans and specifications and any modificati ons thereto and in accordance with this A greement. B -15. F orce Majeure. In the event that Municipality i s delayed or hindered from the performance of any act required hereunder by reason of strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials not related to the price thereof, riots, i nsurrection, war, or other reasons of a like nature beyond the control of the Municipality, then performance of such acts shall be excused for the peri od of the delay, and the peri od for the performance of any such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay. B -16. F undi ng C onsiderations and E xclusions 1.A ll expenditures of S C W P rogram P ayments by Municipality must comply with the provisions of C hapters 16 and 18 of the L os A ngeles C ounty F lood C ontrol D istrict C ode, including but not limited to the provisions regarding eligible expenditures contained in S ection 16.05.A .2 and the provision regarding ineligible expenditures contained in S ection 16.05.A .3. 2.S C W P rogram P ayments shall not be used in connection with any P roject implemented as an E nhanced C ompli ance A ction ("E C A ") and/or S upplemental E nvironmental P roject ("S E P ") as defined by S tate Water Resources C ontrol B oard Office of E nforcement written policies, or any other P roject implemented pursuant to the settlement of an enforcement action or to offset monetary penalties imposed by the S tate Water Resources C ontrol B oard, a Regional Water Quality C ontrol B oard, or any other regulatory authority; provided, however, that S C W funds may be used for a P roject implemented pursuant to a time schedule order ("TS O") issued by the L os A ngeles Regi onal Water Quality C ontrol B oard if, at the time the TS O was issued, the P roject was included in an approved watershed management program (including enhanced watershed management programs) developed pursuant to the M S 4 P ermit. B -17. Indemnification The Municipality shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the D istrict, the C ounty of L os A ngeles and their elected and appointed offi cials, agents, and employees from and against any and all liabi lity and expense, including defense costs, legal fees, clai ms, actions, and causes of action for damages of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to bodi ly injury, death, personal injury, or property damage, arising from or in conjunction with: (1) any P roject or P rogram implemented by the Municipality, in whole or in part, with S C W P rogram P ayments or (2) any breach of this A greement by the Municipality. B -18. Independent A ctor The Municipality, and i ts agents and employees, if any, in the performance of this A greement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents of the D istri ct. The Municipality shall not contract work with a contractor who is in a period of debarment from any agency within the D istrict. (L A C C C hapter 2.202) B -19. Integration This is an integrated A greement. This A greement is intended to be a full and complete statement of the terms of the agreement between the D istrict and Muni cipality, and expressly supersedes any and all pri or oral or written agreements, covenants, representations and warranties, express or i mplied, concerning the subject matter of thi s A greement. B -20. L apsed F unds 1.The Municipali ty shall be able to carry over uncommitted S C W P rogram P ayments for up to five (5) years from Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 7 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 7 of 14 the end of the fiscal year in which those funds are transferred from the D istrict to the Munici pality. 2.If the Municipality is unable to expend the S C W P rogram P ayment wi thin five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year in which those funds are transferred from the D istri ct to the Munici pality, then lapsed funding procedures will apply. L apsed funds are funds that were transferred to the Muni cipality but were not committed to eligible expendi tures by the end of the fifth (5th) fiscal year after the fiscal year in which those funds were transferred from the D istrict. 3.L apsed funds shall be allocated by the Watershed A rea S teeri ng C ommittee of the respective Watershed A rea to a new P roject with benefit to that Municipality, if feasible in a reasonable time frame, or otherwise to the Watershed A rea. 4.In the event that funds are to lapse, due to circumstances beyond the Municipality’s control, then the Muni cipality may request an extension of up to twelve (12) months in which to commit the funds to eligible expenditures. E xtension Requests must contain sufficient justifi cation and be submitted to the D istrict in writing no later than three (3) months before the funds are to lapse. 5.The decision to grant an extension i s at the sole discretion of the D istri ct. 6.F unds still uncommitted to eli gible expenditures after an extension is granted will be subject to lapsed funding procedures wi thout exception. E xample B elow. Fiscal Year Transferred Funds Lapse After E xtension Request D ue C ommit By 2019-20 6/30/2025 No later than 3/31/2025 No later than 6/30/2026 B -21. Munici pal P roject A ccess Upon reasonable advance request, the Municipality shall ensure that the D istrict or any authorized representative, will have safe and suitable access to the site of any P roject i mplemented by the Municipality in whole or in part with S C W P rogram P ayments at all reasonable times. B -22. Non-D iscrimi nation The Municipality agrees to abide by all federal, state, and C ounty laws, regulations, and policies regardi ng non- discrimination i n employment and equal employment opportuni ty. B -23. No Third-P arty Rights The parties to this A greement do not create rights in, or grant remedies to, any third party as a beneficiary of thi s A greement, or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking establi shed herein B -24. Notice 1.The Municipali ty shall notify the D istrict in writing within five (5) working days of the occurrence of the following: a.B ankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the Municipality; or b.A cti ons taken pursuant to S tate law in anticipation of filing for bankruptcy. 2.The Municipali ty shall notify the D istrict wi thin ten (10) working days of any litigation pending or threatened agai nst the Municipali ty regarding its continued existence, consi deration of dissolution, or disincorporation. 3.The Municipali ty shall notify the D istrict promptly of the following: a.A ny signifi cant deviation from the submitted A nnual P lan for the current F iscal Year, including di scussion of any major changes to the scope of funded projects or programs, noteworthy delays i n implementation, reduction i n benefits or community engagement, and/or modificati ons that change the S C W P rogram Goals intended to be accomplished. b.D iscovery of any potenti al archaeologi cal or historical resource. S hould a potenti al archaeologi cal or histori cal resource be discovered during construction, the Municipality agrees that all work in the area of the find will cease until a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the situation and made recommendations regarding preservation of the resource, and the D istrict has determined what actions should be taken to protect and preserve the resource. The Municipality agrees to implement appropriate actions as di rected by the D istrict. c.A ny public or medi a event publicizing the accomplishments and/or results of this A greement and provide the opportunity for attendance and participation by D istrict representati ves wi th at least fourteen (14) days’ notice to the D istri ct. B -25. Munici pality’s Responsibili ty for Work The Municipality shall be responsible for all work and for persons or entities engaged in work performed pursuant to thi s A greement including, but not limited to, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and providers of services. The Municipality shall be responsible for responding to any and all disputes arising out of its contracts for work on the P roject. The D i strict will not mediate disputes between the Muni cipality and any other entity concerning responsibility for Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 8 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 8 of 14 performance of work. B -26. Reporting The Municipality shall be subject to and comply wi th all applicable requirements of the D istri ct regarding reporting requirements. Municipalities shall report available data through the S C W Reporting Module, once available. 1.A nnual P rogress/E xpenditure Reports. The Municipality shall submit A nnual P rogress/E xpenditure Reports, using a format provided by the D istrict, within six (6) months following the end of the F iscal Year to the D i strict to detail the activities of the pri or year. The A nnual P rogress/E xpenditure Reports shall be posted on the D istrict’s publicly accessible website and on the Municipali ty’s website. The A nnual P rogress/E xpenditure Report shall i nclude: a.A mount of funds received; b.B reakdown of how the S C W P rogram P ayment has been expended; c.D ocumentation that the S C W P rogram P ayment was used for eligi ble expenditures in accordance wi th C hapters 16 and 18 of the C ode; d.D escription of acti vities that have occurred, mi lestones achieved, and progress made to date, during the applicable reporti ng period including compari son to the A nnual P lan and corresponding metri cs; e.D iscussion of any existing gaps between what was planned and what was achieved for the prior year, include any lessons learned; f.D escription of the Water Quality B enefits, Water S upply B enefits, and C ommunity Investment B enefits and a summary of how S C W P rogram P ayments have been used to achieve S C W P rogram Goals for the prior year, including graphical representation of available data and speci fic metrics to demonstrate the benefits being achi eved through the years’ investments. g.D iscussion of alignment with other local, regional, and state efforts, resources, and plans, as applicable. Thi s includes di scussion of opportuni ties for addressing additional S C W P rogram Goals, leveragi ng S C W P rogram Goals, and increasing regional capacity to supplement the S C W P rogram. h.A dditional financial or P roject-related information in connection wi th activity funded in whole or i n part using S C W P rogram P ayments as required by the D istrict. i .C ertification from a C ali fornia Registered P rofessional (C i vil E ngi neer or Geologist, as appropriate), that projects implemented wi th S C W P rogram P ayments were conducted in accordance with C hapters 16 and 18 of the C ode. j.Report on annual and total (since inception of program) benefits provided by programs and projects funded by S C W P rogram P ayment. This i ncludes comparisons to annual plans and alignment wi th corresponding specific quantitati ve targets and metrics (note that S C W Reporting Module will facilitate calculation of benefi ts and graphi cal representation of pertinent data): i.A nnual volume of stormwater captured and treated ii.A nnual volume of stormwater captured and reused iii.A nnual volume of stormwater captured and recharged to a managed aquifer iv.A nnual creation, enhancement, or restoration of C ommunity Investment B enefits. If none, discuss considerations explored and reasons to not i nclude. v.A nnual acreage increases in Nature-B ased S oluti ons and claimed level of NB S (with matrix demonstrating determination of good, better, best, as outlined in E xhibit C ). If none, di scuss considerations explored and reasons to not i nclude. vi.A nnual expendi tures providing D A C B enefi ts. If none, discuss considerations explored and reasons to not include. 2.D ocumentation of the C ommunity Outreach and E ngagement utilized for and/or achi eved with the S C W P rogram P ayment described in the A nnual P lan E xhibit A . This informati on must be readily accessi ble to members of the public. 3.A s Needed Informati on or Reports. The Municipality agrees to promptly provide such reports, data, and i nformation as may be reasonably requested by the D istrict including, but not limited to material necessary or appropriate for evaluation of the S C W P rogram or to fulfill any reporting requi rements of the C ounty, state or federal government. B -27. Representations, Warranties, and C ommitments The Municipality represents, warrants, and commits as follows: 1.A uthorization and Vali dity. The execution and delivery of this A greement, including all incorporated documents, by the individual si gning on behalf of Municipality, has been duly authorized by the governing body of Municipality, as applicable. Thi s A greement constitutes a valid and bindi ng obligation of the Municipality, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by law. 2.No Violations. The execution, delivery, and performance by the Munici pality of this A greement, including all i ncorporated documents, do not violate any provision of any law or regulation i n effect as of the date set forth on the first page hereof, or result in any breach or default under any contract, obligation, indenture, or other instrument Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 9 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 9 of 14 to which the Municipality is a party or by which the Munici pality is bound as of the date set forth on the first page hereof. 3.No L iti gation. There are no pending or, to the Municipality’s knowledge, threatened actions, claims, investigations, suits, or proceedings before any governmental authority, court, or administrati ve agency which affect the Municipality's ability to complete the A nnual P lan. 4.S olvency. None of the transactions contemplated by this A greement will be or have been made wi th an actual i ntent to hinder, delay, or defraud any present or future creditors of the Municipality. A s of the date set forth on the fi rst page hereof, the Munici pality is solvent and will not be rendered insolvent by the transactions contemplated by this A greement. The Municipality is able to pay its debts as they become due. 5.L egal S tatus and E ligibility. The Municipality is duly organized and exi sting and in good standing under the laws of the S tate of C aliforni a. The Munici pality shall at all times maintain its current legal existence and preserve and keep in full force and effect i ts legal rights and authority. 6.Good S tanding. The Munici pality must demonstrate it has not failed to comply with previous C ounty and/or D istrict audit di sallowances within the preceding fi ve years. B -28. Travel A ny reimbursement for necessary ground transportation and lodging shall be at rates not to exceed those set by the C alifornia D epartment of Human Resources; per diem costs wi ll not be eligi ble expenses. These rates may be found at http://www.calhr.ca.gov/employees/P ages/travel-reimbursements.aspx. Reimbursement will be at the S tate travel amounts that are current as of the date costs are i ncurred by the Muni cipality. No travel outside the L os A ngeles C ounty F lood C ontrol D istrict region shall be reimbursed unless prior written authori zation i s obtai ned from the P rogram Manager. B -29. Unenforceable P rovision In the event that any provision of this A greement i s determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, the parti es agree that all other provisions of this A greement have force and effect and shall not be affected thereby. B -30. W ithholding of D isbursements and Material Violations Notwithstanding any other provision of this A greement, the D istrict may withhold all or any portion of the S C W P rogram P ayment for any F iscal Year in the event that: 1.The Municipali ty has violated any provision of this A greement; or 2.The Municipali ty fails to mai ntain reasonable progress in achieving S C W P rogram Goals, following an opportunity to cure. 3.F ailure to remain in Good S tanding, descri bed in S ecti on B -26 of E xhibit B . 4.F ailure to submit annual reports on meeting S C W P rogram Goals. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 10 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 10 of 14 E XH IB IT C – N AT U R E B ASE D SOLU T ION S (N B S) B E S T MAN AGE ME N T PR AC TIC E S Municipalities shall consider incorporation of Nature-based solutions (NB S ) i nto their projects. NB S refers to the sustainable management and use of nature for undertaki ng socio-envi ronmental challenges, including climate change, water security, water pollution, food security, human health, and disaster risk management. A s this environmental management practice is increasingly incorporated into projects for the S C W P rogram, this guidance document may be expanded upon to further quantify NB S practices based on benefits derived from their incorporati on on projects. The S C W P rogram defines NB S as a P roject that utilizes natural processes that slow, detain, infiltrate or filter S tormwater or Urban Runoff. These methods may include relying predominantly on soils and vegetation; i ncreasing the permeability of Impermeable A reas; protecting undeveloped mountains and floodplains; creating and restoring riparian habitat and wetlands; creating rain gardens, bioswales, and parkway basins; enhancing soil through composting, mulching; and, planting trees and vegetati on, with preference for native species. NB S may also be designed to provide additional benefits such as sequestering carbon, supporting bi odiversi ty, providing shade, creating and enhancing parks and open space, and i mprovi ng quality of life for surrounding communi ties. NB S include P rojects that mimic natural processes, such as green streets, spreading grounds and planted areas with water storage capacity. NB S may capture stormwater to improve water quality, collect water for reuse or aquifer recharge, or to support vegetation growth utilizing natural processes. Municipalities are to i nclude i n each A nnual P rogress/E xpenditure Report whether and how their project achieves a good, better, or best for each of the 6 NB S methods in accordance wi th the guidance below. A ddi tionally, A nnual P rogress/ E xpenditure Reports should include di scussion on any considerations taken to maximi ze the class wi thin each method. If at least 3 methods score within a single class, the overall project can be characterized as that class. Municipalities must attach a copy of the matrix for each project with the good, better, or best column indicated for each method, to facilitate D istrict tracking of methods being utilized. ME T H OD S GOOD B E T T ER B E S T Vegetation/Green S pace Use of climate appropriate, eco-friendly vegetati on (groundcover, shrubs, and trees) / green space 5%- 15% covered by new cli mate-appropriate vegetati on Use of native, climate appropriate, eco-fri endly vegetation (groundcover, shrubs, and trees) / green space 16%- 35% covered by new native vegetation E stablishment of plant communiti es with a diversity of native vegetation (groundcover, shrubs, and trees) / green space that is both native and cli mate- appropriate More than 35% covered by new native vegetation Increase of P ermeability Installation of vegetated landscape – 25%-49% paved area removed Redesi gn of existing i mpermeable surfaces and/or installati on of permeable surfaces (e.g. permeable pavement and i nfiltrati on trenches) Installation of vegetated landscape – 50%-74% paved area removed Improvements of soil health (e.g., compaction reduction) Installation of vegetated landscape – 75%-100% paved area removed C reation of well-connected and self-sustained natural landscapes with healthy soils, permeable surfaces, and appropriate vegetation P rotection of Undeveloped Mountains & F loodplains ●P reservation of nati ve vegetati on ●Minimal negative impact to existi ng drainage system ●P reservati on of native vegetation ●Installation of new feature(s) to improve existing drai nage system ●C reation of open green space ●Installation of features to improve natural hydrology Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 11 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 11 of 14 C reation & Restoration of Riparian Habitat & Wetlands ●P artial restoration of existing riparian habitat and wetlands P lanti ng of climate appropriate vegetati on between 11 and 20 different climate appropriate or native plant species newly planted ●No potable water used to sustain the wetland ●F ull restoration of existing riparian habitat and wetlands ●P lanting of native vegetation - between 21 and 40 different nati ve plant species newly planted ●No potable water used to sustai n the wetland ●F ull restoration and expansion of existi ng riparian habitat and wetlands P lanting of plant communiti es with a diversity of native vegetation – between 41 and 50 different native plant speci es newly planted ●No potable water used to sustain the wetland New L andscape E lements E lements desi gned to capture runoff for other simple usage (e.g. rain gardens and cisterns), capturi ng the 85th percentile 24-hour storm event for at least 50% of the entire parcel E lements that desi gn to capture/redirect runoff and filter pollution (e.g. bioswales and parkway basins), capturing the 85th percentile 24-hour storm event from the entire parcel L arge sized elements that capture and treat runoff to supplement or replace existing water systems (e.g. wetlands, daylighting streams, groundwater infiltration, floodplain reclamation), capturing the 90th percentile 24-hour storm event from the enti re parcel and/or capturing off- site runoff E nhancement of S oil Use of soil amendments such as mulch and compost to retain moisture i n the soil and prevent erosion P lanting of new climate appropriate vegetation to enhance soil organic matter Use of soil amendments such as mulch and compost that are locally generated to retain moisture in the soil, prevent erosi on, and support locally based composting and other soil enhancement activities P lanting of new nati ve, climate-appropriate vegetation to enhance soil organic matter Use of soi l amendments such as mulch and compost that are locally generated, especi ally use of next-generation design with regenerative adsorbents (e.g. woodchips, biochar) to retain moi sture in the soi l, prevent erosion, and support on-site composting and other soil enhancement activities P lanting of new native, climate appropriate vegetation to enhance soil organic matter Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 12 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 12 of 14 E X H IB IT D – OP E R AT ION S AN D MAIN T EN AN C E GU ID AN C E D OC U MEN T Municipalities shall operate and maintain infrastructure projects for the useful life of the project and are to consider using the following guidance for operations and maintenance for infrastructure projects. Operational maintenance is the care and upkeep of P rojects that may require detailed techni cal knowledge of the P roject’s functi on and design. P roject specific operational and maintenance plans shall consider the activities listed below and set forth specifi c activities and frequencies (not limited to those below) as determined to be appropriate by the Muni cipali ti es and best practices, including stakeholder engagement as applicable. Operational maintenance is to be performed by the operator of the P roject with a purpose to make the operator aware of the state of readiness of the P roject to deliver stormwater and urban runoff benefits. 1.L itter C ontrol •Regular removal of li tter, nonhazardous waste materials, and accumulated debris near planted areas, rock areas, decomposed granite areas, rest areas, fence perimeters, adjoi ning access roads and driveways, drains, pedestrian trails, viewing stations, shelter houses, and bicycle pathways. •Regular inspection and maintenance of pet waste stations. •Maintai ning trash receptacles. •Removal of trash, debris, and blockages from bioswales. •Inspecti on and cleani ng of trash booms. •Inspecti on of weir gates and stop logs to clean debris, as required. 2.Vegetation Maintenance •Weed control o Recognition and removal of weeds, such as perennial weeds, morning glory, vine-type weeds, ragweed, and other underground spreading weeds. o Avoiding activities that result in weed seed germi nation (e.g. frequent soil cultivation near trees or shrubs). o Regular removal of weeds from landscape areas, includi ng from berms, painted areas, rock areas, gravel areas, pavement cracks along access roads and driveways, drains, pedestrian trails, viewi ng stations, park shelters, and bicycle paths. •Tree and shrubbery trimming and care o Removal of dead trees and elimination of diseased/damaged growth. o P revent encroachment of adjacent property and provide vertical clearance. o Inspect for dead or di seased plants regularly. •Wetland vegetation and landscape maintenance o Installation and maintenance of hydrophytic and emergent plants in perennially wet and seasonal, i ntermi ttent habitats. o D raining and drawdown of wetland and excessive bulrush removal o Weed and nui sance plant control. o Removal of aquatic vegetation (e.g. algae and primrose) using appropriate watercraft and harvesting equipment. o Wildflower and meadow maintenance. o Grass, sedge, and yarrow management. o Removal of unwanted hydroseed. 3.Wildlife Management •E xotic species control. •P rovide habitat management; promote growth of plants at appropriate densities and promote habitat structure for animal species. •P rotect sensitive animal species (e.g. protection during critical life stages including breedi ng and migrati on). •Avoid disturbances to nesting birds. •Avoid spread of invasive aquatic species. 4.F acility Inspection •Inspect project sites for rodent and i nsect i nfestations on a regular basis. •Inspect for and report graffiti in shelter houses, viewing stations, benches, paving surfaces, walls, fences, and educational and directional signs. •Inspect facilities for hazardous conditions on roads and trails (e.g. access roads and trails, decomposed granite pathways, and maintenance roads). Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 13 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 13 of 14 •Inspect shade structures for structural damage or defacement. •Inspect hardscapes. •Inspect and maintain interpretive and informational signs. •Inspect site furnishings (e.g. benches, hitching posts, bi cycle racks). •Maintai n deck areas (e.g. benches, signs, decking surfaces). •Visually inspect weirs and flap gates for damage; grease to prevent locking. •Inspect all structures after major storm events, periodically inspect every 3 months, and operate gates through full cycles to prevent them from locking up. 5.Irrigation S ystem Management •E nsuring automatic i rrigation controllers are functioning properly and providing various plant species with proper amount of water. o C ycle controller(s) through each station manually and automatically to determine if all facets are functioni ng properly. o Inspection should be performed at least monthly. o Recover, replace, or refasten displaced or damaged valve box covers. o Inspect and repair bubbler heads. o Repair and replace broken drip lines or emitters causing a loss of water (to prevent ponding and erosion). o Maintain drip system filters to prevent emitters from clogging. Inspection and cleaning should occur at least monthly. o Inspect and clean mai nline filters, wye strainers, basket fi lters, and filters at backflow devices twice a year. o Maintain and check function of the drip system. •K eeping irrigation control boxes clear of vegetation. •Operating irrigation system to ensure it does not cause excessively wet, waterlogged areas, and slope failure. •Utilizing infrequent deep watering techniques to encourage deep rooti ng, drought tolerant plant characteristics to promote a self-sustaining, irrigation free landscape. •D etermine watering schedules based on season, weather, vari ation in plant size, and plant varieties. A t least four times a year (e.g. change of season), reschedule controller systems. •Turn off irrigati on systems at the controller at the beginni ng of the rainy season, or when the soil has a high enough moisture content. •Use moisture sensing devices to determine water penetration i n soil. 6.E rosion Management and C ontrol •Inspect slopes for erosion during each mai ntenance acti vity. •Inspect basins for erosion. •Take corrective measures as needed, including fi lling eroded surfaces, reinstalling or extending bank protecti on, and replanting exposed soil. 7.Ongoing Monitoring A ctivities •Monitor controllable i ntake water flow and water elevation. •E xamine inflow and outflow structures to ensure devices are functioning properly and are free of obstructions. •Water quality sampling (quarterly, unless justified otherwi se). •C hecki ng telemetry equipment. •Tracking and reporting inspection and mai ntenance records. 8.Vector and Nui sance Insect C ontrol •Monitoring for the presence of vector and nuisance insect speci es. •A dequate pretreatment of influent wastewater to lessen production of larval mosquitos. •Managing emergent vegetati on. •Using hydraulic control structures to rapidly dewater emergent marsh areas. •Managing flow velocities to reduce propagation of vectors. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 14 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 14 of 14 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:August 6, 2024 From:Daniel S. Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works Department:Public Works Submitted by:Lissette Melendez, Project Engineer Subject Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for Measure W Funds Recommendation Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute the Transfer Agreement between the City of Vernon and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, in substantially the same form as submitted, to receive Annual Safe, Clean Water Program Funds (Measure W), for a 4-year term. Background Safe, Clean Water Program (SCWP) Overview In November 2018, Los Angeles County voters approved Measure W, the Safe, Clean Water Program. This initiative aims to enhance our local water supply, improve water quality, and safeguard public health. Additionally, the SCWP assists municipalities in meeting the requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. Revenue Distribution According to Section 16.04.A.2 of the Flood Control District Code, 40% of annual SCWP tax revenues will be allocated to municipalities within the District. The distribution will be proportional to the amount of revenue collected in each municipality. Furthermore, Section 16.05.A.1 mandates that municipalities must establish a Transfer Agreement with the District before receiving SCWP funds. Transfer Agreement Details The proposed Transfer Agreement, set to expire at the end of the 2027-28 Fiscal Year, ensures that SCWP payments will continue annually. These payments will be based on actual revenue collection timing by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed and approved the Transfer Agreement as to form. Fiscal Impact Entering into this Transfer Agreement will result in an estimated $925,000 in revenue to the General Fund, which will be allocated annually through the budget process to the Public Works and Health Departments. Attachments 1. Transfer Agreement No. 2024MP81 . . Item 17 Page 1 of 15 TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND VERNON AGREEMENT NO. 2024MP81 SAFE, CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – MUNICIPAL PROGRAM This Transfer Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Agreement,” is entered into as of by and between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, hereinafter referred to as "District," and Vernon, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality." WHEREAS, District, pursuant to the Los Angeles Region Safe, Clean Water (SCW) Program ordinance (Chapter 16 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code) and the SCW Program Implementation Ordinance (Chapter 18 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code), administers the SCW Program for the purpose of funding Projects and Programs to increase stormwater and urban runoff capture and reduce stormwater and urban runoff pollution in the District; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.04.A.2. of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, forty percent (40%) of annual SCW Program tax revenues shall be allocated to Municipalities within the District, in the same proportion as the amount of revenues collected within each Municipality, to be expended by those cities within the cities' respective jurisdictions and by the County within the unincorporated areas that are within the boundaries of the District, for the implementation, operation and maintenance, and administration of Projects and Programs, in accordance with the criteria and procedures established in this Chapters 16 and 18 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16.05.A.1. of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, prior to their receipt of SCW Program funds, Municipalities must enter into an agreement with the District to transfer SCW Program funds; WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors has approved a standard template Agreement, as required by and in accordance with Section 18.09 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, for the transfer of SCW Program funds to Municipalities. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, mutual representations, covenants and agreements in this Agreement, the District and the Municipality, each binding itself, its successors and assigns, do mutually promise, covenant, and agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS The definitions set forth in Sections 16.03 and 18.02 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code shall apply to this Agreement. In addition, the following definitions shall also apply: “Agreement” means this Transfer Agreement, including all exhibits and attachments hereto. “Annual Plan” means the plan referred to in Section 18.09.B.5 of the Code that includes the contents specified in Exhibit A. "Code" means the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code. “Days” means calendar days unless otherwise expressly indicated. “Fiscal Year” means the period of twelve (12) months terminating on June 30 of any year. “Safe Clean Water (SCW) Program Payment” means the Municipality's annual allocation of SCW Program funds as described in Section 16.04.A.2. of the Code disbursed by the District to the Municipality. “Year” means calendar year unless otherwise expressly indicated. II. PARTY CONTACTS The District and the Municipality designate the following individuals as the primary points of contact and communication regarding the Municipal Program and the administration and implementation of this Agreement. Los Angeles County Flood Control District Municipality: Vernon Name: Haris Harouny Name: Address: 900 S Fremont Ave, Alhambra, CA 91803 Address: Phone: (626) 300-2620 Phone: Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 1 of 14 July 01, 2024 Veronica Petrosyan 4305 Santa Fe Ave Vernon, CA 90058 (323)826-1448 . . Item 17 Page 2 of 15 Email: hharouny@dpw.lacounty.gov Email: Either party to this Agreement may change the individual identified as the primary point of contact above by providing written notice of the change to the other party. III. EXHIBITS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The following exhibits to this Agreement, including any amendments and supplements hereto, are hereby incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement: EXHIBIT A – ANNUAL PLAN CONTENTS EXHIBIT B – GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS EXHIBIT C – NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS (Best Management Practices) EXHIBIT D – OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT IV. MUNICIPAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION A. The Municipality shall annually prepare and submit to the District, an Annual Plan. The Annual Plan shall be submitted not later than 90-days prior to the start of the Fiscal Year for which the Plan is prepared. B. The Municipality shall utilize the SCW Program Payments in compliance with Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. C. The Municipality shall comply with the terms and conditions in Exhibits B, C, and D, of this Agreement, and all applicable provisions of Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code, specifically including, without limitation, Section 18.06. V. SCW PROGRAM PAYMENTS TO MUNICIPALITIES A. SCW Program Payments will generally be available for disbursement by December 31, provided a duly executed transfer agreement is in effect and subject to the Municipality's compliance with the conditions described in paragraph B, below; however the District may, in its discretion, change the date and number of the actual disbursements for any Fiscal Year based on the amount and timing of revenues actually collected by the District. B. The District shall disburse the Municipality's SCW Program Payment upon satisfaction of the following conditions: (1) the District has received the Annual Progress/Expenditure Report required pursuant to Section 18.06.D of the Code; (2) the District has received Municipality's Annual Plan for that Fiscal Year, and (3) the Municipality has complied with the audit requirements of Section B-6 of Exhibit B. C. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no disbursement shall be made at any time or in any manner that is in violation of or in conflict with federal, state, County laws, policies, or regulations. D. All disbursements shall be subject to and be made in accordance with the terms and conditions in this Agreement and Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. VI. TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement shall expire at the end of the 2027-28 Fiscal Year. The parties shall thereafter enter into a new agreement based on the most recent standard template agreement approved by the Board. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 2 of 14 vpetrosyan@cityofvernon.org . . Item 17 Page 3 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. By: Name: Title: Date: LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: By: Name: Title: Date: Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 3 of 14 ATTEST: __________________ Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________ Zaynah N. Moussa, City Attorney Daniel Calleros Interim City Administrator . . Item 17 Page 4 of 15 EXHIBIT A – ANNUAL PLAN CONTENTS A-1. Description of all projects anticipated to be funded using the SCW Program Payment. Include a discussion of how the projects will result in the achievement of one or more SCW Program Goals, including quantitative targets and corresponding metrics for subsequent reporting of all applicable parameters. A-2. Description of all programs anticipated to be funded using the SCW Program Payment. Include a discussion of how the programs will result in the achievement of one or more SCW Program Goals; including quantitative targets and corresponding metrics for subsequent reporting of all applicable parameters. A-3. Description of all operation and maintenance activities anticipated to be funded using the SCW Program Payment. Include a discussion of how those activities will result in the achievement of one or more SCW Program Goals. Additional operation and maintenance activities, even if funded by other sources, should be referenced to provide an overview of anticipated overall project approach. A-4. Description of the stakeholder and community outreach/engagement activities anticipated to be funded with the SCW Program Payment, including discussion of how local NGOs or CBOs will be involved, if applicable, and if not, why. Additional outreach/engagement activities, even if funded by other sources, should be referenced to provide an overview of anticipated overall project approach. A-5. Description of post-construction monitoring for projects completed using the SCW Program Payment. Additional post-construction monitoring activities, even if funded by other sources, should be referenced to provide an overview of anticipated overall project approach. A-6. Provide the status of any projects that have been awarded (or are seeking award of) Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI) verification, if applicable. A-7. Provide the budget for the activities described in provisions A1 through A-5 SCW Program Payment. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 4 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 5 of 15 EXHIBIT B – GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS B-1. Accounting and Deposit of Funding Disbursement 1.SCW Program Payments distributed to the Municipality shall be held in a separate interest-bearing account and shall not be combined with other funds. Interest earned from each account shall be used by the Municipality only for eligible expenditures consistent with the requirements of the SCW Program. 2.The Municipality shall not be entitled to interest earned on undisbursed SCW Program Payments; interest earned prior to disbursement is property of the District. 3.The Municipality shall operate in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). 4.The Municipality shall be strictly accountable for all funds, receipts, and disbursements for their SCW Program Payment. B-2. Acknowledgement of Credit and Signage The Municipality shall include appropriate acknowledgement of credit to the District’s Safe, Clean Water Program for its support when promoting activities funded with SCW Program funds or using any data and/or information developed SCW Program funds. When the SCW Program Payment is used, in whole or in part, for construction of an infrastructure Project, signage shall be posted in a prominent location at Project site(s) or at the Municipality’s headquarters and shall include the Safe, Clean Water Program color logo and the following disclosure statement: “Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District’s Safe, Clean Water Program.” At a minimum the sign shall be 2’ x 3’ in size. The Municipality shall also include in each of its contracts for work under this Agreement a provision that incorporates the requirements stated within this paragraph. When the SCW Program Payment is used, in whole or in part, for a scientific study, the Municipality shall include the following statement in the study report: “Funding for this study has been provided in full or in part from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District’s Safe, Clean Water Program.” The Municipality shall also include in each of its contracts for work under this Agreement a provision that incorporates the requirements stated within this paragraph. B-3. Acquisition of Real Property - Covenant Any real property acquired in whole or in part with SCW Program funds shall be used for Projects and Programs that are consistent with the SCW Program Goals and with the provisions of Chapter 16 and 18 of the Code. Any Municipality that acquires the fee title to real property using, in whole or in part, SCW Program funds shall record a document in the office of the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk containing a covenant not to sell or otherwise convey the real property without the prior express written consent of the District, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. B-4. Amendment Except as provided in Section II of the Agreement, no amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties. No oral or written understanding or agreement not incorporated in this Agreement is binding on any of the parties. B-5. Assignment The Municipality shall not assign this Agreement. B-6. Audit and Recordkeeping 1.The Municipality shall retain for a period of seven (7) years, all records necessary in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles to determine the amounts expended, and eligibility of Projects implemented using SCW Program Payments. The Municipality, upon demand by authorized representatives of the District, shall make such records available for examination and review or audit by the District or its authorized representatives. Records shall include accounting records, written policies and procedures, contract files, original estimates, correspondence, change order files, including documentation covering negotiated settlements, invoices, and any other supporting evidence deemed necessary to substantiate charges related to SCW Program Payments and expenditures. 2.The Municipality is responsible for obtaining an independent audit to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and all requirements applicable to the Municipality contained in chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. Municipality shall obtain an independent audit of their SCW Program Payments every three (3) years. Audits shall be funded with Municipal Program funds. 3.Municipality shall file a copy of all audit reports by the ninth (9 ) month from the end of each three (3) year period to detail the preceding three (3) years of expenditures. Audit reports shall be posted on the District’s publicly accessible website. Due date example below. th Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 5 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 6 of 15 Every Third Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Audit Begins Audit Report Due to District 2023-24 7/1/2027 No later than 3/31/2028 4.Upon reasonable advanced request, the Municipality shall permit the Chief Engineer to examine the infrastructure Projects using SCW Program Payments. The Municipality shall permit the authorized District representative, including the Auditor-Controller, to examine, review, audit, and transcribe any and all audit reports, other reports, books, accounts, papers, maps, and other records that relate to the SCW Program Payments. Examination activities are considered District administration of the SCW Program. 5.Expenditures determined by an audit to be in violation of any provision of Chapters 16 or 18 of the Code, or of this Agreement, shall be subject to the enforcement and remedy provisions of Section 18.14 of the Code. B-7. Availability of Funds District’s obligation to disburse the SCW Program Payment is contingent upon the availability of sufficient funds to permit the disbursements provided for herein. If sufficient funds are not available for any reason including, but not limited to, failure to fund allocations necessary for disbursement of the SCW Program Payment, the District shall not be obligated to make any disbursements to the Municipality under this Agreement. This provision shall be construed as a condition precedent to the obligation of the District to make any disbursements under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to provide the Municipality with a right of priority for disbursement over any other Municipality. If any disbursements due to the Municipality under this Agreement are deferred because sufficient funds are unavailable, it is the intention of the District that such disbursement will be made to the Municipality when sufficient funds do become available, but this intention is not binding. If this Agreement’s funding for any Fiscal Year is reduced or deleted by order of the Board, the District shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the District or offer an amendment to the Municipality to reflect the reduced amount. B-8. Choice of Law The laws of the State of California govern this Agreement. B-9. Claims Any claim of the Municipality is limited to the rights, remedies, and claims procedures provided to the Municipality under this Agreement. Municipal expenditures of a SCW Program Payment that involves the District shall utilize a separate and specific agreement to that Project that includes appropriate indemnification superseding that in this Agreement. B-10. Compliance with SCW Program The Municipality shall comply with and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all provisions of Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. B-11. Compliance with Law, Regulations, etc. The Municipality shall, at all times, comply with and require its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules, guidelines, regulations, and requirements. B-12. Continuous Use of Municipal Projects; Lease or Disposal of Municipal Projects The Municipality shall not abandon, substantially discontinue use of, lease, or dispose of all or a significant part or portion of any Project funded in whole or in part with SCW Program Payments during the useful life (defined as 30 years unless specified otherwise in annual plans and subsequent reports) of the Project without prior written approval of the District. Such approval may be conditioned as determined to be appropriate by the District, including a condition requiring repayment of a pro rata amount of the SCW Program Payments used to fund the Project together with interest on said amount accruing from the date of lease or disposal of the Project. B-13. Disputes Should a dispute arise between the parties, the party asserting the dispute will notify the other parties in writing of the dispute. The parties will then meet and confer within 21 calendar days of the notice in a good faith attempt to resolve the dispute. If the matter has not been resolved through the process set forth in the preceding paragraph, any party may initiate mediation of the dispute. Mediation will be before a retired judge or mediation service mutually agreeable to the parties. All costs of the mediation, including mediator fees, will be paid one-half by the District and one-half by the Municipality. SCW Program Payments shall not be used to pay for any costs of the mediation. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 6 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 7 of 15 The parties will attempt to resolve any dispute through the process set forth above before filing any action relating to the dispute in any court of law. B-14. Final Inspection and Certification of Registered Professional Upon completion of the design phase and before construction of a project, the Municipality shall provide certification by a California Registered Professional (i.e., Professional Civil Engineer, Engineering Geologist) that the design has been completed. Upon completion of the project, the Municipality shall provide for a final inspection and certification by a California Registered Professional (i.e., Professional Civil Engineer, Engineering Geologist), that the Project has been completed in accordance with submitted final plans and specifications and any modifications thereto and in accordance with this Agreement. B-15. Force Majeure. In the event that Municipality is delayed or hindered from the performance of any act required hereunder by reason of strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials not related to the price thereof, riots, insurrection, war, or other reasons of a like nature beyond the control of the Municipality, then performance of such acts shall be excused for the period of the delay, and the period for the performance of any such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay. B-16. Funding Considerations and Exclusions 1.All expenditures of SCW Program Payments by Municipality must comply with the provisions of Chapters 16 and 18 of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District Code, including but not limited to the provisions regarding eligible expenditures contained in Section 16.05.A.2 and the provision regarding ineligible expenditures contained in Section 16.05.A.3. 2.SCW Program Payments shall not be used in connection with any Project implemented as an Enhanced Compliance Action ("ECA") and/or Supplemental Environmental Project ("SEP") as defined by State Water Resources Control Board Office of Enforcement written policies, or any other Project implemented pursuant to the settlement of an enforcement action or to offset monetary penalties imposed by the State Water Resources Control Board, a Regional Water Quality Control Board, or any other regulatory authority; provided, however, that SCW funds may be used for a Project implemented pursuant to a time schedule order ("TSO") issued by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board if, at the time the TSO was issued, the Project was included in an approved watershed management program (including enhanced watershed management programs) developed pursuant to the MS4 Permit. B-17. Indemnification The Municipality shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, the County of Los Angeles and their elected and appointed officials, agents, and employees from and against any and all liability and expense, including defense costs, legal fees, claims, actions, and causes of action for damages of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage, arising from or in conjunction with: (1) any Project or Program implemented by the Municipality, in whole or in part, with SCW Program Payments or (2) any breach of this Agreement by the Municipality. B-18. Independent Actor The Municipality, and its agents and employees, if any, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents of the District. The Municipality shall not contract work with a contractor who is in a period of debarment from any agency within the District. (LACC Chapter 2.202) B-19. Integration This is an integrated Agreement. This Agreement is intended to be a full and complete statement of the terms of the agreement between the District and Municipality, and expressly supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements, covenants, representations and warranties, express or implied, concerning the subject matter of this Agreement. B-20. Lapsed Funds 1.The Municipality shall be able to carry over uncommitted SCW Program Payments for up to five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year in which those funds are transferred from the District to the Municipality. 2.If the Municipality is unable to expend the SCW Program Payment within five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year in which those funds are transferred from the District to the Municipality, then lapsed funding procedures will Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 7 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 8 of 15 apply. Lapsed funds are funds that were transferred to the Municipality but were not committed to eligible expenditures by the end of the fifth (5th) fiscal year after the fiscal year in which those funds were transferred from the District. 3.Lapsed funds shall be allocated by the Watershed Area Steering Committee of the respective Watershed Area to a new Project with benefit to that Municipality, if feasible in a reasonable time frame, or otherwise to the Watershed Area. 4.In the event that funds are to lapse, due to circumstances beyond the Municipality’s control, then the Municipality may request an extension of up to twelve (12) months in which to commit the funds to eligible expenditures. Extension Requests must contain sufficient justification and be submitted to the District in writing no later than three (3) months before the funds are to lapse. 5.The decision to grant an extension is at the sole discretion of the District. 6.Funds still uncommitted to eligible expenditures after an extension is granted will be subject to lapsed funding procedures without exception. Example Below. Fiscal Year Transferred Funds Lapse After Extension Request Due Commit By 2019-20 6/30/2025 No later than 3/31/2025 No later than 6/30/2026 B-21. Municipal Project Access Upon reasonable advance request, the Municipality shall ensure that the District or any authorized representative, will have safe and suitable access to the site of any Project implemented by the Municipality in whole or in part with SCW Program Payments at all reasonable times. B-22. Non-Discrimination The Municipality agrees to abide by all federal, state, and County laws, regulations, and policies regarding non- discrimination in employment and equal employment opportunity. B-23. No Third-Party Rights The parties to this Agreement do not create rights in, or grant remedies to, any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement, or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established herein B-24. Notice 1.The Municipality shall notify the District in writing within five (5) working days of the occurrence of the following: a.Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the Municipality; or b.Actions taken pursuant to State law in anticipation of filing for bankruptcy. 2.The Municipality shall notify the District within ten (10) working days of any litigation pending or threatened against the Municipality regarding its continued existence, consideration of dissolution, or disincorporation. 3.The Municipality shall notify the District promptly of the following: a.Any significant deviation from the submitted Annual Plan for the current Fiscal Year, including discussion of any major changes to the scope of funded projects or programs, noteworthy delays in implementation, reduction in benefits or community engagement, and/or modifications that change the SCW Program Goals intended to be accomplished. b.Discovery of any potential archaeological or historical resource. Should a potential archaeological or historical resource be discovered during construction, the Municipality agrees that all work in the area of the find will cease until a qualified archaeologist has evaluated the situation and made recommendations regarding preservation of the resource, and the District has determined what actions should be taken to protect and preserve the resource. The Municipality agrees to implement appropriate actions as directed by the District. c.Any public or media event publicizing the accomplishments and/or results of this Agreement and provide the opportunity for attendance and participation by District representatives with at least fourteen (14) days’ notice to the District. B-25. Municipality’s Responsibility for Work The Municipality shall be responsible for all work and for persons or entities engaged in work performed pursuant to this Agreement including, but not limited to, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and providers of services. The Municipality shall be responsible for responding to any and all disputes arising out of its contracts for work on the Project. The District will not mediate disputes between the Municipality and any other entity concerning responsibility for performance of work. B-26. Reporting Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 8 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 9 of 15 The Municipality shall be subject to and comply with all applicable requirements of the District regarding reporting requirements. Municipalities shall report available data through the SCW Reporting Module, once available. 1.Annual Progress/Expenditure Reports. The Municipality shall submit Annual Progress/Expenditure Reports, using a format provided by the District, within six (6) months following the end of the Fiscal Year to the District to detail the activities of the prior year. The Annual Progress/Expenditure Reports shall be posted on the District’s publicly accessible website and on the Municipality’s website. The Annual Progress/Expenditure Report shall include: a.Amount of funds received; b.Breakdown of how the SCW Program Payment has been expended; c.Documentation that the SCW Program Payment was used for eligible expenditures in accordance with Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code; d.Description of activities that have occurred, milestones achieved, and progress made to date, during the applicable reporting period including comparison to the Annual Plan and corresponding metrics; e.Discussion of any existing gaps between what was planned and what was achieved for the prior year, include any lessons learned; f.Description of the Water Quality Benefits, Water Supply Benefits, and Community Investment Benefits and a summary of how SCW Program Payments have been used to achieve SCW Program Goals for the prior year, including graphical representation of available data and specific metrics to demonstrate the benefits being achieved through the years’ investments. g.Discussion of alignment with other local, regional, and state efforts, resources, and plans, as applicable. This includes discussion of opportunities for addressing additional SCW Program Goals, leveraging SCW Program Goals, and increasing regional capacity to supplement the SCW Program. h.Additional financial or Project-related information in connection with activity funded in whole or in part using SCW Program Payments as required by the District. i.Certification from a California Registered Professional (Civil Engineer or Geologist, as appropriate), that projects implemented with SCW Program Payments were conducted in accordance with Chapters 16 and 18 of the Code. j.Report on annual and total (since inception of program) benefits provided by programs and projects funded by SCW Program Payment. This includes comparisons to annual plans and alignment with corresponding specific quantitative targets and metrics (note that SCW Reporting Module will facilitate calculation of benefits and graphical representation of pertinent data): i.Annual volume of stormwater captured and treated ii.Annual volume of stormwater captured and reused iii.Annual volume of stormwater captured and recharged to a managed aquifer iv.Annual creation, enhancement, or restoration of Community Investment Benefits. If none, discuss considerations explored and reasons to not include. v.Annual acreage increases in Nature-Based Solutions and claimed level of NBS (with matrix demonstrating determination of good, better, best, as outlined in Exhibit C). If none, discuss considerations explored and reasons to not include. vi.Annual expenditures providing DAC Benefits. If none, discuss considerations explored and reasons to not include. 2.Documentation of the Community Outreach and Engagement utilized for and/or achieved with the SCW Program Payment described in the Annual Plan Exhibit A. This information must be readily accessible to members of the public. 3.As Needed Information or Reports. The Municipality agrees to promptly provide such reports, data, and information as may be reasonably requested by the District including, but not limited to material necessary or appropriate for evaluation of the SCW Program or to fulfill any reporting requirements of the County, state or federal government. B-27. Representations, Warranties, and Commitments The Municipality represents, warrants, and commits as follows: 1.Authorization and Validity. The execution and delivery of this Agreement, including all incorporated documents, by the individual signing on behalf of Municipality, has been duly authorized by the governing body of Municipality, as applicable. This Agreement constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Municipality, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as such enforcement may be limited by law. 2.No Violations. The execution, delivery, and performance by the Municipality of this Agreement, including all incorporated documents, do not violate any provision of any law or regulation in effect as of the date set forth on the first page hereof, or result in any breach or default under any contract, obligation, indenture, or other instrument to which the Municipality is a party or by which the Municipality is bound as of the date set forth on the first page hereof. 3.No Litigation. There are no pending or, to the Municipality’s knowledge, threatened actions, claims, investigations, suits, or proceedings before any governmental authority, court, or administrative agency which affect the Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 9 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 10 of 15 Municipality's ability to complete the Annual Plan. 4.Solvency. None of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will be or have been made with an actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any present or future creditors of the Municipality. As of the date set forth on the first page hereof, the Municipality is solvent and will not be rendered insolvent by the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Municipality is able to pay its debts as they become due. 5.Legal Status and Eligibility. The Municipality is duly organized and existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California. The Municipality shall at all times maintain its current legal existence and preserve and keep in full force and effect its legal rights and authority. 6.Good Standing. The Municipality must demonstrate it has not failed to comply with previous County and/or District audit disallowances within the preceding five years. B-28. Travel Any reimbursement for necessary ground transportation and lodging shall be at rates not to exceed those set by the California Department of Human Resources; per diem costs will not be eligible expenses. These rates may be found at http://www.calhr.ca.gov/employees/Pages/travel-reimbursements.aspx. Reimbursement will be at the State travel amounts that are current as of the date costs are incurred by the Municipality. No travel outside the Los Angeles County Flood Control District region shall be reimbursed unless prior written authorization is obtained from the Program Manager. B-29. Unenforceable Provision In the event that any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, the parties agree that all other provisions of this Agreement have force and effect and shall not be affected thereby. B-30. Withholding of Disbursements and Material Violations Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the District may withhold all or any portion of the SCW Program Payment for any Fiscal Year in the event that: 1.The Municipality has violated any provision of this Agreement; or 2.The Municipality fails to maintain reasonable progress in achieving SCW Program Goals, following an opportunity to cure. 3.Failure to remain in Good Standing, described in Section B-26 of Exhibit B. 4.Failure to submit annual reports on meeting SCW Program Goals. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 10 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT C – NATURE BASED SOLUTIONS (NBS) BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Municipalities shall consider incorporation of Nature-based solutions (NBS) into their projects. NBS refers to the sustainable management and use of nature for undertaking socio-environmental challenges, including climate change, water security, water pollution, food security, human health, and disaster risk management. As this environmental management practice is increasingly incorporated into projects for the SCW Program, this guidance document may be expanded upon to further quantify NBS practices based on benefits derived from their incorporation on projects. The SCW Program defines NBS as a Project that utilizes natural processes that slow, detain, infiltrate or filter Stormwater or Urban Runoff. These methods may include relying predominantly on soils and vegetation; increasing the permeability of Impermeable Areas; protecting undeveloped mountains and floodplains; creating and restoring riparian habitat and wetlands; creating rain gardens, bioswales, and parkway basins; enhancing soil through composting, mulching; and, planting trees and vegetation, with preference for native species. NBS may also be designed to provide additional benefits such as sequestering carbon, supporting biodiversity, providing shade, creating and enhancing parks and open space, and improving quality of life for surrounding communities. NBS include Projects that mimic natural processes, such as green streets, spreading grounds and planted areas with water storage capacity. NBS may capture stormwater to improve water quality, collect water for reuse or aquifer recharge, or to support vegetation growth utilizing natural processes. Municipalities are to include in each Annual Progress/Expenditure Report whether and how their project achieves a good, better, or best for each of the 6 NBS methods in accordance with the guidance below. Additionally, Annual Progress/ Expenditure Reports should include discussion on any considerations taken to maximize the class within each method. If at least 3 methods score within a single class, the overall project can be characterized as that class. Municipalities must attach a copy of the matrix for each project with the good, better, or best column indicated for each method, to facilitate District tracking of methods being utilized. METHODS GOOD BETTER BEST Vegetation/Green Space Use of climate appropriate, eco-friendly vegetation (groundcover, shrubs, and trees) / green space 5%- 15% covered by new climate-appropriate vegetation Use of native, climate appropriate, eco-friendly vegetation (groundcover, shrubs, and trees) / green space 16%- 35% covered by new native vegetation Establishment of plant communities with a diversity of native vegetation (groundcover, shrubs, and trees) / green space that is both native and climate- appropriate More than 35% covered by new native vegetation Increase of Permeability Installation of vegetated landscape – 25%-49% paved area removed Redesign of existing impermeable surfaces and/or installation of permeable surfaces (e.g. permeable pavement and infiltration trenches) Installation of vegetated landscape – 50%-74% paved area removed Improvements of soil health (e.g., compaction reduction) Installation of vegetated landscape – 75%-100% paved area removed Creation of well-connected and self-sustained natural landscapes with healthy soils, permeable surfaces, and appropriate vegetation Protection of Undeveloped Mountains & Floodplains ●Preservation of native vegetation ●Minimal negative impact to existing drainage system ●Preservation of native vegetation ●Installation of new feature(s) to improve existing drainage system ●Creation of open green space ●Installation of features to improve natural hydrology Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 11 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 12 of 15 Creation & Restoration of Riparian Habitat & Wetlands ●Partial restoration of existing riparian habitat and wetlands Planting of climate appropriate vegetation between 11 and 20 different climate appropriate or native plant species newly planted ●No potable water used to sustain the wetland ●Full restoration of existing riparian habitat and wetlands ●Planting of native vegetation - between 21 and 40 different native plant species newly planted ●No potable water used to sustain the wetland ●Full restoration and expansion of existing riparian habitat and wetlands Planting of plant communities with a diversity of native vegetation – between 41 and 50 different native plant species newly planted ●No potable water used to sustain the wetland New Landscape Elements Elements designed to capture runoff for other simple usage (e.g. rain gardens and cisterns), capturing the 85th percentile 24-hour storm event for at least 50% of the entire parcel Elements that design to capture/redirect runoff and filter pollution (e.g. bioswales and parkway basins), capturing the 85th percentile 24-hour storm event from the entire parcel Large sized elements that capture and treat runoff to supplement or replace existing water systems (e.g. wetlands, daylighting streams, groundwater infiltration, floodplain reclamation), capturing the 90th percentile 24-hour storm event from the entire parcel and/or capturing off- site runoff Enhancement of Soil Use of soil amendments such as mulch and compost to retain moisture in the soil and prevent erosion Planting of new climate appropriate vegetation to enhance soil organic matter Use of soil amendments such as mulch and compost that are locally generated to retain moisture in the soil, prevent erosion, and support locally based composting and other soil enhancement activities Planting of new native, climate-appropriate vegetation to enhance soil organic matter Use of soil amendments such as mulch and compost that are locally generated, especially use of next-generation design with regenerative adsorbents (e.g. woodchips, biochar) to retain moisture in the soil, prevent erosion, and support on-site composting and other soil enhancement activities Planting of new native, climate appropriate vegetation to enhance soil organic matter Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 12 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 13 of 15 EXHIBIT D – OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Municipalities shall operate and maintain infrastructure projects for the useful life of the project and are to consider using the following guidance for operations and maintenance for infrastructure projects. Operational maintenance is the care and upkeep of Projects that may require detailed technical knowledge of the Project’s function and design. Project specific operational and maintenance plans shall consider the activities listed below and set forth specific activities and frequencies (not limited to those below) as determined to be appropriate by the Municipalities and best practices, including stakeholder engagement as applicable. Operational maintenance is to be performed by the operator of the Project with a purpose to make the operator aware of the state of readiness of the Project to deliver stormwater and urban runoff benefits. 1.Litter Control •Regular removal of litter, nonhazardous waste materials, and accumulated debris near planted areas, rock areas, decomposed granite areas, rest areas, fence perimeters, adjoining access roads and driveways, drains, pedestrian trails, viewing stations, shelter houses, and bicycle pathways. •Regular inspection and maintenance of pet waste stations. •Maintaining trash receptacles. •Removal of trash, debris, and blockages from bioswales. •Inspection and cleaning of trash booms. •Inspection of weir gates and stop logs to clean debris, as required. 2.Vegetation Maintenance •Weed control o Recognition and removal of weeds, such as perennial weeds, morning glory, vine-type weeds, ragweed, and other underground spreading weeds. o Avoiding activities that result in weed seed germination (e.g. frequent soil cultivation near trees or shrubs). o Regular removal of weeds from landscape areas, including from berms, painted areas, rock areas, gravel areas, pavement cracks along access roads and driveways, drains, pedestrian trails, viewing stations, park shelters, and bicycle paths. •Tree and shrubbery trimming and care o Removal of dead trees and elimination of diseased/damaged growth. o Prevent encroachment of adjacent property and provide vertical clearance. o Inspect for dead or diseased plants regularly. •Wetland vegetation and landscape maintenance o Installation and maintenance of hydrophytic and emergent plants in perennially wet and seasonal, intermittent habitats. o Draining and drawdown of wetland and excessive bulrush removal o Weed and nuisance plant control. o Removal of aquatic vegetation (e.g. algae and primrose) using appropriate watercraft and harvesting equipment. o Wildflower and meadow maintenance. o Grass, sedge, and yarrow management. o Removal of unwanted hydroseed. 3.Wildlife Management •Exotic species control. •Provide habitat management; promote growth of plants at appropriate densities and promote habitat structure for animal species. •Protect sensitive animal species (e.g. protection during critical life stages including breeding and migration). •Avoid disturbances to nesting birds. •Avoid spread of invasive aquatic species. 4.Facility Inspection •Inspect project sites for rodent and insect infestations on a regular basis. •Inspect for and report graffiti in shelter houses, viewing stations, benches, paving surfaces, walls, fences, and educational and directional signs. •Inspect facilities for hazardous conditions on roads and trails (e.g. access roads and trails, decomposed granite pathways, and maintenance roads). Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 13 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 14 of 15 •Inspect shade structures for structural damage or defacement. •Inspect hardscapes. •Inspect and maintain interpretive and informational signs. •Inspect site furnishings (e.g. benches, hitching posts, bicycle racks). •Maintain deck areas (e.g. benches, signs, decking surfaces). •Visually inspect weirs and flap gates for damage; grease to prevent locking. •Inspect all structures after major storm events, periodically inspect every 3 months, and operate gates through full cycles to prevent them from locking up. 5.Irrigation System Management •Ensuring automatic irrigation controllers are functioning properly and providing various plant species with proper amount of water. o Cycle controller(s) through each station manually and automatically to determine if all facets are functioning properly. o Inspection should be performed at least monthly. o Recover, replace, or refasten displaced or damaged valve box covers. o Inspect and repair bubbler heads. o Repair and replace broken drip lines or emitters causing a loss of water (to prevent ponding and erosion). o Maintain drip system filters to prevent emitters from clogging. Inspection and cleaning should occur at least monthly. o Inspect and clean mainline filters, wye strainers, basket filters, and filters at backflow devices twice a year. o Maintain and check function of the drip system. •Keeping irrigation control boxes clear of vegetation. •Operating irrigation system to ensure it does not cause excessively wet, waterlogged areas, and slope failure. •Utilizing infrequent deep watering techniques to encourage deep rooting, drought tolerant plant characteristics to promote a self-sustaining, irrigation free landscape. •Determine watering schedules based on season, weather, variation in plant size, and plant varieties. At least four times a year (e.g. change of season), reschedule controller systems. •Turn off irrigation systems at the controller at the beginning of the rainy season, or when the soil has a high enough moisture content. •Use moisture sensing devices to determine water penetration in soil. 6.Erosion Management and Control •Inspect slopes for erosion during each maintenance activity. •Inspect basins for erosion. •Take corrective measures as needed, including filling eroded surfaces, reinstalling or extending bank protection, and replanting exposed soil. 7.Ongoing Monitoring Activities •Monitor controllable intake water flow and water elevation. •Examine inflow and outflow structures to ensure devices are functioning properly and are free of obstructions. •Water quality sampling (quarterly, unless justified otherwise). •Checking telemetry equipment. •Tracking and reporting inspection and maintenance records. 8.Vector and Nuisance Insect Control •Monitoring for the presence of vector and nuisance insect species. •Adequate pretreatment of influent wastewater to lessen production of larval mosquitos. •Managing emergent vegetation. •Using hydraulic control structures to rapidly dewater emergent marsh areas. •Managing flow velocities to reduce propagation of vectors. Municipal Program Agreement No.2024MP81 Page 14 of 14 . . Item 17 Page 15 of 15 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Freddie Agyin, Director of Health and Environmental Control Department:Health and Environmental Control Submitted by:Veronica Petrosyan, Deputy Director of Health and Environmental Control Subject Addendum No. 1 to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Grant Program Agreement with AltaMed Health Services Recommendation Approve and authorize the City Administrator to execute Addendum No. 1 to the SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement with AltaMed Health Services, in substantially the same form as submitted, to incorporate the City's insurance requirements. Background In September 2023, the City received a SAMHSA grant award of $1,998,900 for a three-year term for an “On-the-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care.” The grant's purpose is to pilot an approach to comprehensive healthcare for medically underserved minority persons experiencing unsheltered homelessness through the provision of portable clinical care delivered outside and that is focused on the integration of behavioral health, infectious disease services and HIV treatment, and primary care and prevention services. The On-the-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care Pilot Project is designed to support the City’s Health Department and the Vernon Health + Wellness Center in a mission to ensure that access to health services are unimpeded and that equitable, respectable, quality offerings are available to all individuals regardless of ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The grant award will allow the City to focus its direct attention on unsheltered individuals within the City and in the surrounding Southeast Los Angeles community. On July 16, 2024, the City Council approved to execute a SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement with AltaMed Health Services for the pilot project (Attachment 2). Subsequent to the City Council’s approval, staff recognized that the City's insurance requirements were inadvertently omitted from the SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement. Approval of Addendum No. 1 (Attachment 1) will incorporate the insurance requirements as set forth in Exhibit A. Addendum No. 1 to the SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Addendum No. 1 to the SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement 2. SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement . . Item 18 Page 1 of 1 ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION FOR ON-THE- STREETS PORTABLE CLINICAL CARE WITH INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND HIV CARE This Addendum No. 1 (Addendum) to the Agreement for on-the-streets portable clinical care with integrated behavioral health and HIV care dated July 16, 2024 (Agreement), is made as of July 16, 2024, by and between the City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation (City), and AltaMed Health Services Corporation, (Contractor), a non-profit California corporation. The City and Contractor agree as follows: RECITALS A. The City and Contractor are parties to a written Agreement dated July 16, 2024, under which Contractor provides on-the-streets portable clinical care with integrated behavioral health and HIV care. B. The City and Contractor desire to incorporate City insurance requirements as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Addendum agree as follows: 1. Contractor agrees to the insurance provisions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 2. Except as expressly modified by this Addendum, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3. The provisions of this Addendum shall constitute the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter included in this Addendum and shall supersede any other agreement, understanding, or arrangement, whether written or oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Addendum. 4. The person or persons executing this Addendum on behalf of each of the parties warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Addendum on behalf of that party and has the authority to bind that party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. . . Item 18 Page 1 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 2 of 21 Exhibit A 1.0 INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representative, or employees. The policies shall state that they afford primary coverage. 1.1 Automobile Liability Insurance – Primary insurance coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto coverage form for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles or any auto. The policy shall have a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). If Contractor is transporting one or more non- employee passengers in the performance of the services, the automobile liability policy shall have a combined single limit of two million dollars ($2,000,000). If Contractor owns no autos, a hired, non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy is acceptable. 1.1.1 Contractor agrees to subrogate automobile liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees (“Claims”), which are attributable to any act or omission by the Contractor under the performance of the services. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the policy as additional insureds and, under the Contractors’ policy, there shall be a waiver of subrogation, and the policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance. 1.2 Commercial General Liability Insurance – Contractor shall carry General Liability Insurance covering all operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor providing coverage for bodily injury and property damage with a single limit of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and four million dollars ($4,000,000) general aggregate limit written on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) . . Item 18 Page 3 of 21 Comprehensive General Liability "occurrence" Form CG 00 01 or its equivalent for coverage on an occurrence basis. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers must be endorsed on the policy as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of this Agreement. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance. The policy shall be endorsed to include a waiver of subrogation. 1.2.1 If Contractor intends to employ other contractors as part of the services rendered, the City must approve and will establish the appropriate insurance requirements. 1.2.2 Contractor agrees to subrogate General Liability resulting from performance under this agreement by agreeing to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City, and its respective employees, agents, and City Council from and against all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, damages, injuries and expenses, including all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees (“Claims”), which are attributable to any act or omission by the Contractor under the performance of the services. 1.3 Professional Errors and Omissions Coverage in a sum of not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000) per claim and the annual aggregate, covering all acts, errors, omissions, negligence, infringement, or intellectual property (except patent or trade secret), network and privacy risks (including coverage for information, as well as notification costs and regulatory defense) in performance of services for the City or on behalf of the City hereunder. Applicable aggregate must be identified and claims history provided to determine amounts remaining under the aggregates. Contractor shall maintain such coverage for at least five (5) year after the termination of this agreement. 1.4 Umbrella Liability Insurance – An umbrella (over primary) may be used to comply with limits or other primary coverage requirements. When used, the umbrella policy shall apply to bodily injury/property damage and personal injury/advertising injury and shall include a “dropdown” provision providing primary coverage for any liability not covered by the primary policy. The umbrella policy shall have no additional exclusion or coverage difference from the primary policy. The coverage shall also apply to . . Item 18 Page 4 of 21 automobile liability. 1.5 Workers’ Compensation/Employers Liability - Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers' compensation for injuries on the job. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners: 1.5.1 Provide a copy of the permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or 1.5.2 Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident. The policy shall be endorsed to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from performance of this Agreement or 1.5.3 If Contractor has no employees, it may certify or warrant to the City that it does not currently have any employees or individuals who are defined as “employees” under the Labor Code, and the requirement for Workers’ Compensation coverage will be waived by completing the waiver form provided by the City. 1.6 If Contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. 1.7 Each insurance policy included in this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to City. 1.8 Insurance shall be placed with insurers with an A.M. Best rating of no less than A-VIII. Any self-insured retention or deductible in excess of $25,000 must be approved in advance by the City. Any policies written on a claims-based basis must include a minimum of a 3-year tail. 1.9 Prior to the commencement of performance, Contractor shall furnish City with a certificate of insurance for each policy. Each certificate is to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to evidence coverage on its behalf. The certificate(s) must be in a form approved by City. City may require complete, certified copies of any . . Item 18 Page 5 of 21 or all policies upon request. 1.10 Failure to maintain required insurance at all times shall constitute a default and material breach. In such event, Contractor shall immediately notify City and cease all performance under this Agreement until further directed by the City. In the absence of satisfactory insurance coverage, City may, at its option: (a) procure insurance with collection rights for premiums, attorney's fees, and costs against Contractor by way of set-off or recoupment from sums due to Contractor, at City's option; (b) immediately terminate this Agreement and seek damages from the Agreement resulting from said breach; or (c) self-insure the risk, with all damages and costs incurred, by judgment, settlement or otherwise, including attorney's fees and costs, being collectible from Contractor, by way of set-off or recoupment from any sums due to Contractor. . . Item 18 Page 6 of 21 HUB International Insurance Services CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) AUGUST 8, 2024 PRODUCER HUB International Insurance Services, Inc. 600 Corporate Pointe, STE. 600 Culver City, CA 90230 Phone (310) 568-5900 / Fax (866) 248-6053 CA DOI Lic. # 0757776 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # / AM Best # AM BEST RATING INSURED ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION 2040 CAMFIELD AVE LOS ANGELES, CA 90040 INSURER A: BETA RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 055007 A-9 INSURER B: IRONSHORE SPECIALTY 25445 A15 INSURER C: COVERAGES INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY HCL-24-044 07/01/2024 07/01/2025 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $4,000,000 OCCUR CLAIMS MADE MED EXP (Any one person) $5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $2,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $100,000 GEN’L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PROJECT LOC PRODUCTS – COMP/OP AGG $4,000,000 MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY OCCUR CLAIMS MADE RETROACTIVE DATE: EACH CLAIM AGGREGATE 1ST EXCESS LIABILITY OCCUR CLAIMS MADE EACH CLAIM AGGREGATE $ $ WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WCStatu- tory Limits Oth -er E.L. Each Accident $ E.L. – EA Employee $ E.L. – Policy Limit $ B MANAGED CARE ERRORS & OMISSIONS HC7BAB9BUL004 5/30/2024 5/30/2025 Each Claim Aggregate $3,000,000 $3,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PROVISIONS RE: SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement for On-the Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care dated 7/16/24. The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers are named as additional insured with respect to legal liability arising from the acts or omissions of the named insured. Coverage is primary & non-contributory. Waiver of subrogation applies. 30 days notice of cancellation applies. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION *EXCEPT 10 DAYS FOR NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM CITY OF VERNON ATTN: FREDDIE AGYIN, DIRECTOR OF HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE VERNON, CA 90058 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED INACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Rosemary Pudlik . . Item 18 Page 7 of 21 It is understood and agreed that coverage afforded by this Contract is extended to: The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as a Supplemental Member pursuant to Section 7.2, but only for legal liability arising out of the acts, errors or omissions of the Named Member or a Subsidiary solely in the performance of the following contract with the Named Member or Subsidiary: SAMHSA Grant Program Agreement for On-the Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care dated 7/16/24 This Amendment does not extend coverage for the acts, errors or omissions of The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. This Amendment extends protection to the Supplemental Member listed above prior to any applicable insurance, other coverage or self-insurance and will not seek the contribution from any insurance, other coverage or self- insurance available to the Supplemental Member. ALL OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. Authorized Representative of BETARMA Certificate Number: HCL-24-044 Amendment No: H490-12 BETA Risk Management Authority ("BETARMA") A Public Entity AMENDMENT SUPPLEMENTAL MEMBER Issued to: AltaMed Health Services Corporation Effective Date: 07/01/2024 at 12:01 a.m.Expiration Date: 07/01/2025 at 12:01 a.m.Additional Contribution: Per Contract HCL-H490(07/18) Date Issued: July 1, 2024 (Initial)Page 1 of 1 . . Item 18 Page 8 of 21 It is understood and agreed that Section 7.13. - Transfer of Rights of Recovery Against Others to BETARMA - does not apply to the following person(s) or organization(s) listed below with whom the Named Member or a Subsidiary agreed under a written contract prior to the loss to waive its right to subrogation against the person(s) or organization(s). The City of Vernon, its directors, commissioners, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers ALL OTHER TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. Authorized Representative of BETARMA Certificate Number: HCL-24-044 Amendment No: H387-27 BETA Risk Management Authority ("BETARMA") A Public Entity AMENDMENT WAIVER OF SUBROGATION PRIOR TO LOSS FOR LISTED PERSON(S) OR ORGANIZATION(S) Issued to: AltaMed Health Services Corporation Effective Date: 07/01/2024 at 12:01 a.m.Expiration Date: 07/01/2025 at 12:01 a.m.Additional Contribution: Per Contract HCL-H387(10/13) Date Issued: July 1, 2024 (Initial)Page 1 of 1 . . Item 18 Page 9 of 21 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person)$ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) $ $ $ $ $ The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 8/8/2024 License # 0757776 (310) 568-5900 (310) 568-9098 21458 AltaMed Health Services Corporation AltaMed Health Network Inc. 2040 Camfield Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 A X WCC-615-007165-014 4/1/2024 4/1/2025 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 The above referenced policy will include a blanket waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Vernon, its Directors, Commissioners, Officers, Employees and Volunteers when required by written contract. City of Vernon Attn: Freddie Agyin 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 ALTAHEA-01 SVALDEZ HUB International Insurance Services Inc. 600 Corporate Pointe Suite 600 Culver City, CA 90230 Employers Insurance Company of Wausau X . . Item 18 Page 10 of 21 WCC-615-007165-014 04/01/2024 . . Item 18 Page 11 of 21 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person)$ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) $ $ $ $ $ The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 8/8/2024 License # 0M93299 (951) 365-3850 18058 AltaMed Health Services Corporation Attn: Office of Compliance & Risk Mgmt 2040 Camfield Ave Commerce, CA 90040 33138 1 1,000,000A X X PHPK2676892 4/11/2024 4/11/2025 Comp $500 Collison $1,000 5,000,000B LHA601540 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 5,000,000 Subject to all policy terms, exclusions and conditions. The City of Vernon, its director, commissioners, officers, employees, agents and volunteers are an Additional Insured with respects to attached Auto Liability endorsement if required by written contract. Auto Liability Primary and Non-Contributory endorsement attached, and auto liability waiver of subrogation applies per attached endorsement. City of Vernon Risk Management 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 ALTAHEA-01 HFARMANI SIP Insurance Services - Temecula 301 E. Colorado Blvd. Suite #205 Pasadena, CA 91101 Heidi Farmani heidif@sipbrokers.com Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company Landmark American Insurance Company X X X X X X X . . Item 18 Page 12 of 21 CA 20 48 02 99 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1998 Page 1 of 1 POLICY NUMBER: PHPK2676892 COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 20 48 02 99 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. DESIGNATED INSURED This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by this endorsement. This endorsement identifies person(s) or organization(s) who are "insureds" under the Who Is An Insured Provision of the Coverage Form. This endorsement does not alter coverage provided in the Coverage Form. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Endorsement Effective: 04/11/2024 Countersigned By: Named Insured: AltaMed Health Services Corp. (Authorized Representative) SCHEDULE Name of Person(s) or Organization(s) : The City of Vernon, its director, commissioners, officers, employees, agents and volunteers (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to the endorsement. ) Each person or organization shown in the Schedule is an "insured" for Liability Coverage, but only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an "insured" under the Who Is An Insured Provision contained in Section II of the Coverage Form. . . Item 18 Page 13 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 14 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 15 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 16 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 17 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 18 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 19 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 20 of 21 . . Item 18 Page 21 of 21 SAMHSA GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION FOR ON-THE-STREETS PORTABLE CLINICAL CARE WITH INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND HIV CARE COVER PAGE Provider: AltaMed Health Services Corporation Responsible Principal of Provider: Paula Jamison, Sr. VP Notice Information – Provider: AltaMed Health Services Corporation 2040 Camfield Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 Attention: Paula Jamison, Sr. VP Telephone: (323) 303-2476 Notice Information - City: City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: Freddie Agyin, Director of Health & Environmental Control Telephone: (323) 583-8811 ext. 840 Commencement Date: July 16, 2024 Termination Date: September 29, 2026 Consideration: Total not to exceed $1,499,175 (includes all applicable sales tax); and more particularly described in Exhibit B . . Item 18 Page 1 of 78 SAMHSA GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION FOR ON-THE-STREETS PORTABLE CLINICAL CARE WITH INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AND HIV CARE THIS GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into on July 1, 2024, by and between the City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation ("City") and AltaMed Health Services Corporation, a non-profit California corporation (“Provider”). City and Provider are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.” R E C I T A L S A. The City has been awarded a grant for On-the-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care (“Project”) by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (“SAMHSA”). B. The City as part of accepting the grant has agreed to SAMHSA’s Terms and Conditions and Special Terms and Conditions in the Notice of Award from SAMHSA to City (“Notice of Award”). C. Provider is able and willing to abide by all the terms of the SAMHSA Terms and Conditions and Special Terms and Conditions in the Notice of Award. D. City desires to enter into this Agreement for Provider to provide the services required by the SAMHSA Project. E. Provider desires to enter into this Agreement with City to provide the services for the City and SAMHSA as required by the Project. A G R E E M E N T NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, City and Provider hereby agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement begins on the July 16, 2024 and expires on September 29, 2026 (“Term”), unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms herein. 2. SERVICES. 2.1 Scope of Work. Provider shall perform all work necessary to complete the services set forth in the City’s Request for Proposals issued on or about SAMHSAA Grant Program Agreement Between City of Vernon and AltaMed Health Services . . Item 18 Page 2 of 78 May 20, 2024, and titled RFP for On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care, and the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. 2.2 Invoices. Provider must complete the Scope of Work for the Project and submit properly itemized invoices to the satisfaction of the City and in the format attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, with all relevant information necessary for the City to complete the reporting requirements in SAMHSA’s Notice of Award attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit “C”. Provider invoices must include the position of any person performing billable work, the hours and location worked, and what billable work was completed. In addition to the invoice template requirements, Provider agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the SAMHSA Notice of Award, including but not limited to funding conditions, detailed narrative/justification for all costs, and required reports. 2.3 The SAMHSA award number must be included on all invoices. 2.4 Payment. Subject to the conditions and requirements set forth herein, City agrees to pay Provider a sum not to exceed $1,499,175 for work performed under this Agreement. Provider acknowledges that it is familiar with the section of the SAMHSA Notice of Award titled “Funding Limitations” and agrees to comply with its provisions. 2.5 Use of Grant Monies. Provider use of any Project funds must comply with the Contractor Agreement between the City and SAMHSA. Provider must comply with all applicable federal laws and regulations, including Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R) Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Costs Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), and 45 C.F.R. Part 75 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, HHS Grants Policy Statement, and Audit Requirements for HHS Awards). It is Provider ’s responsibility to understand and comply with all requirements set forth therein. 2.6 Services Limited to Term. No services shall be rendered by Provider under the Project after September 29, 2026 and no payments will be made by City for services rendered under the Project after September 29, 2026. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND SAMHSA AND INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY. . . Item 18 Page 3 of 78 3.1 Provider agrees to comply with all the provisions of the Contractor Agreement between the City and SAMHSA. Provider must indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to City), protect and hold City, and its officers, employees, agents and representatives, harmless from, any and all claims of any kind or nature arising out of the Project or this Agreement or the implementation hereof, including, but not limited to, any damages to property, injuries to persons or accidental death (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs), which may be caused by work performed under this Agreement or any activities associated with the Project, whether such activities or work is performed by Provider or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted by the Provider (“Claims”). Provider ’s indemnity obligations under this section will survive termination of this Agreement. Provider ’s indemnity obligations under this section do not extend to claims, demands, damages, defense costs or liability for property damage, bodily injury or death occasioned by the willful misconduct of the City, or its officers, employees, agents or representatives. 3.2 Provider hereby waives, releases and discharges forever the City, and its employees, officers, volunteers, agents and representatives, from any and all present and future Claims arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, the performance of the Project, or Provider’ obligation to comply with all laws with respect to the Agreement. 4. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. 4.1 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Provider must comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the Project. 4.2 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Provider must not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, sex, gender, religion (including religious dress and grooming practices), national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition (including cancer and genetic characteristics), marital status, age, sexual orientation, color, creed, pregnancy, genetic information, gender identity or expression, political affiliation or belief, military/veteran status, or any other classification protected by applicable local, state, or federal laws (each a “Protected Characteristic”), against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a . . Item 18 Page 4 of 78 subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Provider under this Agreement. 5. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 5.1 Compliance with Laws. Provider must carry out the Project in conformity with all applicable federal, state and local laws, including Labor Code requirements; all provisions of the City’s Municipal Code; and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S. Code Section 12101, et seq., Government Code Section 4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 51, et seq., and Executive Order (E.O.) 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by E.O. 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and as supplemented by regulations at 41 C.F.R. Part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.” 5.2 Ownership of Materials. Provider hereby transfers and assigns to City all right, title and interest (including copyright rights) in and to all materials created or developed by Provider pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, reports, summaries, articles, pictures and art (collectively, the “Materials”) (subject to any licensed third-party rights retained therein). Provider must inform City in writing of any third-party rights retained within the Materials and the terms of all license agreements to use any materials owned by others. Provider understands and agrees that Provider retains no rights to the Materials and must assist City, upon reasonable request, with respect to the protection and/or registrability of the Materials. Provider represents and warrants that, unless otherwise stated to City in writing, the Materials are original works and do not infringe or violate the rights of any third party or violate any law. The obligations of this paragraph are subject to any applicable requirements of a Federal funding agency. 5.3 Assignment. Without the prior written consent of the City, Provider may not assign this Agreement nor delegate any duties herein. 5.4 Notices, Demands and Communications between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice (“Notice”) which either party . . Item 18 Page 5 of 78 may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by email to the party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the party as set forth below, or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. If to the City: City of Vernon Attention: Freddie Agyin Director of Health & Environmental Control 4305 Santa Fe Ave Vernon, CA 90058 Email: fagyin@cityofvernon.org If to the Provider: Provider: AltaMed Health Services Corporation Attention: Paula Jamison Sr. VP, Population Health Management Address: 2040 Camfield Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90040 Email: pjamison@altamed.org Notices sent by a party's attorney on behalf of such party are deemed delivered by such party. 5.5 Relationship between City and Provider. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between City and Provider is not that of a partnership or joint venture and that City and Provider are not deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other. Provider agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City from any claim made against City arising from a claimed relationship of partnership or joint venture between City and Provider with respect to the Project or Agreement. 5.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including any exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties regarding its subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings, correspondence, documentation, and agreements (written or oral). 5.7 Order of Precedence. In case of conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the terms contained in any document attached as an Exhibit or . . Item 18 Page 6 of 78 otherwise incorporated by reference, the terms of this Agreement shall strictly prevail. The terms of the City’s Request for Proposals shall control over the Provider’s Proposal. 5.8 Written Amendment. This Agreement may only be changed by written amendment executed by Provider and the City Administrator or other authorized representative of the City, subject to any requisite authorization by the City Council. Any oral representations or modifications concerning this Agreement shall be of no force or effect. 5.9 Conflicts of Interest. No member, official or employee of City can have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor must any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. 5.10 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Agreement. 5.11 Applicable Law; Venue. The laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws principles, must govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts lies exclusively in the County of Los Angeles, California Superior Court. In the event of litigation, venue lies exclusively in the United States District Court, Central District of California, in Los Angeles. 5.12 No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is made and entered into solely for the benefit of the City and Provider and no other third party has any right of action under this Agreement. 5.13 Disclosure of Documents. Provider acknowledges that the City is subject to the provisions of the California Public Records Act and that any information submitted to the City may be disclosed to the extent required by law. 5.14 Liability. Provider is wholly liable for any Claims arising out of this Agreement. . . Item 18 Page 7 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 8 of 78 Exhibit A Scope of Work 1. During the project period ending September 29, 2026 a. Provide basic primary health care services and supplies to 600 unhoused individuals b. Conduct 600 screenings and assessments of substance use disorders and co- occurring mental and substance use disorders utilizing a low threshold approach that offers SUD services, including medication assisted Opioid Use disorder and alcohol use disorder with unhoused individuals. c. Provide 600 unhoused clients with case management including comprehensive assessment of the client’s needs and development of an individualized service plan (including infectious disease prevention/treatment services, funding for treatment, etc) and referral/linkage to treatment as appropriate. d. Screen 600 unhoused individuals and their drug-using and/or sexual partners for HIV, viral hepatitis (B and C), STI’s, Mpox, and tuberculosis and provide HIV testing, using a portable clinical care approach. Note: Hepatitis A testing will also be performed if an outbreak takes place in the area. e. Provide treatment for 210 unhoused individuals and their drug-using and/or sexual partners for HIV, viral hepatitis, STIs, Mpox, and tuberculosis, and provide HIV testing using a portable clinical care approach. f. Navigate 30 unhoused individuals to Mpox testing, treatment and prevention resources, and mental health support. g. Provide testing to 600 unhoused individuals for STIs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis) and provide treatment on-site as needed. h. Screen 300 unhoused individuals for symptomatic tuberculosis. i. Test 300 unhoused individuals for latent or active tuberculosis j. Provide tuberculosis treatment to 20 unhoused individuals. 2. Prior to grant activities beginning implement infectious disease testing quality assurance measures following established guidelines. 3. Prior to grant activities beginning, develop a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options and develop Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) with the following, as appropriate: • Primary HIV treatment and care providers, including Ryan White providers, to strengthen integration of care through case management. • Treatment providers for referrals and linkages to follow-up care and treatment for individuals with viral hepatitis (B or C). • Care providers for referrals and linkages to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). • Care providers for referrals and linkage to Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP). 4. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, provide evidence-based harm reduction education and supplies including FDA-approved overdose reversal medication as well as drug supply testing and overdose prevention education and services on-site, as allowable under this award and adhering to federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and other requirements related to such programs or services for a total 600 unhoused individuals. 5. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, provide Mental . . Item 18 Page 9 of 78 healthcare, treatment, and referral for a total of 300 unhoused individuals including: a. Screening and assessment of mental health conditions and co- occurring mental and substance use disorders. b. Trauma-informed, culturally responsive, client-centered, evidence- based, recovery- oriented, and integrated mental health and substance use services on-site c. Deliver or coordinate any services determined to be necessary to address identified mental health conditions 6. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, provide outreach services to 1200 unhoused individuals living in the streets, encampments or other places not meant for human habitation by implementing strategies that effectively reach the people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness. 7. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, provide 200 unsheltered homeless individuals case management services to address social determinants of health, including housing for a total of unhoused individuals including the following: • Implementing strategies that effectively reach the people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness • Implementing a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options, including collaborating with HUDs Continuum of Care to enroll individuals in the local Coordinated Entry System, as well as the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program and other public housing options. • Providing case management services to coordinate all aspects of care, including behavioral health, primary care, infectious disease prevention and treatment, other supportive services (e.g., housing, benefits, employment), and assist with transitions for returning to the community after any hospitalization or emergency room visit as appropriate, including enrolling eligible individuals in health insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and other benefit programs (e.g., Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, prescription assistance programs, etc.), and other human and community-based services as appropriate. 8. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, provide transportation directly to and from referral providers for a total 150 unhoused individuals. 9. Prior to the beginning of service provision, provide training for 100% of staff and service providers on harm reduction strategies, evidence-based practices, motivational interviewing, intensive case management, community reinforcement approach and/or peer supports. 10. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, distribute hygiene kits, safer sex kits and, or equipment and supplies to 1200 unhoused individuals to enhance harm reduction efforts 11. During the project period ending September 29, 2026, utilize telehealth and/or telemedicine services with a total of 25 unhoused individuals 12. At the conclusion of 4 quarters of service delivery, develop policies to support needed service system improvements regarding establishment of standards of . . Item 18 Page 10 of 78 care for IBHPC + HIV Street Medicine. 13. Annually throughout the performance period, participate in a virtual learning collaborative to share best practices and lessons learned, as well as brainstorm solutions to challenges faced by members of the learning collaborative. 14. Annually throughout the performance period, document best practices and lessons learned while implementing integrated care using a portable clinical care approach and Disseminate findings from pilot program. 15. Upon completion of the performance period, document best practices and lessons learned for the public through either the development of white papers, participation in conference presentations, a guide to be shared with the public about launching their own portable clinical care program, etc. . . Item 18 Page 11 of 78 Exhibit B Invoice Requirements Invoices must be submitted on a monthly basis and include the following information: 1. Project/Activity Name 2. Date (Performance Period) 3. Cost breakdown for proposed reimbursable expenses 4. A detailed description of work by each individual billing services including but not limited to hours worked, key personnel assigned, summary of meetings, staff hired with date of hire, number of clients served, type of services provided, and point of care., 5. Itemized travel and boarding expense information 6. Adequate support as applicable including: a. Itemized receipts (including but not limited to copies of reports/supporting documents referenced in Exhibits A, C-D) b. Staff resumes/credentials c. Staff training dates and applicable certifications 7. In addition to the invoice requirements noted above, the SAMHSA Grant Application, Notice of Award, and Disparity Impact Statement attached hereto as Exhibits C-E are incorporated herein by reference and Provider agrees to comply with all terms and conditions therein, including but not limited to funding conditions, detailed narrative/justification for all costs, and reporting requirements. . . Item 18 Page 12 of 78 Exhibit C Grant Application . . Item 18 Page 13 of 78 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 11 /30/2025 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 * 1. Type of Submission: Q Preapplication Q Application • Changed/Corrected Application * 2. Type of Application: * If Revision, select appropriate letter(s): •New Q Continuation *Other (Specify) Q Revision * 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier: 7/26/2023 5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier: 93.899 -23-024 State Lase Only: 6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: * a. Legal Name: he City of Vernon * b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): * c. UEI: ZMK4GCEKJ7G3 95-6000808 d. Address: * Street1: 305 Santa Fe Avenue Street2: * City: ernon County/Parish: * State: CA: California Province: * Country: USA: UNITED STATES * Zip /Postal Code: 90058-1714 c. Organi-rational unit: Department Name: Division Name: f. \`ame and contact information of person to he contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: *First Name: - Middle Name: * Last Name: Suffix: Title: Organizational Affiliation: * Telephone Number: Fax Number: * Email: Page 2 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024. Received Date: 2023-07-26714:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 14 of 78 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 12/31 /2022 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 * 9. "Cype of Applicant l: Select Applicant 'Type: C: City or Township Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: * Other (specify): x 10. Name of Federal Agency: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Adminis 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: CFDA Title: x 12. Funding Opportunity Number: -23-024 * Title: Minority HIV/AIDS Fund: Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care for Unsheltered Populations Pilot Project 13. Competition Identification Number: -23-024 Title: Portable Clinical Care Pilot Project 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): File Name: 1247-Attachment 9.pdf IS. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions. File Name: Page 3 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024. Received Date: 2023-07-26714:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 15 of 78 OMB Number. 4040-004 Expf ration Date: 12/31 /2Q22 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 16. Congressional Districts Of: * a. Applicant q-042 * b. Program/Project: q-a42 Attach an addtt(onal list of Program/Project Congressional D(st~icts if needed. 17. Proposed Project: * a. Start Date: 0/01 /2023 * b. End Date: 9/3 /2026 18. Estimated Fending (S): * a. Federal 1,498,900.0 * b. Applicant 0.0 * c. State * d. Local 0.0 * e. Other 0.0 * f. Program Income p, * g. TOTAL 1,998,900.0 * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Ezecn6f e Order 12372 Process? p a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on ~ b. Program is subject to E.0.12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. Q c. Program is not covered by E.0.12372. * 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes", provide ezplanation in attachment.) p Yes ~ No Z1. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are tree, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also pro~zde the required assurances** and agree to comply with ant resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, ficfitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrati~~e penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) ~1 ** I AGREE **The list of certifications and assurances, or an intemet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representati~•e: Prefix: *First Name: - Middle Name: * Last Name: Suffix: - * T(tle: edical Director * Telephone Number. Fax Number. * Email: * S(gnature of Authorized Representative: *Date Signed: Page 4 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024. Received Date: 2023-07-26T14:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 16 of 78 Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation's Most Business-Friendly City July 5, 2023 Statement of Certification of Geographic Catchment Area This letter serves to certify the City of Vernon's On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program will target unsheltered homeless individuals in Los Angeles County, California, which is one of the ALL INside Initiative jurisdictions. In Community . .~ Fredrick Agyin, Director of Health City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058-1714 1247-Attachment 9 Page 5 . . Item 18 Page 17 of 78 BUDGET INFORMATION - Non-Construction Programs OMB Approval No. 4040-0006 Expiration Date 02/28/2025 SECTION A -BUDGET SUMMARY Grant Program Function or Activit a y ~ ~ Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number (b) Estimated Unobligated Funds New or Revised Budget Federal (c) Non-Federal (d) Federal (e) Non-Federal (fl Total (g) 1 . Personnel 0 $0.00 $0.00 $53,000.00 $0.00 $53,000.00 2. Contractual 0 $0.00 $0.00 $569,500.00 $0.00 $569,500.00 3 . Other 0 $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 4 . Indirect 0 $0.00 $0.00 $8,800.00 $0.00 $8,800.00 5. Totals $0.00 $0.00 $666,300.00 $0.00 $666,300.00 SECTION B -BUDGET CATEGORIES 6. Object Class Categories GRANT PROGRAM, FUNCTION OR ACTIVITY Total (5) (1) Personnel (2) Contractual (3) Other (4) Indirect a. Personnel X53,000.00 $532,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $585,000.00 b. Fringe Benefits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 c. Travel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 d. Equipment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 e. Supplies $0.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 f. Contractual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 g. Construction $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 h. Other $0.00 $25,000.00 $35,000.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 i . Total Direct Charges (sum of 6a-6h) $53,000.00 $567,000.00 $35,000.00 $0.00 $655,000.00 j. Indirect Charges $0.00 $2,500.00 $0.00 $8,800.00 $11,300.00 k. TOTALS (sum of 6i and 6j) $53,000.00 $569,500.00 $35,000.00 $8,800.00 $666,300.00 7. Program Income $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Standard From 424A (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Page 6 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024 . Received Date: 2023-07-26714:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 18 of 78 SECTION C -NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES (a) Grant Program (b) Applicant (c) State (d) Other Sources (e) TOTALS 8. Personnel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 9. Contractual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 10 . Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 11 . Indirect $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 12. TOTAL (sum of lines 8-11) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SECTION D -FORECASTED CASH NEEDS 13. Federal Total for 1st Year 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter $666,300.00 $166,575.00 $166,575.00 $166,575.00 $166,575.00 14. Non-Federal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 15. TOTAL (sum of lines 73 and 74 ) $666,300.00 $166,575.00 $166,575.00 $166,575.00 $166,575.00 SECTION E -BUDGET ESTIMATES OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF THE PROJECT (a) Grant Program FUTURE FUNDING PERIODS (Years) (b) First (c) Second (d) Third (e) Fourth 16. Personnel $53,000.00 $53,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 17. Contractual $569,500.00 $569,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 18 . Other $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 19 . Indirect $8,800.00 $8,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 20. TOTAL (sum of lines 76-79) $666,300.00 $666,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 SECTION F -OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION 21. Direct Charges: 0 22. Indirect Charges: Indirect Charges: de minimis rate 10% on $88,000 23. Remarks: Standard Form 424A (rev. 7-97) Paget Authorized for Locai Reproduction Page 7 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024 . Received Date: 2023-07-26714:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 19 of 78 ASSURANCES -NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS OMB Approval No. 4040-0007 Expiration Date 02/28/2025 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0040), Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. NOTE: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant: 1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. 2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act 7 of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). 6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§1681- 1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reporoduction Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (fl the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee- 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of . alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statutes) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and, (j) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statutes) which may apply to the application. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally- assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in purchases. 8. Will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Standard Form 4248 (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Page 8 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024 . Received Date: 2023-07-26714:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 20 of 78 9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements. 10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. 11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (fl conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523); and, (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93- 205). 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq.). 14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." 18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program. 19. Will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104) which prohibits grant award recipients or asub-recipient from (1) Engaging in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect (2) Procuring a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect or (3) Using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award. * SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL *TITLE Medical Director * APPLICANT ORGANIZATION *DATE SUBMITTED The City of Vernon 07-26-2023 Standard Form 4246 (Rev. 7-97) Back Page 9 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024 . Received Date: 2023-07-26T 14:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 21 of 78 OMB Number: 4040-0019 Expiration Date: 02/2812022 Project Abstract Summary Funding Opportunity TI-23-024 Number: CFDA(s): Applicant Name: The City of Vernon Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care Project Abstract: In order to address the growing need in our community to provide healthcare to the unhoused, The City of Vernon is partnering with and MLK Hospital Street Medicine and Wellness Equity Alliance to implement our On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care IBHPC+HIV Care Program. This program combines the best practices of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care and HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment interventions with the promising practice of Street Medicine to provide comprehensive services to unsheltered people experiencing homelessness. On-The-Streets provides direct patient care through multi-disciplinary teams who conduct walking rounds and pop up clinics for the unsheltered homeless population in the Greater Vernon Area. Our implementation strategy for this program is built on a foundation trust-building, flexibility, and respect for the unsheltered individuals' unique experiences and wishes. We recognize that unsheltered individuals have many of the same medical issues as the general population, we also recognize that traditional doctor-patient relationship in brick and mortar practices does not meet the needs of this population. We firmly believe that quality healthcare is a fundamental right that should be accessible to every person, irrespective of their housing situation and we are experienced in addressing the unique needs and challenges faced by unhoused individuals, particularly those who have been living on the streets or encampments for extended lengths of time and those with complex co-morbidity issues. On the Streets will improve health outcomes of those who do not readily utilize shelters or the adjunctive services co-located within shelters by providing direct patient care to unsheltered individuals experiencing homelessness. The Street Medicine Team is a roaming multi-disciplinary team will be a with "relationship-based" model including frequent/re-occurring contact with patients. The team will be comprised a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, a Medical Assistant, Community Health Worker SUD Counselor, Community Health Worker/HIV Counselor/Tester and a Consulting Psychiatrist. Page 10 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024 . Received Date: 2023-07-26T 14:03: 34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 22 of 78 OMB Number: 4040-0010 Expiration Date: 11/30/2025 Project/Performance Site Locations) Project/Performance Site Primary Location Organization Name: City of Vernon O I am submitting an application as an individual, and not on behalf of a company, state, local or tribal government, academia, or other type of organization. UEI: ZMK4GCEKJ7G3 Street1*: 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Street2: City*: Vernon County: State*: CA: California Province: Country*: USA: UNITED STATES Zip /Postal Code*: 90058-1714 Project/Performance Site Congressional District*: CA-037 Additional Locations) File Name: Page 11 Tracking Number: GRANT13946260 Opportunity Number: TI-23-024 . Received Date: 2023-07-26T 14:03:34.000-04:00 . . Item 18 Page 23 of 78 A-1 The population of focus is unhoused individuals, youth and families living on the streets or locations not meant for habitation such as cars, vans, tents, and makeshifts in the City of Vernon and the surrounding area within the county of Los Angeles. This catchment area is west of the Los Angeles River, south of I-10 east of I-110, and north of I-105. The Zip Codes included are 9001 1, 90003, 90001, 90002, 90058, 90255, 90280, 90270.90744 and 90745. The greater Vernon area is part of Los Angeles Continuum of Care (CoC) and is located within Service Planning Area 6 South. It is located in one of the identified U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness' ALLIn Initiative jurisdictions. (Certification in attachments) In this CoC, there are more than 45,000 unsheltered homeless adults and nearly 800 unsheltered homeless children. Approximately half are Hispanic/Latino. (US Department of~Housing and Urban Development Point -In-Time Courtl 2022) Demographically this population is 31 %Female, 67% Male, and 2% identifying as Non -binary, Questioning or Transgender; 42% are Hispanic/Latino, 31%Black or African American, 19% White and 5% multiple races or other. In addition: 5%are transition -age youth (age 18-24); 42% are chronically homeless; 30% have substance abuse disorders, 25%suffer from serious mental illness and an estimated 3-4% are positive with HIV. Socioeconomically they have low or no income and few resources. They have lost connection with family and friends and are socially isolated within encampments or in cars. They suffer from trauma and are reluctant to seek out care. Source: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count Report, June 2023) A-2 Vernon is located in Los Angeles County which has the largest homeless population in the U.S. The unsheltered population is experiencing profound healthcare access issues here. Improved health-cat•e access among people experiencing homelessness is identified as a critical need for Vernon and the surrounding area. As such, the City Health Department is targeting this population for services and care. (City of Vernon Community Health Needs Assessment, 2023) The upstream causes of poor health in the homeless population in the greater Vernon Area include extreme poverty, harsh living envit•onments, trauma and structural bari•iei•s to care. The downstream causes include infectious diseases, HIV, heart disease, substance use disorders (SUDs) and mental illnesses and SUDS which are all quite prevalent among this population. Exacerbating this problem is the fact that aside from the City Department of Health and a few urgent care practices, there are minimal options for health care in Vernon with no primary care providers, women's health providers, mental health providers or substance use disorder resources. (Source: City of Vernon Commzmity Health Needs Assessment, 2023) The majority of unhoused individuals in Vernon have been living on the streets or in places not meant for habitation for many years and typically show signs of physical decline and mental health decompensation. There is currently no system in place to addt•ess the myriad of barriers these individuals face. As such the City Police Department is navigating complex systems of care in Los Angeles County to find health care and mental health services for these individuals. This is inefficient and unsustainable for the City. (Source: City of Vernon Community Health Needs Assessment, 2023) A 2022 study by the RAND Institute found that 54% of unhoused people living in Los Angeles reported having a ►rental health condition. And, when a broad view of mental health is taken into consideration —including depression, stress and anxiety —some experts argue that it impacts all homeless people. 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 12 . . Item 18 Page 24 of 78 In our area, just as in the rest of the United States, homeless services systems continued to expand the availability of both temporary and permanent beds in 2022, but these resources still fall short of reaching everyone in need. (Source: National Alliance to End Homelessness State of Homelessness: 2023 Edition.) And so, while we understand that housing can serve as an excellent platform for providing a system of care, the fact remains that housing remains elusive to the unhoused individuals in the Greater Vernon Area and street homeless men and women have life spans nearly 30 years shorter than their housed counterparts as access to primary care services remains difficult due to structural and economic barriers. (Source: Street Medicine Program, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California and Street Medicine Institute, Ingomar, Pennsylvania) We simply cannot wait for all of these individuals to be housed before addressing these critical physical and mental health issues if we are to improve the overall health and wellness of the Greater Vernon Area. Number of unduplicated Individuals to be Served with Award Funds Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 300 400 500 1200 The overarching goal of this program is to improve access to healthcare for the unsheltered population is in the Greater Vec•non Area as ide~ltified in the 2023 Community Health Needs Assessment. While housing for homeless individuals is preferred, the City will address this inequity by implementing efficient and effective strategies to provide health care on the streets and in encampments with the following objectives: l .During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026 we will: a. Provide basic primary health care services and supplies to 600 unhoused individuals b. Conduct 600 screenings and assessments of substance use disorders and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders utilizing a low threshold approach that offers SUD services, including medication assisted Opioid Use disorder and alcohol use disorder with unhoused individuals. c. Provide 600 unhoused clients with case management including comprehensive assessment of the client's needs and development of an individualized service plan (including infectious disease prevention/treatment services, funding for treatment, etc) and referral/linkage to treatment as appropriate. d. Screen 600 unhoused individuals and their drug-using and/or sexual partners for HIV, viral hepatitis (B and C), STI's, Mpox, and tuberculosis and provide HIV testing, using a portable clinical care approach. Note: Hepatitis A testing will also be performed if an outbreak takes place in the area. e. Provide treatment for 210unhoused individuals and their drug-using and/or sexual partners for• HIV, viral hepatitis, STI's, Mpox, and tuberculosis and provide HIV testing, using a portable clinical care approach. f. Navigate 30 unhoused individuals to Mpox testing, treatment and prevention resources and mental health support. g. Provide testing to 600 unhoused individuals for STIs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis) and provide treatment on-site as needed. h. G Screen 300unhoused individuals for symptomatic tuberculosis. i. Test 300 unhoused individuals for latent or active tuberculosis j. Provide tuberculosis treatment to 20 unhoused individuals. 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 13 . . Item 18 Page 25 of 78 2. Prior to grant activities beginning implement infectious disease testing quality assurance measures following established guidelines. 3. Prior to grant activities beginning, develop a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options and develop Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs) with the following, as appropriate: • Primary HIV treatment and care providers, including Ryan White providers, to strengthen integration of care through case management. • Treatment providers for referrals and linkages to follow-up care and treatment for individuals with viral hepatitis (B or C). • Care providers for referrals and linkages to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). • Care providers for referrals and linkage to Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP). 4. During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, provide evidence-based harm reduction education and supplies including FDA -approved overdose reversal medication as well as drug supply testing and overdose prevention education and services on-site, as allowable under this award and adhering to federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and other requirements related to such programs or services for a total 600 unhoused individuals. 5. During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, provide Mental healthcare, treatment, and referral for• a total of 300 unhoused individuals including: a. Screening and assessment of mental health conditions and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. b. Trauma-informed, culturally responsive, client-centered, evidence-based, cecovery- oriented, and integrated mental health and substance use services on-site c. Deliver or coordinate any services determined to be necessary to address identified mental health conditions 6. During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, provide outreach services to 1200 unhoused individuals living in the streets, encampments or other places not meant for• human habitation by implementing strategies that effectively reach the people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness. 7. During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, provide 200 unsheltered homeless individuals case management services to address social determinants of health, including housing for a total of unhoused individuals including the following: • Implementing strategies that effectively reach the people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness • Implementing a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options, including collaborating with HUDs Continuum of Care to enroll individuals in the local Coordinated Entry System, as well as the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program and other public housing options. • Providing case management services to coordinate all aspects of care, including behavioral health, prima►•y care, infectious disease prevention and treatment, other supportive services (e.g., housing, benefits, employment), and assist with transitions for returning to the community after any hospitalization or emergency room visit as appropriate, including enrolling eligible individuals in health insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and other benefit programs (e.g., Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, prescription assistance programs, etc.), and other human and community-based services as appropriate. 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 14 . . Item 18 Page 26 of 78 8. During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, provide transportation directly to and from referral providers for a total 150 unhoused individuals. 9. Prior to the beginning of service provision, provide training for 100% of staff and service providers on harm reduction strategies, evidence-based practices, motivational interviewing, intensive case management, community reinforcement approach and/or peer supports. 10 During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, distribute hygiene kits, safer sex kits and, or equipment and supplies to 1200 unhoused individuals to enhance harm reduction efforts 11. During the project period ending Sept 30, 2026, utilize telehealth and/or telemedicine services with a total of 25 unhoused individuals 12. At the conclusion of 4 quarters of service delivery, develop policies to support needed service syste►n improvements regarding establishment of standards of care for IBHPC +HIV Street Medicine. 13. Annually throughout the performance period, participate in a virtual learning collaborative to share best practices and lessons learned, as well as brainstorm solutions to challenges faced by members of the learning collaborative. 14. Annually throughout the performance period, document best practices and lessons learned while implementing integrated care using a portable clinical cac•e approach and Disseminate findings from pilot program. 15. Upon completion of the performance period, document best practices and lessons learned for the public through either the development of white papers, participation in conference presentations, a guide to be shared with the public about launching their own portable clinical care p►•ogram, etc B-2 The City of Vel•non Health Depat-tment is currently providing Integt•ated Behavioral Health and Primary Care (IBHPC) including HIV interventions from 3 mobile trailers and 2 ►nobile units (Mercedes Sprinter vans). In order to address the growing need in our community to reach the unhoused, we are pa~~tnering with MLK Hospital Street Medicine and Wellness Equity Alliance to implement our On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care IBHPC+HIV Care Program. This program combines the best practices of IBH/Primary Care and I-IIV/AIDS prevention and treatment interventions with the promising practice of Street Medicine to provide comprehensive services to unsheltered people experiencing homelessness. On-The-Streets provides direct patient care through multi -disciplinary teams who conduct walking rounds and pop up clinics for the unsheltered homeless population in the Greater Vernon Area. Our implementation strategy for this program is built on a foundation trust-building, fl exibility, and respect for the unsheltered individuals' unique experiences and wishes. We recognize that unsheltered individuals have many of the same medical issues as the genet•al population, we also recognize that traditional doctor patient relationship in bc•ick and mortar practice does not meet the needs of this population. We firmly believe that quality healthcare is a fundamental right that should be accessible to every person, irrespective of their housing situation and we are experienced in addressing the unique needs and challenges faced by unhoused individuals, particularly those who have been living on the streets or encampments for extended lengths of time and those with complex co-morbidity issues. On the Streets will improve health outcomes of those who do not readily utilize shelters or 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 15 . . Item 18 Page 27 of 78 the adjunctive services co-located within shelters by providing dire direct patient care to unsheltered individuals experiencing homelessness. The Street Medicine Team is a roaming multi -disciplinary team will be a with "relationship- based" model including frequent/re-occurring contact with patients. The team will be comprised a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, a Medical Assistant, Community Health Worker (CHW) SUD Counselor, CCHW/HIV Counselor/Tester, and a Consulting Psychiatrist. Planning Prior to deploying this team, we will • convene a planning session with all partners, staff and stakeholders including individuals with lived experience. • develop Electronic Medical Record workflow that allows for efficient reporting on outcomes for this project and a • develop and review a Behavioral Health Disparity Impact Statement (DIS). • provide training to staff and other• stakeholders on the National CLAS standards, mental health and substance use disorders, harm reduction strategies; Street Medicine; Project specific policies and p►•oceduces; Integrated Care; U=U messaging, telehealth services, and other relevant topics GIS Street Mapping WEA will provide a series of comprehensive community health needs assessments (CHNAs) to identify the most impactful locations from a social detet•minants of health (SDoH) standpoint. WEA is able to pet•form 360° community health assessments using adata-science technique that consolidates a group of SDoH data-sets (>90) focusing on social vulnerability and the cascading impacts of SUD and HIV risk, coupled with GIS-guided anonymized cell phone data. Our group will evaluate this data overlaid on GIS to determine the "hotspots" where altel•native medical services (e.g. HIV prevention mobile units) sf~ould be deployed in order to achieve maximal impact. These data-driven decisions will not supplant, but rather• enhance our coordination with CBOs and other community stakeholders involved in identifying sites. In addition, when we superimpose anonymized cellphone movement data (GIS), we can better understand where people are spending their time. Data like this can be analyzed more granula►•ly to identify specific places, days of the week, and time of day where these residents may be reached. It can also be used to identify movement patterns and behaviors to help inform strategy, such as how often residents visit health centers, child care facilities, as well as other community engagement (e.g. fast food, liquor establishments, churches, grocery stores, etc). Having adata-informed strategy to target equitable distribution of resources, close gaps in access, and ►neet patients and ►•esidents "where they are at" with targeted interventions designed based on information rather than an Deployment Strategy In terms of data analytics, our approach isthree-pronged. First, we will work with our data analytics approach to provide demographic, SDo~-I, and mobility data to pinpoint specific locations in vulnerable neighborhoods from each region to deploy mobile clinics and/or provide community health education on HIV prevention. The analysis support will focus on identifying key communities that are particularly vulnerable due to lack of access to care (many socially-determined) and lack of actionable data for programs to target limited resources like mobile clinics-to reach the highest 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 16 . . Item 18 Page 28 of 78 number of people. The city of Vernon (in collaboration with our partners) will provide the following deliverables: • Conduct iterative analyses in order to identify specific locations within the regions that are frequently visited by community residents that are highly impacted by SDoH and community vulnerabilities, which may include data factors such as: socioeconomic and language barriers, access to care and transportation, housing stability, chronic condition prevalence, etc. o We will mostly focus on areas of known high population density of IDUs, including shooting galleries and encampments. • Utilizing these data indicators, we will outline the highest-risk geographies/neighborhoods to focus on (5 sq mi area each). • Conduct analysis of mobility patterns using human mobility data within the region identified to isolate the highest-density areas- this shows high-level foot traffic and travel patterns across the areas) of analysis. • From the highest-density areas identified, WEA will isolate specific sites/buildings to generate descriptive statistics on peak days and times- these will be the specific site recommendations for• mobile health or community outreach efforts. • Provide a written report outlining the methodology, findings, and recommendations. • Determine the data fields and frequency required to track outcomes of interest, which may be of interest to SAMHSA. • Analyze tracked program data on an ad hoc basis to identify any key insights that can be used to guide the strategy of the program, outreach, or workflow ope►•ations. Implementation The Street Medicine team will utilize a combination of roaming rounds and pop-up clinics to • Provide basic primary health care services and supplies • Provide Low bar►•ier substance use disorder treatment • Syndemically address infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted infections (STI), vi►•al hepatitis, Mpox, and tuberculosis, as appropl•iate • Provide harm reduction services • Provide Mental healthcare, treatment, and referral • Conduct outreach and provide case management services to address social determinants of health, including housing. After our initial implementation we will conduct an Initial Project Evaluation and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Analysis. We will revise procedures as appropriate based on results from CQI analysis and redeploy. We will follow up with a Rapid CQI Changes Assessment and revise protocols again if needed. We will report all findings including best practices lessons learned and challenges as well as throughputs and outcomes. Integrated Behavioral Health Care —Chronic diseases that drive morbidity and health ca►•e costs are often influenced by behavioral health conditions such as depression, anxiety and substance use disorders. When effectively managed, these behavioral health symptoms are mitigated, improved patient outcomes can be seen for chronic and infectious diseases. We will utilize this approach with primary care and behavioral health providers working together, in teams. Traditionally, this Evidence Based Practice is site -based with practitioners co-located in the same building. We will adapt this model to work within a street medicine concept by taking the practitioners out of the building. We will keep them in integrated teams that will operate in the streets in roaming rounds and pop-up clinics in areas where unhoused individuals congregate. 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 17 . . Item 18 Page 29 of 78 Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and Medication for Alcohol Use Disorder —These EBPs use medications that target the brain in combination with counseling and behavioral therapies to provide a whole patient approach to treahnent. These practices are effective with this population of focus and are critical components of recovery for individuals experiencing homelessness. They decrease deaths by overdose and are supported by research. We will refer patients to certified providers. Motivational interviewing (Mn is aclient-centered counseling approach that helps individuals overcome ambivalent feelings and insecurities and generate motivation to change undesired behaviors and reduce or stop unhealthy lifestyle choices. It helps individuals with a variety of presenting problems, including mental health disorders andlor SUDS typically experienced by tuisheltered homeless individuals. MI can move individuals towards recovery and engage theta iu treatment before and while working toward a stable housing placement. Street Medicine —Street Medicine is a practice that has emerged in the past decade in which healthcare providers deliver medical care to homeless populations outside of traditional healthcare facilities in various settings where unsheltered people live. There are cturently no definitive standardized protocols for delivering street mnedicine. However, there are best practices w~iich can be followed. Street medicine works well with unsheltered people experiencing homelessness as it reduces health inequities and stigma ainon~ excluded populations. It also allows early interventions and easier access to healthcare services. These types of programs also represent a cost-effective delivery model that unproves health outcomes in uuderserved populations. It is preventive nature, which reduces serious and costly complications that can increase healthcare- associated costs for a coininunity. C-2 Fidelity monitoring is a key eleulent in successful unpleineutation, sustainmeut, and expansion of otu~ program. As such the City of Vernon will incorporate Fidelity reviews as part of the evaluation and unprovetnent process to evaluate adherence, exposiue, quality of delivery, participant responsiveness, and program differentiation. The data collection protocol inay include data sources and methods of observation such as "site" visits while the team is working iu the streets or encampment, at teaiu ineetiugs, interviews with staff and patients, and a review of docuineutation. D1 -The City of Vernon, which is one of only fotu cities in the state of Califonua with its own health departYneut, is focused on ensuring the health and safety of its residents, workers, visitors and neiahborina communities. The City of Vernon will lead. direct and oversee t}us nroiect. . He will be the Project uector or s program. e as years o experience ea g popu atiou and public health systems across the nation and beyond. He serves as one of 12 members of the boards for the HIV Medicine Association (F.~TMA), representing >12,000 HIV providers in the US. Here has served as one of the leaders to promote the effectiveness of street medicine for people living with or at risk of HIV. Iu fact, he co-authored a white paper on this topic, which was published by F.[IVMA. He is widely laiowu as a national subject matter expert on HIV prevention and treahnent for eo le ex eriencing homelessness. is well positioned to be the Project Director having served as the first Chief Medical O icer or NYC dluing the first COVID-19 stage in 2020, overseeing COVID-19 clinical operations for the Office of Emergency Mauageuient and numerous CMO posts overseeing community health centers focusing on homelessness, indigenous health, migrant health, substance 1248-City of Vemon Street Medicine Narrative Page 18 . . Item 18 Page 30 of 78 abuse and mental health across the US. He has been MAT medical director for a number of organizations. He was also previously the national director of infectious diseases for the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, the largest community-based HIV organization in the US. MLK Community Healthcare is an integrated healthcare delivery system that serves the medically- underserved community of South Los Angeles in the Greater Vernon Area. Their Street Medicine Department is addressing the needs of the unsheltered patients that seek care in their facilities. The Street Medicine Department sends an interdisciplinary team of clinical care experts, social services personnel and outreach experts onto the streets to do regular checks on formerly hospitalized MLK Community Hospital patients who are unhoused. The team performs a range of health and supportive functions, from refilling prescription medicines to performing simple wound care or staple or suture removal. MLK Community Health Care Street Medicine has committed to proving appropriate referral of eligible unhoused patients in the MLK Community Healthcare service area and to collaborating on care for patients. Wellness Equity Alliance (WEA), the organization that prepared the 2023 Community Health Needs Assessment for the City of Vernon will be providing the street medicine team staff and supplies, program coordination, project evaluation, quality assurance and improvement process as well as the Electronic Medical Record & Telehealth service/technical interface, GIS technology. WEA is a national public health organization and multidisciplinary team of physicians, health professionals, and organizational experts with expertise in infectious disease, public health, emergency medicine, primary care, cardiology, pediatrics, psychiatry, community health work (CHW), nursing and advanced pI•actice pharmacy. WEA partners with governme~lt, non-profit or sovereign entities to provide comprehensive community &public health extension services tailored to minimize access barriers for historically marginalized communities. WEA's core mission is to addt•ess healthcare disparities largely driven by the social determinants of health (SDoH). Their team has experience and proven ability to rapidly deploy professional medical personnel and resources as needed to accommodate outbreaks and other unexpected issues in demanding environments. WEA's team members built their• national reputation by partnering with more than 60 government agencies to respond to the COVID-19 mass vaccination program. Their work delivered more than 2 million COVID-19 vaccinations across more than 10 states in the US with a focus on underserved and historically marginalized communities. Standing up amulti-state, mass vaccination program in the midst of a pandemic required a relentless focus on quality care and rapidly implemented performance improvement cycles as CDC guidelines changed. Given the worsening of chronic disparities exacerbated by impact of the pandemic, they quickly expanded their operational models across the U.S. to encompass a wide scope of communicable diseases including HIV/AID, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis, STI's, Mpox as well as behavioral health, substance abuse diabetes and other clinical needs of historically marginalized populations. Brett J. Feldman, MSPAS, PA -C, will be serving as an advisor through WEA on this project. Mr. Feldman serves as the Vice Chair of the Street Medicine Institute, an international organization that provides technical assistance to street medicine prograrr►s around the world. His work has been featured on the BBC, Channel News Asia, Washington Post, LA Times, CNN, the Associated Press and Telemundo. A PBS documentary featuring Brett and the street medicine program that he founded, Close to Home: Street Medicine, won an Emmy award in 2018. Mr. Feldman is also the Director and co-Founder of Street Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine (KSOM) of USC and an Assistant Professor of Family Medicine. He has practiced homeless medicine since 2007 and founded programs at Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN) 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 19 . . Item 18 Page 31 of 78 Street Medicine in Allentown, PA, and co-founded the KSOM of USC Street Medicine in Los Angeles, CA. Title Role Qualifications Level of Effort A master's degree in public health, healthcare Oversee and manage the day-to-day ad►ninistration, social operations of the integrated behavioral health work, or a related field is Project and primary care street medicine program, required. A clinical o.25 FTE (25 /o Director ensuring smooth functioning and efficient degree (e.g., MD, DO, LOE) delivery of services. NP, PA) is preferred. Extensive experience serving marginalized populations required. A bachelor's degree in a relevant field is required. Extensive Lead the development and implementation of experience serving unsheltered Program an HIV integrated behavioral health and individuals such as ublic health, p 1 FTE Coordinator primary care street medicine program, healthcare administration social ~ 100%) ensuring alignment with the organization's work, or a related discipline is mission, goals, and strategic objectives. required. Develop and implement an evaluation plan for A master's degree or higher in Project the integrated behavioral health and primary public health, social sciences, Evaluator care street medicine program, including the evaluation, or a related field is identification of evaluation methods, data required. .25FTE (25% collection tools, and perfor►nance indicators. LOE) Master's degree in Nursing, with a specialty in Psychiatric ursing Valid CA licensure as a Physical health assessments, Mental health Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner assessments, Designing treatment plans, 10+years of experience in a Psychiatric Prescribing psycho-pharmaceuticals and clinical setting preferred Nurse medication, Experience working in o 1 FTE (100 /o Practitioner Working with patients and families to explain ambulatory settings Experience working with LOE) treatment plans, adjust medication and underserved communities, treatment for patients including those experiencing homelessness 5+years' experience prescribing medication assisted treatment (MAT) Completion of a medical Medical Assists with all clinical needs and supports assistant training program from 1 FTE (100% Assistant administrative overflow work. an accredited institution is LOE) required. Community Associate's or Bachelor's degree Health Worker Assists with patient outreach, resourcing, in public health, social work, ~ FTE (100% SUD patient retention, com►nunity surveillance, and nursing, psychology, or a related LOE) Counselor operational support; provide SUD counseling. field; Credentialed to provide SUD counseling. 3-5 years' 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 20 . . Item 18 Page 32 of 78 experience SUD patients and unsheltered homeless population preferred. Community Associate's or Bachelor's degree Health Worker Assists with patient outreach, resourcing, in public health, social work, HIV patient retention, community surveillance, and nursing, psychology, or a related 1 FTE (100% Counselor/Tes operational support; provides HIV testing and field; 3-5 years' experience with LOE) ter counseling. HIV patients and unsheltered homeless population preferred. Medical Doctor licensed to practice in California; General Psychiatry Board Certification Diagnostic evaluations, treatment from The American Board of Consulting recommendations based on their assessments; Psychiatry and Neurology; Child Psychiatrist medication management; consultation, and Adolescent Psychiatry .25~FTE recommendations, and guidance to the street Board Certification from The (25 /o LOE) medicine team regarding patients with mental American Board of Psychiatry Health diagnoses. and Neurology; Certification in Community Psychiatry from American Association of Community Psychiatrists E1 The City of Vernon is committed to i►nplementing a robust monitoring and evaluation system to track the program's progress and outcomes. We will regularly collect data, analyze results, and use the findings to make informed decisions. WEA ground and support staff will continue to engage in highly tc•ained data collection efforts throughout the operational pe►•iod, which will funnel into our population health analytic tools analyzing the following measures: • Using our local digital platforms (engaging local HIE platforms), we will perform M&E of the following: o Changes in Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs (KAB) iterative surveys (starting with baseline) of those who have completed the workshops andqualitative data about feelings of "engagement" and "connection" to PCMHs, community centers, schools, etc. o Increase in PHQ-9 score implementation among patients o Increase in # of MAT patients (e.g. buprenorphine rx)# patients served o Demographics, including: Neighborhood makeup Primary languages spoken Race/ethnicity Sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) o # comorbidities o # refer►•als to Social services, HIV care, primary care medical home o #adverse events o Changes in HIV or behavioral health-related cases related to ED visits, pioid overdose, Hospitalizations, ICU admissions, or deaths This (along with a number of WEA-determined QI measures), will help determine the level of success and direction of ongoing and sustainable clinical needs and assist in focusing on CQI efforts using the Triple Aim approach. \1Ve will work with the Vernon epidemiology team to continue to work on data comparisons to help us continue to laser-focus our ongoing operational blueprints and help us make improvements to our operational models as we continue to improve quality. 1248-City of Vernon Street Medicine Narrative Page 21 . . Item 18 Page 33 of 78 Exhibit D Notice of Award . . Item 18 Page 34 of 78 Page 1 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Notice of Award FAIN# H79TI087013 Federal Award Date 07/05/2024 Recipient Information 1. Recipient Name CITY OF VERNON 4305 S SANTA FE AVE VERNON, CA 90058 2. Congressional District of Recipient 42 3. Payment System Identifier (ID) 1956000808A1 4. Employer Identification Number (EIN) 956000808 5. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) 060883022 6. Recipient’s Unique Entity Identifier ZMK4GCEKJ7G3 7. Project Director or Principal Investigator Veronica Petrosyan vpetrosyan@cityofvernon.org 323-583-8811 8. Authorized Official Fredrick Agyin fagyin@cityofvernon.org 323-583-8811 Federal Agency Information 9. Awarding Agency Contact Information Robert Corless Grants Specialist robert.corless@samhsa.hhs.gov (240) 276-1146 10. Program Official Contact Information Kirk E James Program Official Kirk.James@samhsa.hhs.gov 240-276-1617 Federal Award Information 11. Award Number 5H79TI087013-02 12. Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) H79TI087013 13. Statutory Authority Div. H, Title II of the CAA, 2023 (Public Law No. 117-103) 14. Federal Award Project Title On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 15. Assistance Listing Number 93.899 16. Assistance Listing Program Title Minority HIV/AIDS Fund (MHAF) 17. Award Action Type Non-Competing Continuation 18. Is the Award R&D? No Summary Federal Award Financial Information 19. Budget Period Start Date 09/30/2024 – End Date 09/29/2025 20. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this Action $666,300 20a. Direct Cost Amount $666,300 20b. Indirect Cost Amount $0 21. Authorized Carryover 22. Offset 23. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated this budget period $666,300 24. Total Approved Cost Sharing or Matching, where applicable $0 25. Total Federal and Non-Federal Approved this Budget Period $666,300 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26. Project Period Start Date 09/30/2023 – End Date 09/29/2026 27. Total Amount of the Federal Award including Approved Cost Sharing or Matching this Project Period $1,332,600 28. Authorized Treatment of Program Income Additional Costs 29. Grants Management Officer - Signature LeSchell D Browne 30. Remarks Acceptance of this award, including the "Terms and Conditions," is acknowledged by the recipient when funds are drawn down or otherwise requested from the grant payment system. . . Item 18 Page 35 of 78 Page 2 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM Notice of Award Portable Clinical Care Pilot Project Issue Date: 07/05/2024 Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Award Number: 5H79TI087013-02 FAIN: H79TI087013 Program Director: Veronica Petrosyan Project Title: On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care Organization Name: CITY OF VERNON Authorized Official: Fredrick Agyin Authorized Official e-mail address: fagyin@cityofvernon.org Budget Period: 09/30/2024 – 09/29/2025 Project Period: 09/30/2023 – 09/29/2026 Dear Grantee: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration hereby awards a grant in the amount of $666,300 (see “Award Calculation” in Section I and “Terms and Conditions” in Section III) to CITY OF VERNON in support of the above referenced project. This award is pursuant to the authority of Div. H, Title II of the CAA, 2023 (Public Law No. 117-103) and is subject to the requirements of this statute and regulation and of other referenced, incorporated or attached terms and conditions. Award recipients may access the SAMHSA website at www.samhsa.gov (click on “Grants” then SAMHSA Grants Management), which provides information relating to the Division of Payment Management System, HHS Division of Cost Allocation and Postaward Administration Requirements. Please use your grant number for reference. Acceptance of this award including the “Terms and Conditions” is acknowledged by the grantee when funds are drawn down or otherwise obtained from the grant payment system. If you have any questions about this award, please contact your Grants Management Specialist and your Government Project Officer listed in your terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, LeSchell D Browne Grants Management Officer Division of Grants Management See additional information below . . Item 18 Page 36 of 78 Page 3 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM SECTION I – AWARD DATA – 5H79TI087013-02 Award Calculation (U.S. Dollars) Personnel(non-research) $53,000 Contractual $613,300 Direct Cost $666,300 Approved Budget $666,300 Federal Share $666,300 Cumulative Prior Awards for this Budget Period $0 AMOUNT OF THIS ACTION (FEDERAL SHARE) $666,300 SUMMARY TOTALS FOR ALL YEARS YR AMOUNT 2 $666,300 3 $666,300 Note: Recommended future year total cost support, subject to the availability of funds and satisfactory progress of the project. Fiscal Information: CFDA Number: 93.899 EIN: 1956000808A1 Document Number: 23TI87013A Fiscal Year: 2024 IC CAN Amount TI C96N825 $666,300 IC CAN 2024 2025 TI C96N825 $666,300 $666,300 TI Administrative Data: PCC: PCCPMHAF / OC: 4145 SECTION II – PAYMENT/HOTLINE INFORMATION – 5H79TI087013-02 Payments under this award will be made available through the HHS Payment Management System (PMS). PMS is a centralized grants payment and cash management system, operated by the HHS Program Support Center (PSC), Division of Payment Management (DPM). Inquiries regarding payment should be directed to: The Division of Payment Management System, PO Box 6021, Rockville, MD 20852, Help Desk Support – Telephone Number: 1-877-614-5533. The HHS Inspector General maintains a toll-free hotline for receiving information concerning fraud, waste, or abuse under grants and cooperative agreements. The telephone number is: 1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447- 8477). The mailing address is: Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services, Attn: HOTLINE, 330 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20201. SECTION III – TERMS AND CONDITIONS – 5H79TI087013-02 This award is based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, SAMHSA on the above-title project and is subject to the terms and conditions incorporated either directly or by reference in the following: a. The grant program legislation and program regulation cited in this Notice of Award. b. The restrictions on the expenditure of federal funds in appropriations acts to the extent those restrictions are pertinent to the award. c. 45 CFR Part 75 as applicable. . . Item 18 Page 37 of 78 Page 4 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM d. The HHS Grants Policy Statement. e. This award notice, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CITED BELOW. Treatment of Program Income: Use of program income – Additive: Recipients will add program income to funds committed to the project to further eligible project objectives. Sub-recipients that are for-profit commercial organizations under the same award must use the deductive alternative and reduce their subaward by the amount of program income earned. In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 45 CFR 75.113 and Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75, recipients that have currently active Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts with cumulative total value greater than $10,000,000 must report and maintain information in the System for Award Management (SAM) about civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings in connection with the award or performance of a Federal award that reached final disposition within the most recent five-year period. The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system (currently the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)). Full reporting requirements and procedures are found in Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75. SECTION IV – TI SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS – 5H79TI087013-02 REMARKS Continuation Award 1. This Notice of Award (NoA) is issued to inform your organization that the application submitted for the Minority HIV/AIDS Fund: Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care for Unsheltered Populations Pilot Project (PCCPMHAF) program is being continued. o This award reflects approval of the revised budget submitted 4/4/2024 in response to a Request for Additional Materials (RAM). o This award also reflects acceptance of supporting documentation submitted 4/4/2024, 4/11/2024 and 5/2/2024 in response to a Request for Additional Materials (RAM). 2. Key Personnel Key Personnel are listed below: Veronica Petrosyan, Project Director @ 25% level of effort Jovanka Ciares, Project Coordinator @ 100% level of effort James Brown, Project Evaluator @ 25% level of effort Organizations receiving Federal Funds may not exceed 100% level of effort for any program staff member (Key Personnel or otherwise) across all federally funded sources. Any changes to Key Personnel including level of effort involving separation from the project for any continuous period of three months or longer, or a reduction in time dedicated to the project of 25% or more requires a prior approval and must be submitted as a postaward amendment in eRA Commons. Note: If an organization is awarded a grant and chooses to move forward with hiring an individual for a Key Personnel position before receiving SAMHSA’s formal approval, this will be done at the organization’s own risk. For additional information on how to submit a post-award amendment, please visit the SAMHSA website: https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/post-. . Item 18 Page 38 of 78 Page 5 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM award-amendments. 3. All responses to award terms and conditions and post award amendment requests must be submitted as .pdf documents in eRA Commons. For more information on how to respond to tracked terms and conditions or how to submit a post award amendment request please refer to https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-training-materials under heading Grant Management Reference Materials for Grantees. 4. Recipients are expected to plan their work and ensure that funds are expended within the 12-month budget period reflected on this Notice of Award. If activities proposed in the approved budget cannot be completed within the current budget period, SAMHSA cannot guarantee the approval of any request for carryover of remaining unobligated funding. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Annual Programmatic Progress Report Per the NOFO, your entity is required to submit a semi-annual and an annual progress report on the project performance for each budget period/incremental period as follows; By 04/30/2025 submit via eRA Commons By 12/28/2025, submit via eRA Commons. The Programmatic Report is required on a semi-annual basis and must be submitted as a .pdf to the View Terms Tracking Details page in the eRA Commons System Each Programmatic Report must, at a minimum, include the following information: o Data and progress for performance measures as reflected in your application regarding goals and evaluation activities. o A summary of key program accomplishments to-date. o Description of the changes, if any, that were made to the project that differ from the application for this budget period. o Description of any difficulties and/or problems encountered in achieving planned goals and objectives including barriers to accomplishing program objectives, and actions to overcome barriers or difficulties. o Progress achieved in the project which should include qualitative and quantitative data (GPRA) to demonstrate programmatic progress to include updates on required activities, successes, challenges, and changes or adjustments that have been made to the project. o Progress toward reaching all required goals and objectives of the pilot project. o Programmatic data such as staffing footprint, expenditures, and other reporting requirements as appropriate to reach pilot goals. o Progress on the inclusion of underserved populations related to the Disparity Impact Statement (DIS). o Barriers encountered, including challenges serving populations of focus; Efforts to overcome these barriers. o Evaluation activities for tracking DIS efforts. Note: Recipients must also comply with the GPRA requirements that include the collection and periodic reporting of performance data as specified in the FOA or by the Grant Program Official (GPO). This information is needed in order to comply with . . Item 18 Page 39 of 78 Page 6 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM PL 102-62, which requires that Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) report evaluation data to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of its programs. The response to this term must be submitted as .pdf documents in eRA Commons. Please contact your Government Program Official (GPO) for program specific submission information. For more information on how to respond to tracked terms and conditions please refer to https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-training-materials under heading How to Respond to Terms and Conditions. Additional information on reporting requirements is available at https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/reporting-requirements. Annual Federal Financial Report (FFR or SF-425) All financial reporting for recipients of Health and Human Services (HHS) grants and cooperative agreements has been consolidated through a single point of entry, which has been identified as the Payment Management System (PMS). The Federal Financial Report (FFR or SF-425) initiative ensures all financial data is reported consistently through one source; shares reconciled financial data to the HHS grants management systems; assists with the timely financial monitoring and grant closeout; and reduces expired award payments. The FFR is required on an annual basis no later than 90 days after the end of each Budget Period. The FFR should reflect cumulative amounts. Additional guidance to complete the FFR can be found at http://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants- management/reporting-requirements. SAMHSA reserves the right to request more frequent submissions of FFRs. If so, the additional submission dates will be shown below. Your organization is required to submit an FFR for this grant funding as follows: o By 12/28/2025, submit the Federal Financial Report (FFR)/(SF-425). o The grant recipient staff member(s) responsible for FFR preparation, certification and submission of the FFR must either submit a request for New User Access or Update User Access to the FFR Module as applicable. Refer to the PMS User Access website https://pms.psc.gov/grant-recipients/user- access.html for information on how to submit a New User Access, Update User Access or Deactivate User Access. You can also view PMS’ Video on how to request new user access @ https://youtu.be/kdoqaXfiuI0 and PDF resource with instructions on Requesting Access @ https://pms.psc.gov/forms/New-User- Request_Grantee.pdf o Instructions on how to submit a FFR via PMS are available at https://pmsapp.psc.gov/pms/app/help/ffr/ffr-grantee-instructions.html (The user must be logged in to PMS to access the link). Updates to the FFR instructions effective 4/1/2022 are also available @ https://pms.psc.gov/grant- recipients/ffr-updates.html o While recipients must submit the FFR in PMS, the FFR can also be accessed by connecting seamlessly from the eRA Commons to PMS by clicking the “Manage FFR” link on the “Search for Federal Financial Report (FFR)” page in eRA Commons, which will redirect to PMS. SAMHSA will not accept FFRs submitted by email or uploaded as an attachment into eRA. To access the “Manage FFR” link in eRA Commons, the individual must be registered in eRA Commons and . . Item 18 Page 40 of 78 Page 7 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM assigned the Financial Status Reporter (FSR) role for their organization. The individual assigned the FSR role is responsible for reporting the statement of grant expenditures for their organization. Refer to the page Managing eRA User Accounts on SAMHSA's website for instructions on how to assign a the FSR role. If you have questions about how to set up a PMS account for your organization, please contact the PMS Help Desk at PMSSupport@psc.hhs.gov or 1-877-614-5533. Note: Recipients will use PMS to report all financial expenditures, as well as to drawdown funds; SAMHSA recipients will continue to use the eRA Commons for all other grant-related matters including submitting progress reports, requesting post- award amendments, and accessing grant documents such as the Notice of Award. Standard Terms for Awards Your organization must comply with the Standard Terms and Conditions for the Fiscal Year in which your grant was awarded. The Fiscal Year for your award is identified on your Notice of Award. SAMHSA's Terms and Conditions webpage is located at: https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/notice-award- noa/standard-terms-conditions. Standards for Financial Management Recipients and subrecipients are required to meet the standards and requirements for financial management systems set forth in 45 CFR part 75 Subpart D. The financial systems must enable the recipient and subrecipient to maintain records that adequately identify the sources of funds for federally assisted activities and the purposes for which the award was used, including authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, liabilities, outlays or expenditures, and any program income. The system must also enable the recipient and subrecipient to compare actual expenditures or outlays with the approved budget for the award. SAMHSA funds must retain their specific identity − they may not be commingled with non- federal funds or other federal funds. “Commingling funds” typically means depositing or recording funds in a general account without the ability to identify each specific source of funds with related expenditures. Reasonable Costs for consideration Recipients must exercise proper stewardship over Federal funds and ensure that costs charged to awards are allowable, allocable, reasonable, necessary, and consistently applied regardless of the source of funds according to “Reasonable Costs” consideration per 2 CFR § 200.404 and the “Factors affecting allowability of costs” per 2 CFR § 200.403. A cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. Consistent Treatment of Costs Recipients must treat costs consistently across all federal and non-federal grants, projects and cost centers. Recipients may not direct-charge federal grants for costs typically considered indirect in nature, unless done consistently. If part of the indirect cost rate, then it may not also be charged as a direct cost. Examples of indirect costs include (administrative salaries, rent, accounting fees, utilities, office supplies, etc.). If typical indirect cost categories are included in the budget as direct costs, it is SAMHSA’s understanding that your organization has developed a cost accounting system adequate to justify the direct charges and to avoid an unfair . . Item 18 Page 41 of 78 Page 8 of 8 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/5/2024 12:12 AM allocation of these costs to the federal government. Also, note that all awards are subject to later review in accordance with the requirements of 45 CFR 75.364, 45 CFR 75.371, 45 CFR 75.386 and 45 CFR Part 75, Subpart F, Audit Requirements. Compliance with Award Terms and Conditions FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE STATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN ACTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 45 CFR 75.371, REMEDIES FOR NON- COMPLIANCE AND 45 CFR 75.372 TERMINATION. THIS MAY INCLUDE WITHHOLDING PAYMENT, DISALLOWANCE OF COSTS, SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT, TERMINATION OF THIS AWARD, OR DENIAL OF FUTURE FUNDING. All previous terms and conditions remain in effect until specifically approved and removed by the Grants Management Officer. Staff Contacts: Kirk E James, Program Official Phone: 240-276-1617 Email: Kirk.James@samhsa.hhs.gov Robert Corless, Grants Specialist Phone: (240) 276-1146 Email: robert.corless@samhsa.hhs.gov . . Item 18 Page 42 of 78 Page 1 of 4 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/2/2024 12:08 AM Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Notice of Award FAIN# H79TI087013 Federal Award Date 07/02/2024 Recipient Information 1. Recipient Name CITY OF VERNON 4305 S SANTA FE AVE VERNON, CA 90058 2. Congressional District of Recipient 42 3. Payment System Identifier (ID) 1956000808A1 4. Employer Identification Number (EIN) 956000808 5. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) 060883022 6. Recipient’s Unique Entity Identifier ZMK4GCEKJ7G3 7. Project Director or Principal Investigator Veronica Petrosyan vpetrosyan@cityofvernon.org 323-583-8811 8. Authorized Official Fredrick Agyin fagyin@cityofvernon.org 323-826-1448 Federal Agency Information 9. Awarding Agency Contact Information Robert Corless Grants Specialist robert.corless@samhsa.hhs.gov (240) 276-1146 10. Program Official Contact Information Kirk E James Program Official Kirk.James@samhsa.hhs.gov 240-276-1617 Federal Award Information 11. Award Number 6H79TI087013-01M003 (Administrative Change) 12. Unique Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) H79TI087013 13. Statutory Authority Div. H, Title II of the CAA, 2023 (Public Law No. 117-103) 14. Federal Award Project Title On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 15. Assistance Listing Number 93.899 16. Assistance Listing Program Title Minority HIV/AIDS Fund (MHAF) 17. Award Action Type Amendment 18. Is the Award R&D? No Summary Federal Award Financial Information 19. Budget Period Start Date 09/30/2023 – End Date 09/29/2024 20. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated by this Action $0 20a. Direct Cost Amount $0 20b. Indirect Cost Amount $0 21. Authorized Carryover $0 22. Offset $0 23. Total Amount of Federal Funds Obligated this budget period $666,300 24. Total Approved Cost Sharing or Matching, where applicable $0 25. Total Federal and Non-Federal Approved this Budget Period $666,300 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26. Project Period Start Date 09/30/2023 – End Date 09/29/2026 27. Total Amount of the Federal Award including Approved Cost Sharing or Matching this Project Period $666,300 28. Authorized Treatment of Program Income Additional Costs 29. Grants Management Officer - Signature Robert Corless 30. Remarks Acceptance of this award, including the "Terms and Conditions," is acknowledged by the recipient when funds are drawn down or otherwise requested from the grant payment system. . . Item 18 Page 43 of 78 Page 2 of 4 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/2/2024 12:08 AM Notice of Award Portable Clinical Care Pilot Project Issue Date: 07/02/2024 Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Award Number: 6H79TI087013-01M003 FAIN: H79TI087013 Program Director: Veronica Petrosyan Project Title: On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care Organization Name: CITY OF VERNON Authorized Official: Fredrick Agyin Authorized Official e-mail address: fagyin@cityofvernon.org Budget Period: 09/30/2023 – 09/29/2024 Project Period: 09/30/2023 – 09/29/2026 Dear Grantee: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration hereby awards a grant in the amount of $0 (see “Award Calculation” in Section I and “Terms and Conditions” in Section III) to CITY OF VERNON in support of the above referenced project. This award is pursuant to the authority of Div. H, Title II of the CAA, 2023 (Public Law No. 117-103) and is subject to the requirements of this statute and regulation and of other referenced, incorporated or attached terms and conditions. Award recipients may access the SAMHSA website at www.samhsa.gov (click on “Grants” then SAMHSA Grants Management), which provides information relating to the Division of Payment Management System, HHS Division of Cost Allocation and Postaward Administration Requirements. Please use your grant number for reference. Acceptance of this award including the “Terms and Conditions” is acknowledged by the grantee when funds are drawn down or otherwise obtained from the grant payment system. If you have any questions about this award, please contact your Grants Management Specialist and your Government Project Officer listed in your terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, Robert Corless Grants Management Officer Division of Grants Management See additional information below . . Item 18 Page 44 of 78 Page 3 of 4 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/2/2024 12:08 AM SECTION I – AWARD DATA – 6H79TI087013-01M003 Award Calculation (U.S. Dollars) Personnel(non-research) $585,000 Supplies $10,000 Other $60,000 Direct Cost $655,000 Indirect Cost $11,300 Approved Budget $666,300 Federal Share $666,300 Cumulative Prior Awards for this Budget Period $666,300 AMOUNT OF THIS ACTION (FEDERAL SHARE) $0 SUMMARY TOTALS FOR ALL YEARS YR AMOUNT 1 $666,300 Note: Recommended future year total cost support, subject to the availability of funds and satisfactory progress of the project. Fiscal Information: CFDA Number: 93.899 EIN: 1956000808A1 Document Number: 23TI87013A Fiscal Year: 2023 IC CAN Amount TI C96N825 $0 IC CAN 2023 TI C96N825 $0 TI Administrative Data: PCC: PCCPMHAF / OC: 4145 SECTION II – PAYMENT/HOTLINE INFORMATION – 6H79TI087013-01M003 Payments under this award will be made available through the HHS Payment Management System (PMS). PMS is a centralized grants payment and cash management system, operated by the HHS Program Support Center (PSC), Division of Payment Management (DPM). Inquiries regarding payment should be directed to: The Division of Payment Management System, PO Box 6021, Rockville, MD 20852, Help Desk Support – Telephone Number: 1-877-614-5533. The HHS Inspector General maintains a toll-free hotline for receiving information concerning fraud, waste, or abuse under grants and cooperative agreements. The telephone number is: 1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447- 8477). The mailing address is: Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services, Attn: HOTLINE, 330 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20201. SECTION III – TERMS AND CONDITIONS – 6H79TI087013-01M003 This award is based on the application submitted to, and as approved by, SAMHSA on the above-title project and is subject to the terms and conditions incorporated either directly or by reference in the following: a. The grant program legislation and program regulation cited in this Notice of Award. b. The restrictions on the expenditure of federal funds in appropriations acts to the extent those restrictions are pertinent to the award. . . Item 18 Page 45 of 78 Page 4 of 4 Version: 201 - 12/14/2023 2:33 PM | Generated on: 7/2/2024 12:08 AM c. 45 CFR Part 75 as applicable. d. The HHS Grants Policy Statement. e. This award notice, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CITED BELOW. Treatment of Program Income: Use of program income – Additive: Recipients will add program income to funds committed to the project to further eligible project objectives. Sub-recipients that are for-profit commercial organizations under the same award must use the deductive alternative and reduce their subaward by the amount of program income earned. In accordance with the regulatory requirements provided at 45 CFR 75.113 and Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75, recipients that have currently active Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts with cumulative total value greater than $10,000,000 must report and maintain information in the System for Award Management (SAM) about civil, criminal, and administrative proceedings in connection with the award or performance of a Federal award that reached final disposition within the most recent five-year period. The recipient must also make semiannual disclosures regarding such proceedings. Proceedings information will be made publicly available in the designated integrity and performance system (currently the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)). Full reporting requirements and procedures are found in Appendix XII to 45 CFR Part 75. SECTION IV – TI SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS – 6H79TI087013-01M003 REMARKS Post Award Amendment - Administrative Change This award is an administrative change to correct the Authorized Representative's name and contact information from Frederick Aygin (faygin@cityofvernon.org) to Fredrick Agyin (fagyin@cityofvernon.org). STANDARD TERMS OF AWARD All previous terms and conditions remain in effect until specifically approved and removed by the Grants Management Officer. Staff Contacts: Kirk E James, Program Official Phone: 240-276-1617 Email: Kirk.James@samhsa.hhs.gov Robert Corless, Grants Specialist Phone: (240) 276-1146 Email: robert.corless@samhsa.hhs.gov . . Item 18 Page 46 of 78 Exhibit E Disparity Impact Statement . . Item 18 Page 47 of 78 SAMHSA Disparity Impact Statement Grantee Organization Name:City of Vernon Grant ID:13946260 Grant Program:On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care Project Director:Tyler Evans,MD,MS,MPH,AAHIVS,DTM&H,FIDSA Grant Project Officer:Jovanka Ciares SECTION I.Identifying Behavioral Health Disparities IDENTIFY and DESCRIBE THE SCOPE of the PROBLEM The main,overarching problem we are seeking to address is the lack of access to healthcare for the unsheltered population in the Greater Vernon Area as identified in the 2023 Community Health Needs Assessment.While housing for homeless individuals is preferred,the City will address this inequity by implementing efficient and effective strategies to provide health care on the streets and in encampments.This includes but are not limited to: ●Provide mental health,support,care,treatment,and referrals ●Provide outreach services to 1200 unhoused individuals living on the streets,in encampments or other places not meant for human habitation by implementing strategies that effectively reach the people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness. ●Implementing a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options,including collaborating with HUDs Continuum of Care to enroll individuals in the local Coordinated Entry System,as well as the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program and other public housing options. In addition,we seek to address the lack of screening for substance use disorders and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders and provide Substance Use Disorders (SUD) services,including medication-assisted Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)and Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)treatment with unhoused individuals,including: ●Provide evidence-based harm reduction education and supplies,including FDA-approved overdose reversal medication as well as drug supply testing and overdose prevention education and services on-site,as allowable under this award and adhering to federal,state,and local laws,regulations,and other requirements . . Item 18 Page 48 of 78 ●Provide training for 100%of staff and service providers on harm reduction strategies, evidence-based practices,motivational interviewing,intensive case management, community reinforcement approach and/or peer support. Our team also seeks to address the lack of infectious disease prevention and treatment services,funding for treatment,and referral/linkage to treatment for unhoused individuals and their drug-using and/or sexual partners for HIV,viral hepatitis (B and C),STI’s,Mpox,and tuberculosis,including but not limited to: ●Distribute hygiene kits,safer sex kits and,or equipment and supplies to 1200 unhoused individuals to enhance harm reduction efforts. ●Utilize telehealth and/or telemedicine services with a total of 25 unhoused individuals Source:City of Vernon CHNA Report DISPARATE POPULATION(S)OF FOCUS The population of focus is unhoused individuals,youth and families living on the streets or locations not meant for habitation such as cars,vans,tents,and makeshifts in the City of Vernon and the surrounding area within the county of Los Angeles.This catchment area is west of the Los Angeles River,south of I-10 east of I-110,and north of I-105. The Zip Codes included are 90011,90003,90001,90002,90058,90255,90280,90270.90744 and 90745.The greater Vernon area is part of Los Angeles Continuum of Care (CoC)and is located within Service Planning Area 6 South.In this CoC,there are more than 45,000 unsheltered homeless adults and nearly 800 unsheltered homeless children.Approximately half are Hispanic/Latino.* Demographically this population is 31%Female,67%Male,and 2%identifying as Non-binary, Questioning or Transgender;42%are Hispanic/Latino,31%Black or African American,19% White and 5%multiple races or other.In addition:5%are transition-age youth (age 18-24);42% are chronically homeless;30%have substance abuse disorders,25%suffer from serious mental illness and an estimated 3-4%are positive with HIV.Socioeconomically they have low or no income and few resources.They have lost connection with family and friends and are socially isolated within encampments or in cars.They suffer from trauma and are reluctant to seek out care.** *Source:(US Department of Housing and Urban Development Point-In-Time Count 2022) **Source:Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority,Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count Report,June 2023) . . Item 18 Page 49 of 78 DEMOGRAPHIC TABLE Measure Greater Vernon Area Champagne Area I-15 & CA-60 Area Lenwood Area Auto Club Speedway Area Population estimate 248 4,106 9,055 4,153 6,372 Percentage of persons below 150%poverty 17.7%21%18.3%33%20.6% Unemployment Rate 9.6%9.1%6.8%10.8%11.1% Percentage of housing cost-burdened occupied housing units with annual income less than $75,000 (30%+of income spent on housing) 28.2%29.7%20.5%32.8%30.4% Percentage of persons with no high school diploma (age 25+)13.2%11.5%23.4%23.8%26.9% Percentage uninsured in the total civilian noninstitutionalized population 8.5%4.1%13.7%10.2%12.8% Percentage of persons aged 65 and older 12.5%4.3%8.3%12%4.5% Percentage of persons aged 17 and younger 39.5%28.9%26.4%33.5%29.8% Percentage of civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability 8.1%5.7%14.6%15%4.4% Percentage of single-parent households with children under 18 42.3%14.4%3.8%12.6%10.1% Percentage of persons (age 5+)who speak English “less than well”11.5%4.4%8.8%4%12.5% Percentage minority persons 91.9%76.8%74.3%55.3%89.8% Percentage of Hispanic or Latino persons 83.9%61.9%59.3%44%75.2% Percentage of Black/African American,not Hispanic or Latino persons 6.9%5.3%4.2%8%9.1% Percentage of Asian,not Hispanic or Latino persons 1.2%7.4%9.3%1.5%4.5% Percentage of American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0%0%0% Percentage of Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0.4%0%0% Percentage of two or more races,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%2.2%1.1%1.9%0.4% Percentage of some other race,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0%0%0.6% Percentage of housing in structures with 10 or more units 38.4%4.8%4.7%12.6%9.5% Percentage of mobile homes 0%1%23.1%2.8%17.9% . . Item 18 Page 50 of 78 Measure Greater Vernon Area Champagne Area I-15 & CA-60 Area Lenwood Area Auto Club Speedway Area Population estimate 248 4,106 9,055 4,153 6,372 Percentage of persons below 150%poverty 17.7%21%18.3%33%20.6% Unemployment Rate 9.6%9.1%6.8%10.8%11.1% Percentage of housing cost-burdened occupied housing units with annual income less than $75,000 (30%+of income spent on housing) 28.2%29.7%20.5%32.8%30.4% Percentage of persons with no high school diploma (age 25+)13.2%11.5%23.4%23.8%26.9% Percentage uninsured in the total civilian noninstitutionalized population 8.5%4.1%13.7%10.2%12.8% Percentage of persons aged 65 and older 12.5%4.3%8.3%12%4.5% Percentage of persons aged 17 and younger 39.5%28.9%26.4%33.5%29.8% Percentage of civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability 8.1%5.7%14.6%15%4.4% Percentage of single-parent households with children under 18 42.3%14.4%3.8%12.6%10.1% Percentage of persons (age 5+)who speak English “less than well”11.5%4.4%8.8%4%12.5% Percentage minority persons 91.9%76.8%74.3%55.3%89.8% Percentage of Hispanic or Latino persons 83.9%61.9%59.3%44%75.2% Percentage of Black/African American,not Hispanic or Latino persons 6.9%5.3%4.2%8%9.1% Percentage of Asian,not Hispanic or Latino persons 1.2%7.4%9.3%1.5%4.5% Percentage of American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0%0%0% Percentage of Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0.4%0%0% Percentage of two or more races,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%2.2%1.1%1.9%0.4% Percentage of some other race,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0%0%0.6% Percentage of housing in structures with 10 or more units 38.4%4.8%4.7%12.6%9.5% Percentage of persons in group quarters 0%0%0%0%0.9% Percentage of occupied housing units with more people than rooms 9.9%10.1%13.1%8.9%21.7% . . Item 18 Page 51 of 78 Measure Greater Vernon Area Champagne Area I-15 & CA-60 Area Lenwood Area Auto Club Speedway Area Population estimate 248 4,106 9,055 4,153 6,372 Percentage of persons below 150%poverty 17.7%21%18.3%33%20.6% Unemployment Rate 9.6%9.1%6.8%10.8%11.1% Percentage of housing cost-burdened occupied housing units with annual income less than $75,000 (30%+of income spent on housing) 28.2%29.7%20.5%32.8%30.4% Percentage of persons with no high school diploma (age 25+)13.2%11.5%23.4%23.8%26.9% Percentage uninsured in the total civilian noninstitutionalized population 8.5%4.1%13.7%10.2%12.8% Percentage of persons aged 65 and older 12.5%4.3%8.3%12%4.5% Percentage of persons aged 17 and younger 39.5%28.9%26.4%33.5%29.8% Percentage of civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability 8.1%5.7%14.6%15%4.4% Percentage of single-parent households with children under 18 42.3%14.4%3.8%12.6%10.1% Percentage of persons (age 5+)who speak English “less than well”11.5%4.4%8.8%4%12.5% Percentage minority persons 91.9%76.8%74.3%55.3%89.8% Percentage of Hispanic or Latino persons 83.9%61.9%59.3%44%75.2% Percentage of Black/African American,not Hispanic or Latino persons 6.9%5.3%4.2%8%9.1% Percentage of Asian,not Hispanic or Latino persons 1.2%7.4%9.3%1.5%4.5% Percentage of American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0%0%0% Percentage of Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0.4%0%0% Percentage of two or more races,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%2.2%1.1%1.9%0.4% Percentage of some other race,not Hispanic or Latino persons 0%0%0%0%0.6% Percentage of housing in structures with 10 or more units 38.4%4.8%4.7%12.6%9.5% Percentage of households with no vehicle available 4.2%1.3%2%5.1%2.3% Percentage of households without a computer with a broadband Internet subscription 15.3%5.2%1.3%19.4%9.4% . . Item 18 Page 52 of 78 SECTION II.Addressing Disparities Using the Funding Opportunity SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH From the five Social Determinant of Health Domains,our organization will focus on two,namely: 1.Education and Quality: a.Providing evidence-based harm reduction education and supplies including FDA-approved overdose reversal medication as well as drug supply testing and overdose prevention education and services on-site,as allowable under this award and adhering to federal,state,and local laws,regulations,and other requirements related to such programs or services for a unhoused individuals. b.Implementing strategies that effectively reach the people who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness. c.Implementing a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement for sustainable permanent housing options,including collaborating with HUDs Continuum of Care to enroll individuals in the local Coordinated Entry System,as well as the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program and other public housing options. d.Providing case management services to coordinate all aspects of care,including behavioral health,primary care,infectious disease prevention and treatment, other supportive services (e.g.,housing,benefits,employment),and assist with transitions for returning to the community after any hospitalization or emergency room visit as appropriate,including enrolling eligible individuals in health insurance,Medicaid,Medicare,and other benefit programs (e.g.,Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income,Temporary Assistance for Needy Families,Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,prescription assistance programs,etc.),and other human and community-based services as appropriate. 2.Health Care Access and Quality,including but not limited to: a.Providing basic primary health care services and supplies to unhoused individuals b.Conducting screenings and assessments of substance use disorders and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders utilizing a low threshold approach that offers SUD services,including medication assisted Opioid Use disorder and alcohol use disorder with unhoused individuals. c.Screening and assessment of mental health conditions and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. d.Offering trauma-informed,culturally responsive,client-centered,evidence-based, recovery oriented,and integrated mental health and substance use services on-site . . Item 18 Page 53 of 78 e.Delivering or coordinating any services determined to be necessary to address identified mental health conditions BEHAVIORAL HEALTH IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR THE NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR CULTURALLY AND LINGUISTICALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES IN HEALTH AND HEALTHCARE These are the CLAS activities,policies,and procedures we will undertake to advance health equity,improve quality,and help eliminate health care disparities: 1.Provide effective,equitable,understandable,and respectful quality care and services that are responsive to diverse cultural health beliefs and practices,preferred languages, health literacy,and other communication needs. a.We are a highly culturally diverse,highly trained staff that are both committed and trained to provide care in various languages,cultures and take into account the idiosyncrasies of the population we serve.Our robust policies &procedures will continue to meet the maximum standards of care at a national level. 2.Offer language assistance to individuals who have limited English proficiency (LEP) and/or other communication needs,at no cost to them,to facilitate timely access to all health care and services. a.We prioritize the hiring of staff that is bi-lingual or multi-lingual and our outreach and educational materials are always available in at least two languages,often in up to five languages. b.We provide language assistance through professional translators to individuals with LEP c.We inform all individuals of the availability of language assistance services clearly and in their preferred language,verbally and in writing.This is currently standard practice for our work in the Vernon community;offering services 100% of the time in Spanish and English,while also incorporating other languages (Korean,Simplified Chinese,others. d.We ensure the competence of individuals providing language assistance, recognizing that the use of untrained individuals and/or minors as interpreters should be avoided.We use professional translators when a staff member who speaks the patient's primary language is not on site. e.We are committed to providing easy-to-understand print and multimedia materials and signage in the languages commonly used by the populations in the service area.With an extremely diverse community this is standard practice and staff are trained to understand that this is a priority.100%of our materials are . . Item 18 Page 54 of 78 produced in Spanish and English,while also incorporating other languages (Korean,Simplified Chinese,others)based on the target audience. 3.We will advance and sustain organizational governance and leadership that promotes CLAS and health equity through policy,practices,and allocated resources. a.We recruit,promote,and support a culturally and linguistically diverse governance,leadership,and workforce that are responsive to the population in the service area. b.We educate and train governance,leadership,and workforce in culturally and linguistically appropriate policies and practices on an ongoing basis. 4.Our leadership and staff are committed to establishing culturally and linguistically appropriate goals,policies,and management accountability,and infuse them throughout the organization's planning and operations. a.We conduct ongoing assessments of the organization's CLAS-related activities and integrate CLAS-related measures into measurement and continuous quality improvement activities. b.We collect and maintain accurate and reliable demographic data to monitor and evaluate the impact of CLAS on health equity and outcomes and to inform service delivery. c.We conduct regular assessments of community health assets and needs and use the results to plan and implement services that respond to the cultural and linguistic diversity of populations in the service area. d.Partnering with the community to design,implement,and evaluate policies, practices,and services to ensure cultural and linguistic appropriateness is a priority e.Our conflict and grievance resolution processes are designed to be culturally and linguistically appropriate to identify,prevent,and resolve conflicts or complaints. f.Our progress in implementing and sustaining CLAS is communicated to appropriate stakeholders,constituents,and the general public. SECTION III.Developing a Disparity Reduction Quality Improvement Plan IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVITY The implementation plan includes the following goals: 1.Provide unhoused clients with case management including comprehensive assessment of the client’s needs and development of an individualized service plan (including infectious disease prevention/treatment services,funding for treatment,etc)and referral/linkage to treatment as appropriate,screen individuals and their drug-using . . Item 18 Page 55 of 78 and/or sexual partners for STI’s and other diseases,navigate unhoused individuals to treatment and prevention resources and mental health support. 2.Develop a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options. 3.Provide unsheltered homeless individuals case management services to address social determinants of health,including collaborating with HUDs Continuum of Care to enroll individuals in the local Coordinated Entry System,as well as the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program and other public housing options. 4.Provide case management services to coordinate all aspects of care,including behavioral health,primary care,infectious disease prevention and education. 5.Conduct screenings and assessments of substance use disorders and co-occurring mental and substance use disorders utilizing a low threshold approach that offers SUD services,including medication assisted Opioid Use disorder and alcohol use disorder with unhoused individuals. INTENDED OUTCOMES AND IMPACT Through the implementation of the activities mentioned above,our intended goals and impact are to: 1.Increase access to and use of mental health and substance use services and better overall behavioral health outcomes in the greater Vernon area. 2.Increase access to education and supplies including FDA-approved overdose reversal medication for harm reduction as well as drug supply testing and overdose prevention education and services. 3.To increase testing and treatment for unhoused individuals and their drug-using and/or sexual partners for STI and other infectious diseases. 4.To implement a detailed plan of action with purposeful and documented engagement with sustainable permanent housing options. CLIENT/PEER/PARTNER INVOLVEMENT Per the City of Vernon Community Health Needs Assessment Report,we will engage Vernon businesses,residents and other area stakeholders for outreach,to provide enhanced training. . . Item 18 Page 56 of 78 We are actively engaging with the Vernon business community and are contracting with the Street Medicine Institute at USC to provide enhanced specialty training to our staff.In addition, SUD,other mental health specialists and community health workers will also be part of the community engagement and outreach teams. Finally,we will ensure that our peers and partners for training and support are from diverse populations (African American,Native Americans,Hispanic/Latinx,Asian American,Native Hawaiian,and Other Pacific Islander communities,individuals who identify as two or more races,and LGBTQIA+). ACTION PLAN Activities regarding Health Disparities have begun and will continue throughout the grant project period. MEASUREMENT/EVALUATION We will implement a robust monitoring and evaluation system to track the program's progress and outcomes.We will regularly collect data,analyze results,and use the findings to make informed decisions. Our in-the-ground and support staff will continue to engage in highly trained data collection efforts throughout the operational period,which will funnel into our population health analytic tools analyzing the following measures: ●Using our local digital platforms (engaging local HIE platforms),we will perform Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E)of the following: ○Changes in Knowledge,Attitudes and Beliefs (KAB)iterative surveys (starting with baseline)of those who have completed the workshops and qualitative data about feelings of “engagement”and “connection”to PCMHs,community centers, schools,etc. ○Increase in PHQ-9 score implementation among patients ○Increase in #of MAT patients (e.g.buprenorphine rx)#patients served ○Demographics,including:Neighborhood makeup Primary languages spoken Race/ethnicity Sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) ○#comorbidities ○#referrals to Social services,HIV care,primary care medical home ○#adverse events ○Changes in HIV or behavioral health-related cases related to ED visits,opioid overdose,Hospitalizations,ICU admissions,or deaths This (along with a number of other QI measures)will help determine the level of success and direction of ongoing and sustainable clinical needs and assist in focusing on CQI efforts using . . Item 18 Page 57 of 78 the Triple Aim approach of improving the experience of care,improving the health of populations,and reducing per capita costs of health care.We will work with the Vernon epidemiology team to continue to work on data comparisons to help us continue to laser-focus our ongoing operational blueprints and help us make improvements to our operational models as we continue to improve quality. SUSTAINABILITY From a sustainability standpoint,our team will develop policies to support needed service system improvements regarding establishment of standards of care for On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care Program with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care. In addition,the team will: ●Participate in a virtual learning collaborative to share best practices and lessons learned ●Brainstorm solutions to challenges faced by members of the learning collaborative. ●Document best practices and lessons learned while implementing integrated care using a portable clinical care approach and disseminate the findings from the pilot program. ●Document best practices and lessons learned through the development of white papers, participation in conference presentations,and others. . . Item 18 Page 58 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 59 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 2 | Page AltaMed Health Services: On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care INTRODUCTION Background Founded in 1969, AltaMed is a non-profit 501(c)(3) Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Now the largest FQHC in California, AltaMed’s regional health network offers a medical home in LA and Orange County (OC) with a full range of primary care, enabling and social service programs to low-income underserved communities for over 270,000 predominantly Latino children, youths, adults and seniors, 14% of which are uninsured. Target patients are by definition vulnerable, underserved populations and AltaMed is committed to provide quality care without exception to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. With 98% of our total patient population living at or below 200% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and 83% of our population identifying as Latino, the communities AltaMed serves have a higher likelihood to be without insurance or have insufficient coverage; reside in an area with a shortage of primary care providers; have language or other cultural barriers that prevent them from accessing care or from navigating the health care system; or have illnesses or conditions that have expanded their needs beyond their coverage. This community has significant disparities in health care access, quality and outcomes. AltaMed’s proposed Primary Care Clinic pilot will be deployed in the City of Vernon, in close proximity to several of AltaMed’s primary care clinics in Los Angeles County, communities with significant disparities in income and access, and with significant numbers of unsheltered populations. The proposed portable clinical care pilot will target unsheltered populations and surrounding community members in Los Angeles County. Homelessness and health are inextricably linked. People experiencing homelessness often have serious physical and behavioral health needs but little access to traditional health care facilities and providers. AltaMed seeks to provide access to high quality, culturally connected care to approximately 4,000 individuals in Vernon and the community who may be unsheltered, commuter, working residents and constituents through its Portable Clinical Care model. AltaMed understands the critical importance of implementing a Portable Care Clinic model that 1) understands the linguistic and cultural needs of a growing Latino demographic amongst the unhoused population; 2) connects the population served with necessary healthcare services that more comprehensively address their needs, from primary care to mental health; and 3) meets community where they are. According to data from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, which is the lead agency for the Los Angeles HUD Continuum of Care (HUD CoC; Los Angeles City & County CoC CA-600), there were more than 75,000 individuals experiencing homelessness in LA County in 2023. This represents an increase of more than 9% from 2022 and more than 43% since 2018. Unsheltered homeless populations increase 14% from 2022 up to more than 55,000 individuals. AltaMed’s community clinics are primarily in LA Service Planning Areas 2, 4, 6, and 7 and these areas had the highest amounts of unsheltered individuals in 2023, with SPA 2 (10,443), SPA 4 (18,531), SPA 6 (12,995), and SPA 7 (6,511 individuals). In addition, more than 25% reported serious mental illness in 2023. There is also an increase (nearly 50%) of transition age youth (aged 18-21 years old) who are experiencing unsheltered homelessness in 2023. Further data shows that 30% of unhoused individuals experience a substance use disorder in 2023, an increase from 26% reported from 2022. While the state average overdose death rate may not rank high in the nation, the communities AltaMed serves have a disproportionately high incidence, with several communities 25%- 70% higher than the state average of 4.79 per 100,000. Within AltaMed’s Los Angeles County services . . Item 18 Page 60 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 3 | Page area, zip codes and their corresponding communities with overdose death rates greater than the state rate include Boyle Heights (8.08 per 100,000), Downtown LA (6.97 per 100,000) and Montebello (5.43 per 100,000). Program Description The City of Vernon and AltaMed share a mutual commitment in ensuring the health, safety, and wellbeing of its residents, workers, visitors, and neighboring communities. For over 55 years, AltaMed has worked to provide access to point of care services for high need individuals and connecting them back to shorter and longer term care so that their health outcomes may improve. For over 20 years, AltaMed has managed and executed mobile health unit programs, providing in-place services, that are both culturally and linguistically competent, to our shared communities. AltaMed seeks to expand this work in partnership with the City of Vernon, utilizing its “Health Bungalows” and mobile units to conduct a hub-and-spoke care model for its community. AltaMed’s proposed program will deploy a phased clinical care service pilot to unsheltered individuals in City of Vernon and surrounding neighborhoods with a specific target of integrating Behavioral Health (including substance use disorder), HIV testing and treatment, and social services support into the comprehensive care model that participants will benefit from. AltaMed will work in coordination with City of Vernon, its clinic sites located in Los Angeles County and social services partners to address the overall lack of health care infrastructure available to individuals experiencing homelessness in the region by implementing a multidisciplinary team coordination model that comprehensively addresses the needs of these populations. Recognizing the intersectionality of social determinants of health with ethnicity, culture, and the impacts of systemic racism, it is clear that in order to address health disparities, particularly those impacting the underserved/unhoused Los Angeles community, AltaMed will target the following care gaps with its PCC model: 1) Access to primary care services: Many patients do not have access to clinical care services and do not know how to access care, apply for health insurance, or consistently access the health system and instead end up in the emergency room once health conditions escalate. AltaMed will provide primary health care services and supplies through the Vernon “Health Bungalows” and in-place via community outreach efforts and mobile unit events. 2) Behavioral Health and Substance Use Screening: AltaMed will integrate its behavioral health model and substance use/Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) care into its PCC care model, deploying screenings such as Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C and AUDIT) and substance abuse misuse using the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10). Once enrolled as an AltaMed member, patients will have access to AltaMed integrated Behavioral Health services, including therapy with licensed social workers for mild to moderate anxiety or depression, Medication Assisted Treatment, and referrals to specialty mental health services with AltaMed’s community partners. 3) Patient Education & Community Outreach: AltaMed will deploy teams to meet communities and where unsheltered populations congregate, in order to engage with patients, provide health education, and connect them to short and long term clinical and social services. . . Item 18 Page 61 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 4 | Page 4) Community Support Linkages: Unsheltered patients are medically and socially vulnerable and physicians are often unaware of how to manage their care and what services are available. AltaMed is working closely with LAHSA as they develop coordinated approaches to improve housing placement services and reduce the barriers to placing individuals in stable housing. However, many people do not know how to get connected with these agencies and how best to use their services. AltaMed’s PCC will work to build awareness with both community members and its clinical teams, and to connect appropriate services and benefits to individuals. The City of Vernon’s health hubs and mobile health units will be the initial step to link a prospective patient to their new medical home. AltaMed will employ a 3-phased approach to care, beginning with offering primary care services from the “health bungalows”. Phase 1 Over the course of Year 1 (July 2024- July 2025), AltaMed will operationalize primary care services within one City of Vernon’s Health Bungalow. Basic primary care services will include: routine health check-ups and physical exams, diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic illnesses (i.e. diabetes, high blood pressure, and hypertension), preventive services: immunizations, screening for HIV, TB, and Hepatitis, Health Education, Mental Health screenings and substance use disorder screenings, Case Management: referral to social services and housing resources, and Health Education. During this time, AltaMed will also buildout the necessary Health Information systems (E.H.R, practice management, data security) and business and clinical protocols and procedures necessary. Phase 2 (November 2024): In Phase 2, AltaMed will expand Phase 1 services by activating two mobile units. AltaMed will administer community outreach, outpatient care, routine health services, and referrals to social services providers (housing, food resources, etc.). AltaMed will utilize the City of Vernon’s community outreach mobile unit to conduct community outreach and health education to local businesses and community members, promoting the services offered by The City of Vernon and AltaMed. Leveraging its community health status as a trusted messenger in the community, AltaMed will foster relationships with community members and begin to conduct in-place treatment and internal referrals via the City of Vernon’s mobile health unit. AltaMed’s PCC Team (a licensed vocational nurse, community health worker and case manager) will offer screenings and treatment through Vernon’s mobile health unit, such as: vital signs check, assess for critical health conditions, wound care, medication support, direct telehealth services (if needed) to address health care needs, trauma, behavioral health, and social service needs. Phase 3 (January 2025): Phase 3 will serve to meet demand for complex health care needs by activating AltaMed’s referral system to specialty services and larger referral network. This work involves connecting patients with a case manager and social worker. The social worker will deliver therapy for mild-to-moderate cases of anxiety and depression. The case manager will coordinate clinical appointments and social service needs (food, housing) throughout the scope of this partnership. AltaMed recognizes the significant level of care these patients often need. AltaMed will also work with the participants to determine if a set meeting day and time would be beneficial to their ongoing care. By using a team-based and phased approach, AltaMed will be able to provide these services as noted above. Within the City of Vernon’s Hub “Health Bungalows” and through referrals, AltaMed will administer comprehensive behavioral health services (co-occurring mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) . . Item 18 Page 62 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 5 | Page treatment), HIV care and treatment, and crisis intervention. AltaMed’s Behavioral Health department supports community members with intervention programs serving ‘mild to moderate’ cases with screenings that may treat depression, anxiety, chronic medical condition, postpartum depression, and recently diagnosed patients (with conditions like HIV and diabetes). AltaMed will utilize the Vernon Health Bungalows to in order to expand access to behavioral health services and co-occurring mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) services. AltaMed will deploy its behavioral health clinicians to conduct the following activities at the centralized hubs: client scheduling, in-take, and assessment for referrals in order to identify patient need to appropriate interventions, and provide linkages to additional care. All patients, 18 years old or older, will be screened during their annual visit using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C and AUDIT) and Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10). If patients screen positive, on the AUDIT or DAST-10 (see Attachment 2 for details on scoring), patients will receive Brief Intervention and a referral for substance abuse treatment (at AltaMed), which may include medication assisted therapy for alcohol or opioid misuse. Patients identified through the screening process or through the EPIC records will be referred to the MAT program, beginning with the Case Manager who can link the patients (through a Vidyo Telehealth visit or scheduling an appointment) with the Clinical Pharmacist who will conduct an appropriateness screen. After the initial intake, patients may be connected with a MAT provider and Behavior Health (BH) services, which may be provided in one of AltaMed’s clinics or through telehealth services depending on the patients’ location. HIV Care and Treatment AltaMed’s HIV programs is one of the most robust providers of sexual health testing and training in LA. With more than 20 years’ experience funded as a provider through HRSA Ryan C White federal program for HIV services, AltaMed has a robust workflow for in-community testing for HIV, Hepatitis, several STDs and TB. A member of the HIV team will work with the PCC team to ensure that these services are provided for unsheltered patients as part of the PCC protocol. If positive, the Case Manager will help to link the patient to ongoing clinical support and treatment for these conditions. As an FQHC, AltaMed also has several co-located pharmacies in its clinics which qualify under to 340b program to provide low and no-cost medications to patients in need. These services will be leveraged to support participants in the PCC pilot. AltaMed will develop and execute the following services in partnership with the City of Vernon: • Provide in place testing for HIV, Hepatitis and TB • Provide linkages to HIV Team for positive test outcomes, • Provide ongoing education and harm reduction support to reduce the spread of these illnesses • Provide linkages through the HIV Team to peer support for participants with positive diagnoses • Develop standardized testing protocol to capture key conditions such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, Mpox, etc. and test for them with rapid results (through AltaMed’s clinics and contracted lab Quest Diagnostics) Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorder treatment & Withdrawal management programs MAT is the combination of FDA-approved medication, counseling, and behavioral therapies to provide a "whole patient" approach to the treatment of opioid, alcohol, and other substance use disorders. MAT is currently available at 11 AltaMed Clinics in Los Angeles and Orange County for opioid and alcohol use disorders. AltaMed will leverage its clinic locations with trained MAT physicians to provide telehealth services for patients with SUD and OUD needs. AltaMed will develop and execute the following services in partnership with the City of Vernon: . . Item 18 Page 63 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 6 | Page • Integrate Behavioral Health and MAT services into Vidyo telehealth services for primary care and behavioral health follow up The overall goals of this program are to provide increased community and internal awareness of the integrated portable clinic that will be providing services on site in the community, increased number of patients identified for services through direct community outreach and in-clinic referrals of individuals who have documented homelessness, increased access to mental health services for underserved individuals and increase individual access linkage to additional services such as food banks, housing, alcohol use disorder/substance abuse disorder services, a higher level of care for mental health, regional center, or a permanent medical home to receive additional health services. AltaMed anticipates to service the following number of unduplicated client interactions through the course of this partnership: • Year 1: 500 - 1,000 • Year 2: 1,500 – 3,000 • Year 3: 2,000 – 5,000+ Coordinate with community partners, law enforcement, and outreach teams AltaMed has an extensive history of collaborating with outside agencies/organizations to support our patients. Relevant to this proposal, AltaMed has included a list of CBOs that it can anticipate to coordinate with in the event of additional linkages: Alma Family Services, Mela Counseling Services Center, SoCal Alcohol and Drug Programs, MAT Provider Aegis Treatment Centers LLC, LA CADA, Vernon Police Department, LA County Fire Department. AltaMed has history working with the following CBOs around housing navigation and unsheltered populations: The Whole Child, Union Station, LAHSA homeless outreach, PATH, HOPICS, Inner City Visions, Salvation Army Whittier, Salvation Army Mental Health shelter on Washington, Bell Shelter, Safe Parking, LACDA, HACLA, Cerritos Mental Health, Exodus outreach, Shower of Hope, Tiny Homes Montebello, Serenity Homes Baldwin Park, People’s Concern, Whittier First Day, American family housing, Volunteers of America LA, Weingart Center, LA Family Housing, Department of Health Services, Department of Mental Health, Harbor Interfaith, Catholic Charites, Jovenes, Union Rescue Mission, Proyecto Pastoral , Guadalupe Homeless Project, First to Serve, Multiservice Center Long Beach, St. Joseph Center, Foothills Aids Project, HOPWA, SRO Los Angeles. Data Collection and Reporting As the largest non-profit Federally Qualified Health Center in California with over 45 years of experience operating primary care clinics and managing related programs for its safety-net population, AltaMed has built and sustained an administrative, clinical, and fiscal infrastructure with the capacity to successfully implement and manage the requirements of this program. These systems support the effective and cost- efficient utilization of grant funds and ongoing project management to ensure the timely completion of program goals. AltaMed maintains a combination of proprietary software and leading industry software, such as EPIC, to streamline data collection, tracking and reporting. By deploying the PCC team with iPads that link to EPIC, they will be able to complete assessments, document encounters, make referrals, link to telehealth visits, and document outcomes from screenings, etc. at the point of care. In addition, AltaMed in now part of LANES, which is a health exchange system that allows AltaMed to access health information for shared patients with the LAC+USC County hospital systems to assess if patients have recently been admitted and discharged from an LA-based hospital. AltaMed has worked extensively with local, state and federal programs and as a federally qualified health center, is well versed in measuring, monitoring and . . Item 18 Page 64 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 7 | Page reporting data, especially related to grant funded activities. With effective data collection at the point of contact (complete patient consent forms, accurate demographic information entered into EPIC, etc.), AltaMed ensures progress toward the program goal is effectively tracked and reported. AltaMed will collect and report on a semi-annual (six month) basis to The City of Vernon: • Total number of clients served • Client demographic information • Number of clients receiving services by service type, client demographics, and service delivery type (i.e., point of care, referral): o Primary health care services, o Low-barrier SUD treatment services, o Infectious disease services, including prevention, testing, and treatment services o Mental healthcare services, o Harm reduction services o Case management and other support services • Number of services rendered by service type and service delivery type (i.e., point of care, referral): o Primary health care services, o Low-barrier SUD treatment services, o Infectious disease services, including prevention, testing, and treatment services, o Mental healthcare services, o Harm reduction services o Case management and other support services • Number of harm reduction supplies (i.e., overdose reversal medications and fentanyl test strips), HIV test kits and viral Hepatitis test kits purchased with SAMHSA funds as well as the number of positive HIV and viral Hepatitis tests. • Referrals and linkages to follow-up care AltaMed will work with the Grant Manager to complete a Behavioral Health Disparities report on a semi- annual basis to the City of Vernon. AltaMed will also submit a semi-annual progress report, documenting best practices, lessons learned, and challenges encountered. The health outcomes of these results will be measured by EPIC EHR, GPRA-CSAT. AltaMed will measure program success against the following benchmarks: • Increase in the number of unsheltered patients with access to primary care services • Increase in the number of unsheltered patients with access to behavioral health, substance use and MAT services • Increase in the number of patients with access to HIV, Hepatitis, and TB testing and services • Increase in the number of patients with access to social services (housing placement, food services) • Increase in the number of patients receiving MAT services AltaMed anticipates developing annual program reports, discussing lessons learned, peer-reviewed publications on program outcomes, and best practices for replication. AltaMed will be happy to disseminate this information with the City of Vernon and other community partners in order to share learnings and best practices for a PCC model of care. . . Item 18 Page 65 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 8 | Page General Scope of Work Through AltaMed’s Portable Clinical Care model, with integrated behavioral health and HIV care, AltaMed seeks to promote and increase awareness of the PCC model in the community and on site at the City of Vernon’s “Health Hubs”, provide direct on-site and in-place clinical services, and provide service linkage to additional resources, such as food, housing placement, long term mental health, or a permanent medical home to receive additional health services. Through the scope of this 3-year partnership, AltaMed will conduct the following activities, in order to display an increase in access to these critical services: • Hub Services that include primary care, behavioral health (with co-occurring services to include substance use disorder (SUD) treatment/withdrawal management programs), HIV care and treatment, and linkages to additional providers. o AltaMed will operate a centralized service location within one City of Vernon’s Health Bungalow. This site will serve as the primary service site for patient needing primary care and linkage to additional services. Staffed with a primary care provider, community health worker, and behavioral health case manager, patients will receive on-site basic primary care services (including wound care, acute infection follow up, vital sign monitoring, screening for high blood pressure and diabetes), mental health and substance abuse screening, HIV screening and case management services to address social determinants of health including housing and coordinate all aspects of care (behavioral health, primary care, infectious disease and supportive services). As needed, patients will be referred to a social worker for appropriate interventions and case management support services, as well as AltaMed’s large network of primary care clinic sites, specialty services and high-risk patient programming— Clinician Home Visit Program, Enhanced Care Management, and Care Navigation for Unsheltered Patients. • Spoke Services that include day patient care in the field, routine health services and education, case management, and referrals to additional providers. o AltaMed will staff the City of Vernon’s mobile units (community outreach and service), offering outpatient care, routine health services, and referrals to specialized providers (housing, food resources, etc.). A licensed vocational nurse, case manager and community health worker will utilize the City of Vernon’s community outreach mobile unit to conduct community outreach and health education to local businesses and community members, promoting the services offered by The City of Vernon and AltaMed. Leveraging its community health status as a trusted messenger in the community, AltaMed will foster relationships with community members and begin to conduct in-place treatment and internal referrals via the City of Vernon’s mobile health unit. • Program Administration in order to effectively establish workflows that will properly address the City of Vernon’s health needs, and allow AltaMed to ensure timely and ample services. o Through a “ramp up” period in the first quarter of the partnership, AltaMed will establish workflows for all of the services proposed, complete hire and training of care teams on integrated PCC care model + behavioral health and HIV testing, conduct thorough mapping . . Item 18 Page 66 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 9 | Page exercises to target highest need encampments, intersections, and extend existing contracted relationships with specialty providers. • Data Collection: A dedicated team, made up of a Project Director, Program Coordinator, and clinical team will be deployed to reach unsheltered, community, worker, and resident individuals in the community with the goal of increasing their knowledge and access to care. By the end of the 3- year period, AltaMed’s Program Evaluator will assess and display the following successes of the program, using programs such as our EPIC EHR and GPRA-CSAT: o Increase in the number of individuals receiving primary care with wrap around services o Increase in the number of individuals receiving mental health, substance use and MAT services o Increase in the number of individuals receiving HIV Hepatitis, TB Testing & services o Increase in the number of community linkages to community providers for SUD and MOUD services, behavioral and mental health, primary care, telehealth, and other services like food and housing placement. Ultimately through this partnership, AltaMed will provide accessible, holistic healthcare to unsheltered, racially and ethnic diverse, and underserved individuals who face barriers to traditional healthcare services. Work Plan Ramp Up Period & Project Management (Est. start date: July 1, 2024) AltaMed’s PCC Project Director, Program Coordinator and Community Health Worker will conduct the following activities in order to establish efficient workflows for in-place and on-site care, and scale services on behalf of the City of Vernon’s health department: • Establish and finalize the following workflows: o PCC, Behavioral Health, SBIRT, MAT (patient assessment and follow up) o Testing and services for HIV, Hepatitis, and TB o Linkage to additional services (housing, food, etc, working with key partners) o Health insurance screening process (Medicaid, Medicare) • Integrate universal substance use screening into our electronic health record (EPIC) • Complete hire and training of care teams on integrated PCC care model + behavioral health and HIV testing • Extend existing contracted relationships with specialty substance use service providers and other community service providers o Create direct linkage to peer recovery support services • Integrate Vernon mobile units and hubs within scope. Work with PFS to obtain the appropriate clearance from the State after Change in Scope has been obtain in order to bill for services, if needed • Leverage AltaMed’s internal community affairs and branding teams in order to develop several linguistically appropriate communications pieces, including: promotion of services at hub “Health Bungalows”, health education pamphlets (to help increase awareness of OUD and other substance abuse risks, MAT services), resource guides for additional linkage to care after resources • Conduct a thorough mapping exercise to target highest need encampments, intersections, and establish MOU’s with groups serving unhoused populations . . Item 18 Page 67 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 10 | Page • Deploy team, establish partnerships and referrals to other service providers and CBO’s serving this population Primary Care at Bungalows (Est. start date: October 1, 2024) An AltaMed PCC Physician, Licensed Vocational Nurse, Case Manager, and Community Health Worker will be the primary staff involved in operationalized primary care services within the City’s Health Bungalows: • PCC provider will rotate, 2 days a week at the Vernon location. Provider will also be made available via telehealth. • LVN, Case Manager and CHW will be available 4 days/week at the bungalows. • Administer primary care services, preventative services, case management and health education. • Build out the necessary health information systems and business and clinical protocols and procedures, as necessary. Primary Care at Bungalows + Mobile Unit Activation (Est. start date November 2024) AltaMed PCC Physician, LVN, Case Manager, and CHW will expand Phase 1 services by activating 2 mobile units. AltaMed will • Administer community outreach and health education to local businesses and community members, promoting the services offered by The City of Vernon and offer screenings and treatment through Vernon’s mobile health unit • PCC provider, LVN, Case Manager, and CHW will rotate 2 days a week at the Vernon location. Provider will also be made available via telehealth • PCC provider, LVN, Case Manager, and CHW will rotate 2 days a week in the field. Primary Care at Bungalows + Mobile Unit Care + Referral Services (Est. start date January 2025) Phase 3 will serve to meet demand for complex health care needs by activating AltaMed’s referral system to specialty services and larger referral network. Staff, made up of our Program Coordinator, PCC Team Physician, Case Manager, and Social Worker will conduct the following activities: • PCC provider, LVN, Case Manager, and CHW will rotate 2 days a week at the Vernon location. Provider will also be made available via telehealth • PCC provider, LVN, Case Manager, and CHW will rotate 2 days a week in the field. • Social worker will deliver therapy for mild-to-moderate cases of anxiety and depression • Case manager will coordinate clinical appointments and social service needs (food, housing) Fees and Costs In order to develop and execute the Portable Clinic Care model, AltaMed would require $1,959,300 in funding, over a three-year period. Year one would require $659,552 in funding. Years two and three would require $649,874 in funding. AltaMed will optimize several of its clinical departments, including its Behavioral Health, Health Services Operations, and HIV departments, in order to oversee the PCC team who will provide outpatient services, outreach and necessary linkage to care. Primary costs requested from The City of Vernon include personnel, travel, and supplies (equipment and medical): . . Item 18 Page 68 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 11 | Page Personnel • Program Director (.25 FTE) will oversee the deployment of the program, training and reporting o Not to exceed $159,075 over 3 years ($53,025 annually) • Program Coordinator (1 FTE) will work with the Project Director to develop and execute the work plan to implement the PCC protocol. o Not to exceed $255,000 over 3 years ($85,000 annually) • PCC Team Physician (.5 FTE) will provide direct clinical services to unsheltered populations. o Not to exceed $312,000 over 3 years ($104,000 annually) • Case Manager Coordinator (1 FTE) will work with the PCC team in the field to help link patients with additional services after their initial visit. o Not to exceed $165,000 over 3 years ($55,000 annually) • Social Worker (.25 FTE) will provide direct behavioral health services. o Not to exceed $41,250 over 3 years ($13,750 annually) • Community Health Worker (.8 FTE) will act as lead care managers to help patients address the social, medical and community problems that lead to poor health. o Not to exceed $130,440 over 3 years ($43,480) • Licensed Vocational Nurse will provide nursing care o Not to exceed $168,429 over 3 years ($56,143 annually) • Program Evaluator (.25 FTE) will coordinate closely with the PD to develop and finalize an evaluation and performance assessment plan. o Not to exceed $135,000 over 3 years ($45,000 annually) • Grant Manager (.10 FTE) will support program reporting and administration. o Not to exceed $20,461 over 3 years ($6,280 annually) • Fringe Benefits (@.28%) includes FICA, Health Insurance, Unemployment, Workers Compensation, Pension/Retirement, and Medicare o Not to exceed $424,788 over 3 years ($141,596 annually) Supplies • Computers (Unit cost $1,888 x 3) o Not to exceed $5,664 in Year One • Cell Phones (Year one $3,270, [$70/month X 12 months x 3 Staff]) (Years two & three [$70/month x 12 months x 3 staff]) o Not to exceed $8,310 over three years • iPads for field use ($1,000 (including software licenses) x 3 Staff) o Not to exceed $3,000 in Year One • Office Supplies (General office supplies, printing, etc.) ($192 per month x 12) o Not to exceed $6,912 over three years Travel • Staff Mileage: Travel from AltaMed Corporate to Vernon City Hall (480 miles per month X 3 Staff X $0.585/mile x 12 months) o Not to exceed $30,327 over three years ($10,109 annually) • Vehicle Operational Expenses (Insurance) o Not to exceed $30,000 over three years ($10,000 annually) Medical Supplies (Testing, Vaccination, Treatment Supplies) • In-place clinical care supplies (wound care, gloves, gauze, alcohol wipes, etc.) ($1,000/month) . . Item 18 Page 69 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 12 | Page o Not to exceed $36,000 over three years ($12,000 annually) • Over the counter medications (antacids, ibuprofen, etc.) ($200/month) o Not to exceed $7,200 over three years ($2,400 annually) • Testing Kits (Roche Accucheck (test strips, lancets), Hemocue 201 (test strips), Clintech status (test kit), DCA Advantage (test kit), TB Test Kit, HIV Test kit) ($100/month) o Not to exceed $3,600 over three years ($1,200 annually) Indirect Costs: This covers 2.8% general and administrative expenses (e.g., accounting department costs, personnel department costs, etc.). Note: AltaMed's federally negotiated indirect amount is 24.5%. • Not to exceed $53,366 over three years (Year One: $17,964 and $17,701 in Years Two and Three) AltaMed will develop a long-term sustainability plan, identifying additional funding sources and direct billing mechanisms that will ensure these critical services are made available to this growing population of unhoused Latinos and communities of color to ensure culturally connected holistic care is available to them in Vernon and in the surrounding communities long-term. AltaMed would welcome the opportunity to continue to work with the City of Vernon beyond the funding period to co-identify funding opportunities that could sustain and expand operations, in pursuit of building out a robust health department in the city. Ability of the Proposer to Perform Experience with Similar Programs and Populations AltaMed launched our first mobile clinic in 1999 and has operated an integrated service model for patients experiencing homelessness since 2020. We operate dental mobile units and school-based behavioral health clinics that offer dental care, vaccinations, and health screenings to the highest need neighborhoods. AltaMed’s experience with reaching and building trust with Latino and other diverse underserved communities will enhance our PCC team’s ability to address immediate needs and provide preventive care and support services. AltaMed has been working with unsheltered populations since its inception, with the creation of a dedicated Home Care team in 2018 with the specific mandate to meet patients where they are, whether in their homes or whether they are unsheltered. As AltaMed’s patient population is primarily Latino and low income; patients served tend to experience a number of health disparities due to lack of health literacy, race, lack of access to quality primary care, and socioeconomic status. AltaMed has experience implementing and managing large scale research and service grant projects to address gaps in care and address critical social needs for severely vulnerable and unhoused populations, including: 1. Housing Navigation Program AltaMed’s Patients Experiencing Homelessness (PEH) team engages in patient outreach, one-on-one service navigation, case management, and in-person interventions to address housing insecurity. The robust two-person team began services in 2020 and manages an active portfolio of 280 patients. The team continued direct, in-person services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic while maintaining a 60% assistance rate. The top linkages provided have been to the Coordinated Entry System, Project Room/Home Key, health services, transportation, and various county agencies. Patients are referred to AltaMed’s PEH team by various stakeholders, such as 1). in-clinic providers, (2) AltaMed’s Clinician . . Item 18 Page 70 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 13 | Page Home Visit Program that engages in street medicine and manages transitions of care for recently discharged patients, (3) and lastly, external housing navigation teams like Exodus, PATH, and LAHSA. AltaMed serves as the patient’s medical home while partnering with external agencies to ensure seamless access to services. The PEH team works diligently to gain and maintain the trust of patients experiencing homelessness by offering to accompany patients to appointments with clinicians, service providers, and civil matters. PEH team members support patients in service navigation by routinely following up with the service provider to mitigate any barriers for the patient. Patients receive regular contact from a PEH team member, and when patients transition to permanent housing, contact is reduced to once every 3 months to ensure housing retention. 2. Clinician Home Visit Program AltaMed manages a Clinician Home Visit Program, which involves going above and beyond to serve the complex needs of patients who are homebound or have significant barriers to managing their health and getting to their appointments. The patients in this program have had two or more hospitalizations or over four emergency room visits within the last six months. They also have one or more of the following medically severe diagnosis: congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, uncontrolled diabetes, degenerative neuro disease, recurrent asthma exacerbation, end stage renal disease and on dialysis, wounds w/ a chronic condition or stroke. Additionally, patients with two or more of the following also qualify for the program: dementia, on multiple medications, blindness, heart disease or uncontrolled high blood pressure. The Clinician Home Visit Program is a multidisciplinary clinical team of physicians, nurse practitioners/physician assistants, nurses and medical assistants who deliver clinical care in a patient’s place of residence to remove barriers for our high-risk/seriously ill and homebound patients to reduce unnecessary and costly hospitalizations. In 2023 the team recorded 3,602 patient visits that resulted in a 30% average reduction in Emergency Department visits and a nearly 37% average reduction in hospital admissions. 3. Enhanced Care Management In response to California’s CalAIM initiative designed to improve health outcomes for Medi-Cal beneficiaries with complex needs—including individuals experiencing homelessness, AltaMed began the build out of its Enhanced Care Management program in 2022. Since then, AltaMed has grown a robust interdisciplinary care team approach that supports even the most complex social, developmental, behavioral, and clinical conditions of socially and medically complex patients. With care teams that include Community Health Workers, Patient Care Coordinators, Social Workers, Physicians and Nurses, and ancillary staff, AltaMed provides intensive case management, personalized care plans and collaborates with community based service providers to care for the whole person. 4. Behavioral Health Integration In 2014, AltaMed received a $500,000 grant from HRSA to integrate an SBIRT protocol for depression into its primary care protocol. Since then, AltaMed has successfully implemented the program with almost 95% of adults (143,000 adults in 2019, pre-COVID) receiving a depression screening at their first or annual visits. 5. Healthy Communities, Healthy Lives: A $3 Million grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded in 2014, coalition includes LADPH, Los Angeles Unified School Districts, Superior Grocers, 211 Los Angeles, YMCA . . Item 18 Page 71 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 14 | Page Metro Los Angeles, and several other community agencies, to (1) increase access to healthy food options, (2) increase awareness of and access to opportunities for physical activity, and, (3) increase utilization of community programs that prevent, reduce risk for and management diabetes, obesity and other chronic ailments. 6. Integrated HIV Services Among its 276,000 clients, AltaMed serves over 2,200 individuals with diagnosed HIV each year at four dedicated HIV primary care clinics with a strong footprint in densely-populated Latinx communities most impacted by HIV. AltaMed’s commitment to Ending the HIV Epidemic also includes its dedicated efforts to HIV prevention, reaching over 3,000 high-risk individuals each year through its evidence-based, high-impact approaches to prevention including community-based and biomedical interventions. AltaMed is a long-standing Ryan White and Minority AIDS Initiative provider with an almost 40-year history of working with its target population. In 1986, AltaMed first launched its HIV Medical Services to combat HIV/ AIDS in its own community of East LA. Its partnership with the Ryan White Part C program to deliver HIV outpatient early intervention services began a few years later through a demonstration grant from the Bureau of Primary Health Care in 1989. AltaMed has emerged as a regionally prominent HIV service provider offering vulnerable populations in predominantly Latinx immigrant communities a full spectrum of bilingual and culturally-competent prevention and treatment services in Los Angeles County. AltaMed is prepared to leverage years of programming and implementation experience---including offsite STD testing through a mobile unit —to serve City of Vernon member. AltaMed has a successful history of deploying a HIV mobile unit, using it to conduct 2,533 HIV tests in 2018 and 2,470 in 2019. In 2020, due to loss of funding and the COVID-19 Pandemic, testing moved to a storefront location in Boyle Heights, Los Angeles. As a result, AltaMed was conducted 424 tests in 2020 and 566 tests in 2021. Since that time, the department has been working hard to expand rapid testing participation. In 2023, AltaMed performed 2,616 rapid tests, an 18.8% increase over 2022 levels. This increase is a result of increased outreach and testing services in both Los Angeles and Orange Counties, establishing partnerships with community based organizations, and hosting quarterly events at our prevention site in Boyle Heights. AltaMed’s successful history of conducting offsite testing through a mobile unit at formalized partner locations, including substance abuse and mental health Community Based Organizations (CBOs), demonstrates that targeted and enhanced testing efforts to stop the spread of HIV in Los Angeles and Orange Counties must include offsite, mobile field testing with local partners as well as informal social/affinity groups. AltaMed also has extensive experience developing and implementing programs for underserved populations from a variety of diverse backgrounds. As a large majority of the population served are immigrants and Spanish speaking, AltaMed has successfully adopted the National CLAS standards, developing a workforce the majority of whom are not only bilingual in English and Spanish, but are also familiar with the lifestyle and cultural diversity of the populations served. AltaMed also maintains a Cultural and Linguistics Specialist. This Specialist serves to educate and train the entire AltaMed staff to provide culturally and linguistically sensitive customer service. This training includes conflict management and resolution, presentation and telephone etiquette, and appropriate methods of interacting with consumers. Demographic data, including patients preferred language, ethnicity and race are collected as part of patient clinic encounters and stored in EPIC. AltaMed conducts annual community needs assessments to understand characteristics, shifting demographics, and accurately assess needs. AltaMed receives patient feedback on services through satisfaction and experience surveys and ongoing physician surveys. . . Item 18 Page 72 of 78 On-The-Streets Portable Clinical Care with Integrated Behavioral Health and HIV Care 15 | Page Staff Capacity Each of the staff participating in this project have extensive experience serving this community. Key Personnel for the program will include: • Project Director (0.25 FTE) Dr. Christopher Bui, has served as AltaMed’s Medical Director of Home Care Services for High-Risk Populations since 2018 and will oversee the deployment of the program, training and reporting. • The Program Coordinator (1 FTE) will work with the Project Director to develop and execute the work plan to implement the PCC protocol. They will also manage the care team, including the Social Worker and Case Manager Coordinator, to support execution of the protocol, and help to enhance/expand the adoption of the services. • Project Evaluator (0.25 FTE) role will be filled by Sharon Hudson, PhD, who is the Director of Implementation Science and Evaluation. The PE will coordinate closely with the PD to develop and finalize an evaluation and performance assessment plan. The PE is bilingual in English and Spanish, and has over 20 years’ experience in research design and evaluation. Skills and previous qualifications for key personnel are below, and professional resumes are included in this proposal: Project Director: Dr. Christopher Bui is Associate Chief Medical officer of Senior and Complex care at AltaMed. Dr. Bui has over 15 years of experience providing medical care to patients with severely complex clinical and social needs. As a Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation specialist and Palliative Medicine fellow, Dr. Bui is well versed in service complex populations and developing innovative clinical programs. As a Director of Outpatient Palliative Medicine at Kaiser Permanent, he led the operationalization of a new clinic for geriatric patients. Dr. Sharon Hudson is the Director of Implementation Science & Evaluation at the AltaMed Institute for Health Equity. Dr. Hudson has over 25 years of experience as a Behavioral Scientist, responsible for designing and implementing programs and research studies in primary care, specialty care, and community- based health. Currently, Dr. Hudson serves as AltaMed's lead evaluator on two SAMHSA-funded programs: La Linterna (a multi-disciplinary clinic for recently immigrated youth and their families), and the medication assisted therapy (MAT) program for individuals with opioid use disorder or alcohol use disorder. AltaMed has provided an abbreviated CV for her, keeping the page limits of this RFP in mind. For a full professional resume that includes her professional appointments, honors/awards, teaching, service, research/scholarship, and full list of publications, please email Tatiana Acosta at foundationsubmissions@altamed.org . . Item 18 Page 73 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 74 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 75 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 76 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 77 of 78 . . Item 18 Page 78 of 78 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Robert Sousa, Chief of Police Department:Police Submitted by:Nicholas Perez, Lieutenant - Patrol Division Subject Purchase Contract with D&R Office Works, Inc. for Furniture and Workspace Storage Recommendation A. Approve the issuance of a Purchase Contract with D&R Office Works, Inc. (D&R) for the purchase of furniture items and workspace storage for the Police Department, for a total amount not-to-exceed $17,197; and B. Authorize a contingency amount of eight percent (8%) or $1,376 for unforeseen price increases or substitutions due to inventory availability, and grant authority to the City Administrator to issue Change Orders for an amount up to the contingency amount, if necessary. Background The Vernon Police Department (PD) has engaged D&R to facilitate improvements to office spaces and employee common areas throughout the Department. Efficiently designed workspaces are important for productivity and collaboration, consider the well-being and comfort of employees, and foster a positive work environment. The proposed plan includes replacing eight commercial-grade chairs in the conference room, a storage space for the Evidence Officer’s office, and furniture for the break room. The chairs and break room furniture flagged for replacement have been in use for over 10 years. D&R has estimated a six-week turnaround time to deliver and install the new furniture. As a registered participant of OMNIA Partners, a cooperative purchasing organization, the proposed purchase from D&R is exempt from competitive bidding requirements pursuant to Vernon Municipal Code (VMC) Section 3.32.110(A)(5b), which exempts, “Contracts for supplies, equipment or services…when supplies, equipment or services can be purchased from a vendor offering the same prices, terms and conditions as in a previous award from the City or another public agency either by competitive bid or through a negotiated process and, in the opinion of the Finance Director [or designee], it is to the advantage of the City to do so.” The Financial Services Administrator concurs that it is advantageous for the City to move forward with the proposed purchase as OMNIA Partners provides competitively solicited cooperative purchasing contracts that comply with the City’s purchasing requirements. Per VMC 3.32.030(B), City Council approval is required if, in the twelve (12) months preceding the effective date of a proposed new, renewed, or otherwise amended contract, the City has paid or awarded the vendor more than $100,000. Within the past twelve (12) months, the City has paid or awarded D&R a total of approximately $269,993. Fiscal Impact The fiscal impact is not-to-exceed $18,573 including an eight percent (8%) contingency. Sufficient funds are available in the General Fund, Police Department, Capital Equipment Non-Auto Account No. 011-030-300-660015 for the current fiscal year. Attachments 1. D&R Office Works, Inc. Proposal. . Item 19 Page 1 of 1 LT NICK PEREZ CITY OF VERNON -PD-BREAKROOM 4305 SANTA FE AVE VERNON CA 90058 323-583-8811 x116 SOLD TO:SHIP TO: PROPOSAL P: E: P: Karen Braun8/21/2024 LT NICK PEREZ 4163-R1 Part Number Part DescriptionQty Sell Ext Sell DATE SALESPERSONCUSTOMER NO CUSTOMER PO NOPROPOSAL NO Line # OMNIA RA1918041 $0.00 $0.001 LEAD TIME 4-6 WEEKS1 $0.00 $0.002 QUOTATION EXPIRES OCT 30, 20241 $0.00 $0.003 ALL FINISHES TO BE DETERMINED1 $0.00 $0.004 925 1560-Y2-A9B Strata - Mid-Back, Synchro-Tilt Control, A9 Height & Width Adj. Black Arms 8 $465.00 $3,720.005 GRADE-CFabric Grade Selection Fabric Grade C CANTERGrade C Fabrics Momentum - Canter ONYX3022Canter Colors Onyx 3022 BFFrame Color Black Frame Page 1 of 4 . . Item 19 Page 1 of 5 Karen Braun8/21/2024 LT NICK PEREZ 4163-R1 Part Number Part DescriptionQty Sell Ext Sell DATE SALESPERSONCUSTOMER NO CUSTOMER PO NOPROPOSAL NO Line # BA2BBase Selection BA2B 26" Aluminum Base - Black Powder Coat C4Casters Selection C4 Heavy Duty Casters SSSeat Slider Selection Seat Slider 2.5" Side Paddle Activated HDHeavy Duty Multi-Shift Option (350 lbs.) Selection Heavy Duty Upgrade ~CAL TB 133 Fire Barrier No Cal TB 133 (standard upholstery) HON HLSL36TW WM Tackboard for 36W WM Overhead4 $173.16 $692.646 $(A)Fabric Selection Grd A Fabric .LNGrd A Fab Landscape 35Select Landscape Fabric Color Slate HON HLSL72TW Tackboard for 72" W Wallmount Tackboard4 $265.72 $1,062.887 $(A)Fabric Selection Grd A Fabric .LNGrd A Fab Landscape 35Select Landscape Fabric Color Slate HON HF23C Lock Core Replacement Kit Brushed Chrome2 $33.80 $67.608 ...Select Key Number VERIFY KEY # HON HSISLAUTNPNB8418S2 Islds Top 18Dx84W Span 21 $267.28 $267.289 $(L1STD)Laminate Grade Options Grd L1 Standard Laminate ~Select Grade 1 Laminate Finish Undecided LAMINATE Option .FWSelect Edgeband Color Florence Walnut HON H9193A Flagship 42W 3-Drw "A" Pull Lateral 42W 39-1/8H 18D2 $1,173.12 $2,346.2410 .XLock/Omt Opts OMT Core to Order Key Alike $(P1)Select Paint Color P1 Paint Opts Page 2 of 4 . . Item 19 Page 2 of 5 Karen Braun8/21/2024 LT NICK PEREZ 4163-R1 Part Number Part DescriptionQty Sell Ext Sell DATE SALESPERSONCUSTOMER NO CUSTOMER PO NOPROPOSAL NO Line # .P28Select Grade 1 Paint Fossil HON HCT36SX Arrange Counter Height X-base for 24-30" Surfaces1 $383.24 $383.2411 $(P1)Select Paint Color P1 Paint Opts ...Select Grade 1 Paint Skipped Option HON HCT29MT Arrnge Seated Hght T-legs for 30D Srfc - 2 bases1 $518.96 $518.9612 $(P1)Select Paint Color P1 Paint Opts ...Select Grade 1 Paint Skipped Option HON HRUCK1L Ruck Shell Chair6 $335.92 $2,015.5213 $(L1STD)Laminate Selection Grd L1 Standard Laminates ...Select Grade 1 Laminate Finish Skipped Option ...Select Paint Option Skipped Option HON HRUCK5L Ruck Shell Stool3 $403.00 $1,209.0014 $(L1STD)Laminate Selection Grd L1 Standard Laminates ...Select Grade 1 Laminate Finish Skipped Option ...Select Paint Option Skipped Option HON HCTSQR30 Arrange Table 30" Square Top1 $233.48 $233.4815 .NGrommet Selection No Grommet $(L1STD)Select Grade Grd L1 Standard Laminates ...Select Grade 1 Laminate Finish Skipped Option ...Select Edgeband Color Skipped Option Page 3 of 4 . . Item 19 Page 3 of 5 Karen Braun8/21/2024 LT NICK PEREZ 4163-R1 Part Number Part DescriptionQty Sell Ext Sell DATE SALESPERSONCUSTOMER NO CUSTOMER PO NOPROPOSAL NO Line # HON HCTRECT3072 Arrange Table 30" x 72" Rectangle Top1 $331.24 $331.2416 .NGrommet Selection No Grommet $(L1STD)Select Grade Grd L1 Standard Laminates ...Select Grade 1 Laminate Finish Skipped Option ...Select Edgeband Color Skipped Option MVD MCHDBC2472 Buffett Credenza w/ 4 Box Drawers, 4 Full Hinged Doors, 24x72x36H - Standard Modesty Panel 1 $1,866.48 $1,866.4817 ...Top Color Skipped Option MMH13Eight Cabinet Door Handle Selection Bar Handle Silver 8" (8) MMFL_4BDrawer Lock Option Four Face Locks for Box Drawers Delivery and Installation $882.87 $882.87 Sales Tax $1,598.74 $1,598.74 Total:$17,196.17 Quotation is based on normal business hours, unless otherwise noted. Ground floor delivery, unless otherwise noted Orders once placed cannot be cancelled or changed Area must be cleared by owner of all existing furniture prior to delivery Page 4 of 4 . . Item 19 Page 4 of 5 13' 7" 36/336/318x42x3918x4218x72 30x66x2924x42x29TASK 5244BL 5244BL Steel Shelving-Open 4 x 8 Mag Glass Board 8' 0" 7' 6" 30x72HCT29MTHCT29MTHRUCK1L HRUCK1LHRUCK1LHRUCK1LHRUCK1LHRUCK1Lexisting sink and cabinetsMCHDBC2472BREAKROOM BRIEFING ROOM 30x30 HCT36SX HRUCK5LHRUCK5LHRUCK5L. . Item 19 Page 5 of 5 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel S. Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works Department:Public Works Submitted by:Daniel S. Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works Subject I-710 South Corridor Status Update Recommendation Receive and file the report on the I-710 South Corridor Project. Background Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) staff worked with Caltrans through a lengthy process to develop the I-710 South Corridor Project resulting in three final project alternatives that were considered by the Metro Board: Alternative 1 (the “No Build” alternative), and “Build Alternatives” 5C and 7. At its March 2018 meeting, the Metro Board approved Alternative 5C as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the project to advance through the environmental process. Three years later, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) required additional air quality analysis for the proposed project. This delay rendered the data supporting Alternative 5C and the entire environmental document stale and in need of re-validation. At its May 2021 meeting, the Metro Board decided to suspend further work on the environmental clearance of the I-710 South Corridor Project LPA 5C due to environmental, community impact and displacement concerns raised by local communities, Caltrans, and the EPA. The Board directed staff to pursue an alternative path to developing a better program of projects for the I- 710 South corridor by re-engaging impacted communities and stakeholders to develop a more multimodal and sustainable approach to addressing transportation and community challenges in the corridor. A task force was created and charged with developing a Long Beach - East Los Angeles Corridor Draft Mobility Investment Plan (LB-ELA CMIP). The LB-ELA CMIP is focused on improving regional and local mobility of people, goods, and air quality while fostering economic vitality, social equity, environmental sustainability, and access to opportunity for the most impacted residents along the I-710 Corridor. The final LB-ELA CMIP was published on June 3, 2024. Some of the projects identified in the LB-ELA CMIP include support for zero emissions trucks, Electric Vehicle (EV) charging and hydrogen fueling stations, expanded bus service, and the creation of bicycle lanes. The Metro Board has identified Alternative 1, the “No Build” alternative, as the LPA and has funded the completion of the environmental documents in order to clear the path for the Metro Board to take future action on projects and programs identified in the LB-ELA CIMP. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan . . Item 20 Page 1 of 1 ZEROEMISSION EQUITY • SUSTAINABILITY • AIR QUALITY • COMMUNITY • ENVIRONMENT • MOBILITY • OPPORTUNITY • PROSPERITY • SAFETY APRIL Long Beach - East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan A QUALIFYING I COMPREHENSIVE MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR PLAN . . Item 20 Page 1 of 305 Michael Cano Executive Officer Countywide Planning & Development canom@metro.net Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Communities 47 47 22 103 91 91 91 60 60 710 110 710 10 5 105 105 605 110 405 405 405 5 605 1 IN = 15,000 FT SEAL BEACH LOS ALAMITOS CYPRESS LA PALMA ROLLING HILLS ROLLING HILLS ESTATES LOMITA SIGNAL HILL ARTESIA CERRITOS LAWNDALE CUDAHY SANTA FE SPRINGS BELL GARDENS MAYWOOD BELL VERNON EAST LOS ANGELES COMMERCE HAWAIIAN GARDENS LAKEWOODCARSON BELLFLOWER GARDENA COMPTON HAWTHORNE LYNWOOD SOUTH GATE HUNTINGTON PARK PICO RIVERA WHITTIER MONTEBELLO REDONDO BEACH PARAMOUNT TORRANCE NORWALK DOWNEY INGLEWOOD LONG BEACH DOWNTOWN LA Port of LA Port of LB LGB PACIFIC COAST H IGHWAY PAC I FIC C O A S T H I G H W A Y Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 2 of 305 i Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background Contents Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vii Dedication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .viii Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ix Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan: Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-2 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-4 Existing Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-5 Transportation, Access, and Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-7 Community Health, Air Quality, and Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-8 Task Force and Charter Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-9 Vision Leading the Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-11 Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-13 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-18 Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ES-22 1 . Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-1 1 .1 Purpose of the Investment Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-1 1 .2 Brief History of the Corridor before the LB-ELA Corridor Project . . . . . .1-5 1 .3 The Need for LB-ELA Corridor Improvements – Decades in the Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-6 1 .4 Goods Movement Strategic Plan and I-405 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan – Precursors and Framework for the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1-8 2 . Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-1 2 .1 Creation of the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force (Staff Response to Board Motions 47 and 48) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-2 2 .2 Task Force Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-4 2 .3 Task Force Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-7 2 .3 .1 Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-8 2 .4 Working Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-9 2 .4 .1 Coordinating Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-9 2 .4 .2 Community Leadership Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-9 2 .4 .3 Community Engagement Strategy Working Group . . . . . . . . . . . .2-11 2 .4 .4 Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-12 2 .4 .5 Equity Working Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-13 2 .4 .6 Zero-Emission Truck Working Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-13 2 .5 Community Values and Agreements to Build Consensus . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-18 2 .6 Work Plan Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-20 2 .7 Public Engagement Process, Including CBO Partnering . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-23 3 . Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-1 3 .1 LB-ELA Corridor Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-3 3 .2 Population Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-4 3 .2 .1 Equity Focus Communities Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-4 3 .2 .2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-4 3 .3 Community Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-17 3 .3 .1 Air Quality and Environmental Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-17 3 .3 .2 Health Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-23 3 .3 .3 Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-25 3 .3 .4 Access to Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-30 3 .4 Land Use Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-33 3 .5 Transportation Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-34 3 .5 .1 Goods Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-34 3 .5 .2 Travel to Work Mode Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-36 3 .5 .3 Active Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-38 3 .5 .4 Arterial Roadway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-39 3 .5 .5 Freeway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-45 3 .5 .6 Transit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-49 . . Item 20 Page 3 of 305 ii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background 4 . Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-1 4 .1 Identification of Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-3 4 .1 .1 Winter 2021 – Spring 2022: Existing Conditions Analysis . . . . . . .4-4 4 .1 .2 Summary of Key Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-5 4 .2 Task Force, CLC, and Working Group Input and Approval . . . . . . . . . . . .4-6 4 .3 Overview of Adopted Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . .4-7 4 .3 .1 Vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-7 4 .3 .2 Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-8 4 .3 .3 Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-10 4 .4 Board Adoption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-12 5 . Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . . . . . .5-1 5 .1 Development Process of Initial List of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-2 5 .1 .1 Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity (PIPO) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-4 5 .1 .2 Previous Studies and Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-6 5 .1 .3 Public and Community Input to the MSPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-6 5 .1 .4 Initial and Revised Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs Lists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-6 5 .1 .5 Active Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-7 5 .1 .6 Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-9 5 .1 .7 Community Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-10 5 .1 .8 Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-11 5 .1 .9 Goods Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-14 5 .1 .10 Transit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-16 5 .2 Other/ Additional Projects for Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-17 6 . Evaluation and Prioritization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-1 6 .1 Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-3 6 .1 .1 Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-3 6 .2 Prioritization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-20 6 .2 .1 Tiering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-20 6 .2 .2 Flags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-22 7 . Funding Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1 7 .1 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-1 7 .2 Measure R and Measure M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-3 7 .3 Suitable Discretionary Grant Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-5 7 .3 .1 Funding Program Eligibility Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-5 7 .3 .2 Federal Discretionary Funding Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-6 7 .3 .3 State Discretionary Funding Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-6 7 .3 .4 Regional Discretionary Funding Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-7 7 .3 .5 Local Match Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-7 7 .4 Summary and Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-9 7 .4 .1 Implementation and Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-10 8 . Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-1 8 .1 Projects with Outside Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-2 8 .2 Projects and Programs Receiving Measure R/M Investment . . . . . . . . .8-6 8 .3 Initial Investments: Projects/Programs Recommended for Initial Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-8 8 .3 .1 New Project Recommended for Initial Investment . . . . . . . . . . . .8-12 8 .4 Fact Sheets: Projects and Programs Recommended for Initial Investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-12 8 .5 Community Programs Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-44 8 .6 Modal Programs and START UP Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-67 . . Item 20 Page 4 of 305 iii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background 9 . Next Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-1 9 .1 Investment Plan Implementation Working Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-2 9 .1 .1 Modal Working Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-2 9 .1 .2 Community Programs Working Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-3 9 .2 Technical Assistance (START-UP) Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-3 9 .3 Guidance for Project Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-4 9 .4 Tracking Investment Plan Progress and Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-5 9 .5 Planning for the Next Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-7 10 . List of Acronyms and Abbreviations, Glossary of Terms, and Local, State and Regional Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10-1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10-2 Glossary of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10-4 Local, State and Regional Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10-17 Appendices Appendix 2-A Task Force Membership Roster Appendix 2-B Task Force Charter Appendix 2-C Coordinating Committee Membership Roster Appendix 2-D Community Leadership Committee Membership Roster Appendix 2-E Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Documentation Appendix 2-F Zero-Emission Truck Working Group Presenters and Presentation Information Appendix 5-A Full List of Multimodal Strategies, Projects and Programs (MSPPs) Appendix 6-A Rubrics for Benefit and Concern Criteria Appendix 6-B Evaluation Results Appendix 6-C Tiering Results Appendix 7-A Full List of Investment Plan Projects and Potential Funding Appendix 7-B Summary of Federal Discretionary Grant Programs Identified for Investment Plan Projects and Programs Appendix 8-A Investment Plan Projects and Programs by Location and Goal Focus Area . . Item 20 Page 5 of 305 iv Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background Tables Table 2-1 . Demographic Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-6 Table 2-2 . Initial Community Leadership Committee Membership Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-10 Table 3-1 . Bridge Condition Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-40 Table 3-2 . Pavement Condition Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-40 Table 5-1 . PIPO Early Initiative Candidate Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-4 Table 5-2 . Active Transportation Project Types by Sub-Category . . . . . . . . .5-7 Table 5-3 . Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Project Types by Sub-Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-9 Table 5-4 . Community Programs Project Types by Sub-Category . . . . . . . .5-10 Table 5-5 . Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Project Types by Sub-Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-11 Table 5-6 . Goods Movement Project Types by Sub-Category . . . . . . . . . . . .5-14 Table 5-7 . Transit Project Types by Sub-Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-16 Table 6-1 . Air Quality (AQ) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-8 Table 6-2 . Community Health (CH) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-9 Table 6-3 . Mobility (MB) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-10 Table 6-4 . Safety (SF) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-10 Table 6-5 . Environment (EN) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-11 Table 6-6 . Opportunity and Prosperity (OP) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-12 Table 6-7 . Equity (EQ) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-13 Table 6-8 . Sustainability (SA) Benefit Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-15 Table 6-9 . Outcome, Design, and Construction Concerns (Con) . . . . . . . . . . .6-16 Table 7-1 . Estimated Project Costs and Recommended Programming of Measure R/M Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-4 Table 7-2 . Federal Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-6 Table 7-3 . State Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-6 Table 7-4 . Regional Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-7 Table 7-5 . Local Match Requirements by Funding Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-8 Table 7-6 . Funding Need and Discretionary Grant Programs to Target . . . . .7-9 Table 8-1 . Corridor Investments Supported by Other* Funding Sources . . .8-3 Table 8-2 . Projects/Programs Recommended for Initial Investments (alphabetical) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-10 Table 8-3 . Active Transportation Investment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-68 Table 8-4 . Active Transportation Modal Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-70 Table 8-5 . Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Investment Summary . . .8-72 Table 8-6 . Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Modal Program . . . . . . . . .8-74 Table 8-7 . Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Investment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-77 Table 8-8 . Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-79 Table 8-9 . Goods Movement Investment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-80 Table 8-10 . Goods Movement Modal Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-81 Table 8-11 . Transit Investment Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-82 Table 8-12 . Transit Modal Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-84 . . Item 20 Page 6 of 305 v Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background Figures Figure 2-1 . Task Force Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-5 Figure 2-2 . Consensus-Building Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-7 Figure 2-3 . LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . .2-8 Figure 2-4 . Zero-Emission Truck Metro Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-14 Figure 2-5 . Five-Step Decision-Making Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-19 Figure 2-6 . Work Flow Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-21 Figure 2-7 . Charter Work Plan and Consensus Checkpoints . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-22 Figure 2-8 . Geographic Coverage of Community Engagement Activities . . .2-26 Figure 3-1 . LB-ELA Corridor Study Area (LA County Context) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-3 Figure 3-2 . LB-ELA Corridor Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-3 Figure 3-3 . L A Metro Equity Focus Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-4 Figure 3-4 . Median Household Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-6 Figure 3-5 . Poverty Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-6 Figure 3-6 . Age 65 and Over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-6 Figure 3-7 . Percentage of Individuals with Disability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-7 Figure 3-8 . Auto Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-7 Figure 3-9 . Youth and Senior Age Groups Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-8 Figure 3-10 . Black or African American Alone, non-Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-9 Figure 3-11 . Asian Alone, non-Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-9 Figure 3-12 . Hispanic or Latino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-9 Figure 3-13 . White Alone, non-Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-9 Figure 3-14 . Race and Ethnicity Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-10 Figure 3-15 . Population Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-11 Figure 3-16 . Employment Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11 Figure 3-17 . Commercial Jobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-12 Figure 3-18 . Industrial Jobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-12 Figure 3-19 . Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-12 Figure 3-20 . Other Services Jobs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-12 Figure 3-21 . Unemployment Rates Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-13 Figure 3-22 . Unemployment Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-14 Figure 3-23 . Individuals with No High School Degree or Above . . . . . . . . . . . .3-14 Figure 3-24 . Cost Burdened Renters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-15 Figure 3-25 . Cost Burdened Homeowners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-15 Figure 3-26 . Housing Burden Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-16 Figure 3-27 . Particulate Matter 2 .5 (PM 2 .5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-18 Figure 3-28 . Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-18 Figure 3-29 . Particulate Matter 2 .5 Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-19 Figure 3-30 . Diesel Particulate Matter Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-19 Figure 3-31 . Tree Canopy Coverage Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-20 Figure 3-32 . Percentage of Population Covered by Tree Canopy . . . . . . . . . . .3-20 Figure 3-33 . Urban Heat Island Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-22 Figure 3-34 . Ground Toxic Cleanup Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-22 Figure 3-35 . Asthma Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-23 Figure 3-36 . Asthma Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-24 Figure 3-37 . Cancer Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-24 Figure 3-38 . Bicycle or Pedestrian Crashes Location and Severity . . . . . . . . .3-26 Figure 3-39 . Bicycle or Pedestrian Crashes Fatality and Serious Injury . . . . .3-26 Figure 3-40 . Truck Crash Location and Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-28 Figure 3-41 . Truck Crashes Concentrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-28 Figure 3-42 . Truck Crashes with CSTAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-29 Figure 3-43 . All Crashes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-29 Figure 3-44 . I-710 Crashes – Locations and Severity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-29 Figure 3-45 . Lack of Park Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-31 Figure 3-46 . Lack of Supermarket Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-31 Figure 3-47 . High-Quality Transit Areas (HQTA) (2045) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-31 Figure 3-48 . L A River Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-32 Figure 3-49 . Public School Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-32 Figure 3-50 . Land Use Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-33. . Item 20 Page 7 of 305 vi Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background Figure 3-51 . Countywide Strategic Truck Arterial Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-34 Figure 3-52 . Daily Truck Trips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-35 Figure 3-53 . Public School Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-36 Figure 3-54 . Mode Share Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-37 Figure 3-55 . I-710 Active Transportation Crossing Gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-38 Figure 3-56 . Bicycle Lane Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-38 Figure 3-57 . Major Arterials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-39 Figure 3-58 . Street Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-39 Figure 3-59 . Bridge Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-41 Figure 3-60 . Pavement Condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-41 Figure 3-61 . Arterial Roadway Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-43 Figure 3-62 . Morning Arterial Roadway Speeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-43 Figure 3-63 . Evening Arterial Roadway Speeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-43 Figure 3-64 . Study Area Arterial Roadway Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled . . . . .3-44 Figure 3-65 . I-710 Freeway Morning Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-45 Figure 3-66 . I-710 Freeway Evening Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-45 Figure 3-67 . Daily Vehicle and Person Trips on I-710 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-46 Figure 3-68 . Northbound Bottlenecks Along I-710 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-47 Figure 3-69 . Southbound Bottlenecks Along I-710 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-47 Figure 3-70 . Freeway Pavement Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-48 Figure 3-71 . Transit Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-49 Figure 3-72 . Transit Rail Boarding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-50 Figure 3-73 . Transit Bus Boarding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3-50 Figure 5-1 . Phase 3 Overview of the LB-ELA Investment Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-2 Figure 5-2 . E xample Formation of Multimodal Groupings of Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-5 Figure 6-1 . Evaluation Process Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-2 Figure 6-2 . Project Benefit and Concern Rating Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-4 Figure 6-3 . Project Health Outcomes and Example Community Results . . .6-18 Figure 6-4 . Funding Pathways for Tiered Projects and Programs . . . . . . . . .6-21 Figure 7-1 . Funding Strategy Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7-2 Figure 8-1 . Projects/Programs for Initial Investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-9 . . Item 20 Page 8 of 305 viivii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Vision A concise statement that captures the collective aspirations, desires, and outcomes of the project An equitable, shared LB-ELA Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options for moving people and goods that will foster clean air (zero emissions), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities, and users in the Corridor. Foreword The Long Beach-East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) is a comprehensive strategic planning initiative focused on enhancing the transportation infrastructure and services in the LB-ELA Corridor, and serves as a qualifying Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan for the California Transportation Commission’s Solutions for Congested Corridors Program. The Investment Plan represents a significant milestone in regional transportation planning, embodying an innovative collaborative approach that integrates community insights, technical expertise, and a commitment to equity and sustainability. The Investment Plan is not just a roadmap for infrastructure development; it reflects the collective vision and aspirations of the communities and stakeholders it serves. As a part of the process, the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force and Community Leadership Committee (CLC) members agreed to a shared Vision Statement for the Investment Plan. “An equitable, shared LB-ELA Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options for moving people and goods that will foster clean air (zero emissions), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities, and users in the Corridor.” The Investment Plan lays out the strategies, projects, and programs proposed, and highlights the key elements that make the Investment Plan a transformative project for the LB-ELA Corridor. It underscores the importance of multimodal transportation solutions and their benefits to the community, the environment, and the economy. The Investment Plan also looks to the future, identifying working groups to help develop and refine projects and programs identified for funding or as a modal program candidate. The Community Programs Catalyst Fund and technical assistance program (START-UP Fund) created through this strategic vision will provide an important, targeted, and innovative approach to meeting community needs and providing benefits that complement and exceed those found in a traditional transportation investment strategy, reflecting the great needs found in these communities that have faced so many impacts over decades. By presenting a detailed account of the development process, engagement strategies, and the diverse range of improvements planned, the Investment Plan aims to provide stakeholders, policymakers, and the public with a clear understanding of the objectives, scope, and expected outcomes. The LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan is more than just a transportation project; it is a testament to the power of collaborative planning in creating a more connected, accessible, and vibrant region. This Investment Plan closes the door on policy and investment decisions that have impacted local communities over many generations and marks the beginning of a new chapter – one focused on bringing together diverse voices and innovative solutions for a thriving LB-ELA Corridor that supports the generations of tomorrow. Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 9 of 305 viii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Dedication In heartfelt remembrance of Martha Fierro, a remarkable community member and passionate activist. Martha’s legacy is one of unwavering dedication to the well-being of her community of Cudahy. A proud member of Metro’s LB-ELA Corridor Community Leadership Committee, she consistently championed public health and community-led initiatives. Her commitment was evident in her fierce advocacy for green spaces in park-poor communities profoundly impacted by the 710 freeway. Martha played a pivotal role in shaping a vision of multi-modal mobility options and community improvements along the corridor. As a fierce Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) member and community leader, Martha’s dedication extended beyond meetings and committees—she rallied her neighbors, leading transformational efforts to enhance parks and green spaces in the City of Cudahy. Martha’s enduring legacy is etched in her dedication to projects that prioritize people and public health over goods and profit. She is an inspiring example for Southeast Los Angeles residents advocating for the right to environmental justice. Written by her friends at Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) In Memoriam Martha Fierro Community Leadership Committee Member, City of Cudahy January 6, 1965 – February 1, 2023 Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 10 of 305 ix Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Acknowledgements Task Force Community-Based Organizations and Advocacy Groups Jennifer Ganata, Senior Staff Attorney, Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) Janeth Preciado Vargas, Southeast LA Youth Organizer, Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) Ambar Rivera, Researcher, Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) Dilia Ortega, Youth Program Coordinator, Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) Laura Cortez, Community Organizer/Co-Director, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice (EYCEJ) Taylor Thomas, Co-Director, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice (EYCEJ) Angela McNair Turner, Managing Attorney, Housing and Communities Workgroup, Legal Aid Foundation of LA (LAFLA) Sean Bigley, Senior Staff Attorney, Housing and Communities Workgroup, Legal Aid Foundation of LA (LAFLA) Cassidy Bennett, Staff Attorney, Housing and Communities Workgroup, Legal Aid Foundation of LA (LAFLA) Jonathan Jager, Staff Attorney, Housing and Communities Workgroup, Legal Aid Foundation of LA (LAFLA) Ghirlandi Guidetti, Staff Attorney, Housing and Communities Workgroup, Legal Aid Foundation of LA (LAFLA) Sylvia Betancourt, Project Manager, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma (LBACA) Marlin Dawoodjee Vargas, Community Outreach Liaison, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma (LBACA) Alberto Campos, Associate Director, Southeast Los Angeles Collaborative (SELA Collaborative) Dr. Wilma Franco, Executive Director, Southeast Los Angeles Collaborative (SELA Collaborative) Labor and Economic/Workforce Development Louie Diaz, Vice President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 848 Eric Tate, Secretary-Treasurer, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 848 Chris Wilson, Public Policy Manager, LA County Business Federation (BizFed) Stephen Cheung, President and CEO, LA County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC) Jermaine Hampton, Sr. Director of Workforce Development and Special Projects, LA County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC) Transportation Agencies Randy Johnson, Director of Government Affairs and Outreach, Access Services, Inc. Steven Wrenn, Community Liaison, Access Services, Inc. Louis Burns, Community Liaison, Access Services, Inc. Michael Leue, Chief Executive Officer, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) Roderick Diaz, Director of Planning and Development, Metrolink David Huang, Planning Manager, Metrolink Lisa Patton, Executive Director/VP, Finance and Budget, Long Beach Transit (RideLBT) Marisol Barajas, Manager of Government Relations, Long Beach Transit (RideLBT) Scott Strelecki, Program Manager II, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Allison Linder, Clean Cities Coalition Director and Senior Regional Planner, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Freight and Logistics Industry Lena Kent, General Director, Public Affairs, BNSF Railway Robert Loya, Chief Operating Officer, Harbor Trucking Association (HTA) Matt Schrap, Chief Executive Officer, Harbor Trucking Association (HTA) Michele Grubbs, Vice President, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA) Thomas Jelenić, Vice President, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA) Theresa Dau-Ngo, Director of Port Planning, Port of Long Beach (POLB) Rick Cameron, Deputy Executive Director, Planning and Development, Port of Long Beach (POLB), in memoriam Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 11 of 305 x Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Sharon Weissman, Member, Port of Long Beach (POLB) Kerry Cartwright, Director of Goods Movement, Port of Los Angeles (POLA) Tony Gioiello, Deputy Executive Director of Development, Port of Los Angeles (POLA) Lupe Valdez, Senior Director of Public Affairs, Union Pacific Railroad Vic La Rosa, CEO, President & Co-Founder, Total Transportation Services (TTSI), in memoriam Tony Williamson, Director of Compliance & Sustainability, Total Transportation Services (TTSI) Environmental Organizations Dr. Joe Lyou, President and CEO, Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) Christopher Chavez, Deputy Policy Director, Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) Fernando Gaytan, Senior Attorney, Earthjustice Vanessa Rivas Villanueva, Research and Policy Analyst, Earthjustice Adrian Martinez, Senior Attorney, Earthjustice Cecilia Segal, Senior Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Natalia Ospina, Staff Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Kimberly Leefatt, Staff Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Heather Kryczka, Staff Attorney, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Najah Louis, Legal Fellow, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Alec Cronin, Attorney and Legal Fellow, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Kala Babu, Summer Legal Intern, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Academic/Research/Policy/Foundations Alyssa Haerle, Director, Infrastructure Incentive Administration, CalStart Alycia Gilde, Vice President, Clean Fuels and Infrastructure, CalStart Niki Okuk, Deputy Director, CalStart Fidencio Gallardo, Education Innovation Deputy, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Edward Muna, Project Manager, USC Equity Research Institute (ERI) Dr. Manuel Pastor, Distinguished Professor of Sociology and American Studies & Ethnicity and Turpanjian Chair in Civil Society and Social Change, USC Equity Research Institute (ERI) Dr. Marlon Boarnet, Director, USC METRANS Transportation Consortium Sue Dexter, Researcher, USC METRANS Transportation Consortium Dr. Genevieve Giuliano, Executive Committeer, USC METRANS Transportation Consortium Local Jurisdictions Ali Saleh, Councilmember, City of Bell, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Maria Davila, Councilmember, City of Bell Elizabeth Alcantar, Councilmember, City of Cudahy, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Kevin Lainez, Councilmember, City of Commerce, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Oralia Rebollo, Mayor Pro Tem, City of Commerce, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Tina Backstrom, Senior Director of Transportation, Office of Mayor Karen Bass, City of Los Angeles Kidada Malloy, Planning Deputy, City of Los Angeles Daniel Rodman, Deputy Director, Transportation Services, City of Los Angeles Roberto Uranga, Councilmember, City of Long Beach, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Dr. Suely Saro, Councilmember, City of Long Beach, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Chork Nim, Chief of Staff for Dr. Suely Saro, City of Long Beach, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Tyler Curley, Deputy City Manager, City of Long Beach, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Marisela Santana, Councilmember, City of Lynwood, I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Steve Burger, Deputy Director, Transportation, LA County Department of Public Works (DPW) Hank Hsing, Project Manager, LA County Department of Public Works (DPW) Elaine Kunitake, Principal Engineer, LA County Department of Public Works (DPW) Waqas Rehman, Board of Supervisors, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Benjamin Feldman, Special Projects Deputy, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Karina Macias, Senior Transportation and Infrastructure Deputy, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Martin Reyes, Transportation Deputy, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Aydin Pasebani, Environmental and Special Projects Deputy, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Lilly O’Brien-Kovari, Senior Deputy, Transportation and Infrastructure, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 2 Viviana Gomez, Transportation Deputy, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 4 Luke Klipp, Senior Transportation Deputy, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 4 Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 12 of 305 xi Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Task Force Ex-Officio Tigran Agdaian, Manager, Breathe Southern California Ivan Fonesca, Public Policy and Communication Coordinator, Breathe Southern California Raj Dhillon, Senior Manager of Advocacy & Public Policy, Breathe Southern California Gisele Fong, Long Beach Program Manager, California Endowment Matthew O’Donnell, Branch Chief, Risk Reduction Branch, California Air Resources Board (CARB) Robert Krieger, Branch Chief, Risk Reduction Branch, California Air Resources Board (CARB) Dr. Tom O’Brien, Executive Director, Center for International Trade and Transportation, California State University, Long Beach (CITT CSULB) Hector De La Torre, Executive Director, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) Marisa Perez, Transportation Policy Advisor, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) Nancy Pfeffer, (Former) Executive DIrector/VP, Finance and Budget, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) Dan Meylor, Vice Chair, Seaport CBP, LA Customs Brokers and Freight Forwarders Association, Inc. Dan Monnier, Board Member, Treasurer, and Chair of the Logistics Committee, LA Customs Brokers and Freight Forwarders Association, Inc. Leanna Noble, Interim Program Director, Long Beach Residents Empowered (LIBRE) Dr. Aaron Katzenstein, Deputy Executive Officer, Technology Advancement Office, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Dr. Sarah Rees, Deputy Executive Officer, Planning, Rule Development and Implementation, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Matt Miyasato, Deputy Executive Officer and Chief Technologist, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Morgan Capilla, Environmental Justice Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (US EPA 9) Connell Dunning, Environmental Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (US EPA 9) Francisco Dóñez, Environmental Justice Coordinator and Diesel Program Staff, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (US EPA 9) Noora Shehab-Sehovic, Environmental Justice Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (US EPA 9) Andrew Zellinger, Environmental Reviewer, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (US EPA 9) Matthew Means, Vice President, Asset Management, Watson Land Company Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 13 of 305 xii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Coordinating Committee Task Force Representatives Sharon Weissman, Port of Long Beach Sylvia Betancourt, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma Elizabeth Alcantar, Gateway Cities Council of Governments I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Community Leadership Committee Representatives Phyllis Ollison, Compton Tiesha Davis, San Pedro Viridiana Preciado Cervantes, Walnut Park Community Leadership Committee Leticia Rodriguez, Bell Luis Mesa, Bell Natalie Diaz, Bell Gardens Emmanuel Godinez, Boyle Heights Fa’alagilagi Meni-Siliga, Carson Alfonso Garate, Commerce Phyllis Ollison, Compton Irma Lopez, Cudahy Martha Fierro, Cudahy, in memoriam Amelia Carballo, Downey Marjorie Wall, Downey Guadalupe Arellano, East LA Kathleen Barajas, East LA Miyuki Gomez, East LA Sinetta Farley, East/Rancho Dominguez (Unincorporated) Jose Rodolfo Vallejo, Huntington Park Dan Wamba, Lakewood Marcos Lopez, Long Beach Maria Reyes, Long Beach Marlene Sanchez, Long Beach Aide Castro, Lynwood Ivan Rojas, Lynwood Elizabeth Zamarripa, Lynwood Jamila Cervantes, Maywood Andres Duarte, Montebello Amber Bobadilla, Paramount Esmeralda Hernandez, South Gate Dora Douglas, Vernon Viridiana Preciado Cervantes, Walnut Park Tiesha Davis, Wilmington/San Pedro (San Pedro) Manuel Arellano, Wilmington/San Pedro (Wilmington) Kevin Shin, At-Large Susan Adams, At-Large Equity Working Group Task Force Representatives Randy Johnson, Access Services Michael Leue, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Niki Okuk, CalStart Ali Saleh, City of Bell Kevin Lainez, City of Commerce Dr. Joe Lyou, Coalition for Clean Air Janeth Preciado Vargas, Communities for a Better Environment Jennifer Ganata, Communities for a Better Environment Ambar Rivera, Communities for a Better Environment Dilia Ortega, Communities for a Better Environment Karina Macias, LA County Supervisorial District 1 Lily O’Brien Kovari, LA County Supervisorial District 2 Luke Klipp, LA County Supervisorial District 4 Viviana Gomez, LA County Supervisorial District 4 Fernando Gaytan, Earthjustice Vanessa Rivas Villanueva, Earthjustice Adrian Martinez, Earthjustice Taylor Thomas, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice Laura Cortez, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice Louie Diaz, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 848 Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 14 of 305 xiii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Ghirlandi Guidetti, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles-Long Beach Marlin Dawoodjee Vargas, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma Sylvia Betancourt, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma Marisol Barajas, Long Beach Transit Lisa Patton, Long Beach Transit Waqas Rehman, Board of Supervisors, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Najah Louis, National Resources Defense Council Kimberly Leefatt, National Resources Defense Council Natalia Ospina, Natural Resources Defense Council Thomas Jelenić, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association David Libatique, Port of Los Angeles Sharon Weissman, Port of Long Beach Dr. Wilma Franco, Southeast Los Angeles (SELA) Collaborative Alberto Campos, Southeast Los Angeles (SELA) Collaborative Lupe Valdez, Union Pacific Railroad Edward Muna, USC Equity Research Institute Community Leadership Committee Representatives Kevin Shin, At-Large Susan Adams, At-Large Luis Mesa, Bell Natalie Diaz, Bell Gardens Emmanuel Godinez, Boyle Heights Fa’alagilagi Meni-Siliga, Carson Alfonso Garate, Commerce Phyllis Ollison, Compton Irma Lopez, Cudahy Guadalupe Arellano, East LA Kathleen Barajas, East LA Miyuki Gomez, East LA Sinetta Farley, East/Rancho Dominguez (Unincorporated) Jose Rodolfo Vallejo, Huntington Park Maria Reyes, Long Beach Marlene Sanchez, Long Beach Aide Castro, Lynwood Jamila Cervantes, Maywood Amber Bobadilla, Paramount Esmeralda Hernandez, South Gate Dora Douglas, Vernon Tiesha Davis, Wilmington/San Pedro (San Pedro) Viridiana Preciado Cervantes, Walnut Park Ex-Officio Representatives Tigran Agdaian, Breathe Southern California Gisele Fong, California Endowment Hector De La Torre, Gateway Cities Council of Governments Nancy Pfeffer, Gateway Cities Council of Governments Andrew Zellinger, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Morgan Capilla, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 15 of 305 xiv Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Zero-Emission Truck (ZET) Working Group Task Force Representatives Randy Johnson, Access Services (Task Force) Steven Burns, Access Services (Task Force) Michael Leue, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (Task Force) Chris Wilson, BizFed (Task Force) Lena Kent, BNSF Railway (Task Force) Niki Okuk, CalStart (Task Force) Blair Schlecter, CalStart (Task Force) Alycia Gilde, CalStart (Task Force) Ali Saleh, City of Bell (Task Force) Chork Nim, City of Long Beach (Task Force) Tyler Curley, City of Long Beach (Task Force) Daniel Rodman, City of Los Angeles (Task Force) Marisela Santana, City of Lynwood (Task Force) Dr. Joe Lyou, Coalition for Clean Air (Task Force) Christopher Chavez, Coalition for Clean Air (Task Force) Dori Chandler, Coalition for Clean Air (Task Force) Jennifer Ganata, Communities for a Better Environment (Task Force)Ambar Rivera, Communities for a Better Environment (Task Force) Dilia Ortega, Communities for a Better Environment (Task Force)Fernando Gaytan, Earthjustice (Task Force) Vanessa Rivas Villanueva, Earthjustice (Task Force) Adrian Martinez, Earthjustice (Task Force) Taylor Thomas, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice (Task Force) Laura Cortez, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice (Task Force) Lynda Bybee, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Task Force Ex-Officio) Hector De La Torre, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Task Force Ex-Officio) Norman Emerson, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Task Force Ex-Officio) Karen Heit, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Task Force Ex-Officio) Marisa Perez, Gateway Cities Council of Governments (Task Force Ex-Officio) Matt Schrap, Harbor Trucking Association (Task Force) Robert Loya, Harbor Trucking Association (Task Force) Louie Diaz, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 848 (Task Force) Eric Tate, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 848 (Task Force) Ghirlandi Guidetti, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles-Long Beach (Task Force) Sylvia Betancourt, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma (Task Force) Marlin Dawoodjee Vargas, Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma (Task Force) Waqas Rehman, Board of Supervisors, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 Benjamin Feldman, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 (Task Force) Martin Reyes, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 (Task Force) Aydin Pasebani, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 1 (Task Force) Lily O’Brien Kovari, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 2 (Task Force) Luke Klipp, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 4 (Task Force) Viviana Gomez, Los Angeles County Supervisorial District 4 (Task Force) Andrew Ross, LA County Department of Public Works (Task Force) Elaine Kunitake, LA County Department of Public Works (Task Force) David Huang, Metrolink (Task Force) Najah Louis, Natural Resources Defense Council (Task Force) Natalia Ospina, Natural Resources Defense Council (Task Force) Kala Babu, Natural Resources Defense Council (Task Force) Michele Grubbs, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (Task Force) Thomas Jelenić, Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (Task Force) Sharon Weissman, Port of Long Beach (Task Force) Maria Vannoy, Port of Long Beach (Task Force) Theresa Dau-Ngo, Port of Long Beach (Task Force) Christina Skacan, Port of Long Beach (Task Force) Kimberly Ritter, Port of Long Beach (Task Force) Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 16 of 305 xv Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Tony Gioiello, Port of Los Angeles (Task Force) Matt Miyasato, South Coast Air Quality Management District (Task Force Ex-Officio) Alberto Campos, Southeast Los Angeles (SELA) Collaborative (Task Force) Scott Strelecki, Southern California Association of Governments (Task Force) Alison Linder, Southern California Association of Governments (Task Force) Connell Dunning, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (Task Force Ex-Officio) Morgan Capilla, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (Task Force Ex-Officio) Karina O’Connor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (Task Force Ex-Officio) Andrew Zellinger, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (Task Force Ex-Officio) Dr. Genevieve Giuliano, USC METRANS (Task Force) Sue Dexter, USC METRANS (Task Force) Community Leadership Committee Representatives Natalie Diaz, Bell Gardens Fa’alagilagi Meni-Siliga, Carson Phyllis Ollison, Compton Kathleen Barajas, East LA Miyuki Gomez, East LA Maria Reyes, Long Beach Aide Castro, Lynwood Jamila Cervantes, Maywood Dora Douglas, Vernon Tiesha Davis, Wilmington/San Pedro (San Pedro) Industry Representatives Elizabeth John, California Energy Commission Mark Wenzel, California Energy Commission Hannah Walter, California Transportation Commission Michael Samulon, City of Los Angeles Will Mitchell, Forum Mobility Yvette Kirrin, Gateway Cities Council of Governments Kekoa Anderson, Gateway Cities Council of Governments Jack Symington, Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator Val Amezquita, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Scott Briasco, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power George Payba, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Jose Maria Paz, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Jermaine Hampton, Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation Lynda Bybee, LSA Associates Matt Arms, Port of Long Beach Leela Rao, Port of Long Beach Morgan Caswell, Port of Long Beach Chris Cannon, Port of Los Angeles Amber Coluso, Port of Los Angeles Tim DeMoss, Port of Los Angeles Jacob Goldberg, Port of Los Angeles Yolanda Mativa, Port of Los Angeles Teresa Pisano, Port of Los Angeles Miranda Von Roishmandt, Port of Los Angeles Tanya Peacock, SoCalGas Philip Law, Southern California Association of Governments Jason Groves, Southern California Edison Damon Hannaman, Southern California Edison Steven Tilk, Southern California Edison Jennifer Krope, U.S. Department of Energy Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 17 of 305 xvi Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Metro Team Metro Project Team Michael Cano, Executive Officer, Multimodal Integrated Planning Ernesto Chaves, Senior Executive Officer, Office of Strategic Innovation KeAndra Cylear-Dodds, Executive Officer, Office of Equity and Race Lilian De Loza-Gutierrez, Executive Officer, Community Relations Lucy Delgadillo, Senior Manager, Complete Streets & Highways Jessica Medina, Manager, Office of Equity and Race Akiko Yamagami, Senior Manager, Goods Movement Planning Metro Project Team Support Sona Babayan, Senior Transportation Planner, Grants Management and Funds Administration Avital Barnea, Senior Executive Officer, Multimodal Integrated Planning Ginny Brideau, Senior Director, Community Relations Anthony Burton, Senior Manager, Federal/State Policy and Programming Jennifer Butler, Deputy Executive Officer, Public Relations Patrick Chandler, Manager, Public Relations Missy Coleman, Director Public Relations Ricardo Corona, Transportation Planner, Strategic Financial Planning James de la Loza, Chief Planning Officer, Countywide Planning & Development Pamela Del Valle, Sr. Marketing and Communications Officer, Marketing Mark Dierking, Director, Community Relations Nicole Hernandez, Transportation Associate I, Complete Streets & Highways Craig Hoshijima, Executive Officer, Strategic Financial Planning Maria Hsin, Transportation Associate I, Office of Equity and Race Laurie Lombardi, Senior Executive Officer, Strategic Financial Planning India Mandelkern, Senior Manager Community Relations Transportation Planning Allison Mannos, Senior Manager, Office of Equity and Race Mey Mitteenn, Senior Public Communications Officer, Public Relations Carlos Montez, Deputy Executive Officer, Complete Streets & Highways Kevin Pascasio, Transportation Planner, Complete Streets & Highways Shelly Quan, Manager, Federal/State Policy and Programming Andres Roa, Transportation Associated I, Complete Streets & Highways Erick Robles, Transportation Associated I, Goods Movement Planning Dominica Smith, Senior Director, Chief of Staff Administrative Ray Sosa, Chief Planning Officer, Countywide Planning & Development Linda Tam, Assistant Administrative Analyst, Federal/State Policy and Programming Jose Ubaldo, Manager, Public Relations Zoe Unruh, Manager, Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Planning Metro Contributors Matthew Abbott, Manager, Mobility Corridors Ed Alegre, Deputy Executive Officer, Intelligent Transportation Systems Paul Backstrom, Senior Director, Long Range Transportation Planning Neha Chawla, Senior Manager, First and Last Mile Frank Ching, Deputy Executive Officer, Transportation Demand Management Policy and Programs Joseph Forgiarini, Senior Executive Officer, Service Development Fabian Gallard, Senior Manager, Grants Management and Oversight Steve Gota, Executive Officer, Intelligent Transportation Systems Meghna Khanna, Deputy Executive Officer, Mobility Corridors Wells Lawson, Deputy Executive Officer, Joint Development David Leyzerovsky, Manager, Long Range Transportation Planning Cris Liban, Deputy Chief Sustainability Officer, Sustainability Policy Jacob Lieb, Senior Director, First and Last Mile Eva Moir, Senior Manager, Intelligent Transportation Systems Eva Pan Moon, Senior Manager, Intelligent Transportation Systems Zachary Popp, Manager, Federal/State Policy and Programming Heather Repenning, Executive Officer, Chief of Staff Administrative Jacqueline Su, Manager, Mobility Corridors June Susilo, Deputy Executive Officer, Program Management Stephen Tu, Deputy Executive Officer, Station Experience Wayne Wassell, Senior Manager, Service Planning Hector Gutierrez, Senior Manager, Office of Strategic Innovation Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 18 of 305 xvii Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Caltrans District 7 Team Gloria Roberts, District Director Monica Benavides, Chief Deputy District Director Kelly Ewing-Toledo, Deputy District Director, Divsion of Environmental Planning Marlon Regisford, Deputy District Director, Division of Planning and Local Assistance Jeff Newman, Chief of Staff James Shankel, Senior Freight Planning Specialist Project Team AECOM Dave Levinsohn, Vice President, Project Director Susan Ambrosini, Principal Lilia Scott, Task Lead, Deputy Project Manager, Senior Transportation Planner Laura Adleman, Senior Outreach and Engagement Specialist Aryeh Cohen, Urban Planner, Technical Lead Tatum Lau, Senior Associate Julie Rush, Senior Deputy Project Manager, Transportation Planning Siyuan (Tom) Li, Technical Director of Urban Analytics Shengao (Victor) Xie, Senior Transportation Planner Lala Yi, UI/UX Designer, Technical Lead Cambridge Systematics Keir Opie, Principal Jonathan Overman, Task Lead Samuel Zneimer, Senior Project Manager Cal Strategic Management Robert Cálix, Principal Here LA Amber Hawkes, Co-Director Shannon Davis, Co-Director Serena Powell, Urban Design Fellow Sofia Gulaid, Urban Designer II & Project Manager Morales+Morales Partners Erika Morales, Partner Ramboll Julia Lester, Principal Varalakshmi Jayaram, Senior Managing Consultant Arellano Associates Melissa Holguin, Staff and Project Director Susan DeSantis, Senior Project Manager Laura Herrera, Project Manager Nora Casillas, Deputy Project Manager Nancy Verduzco, Senior Tech Coordinator Julie Nieto, Senior Project Coordinator Xochitl Medrano, Senior Project Coordinator Adrian Farran, Senior Project Coordinator Trey Grogan, Senior Project Coordinator Eric Davidian, Project Coordinator Parker Wojciechowski, Project Coordinator Allison Crook, Project Coordinator Samantha Sosa, Project Coordinator Leticia Bustamante, Assistant Project Coordinator Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. Background . . Item 20 Page 19 of 305 ES-1 ZEROEMISSION EQUITY • SUSTAINABILITY • AIR QUALITY • COMMUNITY • ENVIRONMENT • MOBILITY • OPPORTUNITY • PROSPERITY • SAFETY APRIL Long Beach - East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan A QUALIFYING I COMPREHENSIVE MULTIMODAL CORRIDOR PLAN Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan: Executive Summary Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 20 of 305 ES-2 Overview The Long Beach-East LA (LB-ELA) Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) is Metro’s commitment to invest in a wide range of transportation-related improvements throughout the LB-ELA Corridor–– an approximately 19–mile-long and 5-mile-wide region that includes 18 cities and 3 unincorporated communities surrounding I-710 between Long Beach and East Los Angeles. The Investment Plan identifies, prioritizes, budgets, and plans for needed transportation improvements and complementary community health and social and economic opportunity initiatives for these diverse communities. An Unprecedented Effort. This Investment Plan reflects an unprecedented planning process and investment approach for Metro. The robust, community-centered planning process allowed Metro to integrate a diverse and representative range of voices in its decision-making process and build trust with the Corridor’s impacted communities. The Investment Plan recognizes the connection between the regional transportation system and all aspects of social and economic opportunity, including community health, and strives to repair past harms and ongoing inequities facing LB-ELA Corridor communities as a result of the past century of planning and policymaking. An Equitable Process. Metro heard clearly from the community that they want to take part in shaping the future of this Corridor. In response, Metro formed a Task Force, Community Leadership Committee (CLC), and Working Groups to find common ground, build trust and consensus, and ensure mobility options that meet the needs of all users of the transportation system are integrated into the Investment Plan. The planning process was informed by extensive, multilingual public engagement and enhanced through partnerships with community-based organizations and compensation reflecting the value of community voices, leadership, and knowledge. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 21 of 305 ES-3 A Collective Vision. The Investment Plan is not just a roadmap for infrastructure development; it reflects the collective vision and aspirations of the LB-ELA Corridor communities. From top to bottom, the Investment Plan is built upon the Vision, Goals (Air Quality, Community, Environment, Mobility, Opportunity, Prosperity, Safety) and Guiding Principles (Equity, Sustainability) crafted and adopted by the Task Force, CLC, and Working Groups, drawing upon community-identified priorities. Our community-generated vision statement: “An equitable, shared LB-ELA Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options for moving people and goods that will foster clean air (zero emissions), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities, and users in the Corridor.” A Multimodal Plan. The Investment Plan includes a collection of over 200 projects and programs that serve the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles through investment in active transportation facilities, transit service, and rider experience, multimodal complete street designs, zero-emissions goods movement infrastructure, and targeted investments to I-710 infrastructure that repair multimodal connections across the freeway and improve safety and operations to reduce the freeway’s impacts on surrounding communities. In contrast to previous planning efforts for this Corridor, no proposed improvement funded by the Investment Plan would widen the I-710 freeway or require the displacement of residents or businesses. The development of 15 Community Programs will proactively and intentionally advance community health and well-being in ways not typically addressed by transportation planning. A Strategic Investment Approach. The Investment Plan applies a strategic, multi-phase investment approach to leverage $743 million in sales tax revenue to attract an additional $3.3 billion in state and federal funding to develop and implement projects and programs in the Corridor. A New Chapter. The LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan is more than just a transportation project; it is a testament to the power of collaborative planning in creating a more connected, accessible, and vibrant region. This Investment Plan closes the door on policy and investment decisions that have impacted local communities over many generations and marks the beginning of a new chapter – one focused on bringing together diverse voices and innovative solutions for a thriving LB- ELA Corridor that supports the generations of tomorrow. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 22 of 305 ES-4 Background The LB-ELA Corridor is the nation’s most prominent and impactful freight corridor. It connects the Western Hemisphere’s busiest seaport complex— the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles—with the transcontinental railroad intermodal yards near Downtown Los Angeles and warehouse destinations along the corridor and beyond. As Southern California’s population has grown since the 1960s when I-710 was built, so has the demand for I-710 to carry commuters and goods movement trucks. Growing demand strains the freeway’s limited capacity, resulting in traffic congestion, safety concerns, and spillover traffic onto local roadways, while daily travel of personal vehicles and diesel-fueled trucks compounds air quality and health impacts on communities already impacted by industrial pollution. The most impacted communities have also endured decades of racial discrimination and economic disadvantage, contributing to health burdens and other inequities along the corridor. After decades of studying these issues, Metro and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) proposed widening and modernizing I-710, in a process that spanned from 2005 to 2020. However, the approach of expanding lane capacity to meet demand and solve related issues of congestion and pollution reflected an outdated approach to freeway modernization that failed to balance industry priorities and regional economic prosperity with the needs and health of the surrounding community. In addition to untenable displacement impacts to residents and businesses, Metro and Caltrans could not demonstrate the previous project’s ability to add freeway lane capacity without inducing demand and additional air quality impacts on the surrounding communities. Despite a proposal to meet air quality conformity through the development of a zero-emission truck program, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that the freeway widening project remained a project of air quality concern even with investment in zero-emission technology. This determination, along with significant community opposition to the project, Investment Plan Figure 3-1. LB-ELA Corridor Study Area (LA County Context) triggered a change in course; Metro and Caltrans suspended the process, and a new approach for the Corridor was needed. The Investment Plan reflects the Metro Board’s leadership in responding to these policy shifts and community concerns. This new approach re- envisions the processes and investments needed to move people and goods seamlessly, equitably, and sustainably throughout the LB-ELA Corridor. Developed in close collaboration with residents and local and regional partners, this plan reflects Metro’s commitment to build trust and lasting partnerships with the community and bring multimodal, community-centered, and regionally significant investment to the Corridor. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 23 of 305 ES-5 Existing Conditions The LB-ELA Corridor includes 18 cities and 3 unincorporated communities within about a mile on each side surrounding the 19- mile extent of I-710 between East Los Angeles and Long Beach. The Corridor is home to 1.2 million people, or roughly 12% of the County’s population, and contains 11% of the County’s jobs. Serving as the primary gateway to and from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the Corridor’s transportation system is an economic wellspring, but also a source of major traffic congestion, pollution, and safety impacts for people work live, work, play, and move in the corridor. Investment Plan Figure 3-2. LB-ELA Corridor Study Area Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 24 of 305 ES-6 Investment Plan Figure 3-3. LA Metro Equity Focus CommunitiesDespite the Corridor’s regional and national economic significance, the past century of planning and policy decisions have created and reinforced patterns of racial segregation, disinvestment, and economic disparities facing the same communities bearing the worst environmental burdens of the Corridor’s economic activity. Many of these impacts are concentrated in the Corridor’s Equity Focus Communities (EFCs), defined by Metro as census tracts where transportation needs are greatest. The EFC Map considers the concentration of three factors associated with mobility barriers: low- income households; Black, Indigenous, and other people of color (BIPOC) residents; and households with no access to a car. Approximately 73% of the LB-ELA Corridor population lives in an EFC area. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 25 of 305 ES-7 Transportation, Access, and Safety The I-710 freeway carries nearly 40,000 heavy-duty trucks, and hundreds of thousands more commuter vehicles daily, contributing to air quality, noise, congestion, and safety and environmental impacts to the surrounding communities. The I-710’s aging infrastructure is not designed to meet the Corridor’s growing demand for freight capacity, which creates safety and operational impacts both on and off the freeway. Because the freeway hasn’t been improved in 60 years, safety issues have gotten worse over time and congestion has led to trips on local roads and in residential neighborhoods. High levels of congestion along the freeway and significant arterials impact community members’ ability to reach their jobs, schools, and other needs by increasing travel times for drivers, bus riders, and goods movement vehicles. Travel times are also an issue for pedestrians and active transportation users in the corridor, who are often forced onto indirect routes given a lack of safe and connected infrastructure. In addition, the original I-710 bridges were designed to get vehicles on and off the freeway, without a focus on pedestrian movement or safety. Given high volumes of vehicles entering and exiting the freeway, bike and pedestrian safety is of particular concern surrounding freeway on/off-ramps and overcrossings. The I-710 also reinforces and expands the division between communities on either side of the LA River. Most east/west overcrossings do not have safe bicycle infrastructure, and some crossings have missing, unpaved, or narrow sidewalks. Other freeways and rail infrastructure in the Corridor also impede connections between neighboring communities. Streets within the Corridor are designed for high volumes of vehicular traffic with limited or poorly maintained active transportation and pedestrian infrastructure. While some agencies have introduced safer street design in recent years, a cohesive network of safe, dedicated bike and pedestrian infrastructure is lacking throughout the Corridor. While the Corridor is well-served by bus services and the Metro A Line light rail, the transit system faces challenges related to frequency, reliability, security, and comfort. The Corridor has a higher proportion of zero-vehicle households than the County, and an absence of high-quality transit services is an issue that directly affects access to resources and opportunities for the Corridor’s transit-dependent residents and workers. Investment Plan Figure 3-27. Active Transportation Infrastructure. I-710 Active Transportation Crossing Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 26 of 305 ES-8 Community Health, Air Quality, and Environment The I-710 South Corridor accounts for 20% of all particulate matter emissions in Southern California. The high pollutant levels affecting the nearby communities have earned the name “diesel death zone,” referring to the linkage between diesel pollution and respiratory and cardiovascular health conditions. The Corridor’s respiratory and cardiovascular health burdens resulting from freeway emissions and other sources of air pollution are compounded by long-standing disparities in health and access to healthcare. The LB-ELA EFC areas experience higher pollutant levels than the rest of the Corridor and the County overall. Limited access to safe and comfortable active transportation and outdoor recreational infrastructure, as well as exposure to heat through a lack of shade and greening, contribute to health burdens faced by these communities. The presence or lack of tree canopy and green space is a major equity issue aligned with patterns of racial and economic segregation in the Corridor, with wide-ranging impacts on the urban heat island effect, air quality, stormwater runoff, pedestrian sun exposure, and overall streetscape quality. The lack of publicly accessible green space also limits access to opportunities for outdoor recreation, which affects community health and quality of life. Investment Plan Figure 3-20. Health Indicators, Asthma Rate Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 27 of 305 ES-9 Task Force and Charter Process Metro launched the Task Force in the fall of 2021 in response to Metro and Caltrans’ decision to suspend the earlier I-710 project, with consideration of communities who voiced the need for a different vision for improving mobility, safety, air quality and quality of life in the corridor. The Task Force was composed of a diverse group of 40 stakeholders who represent the interests of community-based organizations; environmental advocacy groups; community serving organizations; cities and governmental agencies; as well as goods movement, logistics, transportation, labor, and business groups. Early in the process, the Task Force approved a Task Force Charter that defined the organizational structure, roles, and responsibilities. (See Appendix 2-A, Task Force Membership Roster and Appendix 2-B, Task Force Charter) Coordinating Committee The Coordinating Committee (CC) worked with the project team to plan Task Force meetings and give input on meeting content and approach. The CC had five members, including two from the Community Leadership Committee and three from the Task Force. The three Task Force representatives included one from a community-based organization, a government agency, and the goods movement/transportation industry/ labor. The CC played a crucial role in shaping how the Task Force operated with input on meeting agendas, project timelines, and community engagement strategies. They received regular project updates and discussed highlights from Task Force, Community Leadership Committee, and Working Group meetings. The Coordinating Committee held 21 virtual monthly meetings at least two weeks before each Task Force meeting from April 2022 through January 2024. (See Appendix 2-C, Coordinating Committee Membership Roster) Community Leadership Committee To meet the Metro Board’s directive to re-engage impacted communities and their members and to implement Metro’s Equity Platform, a Community Leadership Committee (CLC) was formed to incorporate resident voices. Formed in March 2022 with 26 members, the CLC advised the Task Force, contributing crucial recommendations during consensus checkpoints. To achieve the most equitable outcome, selection criteria for CLC membership included living in the study area, working in the corridor, commitment to be engaged, of BIPOC background, language, and age. The establishment of this group for a large-scale planning effort marked an unprecedented move for Metro and the region and underlined a commitment to equity and community engagement in the decision-making process. (See Appendix 2-D, CLC Membership Roster) Working Groups The Working Groups included Community Engagement Strategy, Equity, and Zero-Emission Truck. The groups played pivotal roles in enhancing collaboration and decision-making and shaping the Task Force’s efforts and results. Combined Task Force and CLC Meeting to discuss Draft Investment Plan Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 28 of 305 ES-10 A Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Integrating Equity in the Process Equity was integrated into all aspects of the Task Force process and the Investment Plan based on the framework created by Metro’s Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool (EPET) developed by Metro’s Office of Equity and Race. The EPET informed the technical approach and decision-making process in all aspects of the Investment Plan including developing the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles; analyzing existing conditions data; selecting the initial list of multimodal strategies, projects, and programs; developing and using the evaluation methodology; the community engagement process and discussions during stakeholder meetings. In addition, the Task Force and CLC adopted an Equity Guiding Principle to guide decision-making throughout the process. Inclusive Community Engagement Public engagement efforts included in-person and virtual meetings, office hours, community surveys, pop-ups, and community events. Communication tools such as a website, story map, project dashboard, project hotline, social media posts, newsletters, printed copies mailed directly or handed out, and multilingual support ensured broad project updates and feedback opportunities, emphasizing an equitable approach. Collaboration with over 40 local community-based organizations further amplified outreach and awareness efforts. To ensure all persons were provided access to available materials and information, Task Force meetings were conducted with simultaneous Spanish, Khmer, and Tagalog interpretation, and CLC Meetings with Spanish interpretation. Diverse Voices Contributing to Inclusive Outcomes The Task Force’s commitment to consensus building, transparent decision- making, and representative community engagement, established a robust framework for the Investment Plan. Metro also responded to feedback by adjusting the process and schedule to allow for input, reevaluation of the outcomes and more time, resulting in a comprehensive approach that ensured diverse voices contributed to informed and inclusive outcomes. Investment Plan Figure 2-5. Five-Step Decision-Making Model A Commitment to Zero-Emissions Metro is focused on a 100% shift to zero emissions by 2025, which is 10 years ahead of the state’s mandate by 2035. By transitioning to zero emission trucks and buses, and working with cities to implement charging stations, Metro is helping to combat greenhouse gases. The Metro Board of Directors established a $200 million Zero-Emission Truck Program to alleviate public health impacts on local communities from diesel and other emissions from diesel trucks. Metro’s initial $50 million seed funding will be leveraged with contributions from private, regional, state, and federal sources to deploy zero-emission trucks and needed infrastructure. The program’s strategies include fostering proactive collaboration with community and regional partners, identifying regional funding partners, pursuing discretionary grant opportunities, assessing policy and legislative challenges, exploring short and long-term possibilities, and anticipating potential community impacts to formulate strategies for community benefits. Metro is steadfast in its commitment to exploring all workable zero-emission technologies, such as battery-electric and hydrogen, to meet regulatory mandates and sustainability goals without endorsing any specific solution. Metro understands the commitment to zero-emissions is crucial to address the health burdens of people suffering from asthma, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and pollution impacts. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 29 of 305 ES-11 Vision Leading the Plan To identify the Corridor’s key issues and opportunity areas, the project team initially reviewed planning studies and community responses from the past two decades of planning and community advocacy to show context, lessons learned, and to establish a starting point for the new visioning process. This initial research was followed by community listening sessions, a Vision and Goals public survey, public meetings, and a robust analysis of existing conditions, all of which were discussed across a series of meetings with Task Force and CLC members. The Task Force, CLC, and the Equity Working Group collaborated to envision a future that balances the diverse needs of the Corridor’s stakeholders. Over several months, these groups thoughtfully composed and refined the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles as a framework to guide and focus the Investment Plan’s development process and outcomes. The Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles align with the Southern California Association of Governments’ Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, the 2020 Metro Long Range Transportation Plan, the Equity Platform, Los Angeles County and City ballot measures, and the Metro Board approved plans, policies, and initiatives, providing the foundation for the evaluation framework to assess projects against multiple criteria. The Vision is supported by two Guiding Principles and seven Goals informed by Metro’s policy priorities and the many interconnected challenges facing the LB-ELA Corridor today within the historical context of the I-710 and its generational impacts on surrounding communities. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 30 of 305 ES-12 Vision A concise statement that captures the collective aspirations, desires, and outcomes of the project Guiding Principles Values that guide all processes and outcomes through a cohesive and intentional framework Goals Desired outcomes for general areas of concern to support and realize the overall Vision An equitable, shared LB-ELA Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options for moving people and goods that will foster clean air (zero emissions), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities, and users in the Corridor. EQUITY A commitment to (1) strive to rectify past harms; (2) provide fair and just access to opportunities; and (3) eliminate disparities in project processes, outcomes, and community results. The plan seeks to elevate and engrain the principle of Equity across all goals, objectives, strategies, and actions through a framework of Procedural, Distributive, Structural, and Restorative Equity, and by prioritizing an accessible and representative participation process for communities most impacted by the I-710. AIR QUALITY Foster local and regional clean air quality. OPPORTUNITY Increase community access to quality jobs, workforce development, and economic opportunities. COMMUNITY Support thriving communities by enhancing the health and quality of life of residents. PROSPERITY Strengthen LA County’s economic competitiveness and increase access to quality jobs, workforce development, and economic opportunities for all communities, with a focus on strengthening the LB-ELA Corridor communities, which have been and continue to be harmed by economic activity and development. ENVIRONMENT Enhance the natural and built environment. SAFETY Make all modes of travel safer. MOBILITY Improve the mobility of people and goods. SUSTAINABILITY Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. A commitment to sustainability to satisfy and improve basic social, health, and economic needs/ conditions, both present and future, and the responsible use and stewardship of the environment, all while maintaining or improving the well-being of the environment on which life depends. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 31 of 305 ES-13 Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs ES-1 Due to an unprecedented amount of available discretionary grant funding, the Board provided early direction to create a list of Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity (PIPO) projects in 2022, before defining the Investment Plan project list, to find projects Metro could support and submit for grant funding ahead of the Investment Plan’s adoption in 2024 . ES-2 The community programs were prioritized on a separate track (i .e ., they weren’t ranked and tiered) given the Investment Plan’s commitment to equity and improving the lives of those in the community . Identifying Projects and Programs Once the Metro Board adopted the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, the project team started developing Multimodal Strategies and Identifying Projects and Programs (MSPPs)ES-1. More than 200 MSPPs were identified for evaluation, ranging from early concepts to projects that are ready for implementation. The Task Force used a broad engagement approach to get input from residents, community groups, interested stakeholders, partner agencies, and other parties to inform the MSPPs, which included the following: • Community programs for job creation/work opportunities, environment, air quality/community health and housing stabilization/land use; • Active transportation projects to improve pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure; • Arterial roadways/complete streets, including traffic calming, general roadway improvements, signal coordination/transportation systems management (TSM), and intelligent transportation systems (ITS); • I-710 multimodal, operational, safety, and access investments for the community (MOSAIC), including interchange upgrades and auxiliary lanes with multimodal operations and safety improvements for autos, trucks, bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. • Goods movement investments, including safety and air quality improvements; and • Transit projects, including new and improved high-capacity bus and rail public transit systems and various transit amenities. Because regional and local partners played a key role in compiling these MSPPs, the Investment Plan is intended to be consistent with their planning frameworks such as local land use plans. The project team screened the full list of candidate early action projects to exclude project concepts that would displace residences or businesses in local communities or could not be feasibly redesigned to avoid significant displacement. Overall, the MSPP was informed by: • Earlier studies and initiatives; • Social pinpoint interactive map and public surveys; • Public workshops and community-based organization engagement; and • Task Force, CLC, and Working Group meetings. Evaluating and Prioritizing Projects and Programs To determine which projects and programs to prioritize, the project team worked with the Task Force and CLC to develop and use an evaluation process to assess each MSPPs alignment with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles by considering potential benefits and concerns and implementation readiness.ES-2 The Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles provided the foundation for the evaluation process and were translated into 82 metrics (66 ‘benefit’ and 16 ‘concern’) by which each project or program was assessed to determine its relative benefits to impact. Some metrics were qualitative with defined rules to assess each metric. The remaining metrics were quantitative based on travel demand forecasting model results and a geographic information system (GIS). Each project was ranked against these metrics Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 32 of 305 ES-14 on a scale of 0 to 3 or “not applicable” (N/A). The evaluation process combined the metrics by Goal and Guiding Principle which resulted in the ranking of projects within each MSPP travel mode: • Active Transportation • Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets • Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements • Goods Movement • Transit The ranked project scores were combined with a ‘project readiness assessment’ that separated the projects into two tiers: • Tier 1: MSPPs well-suited to receive Measure R and M funding in the Initial Investment Recommendations due to their high level of alignment with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles and more advanced project readiness; and • Tier 2: MSPPs that need planning or development to be better defined and/or aligned with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Investment Plan Figure 6-4. Funding Pathways for Tiered Projects and Programs Implementation Construction, pilot studies, and program launch Pre-Implementation Mode Active Transportation Arterial Roadways / Complete Streets Freeway Safety & Interchange Improvements Good Movement Transit Development Support further development of projects concepts and technical assistance Tier 1 More Ready Higher Evaluation Score Lower Evaluation Score Packaged Projects Less Ready Tier 2 Tier 2 Tier 1 Planning, design, and environmental phases Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 33 of 305 ES-15 The LB-ELA Corridor Task Force’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles supported the evaluation process resulting in each project being categorized, with its mode type, as Tier 1 (higher alignment) or Tier 2 (lower alignment), as an outcome of their evaluation results. Tier 1 projects scored well across many evaluation criteria. Tier 2 projects generally received lower scores across the evaluation criteria, or only scored well for a limited number of Goals or Guiding Principles. Projects were categorized into tiers based on their relative evaluation score within their respective mode, i.e., projects with different modes were not compared across modes for placement in Tier 1. Projects were also organized into readiness categories of “Implementation,” “Pre-Implementation,” or “Development” to find the path forward for each project and program. The disparity in project readiness reflected equity gaps for lower-resource communities in the LB-ELA Corridor and resulted in inconsistent information for each project or program under review. The tiers include projects that will be competitive for near-term or mid- term discretionary grant opportunities. Tier 1 projects may receive funding to support seeking future discretionary grant opportunities ES-3 Equity flags were derived from the Concerns evaluation, highlighting projects that had the potential to negatively impact equity focus communities (EFCs) and that required specific, additional guidance to minimize those impacts . Community Input Consideration (CIC) flags captured community input that would not be reflected in the technical project evaluation results . CIC flags included project-specific implementation concerns and, recommendations for improvement of project concept or design and implementation. Tier 2 projects have two pathways: to provide complementary benefits as part of a package with other Tier 1 or Tier 2 projects; or to be eligible and competitive for a specific, available grant opportunity tailored to such a project. Tier 2 projects would not be considered for investment at this time but will be reconsidered as part of the Modal Program development process in future years. Added prioritization factors included: • Roles and Responsibilities • Discretionary Grant Strategy • Project Cost/Local Match Required • Political/Institutional/Jurisdictional Support • Equity Considerations • Practical Feasibility/Constructability • Design Concerns • Equity and Community Input Consideration (CIC) FlagsES-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 34 of 305 ES-16 Funding Strategy The Investment Plan recommends the investment of $743 million in Measure R and M funding dedicated to the LB-ELA Corridor to catalyze an additional $3.3 billion in local, state, and federal investment in priority projects and programs consistent with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles of the LB-ELA Corridor. Taken together, the total investment generated from Measure R and M funding is expected to be more than $4 billion. When including port-related projects, the Southeast Gateway Light-Rail Transit line, and the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 that are not directly funded by the Investment Plan, the total project local, state, and federal funding for projects/programs being implemented in the corridor totals more than $20 billion. The success of the Investment Plan in implementing projects and programs that advance the Task Force’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles relies on leveraging limited local sales tax dollars allocated to the Corridor through Measure R and Measure M along with robust regional, state, and federal funding. The Investment Plan is a “down payment” for future improvements in communities that need them the most. Developing a funding strategy is a multi-step process that requires a targeted approach, including: • Evaluate LB-ELA Corridor projects and programs for Measure R/M funding: This analysis involves developing a holistic understanding of candidate projects and their attributes to figure out their suitability for Measure R/M funding and eligibility for discretionary grant opportunities. • Identify projects and programs receiving Measure R/M funding (ongoing): Based on the analysis conducted, subsets of programs and projects were identified as suitable candidates to receive Measure R/M funds that can be used as seed funding to progress project development or as a local match to meet the requirements for regional/state/federal implementation and construction funding programs. • Regional, state, and federal funding programs, including eligibility and match requirements assessment (ongoing): This ongoing assessment includes finding and evaluating suitable regional, state, and federal discretionary programs across various modes of transportation and community programs. The attributes and sought-after outcomes of these relevant funding programs were matched with the attributes and forecast impacts and benefits of the Investment Plan Modal Programs and projects. • Continued development of project readiness, positioning, and partnership opportunities (ongoing and planned): Throughout the process, non-construction development activities and other actions will be undertaken to progress and position projects to improve their competitiveness and to provide a greater chance for successfully accessing discretionary funding—including conducting design, initiating technical studies, and establishing partnership opportunities. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 35 of 305 ES-17 Investment Plan Figure 7-1. Funding Strategy Development Measure R/M Strategy Discretionary Funding Strategy Projects & Programs prioritization Funding Program eligibility assessment Evaluation of Projects and Programs Projects & Programs recommended for Metro funding Assessment of leveraging need (match/cost sharing) Funding Strategy Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 36 of 305 ES-18 Recommendations The Investment Plan has several recommendation categories, including projects recommended for initial investment based on their high ranking in the evaluation process and project readiness, 15 Community Programs that are recommended for initial investment given the Plan’s strong emphasis on equity in the corridor, and projects suitable to receive Measure R and M funding through the Modal Programs, which group projects by primary travel mode. Projects/Programs for Initial Investment Projects and programs recommended for Initial Investment, shown to the right, are in various stages of project development, from planning through implementation. Name Total Cost / Leveraged Target ($M) Investment Plan ($M) Community Programs Catalyst Fund $340.0 $40.0 Bus Stop Improvement Projects/Programs $38.0 $19.0 Complete Street Corridor: Alondra Blvd $45.0 $9.0 Complete Street Corridor: Atlantic Blvd $457.2 $68.6 Complete Street Corridor: Florence Ave $124.5 $24.9 Complete Street Corridor: Long Beach Blvd $1.5*$0.8 Complete Street Corridor: Slauson Ave $18.0 $3.6 Compton Creek Bike Underpasses $1.0*$0.5 Compton Transit Management Ops. Center Enhancements $27.0 $2.0 Freight Rail Electrification Pilot Project $50.0 $10.0 Goods Movement Freight Rail Study $10.0 $2.0 Humphreys Avenue Pedestrian/Bike Overcrossing $24.3 $9.0 I-710 Freeway Lids, Caps & Widened Bridge Decks $15.0 $5.0 I-710 MOSAIC Program (Interstate 710 Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Improvements for the Community) $612.0 $153.6 I-710 Particulate Matter (PM) Reduction Pilot Project $10.0 $2.0 I-710 Planning Study: Reconnecting the Long Beach-East LA Corridor Communities $2.5 $2.5 I-710 Traffic Controls at Freeway Ramps $50.0 $10.0 LB-ELA Corridor Bus Transit Priority Program $461.5 $31.1 Metro A Line: First/Last Mile Improvements $12.3 $9.8 Metro A Line: Quad Safety Gates at all A Line Crossings $10.0 $5.0 Rail to River Active Transportation Corridor, Segment B $6.3 $3.2 Regionally Significant Bike Projects $41.4 $15.7 Shoemaker Bridge/Shoreline Drive $832.6 $9.0 Southeast Gateway Line Bike and Pedestrian Trail $17.0 $3.8 Zero Emission Truck (ZET) Program $200.0 $50.0 Projects/Programs for Initial Investment Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 37 of 305 ES-19 Investment Plan Figure 8-16. Projects/Programs for Initial Investment Active Transportation / TDM Arterial Roadways / Complete Streets Freeways Interchanges and Safety Improvements Goods Movement Transit Symbol Project Name Projects by Mode PROJECTS FOR INITIAL FUNDING 1 IN = 15,000 FT Equity Focus Communities SEAL BEACH LOS ALAMITOS CYPRESS LA PALMA ROLLING HILLS ROLLING HILLS ESTATES LOMITA SIGNAL HILL ARTESIA CERRITOS LAWNDALE CUDAHY SANTA FE SPRINGS BELL GARDENS MAYWOOD BELL VERNON COMMERCE HAWAIIAN GARDENS LAKEWOOD CARSON BELLFLOWER GARDENA COMPTON HAWTHORNE LY NWOOD SOUTH GATE HUNTINGTON PARK PICO RIVERA WHITTIER MONTEBELLO REDONDO BEACH PARAMOUNT TORRANCE NORWALK DOWNEY INGLEWOOD LONG BEACH DOWNTOWN LA Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 38 of 305 ES-20 Community Programs Community Programs incorporate a range of benefits that are responsive to long-standing equity issues that communities of the Long Beach corridor face, and will proactively and intentionally advance community health and well-being in ways not typically addressed by transportation planning or eligible for transportation funding sources. The LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan, thanks to Metro Board leadership which called for the inclusion of impacted communities in the development of the Investment Plan, features a $40 million Community Programs Catalyst Fund for 15 Community Programs that will complement the Investment Plan’s multimodal transportation investment. Some Community Programs are focused on addressing current burdens that exist because of past policy, disinvestment, and infrastructure development; others are proactive measures to sustain community stability and maximize benefits as projects are implemented in the future. Metro expects that approximately $300 million in additional funds, targeting an average of $20 million per Community Program, could be leveraged using the Community Program Catalyst funding, through local, regional, state, and federal funding programs that are more suitable to each Community Program. In discussions with the Task Force and CLC, community health emerged as an overarching priority for the Investment Plan. While transportation investments can benefit health through the improvement of non-polluting modes, access to healthcare, and conditions for outdoor and physical activity, not all elements of community health can be addressed through transportation infrastructure. Community Programs address direct health impacts, such as asthma and cancer risk related to particulate matter exposure, as well as various social determinants of health, including social and community context, neighborhood and built environment, and economic stability. The 15 Community Programs are organized into three general topic areas: • Health/Air Quality/Environment • Housing Stabilization/Land Use • Job Creation/Work Opportunities Health/ Air Quality/ Environment LB-ELA_0192 Bus Electrification Projects LB-ELA_0133 LB-ELA Corridor Community Health Benefit Program LB-ELA_0191 Zero-Emission Infrastructure for Autos LB-ELA_0218 Air Quality Monitoring Stations LB-ELA_0134 LB-ELA Corridor Energy Reduction/ Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reduction Program LB-ELA_0187 LB-ELA Corridor “Urban Greening” Initiative LB-ELA_0190 Public Art/Aesthetics Housing Stabilization/ Land Use LB-ELA_0009 Southeast Gateway Line Transit-Oriented Development Strategic Implementation Plan and Program (TOD SIP) LB-ELA_0193 Transit-Oriented Communities/Land Use LB-ELA_0194 Homeless Programs LB-ELA_0135 Housing Stabilization Policies Job Creation/ Work Opportunities LB-ELA_0197 Vocational Educational Programs LB-ELA_0195 Targeted Hire Programs LB-ELA_0196 Employment/Recruitment Initiatives LB-ELA_0186 Economic Stabilization Policies Community Programs by Topic Areas Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 39 of 305 ES-21 Modal Programs In addition to identifying projects and programs for initial funding, the Investment Plan also looks to the future of the LB-ELA Corridor by planning, developing, identifying, and refining projects, programs, and strategic initiatives that will advance the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles into future years. Investment Plan elements that will be included in Modal Programs include: • Near-term Tier 1 projects not selected for immediate funding; • Longer-term Tier 1 projects requiring additional development to become implementation-ready; • Tier 2 projects that will need additional development and refinement to become more aligned with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles to be considered for implementation in the future; • Equitable project planning to find equity gaps, provide technical assistance for lower-resourced communities, and develop projects for future implementation; and • Pilot programs, strategic initiatives, and planning studies. START-UP Fund The Investment Plan’s function is to strategically distribute and leverage funding that will allow the Corridor’s various jurisdictions to develop and implement their own existing projects. While the evaluation process employed a distributive equity lens to prioritize projects that are most likely to benefit the highest-need communities, the distribution of project proposals received, and levels of project development/readiness reflect disparities in municipal capacity and historic investment. Project concepts gathered from community input are included in the Investment Plan but will require start-to-finish planning processes in most cases, and need municipalities to take ownership of technical development and implementation. As cities and neighborhoods that have faced historic underinvestment often have less funding and fewer technical staff members to plan, develop, fund, and implement capital projects, these areas may be underrepresented in the Investment Plan’s full project list, let alone the recommendations for initial investment. To address this issue, Metro is setting aside a START-UP Fund (“Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative Transportation Uplifting People”) that provides targeted technical assistance to support communities with the highest needs, relative to their technical resources and capacity for project development and implementation. The START-UP Fund will help communities develop project concepts for grant eligibility, and help communities participate in the implementation of the Investment Plan’s Corridor-wide programs (e.g., “traffic calming features,” “pedestrian gap closures,” and various Community Programs). Modal Programs and the START-UP Fund will allow the Investment Plan to be a flexible, dynamic, living document that addresses future priorities and needs as they evolve. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 40 of 305 ES-22 Next Steps The Investment Plan’s vision is to reconnect the underserved communities of Long Beach-East Los Angeles that have been dealing with the effects of the I-710 freeway for generations and implement a comprehensive, multimodal transportation plan to rectify past harms in the corridor through adoption of the Investment Plan. In the next phase, we will continue to engage Task Force and CLC Members, industry experts, funding, research and resource partners, and community members to ensure we dedicate the time needed to refine the projects and programs and remain consistent with the sustainable, equitable, community-centered implementation of this plan. This Investment Plan will act as a living document and will require additional actions after Metro Board adoption. Over the next several years, Metro will continue to update and move the Investment Plan forward. Only a small number of projects and programs within the Investment Plan are fully defined and ready for implementation. The majority of projects and programs require further development, design, refinement, community engagement, and/or environmental review. Recognizing this need to continue the development of projects and programs for which we have designated initial investment, community programs, or modal program funding, Metro recommends the formation of five new LB-ELA Implementation Working Groups. These groups will meet on an ongoing basis following the adoption of the Investment Plan to allow Metro to continue developing and defining projects and programs that are not fully developed, and to serve as a continuation of collaborative partnerships with a broad range of stakeholders, including Task Force, CLC, and community members, in implementing the Investment Plan after adoption. This work will be conducted within the LB-ELA Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles framework. Metro recommends the creation of two “Modal” Working Groups, which would lead efforts to develop and refine the initial investment projects/ programs and modal programs, and three “Community Program” Working Groups, which would lead efforts to develop and refine the fifteen Community Programs in the Investment Plan. The Community Program Working Groups will likely be organized by topic and will include Community Health/Air Quality/Environment, Housing Stabilization and Land Use, and Job Creation and Work Opportunities. Given the breadth of issues this Investment Plan addresses, and its nature as a strategic planning document, performance metrics will need to measure the Plan’s impacts across modes and on multiple scales of progress and success. Metro recommends the establishment of a LB-ELA Investment Plan Performance Tracking Program to track and measure progress and impacts, using consistent methods and tools to set performance-tracking expectations for project sponsors and lead agencies to support. Metrics will include process metrics, project outcome metrics, and community result metrics. While a robust approach was taken to evaluate potential benefits and concerns resulting from each project, many projects will be further developed through the modal programs. Some community members have shared their concerns about investing in projects that have not been fully developed and the potential disbenefits that could result from the development of new and conceptual projects without equal level of scrutiny applied. Projects that are found to be unaligned with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles of this process will not move forward. For new projects, not yet evaluated as part of the Investment Plan process, the Working Groups will be able to leverage the evaluation framework and criteria created for the Investment Plan. Working Groups will also review equity and Community Input Concern (CIC) flags to refine project design and implementation, and projects will be subject to environmental review as part of the CEQA/NEPA process. In addition, in response to comments from community members, Metro is committed to using the explicit guidance on air quality, displacement, surveillance, and impervious cover to shape project development during the Implementation Phase. Metro intends to deliver on the promise to generate additional benefits for the LB-ELA communities that complement the transportation improvements the Investment Plan recommends. The success of the plan relies on a team effort moving forward—Metro looks forward to continued work with community members, local organizations, industry experts and researchers, and elected officials as the Investment Plan becomes a reality. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Executive Summary 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary . . Item 20 Page 41 of 305 1-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 1. Background 1.1 Purpose of the Investment Plan The Long Beach-East LA (LB-ELA) Corridor is home to many vibrant, multicultural, and unique communities that together represent 12% of Los Angeles County’s population. These historic communities include four of LA County’s oldest incorporated cities—Compton (1888), Long Beach (1897), Vernon (1905), and Huntington Park (1906)—and feature a rich mosaic of ethnicities, culinary experiences, religious denominations, and cultural traditions that help make LA County a diverse and dynamic place to live and work. The future opportunity for the LB-ELA Corridor communities to thrive and enjoy a high quality of life, from clean air and good health to safe and plentiful mobility options and access to opportunities, remains challenged and unclear due to the compounded, generational legacy of transportation infrastructure decisions, policies, and investment priorities that have served more to fracture and dim the LB-ELA Corridor mosaic than to unify and illuminate it. Transportation infrastructure investment, at its best, uplifts and connects communities in need and, at its worst, disconnects and burdens vulnerable communities with consequences and concentrated localized impacts at the expense of dispersed regional benefits. The history of the planning, construction, and purpose of I-710, a 19-mile freeway completed in 1964, represents the latter outcome. With the decision to route this freeway alongside the LA River to connect the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles with the Central Manufacturing District and intermodal rail yards located near East LA, the I-710 tore through LB-ELA Corridor communities that pre- existed the freeway, displacing numerous residents, and adding to the shared harmful legacy of freeway construction intentionally routed through BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) communities to serve regional economic interests. Decades later, I-710 serves as the nation’s most important freight highway corridor, supporting the movement of goods that support the regional, state, and national economies. Tens of thousands of heavy-duty diesel trucks travel on the freeway daily, serving the nation’s busiest seaport complex, intermodal railyards, warehouses, logistics centers, and transloading facilities. The LB-ELA Corridor’s shared-use transportation system—anchored by I-710 and supported by 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 42 of 305 1-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan five intersecting freeways (I-405, State Route [SR] 91, I-105, I-5, and SR-60), the Alameda Rail Corridor, and major arterial highways—is responsible for moving the growing volume of cargo handled by the nation’s busiest seaport complex to the transcontinental rail terminals near Downtown Los Angeles and other national and local destinations. I-710 is also the nation’s most community-adverse freight highway corridor. As Southern California’s population grew over the decades, so did the demand on I-710 to carry regional commuters and goods, straining the freeway’s limited capacity, resulting in traffic congestion, safety concerns, and spillover traffic onto arterial roadways parallel to the freeway that serve the LB-ELA Corridor communities. As the nation, state, and regional economy prospered from the increased movement of goods and international trade supported by I-710, the communities through which the freeway was constructed bore the burden of increased air pollution and freight traffic, deteriorated public health and mobility, displacement, and an overall poorer quality of life. These negative community health impacts and externalities have tragically earned the LB-ELA Corridor the apt moniker “Diesel Death Zone.” From the communities’ perspective, the echoes of these open wounds reverberated when, after two decades of study and evaluation, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) proposed widening I-710 to expand the freeway’s capacity to accommodate general- purpose travel lanes. These extra lanes were intended to absorb increased truck and vehicle travel to reduce traffic congestion and collisions, improve freight movement through the region, and support the region’s economic needs. However, this widening would also cause even more 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 43 of 305 1-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan displacement of people and jobs in communities already separated and harmed by the freeway, increased impacts to local air quality, public health, and the environment, and a continued focus on serving the region’s economic needs at the expense of the LB-ELA Corridor communities’ quality of life and health. Following the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) expression of concerns during this proposal’s environmental review that the agency did not believe the project would meet air quality conformity, Metro and Caltrans suspended its advancement. This decision marked a watershed moment for Metro, recognizing that the proposed project developed years ago did not comply with updated federal, state, and regional policy frameworks, did not align with current approaches to transportation investment from a multimodal, air quality, climate, and community-supportive perspective, and did not address, repair, and overcome the long-standing impacts of I-710 on the LB-ELA Corridor communities. Metro heard these concerns and envisioned a first-of-its-kind community- centered process to develop the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan)1, which would re-envision how to invest in the corridor’s transportation infrastructure in a multimodal, locally-focused, yet regionally significant manner through a process that brought communities to the table with regional stakeholders to find common ground. To support this approach, Metro created a Task Force and Community Leadership Committee (CLC) to serve as advisory bodies that would determine the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles of the Investment Plan, help identify and evaluate proposed projects, develop strategies to leverage funding, conduct robust community engagement, find ways to reach consensus, and finalize funding recommendations for Metro Board consideration. Empowering the community and stakeholders to participate in this process helped Metro develop an Investment Plan that reflects the community’s voice and the Metro Board’s direction to ensure that regional planning for 1 The name of this project was formerly the I-710 South Corridor . Through a community involvement survey and input on recommended names, the project was renamed Long Beach- East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Improvement Plan . 2 Letter from Metro CEO to Board of Directors, Re-imagining highway improvements, May 25, 2021 . highway improvements “must include a renewed commitment to inclusive and meaningful engagement of communities as well as a steadfast commitment to addressing the equity, displacement, air quality, congestion and economic concerns that have plagued communities around major freeway corridors.”2 One main concern raised consistently by Corridor residents was the need to produce an Investment Plan that would not re-introduce freeway widening or displacement of people from their homes given the existing challenges to community cohesion, home ownership, and housing costs. This pervasive public input is reflected in several Metro policies. In June 2022, the Metro board adopted its Multimodal Highway Investment Objectives policy which includes the following objective: “Recognizing LA County’s history of inequitable highway investment policies and construction, work with local communities to reduce disparities caused by the existing highway system and develop holistic, positive approaches to maintain and improve the integrity of and quality of life of those communities with minimal or no displacement during the implementation of highway improvements.” Additionally, the Metro Board adopted a policy that removed from Investment Plan consideration any “capacity enhancing freeway widening” projects. With this community input and Metro Board policy in mind, staff eliminated from consideration projects proposed for evaluation that had known displacement impacts and carefully evaluated every project and program recommended for funding in the Investment Plan. Metro is pleased to affirm that the Investment Plan, in contrast to the prior I-710 South Corridor Project, does not recommend any projects or programs with any known displacements for funding and remains committed to ensuring these anti-displacement Board policies remain intact through the implementation of the Investment Plan. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 44 of 305 1-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Metro developed the Investment Plan with the belief that equitable processes would result in equitable outcomes and with the intention of restoring trust with and centering Corridor communities that have been historically harmed and disproportionately impacted by I-710 over the years. The Investment Plan recommends funding a community-centered, balanced, and multimodal array of projects and programs, including support for zero-emission truck and locomotive technology, prioritized bus lanes for faster transit service, complete street treatments for more integrated mobility options on arterial roadways, safer pedestrian and bicycle pathways, active transportation corridor gap closures, bus shelters and first/last mile transit improvements to improve customer experience, reduced particulate matter from roadway sources to improve air quality and public health, and connecting communities to the LA River Bikeway. The Investment plan also proposes an innovative approach to improving the I-710 freeway facility and bridges through the I-710 MOSAIC (Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Investments for the Community) Program, which will improve how community members access the freeway through safer on and off ramps and cross the freeway with safety and mobility improvements for bus, bicycle, and pedestrian travel to reconnect communities separated by the freeway and LA River. Equity is a hallmark of the Investment Plan. In addition to the community inclusive process and transportation projects and programs recommended for funding that will help address equity needs in the LB-ELA Corridor, the Investment Plan also creates and funds two innovative programs that Metro will implement to deliver holistic, equity-focused community benefits. One program is the START-UP (Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative Transportation Uplifting People) Fund, which will provide support for lower-resourced communities to develop projects for implementation. The other program is the Community Programs Catalyst Fund, which supports the development of 15 Community Programs (not normally eligible for funding in a transportation investment plan) to allow Metro to lead the region to convene communities and stakeholders to plan, develop priorities, and identify funding strategies to deliver projects and programs related to community health, air quality, zero-emission technology, urban greening, greenhouse gas reduction, workforce development and targeted hiring, economic and housing stabilization, transit oriented development and communities, and public art/aesthetics. Finally, the Investment Plan is a living document that will be reviewed and updated every few years to ensure that projects and programs are advancing and delivering benefits as expected and that new priorities can be evaluated and developed over time to take advantage of funding reserved within the plan’s Modal Programs. This Investment Plan represents the consensus support of Metro stakeholders who live and work along the LB-ELA Corridor. This multidimensional, multimodal investment strategy enhances regional and local mobility and air quality while fostering economic vitality, social equity, environmental sustainability, improved public health, and access to opportunity. Through the development and implementation of the Investment Plan, Metro hopes to restore and illuminate the LB- ELA Corridor mosaic—comprising vibrant, resilient, and multicultural communities—with transportation investments complemented by community programs designed to uplift people in the Corridor and fulfill their hopes for a safer, cleaner, healthier, more mobile, and more prosperous future for generations to come. This document fulfills the requirements of the California Transportation Commission for Metro to adopt a qualifying Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan for the I-710/LB-ELA Corridor to allow projects in the Investment Plan to be eligible for funding from the Senate Bill 1 Solutions for Congested Corridors Program. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 45 of 305 1-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 1.2 Brief History of the Corridor before the LB-ELA Corridor Project The founding of the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach dates back to the turn of the 20th century, and the multiple global events that shaped the current day flow of goods and supply chain practices unfolded since. In 1897, the federal government selected San Pedro Bay over Santa Monica Bay for harbor development, paving the way for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Shortly after that decision, the City of Los Angeles created the Board of Harbor Commissioners in 1907, and the City of Long Beach followed in 1917 to oversee the operations of their respective ports. Fast forward to 1956, an innovative shipping concept called containerization started in the U.S. East Coast, and the Sea-Land Services (now A.P. Moller - Maersk) made the first container ship call at the Port of Long Beach in 1962. Containerization has since revolutionized the way goods are moved across the world. Indeed, the container volume at Port of Long Beach grew at an average annual growth rate of nearly 40 percent between 1969 and 1980. 1980s was the beginning of China’s ascendance as a global manufacturing superpower. China’s success was a result of a combination of centrally- owned manufacturing plants, innovations in manufacturing practices, low labor costs, and its strong business ecosystem, but also attributed to a lack of regulatory compliance and low taxes and duties. Many U.S. manufacturers offshored their production activities to China to take advantage of China’s low-cost production and high productivity. The areas near the Ports historically attracted various industries, including fishing, canneries, oil drilling and shipbuilding in the early days of the 20th century, and logistics infrastructure investments including rail and roadway transportation networks and warehouse and goods handling facilities since the latter half of the 20th century. Rapid population growth took place as waterfront businesses flourished. When China emerged as a global manufacturing powerhouse, many U.S. manufacturers and retailers favored San Pedro Bay as a strategic global trade node because of its proximity to China and shorter shipping time as compared to the East Coast ports, well-developed goods movement transportation infrastructure, and a large population base to support logistics activities. Since the first port call of the Sea-Land Services, the container volumes at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach surged, making the Ports the largest container port complex in the Western Hemisphere. The development of I-710 (formerly California Routes 15 and 7) in 1964 connected the Central Manufacturing District in Southeast LA to the expanded San Pedro Bay Port Complex, facilitating the burgeoning movement of goods and commerce. The economic pursuits of the region at the time, however, did not equitably consider the needs of all communities in the path of the I-710. The LB-ELA Corridor comprises 18 incorporated cities and three unincorporated communities that are diverse, with unique development and growth histories. Though the Corridor overall is an important economic driver for the region, the benefits and burdens of that historical development have not always been equitably distributed. Some communities of color and low-income households suffer the impacts of inequitable planning and policy decisions made long before I-710 was built. The redlining, discriminatory lending practices and exclusionary zoning that solidified residential racial segregation in LA County in the middle of the 20th century split some neighborhoods apart, destroyed others, and forced some communities to bear the brunt of freight and commuter traffic that supports the region, the state, and a significant part of the country. The resulting inequities in community impacts have been exacerbated by the construction and changes to the I-710 to meet the increased volume of international trade in recent decades. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 46 of 305 1-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 1.3 The Need for LB-ELA Corridor Improvements – Decades in the Making 3 Case Study - California I-710 – Engaged Community Supports Corridor Study Partnership, https://onlinepubs .trb .org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_California-I-710 .pdf . By the 1990s, the I-710 South Corridor faced a convergence of challenges arising from increased traffic, local population expansion, growth in trade at the San Pedro Bay Port Complex, and deteriorating transportation infrastructure, giving rise to safety and mobility concerns that could not be ignored. Portions of the freeway were experiencing delays of 3 or more hours daily.3 The following timeline outlines efforts made over two decades to relieve congestion and improve safety along the LB-ELA Corridor: continue on next page 2000 Initiation of a major study by Caltrans, Metro, SCAG, and GCCOG to draft a locally preferred strategy addressing safety, congestion, and quality-of- life along the I-710 Corridor. 2005 Completion of the Major Corridor Study, recommending separate truck lanes, an increase in general-purpose lanes, interchange improvements, and improvements to Corridor arterial streets. 2008 Start of the I-710 Corridor Project EIR/EIS, addition of Subject Working Groups and Local Advisory Committees to the Community Advisory Framework, and passage of Measure R with identified funding for the I-710 Corridor. 2012 Public release of the draft EIR/EIS, proposal of Community Alternative 7 by local environmental groups advocating for increased transit service and zero-emission trucks and separate Zero Emissions Truck Lanes, and release of the Air Quality Action Plan identifying strategies to reduce emissions. 2003 Community concerns about air quality and residential displacement led to the creation of the Community Advisory Committee by the Oversight Policy Committee to focus on key issues affecting communities along the I-710 Corridor. 2007 Metro and GCCOG launched the Air Quality Action Plan in response to the study’s findings, aiming to improve health for residents and employees of the transportation corridor. 2011 A Health Impact Assessment conducted by Metro and GCCOG as part of the Air Quality Action Plan. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 47 of 305 1-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2017 The revised draft EIR/supplemental draft EIS was released for public review, offering detailed analyses on the proposed improvements and their impacts within the corridor. 2013 CALSTART prepared the I-710 Project Zero- Emission Truck Commercialization Study, contributing to the Technology Plan for Goods Movement undertaken by Metro and GCCOG. Metro, Caltrans and GCCOG proceed to start the development of a revised Draft EIR/EIS based on community feedback and changes in freight cargo logistics transport. A revised set of alternatives was analyzed including the No Build, a freeway modernization combined with a Zero-Emission Truck Program, and a freeway modernization combined with separate truck-only lanes accessible only to zero emissions trucks. 2021 In May 2021, the Metro Board suspended the environmental review of the I-710 South Corridor Project’s Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) 5C (herein referred to as Alternative 5C) due to significant concerns that the proposed project would not meet air quality conformity standards; would create untenable displacement in disadvantaged communities adjacent to the freeway; and would contradict updated local, state, and federal policies related to freeway widening or expansion projects. The GCCOG formed the I-710 Ad Hoc Committee in July, aiming to integrate locally supported solutions after the halt of approval of Alternative 5C. In September, the Metro Board and Caltrans launched a comprehensive approach to re-engage communities and stakeholders, forming the I-710 South Corridor Task Force for a more multimodal, equitable, and sustainable approach to corridor challenges. 2016 Voters in LA County passed Measure M, providing additional funding for the LB-ELA Corridor. This measure aimed to alleviate traffic congestion, repair infrastructure, and expand public transit, while also subsidizing fares for vulnerable groups. Concurrently, Metro and the GCCOG completed a Strategic Transportation Plan, proposing a comprehensive set of projects to enhance regional transportation through advancements in technology and infrastructure to accommodate growing demands. 2024 Board adoption of the LB-ELA Investment Plan. 2018 The Metro Board reviewed the three alternatives from the revised draft EIR/ supplemental draft EIS: “No Build,” Alternative 5C, and Alternative 7. Ultimately, Alternative 5C was approved as the Locally Preferred Alternative, which included the I-710 Zero-Emission Truck Program and aimed for a comprehensive modernization of the I-710. This decision also introduced an Early Action Program to deliver immediate benefits in safety, mobility, and air quality, prioritizing several projects before any mainline freeway work commenced. The development of the Final EIR/EIS documenting the selection of Alternative 5C as the Preferred Alternative was initiated. 2020-2021 The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reiterated through a letter to Caltrans and Metro that a hotspot analysis would be required for the LPA (Alternative 5C) due to the project resulting in increased truck-related diesel emissions and resulting potential challenges meeting air quality standards.. In response to these actions and continued community concerns, the Metro Board suspended work on the Final EIR/ EIS for Alternative 5C. 2022 The project was renamed to the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan, reflecting a broader focus. The Metro Board, responding to a request from Caltrans and state policy changes aimed at improving climate change effects, formally rescinded Alternative 5C as the Preferred Alternative in favor of the “No Build” alternative and directed development of the Final EIR/EIS to document that decision. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 48 of 305 1-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 1.4 Goods Movement Strategic Plan and I-405 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan – Precursors and Framework for the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Process As the world shut down in response to COVID-19, it was clear how vital the goods movement industry is to keeping people fed, businesses open, and hospitals fully stocked. The pandemic also shone a light on how pre-existing inequities and poor health caused by the movement of freight were further exacerbated by the health and economic impacts of this devastating global pandemic. In response to these local and global challenges, Metro recognized the importance of creating transformative plans to make LA County more economically competitive, environmentally sustainable, and socially equitable. Metro’s 2021 LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan and 2022 Interstate 405 (I-405) Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan (CMCP) meet this need and are transformative plans that serve as precursors to the framework for the Task Force process. Metro initiated the LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan in the wake of this heightened commitment. The plan sought from the onset to understand better the relationship between goods movement and equity and how best to acknowledge past impacts, mitigate existing issues, and identify future opportunities to improve the lives of county residents most affected by the movement of goods through the region —today and for generations to come. Metro recognized that it was crucial to engage affected communities in the development, refinement, and implementation of the plan’s programs and strategies to achieve the goals of the plan – namely, to support transportation and economic investments in the LA County goods movement system that will elevate well-being and improve environmental conditions of our most impacted communities. The plan and the sustainable freight competitiveness framework that emerged reflect the collective commitment of Metro and goods movement stakeholders to establishing equity as the fundamental driver for shaping policies, initiatives, and projects intended to result in inclusive economic competitiveness. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 49 of 305 1-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan From this framework emerged five near-term equity-conscious strategies to implement the plan’s Vision: partnering across the region to foster workforce development programs that support the freight labor needs of tomorrow. creating a formal, recurring equity freight working group; forming a high-level freight rail partnership to drive investment into LA County; leading a countywide discussion on the role of goods movement needs in curbside management planning and policies; and deploying cleaner truck technology to displace diesel operations on freight-intense highway corridors; 1 3 2 5 4 Following the development of the LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan, Metro adopted the I-405 CMCP in September 2022. The I-405 CMCP seeks to improve mobility along the entire length of the I-405, one of the most congested corridors in LA County and the nation. The goal of this planning effort was to understand the diverse users and communities relying on and impacted by the I-405 Corridor, solicit their feedback, and show how multimodal improvements could reduce congestion, move more people, increase accessibility for all users, and support and advance equitable outcomes for historically disadvantaged communities. 4 2022 California Code Streets and Highways Chapter 8 .5 Congested Corridors, https://law .justia .com/codes/california/2022/code-shc/division-3/chapter-8-5/section-2392/ . 5 The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB 1), https://www .metro .net/about/sb1/ . Both plans were developed within an evolved policy framework that prioritized stakeholder engagement and addressed quality-of-life issues when securing state and federal funding. This approach was codified in the creation of the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program, whose enabling statute indicates that “preference shall be given to corridor plans that demonstrate that the plans and the specific project improvements to be undertaken are the result of collaboration between the department and local or regional partners that reflect a comprehensive approach to addressing congestion and quality-of-life issues within the affected corridor through investment in transportation and related environmental solutions.” 4 This Investment Plan also provides a qualifying I-710 CMCP to compete for and secure a portion of the $250 million in state funding made available annually through the Senate Bill 15 Solutions for Congested Corridors Program. This critical funding supports Metro’s ability to deliver Measures R and M. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations1. Background . . Item 20 Page 50 of 305 2-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2. Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6 Refer to Metro Planning and Programming Committee Report, May 2021: Agenda Item 8 . 7 The project name change from the I-710 South Corridor to the Long Beach-East LA Corridor was a formal change made by action of the Metro Board in 2022 . In May 2021, the Metro Board suspended the environmental review of the I-710 South Corridor Project’s Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) 5C (herein referred to as Alternative 5C) due to significant concerns that the proposed project would not meet air quality conformity standards; would create untenable displacement in disadvantaged communities adjacent to the freeway; and would contradict updated local, state, and federal policies related to freeway widening or expansion projects. At the same time, the Metro Board directed the CEO to re-engage impacted communities along I-710 South, convene stakeholders, and develop a new, multimodal, community-focused, and regionally significant transportation investment plan for the Corridor, which is a corridor of national freight significance and regional mobility, with substantial impacts borne by residents adjacent to the I-710 freeway.6 To accomplish this directive, Metro established the Long Beach to East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor Task Force in September 2021 to serve as its advisory body to the Board to develop recommendations for the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan).7 The Metro Board was highly focused on ensuring that this new process, in contrast to the prior one, included people from impacted communities who would provide meaningful feedback toward a shared vision and promote an inclusive and representative decision-making process. The invitation to participate as part of the Task Force membership was deliberately formulated to ensure that members could fully engage, represent their communities and interests, commit their time, and support the goal of creating a community-supported Investment Plan. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 51 of 305 2-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.1 Creation of the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force (Staff Response to Board Motions 47 and 48) 8 Refer to Metro Board of Directors Meeting, May 2021 . 9 I-710 Ad Hoc Committee Final Report the COG Board, June 2022, https://www.dropbox.com/sh/qwjnsyur2i0o4q9/AADu1hgmROsU_SwfE9IfA57ua/710%20Task%20Force%20Meetings/Task%20 Force%20Meeting%20%2311%208.8.22?dl=0&preview=GCCOG+Ad-Hoc+Committee+Report.pdf&subfolder_nav_tracking=1 In May 2021, the Metro Board of Directors approved Motions 47 and 488 effectively clearing the path forward for the Task Force to provide a new set of projects, programs, and legislative recommendations in place of the suspended and ultimately terminated Alternative 5C proposal to widen the Interstate. The Task Force was also charged with developing an Investment Plan for Metro Board consideration to deliver much-needed investment for the communities directly impacted by the movement of people and goods through the I-710 South Corridor. Metro also requested that the Task Force partner with the Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG). Through the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force process, this partnership created and delivered an Investment Plan that recommends funding for projects and programs designed to realize multimodal strategies that address the re-established purpose and need. Input from the GCCOG, particularly through its I-710 Ad Hoc Committee recommendations9, was incorporated into the Investment Plan. Additionally, three city officials from the Ad Hoc Committee and representatives from Long Beach, the Port of Long Beach, and all three county supervisorial districts in the study area are voting members of the Task Force, with the GCCOG Executive Director serving as an ex officio member. For the Task Force to be effective, the members needed to represent a broad set of community and regional voices reflecting the many challenges facing the Corridor, and that would help this group re-evaluate the purpose and need of the Corridor project and develop multimodal and multipurpose strategies, projects and programs, and investment priorities accordingly. The broad and diverse Task Force membership was selected to explore and address the myriad challenges facing their respective LB-ELA communities and Corridor travelers—from traffic congestion and safety concerns, poor air quality and public health, and lack of opportunity and multimodal mobility options. Task Force members also needed to represent viewpoints from community-based organizations to elected officials, from business to labor, and from environmental advocates to the goods movement industry. Bringing all these voices “to the table” in a collaborative effort proved to be a pivotal difference from prior efforts and will be beneficial for the development and ongoing implementation of future improvements, including strategies and funding advocacy. The group comprised approximately 40 community and regional stakeholders from a vital cross-section of communities, industries, public entities, policy experts, businesses, and labor agencies. All these stakeholders represent people or interests that were directly impacted by or dependent on the movement of people and goods in, through, and around the LB-ELA Corridor (Appendix 2-A). From September 2021 through April 2024, the Task Force convened 34 times—typically in the evenings, to ensure optimal participation for members. The Task Force: • Reaffirmed the boundaries of the LB-ELA Corridor study area; • Reviewed and reassessed the purpose and need for improvements to the LB-ELA Corridor between the Ports and State Route 60; • Collaborated to define the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles which are outlined in Chapter 4 and align with the existing regional and state policy framework; • Identified an array of strategies, projects, and programs, prioritized in the near-term to long-term, that will realize the goals to meet the needs of stakeholders and Corridor users; • Created a multimodal, equity-focused, community-supportive, and regionally significant Investment Plan, in alignment with the Task 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 52 of 305 2-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Force’s established Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, that will allow Metro and Caltrans—in partnership with Task Force members and local, regional, state, and federal agencies—to implement these projects and programs; and • Regularly reported the outcomes of the Task Force to the Metro Board and the State of California throughout the process through coordination meetings. Furthermore, to meet the Metro Board’s directive to re-engage impacted communities and their members and to implement Metro’s Equity Platform, the project team, based on input from Task Force members, recommended creating a forum to bring together residents from the communities along the LB-ELA Corridor to help advise the Task Force. The goals of this forum were to help the Task Force and project team ground-truth ideas, establish a process for broader community input, review project information and recommendations, and bring forward priorities and concerns to be considered by the Task Force in developing its recommendations. With this request, the project team established a new group named the Community Leadership Committee (CLC), which consisted of residents from the project area and aimed to include at least one member per LB- ELA Corridor jurisdiction or neighborhood, as defined by the Task Force study area. Applicants that lived close to the freeway or to heavy industrial uses were prioritized, and jurisdictions that had more people living within “Impacted Areas” (as defined by being located within 1/2 mile of Freeways, Ports, or Intermodal Yards), were allotted more than one CLC seat. CLC selection criteria also included people who not only live but also work in the corridor, are engaged through social and community organizations, can represent youth or senior populations, are Black, Indigenous, or people of color, and non-native English speakers. The CLC’s purpose was to advise 10 Metro CEO Letter to Board of Directors, Reimagining Highway Improvements, May 25, 2021 . the Task Force on proposals and recommendations throughout its process. The CLC began with 24 CLC members in March 2022. Over the course of two years, some CLC members were added, others resigned, and some seats were replaced. We sadly lost a member during this planning time (see Memorium). By April 2024, there were 26 CLC Members. The creation of this group, with its central role in such a large-scale planning effort, has been unprecedented for Metro and the region. It has also been a significant step forward in contrast to previous planning efforts such as Alternative 5C, reflecting the Metro Board’s leadership and recognition that its regional planning for highway improvements “must include a renewed commitment to inclusive and meaningful engagement of communities as well as a steadfast commitment to addressing the equity, displacement, air quality, congestion and economic concerns that have plagued communities around major freeway corridors.”10 The CLC has proven pivotal in the Investment Plan process, providing critical recommendations to the Task Force on goals, proposals, and recommendations at key consensus checkpoints. Working groups were also added to the structure, as described in the following section. These groups, which were also attend by CLC members and provided key direction and input during the Investment Plan process, included the Coordinating Committee, the Community Engagement Strategy (CES) Working Group, the Equity Working Group, and the Zero- Emission (ZE) Truck Working Group. By comprising these many working groups and integrating community members into the decision-making process, the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force development signified a tremendous commitment by the Metro Board and staff to incorporate equity fully into the Investment Plan as both a process and an outcome. The Investment Plan reflects this commitment through its recommendations for funding. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 53 of 305 2-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.2 Task Force Activities 11 Nine additional criteria were subsequently added . The Task Force process was launched in 2021 and, with its establishment, created a new project that superseded the previous project’s environmental phase (Alternative 5C), which was suspended at first and ultimately terminated. This significant step initiated by the Metro Board acknowledged the need to consider what did not work in the prior process to address Corridor needs and understand the concerns and frustrations the community had historically voiced toward Metro and Caltrans related to the I-710 South Project. Metro created the Task Force as a forum to foster dialogue and repair and build trust among Metro, the community, and the Corridor stakeholders, many of whom had not worked together before, had differing or conflicting viewpoints, or had not been part of the prior project’s decision-making process. To center equity throughout the process, Task Force members helped pilot the Metro Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool (EPET), a tool that helps assess existing conditions and related data, engage the community, explore potential impacts of different projects and programs, and ultimately, determine an equitable outcome and path forward for a project. The EPET was used throughout the Task Force’s process. Throughout 2022, Task Force members learned about the Corridor Existing Conditions and discussed the future each member preferred to see for the Corridor while engaging in an extensive consensus-based process, checking the group’s pulse, and voting at key checkpoints. This ultimately resulted in establishing an agreed upon Task Force and CLC-approved Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles to provide a clear framework for the decision-making and priority setting described in Chapter 4. By the close of 2022 and into early 2023, the Task Force reached the significant milestone of confirming more than 200 Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs (MSPPs) to advance into the evaluation phase. The Task Force sought as inclusive a set of MSPPs as possible, using a broad outreach and engagement approach to receive input from Corridor residents, community groups, interested stakeholders, partner agencies, and other parties. An extensive public engagement effort was developed to contribute to the list of candidate MSPPs, with a particular focus on engagement with impacted communities supplemented by partnerships with CBOs. The MSPP phase is outlined in Chapter 5. In 2023, Task Force and CLC members voted to apply 73 evaluation criteria11 aligned with and advancing the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles to the list of over 200 projects. They also provided feedback on applying the approved evaluation criteria to the list of potential multimodal projects and programs. Three hybrid meetings were conducted to create opportunities for engagement between the Task Force and CLC members and the ability to discuss the proposed evaluation criteria. Five additional virtual and hybrid meetings were held for the CLC to provide additional opportunities to promote discussion and to provide detailed input on the proposed evaluation, prioritization criteria, and tiering analysis. To refine draft ranking scores of projects, Task Force Members met in Small Group Meetings with the project team, with open participation for CLC Members. Figure 2-1 illustrates the major milestone phases leading up to the presentation of the Investment Plan to the Metro Board. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 54 of 305 2-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 2-1. Task Force Process Stakeholder Engagement Building Trust & Dening Consensus Dening Vision, Goals & Guiding Principles Developing Multimodal Strategies & Identifying Project & Program Evaluating & Rening Projects & Programs Creating an Investment & Policy Strategy for Implementation Reporting to the MetroBoard FALL 2021 – WINTER 2022 WINTER – FALL 2022 – WINTER 2023 SPRING – SUMMER 2023 Board Action and Milestone Decision Board Status Report SUMMER – FALL 2023 SPRING 2024 FALL 2022 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 55 of 305 2-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan In furtherance of Metro’s Equity Platform, the project team sought to bridge the divide for impacted residents in the Corridor whose primary language is not English and to ensure all persons have access to available materials and information. Table 2-1 shows a demographic analysis that considers the need for these languages as identified through community profiles for the Corridor cities and unincorporated communities. Table 2-1. Demographic Analysis City / Community Tagalog Khmer Korean Chinese Spanish Long Beach ●●●●● Signal Hill ●●●●● Carson ●●●●● Lakewood ●●●●● Bellflower ●●●●● Paramount ●●●●● Compton ●●●●● Downey ●●●●● Lynwood ●●●●● South Gate ●●●●● Huntington Park/ Cudahy/ Bell/ Bell Gardens ●●●●● Commerce ●●●●● Vernon/ Maywood ●●●●● East Los Angeles ●●●●● Boyle Heights ●●●●● East Rancho Dominguez ●●●●● Walnut Park ●●●●● Wilmington ●●●●● San Pedro ●●●●● ● ≥5% of population (5 years or older) of one or more census tracts within jurisdiction speak language indicated● <5% of population (5 years or older) of one or more census tracts within jurisdiction speak language indicated Source: U.S. Census Data 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) data for Limited English Proficiency. Note: Percentages used as they applied to more than one city/community. Additionally, the project team offered services in any other language upon request. It was determined that the top three limited English-proficent languages represented would be accounted for in the Task Force process. All Task Force meetings were conducted in English with simultaneous Spanish, Khmer, and Tagalog interpretation, and CLC Meetings were conducted in English with simultaneous Spanish interpretation. All presentation videos were made available to the public in English, Spanish, Khmer, and Tagalog for Task Force Meetings, and presentation videos for CLC Meetings were made available in Spanish. Meeting materials and handouts were also made available in English and Spanish, and in additional languages by request.12 For the most part, Task Force and CLC meetings were conducted in a virtual format, with select sessions offering the option of in-person attendance. All Task Force and CLC meetings were open to the public. 12 All LB-ELA Corridor public meeting materials and resources can be found on the Project Hub at https://www .metro .net/projects/lb-ela-corridor%20 plan/#documents . 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 56 of 305 2-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.3 Task Force Charter The Task Force created a Charter and Governance Structure Working Group to determine a clear set of guidelines, agreements, and structure for how the Task Force would function. Members of the working group examined various consensus-building and decision-making models employed in other relevant project team planning efforts (I-710 EIR/EIS and Public Safety Advisory Committee). This group provided feedback on the draft LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Charter prepared by the project team, including a potential leadership structure, consensus and decision- making process, and roles and expectations of different groups. The Charter and Governance Structure Working Group proposed a consensus-building model (Figure 2-2) in which individuals commit to supporting a decision, even in the absence of unanimous agreement. This approach involved the introduction of a discussion topic, followed by a proposal presented by the project team. Subsequently, members shared their perspectives on the proposal. Through an iterative process, the project team revised proposals to accommodate concerns until a majority actively “supported” the proposals or found it acceptable enough to “live with.” Figure 2-2. Consensus-Building Model I SUPPORT the Proposal I CAN LIVE WITH the Proposal I HAVE CONCERNS about the Proposal I WILL STAND ASIDE on this one Subsequently, the Task Force and the CLC implemented the consensus- building model, employing it consistently throughout the process to assess the degree of agreement for the proposed recommendations. After this consensus-seeking approach ended, the Task Force and the CLC voted in their respective groups to finalize recommendations. The Charter and Governance Structure Working Group met in November 2021, January 2022, and for a final meeting in February 2022, following the adoption of the Task Force Charter. All Charter and Governance Structure Working Group meetings were open to the Task Force and CLC Members. The meetings included Spanish interpretation. The charter (Appendix 2-B) also established the CLC and other working groups to support the work of the Task Force. The working groups, which included Task Force and CLC members, as well as subject matter experts, met to research and have a deeper analysis and discussion of specific project-related issues and develop proposals for consideration by both the Task Force and the CLC. Figure 2-3 provides a detailed overview of the various meeting types, frequency, purpose, membership, and format. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 57 of 305 2-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan LB-ELA Corridor Task Force* Meetings ■Frequency: Monthly ■Purpose: Discuss and come to consensus on recommendations ■Members: Up to 50 representatives from a broad cross-section ■Format: Virtual, Hybrid and In-Person Meetings Coordinating Committee** Meetings ■Frequency: Monthly, one week following each Task Force meeting ■Purpose: Plan meetings and support CLC and LB-ELA Corridor Task Force ■Members: Three existing Task Force members and two CLC members ■Format: Virtual Meetings Community Leadership Comittee*** Meetings ■Frequency: At least once a month and will be open to the public, including opportunities for public comments and engagement ■Purpose: Advice on LB-ELA Corridor Task Force proposals and recommendations ■Members: Residents from the project area ■Format: Virtual, Hybrid and In-Person Meetings Working Group Meetings ■Frequency: As needed ■Purpose: Research and analyze specific issues to develop proposals and recommendations for consideration by the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force and CLC ■Members: No more than 25 Task Force and CLC members ■Format: Virtual Meetings Listening Sessions and Other Community Meetings ■Frequency: Monthly, one week following each Task Force meeting ■Purpose: Plan meetings and support CLC and Task Force ■Members: Three existing Task Force members and two CLC members ■Format: Virtual and In-Person Meetings * LB-ELA Corridor Task Force (Previously called the I-710 Task Force) ** Coordinating Committee (Previously called the Executive Steering Committee) *** Community Leadership Committee (Previously called the Community Advisory Committee) Figure 2-3. LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting Descriptions 2.3.1 Compensation Consistent with Metro’s Advisory Body Compensation (ABC) Policy,13 eligible Task Force and CLC members were compensated at a rate of $200 per meeting for regular advisory body members and $50 for working group meetings. All eligible Task Force members decided not to accept compensation. From January 2022 to April 2024, Metro compensated 13 More information regarding Metro’s ABC Policy can be found at: https://equity-lametro .hub .arcgis .com/pages/engagement-resources#ABCP 27 CLC members for their role in the Task Force process, a total of $148,250 (as of 4/29/2024). This was one of Metro’s first applications of the ABC Policy on the advisory body of a project of this scale. In furtherance of the Equity Platform, the ABC Policy recognizes the expertise of community members and the value of their time, experience, and insights. Its initial use in the LB-ELA Investment Plan process yielded a high level of quality engagement and commitment from CLC members. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 58 of 305 2-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.4 Working Groups 14 The Coordinating Committee was formerly known as the Executive Steering Committee; this name change reflected the role of this group and was updated in early 2022 . The committees and working group bodies played a crucial role in ensuring that the broader Task Force’s efforts remained focused and incorporated the unique needs of the LB-ELA Corridor communities. 2.4.1 Coordinating Committee The Coordinating Committee (CC)14 worked with the project team to plan Task Force meetings and to provide input regarding content and approach to Task Force meetings. The Coordinating Committee comprised five members, including two from the CLC and three from the Task Force. Among the three Task Force representatives, one representative was elected by the Task Force from each of the following membership categories: Community-Based Organizations (CBOs), Cities/ Government agencies, and Goods Movement/ Transportation Industry/ Labor (Appendix 2-C) Members of the Task Force and CLC were selected through a nomination process. Individuals either nominated themselves or were nominated by their respective members. The Task Force formally voted to approve the Coordinating Committee’s final composition at its seventh meeting held in March 2022. The Coordinating Committee played a crucial role in shaping the Task Force’s operational framework. This included offering insights on various aspects such as meeting agendas, project timelines, and strategies for community engagement. Additionally, the Committee received regular project updates and discussed insights on key highlights from prior Task Force, committee, and working group meetings. The Coordinating Committee met monthly, at least two weeks before each Task Force meeting, for 22 meetings from February 2022 through January 2024. Coordinating Committee meetings were held virtually and were closed meetings. 2.4.2 Community Leadership Committee The Community Leadership Committee (CLC) comprised committed corridor residents who advised the Task Force (see Appendix 2-D). The Metro Board made clear in its direction to the CEO in May 2022 that the voice of impacted communities and residents would need to underpin any new recommendations brought forth to replace Alternative 5C from the prior project’s environmental process. In the Alternative 5C process, Local Advisory Committees were created in each of the LB-ELA Corridor Communities to ensure feedback Metro is working to improve its efforts to listen and learn from the communities that we serve. We recognize that to increase access to opportunities for all, we must understand how to increase access for those who face barriers. No matter our intent, we will not be successful unless we work to address their needs first. Metro can only serve those with the greatest needs by understanding their needs through intentional listening. Authentic listening and learning requires meaningful engagement. Community-driven conversations are essential, but they require trust. In order for Metro to build trust, the agency must intentionally collaborate and listen to community experiences. Our engagement efforts must also work to ensure that community members are left feeling heard, reflected and respected. Hence, Metro must work to show how community input informs and shapes our decisions, actions, and investments. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 59 of 305 2-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan from stakeholders from the “bottom-up”. However, the Local Advisory Committees were either not established or not active in all the LB-ELA communities. In contrast, this Task Force process sought to integrate the full participation of each corridor community through a new local community representative body, the Community Leadership Committee. Although the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force initially consisted of a wide range of stakeholders and leaders, this group did not fully represent the diverse range of experiences, needs, and voices within the community. Including community residents directly in the decision-making process was necessary to ensure that the decisions made by the Task Force reflected the lived experiences and priorities of those directly impacted by living in the Corridor. The CLC reviewed and advised on Task Force goals, proposals, and recommendations every month. CLC members also participated in working groups, helped ground-truth data, and advised on community engagement efforts. The CLC comprised diverse and committed community members living along the LB-ELA Corridor. At least one member represented each city or unincorporated community along the LB-ELA Corridor, while additional representatives were included from jurisdictions deemed to be highly impacted. These jurisdictions are characterized by a significant population living near the ports, intermodal yards, or the I-710 freeway. The most impacted jurisdictions had two additional members each (Long Beach – 3, East Los Angeles – 3), and the next highest impacted jurisdiction has one additional member (Lynwood – 2). There was also one at-large representative for any communities not represented in the jurisdiction list but in the project area. In total, there were 29 available CLC seats. To achieve the most equitable outcome, considerable attention was given to the selection criteria for CLC membership. The applicant(s) with the highest score was chosen in each jurisdiction. From December 2021 through January 2022, the Task Force and working groups provided input on a point system to select CLC members. These criteria included:15 15 Community Leadership Committee (CLC) Meeting 1, March 2022 . • Lives in the study area (required) • Works in the Corridor (1 point) • Engaged community member (1 point) • Lives in a highly impacted area (1 point) • Lives in two or more highly impacted areas (2 point) • Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) (1 point) • Primary language is non-English (1 point) • Under the age of 25 (1 point) • Over the age of 64 (1 point) Table 2-2 showcases the membership demographics of the initial CLC membership. Two members were monolingual Spanish speakers. Table 2-2. Initial Community Leadership Committee Membership Demographics Category Percentage Demographic Race/Ethnicity* 75 Latino 13 Black/African-American 13 Asian/Pacific Islander 4 Prefer not to respond Age** 8 Under 18 8 18 – 24 17 25 – 34 25 35 – 49 33 50 – 64 8 65+ Notes: * Rounded. Respondents could select more than one response, does not equal 100% ** Rounded 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 60 of 305 2-11 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Throughout the Task Force process, the composition of the CLC changed, and departing members were succeeded by applicants who represented the same or similar communities. These replacements were confirmed through a voting process conducted by the CLC and the Task Force. To create an accessible and inclusive process, project team members provided additional support to ensure that CLC members were clear about their roles, the goals of each phase of the Investment Plan development process, and the goals of each meeting. Before the first CLC meeting, project team members met with CLC members for an in-person orientation on using the Zoom platform for virtual meetings to support effective participation. Project team members made regular check-in phone calls to answer questions about the process and remind members about upcoming meetings. The project team also implemented specialized outreach tactics to ensure that CLC members stayed informed during the process. They sent bilingual email correspondence and video messages explaining every step in the process before CLC meetings. Several CLC Members also attended “Office Hour” sessions, an opportunity to ask questions of and provide input directly to the project team in a small group setting. The CLC convened for thirty-two meetings between December 2022 and April 2024, three of which were combined Task Force and CLC meetings. CLC meetings were conducted in English with simultaneous Spanish interpretation. In advance of all meetings, presentations and materials were also made available in English and Spanish. CLC members also frequently received printed, bilingual materials before meetings. All CLC meetings were held virtually, with select sessions offering an in-person attendance option. All CLC meetings were open to the public. 2.4.3 Community Engagement Strategy Working Group The Community Engagement Strategy (CES) Working Group was established early in the Investment Plan development process to provide initial guidance on community engagement strategies. Members discussed lessons learned from previous community engagement and how the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force could take new approaches to conduct better community engagement. These efforts were aimed at fostering an environment where the community’s voices are not only acknowledged but also genuinely respected throughout the information-gathering process and the subsequent formulation of recommendations made by the Task Force. Four CES Working Group meetings were held in November 2021, January 2022, February 2022, and July 2022. The first three meeting topics included an overview of the Task Force process, and an opportunity for community members to provide input on the CLC and CC membership composition, the CLC application evaluation criteria, and strategies for promoting CLC membership. At its February 2022 meeting, working group members finalized recommendations for the CLC membership composition and evaluation criteria and discussed effective outreach strategies and workshop formats to increase public awareness and involvement in establishing the Task Force’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. At the July 2022 meeting, the CES Working Group received an update on the finalization of the Task Force consensus values, the CLC and Task Force nomination of three initiatives/ projects that will seek state and federal funding opportunities through the Metro “Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity,” and the opportunity to rename the project to be more inclusive of the impacted communities, priorities, and approaches that will be advanced in the future of the project; and participated in a robust discussion of how CBOs can support Task Force efforts in local communities. CES Working Group meetings were conducted virtually and were accessible to the public. Spanish interpretation services were provided for all CES Working Group meetings. After July 2022, discussions on community engagement were brought to CLC, the Equity Working Group, and the Coordinating Committee, given the overlap in participation between the three and the importance of inclusive and effective engagement in advancing equity. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 61 of 305 2-12 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.4.4 Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool As noted above, the Investment Plan was developed using the Metro Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool (EPET); making this one of a handful of projects piloting the tool. The EPET was developed by Metro’s Office of Equity and Race to support implementing projects and programs that eliminate racial and social disparities and give all people in LA County an enhanced quality of life. Metro recognizes that deep-rooted and pervasive racial and socioeconomic inequities exist that create disparate impacts, even when the intention is to help all. We must understand the root causes of those inequities to develop solutions that help those faring the worst to improve access to opportunity for all. The EPET, consisting of six categories of questions (referred to as sections), assisted the project team in 1) identifying disparities that impact how Metro’s services, programs, and projects are experienced; 2) understanding the root causes of those disparities; and 3) developing and implementing projects, programs, plans, policies, and initiatives in a manner that provides more equitable outcomes. Because the scope of the Investment Plan does not include project/program implementation or post-implementation evaluation, the application of the EPET to date has focused primarily on the first four of the six sections listed below: • Connect Community Results to Project Outcomes • Analyze Data • Engage the Community • Plan for Equitable Outcomes • Implement Proposal • Evaluate, Communicate, and Stay Accountable The EPET was applied as a guide throughout the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Process and the development of the Investment Plan. Although it was primarily used in discussions within the Equity Working Group (composed of Task Force and CLC members), it was also useful in guiding discussions in the CLC and Task Force. The EPET informed the technical approach and decision-making process in all aspects of the Investment Plan, including the development of the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles; analysis of existing conditions data; selection of the initial list of multimodal strategies, projects, and programs; development and application of the project evaluation methodology; and the community engagement process and discussions during stakeholder meetings. Section 1: Connecting Community Results to Project Outcomes helped the project team, Task Force, CLC, and working groups build a foundational understanding of the issues facing communities within and surrounding the LB-ELA Corridor, identify opportunity areas for the Investment Plan’s projects and programs to support meaningful improvements, and identify the desired community results (equitable future states of well-being) to which these improvements of the Investment Plan will contribute. The outcomes of this process were distilled in the Investment Plan’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles adopted by the Task Force. Section 2: Analyze Data supported extensive qualitative and quantitative data analysis to identify existing conditions, needs, and disparities among various communities in the Corridor, and in comparison, with Los Angeles County. The EPET’s guidance helped to identify appropriate data sources and impacted areas, building on the issues and opportunity areas identified in Section 1. Data were primarily analyzed for socioeconomic conditions, environmental conditions, community health, and travel patterns related to mode share, emissions, throughput, and safety. Community survey data and anecdotal insights from CLC and Task Force members were used to supplement and validate quantitative data to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the LB-ELA Corridor communities. Section 3: Engage the Community supported various efforts in developing the Task Force and Public Engagement process and informed an in-depth documentation of Community History in the LB-ELA area and the broader region. The EPET’s guidance helped to identify groups historically and currently marginalized, particularly by transportation planning processes and decisions in the Corridor, and to examine the investments, decisions, 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 62 of 305 2-13 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan events, developments, or disinvestment strategies that have contributed to current community conditions. The EPET helped guide and document the various engagement strategies employed throughout the Investment Plan process and use findings from the engagement to produce root cause analysis and identify groups most likely to be benefited or burdened by the Investment Plan’s outcomes. Section 4: Plan for Equitable Outcomes supported the development of a robust evaluation methodology to capture potential benefits and concerns related to the Investment Plan’s various goals and guiding principles to apply across project modes, geographies, and scales. The EPET’s guidance helped to connect the evaluation criteria to key equity issues, community input, and root cause analysis to determine which prioritized projects and programs are best equipped to ensure equitable outcomes and contribute to the desired community results. A full summary of the EPET findings can be found in Appendix 2-E. 2.4.5 Equity Working Group The Equity Working Group (EWG) was open to all Task Force and CLC members as an opportunity to engage more deeply with equity issues in the LB-ELA Corridor, support the implementation of the EPET pilot, provide equitable project planning input on all steps of the Task Force process, and support the Task Force in understanding equity-related issues and strategies. Members of the Equity Working Group brought extensive lived and professional experience advocating for environmental justice, health equity, and economic equity in their communities, the larger LB-ELA Corridor, and beyond. Sixteen Equity Working Group meetings were convened between April 2022 and March 2024. Meetings were conducted in English, with simultaneous Spanish interpretation and translated meeting materials available in Spanish. Equity Working Group meetings typically consisted of a presentation and discussion relating to technical work phases in 16 Substitute Motion - 710 South Clean Truck Program - Attachment A https://metro .legistar .com/LegislationDetail .aspx?ID=5524278&GUID=92641BD0-6BC4-4590-BD62-96E4C05354C4 project selection and evaluation, development of EPET documentation, and the overall Task Force and Investment Plan process. Although the Equity Working Group is not a formal decision-making body, occasional votes were held to provide recommendations to the Task Force preceding formal votes. Throughout 2022, the Equity Working Group contributed to developing project Goals and Guiding Principles (particularly the Equity Guiding Principle), existing conditions data analysis, community outreach processes, and the history of policy, infrastructure, and demographic change in the Corridor area. These discussions addressed questions posed in EPET sections 1 through 3: Connect Community Results to Project Outcomes, Analyze Data, and Engage the Community. In 2023, the Equity Working Group provided feedback on the initial list of multimodal projects and programs, draft evaluation criteria, and evaluation results, prompting additional discussion, research, and coordination to integrate Health Equity more effectively in the project evaluation process and plan implementation approach. These meetings significantly guided the overall technical process and addressed questions posed in EPET section 4: Planning for Equitable Outcomes. The Equity Working Group also provided review and feedback on draft EPET documentation, specifically for the community history timeline and narrative. 2.4.6 Zero-Emission Truck Working Group As part of its commitment to improve air quality for communities along the Corridor, the Metro Board acted in October 2021to commit $50 million as seed funding for an I-710 South Zero-Emission Truck (ZET) Program that would become part of the work of the Task Force.16 In response, Metro initiated a Zero-Emission Truck (ZET) Working Group. The working group, which includes Task Force, CLC members, and industry representatives, was charged with developing the ZET Program under the guidance of the ZE technology parameters adopted by the Board. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 63 of 305 2-14 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Twenty regular ZET Working Group meetings were convened from November 2021 to February 2024. These meetings typically included presentations and discussions among ZET Working Group members across a variety of topics to determine priorities in advancing the deployment of ZE trucks and infrastructure throughout the LB-ELA Corridor (see Appendix 2-F). ZET Working Group members (made up by Task Force and CLC members) and key partners vetted the following topics in shaping the ZET Program: • Goals and objectives for the ZET Program in the context of Motion 16 (Directors Hahn and Dutra); • Industry perspectives and the role of stakeholders in the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force; • Air quality and environmental justice challenges and opportunities for the LB-ELA Corridor, as presented by the EPA; • Air quality context from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the challenges in meeting upcoming federal air quality attainment deadlines due to the slow rollout and scaling of ZET technology and infrastructure to displace the large volume of diesel trucks moving goods in the region; • State of clean truck technology and efforts to accelerate the commercialization of the ZE Class 8 heavy-duty trucks; • Governor Newsom’s fiscal year 2022 budget and the prospects for ZE trucks and infrastructure funding opportunities; • Federal funding opportunities and collaboration with United States Department of Transportation representatives; • Strategies to ensure proper community participation through engagement activities at key planning decision points regarding ZE Infrastructure siting; • Strategies to best leverage Metro’s $50 million in seed funding with the state and federal governments’ existing and future resources, while exploring partnerships with organizations already funding incentives to deploy ZE truck technology and infrastructure, such as the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, the California Air Resources Board, and SCAQMD. From March to June 2022, the ZET Working Group sought to finalize the framework and principles to leverage the $50 million in seed money allocated for this effort by the Metro Board to reach a $200 million minimum funding target, as shown on Figure 2-4. Figure 2-4. Zero-Emission Truck Metro Funding $50M Metro Board approved funding for ZE Class 8 Heavy Duty trucks infrastructure $3M for technical assistance to support small eet owners who live and work in the corridor 90% 10% approved for a publicly available truck charging facility (April 2023) Leverage $150M+ private, regional, state, and federal funding ZE CORRIDOR The ZET working group met to address additional topics, including workforce development, investigating parcels of land for potential siting of publicly accessible ZE charging infrastructure, and developing effective community engagement strategies at the regional level for planning purposes and at the local level for site-specific proposals. As a result, the 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 64 of 305 2-15 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan working group decided to dedicate $45 million of its seed funding to invest in ZE infrastructure development and leverage the remaining $5 million as a strategic set-aside to support small fleet owners in the transition. In addition, the working group adopted the following principles to guide its efforts. Since adopting these principles, the ZET Working Group held focus group discussions with industry, infrastructure, and community stakeholders to identify needs in pursuit of Metro’s vision for regionally significant ZE infrastructure facilities. These focus group discussions were critical in developing Metro’s Vision for Regional ZE Infrastructure Facilities. Community-identified needs focused on impacts on safety, public health, reduced congestion, and avoiding sensitive receptors. Community members who participated in the focus group discussion also emphasized their desire for Metro’s investment to result in benefits to the surrounding communities, including job opportunities and neighborhood beautification. Industry and Infrastructure needs focused on grid capacity and identifying locations that complement the needs of existing goods movement patterns. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 65 of 305 2-16 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan In April 2023, the working group approved a request from the Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator to dedicate up to $3 million in seed funding to support the development of a publicly available ZE charging facility in Wilmington, California. The estimated total cost of this facility is $15 million. The working group agreed that this project aligned with the ZET Program Principles, offered appropriate leveraging of the $50 million seed funding, and represented an opportunity to collaborate with regional partners to accelerate the deployment of ZE infrastructure in the LB-ELA Corridor. The ZET Working Group received presentations and discussed opportunities for job training and workforce development.18 These included guest presentations and discussions with the Center for International Trade and Transportation, South Bay Workforce Investment Board, and vocational programs to identify opportunities for regional coordination to advance the working group’s principle of workforce development. Key outcomes from these discussions included the need to create a structured outreach plan to target potentially interested individuals, collaborate with community colleges and LA County’s Workforce Board to implement workforce development and training opportunities and engage with stakeholders directly to increase community readiness. The ZET Working Group also received presentations on grant opportunities. These included guest presentations and discussions from the U.S. Department of Transportation, the California Air Resources Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). In the summer of 2023, the work focused on convening a series of stakeholder interviews to discuss the development of a regionally coordinated legislative and governmental affairs platform to reduce barriers and increase incentives that will advance the adoption of zero-emission technology. The interviews coalesced around several key initial recommendations for the Metro Board: • Creating a regional collaborative—including representatives from Caltrans, Metro, LA Department of Water and Power, Southern California Edison, SCAQMD, California Energy Commission, Southern California Association of Governments, and others—to improve coordination, sequencing, and efficiency in developing Corridor-specific ZE charging infrastructure; • Leveraging a portion of the $5 million set-aside to assist small fleet owners in transitioning to ZE trucks; and • Exploring a strategy to dedicate more resources to publicizing ZE sector jobs by collaborating with regional partners on existing workforce efforts. 18 All LB-ELA Corridor ZET Working Group meeting materials and resources can be found on the Project Hub at https://www.metro. net/projects/lb-ela-corridor%20plan/#documents. CEC Approved a $1.9 Billion Plan to Expand Zero-Emission Transportation Infrastructure that accelerates progress on the state’s electric vehicle charging and hydrogen refueling goals. California is investing an unprecedented amount of funding to build a bigger, better network of charging and refueling infrastructure for zero- emission cars, trucks and buses.17 17 California Energy Commission Approves $1 .9 Billion Plan to Expand Zero-Emission Transportation Infrastructure, https://www . energy .ca .gov/ news/2024-02/cec- approves-19- billion-plan-expand- zero-emission-transportation- infrastructure 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 66 of 305 2-17 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan These interviews also identified several initiatives that require the need for additional research, including: • A California Environmental Quality Act categorical exemption and statutory permit approval deadlines for ZE charging facilities; and need to protect community interests. • Improved awareness of statutorily created streamlining opportunities for municipalities to improve the timing and sequencing of ZE infrastructure development; • Allocation of additional funding for increased road maintenance because of the increased weight of battery electric trucks; and • Support for small fleet owners burdened by high vehicle insurance costs. Additionally, recent discussions with community members and advocacy groups have highlighted the need to understand the current and future state of hydrogen as an alternative clean transportation fuel. The ZET Program considers both battery-electric and hydrogen as viable zero- emission technologies. However, lack of familiarity and uncertainty surrounding hydrogen production, transportation, storage, and fueling within an urbanized context poses many concerns about hydrogen. The ZET Working Group will consult with the federal and state guidance on hydrogen, and closely coordinate with communities to explore ways to meet their expectations. Unlike the ZE passenger vehicle space, which is already well-established after decades of research, development, and investment, ZE trucks are still in the development phase. This means that technologies are still rapidly changing, and both public and private stakeholders are racing to meet the growing demand while also delivering community, health, and climate benefits. Realizing a network of ZET infrastructure within the LB-ELA Corridor will require a strong commitment and close collaboration from all stakeholders. The ZET working group’s upcoming priorities in 2024 are to advance the above-listed objectives by conducting ZE truck feasibility studies to identify site locations and coordinate with regional partners to streamline site identification and development that aligns with the ZET Program Principles and the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles of the LB- ELA Corridor Task Force. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 67 of 305 2-18 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.5 Community Values and Agreements to Build Consensus Consensus building serves as the cornerstone of the Task Force process, playing a pivotal role in effective decision-making and collaborative efforts. It encourages open dialogue and the inclusion of diverse perspectives, resulting in choices representative of the Task Force, CLC, and the communities they represent. By involving all stakeholders, consensus building not only improves the quality of decisions but also fosters a sense of ownership and commitment, which will be vital to implementing these priorities. The following values, which were included in the Task Force Charter, demonstrate the decision-making approach used by all Task Force members, fostering commitment and active participation: • Cooperation among Equals – All Task Force members are seen as equals in the process and as sharing power across different communities and stakeholder groups so there is a respectful and trusting atmosphere. • Exploration of Differences – The Task Force explores the different needs and perspectives of as many communities and stakeholders as possible before forming a proposal. • Building Common Ground – Space is created for open discussion and identification of information and ideas to be considered, enabling the Task Force to find commonalities. • Identification of Inclusive and Actionable Win-Win Solutions – Members of the Task Force work together to find solutions that everyone actively supports, or at least does not actively oppose, and that can be implemented through the process and/or integrated into the Investment Plan recommendations for consideration by the Metro Board and Caltrans. The Task Force adopted a five-step consensus-based decision-making model (Figure 2-5). In the initial step, a topic was introduced, and questions and concerns surfaced. Subsequently, a proposal was presented. In the third step, consensus was gauged using various degrees of agreement. (for example: “I support,” “I can live with,” “I have concerns,” or “I will stand aside”) amongst working group, CLC, or Task Force members. If consensus was not reached, members were provided the opportunity to refine the proposal after exploring underlying issues. In cases where consensus was achieved, the pivotal fifth step involved a vote, resulting in a recommendation based on a supermajority (60% threshold) vote by the members. A successful supermajority vote allowed the decision or proposal to move to the next step or phase in the work plan process. For Task Force votes, members who strongly disagreed were given the chance to express their dissenting opinions along with the final recommendations to the Board. The five-step decision-making model prioritized transparency throughout the process. During consensus tests and voting procedures, members and the project team collectively refined recommendations. Degrees of agreement and votes were determined through a roll call vote, with real- time documentation of input and outcomes prominently displayed during meetings. This information was then integrated into meeting summaries for reference. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 68 of 305 2-19 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 2-5. Five-Step Decision-Making Model 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 69 of 305 2-20 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.6 Work Plan Process To carry out the goals of the Task Force and deliver an Investment Plan to the Metro Board, the project team developed a Work Flow designed to support each stage of the Task Force’s Work Plan. Figure 2-6 illustrates the sequential stages guiding the progression toward milestone and consensus checkpoints. It visually represents the flow of information and collaborative efforts among the project team, the Task Force, the Coordinating Committee, the CLC, the working groups, the public, and the Metro Board. Work started with the project team, which included Metro, Caltrans, subject experts and professional services staff. The project team was responsible for preparing meeting materials, technical information, and other resources in support of the Task Force, the Coordinating Committee, the CLC, and working groups. In Step 1, the project team provided meeting materials, technical information, and other resources in collaboration with the Coordinating Committee. In Step 2, the agenda topics confirmed by the Coordinating Committee were introduced to the Task Force at its monthly meeting. Task Force members and the public discuss proposals and were notified of the specific topics to be discussed in the working groups. The Coordinating Committee also recommended agenda items for the CLC that emanated from Task Force members and public discussion at the monthly Task Force meetings. The CLC was represented on the Coordinating Committee by two members selected by the CLC. In Step 3, the Task Force requested specific working groups to clarify issues, surface questions, and concerns; and to develop proposals that aligned with the Task Force values. The working groups were represented by a mix of Task Force members, CLC members, and additional stakeholders and experts as needed to advance the working group’s objectives. Working groups were not open to the public. In Step 4, after working groups prepared a proposal for consideration by the Task Force and CLC, the CLC met at least one week before the next Task Force meeting to review, discuss, and advise on the proposal for the Task Force. If there were concerns or further questions regarding the working group proposal, the CLC advised the working group to re- evaluate the proposal. The project team worked with the CLC to summarize community feedback that would be shared with the Task Force at its next monthly meeting. The CLC also validated data and findings and advised on community engagement strategies and efforts. In Step 5, the recommendations of the working groups were shared with and evaluated by the CLC. If the CLC agreed with the recommendations, they shared the recommendations with the Task Force. If there were pending concerns, the issue would go back to the working groups to re- evaluate the recommendations and address concerns. In Step 6, the Task Force presented its final recommendations for the Investment Plan to the Metro Board which made the final decision to approve the Investment Plan. The Metro Board made the final decision on the Investment Plan. The recommendations of the CLC and public input for each phase of the Task Force process were provided to the Metro Board as part of the final report. Note that Step 6 occured once in the work plan— following the final Task Force consensus checkpoint. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 70 of 305 2-21 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 2-6. Work Flow Process Project Team Coordinating Committee+ Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor Task Force Zero-Emission Truck Working Group++ Community Engagement Strategy (CES) Working Group^ Equity Working Group 1 2 3* *Steps 1-5 depict normal process for proposals. If needed, Steps 3-5 will be repeated. Refer to Decision-Making Process chart for an explanation of decision points. **Step 6: Metro Board will consider and make the nal decision on the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan. +The Coordinating Committee was previously referred to as the Executive Steering Committee. ++The Zero-Emission Truck Working Group was previously referred to as the Clean Truck Working Group. ^Due to CES Working Group member unavailability to meet, the tasks of the CES Working Group were shared among the Task Force, CLC, Coordinating Committee, and Equity Working Group members. The Charter and Community Agreements Working Group met for three meetings from November 2021 through February 2022 to create the project Charter. Yellow - CLC Participation Green - Public ParticipationWorking GroupsMetro Board of Directors 6** 4*Community Leadership Committee (CLC) Community Engagement Activities + Public Comment Opportunities 5* 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 71 of 305 2-22 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The Task Force worked through the various topics identified by the project team and membership and sought consensus on each phase of the Work Plan before advancing to the next phase. The Consensus Checkpoint included reaching internal consensus within the Task Force to proceed to the next phase, community outreach and discussion, and notification of the Metro Board regarding Task Force progress. The consensus checkpoint process (Figure 2-7) was developed by the Charter and Governance Structure Working Group and adopted by the Task Force. Figure 2-7. Charter Work Plan and Consensus Checkpoints Purose, Formation & Working Protocols of the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Introduction and History of the LB-ELA Corridor Purpose of Task Force Community Engagement Strategy Charter and Community Agreements Introduction to the Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Developing the LB-ELA Corridor Vision & Goals Identifying Community Needs and the Regional Context Analyzing Corridor Conditions and Identifying Disparities Developing a Corridor Vision and Goals Equity Planning and Evaluating Tool Chekpoint Developing the Multimodal Strategies for the LB-ELA Corridor Identifying Multimodal Strategies to meet Corridor Vision and Goals Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Checkpoint Identifying the Priority Projects & Programs Identifying Projects and Programs responsived to the Multimodal Strategies Assessment of Benets and Potential Negative Impacts of Proposed Projects and Programs Creating the LB-ELA Corridor Program Preliminary Scope, Schedule, and Costs for Projects and Programs Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Checkpoint Development of Criteria for Prioritizing Projects Prioritizion of Projects and Programs Finalize Scope of LB-ELA Task Force Project and Program Developing the Implementation of the LB-ELA Corridor Program Develop overview of local, state, federal and private funding opportunities Create cashow considerations for priority projects Create overview of legislative/policy opportunities for and challenges to implementing Program Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Checkpoint Create advocacy program in support of implementing Program Finalize Investment, Legislative and Advocacy Strategy Board Presentation Preview Presentation to Metro Board Follow up Task Force Meetings to support implementation of LB-ELA Task Force Program Metro Board will consider and make the nal decision on the LB-ELA Investment Plan Consensus Checkpoint Consensus Checkpoint Consensus Checkpoint Consensus Checkpoint Consensus Checkpoint Consensus Checkpoint Presentation of LB-ELA Corridor Program and Implementation Follow-through 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 72 of 305 2-23 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 2.7 Public Engagement Process, Including CBO Partnering Central to the success of the Task Force’s work is a commitment to community outreach and public engagement. Involving the public in decision-making processes ensures more informed and inclusive outcomes. Throughout the Task Force process, the public has been integral, receiving project information and providing feedback through various avenues such as attending public meetings, providing comments, contributing to surveys, and engaging in community meetings, and events, and via partnerships with various local community-based, faith-based and community-development based organizations. Between December 2021 and January 2022, the project team actively sought public engagement to gather recommendations regarding the formation of the Community Leadership and Coordinating Committees. Through this outreach effort, the project team also sought input on strategies for recruiting Community Leadership Community Members and solicited feedback on the decision-making process. The project team implemented its initial Community-Based Organization (CBO) Partnering Strategy with 17 CBOs from the LB-ELA Corridor following the best practices outlined in Metro’s CBO Partnering Strategy. The project team worked with the CBOs that serve the communities along the Corridor during the Multimodal, Strategies, Projects and Programs (MSPP) phase. The project team’s goal was to engage these communities by gathering input from CBOs and the people they serve to identify multimodal strategies, projects, and programs that constitute needs and priorities for these impacted communities. From September to November 2022, CBOs helped gather one‐on‐one input from stakeholders and residents in their networks through a survey and interactive mapping tool at CBO-hosted community workshops, virtual meetings, and event pop‐ups. Twenty-one community workshops were conducted along the Corridor to gather input from community members, the public, and other local stakeholders. Some of the workshops were coordinated directly with CBOs and local government agencies. As part of an equitable approach, the project team offered multilingual support at all community workshops and meetings by providing interpretation services and drafting collateral material in Spanish, Tagalog, and Khmer (languages determined based on community profile data derived from the U.S. Census ACS data). The workshops included a presentation of the project, followed by an activity that leveraged the Social Pinpoint survey and mapping tool. Most of the community workshops (76%) were conducted in person, while 24% were conducted virtually. The in‐person workshops included staff support to complete the digital survey, particularly for events with seniors and communities with a “digital divide”. Paper copies were also provided to make the survey more accessible. The virtual workshops included staff support to gather comments that were later entered into the survey and interactive mapping tool. With the support from local CBOs, the public outreach team also hosted 18 events along the Corridor, including pop-up events to support notification and engagement efforts to gather input from different communities. During this phase of the efforts, $69,820 in stipends were paid directly to CBOs as part of this Task Force effort. The survey and interactive mapping tool were originally open from August 2, 2022, through September 8, 2022, with two extensions—to October 15, 2022, and once more to November 14, 2022—to accommodate more time for public feedback from community members. These extensions were supported by the engagement efforts that continued through early November. The extensions also allowed the Task Force and CLC members to provide additional input using the Social Pinpoint online survey. The public completed 1,920 surveys and 985 mapping comments during this phase. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 73 of 305 2-24 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan SELA Collaborative The Southeast Los Angeles (SELA) Collaborative is a network of organizations working together to strengthen the capacity of the nonprofit sector and increase civic engagement in Southeast LA. SELA’s mission is to strengthen the SELA communities, build collective power, and encourage innovation to drive regional systemic change. SELA creates awareness and opportunities for the public and communities affected along the I-710 Corridor to participate. The Coalition for Environmental Health and Justice The Coalition for Environmental Health and Justice (CEHAJ) is a coalition of organizations, associations, and community groups working to achieve environmental justice, improving air quality, community health, and overall quality of life for residents living in the I-710 corridor in Southern California. CEHAJ is committed to ensuring the right of community residents to be part of the decision-making process as it relates to proposed expansion projects for the I-710 freeway. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 74 of 305 2-25 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan • Avance Latino • Black Women Rally for Action • Cal State University, Los Angeles/Pat Brown Institute • Calvary Chapel Compton • Cambodian-Scholar Long Beach • Center for International Trade and Transportation (CITT) • COFEM (SELA Collaborative) • Communities for Better Environment (CBE) • Compton Advocates Coalition • Eastmont Community Center • East LA College (ELA) • East LA College (South Gate) • FoodCycle • Good Faith Missionary Baptist Church • Hoops 4 Justice • La Comadre (Somos Sureste) • Long Beach Gray Panthers • MAOF – Downey • MAOF – HQ Montebello • Mujeres Unidas Sirviendo Activamente • National Council of Negro Women (Long Beach Section) • Northwest Downey Little League • Para Los Niños • Promesa Boyle Heights/ Proyecto Pastoral • Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center/ Foundation • Regional Hispanic Institute • Streets Are for Everyone (SAFE) • Salvation Army Red Shield • South Gate Junior Athletics Association • Southeast Los Angeles Collaborative (SELA Collaborative) • Tower of Faith Evangelic Church • Unearth and Empower Communities • YMCA – Montebello/ Commerce • YMCA – Southeast Rio Vista (Maywood) • YMCA – Weingart East LA The overall outreach efforts continued during this phase and generated public awareness and encouraged community input on the draft LB- ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan. A summary of these engagement activities, included: • Community meetings; • Virtual meetings; • Meetings with cities, city officials, and their staff; and • Informational booths at community events and pop-up events. A wide variety of communication tools were also employed to ensure that key project updates and opportunities to elicit feedback were shared broadly throughout the Corridor, including: • Social Media posts; • E-blast messages; • Project hotline; • Project Emails; • Project newsletters; • Project fact sheets; • Meeting flyers; and • Corridor-wide mail distribution. An equitable approach was employed to ensure that all jurisdictions with Equity Focus Communities had at least one activity. In addition to the 15 CBO partners engaged in the first phase of outreach to generate community input and awareness, the project team partnered with an additional 20 local CBOs to amplify outreach efforts across the Corridor during the release of the Investment Plan, culminating in 35 CBOs that have actively participated in engagement activities for this project. Over both rounds of engagement, $128,000 in stipends were paid to CBOs for their partnership, averaging to about $3,600 per CBO. The 35 CBO partners engaged throughout this process are: 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 75 of 305 2-26 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The levels of involvement for the CBOs included notification activities such as posting on their social media, e-blasts, newsletters, and public calendar on their website. Additional notification campaigns included text messages, phone banking, and placement of banners and lawn signs near meeting locations to draw in passersby. Engagement activities included hosting a location to convene and watch virtual community meetings; providing time on their agendas at their regularly scheduled meetings for the project team to provide project updates; providing staff to assist at informational booths, pop-up events, and transit intercepts; and providing staff to canvass neighborhoods or events with flyers (Figure 2-8). Including these key CBOs in the Investment Plan process proved to be an effective approach to reaching stakeholders who might not otherwise have participated in the important corridor- wide process for future investment in mobility projects, programs, and strategies. Metro released the Draft Long Beach to East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) on January 31, 2024, including a 30-day review period for additional feedback and input. On February 28, 2024, Metro extended the review period for an additional 30 days to allow stakeholders and community members more time to review the document and for Metro to host supplemental community meetings. The comment period ended on April 1, 2024. To enhance community awareness and involvement, Metro led a community engagement program that targeted all communities along the Long Beach to East Los Angeles corridor. Metro successfully onboarded 28 Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) as part of its CBO Partnership Program. This collaborative initiative aimed to leverage the extensive networks and local insights of these organizations to effectively disseminate information regarding the project. The partnership facilitated a comprehensive series of notification and engagement activities designed to reach a broad audience. Notification efforts encompassed the distribution of flyers and posters, door-to-door notices, the sending of e-blasts/e-newsletters, placement of banners and lawn signs, creation of notification toolkits, as well as phone banking and SMS text campaigns. Furthermore, social media posts, website updates, and local announcements served to amplify the message. Figure 2-8. Geographic Coverage of Community Engagement Activities 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 76 of 305 2-27 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan On the engagement front, the initiative featured: • Event information booths/pop-up outreach booths at key locations along the corridor (15). • Transit-intercepts at heavily used bus stops and rail stations within the corridor (10). • CBO co-hosted live streaming meeting locations (7) -Monterey Park, Maywood, Downey, Long Beach, South Gate, Bell19 • Direct outreach to businesses and schools. These efforts not only ensured widespread dissemination of project- related information but also fostered an inclusive environment where community members could engage, inquire, and provide feedback on the project, strengthening the bond between Metro and the communities it serves. Additionally, the project team conducted a series of meetings along the corridor. These meetings aimed to engage community members and stakeholders to provide them with information about the Investment Plan and the projects included and solicit feedback. Over 4,000 community members across the corridor were engaged during this phase.. The project team collected feedback through various meeting modalities and question/comment collection avenues. These included: • In-person Community Meetings (5) -Commerce, Lynwood, Long Beach, Compton, Paramount • Virtual Meetings (5) • Community Leadership Committee Meetings (2) • Small Group Meeting (1) • Task Force Meeting (1) 19 One location had two meetings • CBO-Led Meetings/Events (3) • Project Dashboard and Email • Project Hotline Feedback collected throughout all the meetings mainly came from community members, Community Leadership Committee (CLC) members, Task Force members, and freight industry representatives. From January 31, 2024 through April 1, 2024, the project team received 354 questions and comments. General themes of the comments and questions submitted by community members and stakeholders included: Freeway and Roadway Infrastructure: Concerns about the impact of the 710 freeway on local communities, specifically concerns about freeway widening, truck traffic, pedestrian safety, congestion, and the Alameda Corridor. None of the proposed projects will lead to displacement or involve widening the freeway. Other concerns will be noted as projects continue being developed through their planning stages. Public Transit Enhancements: Interest in additional public transit options, requests for improvements to existing bus stop infrastructure, and requests for increased bus service frequency. Community Involvement and Transparency: Interest in seeing more community involvement in meetings. Questions about specific project details, methods of keeping the community informed, and the process of community participation. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 77 of 305 2-28 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Funding and Allocation: The feedback received in this category included diverse perspectives on funding allocation, including the balance between investments in freeway projects and green initiatives. Additionally, the feedback emphasized the importance of financial transparency throughout the project. Safety and Security: There were some concerns about public transportation safety issues related to Metro’s enforcement of its Code of Conduct and the general cleanliness of transit vehicles. Health and Environmental Impact: Feedback highlighted issues relating to air quality and health impacts and expressed interest in zero-emission initiatives and Vision Zero efforts for traffic safety. Active Transportation and Green Spaces: Feedback supported additional bike lanes, pedestrian pathways, green buffers, and general improvements to active transportation infrastructure. Equity and Social Issues: Some comments focused on equity initiatives, hiring practices, job opportunities created by the project, and ensuring that improvements benefit all population segments. Project Implementation and Management: Feedback requested clarity over the management of community programs, project timelines, funding kick-offs, and maintenance of completed projects. Specific Projects and Areas of Focus: Some responses highlighted a desire for enhanced links along the corridor, particularly advocating for a pathway joining Bristow Park with Bandini Park, the installation of facilities for electric vehicles, and a call for the creation of additional green spaces as well as programs that prioritize local employment opportunities. Technological and Future Planning: Responses indicated an interest in the comparative evaluation of technological choices, like hydrogen and electric, for transport solutions and forward-thinking strategies for initiatives like congestion pricing and the shift to electrified freight rail systems. Incorporating Youth Perspectives and Inclusivity: Some feedback encouraged the future inclusion of youth perspectives in the planning process. There were some questions regarding the interpretation of equity and the identified community requirements and preferences in relation to the corridor. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process . . Item 20 Page 78 of 305 3-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 18 Agenda Item #2 - I-710 South Corridor Existing Conditions, https://www .dropbox .com/sh/ qwjnsyur2i0o4q9/AACsAVh4IuY6TWiyJoqeFwkEa/710%20Task%20Force%20Meetings/ Task%20Force%20Meeting%20%234%201 .10 .22?dl=0&preview=Agenda+Item+%232+-+I- 710+South+Corridor+Existing+Conditions .mov&subfolder_nav_tracking=1 19 Equity Working Group Meeting #4 Presentation- 6-30-22, https://www .dropbox .com/sh/ qwjnsyur2i0o4q9/AAArfPe9GGGZqstTfxgvxz3ha/Working%20Groups/Equity/Meeting%20 %234-%206-30-22?dl=0&preview=Equity+Working+Group+Meeting+%234+Presentation-+6-30-22 . pdf&subfolder_nav_tracking=1 This chapter presents existing characteristics, conditions, issues, and disparities in the Long Beach–East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor. First, this chapter defines the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area and provides an overview of who lives there through socioeconomic and demographic information. Next, the chapter highlights key community impacts related to the environment, health, safety, and access facing Corridor residents continuously elevated by community voices. Lastly, the chapter provides a more detailed set of data on existing conditions relating to the Corridor’s land uses and multimodal transportation system, including infrastructure conditions and travel characteristics. The project team presented an initial existing conditions video18 to the Task Force, Community Leadership Committee (CLC), and Working Groups in January 2022, inviting discussion of the data and input on additional metrics that should be added to the analysis, specifically from an equity perspective. The project team subsequently produced an equitable project planning existing conditions presentation19 in June 2022, which incorporated new metrics based on community and Task Force input, and applied Metro’s Equity Focus Communities (EFC) as an overlay to identify patterns and disparities in conditions for EFC and non-EFC areas within the Corridor. This chapter compiles the findings from both sets of existing conditions, which were critical to developing the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles; Multimodal Strategies, Projects and Programs List; Evaluation and Prioritization Criteria; and Funding Recommendations. Photo courtesy of Caltrans District 7 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 79 of 305 3-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan THE LB-ELA CORRIDOR AT A GLANCE 12% of LA County VMT 50% of the daily VMT in the Study Area is generated on freeways. . MILLION Residents are living in the Study Area , of the population in LA County 11% of the jobs in LA County, including over THOUSAND jobs related to goods movement Most of the Study Area contains census tracts with over Daily vehicle trips range from THOUSAND+ trips per day on I-710,In 2019, there were over 111,000 total Metro bus and rail boardings and almost 50,000 Long Beach Transit boardings on a daily basis in the Study Area From 2017 to 2019, 11% of all collisions in LA County occurred in the Study Area, 13% of LA County collisions involving trucks and 29% of collisions involving bicyclists and pedestrians occurred in the Study Area. Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) rates are % HIGHER in the Study Area than the County average % of that cargo moves by RAIL or TRUCK through the Study Area About 30% of national cargo, valued at roughly $500 BILLION, is handled at the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, and An estimated . MILLION vehicle hours of delay occurred in 2016, in the Study Area, including the mainline segments, on-ramps, and off -ramps. This number is projected to increase by about 18 PERCENT by 2045. of the residents in the Study Area reside within a half mile of the LA River (LARIO) Bike Path. The Study Area vehicle miles traveled (VMT) VMT is over MILLION miles per day – % jobs are located in the Study Area 12% %of residents identifying as Latino and Black. including THOUSAND truck trips. % HIGHER in the Study Area, respectively, than the LA County average. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 80 of 305 3-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.1 LB-ELA Corridor Study Area As shown in Figure 3-1 and Figure 3-2, the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area (referred to throughout this chapter as “the Study Area” or “the Corridor”) includes the 19-mile extent of Interstate 710 (I- 710) from State Route (SR) 60 in East Los Angeles to its southern terminus in Long Beach, plus key parallel and intersecting arterial roadways, and all or part of eighteen cities and some portions of unincorporated Los Angeles County surrounding I-710. The Study Area’s western boundary includes portions of Alameda Street, Central Avenue, Wilmington Avenue, and Interstate 110 (I-110). The Study Area’s eastern boundary includes segments of Garfield Avenue, Interstate 5 (I-5), Lakewood Boulevard, and Cherry Avenue. The Task Force adopted the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area boundaries in early 2022. The Study Area breadth allows for it to contain major arterial roadway and freight rail infrastructure that complements the movement of people and goods along I-710. Figure 3-1. LB-ELA Corridor Study Area (LA County Context) Figure 3-2. LB-ELA Corridor Study Area Source: LA Metro, Caltrans, Los Angeles Times 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 81 of 305 3-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2 Population Characteristics 20 equity-focus-communities-overview, https://www .dropbox .com/s/ew25aelmuvwqizv/ equity-focus-communities-overview .pdf?dl=0 Approximately 1.2 million residents (12% of LA County’s population) live within the LB-ELA Corridor. The following sections provide an overview of Metro’s Equity Focus Communities (EFC) designation, which applies to a substantial portion of the Study Area, followed by detailed socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the Study Area’s population. 3.2.1 Equity Focus Communities Overview Metro defines EFCs20 as census tracts with greater transportation needs by considering the concentration of three criteria associated with mobility barriers: low-income households earning less than $60,000 per year, residents who are Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC), and households with no access to a car. The Metro Equity Need Index (MENI) ranks all census tracts in LA County by level of need in terms of equitable access to opportunity and places census tracts into quintiles, with the top 40% (High Need and Very High Need categories) categorized as EFCs. People in these census tracts face more mobility barriers than people in non-EFC census tracts. About 842,650 residents (73% of the LB-ELA Corridor population) live in an EFC area. Figure 3-3 shows the prevalence of EFCs throughout the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area. Areas with low populations are excluded from the MENI and EFC analysis, such as the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles, Long Beach Airport, intermodal rail yards in Vernon, and other heavily industrialized areas. 3.2.2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics On their surface, socioeconomic characteristics such as unemployment rates, educational attainment, and housing cost burden may seem disconnected from transportation planning; however, major infrastructure investments can have a substantial impact on employment and educational opportunities through the introduction of new jobs to pay for higher education, and increased access to educational institutions and job Figure 3-3. LA Metro Equity Focus Communities Source: LA Metro centers. New investments can also potentially impact housing stability and economic displacement pressure. For these reasons, it is important to understand the Corridor’s existing conditions and disparities to plan for investment equitably. Some selected metrics are illustrated in charts with disparities summarized as ratios to compare the value for the County to the Corridor and the value for Corridor EFCs to Corridor non-EFCs. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 82 of 305 3-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics The Study Area’s median household income of $56,005 is 26% lower than the County’s median of $75,887. Compared to the County, the Study Area contains a higher proportion of households earning less than $100,000 annually. The “Median Household Income” map in Figure 3-4 shows that the communities west of I-710 tend to have lower household income, and the northern portion of the Study Area has the lowest household income overall. The “Poverty Level” map in Figure 3-5 shows that there are concentrations of residents below the poverty level throughout the Study Area, including Long Beach, Wilmington, Lynwood, and much of the northern part of the Study Area. Overall, the Study Area has a poverty rate of 18.3% compared to the County’s poverty rate of 15%. The Poverty Level is defined by the Census Bureau, which uses a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is in poverty. If a family’s income is below that threshold, that family and all its members are considered to be in poverty. The “Age 65 and Over” map in Figure 3-6 shows that areas with the most individuals older than 65 include Lakewood, Downey, and portions of Long Beach. Generally, communities to the west of I-710 tend to have a younger population than those to the east. As shown in Figure 3-9, the Study Area also has a higher proportion of residents under 10 years old than LA County as a whole. The “Percentage of Individuals with a Disability” map in Figure 3-7 shows varied disability rates throughout the Study Area. The Study Area contains a greater proportion of individuals with a disability than LA County as a whole. Overall, the Study Area has a disability rate of 8.5%, compared to the County’s disability rate of 6%. The “Auto Ownership” map in Figure 3-8 shows the highest Zero Vehicle Households (ZVH) rates located in census tracts of Long Beach, East Los Angeles, Huntington Park, South Gate, Lynwood, and Compton. Overall, the Study Area has an average ZVH rate of 3.8%, compared to the County’s ZVH rate of 2.9%. Census data demonstrate existing disparities in outcomes among demographic groups in the Corridor, such as the average per capita income of $33,870 for non-Hispanic white residents compared to $18,297 for Hispanic or Latino residents.21 Due to the size of the study area and wide range of relevant data sets, it was not possible to disaggregate all data related to environmental conditions, infrastructure, or services by race/ethnicity or income levels. However, Metro’s EFCs were applied as an overlay and geoprocessing filter to document disparities for areas with the highest concentrations of low-income households, BIPOC residents, and share of households with no access to a vehicle. 21 Data from the U .S . Census, Findings by race: NH White ($33,870), Asian ($29,904), Black/African American ($25,120), Other ($18,540), Latino/Hispanic ($18,297) . The Study Area’s median household income of $56,005 is 26% lower than the County’s median of $75,887. The “Poverty Level” map in Figure 3-5 shows that there are concentrations of residents below the poverty level throughout the Study Area, including Long Beach, Wilmington, Lynwood, and much of the northern part of the Study Area. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 83 of 305 3-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2.2.2 # Figure 3-4. Median Household Income Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey Figure 3-6. Age 65 and OverFigure 3-5. Poverty Level 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 84 of 305 3-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2.2.3 # Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey Figure 3-7. Percentage of Individuals with Disability Figure 3-8. Auto Ownership 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 85 of 305 3-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2.2.4 # Source: LA Metro, 2015-2019 American Community Survey Figure 3-9. Youth and Senior Age Groups Comparison 3.2.2.2 Race and Ethnicity Figures 3-10, 3-11, 3-12 and 3-13 show the breakdown of population by Race and Ethnicity in the Study Area. These maps use data and categories from the United States Census Bureau, so it is important to acknowledge that these categories do not capture the full range of identities represented in the Study Area, or the preferred terminology with which some communities and individuals identify. Residents who identify as Hispanic or Latino are the most prevalent population within the Study Area (77% of the Corridor population). Wilmington, Downtown Long Beach, and areas generally north of SR 91 include a higher density of residents who identify as Hispanic or Latino. Residents who identify as Asian are the least prevalent in the Study Area, with the highest concentrations of Asian residents located south of SR 91 and within West Long Beach. Residents who identify as White are generally concentrated in areas of Lakewood, Long Beach, and the northern portion of the Study Area near downtown Los Angeles. Residents who identify as Black or African American are generally concentrated south of Interstate 105 (I-105), specifically around areas of Compton and Lynwood. As indicated in Figure 3-14, the Study Area has a much higher percentage of Hispanic or Latino residents, and a lower percentage of white and Asian residents, than LA County as a whole. Most neighborhoods within the Study Area contain more than 80% of residents who identify with a race other than White. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 86 of 305 3-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan # Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey Figure 3-10. Black or African American Alone, non-Hispanic Figure 3-11. Asian Alone, non-Hispanic Figure 3-12. Hispanic or Latino Figure 3-13. White Alone, non-Hispanic 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 87 of 305 3-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-14. Race and Ethnicity Comparison Source: LA Metro, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 88 of 305 3-11 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2.2.3 Population and Employment Densities As shown in Figure 3-15 and 3-16, the northern portion of the Study Area and downtown Long Beach have the highest population densities, with scattered high-density areas in locations such as Lynwood, Paramount, North Long Beach, and Wilmington. About 11% of jobs in Los Angeles County (0.5 million) are within those boundaries. In terms of employment density, pockets of higher employment density areas include downtown Long Beach, East Los Angeles, City of Commerce, Carson/ Dominguez Hills, west of I-710 between SR 91 and Interstate 405 (I-405), and the Long Beach Airport vicinity. 3.2.2.4 Occupation The Corridor’s manufacturing history and proximity to the ports have created a largely industrial and commercial economy, with nearly twice the share of industrial jobs in the Corridor (29%) as in the County as a whole (16%), and a lower share of service and professional jobs. Likewise, the study area has more industrial and residential land uses than the County as a whole, with proximity between residential and industrial land uses contributing to pollution impacts and associated health risks. Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey, 2019 Longitudinal Employer-Housing Dynamics (LEHD) Figure 3-15. Population Density Figure 3-16. Employment Density Figure 3-17 through Figure 3-20 show the distribution of different job categories in the Study Area. The job categories are based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and include “Commercial,” 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 89 of 305 3-12 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan # Source: 2019 Longitudinal Employer-Housing Dynamics (LEHD) Figure 3-17. Commercial Jobs Figure 3-18. Industrial Jobs Figure 3-19. Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Figure 3-20. Other Services Jobs 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 90 of 305 3-13 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan “Industrial,” “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,” and “Other Services.”22 “Commercial Jobs” includes wholesale trade, retail trade, arts, entertainment and recreations, and accommodation and food service. “Industrial Jobs” include construction, manufacturing, transportation and warehousing, and utilities. “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services” includes finance and insurance, real estate, educational services, and health care and social assistance jobs. “Other Services” includes repairs, religious activities, grantmaking, advocacy, laundry, personal care, death care, and other personal services. The job distribution by industry is fairly even for the top two job categories. “Other Services” jobs have the highest percentage, at 30.2%, and “Industrial” jobs are 29.2% of the total jobs in the Study Area; “Professional Services” have 21.9%; and the remaining 18.7% are “Commercial” jobs. “Commercial” and “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services” jobs are scattered throughout the Study Area, with larger clusters to the north close to downtown Los Angeles. “Industrial” jobs are clustered near the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Long Beach (collectively, the Ports) and areas directly adjacent to the LB-ELA Corridor such as Wilmington, Carson, South Gate, and Vernon. High concentrations of the “Other Services” jobs that make up the greatest number of jobs overall, can be found in most parts of the Study Area other than the industrial areas. The Study Area has more “Industrial” and “Commercial” jobs and fewer “Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services” jobs than the county averages. 3.2.2.5 Unemployment Rate Despite its importance to the regional economy, the Corridor has a slightly higher average percentage of the workforce who are unemployed (7.8%) than LA County (6.1%), with a majority of the Corridor’s highest unemployment rates (as high as 42%) associated with EFCs.23 As shown in Figure 3-21, high unemployment rates appear to reflect areas with lower 22 North American Industry Classification System, 2022, https://www .census .gov/naics/ reference_files_tools/2022_NAICS_Manual .pdf 23 East Los Angeles, Commerce, Compton, East Compton, Long Beach, Wilmington, and San Pedro . educational attainment rates, such as Compton, Lynwood, Huntington Park, and East LA. In Figure 3-22, the ACS data indicates that people in the Corridor and EFCs experience moderate disparities in unemployment rates in comparison to the County and non-EFCs, respectively. The discrepancy between the Corridor’s regional economic significance and its local employment outcomes is a primary concern raised by Corridor communities. Figure 3-23 displays the distribution of residents with no high school degree or higher level of education. Metro is committed to ensuring that Corridor residents are well-positioned to benefit from economic opportunities generated by the projects and programs within the Investment Plan. The Investment Plan has significant potential to create, expand, and increase access to employment opportunities for Corridor residents by catalyzing new infrastructure projects that provide high- quality jobs through construction and operation, improve travel options to connect residents to job centers, schools, and vocational institutions, and supporting policies and community programs that promote local economic and workforce development. Figure 3-21. Unemployment Rates Comparison Source: LA Metro, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 91 of 305 3-14 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan X Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey Figure 3-22. Unemployment Rate Figure 3-23. Individuals with No High School Degree or Above 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 92 of 305 3-15 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.2.2.6 Housing Burden Indicators Housing burden for renters is defined as the percentage of renters within a census block group who spend more than 30% of their household income on rent each month. As shown in the map of Cost Burdened Renters in Figure 3-24, the Study Area has a relatively low rate of cost burdened renters. In certain areas, such as Downtown and Central Long Beach, the higher rates of cost burdened renters reflect the high cost of living and competitive rental markets in urbanized locations with high renter populations. In the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area, we can also see high renter burdens in commercial activity centers with greater constraints on rental housing stock. It is important to note that high renter cost burden rates in predominantly industrial areas likely reflect very small populations within those large census block areas. Housing burden for homeowners is defined similarly to that for renters but using mortgage payments instead of rent. As shown in the map of Cost Burdened Homeowners in Figure 3-25, a much higher share of Corridor homeowners are cost burdened compared to renters. High rates of cost burdened homeowners are distributed fairly evenly throughout the Study Area, but generally appear in low-density residential areas. Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey Figure 3-24. Cost Burdened Renters Figure 3-25. Cost Burdened Homeowners 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 93 of 305 3-16 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The Housing Burden Comparison chart in Figure 3-26 indicates a notable disparity in the share of Housing Burdened Low-income Households in EFCs (27%) compared to non-EFCs in the Corridor (19%).24 Figure 3-26. Housing Burden Comparison Source: LA Metro, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 24 Data from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year estimates 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 94 of 305 3-17 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.3 Community Impacts 25 Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD . Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution . JAMA . 2002;287(9):1132–41 . This section highlights key data points related to the Corridor’s equity issues identified and elevated in previous planning efforts and various stages of community input. These issues, referred to in this section as Community Impacts, relate to air quality and other environmental conditions, health outcomes, safety outcomes, and access to resources. Where County comparisons and EFC overlays are applied (to select metrics), a consistent pattern of disparity is revealed, with the LB-ELA Corridor generally facing greater burdens than the rest of the County, and EFCs facing greater burdens than the non-EFC areas within the Corridor. 3.3.1 Air Quality and Environmental Conditions 3.3.1.1 Particulate Matter Particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) and diesel particulate matter (DPM) are used as indicators to map out the air quality in the Study Area. PM2.5 are small particulates that are less than 2.5 microns in diameter. Breathing in particle pollution can be harmful to health. Several studies have evaluated the relationship between PM2.5 and the ensuing risk of lung cancer occurrence and fatality. Their findings have indicated that PM2.5 may be a risk factor for lung cancer. A study based on prospective cohort data gathered by the American Cancer Society25 declared that prolonged exposure to PM2.5 significantly affected survival, with each increase of 10 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) being associated with an approximately 8% increase in the risk of death from lung cancer. The level of PM2.5 is measured in μg/m3. Levels above 12 μg/m3 exceed the federal standard for PM2.5. Figure 3-27 shows that the highest concentrations of PM2.5 occur in the middle and northern portions of the Study Area. DPM comes from exhaust from trucks, buses, trains, ships, and other equipment with diesel engines. The DPM map in (Figure 3-28) displays tons of DPM emitted per year by mobile and stationary sources in the nearby populated parts of each census tract. DPM concentrations occur throughout the Study Area, including around the Ports, south Long Beach, near the I-710/SR 91 interchange, along I-710, and in the northern portion of the Study Area. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 95 of 305 3-18 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan # Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Figure 3-27. Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM 2.5)Figure 3-28. Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 96 of 305 3-19 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-29 shows slight PM2.5 disparities facing the Corridor and Corridor EFCs but suggests that major variations in PM2.5 generally occur at a larger, regional scale. Figure 3-30 shows that DPM pollution is a critical air quality disparity impacting the Corridor and Corridor EFCs. Figure 3-29. Particulate Matter 2.5 Comparison Source: LA Metro, CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Figure 3-30. Diesel Particulate Matter Comparison Source: LA Metro, CalEnviroScreen 4.0 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 97 of 305 3-20 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.3.1.2 Environmental Indicators Analysis of other environmental indicators is shown in Figures 3-32 through 3-37, including “Percentage of Population Covered by Tree Canopy,” “Urban Heat Island Effect (UHIE),” and “Ground Toxic Cleanup Sites” throughout the Study Area. “Tree canopy” refers to the layer of tree leaves, branches, and stems that provide tree coverage of the ground when viewed from above. A robust tree canopy can help reduce temperatures and air pollution, provide shade, improve neighborhood aesthetics, enhance property values, and attract residents/ businesses. The map shows the population-weighted percentage of the census tract area with tree canopy (the percentage of land covered by tree canopy, weighted by people per acre). The LB-ELA Corridor has many areas that lack tree canopy. Areas with less than 3% of the population covered by tree canopy are scattered throughout, including Commerce, Vernon, and portions of Compton, Paramount, and Long Beach. Areas with a higher percentage of the population covered by tree canopy (7 to 10%) are also scattered throughout, including neighborhoods in and around Lakewood, South Gate, and Long Beach. As shown in Figure 3-31 and Figure 3-32, the Corridor and EFCs face disparities in tree canopy coverage. The average tree canopy in LA County is 5.5%, compared to 4.2% in the Corridor. In EFC areas within the study area, tree canopy is slightly lower at 4.1%, compared to non-EFCs at 4.6%.26 Figure 3-31. Tree Canopy Coverage Comparison Source: LA Metro, Healthy Places Index 3.0, CDPH/National Land Cover Database 26 CDPH/National Land Cover Database, accessed via the California Healthy Places Index Figure 3-32. Percentage of Population Covered by Tree Canopy Source: Healthy Places Index 3.0, CDPH/National Land Cover Database 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 98 of 305 3-21 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The northeastern section of our Study Area experiences the greatest heat increase from the UHIE. This condition reflects that the heat generated by urban heat islands in coastal areas tends to move inland, where mountains trap warmer air. On a more localized scale, a lack of tree canopy and vegetative ground cover can also contribute to the UHIE Heat islands are created by a combination of heat- absorptive surfaces, heat-generating activities, and the absence of vegetation, typically associated with highly urbanized areas. The index score measures the UHIE by calculating the difference in temperature for urban areas relative to rural areas. The UHIE increases health risks from both heat exposure and the enhanced formation of air pollutants, especially ozone. It also contributes to significant energy consumption due to additional air conditioning needs. Figure 3-33 shows that the northeastern section of our Study Area experiences the greatest heat increase from the UHIE. This condition reflects that the heat generated by urban heat islands in coastal areas tends to move inland, where mountains trap warmer air. On a more localized scale, a lack of tree canopy and vegetative ground cover can also contribute to the UHIE. Contaminated sites indicate degradation to the natural environment, pose health risks to surrounding communities, and contribute to an overall lack of land area available for community- serving land uses due to the presence of hazardous substances. Contaminated sites are aggregated into CalEnviroScreen’s “Cleanup Sites” indicator, which applies weighting to sites based on the nature and magnitude of threat and burden posed, and proximity to populated areas. The Cleanup Site database of points contains information on numerous types of cleanup sites, including Federal Superfund, State Response, Corrective Action, School Cleanup, Voluntary Cleanup, Tiered Permit, Evaluation, Historical, and Military Evaluation sites. Figure 3-34 shows that substantial concentrations of Cleanup Sites are located throughout the northern and western portions of the Study Area, within and surrounding the Ports, and in areas of Paramount, Long Beach, and Signal Hill. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 99 of 305 3-22 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Source: CalEPA Figure 3-33. Urban Heat Island Effect Source: EnviroStor Cleanup Sites Database Figure 3-34. Ground Toxic Cleanup Sites 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 100 of 305 3-23 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.3.2 Health Outcomes Communities within the LB-ELA Corridor face significant health disparities, which have been consistently elevated by Task Force, Working Group, CLC, and community members throughout the Task Force’s planning process, and are documented by health and environmental justice screening tools such as CalEnviroScreen, CA Healthy Places Index, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Environmental Justice Index Explorer, and a number of studies related to vehicular pollution and health outcomes surrounding I-710 and throughout the region.27,28,29,30 The analysis in this section highlights how key indicators impact communities throughout the Corridor and examines disparities facing Corridor and EFCs. 27 The Gateway Cities Air Quality Action Plan, November 2011, https://humanimpact .org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/HIA-I710-Air-Quality-Plan .pdf 28 Community Health in the I-710 Corridor, September 2019, https://la .myneighborhooddata .org/2019/09/community-health-in-the-710-corridor/ 29 Race, Class, and the Production of and Exposure to Vehicular Pollution in Los Angeles, July 2021, https://www .metrans .org/assets/research/psr-20-19_boeing_final-report_v2 .pdf 30 Improving Environmental Justice and Mobility in Southeast Los Angeles Executive Summary, August 2021, https://www .metrans .org/assets/research/psr-18-sp91_giuliano_final-report .pdf 3.3.2.1 Health Indicators “Asthma Rate” can be measured by estimating the number of emergency department visits for asthma per 10,000 people. Figure 3-35 shows that high rates of asthma incidents can be found throughout the Study Area, particularly south of I-105, and in Vernon and East LA to the north. Figure 3-36 shows that a substantial disparity exists in asthma hospitalization rates when comparing the Corridor with LA County. Figure 3-35. Asthma Comparison Source: LA Metro, CalEnviroScreen 4.0 “Cancer Risk” is expressed as the number of extra cancer cases occurring over a 70-year lifetime per 1 million people exposed to toxic air contaminants. Figure 3-37 shows the highest Cancer risk in the POLB and Downtown Long Beach areas and the lowest risk in the central-eastern portion of the Study Area. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 101 of 305 3-24 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Source: Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study V Figure 3-36. Asthma Rate Figure 3-37. Cancer Risk 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 102 of 305 3-25 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.3.3 Safety 3.3.3.1 Bike and Pedestrian Crashes The “Bicycle or Pedestrian Crashes Location and Severity” map in Figure 3-38 shows that downtown Long Beach has a high concentration of bicyclist or pedestrian-involved crashes. Other areas with concentrations of bicycle and pedestrian crashes include parts of Lakewood/North Long Beach, Carson, Compton, East Los Angeles, Wilmington, and the northwestern portion of the Study Area. The “Bicycle or Pedestrian Crashes Fatality and Serious Injury” map in Figure 3-39 shows the locations of only serious injuries and fatalities in the Study Area. Similar to total bicycle and pedestrian crashes, higher concentrations of crashes with a fatality or serious injury occur in downtown Long Beach, Carson, Compton, Lakewood, the northwest part of the Study Area, and East Los Angeles. Concentrations of bicycle and pedestrian crashes are predominantly located in EFCs in the Study Area, highlighting the importance of safe active transportation infrastructure as a key equity issue for Corridor communities. Concentrations of bicycle and pedestrian crashes are predominantly located in EFCs in the Study Area, highlighting the importance of safe active transportation infrastructure as a key equity issue for Corridor communities. Photo courtesy of Caltrans District 7 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 103 of 305 3-26 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Source: Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), 2017-2019 Figure 3-38. Bicycle or Pedestrian Crashes Location and Severity Figure 3-39. Bicycle or Pedestrian Crashes Fatality and Serious Injury 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 104 of 305 3-27 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.3.3.2 Truck Crashes Figure 3-40 shows the location and severity of the truck crashes. Truck crashes predominantly occur along truck routes—including all freeway and arterial roadways that allow truck movements, such as Alameda Street and Pacific Coast Highway. Concentrations of truck crashes also occur in the areas with more industrial and warehousing land uses, such as the northern portion of the Study Area, the Ports, and the Rancho Dominguez area west of I-710 and south of SR-91 (Figure 3-41). Fatalities and serious injuries are small in volume, but they occur throughout the Study Area. The I-710 freeway has a high level of truck crashes. Hot spots include the northwestern portion of the Study Area and along several Countywide Strategic Truck Arterial Network (CSTAN) routes: Del Amo Boulevard, Anaheim Street, Pacific Coast Highway, Alameda Street, and Long Beach Boulevard. (Figure 3-42) 3.3.3.3 All Crashes Figure 3-43 and Figure 3-44 show the locations and severity of all crashes in the Study Area, including those on I-710. Looking at all crashes—including vehicle, bicyclist-involved, and pedestrian-involved crashes—the northern portion of the Study Area and downtown Long Beach have the highest concentration of crashes. Finally, along I-710 itself, more fatalities and serious injuries occur at the I-710/SR 91 interchange, near the Pacific Coast Highway, south of I-105, and at other isolated locations along I-710. These crash data indicated a critical need for safety improvements specifically at I-710 interchanges, which is reflected in the types of freeway improvement concepts that performed well in the evaluation of potential safety benefits. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 105 of 305 3-28 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan These crash data indicated a critical need for safety improvements specifically at I-710 interchanges. Figure 3-40. Truck Crash Location and Severity Figure 3-41. Truck Crashes Concentrations Source: Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), 2017-2019 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 106 of 305 3-29 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-42. Truck Crashes with CSTAN Source: Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), 2017-2019 Figure 3-43. All Crashes Figure 3-44. I-710 Crashes – Locations and Severity 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 107 of 305 3-30 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.3.4 Access to Resources Access to resources is measured by five indicators in this section: “Lack of Park Access,” “Lack of Supermarket Access,” “High-Quality Transit Area (HQTA),” “LA River Access,” and “Public School Access” (see Figure 3-45 through Figure 3-49). 3.3.4.1 Lack of Park Access Park access is defined as the percentage of the population living within walkable distance (½ mile) of a park, beach, or open space of 1 acre or more. Having parks nearby can encourage physical activity, reduce chronic diseases, improve mental health, and foster community connection. Areas with the lowest percentage of the population with park access include neighborhoods in and around Huntington Park, South Gate, Downey, Paramount, Compton, and Long Beach. Large portions of the remainder of the Study Areas have a higher percentage of the population with park access, including neighborhoods like Commerce, Compton, Lakewood, and Long Beach. 3.3.4.2 Lack of Supermarket Access Supermarket access is defined as the percentage of the population in urban areas who live less than ½ mile from a supermarket/large grocery store. Having access to a nearby supermarket can encourage better diet and eating behaviors; lower the costs of obtaining food; reduce chronic diseases; and lower the risk of food insecurity, which is the lack of consistent access to enough food for an active, healthy life. Areas with the lowest percentage of the population with supermarket access include the neighborhood of Commerce; portions of Long Beach and Paramount; and the neighborhoods directly south of Compton and SR 91, west of I-710. Some of these are industrial areas with no grocery stores and low population. Areas with a higher percentage of the population with grocery store access include neighborhoods like South Gate, Compton, Downey, Lakewood, and Long Beach. 3.3.4.3 High-Quality Transit Area (2045) High-Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs) are defined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as an area within ½ mile of a well- serviced transit stop or a transit corridor with a service frequency of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. SCAG’s 2045 HQTAs are based on the planned transit system according to the SCAG 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan. Frequently, convenient transit service is a key driver in creating viable nonmotorized transportation options for traveling to work, school, home, or other destinations, especially for those without a car who rely on the service as the primary mode of travel. Fortunately, transit access is not an area of disparity for the Corridor or EFCs. A substantial portion of the study area (78%) is located within an HQTA. An even higher proportion of study area EFCs are located in 2045 HQTAs (85%), but only 60% of LA County falls within a 2045 HQTA. 3.3.4.4 LA River Access The LA River is a regional amenity that provides walking paths, bicycle paths, access to river adjacent parks, and other activities. Specifically, the Study Area contains the LA River Bikeway, 29.1 miles of continuous bikeway between Vernon and Long Beach. The Lower LA River Revitalization Plan identifies proposed multi-use path enhancements, complete streets, river channel enhancements, and bridge crossing improvements. About 23% of residents in the LB-ELA Corridor reside within ½ mile of the LA River Bikeway. 3.3.4.5 School Access School access is defined as the distance less than ½ mile from a school. The industrial areas in the Study Area do not include school locations. Nearly all of residents in the Study Area reside within ½ mile of a public school. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 108 of 305 3-31 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-45. Lack of Park Access Source: LA County Park Needs Assessment Figure 3-46. Lack of Supermarket Access Figure 3-47. High-Quality Transit Areas (HQTA) (2045) Source: Healthy Places Index 3.0, USDA Food Access Research Atlas (2017) Source: Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 109 of 305 3-32 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-48. LA River Access Source: LA Metro Figure 3-49. Public School Access Source: California Department of Education 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 110 of 305 3-33 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.4 Land Use Characteristics The Study Area land uses are primarily industrial and residential, with less commercial and office uses, unlike much of LA County. In several locations residential and industrial uses are close to, or adjacent to one another, for example the Ports which is associated with larger pollution impacts and for those residents. Figure 3-50 shows the land uses of the Study Area and highlights the industrial concentrations. Figure 3-50. Land Use Map Source: SCAG 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 111 of 305 3-34 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5 Transportation Conditions 3.5.1 Goods Movement In the LB-ELA Corridor, I-710 serves as the principal transportation connection for goods movement between the Ports, both at the southern terminus of I-710 and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe/ Union Pacific rail yards in the cities of Commerce and Vernon, along with warehouses and freight trans-shipment facilities within and beyond the Corridor. 3.5.1.1 Goods Movement Infrastructure The CSTAN, as indicated in Figure 3-51 identifies the primary truck arterial network in LA County and prioritizes truck related improvements. CSTAN helps to create the inter-jurisdictional truck route system and supports the Federal Primary Freight Network. Figure 3-51. Countywide Strategic Truck Arterial Network Source: LA Metro 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 112 of 305 3-35 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.1.2 Goods Movement Travel Figure 3-52 maps the daily truck trips along I-710. Clearly, heavier truck volumes occur at the southern end of the Corridor, near the Ports, with nearly 40,000 daily heavy-duty truck trips. In addition, the goods movement activities can be segmented by the east-west freeways that intersect with I-710. The truck volumes and the truck percentage are extremely high south of SR 91 when compared with typical freeways. However, truck trips decrease substantially north of I-105. Most of the heavy-duty trucks south of I-405 are oriented toward Port activities. Figure 3-52. Daily Truck Trips Source: PorTAM These impacts include truck traffic diversion from the freeway to parallel arterials such as Atlantic Boulevard and Long Beach Boulevard. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 113 of 305 3-36 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.2 Travel to Work Mode Share This section discusses how people travel to work through the Study Area, reflecting the availability and quality of multimodal infrastructure and user preferences. Note that the analysis in this section uses 2019 data. Figure 3-53 shows that driving alone and carpooling are the predominant modes for people to get to work, indicating a strong dependency on the private automobile in the Study Area. The existing mode split means that I-710 carries high volumes of vehicles and suffers from the resulting congested conditions and traffic-related impacts. These impacts include truck traffic diversion from the freeway to parallel arterials such as Atlantic Boulevard and Long Beach Boulevard. These conditions affect the quality of life of those traveling through and living in the Corridor and region. Figure 3-53. Public School Access Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 114 of 305 3-37 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-54. displays the share of work trip travel each travel mode: work from home, transit, walk/bicycle, carpool, and drive alone. As indicated in Figure 3-54, the work trip mode share in the Study Area is similar to that of the County as a whole, with a higher percentage of carpooling and less work from home but double the use of transit. Figure 3-54. Mode Share Comparison Source: 2015-2019 American Community Survey Photo courtesy of Caltrans District 7 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 115 of 305 3-38 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.3 Active Transportation 3.5.3.1 Active Transportation Infrastructure Active transportation infrastructure is lacking throughout the Corridor, particularly throughout much of the northern Corridor cities. Much of the existing active transportation network suffers from fragmentation and maintenance issues, with few safe active transportation connections across I-710 and LA River.31 Figure 3-55 shows the active transportation deficiencies which include pedestrian and bicycle crossing gaps along I-710 and the bicycle lane network in the Study Area. A major north-south protected multiuse path for bicycles and pedestrians along the LA River provides continuous north-south access for active transportation travelers. However, there are many issues related to active transportation infrastructure, such as a lack of sidewalks, crosswalks, designated bicycle routes in much of the Study Area, a lack of designated bicycle lanes at many of I-710 and LA River east/west crossings, and difficulty in crossing both the freeway and the river due to the lack of bicycle lanes or missing/unpaved/ narrow sidewalks. As also shown in Figure 3-56, many of I-710 and LA River east/west crossings do not have designated bicycle lanes or other bicycle facilities. Some crossings have missing, unpaved, or narrow sidewalks, which creates gaps in the active transportation network. In addition to high volumes of private vehicles entering and exiting the freeway, these gaps make crossing the freeway and river safely difficult for bicyclists and pedestrians. 31 Bikeways Data from Southern California Association of Governments and LA County Figure 3-55. I-710 Active Transportation Crossing Gaps Source: SCAG, LA County Bikeways Data Figure 3-56. Bicycle Lane Network 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 116 of 305 3-39 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.4 Arterial Roadway 3.5.4.1 Study Area Arterial Roadway Network As shown in Figure 3-57, I-710 extends 19.2 miles in the Study Area. There are four freeway interchanges with east/west freeways, including I-5, I-105, SR 91, and I-405. No high- occupancy vehicle lanes nor truck lanes were constructed as part of I-710. In addition, many key arterials are paralleling I-710. Figure 3-58 also shows that I-710’s pavement condition is considered “Good,” as are most of the local streets in the Corridor. Generally, the roadway conditions of the streets in the southern portion of the Study Area are better than those in the north. Figure 3-57. Major Arterials Figure 3-58. Street Conditions 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 117 of 305 3-40 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.4.2 Study Area Bridges and Pavement As indicated in Table 3-1 below, the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area features higher percentages of bridges in poor and fair condition than LA County as a whole. Several bridges along I-710 are in “Poor” condition, as the map in Figure 3-59 indicates. Pavement condition is classified for local and arterial roads using four levels: “Poor,” “Fair,” and “Good.” As shown in Table 3-2 and Figures 3-59 and 3-60, no jurisdictions in the Study Area have their roads classified as “Poor”; however, more than half of the area is classified as “Fair.” Table 3-1. Bridge Condition Comparison Table 3-2. Pavement Condition Comparison The LB-ELA Corridor Study Area features higher percentages of bridges in poor and fair condition than LA County as a whole. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 118 of 305 3-41 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-59. Bridge Condition Figure 3-60. Pavement Condition 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 119 of 305 3-42 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.4.3 Arterial Roadway Travel Characteristics Figure 3-61, Figure 3-62, and Figure 3-63 illustrate the infrastructure characteristics for vehicles in the Study Area through congestion and travel speeds, specifically “Arterial Roadway Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay,” “Morning Arterial Roadway Speeds,” and “Evening Arterial Roadway Speeds.” The Study Area contains many arterials with high levels of delay and significant congestion. Routes with higher delay include Long Beach Boulevard, Atlantic Avenue, Cherry Avenue/ Garfield Boulevard, Lakewood Boulevard, and several other east/ west routes. Vehicle speeds during the morning hours tend to remain greater than 18 miles per hour, and there seems to be greater morning congestion in the northbound direction. The arterials with the lowest speed during the morning hours include Long Beach Boulevard, Atlantic Avenue, westbound Whittier Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Florence Avenue/ Mills Avenue, Alameda Street northbound, and Manchester Avenue eastbound/ Firestone Boulevard. Four additional corridors contain vehicle speeds less than 18 miles per hour in the evening peak hours compared to the morning peak hours. They include Whittier Boulevard eastbound, Slauson Avenue, Atlantic Avenue southbound, and Santa Fe Boulevard southbound. The Study Area contains many arterials with high levels of delay and significant congestion. Routes with higher delay include Long Beach Boulevard, Atlantic Avenue, Cherry Avenue/ Garfield Boulevard, Lakewood Boulevard, and several other east/ west routes. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 120 of 305 3-43 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 3-61. Arterial Roadway Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay Source: Metro Arterial Performance Measurement (Measure Up) Figure 3-62. Morning Arterial Roadway Speeds Figure 3-63. Evening Arterial Roadway Speeds 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 121 of 305 3-44 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan “Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)” was chosen to quantify and visualize the number of trips taken on arterials roadways in the Study Area. The VMT in the Study Area is about 12% of LA County’s VMT. As shown in Figure 3-64, the Study Area contains many arterials with high levels of VMT and they generally match the arterials with high daily vehicle hours of delay. This is because more vehicles are filling up the freeway space, creating congestion; that is, the more miles people are driving their vehicles, the more vehicles there are on the roadway at any given time. The routes with higher VMTs include Santa Fe Avenue, Cherry Avenue/ Garfield Boulevard, Lakewood Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, and several other east/ west routes. Figure 3-64. Study Area Arterial Roadway Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled Source: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model The VMT in the Study Area is about 12% of LA County’s VMT. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 122 of 305 3-45 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.5 Freeway 3.5.5.1 Freeway Travel Characteristics Figure 3-65 and Figure 3-66 shows that driving on I-710 itself features speeds under 45 miles per hour, with a substantial portion of the Corridor under 35 miles per hour. The highest speeds in the morning are in the mid-Corridor area southbound between I-405 and I-105. In the evening, the northbound has one segment with higher speeds in the Commerce area, and the southbound has one segment of higher speeds from north of I-105 to SR 91. Figure 3-65. I-710 Freeway Morning Speed Figure 3-66. I-710 Freeway Evening Speed Source: National Performance Management Research Data Set 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 123 of 305 3-46 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan “Daily Vehicle and Person Trips” was chosen to quantify and visualize the number of trips taken along I-710 in the Study Area. Figure 3-67 indicates that daily vehicle trips range from 144,000 trips per day south of I-405 to more than 300,000 between SR 91 and I-105. Daily person trips range from 224,000 south of I-405 to more than 500,000 between SR 91 and I-105. The segment between SR 91 and I-105 has the highest number of vehicle and person trips. The southern segment contains the lowest number of vehicles and person trips. Figure 3-70 displays freeway pavement conditions in the study area. Figure 3-67. Daily Vehicle and Person Trips on I-710 Source: Caltrans 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 124 of 305 3-47 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.5.2 Freeway Bottlenecks Congestion and slow speeds cause bottlenecks in the roadway system; bottlenecks are locations that experience specific increases in delay. As shown in Figure 3-68 and Figure 3-69 bottlenecks occur throughout the LB-ELA Corridor along I-710. The worst northbound bottlenecks occur at Willow Street, Long Beach Boulevard, Imperial Highway, and Atlantic Avenue. The worst southbound bottlenecks occur at Florence Avenue and the vicinity where I-405 meets I-710. Figure 3-70 displays freeway pavement conditions in the study area. Figure 3-68. Northbound Bottlenecks Along I-710 Figure 3-69. Southbound Bottlenecks Along I-710 Source: Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 125 of 305 3-48 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.5.3 Freeway Pavement Conditions Source: Caltrans High Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Figure 3-70. Freeway Pavement Conditions 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 126 of 305 3-49 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.6 Transit 3.5.6.1 Transit Infrastructure In terms of infrastructure for transit, multiple transit services are in or touch the Study Area as shown in Figure 3-71. These transit services including LA Metro rail and bus, Metrolink, Long Beach Transit, Amtrak, Los Angeles Department of Transportation Dash, and local community bus circulators. Figure 3-71. Transit Infrastructure Source: LA Metro, Amtrak, Long Beach, and LADOT DASH Route Lines 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 127 of 305 3-50 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 3.5.6.2 Transit Usage Currently, there are about 111,000 total Metro bus and rail boardings and nearly 50,000 Long Beach Transit boardings on a daily basis in the Study Area (Figure 3-72 and Figure 3-73). Metro rail boardings in the Study Area constitute 8.5% of all Metro Rail boardings. The highest ridership stations are at transfer stations, and many rail passengers board at the end of the A Line in Long Beach. The pandemic that began in 2020 imposed a significant negative impact on ridership, and ridership is still slowly recovering. Source: 2019 LA Metro Ridership Data Figure 3-72. Transit Rail Boarding Figure 3-73. Transit Bus Boarding 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections . . Item 20 Page 128 of 305 4-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles The Long Beach-East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) expresses and advances myriad investment priorities identified by the Corridor’s residents and stakeholders to support their Vision for the LB-ELA Corridor. The Vision is supported by seven Goals and two Guiding Principles, which are informed by Metro’s policy priorities while also responding to the many specific and interconnected challenges facing the LB-ELA Corridor today within the historical context of Interstate 710 (I-710) and its generational impacts on surrounding communities. The Plan’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles further Metro’s Equity Platform, respond to the communities’ needs and priorities along and within the corridor. The Plan builds on California’s ambitious transportation decarbonization goal set by Executive Order N-79-20, and support the principles outlined in the State of California’s Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure, the framework and goals in the California Transportation Plan 2050, the California State Transportation Agency’s Core Four Priorities, and California’s Climate Change Scoping Plan. The Plan’s commitment to a zero-emission future for the LB-ELA Corridor also reflects the current national and state policies and guidance set forth by the National Zero-Emission Freight Corridor Strategy, designation of the National Highway Freight Network as the National Electric Vehicle Corridors, and the state’s SB671 Clean Freight Corridor Efficiency Assessment. This plan is a qualifying CMCP under CTC SCCP guidelines. The Investment Plan’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles also closely align with the Southern California Association of Governments’ Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy, the 2020 Metro Long Range Transportation Plan, Metro’s Vision 2028 Goals, and the Metro Board approved plans, policies, and initiatives providing the foundation for the evaluation framework to assess projects against multiple criteria. This chapter introduces the LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles and describes the process through which these statements were inspired, drafted, refined, and adopted. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 129 of 305 4-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Vision A concise statement that captures the collective aspirations, desires, and outcomes of the project Guiding Principles Values that guide all processes and outcomes through a cohesive and intentional framework Goals Desired outcomes for general areas of concern to support and realize the overall Vision An equitable, shared LB-ELA Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options for moving people and goods that will foster clean air (zero emissions), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities, and users in the Corridor. EQUITY A commitment to (1) strive to rectify past harms; (2) provide fair and just access to opportunities; and (3) eliminate disparities in project processes, outcomes, and community results. The plan seeks to elevate and engrain the principle of Equity across all goals, objectives, strategies, and actions through a framework of Procedural, Distributive, Structural, and Restorative Equity, and by prioritizing an accessible and representative participation process for communities most impacted by the I-710. AIR QUALITY Foster local and regional clean air quality. OPPORTUNITY Increase community access to quality jobs, workforce development, and economic opportunities. COMMUNITY Support thriving communities by enhancing the health and quality of life of residents. PROSPERITY Strengthen LA County’s economic competitiveness and increase access to quality jobs, workforce development, and economic opportunities for all communities, with a focus on strengthening the LB-ELA Corridor communities, which have been and continue to be harmed by economic activity and development. ENVIRONMENT Enhance the natural and built environment. SAFETY Make all modes of travel safer. MOBILITY Improve the mobility of people and goods. SUSTAINABILITY Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. A commitment to sustainability to satisfy and improve basic social, health, and economic needs/ conditions, both present and future, and the responsible use and stewardship of the environment, all while maintaining or improving the well-being of the environment on which life depends. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 130 of 305 4-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4.1 Identification of Issues The issues Metro intended to address through the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force process and Investment Plan are wide-ranging, reflecting the geographic scale of and the depth of unmet investment need in the Corridor. These issues are compounded by the many challenges associated with serving the nation’s busiest seaport complex, a highly populated region, and the residual effects of the project history from which the renewed LB-ELA Corridor planning process emerged. In addition to the travel characteristics and infrastructure conditions typically assessed for transportation planning efforts, issues identified in this process encompass the last century of racial, economic, and environmental injustice that was reinforced by public policy and infrastructure decisions and continues to impact the Corridor’s communities today. To identify the Corridor’s key issues and opportunity areas, the project team initially reviewed planning studies and community responses from the past two decades of planning and community advocacy around the LB- ELA Corridor to establish context and lessons learned for the new LB-ELA Corridor visioning process. This initial research was followed by community listening sessions, a vision and goals public survey, a public meeting, and a robust analysis of existing conditions, all of which were discussed across a series of meetings with Task Force and Community Leadership Committee (CLC) members. Applying a shared understanding of the Corridor’s issues, the Task Force, CLC, and Equity Working Group collaborated to envision a future that balances the diverse needs of the Corridor’s stakeholders. Over several months, as described below, these groups thoughtfully composed and refined the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles as a framework to guide and focus the Investment Plan’s development process and outcomes. This effort aligns with Metro’s Multimodal Highway Investment Objectives policy, adopted in June 2022, which includes the following objective: “Recognizing LA County’s history of inequitable highway investment policies and construction, work with local communities to reduce disparities caused by the existing highway system and develop holistic, positive approaches to maintain and improve the integrity of and quality of life of those communities with minimal or no displacement during the implementation of highway projects.” SAFETY Nearly 10% of all the year 2021 traffic deaths in the U.S. occurred on California roadways. Fatalities for Active Transportation users are also at a 16-year high. By embedding the Safe System approach into our investments, planning, design and innovation, we will be able to achieve better outcomes on this urgent responsibility. EQUITY Historically, transportation decisions prioritized movement of vehicles over the movement of people. We also built a transportation system that in some cases had detrimental impacts in underserved communities. We aim to create an equitable and accessible transportation network and to provide equitable opportunities for all people. CLIMATE ACTION Nearly half of all climate-changing pollution in California comes from the transportation sector, and this demands our action for a cleaner future for all Californians. We must continue making our carbon footprint smaller by investing in a more multimodal system, embracing smarter land use development and utilizing innovation around zero emission vehicles. ECONOMIC PROSPERITY Transportation policy done right creates well-paying jobs, provides affordable options, supports housing opportunities and powers our economy. This must be our focus as we strive for all people to be on equal footing, resulting in more thriving, robust communities. The Investment Plan is consistent with CALSTA’s (California State Transportation Agency) Core Four Priorities 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 131 of 305 4-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan December 2021: Listening Sessions In December 2021, the project team held two LB-ELA Corridor Project Listening Sessions intended to engage members of the Corridor communities in developing a plan and investment strategy centered on local needs. The project team shared information regarding the process for creating a new plan for the Corridor and provided updates on the function and work of the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force. Community members expressed pride in the community outcry that resulted in the halting of the freeway widening project and shared a desire to move forward with a transparent process led by the community. Participants identified community priorities, including reduced traffic and emissions, improved public health and green space, expanded bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and no displacement of homes and businesses as proposed in the original I-710 South Corridor project (Alternative 5C). March 2022: Vision and Goals Development Public Meeting The project team held a Vision and Goals Development public meeting (virtually) in March of 2022. It was attended by 83 participants, including 11 Task Force members or alternates and 50 members of the public. The meeting included an interactive discussion and poll, in which participants identified their priorities for potential improvements in the Corridor. The top priority areas included Air Quality (selected by 73% of participants as one of their top three areas of concern), Travel Options (50%), and Community Health (50%). Other areas of concern included Street Safety (43%), Environment (40%), Jobs and Economic Opportunity (13%), and Other (13%). Participants shared specific recommendations for goals related to the various areas of concern in the interactive discussion. Air Quality recommendations included a requirement that projects meet the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Air Standards and that the Investment Plan support adding more trees and plants along the Corridor to promote clean air and reduce the heat island effect and air pollution. Mobility recommendations included establishing access to high-quality, multimodal mobility options and considering Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. Safety recommendations included safer paths for pedestrians and bicyclists and the incorporation of guidelines prioritizing safety policies. Economy recommendations included the creation of good-paying jobs with local hiring as a priority and support for commercial land uses. February – March 2022: Vision and Goals Survey From February to March 2022, the project team administered a Vision and Goals survey, through which the public identified their priorities for potential improvements in the Corridor, selecting up to three of the following: Air Quality, Community Health, Environment, Street Safety for all Transportation Users, Travel Options, Jobs and Economic Opportunities, and Housing. More than 3,000 stakeholders received the survey, and the 451 responses comprised 427 members of the public and 24 Task Force members. 53% of respondents selected air quality as one of their top three priorities for improvements in the Corridor, 51% selected travel options, and 50% selected street safety for all transportation users. 4.1.1 Winter 2021 – Spring 2022: Existing Conditions Analysis As detailed in Chapter 3, the LB-ELA Corridor planning process was informed by extensive qualitative and quantitative data analysis to identify existing conditions, needs, and disparities among various communities within the Corridor and compare them with LA County. Based on the issues and opportunity areas identified through public input and prior studies, data were primarily analyzed for socioeconomic conditions, environmental conditions, community health, and travel patterns related to mode share, emissions, throughput, and safety. Community survey data and anecdotal insights from CLC and Task Force members were used to supplement and ground-truth quantitative data to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the LB-ELA Corridor communities. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 132 of 305 4-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan A subsequent existing conditions analysis produced for discussion with the Equity Working Group incorporated new metrics based on community and Task Force input and applied Metro’s Equity Focus Communities (EFCs) as an overlay to identify patterns and disparities in conditions for EFC and non-EFC areas within the Corridor. This project planning analysis further helped identify that people along the LB-ELA Corridor are overburdened in many ways compared with other parts of the region. Given the high percentage of BIPOC populations in the Corridor, these issues were identified as reinforcing racial inequities and demonstrating how structural racism persists in urban communities. 4.1.2 Summary of Key Issues Key issues highlighted by initial research and engagement, which informed the development of the LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, are summarized below:32 • high freeway emissions and poor air quality; • cumulative community health burdens; • unsafe and hostile streets for pedestrians and bicyclists; • poor transit service reliability; • slow travel times; • lack of green space and shade; • goods movement capacity and impacts; • disconnected communities; • historic disinvestment and disenfranchisement; • lack of trust from the previous I-710 project and process; and • disparities in municipal capacity and resources within the LB-ELA Corridor. 32 For additional equitable project planning discussion of LB-ELA Corridor issues, see Appendix 2-E Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Documentation Photo courtesy of Caltrans District 7 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 133 of 305 4-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4.2 Task Force, CLC, and Working Group Input and Approval 33 For additional equitable project planning discussion of LB-ELA Corridor issues, see Appendix 2-E Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool Documentation Between April and September 2022, the Task Force, CLC, and Equity Working Group each spent several meetings crafting the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles to balance the various stakeholder priorities represented carefully and to develop language that provides accurate and actionable statements of the Task Force and CLC’s shared values. The Task Force served as the formal voting body to approve the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, with the CLC and Equity Working Group providing multiple rounds of input and voting on recommendations for the Task Force. The following timeline summarizes key points of Task Force33, CLC, and Equity Working Group Input and Approval: • April 2022: Preliminary Vision and Goals statements were presented to CLC, Task Force, and Equity Working Group for review and discussion. The Equity Working Group made a recommendation to consider elevating Equity as a Guiding Principle. • May 2022: The CLC discussed and provided input on the language of the Vision and Goals. The Task Force voted to approve the proposed Equity Guiding Principle and continued discussing the Vision and Goals. The project team proposed elevating Sustainability as the second Guiding Principle. • June 2022: The CLC and Task Force continued to discuss refinements to the Vision and Goals. The CLC voted to recommend a version of the Vision statement to the Task Force. The Task Force voted to approve the proposed Sustainability Guiding Principle. • July 2022: The Vision statement was formally approved at the July 2022 Task Force meeting, along with the Goals of Air Quality, Mobility, Community, and Environment. • August 2022: The Safety goal and the Opportunity Goal were formally approved at the August 2022 Task Force meeting, with the contingency with that a new Prosperity goal with a regional focus would be developed with input from the CLC. The CLC discussed the proposed Prosperity goal. • September 2022: The Prosperity goal was refined and formally approved at the September 2022 Task Force Meeting. The Metro Board adopted the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles at its September 2022 meeting as official policy. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 134 of 305 4-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4.3 Overview of Adopted Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 34 The Vision Statement was adopted with reference to the “An equitable, shared I-710 South Corridor transportation system…”. However, since then, the project name has been formally changed to the “Long Beach-East LA Corridor,” which is reflected in this document. 4.3.1 Vision 4.3.1.1 Vision Statement An equitable, shared LB-ELA Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options for moving people and goods that will foster clean air (zero emission), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities, and users in the corridor.34 The Vision statement reflects the collective input of the public between December 2021 and March 2022, and four months of thoughtful deliberation and refinement in the Task Force, CLC, and Equity Working Group meetings between April and July 2022. The central themes of the Vision statement were consistent throughout these discussions, with consensus that the Vision should expand beyond the operation of the freeway and support a multimodal transportation system that improves the quality of life for people living and working in communities throughout the LB-ELA Corridor. The approved Vision Statement reflects the CLC’s desire to include several key terms and concepts in the statement: • including mention of both the “community” and “residents” in the statement; • using the term “fosters” versus the previously used “support,” to make the Vision Statement more action-oriented; • including the phrase “economic empowerment” versus “economic resilience” to lift up Corridor community members; and • including direct reference to zero emission to set the goal for how to achieve “clean air.” Members of the Task Force and CLC did not always agree on the use of specific words in the Vision statement, demonstrating the importance of the language used to express the Task Force’s values and aspirations for the Corridor. Debate within these meetings primarily focused on whether to incorporate a direct reference to goods movement in the Vision statement. Members in favor highlighted that goods movement is a significant function of the Corridor, contributing to the regional economy and the needs of community residents and small businesses. Additionally, the project team reminded the Task Force and CLC that goods movement is included in the mission statement of Metro’s enabling legislation. However, many CLC and Task Force members expressed concern over the explicit inclusion of “goods” and “users” in the Vision statement, emphasizing that planning efforts in the Corridor have historically prioritized goods movement at the expense of Corridor residents and that this focus contributed to the ongoing environmental and health burdens impacting these communities. These members argued that reference to a “multimodal” transportation system sufficiently captured goods movement among other modes of transportation and that omission of language specific to goods movement would reflect a commitment to prioritizing Corridor residents. In an unsuccessful motion to remove the language “goods” and “users,” the following alternative Vision statement was raised to a vote: “An equitable, shared I‐710 South Corridor transportation system that provides safe, quality multimodal options that will foster clean air (zero emissions), healthy and sustainable communities, and economic empowerment for all residents, communities in the Corridor.” Ultimately, the Task Force voted to adopt the Vision statement that contained direct references to goods movement and all users of the Corridor. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 135 of 305 4-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4.3.2 Goals Air Quality: Foster local and regional clean air quality Air quality was the number one area of concern for respondents to the Vision and Goals survey, and air quality issues in the Corridor were documented extensively in prior research and existing conditions analysis for the project. The LB-ELA Corridor accounts for 20% of all particulate emissions in Southern California.35 The high levels of diesel pollutants affecting communities within a quarter mile of the freeway have earned the Corridor the name “diesel death zone,” referring to the linkage between diesel pollution and respiratory and cardiovascular health conditions.36 Task Force discussion around the Air Quality goal highlighted that the Investment Plan has an opportunity to impact air quality at both local and regional scales, which is reflected in the adopted Goal statement. Community: Support thriving communities by enhancing the health and quality of life of residents. The Task Force, CLC, and members of the public have consistently advocated for prioritizing public health issues throughout the planning process. The health and quality of life of LB-ELA Corridor communities is deeply connected to the transportation system, land uses, and quality of other public facilities and infrastructure in the Corridor. The Corridor communities’ respiratory and cardiovascular health burdens from freeway emissions and other polluting land uses are compounded by long-standing health disparities and healthcare access.37 Limited access to safe and comfortable active transportation and outdoor recreational infrastructure,38 and exposure 35 South Coast Air Quality Management District, http://www .aqmd .gov/docs/default-source/news-archive/2021/JETSI-aug31-2021 .pdf 36 Nelson, Laura J . “710 Freeway is a ‘diesel death zone’ to neighbors,” Los Angeles Times, March 1, 2018 . 37 OEHHA CalEnviroScreen 4 .0, https://oehha .ca .gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 38 SCAG Regional Bikeways Data, https://gisdata-scag .opendata .arcgis .com/datasets/e4734b0af74b4405b0c9772d6f1f2c06_0/explore?location=33 .852814%2C-118 .181178%2C12 .26 39 Tree People, LA County Tree Canopy Map, https://www .treepeople .org/los-angeles-county-tree-canopy-map-viewer/ 40 Tree People, LA County Tree Canopy Map, https://www .treepeople .org/los-angeles-county-tree-canopy-map-viewer/, Los Angeles County Park Needs Assessment, https://lacountyparkneeds . org/pnaplus-home/ 41 LA Metro NextGen Bus Plan, https://www .metro .net/about/plans/nextgen-bus-plan/, Southeast LA (SELA) Transportation Study (Giuliano et al ., 2018), https://calstatela .patbrowninstitute . org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Giuliano_ForWeb .pdf to heat through a lack of shade and greening39 also contribute to health burdens in the Corridor. Environment: Enhance the natural and built environment. The Environment Goal as an area of concern captures a range of issues related to the natural and built environment, from biodiversity, water quality, and extreme heat to noise pollution and the visual quality of infrastructure and development. The presence or lack of tree canopy and green space is a major equity issue aligned with patterns of racial and economic segregation in the Corridor, with wide-ranging impacts on the urban heat island effect, air quality, stormwater runoff, pedestrian sun exposure, and overall streetscape quality. The lack of publicly accessible green space also limits access to opportunities for outdoor recreation, which impacts community health and quality of life.40 Initially considered as a combined Goal of “Sustainability and Environment,” the adopted Goal title was simplified to “Environment,” and Sustainability was elevated to a Guiding Principle applying broadly across all Goals. Mobility: Improve the mobility of people and goods. A reliable and efficient system of multimodal travel options for people and goods is a top priority for Corridor stakeholders. For individuals traveling throughout the Corridor, the quality of a multimodal transportation system contributes both to the user experience and to the systemwide mode share, with individuals’ decisions to use transit or active transportation over a personal vehicle having broader impacts on air quality, congestion, and street safety.41 Vehicle congestion results in impacts to travel times for drivers, bus riders, and goods movement vehicles, who all rely on major freeway and arterial routes. Travel times are also an issue for pedestrians 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 136 of 305 4-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan and active transportation users in the Corridor, who are often forced onto indirect routes given a lack of safe and connected infrastructure. Reliable transit service directly impacts access to resources and opportunities, particularly for the Corridor’s transit-dependent residents and workers. Opportunity: Increase community access to quality jobs, workforce development, and economic opportunities. Expanding access to economic opportunities is another top priority for the LB-ELA Corridor, both in terms of the quantity and quality of jobs, workforce development opportunities, and other quality-of-life needs and amenities, and the accessibility and reliability of transportation options to get to those jobs, opportunities, and amenities. High congestion levels on the freeway and significant arterials, combined with the lack of safe, accessible, timely, and reliable active transportation and transit options, all impact community members’ ability to reach these destinations. The I-710 as a facility reinforces and expands the division between communities on either side of the LA River, and other freeways and rail infrastructure in the Corridor also impede connections between neighboring communities and opportunities, creating a major need to “reconnect communities” divided by this infrastructure. In response to CLC and Task Force input, an initially considered “Economy” Goal was separated into two Goals – “Opportunity” and “Prosperity” – to account for the distinction between and the need for both access to economic opportunities for Corridor residents, and regional economic growth and competitiveness. The CLC felt strongly that this goal must ensure that project outcomes first and foremost benefit the communities in the Corridor rather than focusing on the larger “region.” Prosperity: Strengthen LA County’s economic competitiveness and increase access to quality jobs, workforce development, and economic opportunities for all communities, with a focus on strengthening the LB-ELA Corridor communities, which have been and continue to be harmed by economic activity and development. 42 LA Metro, LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan, 2021, http://media .metro .net/2021/Goods-Movement-Strategic-Plan-Spreads .pdf The LB-ELA Corridor plays a nationally significant role in transporting goods to and from the nation’s busiest seaport complex comprising the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, contributing to LA County’s global stature, economic strength, and workforce opportunities. However, tens of thousands of daily truck trips along I-710 contribute to air quality, noise, congestion, and other environmental impacts on the surrounding communities.42 Additionally, the past century of planning and policy decisions in the Corridor, including the development and construction of I-710 in the 1960s, have created and reinforced patterns of segregation and disinvestment, leaving many communities vulnerable to adverse impacts of regional and national commerce without the resources and opportunities to participate fully in economic development. A subset of CLC and Task Force members felt that a Goal relating to regional prosperity may reinforce an extractive condition under which LB-ELA Corridor communities have historically been exploited and subjected to environmental harm for the region’s benefit. Responding to these concerns, the adopted language of the Prosperity Goal indicates that the Investment Plan has an opportunity to strengthen the LB-ELA Corridor’s role in regional prosperity while recognizing past harms and intentionally prioritizing LB-ELA Corridor communities as the beneficiaries of future economic growth. Safety: Make all modes of travel safer. Safety for all modes of travel is a primary area of concern in the Corridor. Streets within the Corridor are generally designed for high volumes of vehicular traffic with limited or poorly maintained active transportation and pedestrian infrastructure. Additionally, the heavy presence of trucks in the Corridor contributes to a higher-than-usual prevalence of conflict points between trucks and cars, bicycles, and pedestrians. Due to the increased severity of truck-involved collisions, safety improvements to the I-710 and surrounding roadways are critical to reducing traffic injuries and fatalities for all users. Although some jurisdictions have introduced dedicated infrastructure and safer street design in recent years, a cohesive network of safe bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is lacking throughout the Corridor. The I-710 freeway has also yet to be modernized since it was constructed 60 years ago, and 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 137 of 305 4-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan existing conditions have led to safety issues that spill over into neighboring communities. Given high volumes of vehicles entering and exiting the freeway, bicycle and pedestrian safety is of particular concern surrounding freeway on/ off-ramps and overcrossings.43 Improvements to the on and off ramps serving the freeway have the potential to significantly improve safety for all users of the roadway especially bicyclists and pedestrians. 4.3.3 Guiding Principles During the discussion and refinement of the preliminary Goal statements, the Equity Working Group recommended elevating the concern areas of Equity and Sustainability to serve as overarching Guiding Principles rather than individual Goals, given their broader applicability to each of the other Goal areas and the overall Task Force process. This approach provides a clear commitment by the Investment Plan to speak to these vital issues, unlike the prior I-710 South Corridor project and process. Guiding Principle: Equity A commitment to (1) strive to rectify past harms; (2) provide fair and just access to opportunities; and (3) eliminate disparities in project processes, outcomes, and community results. The plan seeks to elevate and engrain the principle of Equity across all goals, objectives, strategies, and actions through a framework of Procedural, Distributive, Structural, and Restorative Equity, and by prioritizing an accessible and representative participation process for communities most impacted by the I-710. Equity is at the core of the LB-ELA Corridor’s renewed Vision and planning process. The Guiding Principle of Equity reflects Metro’s expanding agency-wide commitment to equity, as demonstrated by the establishment 43 SCAG Regional Bikeways Data, LA County Bikeways Open Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), 2017-2019, https://tims .berkeley .edu/ 44 East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice, I-710 Corridor, https://eycej.org/index.php/campaigns/i-710/ 45 Metro defines equity as “both an outcome and a process to address racial, socioeconomic, and gender disparities, to ensure fair and just access with respect to where you begin and your capacity to improve from that starting point to opportunities, including jobs, housing, education, mobility options, and healthier communities . It is achieved when one’s outcomes in life are not predetermined, in a statistical or experiential sense, on their racial, economic, or social identities . It requires community informed and needs based provision, implementation, and impact of services, programs, and policies that reduce and ultimately prevent disparities . Equity means that Metro’s service delivery, project delivery, policymaking, and distribution of resources account for the different histories, challenges, and needs of communities across Los Angeles County; it is what we are striving toward .” of Metro’s Office of Equity and Race, the adoption of the Metro Equity Platform, and the piloting of the Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool (EPET) to guide the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force process. In discussions of equity— initially considered as a Goal—the Equity Working Group determined that a standalone goal of Equity would not capture its broader application to each Goal area and the planning process. Beyond addressing inequities in the distribution of benefits and impacts of public infrastructure and services, the LB-ELA Corridor planning process was grounded in repairing broken trust and building new trust between Metro and the communities it serves within the LB-ELA Corridor. The previous I-710 South Freeway project featured the expansion of the freeway right-of-way into adjacent communities to accommodate new general- purpose travel lanes to create greater capacity for growing traffic and population. This project’s scope was widely perceived as a continuation of harmful 20th-century transportation planning practices, prioritizing industry over the health and livelihoods of Corridor residents. Despite emerging from an extensive public engagement and environmental review process, the board-approved Alternative 5C failed to address the needs and concerns of communities that would bear the project’s adverse impacts, thus eroding trust in Metro and Caltrans among many Corridor residents and environmental stakeholders.44 The definitions of Procedural, Distributive, Restorative, and Structural equity were introduced in the Equity Working Group to support focused discussions of equity throughout this planning process. Note that these detailed definitions are not part of Metro’s official definition of Equity.45 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 138 of 305 4-11 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Procedural Equity • Proactive and accessible community engagement bridges linguistic, technology, and ability gaps to meet communities where they are and enable participatory and representative decision-making processes. • Ongoing systems of accountability and communication to build and maintain trust. Distributive Equity • Allocation of benefits and amenities proportionate to levels of need and historic investment and based on self-identified community priorities rather than ‘one-size-fits-all’ solutions. • Policies and resource management to ensure benefits reach intended recipients. Restorative Equity • Acknowledgement of, and atonement for historic and ongoing systemic harms resulting from planning practice and policy. • Commensurate actions, resources, and investments dedicated to remediation and prevention of further systemic harms. Structural Equity • Evolution of decision-making bodies to reflect the communities they serve. • Restructuring of organizational systems and hierarchies to empower historically marginalized groups. Guiding Principle: Sustainability Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. A commitment to sustainability to satisfy and improve basic social, health, and economic needs/conditions, both present and future, and the responsible use and stewardship of the environment, all while maintaining or improving the well-being of the environment on which life depends. Sustainability is at the core of the renewed vision and planning process for the LB-ELA Corridor. The Guiding Principle of Sustainability reflects Metro’s expanding agency-wide commitment to sustainability, as demonstrated by the establishment of Metro’s Sustainability Council, adoption of numerous sustainability plans and policies, and development of sustainability toolkits and regional collaboration efforts. Sustainability was initially considered as part of a combined “Sustainability and Environment” Goal, however, further discussions of Sustainability in the Task Force touched upon the overlap between Sustainability and each of the other Goals. Sustainability addresses the potential of projects to integrate benefits across goal areas to advance positive systems change and innovate to protect and enhance community and environmental well-being. Following the precedent set by the Equity Guiding Principle, the project team proposed elevating Sustainability to serve as a second Guiding Principle and introduced the proposed language to the Task Force for discussion and refinement. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 139 of 305 4-12 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4.4 Board Adoption 46 Metro Board Motion / Motion Response, https://metro.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5844793&GUID=BEDCE3EF-A791-4ACD-AA1D-DB2C13CD61BB The Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles were recommended to the Metro Board of Directors at the regular Board Meeting on September 22, 2022, along with the Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity and the Project Name change from the I-710 South Corridor Mobility Investment Plan to the Long Beach-East LA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan.46 The Metro Board formally adopted the recommended Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, the Pre- Investment Plan Opportunity, and the new Project Name as policy. The Board’s adoption of the LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles was a significant milestone in the development of the Investment Plan, representing the first formal success of the Task Force, CLC, and Working Groups’ collaborative decision-making process. The six-month decision-making process was an immense and challenging effort, informed by previous planning efforts and decades of lived experience in the Corridor, which required participants to confront differing perspectives and work through tension to reach consensus on shared aspirations for the Corridor. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles . . Item 20 Page 140 of 305 4-13 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles From the start of the Long Beach-East LA (LB-ELA) Corridor Mobility Investment Plan development, Metro consistently heard from community stakeholders that air quality impacts on public health were a top concern for remediation. During the development of the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, community members made clear their desire for zero-emission (ZE) technology to be the goal for local, state, and federal investment in the Corridor. Metro shares the vision of transforming the LB-ELA corridor into a ZE corridor with the communities adjacent to I-710. This goal was articulated in the Vision Statement approved by the CLC and Task Force and speaks to the community’s desire to invest strategically in the LB-ELA Corridor to promote ZE technology across all modes of transportation – from the freight sector to public transit. This vision is supported by the federal and state governments, which have sent strong policy signals toward transportation decarbonization and the transition to ZE technology as a vehicle to achieve this goal. At the federal level, the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation was formed through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, with a series of funding programs made available through the U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. At the state level, the California Air Resources Board has adopted the Advanced Clean Truck (ACT) Rule, which requires manufacturers to sell ZE trucks, and the Advanced Clean Fleet (ACF) Rule, which requires a phased-in use of ZE vehicles for targeted fleets and that manufacturers only manufacture ZE trucks starting in the 2036 model year. The ACT Rule has been adopted by 11 other states across the country. In December 2023, the California Transportation Commission approved the SB671 Clean Freight Corridor Efficiency Assessment, identifying priority freight corridors across the state to accelerate the transition to ZE goods movement. The Assessment includes the LB-ELA Corridor as part of its Priority Clean Freight Corridors. The Investment Plan supports this ZE vision through several significant investments, as follows: • Heavy-duty freight trucks: $50 million in seed funding will support the delivery of $200 million in ZE infrastructure designed to support the accelerated deployment of ZE heavy-duty freight trucks in the LB-ELA Corridor. (LB-ELA_0004 / LB-ELA_0023) • Freight locomotives: $10 million to support a multi-partner effort to advance the development and use of ZE locomotives in the Corridor with the goal of converting the Alameda Corridor into a ZE-only locomotive facility. • Community Program – Zero-Emission Infrastructure for Automobiles: Catalyzed with $40 million for Community Programs Catalyst Fund, this program would work with local jurisdictions, public agencies, and private- public partners to develop and site additional charging stations for ZE vehicles in the LB-ELA Corridor. • Community Program – Bus electrification projects: Catalyzed with $40 million for Community Programs Catalyst Fund, this program would seek incentives to accelerate the deployment of ZE transit and vanpool vehicles in the LB-ELA Corridor. Projects could include bus electrification (public transit buses and school buses) and ZE charging infrastructure. These investments complement existing policies and programs adopted by Metro intended to support decarbonizing transportation and sustainability throughout the region, including Metro’s Climate Action Plan, Zero-Emission Electric Bus and Infrastructure Program, and the Electric Vehicle Parking Strategic Plan. The Investment Plan takes the ZE and sustainability approach and includes a zero- emission freight rail pilot program to evaluate the feasibility and potential of transitioning freight rail locomotives to ZE. Transforming the LB-ELA Corridor into a ZE corridor will require unprecedented coordination with many stakeholders in many policy areas to deliver a comprehensive approach to eliminating tailpipe emissions, improving public health, and providing community benefits in the Corridor. The Investment Plan will serve as the foundation to realize the LB-ELA Corridor’s vision to be transformed into a ZE Corridor in a way that reflects and advances the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles set forth by the Corridor’s residents and stakeholders. A Vision for a Zero-Emission Corridor . . Item 20 Page 141 of 305 5-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs This chapter describes the technical, Task Force, Community Leadership Committee (CLC), and public engagement efforts that led to the development of the initial list of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs (MSPPs) to be evaluated for inclusion in the projects recommended for implementation in the Investment Plan. This list is based directly on input from community members, Corridor jurisdictions, partner agencies, and planning work previously conducted in the Corridor. The input of local and regional partners and jurisdictions in compiling these MSPPs has helped align the Investment Plan with local land use planning frameworks. Ultimately, a meticulous evaluation and prioritization process was conducted that was integral in identifying which Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs (MSPPs) would be included in the Investment Plan, considering the alignment with the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles that the Task Force and subsequently, the Metro Board, adopted. (see Chapter 6 – Evaluation and Prioritization). This chapter presents a summary of the MSPPs by mode, project type, and subtype as adopted by the Task Force and its committees. It includes a discussion of how the list was developed based on relevant input from community involvement efforts, including community-based organizations (CBOs) and public meetings. This chapter also includes a discussion of the projects and programs included from other planning efforts that have been conducted in the Corridor and address the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. The initial list of MSPPs is included in Appendix 5-A, organized by mode, project type, and subtype for each project and program. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 142 of 305 5-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 5-1. Phase 3 Overview of the LB-ELA Investment Plan In addition to receiving input from the community and public, the project team also reviewed a wide range of current and prior programs and initiatives from local, subregional, and regional agencies related to the Long Beach–East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor. The project team included select elements of the original Interstate 710 (I-710) South Corridor project, including envisioned “I-710 early action projects,” defined by the Metro Board in Motions 5.1 and 5.2. The project team screened these candidate early action projects to exclude project concepts that would intrinsically result in displacements of residences or businesses in local communities or could not be feasibly redesigned to avoid significant displacement. A set of recommendations created by the Gateway Cities Council of Governments’ (GCCOG’s) I-710 Ad Hoc Committee and the “Community Alternative 7” proposed by community activists in 2014 before the I-710 South Corridor Project were also included45. The project team also included planned projects from Corridor cities and LA County, the Ports, Caltrans, Metro’s Measure R/M expenditure plans, the Metro Long-Range Transportation Plan, the Metro 2028 Mobility Concept Plan, the Metro Active 45 Community Alternative 7 https://eycej .org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/CEHAJs-DEIR-comments-regarding-the-CA7-1 .pdf 5.1 Development Process of Initial List of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs Following the Board’s adoption of the Task Force’s recommended Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, the project team initiated the next phase of the work plan: Developing Multimodal Strategies and Identifying Projects and Programs (Figure 5-1). The Task Force sought as inclusive a set of MSPPs as possible, using a broad outreach and engagement approach to receive input from Corridor residents, community groups, interested stakeholders, partner agencies, and other parties. An extensive public engagement effort was conducted to contribute to the list of candidate MSPPs, with a particular focus on engagement with impacted communities supplemented by partnerships with CBOs. Involving more than seven months of public engagement, this effort included an online survey and interactive map that provided an opportunity for residents, community leaders, and other stakeholders to give direct input into the process. Metro’s outreach campaign engaged approximately 5,400 community members and stakeholders through 46 events hosted by 18 CBOs and 18 pop-up events. Additionally, the project team hosted four workshops in Spanish (with English translation) and two workshops in English (with Spanish translation). As a result, almost 3,000 responses to the survey and interactive mapping tool were submitted, generating new approaches to making improvements within the Corridor by those residents most impacted within the Corridor. Initial List of Projects & Programs 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 143 of 305 5-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Transportation Strategic Plan, and the Southern California Association of Governments’ Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy. Projects and programs from these sources that met the Task Force Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles and other Metro policies, such as the Metro Multimodal Highway Investment Objectives46 were included in developing the initial MSPP list. In addition, projects and programs from partner agencies such as the San Pedro Bay Ports, Long Beach Transit (LBT), California Air Resources Board (CARB), South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and California Transportation Committee (CTC), to name a few, were also considered in developing the MSPP list. Overall, the MSPP was informed by: • previous studies and initiatives; • social pinpoint interactive map and public surveys; • public workshop meetings/ CBO engagement; and • working group, CLC, and LB-ELA Corridor Task Force meetings. At first, more than three hundred strategies, projects, and programs were identified through all these various efforts; however, over the 18 months it has taken to develop the Investment Plan, this list has evolved due to changes in project development status or scope and advancements in project implementation, including the fact that some projects have been funded for implementation or have initiated construction during that timeframe. Similar MSPPs are grouped into modal categories for two purposes in the Investment Plan: general organization and supporting their readiness for the evaluation phase. However, the project team recognized that most projects or programs will advance multiple goals and that the full set of MSPPs work together from a multimodal transportation system perspective. 46 Metro Objectives for Multimodal Highway Investment approved by the Metro Board on 6/23/22 47 All Community Programs are all in the “Initial Investment” category as described in chapter 8 Recommendations . The MSPPs were sorted into the following six categories, listed in alphabetical order: • Active Transportation/ Traffic Demand Management • Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets • Community Programs47 • Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements • Goods Movement • Transit Figure 5-2 displays an example of how an initial list of the MSPPs aligned with modal categories and the Goals and Guiding Principles of the Investment Plan. The Multimodal Groupings of Strategies, Projects, and Programs represent the transportation modes and community programs and align well with the Task Force’s adopted Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Each category comprises four sub-categories that help classify and group the broad range of projects and programs that compose the Initial List of MSPPs into similar projects that can be evaluated in the next phase of the plan’s development. The project team also presented information on the Initial List of MSPPs to the CLC at seven meetings and the Equity Working Group at five meetings between August 2022 and February 2023. Input received from these groups was used to refine the Initial List and provide feedback to the Task Force for consideration at its meetings reviewing the MSPPs. Some key questions and concerns centered on ensuring impacts on local communities, particularly safety and air quality, were drawn from the assessment process. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 144 of 305 5-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.1 Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity (PIPO) Recognizing the unprecedented amount of discretionary grant funding made available at the State (through programs administered by California’s Transportation Commission and State Transportation Agency) and Federal levels (through existing, augmented, and new programs funded through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act/Bipartisan Infrastructure Law) in 2022, the Board directed staff via Motion 9 to return with a “minimum of three initiatives that will apply for available State and Federal funding opportunities in Calendar Year 2022,” in advance of the 710 Task Force Investment Plan being finalized in 2023. To fulfill this directive, Task Force membership, the CLC, cities, local agencies, and organizations to provided nominations for projects it had or could submit for State or Federal grant funding in 2022 - with the understanding that these projects must be located within the LB-ELA study area and would not draw down on the remaining Measures R and M funding for the I-710 South Corridor Project to be leveraged by the Task Force’s Investment Plan.48 This outreach generated 22 project nominations and Metro identified an additional 13 projects. After analyzing the projects, understanding the concerns raised and input provided by the CLC, EWG, Task Force and other stakeholders, and identifying projects for which a grant application had not yet been submitted, Metro identified a full PIPO for Board review and a set of early initiative projects (Table 5-1) for Board consideration. 48 The latter criterion assuaged concerns raised by Task Force members that the local funding available as the foundation for the Investment Plan (approximately $743 million) could be siphoned away in support of projects not yet fully vetted nor recommended by the Task Force . 49 ATP = Active Transportation Program LPP-C = Local Partnership Program - Competitive TCEP = Trade Corridor Enhancement Program Other Federal = USDOT’s Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program, Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity, and Neighborhood Access and Equity Grant Program . This table displays the project information as it was approved in the PIPO stage . Project information has been updated through the Investment Plan process and may differ elsewhere . These projects comprise pedestrian and bicycle safety, active transportation, transit enhancement, goods movement, corridor mobility, intelligent transportation system, and Zero-Emission technology project components. Collectively these projects represent an approach to investment in the LB-ELA Corridor that advances Metro’s Multimodal Highway Investment Objectives policy and aligns with the Goals recommended by the Task Force. All four PIPO projects were awarded grants from state and federal programs prior to the adoption of the Investment Plan, signaling the strength of these projects, which represent various modes of transportation, in leveraging significant funding as envisioned by the Investment Plan. Table 5-1. PIPO Early Initiative Candidate Projects49 Project Funding Program(s) Project Cost (est.) Local Match Awarded Amount Humphreys Avenue Bike/ Pedestrian Crossing over I- 710 in East LA LPP-C Other Federal $12.0 M $6.0 M $8.9 M Huntington Park Safe Routes for Students and Seniors State ATP $4.8 M N/A $4.26M I-710 Integrated Corridor Management Project State TCEP $30.2 M $7.2 M $27.84 Southeast LA Transit Improvement Program State LPP-C $29.5 M $15.0 M $14.5 M 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 145 of 305 5-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The Task Force concluded the Developing Multimodal Strategies and Identifying Projects and Programs phase of the work plan at its February 2023 meeting and supported moving the Initial List of MSPPs into the Evaluating and Refining Projects and Programs Phase (Figure 5-2 provides an example). Figure 5-2. Example Formation of Multimodal Groupings of Strategies, Projects, and Programs Vision Statement & Guiding Principles (Equity, Sustainability) Air Quality Community OpportunityMobilitySafety Prosperity Environment Multi modal, Packaging Framework Acti ve Transportati on (Bicycle/Pedestrian) Arterial Roadway Community Programs & Policies Goods Movement Transit (Bus & Rail) Freeway Zero Emissions Infrastructure Zero Emissions Truck Program Vegeta� on Barriers to Reduce Par� culate Ma� er Landscaped Medians Community Health & Benefi t Program Improved Transit Stops ADA Improvements Targeted Hire Transit Fare Assistance New Bike Routes Signal Coordina� on on Major Arterials Bus Priority Lanes New Bikes/Peds Overcrossings Traffi c Calming Grade Separa� on Projects Traffi c Controls at Freeway Ramps Housing Stabiliza� on Policies Connec� ons to LA River Energy Effi ciency Programs New Higher Sound Walls on I-710 Goals:Mul� modal Strategies, Projects & Programs4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 146 of 305 5-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.2 Previous Studies and Initiatives Previous studies and initiatives relevant to the scope of Investment Plan that were referenced include the Metro Long Range Transportation Plan, SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy, the Metro 2028 Mobility Concept Plan, Metro’s Active Transportation Strategic Plan, City Bicycle Master Plan(s), GCCOG I-710 Ad Hoc Committee recommendations, CEHAJ proposed Community Alternative 7, Caltrans State Highway Operations and Protection Program, and Metro Board Motions 5.1/ 5.2 I-710 Early Action Concepts. Collaborative efforts across municipalities and jurisdictions are essential to addressing challenges such as traffic congestion, environmental sustainability, and equitable transportation access, and developing effective and sustainable solutions that meet the diverse needs of the entire region. The wealth of insights, data, and lessons learned from these past efforts can be leveraged to improve the future development of the LB-ELA Corridor. 5.1.3 Public and Community Input to the MSPP As briefly described above, Metro’s LB-ELA Corridor Mapping Tool and Survey served as another channel for collecting input on potential MSPPs. This interactive mapping tool allowed respondents to express concerns and provide Metro staff and the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force with geographic- specific recommendations regarding the mobility requirements of communities along the Corridor. • Metro understands that many needs for Equity-Focus Communities may not have been captured adequately due to their historical lack of technical assistance, resources, and outreach that could have prepared projects for development and readiness as near-term investments. Consequently, Metro has identified equity planning gaps to overcome and to ensure the needs of all communities are fully understood and addressed throughout the life of the Investment Plan through Modal Programs (See Chapter 8 Recommendations). Metro undertook an extensive community outreach and consultation effort to “ground truth” the proposed strategies, projects, and programs included in the MSPP. Responses from stakeholders to surveys, that were in digital and paper formats, were another layer of input leveraged to select the MSPPs that enhance future mobility for individuals and the efficient movement of goods by identifying mobility improvements. The survey sought input from respondents regarding their experiences and their community’s needs. Specifically, it inquired about the projects, programs, and strategies respondents would most like to see implemented in their local community and the Corridor. 5.1.4 Initial and Revised Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs Lists The Initial MSPP List includes more than 200 projects and programs organized into six “Improvement Categories.” Outreach yielded the full MSPP list. Each MSPP aligns with multiple elements of the Investment Plan’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles that aim to create an equitable and sustainable future for the Corridor. The improvement categories have been thoughtfully crafted to encompass a wide range of transportation modes, exemplifying Metro’s dedication to offering diverse and inclusive transportation choices that align with each of the seven overarching Goals. These subcategories are described in greater detail later in the following sections. The improvement categories (in alphabetical order) are as follows: • Active Transportation • Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets • Community Programs • Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements • Goods Movement • Transit (Bus or Rail) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 147 of 305 5-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.5 Active Transportation Active Transportation improvements include infrastructure enhancements that promote a variety of walking and cycling needs. These improvements aim to foster safer, more accessible, and more appealing environments for pedestrians and cyclists, ultimately inducing a larger number of individuals to opt for active transportation options instead of relying on motorized ones. The sub-categories for active transportation improvements are: • pedestrian and first/ last-mile improvements; • bicycle routes and facilities; • safety and amenities; and • travel demand management Table 5-2 showcases specific project types by sub-category for active transportation improvements. Table 5-2. Active Transportation Project Types by Sub-Category Sub-Category Project Types Pedestrian and first/ last- mile improvements New pedestrian/ bicycle overcrossings New pedestrian/ bicycle pathways New pedestrian/ bicycle connections to rail, transit, LA River New crosswalks, sidewalks Bicycle routes and facilities New bicycle paths/ trails New buffer/ barrier-protected bicycle routes New bicycle lanes New, signed bicycle routes Safety and amenities High-visibility crosswalks Wider sidewalks Pedestrian/ bicycle crossing enhancements Bicycle parking, lighting, repair stations Bicycle share programs Traffic controls for pedestrians/ bicycles Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements Shade structures, trees, landscaping Security and lighting Travel demand management Vanpools/ carpool programs Telecommuting programs Promotional campaigns to encourage alternative modes of travel Source: LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting #16, January 2023. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 148 of 305 5-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan LA River Path Project The LA River Path Project is an eight-mile shared-use bicycle and pedestrian path along the LA River between Elysian Valley and the City of Maywood, through downtown Los Angeles and the City of Vernon. It is the central bike/pedestrian facility through the LB-ELA Corridor. This project will close the gap in the LA River Path, creating a safe, efficient active transportation travel option connecting the San Fernando Valley and Long Beach. https://www.metro.net/projects/lariverpath/ The project is currently conducting environmental analysis and technical studies based on the below schedule. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in anticipated in Spring 2024. Schedule Public Scoping Public meetings and project scoping comment period Environmental Analysis and Technical Studies Conduct environmental analysis and technical studies Draft EIR Release Public hearings and public comment period Final EIR Release Record of decision with response to public comment and board meeting20192019-20232023-20242024-20254. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 149 of 305 5-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.6 Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets improvements encompass enhancements and updates made to major roads, referred to as arterial roads, to improve their traffic flow, safety, efficiency, and overall effectiveness. These arterial roads serve as vital transportation arteries, managing substantial traffic volumes and connecting diverse neighborhoods within a city or linking cities together. These enhancements aim to increase transportation efficiency, alleviate traffic congestion, enhance safety for all road users, and foster improved connectivity among the LB-ELA Corridor communities. The sub-categories for arterial roadways/complete streets improvements are: • complete streets; • traffic calming; • general local/ regional roadway; and • signal coordination/ transportation systems management (TSM)/ intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Table 5-3 showcases specific project types by sub-category for arterial roadways/complete streets improvements. Table 5-3. Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Project Types by Sub-Category Sub-Category Project Types Sub-Category Project Types Complete streets New green spaces, trees, bioswales Traffic calming Speed reductions Bicycle and pedestrian improvements Speed bumps Public art Truck restrictions in neighborhoods Signage Roundabouts Transit stop amenities (furniture, shelters)Road diets Operational/ safety improvements Stop signs, traffic signals ADA upgrades Speed enforcement cameras LED street lighting Flashing crosswalks Stormwater retention School zone warning devices General local/ regional roadway Stormwater treatment Signal coordination/ Transportation Systems Management (TSM)/ Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Traffic/ pedestrian signal upgrades Upgrade traffic signals, crosswalks, sidewalks, driveways, curb ramps, etc. Video camera installation New/ improved bridges Equipment upgrades ADA upgrades Emergency vehicle priority Intersection improvements Signage Pedestrian circulation and safety Signal synchronization Streetscape improvements Advanced technologies to manage traffic and to inform the traveling public Bicycle and pedestrian improvements Roadway widening/ realignment Source: LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting #16, January 2023. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 150 of 305 5-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.7 Community Programs Community Programs are improvements that involve enhancing existing programs or creating new ones that directly benefit the local communities more comprehensively than typical transportation investment. These enhancements address specific needs, issues, or interests within the community and foster inclusivity and participation. Several of these programs are not eligible to use Metro funding for implementation; however, because they are very important to the communities within the Corridor and support the Investment Plan’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, the project team recommends Metro commits to identifying and partnering with other agencies and entities that are responsible for those issues—for example, the LA County Department of Health—to help develop, support, fund, and lead these programs. The sub-categories for community program improvements are • job creation/ work opportunities; • health/air quality/environment; and • housing stabilization/ land use Table 5-4 showcases specific project types by sub-category for community program improvements. The program also includes the Community Catalyst Fund which will allow each category to be further developed into a fundable project or program, develop priorities for projects and programs, and create strategies for ongoing funding from local sources and discretionary grant sources. Table 5-4. Community Programs Project Types by Sub-Category Sub-Category Project Types Job Creation/Work Opportunities Targeted local hire Employment recruitment initiatives Vocational educational programs Economic stabilization policies Workforce education and development Partnerships with employers Partnerships with academic institutions Health/Air Quality/ Environment GHG emissions reduction Renewable energy/ solar power project Urban greening, tree canopy, green space Greenbelts, drought-tolerant planting parklets Habitat restoration and connectivity Public art/ aesthetics Zero-emission infrastructure for automobiles Bus electrification Community health benefit program Air filters for schools and community facilities Environmental building improvements Health education/ outreach Community health screening Vegetation barriers/ buffer landscaping Housing Stabilization/ Land Use Housing/ rent stabilization policies Anti-displacement programs Rental assistance programs Inclusionary housing Transit-oriented communities Homeless programs Partnership with community organizations Density bonus programs Community land trusts Grant writing assistance Source: LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting 16, January 2023. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 151 of 305 5-11 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.8 Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements involve redesigning and modernizing select interchanges and auxiliary lanes on I-710 to improve freeway mainline traffic safety and operations, reduce freeway congestion, and therefore reduce traffic diversion through the arterial interchanges onto the arterials and adjacent community streets. These improvements will help reconnect communities separated by I-710 by reducing transit 50 Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets funding can also be used for reconnecting communities . delays and enhancing the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians crossing the I-710 and, at some locations, the LA River arterial crossing.50 Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements projects included in the plan must show alignment with the project’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles for the Corridor and other related policies, such as Metro’s Multimodal Highway Investment Objectives policy. That is why the interchange improvement projects are being renamed as I-710 MOSAIC Program: Multimodal, Operational, Safety and Access Improvements for the Community Program. The sub-categories for freeway safety and interchange improvements are congestion pricing, freeway improvements, freeway amenities/ ITS, and zero-emission lanes on the I-710. These are described in Table 5-5. Table 5-5. Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Project Types by Sub-Category Sub-Category Project Types Congestion pricing Congestion Pricing concepts to charge single-occupant vehicles; carpools, buses, zero-emission trucks, and zero-emission automobiles would travel free Freeway improvements Interchange improvements Ramp safety and redesign Auxiliary and operational lanes Traffic controls to protect bicycles/ pedestrians at freeway ramps Truck bypass lanes Freeway lids, caps, and widened bridge decks to provide “greenbelt” connections over I-710/ L A River Freeway amenities/ ITS Particulate matter reduction pilot project Freeway repair and safety projects Soundwalls Drought-tolerant landscaping Zero-emission lanes on I-710 Zero-emission truck travel zone restrictions Zero-emission truck lanes Source: LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting 16, January 2023. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 152 of 305 5-12 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Port of Los Angeles Maritime Support Facility Improvement Source: https://www.californiaconstructionnews. com/2023/07/24/port-of-la-receives-233-million-for- infrastructure-projects/. Port of Los Angeles (POLA) is the largest U.S. port by cargo volume. In 2023, POLA received $233 million as part of a $1.5 billion State of California initiative to improve critical infrastructure, fostering a more efficient and sustainable supply chain with a focus on decarbonization efforts in goods transportation. This historic investment supports projects like the Maritime Support Facility Improvement, Rail Mainline/Wilmington Pedestrian Grade Separation Bridge, and State Route 47/ Seaside Avenue and Navy Way Interchange Improvements.[1] Port of Long Beach America’s Green Gateway Project (Pier B) Source: https://polb.com/port-info/news-and-press/ port-receives-283-million-for-americas-green- gateway-12-18-2023/. Port of Long Beach (POLB) is the second- largest U.S. port by cargo volume. The “America’s Green Gateway” project, known as the Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility at POLB, involves a $1.6 billion investment to enhance on-dock rail capacity and is expected to begin construction in 2024. This project aims to expedite national supply chain deliveries, reduce congestion, and improve air quality, positioning the Port to strengthen competitiveness and alleviate truck traffic on regional freeways. The project has received almost $650 million from state and federal funding programs, including a recent $283 million award from the US DOT’s MEGA program. [2] San Pedro Bay Port Complex Source: United States Department of Transportation (USDOT)/ Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), 2023, https://geodata.bts.gov/ datasets/usdot::principal-ports/about. The “Clean Truck Express” lane at Pier 400 Los Angeles terminal was launched on December 5th in support of sustainable transportation. This dedicated lane is exclusively for vehicles registered in the Port of Los Angeles “Clean Truck Program” and powered by battery electric, natural gas, or other zero emission technologies. By providing a dedicated lane for these trucks, APM Terminals aims to reduce gate-in times for customers, thereby minimizing energy consumption, promoting lowering emissions, and improving operational efficiency. This approach reflects APM Terminal’s commitment to environmental stewardship and supporting its customers in achieving their sustainability goals. [1] Port of Los Angeles secures $233 million in state infrastructure grants - Port Technology International [2] Port Receives $283 Million for ‘America’s Green Gateway’ - Port of Long Beach (polb .com) [3] San Pedro Bay Portwide Rail Planning for Today and 2040 | Proceedings | Vol , No (ascelibrary .org) (continued on next page) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 153 of 305 5-13 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan APM Terminals will look to expand its express lane initiative where aligned to customer needs after collecting performance data during a pilot period. The introduction of these priority lanes is one small part of APM Terminal’s broader commitment to decarbonization and lifting the standard of responsibility to secure a sustainable future. You can read more at: https://www. apmterminals.com/en/los-angeles/ practical-information/news-and- alerts/2023/231201-clean-truck- express-lane-opens-at-pier-400 Goods Movement Training Center The Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach are creating the nation’s first training facility specifically devoted to supply chain workers, located within the San Pedro Bay ports complex. The Goods Movement Training Campus will provide a single and centralized location aimed at attracting, recruiting, and retaining workers in the goods movement sector. The state allocated $110 million to be spread across three fiscal years, which started with the 2022-23 state budget and included additional amounts in 2023-24 and 2024-25. The training center will provide new job opportunities for residents of nearby communities while strengthening skills for the existing logistics workforce. Dockworkers, truck drivers, warehouse employees and other essential logistics workers will have an opportunity to learn how to operate the cutting edge equipment that will help the San Pedro Bay ports enhance air quality, combat climate change and transition to zero-emissions operations by 2035. The 20-acre campus, expected to open by 2029, is a partnership between the Port of Los Angeles, the Port of Long Beach, the California Workforce Development Board, the ILWU and the Pacific Maritime Association. The ports will equally split the balance of the project cost while working with partners to secure additional funding for training equipment and curriculum. (continued from previous page) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 154 of 305 5-14 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.9 Goods Movement Goods Movement improvements encompass the implementation of various enhancements to policies, transportation infrastructure, and logistics practices, with the goal of optimizing the efficient movement of goods and freight within and through the Corridor, and supporting economic benefits. The zero-emission rail and truck programs, and zero-emission infrastructure are specifically intended to reduce harmful emissions and health impacts to Corridor communities and improving quality of life. The sub-categories for Goods Movement improvements are: • freight rail/ goods movement travel demand management; • ports; and • truck programs/ intelligent transportation systems. Table 5-6 showcases specific project types by sub-category for goods movement improvements. Table 5-6. Goods Movement Project Types by Sub-Category Sub-Category Project Types Freight rail/ goods movement travel demand management On-dock rail expansion New inland port, greater use of freight rail Port railyard expansion and modernization Freight rail grade separations Zero-emission freight rail pilot Ports Interchange improvements Grade separations Roadway realignments, safety, and landscape improvements Wharf expansions and vessel emission reductions Cargo operational efficiencies Truck programs/ intelligent transportation systems Zero-emission truck programs Zero-emission infrastructure Empty container management Use of advanced technologies to optimize sequencing of container delivery and pick-ups to reduce congestion near railyards and ports Source: LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting 16, January 2023. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 155 of 305 5-15 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Reducing Tailpipe Emissions Improves Public Health Vehicle emissions, their impacts on air quality, and the resulting cumulative community health burdens are among the top priority issues repeatedly raised by the Corridor communities throughout the engagement process for the Investment Plan. The zero-emission (ZE) truck program funded through the Investment Plan is a vital strategy to eliminate tailpipe emissions from heavy-duty diesel trucks that travel along the Corridor and will help meet state regulations governing the transition of diesel trucks to ZE technology. However, harmful particulate matter (PM) is also produced from non-tailpipe sources, including fugitive road dust, tire wear, and brake wear associated with vehicular traffic— particularly heavy-duty trucks—on freeways and local roads. The amount of PM emitted from non-tailpipe sources is proportional to the traffic volume and correlates to vehicle weight, traffic, and weather conditions. The presence and exacerbation of non-tailpipe emissions on I-710 was a primary reason the United States Environmental Protection Agency did not find the prior I-710 South Project met air quality conformity standards. The health impacts of PM, including its causal relationship to lung cancer and respiratory diseases, are well documented. Increasingly, research findings link tire wear emissions to certain types of cancer, developmental, reproductive, and heart diseases as people breathe the air that contains toxic chemicals and heavy metals from tire wear emissions. As cargo throughput is expected to increase through the Ports, so is the number of trucks serving the Ports and traveling through the LB-ELA Corridor. Furthermore, battery-electric (BE) vehicles, including trucks, are up to 30 percent heavier than non-BE vehicles due to the battery weight, and this heavier vehicle weight will likely result in an increase in non- tailpipe emissions. As we look forward to a ZE future for every truck and car traveling on I-710 and in the LB-ELA Corridor, we recognize that the roadway will still generate PM that will continue to cause public health impacts for communities in the Corridor. The Investment Plan includes the Particulate Matter (PM) Reduction Pilot Projects to address these non-tailpipe emissions and evaluate various concepts and strategies to eliminate, capture, reduce, or mitigate non-tailpipe PM emissions. The project aims to test and evaluate various concepts and strategies, including roadside vegetation barriers within available Caltrans’ right-of-way, air filters for nearby schools or community facilities, pavement materials, tire materials, frequent street-sweeping, and deployment of air quality monitoring systems. Green canopies, groundcover vegetation, and bioswales included in the Investment Plan capture non-tailpipe emissions and alleviate heat island effects when incorporated into freeways and roadway designs. One concept that may prove effective related to pavement materials is using Rubber Modified Asphalt (RMA). RMA is a cost-effective pavement overlay material that reduces road dust and tire wear emissions compared to conventional asphalt or concrete. RMA mixes recycled and broken-up tire materials into asphalt and is considered a more sustainable pavement material because it reduces waste that would otherwise go to landfills than conventional asphalt. Caltrans has been using RMA on state highways since the 1990s. Caltrans considers many factors when selecting pavement material for its facilities. However, given RMA's known air quality and sustainability benefits compared to conventional concrete or asphalt, Caltrans may consider broader use of RMA to reap health and environmental benefits. As vehicles transition to ZE technology, non-tailpipe source emissions will likely become a more prominent issue to be addressed. Recognizing this outlook, the Investment Plan considers creative solutions for the current conditions exacerbating air quality and public health outcomes and includes pilot projects to test and evaluate the effectiveness of various strategies as they get incorporated into projects elements. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 156 of 305 5-16 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.1.10 Transit Transit (Bus or Rail) improvements encompass the implementation of various service and infrastructure projects and in the public transportation systems in a region or city. The objectives of these enhancements are to improve service quality, expand accessibility, and boost overall mobility for commuters and other travelers. By making public transit more attractive, convenient, and rapid, these improvements are intended to improve travel for existing transit users and promote a shift toward public transportation as a viable and sustainable alternative to using private vehicles. The sub-categories for Transit improvements are: • high-capacity transit (rail/ bus rapid transit [BRT]); • transit amenities; • bus transit; and • rail line/ station improvements. Table 5-7 showcases specific project types by sub-category for transit improvements. Table 5-7. Transit Project Types by Sub-Category Sub-Category Project Types High-capacity transit (rail/ BRT) New light-rail stations/ lines Rail line extensions BRT projects Transit amenities Bus shelters and lighting Transit security features Web app for transit times Transit discounts/ free passes Transit education program Customer experience program Real time displays Transit cleaning and maintenance Station furniture and shade ADA improvements Traffic control for pedestrians and bicycles Bus transit Express service Shuttles Electric bus charging On-demand bus (micro-transit) Improve bus speeds Increased bus frequencies Bus priority lanes Bus electrification projects Rail line/ station improvements Station improvements Signal prioritization for trains Station maintenance Pedestrian safety improvements at stations Improved bicycle-pedestrian connections Train reliability improvements Grade separations for trains Source: LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting 16, January 2023. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 157 of 305 5-17 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 5.2 Other/ Additional Projects for Consideration 51 LB-ELA Corridor Task Force Meeting 17, February 2023 . This MSPP is defined at the time of this document’s release, which can be viewed as a “living” Investment Plan. These have either been 1) projects included in prior lists based on prior policy guidance or funding available for their development, 2) projects directly suggested by the community, 3) concepts that need to be developed to be assessed for future implementation. Going forward, the Investment Plan will use the Modal Programs to receive new projects for consideration and to refine and complement MSPPs to advance the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. After integrating feedback from the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force, the CLC, and working groups in early 2023, the Revised Initial MSPP was created with newly added projects, programs, features, and improvements. Revisions to project and program descriptions were also developed based on the feedback received.51 Meanwhile, the corresponding agencies and project sponsors clarified how the Revised Initial MSPPs were developed. Long Beach Transit STAR Initiative Long Beach Transit (LBT) offers public transportation services including but not limited to fixed-route service, demand- response service, and water taxi service within southeastern Los Angeles County and northwestern Orange County. Spanning across 14 cities and covering over 107 square miles, LBT logged over 17.3 million annual ridership, 5.6 million service annual service miles and 571,000 service hours during Fiscal Year 2022, operating on 38 fixed routes with a fleet of 250 buses. In 2018, LBT released recommendations for improvements to their bus transit system. This was the result of extensive outreach and analysis and is called the Systemwide Transit Analysis and Reassessment, or STAR Initiative. The Short- Term Roadmap includes targeted improvements that address mobility needs with minor modifications to the existing service network. These improvements will result in better connections to local and regional destinations, increased access to frequent service and higher ridership. Please note, LBT’s STAR initiative was conducted in 2018 and the assumptions at that time may not apply today because of the pandemic and its impacts on public transit ridership. LBT expects to conduct another similar initiative in the coming years. The Long-Term Roadmap includes the improvements necessary to meet mobility needs that were identified through the STAR Initiative throughout the existing service area and beyond. Costs were not analyzed in the development of the Long-Term Roadmap. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs . . Item 20 Page 158 of 305 6-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6. Evaluation and Prioritization This chapter describes the Long Beach – East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor Task Force and Community Leadership Committee’s (CLC) evaluation and prioritization process to review more than 200 LB- ELA Corridor Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs (MSPPs). It describes each step of evaluation and prioritization, including: • the evaluation process, criteria, and results; • the tiering process and initial results within each mode; • the role and use of equity flags and community input consideration (CIC) flags; and • how the evaluation results and additional prioritization criteria are used for the investment recommendations. This process is illustrated in Figure 6-1. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 159 of 305 6-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The MSPPs (see Chapter 5) for the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) yielded more projects and programs than the Investment Plan could fund through the use and leveraging of available Measure R and M funds. To develop investment recommendations, the Goals and Guiding Principles were translated into specific metrics. Each project was ranked against these metrics on a scale of 0 to 3 or “not applicable” (N/A). Metric scores were summarized, including consideration of N/A scorings, which resulted in the first stage of project ranking. Projects received individual metric rankings as whole numbers (0, 1, 2, 3, or N/A) while goals category averages had decimal points when these numbers are averaged together. The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of projects within each travel mode: Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements, Goods Movement, Transit, and Community Programs. The ranked project scores were combined with a project readiness assessment in the Tiering analysis and an implementation assessment. Community Programs went through Figure 6-1. Evaluation Process Chart START-UP Fund Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles Evaluation, Tiering, and Prioritization AIR QUALITY MOBILITY PROSPERITY ENVIRONMENT COMMUNITY SAFETY OPPORTUNITY Projects/Programs for Initial Funding Modal Program ProjectsCommunity Programs Catalyst Fund Active Transporation / Travel Demand Management (TDM) Arterial Roadways / Complete Streets Transit Community Programs Freeway Safety & Interchange Improvements Goods Movement EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY 200+ Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs The Origin of MSPPs Investment Plan Community/Stakeholder Input, Existing Plans/Policies, and Other Sources 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 160 of 305 6-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan the same evaluation as other projects, but the project team determined after evaluation that all the community programs should be prioritized on a separate track (i.e., they would not be ranked and tiered) given the importance of advancing equity in the corridor. The evaluation process was followed by a prioritization process that assessed the potential leveraging of Measure R and M investment with regional, state, and federal funding and the impediments to implementation. The outcome of these processes was the identification of: • MSPPs well-suited to receive Measure R and M funding through inclusion in the Initial Investment Recommendations in the Investment Plan due to their higher level of alignment with the Vision, Goals and Guiding Principles and more advanced project readiness; • MSPPs that needed planning or development—to be better defined and/or aligned with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles— through the Modal Programs that complement the Investment Plan implementation to then be considered for funding in future years. 6.1 Process 6.1.1 Evaluation The LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals and Guiding Principles, as outlined in Chapter 4, provided the foundation for the evaluation process, resulting in 82 metrics52—in Benefit (66) and Concern (16) form—by which each project or program was assessed to determine its potential benefits. Projects were also assessed to identify whether there were additional considerations or potential Concerns tied to a project but not yet identified in the 82 metrics. Summary findings for each MSPP were presented to the Task Force, CLC, and Corridor communities to better understand how well each project and program meets and advances the LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals and Guiding Principles. This process resulted in the draft evaluation scoring 52 The draft metric list included 73 metrics . Through the development of the plan, nine additional concern criteria were added to the evaluation process for a total of 82 metrics . results and project rankings by mode, which were used to organize projects and programs into two tiers. As outlined in Chapter 2, the Task Force, CLC, Equity Working Group, and other stakeholders and community members provided input to the project team at each step of the evaluation phase from March 2023 to December 2023. Similarly, the list of MSPPs was compiled through existing plans, programs, and community inputs. This list included a wide range of concepts at all development stages, from merely a concept to being “shovel-ready,” as outlined in Chapter 5. More than 200 MSPPs were identified for evaluation, ranging from concepts to actual projects ready for implementation. This disparity in project readiness reflected equity gaps for lower-resource communities in the LB-ELA Corridor and resulted in inconsistent information for each project or program under review. Considering this challenge, the project team used all available information for each project and program to determine scores for each metric in this evaluation process. Scoring methodology rubrics were developed for each of the 66 Benefit and 16 Concern metrics to define how they would be applied to assess the potential performance of each MSPP in addressing that metric. The project team assigned experienced technical project team members to develop each rubric based on their area of expertise and knowledge of evaluation methods and tools. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation metrics were applied, depending on the criterion’s nature and the data available to assess each of the 82 metrics. Specifically, quantitative assessments were based on data available from the Southern California Association of Governments Travel Demand Forecasting Model, which was tailored to the LB-ELA Corridor, Air-Quality Modeling, and Geographic Information Systems analyses. Qualitative assessments were based on professional expertise from experience with similar projects, literature on expected benefits and potential adverse impacts related to project types, and stated features of the project or program based on the information available from project sponsors. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 161 of 305 6-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Each evaluation rubric included assumptions, data sources, and any additional literature or information used. It established thresholds for projects and programs to receive a score, as listed below and illustrated in Figure 6-2: • 0 (No Benefit or No Adverse Impact), • 1 (Low Benefit or Low Adverse Impact), • 2 (Medium Benefit or Medium Adverse Impact), • 3 (High Benefit or High Adverse Impact), or • Not Applicable (N/A) typically where a project or program could not realistically be planned or designed to provide the benefit associated with a given criterion or any impact on it. Likewise, projects or programs that do not have any impact on the specific Concern metric. The detailed rubrics for each Benefit and Concern criterion are shown in Appendix 6-A, which documents the evaluation methodology, with individual scoring rubrics for each evaluation criterion. The results of the evaluation process, including individual and summary Benefits and Concern scoring for each project, are shown in Appendix 6-B. The following section provides a more detailed explanation of each evaluation category. Figure 6-2. Project Benefit and Concern Rating Scale Potential Project Benefits Potential Project Concerns Potential Project Benefits No Benefit No Negative Impact 0 0 N/A N/A 1 1 2 2 3 3 Not Applicable Not Applicable Low Benefit Low Negative Impact Medium Benefit Medium Negative Impact High Benefit High Negative Impact 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 162 of 305 6-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Air Quality and Health Disparities in the Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor 53 Disparities in Air Pollution Exposure in the United States by Race/Ethnicity and Income, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34908495/ 54 2020 Mobile Source Strategy, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/sites/default/files/2021-09/Proposed_2020_Mobile_Source_Strategy .pdf 55 California Air Resources Board (CARB) Brake Tire Wear Emissions, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/resources/documents/brake-tire-wear-emissions 56 CalEnviroScreen 4 .0, https://oehha .ca .gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-40 57 I-710 Health Impact Assessment 2017, https://humanimpact .org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/HIA-I710-Air-Quality-Plan .pdf 58 SCAQMD 2022 Air Quality Management Plan, https://www .aqmd .gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2022-air-quality-management-plan/final- 2022-aqmp/appendix-i .pdf?sfvrsn=6 Regional and local transportation infrastructure investments have disproportionally impacted low-income communities and communities of color, who bear the greater share of pollution burdens and environmental stressors53. Mobile sources used for goods movement (trucks, locomotives, and ocean-going vessels) are responsible for generating significant amounts of criteria pollutants, defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which include ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, lead and particulate matter, that negatively impact the health of communities near the Ports and along major trade corridors54. In addition to exhaust emissions from these mobile sources, non-tailpipe emissions, which are released from vehicle components other than the exhaust of a vehicle such as brakes, tires and the road itself, are expected to dominate particulate matter emissions in the coming years.55 The California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool: CalEnviroScreen56, a tool developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), is used by government agencies to evaluate pollution burden and account for potential vulnerability to the adverse effects of pollution. As shown in the following figures, CalEnviroScreen results for the Long Beach-East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor have identified apparent disparities for asthma rates and cardiovascular disease. Further, the rate of Emergency Room visits among the population living within 1 mile of the Interstate 710 is higher than that in Los Angeles County.57 These health disparities are intrinsically tied to pollutants from vehicle traffic, particularly from particulate matter emissions that are 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5) and diesel particulate matter (DPM). In the United States, exposure to ambient PM2.5 is responsible for the largest share of premature deaths associated with air pollution58 and diesel particulate matter is lead evaluation indicator for air toxic impacts 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 163 of 305 6-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (including cancer risk).59,60 Subsequently, CalEnviroScreen61 results for PM2.5 and diesel particulate matter concentrations in the Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor are significant and exist at the highest statewide percentiles ranges. Given that diesel particulate matter and PM2.5 are primary indicators of air-related health outcomes, Metro has included these pollutant concentrations as proxy criteria for a project’s positive or negative impact on human health. 59 Mortality risk from PM2 .5: A comparison of modeling approaches to identify disparities, https://ehp .niehs .nih .gov/doi/10 .1289/EHP9001 60 SCAQMD MATES V Final Report, http://www .aqmd .gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-studies/health-studies/mates-v 61 CalEnviroScreen 4 .0 relies on 2015-2017 PM2 .5 monitoring data and 2016 DPM data which are outdated due to the continued progress made in improving regional air quality by existing and recently adopted regulatory actions . OEHHA . 2022 . Summary of Changes in CalEnviroScreen Version 4 .0, https://oehha .ca .gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/document/ calenviroscreen40summaryofchangesf2021 .pdf 62 Clean Air Action Plan 2017 Update, https://cleanairactionplan .org/2017-clean-air-action-plan-update/ The 2017 Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) The San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) 2017 Update62, proposed for adoption by the joint Long Beach and Los Angeles Boards of Harbor Commissioners in November 2017, built upon previous versions of the Clean Air Action Plan to help the region reduce air emissions and support the statewide vision for more sustainable freight movement. The Clean Air Action Plan 2017 Update established several key emission reduction targets and contained 14 strategies to cut emissions from sources operating in and around the Ports, with the ultimate goal of making progress towards a zero-emissions goods movement future while strengthening the ports’ economic interests. These targets and strategies included: Clean Air Action Plan Emission Reduction Targets: • Reduce residential cancer risk of Port-related DPM emissions by 85% by 2020. • Reduce port-related emissions by 59% for Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 93% for Sulfur Oxides (SOx), and 77% for Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) by 2023. • Reduce greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions from port-related sources to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% by 2050. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 164 of 305 6-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Clean Air Action Plan Strategies: • Advancing the Clean Trucks Program to phase out older trucks and transition to near-zero emissions (NZE) in the early years and zero- emission (ZE) trucks by 2035 with a truck rate to take effect in 2020. • Requiring terminal operators to purchase zero-emission equipment if feasible, or near-zero emissions or cleanest available when procuring new equipment. • Reducing emissions from ships at-berth, and transitioning the oldest, most polluting ships out of the San Pedro Bay fleet. • Accelerating the deployment of cleaner engines and operational strategies to reduce harbor craft emissions. • Expanding use of on-dock rail to shift more cargo leaving the port to go by rail. Progress Since Adoption Since the adoption of 2017 CAAP Update, the Ports have published quarterly Progress Reports63 on the status of Clean Air Action Plan targets and strategies, two feasibility assessments for Drayage Trucks (released in 201864 and 202165), and annual emission inventories66. As reported in their respective 2022 Emission Inventories, both the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles have achieved their Clean Air Action Plan 2023 emission 63 Clean Air Action Plan 2017 Update, https://cleanairactionplan .org/2017-clean-air-action-plan-update/ 64 2018 Draft Drayage Truck Feasibility Assessment, https://cleanairactionplan .org/documents/final-drayage-truck-feasibility-assessment .pdf/ 65 Final Drayage Truck Feasibility Assessment, https://cleanairactionplan .org/2017-clean-air-action-plan-update/# 66 San Pedro Bay Ports Annual Emission Inventories, https://cleanairactionplan .org/results/emission-reductions/ 67 CARB ACF Webpage, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean-fleets/about 68 CARB CHC Regulation, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/our-work/programs/commercial-harbor-craft 69 CARB In-Use Locomotive Regulation, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/our-work/programs/reducing-rail-emissions-california/locomotive-fact-sheets 70 CARB At-Berth Regulation, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/our-work/programs/ocean-going-vessels-berth-regulation 71 CARB Cargo Handling Equipment Regulation to Transition to Zero-Emissions, https://ww2 .arb .ca .gov/resources/documents/cargo-handling-equipment-regulation-transition-zero-emissions reduction targets for diesel particulate matter (DPM), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Sulfur Oxides (SOX). These reductions occurred during a time where numbers of container cargo increased by 36% and 32% in Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles respectively. Emissions are expected to further decline due to recently adopted State level regulations, such as the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF)67 Regulation, the CARB Commercial Harbor Craft Amendments (CHC)68, the CARB In-Use Locomotive Regulation69, and the CARB Ocean Going Vessels At-Berth Rule70, which requires the deployment of ZEV and NZEV technologies at the ports. Additionally, CARB is also developing a cargo handling equipment (CHE) regulation to convert 90% of the State’s CHE fleet to ZE equipment by 2036.71 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 165 of 305 6-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.1.1.1 Air Quality Three Benefit metrics were used to measure project effectiveness to improve air quality in the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-1. Table 6-1. Air Quality (AQ) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description AQ1 Reduces Emissions (Oxides of Nitrogen [NOx], Fine Particulate Matter [PM2.5]) Reduces NOx and PM2.5 emissions from on-road vehicles or offroad mobile equipment AQ2 Facilitates Clean Technologies and Lower Emissions Vehicles Facilitates the deployment of ZE vehicles/ equipment; examples include but are not limited to funding clean vehicle/ equipment technology purchase and ZE fueling infrastructure AQ3 Mode Shift to Cleaner Modes Increases the share of trips made by transit, walking, and bicycling Notes: NOx = oxides of nitrogen PM2.5 = particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter ZE = zero-emission 6.1.1.2 Community Health Five Benefit metrics were used to measure project effectiveness to improve community health in the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-2. Acronyms list Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) California Air Resources Board (CARB) California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool: CalEnviroScreenCargo Handling Equipment (CHE) Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) Greenhouse Gas (GHGs) Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor (LB-ELA) Near-Zero emissions (NZE) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Particulate matter emissions that are 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5) Port of Long Beach (POLB) Port of Los Angeles (POLA) San Pedro Bay Ports Clean Air Action Plan (CAAP) Sulfur Oxide (SOx) Zero-Emission (ZE) 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 166 of 305 6-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Table 6-2. Community Health (CH) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description CH1 Reduces Emissions (Health Effects Metrics: DPM, PM2.5) Reduces DPM and PM2.5 emissions from on-road vehicles, which in turn can generate health benefits CH2 Reduces Exposure at Receptors (HVAC/HEPA, Near-Roadway Vegetation) Reduces exposure at sensitive receptors (e.g., schools and day care centers, hospitals and healthcare clinics, senior centers, and residences) by installing filtration systems at these receptors and/or installing near- roadway vegetation between major roadways and these receptors CH3 Mode Shift to Active Transportation, Transit Increases the share of trips made by transit, walking, and bicycling CH4 Improves the User Experience (May be different metrics for different modes) Provides intuitive roadway network for all users; gap closures; exclusive pathways for active transportation; wayfinding; access to information regarding directions or transportation options; and technological solutions that make travel information, including directions and modal options, more available to the user CH5 Bicycle/Pedestrian Access to Parks, Recreational Areas, or Open Spaces Provides new or upgraded bicycle/ pedestrian facilities that connect with parks, recreational areas, or open spaces; for the purposes of this analysis, this is defined as within ¼ mile of a recreational space Notes: DPM = diesel particulate matter HEPA = high-efficiency particulate air HVAC = heating, ventilation, and air conditioning PM2.5 = particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 167 of 305 6-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.1.1.3 Mobility Seven Benefit metrics were used to measure project effectiveness to improve mobility in the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-3. Table 6-3. Mobility (MB) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description MB1 Ridership Increases transit ridership by shifting trips to transit from other modes MB2 Speeds/Travel Times (People, Goods) Increases roadway speeds (or reduces travel times) for people and goods MB3 Reduces Congestion (Hours of Delay for People and Goods) Reduces hours of delay for people and goods MB4 Modal Accessibility (by Zone) Improves access to new transportation facilities for residents; quantifies the population benefiting from the improvement based on a ¼ mile distance from the new transportation facility MB5 Reliability (Transit, Roadway, Goods Movement) Improves transportation travel time reliability, providing consistent range of predictable travel times across all modes; reliability is improved by optimizing existing transportation systems and expanding travel capacity and reducing travel delay; examples of things that improve reliability include improving safety (reducing crashes/ unexpected delay), signal timing, transit signal priority, dedicated transit lanes, separate facilities for active modes, transportation demand management, and dynamic road user charges MB6 Gap Closures Addresses a gap in the transportation network, or removes a transportation barrier, by providing a new service or new transportation facility MB7 Increases Travel Options Makes a range of (sustainable, non-SOV) transportation options more realistic for likely user trips Note: SOV = single-occupancy vehicle 6.1.1.4 Safety Seven Benefit metrics were used to measure project effectiveness to improve safety in the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-4. Table 6-4. Safety (SF) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description SF1 Protections for Bicycles/Users (Bike Class) Provides exclusive and separated pathways for bicycles SF2 Traffic Protections (Bicycle/ Pedestrian) Provides new or upgraded separation between bicycles/ pedestrians and automobile traffic SF3 Personal Security Provides features and/or services to protect individual users from crime and personal harm SF4 Includes Safety Features Provides safety from automobile collisions, primarily for other modes using the roadway; includes roadway safety for truck use, but not Metro rail safety unless it is interacting with roadway users in the project SF5 Reduces Conflict Points (Vehicle Safety) Reduces the number and severity of conflict points between vehicles traveling on highways and roadways to improve vehicle safety; this metric focuses on vehicle versus vehicle safety and does not address any interactions of vehicles with active transportation modes such as bicycles or pedestrians SF6 Traffic-Calming Features Has the effect of slowing down automobile traffic SF7 Preserves /Rehabilitates Existing Infrastructure Contains elements specifically targeting state of good repair or makes tangible improvements to existing transportation infrastructure 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 168 of 305 6-11 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.1.1.5 Environment Eight Benefit metrics were used to measure project effectiveness to improve the environment in the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-5. Table 6-5. Environment (EN) Benefit Metrics Metric Number and Name Metric Number and Name Description EN1 Improves Environment from Mode Shifts Considers the impact of the mode shift resulting from the project on the surrounding community and environment; takes into consideration the likelihood of mode shift from the project and the benefit of that mode shift on others in the community72 EN2 GHG Reduction Potential Reduces tailpipe GHG emissions from on-road and off-road vehicles EN3 Protects Natural Habitat (Greening Features) Supports improved health outcomes associated with clean air and water by protecting or enhancing natural habitats through green infrastructure investments, primarily through the provision of trees, parks, and vegetation EN4 Water Quality, Drainage, and Flood Management Features Improves water quality and/or drainage and flood management EN5 Reduces Energy Use Measurably reduces overall energy use in the Corridor (BTUs per passenger-mile and/or BTUs per ton-mile) EN6 Reduces Heat Island Effect; Provide Cooling Features for Users Reduces heat island effect by deploying cooling features like planting urban shade trees, installing reflective roofs, and using light-colored or high-albedo pavements and surfaces EN7 Potential for Noise Reduction Reduces transportation noise pollution or includes noise reduction features, such as sound barriers or low-noise technologies EN8 Supports Transportation- Efficient Land Use Principles Benefits, and benefits from, surrounding land uses that foster connectivity with public transit, multimodal trips, and high-density and mixed-use land development Notes: BTU = British thermal unit GHG = Greenhouse gas 72 The opposite of this metric is induced demand for automobile trips which are measured in Con9: Potential for VMT Increases . 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 169 of 305 6-12 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.1.1.6 Opportunity and Prosperity Seven Benefit metrics were used to measure project effectiveness for the combined Goal of improved opportunity and prosperity in the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-6. Table 6-6. Opportunity and Prosperity (OP) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description OP1 Access to Jobs Average number of jobs accessible within a 30-minute time-period by transit or a 45-minute time-period by automobile OP2 Accessibility (Improving Mobility Challenges for All Ages and Abilities) Provides new or improved transportation options, or removes barriers, for users of all abilities, including serving people with disabilities, very young and very old travelers; projects include ADA accessibility, protected active transportation facilities, and other programs that make the transportation network more available to its most vulnerable users OP3 Increases Regional Competitiveness Increase the region’s competitive economic advantage compared to other locations in the U.S.; generates jobs throughout the five-county Greater LA region and stimulates regional economic activity OP4 Work Force Development Project/program includes a workforce development component OP5 Potential Targeted Hire, New Construction Jobs The responsible agency/city has a targeted hiring policy, and scale of construction/infrastructure project OP6 Access to Quality- of-Life Amenities (Grocery Stores, Healthcare Services, Schools) Provides new transportation facilities near quality-of- life amenities; quantifies the number of quality-of-life amenities within ¼ mile of new transportation facility OP7 Access to Open Space, Recreation and Parks, LA River, etc. Provides new transportation facilities near parks and open spaces; quantifies the acreage of parks within ¼ mile of new transportation facility Note: ADA = Americans with Disabilities Act 6.1.1.7 Equity Equity criteria were designed to evaluate whether projects were likely to provide benefits related to existing LB-ELA Corridor disparities and, if so, whether those benefits would be directed to geographies and populations of highest need. Most equity metrics were adapted from other goal-related evaluation criteria (“base criteria”) to reinforce that the Guiding Principle of Equity applies holistically across all Goal areas. This process involved the application of an overlay evaluation to the corresponding rubric for the base criterion. In most cases, the overlay was Metro’s Equity Focus Communities (EFCs) (see call out box). In this “EFC-Lens” approach, the equity criterion score was calculated as the base criterion score, with points added or subtracted based on the share of the project area within EFCs. Other data overlays used to evaluate equity criteria included High Asthma and Cardiovascular Disease Rates (CalEnviroScreen 4.0); Priority Areas for Increasing Access to Regional Recreation (LA County Park Needs Assessment PNA+); and Low Tree Canopy areas (California Healthy Places Index). As with all of the evaluation metrics, the equity metrics underwent extensive review with the EWG, Task Force and CLC. The purpose of these overlay-style equity criteria was to give additional credit to projects that were not only providing benefits but were providing benefits specific to the needs of a specific area or population. For example, if two projects provided the same features related to shade and cooling, they would receive the same score for the EN6 base criterion. However, if one of those projects was located in a well-shaded neighborhood and the other was located along a busy arterial with few existing street trees, the EQ-EN6 criterion score would raise the overall equity score for the second project located in a low tree canopy area. Twenty-four Benefit metrics were used to measure potential project effectiveness in advancing equity throughout the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-7. All twenty-four equity criteria were summarized into one average equity score per project or program (on a scale of 0-3 or N/A), which contributed to the sum of the total project score. Therefore, while many equity criteria closely reflect their corresponding base criteria, the scores were not double counted in the total project score. Metro Equity Platform Pillar 1: Define and Measure: Metro created a community designation called Equity Focus Communities (EFCs) to help us identify where transportation needs are greatest. EFCs consider where there are higher concentrations of resident and household demographics associated with mobility barriers (low-income households earning less than $60,000 per year; Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC) populations; and households that do not have a car). Although the EFC category designation identifies the highest equity need communities at a macro level, Metro will work to measure and understand community conditions and priorities at the service, program and project level throughout our work. Visit metro.net/2022efcmap for an interactive map. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 170 of 305 6-13 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Table 6-7. Equity (EQ) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description EQ-AQ1 Reduces Emissions (NOx, PM2.5) in EFC Areas Reduces NOx and PM2.5 emissions from on-road vehicles or offroad mobile equipment in EFC areas EQ-AQ3 Mode Shift to Cleaner Modes in EFC Areas Increases the share of trips made by transit, walking, and bicycling EQ-CH1 Reduces Emissions (Health Effects Metrics: DPM, PM2.5) in EFC Areas Reduces DPM and PM2.5 emissions from on-road vehicles, which in turn can generate health benefits EQ-CH2 Reduces Exposure to Air Pollution in Communities Facing High Pollution Burden and Asthma Rates Reduces exposure at sensitive receptors (e.g., schools and day care centers, hospitals and healthcare clinics, senior centers, and residences) by installing filtration systems at these receptors and/or installing near-roadway vegetation between major roadways and these receptors EQ-CH3 Mode Shift to Active Transportation, Transit in EFC Areas Increases the share of trips made by transit, walking, and bicycling EQ-CH5 Increases Access to High-Quality Recreational Facilities in Areas Lacking Active Transportation Infrastructure and Parks Supports improved health outcomes associated with physical activity and recreation by providing direct linkages to parks and recreation facilities and providing active transportation infrastructure, particularly in areas lacking access to these facilities and infrastructure elements EQ-MB1 Ridership in EFC Areas Increases transit ridership by shifting trips to transit from other modes EQ-MB2: Speeds/Travel Times (People, Goods) in EFC Areas Increases roadway speeds (or reduces travel times) for people and goods movement EQ-MB3 Reduces Congestion (Hours of Delay for People and Goods) in EFC Areas Reduces hours of delay for persons and goods EQ-MB4 Modal Accessibility in EFC Areas Improves access to new transportation facilities for residents; quantifies the population benefiting from the improvement based on a ¼ mile distance from the new transportation facility EQ-MB5 Reliability (Transit, Roadway, Goods Movement) in EFC Areas Improves transportation travel time reliability, providing a consistent range of predictable travel times across all modes EQ-MB6 Gap Closures in EFC Areas Addresses a gap in the transportation network, or removes a transportation barrier, by providing a new service or new transportation facility EQ-MB7 Increases Reliable and Accessible Transportation Options for Those Who Cannot or Prefer Not to Drive Provides reliability and accessibility improvements to support the viability of non-driving travel modes such as active transportation and transit for populations currently marginalized by auto-centric infrastructure, including zero-vehicle households; children; seniors; individuals with disabilities; and those who choose not to drive for environmental, health-related, or other reasons EQ-SF1 Improves Physical Safety for People Walking, Bicycling, and Rolling Supports health outcomes associated with physical injuries and fatalities by improving safety from automobile collisions or modal conflicts, primarily through the provision of protected and separated pathways and ADA features EQ-SF3 Improves Perceptions of Personal Security for People Walking, Bicycling, Rolling, and Taking Transit Provides features and/or services that may increase the sense of safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and particularly for those from marginalized groups, from crime and personal harm EQ-EN3 Contributes to Remediation of Environmental Damage or Loss of Natural Features Supports health outcomes associated with clean soil, air, and water; contributes to remediation or restoration of natural features such as vegetation, soil, or bodies of water that have been lost or damaged due to previous infrastructure, development, and land use decisions 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 171 of 305 6-14 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Metric Number Metric Name Description EQ-EN6 Includes Urban Greening and Cooling for Areas of Low Tree Canopy and High Heat Island Burden This equity metric builds off EN6, either adding a +1 Benefit if a project is in an area with low tree canopy and/or a +1 if it is in an area with high heat island temperatures (>= 40 degrees) to the original score in EN6 (added Benefit). (EN6 scores were used as the basis for calculating EQ-EN6.) EQ-EN7 Potential for Noise Reduction in EFC Areas Reduces transportation noise pollution or includes noise reduction features, such as sound barriers or low-noise technologies EQ-OP1 Access to Jobs for Persons in EFC Areas Increases the average number of jobs accessible within a 30-minute time period by transit or a 45-minute time period by automobile EQ-OP6 Access to Quality-of-Life Amenities (Grocery Stores, Healthcare Services, Schools) in EFC Areas Provides new transportation facilities near quality-of-life amenities (grocery stores, health care, and schools) EQ-OP7 Access to Open Space, Recreation and Parks for Persons in EFC Areas Provides new transportation facilities near parks and open spaces EQ-OP8 Increases Quantity and Quality of Employment Opportunities for Underemployed and Low-Income Workforce Provides new job opportunities for underemployed and low-income individuals in the workforce EQ-OP9 Reduces Housing or Transportation Costs for Low- Income Households Has the potential to reduce housing or transportation costs through improvements in transit frequency, rail lines, pedestrian projects, bicycle projects EQ-OP10 Reduces Residential or Commercial Displacement Risk Reduces risk of economic (as opposed to physical) displacement as an adverse effect of infrastructure investment, which may result in new development interest, increasing land prices, property values, and ultimately housing/ business costs Notes: ADA = Americans with Disabilities Act DPM = diesel particulate matter EFC = Equity Focus Community NOx = oxides of nitrogen PM2.5 = particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter 6.1.1.8 Sustainability Five Benefit metrics were used to measure potential project effectiveness in advancing sustainability throughout the Corridor, as shown in Table 6-8. In contrast to the equity criteria, which applied an “overlay” evaluation to measure benefits relative to need and existing conditions, sustainability criteria were designed to measure how well projects integrate benefits across goal areas to advance positive systems change and innovate to protect and enhance community well-being. Although the distinction between equity and sustainability led to different evaluation approaches, the sustainability criteria were also summarized into one average sustainability score per project or program (on a scale of 0-3, or N/A), 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 172 of 305 6-15 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan which contributed to the sum of the total project score. Therefore, a project or program’s average equity and sustainability score contributed equally to the project’s total score. Table 6-8. Sustainability (SA) Benefit Metrics Metric Number Metric Name Description SA1 Reduces Reliance on Polluting and Energy-Intensive Modes of Travel and Goods Movement Supports health outcomes associated with clean air by reducing consumption of fossil fuels in mobility through projects or programs that support electrification, cleaner fuels, or travel behavior that reduces per capita VMT SA2 Promotes Physical Activity and Health through Active Transportation and Recreation Supports physical and mental health outcomes associated with activity by providing or enhancing access to infrastructure or services that promotes physical activity SA3 Improves Climate Resilience through Mitigation of Flooding and Extreme Heat Impacts Supports improved health outcomes associated with reducing exposure to hazards; improves community and infrastructure resilience by mitigating the risks and impacts of flooding or extreme heat SA4 Supports Job Creation in and Workforce Transitions to Green Technology and Infrastructure Sectors Provides workforce development opportunities and job training in green sectors or supports the transition to green jobs SA5 Improves Cargo Efficiencies to Minimize Trip Volumes and Emissions from Goods Movement Activity Improves cargo efficiencies to minimize trip volumes and emissions from goods movement activity Note: VMT = vehicle miles traveled 6.1.1.9 Concerns Sixteen Concern criteria were identified through consultation with the CLC and Task Force and a thorough review of each Benefit criterion to ensure that any associated potential adverse impacts were captured with the Concern criteria. For example, if a project could get credit for adding new green space, there may also be potential disbenefits if it removes green space. The full Concerns rubric document, including the process for identifying new Concern criteria, is included in Appendix 6-A. Concern scores contributed to the adjustment of overall Benefit score, assignment of equity flags, and prioritization. For instance, Outcome Concerns, which are less easy to mitigate during the project’s development, were used to adjust the project’s evaluation results during the project tiering process described below. The implication of Concern scores varied depending on the type of Concern and other project-specific factors, such as the share of project area within EFCs. Concerns were classified into three categories based on the type of impact and how much the potential impact depended on project design: Outcome Concerns, Design Concerns, and Construction Concerns. The 16 total Concern criteria included eight Outcome Concerns, seven Design Concerns, and one Construction Concern. Outcome Concerns refer to unintended impacts that are typically experienced on a system-wide or regional scale rather than confined to the project area. These are difficult to avoid through project planning and design. Design Concerns refer to direct physical impacts to the project area that can typically be avoided or minimized through project design. Construction Concerns refer to temporary disruptions to the project area related to project construction activities. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 173 of 305 6-16 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Table 6-9. Outcome, Design, and Construction Concerns (Con) 73 This would occur through induced demand for car trips . Concern Number Concern Name Description Outcome Concerns Con3 Potential for Increased Commute Times Evaluates potential for increased commute times Con4 Potential for Traffic Diversion Evaluates potential for traffic diversion/emission shifting Con5 Potential to Increase Localized Emissions/ Emissions Shifting Evaluates increases in localized DPM and PM2.5 emissions from on-road vehicles that may be related to Health Concerns Con7 Potential for Concentrated Congestion Impacts Evaluates potential for concentrated congestion impacts Con9 Potential for VMT Increases Evaluates whether a project or program has the potential to increase VMT73 Con10 Potential to Increase User Costs Evaluates whether a project or program has the potential to increase user costs, either directly or indirectly Con12 Potential to Increase Economic Displacement Captures potential for increased vulnerability to economic (as opposed to physical) displacement of residents or businesses as an adverse effect of infrastructure investment, which may result in new development interest, increasing land prices, property values, and ultimately housing/business costs Con14 Potential for Reduced Transit Ridership Evaluates whether a project or program has the potential to decrease transit ridership Design Concerns Con1 Potential for Displacements Captures the potential displacements of residences or businesses caused by the construction of a project Con2 Potential for Physical Impacts (ROW)Captures the potential physical impacts to adjacent ROW caused by the construction of a project Con6 Potential for Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety Impact Captures the potential of the project/program to introduce new safety hazards or modal conflicts for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other active transportation users Con11 Potential to Increase Impervious Cover Captures the potential negative impacts related to the addition of impervious surfaces that could increase stormwater runoff, environmental heat gain, or worsen water quality—all of which have negative impacts on ecosystems and human health Con13 Potential to Increase Noise Pollution Evaluates whether a project or program has the potential to increase noise pollution Con15 Potential for New Barriers/Decreased Access Evaluates whether a project or program has the potential to decrease access through the addition of a new physical barrier Con16 Potential for Increased Stormwater Runoff and/or Increased Flood Risk Captures the potential negative impacts related to the addition of infrastructure that does not include specific features that address stormwater runoff or flood management (the risk of flooding is increased when water cannot soak into the ground and instead runs off of impervious surfaces; when rain is heavy, this can lead to flooding, erosion and damage to surrounding infrastructure; these risks increase with weather changes associated with global warming) Construction Concern Con8 Potential Construction Impacts Captures the potential for construction impacts to communities and travelers caused by the construction of a project Notes: DPM = diesel particulate matter PM2.5 = particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter ROW = right-of-way VMT = vehicle mile traveled 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 174 of 305 6-17 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.1.1.10 Health Considerations in Evaluation The project team, with input from the Task Force, CLC, and Corridor communities, identified public health as a priority consideration and outcome in developing the Investment Plan for the LB-ELA Corridor. Several communities in the project area have historically faced significant health disparities (such as high asthma and cardiovascular disease rates) and experienced disproportionate pollution burdens (such as PM2.5 and Diesel PM emissions) compared with other communities in Los Angeles County. These health impacts were documented through health and environmental justice screening tools such as CalEnviroScreen, CA Healthy Places Index, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Environmental Justice Index Explorer, and several studies related to vehicular pollution and health outcomes surrounding the I-710 freeway and throughout the region.74,75,76,77 In addition to the high overall health burdens facing the LB-ELA Corridor communities relative to the county and state as a whole, health burdens within the Corridor disproportionately impact people of color and low- income populations. In developing the evaluation criteria, the project team carefully considered the most effective way to evaluate Project Outcomes that would support the Task Force’s desired Community Results as identified in the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. A Project Outcome is “a clearly defined future state of being at the program, local, or agency level resulting from the proposed action that ultimately supports the community result.” A Community Result, as defined in the project team’s Pilot Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool (EPET), is “the community level condition of well-being we would like to achieve. It lacks disparities based on race, income, ability, or other social demographic.” 74 The Gateway Cities Air Quality Action Plan I-710 CORRIDOR PROJECT HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT . https://humanimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/HIA-I710-Air-Quality-Plan.pdf 75 Community Health in the I-710 Corridor, https://la.myneighborhooddata.org/2019/09/community-health-in-the-710-corridor/ 76 Race, Class, and the Production of and Exposure to Vehicular Pollution in Los Angeles, https://www.metrans.org/assets/research/psr-20-19_boeing_final-report_v2.pdf 77 Improving Environmental Justice and Mobility in Southeast Los Angeles Executive Summary, https://www.metrans.org/assets/research/psr-18-sp91_giuliano_final-report.pdf The evaluation criteria were primarily categorized under the Task Force’s adopted Goals and Guiding Principles. However, to consider health more comprehensively in the evaluation process, several criteria related to each Goal were also presented to the Task Force, CLC, Equity Working Group, and Corridor communities through a framework of Social Determinants of Health to demonstrate how the Investment Plan may support the improvement of health equity in the corridor. As illustrated in Table 6-5, this approach related 27 criteria to one or more health-related project outcomes (“Project Health Outcomes”), which can contribute to various health-related community results in the long-term, as discussed in literature from the CDC, U.S. Department of Transportation, and South Coast Air Quality Management District. The Project Health Outcomes are listed in Figure 6-3 with example community results. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 175 of 305 6-18 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Figure 6-3. Project Health Outcomes and Example Community Results 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 176 of 305 6-19 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 177 of 305 6-20 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.2 Prioritization 78 California Environmental Quality Act: https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/ and National Environmental Policy Act: https://www.epa.gov/nepa The evaluation process resulted in the ranking of projects within each travel mode: Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets, Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements, Goods Movement, and Transit. The rankings were based on the total summary scores across each Benefit criteria and adjusted for the number of Outcome Concerns (Appendix 6-C). These rankings did not automatically represent funding recommendations but rather the first step in identifying which projects were most in alignment with the LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Appendix 6-B displays the list of projects and programs by ranking, mode, and evaluation results. The evaluation results were only one part of the prioritization process. The ranked project scores were combined with a project readiness assessment in the Tiering analysis and an implementation assessment described in the following sections to provide the project team with important information in developing recommendations for the Investment Plan. 6.2.1 Tiering Tiering describes the project team’s process of grouping projects and programs into two categories based on their evaluation results (Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles alignment) and readiness for future implementation (readiness category, described below). The LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles supported the evaluation process described earlier in this chapter; this resulted in each project being categorized, with its mode type, as Tier 1 (higher alignment) or Tier 2 (lower alignment) as an outcome of their evaluation results. Tier 1 projects generally scored well across many evaluation criteria; Tier 2 projects generally received lower scores across the evaluation criteria, or only scored well for a limited number of Goals or Guiding Principles. Projects were categorized into tiers based on their percentile rank within their respective mode, meaning projects with different modes were not compared across modes for placement in Tier 1. Different thresholds were established for each mode based on the number of projects within the mode and the natural breaks in the scoring results (Appendix 6-C). Projects were also organized into readiness categories of “Implementation,” “Pre-Implementation,” or “Development” to identify the right pathway for each project and program. For instance, some projects were conceptual and would need feasibility studies to refine the best solutions, while other projects, such as freeway improvements, would require the time and resources for developing scope, design and environmental clearance (subject to CEQA/NEPA).78 Thus, the “Implementation” category indicated projects or programs that were ready for construction or launch of the program, and likely eligible to compete for discretionary grant funding in the next few years. The “Pre-Implementation” category indicated well-defined projects or programs that required funding and support for pre-construction activities such as planning, design, community engagement, and environmental review. The “Development” category indicated project or program concepts that required substantial work to define scope, agency roles, and agency responsibilities and may require technical assistance to define them better through the Investment Plan's START-UP (Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative Transportation Uplifting People) Fund. The assignment of projects into tiers and readiness categories helped determine suitability for Investment Plan prioritization as an investment priority for the Metro Board. The Tier 1-Implementation and Tier 1-Pre- Implementation categories included projects and planning efforts that will be competitive for near-term or mid-term discretionary grant opportunities. Tier 1-Development projects may receive project development funding to support seeking future discretionary grant opportunities and implementation. Tier 2-Implementation projects had two possible pathways for selection: to provide complementary benefits as part of a package with other Tier 1 or Tier 2 projects; or to be eligible and competitive for a specific, available grant opportunity tailored to such a project. Tier 2-Development projects would not be considered for investment at that time but could be reconsidered as part of the Modal Program development process in future years. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 178 of 305 6-21 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Once the proposed project tiering was determined, findings were presented for feedback from Task Force, CLC, Metro Board, and other stakeholders in November 2023. Based on feedback received and further analysis, a revised set of tiered results was released in January 2024 displayed in Appendix 6-C. Figure 6-4 displays this process graphically. 6.2.1.1 Implementation Assessment In addition to project alignment and readiness, the project list was further refined against several strategic implementation factors to determine whether the projects should be considered for initial funding or assigned to a Modal Program for future funding consideration. These factors helped the project team and the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force to prioritize projects and make final recommendations for funding. The additional prioritization factors included: Identified Roles and Responsibilities: Metro was not considered the lead agency for implementing many of the projects under consideration, particularly those on local roads. For a project to be prioritized for Metro funding and to successfully secure discretionary funds, the roles and responsibilities for implementing the project must be understood and agreed upon. For projects under consideration, Metro is expected to play one or more of the following roles: Lead, Partner, Fund, Support, or Collaborate (Appendix 6-C). Discretionary Grant Strategy: This factor examined how well candidate projects and programs aligned with and competed for funding from regional, state, federal, and other discretionary grant programs to leverage Figure 6-4. Funding Pathways for Tiered Projects and Programs Implementation Construction, pilot studies, and program launch Pre-Implementation Mode Active Transportation / TDM Arterial Roadways / Complete Streets Freeway Safety & Interchange Improvements Good Movement Transit Development Support further development of projects concepts and technical assistance Tier 1 More Ready Higher Evaluation Score Lower Evaluation Scoring Packaged Projects Less Ready Tier 2 Tier 2 Tier 1 Planning, design, and environmental phases 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 179 of 305 6-22 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan local funding. Chapter 7 (funding) describes the methodology used to review the alignment between candidate Investment Plan projects and prospective grant opportunities. Project Cost/Local Match Required: Combined with the discretionary grant strategy assessment, the review also considered project cost and how much local match would be needed to deliver the project, considering the amount of funding available—and when it would be available—to serve as a local match. This factor was important to ensure that the recommendations included a full program of projects, considering limitations on Measure R and M funding available (Chapter 7) and potential project costs for larger, more complex projects. Political/Institutional/Jurisdictional Support: The review considered any existing or expected legitimate concerns to be raised by relevant institutions or political jurisdictions that could undermine the project’s potential for implementation. Equity Considerations: The projects for initial funding align with the Investment Plan’s Guiding Principle of Equity, deliver benefits to EFCs and under-resourced jurisdictions, and consider equity-based concerns in the design, construction, and outcomes phases of Investment Plan implementation. This factor assessed the equitable geographic distribution of funds, considered opportunities to provide technical assistance (START-UP Fund) to jurisdictions with fewer shovel-ready projects, and identified a path forward for concerns to be addressed after approval of the Investment Plan. Practical Feasibility/Constructability: Projects and programs were assessed for any potential limitations to their construction or implementation. Design Concerns: Projects that were more ready for implementation and had a high number of Design Concerns were scrutinized more carefully before finalizing recommendations. These prioritization factors were presented to the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force and CLC for review and input. The project team used these factors, the evaluation scores, the tiering analysis, and the flags discussed below to develop a set of projects to receive Initial Investment under this Investment Plan. 6.2.2 Flags “Flags” are additional outputs of the evaluation and community engagement process and serve as supplementary considerations for prioritization and future project development and implementation processes. Appendix 6-C displays the full list of Community Input Consideration (CIC) and Equity Flags by project or program. 6.2.2.1 Equity Flags Equity flags were derived from the Concerns evaluation, highlighting projects that had the potential to negatively impact equity focus communities (EFCs) and that required specific, additional guidance to minimize those impacts. An equity flag was raised when a project was located or partially located in EFC areas (at least 1/3 or 33% of project area) and had at least one total Concern (see Appendix 6-C). Projects were assigned Low, Moderate, and High Flags based on their total number of Concerns. For Metro-led projects, flags specify strategies to address the Concerns and minimize impacts. For some projects led by other agencies or jurisdictions, equity flags informed specific requirements for project sponsors to address Concerns as part of funding eligibility. Moderate and High Equity flags were also applied as a factor in prioritization. All projects recommended for initial funding do not have a high equity flag. In Modal Programs and future project development, flags may be used to prioritize investments or ensure potential disbenefits are addressed during project planning. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 180 of 305 6-23 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 6.2.2.2 Community Input Consideration Flags Community Input Consideration (CIC) flags captured community input that would not be reflected in the technical project evaluation results. CIC flags included project-specific Implementation Concerns, recommendations for improvement of project concept or design, and indications of general community support. CIC flags were synthesized from meeting notes and discussions with the Task Force, CLC, and other community members and stakeholders. However, it is important to note that a detailed public engagement campaign was not carried out for each project. The CIC flags should not be considered an exhaustive list of potential community concerns, and additional outreach is recommended as projects move toward implementation. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 6. Evaluation and Prioritization . . Item 20 Page 181 of 305 7-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7. Funding Strategy The success of the Long Beach – East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) in implementing projects and programs that advance the Task Force’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles relies upon leveraging limited local sales tax dollars allocated to the Corridor through Measure R and Measure M with a robust level of regional, state, and federal funding. This chapter describes the processes, information, and constraints to developing the overarching funding strategy for the Investment Plan Programs, Community Programs Catalyst Fund and START-UP Fund Program and projects identified for the Initial Investment of Measure R/M funding in the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan. The funding strategy presents the considerations and criteria used to allocate available Measure R/M funds to these programs and projects over the next decade and beyond, including an assessment of how these funds can be leveraged to maximize access to regional, state, and federal discretionary dollars. An overview of relevant regional, state, and federal discretionary funding programs, their sought-after project outcomes, and their eligibility requirements is provided. A full listing of the Investment Plan projects and the funding programs for which they are potentially eligible is included in Appendix 7-A. 7.1 Approach Developing a funding strategy is a multi-step process that required a targeted approach. The following stages of analysis have helped develop the funding strategy: LB-ELA Corridor project and program evaluation: This analysis involves developing a holistic understanding of candidate projects and their attributes to determine their suitability for Measure R/M funding and eligibility for discretionary grant opportunities. Identification of projects and programs for use of Measure R/M funding (ongoing): Based on the analysis conducted, subsets of Modal Programs and projects were identified as suitable candidates for receipt of Measure R/M funds. These funds may be used as preliminary seed funding to progress phases of project development or, for projects at a more advanced level of project readiness, may be used as a local match to meet the requirements for regional/ state/ federal implementation and construction funding programs. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 182 of 305 7-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Assessment of regional, state, and federal funding programs, including eligibility and match requirements (ongoing): This analysis element includes identifying and evaluating suitable regional, state, and federal discretionary programs across various modes of transportation and community programs. The attributes and sought-after outcomes of these relevant funding programs were matched with the attributes and forecast impacts and benefits of the Investment Plan. Continued development of project readiness, positioning, and partnership opportunities (ongoing and planned): Throughout the process, non-construction development activities and other actions will be undertaken to progress and position projects to improve their competitiveness and to provide a greater chance for successfully accessing discretionary funding—including conducting design, initiating technical studies, and establishing partnership opportunities. An overview of the funding strategy development process is shown in Figure 7-1. Figure 7-1. Funding Strategy Development Measure R/M Strategy Discretionary Funding Strategy Projects & Programs prioritization Funding Program eligibility assessment Evaluation of Projects and Programs Projects & Programs recommended for Metro funding Assessment of leveraging need (match/cost sharing) Funding Strategy 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 183 of 305 7-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7.2 Measure R and Measure M 79 LA Metro Board Report: https://boardagendas .metro .net/board-report/2023-0044/ 80 Please refer to the Investment Plan fact sheet for further details on this program . Project ID: LB-ELA_0004 Los Angeles County voters have approved four separate, non-sunsetting transportation sales tax initiatives since 1980 that assess a combined two- percent county sales tax to be dedicated to various transportation uses, from the construction, operation, and maintenance of bus and rail transit systems to the implementation of local roadway and multimodal programs and projects. Each sales tax will generate approximately $1.2 billion in revenues for LA County transportation uses in fiscal year (FY) 2024.79 The first two sales tax initiatives, Proposition A (1980) and Proposition C (1990), created general categories of projects, recipients, and uses to which revenues were programmed. In addition to identifying funding commitments to various categories of uses, Measure R (2008) and Measure M (2016) also included an expenditure plan that outlined exactly how much and in what year funding would go to vital projects across modes, purposes, and regions of LA County. Thanks to this specificity on how these initiatives would expend taxpayer dollars, voters overwhelmingly approved Measure R (67%) and Measure M (71%), surpassing the required two-thirds vote threshold for new sales taxes. The Measure R and M expenditure plans each identified the Interstate 710 (I-710) South Corridor (now the LB-ELA Corridor) as a priority for investment, allocating $590 million and $500 million, respectively, to the Corridor. Of the $1.09 billion total allocated to the Corridor, $743 million remains and is available to be programmed through the Investment Plan, as follows: • $243 million of remaining Measure R I-710 South highway funds are available for Investment Plan projects, including $50 million programmed by the Metro Board to be used as seed funding for the $200 million LB-ELA Corridor Zero Emission Truck program.80 -The Measure R expenditure plan makes these funds available immediately to implement projects in the Corridor. The Investment Plan recommends using these funds to invest in eligible projects and Modal Programs demonstrating high project readiness, aligning highly with the LB-ELA Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, and needing implementation funding before FY 2026. • $500 million of Measure M funds will become available for implementation purposes in FY 2026 ($250 million) and FY 2032 ($250 million). These funds are available earlier than the fiscal year stated in the expenditure plans for planning, development, and pre- implementation purposes. The Investment Plan recommends using these funds to provide near- term investment in pre-implementation activities to support the future implementation of longer-term prioritized projects and to help fund the Investment Plan’s Modal Programs and future implementation commitments. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 184 of 305 7-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Table 7-1. Estimated Project Costs and Recommended Programming of Measure R/M Funds Mode A. Estimated Investment Leveraging Measure R/M Funding ($m) B. Measure R/M Funding Recommendation ($m) Estimated Grant Funding Required ($m) (A – B.3) B.1. Projects for Initial Funding B.2. Modal Programs B.3. Total (B.1 + B.2) Active Transportation/TDM $195 $44 $56 $100 $95 Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets $1767 $116 $72 $188 $1,579 Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements $894 $171 $39 $210 $610 Goods Movement $332 $62 $18 $80 $252 Transit $478 $57 $68 $125 $353 Community Programs $340 $40 $0 $40 $300 Total $4,005 $490 $253 $743 $3,262 Notes: Rounding may affect totals. TDM = travel demand management LA County voters expect Metro to leverage local sales tax funding with regional, state, and federal funding to increase possible investment in vital transportation projects and programs. Table 7-1 demonstrates that the total amount of available Measure R/M funding would only be sufficient to address a modest number of the most highly ranked Investment Plan projects. Metro and its partners will need to apply for other sources of external funding (regional/state/federal funding programs); in many cases, Measure R and/or Measure M funds will be leveraged to meet the various minimum local match requirements required by those funding programs. The following section outlines the discretionary funding programs identified and evaluated for suitability and applicability to the Investment Plan’s Initial Investment projects and Programs. Taking these into account, along with the availability of Measure R/M funding, Chapter 6 discusses the evaluation and prioritization of Investment Plan projects and the regional/ state/ federal funding opportunities identified as suitable for those specific projects. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 185 of 305 7-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7.3 Suitable Discretionary Grant Programs A variety of regional, state, and federal grant programs may be suitable and applicable for the various projects and programs encompassed within the Investment Plan. With the signing of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) into law in 2022, an unprecedented number of funding programs and discretionary dollars are available to fund transportation projects. IIJA enables approximately 380 formulaic and discretionary funding programs across all infrastructure types, with approximately 120 of these programs addressing surface transportation projects and programs. IRA will provide hundreds of billions of additional federal dollars for infrastructure development, with its programs largely targeting sustainability outcomes. These new federal programs complement ongoing state discretionary grant programs funded through Senate Bill 1 in 2017, established programs like the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program, and programs dedicated to reducing air pollution and advancing zero-emission technologies at the state and regional levels. As new funding programs emerge or existing funding programs change, expand, or conclude, the Investment Plan will adapt to these changing conditions and identify new approaches to funding priority projects and programs. Although the breadth of available funding programs represents a significant opportunity for transportation agencies, the augmented number of funding programs and levels of available discretionary dollars can also potentially be daunting if the funding strategy is not clear and targeted. Applying to every possible program for every Investment Plan priority project will not yield an effective outcome. To ensure a focused approach, the project team first conducted a high-level program-wide assessment for the Investment Plan followed by project-level assessments to determine each project’s suitability for accessing the various funding programs. This analysis aimed to identify discretionary funding programs that could be accessed over the short-to-medium term to leverage available local measure funds. For this assessment, formulaic funding programs were not considered because the inclusion of projects and programs in the State Transportation Improvement Program and other state transportation programs largely determines the use of these funds. 7.3.1 Funding Program Eligibility Assessment The assessment of funding programs and their suitability for Investment Plan Modal Programs and Initial Investment projects were evaluated using a “crosswalk” analysis. In the crosswalk analysis, the full suite of available federal and state funding programs was evaluated against Investment Plan programs and projects, with suitability determined based on the following factors: • Alignment of likely candidate program and project outcomes (safety improvements, travel efficiencies, improvements to sustainability and equity) with merit criteria and/or stated objectives of the specific funding programs; • Attributes of candidate programs and projects and alignment with the typologies of infrastructure (e.g., freeways, active transportation, ports, transit, and complete streets) that specific funding programs target; • Program and project cost estimates evaluated against forecast discretionary funding pools, maximum grant award amounts, and typical award sizes noted by the funding program; • Availability of local (or nonfederal, nonstate) funding that can be leveraged and minimum match (cost sharing) requirements for the relevant funding programs; and • General project readiness and status of planning and development of candidate projects. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 186 of 305 7-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7.3.2 Federal Discretionary Funding Programs Table 7-2. Federal Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects provides a summary of federal discretionary grant programs that were identified for Investment Plan projects and programs. Further details on these programs are provided in Appendix 7-B. Table 7-2. Federal Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects Issuing Agency Grant Program Abbreviation FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities BRIC FHWA Bridge Investment Program BIP FRA Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CRISI FRA Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant Program RCE FTA Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grants TOD FTA Capital Investment Grants Program (Small Starts) CIG MARAD Port Infrastructure Development Program PIDP USDOT Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity RAISE USDOT Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods RCN USDOT Safe Streets and Roads for All SS4A USDOT Infrastructure for Rebuilding America INFRA USDOT Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation SMART USDOT Reduction of Truck Emissions at Port Facilities RTEPF USDOT Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grant Program CFI Notes: 7.3.3 State Discretionary Funding Programs Table 7-3. State Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects provides a summary of state discretionary grant programs that were identified for Investment Plan projects and programs. As shown in Appendix 7-B, the funding pools and typical grant award sizes associated with these programs are generally lower than most federal discretionary programs. However, given a smaller pool of applicants, many of these state programs may generally offer a higher probability of award. Table 7-3. State Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects Issuing Agency Grant Program Abbreviation CalSTA Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TIRCP Caltrans Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program LCTOP CARB Community Air Protection Program (AB617) AB617 CNRA Urban Greening Grant Program UGG CSGC Transformative Climate Communities TCC CSGC Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program AHSC CTC SB-1 – Solutions for Congested Corridors Program SCCP CTC State Active Transportation Program State ATP CTC SB-1 – Local Partnership Program – Competitive LPP-C CTC SB-1 – Trade Corridor Enhancement Program TCEP Notes: FEMA = Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA = Federal Highway Administration FRA = Federal Railroad Administration FTA = Federal Transit Administration MARAD = Maritime Administration USDOT = United States Department of Transportation AB = Assembly Bill CalSTA = California State Transportation Agency Caltrans = California Department of Transportation CARB = California Air Resources Board CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency CSGC = California Strategic Growth Council CTC = California Transportation Commission SB = Senate Bill 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 187 of 305 7-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7.3.4 Regional Discretionary Funding Programs Table 7-4. Regional Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects provides a summary of regional discretionary grant programs that were identified for Investment Plan projects and programs. These regional funding opportunities typically have a more focused objective and smaller funding pools. However, the projects and programs in the Investment Plan will likely be strong candidates given their expected impact on local communities and stakeholders and alignment with the regional programs’ sought-after outcomes. The list of potential regional and local discretionary grant programs will continue to be reviewed and augmented following discussions with local partners. Table 7-4. Regional Discretionary Grant Programs to Target for Investment Plan Projects Issuing Agency Grant Program Abbreviation AQMD Community Air Protection Program (Incentives) CAPP AQMD Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust VEMT MSRC Clean Transportation Funding CTF MSRC Transformative Transportation Strategies and Mobility Solutions Program TTSMS Note: AQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District MSRC = Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee 7.3.5 Local Match Requirements An important aspect to consider when seeking access to federal and state discretionary programs is that most have local cost share requirements. Also known as the local match, this cost share represents the minimum contribution of nonfederal or nonstate funding an applicant must commit toward delivering a candidate project if it were to be awarded federal or state funding. Most funding programs require a local match of at least 20%, though this minimum threshold can vary from program to program— and may differ within a program, depending on whether the applicant is seeking funding for planning or construction activities. Additionally, the location of a candidate project can factor into local match requirements, with the minimum threshold lowered, or even waived, for projects in state and federally designated areas of economic, social, and/or environmental disadvantage. Suitable funding programs which address community program projects will be added to the Investment Plan following development by each community program’s working group. Table 7-5. Local Match Requirements by Funding Program provides the range of local match requirements for the funding programs outlined above. Suitable funding programs which address community program projects will be added to the Investment Plan following development by each community program’s working group. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 188 of 305 7-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Table 7-5. Local Match Requirements by Funding Program Federal/ State Grant Program Abbr. Minimum Match Requirement Federal Bridge Investment Program BIP Planning: 10% Construction: 20%/50% (<$100 million/>$100 million Categories) Federal Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities BRIC 25% Federal Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grant Program CFI 20% Federal Capital Investment Grants Program (Small Starts) CIG 20% Federal Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements Program CRISI 20% Federal Infrastructure for Rebuilding America INFRA 40% Federal Port Infrastructure Development Program PIDP 20% Federal Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity RAISE 20% (Urban Areas), 0% (Rural, HDC, or APP) Federal Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant Program RCE 20% Federal Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods RCN 20% (RCP Planning and NAE Capital/Planning), 50% (RCP Capital) Federal Reduction of Truck Emissions at Port Facilities RTEPF 20% Federal Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation SMART No match requirement for planning grants 20% for capital projects Federal Safe Streets and Roads for All SS4A 20% Federal Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grants TOD 20% State Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program AHSC 10% State State Active Transportation Program State ATP No match required State Low-Carbon Transit Operations Program LCTOP No match required State Local Partnership Program-Competitive LPP-C 50% State SB-1 Solutions for Congested Corridors Program SCCP No match required State Transformative Climate Communities TCC 50% State SB-1 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program TCEP No match required if nominated by Caltrans. 30% local match required if nominated by regions. State Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TIRCP No minimum match requirement, but funding leverage is desirable and will be considered in the evaluation State Urban Greening Grant Program UGG No match required Regional Transformative Transportation Strategies and Mobility Solutions Program TTSMS No match required Notes: APP = Areas of Persistent Poverty Caltrans = California Department of Transportation HDC = Historically Disadvantaged Communities NAE = Neighborhood Access and Equity RCP = Reconnecting Communities Pilot 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 189 of 305 7-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7.4 Summary and Considerations The estimated funding needed for Investment Plan projects and programs recommended for funding is shown in Table 7-6 and is estimated to exceed $3 billion. Metro and partners will need to leverage available and forecast Measure R/M funding to develop and deliver the Investment Plan Programs and projects. These funds must be used judiciously as seed money for project development and local cost share to leverage the maximum funding from suitable regional, state, and federal discretionary programs. The project team must consider a wide range of additional funding sources to address the significant gaps between Measure R/M funding and the capital levels required to deliver the prioritized Investment Plan projects and Modal Programs. This chapter has highlighted a range of federal, state, and regional grant opportunities that align with the array of different Investment Plan projects and Modal Programs, building off a detailed crosswalk analysis (Appendix 7-A) and an assessment of the key attributes for funding programs that should be considered (Appendix 7-B). Table 7-6. Funding Need and Discretionary Grant Programs to Target Mode A. Estimated Investment Leveraged from Measure R/M ($m) B. Measure R/M Funding Recommendation ($m)Estimated Grant Funding Required ($m) (A – B.3) Examples of Suitable Funding Programs B.1. Projects for Initial Funding B.2. Modal Program B.3. Total (B.1 + B.2) Active Transportation/ TDM $195 $44 $56 $100 $95 RCN, SS4A, ATP, TCC, UGG, SCCP Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets $1767 $116 $72 $188 $1,579 RAISE, SS4A, ATP, BIP, SCCP, TCEP, SMART Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements $894 $171 $39 $210 $610 RAISE, SMART, BIP, INFRA, RCN, SCCP, TCEP, CFI Goods Movement $332 $62 $18 $80 $252 TCEP, PIDP, RAISE, INFRA Transit $478 $57 $68 $125 $353 RAISE, SCCP, TIRCP, CRISI, RCE, TOD Community Programs $340 $40 $0 $40 $300 UGG, AHSC, AB617, CAPP Total $4,005 $490 $253 $743 $3,262 Notes: TDM = travel demand management 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 190 of 305 7-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 7.4.1 Implementation and Considerations This chapter has set out a framework for how the funding strategy for the Investment Plan has been developed and will continue to evolve. The following chapter (Chapter 8) applies this framework to evaluating the Initial Investment recommendations for projects to receive Measure R/M funding and evaluates which federal/ state/regional grant opportunities should be targeted to address the remaining funding gaps for those prioritized projects. Going forward, the funding strategy will continue to be refined as Investment Plan Modal Programs and projects develop and evolve and new discretionary funding opportunities emerge. It should, therefore, be considered a “living document” subject to updating and adaptation in line with changing opportunities and challenges during the investment plan’s multi-decade timeframe. Throughout this time horizon, the development of Modal Programs and projects should incorporate the following positioning themes, which can contribute to the strategy’s successful implementation: Right-sizing and packaging of projects: This could involve bundling projects where synergies or minimum project sizes apply or splitting larger programs into individual projects, phases, or groups of projects to access specific funding programs more easily and address maximum grant award limits. Positioning projects: This entails framing candidate projects to show multifaceted and, where possible, direct alignment with the desired outcomes and objectives of the targeted discretionary funding program(s). Interim actions to progress project readiness: Project readiness is often a major consideration for discretionary programs, with federal and state agencies seeking to invest in projects that can be delivered over a near-term time horizon (e.g., present-day to five years). Accordingly, to increase the competitiveness of a candidate project, it is important to continue to progress pre-construction development activities including, but not limited to, design and planning (for capital projects), cost estimation, environmental regulatory analysis (CEQA/NEPA), technical studies (safety, traffic, and goods movement) and/or economic modeling (impacts, job creation, and benefits). 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 7. Funding Strategy . . Item 20 Page 191 of 305 8-1 8. Recommendations The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) initiated the development of the Long Beach-East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridor Mobility Investment Plan (Investment Plan) following the Metro Board’s decision to suspend the prior I-710 South Corridor project that threatened to displace residents and local businesses, increase air pollution, exacerbate public health concerns, and create more environmental impacts for some of LA County’s most vulnerable communities adjacent to the freeway. In its place, the Metro Board directed its CEO to develop a new, consensus-based process to engage impacted residents, communities, and stakeholders in developing a comprehensive, multi-modal, community-responsive, and regionally significant transportation Investment Plan. This Investment Plan stands in marked contrast to its predecessor and signals a point of inflection for Metro in how it engages communities and stakeholders in developing a comprehensive approach to investment in freeway corridors through robust, ongoing, and consequential community engagement. To achieve the Metro Board’s vision, staff created the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force and the Community Leadership Committee (CLC) to give impacted residents and communities a meaningful voice in developing the Investment Plan’s values, processes, and recommendations. The Task Force is the main advisory body for Metro, comprising representatives of Corridor communities, institutions, governmental agencies, and industries that are impacted by or dependent upon the movement of people and goods in the Corridor (as described in Chapter 2). The CLC allowed Metro to convene a diverse and committed group of community representatives who live along the LB-ELA Corridor to advise the Task Force throughout the Investment Plan process (see Chapter 2). The Task Force and CLC provided an opportunity for direct engagement to impacted communities that felt excluded or unheard during the prior I-710 South Corridor project process. As a result, the Investment Plan reflects a dedicated focus on addressing the myriad issues facing residents impacted by I-710, including poor air quality; high levels of pollution; significant health and environmental impacts; heavy traffic congestion; poor traffic safety for automobiles, trucks, bicyclists, and pedestrians; a lack of multi-modal transportation infrastructure; low levels of economic opportunity for residents; and high levels of poverty (see Chapter 3). The Task Force and CLC met separately and jointly to review and advise on Investment Plan goals, proposals, and recommendations throughout the process. Members from both groups Photo courtesy of Caltrans District 7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 192 of 305 8-2 also participated in working groups, helped ground truth data, and shared upcoming outreach and engagement efforts with their communities. Over the 30-month Task Force process, the Task Force and CLC members worked together to re-evaluate the many needs and goals for investment in the Corridor, develop multi-modal strategies to meet these needs and identify potential projects and programs in the short and long-term based on those strategies. The stakeholders’ lived experience in the Corridor and desire to improve regional mobility, safety, and air quality while fostering economic vitality, social equity, environmental sustainability, and access to opportunity played an integral role in creating this multi-modal, community-focused, and regionally significant Investment Plan. As a strategic planning document, the Investment Plan establishes an overarching vision for identifying and securing investment in projects and programs that align with and support the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles over the next 20 years. Although the primary focus of the Task Force and CLC was the identification of projects and programs for Metro to invest and leverage Measure R and M funding dedicated to the Corridor, the comprehensive goal of the Investment Plan is also to attract regional, state, and federal investment to implement other projects and programs that also advance the Corridor’s values. The Investment Plan’s overall need for investment consists of projects that are fully or partially funded through external grant funding, those that will receive other Metro funding, and projects that will receive Corridor Measure R/M investment as identified in this Investment Plan. The topline amount of investment the LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan seeks to secure is more than $20 billion, which includes the Measure R/M commitments, anticipated leveraging from the measure funding, as well as other external grant sources. This amount will likely increase as new projects and programs are identified, prioritized, and incorporated into the Investment Plan. 8.1 Projects with Outside Funding Through collaboration with its LB-ELA Corridor stakeholders, Metro has supported and helped deliver investment in a series of multimodal transportation projects since initiating the Task Force in September 2021, from local bicycle lanes to major port infrastructure projects. On July 6, 2023, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) awarded $643.5 million to implement port projects and freight rail projects valued at over $3 billion through its one-time Port and Freight Infrastructure Program (PFIP)81. These include initial funding for major freight rail efficiency projects that will support greater movement of cargo by rail, including the Commerce Flyover project and the Hobart/Commerce Intermodal Facility, which received a combined $27 million toward their total cost of $2.139 billion and the Port of Long Beach System-Wide Investment in Freight Transport (SWIFT) with $225 million in state funds toward the estimated cost of $593.7 million. Additionally, the Task Force also identified a set of projects that received investment through the Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity (PIPO), which allowed Metro to seek grant funding for Corridor projects before the Investment Plan could be finalized to take advantage of available funding opportunities. In 2023, the PIPO yielded $46.6 million in grant funding to support a $76 million investment in the Corridor82. In Cycle 6 of the State Active Transportation Program83,15 projects in Corridor cities and unincorporated communities valued at $114.8 million received $92.6 million in grant funding, including one project that was included in the PIPO. In total, these recent Federal and State grant commitments total over $1.33 billion that will help deliver Corridor projects valued at over $4.9 billion as part of the Investment Plan (see Table 8-1). 81 For more information on CalSTA’s program: https://calsta .ca .gov/-/media/calsta-media/documents/pfip-awards-summary-narrative-7-6-23-a11y .pdf 82 To read about this investment: LPP-C funding for SELA TIP: https://catc .ca .gov/-/media/ctc-media/documents/programs/local-partnership-program/competitive/2022-guidelines- competitive/tab-18-4-6-a11y .pdf 83 For more information: MPO: https://catc .ca .gov/-/media/ctc-media/documents/programs/atp/2023/2023-atp-staff-reccomendations-mpo-component-a11y .pdf and State level: Statewide: https://catc .ca .gov/-/media/ctc-media/documents/programs/atp/2022/2023-atp-staff-recommendations-final-a11y .pdf Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 193 of 305 8-3 84 CalSTA: https://calsta .ca .gov/-/media/calsta-media/documents/pfip-awards-summary-narrative-7-6-23-a11y .pdf 85 https://www .transportation .gov/sites/dot .gov/files/2024-01/MEGA%20Fact%20Sheets%20FY%202023-2024_Final .pdf 86 USDOT - CMAQ: https://www .transportation .gov/sustainability/climate/federal-programs-directory-congestion-mitigation-and-air-quality-cmaq 87 https://catc .ca .gov/-/media/ctc-media/documents/programs/tcep/4192022-tcep-program-of-project-amendment-a11y .pdf 88 US DOT 2023: https://www .maritime .dot .gov/sites/marad .dot .gov/files/2023-11/PIDP%202023%20Awards%20Fact%20Sheets_0 .pdf and 2022: https://www .maritime .dot .gov/sites/ Mode and Project Name Committed Amount ($M) Estimated Total Cost ($M)Funding Source Goods Movement System-Wide Investment in Freight Transport (SWIFT) - Electrification Projects $225.0 $593.7 Port Freight and Infrastructure (PFIP)84 Maritime Support Facility (MSF) Improvement and Expansion Project $149.3 $198.3 Port of Los Angeles Rail Mainline/Wilmington Community and Waterfront Pedestrian Grade Separation Bridge $42.1 $57.9 State Route 47-Seaside Avenue and Navy Way Interchange Improvement Project $41.8 $63.0 Commerce Rail Flyover $12.0 $939.0 Hobart/Commerce Intermodal Facility $15.0 $1,200.0 America’s Green Gateway: Pier B Rail Program Buildout $283.0 $1,547.0 U.S. DOT MEGA Grant85 - SWIFT - Pier B Component $158.4 PFIF - Pier B Street Freight Corridor Reconstruction Project $26.3 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)86 - America’s Green Port Gateway: Pier B Early Rail Enhancement Project $70.4 Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP)87 - America’s Green Port Gateway Phase 1: Pier B Early Rail Enhancements $52.2 US DOT Port Infrastructure Development Program88- North Harbor Transportation System Improvement Project $52.6 Middle Harbor Terminal Zero Emission Conversion Project $30.1 $37.7 Goods Movement Work Force Training Facility $110.0 $150.0 CA State Budget Pier 300 Wharf Expansion/Vessel Emission Reduction Project $300.0 $300.0 Port of Los Angeles Long Beach Container Terminal (LBCT LLC) Electrification Advancement Project (LEAP)$35.0 NA U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration Reduction of Truck Emissions at Port Facilities grant programWattEV Inc. to purchase heavy duty electric trucks at the Port of Long Beach $9.0 NA Voltera Power to build a large-scale charging projects near the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles $1.7 NA Table 8-1. Corridor Investments Supported by Other* Funding Sources Metro is also supporting Corridor projects that will not necessarily be eligible for or receive Measure R and M funds dedicated to the Corridor. Roughly $7.2 billion of federal, state, and Measure M transit capital funding will be needed to deliver the first segment of Southeast Gateway Light-Rail Transit (LRT) Line (formerly the West Santa Ana Branch Line). Overall, the Investment Plan supports the delivery of projects valued at more than $12 billion that will be funded through sources other than the Corridor’s Measure R/M funds described below. Note: table continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 194 of 305 8-4 89 CA CTC: https://catc .ca .gov/-/media/ctc-media/documents/ctc-meetings/2023/2023-06/19-4-9 .pdf 90 LA Metro Board Report: https://boardagendas .metro .net/board-report/2020-0562/ 91 US DOT FY23: https://www .transportation .gov/grants/reconnecting-communities/reconnecting-communities-fy23-awards Mode and Project Name Committed Amount ($M) Estimated Total Cost ($M)Funding Source Active Transportation City of Bell Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements $3.0 $3.0 California Active Transportation Program Cycle 689 City of Carson City-wide Community Safety Improvements $3.5 $3.5 City of Carson Master Bicycle Plan $0.9 $0.9 City of Long Beach Mid-City Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections $8.8 $9.8 Huntington Park Safe Routes for Seniors and Students**$4.3 $4.8 Metro A Line Connections for Unincorporated Los Angeles County $9.9 $12.3 Randolph Street Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Project $0.2 $1.4 Salt Lake Avenue Pedestrian Accessibility Project $7.1 $7.1 Slauson Avenue Corridor and City-Wide Pedestrian, Bike, Transit Improvements $2.1 $2.1 South Downey Safe Routes to School (Project Phase 2)$1.2 $1.2 Tweedy Boulevard Active Transportation Improvements $5.3 $6.6 Southeast Gateway Light Rail Station First-Last Mile Bikeway Safety and Access Project $3.4 $3.4 Walnut Park Pedestrian Plan Implementation $2.5 $9.7 Wilmington Safe Streets: A People-First Approach $32.3 $40.8 West Paramount Utility Easement Multi-use path Phase 1 $9.7 $9.7 Randolph Street Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Project $6.7 $8.5 Metro Active Transportation Program90 Rail Mainline/Wilmington Community & Waterfront Pedestrian Grade Separation Bridge $5.0 $62.6 Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods (RCN FY23)91 Reconnecting North Long Beach - Hamilton Loop Project (Planning Study)$1.2 $1.5 Reconnecting East Los Angeles: 60 Green Bridge Project for Belvedere Park (Planning Study) $0.8 $1.0 Table 8-1. Corridor Investments Supported by Other* Funding Sources (continued) Note: table continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 195 of 305 8-5 92 US DOT: https://www .transportation .gov/sites/dot .gov/files/2023-02/RCP%20Fact%20Sheets%202022 .pdf 93 CA CTC: https://catc .ca .gov/-/media/ctc-media/documents/programs/local-partnership-program/competitive/2022-guidelines-competitive/tab-18-4-6-a11y .pdf 94 Measure M Expenditure Plan: https://www .metro .net/about/measure-m/ 95 US DOT CIG Dashboard: https://www .transit .dot .gov/sites/fta .dot .gov/files/2024-01/Public-CIG-Dashboard-01-05-2024 .pdf Mode and Project Name Committed Amount ($M) Estimated Total Cost ($M)Funding Source Arterial Roadway/Complete Streets I-710 Integrated Corridor Management (ICM)**$27.8 $40.2 TCEP Shoreline Drive Gateway $30.0 $60.0 Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods Pilot (RCN FY22)92 Transit Southeast LA Transit Improvement Program**$14.5 $31.1 Local Partnership Program93 Southeast Gateway Line LRT (Slauson A Line Station to Pioneer Segment)***$1,435.0 $7,167.0 Measure M94 US DOT CIG (TBD)95 Removing Barriers and Creating Legacy - A Multimodal Approach for Los Angeles County $139.0 $162.0 RCN FY23 Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 $3,000.0 $10,169.0 Measure M, TIRCP, Measure R; to pursue RIP, SCCP and LLP (SB-1), CIG,CMAQ, MEGA. and RAISE programs Table 8-1. Corridor Investments Supported by Other* Funding Sources (continued) Notes: This table is not an exhaustive list of all committed investments in the Corridor . Project costs are subject to change . * “Other” funding sources exclude the available Measure R/M funding for the Investment Plan ** Projects included in Metro’s PIPO *** Measure M commitment is for entire LRT corridor Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 196 of 305 8-6 8.2 Projects and Programs Receiving Measure R/M Investment The Investment Plan recommends the investment of $743 million in Measure R and M funding dedicated to the LB-ELA Corridor to catalyze more than $4 billion in local, state, and federal investment in priority projects and programs consistent with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles of the LB-ELA Corridor, as adopted by the Task Force and approved by the Metro Board as official policy for the Corridor. Taken together, the total investment generated from Measures R and M funding is expected to be more than $4 billion. These projects and programs were selected through a Task Force process that initially identified more than 200 projects and programs throughout the LB-ELA Corridor, serving a wide range of travel modes and community- identified needs. After evaluating each project and program’s potential to advance the Task Force’s adopted Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles, highly rated projects were considered in the LB-ELA Corridor context and prioritized by assessing each project and program for technical, logistical, and political feasibility. This evaluation and prioritization process resulted in a comprehensive list of Initial Investment projects and programs (see Table 8-1) recommended for Metro’s fixed Measure R/M funding for the Corridor, as identified in each Measure’s respective expenditure plan. The Measure funding represents a small portion of the total needed to deliver these Corridor improvements; to be successful, Metro and its partners must leverage these funds with additional regional, state, and federal discretionary grant awards and other sources. These projects recommended for initial funding represent meaningful steps toward fulfilling the Investment Plan’s long-term vision for the LB-ELA Corridor. As previewed in Chapter 6, the Investment Plan aims to use Measure R/M funds as follows96. • Funding for Implementation: The Investment Plan will fund projects that are (1) highly rated in achieving the Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles as defined by the Task Force and CLC and (2) are ready for near-term funding opportunities through existing and available Measure R dollars97. This category could include ready-to-go projects identified through the Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity (PIPO) process (as described in Chapter 5). • Funding for Pre-Implementation: The Investment Plan will allocate funds to advance other highly rated, but less-ready projects through their remaining planning and pre-implementation steps. Due to their scale and complexity, these medium to long-term projects need more time to be ready for future funding cycles (with near- term planning funding, medium-term environmental funding, and longer-term implementation funding reserved for these projects). • Funding for Development: To support the Plan’s commitment to equity, the plan will allocate funds through Modal Programs to support equitable project planning, development, and ultimately, implementation of future projects that address the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Given that some communities did not have project concepts ready for inclusion in the MSPP, this funding will focus on identifying gaps or needs and help prioritize Equity Focus Communities (EFC), in addition to those considered in the first two categories. It will provide needed technical assistance and planning resources currently lacking within under-resourced communities to fully develop project concepts, currently in their early stages, to advance toward implementation. The funding is called the START-UP (Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative 96 These categories are displayed by project in the project fact sheets in this document as “phase” or in the online visualization dashboard as “status”. 97 See Chapter 7, Funding, for more on this. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 197 of 305 8-7 Transportation Uplifting People) Fund and will result in additional candidate projects that address the Equity Guiding Principle that will qualify for future funding. • Funding for Community Programs: Community Programs are a hallmark of the Investment Plan’s commitment to equity and improving the lives of those in the community. These programs are designed to provide unique, equity-centered benefits to impacted LB-ELA Corridor residents, reflecting the input received from community members throughout the Investment Plan development process. The Investment Plan includes $40 million in funding, called the Community Programs Catalyst Fund, and is targeting additional grant funding for a total of $300 million—an average of $20 million for each of the 15 Community Programs. The intent of the Catalyst Fund is to allow each program to be further developed into a fundable project or program, develop priorities for projects and programs, and create strategies for ongoing funding from local sources and discretionary grant sources. Because the community programs feature varying degrees of transportation-related scope, leveraging outside grant and local funding will be an important focus of this effort, as Metro cannot fund most of the community programs beyond the planning stage due to the transportation nexus requirements of Measure R/M funding. Metro commits to collaborating and partnering with other assigned lead agencies to identify eligible funding sources, implementation pathways, and appropriate sponsors for these programs. Community Program development will be supported by Working Groups that will include community members and community-based organizations, further described in Chapter 9. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 198 of 305 8-8 8.3 Initial Investments: Projects/Programs Recommended for Initial Funding Based on the project outreach and evaluation processes, the projects recommended for the initial funding allocation of Measure R/M funds assigned to the LB-ELA Corridor are included in Table 8-2 and are explained in more detail in the Fact Sheets in Section 8.4. The projects recommended for Initial Investment are in various stages of project development, from planning through implementation. All applicable projects will adhere to Clean Air Act conformity analysis requirements. These projects/programs are displayed in Figure 8-16. In addition to the projects and programs identified for Initial Investment, the Investment Plan also looks to the future of the LB-ELA Corridor by supporting, planning, developing, identifying, and refining projects, programs, and strategic initiatives, and addressing unmet equity needs to advance the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Modal Programs, detailed in a subsequent section, will serve as the mechanism by which these ongoing planning and development activities leading to implementation will occur following the adoption of the Investment Plan. The Investment Plan features five Modal Programs centered around the following modes of transportation to categorize projects during the development of the plan: Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements, Goods Movement, and Transit. Metro, its partners, and stakeholders will need to continue collaborating to advance the projects in the Modal Programs toward implementation to further the goals of the Investment Plan. Furthermore, the Investment Plan will reserve funding within each Modal Program to carry out these planning and development activities and implement some projects that eventually emerge from this future work. Further detail is provided for projects and programs recommended for Initial Investment in the following tables. Project descriptions reflect project details available at the time of the Investment Plan project collection and evaluation process. The description and scope for projects that will require additional pre-implementation work may be modified in the future based on these planning and design processes. Projects and programs may include Equity and/or Community Input Consideration Flags described below. • Equity Flags - Highlight potential Concerns that impact EFCs, as identified through the technical evaluation criteria. A high Equity Flag refers to more or greater potential impacts, and medium or low Equity Flags refer to fewer or lesser potential impacts respectively. Where a project includes an Equity Flag, implementation requirements and guidance are provided to address the equity issues identified. • Community Input Considerations (CIC) Flags - Highlight recommendations or Concerns raised by community members through the Investment Plan development process that were not captured through the technical evaluation criteria (see Chapter 6 for more information). The projects and programs recommended for Initial funding are listed in Table 8-2. Equity and CIC flags are noted in project Fact Sheets within this chapter and in Appendix 6-C, Table 8. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 199 of 305 8-9 Active Transportation / TDM Arterial Roadways / Complete Streets Freeways Interchanges and Safety Improvements Goods Movement Transit Symbol Project Name Projects by Mode PROJECTS FOR INITIAL FUNDING 1 IN = 15,000 FT Equity Focus Communities SEAL BEACH LOS ALAMITOS CYPRESS LA PALMA ROLLING HILLS ROLLING HILLS ESTATES LOMITA SIGNAL HILL ARTESIA CERRITOS LAWNDALE CUDAHY SANTA FE SPRINGS BELL GARDENS MAYWOOD BELL VERNON COMMERCE HAWAIIAN GARDENS LAKEWOOD CARSON BELLFLOWER GARDENA COMPTON HAWTHORNE LYNWOOD SOUTH GATE HUNTINGTON PARK PICO RIVERA WHITTIER MONTEBELLO REDONDO BEACH PARAMOUNT TORRANCE NORWALK DOWNEY INGLEWOOD LONG BEACH DOWNTOWN LA Figure 8-1. Projects/Programs for Initial Investment Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 200 of 305 8-10 98 The Humphreys Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing project was selected for the Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity (PIPO) by the Metro Board in September 2022 as a priority for the LB-ELA Corridor. This project received a $9.9615 million USDOT Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods Grant. Project/Program Name Investment Plan Amount ($M)Project ID Bus Stop Improvement Projects/Programs $19.0 LB-ELA_0203 Complete Street Corridor: Alondra Boulevard $9.0 LB-ELA_0060 Complete Street Corridor: Atlantic Boulevard $68.6 LB-ELA_0057 Complete Street Corridor: Florence Avenue $24.9 LB-ELA_0058 Complete Street Corridor: Long Beach Boulevard $0.8 LB-ELA_0062 Complete Street Corridor: Slauson Avenue $3.6 LB-ELA_0061 Clean Truck Infrastructure**LB-ELA_0023 Compton Creek Bike Underpasses $0.5 LB-ELA_0165 Compton Transit Management Operations Center Enhancements $2.0 LB-EVA_0168 Freight Rail Electrification Pilot Project $10.0 LB-ELA_0217 Goods Movement Freight Rail Study $2.0 LB-ELA_0151 Humphreys Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing98 $9.0 LB-ELA_0139 I-710 Freeway Lids, Caps and Widened Bridge Decks $5.0 LB-ELA_0181 I-710 MOSAIC Program $153.6 I-710/Firestone Interchange Improvements LB-ELA_0033 I-710/Florence Interchange Improvements LB-ELA_0034 I-710/Willow Interchange Improvements LB-ELA_0028 I-710/Del Amo Interchange Improvements LB-ELA_0029 I-710/Long Beach Boulevard Interchange Improvements LB-ELA_0030 I-710/Alondra Interchange Improvements and Modification of SB I-710 to SR 91 Connectors LB-ELA_0031 I-710/Imperial Interchange Improvements LB-ELA_0032 I-710/Auxiliary Lanes (Willow to Wardlow)LB-ELA_0035 I-710/I-405 Connector Project Improvements LB-ELA_0036 I-710/I-105 Connector Project Improvements LB-ELA_0037 I-710 Auxiliary Lanes (Del Amo Boulevard to Long Beach Boulevard)LB-ELA_0038 Table 8-2. Projects/Programs Recommended for Initial Investments (alphabetical) Note: table continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 201 of 305 8-11 Project/Program Name Investment Plan Amount ($M)Project ID I-710/Anaheim Interchange Improvement LB-ELA_0091 I-710/PCH Interchange Improvement LB-ELA_0092 I-710/Wardlow Interchange Improvement LB-ELA_0093 I-710 Particulate Matter Reduction Pilot Project $2.0 LB-ELA_0157 I-710 Planning Study: Reconnecting the Long Beach-East LA Corridor Communities***$2.5 LB-ELA_9318 I-710 Traffic Controls at Freeway Ramps $10.0 LB-ELA_0156 LA-ELA Corridor Bus Transit Priority (Eight Corridors)$31.1 • Atlantic Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0146 • Long Beach Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0141 • Florence Avenue Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0144 • Slauson Avenue Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0142 • Gage Avenue Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0143 • Firestone Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0145 • Whittier Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0178 • Olympic Boulevard Bus Priority Lane Corridor LB-ELA_0179 Metro A Line First/Last Mile Plan Improvements $9.8 LB-ELA_0008 Metro A Line: Quad Safety Gates at all A Line [Blue Line]$5.0 LB-ELA_0175 Rail to River Active Transportation Corridor Segment B $3.2 LB-ELA_0006 Regionally significant bicycle projects from the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan $15.7 LB-ELA_0017 Shoemaker Bridge/Shoreline Drive $9.0 LB-ELA_0010 Southeast Gateway Line Bike and Pedestrian Trail**$3.8 LB-ELA_0111 Zero-Emission Truck Program $50.0 LB-ELA_0004 Community Programs Catalyst Fund $40.0 NA Table 8-2. Projects/Programs Recommended for Initial Investments (alphabetical, continued) Notes: I-710 = Interstate 710 * Clean Truck Infrastructure investment included as part of the Zero-Emission Truck Program (LB-ELA_0004) ** Formerly called the "West Santa Ana Branch" trail . Bikeway project name updated to reflect new rail corridor name . *** See Section 8 .3 .1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 202 of 305 8-12 8.3.1 New Project Recommended for Initial Investment I-710 Planning Study: Reconnecting the Long Beach-East LA Corridor Communities (LB-ELA_9318) This planning study will advance the work of the Task Force in collaboration with project partner METRANS to identify crossings of I-710 at which capital improvements are needed to reconnect communities on either side of the freeway. This study meshes well with the Alternatives Analysis study of the I-710 MOSAIC Program projects (see fact sheet below). These crossing improvements will increase access to jobs, healthcare, education, grocery stores, and green space in this disadvantaged corridor that has long been deprived of quality connections to these necessities, especially by foot and bike. The planning study will identify which crossings are in highest need of improvements, and which specific capital improvements address those needs. To achieve this outcome, the planning study will advance the work of the Task Force and use METRANS research expertise to analyze existing travel patterns along the corridor and across the I-710 freeway. The analysis will also identify out-of-standard crossings and locations that would benefit the most from safety, active transportation, and transit improvements. The analysis will consider how to improve mobility, provide safe access to jobs, healthcare, and grocery stores, as well as green space and recreational areas such as the LA River Path. It will develop prioritization criteria to identify the most critically needed improvements in consultation with the community and Community Based Organizations (CBOs). Metro applied for a Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods grant to fund this study but was unsuccessful. Metro believes this is vitally important for helping to prioritize future funding to address critical gaps and connect communities that are divided by the I-710 freeway. 8.4 8.4 Fact Sheets: Projects and Programs Fact Sheets: Projects and Programs Recommended for Initial InvestmentRecommended for Initial Investment Fact sheets to follow. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 203 of 305 8-13 Collaborate with the local jurisdictions (cities and unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County) to implement bus stop improvements in the LB-ELA Corridor. Bus stop improvements would include items such as lighting, security features, benches, shade and shelters, drinking fountains, solar-powered arrival displays, trashcans, landscaping, signage, crosswalks, and improved ADA accessibility, including repositioning of utility boxes on the sidewalk. Provide financial support to help leverage local funds for project implementation. Funds would be made available based on criteria such as project need, project readiness, and project benefits relative to costs, among other factors. The Investment Plan investment would be used to purchase and install bus shelters with real-time displays and security lighting at 100 of the bus stops that currently lack shelters as well as 1,000 curb ramps to improve ADA accessibility to bus stops in the LB-ELA study area. The $19 million can be used to leverage additional grant funding to implement additional locations as well as to support the installation of additional amenities mentioned above, such as lighting, security features, benches, drinking fountains, solar-powered arrival displays, trashcans, landscaping, and signage. Additionally, Metro is currently piloting portable public restrooms at Metro rail stations; this pilot could be expanded to specific bus stop locations if there is adequate space. The exact locations of the shelters and curb ramps will be determined using a prioritization process that focuses on areas of highest need. Metro anticipates that it will use the EFC designations, coordination with cities and Access Services, areas with high ridership, and areas that lack shade and are vulnerable to heat impacts to inform prioritization. Investment in this program will also address several city-wide bus stop improvement projects, including Bus Shelter Upgrades (LB-ELA_0118 – Signal Hill), Bus Stop Improvements (LB-ELA_0077 – Commerce), and Bus Stop Improvements (LB-ELA_0103 – Maywood). Metro also anticipates that cities will be responsible for a city funded local match for these projects, to be determined. Location: Study-area wide Metro Role: Partner Lead: Metro, Long Beach Transit, and local jurisdictions Top scoring goals/principles addressed Safety, Community Health, Opportunity, and Prosperity Flags Equity Flag: None CIC Flag: Add design specification for paving materials to ensure bus stop accessibility for mobility devices Modes Transit, Active Transportation, Arterials Phase Development/ Implementation Potential for packaging Related projects include Southeast Los Angeles (SELA) Transit Improvements Project (TIP) [LB-ELA_0169], Bus Shelter Upgrades (LB-ELA_0118 – Signal Hill), Bus Stop Improvements (LB-ELA_0077 – Commerce), and Bus Stop Improvements (LB-ELA_0103 – Maywood). Estimated cost $19 million: $60,000 per shelter (100 shelters) $13,000 per curb ramp (1000 ramps) Potential funding sources Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (7300 series) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit facilities grants Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 20% – FTA grants $19 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Metro will expect cities to provide at least a portion of the local funding match for these projects and generally be expected to be responsible for the future operations and maintenance costs of these facilities. Bus Stop Improvement Projects/Programs LB-ELA_0203 Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 204 of 305 8-14 Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Safety, Community Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Assess potential for roadway reconfiguration to impact existing truck routes, and how changes may reroute truck traffic that will impact neighboring streets. Maintain existing parking where possible and facilitate alternative parking solutions where street parking reductions are needed. Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Implementation/ Pre-implementation Potential for packaging Alondra Boulevard Intersection Improvements (LB- ELA_0109) Alondra Boulevard Bridges (LB-ELA_0107) I-710/ Alondra Interchange Improvements and Modification of SB I-710 to SR 91 Connectors (LB-ELA_0031) Estimated cost $45 million Potential funding sources99 State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – State ATP, SCCP Alondra Boulevard, between Central Avenue and Lakewood Boulevard. Reconstruct Alondra Boulevard to establish a Complete Street Corridor, including bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. Design Guidance: While multimodal travel options and throughput are important, Complete Streets projects should prioritize safety for all users. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, major arterial roadway redesigns should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize roadway expansions that require displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Location: Compton, Paramount Metro Role: Fund Lead: Compton/Paramount/Gateway Cities COG Complete Street Corridor: Alondra Blvd LB-ELA_0060 Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance $9 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: 99 The list of funding sources and their abbreviations can be found in Tables 7-2 through 7-5 in Chapter 8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 205 of 305 8-15 $69 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Atlantic Avenue/ Boulevard, between Ocean Boulevard and State Route (SR) 60. Reconstruct Atlantic Avenue/ Boulevard to establish a Complete Street Corridor, including bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. Design Guidance: While multimodal travel options and throughput are important, Complete Streets projects should prioritize safety for all users. The Atlantic Corridor project passes through ten jurisdictions, including Bell, Commerce, Compton, Cudahy, Long Beach, Lynwood, Maywood, South Gate, Vernon, and communities in unincorporated Los Angeles County. Given the differing schedules for this project, with some segments ready for implementation in 1 to 2 years and other sections needing 4 to 5 years before construction, this Corridor will require near- term and long-term measure funding. Given the high project cost, this Corridor will need to leverage significant funding from state and federal grant programs and will need to be developed in phases. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, major arterial roadway redesigns should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize roadway expansions that require displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Complete Street Corridor: Atlantic Blvd LB-ELA_0057 Description Implementation Requirements/GuidanceLocation: Bell, Commerce, Compton, Cudahy, Long Beach, Lynwood, Maywood, South Gate, Vernon, East Los Angeles, East Rancho Dominguez Metro Role: Support and/or fund Lead: Gateway Cities COG/Cities Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Community, Mobility Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Assess potential for roadway reconfiguration to impact existing truck routes, and how changes may reroute truck traffic that will impact neighboring streets. Maintain existing parking where possible and facilitate alternative parking solutions where street parking reductions are needed. Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Implementation/ Pre-implementation Potential for packaging Atlantic Bus Only Lane and Transit Signal Prioritization (LB-ELA_0019 and LB-ELA_0146) Mixmaster Traffic signal Improvements (Telegraph/ Eastern/ Atlantic) (LB-ELA_0071) Atlantic Boulevard widening Over I-5 at Mixmaster Intersection (LB-ELA_0221) Estimated cost $457 million Potential funding sources RCN, State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – ATP, SCCP 20% – RCN (Planning) 50% – RCN (Capital) Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 206 of 305 8-16 Atlantic Blvd: Pulsing the LB-ELA Corridor with Every Mile Atlantic Blvd is a major North-South corridor within the Study Area. It passes through the cities of Alhambra, Monterey Park, Commerce, Vernon, Maywood, Bell, Cudahy, South Gate, Lynwood, Compton, Long Beach, and unincorporated East Los Angeles. The vision for this corridor is to promote a balanced, comprehensive, multimodal transportation system to enhance sustainability and mobility of the communities within the corridor. Metro Local Bus Line 260 runs along Atlantic Blvd. between Huntington Dr. and Artesia Blvd. Long Beach Transit Line 61 serves Atlantic Blvd. south of Artesia Blvd. These are the two major bus routes along Atlantic Blvd. with pre-pandemic annual ridership of 3,186,229 and 4,585,635 respectively. At the intersection of Atlantic Blvd and Pomona Blvd in East Los Angeles is Metro's Atlantic station, the current eastern terminus of the E Line. This station provides the East Los Angeles community service to Downtown Los Angeles, Santa Monica, and other Metro Rail lines. In addition to the communities along the E Line, Atlantic Blvd provides a regional connection through its significance connecting to other existing and planned Metro Light Rail Transit (LRT) Lines. Future connectivity will be provided at the proposed Firestone Station of the Southeast Gateway LRT project in the southern segment of Atlantic Blvd at Atlantic/Firestone. This regional connectivity will be further strengthened via the existing C Line Firestone/Alameda station west of the future Firestone Station. The efforts to achieve this vision include a series of projects and programs with a diverse range of project types such as, Active Transportation/ Transportation Demand Management (TDM), Arterial Roadways, and Transit. The Investment Plan proposes projects and programs for Atlantic Ave./Blvd. recommended for both initial investment and modal programs. Photo courtesy of Caltrans District 7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 207 of 305 8-17 Project ID Project Name Description Project/Program Cost (M) CMIP/Metro Contribution LB-ELA_0057 Complete Streets Planning Atlantic Ave./Blvd., between Ocean Blvd. and SR-60. Reconstruct Atlantic Ave./ Blvd. to establish a Complete Street Corridor, including: bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. $457 $68.58 LB-ELA_0146 Bus Priority Lane Improvement BRT project along Atlantic to provide improved speed, reliability, and frequency.TBD $1+ LB-ELA_0017 Regionally Significant Bicycle Projects from the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan Implement regionally significant active transportation projects adopted as part of the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan including several proposed bikeways serving Atlantic Blvd. $41.44 $15.65 Project ID Project Name Description Project/Program Cost (M) CMIP/Metro Contribution LB-ELA_0019 Bus Only Lane and Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Improve bus times, speeds, and reliability along Line 260 (Atlantic Blvd.). Proposed improvements would include: transit signal prioritization, bus priority lanes and bus stop bulb outs, all door boarding, bus stop and layover improvements. TBD NA LB-ELA_0071 Mixmaster Traffic signal Improvements (Telegraph/ Eastern/Atlantic) Traffic signal upgrade at Telegraph / Eastern / Atlantic. Also consider improvements such as turning lane pavement markings, striping, and enhanced signage so that approaching traffic can get properly aligned well in advance of this intersection. $2 NA LB-ELA_0095 Crosswalk Improvements Provide pedestrian crosswalk improvements (pedestrian buttons, signage, and electrical infrastructure) at Rosewood/Abbott, Mallison/Abbott, Long Beach/ Tecumseh, Imperial/Ruth & Atlantic/Brewster intersections (Phase 1). $2 NA LB-ELA_0120 Safety Improvements Within the East Rancho Dominguez (unincorporated LA County), implement safety- related improvement projects along the following roadways: Compton Boulevard, Atlantic Avenue, Rosecrans Avenue, and Alondra Blvd. $7 NA LB-ELA_0221 Atlantic Blvd Bridge Widening Would widen Atlantic Blvd bridge structure over I-5 at intersection of Telegraph Road, Eastern Avenue, and Atlantic Boulevard in the City of Commerce. Would help relieve traffic congestion and provide a safer roadway for all modes of transportation. $50 NA Initial Investment Modal Program Atlantic Blvd Projects Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 208 of 305 8-18 $0.8 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Planning study Long Beach Boulevard/ Pacific Boulevard. Reconstruct Long Beach Boulevard/ Pacific Boulevard, between Ocean Boulevard and Slauson Avenue to establish a Complete Street Corridor, including bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. Design Guidance: While multimodal travel options and throughput are important, Complete Streets projects should prioritize safety for all users. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, major arterial roadway redesigns should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize roadway expansions that require displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Complete Street Corridor: Long Beach Blvd LB-ELA_0062 Description Implementation Requirements/GuidanceLocation: Compton, Huntington Park, Long Beach, Lynwood, South Gate, Walnut Park Metro Role: Support and/or fund Lead: COG/Cities Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Community, Safety Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Assess potential for roadway reconfiguration to impact existing truck routes, and how changes may reroute truck traffic to impact neighboring streets. Maintain existing parking where possible and facilitate alternative parking solutions where street parking reductions are needed. Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Development Potential for packaging Micromobility Pilot Project (LB-ELA_0220) Long Beach Boulevard Bus Priority Lanes (LB-ELA_0141) I-710/ Long Beach Boulevard MOSAIC (LB-ELA_0030) Blue Line First/ Last Mile Projects (Willow/ Wardlow/ PCH Stations) (LB-ELA_0008) Estimated cost $1.5 million (Planning study) Potential funding sources SS4A, State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – State ATP, SCCP 20% – SS4A Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 209 of 305 8-19 $4 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Slauson Avenue, between Alameda Street and Lakewood Boulevard. Reconstruct Slauson Avenue to establish a Complete Street Corridor, including bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. Design Guidance: While multimodal travel options and throughput are important, Complete Streets projects should prioritize safety for all users. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, major arterial roadway redesigns should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize roadway expansions that require displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Complete Street Corridor: Slauson Ave LB-ELA_0061 Description Implementation Requirements/GuidanceLocation: Bell, Commerce, Huntington Park, Maywood, Montebello, Vernon Metro Role: Fund Lead: COG/Cities Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community, Safety, Equity Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Assess potential for roadway reconfiguration to impact existing truck routes, and how changes may reroute truck traffic to impact neighboring streets. Maintain existing parking where possible and facilitate alternative parking solutions where street parking reductions are needed. Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Implementation/ Pre-implementation Potential for packaging Metrolink Regional Rail Line between Union Station and Long Beach (LB-ELA_0219) Slauson Avenue Corridor and Citywide Pedestrian, Bike, Transit Improvements (LB-ELA_0126) Metro Bus Priority Lane Corridor along Line 108 (Slauson) (LB-ELA_0142) Estimated cost $18 million Potential funding sources State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – State ATP, SCCP Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 210 of 305 8-20 $25 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Florence Avenue, between Alameda Street and Lakewood Boulevard. Reconstruct Florence Avenue to establish a Complete Street Corridor, including bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. Design Guidance: While multimodal travel options and throughput are important, Complete Streets projects should prioritize safety for all users. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, major arterial roadway redesigns should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize roadway expansions that require displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Complete Street Corridor: Florence Ave LB-ELA_0058 Description Implementation Requirements/GuidanceLocation: Bell, Bell Gardens, Downey, Huntington Park Metro Role: Support and/or fund Lead: Gateway Cities COG/ Cities Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Community, Safety Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Assess potential for roadway reconfiguration to impact existing truck routes, and how changes may reroute truck traffic to impact neighboring streets. Maintain existing parking where possible and facilitate alternative parking solutions where street parking reductions are needed. Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Implementation/ Pre-implementation Potential for packaging Florence Avenue Bridges (LB-ELA_0067) Florence Avenue and Paramount Boulevard Intersection Improvement (LB-ELA_0080) Traffic Signal Upgrades (LB-ELA_0083) I-710/ Florence Interchange Improvements (LB-ELA_0034) Metro Bus Priority Lane Corridor along Line 111 (Florence) (LB-ELA_0144) Estimated cost $124 million Potential funding sources State ATP, SCCP, UGG, TCC Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – ATP, SCCP, UGG, TCC (Development) 50% – TCC (Implementation) Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 211 of 305 8-21 $50 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality; Opportunity; Environment Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues Modes Goods Movement only Phase Implementation Potential for packaging Combined with LB-ELA_0004 Estimated cost $200 million Potential funding sources PIDP, RTEPF, and CFI Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 10% – Charging and Fueling Infrastructure (CFI) Program; 20% – Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP), Reduction of Truck Emissions at Port Facilities The Clean Truck Infrastructure project (LB-ELA_0023) would install charging infrastructure for ZE trucks. Metro is committed to exploring all viable zero-emission technologies, including battery-electric and hydrogen, to meet regulatory mandates and sustainability goals without endorsing one solution. Metro is also committed to investing its CMIP funds in a manner that aligns with and advances the LB- ELA Corridor Task Force Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Displacements and Physical Impacts: Siting of ZE truck infrastructure should avoid displacements or right-of-way impacts. Assess potential for roadway reconfiguration to impact existing truck routes, and how changes may reroute truck traffic to impact neighboring streets. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, Metro and jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Hydrogen Concerns: The environmental impact of hydrogen production, particularly its association with fossil fuels and significant greenhouse gas emissions on already impacted communities is a major concern. In addition, safety risks associated with the transportation and storage of hydrogen, including risks related to pipelines, trucks, rail, and ships are also of concern. Hazardous emissions such as Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) from hydrogen combustion and its impact on respiratory health in vulnerable communities should be assessed. Metro should engage in community-centered decision-making through the Air Quality and Health Working Group with impacted communities and should avoid endorsements of potentially harmful applications without community input. Metro should also conduct community education on hydrogen fuel and related issues with regional and community partners. Environmental Review and Permit Streamlining Concerns: Metro supports robust public review and vetting for all projects, including those projects labeled zero-emission. Metro should engage in community-centered decision-making through the Air Quality and Health Working Group with impacted communities and should avoid endorsements of potentially harmful applications without community input. Metro should also conduct community education on hydrogen fuel and related issues with regional and community partners. Flooding and Water Quality Impacts: Facilities that require the expansion or addition of paved areas should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Clean Truck Infrastructure LB-ELA_0023 Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Location: Study Area Wide Metro Role: Partner Lead: Metro/ Caltrans/ Ports Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 212 of 305 8-22 $0.5 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Planning study Top scoring goals/principles addressed Safety, Community, Equity Flags Equity Flag: Low See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues Modes Active Transportation Phase Planning (Conceptual Study) Potential for packaging A Line First/ Last Mile Plan Improvements (Artesia Station) (LB-ELA_0008) Estimated cost $1 million for study. Results of feasibility study will include cost estimate for underpasses or other lower cost crossing options Potential funding sources State ATP, TCC, UGG, RCN, Rails to Trails Grant matching fund requirements Minimum Local Match: 0% – ATP, UGG 20% – RCN (Planning), Rails to Trails 50% – RCN (Capital), TCC (implementation) Along Compton Creek Bike Path, between 120th Street and Greenleaf Boulevard, construct a bike path under-crossings at 120th Street, El Segundo Avenue, Rosecrans Avenue, Compton Avenue, and Alondra Avenue. Add lighting, landscaping, benches, and shade to the existing path. The feasibility of adding underpasses has not been studied. This recommended funding will explore the costs and benefits of adding underpasses, overcrossings, and other crossing improvements. Flooding and Water Quality Impacts: Class I bikeways or other facilities that require the expansion or addition of a paved right-of-way should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Location: Compton Metro Role: Lead and/or fund Lead: Compton/Metro Compton Creek Bike Underpass LB-ELA_0165 Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 213 of 305 8-23 $2 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community Health, Safety, Mobility Flags Equity Flag: None CIC Flag: None Modes Transit, Active Transportation Phase Development/ Pre-construction Potential for packaging Compton Boulevard bikeway as part of the MSPP project LB-ELA_0017: Regionally significant bike projects from the Metro Active Transportation Plan Estimated cost $27 million (estimated based on all projects included in Blue Line First/ Last Mile Plan) Potential funding sources State ATP, TCC Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – State ATP, TCC (Development) 50% – TCC (implementation) Project improvements would include beau- tification, art, monuments, safety, increased bike storage, bike parking, walkways, and bike paths (Phases 1 through 5). Location: Compton Transit Management Operations Center: 275 N. Willowbrook Avenue, Compton. NA Location: Compton Metro Role: Partner and/or lead Lead: Compton/Metro Compton Transit Management Operations Center Enhancements LB-ELA_0168 Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 214 of 305 8-24 Work with the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) along with the railroads (Union Pacific (UP) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)) to continue to develop and test various battery electric locomotives and other electrification technologies for operation on the in the Alameda Corridor, with an ultimate goal reducing air quality impacts in the corridor with the advancement of a ZE technology capable of entering commercial, revenue service operation. Location: Vernon; Huntington Park; Florence- Graham; Firestone Park; South Gate; Lynwood; Compton; Willowbrook; Rancho Dominguez; Long Beach Metro Role: Fund Lead: Railroad/Alameda Corridor/Ports Freight Rail Electrification Pilot Project LB-ELA_0217 Description In response to draft CARB regulations on locomotive emissions starting in 2030. Implementation Requirements/Guidance $10 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Top scoring goals/principles addressed Environment; Air Quality; Community Health Flags Equity Flag: None CIC Flag: Concern to the extent the project serves only private industries that should fund electrification directly. Modes Goods Movement only Phase Implementation Potential for packaging NA Estimated cost $50 million Potential funding sources FRA pilot programs, RAISE, INFRA, TIRCP, LCTOP, and others Grant matching fund requirements TBD Minimum local match: 0% – LCTOP, TIRCP 20% – RAISE, INFRA, FRA Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 215 of 305 8-25 $2 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Study Conduct an assessment to evaluate options for deriving greater utilization of the Alameda Corridor as a potential means for reducing truck trips in the Southern California subregion. This assessment would include options such as opportunities to increase on- dock freight rail mode share; implementation of short-haul, freight rail shuttle service to new inland rail facilities; and increased use/ improved operational efficiencies of existing near-dock and off-dock intermodal facilities. This evaluation would take into account updated cargo forecasts, economic factors and projections, current trends associated with the goods movement logistics chain, including transload truck trips, and railroad and intermodal capacity constraints in the Southern California region. The Goods Movement Freight Rail Study would assess a variety of options and weigh the costs and benefits from a systemwide perspective, including changes in truck trip travel patterns, land use implications, environmental benefits and impacts, safety benefits and impacts, as well as institutional constraints. Location: Nevin; Clement Junction; Vernon; Huntington Park; Nadeau; Firestone Park; South Gate; Lynwood; Compton; Willowbrook; Rancho Dominguez; Thenard; Long Beach Metro Role: Partner Lead: Metro/ Ports/ Railroads Goods Movement Freight Rail Study LB-ELA_0151 Description Project Impacts: To ensure consistency with the visions set out by the Task Force, Metro should ensure that investment in this study must come with a strong commitment to study the impacts of the freight paths project recommends, which would include impacts on bike and pedestrian safety, concentrated congestion, construction impacts, increased impervious surface, and potential for new physical barrier – particularly for inland port and rail yards Addressing Community Concerns: Recognizes concerns regarding public health, emissions during hydrogen production, transportation safety, and potential leakage, affirming Metro's dedication to minimizing impacts and educating communities. Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Opportunity, Mobility Flags Equity Flag: NA – this is a study. CIC Flag: The study should focus on the potential for pollution reduction and impacts on local communities. Study should include assessment of long-term funding needed to maintain environmental sustainability. Modes Goods Movement only Phase Planning Potential for packaging NA Estimated cost $10 million (Potential to leverage with $2 million investment) Potential funding sources Fed: INFRA, PIDP State: TCEP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – TCEP (if Caltrans nominated) 20% – PIDP 30% – TCEP 40% – INFRA Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 216 of 305 8-26 Humphrey's Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing100 LB-ELA_0139 100 Recommended for initial funding but also included in the Modal Programs in case it does not get funded . $9 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), in collaboration with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LADPW), plans to construct a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing (Humphreys Avenue Crossing) near the existing Humphreys Avenue vehicle bridge in East Los Angeles. The project aims to reconnect the historically divided East L.A. neighborhood caused by Interstate 710 (I-710). The Crossing, serving as a dedicated pedestrian/cyclist route, addresses the barrier created by I-710 and enhances accessibility for vulnerable populations, connecting to essential facilities and Humphreys Avenue Elementary School. Description NA Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community, Safety Flags Equity Flag: NA CIC Flag: NA Modes Active Transportation/TDM Phase Implementation Potential for packaging NA Estimated cost $24.3 million Potential funding sources Reconnecting Communities Grant Award for $9.861M $1 million committed from LA County Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 20% – RCP Location: East Los Angeles Metro Role: Fund Lead: Metro Originating from Metro Board's Motion 22.1 in 2015, the Humphreys Avenue Crossing received approval and funding, signifying a step towards rectifying past planning decisions. This project recently received $9.861M from the Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Grant program. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 217 of 305 8-27 $5 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Pre-implmentation I-710 Freeway Lids, Caps and Widened Bridge Decks LB-ELA_0181 Widen arterial bridge decks at key locations over the I-710 Freeway/ L A River Channel to provide “land islands,” “urban parklets,” and “green belt” connections over I-710 and the LA River. Include pedestrian/ bicycle pathways. Description Follow Caltrans highway design requirements and context-sensitive design guidance. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, freeway projects should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, Metro should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community, Mobility, Safety, and the Equity principle Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: None Modes Active transportation, arterial roadways Phase Development/ Pre-implementation Will require an initial feasibility study to determine in which arterial interchanges these projects could be incorporated. The implementation of some of these could be incorporated into the redesign of select interchanges that are part of the proposed I-710 MOSAIC Program. Potential for packaging This program could also be packaged with the I-710 MOSAIC Program because that program starts with an alternatives analysis/ prioritization study that could be expanded to include assessing the redesign of some of the interchanges to incorporate lids, caps, or widened bridge decks. Estimated cost $25 million (estimated amount to be leveraged) Potential funding sources RCN, State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – State ATP, SCCP 20% – RCN (planning) 50% – RCN (capital) Metro Role: Lead, co-fund Lead: Metro/Caltrans Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 218 of 305 8-28 Phyllis Ollison, CLC This has been a massive effort. I congratulate you on what you're achieving. For gathering different people, including the community, to come up with the best plan for this corridor. The I-710 MOSAIC Program: Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Investments for the Community. This bundle of projects includes interchange upgrades and auxiliary lanes that include multimodal operations and safety improvements for autos, trucks, bicycles, pedestrians and transit. The interchange improvements are located where the freeway connects with local arterials and are also generally adjacent to the LA River, which provides the opportunity to improve the arterial river crossing bridges as well. The arterial interchange project concepts will have design elements that will address multiple modes, including bicyclists and pedestrians, not just autos and trucks. The freeway to freeway connector improvements and auxiliary lanes are proposed to improve auto and truck traffic safety and operations which will also invest in the community through safer travel. The I-710 MOSAIC Program naming of this bundle of projects is intended to better describe the nature of this initial investment. I-710 MOSAIC Program (Interstate 710 Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Investments for the Community) Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 219 of 305 8-29 101 Caltrans Planning and Environmental Linkages Handbook, https://dot .ca .gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmental- analysis/documents/ser/ct-pel-guidebook-a11y .pdf Top scoring goals/principles addressed Safety, Mobility, Opportunity Flags Equity Flags: I-710/ Alondra MOSAIC Improvements and Modification of SB I-710 to SR 91 Connectors (LB-ELA_0031): High I-710/ Florence MOSAIC Improvements (LB-ELA_0034): High I-710/ I-105 Connector MOSAIC Improvements (LB- ELA_0037): Moderate I-710/ PCH MOSAIC Improvement (LB-ELA_0092): High See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues Other projects: No Equity Flag CIC Flag: General: Concerns about potential displacements (LB- ELA_0028, LB-ELA_0031, LB-ELA_0034, LB-ELA_0037, LB-ELA_0091 and LB-ELA_0093 specifically, and others generally), reduced access and increase in traffic for the local communities. Projects will require detailed traffic and impact studies. Develop designs that are inclusive of and emphasize safety for cyclists and pedestrians. Many of these Concerns can be addressed in an AA/Prioritization Study. LB-ELA_0091; LB-ELA_0092; LB-ELA_0093: Update design specifications to emphasize connections to west Long Beach. Modes Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements, Goods Movement, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit, Active Transportation. Many of the I-710 MOSAIC project concepts are multimodal because they improve traffic safety and operations on the freeway mainline and the crossing arterial, they improve bicycle and pedestrian safety, reconnect communities, and improve transit operations. They are developed to respond to current and future traffic safety and operational issues on the freeway, as well as including the need for Complete Street Corridors and bus priority lanes and filling gaps in the Active Transportation network. Include all the proposed Investment Plan I-710 MOSAIC infrastructure projects into one set of candidate projects for an Alternatives Analysis/ Prioritization study. This is necessary because the Investment Plan evaluation of the project design concepts is not detailed enough to prioritize these projects with respect to which ones should be in the first group to be advanced in the Alternatives Analysis study. The study will assess the 14 Investment Plan I-710 MOSAIC project concepts in more detail to ascertain which ones to recommend to the Metro Board to advance to preliminary engineering and environmental analysis and in what order. This will include new technical analyses of the multimodal benefits of each project including improvement of freeway mainline safety and operations based on updated traffic data, and refined design concepts, and reassessment of key impacts, including potential displacements, VMT, and air quality conformity. Caltrans has completed a Planning and Environmental Linkages Handbook that provides additional information about this approach101, which is designed to formally document planning level analyses so I-710 MOSAIC Program (Interstate 710 Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Investments for the Community) Description Location: Long Beach, Compton, Paramount, South Gate, Cudahy, Bell, Bell Gardens Metro Role: Metro may lead & fund in cooperation with Caltrans & Gateway Cities COG. Lead: Metro/Caltrans that information and conclusions derived from such processes can be incorporated by reference (and not have to be revisited) for later NEPA analyses. This Alternatives Analysis process will include a robust public and community involvement and engagement process. Also, as part of this Alternatives Analysis study the independent utility and logical termini of each proposed project will also be assessed, which may lead to packaging some of these projects into one combined project— for example, packaging the proposed auxiliary lane between the Del Amo Boulevard and Long Beach Boulevard interchanges with the redesign of them into I-710 MOSAIC projects. This study will provide the more refined assessment needed to determine which of these projects are the most beneficial, without significant impacts, and should move to the next phase of their development. These will be put before the Metro Board to approve the short list of projects to move forward to the next phase. The next phase of I-710 MOSAIC project development is the Project Approval/ Environmental Document of I-710 MOSAIC project development phase. Each of the most highly rated 4-6 project concepts from the Alternatives Analysis study will be refined and assessed in much greater detail following required CEQA/NEPA project development procedures. Note: This Fact Sheet continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 220 of 305 8-30 Phase Development, Pre-implementation, and Implementation All Individual projects will start in the Development phase with a combined Alternatives Analysis/ Prioritization study. This study will include public involvement and engagement. With Metro Board approval, the three to four highest priority projects emerging from this study will be further advanced to the pre-implementation phase by conducting California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/ National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) studies (EIR/EIS). Finally, projects selected from that process by the Metro Board for implementation will move into the implementation phase of final design and then construction. Potential for packaging The I-710 MOSAIC projects include active transportation connectivity and safety features and improve traffic flow to enable bus travel times to be more reliable. There are opportunities to select arterial interchanges for improvement that not only improve traffic safety and operations but also align with and support the related Complete Streets, Active Transportation, and Transit projects along those crossing arterials. Estimated cost Alternatives Analysis/ Prioritization for 14 project concepts: $9 million CEQA/ NEPA studies for three to four project concepts: $34 million Design and construction for three to four concepts: $573 million Total estimated cost: $612 million Potential funding sources Federal: SS4A, RAISE, RCN, INFRA State: RIP, SCCP, TCEP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – RAISE (Rural, HDC, APP), TCEP (Caltrans nominated), SCCP, RIP 20% – RAISE (Urban), RCN (planning), SS4A 30% – TCEP 40% – INFRA 50% – RCN (Capital) $154 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: The CEQA/NEPA process includes ongoing community and public review so that the affected communities and the public can provide input and feedback on design features that maximize benefits while minimizing impacts. Following this process, the remaining I-710 MOSAIC projects will be prioritized for implementation and these recommendations will be made to the Metro Board for consideration. Following Metro Board action on the priority list of projects to move into implementation, staff will advance those projects for grant funding, final design, and implementation. I-710 MOSAIC Program (Interstate 710 Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Investments for the Community) (continued) Further project development will need to take into account Concerns and Flags. Community involvement will be included. Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, freeway projects should use the existing right-of-way wherever possible and minimize displacements or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, Metro and Caltrans should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and discuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Flooding and Water Quality Impacts: Facilities that require the expansion or addition of a paved right-of-way should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Implementation Requirements/Guidance Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 221 of 305 8-31 $2 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: I-710 Particulate Matter (PM) Reduction Pilot Project LB-ELA_0157 Implement a pilot project on I-710 to deploy and evaluate measures to reduce exposure of nearby populations to particulate matter, specifically localized sources of entrained/ fugitive dust, tire wear, and brake wear associated with traffic on the freeway. These measures may include roadside vegetation barriers within available Caltrans’ right-of-way, air filters for nearby schools or community facilities, pavement materials, frequent street-sweeping, and deployment of air quality monitoring systems, among others. In addition, include options to examine the effectiveness of “cool pavement” applications to reduce heat island effects. As part of the work plan, the pilot project would include a study element to assess and document the efficacy of the various measures. Description NA Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community and Sustainability Principle Flags Equity Flag: None CIC Flag: Concerns about potential displacements Modes Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements, Goods Movement Phase Development Define and conduct a study of the efficacy of various methods to reduce particulate matter emissions from the I-710 freeway, especially from non-tailpipe emissions. Also included in the study is determining the heat island reduction effects of “cool pavement.” Potential for packaging The findings of this study may lead to projects that can be implemented by other programs and projects in the Investment Plan. Estimated cost $2 million feasibility study and launch of pilot program Potential funding sources CMAQ Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 11.5% – CMAQ Metro Role: Partner/Fund Lead: Metro Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 222 of 305 8-32 $10 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: I-710 Traffic Controls at Freeway Ramps LB-ELA_0156 Add traffic signals with protected pedestrian/ bicycle phase(s), crosswalks, lighting, landscaping, signing and striping, and other safety-related pedestrian features at the ramp termini of I-710 arterial interchanges. Description NA (improvements must conform to Caltrans design standards) Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Community and Safety Flags Equity Flag: None CIC Flag: Concerns about potential displacements Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Phase Development/ Pre-Implementation Caltrans will first need to study the feasibility of adding ramp termini traffic controls to I-710 interchange ramps that currently do not have them. The factors that affect the ability to add these active transportation safety features are dependent on the existing interchange ramp geometry and ramp traffic volumes. This feasibility study would then lead to Caltrans Project Initiation Documents to determine the more specific design changes, impacts, and costs associated with each proposed feasible interchange ramp terminus improvement. The feasible interchange locations for traffic controls on ramps will be coordinated with the interchange improvement recommendations resulting from the MOSIAC freeway Alternatives Analysis/ Prioritization study to avoid duplication of recommendations. Potential for packaging These projects could become an initial interim active transportation safety improvement for the interchanges that are also selected to advance through the CEQA/ NEPA process to assess the total redesign of those interchanges included in the I-710 MOSAIC Program described elsewhere in the list of projects for initial funding. Their development could be included in the multimodal freeway infrastructure alternatives analysis/ prioritization study which is the first phase of that project recommendation. Estimated cost $50 million (estimated leveraged amount) Potential funding sources SS4A Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 20% – SS4A Metro Role: Partner/Fund Lead: Caltrans Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 223 of 305 8-33 The LB-ELA Corridor Bus Transit Priority Program will fund capital projects that will enhance the quality of bus transit service in the Study Area. As part of the development of the MSPP list, there were eight corridors identified for transit priority. Each of these eight corridors will be considered for implementation of bus lanes and/or other treatments to speed up bus service and improve access to transit on priority corridors. The factsheet below describes the corridors analyzed and the path to implementation. Additionally, not all corridors in the Study Area were evaluated through this process. This initiative will also consider other corridors and locations in need of transit priority treatments. LB-ELA Corridor Bus Transit Priority Program This initiative will study the 8 transit corridors identified for bus priority treatments, including the Atlantic Blvd, Florence Ave, Long Beach Blvd, Slauson Ave, Whittier Blvd, Olympic Blvd, Gage Blvd, and Firestone Blvd. Other Corridors not listed may be considered for future investment. Metro's Orange Line busway in the San Fernando Valley . Credit: LA Metro Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 224 of 305 8-34 102 Average cost for BRT lite is $6 .5 million/mile; total estimated cost of all projects is $462 million 103 The list of funding sources and their abbreviations can be found in Tables 7-2 through 7-5 in Chapter 7 $31 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * $3M for planning, $23.1M for implementation of two corridors, and $5M for additional targeted improvements Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community Health, Mobility, Equity Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Establish project specifications to minimize negative impacts on local businesses and support local businesses with technical assistance (START-UP Fund). Maintain existing parking where possible and facilitate alternative parking solutions where street parking reductions are needed. Modes Transit, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Phase Development/ Pre-construction Potential for packaging Related projects include the four funded Complete Streets Corridor projects (LB-ELA_0057, LB-ELA_0058, LB-ELA_0061, LB-ELA_0062) as well as the Atlantic BRT project (LB-ELA_0019) Estimated cost $462 million102 Potential funding sources103 RAISE, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Small Starts Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – RAISE (Rural, HDC, APP) 20% – RAISE (Urban) 40% – CIG Small Starts Improve bus times, speeds, and reliability along Atlantic Boulevard, Long Beach Boulevard, Florence Avenue, Slauson Avenue, Gage Avenue, Olympic Boulevard, Whittier Boulevard, and Firestone Boulevard, with the opportunity to study additional corridors. Improvements would include transit signal prioritization, bus priority lanes and bus stop bulb outs, all door boarding, and bus stop and layover improvements. The Investment Plan will support the enhancement of transit priority treatments throughout the LB-ELA corridor. This initiative will study the 8 transit corridors identified for bus priority treatments, including the Atlantic Blvd, Florence Ave, Long Beach Blvd, Slauson Ave, Whittier Blvd, Olympic Blvd, Gage Blvd, and Firestone Blvd. In addition, corridors not listed on the initial MSPP list will be considered for future investment, such as Willow St in Long Beach, or others that were not evaluated through this process. The Investment Plan will provide $3M to study and prioritize these corridors for transit priority treatments. The CMIP will set aside $23M to implement bus priority lanes and transit priority treatments on 2 of the 8 corridors and an additional $5M for spot treatments to improve transit speed and reliability on other corridors. Some of the corridors include those that are also recommended for Complete Streets funding, including Atlantic Boulevard, Long Beach Boulevard, Florence Boulevard, and Slauson Avenue. These corridors were also studied as part of Metro’s BRT Vision and Principles study and are the top performing corridors in the LB-ELA study area. Impacts on non-transit users: Bus lane projects have the potential to increase travel times for non-transit vehicles as well as the potential for cut-through traffic onto neighborhood streets. As part of the design and outreach processes, Metro and partner agencies will need to address travel time and parking considerations, truck traffic volumes, and the possibility of increased cut-through traffic on neighborhood streets when considering dedicating a lane to bus only travel. LB-ELA Corridor Bus Transit Priority Program Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Location: Multiple jurisdictions/ Corridor-wide Metro Role: Lead Lead: Metro Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 225 of 305 8-35 Metro A Line First/ Last Mile Plan Improvements LB-ELA_0008 Implement projects identified in the A Line First/ Last Mile Plan (formerly the Blue Line) in the LB-ELA Corridor, with an emphasis on Del Amo Station. Projects to include ramp reconfigurations, sidewalk, and bike lane improvements, and crossing improvements, among others. The First/ Last Mile Plan for the Blue Line was adopted in April 2018 and represents a first-of-its-kind effort to plan comprehensive access improvements for an entire transit line. The Plan covered all 22 stations on the Metro A (Blue) Line and piloted an inclusive, equitable project planning community engagement process. The Plan included planning-level, community-identified pedestrian, and bicycle improvements within walking (1/2-mile) and biking (3-mile) distance of each A Line station. The Del Amo project will expand existing bicycling infrastructure through protected bike lanes to ensure bicyclists can safely connect to the Metro A Line Del Amo Station along the route and the 18-mile LA River bike path to the east. Del Amo Blvd is faced with significant safety issues, exacerbated by the I-110, I-405, and I-710 freeways bisecting the Corridor, creating barriers to transit access, and contributing to pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities. Improvements along Avalon Blvd, which connects to the university, will help ensure safe active transportation mobility for students. Building on planning and outreach efforts from the Metro A Line FLM Plan, the Project proposes protected bicycle lanes, seven intersection improvements consisting of refuge islands, dual curb ramps with truncated domes, high visibility crosswalks, and leading pedestrian intervals to reduce risks to people walking, bicycling, and rolling, and to help LA County reach vision zero. Location: Multiple Jurisdictions (Carson, Compton, Long Beach, Los Angeles) Metro Role: Lead Lead: Metro/Cities Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Community, Equity Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Pre-Construction/ Implementation Potential for packaging All: Regionally significant bike projects from the Metro Active Transportation Plan (LB-ELA_0017); City of Long Beach 8-to-80 Bikeways (LB-ELA_0162); LB-ELA Corridor Bicycle Gap Closure Projects (LB-ELA_0163) Artesia Station: Artesia Complete Street Corridor (LB- ELA_0056); Compton Creek Bike Underpasses (LB- ELA_0165) Wardlow, Willow, PCH Stations: Long Beach Boulevard Complete Street Corridor (LB-ELA_0062) Compton Station: Compton Transit Management Operations Center Enhancements (LB-ELA_0168); Compton Creek Bike Underpasses (LB-ELA_0165) Estimated cost $13.53 million (Del Amo Station) Potential funding sources Station TOD, State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum Local Match: 0% – ATP, SCCP 20% – Station TOD Description Note: This Fact Sheet continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 226 of 305 8-36 Displacements and Physical Impacts: In general, major active transportation projects should use the existing right-of-way if adding Class II or IV bike facilities to the roadway. Class I bikeways or other facilities that require the expansion or addition of a paved right-of- way should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Metro A Line First/ Last Mile Plan Improvements (continued) LB-ELA_0008 The Blue (A) Line First/ Last Mile plan has recommendations for all stations in the Corridor, and the Investment Plan will invest in advancing First/ Last Mile projects with a focus on the following stations: • Del Amo • Artesia • Wardlow • Willow • PCH Note: Compton Station First/ Last Mile improvements are being funded separately through LB-ELA_0168 (Compton Transit Management Operations Center Enhancements). Implementation Requirements/Guidance $10 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Recommended Investment Plan funding amount includes half the project cost for Del Amo Station, plus $3 million for pre-implementation work on Artesia, Wardlow, Willow, and PCH stations** * Pending conversations with City of Long Beach for Wardlow, Willow, and PCH stations * Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 227 of 305 8-37 * A Line crossings must be within the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area $5 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Metro A Line: Quad Safety Gates at all A Line [Blue Line] Crossings LB-ELA_0175 Install Quad Safety Gates at all A Line [Blue Line] Crossings* for safety and increased speed/ safety zones. Description The Investment Plan will invest $5 million to install quad safety gates at 10 locations on the A Line. These locations will be determined based on need, including factors such as equity, vehicular traffic, and accident data.* Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Safety, Equity, Community Health Flags Equity Flag: None CIC Flag: None Modes Transit, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Phase Implementation Potential for packaging TBD Estimated cost $450,000 per location Potential funding sources RCE, CRISI Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 20% – RCE, CRISI Location: TBD - along Metro A Line Metro Role: Lead Lead: Metro Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 228 of 305 8-38 $3 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Metro A Rail to River Active Transportation Corridor Segment B LB-ELA_0006 Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community, Safety, Equity Flags Equity Flag: Low See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: None Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Phase Pre-Construction/ Implementation Potential for packaging Randolph Bike and Pedestrian Project (LB-ELA_0066) Estimated cost $6.3 million Potential funding sources State ATP, SCCP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum Local Match: 0% – State ATP, SCCP An approximately 4.3-mile active transportation corridor between the LA River and the Slauson A (Blue) Line station that connects to Segment A. The Rail to River Active Transportation Corridor Segment B [LB-ELA_0006] follows the Randolph Street right-of-way between the Slauson A Line Station and the LA River. The Randolph Bike and Pedestrian Project [LB- ELA_0066] comprises the eastern half of this project, in the City of Bell, between Maywood Avenue and the LA River. Economic Displacement Impacts: To minimize potential for economic displacement, local jurisdictions (Huntington Park, Maywood, and Bell) should implement residential and commercial stabilization measures, and proactively engage neighboring residents and businesses to identify needs and connect community members with resources to financial and technical assistance (START-UP Fund). Flooding and Water Quality Impacts: In general, major active transportation projects should use the existing right-of-way if adding Class II or IV bike facilities to the roadway. Class I bikeways or other facilities that require the expansion or addition of a paved right-of- way should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Location: Multiple Jurisdictions (Unincorporated LA County, Bell, Huntington Park, and Maywood) Metro Role: Funding Agency/Technical Assistance Provider Lead: Metro/Cities/LA County Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 229 of 305 8-39 Regionally Significant Bicycle Projects from the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan LB-ELA_0017 Top scoring goals/principles addressed Community, Air Quality, Opportunity Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Ensure that projects limit the amount of new impervious surface and/or ensure projects include additional porous surface and green space Modes Active Transportation, Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, Transit Phase Development/ Implementation Potential for packaging Artesia Boulevard (Alameda Street to Butler Avenue): Artesia Complete Street Corridor (LB-ELA_0056) Long Beach Boulevard (PCH to S. Pine Avenue): Long Beach Complete Street Corridor (LB-ELA_0062), Micromobility Pilot Project [LB-ELA_0220], Metro Bus Priority Lane Corridor along Line 60 (Long Beach Boulevard) (LB-ELA_0141), I-710/ Long Beach Boulevard Interchange Improvements [LB-ELA_0030], Blue Line First/ Last Mile Projects (Willow/ Wardlow/ PCH Stations) (LB-ELA_0008) Randolph Street (Atlantic Boulevard to River Drive): Orange Avenue/ Alamitos Avenue (E. Spring Street to Pine Avenue): Orange Avenue Improvement Project (LB- ELA_0113) Firestone Boulevard (LA River Bike Path to Lakewood Boulevard): Metro Bus Priority Lane Corridor along Line 115 (Firestone) (LB-ELA_0145); I-710/ Firestone Interchange Improvements (LB-ELA_0033) Compton Boulevard (Paulson Avenue to Atlantic Avenue): Blue Line First/ Last Mile Projects (Compton Station) (LB- ELA_0008); Compton Transit Management Operations Center Enhancements (LB-ELA_0168) Implement regionally significant active transportation projects adopted as part of the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan. Metro recently updated their Active Transportation Strategic Plan (November 2023) with a new list of priority corridors throughout the county. The plan identified three first-tier corridors in the Gateway Cities subregion, two of which are in the LB-ELA study area. Additionally, there are several second-tier corridors, some of which overlap with existing corridors on the full project list (see Chapter 5 for potential packaging opportunities). The Investment Plan will invest in advancing the priorities of the Active Transportation Strategic Plan, with a focus on these corridors from the ATSP’s top two tiers that fall within the LB-ELA study area: Description Implementation Requirements/Guidance Location: Corridor-Wide Metro Role: Partner Lead: Local Jurisdictions (Project Dependent) • Artesia Boulevard (Alameda Street to Butler Avenue) • Long Beach Boulevard (Pacific Coast Highway [PCH] to S. Pine Avenue) • Randolph Street (Atlantic Boulevard to River Drive) • Orange Avenue/ Alamitos Avenue (E. Spring Street to Pine Avenue) Firestone Boulevard (LA River Bike Path to Lakewood Boulevard) • Compton Boulevard (Paulson Avenue to Atlantic Avenue) • Active Transportation and SF Railway (Washington Boulevard to Long Beach Avenue/ Slauson Avenue) • Southern Pacific RR (Active Transportation and SF Railway to Atlantic Avenue) • Union Pacific RR (Atlantic Avenue to Wood Avenue) Note: This Fact Sheet continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 230 of 305 8-40 Estimated cost $41.44 million (based on $2 million/mile investment level based on funding 50% of the mileage which is more ready for implementation (14 miles) and $500,000 per corridor for the three less ready corridors. Potential funding sources State ATP, TCC, SCCP Funding available to individual projects only Grant matching fund requirements Minimum Local Match: 0% – State ATP, SCCP, TCC (Development) 50 Percent – TCC (Implementation) $16 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Regionally Significant Bicycle Projects from the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan (continued) LB-ELA_0017 Flooding and Water Quality Impacts: In general, major active transportation projects should use the existing right-of-way if adding Class II or IV bike facilities to the roadway. Class I bikeways or other facilities that require the expansion or addition of a paved right-of- way should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Construction impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 231 of 305 8-41 $9 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * For partial design Shoemaker Bridge/ Shoreline Drive LB-ELA_0010 Although the Investment Plan investment is recommended for design-only, there are several implementation recommendations when the project continues to implementation: Displacements and Physical Impacts: The project entails a major roadway redesign and bridge reconstruction with both temporary and permanent impacts to the existing right- of-way and surrounding recreational facilities, however the project will result in a permanent net gain in parkland acres due to roadway consolidation. Design should minimize impacts to existing facilities where possible, and Long Beach should proactively engage the community to set expectations around the project’s potential impacts, in the context of its broader benefits. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, interruptions to recreational facility access, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Safety, Mobility, Equity Flags Equity Flag: Moderate See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues Modes Arterial Roadway, Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements, Active Transportation Phase Pre-Construction/ Implementation Potential for packaging I-710 LA River Bike Path (LB-ELA_0055) Estimated cost $833M for Shoemaker Bridge Potential funding sources BIP, RAISE, INFRA, TCEP Grant matching fund requirements Minimum Local Match: 0% – RAISE (Rural, HDC, APP), TCEP (if Caltrans nominated) 20% – RAISE (Urban), BIP (Planning, non-large bridge) 30% – TCEP 40% – INFRA 50% – BIP (large bridge) I-710 Improvements/ Shoemaker Bridge Replacement: Replace the Existing Shoemaker Bridge with a new bridge. The new bridge will be reduced to have two mixed-flow lanes in the NB and in the SB directions to tie the flow into I-710. The new bridge will also include pedestrian and bicycle access. Additionally, bicycle, pedestrian, and street enhancements will be provided on adjacent thoroughfares such as Shoreline Drive. Description Location: Long Beach Metro Role: Fund/Support City's Funding Plan Lead: Long Beach Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 232 of 305 8-42 $4 millionRecommended Measure R/M Investment: Southeast Gateway Line Bike & Pedestrian Trail LB-ELA_0111 The City of Paramount is the lead agency on this project and will be responsible for coordination with the Union Pacific Rail Road on issues surrounding the UPRR right-of-way. Flooding and Water Quality Impacts: Class I bikeways or other facilities that require the expansion or addition of a paved right-of-way should incorporate materials and designs that maintain or increase pervious cover, and/or landscaping elements that allow for sufficient stormwater runoff. Construction impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Economic Displacement Impacts: To minimize potential for economic displacement, local jurisdictions should implement residential and commercial stabilization measures, and proactively engage neighboring residents and businesses to identify needs and connect community members with resources to financial and technical assistance (START-UP Fund). Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air Quality, Community, Safety Flags Equity Flag: Low See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: None Modes Active Transportation Phase Development/ Pre-Construction Potential for packaging Southeast Gateway Line Light Rail Station First-Last Mile Bikeway Safety and Access Project (LB-ELA_0213) Estimated cost $17M Potential funding sources $12.5 funding committed Other sources: State ATP, Rails to Trails, TCC, UGG Grant matching fund requirements Minimum Local Match: 0% – State ATP, TCC (Development), UGG 20% – Rails to Trails 50% – TCC (Implementation) Implement Phases 1 through 4 of Bike and Pedestrian Trail (Class I) along RR ROW between LA River and Sommerset in the City of Paramount. Includes lighting, fencing, landscaping, flashing beacons, decomposed granite, ADA curb ramps, and street furniture. Description Lead: City of Paramount with Downey and South Gate Location: Multiple Jurisdictions (Downey, Paramount, South Gate) Metro Role: Partner Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 233 of 305 8-43 $50 million*Recommended Measure R/M Investment: * Already committed by Metro board (shared with LB-ELA_0023) Zero-Emission Truck Program LB-ELA_0004 Displacements and Physical Impacts: Siting of ZE truck infrastructure should avoid displace- ments or right-of-way impacts. Wherever these impacts are under consideration, Metro and jurisdictions should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site-specific conditions and dis- cuss opportunities for relocation assistance and other community benefits. Zero-Emissions and Public Safety Strategies: Metro is committed to exploring all viable zero-emission technologies, including bat- tery-electric and hydrogen, to meet regulatory mandates and sustainability goals without endorsing one solution. • Addressing Community Concerns: Rec- ognizes concerns regarding public health, emissions during hydrogen production, transportation safety, and potential leakage, affirming Metro's dedication to minimizing impacts and educating com- munities. • Compliance with Clean Fleets Rule: California's 2035 Zero-Emission (ZE) drayage truck mandate focused on tail- pipe emissions, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches to achieve ZE outcomes. • State and Federal Investments: Significant investments in hydrogen and battery-elec- tric technologies, including up to $1.2 billion Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub (H2Hubs) award, indicating strong govern- mental support for diverse ZE solutions. • Community Advocacy and Education: Met- ro aims to serve as a community advocate in ZE Truck (ZET) technology policy dis- cussions, ensuring community concerns are addressed, supporting research, and facilitating educational initiatives on ZE technologies. • Expert Panel Discussions and Symposia: Plans to organize expert panels, symposia, and community education events to deep- en understanding of hydrogen technology, its state of development, and its implica- tions for the LB-ELA Corridor. Implementation Requirements/Guidance Top scoring goals/principles addressed Air quality; Sustainability; Environment Flags Equity Flag: Low See related implementation requirements/ guidance below to address equity issues CIC Flag: Establish incentives for small business owners and truck drivers to switch to ZE vehicles. Modes Goods Movement only Phase Implementation Potential for packaging Combined with LB-ELA_0023 Estimated cost $200 million Potential funding sources May be eligible for federal funding sources such as RTEPF (0004) and CIF (AFC category). PIDP, RTEPF (0023); INFRA or State programs such as TCEP (0004 only). Grant matching fund requirements Minimum local match: 0% – TCEP (if Caltrans nominated); 20% – Reduction of Truck Emissions at Port Facilities, INFRA; 30% – TCEP In January 2021, the Metro Board approved the 2021 Goods Movement Strategic Plan, which included a Countywide Clean Truck Initiative, with the 710 South Clean Truck Program identified as a goods movement strategic priority. At its October 2021 meeting, the Metro Board acted to recommit $50 million from Measure R I-710 South Corridor funds as seed funding for the 710 South Clean Truck Program, which has been subsequently renamed the LB-ELA ZET Program. The objective of this program is to turn over diesel trucks in favor of ZE trucks in the LB-ELA Corridor. The program would contribute subsidy funding to deploy a number of ZE trucks on I-710, as well as seed funding to develop electric charging/ refueling stations for ZE trucks. Description Location: Study area wide Metro Role: Partner Lead: Metro+ • Collaborative Efforts for ZE Future: Continue collaboration with stakeholders to develop a ZE future that benefits the LB-ELA Corridor, emphasizing the importance of community input and guidance in educational and policy initiatives. Construction Impacts: Noise pollution, dust emissions, traffic delays/ diversion, and business interruptions should be carefully assessed and planned with mitigation strategies in place. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 234 of 305 8-44 The Investment Plan recommends $40 million in Community Program Catalyst Funding as part of Metro's initial investment to help support the prioritization of this effort. 8.5 Community Programs Recommendations As discussed in Section 8.2, the intent of the Community Programs Catalyst Fund is to be responsive to long-standing equity issues that residents in the LB-ELA Corridor face, and will proactively and intentionally advance community health and well-being in ways not typically addressed by transportation planning or eligible for funding through transportation funding sources. The LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan, thanks to the Metro Board's leadership and direction to include impacted communities in the development of the Investment Plan, features 15 Community Programs that will complement the Investment Plan’s multimodal transportation investments. These Community Programs were identified by members of the Task Force, CLC, and members of the public as priorities for the LB-ELA corridor. Some Community Programs are focused on addressing current burdens that exist because of past policy, disinvestment, and infrastructure development; others are proactive measures to sustain community stability and maximize benefits as projects are implemented in the future. In no case will these programs be used as a mitigation for negative impacts of other projects. In discussions with the Task Force and CLC, community health in all its forms emerged as an overarching priority for the Investment Plan. While transportation investments can improve health outcomes by improving and encouraging non-polluting travel modes, increasing multimodal access to healthcare, and improving conditions for outdoor physical activity, not all aspects of community health can be addressed through transportation infrastructure. The Community Programs Catalyst Fund is designed to address various other social determinants of health, including those related to health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and economic stability. Metro’s extensive community engagement, ongoing dialogue with the CLC, and Task Force members have collectively identified 15 Community Programs as priorities for Metro to support as part of the Investment Plan. Each program has been assigned one or more potential pathways for further development, partnership, and implementation. Given the transportation nexus required for projects to receive Measure R/M funding, Metro support for Community Programs may or may not include direct funding, depending on the program scope. Metro will provide alternative forms of support, including the facilitation of partnerships to identify and collaborate with other agencies better suited to lead these programs and seek eligible funding opportunities. Metro will help to support the creation of partnerships through the facilitation of Community Programs Working Groups, described in more detail in Chapter 9, as well as provide staff time and technical assistance where appropriate. The 15 Community Programs are organized into three general topic areas: • Health/Air Quality/Environment • Housing Stabilization/Land Use • Job Creation/Work Opportunities Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 235 of 305 8-45 The Investment Plan recommends $40 million in Community Program Catalyst Funding as part of Metro’s initial investment to help support the prioritization of this effort. Metro is targeting $300 million in additional funds, averaging $20 million per Community Program, that could be leveraged using the Community Program Catalyst funding, through local, regional, state, and federal funds that are more suitable to each Community Program. The catalyst funding is intended to launch each program, support its development, and foster a self-sustaining process whereby additional revenues are identified to support an ongoing set of priority projects and programs recommended through the Working Group process. In this way, the Community Programs will be co-designed with community members and community-based organizations, in keeping with the Equity guiding principle. Some Community Programs may build upon the existing work of Metro or other jurisdictions and organizations in the LB-ELA Corridor, while others will require establishing new partnerships and work programs. Thesepathways have been organized into the categories summarized in the following paragraphs: Collaborate to Develop New Strategy/ Program. Use the current program description as a starting point to establish a new initiative in partnership with relevant agencies, community-based organizations (CBOs), and technical institutions. Support as Part of External Agency Program. Identify opportunities to support an existing program led by an agency, CBO, or technical institution other than Metro that meets one or more features of the Community Program description. Support as Part of Existing Metro Program. Identify opportunities to support an existing program led by Metro that meets one or more features of the Community Program description. Support as Part of LB-ELA Corridor Project Implementation. Identify opportunities to incorporate features of the Community Program description directly into the design and implementation of specific projects in the Investment Plan. It is important to note that Community Programs are not intended to be mitigations for negative impacts of other projects funded in the Investment Plan; they are projects or programs that support addressing the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles raised by the community. Implementing the Community Programs Catalyst Fund will depend on the continued involvement of community-based partners. Metro will facilitate ongoing working groups for each of the three topic areas listed above, with participation open to current LB-ELA Corridor Task Force members, CLC members, and other partners identified by Metro and Task Force members. Working group participants will collaborate to define programs in each topic area further, identifying lead agencies/ organizations, funding sources, objectives, implementation actions, and other details such as geographic parameters or priority areas. The LB-ELA Corridor Task Force’s Zero-Emission Truck (ZET) Program Working Group will serve as a model and case study for Community Program working groups, and lessons learned from the ZET process will inform the structure and process of future working groups. Through the creation of the Community Programs and the opportunity for them to be self-sustaining through Working Groups, Metro is empowering communities with opportunities to partner with Metro and stakeholders to achieve these investments. The following section outlines each of the Community Programs, including the current program description, potential pathways for development, related existing programs internal and external to Metro, potential partners, a detailed pathway suggestion, and additional notes or guidance related to a program implementation. The Investment Plan provides a starting point for these Community Programs, which will be developed and refined in the months that follow the adoption of the Investment Plan by the Metro Board in April 2024. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 236 of 305 8-46 LB-ELA_0133 LB-ELA Corridor Community Health Benefit Program LB-ELA_0191 Zero-Emission Infrastructure for Autos LB-ELA_0192 Bus Electrification Projects LB-ELA_0218 Air Quality Monitoring Stations LB-ELA_0134 LB-ELA Corridor Energy Reduction/ Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reduction Program LB-ELA_0187 LB-ELA Corridor “Urban Greening” Initiative LB-ELA_0190 Public Art/ Aesthetics LB-ELA_0009 Southeast Gateway Line Transit-Oriented Development Strategic Implementation Plan and Program (TOD SIP) LB-ELA_0193 Transit-Oriented Communities/ Land Use LB-ELA_0194 Homeless Programs LB-ELA_0135 Housing Stabilization Policies LB-ELA_0197 Vocational Educational Programs LB-ELA_0195 Targeted Hire Programs LB-ELA_0196 Employment/ Recruitment Initiatives LB-ELA_0186 Economic Stabilization Policies Community Programs by Topic Area Health/Air Quality/Environment Housing Stabilization/ Land Use Job Creation/Work Opportunities Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 237 of 305 8-47 Health/Air Quality/Environment LB-ELA Corridor Community Health Benefit Program LB-ELA_0133 Under this program, funding would be made available to implement air quality projects to reduce exposure to air pollution as well as health education and screening programs in areas adversely affected by existing and proposed transportation infrastructure projects. The LB-ELA Community Health Benefit Program would serve the communities in the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area. This program would provide subsidy funding to implement projects and outreach activities to improve air quality and public health, including but not limited to: • Air Quality Projects for Schools and Community Facilities: air filtration, HVAC upgrades, replacement/ sealing of windows and doors, vegetation barriers or buffer landscaping; • Health Education and Screening: community health screening and diagnosis, health education, training for community health workers, outreach programs; • Providing support for air filtration systems and household whole-home retrofit programs, such as weatherization and abating toxic substances such as lead, mold, and asbestos; and • Developing climate and air pollution and climate resilience centers with air filtration, temperature regulation, and proper sealing for use during emergencies. Program primary pathway: Collaborate to Develop New Strategy/ Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing Metro Programs: None Existing, but link to I-710 Particulate Matter (PM) Reduction Pilot Project [LB- ELA_0157] recommended for funding as part of Investment Plan Existing external programs: SCAQMD School Air Filtration Project Assembly Bill (AB) 617 Community Air Protection Program – Community Emissions Reduction Programs (CERP) Strategies and Actions CARB Community Air Protection Program (CAPP) Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) Long Beach Alliance for Children with Asthma (LBACA) East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice (EYCEJ) Earthjustice Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) SELA Collaborative Natural Resources Defense Council Coalition for Clean Air (CCA) LA County Department of Public Health Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Southern California Clinics Association Southern California (SoCal) Crossroads SmartAirLA Note: Continues on next page Program Description Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 238 of 305 8-48 Health/Air Quality/Environment LB-ELA Corridor Community Health Benefit Program LB-ELA_0133 Metro can partner with CBOs involved in environmental justice and public health (such as EYCEJ and LBACA) to identify and develop a suite of new air quality improvement (exposure reduction) projects throughout the LB-ELA Corridor. Projects may support implementation of strategies and actions identified in the CERP for AB 617 Community Air Protection Program Communities. Metro can provide funding and/or technical assistance for targeted expansion of existing heath education and screening programs. This program may also support and expand upon the I-710 Particulate Matter (PM) Reduction Pilot Project (LB-ELA_0157) recommended for funding as part of the Investment Plan. COVID-19-related public health education and outreach could be used as a model for educational outreach related to air quality and associated health outcomes. Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential Funding Sources LA Care Community Health Investment Fund CDC Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) Community Air Protection Incentives Clean Mobility Investments and the Sustainable Transportation Equity Project (STEP) E-Bike Incentive Project AB 617 Community Air Grants CA Enviro Grassroots Funds Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) Program Sustainable Communities Competitive Environmental Justice Action Grants Youth Community Access Program Community Resilience Centers Program Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Yes – relates to mitigation of environmental effects of public streets and highways (continued) Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 239 of 305 8-49 Health/Air Quality/Environment Zero-Emission Infrastructure for Autos LB-ELA_0191 Work with local jurisdictions (cities, County of Los Angeles), public agencies, and private-public partners to develop and site additional charging stations for ZE vehicles in the LB-ELA Corridor. Provide grant writing assistance to help secure funding. In addition, provide technical support to share best practices such as identification of incentives and/or policy requirements for new development. Program primary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing external programs: LA County Internal Services Department (ISD) Clean Transportation Team Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment expansion program Southern California Edison (SCE) Charge Ready Program SCAG Last Mile Freight Program (Zero-Emission [ZE] Delivery Zones) Metro can work with the County ISD, SCE, local jurisdictions, and private partners to identify electric vehicle charger siting priorities in the LB-ELA Corridor and provide grant writing assistance in pursuit of funding for ZE infrastructure in the Corridor. Metro can support expansion of ZE delivery zones throughout the LB-ELA Corridor through SCAG’s Last Mile Freight program for lighter-duty delivery trucks and vans. When selecting sites for ZE charging facilities, lead agencies and partners should proactively engage residents, businesses, and property owners to understand site- specific conditions and challenges. Hydrogen Concerns: The environmental impact of hydrogen production, particularly its association with fossil fuels and significant greenhouse gas emissions on already impacted communities is a major concern. In addition, safety risks associated with the transportation and storage of hydrogen, including risks related to pipelines, trucks, rail, and ships are also of concern. Hazardous emissions such as Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) from hydrogen combustion and its impact on respiratory health in vulnerable communities should be assessed. Metro should engage in community- centered decision-making through the Air Quality and Health Working Group with impacted communities and should avoid endorsements of potentially harmful applications without community input. Metro should also conduct community education on hydrogen fuel and related issues with regional and community partners. Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) LA County ISD SCE Gateway Cities Council of Governments Gateway Cities Regional Climate Collaborative Los Angeles Cleantech Incubator Southern California Association of Governments Local Jurisdictions Potential Funding Sources California Energy Commission Clean Transportation Program California Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP) Communities in Charge Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Yes Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 240 of 305 8-50 Health/Air Quality/Environment Bus Electrification Projects LB-ELA_0192 Seek incentives to accelerate the deployment of ZE transit and vanpool vehicles in the LB-ELA Corridor. Projects could include bus electrification (public transit buses and school buses) as well as ZE charging infrastructure. Provide technical and grant writing assistance to define and develop potential projects. Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Existing Metro Programs: Metro Bus Electrification Program (100% ZE bus fleet by 2030) Metro can continue expansion of its own electrification efforts and coordinate with GCCOG and LB-ELA jurisdictions on related ZE transit efforts (e.g., ZE trolley on Atlantic through Maywood, Bell, Cudahy, and South Gate). Set aside Measure M funding to study the feasibility of creating a ZE charging depot in the Gateway Cities area to support LB Transit, Metro, and other municipal operation needs, especially for transfer hubs and turnback areas. Hydrogen Concerns: The environmental impact of hydrogen production, particularly its association with fossil fuels and significant greenhouse gas emissions on already impacted communities is a major concern. In addition, safety risks associated with the transportation and storage of hydrogen, including risks related to pipelines, trucks, rail, and ships are also of concern. Hazardous emissions such as Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) from hydrogen combustion and its impact on respiratory health in vulnerable communities should be assessed. Metro should engage in community- centered decision-making through the Air Quality and Health Working Group with impacted communities and should avoid endorsements of potentially harmful applications without community input. Metro should also conduct community education on hydrogen fuel and related issues with regional and community partners. Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) NA Potential Funding Sources Measure M Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Yes Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 241 of 305 8-51 Health/Air Quality/Environment Air Quality Monitoring Stations LB-ELA_0218 Add new air quality monitoring stations in the LB-ELA Corridor Study Area. Sites to be identified in cooperation with the SCAQMD, community-based organizations, and residents as part of the Community Programs Working Groups. Program primary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing external programs: California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) Community Air Protection program/ SCAQMD AB 617 Community Air Monitoring Program Metro can partner with CARB and SCAQMD to identify locations for new air quality monitoring stations along the LB-ELA Corridor and provide technical grant writing assistance to seek funding for air quality monitoring stations through various state and federal grants. NA Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) SCAQMD CARB Local Jurisdictions Potential Funding Sources United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Climate Pollution Reduction Grant Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Yes – relates to research/ maintenance of public streets and highways and mitigation of their environmental effects Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 242 of 305 8-52 Health/Air Quality/Environment LB-ELA Corridor Energy Reduction/ GHG Emissions Reduction Program LB-ELA_0134 Under the Energy Reduction/ GHG Reduction Program, funding would be made available to implement energy reduction as well as GHG reduction projects in areas impacted by transportation projects in the LB-ELA Corridor. This program would be an important element of any major transportation initiative that takes place in the LB- ELA Corridor. The program would provide subsidy funding to implement projects and educational activities intended to reduce GHG emissions. Examples of these projects include renewable energy projects, solar-power generation, energy efficient lighting, and tree planting, among others. Metro can continue expansion of its internal bus electrification efforts and ZE truck program, commit to energy efficiency in delivery of Metro projects (with consulting services from SoCalREN), and offer collaboration on external efforts to reduce GHG emissions through transition to renewable energy throughout the county and region. NA Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) SCAQMD SoCalREN Potential Funding Sources EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grants Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Yes Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing Metro Programs: Metro I-710 ZET Program Metro Bus Electrification Existing external programs: SoCalREN program SCAQMD Air Quality Investment Program (Rule 2202) SCAQMD Community Air Protection Program Incentives Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 243 of 305 8-53 Health/Air Quality/Environment LB-ELA Corridor “Urban Greening” Initiative LB-ELA_0187 There is a critical need to prioritize greenspace commitments in the CMIP, particularly for low-income communities of color in the Corridor. Under this initiative, Community Plan Working Groups will develop and refine “urban greening” projects that foster environmental resilience. They play a vital role in improving air quality, absorbing pollutants, and releasing oxygen, which is especially beneficial for these communities burdened by pollution from industrial and transportation sources. Additionally, green spaces provide valuable opportunities for active transportation, such as walking and cycling, encouraging sustainable modes of transportation and reducing congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, green spaces can help mitigate the urban heat island effect, reducing temperatures in urban areas. This is crucial as temperatures rise due to climate change, contributing to the creation of more resilient and adaptable communities in the Corridor. Urban greening elements may include items such as: provision of green space/ greenbelts; parklets; tree planting; community gardens and community farms; drought-tolerant planting; habitat restoration and connectivity; stormwater capture/ flood diversion/ water management projects; brownfield remediation; natural trail restoration; and green infrastructure, among others. Through the LB-ELA Urban Greening Initiative, project proponents may also partner with other localities, nonprofit organizations, or communities to plan, design, and implement “green” projects that demonstrate that they provide publicly accessible open-space and ecosystem benefits such as urban heat island reduction in the LB-ELA Corridor. Through the Community Plan Working groups, areas that are in the most critical need of new green space will be identified with input from community members. Program primary pathway: Support as part of LB-ELA Project Implementation Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Metro can make funding available to lead agencies for LB-ELA projects to add or expand upon greening elements to maximize the environmental benefits of projects with a transportation focus. Metro can also provide technical support to external agencies and CBOs that lead greening efforts in the LB-ELA Corridor, such as community gardens, tree planting/ maintenance, and LA River cleanup and restoration. Finally, Metro is going to create a countywide Urban Greening program. This program was recommended in Metro’s Moving Beyond Sustainability plan104. NA – Green space and increased greenery should be consulted with local Indigenous peoples, tribes, and organizations to honor and restore local plant life. Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) GCCOG Regional Climate Collaborative East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice Communities for a Better Environment Compton Community Garden Eastmont Community Center TreePeople GrowGood Friends of the LA River Potential Funding Sources Urban Greening Grant Program (CA Natural Resources Agency) Metro Countywide Urban Greening Grant Program (in development) Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely Yes – Relates to the improvement and maintenance of public streets and highways, including the mitigation of their environmental effects 104 https://www .metro .net/about/plans/moving-beyond-sustainability/ Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 244 of 305 8-54 Source: SPP Survey, SPP Mapping Health/Air Quality/Environment Public Art/ Aesthetics LB-ELA_0190 Policy initiative that would require that a percentage of transportation construction funds for major public work projects be earmarked for public art, landscaping, urban design elements, and other aesthetic features for the projects. Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Program third pathway: Support as part of LB-ELA Project Implementation Existing Metro Programs: Metro Art program Existing external programs: Caltrans Transportation Art program Metro can continue to bring arts programming and installations for Metro stations and/or other transportation/ transit infrastructure. Metro can partner with Caltrans on its Transportation Art Program to identify sites and opportunities for local communities and public government agencies to place art and other aesthetic treatments on state-owned facilities and in state-owned rights-of-way. Metro can make funding available to lead agencies for LB-ELA projects to add art, landscaping, or other visual enhancements to projects with a transportation focus. NA Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) Caltrans District Transportation Art Coordinator Potential Funding Sources Metro Art program Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 245 of 305 8-55 Source: Metro LRTP Housing Stabilization/Land Use Southeast Gateway Line Transit-Oriented Development Strategic Implementation Plan (TOD SIP) and Program LB-ELA_0009 The TOD SIP provides an overarching vision and strategic guidance for local Southeast Gateway Line jurisdictions to use as a resource as they develop and implement their own plans, policies, and economic development and mobility strategies in the 12 Southeast Gateway Line station areas along the alignment. Additionally, in 2019, the Metro Board approved a $1 million implementation program to fund Southeast Gateway Line jurisdictions to implement TOD SIP recommendations. Metro can continue to provide guidance to local Southeast Gateway Line jurisdictions as they develop and implement plans, policies, and economic development and mobility strategies in the 12 Southeast Gateway Line station areas. Metro will continue funding implementation activities using the $1 million of implementation funds approved by the Metro Board in 2019. NA Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) Local Jurisdictions Potential Funding Sources Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing Metro Programs: Southeast Gateway Line TOD SIP Implementation Funding Program Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 246 of 305 8-56 Source: COG Ad Hoc Committee, SPP Survey, SPP Mapping Housing Stabilization Policies LB-ELA_0135 Applying an integrated approach, work with cities, County of Los Angeles, and public agencies to propose and pass community stabilization policies to support disadvantaged communities in the LB-ELA Corridor, improve their resilience, and address the social determinants of health. Provide grant writing assistance to secure needed funding. Housing stabilization policies and incentives include measures such as: • Mandates for process improvement: engage the community/ form partnerships with CBOs; • Community benefits: establish a framework/ menu/ equitable development scorecard for new development projects; • Develop community land trusts/ land banks for new housing and/or to support naturally occurring affordable housing; • Local wealth creation: encourage production of local for sale affordable housing, down payment assistance programs, and homeowner maintenance assistance programs; • Inclusionary housing policies with or without the option of in lieu fees; • Housing Trust Fund to support and increase funding for affordable housing production; • Density bonus programs to incentivize affordable and mixed-income housing production; • Affordable accessory dwelling unit (ADU) programs and ADU amnesty programs; • Policies to reduce housing costs, such as parking reduction/ unbundling, innovative construction techniques, fee waivers, and permit streamlining; • Anti-displacement programs for tenants: tenant rights programs, including anti- harassment policies/ just cause eviction policies, legal assistance for tenants, no net loss housing policies for new development, limits on residential demolition and conversion, tenant right-to-return policies, and local resident preference programs for new housing; • Rent stabilization policies; • Low-income rental assistance programs, and low-interest loan programs for maintenance and improvement in rent stabilized units; • Anti-displacement programs for homeowners: tax relief/ loans/ grants for maintenance/ foreclosure assistance; and • Basic Income Program. Through the Community ProgramPlan Working groups, Metro will consult with mission-driven affordable housing providers, tenant advocates, and other experts to develop recommendations for programs and projects. Program Description Housing Stabilization/Land Use Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) GCCOG Local Jurisdictions Fair Housing Foundation BASTA Long Beach Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles Potential Funding Sources GCCOG Housing Trust Fund Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Program primary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing external programs: GCCOG Housing Trust Fund GCCOG Tenant Legal Assistance Note: Continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 247 of 305 8-57 Housing Stabilization Policies (continued) LB-ELA_0135 Housing Stabilization/Land Use Metro can collaborate with GCCOG to identify opportunities for transit-oriented affordable housing in the LB-ELA Corridor through the Housing Trust Fund. Metro can support existing tenant assistance programs through local jurisdictions, GCCOG, and CBOs. Metro can provide technical assistance to local jurisdictions seeking to study and develop housing stabilization policies at a local level, particularly related to transit-oriented development. NA Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 248 of 305 8-58 Source: Metro, SPP Mapping Transit-Oriented Communities/ Land Use LB-ELA_0193 Work with the local jurisdictions (cities, County of Los Angeles) to apply best practices and design guidelines to encourage transit-oriented development near rail stations and heavily used bus routes in the LB-ELA Corridor. Provide technical resources such as grant writing assistance and technical assistance for community development and land use planning. Assist local jurisdictions in coordination with property owners and developers to ensure safe construction and strengthen connections to transit. Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Existing Metro Programs: Metro TOC Policy and Implementation Plan Metro TOC Programs (First/ Last Mile, Joint Development, Systemwide Design, Economic Development, and Transit Supportive Planning) Metro can enact the TOC Implementation Plan, which includes providing grant writing assistance and technical assistance for community development and land use planning. Metro can coordinate with local jurisdictions to better plan for housing near rail stations and heavily used bus routes along the LB-ELA Corridor. Metro can also collaborate with affordable housing organizations and developers to promote development in TOC areas through incentives. Metro already has a TOC policy to support jurisdictions in TOC initiatives. CIC Flag: Skepticism of transit-oriented development initiatives that lack the necessary guardrails to ensure they do not lead to gentrification and other displacement pressures on existing Corridor residents. Recommendation for Metro to consult with mission-driven affordable housing providers and tenant advocates in designing Transit Oriented Development initiatives. Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Flags Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) Local Jurisdictions Potential Funding Sources Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Housing Stabilization/Land Use Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 249 of 305 8-59 Homeless Programs LB-ELA_0194 Support homeless initiatives in the LB-ELA Corridor, and support efforts and recommendations that have emerged from Metro’s Homeless Task Force, Reimagining Public Safety Initiatives, and other County initiatives and studies to address homelessness in and around the transit system, including provisions to: enhance the customer experience; maintain a safe and secure system; and connect homeless persons in the transit system to services and resources. Through the Community Programs Working Groups, Metro will consult with local community-based organizations serving the unhoused in developing these programs, with a focus on addresses the root causes of homelessness as opposed to policing. Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing Metro Programs: Metro Homeless Outreach Pilot program Metro Room to Work program Existing external programs: CCOG/ L A Care Enhanced Care Management Partnership Program Description Metro can support existing Metro Homeless Outreach Team (MHOT) efforts to connect unhoused individuals with services; assess MHOT performance statistics/ need on rail and bus routes, and associated transit stations throughout the LB-ELA Corridor; and coordinate with homeless service providers in the LB-ELA Corridor to ensure that MHOT partnerships in the Corridor are effective and up to date. Metro can partner with other transit agencies in LB-ELA Corridor to expand services and coordinate across systems. Metro can support its existing Room to Work program and identify opportunities for recruitment in the LB-ELA Corridor. NA Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) Local Jurisdictions GCCOG LA Care East LA Women’s Center Fair Opportunity for Change Forgotten Children, Inc. Jordan’s Disciples Community Service Kingdom Causes Bellflower Restoration Diversion Services Salvation Army Potential Funding Sources Measure H CA Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Grants Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Housing Stabilization/Land Use Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 250 of 305 8-60 Economic Stabilization Policies LB-ELA_0186 Work with cities, County of Los Angeles, and public agencies to propose and pass community stabilization policies to support disadvantaged communities in the LB- ELA Corridor. Provide grant writing assistance to secure needed funding. Economic stabilization policies and incentives include measures such as: • Mandates for process improvement: engage the community/ form partnerships with CBOs; • Community financial empowerment programs: local hire agreements, workforce education and development, credit improvement programs; • Locally owned business support: small business interruption fund and loan funds during construction, guide for business support services, zoning to encourage small businesses, and lease-to-own programs for businesses and housing; and • Identify, protect, and encourage legacy and culturally significant businesses, and historical and cultural landmarks; and mandate inclusion of arts and culture spaces in new development. Program primary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Existing Metro Programs: Metro Business Interruption Fund Existing external programs: LA County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC) Business Support Program LA Conservancy Legacy Business Grant Program City of LA Legacy Business Program Long Beach Legacy Business Program BREATHE LA County LA County Commercial Tenant Protections Ordinance Education and Outreach Program Description Metro can provide technical assistance to local jurisdictions for planning and policy studies to enact economic stabilization policies. Metro can also support GCCOG and other organizations that provide business support (technical assistance, microloans, education), and city-led legacy business programs (e.g., Long Beach, Los Angeles) that aim to preserve long-standing businesses facing displacement pressure. Metro can support LA County Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services outreach efforts related to the Commercial Tenant Protections Ordinance. NA Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) LAEDC Cambodian Association of America United Cambodian Community LA Conservancy Long Beach Heritage LA County Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services (WDACS); Office of Small Business Potential Funding Sources Community Development Block Grants Strategic Growth Council California Endowment Liberty Hill Foundation The Kresge Foundation Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Job Creation/Work Opportunities Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 251 of 305 8-61 Targeted Hire Programs LB-ELA_0195 Support the development of targeted and local hire programs to increase the share of public dollars that is devoted to creation of local jobs for community residents in the LB-ELA Study Area. Include measures such as the establishment of Project Labor Agreements that specify local and targeted hire goals for specific construction projects, as well as first-source hire requirements. Collaborate with local jurisdictions and public agencies to align local and targeted hire policies, thresholds, and requirements. Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Program third pathway: Support as part of LB-ELA Project Implementation Existing Metro Programs: Metro Project Labor Agreement/ Construction Careers Policy Existing external programs: LA County Public Works Local and Targeted Hiring Program Metro and LA County Department of Water and Power both have local targeted hire programs already in place. Metro can collaborate with other local jurisdictions/ agencies to tie existing hiring policies to Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, or focus on hiring for specific types of jobs, such as “green” jobs. Metro can also support existing initiatives that include established local hire/ workforce development opportunities and project labor agreements. Targeted hiring policies should be in place during the implementation process to ensure that residents benefit from projects as they are developed/ constructed. CIC Flag: Community suggestion to set minimum residency length requirement that workers must meet to qualify for local hire benefits. Program Description Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) Local Jurisdictions Potential Funding Sources TBD Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: Likely No Job Creation/Work Opportunities Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 252 of 305 8-62 Employment/ Recruitment Initiatives LB-ELA_0196 Partner with public agencies, large employers, and local businesses to conduct recruitment drives at locations in the LB-ELA Corridor (both virtual and in person.) This initiative would also include job fairs and workshops at community facilities and community colleges to provide information to local residents regarding work opportunities and networking resources. Conduct promotional campaigns to actively publicize these events in the LB-ELA Corridor communities. Program primary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Existing Metro Programs: Metro Workforce Initiative Now (WIN-LA) Program Metro Room to Work program Metro Internship and Entry-Level Trainee Program Metro E3 (Expose – Educate – Employ) Initiative and Transportation School Metro Transportation Career Academy Program (TCAP) Existing external programs: GCCOG Workforce Development Programs LA County Public Works Local and Targeted Hiring Program Program Description Metro can support local implementation of its own employment/ recruitment initiatives such as WIN-LA, Room to Work, E3, and TCAP in the LB-ELA Corridor communities. Metro can partner with GCCOG to support existing employment/ recruitment programs in partnership with local educational institutions and labor unions. Metro can engage a variety of local nonprofit organizations providing job placement services to ensure that participants are aware of employment opportunities related to the LB-ELA Investment Plan and throughout the Corridor. NA Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/GuidancePotential partners (may include, but not limited to) GCCOG CALSTART Easterseals GrowGood ICAN California Abilities Network Mexican American Opportunity Foundation Project Return Peer Support – La Casita de Apoyo Restoration Diversion Services Potential partners (continued) Soledad Enrichment Action The Arc Southeast Los Angeles County Veterans Stand Together Potential Funding Sources Metro Workforce Development Programs GCCOG Workforce Development Programs Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: No Job Creation/Work Opportunities Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 253 of 305 8-63 Vocational Educational Programs LB-ELA_0197 Partner with public agencies, private-sector employers, community colleges, labor organizations, and nonprofit organizations to expand vocational and educational programs for community residents in the LB-ELA Corridor. Examples could include training for mechanics who work for small businesses that service ZE vehicles. These programs would provide opportunities to establish a career pathway to work in key economic sectors and move up through the ranks by focusing on workforce development and skills training. Program primary pathway: Support as part of External Agency Program Program secondary pathway: Support as part of Existing Metro Program Program third pathway: Support as part of LB-ELA Project Implementation Existing Metro Programs: Metro WIN-LA Program Metro Room to Work Program Metro Internship and Entry-Level Trainee Program Metro E3 (Expose–Educate–Employ) Initiative and Transportation School Metro TCAP Existing external programs: Port of LA High Road Training Partnership Grant Program Description Metro can partner with public agencies, private-sector employers, community colleges, labor organizations, and nonprofit organizations to expand vocational and educational programs for community residents in the LB-ELA Corridor. Examples could include training for mechanics who work for small businesses that service ZE vehicles. These programs would provide opportunities to establish a career pathway to work in key economic sectors and move up through the ranks by focusing on workforce development and skills training. Vocational training programs should ideally focus on creating a qualified workforce that will most likely benefit from CIP projects. Detailed Pathway Suggestion Implementation Notes/Guidance Potential partners (may include, but not limited to) GCCOG CALSTART International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Training Center Carpenters Union Training Center Slawson Southeast Occupational Center Assistance League of Long Beach Empower Unlimited Driving Hope Grass Roots Community Network Potential partners (continued) Soledad Enrichment Action EXP The Opportunity Engine Unearth and Empower Communities YWCA EntreNous Pacific Gateway Long Beach City College CSU Long Beach Potential Funding Sources High Road Training Partnership (HRTP) Grants Metro Workforce Development Programs GCCOG Workforce Development Programs Measure R/M Funding Eligibility: No Job Creation/Work Opportunities Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 254 of 305 8-64 Long Beach will be a major destination for the 2028 Games as one of the five major sports parks with four venues and six sports. The 2028 Games can serve as a catalyst to create permanent benefits and more sustainable and equitable mobility along the Long Beach-East Los Angeles (LB-ELA) Corridors. In June 2023, Metro published the 2028 Games Mobility Concept Plan (MCP) in response to the Board of Directors' Motion 42. The plan identifies a list of projects that provide permanent benefits for Angelenos while enabling spectators and the workforce to get to the 2028 Games by transit, walking, or rolling. The project list will reconnect communities across highway and arterial barriers by creating multimodal investments: bus speed and reliability improvements, first/last mile strategies and projects, mobility hubs, and non-capital mobility solutions. These investments will improve connectivity in LA County, proving direct benefit to 1 million disadvantaged Angelenos. With an emphasis on equity, legacy, and the 2028 Games, three specific MCP projects are located within the LB-ELA Corridor. The first project is a new crossover track near the intersection of Anaheim Street and Long Beach Boulevard to improve service reliability for the A Line. The second project is a bus priority improvement project along Florence Avenue, Studebaker Road, and Imperial Highway to enhance connectivity between SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, the Metro C Line Norwalk Station, and the Metrolink Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs Station. A Line Crossover at Long Beach Blvd and Anaheim St: The existing A Line between the downtown loop and Anaheim St Station is located within the City of Long Beach. It consists of two mainline tracks in the northbound and southbound directions in the middle of Long Beach Blvd. At a diamond crossing south of Anaheim St, A Line trains pass through downtown Long Beach in a clockwise loop, crossing over from right-hand running to left-hand running. Immediately south of Anaheim St Station, there is a hand-throw single crossover that allows for movements in one direction only. To allow movements in both directions, a power-operator double crossover is proposed to replace both the existing diamond crossing and the existing single crossover. LA Metro would be the lead agency. The location of this transit Planning / Conceptual Study project is Long Beach. It is anticipated to cost $15M funding in park by 25% LPP and State sources. A Line Willow Station Mobility Hub: To provide multimodal options at central locations where theres is the greatest potential for public transit use and active mobility, Metro will implement a mobility hub at the A Line Willow Station. The mobility hub improvements will consist of bike and scooter share stations, public art, concessions, and vendor spaces, accessible parking, electric vehicle charging and green vehicle parking, safe storage for and rental of personal 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games In 2028, Los Angeles will host the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games (2028 Games). The 2028 Games will match the incredible scale and diversity of Los Angeles. According to its organizers, the 2028 Games is estimated to attract 12 to 15 million ticketholders and approximately 400,000 accredited personnel (athletes, officials, media, volunteers, and employees). Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 255 of 305 8-65 micro mobility devices, shade structures, solar panels, Wi-Fi, and device charging docks. While the areas immediately around the selected sites are nonresidential, nearby transit-oriented communities will provide a steady and growing stream of foot traffic once investments growth in bicycling, walking, and transit use. MHs are crucial because they support safe and convenient transfers between transportation modes, supporting first/last mile connections to transit through multimodal options, especially for those with limited mobility choices. LA Metro would be the lead agency. The location of this transit and active transportation Planning / Conceptual Study project is Long Beach. It is anticipated to cost $11M funding in part by 25% LPP and Federal EPA sources. Florence/Studebaker/Imperial Bus Priority Improvements: The bus corridor enhancements on Florence Ave, Studebaker Rd, and Imperial Highway within the jurisdictions of Bell, Bell Gardens, Downey, Huntington Park, Norwalk, and the unincorporated community of Florence Firestone will tie into a fully funded 5.4- mile bus priority lanes project from the Metro K Line Fairview Heights Station to the Metro A Line Florence Station. These enhancements will extend improved transit connectivity and service frequency by another 9.4 miles from the Metro A Line Florence Station to Studebaker Rd and then south to Cecilia St. Enhancements will consists of bus bulbs (to increase bus speeds and reliability by reducing the need for weaving while improving safety for transit users), 38 bus shelters at existing bus stops, all door boarding, and TSP along the entire corridor to serve Metro Line 111, which has connections to 12 Metro and seven non Metro bus routes with a weekday average ridership of 13,000. Over half of Florence Ave is part of the NextGen Bus Plan, as a key rapid bus line corridor. The bus priority improvements on Studebaker Rd south of Cecilia St to Interstate | 105 in Norwalk will provide improved bus speeds by 30% on 1.4 miles of roadway to improve connectivity to the Metro C Line Norwalk Station. Studebaker Rd bus priority lane improvements will tie into the 2.1 miles of Imperial Hwy bus priority lane improvements from Studebaker Rd to the Metrolink Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs Station to improve connectivity between regional commuter rail service and Metro light rail service. The Metrolink Station is a top five ridership station for the 91/Perris Valley and Orange County lines and connects to the Norwalk Entertainment District, Civic Center, and LA County government jobs. LA Metro would be the lead agency. The location of this transit and arterial/complete streets Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 256 of 305 8-66 Planning / Conceptual Study project is multiple jurisdictions in the corridor. It is anticipated to cost $32M funding through RAISE and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Small Starts. These projects will economically benefit the LB - East LA Corridor communities by enhancing access between Equity Focus Communities and major employment centers like Downtown Long Beach and Inglewood. These projects provide cost-effective mobility benefits that can be realized in time to support the 2028 Games and create a lasting legacy. In March 2024, Metro was awarded $139 million from USDOT's Reconnecting Communities Pilot/ Neighborhood Access and Equity Programs that will support the implementation of several projects, including the mobility hub and Florence Avenue bus priority improvement projects. While the projects identified for the 2028 Games were not scored through the LB-ELA Task Force evaluation process, they are funded and scheduled for implementation in time for the 2028 Games. These projects further the vision, goals and guiding principals of the investment Plan by improving transit access in the corridor. The unfunded crossover track project will be included in the Transit Modal Program for the Investment Plan for future consideration. Projects for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 257 of 305 8-67 8.6 Modal Programs and START UP Fund In addition to identifying projects and programs for initial funding, the Investment Plan also looks to the future of the LB-ELA Corridor by planning, developing, identifying, and refining projects, programs, and strategic initiatives that will advance the Corridor’s Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles into future years. Modal Programs and the START-UP (“Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative Transportation Uplifting People”) Fund will allow the Investment Plan to be a flexible, dynamic, living document that addresses future priorities and needs as they evolve. The Investment Plan is based on an intensive, community-engaged process, which determined that additional planning work is needed to identify emerging projects/ programs that align well with the adopted Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Several cities, particularly those without implementation-ready projects for investment consideration, also need technical assistance (through the START-UP Fund) to support this work in their respective EFCs and ensure equitable investments throughout the Corridor. The Projects and Programs under the Investment Plan are also displayed by location and goal focus area in Appendix 8-A. Modal Programs will serve as the mechanism by which these ongoing planning and development activities lead to implementation following the adoption of the Investment Plan. The Investment Plan features five Modal Programs, in addition to the Community Programs Catalyst Fund described in Section 8.3, including: active transportation, arterial roadways/complete streets, freeway safety and interchange improvements, goods movement, and transit105. Metro, its partners, and relevant stakeholders will need to collaborate to advance the projects in the Modal Programs toward their implementation, furthering the goals of the Investment Plan. Investment Plan elements that will be included in Modal Programs include the following: • Near-term Tier 1 projects not selected for immediate funding; • Longer-term Tier 1 projects that require additional development to become implementation-ready; • Tier 2 projects that will need additional development and refinement to become more aligned with the Investment Plan Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles to be considered for implementation in the future; • Equitable project planning to identify equity gaps, provide technical assistance (Through the START-UP Fund) for lower-resources communities, and develop projects for future implementation; and • Pilot programs, strategic initiatives, and planning studies. The Investment Plan will reserve funding in each Modal Program to carry out these planning and development activities and implement some projects that develop from these activities. This includes some projects that were ranked highly in the evaluation process but were identified as not being ready for initial investment under the plan. In addition, the Modal Program funding may be used to advance other partially funded projects with a slight funding gap or those put forward by Metro and partners for grant applications that did not receive external funding. The following sections describe the START-UP Fund, the five Modal Programs, and the Investment Plan funding set aside to accomplish each program's planning, development, and implementation goals. START-UP Fund The Investment Plan’s function is to strategically distribute and leverage funding that will allow the Corridor’s various jurisdictions to develop and implement their own existing projects. While the evaluation process 105 Community Programs can be found in the previous section of this document. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 258 of 305 8-68 employed a distributive equity lens to prioritize projects that are most likely to benefit the highest-need communities, the distribution of project proposals received, and levels of project development/readiness reflect disparities in municipal capacity and historic investment. Project concepts gathered from community input are included in the Plan, but will typically require start-to-finish planning processes, and require municipalities to take ownership of technical development and implementation. As cities and neighborhoods that have faced historic underinvestment often have less funding and fewer technical staff members to plan, develop, fund, and implement capital projects, these areas may be underrepresented in the Investment Plan’s full project list, let alone the recommendations for initial investment. To address this issue, Metro is setting up a START-UP (“Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative Transportation Uplifting People”) Fund that provides targeted technical assistance to support communities with the highest needs, relative to their technical resources and capacity for project development and implementation. The START-UP Fund will help communities develop project concepts for grant eligibility, and help communities participate in implementation of the Investment Plan’s Corridor-wide programs (e.g., “traffic calming features”, “pedestrian gap closures”, and various Community Programs Catalyst Fund). The START- UP Fund will not be tied explicitly to certain municipalities or geographic communities, but assistance will be prioritized for cities or neighborhoods: • Without any projects formally submitted for the Investment Plan • With only conceptual or development phase projects in the Investment Plan • With high concentrations of Equity Focus Communities (EFCs) • Facing the greatest cumulative impacts as identified in existing conditions research Active Transportation The Active Transportation Modal Program category consists of projects and programs that support the safe movement of travelers using human- powered methods of travel, such as walking, bicycling, or rolling, to get from one place to another. Metro’s commitment to advancing Active Transportation is reflected in its 2023 Active Transportation Strategic Plan106, which reaffirms the agency’s proactive role in countywide active transportation planning; and establishes proposals for regional bikeways, pedestrian districts, and first/ last-mile improvement areas surrounding transit stations. While active transportation projects offer opportunities to advance equitable outcomes, projects that increase impervious cover disproportionately harm communities of color due to increased heat resulting from urban heat island effect. Metro-led projects will conform to requirements in Metro’s Tree Policy and Moving Beyond Sustainability Plan and modal programs will provide opportunities to incorporate urban greening into Active Transportation projects. Active Transportation investment is summarized in Table 8-3. Table 8-3. Active Transportation Investment Summary Total Investment Plan Investment $100 million Potential Leverage Investment $150-200 million Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment $44 million Development $500,000 Pre-Implementation $4.5 million Implementation $39 million Modal Program $55.7 million START-UP Fund $11.5 million Pre-Implementation $3.0 million Implementation $41.2 million 106 Document can be accessed here https://www .metro .net/projects/active-transportation-strategic-plan-atsp/ Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 259 of 305 8-69 The LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan will fund several active transportation projects and programs through initial investments (described in the Initial Investments: Projects/ Programs Recommended for Initial Funding, pages 8-10, 8-11) and the development of future projects through the Active Transportation Modal Program. The Investment Plan allocates $100 million in total investment in Active Transportation, including $44 million in recommended initial funding and an additional $57 million for the Active Transportation Modal Program. Many high-scoring Active Transportation programs are Corridor-wide or regional programs that focus on implementing bicycle and pedestrian safety projects from existing active transportation plans, including Metro’s 2023 Active Transportation Strategic Plan. Although several selected projects from these programs are recommended for initial funding, these plans include numerous other projects requiring further development and prioritization. Other Active Transportation program elements include greening and other sustainability features, personal security enhancements, and other elements to enhance the user experience and quality of life within the LB-ELA Corridor. The Active Transportation Modal Program will support the planning and development of future bicycle and pedestrian safety projects, advance projects toward implementation, and fund the implementation of future projects. This approach includes providing equitable project planning technical assistance (START-UP Fund) and resources to help lower-capacity and lower-resourced jurisdictions and communities develop project concepts and strategies for future implementation. By prioritizing these communities for development funding within the Modal Program, the Investment Plan aims to help bridge the gaps in capacity and resources that have historically contributed to spatial inequities in the distribution of investment and within the list of implementation-ready initial projects recommended in the Investment Plan. Of the nearly $56 million available in the Active Transportation Modal Program, 20% ($11.5 million) will be reserved for equitable project planning development and technical assistance (START-UP Fund). 8.6.1.1 Active Transportation Project and Programs Recommended for Initial Investment As described earlier in this chapter, the Investment Plan includes $44 million for initial investments in Active Transportation, including distinct projects on the MSPP list that rated highly and are more ready for implementation. In addition to those projects, there are important planning documents, such as Metro’s recently updated Active Transportation Strategic Plan107 and Long Beach’s Bicycle Master Plan108, which lay out the regionally important Active Transportation corridors in the LB-ELA Corridor. Because many of the Tier 1 Active Transportation projects on the original MSPP received funding in 2023 from California’s Active Transportation Program, additional projects on the MSPP were elevated for inclusion in the initial funding recommendations. The Active Transportation funding investment is based on: • providing funding for projects that received state Active Transportation Program awards but still have a partial funding gap; • providing funding for projects that are prioritized in the Metro Active Transportation Strategic Plan, especially bike paths and cycle tracks that close gaps in the regional Active Transportation network and those that provide access to EFC areas; and • providing funding to advance distinct projects that need support for implementation 8.6.1.2 Active Transportation Modal Programs The projects listed in Table 84 are not included in the initial investment recommendations (or are only partially funded). Metro, its partners, and relevant stakeholders will refine, develop, and potentially package together (if appropriate) these projects and programs to make them ready for implementation through the Active Transportation Modal Program. 107 https://www .metro .net/projects/active-transportation-strategic-plan-atsp/ 108 https://www .longbeach .gov/lbcd/planning/advance/general-plan/mobility/bicycle/ Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 260 of 305 8-70 Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0212*Tweedy Boulevard Active Transportation Improvement South Gate 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0213*Southeast Gateway Line] Light Rail Station First-Last Mile Bikeway Safety and Access Project Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0211*City of Long Beach Mid-City Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections Long Beach 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0206*City of Bell Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Bell Gardens 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0201 Pedestrian/ Bicycle Enhancements and Safety Features Study Area Wide 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0214 I-710 Livability Initiative Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0163 LB-ELA Corridor Bicycle Gap Closure Projects Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0162 City of Long Beach 8-to-80 Bikeways Long Beach 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0204 Pedestrian Gap Closure Projects Study Area Wide 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0200 Bike Share Programs and Bicycle Amenities Study Area Wide 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0102 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan improvements Maywood 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0170*Huntington Park Safe Routes for Seniors and Students Huntington Park 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0076 Pedestrian and Bike Facilities Commerce 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0220 Micromobility Pilot Project Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0094 Hill Street Pedestrian Bridge Overcrossing Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0066 Randolph Bike and Pedestrian Project Bell 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0055 I-710 LA River Bike Path (Western Levee Path)***Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0007 LA River Path – Central LA Maywood to Elysian Valley 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0070 Pedestrian Bridge Bell Gardens 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0208*Salt Lake Avenue Pedestrian Accessibility Project Cudahy 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0207 City of Carson Citywide Community Safety Improvements Carson 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0159 Southern Ave. Pedestrian Connector Project South Gate 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0128 Randolph Street Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Project Maywood 2 Pre-Implementation Table 8-4. Active Transportation Modal Program Note: table continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 261 of 305 8-71 Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0138 Spring Avenue Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0158 Del Amo Pedestrian Gap Closure Project Rancho Dominguez/Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0199 Telecommuting Programs Study Wide Area 2 Development LB-ELA_0114 Walnut Pedestrian Pathway Signal Hill 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0095 Pedestrian Crosswalk Improvements Lynwood 2 Development/ Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0216 Bicycle Safety and Education Program (BEST)Study Wide Area 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0198 Carpool/Vanpool Program Study Wide Area 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0090 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons at Pedestrian Crossings Long Beach 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0082 Enhanced Pedestrian Crosswalk (Rives Ave. and Adwen St.)Downey 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0210 Greenway Traffic Circle Improvement Project Downey 2 Implementation LB-ELA_9300 Wilmington Safe Streets - A People First Approach Los Angeles NA/New LB-ELA_9301 Walnut Park Pedestrian Plan Implementation Walnut Park NA/New LB-ELA_9302 West Paramount Utility Easement Multiuse Path Phase I Paramount NA/New LB-ELA_9303 City of Carson Master Bicycle Plan Carson NA/New LB-ELA_9321 Hamilton Loop**Long Beach NA/New LB-ELA_9311 Southern Connector Pedestrian Bridge South Gate LB-ELA_9312 SELA Bridge Park Connector Overcrossing Lynwood LB-ELA_9314 Compton Boulevard Bike Path***Compton NA/New LB-ELA_9315 Terminal Island to Rio Hondo Bike Path***Multiple Jurisdictions NA/New Table 8-4. Active Transportation Modal Program (continued) Notes: * Project is mostly funded through state ATP program ** Project received planning funding through recent Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Grant *** The three I-710 Corridor Bike Path Concepts were requested to be added to the list . One of the projects was already on the list (LB-ELA_0055)109 Projects deemed to be fully funded were removed from list . New projects have not been evaluated . They may be eligible for future modal program funding as long as they align with the Vision and Goals of the Corridor . 109 https://www .metro .net/projects/710bikepath/ Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 262 of 305 8-72 Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets The Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets modal category includes major, multi-jurisdictional corridor projects, small-scale spot treatments, and intersection improvements. Arterial roadways are the primary transportation network for local travel throughout the LB-ELA Corridor for vehicular traffic, goods movement, transit, and active transportation. Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets also function as an alternative to the I-710 freeway for regional and longer-distance vehicle and freight truck trips, especially when I-710 is congested due to collisions, delays, maintenance, and other impacts on freeway operation. Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets investment is summarized in Table 8-5. Table 8-5. Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Investment Summary The LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan will fund several prioritized Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets projects and programs through initial investments (described in the Initial Investments: Projects/ Programs Recommended for Initial Funding, page 8-7 as well as the development of future projects through the Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Modal Program. The Investment Plan includes $188 million in total investment for Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets, including $116 million in initial funding recommendations and an additional $72 million for the Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Modal Program. The Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Modal Program will support the development and implementation of future projects that meet the vision and goals of the Investment Plan. The types of investments include the following: • Arterial roadway safety: Future arterial investments will be aimed to improve arterial roadway safety, especially at intersections with high rates of traffic collisions and truck/ vehicle or truck/ pedestrian/ bicycle conflicts. • Signal synchronization and operations: Future investment will focus on upgrading traffic signals, video detection*, and the coordination of traffic signal timing to improve arterial roadway efficiency. • Technology: In addition to traffic operations, the Investment Plan will invest in technology to improve safety and facilitate the transition to lower emission and connected autonomous vehicles. • Complete streets and general arterial improvements: General Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets improvements will upgrade roadways to improve travel for all modes, including vehicular traffic as well as active transportation. • Arterial Bridge/ Overcrossing Improvements: Many arterial roadways provide connections to I-710 and other freeways. Interchange improvements are described in the Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements section; however, independent improvements focused on arterial bridges will be funded through the Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Modal Program. Total Investment Plan Investment $188 million Potential Leverage Investment $1.2 to 1.8 million Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment $116 million Development $0 Pre-Implementation $10 million Implementation $106 million Modal Program $72.1 million START-UP Fund $14.5 million Pre-Implementation $4 million Implementation $53.6 million * Video detection not intended for surveillance . Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 263 of 305 8-73 The Arterial Roadway/Complete Streets Modal Program also includes funding for the provision of equitable project planning technical assistance (START-UP Fund) and resources to help lower- capacity and lower-resourced jurisdictions and communities develop project concepts and strategies for future implementation. By prioritizing these communities for development funding within the Modal Program, the Investment Plan aims to help bridge the gaps in capacity and resources that have contributed to historic spatial inequities in the distribution of investment, and in the list of implementation-ready projects put forth in the Investment Plan. Of the $72 million available in the Arterial Roadway/Complete Streets Modal Program, approximately 20% ($14.5 million) will be reserved for equitable project planning development and technical assistance (START-UP Fund). 8.6.1.3 Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Projects and Programs Recommended for Initial Investment As described earlier in this chapter, the Investment Plan will invest $116 million in specific arterial roadway project improvements. The proposed investments include developing and implementing five priority Complete Streets Corridors: Atlantic, Alondra, Florence, Long Beach, and Slauson. These corridors provide crucial north-south alternatives to the I-710 freeway and east-west travel to and across the freeway. These corridors also serve as key transportation thoroughfares, community main streets, commercial districts, and residential neighborhoods. Although the actual design and treatments will be specific to each corridor’s unique context (including its role in the Goods Movement network), the description for each project includes bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities and crosswalks, transit stop features and amenities, safety, and traffic calming features, landscaping, hardscaping, public art (aesthetic treatments), public green spaces, trees, and water quality features such as bioswales and tree wells. 8.6.1.4 Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Modal Programs The projects and programs listed in Table 8-6 are not part of the initial investment recommendations. These projects and programs will be further refined, developed, and potentially made ready for implementation through the Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets Modal Program. It should be noted that not all projects in the modal program will move forward to implementation. Also, some projects, like those that contain traffic cameras, have been opposed by some community members due to concerns related to cameras being used for potential surveillance. It will be immensely beneficial to have a contiguous corridor that is friendly for traveling in ways other than by car. Anonymous dashboard comment Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 264 of 305 8-74 Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0064 Gage Avenue Street Improvements Bell 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0059 Imperial Complete Streets Corridor Lynwood/South Gate/Downey 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0056 Artesia Complete Street Corridor Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0129 Garfield Avenue Improvement Project South Gate 1 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0202 Traffic Calming Study Wide Area 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0044*Route 1 and De Forest Ave Bridge Upgrades Long Beach Long Beach 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0127 Lakewood Boulevard Improvement Project Lakewood 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0119 Wright Road Improvement Project South Gate 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0205 Arterial/General Roadway Improvement Program Study Wide Area 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0041*Route 1 Pedestrian Upgrades Long Beach Long Beach 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0120 Safety-Related Road Improvement Projects East Rancho Dominguez 1 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0104 Rosecrans Ave. Bridge Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0063 Gage Ave. Bridge Bell 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0073 Telegraph Road Improvements Commerce 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0067 Florence Ave. Bridges Bell 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0115 California Ave. Improvements Projects Signal Hill 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0117 Burnett Street/Skyline Drive Improvement Projects Signal Hill 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0040*Route 1 Storm Water Treatment Installation Wilmington/Long Beach Wilmington/Long Beach 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0065 Slauson Ave. Bridge Bell 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0109 Alondra Blvd. Intersection Improvements Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0068 Systematic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) Improvements Bell Gardens 2 Development/Implementation LB-ELA_0107 Alondra Blvd. Bridges Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0108 Garfield Ave. Intersection Improvements Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0086 Gage Avenue Operational and Safety Improvements Bell/Huntington Park 2 Implementation Table 8-6. Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Modal Program Note: table continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 265 of 305 8-75 Table 8-6. Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Modal Program (continued) Note: table continues on next page Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0110 Rosecrans Intersection Improvements Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0051*Route 1 Transportation Management System (TMS) elements Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0020 Sports Park Transportation Performance Modeling Network Long Beach 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0078 Randolph Street Gap Closure Commerce 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0105 Garfield Avenue Improvement Project Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0012 Garfield Widening Paramount 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0166 LB-ELA Corridor Vulnerable Road User Connected Vehicle Infrastructure Deployment Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Development/Implementation LB-ELA_0085 Intersection Improvements (Huntington Park)Huntington Park 2 Development/Implementation LB-ELA_0069 Traffic/Ped Signal Upgrades Bell Gardens 2 Development/Implementation LB-ELA_0074 Traffic Signal Upgrades Commerce 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0088 Protected Left Turns at Signals Long Beach 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0101 Video Camera installation**Maywood 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0071 Mixmaster Traffic signal Improvements (Telegraph/Eastern/Atlantic)Commerce 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0167 I-710 Arterial Signal Performance Measurement Study Area Wide 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0215 I-710 Arterial Traffic Signal Control Communication Upgrades Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0083 Traffic Signal Upgrades Downey 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0100 Traffic Signal Upgrade Projects Maywood 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0013 Tweedy Blvd. Signal Sync Lynwood/South Gate 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0072 Traffic Signal Coordination Projects Commerce 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0097 Traffic Signal Improvements Lynwood 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0084 Video Detection Upgrades**Downey 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0081 Firestone Blvd. Traffic Signal Upgrades and Safety Enhancements Downey 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0099 Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects Maywood 2 Development/Pre-Implementation Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 266 of 305 8-76 Table 8-6. Arterial Roadways/Complete Streets Modal Program (continued) Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0075 Video Camera installation**Commerce 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0096 Traffic Signal Improvements Lynwood 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0098 City Re-Striping Projects Lynwood 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0089 Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption Long Beach 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0087 Traffic Signal Equipment Improvements Long Beach 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0116 Traffic Signal Operational Upgrade Signal Hill 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0112 Signal Coordination/ITS Projects Signal Hill 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0113 Orange Avenue Improvement Projects Signal Hill 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0079 Florence Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation Downey 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0221 Atlantic Blvd. widening Over I-5 at Mixmaster Intersection Commerce 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0080 Florence Ave. and Paramount Blvd. Intersection Improvement Downey 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_9306 ICM Phase 2: Arterial Signal Enhancements and Integration Multiple Jurisdictions NA/New LB-ELA_9316 Lomita Blvd. Punchthrough City of LA (Wilmington)NA/New LB-ELA_9320***Terminal Island Freeway Decommissioning Long Beach NA/New Notes: * Project is part of Caltrans State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) ** Video detection not intended for surveillance . *** This project status is not yet resolved by the local jurisdiction and will not be considered in the Modal Program until then . Projects deemed to be fully funded were removed from list (see Appendix 8-A) New projects have not been evaluated . They may be eligible for future modal program funding as long as they align with the Vision and Goals of the Corridor . Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 267 of 305 8-77 Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements As the primary transportation facility in the study area, I-710 serves a vital purpose in connecting millions of people to key everyday travel destinations. It is also one of the most important corridors for freight movement in the entire country due to its location, carrying tens of thousands of daily truck trips serving the San Pedro Bay Port Complex, intermodal freight rail facilities, warehouses, logistics hubs, and transloading facilities in the LB-ELA Corridor and beyond. Ensuring the safety and operational efficiency of vehicles on the freeway is of crucial importance to local communities that suffer from safety, congestion, air quality, and mobility impacts when freeway operations are degraded, as well as the state and national economy that depends on the flow of goods through I-710. Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements investment is summarized in Table 8-7. Table 8-7. Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Investment Summary The earlier effort to modernize I-710 focused on widening the freeway and implementing general purpose travel lanes to increase capacity, which would have displaced residents and businesses adjacent to the Corridor while degrading air quality and public health in the Corridor communities. The Investment Plan will neither widen the freeway nor add general-purpose travel lanes to add freeway capacity, according to Metro Board policy and state and federal policy guidance. The Investment Plan’s approach, particularly through the I-710 MOSAIC (Multimodal, Operational, Safety, and Access Investments for the Community) Program, targets safety and operational improvements and develops a holistic approach to better manage the freeway and improve multimodal access and safety on and around I-710. This investment strategy will directly address the Vision and Goals of the Investment Plan, including improving safety and mobility, while addressing air quality, related public health issues, and historical underinvestment. The Investment Plan will fund several I-710 MOSAIC projects through a holistic initial investment (described in the Initial Investments: Projects/ Programs Recommended for Initial Funding, page 8-7) as well as the development of future projects and non-traditional freeway investments through the Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Program. The Investment Plan is providing $177.6 million for the projects recommended for initial investment, which is planned to leverage up to $1 billion in freeway investments. Additionally, the Investment Plan will invest $32.4 million in the Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Program to support and develop new and innovative ways to address safety, operational efficiency, integrated Corridor management, and air quality issues surrounding I-710. Examples of projects in the Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Program include new higher soundwalls, stormwater treatment, facility upgrades, technology applications, and future initiatives to explore new freeway usage policies. Total Investment Plan Investment $210 million Potential Leverage Investment $800 million to $1 billion Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment $170.6 million Development $9 million Pre-Implementation $39 million Implementation $129.6 million Existing Metro Programs $39.4 million START-UP Fund $0 million Pre-Implementation $2 million Implementation $37.4 million Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 268 of 305 8-78 8.6.1.5 Freeway Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment As described in Section 7-1, the Investment Plan will invest $170.6 million to develop and implement the I-710 MOSAIC Program, which includes project concepts that will rebuild and upgrade various freeway on- and off-ramps and auxiliary lanes for improved traffic safety, operations, and efficiency. The I-710 MOSAIC Program approach to investing in I-710 includes studying each of the 12 interchange project concepts and two auxiliary lane project concepts on the project list through an Alternatives Analysis that will feature community engagement and will evaluate each project concept for potential benefits (such as safety, operational flow, and reduction of conflicts) and impacts (such as VMT, GHG, possible displacement, and sound). Each project concept will be studied as part of a segment alongside other concepts related to and, in some cases, dependent on the other concept. In addition, these I-710 MOSAIC projects are directly related to projects and potential improvements on the intersecting roadways. Many projects on the MSPP list could be connected to the improvements on I-710, including several independent bridge upgrade projects, Complete Street Corridor projects, and transit enhancement projects that cross many interchanges. Additionally, the Investment Plan will invest $17 million in several non-traditional freeway projects and programs, including studying the concept of adding additional greenspace in the freeway right of way, improving traffic controls at interchanges, and testing methods to reduce the impact of particulate matter emissions from non-tailpipe sources. The Initial Investment will fund the I-710 MOSAIC Program, through which there will be an Alternatives Analysis for the 12 interchanges and two auxiliary lane project concepts that will include community engagement, safety and operational assessments, data collection, modeling, and other considerations to allow Metro to identify four to six project concepts, or packages of project concepts, to recommend to the Metro Board for consideration to move into a preliminary engineering and environmental documentation (PA&ED) phase. The selected project concepts will provide the most safety and operational benefits to the mainline freeway and overall transportation system while minimizing the community impacts. After PA&ED, under the condition they meet certain criteria, the projects will be prioritized as recommendations to the Metro Board for consideration to move forward into additional phases of implementation. Metro will ensure that freeway projects that move forward for implementation complete the appropriate project level transportation conformity requirements. 8.6.1.6 Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Programs The projects and programs listed in Table 8-8 are not part of the initial list of projects for initial funding. These projects and programs will be further refined, developed, and potentially made ready for implementation through the Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Program. It should be noted that some projects, like Congestion Pricing, Express Lanes Strategic Initiative, ZET Lane, and I-710 ZET Travel Zone Restriction Congestion Pricing, have garnered significant industry and/or community opposition. Projects listed as Tier 1 will not necessarily move forward in the future. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 269 of 305 8-79 Table 8-8. Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements Modal Program Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0153*Congestion Pricing Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Development LB-ELA_0046**I-405 Roadway Improvements Long Beach, Signal Hill, Los Angeles, and Carson (SHOPP)Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0182*Express Lanes Strategic Initiative Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Development LB-ELA_0154*I-710 ZET Travel Zone Restriction Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Development LB-ELA_0188 Freeway Landscaping/Maintenance Study Wide Area 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0183*ZET Lane Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Development LB-ELA_0039**I-710 Highway Worker Safety Improvements Long Beach/Compton Long Beach/Compton 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0180 I-710 Truck Bypass Lanes Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0045**Route 91 Bridge No. 53-2143F Rehabilitation Long Beach (SHOPP)Long Beach 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0043**Hobart Railyard Bridge Rehabilitation Commerce/Vernon Commerce/Vernon 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0137 Freeway Soundwalls Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0155 Drought Tolerant Landscaping, Hardscaping and Aesthetic Features along I-710 Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0050**Route 91 Upgrades Carson, Compton, Long Beach, and Bellflower (SHOPP)Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0048**Garfield Avenue Pump Station Upgrades Paramount 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0052**Route 47 at I-710 Roadway Upgrades Wilmington (SHOPP)Wilmington 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0054**Humphrey Maintenance Station Upgrades East Los Angeles (SHOPP)East Los Angeles 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0053**Pacific Place Maintenance Station Building Replacement Long Beach (SHOPP)Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0049**South Gate Pump Plant and Florence Avenue Pump Plant Upgrades South Gate/Bell Gardens/ Downey (SHOPP) South Gate/Bell Gardens/Downey 2 Implementation LB-ELA_9307 ICM Phase 2: Freeway Corridor Enhancements Multiple Jurisdictions NA/New LB-ELA_9317 I-710 SB On-Ramp at Firestone South Gate NA/New LB-ELA_9322 I-710 Active Traffic Management (ATM) Program Study Wide Area NA/New Notes: * Industry members have expressed significant concerns about these projects that will be carried into the modal program for further evaluation ** Project is part of Caltrans State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) . Projects deemed to be fully funded were removed from list (see Appendix 8-A) . New projects have not been evaluated . They may be eligible for future modal program funding as long as they align with the Vision and Goals of the Corridor . Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 270 of 305 8-80 Goods Movement The Goods Movement modal category includes projects and programs that impact the trucks and trains moving goods through the LB-ELA Corridor, particularly those accessing or leaving the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Port of Long Beach (POLB). The Investment Plan prioritizes several projects supporting goods movement in alignment with the Investment Plan’s Vision and Goals, including the accelerated adoption of zero- emission (ZE) heavy-duty trucks, ZE truck infrastructure, a freight rail ZE study, and the goods movement freight rail study. Many prioritized goods movement projects identified through this process will be led and advanced by POLA and POLB without direct investment from the Investment Plan due to limitations on using Measure R/M funds. Through this effort and the Investment Plan development process, Metro is committed to supporting our partner agencies to advance projects that support the vision and goals of the Investment Plan. Metro must also continue to engage the freight industry as a whole to develop solutions that help facilitate the movement of goods and services in a multimodal manner—while at the same time addressing the air quality, health, and safety issues facing the region and impacting local communities in the LB-ELA Corridor. Goods Movement investment is summarized in Table 8-9. The Investment Plan will fund several goods movement projects and programs through initial investments (described in the Initial Investments: Projects/ Programs Recommended for Initial Funding, pages 8-9, 8-10) as well as the development of future projects through the Goods Movement Modal Program. The Investment Plan includes $62 million for initial investments in pilot projects and the Zero-Emission Truck (ZET) Program (described in the Funding Recommendations section) and an additional $18 million for planning, implementing pilot programs, and the future development of additional projects through the Goods Movement Modal Program. This Modal Program will address key safety, operational, and air quality issues related to freight. It will help identify and advance new projects that better address issues related to ZE technology, freight rail, port efficiency, grade separations, truck routes, and truck-to-train cargo mode shift. The initial program list lacked specific projects that directly addressed some of the key truck safety issues in the Corridor, including preventing truck cut-through traffic into residential neighborhoods, truck routing through LB-ELA Corridor communities, and conflicts with other transportation modes on arterial highways. The Goods Movement Modal Program will support collecting better truck traffic and routing data and identifying key freight safety projects for future development and implementation. This program will allow Metro to partner effectively with industry and community stakeholders to support regional, multi- jurisdictional, multimodal approaches to improving the movement of goods through the LB-ELA Corridor while also advancing some of the key initiatives from the 2021 LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan110 that are relevant to the Corridor. Table 8-9. Goods Movement Investment Summary Total Investment Plan Investment $80 million Potential Leverage Investment $250 to 350 million Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment $62 million Development $12 million Pre-Implementation $5 million Implementation $45 million Existing Metro Programs $18 million START-UP Fund $0 million Pre-Implementation $1 million Implementation $17 million 110 https://www .metro .net/about/goods-movement/ Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 271 of 305 8-81 8.6.1.7 Goods Movement Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment As described earlier in this chapter, the Investment Plan will invest $62 million in initial Goods Movement projects. This investment includes the ZET Program, which will invest $50 million in seed funding to grow the ZE infrastructure investment in the LB-ELA Corridor to more than $200 million to support the accelerated adoption of ZE technology for heavy-duty trucks. Within the ZE Truck Program, up to $5 million will be reserved for technical assistance to support a community-focused scope to support the transition to ZE, including workforce development and supporting lower-income truck operators accessing ZE trucks. The Investment Plan will also invest in the study of freight rail in the Corridor to support moving more cargo by train versus truck—particularly through the Alameda Corridor—and a pilot study to evaluate the transition of freight locomotives to ZE technology. 8.6.1.8 Goods Movement Modal Program The projects and programs listed in Table 8-10 are not part of the initial recommendations. These projects and programs will be further refined, developed, and potentially made ready for implementation by their respective sponsors, with possible support from Metro. Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0024 Pier 400 On Dock Rail Modernization Port of Los Angeles 1 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0026 West Basin Container Terminal Railyard Modernization Port of Los Angeles 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0025 Terminal Island Transfer Facility Modernization111 Port of Los Angeles 1 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0132b Pier 300 On-Dock Rail Port of Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0123 Pico Avenue Street Improvement Port of Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0122 Harbor Scenic Drive Roadway and Infrastructure Improvements Port of Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0121 Pier D Street Realignment Port of Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0021 Alameda Corridor Terminus Enhancements Port of Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0124 Port of Los Angeles National Multimodal Zero-Emission Freight Network Improvement Program: Rail System Improvement Projects Port of Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_9305 Truck Safety and Truck Cut Through Study Multiple Jurisdictions NA/ New Implementation LB-ELA_9319 Zero Emission Truck Inductive Roadway Charging Pilot Multiple Jurisdictions NA/ New Implementation N/A ACTA Systems Efficiency and Safety Upgrades Program Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority NA/ New TBD Projects deemed to be fully funded were removed from list (see Appendix 8-A) New projects have not been evaluated . They may be eligible for future modal program funding as long as they align with the Vision and Goals of the Corridor . 111 This is an issue that is being resolved by the local jurisdiction. Table 8-10. Goods Movement Modal Program Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 272 of 305 8-82 Transit The Transit modal category includes improved and new bus and rail service, transit safety, and amenities to increase rider experience and safety on transit services in the LB-ELA Corridor study area. The most notable projects in the study area include the Southeast Gateway Line (Light Rail Transit Corridor), the Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 (E Line extension), and a conceptual new Metrolink connection between Long Beach and Los Angeles. Improvements are also proposed to existing Metro A and C Lines and Metrolink rail services and several new bus priority lane projects on key transit corridors. Transit investment is summarized in Table 8-11. Table 8-11. Transit Investment Summary The Investment Plan will fund several transit projects and programs through initial investments (described in the Initial Investments: Projects/ Programs Recommended for Initial Funding, page 8-7) and the development of future projects through the Transit Modal Program. The Investment Plan invests a total of $125 million in transit projects and programs, including $57 million in initial recommendations (described in the Funding Recommendations section) and an additional $68 million to develop future projects and initiatives through the Transit Modal Program. Although the operational costs associated with increased service would not be eligible for Investment Plan funding, the Transit Modal Program could support the purchase of new or replacement buses, transitioning to ZE vehicles, and technology to support faster and more reliable service. Furthermore, the Transit Modal Program can support the improvement of existing Metro and Metrolink rail corridors and advance the development of new rail corridors. Other projects and programs on the initial MSPPs list include improving passenger security on the transit system, better access to transit stations, station cleanliness, bus stop enhancements, and supporting the passenger experience with transit ambassadors and better access to transit service information. The Transit Modal Program includes funding for the provision of equitable project planning technical assistance (START-UP Fund) and resources to help lower-capacity and lower-resourced jurisdictions and communities develop project concepts and strategies for future implementation. By prioritizing these communities for development funding within the Modal Program, the Investment Plan aims to help bridge the gaps in capacity and resources that have contributed to historic spatial inequities in the distribution of investment and the list of implementation-ready projects put forth in the Investment Plan. Of the $68 million available in the Transit Modal Program, approximately 20% ($14 million) will be reserved for equitable project planning development and technical assistance (START- UP Fund). Total Investment Plan Investment $125 million Potential Leverage Investment $400 million to $600 million Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment $57 million Development $3 million Pre-Implementation $2 million Implementation $52 million Existing Metro Programs $68 million START-UP Fund $14 million Pre-Implementation $3 million Implementation $51 million Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 273 of 305 8-83 8.6.1.9 Transit Project/Programs Recommended for Initial Investment As described in Section 7-1, the $57 million initial investment for transit will focus on providing new and upgraded bus shelters and bus stop amenities in areas of most need, including 100 new bus shelters with lighting and 1,000 new curb ramps near transit stops. The initial investment will support safe access to the Compton A Line Station and neighboring Transit Center through bicycle and pedestrian improvements and will provide enhanced transit and vehicular safety through investment in quad safety gates along the Metro A Line within the LB-ELA study area. The initial investment for transit will focus on providing new and upgraded bus shelters and bus stop amenities in areas of most need, including 100 new bus shelters with lighting and 1,000 new curb ramps near transit stops. The initial investment will support safe access to the Compton A-Line Station and neighboring Transit Center through bicycle and pedestrian improvements and will provide enhanced transit and vehicular safety through investment in quad safety gates along the Metro A Line within the LB-ELA study area. The initial recommendations will also support studying the feasibility of implementing eight bus-lane corridor projects on Atlantic Blvd, Florence Ave, Slauson Blvd, Long Beach Blvd, Whittier Blvd, Gage Avenue, Olympic Blvd, and Firestone Blvd. Additionally, four of those corridors are going to see multimodal improvements through the Arterial Roadways/ Complete Streets investments. 8.6.1.10 Transit Modal Programs The projects and programs listed in Table 8-12 are not part of the list of projects for initial investment. These projects and programs will be further refined, developed, and potentially made ready for implementation through the Transit Modal Program. Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 274 of 305 8-84 Table 8-12. Transit Modal Program Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0169*Southeast LA Transit Improvement Program Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Development Implementation LB-ELA_0140 Metro Micro Transit Zone(s)Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Development/Implementation LB-ELA_0164 Improved Frequency of Metro Buses in the LB-ELA Study Area Study Wide Area 1 Development LB-ELA_0219 Metrolink Regional Rail Line between Union Station and Long Beach Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0001 Southeast Gateway Line Transit Corridor (LRT)Multiple Jurisdictions Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0136 Enhanced Transit Security Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0149 Increased Security Features at Metro's Existing and Planned Light Rail Stations Multiple Jurisdictions 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0161 Transit Ambassador Program Study Wide Area 1 Implementation LB-ELA_0172 Commerce Metrolink Station Improvements Commerce 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0160 Line A (Blue Line) Transit Priority/Signal Synchronization Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0147 Transit Traveler Information System Application (ITS)Study Wide Area 2 Development/Implementation LB-ELA_0148 Transit Fare Discount Program Study Wide Area 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0171 Commuter Rail Maintenance, Repair, and Safety Projects Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Development/Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0177 Add Second Elevator to Firestone and Slauson A Line [Blue Line] Stations Florence-Graham 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0016 Connecting C Line (Green) and Metrolink Norwalk Station Norwalk 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0152 Transit Marketing and Education Program Multiple Jurisdictions 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0077**Bus Stop Improvements (City of Commerce)Commerce 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0103**Bus Stop Improvements (City of Maywood)Maywood 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0118**Bus Shelter Upgrades (City of Signal Hill)Signal Hill 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0130 Long Beach Transit (LBT) Solar Charging Electrification Project Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation Note: table continues on next page Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 275 of 305 8-85 Notes: MCP: 2028 Games Mobility Concept Plan (MCP) to enhance mobility for the Olympic games and beyond . * Project funded through Local Partnership Program Grant ** These bus stops and shelter projects are likely to be combined with the Bus Stop Improvements Project (LB-ELA_0203) on the Initial Recommendation list . *** Projects funded with recent Reconnecting Communities & Neighborhoods Grant . New projects have not been evaluated . They may be eligible for future modal program funding as long as they align with the Vision and Goals of the Corridor . Table 8-12. Transit Modal Program (continued) Project ID Project Name Jurisdiction(s)Tier Phase LB-ELA_0002 C Line (Green) Eastern Extension (Norwalk) (LRT)Norwalk 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0176 Install Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System for A Line [Blue Line]Long Beach 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0173 Grade Separation(s) of the A Line [Blue Line] at Washington Street Los Angeles 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_0189 Transit System Cleanliness/Maintenance Study Wide Area 2 Implementation LB-ELA_0174 New Metrolink Station at planned Commerce/Citadel Station Commerce 2 Pre-Implementation LB-ELA_9308**MCP: A Line Willow Station Mobility Hub Long Beach NA/ New LB-ELA_9309 MCP: A Line cross over at Long Beach Blvd and Anaheim St Long Beach NA/ New LB-ELA_9310 **MCP: Florence/Studebaker/Imperial Bus Priority Improvements Huntington Park, Bell, Bell Gardens, Downey NA/ New Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 (E Line Extension)East Los Angeles (Los Angeles County), Montebello, Pico Rivera, Whittier NA/ New Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 276 of 305 9-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 9. Next Steps The Investment Plan’s vision is to reconnect the underserved communities of the Long Beach- East Los Angeles Corridor that have been dealing with the effects of the freeway for generations and implement a comprehensive, multimodal transportation plan to rectify past harms in the corridor after the adoption of the Investment Plan. As the Investment Plan is a strategic planning document, many of the projects and programs recommended for funding will need to undergo planning, development, refinement, and/or strategic funding assessment work before they are ready for implementation. This work will take place in the Investment Plan Implementation Phase that will commence upon the plan’s adoption by the Metro Board. In this next phase, Metro will continue to engage Task Force and Community Leadership Committee (CLC) Members and convene industry experts, funding, research and resource partners, and community members to ensure we develop a work plan that supports collaboration in the refinement of projects and programs, consistent with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles of the Investment Plan. The following Chapter describes the next steps for the Implementation Phase of the Investment Plan. This phase includes the formation of Working Groups that will shape and advance Community, Modal, and Initial Investment projects and programs and the establishment of a Technical Assistance program, the START-UP Fund, designed to support communities with the highest needs in developing project concepts—a cornerstone of our shared strategic vision for the LB- ELA Corridor. While the formal Task Force and Community Leadership Committee (CLC) process will conclude when the Investment Plan is adopted, members of these bodies will be able to participate in the Implementation Phase by joining the Working Groups identified in this chapter or attending bi-annual meetings at which Metro will provide updates and progress reports on the implementation of the Investment Plan. These opportunities for ongoing engagement will help provide accountability and transparency for our stakeholders and demonstrate progress toward the advancement of the plan’s projects and programs. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 277 of 305 9-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 9.1.1 Modal Working Groups Modal Working Group 1: Develop and refine the initial investment projects/ programs and modal programs for the Transit, Active Transportation, Arterial Roadway/Complete Streets, and micromobility modes. Modal Working Group 2: Develop and refine the initial investment projects/ programs and modal programs for the I-710 MOSAIC/Freeway Safety and Interchange Improvements and Goods Movement modes. The general purpose of the Modal Working Groups, as referenced above, will include, but not be limited to, the following: • Further refine proposed projects and programs; • Ensure alignment with LB-ELA Investment Plan Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles; • Provide ongoing feedback to Metro and other project sponsors; • Support community engagement efforts; • Support implementation of technical assistance/equity work elements of the Investment Plan; • Develop and refine the modal programs; • Support planning/pilot/strategic initiatives; • Provide a forum for affected stakeholders and project sponsors to participate; and • Assist Metro in generating the next wave of recommendations for project priorities and funding recommendations for the Modal Program funding. 9.1 Investment Plan Implementation Working Group Only a small number of projects and programs within the Investment Plan are fully defined and ready for implementation. Most projects and programs require further development, design, refinement, community engagement, and/or environmental review. Recognizing this need to continue development of projects and programs for which we have designated initial investment or modal program funding, Metro recommends the formation of five new LB-ELA Investment Plan Implementation Working Groups to support the Implementation Phase of the plan. These groups will meet on an ongoing basis following adoption of the LB-ELA Investment Plan to allow Metro to continue developing and defining projects and programs and to serve as a continuation of collaborative partnerships with a broad range of stakeholders, including Task Force, CLC, and community members, to help implement the Investment Plan. All Implementation Phase work will be conducted within the LB-ELA Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles framework. Metro recommends the creation of two “Modal” Working Groups, which would lead efforts to develop and refine the initial investment projects/ programs and modal programs, and between three and four “Community Program” Working Groups, which would lead efforts to develop and refine the 15 Community Programs in the Investment Plan. The recommendation to create multiple Working Groups allows for natural connectivity among the projects and programs to be developed within each set of modes while reducing stakeholder fatigue and community concerns related to creating too many Working Groups in the Implementation Phase. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 278 of 305 9-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 9.1.2 Community Programs Working Groups Community Program Working Group 1: Develop and refine the Community Programs within the Health/Air Quality/Environment topic area. Community Program Working Group 2: Develop and refine the Community Programs within the Housing Stabilization/Land Use topic area. Community Program Working Group 3: Develop and refine the Community Programs within the Job Creation/Work Opportunities topic area. The general purpose of the Community Program Working Groups, as referenced above, will include, but not be limited to, the following: • Develop the vision and goals for the Working Group to achieve success in advancing each included Community Program; • Ensure alignment with LB-ELA Investment Plan Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles; • Identify stakeholders, participants, and experts to support the work of the group; • Identify funding sources and grant opportunities to support the funding needs of the programs; • Identify potential projects and programs to develop, include, refine, and/or explore that could be priorities for each Community Program; • Develop priorities and strategies for planning and implementation of these various projects and programs; and • Provide support and input for community engagement strategies. 9.2 Technical Assistance (START-UP) Fund The Investment Plan allocates $40 million to the START-UP (Strategic Technical Assistance for Reparative Transportation Uplifting People) Fund that provides targeted technical assistance to support communities with the highest needs, relative to their technical resources and capacity for project development and implementation. The START-UP Fund will help communities develop project concepts for grant eligibility and help communities participate in the implementation of the eligibility and help communities participate in the implementation of the Investment Plan’s Corridor-wide programs. The START-UP Fund will not be tied explicitly to certain municipalities or geographic communities, but assistance will be prioritized for cities or neighborhoods: • Without any projects formally submitted for the Investment Plan; • With only conceptual or development phase projects in the Investment Plan; • With high concentrations of Equity Focus Communities (EFCs); and/ or • Facing the greatest cumulative impacts as identified in existing conditions research. Specific START-UP Fund priorities will be considered and recommended by the Modal Working Groups, as project opportunities and funding/technical assistance needs are identified through ongoing communication between Metro project staff and LB-ELA Corridor jurisdictions and other community partners. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 279 of 305 9-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 9.3 Guidance for Project Development While a robust approach was taken to evaluate potential benefits and concerns resulting from each project, as described in Chapter 6, many projects will be further developed through the modal programs. Some community members have shared their concerns about investing in projects that have not been fully developed and the potential disbenefits that could result from the development of new and conceptual projects without equal level of scrutiny applied. For new projects, not yet evaluated as part of the Investment Plan process, the Working Groups will be able to leverage aspects of the evaluation framework and criteria created for the Investment Plan to provide an evaluation of proposed projects’ alignment with the Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles. Working groups will also review equity and CIC flags to refine project design and implementation, and projects will be subject to environmental review as part of the CEQA/ NEPA process. In response to comments from community members, Metro is committed to using the following explicit guidance to shape project development across all modes: • Air Quality: All projects will be screened to determine whether an air quality analysis would be required as part of the CEQA/NEPA process. As part of the CEQA/NEPA process, a project’s potential health risk impacts would also be evaluated during construction and operation, which may include a quantitative Health Risk Assessment, depending on a project’s location, construction duration, construction activities, potential sources of emissions and proximity to receptors. • Displacements: This Investment Plan, in contrast to the prior I-710 South Corridor Project, does not recommend any projects or programs with any known displacements for funding and remains committed to ensuring the Board’s anti-displacement policies remain intact through the implementation of the Investment Plan. For projects that need to be developed in the Modal Working Groups, further analysis will be performed to identify and design options to avoid any potential displacements in the future. Given the unique history in this corridor, Metro’s goal is to ensure zero displacement for future projects in this corridor. • Surveillance: Any projects that include cameras or video technology will be evaluated with input from community members due to concerns about potentially compromising the privacy of corridor residents. • Impervious cover and heat burden: Metro understands that increases in impervious cover exacerbates disparities in tree canopy and urban heat island effect. In addition to the Urban Greening Community Program, all relevant projects funded in the Investment Plan will prioritize incorporating urban greening, native and drought-tolerant landscaping, permeable surfaces, and tree canopy, with input from the Working Groups. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 280 of 305 9-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 9.4 Tracking Investment Plan Progress and Success Given the breadth of issues this Investment Plan addresses, and its nature as a strategic planning document, performance metrics will need to measure the Plan’s impacts across modes and on multiple scales of progress and success. Metro recommends the establishment of an LB-ELA Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Performance Tracking Program to track and measure progress and impacts. The program will establish consistent methods and tools for tracking project outcomes across similar projects and set performance tracking expectations for project sponsors and lead agencies to support the intent of understanding the Investment Plan’s cumulative benefits and impacts over time. In coordination with the modal program working groups and other Metro efforts such as the Long Range Transportation Plan, Metro will develop a framework for tracking Investment Plan progress and success that builds upon the metrics used for the existing conditions analysis and project evaluation methodology. Metrics will be organized into the following three categories: Process Metrics • Metrics that quantify or qualify the Investment Plan’s implementation progress based on process milestones and project and program delivery Project Outcome Metrics • Metrics that track progress against the Investment Plan’s goals, which can be attributed to specific projects and programs Community Result Metrics • M Metrics that track progress against the Investment Plan’s desired community results, which cannot be directly attributed to specific projects and programs 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 281 of 305 9-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan A summary of potential performance metrics, for discussion with the Modal and Community Programs Working Groups, is included below: *Examples of potential performance metrics to be applied - Subject to change 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 282 of 305 9-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 9.5 Planning for the Next Phase In response to stakeholder and community feedback throughout the Investment Plan process leading up to the Plan’s approval in 2024, Metro continued to cultivate the development of the next phase of plan—the Implementation Phase. Metro utilized feedback from the Task Force, CLC, and Working Group meetings as a platform for discussing, through the lens of equity, the Investment Plan’s ongoing impact on topics such as community health, air quality and existing disparities in the corridor. Metro held an Equity Working Group meeting on March 25, 2024, to discuss the incorporation of community health in implementation of the Community Programs as well as key objectives for the Environment, Air Quality and Health-related Working Group. Equity Working Group members were asked to help Metro design the future working group structure, initiate the next steps, and prepare for the launch of the Community Programs Catalyst Fund once the Investment Plan is adopted; they provided initial ideas during this planning discussion, including feedback about taking a broad view of defining community health, in alignment with the range of Community Programs. Metro will also identify and incorporate lessons learned from the ZET and Equity Working Groups when establishing a new Working Group structure and will continue to engage stakeholders to finalize this new phase in the months ahead. The success of the plan relies on a team effort moving forward—Metro looks forward to continued work with community members, local organizations, industry experts and researchers, funding and regulatory agencies, and elected officials as the Investment Plan becomes a reality. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations 9. Next Steps . . Item 20 Page 283 of 305 10-1 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 10. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations, Glossary of Terms, and Lo cal, State and Regional Resources 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 284 of 305 10-2 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AHSC Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program APP Areas of Persistent Poverty ATP Active Transportation Program BIP Bridge Investment Program BIPOC Black, Indigenous or People of Color BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe BRT bus rapid transit Btu British thermal unit Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CBO community-based organization CEC California Energy Commission CEP community engagement program CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CES WG Community Engagement Strategy Working Group CIC community input consideration CLC Community Leadership Committee CMCP Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan CRISI Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements CSTAN Countywide Strategic Truck Arterial Network DPM diesel particulate matter EFC Equity Focus Community EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Study EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EPET Equity Planning and Evaluation Tool FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration FY fiscal year GCCOG Gateway Cities Council of Governments GHG greenhouse gas GIS Geographic Information Systems HDC Historically Disadvantaged Communities HOV high-occupancy vehicle HQTA High-Quality Transit Area I-105 Interstate 105 I-405 Interstate 405 I-5 Interstate 5 I-710 Interstate 710 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 285 of 305 10-3 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan IIJA Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act INFRA Infrastructure for Rebuilding America Investment Long Beach-East Plan Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Improvement Plan IRA Inflation Reduction Act ITS Intelligent Transportation System(s) LA County Los Angeles County LADOT Los Angeles Department of Transportation LADWP Los Angeles Department of Water and Power LB-ELA Long Beach-East Los Angeles LPA Locally Preferred Alternative Metro Board Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority MSPP multimodal strategies, projects, and programs NAE Neighborhood Access and Equity NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NOx oxides of nitrogen PA&ED preliminary engineering and environmental documentation PIDP Port Infrastructure Development Program PM2.5 particulate matter equal to or less than 2.5 microns in diameter POLA Port of Los Angeles POLB Port of Long Beach RAISE Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity RCN Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods ROW right-of-way SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCP Solutions for Congested Corridors Program SCE Southern California Edison SMART Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation SR State Route SS4A Safe Streets and Roads for All STP Strategic Transportation Plan TCEP Trade Corridor Enhancement Program TDM travel demand management TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TOD Transit-Oriented Development TSM transportation systems management TSM transportation systems management UHIE Urban Heat Island Effect UP Union Pacific USDOT United States Department of Transportation VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 286 of 305 10-4 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Glossary of Terms This glossary defines keywords featured in the Long Beach-East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan. Glossary Overview General Terms are included at the beginning of the Glossary. These include background terms and other helpful definitions that are not reflected in the Type or Subtype Sections. Type (Category)Subtype (Subcategory) Active Transportation/ Travel Demand Management (TDM) • Bicycle Routes/Facilities • Pedestrian/First Last Mile • Safety and Amenities • TDM Strategies Arterial Roadway • Complete Streets • Signal Coordination, Transportation Systems Management (TSM), Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) • Traffic Calming • General Local/Regional Roadway Evaluation Criteria • Data Analysis • Modeling • Qualitative and Quantitative Metrics Community Programs • Air Quality/Community/Health/Environment • Housing Stabilization/Land Use • Job Creation/Work Opportunities Goods Movement • Truck Programs/ITS • Freight Rail, Goods Movement, TDM • Ports Transit • High-Capacity Transit (Rail & BRT) • Rail Line/Station Improvements • Bus Transit • Transit Amenities Freeway • Freeway Improvements • Freeway Amenities/ITS • Zero Emissions Lanes on I-710 • Congestion Pricing 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 287 of 305 10-5 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Glossary Activity-Based Model (ABM): Estimates household socio-economic characteristics and simulates daily activities to estimate chains of trips to complete those daily activities. Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS): A pedestrian push button that communicates when to cross the street in a non-visual manner, such as audible tones, speech messages, and vibrating surfaces. Active Transportation:Human powered transportation and low speed electronic assist devices: Examples include but are not limited to pedestrians, bicycles, tricycles, wheelchairs, electric wheelchairs, scooters, skates, and skateboards. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in public accommodations, employment, transportation, state and local government services, and telecommunications. It prescribes federal transportation requirements for transportation providers. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) amnesty programs: Intended to provide a low-cost, penalty-free pathway to improve all unpermitted accessory dwelling units to a safe and habitable condition without requiring the removal of the units or displacement of any residents. Advance Transportation Management Systems (ATMS): Provides real-time roadway monitoring, incident detection, and rapid response capabilities. Affordable accessory dwelling unit (ADU) programs: Legal and regulatory term for a secondary house or apartment that shares the building lot of a larger, primary home. They may be built within a converted garage or accessory structure, as a newly built structure, or as a conversion of part of the main house. Air Quality:The degree to which the air in a particular place is pollution-free. Air Quality Modeling:Mathematical and numerical techniques to simulate the physical and chemical processes that affect air pollutants as they disperse and react in the atmosphere. Alameda Corridor:A 20-mile-long rail high-capacity freight expressway linking the port cluster of Long Beach and Los Angeles to the transcontinental rail terminals near downtown Los Angeles. Amenities:Roadway features that help to provide comfort, convenience, and safety. Anti-Displacement Programs: Programs that advocate for intentional development that reduces displacement as the path forward towards equitable, affordable, and inclusive communities Arterial Roadway:A high-capacity road that carries longer-distance flows between important centers of activity. At-grade crossing:A crossing or intersection of highways, railroad tracks, other guideways, or pedestrian walks, or combinations of these at the same level or grade. Auxiliary Lane:An extra short distance lane(s) of the highway adjoining the through travel lanes to allow for speed change, turning, weaving, truck climbing, maneuvering of entering and leaving traffic, and other safety and operational purposes supplementary to through-traffic movement. Basic Income Program:Government program in which every adult citizen receives a set amount of money regularly. The goals of a basic income system are to alleviate poverty and replace other need-based social programs that potentially require greater bureaucratic involvement. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 288 of 305 10-6 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Bicycle Routes/ Facilities: A portion of a right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicyclists which has been designated by pavement markings, curb, cross-hatched paint, planting strip or parked cars. Bike facilities come in many forms and are categorized into classes, typically from Class I to Class IV, with the latter including a buffer/barrier and is considered as the most protective for cyclists/ pedestrians. Bike Facilities/Paths – Class I (1): Paved rights-of-way completely separated from streets. Bike paths are often located along waterfronts, creeks, railroad rights-of-way or freeways with a limited number of cross streets and driveways. These paths are typically shared with pedestrians and often called mixed-use paths. Bike Facilities/Paths – Class II (2): On-street facilities designated for bicyclists using stripes and stencils. Bike lanes are the preferred treatment for all arterial and collector streets on the bikeway network, and not typically installed on low- volume, low-speed residential streets. Bike Facilities/Paths – Class III (3): Streets designated for bicycle travel and shared with motor vehicles. Streets are designated as bike routes because they are suitable for sharing with motor vehicles and/or provide better (or needed) connectivity than other streets. Routes are marked with signs and/or shared lane bicycle (aka “sharrow”) pavement markings intended to encourage bicyclists to ride clear of the “door zone” and to alert motorists to expect bicyclists to occupy the full lane. Bike Facilities/Paths – Class IV (4): Separated bikeway for the exclusive use of bicycles, physically separated from the roadway by a buffer or vertical feature. Bike overcrossing:Also called pedestrian/bicycle bridges, provide critical links in the bicycle/pedestrian system by joining areas separated by a variety of “barriers.” Overcrossings can address real or perceived safety issues by providing users a formalized means for traversing “problem areas” including transportation corridors, such as arterial roads, freeways, and railroad tracks. Bike Share:A service that provides bicycles for a daily, monthly, annual, or trip-based fee. Bike share is recognized as an option for first and last mile transit connections. Learn about Metro’s Bike Share program at https:// bikeshare.metro.net/ Bioswales:Channels designed to concentrate and convey stormwater runoff while removing debris and pollution, which could include vegetated, shallow, landscaped depressions designed to capture, treat, and infiltrate stormwater runoff as it moves downstream. Bobtail:A freight-carrying truck without a trailer. Bollards:A short post used to divert traffic from an area or road. Bridge Decks:The functional area on top of a bridge or overcrossing that allows vehicles and non-motorized traffic such as pedestrians and bicyclists to cross over a roadway, freeway, railroad, or river channel. Brownfield:An area with abandoned, idle, or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion, redevelopment, or reuse is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. Buffered Bike Lanes – Class II(IIB): Buffer striping to provide greater separation between bicyclists and parked or moving vehicles. Bulb outs:A curb extension which allows a bus to stop within the travel lane. This helps buses move faster and more reliably. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 289 of 305 10-7 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Bus Priority Lane Corridor: Typically involves the conversion of the rightmost traffic lane into a travel lane primarily dedicated to buses (allows for right turns and bike lane uses) during specific times and days of the week. These are typically installed to increase service frequency and reliability, as well as enhancing mobility by moving more people without adding more infrastructure. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): Bus Rapid Transit is a mobility or bus option with many of the same benefits as light rail service, but at significantly less cost and with a faster build time. BRT offers reliable, frequent transit service in LA County with bus speed improvements over local bus service, operational enhancements and minimal infrastructure needs. Local examples of BRT service include the G Line (Orange), serving the San Fernando Valley, and the J Line (Silver), which serves El Monte, downtown Los Angeles and San Pedro. Carpool Lane:Also known as High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV), is a lane restricted to vehicles with two (and in some cases three) or more occupants to encourage carpooling. Vehicles include automobiles, vans, buses, and taxis. Changeable Message Signs (CMS): Primarily used to give motorists real-time traffic safety and guidance information about planned and unplanned events that significantly impact traffic on the State’s highway system, such as traffic congestion or AMBER (America’s Missing: Broadcast Emergence Response) Alerts Chassis:The base frame of a motor vehicle. Closed Circuit Television Camera (CCTV): Camera system in which signals are not publicly distributed but are monitored, primarily for monitoring traffic and security purposes. Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Public or private nonprofit organization that are representative of a community and provide educational or related services to individuals in the community. Community Health Screening: Opportunity for anyone to receive free or inexpensive health evaluations to help determine their risk of developing a medical condition Community Health:Non-clinical approaches for improving health, preventing disease, and reducing health disparities through addressing social, behavioral, environmental, economic, and medical determinants of health in a geographically defined population Community Indicator:Quantifiable measures of community results, disaggregated by race/ethnicity and income. Community Land Trusts (CLT) /land banks: Nonprofit organizations governed by a board of CLT residents, community residents, and public representatives that provide lasting community assets and shared equity homeownership opportunities for families and communities Complete Streets:Streets that are designed and operated to enable safe access for all roadway users of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders. Complete Streets strategies can include traffic calming, bicycle priority streets (bicycle boulevards) and pedestrian connectivity to increase physical activity, improve connectivity to the regional bikeway/ greenway networks, local businesses and parks. Congested Speeds:Speeds of less than 35 miles per hour. Connected Vehicle Infrastructure: Infrastructure supporting vehicles that use any number of different communication technologies to communicate with the driver, other cars on the road (vehicle-to-vehicle), roadside to infrastructure (vehicle- to-infrastructure), and the “Cloud”. Connected vehicles are part of the Internet of Things (IoT) concept that many cities and municipalities are beginning to adopt to tackle some of the biggest challenges in the surface transportation industry. For instance, safety, mobility, and environment. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 290 of 305 10-8 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Container Terminal Wharf: An area designated for storing cargo in a container, usually accessible by truck, railroad, and marine transportation. Density Bonus Programs: Incentive-based tool that permits a developer to increase the maximum allowable development on a site in exchange for either funds or in-kind support for specified public policy goals Design Pollution Prevention Infiltration Areas (DPPIAs): Could include stormwater treatment devices that would treat stormwater runoff from sites along the transportation facility and contribute to pollution prevention infiltration. Distributive Equity:1) Allocation of benefits and amenities proportionate to levels of need and historic investment and based on self-identified community priorities rather than ‘one-size-fits-all’ solutions. 2) Policies and resource management to ensure benefits reach intended recipients. Drayage truck movements: The transport of freight from an ocean port to a destination Economic empowerment: The transformative process that helps move marginalized individuals from limited power, voice, and choice to have the skills, resources, and opportunities needed to attain economic security as well as the agency to control and benefit from financial gains. Ensuring the opportunity to participate in and benefit from the community’s economic growth. Economic resilience:To build an equitable and sustainable economy where communities and residents can recover quickly from or withstand or avoid a shock to their economic conditions, especially in the overall transition to a carbon-neutral economy. Economic sustainability: Focuses on practices that support long-term economic growth without negatively impacting social, environmental, and cultural aspects of the community. EFC Lens:Equity Focus Community Lens Emergency vehicle pre-emption (EMVE): A vehicle pre-emption or priority system that is integrated into a local street traffic signal management system designed to move emergencies vehicles faster through signalized roads. As an emergency vehicle approaches an intersection, the traffic light will turn green for the emergency vehicle, and red for the opposing traffic to clear the intersection for the emergency vehicle to pass through when responding to an emergency. EMFAC:A computer emissions modeling software that estimates emission rates for motor vehicles for calendar years from 2000 to 2050 operating in California. Emission Reduction Program: Program to lower the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by an individual, organization or country. Environmental sustainability: The responsibility to conserve natural resources and protect global ecosystems to support health and wellbeing, now and in the future. EQ QUAL:Equity qualitative analysis Equitable development scorecard: An evaluation tool that ensures that residents’ voices are centered in decision-making processes while also building community power by using a point based on how well projects promote equity across several criteria. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 291 of 305 10-9 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Equity Guiding Principle: “A commitment to: (1) strive to rectify past harms; (2) provide fair and just access to opportunities; and 3) eliminate disparities in project processes, outcomes, and community results.” “The plan seeks to elevate and engrain the principle of Equity across all goals, objectives, strategies, and actions through a framework of Procedural, Distributive, Structural, and Restorative Equity, and by prioritizing an accessible and representative participation process for communities most impacted by the I-710.” Equity:1) Both an outcome and a process to address disparities to ensure fair and just access to opportunities. 2) An end state in which all groups have access to the resources, benefits, and opportunities necessary to improve the quality of their lives, which can include a more just decision-making process. Equity-Focus Community (EFC): Metro created a community designation called Equity Focus Communities (EFCs) to help identify where transportation needs are greatest. EFCs consider where there are higher concentrations of resident and household demographics associated with mobility barriers including low-income households, BIPOC/non- white households, and households without a vehicle. EFCs reflect percentile ranges of combined metrics and refer to tracts above the 60th (high need) and 80th (very high need) percentiles. Equity Opportunity:A decision that is designed to enhance positive impacts or reduce negative impacts for historically marginalized communities or others facing disparities in access to opportunities. Evaluation Criteria:A benchmark, standard, or factor against which performance and suitability of an activity, product, or plan is measured. First/Last Mile:The first and last part of the journey that riders walk, bike or roll to and from their nearest station or bus stop is called the “first/last mile connection.” Flag:Tool used to capture additional information not captured in the evaluation score of a project or program. Freeway Lids, Caps:Type of deck bridge built on top of a controlled-access highway or another roadway. It is commonly used to create new parkland in urban areas. In some locations, freeway caps or lids are used to describe overpasses containing widened bridges that accommodate wider sidewalks or small amenity space beside the roadway above the highway. Freeway:An expressway with fully controlled access Freight Rail:The use of railroads and trains to transport cargo, sometimes on railroad track that also carries human passengers. Geofence alerts:A virtual geographic boundary, defined by GPS (Global Positioning System) or RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology. When a mobile device crosses the “fence,” the geofence triggers a response. Essentially, geofences use virtual GPS points to trigger responses that send alerts to mobile devices when users enter or exit the geofenced territory. Geographic Information System (GIS): Computer-based tools used to store, visualize, analyze, and interpret geographic data. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analysis: A type of computer software that allows the user to manipulate geographic information and to produce maps of data. Goal:Desired outcomes for general areas of concern to support the overall Vision. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 292 of 305 10-10 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Goods Movement:The distribution of freight (including raw materials, parts, and finished consumer products) by all modes of transportation including marine, air, rail and truck. Grade Separation:A crossing of two highways, highway and local road, or a highway and a railroad at different levels. For example, a multimodal bridge over or under the railroad tracks. Greenbelts:A band of the countryside surrounding a city or urbanized area on which building is generally prohibited. Similar concepts are greenways or green wedges, which have a linear character and may run through an urban area instead of around it. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Emissions Gases that absorb and emit radiant energy at thermal infrared wavelengths, causing the greenhouse gas effect. The primary greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Emissions of any gas caused by human activity that have the property of absorbing infrared radiation (net heat energy) emitted from Earth’s surface and reradiating it back to Earth’s surface, including carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor. Guiding Principle:A value that guides all processes and outcomes through a cohesive and intentional framework. Hardscaping:Refers to any man-made structure within landscaping design that is made of inanimate materials like gravel, brick, wood, pavers, or stone. Any solid structure in an outdoor area that is not plant life is considered hardscape. HAWK beacon:Also known as Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHBs), HAWK beacons can warn and control traffic at unsignalized locations and assist pedestrians in crossing a street or highway at a marked crosswalk. Unlike a traffic signal, the PHB rests in the dark until a pedestrian activates it via pushbutton or other form of detection. When activated, the beacon displays a sequence of flashing and solid lights that indicate the pedestrian walk interval and when it is safe for drivers to proceed. Housing/Rent Stabilization: A form of control over housing prices so that the given cost of rent for a property only increases by a small amount each year. Hybrid work schedules: An arrangement that informs when employees should work remotely or from the office. Here, each employee’s needs are considered while prioritizing your organization’s goals. Inclusionary Housing:Local policies that tap the economic gains from rising real estate values to create affordable housing. This policy includes reserving a certain percentage of new housing units for low and moderate-income households. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): Improves transportation by integrating advanced information and communications-based technologies (ICT) into transportation infrastructure and vehicles. ITS refers to a system of technologies and operational advancements that, when combined and managed, improve the capabilities of the overall transportation system. Interchange:Road junction that uses grade separations to allow for the movement of traffic between two or more roadways or highways 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 293 of 305 10-11 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Intermodal yards:Any transportation facility primarily dedicated to the business of freight rail and/or intermodal freight rail operations where cargo is transferred to or from a train and any other form of conveyance (usually a truck). Internet service provider (ISP): A company that provides individuals and organizations access to the internet and other related services Land Use:The human use of land. It represents the economic and cultural activities practiced at a given place. Public and private lands frequently represent very different uses Light Rail Transit (LRT): Light Rail Transit (LRT) Is a public transit system with vehicles that are electrically self-propelled by overhead catenary wires and usually operate in one or two-car trains (at peak times, Metro trains can have up to three cars). LRT train cars have passenger capacity of 135 per car and can carry up to 405 passengers per train, operating every five to six minutes. An LRT system has an average speed of 24-35 mph the top speed of 55-65 miles per hour (MPH) and operates above, below or at street level with a typical station spacing being one mile. Metro currently operates LRT on the Metro A Line (Blue), C Line (Green), L Line (Gold), E Line (Expo), and the recently opened K Line (Crenshaw/LAX). Metro Micro Transit Zone(s): Metro Micro service areas designed to replace short, solo trips by offering a flexible, on-demand service operated by Metro employees in vehicles that hold up to 10 passengers. Along with other safety measures, capacity is currently limited to five passengers to reduce risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Mobility on Demand pilot began by offering shared rides to or from transit stations in select zones as a way to expand equitable, affordable and efficient access to Metro’s existing transit network. For more information about Metro Micro, visit https://www.metro.net/micro/. Mixed-Flow Traffic Lanes: Travel lanes used by autos, buses, carpools, and trucks. Model:An analytical tool to provide information to planners; A means to quantitatively forecast the effects of transportation planning, policy, or investment decisions – or external factors – on transportation demand and system performance. Multimodal options: 1) A mixture of several modes of transportation, such as public transportation (i.e., bus, light rail, commuter rail, etc.), autos, trucks, freight rail, and non-motorized systems of transportation. 2) Includes walking, taking public transportation, driving, rolling (riding a bike, scooter, wheelchair, skates). On Dock Rail:Railroad tracks that are located adjacent to port terminal ship berths and allows containers to be moved by cranes from a ship directly to a rail car and vice versa, and does not require the container to exit the terminal’s gate via truck. On-demand bus (Micro-Transit): A form of bus demand-responsive transport vehicle for hire. This transit service offers a highly flexible routing and/or highly flexible scheduling of minibus vehicles shared with other passengers. Operational Lanes:A type of lane that is operated with a management scheme, such as lane use restrictions or tolling, to optimize traffic flow. Overcrossing:A structure carrying a road or street over a highway, freeway, or river channel. Parklets:A small seating area or green space created as a public amenity on or alongside a sidewalk, such as in a former roadside parking space. Pedestrian:Any person who travels by foot or a wheeled conveyance that is not a bicycle, including scooters, wheelchairs and other mobility devices. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 294 of 305 10-12 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Performance Measure:Quantifiable measures to forecast and track how well the proposed action will work or is working. They may be quantitative, qualitative, or otherwise describe actual impact. They may also be short-term, mid-term, or long-term. Person Miles Traveled (PMT): A standard measure of mobility that combines both the number and length of trips Park and Ride (PNR) to Transit: A traveler drives and parks at a transit stop to continue a trip via transit. Port Railyard:A rail facility in which cargo is transferred from drayage truck to train or vice-versa. Port Transportation Analysis Model (PortTAM): Uses Port Cargo Forecasts, Port Facility activities, and related facilities to estimate port-related cargo movements by both Rail and Truck trips. Procedural Equity:1) Proactive and accessible community engagement that bridges linguistic, technology, and ability gaps to meet communities where they are and enable participatory and representative decision-making processes. 2) Ongoing systems of accountability and communication to build and maintain trust. Proposal Outcome:A clearly defined future state of being at the program, local, or agency level resulting from the proposed action that ultimately supports the community result. Public-private partnerships: Public-private partnerships involve collaboration between a government agency and a private-sector company that can be used to finance, build, and operate projects, such as public transportation networks or parks. Financing a project through a public-private partnership can allow a project to be completed sooner or make it a possibility in the first place. Quad Safety Gates:A type of boom barrier gate protecting a grade crossing. It has a gate mechanism on both sides of the tracks for both directions of automotive traffic. The exit gates blocking the road leading away from the tracks are equipped with a delay and begin their descent to their horizontal position several seconds after the entrance gates do, to avoid trapping highway vehicles on the crossing. QUAL:General qualitative analysis Qualitative Assessments: Use of a set of methods, principles, or rules for assessing risk based on nonnumerical categories or levels. Quantitative Analysis:Analysis of a situation or event by means of complex mathematical and statistical modeling. Raised islands:Provides a raised median that serves as a physical separation between opposing vehicle travel lanes while also offering an opportunity for landscaping or visual enhancements to a roadway corridor, and a place of refuge for a pedestrian crossing a multi-lane street – all in support of improved and safe traffic flow. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs): RRFBs are pedestrian-actuated conspicuity or luminosity enhancements used in combination with a pedestrian, school, or trail crossing warning sign to improve safety at uncontrolled, marked crosswalks. The device includes two rectangular shaped yellow indications, each with an LED-array-based light source, that flash with high frequency when activated. Rental Assistance Programs: Programs intended to help eligible households cover rental and utility costs, to assist with prospective payments for rent and utilities, and provide funding for housing stabilization services and other housing- related expenses 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 295 of 305 10-13 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Restorative Equity:1) Acknowledgement of, and atonement for historic and ongoing systemic harms resulting from planning practice and policy. 2) Commensurate actions, resources, and investments dedicated to remediation and prevention of further systemic harms. Right-of-Way:Land legally designated for use by a transportation facility(ies) such as roadways, freeways, and transit lines. Road Diets:Typically involves repurposing an existing roadway – for example, a four-lane, undivided roadway segment to a three-lane segment consisting of two through lanes and a center, two-way left-turn lane – to make additional space available for other transportation modes such as pedestrians and bicyclists. In addition to low cost, the primary benefits of a Road Diet include enhanced safety, mobility and access for all road users and a “complete streets” environment to accommodate a variety of transportation modes. Roundabouts:An intersection where traffic travels around a central island in a counterclockwise direction. Vehicles entering or exiting the roundabout must yield to vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. SA QUAL:Sustainability qualitative analysis Safety:Safety pertains to the measures taken to reduce the risk of road traffic injuries and death. Shared-Use:1) Facilities that have multiple users. For example, some freight rail lines have shared use with Metrolink and Amtrak. Highways have shared use between trucks and cars and transit (sometimes). Roads have shared use between transit, cars, bicycles, pedestrians, delivery trucks, etc. 2) A transportation system that responds to the needs of all users of a transportation corridor that is shared by cars, bicycles, buses, trucks, etc. Shore-side power:Providing electrical power from the shore to a vessel at berth, thereby allowing the auxiliary engines to be turned off. Signal Coordination (Synchronization): Traffic Signal Synchronization is a traffic engineering technique of matching the green light times for a series of intersections to enable the maximum number of vehicles to pass through, thereby reducing stops and delays experienced by motorists. Synchronizing traffic signals ensures a better flow of traffic and minimizes gas consumption and pollutant emissions. Social equity:Fairness and justice for all people in social policy. Social equity considers systemic inequalities to ensure that everyone in a community has access to the same opportunities and outcomes. Equity of all kinds acknowledges that inequalities exist and works to eliminate them. Societal sustainability:Focuses on the basic social needs of humans including health and well-being, education, dignity, equality, peace and justice. Socioeconomic Data:Data of a combined economic and sociological measure of a person’s work experience and family’s economic access to resources and social position in relation to others. Soundwalls:A wall installed parallel to highways with the intent of minimizing the traffic noise for nearby residential areas. Structural Equity:1) Evolution of decision-making bodies to reflect the communities they serve. 2) Restructuring of organizational systems and hierarchies to empower historically marginalized groups. Subtype:A secondary or subordinate type or genre, a specific one considered as falling under a general classification. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 296 of 305 10-14 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA): A system of software and hardware elements that allows organizations to (1) control operations locally or at remote locations, (2) monitor, gather, and process real-time data (3) directly interact with devices such as sensors, valves, pumps, motors, and more through human-machine interface (HMI) software, and (4) record events into a log file. Sustainability Guiding Principle: “Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. A commitment to sustainability to satisfy and improve basic social, health, and economic needs/conditions, both present and future, and the responsible use and stewardship of the environment, all while maintaining or improving the well-being of the environment on which life depends.” Sustainability:The satisfaction of basic social and economic needs, both present and future, and the responsible use of the natural environment, all while maintaining or improving the well-being of the environment on which life depends. Generally made up of three pillars Sustainable community: A community that can maintain and support itself and its residents generationally and sustains itself economically, socially, and environmentally over time. Sustainable development: Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Transportation Demand Management (TDM): Used to forecast traffic flows on the transportation system. Although the transportation system may include other modes of travel such as walking, bikes, or trains, the models are typically used for evaluating roadway improvements or improvements to bus service. Telecommuting:The ability for an employee to complete work assignments from outside the traditional workplace by using telecommunications tools, such as phone, email, and other online communication tools. Thoroughfare:A road or path forming a route between two places. Traffic Calming (speed calming): Local street design techniques that reduce traffic speeds and discourage traffic incursion in residential neighborhoods to improve local street safety and neighborhood quality of life. Techniques include physical traffic barriers (e.g., speed humps), revised street configurations, and traffic speed enforcement. Traffic controls (traffic signals, stop signs): The control of traffic via any of a number of passive rules or signs (including travel way delineations, rights-of-way and other rules-of-the-road, and traffic markings and signs) or active human agents or control devices (police officers and traffic signals), to optimize safe and efficient flows. Traffic Controls:Directing vehicular and pedestrian traffic around a construction zone, accident, or other road disruption, thus ensuring the safety of emergency response teams, construction workers, and the public. Traffic Volumes:Volume of traffic moving on roads at a particular section during a particular time period. Transit Mode Share:The percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using said type. Transit Oriented Communities (TOC): Community development that, by design, enable people to access and use transit more often by centering housing, jobs, services, and shopping around public transit. For more information about Metro’s TOC Program, visit https://www.metro.net/about/toc- technical-assistance-program/ 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 297 of 305 10-15 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Transit Oriented Development (TOD): Moderate- to higher-density development, located within easy walk of a major transit stop, generally with a mix of residential, employment, and shopping opportunities designed for pedestrians without excluding the auto. TOD can be new construction or redevelopment of one or more buildings whose design and orientation facilitate transit use. Transit:The carrying of people, goods, or materials from one place to another. Public transit includes buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, operate on established routes, and are available to the public. Transload Model:Model used to unload goods from one container to another or from one container into a warehousing facility. Transportation Networks: Set of links, nodes, and lines that represent the infrastructure or supply side of transportation. Transportation Systems Management (TSM): A comprehensive strategy to coordinate many forms of transportation (such as car, bus, carpool, rail transit, bicycle and pedestrian modes) to reduce the impact of additional development on transportation capacity. TSM focuses on using existing highway and transit systems more efficiently rather than expanding them. Computerized traffic signals, metered freeway ramps, one-way streets, rideshare matching services and other TSM measures are characterized by their low cost and quick implementation time frame. Travel Demand Management (TDM): A strategy for reducing demand on the road system by reducing the number of vehicles using the roadways and/or increasing the number of persons per vehicle. For example, TDM attempts to reduce the number of people who drive alone during the commuting period and to increase the number in carpools, vanpools, buses or trains, or walking or biking. TDM can be an element of Transportation Systems Management (TSM; see below). Tree wells:Tree wells are the space around a tree under its branches. Truck Bypass Lanes:Roadway that provides physical separation of trucks from passenger vehicles at a freeway interchange to eliminate weaving between passenger cars traveling at higher speeds and trucks traveling at lower speeds. Type:A primary type or genre that allows other similar types to be categorized into group, more or less precisely defined or designated into a class or category Underserved communities: Groups with limited or no access to resources or otherwise disenfranchised. Urban Greening:Public landscaping and urban forestry projects that create mutually beneficial relationships between city dwellers and their environments Urban Heat Island:An urban or metropolitan area is significantly warmer than surrounding rural areas due to human activities. Vanpools:A vanpool is generally a group of between 5 to 15 people with similar travel patterns who ride to work or other places in a shared vehicle (most often a van). Vegetation Barriers/ Buffer Landscaping: Practical environmentally friendly solution to minimize soil erosion and off-target field movement of debris and pollutants Vision Statement:A concise statement that captures the collective aspirations, desires, and outcomes of the project or program. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): A measure of total vehicular travel that accounts for the number of vehicle trips and the length of those trips Vulnerable Road User:Those unprotected by an outside shield, as they sustain a greater risk of injury in any collision with a vehicle and are therefore highly in need of protection against such collisions. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 298 of 305 10-16 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Walk to Transit:Transit within walking distance Zero Emission Infrastructure: Fueling or electric charging stations for vehicles that produce no emissions Zero Emissions Truck Lanes: Explore options and assess the feasibility of converting the right-hand lane on I-710 to create a Zero Emissions Truck Lane. Only zero-emissions trucks could travel in this lane, while fossil-fuel vehicles would be excluded. No new lanes would be added to the existing footprint of I-710. Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV): Trucks or vehicles that produce no tailpipe emissions of criteria pollutants. Generally, ZEVs feature electric powertrains. Technically, ZEVs are still responsible for some greenhouse gas emissions, as the GHG content from the electricity generation must be accounted for. ZEVs include battery electric vehicles (BEV), plug-in electric hybrids (PHEV) when powered by an electric engine, and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCV). 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 299 of 305 10-17 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Local, State and Regional Resources Metro’s Equity Platform https://www.metro.net/about/equity-race/ Metro’s Equity Platform, adopted by the Metro Board in 2018, is the agency’s guiding framework to address disparities by incorporating equity in all aspects of Metro’s budget and decision-making on a continuing bases to create equitable access to opportunities for all who live, work and play in Los Angeles County. The Equity Platform is structured around four pillars: 1) Listen and Learn, 2) Define and Measure, 3) Focus and Deliver, and 4) Train and Grow. In 2020, the Metro Board adopted an agency- wide equity definition which states that “Equity is both an outcome and a process to address racial, socioeconomic and gender disparities, to ensure fair and just access -[...]-to opportunities, including jobs, housing, education, mobility options and healthier communities. It is achieved when one’s outcomes in life are not predetermined, in a statistical or experiential sense, on their racial, economic or social identities. It requires community informed and needs-based provision, implementation and impact of services, and programs and policies that reduce and ultimately prevent disparities.” The LB-ELA Investment Plan is responsive to Metro’s Equity Platform and acknowledges the necessity to work intentionally to eliminate racial and socioeconomic disparities within and along the corridor. 2021 LA County Goods Movement Strategic Plan https://media.metro.net/2021/Goods-Movement-Strategic-Plan-Spreads. pdf The Plan is Metro’s response to the many freight-related transportation planning challenges that undermine our county’s efforts to be economically competitive, environmentally sustainable, and socially equitable. By creating a vision for goods movement needs in LA County, Metro seeks to engage our regional, state, and federal partners to develop and enrich planning efforts at these levels of government with the priorities of the county in mind. This plan aligns with Metro’s Vision 2028 Strategic Plan and 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan and sets forth the strategic initiatives and priorities for Metro’s goods movement planning activities over the next five years. Blue Line First/Last Mile Plan https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/first_last_mile_ strategic_plan.pdf The Plan was prepared for all 22 stations on the Metro Blue Line, representing a first-of-its-kind effort to plan comprehensive access improvements for an entire transit line, its greater innovation is in piloting an inclusive, equity-focused community engagement process. As part of the consultant team for this effort, Metro partnered with a coalition of CBOs to lead outreach efforts on the project, and to help shape the overall direction of this plan. Among the improvements the plan calls for are better sidewalks, more and safer crosswalks, more lighting for pedestrians, better and safer bike lanes and facilities, more trees to supply shade, bus stop improvements, pickup/drop-off locations near stations and landscaping. Measure H (County of Los Angeles) https://homeless.lacounty.gov/measureh/#:~:text=Created%20by%20 the%20Board%20of,to%20addressing%20and%20preventing%20 homelessness Measure H is the landmark ¼-cent sales tax approved by 69.34% of Los Angeles County voters in March 2017, the first revenue stream dedicated to preventing and addressing homelessness countywide. It is projected to raise $355 million annually for 10 years, or a total of $3.5 billion, to implement the County’s Homeless Initiative strategies. It is set expire in 2027, unless renewed by voters. A Citizen’s Oversight Advisory Board reviews Measure H spending. Independent audits and performance evaluations also help ensure transparency and accountability. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 300 of 305 10-18 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan Measure HHH (City of Los Angeles) https://housing2.lacity.org/housing/supportive-housing-prop-hhh Los Angeles voters passed Proposition HHH in 2016, which enabled City officials to issue $1.2 billion in bonds for the development of permanent supportive housing units for people experiencing homelessness. In addition to funding permanent supportive housing development, the bonds can be used to help build temporary shelters. The passage of Proposition HHH is notable because it received the support of a broad and unique coalition of public and private stakeholders in LA, including labor unions and private and nonprofit housing developers. Learn more at: localhousingsolutions. org/housing-policy-case-studies/los-angeles-proposition-hhh/ Measure R (Los Angeles County) https://www.metro.net/about/measure-r/ A two-thirds majority of LA County voters approved the Measure R half-cent sales tax in 2008 to finance new transportation projects and programs, and accelerate those already in the pipeline. The Measure R Expenditure Plan devotes its funds to seven transportation categories: 35% to new rail and bus rapid transit projects; 3% to Metrolink projects; 2% to Metro Rail system improvement projects; 20% to carpool lanes, highways and other highway related improvements; 5% to rail operations; 20% to bus operations; and 15% for Local Return programs. The Measure contains an Expenditure Plan that identifies the projects to be funded and additional fund sources that will be used to complete the projects. Metro 2016 Active Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP) https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dtuy70ydn1pxf8o/ AADhHaYBOnWX06uVDQ0K-Ssva?e=1&dl=0 The Active Transportation Strategic Plan is Metro’s overall strategy for funding and supporting the implementation of active transportation infrastructure and programs in Los Angeles County. It identifies strategies to improve and grow the active transportation network, to expand the reach of transit, and develop a regional active transportation network to increase personal travel options. “Active Transportation” refers to any non- motorized mode of travel, including walking, bicycling, rolling, skating, or scooting. S For more, visit: www.metro.net/projects/active-transportation- strategic-plan-atsp Metro 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) https://www.metro.net/about/plans/long-range-transportation-plan/ The LRTP provides a detailed roadmap for how Metro will plan, build, operate, maintain, and partner for improved mobility in the next 30 years. The LRTP will guide future funding plans and policies needed to move LA County forward for a more mobile, resilient, accessible and sustainable future. Metro 2028 Games Mobility Concept Plan https://boardagendas.metro.net/board-report/2022-0781/ The 2028 Olympic and Para-Olympic Games Mobility Concept Plan (MCP) outlines mobility strategies, including capital and operating improvements, to support the transportation infrastructure needed to enhance mobility for the Games and beyond. At its December 2020 meeting, the Metro Board approved Motion 42 which directed staff to work with regional partners to develop a regional investment plan to include a federal engagement strategy and funding proposal to implement transportation improvements that would provide permanent, long- term benefits to the people of Los Angeles County. Metro’s 2028 Games Task Force developed the initial project list of over 200 projects. Staff augmented and refined the Draft Initial Project List presented to the Board in January 2022 as a result of an extensive agency stakeholder outreach process to create the Comprehensive Project List covering over 300 projects. The Comprehensive Project List includes capital and operational improvements, such as bus stops, bus lanes, transfer centers, mobility hubs, communications and security equipment, and system reliability investments; state-of-good-repair and maintenance work; and optimized customer experience improvements, such as wayfinding, digital 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 301 of 305 10-19 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan information, and payment technology. Moving through a 6-step evaluation process, Metro and partner agencies. Identified and prioritized 50 projects for the Mobility Concept Plan Project List. The 2022 Prioritized MCP Project List consists of a broad range of multimodal projects (for example, active transportation, bus, congestion management, rail, and systemwide), and aligns with MCP goals. The project list has a diverse mix of project types: 58% capital projects, 28% operations-related improvements, and 14% expansion of existing Metro programs. Projects on this list have either no funding or partial funding. Metro Active Transportation (MAT) Corridor https://www.metro.net/about/metro-active-transport-transit-and-first- last-mile-program/ Measure M established the Metro Active Transport, Transit and First/Last Mile (MAT) Program, which, over the course of 40 years, is anticipated to fund more than $857 million (in 2015 dollars) in active transportation infrastructure projects throughout the region. This is a competitive discretionary program available to municipalities in LA County and will fund projects to improve and grow the active transportation network and expand the reach of transit. The purpose of the MAT Program is to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking, and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle safety. The Active Transportation Strategic Plan and Equity Platform Framework are the core policies shaping the program. Projects will be funded based on need, with priorities established using a variety of data, such as socio-economic factors, safety for active mode users, health and existing conditions of physical infrastructure for active modes. The Program will operate in two five-year cycles. The Metro Board of Directors approved projects receiving Cycle 1 awards in January 2021. Next Gen Improvements https://la-metro.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index. html?appid=8decc337ba35474ba28d0b4e9ad71647 The Bus Plan was approved in October 2020 to help transition towards a reimagined bus system that focuses on providing fast, frequent, reliable and accessible service to meet the needs of today’s riders. The project was developed through consideration of both technical data and all the priorities and personal experiences heard from nearly 20,000 LA County residents via over 400 meetings, events, presentations and workshops. NextGen Bus Plan https://www.metro.net/about/plans/nextgen-bus-plan/ In 2018, Metro launched an initiative to reimage their bus system to better meet the needs of current and future riders through the NextGen Bus Study. The NextGen Bus Plan was developed through consideration of both technical data and all the priorities and personal experiences heard from nearly 20,000 LA County residents through questionnaires and over 400 meetings, events, presentations and workshops. The process yielded thousands of comments and input from the public, including local stakeholder groups, riders and agencies and that input was used to develop the NextGen Bus Plan. The Plan was reviewed through the public hearing process and Metro Service Councils, and then approved by the Metro Board of Directors in October 2020. The NextGen Bus Plan proposed bus improvements that would: • Double the number of frequent Metro bus lines • Provide more than 80% of current bus riders with 10 minute or better frequency • Improve and expand midday, evening and weekend service, creating an all-day, 7-day-a-week service • Ensure a ¼-mile walk to a bus stop for 99% of current riders • Create a more comfortable and safer waiting environment 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 302 of 305 10-20 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan The Investment Plan transit recommendations are designed to complement the NextGen Bus Plan recommendations with a focus on the public input received from the communities along the LB-ELA Corridor. SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) https://scag.ca.gov/read-plan-adopted-final-connect-socal-2020 Also known as the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, is a long-range visioning plan that builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. It charts a path toward a more mobile, sustainable and prosperous region by making connections between transportation networks, between planning strategies and between the people whose collaboration can improve the quality of life for Southern Californians. This Investment Plan vision, goals, and guiding principles are responsive to the policies and supportive strategies of the RTP/SCS ensuring consistency with the regional needs to mitigate congestion, enhance safety, and balance investments through equitable and multimodal transportation solutions. State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) https://dot.ca.gov/programs/financial-programming/state-highway- operation-protection-program-shopp-minor-program-shopp The 2022 State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) is a four-year program of projects that collectively improves the condition, operation, and sustainability of State Highway System (SHS) and associated transportation infrastructure in California. The SHOPP funds safety and condition improvements, damage repairs, and highway operational and modal improvements on the State Highway System. By continuously repairing and rehabilitating the SHS, the SHOPP protects the enormous investment that has been made over many decades to create and manage the approximately 16,000 miles SHS. The SHS includes all Interstate routes, numbered highway, and other state owned assets including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, culverts, Transportation Management Systems (TMS), safety roadside rest areas, and maintenance stations. The SHOPP also funds projects necessary to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and stormwater control requirements. All projects funded by the SHOPP are limited to capital improvements that do not add new through highway lanes. Los Angeles County Metrolink Station Assessment and Improvement Plan https://metrolinktrains.com/about/agency/score/ A Metro/Metrolink program that assessed the condition and accessibility of each Metrolink station in Los Angeles County to determine an initial set of proposed improvements for each Station. Annual Commuter Rail State of Good Repair (SOGR) Program https://catc.ca.gov/programs/sb1 California Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 provides transportation funding annually to repair aging infrastructure, make strategic investments in congested commute and freight rail corridors, and improve transit service. This a SB 1 program provides approximately $105 million annually to transit operators in California for eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. This investment in public transit is the State of Good Repair Program. 710 South Clean Truck Program (NOW: LB-ELA Zero Emissions Truck Program) https://lede-admin.la.streetsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/ sites/50/2021/05/I-710-Clean-Truck-Program-Long- Description-09.20.20.pdf The Metro Board acted in October 2021 (Motion 16) to commit $50 million as seed funding for a LB-ELA Zero Emission (ZE) Truck program that would become part of the work of the Task Force. In response, staff initiated a ZE Truck Working Group as part of the LB-ELA Corridor Task Force’s 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 303 of 305 10-21 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan engagement process. The Working Group is charged with developing the ZE Truck Program under the guidance of the ZE technology parameters adopted by the Board. Metro Task Force 2022/2023 Pre-Investment Plan Opportunity Projects (PIPO) https://www.metro.net/calendar/i-710-task-force/ Recognizing the unprecedented amount of discretionary grant funding made available at the State and Federal levels in 2022, the Metro Board directed staff via Motion 9 to return with a “minimum of three initiatives that will apply for available State and Federal funding opportunities in Calendar Year 2022,” in advance of the 710 Task Force Investment Plan being finalized in 2023. To fulfill this directive Metro staff put out a request to the Task Force membership, the CLC, cities, local agencies, and organizations to provide nominations for projects and received from stakeholders 22 project nominations ranging from categories such as Transit, Clean Air/Energy, Goods Movement, Corridor Mobility, Complete Streets, and Roadway. Staff also identified 13 additional projects for which Metro played a role in developing or supporting for grant funding. After analyzing the projects, understanding the concerns raised and input provided by the CLC, EWG, Task Force and other stakeholders, and identifying projects for which a grant application had not yet been submitted, staff identified a full PIPO for Board review and a set of 4 early initiative projects for Board approval. Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA) https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/supervisory_control_and_data_ acquisition Transit authorities, including Metro, use SCADA technology to regulate electricity to subways and LRT; to automate train traffic signals for rail systems; to track and locate trains and to control railroad crossing gates. It allows Metro to operate trains more frequently while maintaining safety of rail operations. City of Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan https://www.longbeach.gov/lbcd/planning/advance/general-plan/ mobility/bicycle/ The 2016 updated Bicycle Master Plan (Plan) continues to build upon a long-standing effort to make Long Beach a city known for its bicycle- friendliness and as an active, healthy, and prosperous place to live, work, and play. The Plan expands upon the Mobility Element of the Long Beach General Plan by providing further details on bicycle planning and design. It also recommends a series of bicycle facility projects and programs to be implemented by Long Beach over the next few decades. https://longbeach. gov/lbds/planning/advance/general-plan/mobility/bicycle/ The Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) https://calsta.ca.gov/subject-areas/climate-action-plan The Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) provides a holistic framework to better align the state’s transportation funding with the state’s climate, social, and health equity goals. The CAPTI identifies a set of strategic areas to support and be responsive to the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 or Senate Bill (SB) 1 goals of fixing California’s infrastructure and investing more in transit and safety. The CAPTI supports the goals of the California Transportation Plan (CTP) 2050, which is the state’s vision to achieve greater safety, reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), and increased equity and accessibility for the future of California’s transportation system. The CAPTI also builds on the principles of California’s Climate Change Scoping Plan to achieve the state’s 2030 GHG target and other climate goals. 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations . . Item 20 Page 304 of 305 10-2210-22 Long Beach – East Los Angeles Corridor Mobility Investment Plan 4. Corridor Vision, Goals, and Guiding Principles 2. The Task Force and Task Force Charter Process 6. Evaluation and Prioritization 9. Next Steps 5. Development of Multimodal Strategies, Projects, and Programs 3. Existing Conditions and Future Projections 7. Funding Strategy Appendices1. BackgroundExecutive Summary 8. Recommendations Metro Board Members, 2023-2024 Chair Karen Bass Mayor of the City of Los Angeles 1st Vice Chair Janice Hahn Los Angeles County Supervisor District 4 2nd Vice Chair Fernando Dutra Appointee of Los Angeles County City Selection Committee South East Long Beach (Gateways Cities) sector Board Member Kathryn Barger Los Angeles County Supervisor District 5 Board Member James Butts Appointee of Los Angeles County City Selection Committee Southwest Corridor sector Board Member Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker Appointee of the Mayor of the City of Los Angeles Board Member Lindsey Horvath Los Angeles County Supervisor District 3 Board Member Paul Krekorian Los Angeles City Council President, District 2 Appointee of the Mayor of the City of Los Angeles Board Member Holly J. Mitchell Los Angeles County Supervisor District 2 Board Member Ara J. Najarian Appointee of the Los Angeles County City Selection Committee North County/San Fernando Valley sector Board Member Tim Sandoval Appointee of Los Angeles County City Selection Committee San Gabriel Valley sector Board Member Hilda L. Solis Los Angeles County Supervisor District 1 Board Member Katy Yaroslavsky Los Angeles City Councilmember, District 5 Appointee of the Mayor of the City of Los Angeles Non-Voting Board Member Gloria Roberts District 7 Director California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Appointee of the Governor of California Thank you! Visit lb-ela-cmip.com to read the Investment Plan. Contact Us Michael Cano LA Metro, Executive Officer Countywide Planning & Development 213.418.3010 CanoM@metro.net April 2024 . . Item 20 Page 305 of 305 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Daniel S. Wall, P.E., Director of Public Works Department:Public Works Submitted by:Efren Peregrina Renteria, Procurement Specialist Subject Encumbering Funds for City Contract No. 20240038, City Hall Roof Replacement Recommendation Authorize the Finance Department to encumber $121,900 from Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 to FY 2024-25 for City Contract No. 20240038 City Hall Roof Replacement with Southland Roofing Inc. Background Following a formal bid process, on April 2, 2024, City Council awarded Contract No. 20240038 to Southland Roofing Inc. for $411,500 to replace the City Hall roof. The project began in May 2024 and was on track to be completed within the FY 2023-24. Two progress payments totaling $289,600 were made to the vendor. However, due to delays in the materials supplied by Tremco Roofing & Building Maintenance, the company providing the roof warranty, the project was completed in mid-July of 2024. The project was completed to the City’s satisfaction, however because the work was completed in FY 2024-25 and contract funds were not budgeted in FY 2024-25, there remains a balance of $121,900 yet to be paid to the contractor. Due to the delayed schedule, the Public Works Department is requesting that the remaining FY 2023-24 funds of $121,900 for this project be re-allocated to the FY 2024-25 budget. The re- allocation is necessary in order to pay Southland Roofing Inc. the outstanding balance of $121,900 for their work. Fiscal Impact Funds for the City Hall Roof Replacement were included in the FY 2023-24 budget. Approval of this action requires an appropriation of $121,900 to General Fund, Public Works Department, Facilities Maintenance Division, Capital Outlay Account No. 011-040-415-660000 for FY 2024- 25 from available General Fund Unassigned Balance. Attachments None. . . Item 21 Page 1 of 1 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk Department:City Clerk Submitted by:Sandra Dolson, City Clerk Specialist Subject League of California Cities 2024 Annual Conference Voting Delegate and Alternate Recommendation Appoint a voting delegate and alternate to represent the City of Vernon at the General Assembly, convening during the League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, scheduled October 16-18, 2024 in Long Beach, CA. Background The League of California Cities (CalCities) assists its members by defending and expanding local control through advocacy efforts. They also provide education and training programs designed to teach city officials about new developments in their field and exchange solutions to common challenges facing cities. Each year, the League hosts a Conference and Expo featuring a variety of speakers and timely presentations on key topics and opportunities for peer-to-peer sharing with other California city officials. During the Conference, CalCities convenes a member-driven General Assembly and Resolutions process, providing for member engagement on a range of significant policy issues to protect local control. In order to vote at the Annual General Assembly, CalCities requires City Council action designating a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates. Cal Cities must be notified of the City’s representatives by September 25, 2024. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. League of California Cities Designation of Voting Delegate and Alternate . . Item 22 Page 1 of 1 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 16-18, 2024 Long Beach Convention Center Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. Taking place on Oct. 18, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions. To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official. Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 25. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form. Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates. Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website. Council Action Advised by September 25, 2024 . . Item 22 Page 1 of 4 For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly. Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference. Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate. The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 17, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 18, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 25. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at zseals@calcities.org. Attachments: • General Assembly Voting Guidelines • Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly . . Item 22 Page 2 of 4 1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate. 6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly. . . Item 22 Page 3 of 4 Sixty days before the Annual Conference and Expo, Cal Cities members may submit policy proposals on issues of importance to cities. The resolution must have the concurrence of at least five additional member cities or individual members. How it works: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly General Assembly General Resolutions Policy Committees Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control. The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work. The petitioned resolution is an alternate method to introduce policy proposals during the annual conference. The petition must be signed by voting delegates from 10% of member cities, and submitted to the Cal Cities President at least 24 hours before the beginning of the General Assembly. Petitioned Resolutions The Cal Cities President assigns general resolutions to policy committees where members review, debate, and recommend positions for each policy proposal. Recommendations are forwarded to the Resolutions Committee. Who’s who The Resolutions Committee includes representatives from each Cal Cities diversity caucus, regional division, municipal department, and policy committee, as well as individuals appointed by the Cal Cities president. Voting delegates are appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. The General Assembly is a meeting of the collective body of all voting delegates —one from every member city. Seven policy committees meet throughout the year to review and recommend positions to take on bills and regulatory proposals. Policy committees include members from each Cal Cities diversity caucus, regional division, and municipal department, as well as individuals appointed by the Cal Cities president. During the General Assembly, voting delegates debate and consider general and petitioned resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws amendments are also considered at this meeting. Cal Cities policy development is a member- informed process, grounded in the voices and experiences of city officials throughout the state. For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo Resolutions Committee The Resolutions Committee considers all resolutions. General Resolutions approved1 by either a policy committee or the Resolutions Committee are next considered by the General Assembly. General resolutions not approved, or referred for further study by both a policy committee and the Resolutions Committee do not go to the General Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions are considered by the General Assembly, unless disqualified.2 During the Annual Conference and Expo 1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f). . . Item 22 Page 4 of 4 8 0 1 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:September 17, 2024 From:Michael Earl, Director of Human Resources Department:Human Resources Submitted by:Michael Earl, Director of Human Resources Subject Appointment of Gigi Decavalles-Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer Recommendation Adopt Resolution No. 2024-020 affirming the appointment of Gigi Decavalles-Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer of the City of Vernon and approving and ratifying the execution of a related temporary at-will employment agreement. Background Due to the vacant Director of Finance/City Treasurer position, there is a need in the Finance Department to appoint an individual on a limited duration temporary basis to perform special project work and provide extra help in support of the City’s Finance Department functions. Under Government Code sections 7522.56, 21224, 21227, and 21229, the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) allows contracting agencies to appoint CalPERS retired individuals to fill extra help positions, subject to certain restrictions. Gigi Decavalles-Hughes has more than twenty-six years of municipal finance experience and possesses the desired experience and specialized skills needed to perform the special project work. She held a variety of positions in the Finance, Human Services, and Housing & Economic Development departments with the City of Santa Monica. During the most recent twelve years of her public sector career, Ms. Decavalles-Hughes served as the City of Santa Monica’s Finance Director/City Treasurer where she directed the budget, investments, financial and revenue operations, and risk management functions for an agency with a $745M budget, $1.5B in net assets, and 2300 full-time equivalent employees. Ms. Decavalles-Hughes holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History from Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania and a Master’s in Urban Planning from New York University. Ms. Decavalles-Hughes is appointed as a retired annuitant to perform extra help and special project work in the position of Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer and will be compensated at an hourly rate of approximately $128.25 per hour consistent with the City of Vernon’s publicly available compensation schedule. The temporary at-will employment agreement between the City and Ms. Decavalles-Hughes has been executed with an effective date of September 4, 2024, and is attached as Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2024-020 . The agreement was reviewed and approved as-to-form by the City Attorney prior to its execution. At its regular City Council meeting of September 17, 2024, prior to taking final action to approve this resolution, the City Council received an oral report summarizing the recommended appointment and compensation, in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(c)(3). Fiscal Impact . . Item 23 Page 1 of 2 8 0 1 The fiscal impact is estimated at $123,604. Sufficient funds are available in the General Fund, Finance Department, Salaries Account No. 011-010-130-501010 for the current fiscal year. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 2024-020 2. Temporary At-Will Employment Agreement Decavalles-Hughes . . Item 23 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AFFIRMING THE APPOINTMENT OF GIGI DECAVALLES-HUGHES TO SERVE AS INTERIM DIRECTOR OF FINANCE/CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF VERNON AND APPROVING AND RATIFYING THE EXECUTION OF A RELATED TEMPORARY AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT SECTION 1. Recitals. A. Due to the current vacancy of the Director of Finance/City Treasurer, there is a need for the appointment of a temporary employee for a limited duration to perform extra help and special project work. B. The Finance Department requires someone with specific skills and experience to provide oversight and complete special project work in the areas of organizational assessment, financial forecasting, and investment oversight. C. Gigi Decavalles-Hughes (Decavalles-Hughes) possesses the specialized skills needed to perform the required duties because of her many years of experience in the field of municipal finance. D. The City and Decavalles-Hughes have executed a Temporary At-Will Employment Agreement (Agreement), subject to ratification by the City Council. E. Decavalles-Hughes will be paid within the published salary range for the Director of Finance/City Treasurer position. F. The City Council of the City of Vernon desires to appoint Decavalles-Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer on a limited duration temporary basis, effective September 4, 2024. G. At its regular meeting on September 17, 2024, prior to taking final action to approve this resolution, the City Council received an oral report summarizing the recommended appointment and compensation, in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(c)(3). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Vernon finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct. . . Item 23 Page 1 of 10 SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby affirms the appointment of Gigi Decavalles-Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer of the City Finance Department of the City of Vernon effective September 4, 2024. SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby approves and ratifies the execution of the Temporary At-Will Employment Agreement with Gigi Decavalles- Hughes to serve as Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer of the City of Vernon, in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 5. The Interim City Clerk, or any authorized officer, shall administer the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California to Decavalles- Hughes and shall have her subscribe to it and file it with the Human Resources Department. SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby directs the Interim City Clerk to give a fully executed Agreement to Decavalles-Hughes. SECTION 7. The Deputy City Clerk shall certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED September 17, 2024. ________________________ Judith Merlo, Mayor ATTEST: YONNIE PARKER, Deputy City Clerk (seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ZAYNAH N. MOUSSA, City Attorney Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 2 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 2 of 10 TEMPORARY AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (NON-SAFETY) BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND GIGI DECAVALLES-HUGHES This Agreement is between the City of Vernon (City) and Gigi Decavalles-Hughes (Employee). Recitals Due to the current vacancy in the position of Director of Finance/City Treasurer City desires to employ Employee as an at-will temporary employee for a limited duration to perform extra help and special project work in the position of Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer. Employee desires to be the Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer and acknowledges that such employment is for a limited duration and at-will. Employee possesses the specialized skills needed to perform the duties. The City Administrator, pursuant to the authority granted by the City of Vernon Charter and City Council, agrees to hire Employee, as an at-will temporary employee, subject to the terms and conditions identified below. AGREEMENT Section 1: TERM The effective date of this Agreement shall be September 4, 2024. Employee’s appointment is temporary on an as-needed basis until this Agreement is otherwise terminated pursuant to the provisions herein. Either party may terminate this Agreement pursuant to the provisions set forth below. Employee is an at-will employee and may be terminated, with or without cause, upon seven (7) calendar days written notice. Employee may resign with seven (7) days advance notice as set forth in Section 5 below. Section 2: DUTIES A. Due to the current vacancy in the position of Director of Finance/City Treasurer, City engages Employee as an Interim Director of Finance/City Treasurer to perform work of a limited duration for special projects and extra help beyond regular staff duties. The specialized functions and duties are included as part of the job description for the Director of Finance/City Treasurer position (Attachment “A”, incorporated herein by this reference), as the same may be modified by the City Administrator, from time to time, and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Administrator shall, from time to time, assign. B. Employee agrees that to the best of her ability and experience that she will at all times conscientiously perform the duties and obligations required, either express or implied, by the terms of this Agreement, the ordinances, resolutions and adopted policies of the City of Vernon and the laws and regulations of the State of California and the United States. C. As a public employee, Employee is required to work the hours and work schedule as determined by the City Administrator, and devote whatever time is necessary to Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 3 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 3 of 10 fulfill the employment responsibilities and duties as identified in this Agreement not to exceed 960 hours per fiscal year. D. During the term of this Agreement, Employee is required to have and maintain a valid California Driver’s license. E. Employee acknowledges that in connection with the performance of her duties, she will obtain information from City employees and third parties that is of a confidential nature. Employee agrees that she will not disclose such confidential information other than to officers and employees of the City who have been authorized to have access to such information. Employee further agrees that if she has a question as to the confidentiality of information obtained in the course of her employment, she will contact the City Attorney for advice. Section 3: COMPENSATION As compensation for the services to be rendered by Employee, City agrees to pay Employee an hourly rate of $128.2520 for hours worked, payable in biweekly installments at the same time as other employees of the City are paid and subject to customary withholding. Employee’s salary shall be reflected in the City’s publicly available salary schedule. Section 4: BENEFITS This is a temporary interim position that is not eligible for any employee benefits. Section 5: TERMINATION A. The parties agree that this appointment is temporary, until such time as the term of the Agreement expires or is otherwise terminated. B. Employee is a temporary, at-will employee and serves at the will and pleasure of the City Administrator and this Agreement may be terminated by the City at any time, without cause, subject to the notice requirements and conditions of Section 1. C. The Agreement may be terminated by Employee at any time. Employee agrees to provide at least seven (7) calendar days advance written notice of the effective date of her resignation. Section 6: GENERAL PROVISIONS A.Notice Any notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and either delivered in person or by first class, certified, return receipt requested US Mail with postage prepaid. Such notice shall be addressed as follows: TO CITY: City Administrator City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 TO EMPLOYEE: Gigi Decavalles-Hughes Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 4 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 4 of 10 [Deliver to last updated address in personnel file] B Entire Agreement The text of this Agreement shall constitute the entire and exclusive agreement between the parties. All prior oral or written communications understanding or agreements between the parties, not set forth herein, shall be superseded in total by this Agreement. No Amendment or modification to this Agreement may be made except by a written agreement signed by the Employee and the City Administrator and approved as to form by the City Attorney. C Assignment This Agreement is not assignable by either the City or Employee. D Severability In the event that any provision of this Agreement is finally held or determined to be illegal or void by a court having jurisdiction over the parties, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless the parts found to be void are wholly inseparable from the remaining portions of this Agreement. E.Effect of Waiver The failure of either party to insist on strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants, or conditions in this Agreement by the other party shall not be deemed a waiver of that term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any right or power at any one time or times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of that right or power for all or any other time or times. F.Jurisdiction Any action to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be held exclusively in a state court in Los Angeles County, California. Employee expressly waives any right to remove any such action from Los Angeles County. G.Effective Date This Agreement shall take effect on September 4, 2024. [Signatures Begin on Next Page]. Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 5 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 5 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Vernon has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed on its behalf by its City Administrator and executed by the Employee. City of Vernon, a California charter City and California municipal corporation Dated: By: Daniel Calleros, Interim City Administrator ATTEST: Yonnie Parker, Deputy City Clerk A : Zaynah N. Moussa, City Attorney Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 6 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 6 of 10 Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 7 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 7 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Job Description Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 8 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 8 of 10 Director of Finance/City Treasurer Vernon CA 1 of 2 JOB DESCRIPTION Director of Finance/City Treasurer Date Prepared: Date Revised: March 2014 October 2023 Class Code: 1210 SUMMARY: Under limited supervision, serves as the Chief Financial Officer for Citywide financial management including financial planning, forecasting, capital project financing, investment oversight, debt issuance, management of financial risks, financial operations, and financial reporting; performs complex management and technical duties as the Finance Director and City Treasurer, with responsibility for maintaining fiscal stability and safeguarding the assets of the City; provides financial advice to the City Administrator and City Council; manages assigned personnel, and assures that financial activities are in compliance with state and federal regulations, and City policies and best practices. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: -- Essential functions, as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act, may include any of the following representative duties, knowledge, and skills. This is not a comprehensive listing of all functions and duties performed by incumbents of this class; employees may be assigned duties which are not listed below; reasonable accommodations will be made as required. The job description does not constitute an employment agreement and is subject to change at any time by the employer. Essential duties and responsibilities may include, but are not limited to, the following: Manages the Finance Department through effective planning and fiscal management; provides leadership, direction and guidance in financial strategies and priorities; evaluates and analyzes financial data and recommends and implements solutions; assures the financial activities and procedures are in compliance with all laws, policies, regulations, and accounting standards. Serves as principal financial advisor to the City Council and City Administrator; provides leadership, direction, and guidance to achieve the City goals of fiscal well-being and integrity; interprets concerns, defines desired results, develops solutions, communicates status of financial issues, interprets, and explains policies and regulations, and assures the efficient delivery of high-quality financial services. Monitors Finance Department operations and internal financial controls; assures the quality of the financial activities, services, and work products; prepares and reviews statistical analyses to evaluate trends and financial status; develops revenue and expenditure forecasts and recommends budget adjustments. Directs, leads, and motivates the Finance staff; plans, prioritizes, and assigns tasks and projects; monitors work, develops skills, and evaluates performance; meets with team to discuss and resolve workload, special projects, quality standards, customer services, and technical issues; reviews work, verifies the accuracy of financial records, identifies corrective actions, and assures required deadlines are met. Analyzes financial information on City operations, evaluates departments needs and goals, and recommends financial resources; reviews and monitors status reports, and recommends appropriate actions; prepares and presents financial forecasts and status reports to City Council. Analyzes the Citys financial condition and develops plans to assure financial performance meets goals; coordinates development of City budget; monitors budget, revenue, and expenditure trends. Directs financial reporting, preparation of financial statements, and development of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR); oversees the Citys banking, cash and debt management, bond rating, and investment activities; interprets laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines for financial procedures. Monitors and evaluates the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery methods and procedures; monitors and evaluates workload, technical support systems, internal reporting relationships, and inter- agency issues; identifies opportunities for improvement, and develops recommendations. Coordinates and resolves financial and technical issues with elected officials and outside agencies. Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 9 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 9 of 10 Director of Finance/City Treasurer Vernon CA 2 of 2 Supports the relationship between the City of Vernon and the general public by demonstrating courteous and cooperative behavior when interacting with visitors and City staff; maintains confidentiality of work- related issues and City information; performs other duties as required or assigned. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education, Training and Experience Guidelines: Bachelors Degree in Accounting, Finance, or Business Administration; AND seven years of experience managing public sector financial operations. Masters Degree in Finance or Business Administration is desirable. Knowledge of: City organization, operations, policies, and procedures. Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), and Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) standards, recommended practices, and policies, rules, and regulatory reporting requirements. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for Public Sector financial management, including payroll, treasury, grant funds, and public debt management. Federal and state laws and statutes governing municipal operations, public records, and open meetings. Legal, ethical, and professional rules of conduct for municipal finance officers. Principles and practices of administrative management, including personnel rules, procurement, contract management, risk management, and employee supervision. Record keeping and file maintenance principles and procedures. General ledger and account reconciliation standards. Skill in: Analyzing problems, defining complex issues, identifying alternative solutions, projecting consequences of proposed actions, and implementing recommendations to support goals and build the organization. Effectively managing and leading staff, and delegating tasks and authority. Assessing and prioritizing multiple tasks, projects and demands. Reading, interpreting, understanding, and applying accounting standards and procedures, applicable federal and state rules and regulations, and City policies and procedures. Analyzing City needs and prioritizing and promoting financial strategies to meet future needs. Monitoring and interpreting financial documents and assuring compliance with all regulatory requirements governing municipal financial activities. Analyzing financial issues, evaluating alternatives, and developing recommendations and strategies. Using initiative and independent judgment within established procedural guidelines. Reviewing interrelated financial and technical records and identifying and reconciling errors. Operating a personal computer utilizing standard and specialized software. Establishing and maintaining cooperative working relationships with co-workers. Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. LICENSE AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: A valid California State Drivers License is required. Certified Public Accountant (CPA) or Certified Government Finance Officer (CGFO) designation is preferred. PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT: Work is performed in a standard office environment. Resolution No. 2024-020 Page 10 of 10 . . Item 23 Page 10 of 10