Ordinance No. 11031 ORDINANCE NO. 1103
2
3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
4 VERNON AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY
OF VERNON, CALIFORNIA, 1959, BY AMENDING SECTION
5 26.4.6-3(b) OF SAID CODE REGARDING THE REMOVAL OF
NONCONFORMING BUILDING, STRUCTURES AND USES AND
6 REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT THEREWITH
7
8 WHEREAS, the City of Vernon (the "City") is a municipal
9 corporation and a chartered city of the State of California organized
10 and existing under its Charter and the Constitution of the State of
11 California; and
12 WHEREAS, it is within the City's police power to regulate the
13 use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business,
14 and residences; and
15 WHEREAS, all cities in the State of California have been
16 granted the power from the State Legislature, pursuant to the Planning
17 and Zoning Law contained in Government Code Section 65000, et seq., to
18 regulate zoning and land use within their jurisdictions; and
19 WHEREAS, it is also within the City's power to classify,
20 exclude, restrict and limit what a landowner may do with his or her
21 property, subject to appropriate constitutional constraints; and
22 WHEREAS, on February 25, 1964, the City Council of the City
23 of Vernon (the "City Council") adopted Ordinance No. 752, which
24 established zoning districts and regulations restricting the use of
25 land and buildings in the City; and
26 WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 752 enacted various regulations,
27 including certain building setback requirements for properties
28 adjoining a street or highway in the City; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the forty year amortization period established in
Ordinance No. 752 for the removal of non -conforming building,
structures, and uses was incorporated into Section 26.4.E-3(b) of the
Code by Ordinance No. 973; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.4.E-3(b) of the Code indicates that every''
nonconforming building, structure and use that occurred as a result of
the adoption of Ordinance No. 752 on February 25, 1964, shall be
completely removed or altered to structurally conform to the uses and
development standards permitted in the zone in which it is located
within forty years of the date of adoption, or February 25, 2004; and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 1969, the City Council, adopted
Ordinance No. 801 titled Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance,
which established requirements for off-street parking for automobiles,
circulation and access, and off-street space for loading and unloading
trucks, and maneuvering and access from and to the public streets; and
WHEREAS, the forty year amortization period concerning
Ordinance No. 801 was incorporated into Section 26.4.E-4(b) of the Code
1by Ordinance No. 973; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.4.E-4(b) of the Code indicates that where
insufficient space exists on the lot or parcel for compliance with the
off-street parking and access requirements, compliance shall occur at
the time of any expansion or structural alteration of the building or
buildings, or within forty (40) years of the adoption of Ordinance 801,
or August 19, 2009, whichever occurs first; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by adoption of Ordinance No. 982
on April 18, 1989 and Ordinance No. 973 on May 2, 1989, enacted the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, which is codified as Chapter 26 of the
Vernon City Code (the "Code"); and
- 2 -
1 WHEREAS, in order to comply with the requirements of
2 Ordinance Nos. 752 and 801 a property owner in the City would bear the
3 cost of compliance twice; and
4 WHEREAS, the Director of Community Services & Water has
5 recommended that Section 26.4.E-3(b) of Chapter 26 of the Vernon City
6 Code be amended to extend the time in which buildings must be brought
7 into conformity with certain regulations pursuant to Ordinance No. 752
8 and to coincide with the off-street parking and loading requirements
9 established in Section 26.4.E-4(b) of the Code; and
10 WHEREAS, to clarify the intent of the City Council of the
11 City of Vernon, the provisions of Ordinance No. 752 relating to parking
12 and loading requirements were superceded by the adoption of Ordinance
13 Nos. 982 and 973; and
14 WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that it is in
15 the interests of the public health, safety and welfare to make Section
16 26.4.6-3(b) of the Code consistent with Section 26.4.E-4(b) of the
17 Code; and
18 WHEREAS, the Community Services and Water Department has:
19 (1) performed an Initial Study to determine the potential adverse
20 impacts on the environment that may be caused by the proposed
21 amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; (2) determined that
22 the proposed amendment will not have a significant effect on the
23 environment; and (3) recommended that a Negative Declaration be
24 adopted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act;
25 and
26 WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 711.4(c) of the Fish and
27 Game Code, no evidence has been found that the amendment proposed by
28 this Ordinance will have the potential for adverse effects on wild
1 life resources, and this Ordinance is therefore exempt from the fees
2 otherwise payable under Section 711.4; and
3 WHEREAS, on June 2, 2004, the City Council held a duly
4 noticed public hearing on the adoption of this Ordinance; and
5 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the City of
6 Vernon's Zoning Ordinance by amending Section 26.4.E-3(b) of the Code
7 to extend the time in which compliance with Ordinance No. 752 is to be
8 performed.
9 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON HEREBY ORDAINS:
10 SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
11 finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true
12 and correct.
13 SECTION 2: Section 26.4.E-3(b) of the Code of the City of
14 Vernon, California, 1959, is hereby amended to read as follows:
15 (b) Where the non -conformity occurred as a result of the
16 adoption of Ordinance No. 752 on February 25, 1964: on August 19, 2009.-
17 SECTION 3: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING.
18 The City Council of the City of Vernon finds that this Ordinance is
19 enacted in order to mitigate the threat posed to the public peace,
20 health, or safety by delaying the implementation of Section 26.4.6-3(b)
21 of the Code.
22 The City Council.hereby finds on the basis of the whole
23 record before it (including the initial study and any comments
24 received) that there is no substantial evidence that the Code
25 amendment proposed by this Ordinance will have a significant effect on
26 the environment individually or cumulatively, and that the Negative
27 Declaration reflects the City of Vernon's independent judgment and
28 analysis, and on the basis of said findings the City Council hereby
1 approves and adopts the Negative Declaration for the project.
2 SECTION 4: Pursuant to Section 711.4(c) of the Fish and
3 Game Code, the City of Vernon City Council has found no evidence that
4 the proposed amendment will have the potential for adverse effects on
5 wildlife resources, and the project is therefore exempt from the fees
6 otherwise payable under Section 711.4.
7 SECTION 5: POSTING. There being no newspaper printed,
8 published or circulated in the City of Vernon, the City Clerk is hereby
9 directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall post the
10 same, or cause the same to be posted, within fifteen (15) days after
11 its passage in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code, in
12 three (3) of the most public places in the City of Vernon, to wit: the
13 northwest corner of 38th Street and Santa Fe Avenue, the northeast
14 corner of Leonis Boulevard and Pacific Boulevard, and on the bulletin
15 board in the lobby of the City Hall of said City, located at 4305 Santa
16 Avenue, all in the City of Vernon, County ofLosAngeles, State of
17 California.
18 SECTION 6: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection,
19 subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this
20 Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be void or
21 unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by a court of competent
22 jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or
23 effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part
24 thereof; it being the intention of the City Council of the City of
25 Vernon to have passed and adopted this Ordinance and each section,
26 subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof
27 irrespective of the fact that one or more of the sections, subsections,
28 subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases thereof may be
G
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
declared tobeunconstitutional or invalid or ineffective.
SECTION 7: Any ordinance, part of an ordinance, or code
section in conflict with this Ordinance, specifically Section 21(3)B ofi
Ordinance No. 752, is hereby repealed.
SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall go into
effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30)
days after its final passage and adoption.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2004.
ATTEST:
BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk
EONIS C. MALaURG, Mayor
- 6 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk of the City of Vernon,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance, being Ordinance No.
1103, was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Vernon, held on Wednesday, June 2, 2004,
and thereafter finally adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council held on Wednesday Junej[9'0,12004, and thereafter was duly
signed by the Mayor of the City of Vernon, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:Malburg, Ybarra, Gonzales, Davis,
and McCormick
NOES:
Councilmen:None
ABSTAINED:
u�Councilmen:None
ABSENT:
Councilmen:None
(SEAL)
BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk
- 7 -
e n ) i. fir✓
CITY COUNCIL
LEONIS C. MALBURG
Mayor
THOMAS A. YBARRA
Mayor Pro-Tem
WM. 'BILL" DAVIS
Councilman
H. "LARRY" GONZALES
Councilman
W. MICHAEL McCORMICK
Councilman
BRUCE V. MALKENHORS'�'/�
City Administrator/City Cler r V
Executive Director of
Light & Power
FAX: (323) 826-1438
CITY HALL
.J'
ERIC T. FRESCH
n City Attorney
FAX: (323) 826-1491
KEVIN WILSON
Director of Community Services & Water
FAX: (323) 826-1435
STEVEN E. PARKER
Fire Chief
FAX: (323) 826-1407
BRUCE W. OLSON
Police Chief
FAX: (323) 826-1481
� LEWIS J. POZZEBON
f31YANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA 90058 Director of Enviromental Health
TELEPHONE (323) 583-8811 FAX: (323) 588-4320
r-z�-t- ee;:;t-8.\
May 26, 2004 (91 2 J 01A
Honorable City Council
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Gentlemen:
c! !
D-t unCe l o- tl 03
The City of Vernon is proposing to adopt an ordinance amending Section 26.4.E-3(b)
of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date
of Ordinance No. 752 to coincide with the off-street parking and loading requirements
established in Section 26.4.E-4(b), which is August 19, 2009. As part of the project, the City
Council must adopt a Negative Declaration for the project. An initial study was prepared in
accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Notice of Intent to
adopt the Negative Declaration was circulated.
Herewith for your consideration are the following supporting documents:
l . Staff Report.
2. Notice of Public Hearing, Notice of Intent, Affidavit of Posting, Affidavit of
Mailing and Declaration of Publication.
3. Environmental Checklist form and Initial Study.
4. Proposed Negative Declaration.
The project is consistent with the City of Vernon Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
and City of Vernon General Plan as adopted by the City of Vernon.
Honorable City Council -2- May 26, 2004
Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council determine:
1. That the project is consistent with the General Plan as adopted by the City of
Vernon.
2. That the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
3. That the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on
wildlife resources.
After review of the supporting evidence by the Community Services Department, it is
recommended that Ordinance No. 1103 be approved.
It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted and that a Notice of
Determination and a DeMinimus Finding be filed with the County Clerk.
Respectfully submitte
Sa e/evin ilson, P.E.
Director of Community Services & Water
SKW:sc
Attachments
cc: City Attorney
CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
ON THE AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE CITY OF VERNON
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE TO EXTEND THE TIME WHICH
BUILDINGS MUST BE BROUGHT INTO CONFORMITY WITH CERTAIN
REGULATIONS
May 26, 2004
The City of Vernon is proposing to amend Section 26.4.6-3(b) its
existing Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by extending the time in which
certain non -conforming buildings shall be removed. On February 25,
1964, the Vernon City Council adopted Ordinance No. 752, which
established zoning districts and regulations restricting use of land
and buildings in the City. The City's current Zoning Ordinance
requires all properties to comply with the regulations contained in
Ordinance No.752 within 40 years of its adoption date. The City of
Vernon is proposing an amendment to its zoning regulation extending
the compliance date in Section 26.4.E-3(b) to August 19, 2009.
BACKGROUND
On February 25, 1964, the City Council of the City of Vernon
adopted Ordinance No. 752 enacting various regulations, including
certain building setback requirements for properties adjoining a
street or highway in the City. The purpose of the amendment was to
enable the City to study the applicable planning and zoning
alternatives on the uses of land and buildings within the City.
As previously mentioned, Ordinance No. 752 enacted certain
building setback requirements and parking standards. However, since
the adoption of this ordinance the City's Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance has changed and certain sections of the Vernon City 'Code
("VCC") have been rendered obsolete and conflict with current zoning.
On August 19, 1969, the City Council, adopted Ordinance No. 801,
Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance, which established
requirements for off-street parking for automobiles, their circulation
and access, and off-street space for loading and unloading trucks,
their maneuvering and access from and to the public streets. The
automobile and truck parking provisions of Ordinance No. 752 were
superseded by the adoption of Ordinance Nos. 801, 982 and 973. Section
21(3) of Ordinance No. 752 remained intact. That provision codified at
Section 26.4.E-3(b) of the VCC, provides that every nonconforming
building, structure and use that occurred as a result of the adoption
of Ordinance No. 752 on February 25, 1964, shall be completely removed I
or altered to structurally conform to the uses and development
standards permitted in the zone in which it is located within forty
years of the date of adoption, or February 25, 2004.
Approximately 40 properties within the City are non -conforming
due to setback requirements and would have to be brought into
conformity with the City`s regulation this year. Under existing
provisions of the VCC, a property owner could face the prospect of
bringing his building into conformity with certain regulations now and
face additional compliance requirements in 2009. By modifying the
compliance time period in Section 26.4.E-3(b), to coincide with the
August 19, 2009 date for implementation of the off street parking and
loading requirements which is set forth in VCC Section 26.4.6-4, the
property owners will be able to make improvements to the property and
bring the building(s) into full compliance at one time rather than two
separate improvements.
1. GENERAL PLAN The proposed amendment conforms with, and more
clearly reflects the intent of the City of Vernon General Plan. A
revision of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is permitted with
approval of the City of Vernon City Council.
2. SITE The proposed amendment extending the compliance date in
Section 26.4.E-3(b) to August 19, 2009 shall be effective upon
approval and shall cover all properties in the City of Vernon.
3. ADVERSE EFFECT The revisions to the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance will for the most part clarify ambiguous sections. An
initial study has also been prepared as required by the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that confirms that the amendment to
the Ordinance will not have a significant environmental impact.
Therefore, its been recommended by the Director of Community Services
and Water that a Negative Declaration be adopted in compliance with
CEQA.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
CITY OF VERNON
INITIAL STUDY
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Extension of Ordinance 752 and Zoning
Code Amendment
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Samuel Kevin Wilson
(323) 583-8811
City of Vernon
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
All Zones affected M-Zone, M2-Zone, and
CM -Zone
All Zones affected M-Zone, M2-Zone, and
CM -Zone
On February 25,1964, the Vernon City Council adopted Ordinance No. 752, which
established zoning districts and regulations restricting use of land and buildings in the City.
Ordinance No. 752 enacted various regulations, including certain building setback
requirements for properties adjoining a street or highway in the City. Section 26.4.6-3(b) of
the City's current Zoning Ordinance incorporated Section 21(3) of Ordinance No. 752,
requires all properties to comply with the regulations contained in Ordinance No. 752 within
40 years of its adoption date. Ordinance No. 752 was enacted on February 25,1964.The City
of Vernon is proposing an amendment to its zoning regulations extending the compliance
date in Section 26.4.E-3(b) to August 19, 2009.
Other agencies whose approval is required (and permits needed):
None.
-1-
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below could be potentially affected by this point, involving
at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services
❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources . ❑ Utilities and Service Sys.
❑ Geophysical ❑Energy and Mineral Resources ❑Aesthetics
❑ Water ❑ Hazards ❑Cultural Resources
❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation
❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance
Determination.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed ordinance COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X
I find that although the proposed ordinance could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the proposed ordinance.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
■:
I find that the proposed ordinance MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑
.I find that the proposed ordinance MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑
Signature Date
Samuel Kevin Wilson City of Vernon
Printed Name For
-2-
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation
or zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans
or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a and b. This ordinance will apply to the entire City of Vernon and therefore affects all the
zoning designations in it. The City of Vernon is primarily made up of industrial and distribution
type facilities. The proposed ordinance will extend the 40-year compliance period regarding the
setback requirements established by Ordinance No. 752 and codified at Section 26.4.6-3(b) of
the Vernon City Code ("VCC"). Therefore, it will not conflict with any environmental plans or
policies.
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts
from incompatible land uses)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c. The City of Vernon is an industrial city with no agricultural land use within its
boundaries. Therefore, the proposed ordinance, will not affect agricultural resources or
operations.
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including a low income
or minority community)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
d. Ordinance No. 752 which was enacted on February 25, 1964, established various
regulations, including certain building setback requirements for properties adjoining a street
or highway in the City. The proposed ordinance extends the compliance period at Section
26.4.E-3(b) of the VCC. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed ordinance will not
disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community.
-3-
H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a and b. The population of the City of Vernon is approximately 90, with up to 60,000
people working in the City. The City of Vernon consists of highly industrialized and developed
areas. It is anticipated that the ordinance will not impact population or housing.
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c. The proposed ordinance will not create any new development. Thus, the proposed
ordinance will not displace housing.
III. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a. The proposed ordinance extends the date within which property owners must bring their
buildings into conformity with certain regulations. Therefore, the proposed ordinance will not
increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b. No safety hazard resulting from incompatible uses are expected.
c) . Inadequate emergency access or access
to nearby uses? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c. The proposed ordinance does not pertain or impact any emergency access or access
to nearby uses.
d) Results in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians
or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
-4-
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ❑ ❑ 0 X
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ 0 ❑ X
d through g. The proposed ordinance does not pertain or impact any transportation modes.
IV. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ 0 ❑ X
a and b. The proposed ordinance will not have a direct affect on the level of noise
throughout the City. Therefore, it is not expected to cause any significant noise impacts to
neighboring businesses.
V. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ 0 X
b) Police protection? ❑ ❑ 0 X
c) Schools? ❑ 0 ❑ X
a through c. The proposed ordinance will not pose a need for new or altered fire, police or
school services within the City of Vernon.
VI. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 ❑ ❑ X
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 ❑ 0 X
a and b. The proposed ordinance will have no impacts on the aesthetics of the City.
VII. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving.
a) Seismicity: fault rupture? 0 ❑ ❑ X
b) Seismicity: ground shaking or liquefaction? 0 ❑ ❑ X
c) Seismicity: seiche or tsunami? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
d) Landslides or mudslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
-5-
conditions from excavation, grading or fill? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
f) Subsidence of the land? 0 ❑ ❑ X
g) Expansive soils? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
h) Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a through h. The proposed ordinance has no impact on the geophysical nature of the City.
The topography of the City of Vernon is relatively level. Although there are no known
earthquake faults in the City, Vernon is in a seismically active region and several faults in the
area are likely to cause moderate ground shaking in Vernon. To ensure life safety, all new
construction shall be required to be in compliance with (Zone 4) seismicity requirements of the
Uniform Building Code. There will not be any significant changes to the geologic substructure
or topography.
VHL WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff. ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity)? 0 ❑ ❑ X
d) Changes in the amount of surface water
in any water body? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 0 0 ❑ X
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a through h. The proposed ordinance will have no impact on the hydrology, water quality
or water consumed in the City.
-6-
IX. AIR QUALITY: Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation? ❑ 0 ❑ X
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? 0 ❑ ❑ X
d) Create objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a through d. The proposed ordinance will have no impact on air quality. The City of
Vernon is located within the South Coast Air Basin of California. The basin covers a 6,600-
square mile area within Orange County, non -desert portions of Los Angeles County, Riverside
County, and San Bernardino County. Air quality in the basin is monitored by the South Coast
Air Quality Management District ("AQMD") at 35 monitoring stations throughout the area.
The monitoring station nearest to the City of Vernon is the Pico Rivera station. Readings at the
station are used to characterize air quality in the City of Vernon.
X. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and bids)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Locally designated species
(e.g. heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ❑ 0 0 X
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and
vernal pool)? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ❑ ❑ 0 X
a through e. Vernon is in a highly developed industrial area. The proposed ordinance will
not affect such resources.
XI. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a. The proposed ordinance will have no impact on energy conservation plans.
-7-
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b. The proposed ordinance will have no impact on energy consumed or mineral resources.
XII. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited to
oil, Pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ❑ ❑ 0 X
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
c) The creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
d) Exposure of people to existing sources
of potential health hazards? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or tees? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a through e. The proposed ordinance will not result in any additional hazards. The local
Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) regulates use and storage of hazardous materials at
any facility within the City of Vernon, which is the City of Vernon Environmental Health
Department. All facilities within the City are regularly inspected by the Vernon Fire and
Environmental Health Departments for code violations. The inspections are made to reduce the
potential for urban fires and chemical releases. The Vernon Fire Department has a fully
manned hazardous materials unit. All personnel are trained in hazardous material response.
The proposed existing regulations and permitting requirements will be adhered to by the facility
and this compliance will reduce potential hazards to less than significant levels. Therefore, this
impact will be less than significant.
XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
-8-
❑ ❑
❑
X
❑ ❑
❑
X
❑ 0
❑
X
0 ❑
❑
X
❑ ❑
❑
X
❑ ❑
❑
X
a through f. The proposed ordinance will not substantially alter the need for utility
services.
XIV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood
or regional parks or other recreational
facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a and b. The proposed ordinance will not result in an increase in residential population in
Vernon. No impact on the demand for recreation opportunities is anticipated.
XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ❑
c) Affect historical resources? ❑
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ❑
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? ❑
❑ ❑
X
❑ ❑
X
❑ ❑
X
❑ ❑
X
❑ ❑
X
a through e. Vernon is highly industrialized; no known unique historic, archeological,
paleontological ethnic cultural resources, or religious or sacred uses exist in the project area.
Therefore, no impact is expected.
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? ❑ ❑ ❑ X
a. The City of Vernon is primarily made up of industrial and distribution type facilities
with limited plant life. Plant life is limited to non-native and ornamental species, which are
used for landscaping. Animal life in Vernon and nearby urban communities consists of bird,
reptile and mammal species that live in close proximity to man. There are no endangered
-9-
species in Vernon. There is no evidence or important examples of major periods of California
history in Vernon. Therefore, the proposed ordinance will create no impact.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? 0 ❑ ❑ X
b. There will not be an impact on long-term environmental goals.
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects) ❑ ❑ X ❑
c. The proposed ordinance will not cause a cumulative impact to air quality, traffic, noise,
groundwater, surface water, or exposure to hazardous materials, and will not create any impact
to sensitive receptors. Therefore, the cumulative impact will be less than significant.
d) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?- ❑ ❑ X ❑
d. The proposed ordinance extends the date within which property owners must bring their
buildings into conformity with the certain regulations. Therefore it is anticipated that the
proposed ordinance will not have a cumulative on the environment of the community.
-10-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The City of Vernon will conduct a Public Hearing, which you may attend.
PLACE: Vernon City Hall
City Council Chambers
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
DATE & Wednesday, June 2, 2004 at 5:00 p.nL
TIME: (or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard)
PURPOSE: To consider: (1) the adoption of an ordinance amending the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay implementation of forty (40)
year requirement for removal of nonconforming building, structures and uses to
August 19, 2009; and (2) the recommendation of the Vernon Director of
Community Services & Water Department to adopt a Negative Declaration in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed
amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
A copy of the proposed ordinance and proposed negative declaration will be available for
public review during normal business hours in the Vernon Community Services & Water
Department, located at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California, from May 19, 2004 to June 2,
2004.
The public is also invited to submit written comments prior to the hearing. You may
submit written comments on the proposed negative declaration until 5:00 p.m. on June 2, 2004.
Comments received after that date may not receive full consideration.
If you challenge the adoption of the ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon at,
or prior to, the meeting.
The hearing may be continued or adjourned to a stated time and place without further
notice of a public hearing.
Dated: May 19, 2004
- U•
RUCE V. MALKENHORST,
City Administrator/City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF VERNON )
I, Sergio Canales, Engineering Aide of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that I did, on the
20d' day of May, 2004, post three (3) copies of -
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, to be held on June 2, 2004, (see attached copy)
regarding an adoption of an ordinance amending Section 26.4.6-3(b) of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date of Ordinance No. 752 to coincide with
the off-street parking and loading requirements established in Section 26.4.6-4(b), which is August
19, 2009; and the recommendation from the Vernon Director of Community Services & Water to
adopt a Negative Declaration in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act because
the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
One in each of the following places to wit: At the northwest corner of 38th Street and Santa
Fe Avenue; the northeast corner of Leonis Boulevard and Pacific Boulevard; and on the bulletin
board in the lobby of the City Hall of the City of Vernon, located at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, all in
said City, there being no newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of
Vernon. r�
Date: Mav 20.2004
Canales, Engineering Aide
State of California )
) ss.
County of Los Angeles )
On N aA 2Z12.MkA before me, Gb'lCk �" �„ , Notary Public,
personally appeared Sergio Canales, personally known to me (or- known to me on the basis e
to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature
on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument.
+i-
a -•_. roc
� YJrN a .• � ♦ A� a
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
I, Sergio Canales, declare as follows:
That I am employed in the Community Services Department in the position of
Engineering Aide.
2. That on May 20, 2004 I mailed a copy of Notice of Public Hearing to be held on
June 2, 2004, regarding an adoption of an ordinance amending Section 26.4.6-3(b) of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date of
Ordinance No. 752 to coincide with the off-street parking and loading requirements established
in Section 26.4.6-4(b), which is August 19, 2009; and the recommendation from the Vernon
Director of Community Services & Water to adopt a Negative Declaration in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the owners, tenants
and interested parties on the attached lists, by United Statq§ Mail with pystage prepaid.
.5�'# ;71 / r
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF VERNON ` , )
On 11A 2-MLI , 2 before meQ0i0t 0APCILOR, Notary
Public, personally appeared Sergio Canales, personally known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same
in her authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity
upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
a Commission # 1480313
•d Notwy Ptba - Ca tomiq
I Ak wNvo At os A Dew County
My Comm. Expires Apr 2. 2008
DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CLAUDIA ARELLANO
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO
CITY OF VERNON
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDI-
COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DPT
NANCE
AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT
SANTA FE AVE
yoEA�aa4305
� femon w'v oPules°
VERNON CA 90058
H�"PPL'AAC�E: vanes
City Connell
Chambers, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING'
DATE & TIME: Wednesday, June 2,
AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING OR-
2matter bePia�°r as soon thereafter as the
DINANCE AND NO
PURPOSE.
(the the
tion aninnncee amending ding Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
HEARING/CLOSE/SALE DATE: 06/02/04
Vann ui delay implementation removal on of forty am -
year requirement for removal of nonconform-
iog building, structures and uses to August 19.
2009, and (2) the recommendation of the
Vernon Director of Community Services &
Water Departmem to adopt a Negative Decla-
ration in accordance with the California
The undersigned says:
Environmental, Quality Ace because the
proposed anus to the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant
I am over the age of 18 years and a citizen of the
`ten copy of the posed ordinance and
United States. I am not a arts' to and have no interest in
party
proposed negative declaration b1 be available
for
this matter. I am a principal clerk 'of the METROPOLI-
l
public review auri� normal business tours
during nor
in the Vernon Community Services & water
TAN NEWS -ENTERPRISE, a newspaper of general cir-
culation in the Cite of Los An eles the Judicial District
`� g
2, 2 004.
is invited
�
of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles, and the State
public also to submit
written comments prior to the hewing. You
of California, as adjudicated in Los Angeles Superior
macegWWZdeclazation�a .m �22,
Court Case No. 601165. The notice, a printed copy of
2004 Comments received after that date y ma
fun
which appears hereon, was published on the following
not receive consideratoni
If you challenge the adoption of the
date(s): May 21, 2004
ordinance Ordin you the
limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the (rearing ckscribed in this notice or
I declare under penalty of that the foregoing is
the City
perjury
true and correct. Executed at Los Angeles, California on
fv� arm e`°
The �g may be corm . or ad-
05/21/04.
ed tione and place without
tnoticx
ofapublichewing.
Dated: May 19, 2004
B V. MALKINHORST
In
y A
City Administrater/City Clerk
CN706029 May 21, 2004
signature
Metropolitan News -Enterprise
P.O. Box 60859
Los Angeles, Ca 90060
Phone: (213) 346-0033
Fax: (213) 687-3886
Cust. Num.: 011482 Control Num.: 706029
east. Ref Num.: III 111III 11111111111ull
Page I of 1
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90058
(323) 583-8811
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
PROPOSED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
LEAD AGENCY:
PROJECT TITLE:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
City of Vernon
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
The City of Vernon is proposing to adopt an ordinance amending Section 26.4.6-3(b)
of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date
of Ordinance No. 752 to coincide with the off-street parking and loading requirements
established in Section 26.4.6-4(b), which is August 19, ,2009. The project is subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it requires discretionary approval.
FINDINGS:
The City Council of the City of Vernon has determined that this project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
9
4 pF VER
O~ 'Z
r s�
Ga�V8LT 11"40J
COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Administrator
FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilsoirector of Community Services & Water
DATE: May 19, 2004
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding Ordinance No. 752
The City of Vernon is proposing to adopt an ordinance amending Section 26.4.E-3(b) of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date of Ordinance
No. 752 to coincide with the off-street parking and loading requirements established in Section 26.4.6-
4(b), which is August 19, 2009. The project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA)•
It is recommended that a public hearing for this amendment be held on June 2, 2004.
SKW:sc
pF VPip
R
LY iN00
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT NEGATIVE DECLARATION
The City of Vernon will conduct a Public Hearing, which you may attend.
PLACE: Vernon City Hall
City Council Chambers
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
DATE & Wednesday, June 2, 2004 at 5:00 p.m.
TIME: (or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard)
PURPOSE: To consider: (1) the adoption of an ordinance amending the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay implementation of forty (40)
year requirement for removal of nonconforming building, structures and uses to
August 19, 2009; and (2) the recommendation of the Vernon Director of
Community Services & Water Department to adopt a Negative Declaration in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed
amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
A copy of the proposed ordinance and proposed negative declaration will be available for
public review during normal business hours in the Vernon Community Services & Water
Department, located at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California, from May 19, 2004 to June 2,
2004.
The public is also invited to submit written comments prior to the hearing. You may
submit written comments on the proposed negative declaration until 5:00 p.m. on June 2, 2004.
Comments received after that date may not receive full consideration.
If you challenge the adoption of the ordinance amending the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon at,
or prior to, the meeting.
The hearing may be continued or adjourned to a stated time and place without further
notice of a public hearing.
Dated: May 19, 2004 ,
U•
//-
E(RTV. MALKENHORST,
City Administrator/City Clerk
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,
bN'TER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 13, 2004
TO: Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Administrator/City Clerk
FROM: Eric T. Fresch, City Attorney
RE: Adoption of an Ordinance Delaying 2004 Requirement for
Removal of Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses
Dear Bruce:
I recommend that the City Attorney be authorized to prepare an
amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to delay the
implementation of the forty (40) year requirement set forth in
Vernon City Code Section 26.4.6-3 for the removal of nonconforming
buildings, structures and uses as a result of the adoption of
Ordinance No. 752. By delaying the implementation of Ordinance No.
752 requirements to August 19, 2009, to coincide with the August 1,9,
2009 date for implementation of the off street parking and loading
requirements set forth in Vernon City Code Section 26.4.6-4, the
property owners will have only one compliance date to comply with.
I further recommend that you sign the Notice of Public Hearing for
June 2, 2004, being submitted under separate cover by Kevin Wilson,
have the Notice posted in the three usual places and authorize the
Director of Community Service to publish the Notice with the
Metropolitan News in accordance with Government Code Sections 6509C
and 65091.
I look forward to discussing this matter with you at your earliest
convenience.
EF: j1
cc: Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water
CITY ATTORNEY9S OFFICE
eYNTER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 13, 2004
TO: Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Administrator/City Clerk
FROM: Eric T. Fresch, City'Attorney Ova)
RE: Adoption of an Ordinance Delaying 2004 Requirement for
Removal of Nonconforming Buildings, Structures and Uses
Dear Bruce:
I recommend that the City Attorney be authorized to prepare an
amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance to delay the
implementation of the forty (40) year requirement set forth in
Vernon City Code Section 26.4.6-3 for the removal of nonconforming
buildings, structures and uses as a result of the adoption of
Ordinance No. 752. By delaying the implementation of Ordinance No.
752 requirements to August 19, 2009, to coincide with the August 19,
2009 date for implementation of the off street parking and loading
requirements set forth in Vernon City Code Section 26.4.6-4, the
property owners will have only one compliance date to comply with.
rcommend that you sign the Notice of Public Hearing for
June 2, 2004,'.being submitted under separate cover by Kevin Wilson,
e Not' e posted in the three usual places and authorize the
Director Community Service to publish the Notice with the
Metropolitan News in accordance with Government Code Sections 65090
and 65091.
I look forward to discussing this matter with you at your earliest
convenience.
EF:jl
cc: Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF VERNON )
I, Sergio Canales, Engineering Aide of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that I did, on the
20th day of May, 2004, post three (3) copies of:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, to be held on June 2, 2004, (see attached copy)
regarding an adoption of an ordinance amending Section 26.4.6-3(b) of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date of Ordinance No. 752 to coincide with
the off-street parking and loading requirements established in Section 26.4.E-4(b), which is August
19, 2009; and the recommendation from the Vernon Director of Community Services & Water to
adopt a Negative Declaration in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act because
the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
One in each of the following places to wit: At the northwest corner of 38th Street and Santa
Fe Avenue; the northeast corner of Leonis Boulevard and Pacific Boulevard; and on the bulletin
board in the lobby of the City Hall of the City of Vernon, located at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, all in
said City, there being no newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of
Vernon. 2
Date:
Canales, Engineering Aide
State of California )
) ss.
County of Los Angeles )
On before me, Q0y-'VX �" w� `CCU , Notary Public,
personally appeared Sergio Canales, personally known to me (or- k.,,,..r.., to me on the basis ^r
to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature
on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
GLORIA MM LEOLEDDA
Commission # 1480313
Notary Public - California
Los Angeles COwtty
,,-JL, � ki �
13K � L
My Comm. Expires Apr 2.2008
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
I, Sergio Canales, declare as follows:
1. That I am employed in the Community Services Department in the position of
Engineering Aide.
2. That on May 20, 2004 I mailed a copy of Notice of Public Hearing to be held on
June 2, 2004, regarding an adoption of an ordinance amending Section 26.4.6-3(b) of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Vernon to delay the compliance date of
Ordinance No. 752 to coincide with the off-street parking and loading requirements established
in Section 26.4.E-4(b), which is August 19, 2009; and the recommendation from the Vernon
Director of Community Services & Water to adopt a Negative Declaration in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. To the owners, tenants
and interested parties on the attached lists, by United State Mail with tage prepaid.
Date: Sign:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF VERNON )
On ��T 9 before me P , Notary
Public, personally appeared Sergio Canales, personally known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same
in her authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity
upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal__,.
6lOR1A tAOLLEDA
Commission # 1480313
. I Notary Public - CONOM10
Los Angeles County
My Comm. Expires Apr 2. 2W8