Loading...
Ordinance No. 11551 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PX-1 ORDINANCE NO. 1155 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AMENDING SECTIONS 16.15 AND 16.16 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF VERNON, CALIFORNIA, 1959, TO CHANGE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS AND TO REPEAL ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH WHEREAS, the City of Vernon (the "City") is a municipal corporation and a chartered city of the State of California organized and existing under its Charter and the Constitution of the.State of (California; and WHEREAS, on March 3, 2004., the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Ordinance No. 1099 to establish speed limits on certain streets in accordance with a Speed Zone Survey dated January.2004; and WHEREAS, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. prepared an Engineering and Traffic Survey on Speed Limits dated March 2009 ("Engineering and Traffic Study") on behalf of the Community Services Department for the purpose of evaluating existing speed limits on various streets within the City of Vernon; and WHEREAS, the Community Services Department has recommended that the City Council accept and approve the recommendations contained in the Engineering and Traffic Study and that the Vernon City Code be amended by retaining existing speed limits on some streets and changing speed limits on other streets based on the Engineering and Traffic Study; and WHEREAS, Vehicle Code Section 22357 authorizes cities to determine and declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, according to the Engineering and Traffic Study, the recommendations for prima facie speed limits of 30, 35, 40 and 45 miles per hour on certain streets will facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and will be reasonable and safe on those streets; and WHEREAS, said Engineering and Traffic Study supports the enforcement of the prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40 and 45 miles, per hour on certain streets; and WHEREAS, the California legislature has established various criteria for preparing an engineering and traffic survey and determining speed limits therein in order to promote uniformity throughout the State; and WHEREAS, Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides that .radar may not be used as an enforcement tool if the posted limits are set without being justified in fact by an engineering and traffic survey; and WHEREAS, certain sections of the Vernon Code need to be amended to.establish the speed limits recommended in the Engineering and Traffic Study; and WHEREAS, Chapter 4.1(f) and (h) of the Charter of the City of Vernon provides that an ordinance shall amend a code or repeal any ordinance or code previously adopted. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON HEREBY ORDAINS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: Section 16.15 of the Vernon City Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: - 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sec. 16.15. Speed limits on certain streets --Forty miles per hour. Pursuant to Vehicle Code Section 22357, the city council hereby determines and declares that the prima facie speed limit on the following streets shall be forty (40) miles per hour: ALAMEDA STREET -WEST The northbound lanes from the northern city boundary to the southern city boundary DISTRICT BOULEVARD From Downey Road to Atlantic Boulevard 37TH STREET VERNON AVENUE LEONIS BOULEVARD LEONIS BOULEVARD PACIFIC BOULEVARD 381h STREET From Santa Fe Avenue to Soto Street From Alameda Street to Santa Fe Avenue From Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue From Boyle Avenue to Downey Road From Santa Fe Avenue to the southern city boundary From Santa Fe Avenue to the BNSF Railroad tracks east of Santa Fe Avenue Every violation of this section by propelling a vehicle in excess of the speed limit provided for herein is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. SECTION 3: Section 16.16 of the Vernon City Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 16.16. Speed limits on certain streets --Thirty-five miles per hour. - 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Vehicle Code Section 22357, the city council hereby determines and declares that the prima facie speed limit on the following streets shall be thirty-five (35) miles per hour: ALAMEDA STREET -EAST The two-way street on the east side of the railroad right-of-way from the northern city boundary to the southern city boundary ATLANTIC BOULEVARD From the northern city boundary to the southern city boundary BOYLE AVENUE From Vernon Avenue to Slauson Avenue and the northbound lanes from Slauson Avenue to Randolph Street DISTRICT BOULEVARD From Atlantic Boulevard to eastern city boundary DOWNEY ROAD From the northern city boundary to Fruitland Avenue and the western -most southbound lane from Fruitland Avenue to Slauson Avenue FRUITLAND AVENUE From Santa Fe Avenue to Downey Road PENNINGTON WAY From 26th Street to Bandini Boulevard SANTA FE AVENUE From the northern city boundary to the southern city boundary SLAUSON AVENUE From Boyle Avenue to Downey. Road SOTO STREET From the'northern city boundary to the southern city boundary 26TH STREET From Soto Street to Atlantic Boulevard 38TH STREET From Alameda Street to the Santa Fe Avenue 55TH STREET From Alameda Street to Santa Fe Avenue - 4 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Every violation of this section by propelling a vehicle in excess of the speed limit provided for herein is hereby declared to be Ila public nuisance. SECTION 4: Any ordinance, part of an ordinance, or code section in conflict with this Ordinance is hereby repealed. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be void or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; it being the intention of the City Council of the City of Vernon to pass and adopt this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more of the sections, subsections, clauses, sentences or phrases thereof may be declared to be invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 6: In accordance with Government Code §36933, the City Clerk is hereby (a) directed to cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published at least once in the Vernon Sun and to cause a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance to be posted in the Office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance; and (b) directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to publish at least once in the Vernon Sun the summary of this Ordinance with the names of those City Council Members voting for and against this Ordinance and to post in the Office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the full text of this adopted Ordinance along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against this Ordinance within fifteen (15) days after passage of this Ordinance. - 5 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its passage of the same. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this �l day of May, 2009. ATTEST: ANUELA GIRO , C'ty Clerk -2 ,L-„A. Name: Hilario Gonzales Title: Mayor - 6 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, MANUELA GIRON, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance, being Ordinance No. 1155, was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Vernon, held on Monday, April 27, 2009, and thereafter finally adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on Monday, May 11, 2009, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or the Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Mayor Gonzales, McCormick, Malburg Davis, Maisano NOES: Councilmen: None ABSTAINED: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None MANUELA O City Clerk (SEAL) - 7 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE May 13, 2009 TO: S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water FR Nelly Giron, City Clerk RE: Ordinance No. 1155 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the, City of Vernon Amending Sections 16.15 and 16. 16 of the Code of the City of Vernon, California, 1959, to Change Speed Limits on Certain Streets and to Repeal All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in Conflict Herewith Transmitted herewith is a copy of Ordinance No. 1155 referenced above, which was approved by City Council on May ll,.2009. Thank you. NG : dj c: Donal O'Callaghan Ordinance No. 1155 CITY OF VERNON CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 11, 2009 ORDINANCE NO. 1155 SUMMARY A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FULL TEXT OF ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 1155 IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK LOCATED AT 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA. Ordinance No. 1155. was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Vernon held on April 27, 2009, and approved and adopted by said Council at a regular meeting held on May 11, 2009. On May 11, 2009, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Ordinance No. 1155 amending Vernon City Code Sections 16.15 and 16.16 of Article I, Motor Vehicles and Traffic: General, of Chapter 16, Law Enforcement, as follows: 2 To change the designation of Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Downey Road to Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue and Leonis Boulevard from Boyle Avenue to Downey Road. To increase the current speed limit of thirty-five (35) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Downey Road to forty (40) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue and forty (40) in per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Boyle Avenue to Downey Road. 3. To establish the speed limit for newly constructed street designated as Pennington Way from 26�h Street to Bandini Boulevard at thirty-five (35) miles per hour. Manuela Giron, City Clerk of the City of. Vernon, does hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1155 was duly introduced and approved by the City Council of the City of Vernon ata' regular meeting held on April 27, 2009 and adopted and passed by said Council at a regular meeting held on May 11, 2009 by the following roll call vote AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Gonzales, McCormick, Malburg, Davis, and Maisano. NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None Dated: / 3 lo t? c Manuela Giron, C' C erk Iv v CITY OF VERNON CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 11, 2009 � l 0 �I - ORDINANCE NO. 1155 SUMMARY A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FULL TEXT OF ADOPTED ORDINANCE NO. 1155 IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK LOCATED AT 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA. Ordinance No. 1155 was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Vernon held on April 27, 2009, and approved and adopted by said Council at a regular meeting held on May 11, 2009. On May 11, 2009, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Ordinance No. 1155 amending Vernon City Code Sections 16.15 and 16.16 of Article I, Motor Vehicles and Traffic: General, of Chapter 16, Law Enforcement, as follows: 1. To change the designation of Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Downey Road to Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue and Leonis Boulevard from Boyle Avenue to Downey Road. 2. To increase the current speed limit of thirty-five (35) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Downey Road to forty (40) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue and forty (40) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Boyle Avenue to Downey Road. 3. To establish the.speed limit for newly constructed street designated as Pennington Way from 26`h Street to Bandini Boulevard at thirty-five (35) miles per hour. Manuela Giron, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, does hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1155 was duly introduced and approved by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting held on April 27, 2009 and adopted and passed by said Council at a regular meeting held on May 11, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: Dated: May 13, 2009 COUNCILMEMBERS: Gonzales, McCormick, Malburg; Davis, and Maisano. COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None S/ Manuela Giron, City Clerk PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforementioned; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of EASTERN GROUP PUBLICATIONS' EASTSIDE SUN, MEXICAN AMERICAN SUN, NORTHEAST SUN, BELL GARDENS SUN, VERNON SUN, COMMERCE COMET, CITYTERRACE COMET, MONTEBELLO COMET, MONTEREY PARK COMET, E.L.A. BROOKLYN BELVEDERE COMET AND WYVERNWOOD CHRONICLE, newspapers of general circulation, printed and published THURSDAYS in the County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of JUNE 21, 1.966, CASE NUMBER 884861; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: APRIL 30, all in the year 2009. certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at LOS ANGELES, California, this 30!hday of APRIL, 2009. This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp CITY OF VERNON Proof of Publication of CITY OF VERNON CITY COUNCIL MEETING APR I L 27, 2009 ORDINANCE NO. 1155 SUMMARY Signature DATE: April 8, 2009 TO: FROM: STAFF REPORT APPROVED APR 2 r '09 CITY COUNCIL SERVICES & WATER DE#A*f Tgf:NJq CITY COUNCIL Mayor and City Council APR 1 5 2009 CITY CLERKS OFFICE Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community. Services and Water Speed Limits in the City of Vernon - 2009 Ordinance The City of Vernon has the authority to establish, by ordinance, speed limits that "would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street." California Vehicle Code Section (CVC) 22357 specifies that the City may establish the speed limits upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The survey is defined in CVC Section 627 and must incorporate prevailing speeds, collision records, highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver and residential density except in a business district. However, CVC Section 40802 does not allow the creation of a "speed trap" which is a particular section of highway that has a prima facie speed limit that is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. The City of Vernon established speed limits in 2004 and has secured an engineering and traffic survey by a consultant to establish the new speed limits in the City. The consultant, Hartzog and Crabill has surveyed the City and measured the speeds of the vehicles throughout the City on representative sections of each street and has reported the recommendations in the attached report. The consultant collected the speed data from 40 different roadway segments on 19 different collectors and arterials in the City. The data is collected at free flowing points in the roadway segments on week days and off peak hours with fair weather conditions. An unmarked car with an inconspicuous speed meter is used with the speed meter validated for accuracy before each use. The sampling normally consists of a minimum of 100 vehicles. The 10 mph pace range, the average speed and the 85t' percentile speed are determined from the speed data. The 85t' percentile speed is the speed that 85% o of the vehicles are traveling at or below this speed and is known as the critical speed. From experience, traffic engineers have determined that this critical speed is the most reliable speed to set an appropriate speed limit to allow orderly movement of traffic with the highest safety level. Moreover, the Vehicle Code specifies that the speed limits must be set within 5 mph of the 85' percentile speed of free -flowing traffic unless unusual conditions not readily apparent to drivers are present. The consultant has considered any unusual traffic, roadway, and roadside conditions that could affect the motorist in each segment and has recommended any alterations in the recommended speed limits. The collision history of the roadway is also incorporated in the setting of the speed limit for a roadway segment. The consultant has considered all the above elements and has recommended the speed limits for the segments of roadway in the City: The recommendations and the justifications for the speed limits are provided in the attached report. The consultant has recommended that the ordinance for the new speed limits will be the same as the one enacted in 2004 with the exception of the speed limits for the following street segments which are recommended to be increased: Leonis Blvd. - Pacific Blvd. to Boyle Avenue Leonis Blvd. — Boyle Avenue to Downey Road Previous Speed Recommended 35 mph 40 mph 35mph 40 mph In addition, a new street was constructed and named Pennington Way. Since this segment of street is an extension of 26�1 Street and the speed limit on this street as well as the 26t' Street Bridge over Atlantic Blvd. that transitions into Pennington Way has been determined to be 35 mph, it is recommended that the speed limit be set at 35 mph. Pennington Way — 26t' Street to Bandini Blvd. Recommended speed limit 35 mph The setting of the speed limits by the engineering and traffic survey will permit the Police Department to enforce the speed limits in the City. The speed limits will be posted by Community Services on clearly visible signage throughout the City. With the enactment of the ordinance the speed limits are established with the Courts and any citations are enforceable along with the fines imposed for any violations. COMMUNITY SERV ATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Donal O'Callaghan, Director of Utilities and Government Infrastructure FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water ,sue/X--- DATE: April 15, 2009 SUBJECT: Speed Limits in the City of Vernon — 2009 Ordinance The City of Vernon has the authority to establish, by ordinance, speed limits that "would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street." California Vehicle Code Section (CVC) 22357 specifies that the City may establish the speed limits upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The survey is defined in CVC Section 627 and must incorporate prevailing speeds, collision records, highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver and residential density except in a business district. However, CVC Section 40802 does not allow the creation of a "speed trap" which is a particular section of highway that has a prima facie speed limit that is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. The City of Vernon established speed limits in 2004 and has secured an engineering and traffic survey by a consultant to establish the new speed limits in the City. The consultant, Hartzog and Crabill has surveyed the City and measured the speeds of the vehicles on the streets throughout the City and has reported the recommendations in the attached report. The ordinance for the new speed limits will be the same as the one enacted in 2004 except it is recommended that the speed limits be increased for the following streets: Leonis Blvd. — Pacific Blvd. to Boyle Avenue 40 mph (previously 35 mph) Leonis Blvd. - Boyle Avenue to Downey Road 40 mph (previously 35 mph) A new street has been constructed and the speed limit is recommended to be set as follows: Pennington Way - 26t' Street to Bandini Blvd. 35 mph A staff report detailing the procedures to establish the speed limits is enclosed. The City Attorney has drawn the ordinance for enactment and it is recommended that the City Council approve and enact the ordinance to establish speed limits citywide for the next five years. SKW/sn Enclosure C: City Attorney City Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE " Table of Contents................. ... Traffic Engineer's Certification ii Introduction.......:..................................................................................................... 1 Basic Speed Law ............................................ 2 1 1 .... . ... ... _ Prima Facie Speed Limits . 2 Establishment of Speed Zones..............................................................................,.. 3 Data Collection Procedures ..., 3 f 1 Speed Zoning Methodology..................................................................................... 4 Speed Zone Survey ..., .. ... ... ...... ......... . . 4 " Local Street Exemptions.................................................... ................................... 5 Other Considerations ..... ....... ........ ..... ........... .. .......... 5 Collection Time-Frames.................:.............................................................. 6 iRadar Analysis Factors..... ...... .......... ....: ... . .. . ... . 6 1 Field Review . ... .. .. .. ... .... .. 7 Accident History... ... .. ......... ........... .. .......... ....... 8 Results and Recommendations ...... ...... .. 8 - Locations of No Speed Limit Changes ........................................... ......... 8 Support Explanations for ° No Speed Limit Changes ......................................... 10 Locations of New Speed Limit Postings ....:................ . 11 Support Explanations for " New Speed Limit Postings ............ .......................... 11 Locations of Speed Limit Increases............................................................... 11 Support Explanations for" Speed Limit Increases ............................................. 11 Summary. of Recommendations. ........ ........................ .. ... .12 Appendix A - For Each Street Segment in the Survey Data Summary Sheet...........; Radar Speed Distribution Sheet. . ... _ ...... Survey Field Sheet. .. ... .. ..... Appendix B — Certification Radar Gun Certification ...... ........................ ......... .. ... Technician Certification.............:.:.................................:.....,.............:.. . i CITY OF VERNON. ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS Introduction I In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey has been developed for the City of Vernon as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected' streets within the, City. The work herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. The goal of the review was two -fold. The first was to review new roadway segments to determine if speed limit postings should be recommended. The second involved a determination as to whether changes in pre- existing conditions have occurred where existing speed limits should be modified. The requirement to perform Engineering and Traffic surveys for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code. It indicates that once every five (5) years (may be extended to 7 years under certain conditions), to conform to Section 408028 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), speed surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits. If such a .survey is not performed, then the new data and its use will constitute a "speed trap".. Per the Vehicle Code, a "speed trap" is either of the following: j (a) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries l marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. b A articular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided b this code t O p 9 y P Pe P y or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established pursuant to Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3.which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within a specked date of the alleged violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects. The definition of a Traffic and Engineering Survey is contained in Section 627 of the 1 Vehicle Code and is as follows: ..l Engineering and Traffic survey, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods contained within the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA. MUTCD) for use by State and local authorities. An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the Department, consideration of the following: (a) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (b) Accident records. (c) Highway, traffic and roadside- conditions not readily apparent to the driver. The California Vehicle Code: (CVC) and the CA. MUIrCD, have set certain regulations regarding the: posting and enforcement of speed zones.These regulations ` generally reflect that speed zoninglestablishment should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response. to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general a understanding of the ""Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and _ "Intermediate Speed Zones". NOW a" Ift All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as: "No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed .greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time -to -time and place -to - place and; therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust his driving behavior to fit the conditions he I encounters. He must learn to do this with a minimum of assistance from the police; l The Basic Speed law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions = 7 around them, in a reasonable manner. Prima F_ggie §R22d Umits (CVC 2,2351) All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. A driver may exceed any prima facie limit if it is safe to do so under prevailing conditions. However, when a police officer cites a driver for exceeding a prima facie speed limit, it is up to the driver to prove, if he can, that he was driving in a reasonable and prudent manner under the existing conditions. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima facie speed limit when it is safe to do _ so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic; weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times. Certain prima facie limits are established by law (CVC 22362). These include a 15 mph limit in alleys, Mind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are present enroute to or from school. Business and residence districts are defined in the Vehicle Code as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Sections 235 and r� r 240 define these regulations. A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether or not a valid business or residence' district exists. The law does not require posting these prima facie limits, which are readily apparent. e Establishment of Speed Zones Previously speed limits were established at or below the closest 5-mile increment to the 85th percentile speed. Recent changes to be brought before the California Traffic Control Devices Committee (CTCDC) when a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be within 10 km/h or 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed of free -flowing traffic, except as shown below in option. Option: The posted speed limit may be reduced by 10 km/h or 5 mph from the 10 km/h or 5 mph increment of the 850 percentile speed, if unusual conditions not readily apparent to drivers, such as significantly higher collision rates or other factors exist, as long as those conditions are in compliance with all the appropriate sections of the CVC, especially CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Standard: If used, a one-time 10 km/h or 5 mph reduction, according to CC Sections 627 and 22358.5, shall be documented in writing. The final, posted speed limit shall not be less than the 50th percentile speed, Data Collection Procedures Speed evaluation data was collected at 40 different roadway segments on 19 different roadways in the City of Vernon. These areas and the number of segments on each are described as follows: 1. 25th Street (1) 11.Downey Road (2) 2. 26th Street (4) 12. Fruitland Avenue (4) 3. 37th Street (2) 13. heonis Boulevard (2) 4. 55th Street (1) 14.Pacific Boulevard (1) 5. Alameda Street (2) 15. Sante Fe Avenue (3) 6. Alcoa Avenue (2) 16. Slauson Avenue (1) ` 7. Atlantic Boulevard (1) 17. Soto Street (2) 8. Bandini Bouelvard (3) 18. Vemon Avenue (3) 9.. Boyle Avenue (2) 19. Washington Boulevard (1) 10. District Boulevard (3) As described in various traffic engineering documents - including information provided by the State of California, the individual locations on which radar data collection procedures were used involved considerations for the following: a. Stop sign or traffic signal locations; b. Visibility problems; 3 7 c. Traffic flow opportunities at or near intersections, major driveways, crosswalks, railroad crossings and unusual turning movements;< ` d. The influence of other traffic factors on the speed of cars such as from parking, r roadway features, and lighting. _. j Sneed Toning Lffiodolouv The CA. MUTCD specifies a , 'short method" of determining speed limits on City and County roadways. and local Streets, excerpted as follows; 1 City and County Through Highways, Arterial and Collector Loads Procedures. ` The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. If there are other factors, such as high pedestrian volumes coupled with lack of sidewalks, etc. that might require further down zoning of speeds, then it is recommended that the procedure for speed zoning on State Highways be followed. However, experience has proven that the short method will handle most situations adequately. Steed done Survey Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a ` radar speed meter. The radar speed meter accuracy is validated prior to each use. A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducted. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits. The section selected should be straight and should have no traffic signal, stop sign or intersection with a major cross street. i Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours on weekdays. The i weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is important that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous so as to not affect traffic speeds, For this reason, an unmarked car is used, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to survey traffic in both directions, where feasible and shouldnot make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway centerline. It is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey. This may, result in excessive survey periods for low -volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted for a minimum of two hours, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles. 4 As previously discussed, speed limits are established within 5 mph of the 85th t percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed can be selected directly from the data sheet. However, roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist may result in a further reduction of 5 mph in the recommended seed limit. Under no circumstance may the speed limit be established lower than the 50 percentile speed. As a check on the validity of the proposed speed limit, an analysis should be made of ` the three-year accident record for the section of roadway under consideration. If this record shows an abnormally high percentage of accidents associated with excessive speeds, the proposed speed limit should be further reduced. This is a judgment ] situation, and will not usually be a factor. Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition _. areas. j Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or J roadway development. Speed zoning in 5 mile per hour increments should be avoided if possible. A 10-mile per hour increment is preferable. ` - Speed zoning should be coordinated between adjacent jurisdictions. Local Street Exemations (CVC 40802) Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the .radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The code is as follows: "For the purpose of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential j property and shall meet the following three conditions: 1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. 2. Not more than one half mile of uninterrupted length. 3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. Other Considerattons Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily, apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices, roadway alignment, width surface conditions, accident history and any . C 5 unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning,_ ftdar Collection Time Frames The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak periods for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather. The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash_ of an unmarked vehicle with the meter reading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar units calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork. ` 1 The radar operator recorded the speed meter readings for each location on • Radar Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the appendix of this report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed in each direction or a cumulative sample of 200 vehicles for both directions, where possible. On low volume roads, where a total sample of 200 vehicles would result in an excessive time period, sampling was continued until a representative bell -shaped frequency distribution was attained. Andmis: Factors Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These include the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below. 1. The CRMCAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile is defined as that speed at or below i which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic engineers have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits. Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this cas e is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that other factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used; it not only conforms to that required by the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits. 2. The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained-. It is a measure of the dispersion of s . Pe peels .within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greatest extent possible is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed. 3. The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED, or 50th percentile speed, represents the midpoint value within the range of 'recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. in other words, 59% of the vehicles travel faster and 50% travel slower than the 6 median speeds. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution. 4. The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is o that speed at or below which 15 /o of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum .1 allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles traveling_ below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the accident potential. I, 5. MODAL SPEED: The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution (the most). It serves as another useful measure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits: G. STANDARD ND RD DEVIATION: This is a mathematical calculation, . which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the overall review of recommended speed limits and serves to verify the J level of confidence of data used in making recommendations. 7. The MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the ` number of samples. The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the speed distribution ` curves calculated for each survey location. These distribution curves represent a method of a graphical analysis, which compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling. i Field Review In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is that existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually indicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed below: j 1 Segment, length, width and alignment 2. Level of pedestrian activity and pedestrian activity. 3. Traffic flow characteristics 4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves: 5. Driver sight distance constraints. 6. Adjacent residential/commercial/industrial etc.' zoning. 7. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors 8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on street parking; 9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices; 10. Roadway conditions, bumps and dips; 11. Obstructions to pedestrian visibility; 12. Land use and proximity of schools; r 13. Uniformity with existing speed zones totwith adjacent jurisdictions; 14. Any other unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver. The results of the field review of related roadttraffc variables are summarized on the -j Engineering and Traffic Survey sheets found in the Appendix of this report. &ge(derltHls The Engineering, and Traffic Survey forms summarize the available latest three e f g g y _ years o accident information for the subject streets segments. The accident information includes the total number of accidents within each street segment and of those accidents, the number which are speed: -related. This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the City of Vernon: The annual accident rate figures represent the number of speed -related accidents divided by years, of accident records. The evaluation of accidents is useful as a check on ,the accuracy of recommended or existing speed limits and is an indicator of roadway ` conditions not readily apparent to the reasonable driver. Should this review show a high percentage of accidents associated with excessive speeds, and then consideration basedon professional traffic engineering judgment should be directed toward reducing the posted or recommended speed limit. ROMlts and Recommend_ atians The following Summary of Recommendations presents the results of the radar survey for the selected 40 locations. As shown, the chart presents the necessary analysis elements that in addition to the field review of a registered traffic engineer, led to the recommendations indicated. Lc aiiROW 91 Me- SMd WO Chaff The Summary indicates. that 37 of the 40 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. The reason centers mostly on the fact that newly measured J values of the 88th percentile and the 10 MPH pace are still within the parameters of the existing speed limits. Hence, the current postings should remain as is At two (2) of these locations, one direction of travel is not currently posted and posting is required to allow for ,speed limit enforcement. These segments as well as the segments recommended for "No Change" are listed below: R6"` wreet Sante Fe Ave to Soto St Remain posted at 30 MPH Soto St to Downey Rd Remain pasted at 35 MPH Downey Rd to Bonnie Beach P1 Remain posted at 38 MPH Bonne Beach PI to East City Limits Remain posted at 35 MPH s; 3Th Street Alameda St to Sante Fe Ave Remain posted at 30 MPH Sante Fe Ave to Soto St Remain posted at 40 MPH 55P Street ` Alameda St to Sante Fe Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH Alameda Street North City Limits to Vernon Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH Vernon Ave to Slauson Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH Alcoa Avenue Vernon Ave to Fruitland Ave Remain posted at 30 MPH ,1 Fruitland Ave to Slauson Ave Remain posted of 30 MPH J Atlantic Boulevard North City Limits to District BI Remain posted at 35 MPH ` Bandini Boulevard Soto St to Downey Rd Remain posted at 45 MPH Downey Rd to Bonnie Beach PI Remain posted at 45 MPH Bonnie Beach PI to Atlantic BI Remain posted at 45 MPH Boyle Avenue Vernon Ave to Leonis,Bl Remain posted at 30 MPH Leonis BI to Slauson Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH Distirct Boulevard i Downey Rd to Corona Ave Remain posted at 40 MPH Corona Ave to Atlantic BI Post Eastbound - 40 MPH Atlantic BI to East City Limits Remain Posted at 35 MPH Downey Road Washington BI to Vernon Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH Vernon Ave to Fruitland Ave Post Northbound - 35 MPH Fruitland Avenge Sante Fe Ave to Soto St Remain posted at 35 MPH Soto St to Downey Rd Remain posted at 35 MPH Downey Rd to Corona Ave Remain posted at 25 MPH Corona Ave to District BI Remain posted at 30 MPH Pack 8ou12ya d Sante Fe Ave to South City Limits Remain posted at 40 MPH 9 Sante Fe Avenue North City Limits to 38'h St Remain posted at 35 MPH r 3e St to Fruitland Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH FruitlandAve to South City Limits Remain posted at 35 MPH Slauson Avenue Boyle Ave to Downey Rd Remain posted at 35 MPH jSo treat 1 North City Limits to Vernon Ave Remain posted at 35 MPH -11 Vernon Ave to South City Limits Remain posted at. 35 MPH Vernon Avenue Alameda St to Sante Fe Ave Remain posted at 40 MPH Sante Fe Ave to Soto St Remain posted at 30 MPH Soto St to Downey Rd Remain posted at 30 MPH Washington Boulevard Downey Rd to East City Limits Remain posted at 45 MPH -upaor '—g3RMngJons of " No Speed Llrnit Cha!lges " Although 37 of the surveyed segments will retain the existing speed limits, the following sections areonesthat have speed signs pasted in one direction and are recommended for "no change" in the speed limit. For the ability to enforce speed limits, the segment shall be posted. Qistird eOleAN I Corona Avenue to Atlantic Boulevard This portion of District Boulevard is a four lane roadway. Adjacent land use is mainly industrial with heavy truck traffic. Currently, it has a 40 mph speed sign posted westbound only. With the 85th percentile speed of 43.1 mph and a 10 mph pace range 34 to 43 mph, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be maintained. For enforcement, a 40 mph speed sign should be installed eastbound. QQw9ft Road Vernon Avenue to Fruitland Avenue This section of Downey Road has two lanes of travel in each north -south direction. Field observations include heavy truck traffic in area, no shoulders and no stopping anytime along roadway, and bus stops on both sides of street. With an 85th percentile speed of 37.2 mph, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit remain. For enforcement, a similar speed sign should be posted northbound. 10 Locations of Now Speed Limit Postings ` One location is currently unposted with no visible speed limits signs at either end of the segment. It is noted that for each case, the recommendation to post is necessary to enhance the enforcement of the recommended safe speed limit. These areas are indicated below with recommendations to install such speed limits being identified in the summary pages. 2 m Stree Alameda St to Sante Pe Ave Post a 30 mph Speed Limit Support Explanations of "New Speed Limit Postings " 25' Street Alameda Stre et to -Same F® Avenue The section of 25th Street is a two lane roadway. It is solely industrial with. many big rig trucks traveling along roadway. With the 85th percentile speed of 33.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 26 to 35 mph, it is recommended that a 30 mph speed limit be = posted for this area. Locations of Sneed Limit Increases j At two locations, the Engineering and speed survey data indicates a need for a speed limit increase. The segments and reasons for these recommendations are listed below: Leonis Boulevard Pacific Bl to Boyle Ave Increase speed from 35 to 40 MPH Boyle Ave to Downey Rd Increase speed from 35 to 40 MPH Support Explanations of " Speed Limit Increases i Leonia Boulevard Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue This section of Leonis Boulevard . is a four lane roadway. Adjacent land uses are industrial and business. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. U4ums are prohibited at signalized intersections. There are many areas of "No Parking Anytime red and green curbs. With an 85th percentile speed of 42.1 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 32 to 41 mph, it is recommended that the existing speed limit be increased to 40 mph. Boyle Ave to Downey Rd This section of Leonis Boulevard is a four lane roadway. Field observations include a 35 mph speed limit, adjacent land uses of industrial and business, heavy truck traffic and no U-tums at signalized intersections. With an 85th percentile speed of 41.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph, it is recommended that the existing speed limit be increased to 40 mph. 11 _1 _J w U J J - J z z g us a Z z� w� oz Z o a o o z z z z z z z Z rn w <o ao 00 Q N O GOto U3 a f0 W CC N cou7 ICl O N �Mp V ^ c N N N t7 N if N C7 LL oD e- O er 1- aD N 1Cf N M CD O N N M M m ccug o N t O. C� Cif r. O Gf 1N� CD c7 �- �c�pppCO to No Z, 1 m e oO c cl O 44 OQ �? W z' of �i Ym > t-Q a9a Qm 11 } Q J J / Q SO X: NW WW WI W f'H OZ� per, O~ W4' a a'w Og g0 OtW Wg O►. H N >ul U. d 2i m ma > _,rn a CU UQ �] Ww WW 0- a. a 0 LU z z z z z N W L+ Mco N N O N N t9 M c` co N N l'7 lh t7 th ra M M a} d Qq 1 c 0 In 10 o N 2 c� IAn n g _ o u Lo W - ti. - ►'� ova a v~ia r. Uz �1 zc3 �� � uw �4p O��p �G Z� >N ? Q t/St/) oQpp�p tT�C� poaya � QW ie • ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON I 25TH STREET ALAMEDA STREET TO SANTE FE AVENUE. DATE: 302009 SURVEYC. BUENDIA r� TIME 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED 'ATA LOCATION OF SURVEY FAST OF ALAMEDA DATE OF SURVEY 31912009 85th PERCENTILE 33.0 MPH 10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 80-.0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT PO§jED ACCIDENT HIST RY . NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 1 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) A CJMILLION VEH, MILES 0.00ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 7,200 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALAMEDA / SANTE FE CROSSWALKS AT ALAMEDA / SANTE FE PEDESTRIANIBICYCL.ES YES / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF GREEN CURB ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.53 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBIL17Y GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS POOR SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE ADJAC NT LAND USE,_ INDUSTRIAL 1RFC-QMiWNDr 0 SP. ED LIMIT 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST USTIFIGATION: The section of 25th Street Is a two lane roadway. It Is solely Industrial with many big dg trucks traveling along roadway. With the 88th percentile speed of 33.0 mph and a 10 mph Pam range of 26 to 35 mph, it is recommended that a 30 mph speed limit be posted for this area. i RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCj CITY OF VERNON j 25TH STREET ALAMEDA ST TO SANTE FE AVE DATE: 31=009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA - TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK CUMMULATIVE SPEED 0 40 60 80 100 100.00/0 59 x 100.0% 58 x 100.00 57 X 100.O0b 100.00A 5 x 100.0% 54 x 100.0% 53 X 100.00A 1 52 x 100.00 J 51 x 100.0% 100.00% 49 X 100.00A 48 x 100.00/0 ` 47 x 100.00/0 100.00/0 45 x 100.0% 1 44 x 100.00A 43 x 100.09/0 19 42 X 100.00A 41 x 100:0°� 100.0"/0 39 x 100.0% 38 x 100.096 ` 37 x 99.3% 36 x 96.7% 35 x 94.3% }PACE 34 x 89.30A )PACE 33 x 85.0% }PACE - - -85PCT 32 x 80.0% }PACE 31 - x 69.30A )PACE 30 x 64.30A )PACE 29 x 52.1% )PACE 28 x 41.4% )PACE - --MEAN 27 x 34.30A }PACE 261 23.60A }PACE 25 - - -15PCT ` 24 x x 13.3% 0 23 x 12.9% ?2 x 8.6% 0 x 5.7% 19 x 3.6% 18 x 2.1% 17 x 1.4% 1 16 x 0.7% 15 x 0.7% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH LOWER UMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH - PERCENT OVER PACE; 5.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.8 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 80.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE- 14.3 % - 25MI ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY - HciCITY OF VERNON 26TH STREET SANTE FE AVENUE TO SOTO STREET DATE: 2t25/2009" SURV BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 2:45 PM 3:30 PM CHECKED BY. JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF HARRLETT DATE OF SURVEY W25/2009 851h PERCENTILE - 31.8 MPH 10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 78.6 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 6 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH,, MILES 1 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONL ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.60 i/ERTICAL CUR1/E NONE ` HORIZONTAL CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY ROAD CONDITIONS SIOEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS STREET LIGHTING OTHER SHORT GRADUAL CURVE AT $ANTE FE THEN NO CURVES GOOD FAIR YES/YES (MANY) YES SINGLE YELLOW / SOLIDE DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL /BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE JUSTIFICATION: \ 3 _3 RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY' OF VERNON - Jl 26TH STREET SANTE FE AVE TO SOTO ST DATE: 2/2612009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA i TIME: 2:45 PM' - 3:30 PM CHECK l BY: J . RRY STOCK M 60 100 100.0% `20 59X 100.(% 58 X 100.0°A 67 X 100.0 A ` 100.0% 100.0% 54 X 100.% 53 X 100.0%e 100:% - 100.0°A 49 .: _ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.00A 44 X t00.096 43 X 100.00% _ 42 X 100.0% 100.00A 99.3% ( 39 X 99.3% 96.4% 37 x 96 36 X 96.4°A -� 35 x 953% 34 x c 92.9 A 33 x 90.0°A 32 x 86.4% )PACE 31 :, 78.6% )PACE - - -85PCT 29 600 0% PACE, 28 x 47.9% }PACE - - -MEAN 27 x 41.4% )PACE 61 225 X x 25.7 }PA E 24 x 13.7% }PACE 23 x 12.1% }PACE - - -16PCT 22 x 7.9% X 4.3% 19' x 2.1% lax 1.4% 17 X 1.4% 16 x 0.1% 15 X 0.7% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 ' % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 78.6 °Io 13th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE 7.9 "/o 4 tu 10 cu y Mmt; IIIYIIIIpip���E��9YY�Q ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ �MN�OO�mf�10NdMN^OOi001�t0 if1�N�ul��ddVdQ�`taMMMM �n�uunnn ■ ■ ■ ■■■U■■■E■■ MENU■■■■■■ ■ ■ N�11iLl'OOioDI�tO��t N�-OQr�OntONV�MIN•-gOf h10ifStMN•' in my UI in OL'on 't �t ,► ,t -*j,* � M n M M M M M N N N p !l, ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HCI 26TH STREET SOTO STREET TO, DOWNEY ROAD ATE: 3/X2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA ` TIME: 10:00 AM 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF SIERRA PINE DATE OF SURVEY 3/3/2009 86th PERCENTILE 35.2 MPH 10 MPH PACE 27 - 36 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 69.8 % PO$TED SP D LIMIT 35 MPH ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.78 V T C VE T UP OWNHIL GRA ES - -5 ER ICAL UR SLIGH -D L D '1 HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT SENDS AT SIERRA PINE AND WEST OF DOWNEY (undedpass) ` LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (HEAVY) STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER DOWNFSY DOES NOT INTERSECT WITH 26TH ST unde ass ADJACRNt LAND USE INDUSTRIAL RRgOMMENDSD SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANG JUSTIFICATION: The recommended 35 mph is 0.2 mph below the 85th percentile speed: RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET ON CITY OF HCi 26 H STREET SOTO ST TO DOWNEY RD DATE: 3/3/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA ` TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK SPEED 20 UUMOCKTREPURCENT 40 60 80 igg 160 x 100.0% ,l 59 x 100.0% 58 x 100.0"% 57 x 100.0°� 100.0% - 100.0% 54 x 100.0%' 53 x 100.0°i6 l 52 x 100.0% 1 51 x 100.0% 50 x 100.0% 49 x 100.0% l 100.0% . J 100.0% 4 x 100.0% 44 x 100.0% ` 43 x 100.0°% 42 x 100.0% 41 100.0% 99.3% 39 x e 97.3 /o r 38 x 94.0% x 36 x 89.9% }PACE 35 34 x x 83.9% )PACE 76.5% )PACE - - -85PCT 33 x 69.1%}PACE 32 x 65.8% }PACE 31 x 56.4% )PACE Yd x 52.3% )PACE 29 39.6% }PACE - - -MEAN 28 x 33.6% }PACE 27 x 24.8% }PACE 26 x 20.1% 25 x 15.4% 24 x 12.1% ---15PCT 23 X 10.1% 22 X 5.4% t 21 X 2.7% 20 X 1.3% 19 x 0.0% 18 x 0.0% 17 x 0.0% 16 X -0.0% 1 x 0,0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH TOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.1 ` %° MEDIAN SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 69.8 % 15th PERCENTILES SPEED: 24.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.1 ADJACENT LAND USF- I INDUSTRIAL / RXR TRACKS RECOMMEND D IN46 LIMIT 35 MPH .: SPEED UM17 CHANGE. NO CHANGE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CI CITY OSTRVERNON - DOWNEY RD TO BONNIE BEACH DATE: 3/3/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK CUIMUMVEPERCM 100.0°% 59 x 100.0°A X 100.0 100.0°A 100.0% 53 100.0% ] 100. 0% j 1 1W.0% ` 100.096 49 x 100.0% 47 100.0%J 1W.0% J 100.0% . 100.0% _ 43 x 98.0°A 42 x 95.3% 1 X 94.0°A x x 85.2% X 82.6% )PACE - - -85PCT - .. 37 X 76.5% )PACE x 63.1% }PACK 56.4% )PACE 341 x 44.3% )PACE ---MEAN 33 32 x x 37.6% )PACE 32.20A )PACE 31 x 22.1% )PACE 30 18.1% )PACE, 29 x 12.8% )PACE- - 45PCT 28 x 8.1"% k 6.0% X 4.0% x 27°fo 1 24 X 2.0% 23 . x 22 1. 21 X 0.7% _ _ 0.7 °A 19 �t 0.0% 18 x 0.0% 17 x 16 X 0 0.0.0%. 1 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 74.5% 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.4 MPH Pt RCENT UNDER PACE: 8.1 % 2"t4M '■■■■■■■■■■■ ■mm■mm■■■mm m■■■m■mm■m■ ■oom■■■■■m■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■mm■■■■m■■ ■mm■■mo■mo■ Vil■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ommm■■mmm■ ■ ■mmmmo■■m■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ � :iii:i:°■iiiii:s■i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ q 0 i1 i 0 ■■■m■■s■ ■ommom■■ ■■mmos■m ■mo■mm■■ omm■■■m■ ■omm■mmm moss■■■■ ■■s■mmo■ ■■mm■■■m ■■■■■o■■ I�ri n cv -- o w ao u►uVau���naa'. ■ ■ ■ ONE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■\.�\■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ l j ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF 1 ci 26TH STREET VERNON �] BONNIE BEACH PL TO EAST Cl' ` DATESURVEY BY. C. BU N IA TIME: 11:45 AM 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK 'LIMITS (E of AYERS) pREVAILING'SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF BONNIE BEACH _ DATE OF SURVEY 3f3/2009 85111 PERCENTILE 39.8 MPH 10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 56.2 "fo POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH ' NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS TOTAL ACCIDENTS ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE ACC&ILLION VEH MILES TRAFFIC ACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 4,200 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS NONE CROSSWALKS NONE PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES NO / NO (WH) I FEW / NO (EB) TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO (WB) / PARTIAL (EB) OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB (ES) ` ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 1,98 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE f LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD 1 SIDEWALKSORIVEWAYS NO / NO - YES 7 YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER 2, WAY LEFT TURN LANE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET C CITY OF VERNON 26TH STREET BONNIE BEACH PL TO E.C.L. (E.of AYERS) DATE: 3/3/2009 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:46 PM CHECKED BY; JERRY STOCK` CUMMULATWE PERCENT 1SPEED 20 40 60 80 100 J60 x 100.0% 59 x 100.0°% 58 x 100.0% 57 x 100.0% 56 x 100.0% 55 x 100.0°% 54 x 100.0°% 53 x 100.0°A 52 x 100.0% 1 x 100.0% 100.0% 49 x 100.0•/0 j 48 _ 100.0°% J 47 x 1W.0°A 48 X 99.3°% 45X 99.3% _ 44 x 90.3°% 43 x 94.8°% 42 x 91.8°% 1 x 90.3% x 39 X 81.3% )PACE - - -85PCT 38 x 75.4% )PACE 37 x 68.7% }PACE 6 x 64.2% )PACE A 35x 59.0°% )PACE 34 X ' 56.0% )PACE 33 x 52.2% )PACE 32 x 47.8°% )PACE - --MEAN 31 x 41.0% )PACE 30 x 35.1°% )PACE - 29 x 26.1 % 28 x 20.1 °% 27 X 18.7°% - 26 X 12.7°% - - -15PCT 2 x 9.0°% 24 X 7.5°% 23 x 6.7°% , 221 2 0 x X 6.0°% ` 20 X. 6.0% 19 x 3.0% 18 x 0.7% 17 x 0.7°% lax 0.0% 15 x 0.0°% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.6 °% MEDIAN SPEED: 32.5 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 55.2 °% 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.1 0/6 0 0 C] li Mme■Mm■■ mn■mm■sn ■eM■■MOM ■onsMMMe ■MMM■Mm■ Monosson ■■M■M■N■ monmmm■■ ■mommo■■ ■nuOMMOM unnommom ■■mouse■ ■mosm■s■ Monsoons ■nsmmmns monsoons ■■nsmm■■ ■■MOM■■■ ■sM■■M■n ■SMM■M■s ■MOMMOMM M■MM■M■■ MONSOONS Mm■■nO■ monsoon MONSOON Monsoon Monsoon smommum MM■MM■■ MM■MMM■ ■■MMSM■ MM■eMM■ ■s■■MMe ■sM■■MMM■ M■■■■■MM■ MMe■sMMe■ M■s■mM■M■ M■M■M■M■■ M■MSM■MM■ M■MMM■M■■ ■■■■OMM■M ummossone ■■mmueum■ monsmanom ■M■NMOM■■ ■s■MM■MMM ■■one■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■Mon■■ ■■■Mee■■■■■■■■e■■■e■■■■so■■e ■■■■■■■■■■■■■Mee■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■ns�a■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■Omen ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Mee■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■s■■■■■■esm■■mom■■■■ern■■■■■ ■■■■mm■■■men■■■■■■e■m►�nee■er oa�aon�o �o n a�w--o Oft u� rnad�a�aaaa °� msmmmmm■mn mommoommus ■omm■Mnnms MnM■Monomm eMMMM■■OM■ M■MMMSMM■O ■■■MM■MM■■ ■■MMM■NM■s M■O■MSN■■■ MUMMMERMEN ■eM■MM■MM■ ■■e■MM■MN■ ■■MM■SMN ■■MOM■■■ ■■M■Ms■M ■■MMO■■■ ■■M■nNMe snMMnM■N moommon■ Monosson Monsoons MMMM■M■M M■MMMMM■ Monosson ■MM■MMM■ ■Mo■■MO■ MmMMMMe■ onm■mmem ■■MM■M■■ ■ommmom■ ■Ms■OM■M WMQMMM■M uoemmmmmum n `1 37TH STREET ALAMEDA STREET TO SANTE FE AVENUE DA V18 09 SURVEY : C. BUENDIA TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 4 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACCJMILLION VEH. MILES 1 0.41 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONO TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 4,300 LANE CONFIGURATION PLANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SANTE FE / STOP - ALAMEDA CROSSWALKS AT SANTE FE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY)' ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER AREAS OF RED AND GREEN CURB ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS RE OMMEND D SPEED LIMIT 1 30 MPH SPE . DLIMIT CHAN E : NO CHANGE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCI CITY OF VERNON 37TH STREET ALAMEDA ST TO SANTE FE AVE = DATE: 2/1812009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 2:00 PM - '2.46 PM CHECKED BY. J RRY STOCK 100.0% 59 x 100.0% 68 x 100.(rA 57 x 1000% 1 100.0% .1 100.0% 54 x 100.0% 53 x 100.0% 52 x 100.0•A 100.0% 50 100.0% 48 100.0'ti 48 100.0% 47 100.0%. ` 100.0% 100.0% 44 x 100.(%. 43 X 99.395 1 1 42 X 99.3% 98.6% 40 X 97.9DA 39 26 x 96.60A - ` 37 x 96.6% X 93.8% X 34 x 88.2% )PACE 33 x 80.7% }PACE - - 485PCT 32 x 73.8% }PACE 31l x 64.1 % }PACE x 57.9% }PACE )PACE - --MEAN - 28 x 39 3% 27 ' x - 29.7%)PACE 28 21 A% )PACE u25 x 15.2% tPACE 241 9.096 - - -15PCT 23 X 6.2% 221 2 xx 28% 18 1.4% lex 0.79E 17 X 0.796 18 x 0.0°k 16 x 0.0°� UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.8 %° MEDIAN SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 77.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE. 9.0 orn00 AnIt*v CI • nnn: MOMMEME ENGINEERING ANp I KAFFIC SURVEY � CITY OF VERNON Hci 37TH STREET SANTE FE AVENUE TO SOTO STREET y AT 502009 SURVEYBY: C. BU NDIA TIME: 2:W PM 2:45 PM CHECKED BY. JERRY STOCK ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEMRELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 7 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) A%/MILLION VEH. MILES 1 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) 17,310 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION SIGNAL - SOTO / SANTE FE / JEWEL AT SOTO / SANTE FE / JEWEL YES/YES YES (HEAVY) YES AREAS OF RED CURB RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCICITY OF 37TH STREET VERNON SANTE FE AVE TO SOTO ST DATE: 2/2512009 SURVEY BY: C. SUENDIA TIME, 2,00 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BT JERRY STOCK �I ;1 _1 _J 4� ..1 GUMUMMIVE PERCENT SPED 20 40 60 0 100 59 58 57 54 53 52 51 49 X 48 x 47 X 46 x 451 x 44 43 x x 42 x 41 x 40 x 39 x 38 x 37 36 x x 34 x 33 x 32 x 31 x 29 x 28 x 27 X 26 X 24 x 23 x 22 x 21x x 19x 18 x 17x 16 x 15x 100.00A 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1000A 100.0°A 100.0% 99.4% 99.4°A 98.9% 98.3% 96.6% 94.9°A 93.2% 92.0% 920°% 90.3% 85.2% 83.0% - 85PCT 76.7°�6 71.0%° 68.8% 64.8% }PACE 69.1 % }PACE 54.0% )PACE 48.9°A-}PACE - - -MEAN 46.0°A )PACE 35.8% )PACE 31.8% )PACE 26.0% }PACE 18.8% }PACE 16.50A }PACE 10.8°A -45PCT 8.5% 6.3% 4.5% 2.3% 1.1'e6 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% " 0.0°A UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: ; 35.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.2 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 54.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.8 SEEN SEEM MEMO OMEN OMEN OEM 111:11:1111,1112,01, ■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■ ■m■■■■m■■■■■■Ms EM■MMEMMEMEM■ME ..mm■mmsm■■mmum ■■.M■m■■s■■■m■■ .smm■■m■ms■mm■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■.■■■■■.■m■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ AIM■■■M.■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■e■u■E■.■■■■■■m■■■■. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■.■e■■m■■ ■■■■■■■■.■■■■■.■■See ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■SEE■■■■s■e■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■M■s■■.■m■See, ■■■e��em.■■gee■.s■■. SEES■.■ r►�e■■■■■s,�r� in 1* N�nhdddVt�+Fr`'�' .■■.■..... ■..■.■sus■ .■■■■■■■■. .....■■.■. ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■®■SEES.. ■E■EMEM.■ MEMEMEMEM ■M■NE■E■■ ■■■ME■■■■ ■■■m■■Mm■ ■EMEMEOEM M■ME■■ME■ ■■mm■mm■m ■.muss■■■ ■■mmmme■■ mm.s■mmmm ■mmummm■m s■mm■mm■■ m■ss■mmm■ Emmummmsm mEs■■e■m■ ■M■MMESEM MOMMEMEME ■m■■s■m■■ mmsesrm■■ m■ssm■ms■ e■■■mm■ss mommommon smsemm■mm smmmmsm.s PREVAILING SPEED DATA L•OCATION•OF SURVEY EAST OF 38-TH DATE OF SURVEY 2/26/2009 "h PERCENT#Le- 3$0MP14 10 MPH PACE 27 - 36 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 67.4 % POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH _ 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY j NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEEDAELATED.ACCIDENTS 0. TOTAL ACCIDENTS 3 ANNIiALACCIDENT RATE- 0_100 ACCl0&NTS- PM Y (8 f M'- AiTED--0W-Yl�, ACC.IMILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONL TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 61 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SOTO I SANTE FE CROSSWALKS AT SOTO / SANTE FE PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES YES I FEW TRUCK.TRAFFIC: Y.ES- (HEAVY). ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER AREAS Or--REDAND-GRE� %CURB AREAS OF NO $TOPPING ANYTIME ROADWAY FACTORS LEMGTH OF SEGMENT QMLI S) 0.44 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROADCONDITIONS FAIR SX)EWALKSIDRWIEWAY.S. YES.lYE-S-(MANY.): STREET LIGHTING YES - —r.., ,- 45lL2A1. I-- n.A.C*LJ VA 1- ! ceu ory r%m vri t emul eauTrsf .wrc� - RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET .3 CITY OF VERNON 55TH STREET AL,AMEDA ST TO SANTE FE AVE DATE: 21=009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA J TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK ioa 100.0% 59 X 100.0% 68 X 100.0% 57x 100.0% 100.09A 100.0% 54 x 100.0% 53x 100.0°i6 5 ' x 100.0% so R 100.0% 49 X 100.00/0 48 X 100.0% 47 X 100.0°A _ 100.0% 100.0°k 44 x 100.0% 43 1W.0°k 42 X 99.2% 41 x 96.1% 40, x 94.6% t 39 X 88.4°A 38 x 85.3% 37 X 79.8% _ - -85PCT x 76.7% iPACE _ 35 x 68.2% -1PACE 34 x 64.39A )PACE 33 59:7°!0 }PACE 32 x 65.8% }PACE 3 x 48.8% 1PACE - --MEAN x 40.3% )PACE 29 x 33.3% )PACE 20 x 22.5% )PACE 27 x 13.2% )PAGE - - -15PCT , i 2-5 x 5.4% 24' x 3.9°% 23 x 2.3'& 7 22 x 1.0% 1 x. 1.6% - 3 x 0.8% 19 X 0.0% 18 X 00% 17 X 0,0% 16 X 0.0'�6 1 X 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH _ LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 23.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT` IN PACE: 67.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH _ PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.3 'isN-ae D 4 n� W i 1 rn n .naMa�oc�aon Na m �n�i�n�n�nu�NNaaa aaa h ■■ ■■ ME ■■ I WI�I'I���Ivail�u�i��onaaa�*nvvva�raiMrr-in,,nr�� C r ■■■■■nee■■ems■.■■■■■■■■■■■, ■■■■eee■eee■■■■■e■■nee■■nee ■■■■eee■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nee ■■■■■■■■■■m■■■eeee■■nee■■■■ eeee■ee■ee■■eeee■e■.■eeeeee •■■■s■■eee■■ee■eee■ee■■eeMem ■■■■a■■■■emee■ese■■eee■■■■■ ■■■e■■■■emeeeeeeem..oe■e■■■ . ■■■■esms■■s■■eeee■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ •e■e■eee■■.■e■■eee■e■eeeee■■ ■ee■e■■■■■■eeeee■m■Mee■e►�■■ ■e■nee■■eeeMmeeMeeeeeeee►•oe pnlo tM naNItw) rnaonm W aao�N�N hN aaaaaavaaaMnM� ■ Emmons moss■■ Emmons mommom MEM.e■ mammon ■onom■ ■EMoo■ Emmons ■EMOME momm■■ Monsoon ■Mom■■■ monsoon Monsoon Ognmeo■ , TRAFFIC FacTaRs AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,400 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE -EACH DIRECTION / TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - 26TH / 38TH / VERNON 1 CROSSWALKS NONE PEDESTRtAWBICYCLES NO I NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME NO SHOULDERS i ApJAC NT LAND yS INpUSTRIAI. / BUSIN 5S / RxR TRACK$ Ilsis at west std RLCOMMND<� St'LC3 LIMIT 38 MPH SP4 D.t,IMtT Cf/WG NO C _ . C3 _ RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET Cl CITY OF VERNON L3 ALAMEDA STREET NORTH CITY LIMITS (25TH) TO VERNON AVE DATE: 3111J2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:45 PM CHECKED BY. JERRY STOCK " CUMMULATIVE PERCENT ^� SPEED 8 1 100.0°A 59 X 100.0°A 58x 100.0% 57 x 100.00/0 55 X 100.00 - 100.00A 54 x 100.0% 53 x 100.0° 52 100.0% ,) sil X 100.0°A 0 X 100.0°A 49 X 100.0A 48 x 190.0°� 47 X 100.0% 46x 100.0% 5x 100.0°� 44 X 100.0°A 1 43 X 99.3% J 42 x 98.00/6 41 x 96.6% 40 x- 95.3% " 1 39 x 93.9% l 38 x 90.5°� 37 x 97.8°% 36 x 83.1 % _ - -85PCT ' 35 x 79.1 34 X 74.3°/u _ 33 x 70.9% )PACE 32 x 62.2% )PACE 31 x 56.8% )PACE 30 x 51.4% )PACE 29 x 39.90/9 )PACE - --MEAN 28 x 35.1 % )PACE 27 x 29.1% )PACE 6 x 24.3% )PACE 18.9% )PACE _ 24 x 14.9% )PACE- - -1 SPCT 23 x 10.1 22 X 6.8"/b A2X 0 x 4.1% 19 x 2.7% 18 x 1.4% 17 x 1.4°io 16 X 0.7% 15 x 0.7% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 29.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 60.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 "/° N.m.d -M • ■.■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■!■■■■.■■NEE■.■■.■ilfl9f■■E■1 ..■.o...■■.■.■■..■■■■.■■■■■■■.■■■■■■..■M■1 +■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■®■■■■.■■■■11 ■■■■■ass■■■■■MIN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ilM■■■■■.■� ■■IN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■aa■■■■oiN■NINE■now.■■wN■, ,� ■■■.■■st■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oil■a■■■■a■a■■, on loin III oil■■■Moo■o■■M■■ao■a■■■■, ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Not■■■o■■o■■■■w■■■■■■■� MilaMUM a■■■■■■■■■n■■■■Mw■■■■nil■■®■.■mull +■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■M■■■■■■■■■.■anIII h ■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■oil■■■■■■■■M■■■� ■.■■■■■■oil■■■■■■■■■■■■■won ■■■a■a■■■■■■w■■o ■nil■■■■oao■■■■■■■■■■■■t■i/■■■iii■t■■■■■■w■■■f ,�■®a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■an■■■■■■MnMNaM■■■� INil■■■a■■■■■■■■Mil■■a■■■■■■■■MIN■■■M■■■.■o■■� ' ■■■■oil■■oil■■■ONES ■■■■■■■■■■■■MIN■■■■■■■■o■i r. ■Non ■■■■■■■■■■oil■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■at■■■■■, „ ■u■■■■■■■■■■■■■MN■■INN■■■■■a■a■■■■■t■■■■■■i ■lf11■■o■■■■■■■Nunn ■■■■ MEN ■ilo■■■M■■M■a■■■■ill '■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■IN■a■■■■■■■■■■ i ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oil■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■oti, a■■■M■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t:�■■■■■■t■■■i In MI ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■\■■►�■■�■■■■■■■i ■N■a■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■n■■■M■■IN■■�■■�■■■■■■■f 1 Ww11Mil�� rM�l�i 1 u t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■t■s■■■■■■■■■■■■INN■■■■■■■■■■■■s■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ot■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■a■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■■■■oil■■oil■■ot■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i� ■■■■000■■■oil■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■t■■■oo■�i ■■silo■■oil■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■. No RUN! i L�"■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■if ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■®li man ■■oil■■■■oil■■■■oil■■■■■■■■■■■■�i■■■ta■■■�■ 'r ■■■■■■oil■■■oo■■■■■■w■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■t■■■■■ ® ,q■ffiffiffiffill ■■■■■■■Maw■■aw■a■■a■■■M■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■oil■■s■t■■■■■■■■■oil ��r'■■■■oil■■■to■■e■o■■■o■■■■■w■■■■■■o■■■■■■oil■ HUM ■■■■t■■■ num o■■o11 ■N00000■wo►oaae►■.��■o�■ a ■ ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON MCI ALAMEDA STREET VERNON AVENUE TO SLAVSON AVENUE DATE: 311/2009 URVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 12:30 PM 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF 55TH ST DATE OF SURVEY 3/11/2009 85th PERCENTILE 36.6 MPH 10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 63.5 % . POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 2,500 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - VERNON / 55TH I SLAUSON CROSSWALKS NONE PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES NO / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME NO SHOULDERS ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 1.01 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS NO / NO (SB) - YES / YES (NB) STREET LIGHTING YES . OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / NARROW ROADWAY ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS / RXR TRACKS rallels on west side RE OMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH &PEED 41MIT CHANGE NO CHANGE RADAR SPED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCICITY OF VERNON ALAMEDA STREET VERNON AVIs TO SLAUSON AVE DATE: 3/11=09 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA r B.M.L. 12:30 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKER BY: JERRY STOCK CUMMULATIVE PERCENT, 40 8 1 100:0% 59 x 100:0% 10.0.0% 100.0°A 100.0% 54 x 100.0% 52 x 4o0.o°A 100.00A 100.0% 49 - 100.0°% 48x 100.aw4 47X 100.0°A 100.00A 100.0% 44 x 100.0% , 43 X 99�.4",u _ 1 1 x 9 .00% 40 x 95.8°A 39 x 94.0% (- 38 x 92.20A 37 _ x 87.40A _ x 82.0% - - -85PCT 135 79.6°A )PACE 34 x 70.1% )PACE` 33 , x 64.7% )PACE 32 58.7% )PACE 31' x 53.3% )PACE 45.5% )PACE - - -MEAN 34% 28 : x 34.1 . )PACE 27 x 28.7% )PACE ` X )PACE X 16.4% _. 24 x 11.4% ---15PCT 23 x 6.094 22 x 4.2% 21 X . 1.8 % ` 1 1.80A 18 x 0.0% ' 17 X 0.0°A 18 x: 0.054` 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 8M PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.4 % MEDIAN SPE00 30.6 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 63.5 % 1'3th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.8 MPH PERCENT UNDOR PACE: 16.2 • 4 4 e t I**P a a ej ■E■NO■ ■■■■E■ ■E■EE■ ■ESEE■ ■ENNEN ■O■■■■ ■E■ME■ Emmons NEON■■ N■NNON ■■.■■■ ■■■NO■ ■■ENE■ ■ENNE■ ■■.n.■ ■ENNE■ ■EON■■ ■ENNEN m■■mN■ ■E■■■■E■ ■E■■■■E■ ■■■■ENE■ ■■■eE■E■ ■E■E■■E■ ■ENE■ENE ■■ENE■■■ ■■NEE■E■ ■■■mono■ ■■.■NEE■ ■■E■■■■E■ ■E■E.■E■■ ■ENOMO■E■ somossmon ■EEENN..E noon.. N■■EE■ ■■■NE■ ■ENNE■ ■E■■E■ ■E..ON ■EE.En ■■■■■■ ■■NNE■ ■ENNE■ ■■NNE■ ■E■oE■ .■NEON MESSES ■■■■■■ E■■O■■ ■ENE■■ ■■■NE■ ■■EON■ ■■E■■■ on on r� NO ■E ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.62 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL. CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD a SIDEWALKSUDRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES QTHER SOLID 0% YELLOW CENTERLINE AWAC�NT' L,ANt?.LtS� INDUS'('RW4. RECOMM NQ _ D SPEED MR 36 MPH PRO L IMTi CrHANGF NO GHANEaE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CI CITY OF VERNON - ALCOA AVENUEi VERNON AVE TO FRUITLAND AVE DATE: 3/10/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME?: 1:30 PM - 230 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK EED20 60 80 101) 60i 100.0% 59 1W.0°� 58 100.0% -1 57 x 100.09b 100.00A 1 5 x 1W.0% 100.0% 53 x 100.0% 52 x 100.0% 51 x 100.0% - 100.0% 49 x 100.0°i6 48 x 100.0% 47 x 100.00A 100.0% 5 x 1W.0% x 100.0% l44 100.0% 1 42 x 1W.0% 41 x 1W.0% 100.0% 39 x 100.0% 38 x 100.00/9 37 x 100.0% 36x 100.0% 98.50A 34 x 97.70A _ 33 x 94.7% 32 x 90.8% }PACE 31 x 82.4% )PACE - - -86PCT 79.40% )PACE 29 x 69.5% }PACE 28 x 56.5% }PACE 27 x 51.90A }PACE q X 41.2% }PACE - - -MEAN l� 2 x 31.3% }PACE 24 X 25.2% 1PACE 23 X 17.6% 1PACE 22 x 13.0% - - 46PCT 21 x 8.4% 1 20 5.30 19 X 3.8A 18 x 1.6% 17 x 0.8% 0.80% ° 15 x 0.8 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE. 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 77.9 °Yo 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 130 Manadrl, a _9 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON I CI ALCOA AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE TO %AUSON AVENUE DATE: 3l10/2009 SURVEY BY C. BUENDIA TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:30 PMCHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF FRUITLAND DATE OF SURVEY 3/10/2009 85th PERCENTILE 33.9 MPH 10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH' PERCENT IN PACE 73.5 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 1 30 MPM ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 4 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED ,RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED -ONO), TRAFFIC FACTOR$ AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 4,000 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH, DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - FRUITLAND / SLAUSON CROSSWALKS AT VERNON / SLAUSON PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC— YES (HEAVY) ON —STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB AREAS OF GREEN CURB R ADWAY FACTORS' LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.51 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES IUSTIf�iCATION 3 _J RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY F Hci AL,COA AVENUE FRUITkAND AVE TO SL AUSON AVE DATE: 311=009 SURVEY BY: C. SUENDtA ` TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: JE RRY STOCK 100.0% _1 59 x 100:0%% I $� - 10W0. 100.0% 100.0% 54 , 100.0% 100.0°% ^, 100.0% 100.0% 100.0°% 49 X 100.0°% 1W.0°% 100.0% 100.0% 44 x 100.0% 42 10000.00% 100.0% 190.3% 37 x 97.3% 36,1 x 90.6% J x x 8585.7% )PACE ` x 81 A% )PACE - - -85PCT x 74.1% ?PACE 1 - x 66.7% )PACE - x 61.2% )PACE 20 x 40.3% }PACE - - -MEAN 8 12861 x 40.8% }PACE 27 . x 30.1% )PACE - 23.8°% )PACE 7-25 19.7% )PACE ` 24 x 19 2%% - - -15PCT x 22 x 5.4% 3.4°% ` 19 x 1.4% 1$ 0.7°% 17 0.0% 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 ' MPH 8M PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH - PEI RCENT OVEsR PACE: 14.3 96 ` MEDIAN SPEW 29.1 MPH PERC914T IN PACE: 73.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.2 AW406,+2 x 0� u��i�nuaiu�i, �o I 0 4 Z y�� l W U > _0 O 01 f� 10 ifI 3 w O � tb lfl ►�4 •V cu ry ..®®®..®..... ..........®.. ®...®........ ®®■■®®®®.®®®■ ■.®■®.®®®.■®■ ■®■.®..®®®®®■ ■■■.®....®e■. ■..®®.■®■■®.® e■.■e■®ss®®.■ ■■.®®..■.■®■■ ■..®.■s■®®.®■ ■®®.■.e®■■■■■ ■.■.■.®...®®■ ■®■.....■■®■■ ■w.®®.®.®..■® IA ..®......®...... ■®®®s■■■■■■®.■■■ ■®...e.■s■...®.■ .®®.....■.....®■ ■®®■e.■■a.®.®.®■ ■■®.....s■■■■..■ ■■®®.....■.■■.®■ ■.®®®®..e.®.■®.■ ■..®e■■.se..■■■■ W®.®®®.®.®....®■ ■.■®■.®■.■®....■ ■■■....■s...■..■ ■■®®.....■..®..® ■®®®®.■...®■■..■ ■ ■.®e.®.®.■■■® ■■...■..■■.■■ ■®®■.■...■.t■ ■.®..■.®®■®®■ ■■®®■.®®■.■■■ ■ RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCCITY OF VERNN ATLANTIC BOULEVARD 26TH ST TO DISTRICT OL DATE: 3/11/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK 1 D 20 100.0° - 1 59 X 100.0°A 58 X 100.0°A 57 x 100.0°/a 100.0°A J 100.0°A 54 x 100.0% 100.0"h 52 x 100.0°A J 1 51X 1W.00A 100.0°A 49 x 100.0% ai �o00o:aA 48 x 100.0% 45 9 100.0% I00.00A 42 1 x 97.9% 41 x 95.9°A 0 x 95.4%0 39 x 91.8% 1 38 X 87.1GA IPACE _ 37 79.9°A }PACE - - -85PCT 36 _ X _ 73.2% IPACE 1 X " 70.1% IPACE 34 58.8°A IPACE 33 x 50.0% IPACE - - -MEAN 32 x 44.3°A IPACE 31 X 36.8°A IPACE PACE 29 x 23.7% }PACE 28 x 17.5% 27 x 12.4% - - -15PCT 1! 2B x 7.7°A 2 X 8.2°A _ 24 X 3.1 % 23 x 3.1% , 22 x 1.5°A 1 x 1.5% 1 0 x 1.0% 19 x 0.5% 18 x 0.5% ' 17 x. 0.0% 16 x 0.0% isix 0.0°A , UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH' LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.9 i6 MEDIAN SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 69.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.5 C E rl ■■■■ mass Nunn ■man a■■■ ■■EN MEMO SOME MEMO N■Mn NONE HOME MEMO Noon ■■■a ■o■■ Moon MEMO MEMO MEMO MEMO SEEN Mown Moon SEEN MOM■ mown 11.1 [H It rTFr.FF m■■■■omm■mm■m■ ■■mommm■■Oo■■■ ■■■■■Em■mmm■o■ ■n■mn■Mmm■mm■m ■momai■■■■■m■m ■mm■mmmmmm■■m■ mmmmmmmmmmmm■m mmmmmmmmmmm■m■ m■mm■Smmmmmomm ■mmammmmmmmm■■ ■Ommmmmmmmmmmm ■mmmmmmm■momm■ ■mmmmmammmmm■■ ■m■mmmmmmmmmm■ ■mmmmmm■mmmm■■ ■■mmom■ ■MEMO■■ Monsoon ■oommom mammon■ �•-orn ncoui I� aaaaa� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■Ham■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ LL Mammas ■■MOO■ ■HEN■■ mammon Maim■■ ME■NEN S■■O■■ mammon mammon M■HNE■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ mama■®■■■■■■m■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■min■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■min■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ mama■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■rwm�■mM■■■■�■®mama■ ■� �� m �.v■ram■■■■■■■■■■ l ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ` CITY OF VERNON HeT BANDINI BOULEVARD SOTO STREET T TO DOWNEY ROAD DATE: 5/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA . } TIME: 11:30 AM 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SIERRA PINE DATE OF SURVEY 2/25/2009 85th PERCENTILE 45.0 MPH 10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 58.8 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS, 1 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 14 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACQIMILUON VEH. MILES 1 0.05 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 20,500 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SOTO / SIERRA PINE / DOWNEY CROSSWALKS AT SOTO / SIERRA PINE / DOWNEY PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.85 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE AT SOTO & DOWNEY ` LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES / YES 1 STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL / BUSINES RECOMMENDEOI SPEED LIMIT 45 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE JUSTIFICATION: The recommended 45 mph is at the 85th percentile,speed: RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEEN CITY OF VERNON J BANDINI BOULEVARD SOTO STREET TO DOWNEY ROAD DATE: 2/2512009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME.11:30 AM - 12:16 PM CHECKED SY: JERRY STOCK 100.0% l 59x 100.0% 58x 100.0% 57X 1 Mo 00/0 100.0% . 100:0% 54 X 100.0% 54 . 99.4% 98•4 %98.1% - 49 x ` 95.3% ll x x 90.6% .1 48 x 86.90A 45 x 85.0% }PAGE - - -85PCT 70.8% }PACE: 43 x 73.1% )PACE 144 42 x 70.60/6 )PACE x 61.3% )PACE 40 57.50A }PACE - 3$ x 44.4% )PACE - - -MEAN 38 x 37.5°A )PACE _ - 37 x 35.0% }PACE x 30.6% )PACE _ s x 26.3"% x i 33 0 1&84 32 x 15.60A 31 x 11.3% - - .15PCT i x &196 28 x 4: % 27 x 1.3% 1.3% 24 x 0.6%% 23 x 0.0% 2� x 00% 0.0% lox 0.0% 18 x 0.096 - ' 17 x 0.00/b 16 x 0,0% i Q.Oo10 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 48 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.0 MPH f PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.0 % ' MEDIAN SPEED: 394 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 58.8 % 18th PERCENTILE SPEED: 3t.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 26.3 %' D L2 V 'N' TJ as � Q N--0mmnr0 dMN�olo �OAAWIM �t��t�ttdYd�fMM MMI M MNNNN NN IIA '® t ■ ■ ■EMEME■ EMEMME■ MEMO■■■ MONSOON some■■■ ■m■mm■■ M■ME■MMEMMEMEM M■MMMMMMMMMMMO ■■MM■MMM■MM■M► ■ME■■EM■■MEMom ■ME■MEEM■03000 ■Mmm■mm■ommoo �Q0100001 * 00 C9C��9E�E1111111111�I ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Mee■■■ ■mp■■■■■m■oo■ ■■a■■M■■■■ME■ ■■OMON■■N■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1DJIAlO OaQOh101�I�MN�-Oa�M1td MMM' MMIVNNNNNNNNN.r.+ ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)1 1.17 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE AT DOWNEY LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAM CONDITIONS FAIR SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES QTHER 2 WA1f LEFT TURNAN LE RI7JAC NT LAW©USE IN -I / BU . INSSS RE. OMMNDED SPEED LIMIT' 45MPM $Pt?ED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY F VERNON C �-"E BA DIN I BOULEVARD DOWNEY RD TO BONNIE BEACH PL DATE: 2125/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA ° TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK 40 60 80 100, llCUMMULATIVE -SPEED 100.0% 1 59 x 100.0% 58 x 100.095 57 x 100.0% 156 x 100.0% J55 x 100.0% 54 x 99.5°� 53 x 99.5%. 52 x 99.596 J 51 x 90.9% 98.4% 49 x 96.3% 48 x 93.7% 47 x 89A% 46 x 86.2% _____45 x 82.0% )PACE - - -85PCT 44 , ; x 74.1°% }PACE 43 x 70.9% )PACE 42 x 65.6% }PACE 1 - X _56.1% }PACE 401 , x 51.9% }PACE 39 x 45.5% }PACE - - -MEAN 38 39.2% }PACE 37 X 32.3% }PACE 36 X 25.9% }PACE 35 X 22.2% 34 x 16.9% 33 x 15.9% ` 32 ` x 13.8% - - -15PCT 31 x 10.6% x 10.1°k 29 x 6.9% ` 28 x 5.8% 27 X 4.r% 26 X 2.1% 25 24 x x 2.1% 1.1 °i6 23 X 0.5% 22 X 0.0% 21 X 0.0°A 20 X 0.0°.6 19 x 0.0°% 1 0.0°/6 3 1 0.0% , 1 L - 1 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45:9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.7' MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 59.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 22.2 % ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HCl BANDINI BOULEVARD BONNIE BEACH, PLACE TO ATLANTIC BOULEVARD DATE: 2/25/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SUNOL-AYERS DATE OF SURVEY 2/25/2009 85th PERCENTILE 45.2 MPH 10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 52.2 POSTED SPEED, LIMIT 1 45 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 2 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 13 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.67 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR`(SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC.VILLION VEH. MILES 0.07 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONO TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 38,700 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - BONNIE BEACH / SUNOL-AYERS 1710 FWY / ATLANTIC CROSSWALKS AT BONNIE BEACH / SUNOL-AYERS/ 710 FWY / ATLANTIC PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB AREAS OF NO STOPPING ANYTIME ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT(MILES) 068 VERTICAL CURVE NONE - HORIZONTAL CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY ROAD CONDITIONS SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS STREET LIGHTING OTHER NONE GOOD FAIR YES I YES (MANY) YES 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE / RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL /BUSINESS REGOMMENDEQ SPEFC? LIMIT 45 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE`1, NO CHANGE RADA SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCICITY OF VERNON BANDINI BOULEVARD BONNIE BEACH Pl. TO ATLANTIC BL DATE: 2 2&2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA . TIME: 10:00 AM - 10.45 AM CHECgp BY: JEFERY STOCK 100 00 100.0% 59 _ 100.0% 58 100.0% 57 x 10010% 100.0% 100.00A 54 - 100.0% 53 x 100:00A 52 X 99.49A 98.7% ` 50 98.7% 49 x 97.5% 40 x 94.3% 47 x x 87.9% 45 x 84.1% - - -85PCT 44 x 80.VA x 76.4% 42 x 73.90A At rx. 73.20A x 69.4°A ?PACE _ ! 39 x 83.1 %e }PACE ! 38 ' x 58.0% }PACE -- 37 X 54.8% }PACE x 51.6% }PACE 35 45.2% }PACE - --MEAN 34 38.90A )PACE 33 x 33.89A }PACE 32 x 32.5°A )PACE 1 22.3% )PACE' x 17.2% x 14.0% - - -15PCT 28 x 271 5.7% x 3.8°A 1.3% s 24 X 1.3% 23 x 0.6% 0.0% 0.00A 19 x 0.09A 18 x 0.0% 17 x 0.0% 16 it 0.0OA 1 0.0°k UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PAGE. 40 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 45.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 30.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.8 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 52.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 17.2 °b liiiiiii'lill'bli ■ • 4 L2 vg SEE Emmons Monson ■E■■E■ ■ENNE■ ■E■NE■ ■ESN■■ Monson ■E■■■■ ■■■ME■ Emmons Emmons ■MMON■ ■MMO■■ ■E■■■■ Monson MEM■M■ MM ■nMM■■■EMEM■ EMMM■■M■MMM■ ■ME■MMM■MMM■ mon■omommoo■ MM■MMME■EMM■ m■mmMmm■mmN■ NMMMMMSMMMM■ ■M■MNMMM■■MM ■M■MM■MMM■MM ■MMM■MM■M■M■ ■MMMM■MMM■M■ ■■MM■■MMMMMM MOMMMMM■MM■M ■MM■M■■M■■■M ■MM■MMM■M■M■ MM■M■M■■M■EM ■ ■ ►■■■■ ►MMM■ 0WIEo■ L Nk 2 NPtpN N IV ■■■■■■■■■■ MEMEMEXIMEM ■M■■■EM■■M ■o■■mm■mm■ ■■MNMMNM■■ MMMMMMMMMA ■■■■■■mono ■■■■■■mom■ MMMMMMMMMSI ■M■MEMM■N■ MMMMMMMMMAI ■o■■■MEME■ MEMOMMEMMIS ■E■■M■MME■ MEMMEMEMEM SEE■■ ■Mon■ ■MIME■ ■EOM■ moons ■■mm■ ■MMm■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■ SOMEONE monsoon ■ME■■■■ ■M■MME■ ■n■mmm■ Monsoon Monsoon MONSOON ■mmmoo■ ■mmn■n■ monsoon SOMEONE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ciCITY OF VERNON B YLE AVENUE VERNON AVENUE TO LEONIS B2U6EVAR0 r W1012009 SURVEYC. BUENDIA TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK ROA0W Y FAC OS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.37 11 VERTICAL CURVE NONE 9 HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES I YES i STREET LIGHTING - YES OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINI! RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCICITY OF VERNO BOYLE AVENUEN VERNON AVE TO LEONIS BL DATE: 3/10=09 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA t TIME: 11:30 AM. - 1 :30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK CUMMULATIVE PERCENT }}SPEED 204060 80 100 J 100.0% 59 x 100.0% 58 x 100.0% r x 100.0% l57 56 100.0% J1 100.&A 54 100.0°A 53 100.0% 52 100.0° 5 100.0% 100.0°h 49x 100.0% i 48 x 100.06A 47 x 100.0° J 46 x 100.0% 100.0% 44 x 100.0°!° 0 42 x 100.0°A 41 x 100.0°A 100.0% 39 x 100.00/0 (" 38 X 99.3% 37 x 98.6% x 97.3°/u x 96.6% 33 x 92.50A )PACE 32 x 87.7% )PACE _ 31 x 85.6% )PACE 30 x 77.4% )PACE - - 85PCT 29 x 65.1 % }PACE 28 x 54.8% )PACE 27 x 45.9% )PACE - --MEAN 26 X 34.2% )PACE 25 x 28.6% }PACE LL 24 N 19.9°A }PACE 23 x 16.4% 22 x 13.7°A - - 45PCT X 11.0°% `al x 8.9% 19 x 6.0% 18 x 2.7% 17 x 1.4°/ 16 x 1.40A y 5 X 0.7°A UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 124 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE'.: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.5 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 76.0% 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.4 °% E- El El El ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MENEM SENSE SEEMS SEEMS ■mmon NEESE NOOSE ■ENE■ SENSE SEEMS moomNBm■O■momo■S MEN■■MENEEMSEE■■ Nm■SMomm■Mm■■m■■ ■o■Smonomm■mmomm moomoommm■amomom moMmammo■mo■mmno ■om■Rmmo■o■ommo■ o■m■mmmmmmmoo■■■ ■ommommo■■■M■m■■ ■mmanommommom■mm ommimmommommo■m■ ■ommm000mmom■■m■ ■o■Nommo■■ommo■■ ■■R■m■omm■momomm nommm■mmmm■momom ■o■mmommo■■■■M■o Emomm■m■o■■■■m■■ ■■mommom■oMMommB ■■Mmoo■■■m■■■■■■ moo■mmo■■m■E■■mm ■■mmmommoomm■mo■ sommosommommosso ONSOMMENESSEEMSE ■■mm■■■■mm■mmo■■ ■om■m■mmm■o■■oo■ ME■MEN■■NE■MENN■ ■000mm■■■■■■■mo■ ■Nommommo■■m■■■■ ■oN■ommommo■■om■ mmomm■mommommomm 10 �A ♦ M N �"` 0����T Nw� �11 MN. ® E ■ son MEN man mom NON � 40 ►,►. ►0ao NN, MEN ■MmmE■ Samoan ■Emma■ MEMBER MONO■ BEES■■ Emmons MEMBER NNM■■■ MEMNON Owosso BOSSES MENNEN mam■m■ MENNEN MEMBER MEMNON mm■mom ■NNRMR Mammon UNSEEN mo■MOm MEMBER MEMNON MENNEN MEMBER MESSES ■■NEE■ MENNEN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON U .Ll CT BOYLE AVENUE LEONIS BOULEVARD TO SLAUSON Al DATE: 311012 09 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA` TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY DATE OF SURVEY 85th PERCENTILE 10 MPH PACE PERCENT IN PACE ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 2 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 9 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.67 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC.IMILLION VEH. MILES 0.17 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 14,650 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - FRUITLAND`/ SLAUSON CROSSWALKS AT FRUITLAND / SLAUSON PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES FEW / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB RxR XING ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.75 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE; RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HeCrrY OF BOYLE AVENUEN L.EONIS BL TO SLAUSQN AVE ` ELATE 311=009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 10.30 AM - 11:30 PM CHECKEp BY: iE RY STOCK p 040 60 80 100 -1 J 100600% 59 x 100BOA 58 x 100.0% 57 x 100.0°le 100.0°�6 100.0% 54 x 100.0°% 100.096. 52 10MMA sit x 100.0•% _ 100.0% 49 x 100.0°% 48 x 100.0°fa 47 x 100.0°% 48 98.9% 98.40A 44 x 97.3°% 1 43 x 94.7% J 42 x 92.0% 4f . x 87.8% 40 x 85.66A }PACE r - 39 x 78.20A }PACE - - 485PCT x 75.50A )PACE -37 x 65.4°% )PACE 38— x 62.8°% }PACE 35, x 55.9% }PACE 34 x ' 44.7% }PACE - - -MEAN 33 x 36.2% )PACE 32 x 29.8% )PACE x 26.0% )PACE 21.8°% 29 x 17.6% 28 x 13.8°% - - -15PCT 27 ` X 12.2% 1x 1.0.1% 8.0°% 24 x 5.30A 234 x 3.2% 22 x 2.187 % 0.5°% 19 x 0.0"% 18 X 0.0% 17 x 0.0% 16 X 0.0% _ s 0.0°% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.4 % MEDIAN SPEND: 34.5 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 63.8 % 18th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 21.8 m�-�a 4 4 w mc cc y EEEMEMEMMME ■EMEMMEMMEM ■EM■EEMMMEM ■E■■EME■EMM ■M■MMMEMEM■ ■■MEM■EMEM■ ■EM■E■EMEM■ ■■MM■■MMMM■ ■MMMMMMMMM■ ■■■■MEMMEMM ■MMMM■MMMMM ■MM■■■M■SMM ■■■■■■E■MEM ■MEME■E■MM■ ■omEEM■Mm■■ OO�OI�tO d' Nr01 cONN�N� NN�N m E o1! + �-O ��DN N�-OC�a0nt0 `t N+- tpn Y�f����dYV M MMM N1 N NNNN �-.r ONE ME: MEN OEM NNN, MEMO NONE Room MEMO EMEm NONE M m iA d M N + �O O� aO f� -0 -*,) M N �- �grratl f� �o �tf vt ;+ � v r�1� Q�fYVVdYM MMMMMMMM NNNtVNNNNr.�..r.+.t+I ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HeF DISTRICT BOULEVARD DOWNEY ROAD TO CORONA AVENUE DATE: 2/1&2009 SURVEY Y: C. BUIENDIA TIME: 11:30 AM 12:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK ` 1 TRAFFIC FACTORS J AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 22,300 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DOWNEY / LOMA VISTA - CROSSWALKS AT DOWNEY ILOMA VISTA PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES y OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB ROADWAY F CTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.65 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT CURVE AT DOWNEY LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD ^ j SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YEAS ! YES f STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN I ANE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY OF VERNON HC DISTRICT BOULEVARD DOWNEY ROAD TO CORONA AVENUE DATE: 2/18/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:16 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK RCENT 60 100.0% 58 x 100.0% 58 x 100.0°% 57 x 1W.0% j 1W.0% 1 5 x 100.0% 54 x 100.096 53 x 100.0% 1 52 99.4% 1 51 98.2% 98.2% 49 x 96.4% jj 48 x 96A% 47 x J 46 x 94.00/a' 45 x 93.4% 44 x 90.4% 43 x 89.8% _.� 42 x 88.0% }PACE 41 x , 83.7% }PACE- - -85PCT 78.3% }PACE 39 x 72.3% )PACE 38 x 68.7% ]PACE 37 x 63.3% }PACE 36 x 55.40/9 ]PACE 35 x 48.8% ]PACE - --MEAN , 34 x 41.6% ]PACE _ 33 x 33.7% ]PACE 32 x 30.7% 311 x 27.1% 30 x 23.5% 29 x 16.9% 28 x 12.7% - - -15PCT 27 x 7.2% 6 x 3.0% 25 x 3.00/ 24 x 1.8% 23 x 1.20A i 22 x 0.6% z0 X 0.0%% 19 x 0.0A 18 x 0.00/e - 17 x 0.0% 16 x 0.0% 1 x 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.3 MPH " PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 3&2 MPH PERCENT IN PACES 57.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 30.7 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ") CITY OF VERNON HCJ DISTRICT BOULEVARD CORONA AVENUE TO ATLANTIC BOULEVARD DATE 2/1S72009 SURVEYBY: C. BUENDIA TIME; 10:45 AM - 1130 AM CHECKED BY; JERRY STOCK J J PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF 50TH ST DATE OF SURVEY 2/1=009 85th PERCENTILE 43.1 MPH 10 MPH PACE 34.43 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 64.4 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH E6 / NP 125 MPH(advisory at bend ACCIDENT HISTORY NO: OF MONTHS OBSERVED 38 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 4 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 17 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC.IMILLION VEH. MILES 1 0.17 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.71 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE BEND EAST OF CORONA a LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Slightly at bend) ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHERI RxR XING AT 50TH / 49TH! GIFFORD ? ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL i BUSINESS 0E0OMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE. NO CHANGE —POST EABTBOUNQ RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEEN" CICITY OF VERNON DISTRICT BOULEVARD CORONA AVENUE TO ATLANTIC BOULEVARD DATE: 2/18/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BU-sNDIA TIME: 10:45 AM - 11:30 AM- CHECKED Br.. RRY STOCK CUMMULATIVE 0.0 59 10°% 00.0°% 58x 100.0% 100.0% 100.0°% 54X 100.E°% 53 X 100.0°% 52 X 90.4°% 611 99.4% 50 98.9°% 49 ` x' 97.1% { 49 x 90.6% j 47 x x 91.4°% x 90.2% x 88.5% :144 43 x 84.5% }PACE, - -85PCT 42 78.2°% ?RACE x 74.1°% IPACE 39 x 63.2% ?PACE \ 38 x 55.7% }PACE - .. 37 x 47.1% 1PACE - - -MEAN 39.7% }PACE 35 x _ 32.8% TPACE 34 x 25.3% }PACE 33 x 20.1°% 32 x 16.1% 1 x 11.5% - - -15PCT 30 x 9.8% 29 x 7.5°. 28 x 5.7% 27 x 4.0% 6 .x 1.9%% ` 24 x. 23 x 0.0% 22 x 0.0% 21 x 0.0% 0.0% 19 x 0.0% 18 x- 0.0°% 17 x 0.0% lax 0.0% = 1 x 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: - 43 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE. 34 MPH 86M PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.1 MPH - PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.3 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 64.4 °% 13th PERCENTILE? SPEED: 31.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER FACE: 20.1 %a DMd*2o iC a owoo t0 �N N ti 3 b MESON SENSE ■NNE■ ■■■E■ M■OR■ SEMEN ■ENE■ ■MENN ■NNE■ ERROR tol ■ENE■ ■ESE■ MENEM ■ENE■ MENE■ ENWE SOME NNNN NEWS MEMO RENE ■MEM ■■NE SEEN ■Os■ *01 SEEN NONE ■NEM■■EMENEME■ ■NNS■NN■ssNNN■ ■EEMEE■NME■ME■ NN■s■sNNENNNN■ ■■NW■ENWWENSN■ ■ENM■EMMEMMEOO ON■NNRNNNOssNE ■NEMWMMEMMENM■ ■NNNONEs■NNNE■ EsssssENssEss■ ■M■■NWMM■■M■M■ MEWNWMM■■EM■M■ s■OME■EME■■■E■ ►N►EWNNM■s■■■■ a■a■EEM■■EM■■■ `E&WOMMEM■■ME■ E N N ■ M■■NEE■ ■E■ENE■ ■■EM■N■ ■►►■■■■ ■.osM■■ NNNNNNIV I1 - ■ E ME ME ME ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY HCICITY OF VERNON DISTRICT BOULEVARD ATLANTIC BOULEVARD TO EAST CITY LIMITS = DATE:18/Z SURVEYIA TIME: 10:0O AM 10. AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 51600 LANE CONFIGURATION . 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ATLANTIC CROSSWALKS AT ATLANTIC PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES FEW I NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER PEDESTRIAN WALK WAY ON W HIGH PLATFORM BRICK WALL ROAFWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.79 VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP -DOWN GRADES OVER RxR XINGS ` HORIZONTAL CURVE BEND EAST OF ATLANTIC LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMM SIGHT DISTANCE (slightly at bend) ROAD CONDITIONS POOR SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS NO / YES (SB) - NO ! NO (NB) 7 STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER NO SHOULDER EAST SIDE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET O ciCITY F VERNON sl DISTRICT BOULEVARD ATLANTIC BOULEVARD TO EAST CITY LIMITS DATE: 2/18/2009 SURVEY BY: ' C. BUENDIA G TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK - CUMMULATWWRCE14T PEED 20 40 60 80 t Jou .1 R 100.0°A 59 x 100.(r% 58 x 100.0°% 57 X 100.0°% 56 10000.00°%°% 54 x 100.0"/0 100.0"/0 l 52 x 100.0°% 1 51x 100.00/0 100.0°% 49 x 100.0% 48 x 100.0°% 47 x 100.0°% -� 46 x 100.0°% 100.0"% 44 x 100.0% . 43 x 100.0% 42 x 99.2% .41 X 97.0% 40 x 94.7°% 39 x 92.4°% 38 x 0 90.2 % 37 x 86.4% 38 X 80.3% }PACE - - -85PCT 5 x 75.8% }PACE i 34 x 82.9°% )PACE 33 x 50.8°% )PACE 32 X 45.5°% }PACE - - -MEAN 1 x 36.4°% }PACE 30 x 32.6°% }PACE ` 29 x 25.0% }PACE 28 x 23.5°% }PACT: 27 19.7% }PACE 26 x 12.1°%---15PCT 25 x 10.6% 24 x 6.1°% 23 x 3.896 22 x 3.8"% 20 x 0 8°% 19 x 0.0% 18 x 0.0% 17 X 0.0°% 16 x 0.0°% 5 X 0.0°% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 19.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 68.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26A MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.1 °% o[sma-b ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 1 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 5 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.05 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONL TRAFFIC. FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 31,650 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION , TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - WASHINGTON ! VERNON / BANDINI CROSSWALKS AT WASHINGTON / VERNON / BANDINI PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME NO SHOULDERS./ BUS STOPS ADJACCNT LAND UINDUSTRIAL SE REC MMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH $PEED I;* CHANGE NO CHANGE JUSTIFICATION: The recommended 35 mph is 4.4 mph below the 85th percentile speed. RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET liciCITY OF VERNON DOWNEY ROAD WASHINGTON BOULEVARD TO VERNON AVE? -� DATE: 2/26/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENOW TIME: 9.45i AM' - 10:30 AM CHE KED BY: J RY STOCK 1 10Q 0% 5gx 10Eko% 58 x 100.096 `I 57 x 10(xQ% j66 x 100.0% 100.096 54 x 100.090 53 x 100:0% $2 x 1W.0% 1 x 100.0% 100.0% 49 X 994% �198_ 98.7% 98.7% 44 x 97.60A 43 x 96.8% ` 42 x 96.20/6 1 x 92A% x 89.8% IPACE 39 x 82.2% }PACE - - -85PCT 38 79.0% }PACE 37 x 72.60/a )PACE 36 x 69.4% SPACE x 66.2% WACE 34 x 50.1% }PACE ` 33 x 47.1 % }PACE - - -MEAN 32 x 40.8% )PACE x 34.4% }PACE 30 x 29.3%' 29 x 25.5°A 28 18.5% 27 26 ` x X 14.6% 9.6% - - -15PCT 25 X 8.3°To 24 x 5.1 23 x 3.2'/0 x 1.90/0 0.6% 0.0% 19 X 6.0% 18 x 0.0% 17 k 0.0% - 16 x 0.0% 15 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE 31 MPH ; 85M PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.4 MPH , PERCENT OVER RACE: 21.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 60.5 % 18th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.1, MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 29.3 r22 • ♦u lic cc y ■■ No ■■NEM ■Es■■ MENE■ ■■ES■ ■■E■■ ■o is ME ME ME ■■ q-n MENEEME■E ■o■msS■E■ MEMEMEMEM ■■ssommim EMEMEMMEM Em■SomME■ ■OmmosE■■ ■E■m■somm ■mossmmMM MEMMEMMEM J a■E.N MOOR■ MENEE MEMOS ■ONNE ■mom■ ■OM■■ EM■MM ■NRO■ ■■MM■ NOSES ■■MM■ ■E■■■ ■■■E■ NEE■■ ■NEE■ ■■ES■ ■■NEE ■■■S■ ■mm■■ MEN :IIM ■s ■EM■E■E■ ommMMMR■ ■EMENEMM ■■■M■■ON ■M■MM■E■ ■OEMs■■■ MEMENMEM MENE■ MENE■ ■ENE■ MENE■ ammo■ MESON ■ENE■ ■ENE■ MEN■■ smam■ DQWNEY ROAD VERNON AVENUE TO t=RuitLAND AVEI 6/20 SURVEYIA TIME: %30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STUCK PRE?VAiLING SPME DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF EXCHANGE , ` DATE OF SURVEY 2/26/2009 85th PERCENTILE 37.2 MPH 10 MPH PACE 28.37 MPH PERCENT IN PACE M °!o PO ; 0 geftum.T 35 MPH SB / NP NB ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OFF MONTHS: OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 2 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH: MIRES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 1 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - VERNON / DISTRICT / LEONIS CROSSWALKS AT VERNON / DISTRICT / LEONIS PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW TRUCKTRAFFIC YES(HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME NO SHOULDERS / BUS STOPS ADJACENT LAND USEI INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS A COMMI5NQ070 $1 ED LIMl7 35 MPH SPEE . QMIf CHA R I NO C [ JUSTIFICATION: This section of Downey Road has two lanes of travel In each north -South direction. Field observations Include heavy truck ttaft In area, no shoulders and no stopping anytime along roadway, and bus stops on both skies of street With an 85th pametnile speed of 37.2 mph, it is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit remain. For enforcement, a similar speed sign should be posted northbound. F1kr: Dvaw ,23 RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY OF He N DOWNEY ROAD VERNON AVENUE TO FRUITLAND AVENUE DATE: 2/26/2009 SURVEY BY C. BUENDtA TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK 0 CUMMULATIVE PERCENT 4060 100.0°A 59 x 100.0°A 58 X 1W.0°A 57 x 100.0°A 1 J 56 x 100.0% 100.0% 54 x 100.0% 52 x 100.0% J 1 51 _ 100.0% 100.0% 49 .0% � 1W 100.0°� 47 x 100.0°A 46 100:0°A 100.0°A l44 X 99.3°A J43 x 98.7% 42 x 98.0°A 41 X 97.4% 39 x 92.86A 38 x 88.2% 37 x 84.2% }PACE- -85PCT 36 x 74.3% )PACE 35 x 70.4% )PACE 34 x 57.2% )PACE _ ` 33 x 50.7% }PACE 32 x 43A% )PACE - - -MEAN 31 38.2% )PACE _ 30 X 30.3°A )PACE 29 x 17.8% }PACE 28 x 13.2°A )PACE - - -15PCT 27 x 5.9% 3.9°A 2.0°A 24 x 0.7°�6 23 X 0.7% 22 x 0.7% 21 x 0.0% 2 X 0.0"A 1 9 x 0.0% 19 x 0.0% 16 x °A 0.0 0.0% 1 X 0:0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.9 D-Nwpn r ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HCI FRUITLAND AVENUE SANTE FE AVENUE TO SOTO STREET D 2/26/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 3:15 PM 3A5 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF PACIFIC DATE OF SURVEY 2/26/2009 85th PERCENTILE 36.1 MPH 10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 5 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 11,000 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SANTE FE7 PACIFIC I SOTO CROSSWALKS AT SANTE FE / PACIFIC / SOTO PEDESTRIANISICYCLES YES / FEW TRACK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING PARTIAL OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB ADJACENT LAND USE INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS R COMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH SP8 .0 LIMIT CHANGE ` NO CHANGE JUSTIFICATION The recommended 35 mph 1s 1.1 mph below the 85th`percentile speed. .j RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET` HIC. CITY OF VERNON FRUITLAND AVENUE SANTE FE AVENUE TO SOTO STREET DATE. 2J26 009 SURVEY ft C. SUENDIA - TIME: 3;15 PM - 3.45 PM CHKE ECQ BY: JERRY STOCK -C 20 :40 so so 1 00 100.0% ` 59 100.Q% 56x 100.0% r� 5Z 100.0% 100.0% 54 x 100.0% 83 x 100.09 1 52 x 100.091: 1 X 100.0°% so x 10010% 49 x 100:0% 100.0•A 46 x 100.0% _10010% 44 x 09.3°4 43 x 99.3% 42 x 98.6°k 41 x 97.Wo 96.68A - 39 x 93.0%e f\ 38 x. 92.30A }PACE 336 7 x x 84.60A }PACE - - =WPCT 78.36A 1PACE 34 x 60.4% )PACE 33 58.7% }PACE 32 x 49.08A }PACE - - -MEAN 31. 38.50A }PACE ` x 32.9% }PACE ` 29 x 20.3% }PACE 28 x 14.0°A -- -16PCT 27 X 11:9% _ x : 7.09A 25 x .1 24x 14% 23 x 0.7% 22 x 1 7°� 0.0.70A 19 x. 0.0% 18 x 0.0°A 17 x 0.04/e 16 x 0.0% - 1 x 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.1 MPH' PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.7 % AN MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 15th SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.0 96 �e�eeaaea�oeaeeao�����e� All,� Him!!����� .................. ..................... . :::::::::::::::::::::: ■M■■■■■■■■No IN MEMO on MEMOS ■■■■■■■■■■E■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EEWOMEN 0 ■■O■O■■ 4 1o1•11•o1slo■E■■■■aE■e■E■■■ 0 k1m MEMO ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�� ■loon.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■loss ii:eeiiiiiiieisii:iiii - � : �eeeeaeeeeae�e���eee�ee��a ® �•.■.....■.■.....■err:®:::®: ■.....■.■■.■■■.nee■■■■■■■.■ _ ...■■.■.■■.■■■lot■■■■■■■■■■■ OM INNNa ■e■■■■■■n■■■■■■■ ■E■e■■■e■■s■■■■■ ■■sROE■an■■■Emus Emmons Ism ■■■■lo■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■ROE■■■MIN ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ so MEMOSON MMMMM ■■■■o■■■■■■■■mon o■ 0 mum ME 11jususumM■M■MM■■sum■onsloe■s■■ .e■MEMElo.eeE■■ ■�■■■.Mon ■■■■E■■ No a,ee.e■■Ee■■■■eeme■■■ ■E.em■E■■i �8�6��8888B68AA8{ M ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ` CITY OF VERNON H i FRUITLAND AVENUE SOTO STREET TO DOWNEY ROAD 09 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 3:00 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK P EVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BOYLE DATE OF SURVEY 3/3/2009 85th PERCENTILE 35.1 MPH 10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPFi PERCENT IN PACE 66.9 °i6 PO_W,60 SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 8 850 LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SOTO / BOYLE / AL.COA / DOWNEY CROSSWALKS AT SOTO / BOYLE / ALCOA / DOWNEY PE?DESTRIANIBICYCLES YES / FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURET AND GREEN CURB AREAS OF NO STOPPING ANYTIME: ROADWAY FACTORS` LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.83 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL, VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDE:WAL,KSIDRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTH R_ 01 S R) DBL YELLOW CENTE?RL 114R RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CICITY F VERNON 1i U TOLAND AVENUE SOTO STREET TO DOWNEY ROAD DATE: 3/3/2009 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA TIME: 3:00 PM - 3:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK j SPEED CUMMULATIVE 20 40 8 100 1000.0 0.00/0 OA 58 x 100.0% - 57 x 100.0°ib se 100.0% 55 100.0°% { 100.0'i6 53 1000°% 52 100.0% 519 100.00A 501 1.00.0% 49 100.(°i6 48 1100.0% 100.0°A 47 100.0% 46 100.0% 100.0°% 98.8% 42 x 98.8°% x 97.1°% 40 x 95.96A 39 x 93.6°% 1 38 x 91.3°A 37 x 90.7% 36 x 86.00A 35 x 84.9% - - -85PCT 34 x 80.2% )PACE 33 x 72.7% )PACE 32 x 69.2% )PACE 31 60.6% }PACE 30 x 51.2% )PACE 29 x 41.9% }PACE - - -MEAN 28 39.5% )PACE 27 x 32.0°A )PACE "'26 x 27.3% )PACE 25 x 20.3% )PACE 24 x 13.4°% - - -15PCT 23 x 9.9% 22 x 6.4% 21 x 3.50A 20 x 2.3% 19 x 0.6% 18 x 0.0°.6 17 x 0.0% 16 x 0.0°.6 g x 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35A MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: ' 19.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.9 ` MPH PERCENT IN PACE: - 66.9 "% 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.4 °!o f,�n.no.2s 0 r 0 0 1111111111111 !!!!mmm ■■■■rm■mm■■m■ m■■m■■■/omm■■ ■■m■mm■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■mm■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 11111HICH ■■■■■■■■■■■■ Mammon Evans ■■mm■mmm■■m■ ■omo■■■ommoo ■■■■■■■■r■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■o■■■■■■■■■■ mama■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■m■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■om■■■■■■e■e ■■■■■■■■■■■■ mom■■m■■■■■■ ■■■■■■s■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■o ■■■■■■■■■■■■ mmmo■o■■■moo ■■■■■■■■■o■■ HHHHUR ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■i■■ ■oo■■om►■►�■■ ■■■arm■�►�m�•►�� * �Oa�V EMI 11:r11!llll Io 1keoh�+r •�ornmnw�, NNN P� ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HCI FRUITLAND AVENUE DOWNEY ROAD TO CORONA AVENt DATE: 3/912009 SURVEY BY: C. BUEN IA TIME: 11:45 AM - 1245 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF EVERETTE DATE OF SURVEY 3/9/2009 88th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH 10 MPH PACE C 23 - 32 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 78.3 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 3 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC.IMIWON VEH. MILES 1 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 6,000 LANE CONFIGURATION I LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DOWNEY / STOP - LOMA VISTA / CORONA CROSSWALKS AT DOWNEY PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES FEW / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER MANY AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF GREEN CURB AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.05 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE CURVE NEAR CORONA LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES /YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE, INDUSTRIAL, / BUSINE S RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT I 25 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANCE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET` _ HCICITY OF VERNON FRUITLAND AVENUE DOWNEY ROAD TO CORONA AVENUE J DATE: 3MI2009 SURVEY BY: C: SUENDIA TIME: 11:45 AM - 12:45 PM CH !% ; BY. .TERRY STOCK `40 iw 100.0% 59 x 100.0% 58 x 100.0% 57 x 1W.0•% jgol x 100.0% 55 x 100.0% 54 x 100.0%' 53 x im0% 52 x 100.0°% 100.0% 100.0% 49 x 100.0% 100.0 100.0'% 100.0% 4./ 100.0' 100.0% 100.0°� 100.0% 100.0•/0 38 x 100.0% - 37 x 100.0°% 99.4% 98.8% 34 x 98.2°% 2 _33 x 95.29A }PACE 1 x 89.8°% }PACE 30 x 85,5°�O }PACE 29 79.6% }PACE - - -85PCT 28 x 08.7% }PACE 27 x 61.4°% }PACE - a261 X 4%4'% }PACE - - -MEAN _ 24 x 34.3% }PACE 23 ' x 27.1% }PACT~ 22 x 16.9% 21 X. 12.7°A--45PCT 7.2% s2W 19 x 4.2% 18 x. 2.4% 17 x 0.0%' 16 x 0.0% 1 x 0.0'fe UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32: MPH MOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 ` % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.1 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 78.3 % 16th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.9 % • M � QIOOh�GiA�MN�+OQ1�f��0 . �ia•r�avdv��vMMMM ornmnicin � tD if1 iq rt1 iA iA � u�. .....■■..MENEM Nunn MEMO ........■■..e■ ■■■■■.■■.e.M■■.■■e■■■■■ ■...■■..■...■■.■■■■■■.. Uffliffill: .■■■■■■■■■e■■■■e■■■■.■.■ ■■.■■e■■.■e■■ ■.■■■■■■..■e.■■■■■.M■■■ m.■.■■.■■■■■■eE.■■■.■■■.■■.■■■■■■■■■■■s■■■■ ■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■.►■�■.■ .■■■■■■■■■■.■■es.�■,■.■ OEM ■■■■■■■■.■■■■■1►■�■�■ ■■■.■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■a.► ■■■■■■s■.......■.■,.■.■ ■■■■■■.■..\\.1\\\\1\\ \6 ttMN�O amn umn V MN� O mOp Ptp to di dd�dddMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNNi ■■■■■■■.■■■■■■.■■■■■■ mom ■■■■■■ HINIUMMUMMEMOMM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MOM■■■►■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■aa■■■.• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■s■►a..,► ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■■■\■►�■■► ■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■.�■■®cv.\■■■say IMA �l�llddiddQ�rM1"'I"n �1MMNNNN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HI FRUITLAND AVENUE CORONA AVENUE Tq DISTRICT BOULEVARD AT 3 W9 : Q BUENDIA, TIME: 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK `j _j PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF GIFFORI? HATE OF SURVEY 319J2009 85th PERCENTILE 34.7 MPH 10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH PERCENT 1N PACE 67.3 96 POSTED SF'LED WIT 30 MPH TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 3,200 LANE: CONFIGURATION 1 LANE EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - DISTRICT I CUDAHAY / GIFFORD I CORONA CROSSWALKS NONE PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES NO i NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES ON -STREET PARKING NO (EB) / YES (WB) OTHER NO PARKING 6pm-6am ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.57 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS NO / NO (EB) - NO I YES (WO) STREET LIGHTING NARROW ROADWAY I NO SHOULDERS (EB) OTHERI SINGLE DASHED C�NTE:RLINE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET r ' CITY OF VERNON lZ l�l FRUITLAND AVENUE CORONA AVENUE TO DISTRICT BOULEVARD r DATE: 3/9/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA J TIME: 3:09 PM - 4:00 PM CHECKED BY: - JERRY STOCK SP E 20 40 60 1 100.0% 59 x 100.0°% 58 x 100.0% 57 x 100.0°% 56 100.0% J 5 - 100.0% _ J 54 x 100.0% _53 x 100.0% 52 x 100.096 J 51 100.0% J 1 W.0% 49 x 1W.0"/0 48 x 100.0% 47 x 100.0% 46 1W.0% - 100.0% 44 x 100.0% 43 x 100.070 42 x 100.0% 411 x 98.6% 40 x 98.0% .39 X 97.3°i6 38 x 95.r/a 37 X 93.2% 36 x 87.8°�6 35 x 85.7% 34 x 83.r/o }PACEE- - -85PCT 33 x 81.0°% }PACE 32 x 75.5% )PACE 31 x 70.7% }PACE 30 x 63.3% }PACE 29 x 53.1% 1AACE I 28 x 48.30r6 }PACE - - -MEAN 27 x 40.1 % 1PACE x 32.rA }PACE - 2 x ACt 1 24 x 16.3 /o 23 x 15.0% - - -15PCT 22 x 9.5°% 21 X 7.6% 20 x 4.1 °% j 19 x 1.4%18 X 1.4% 17 X 1.4% 16 x 0.7°% 15 x 0.r%o UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 16.3 % MEDIAN SPEED:, 28.4 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 67.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 16.3 �1 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY r lZ �1 CITY OF VERNON LEONIS BOULEVARD PACIFIC BOULEVARD TO BOYLE AVENUE ATE; 211812009 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDLA TIME: 12:15 PM 1:00 PM CHECKED BY JERRY STOCK J .1 PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SOTO DATE OF SURVEY 2/18/2009 85th PERCENTILE 42.1 MPH 10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 59.6 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO.OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED.. -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 2 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACCJMILLION VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 12,700 LANE CONFIGURATION ; 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - PACIFIC / SOTO CROSSWALKS AT PACIFIC / SOTO PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER NO U-TURNS AT INTERSECTIONS AREAS OF RED & GREEN CURB / AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.69 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE j' l RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET ` Cl CITY OF VERNON LEONIS BOULEVARD PACIFIC BOULEVARD TO BOYLE AVENUE DATE: 2/1802009 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA TIME: 12:16 PM - 1:00 PM C_-HRMD W. JI I RY STOCK SPEED0 so 100 100:004 100.0% ` 1Q0.0°A 57 x 100.0% 100.056 1W.0% 54 x 1W.0% x 100.0°% ll63 100.0% J 100.0% 1 W.0% 1W.096 _ 100.0°i{'i 46 x 943% 451 x 94.736 _ 44 x 92.7% x 42 x . 84.8% - - -85PCT 1 79.5% )PACE 401 x 71.5% }PACE 39 x 65.5% )PACE 38 x 62.3% )PACE 37 x 57.60/6 }PACE 36 x 48.3% }PACE - - -MEAN 351 x 3'► x 41.1% }PA E 33 x 32.50A }PACE 32 x 25.8% )PACE 19.9% 29 x x 17.3% 3.29A" -15PCT 28 x 6.0% 27 x 5.39/o 3.3% 2.6% 2 4 x 2.a% 22 0. D 0.0% 3 19 x 0.0% 0.0°A X 0.0% 18 0.0% 16 X 0.0% -15 X 00% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32' - MPH 851h PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.6 % MEDIAN, SPEED: 36.2MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 69.6 % ' 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE- 19.9 °Ib 1:77 • 0 BBBBBB�BB008��8BB��08BBBBB�B8�6�B88B�BB�B����B I Y r AW Ilrli�� vr� t® ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■■■w■■■■■■w■■■■ HINUMMOM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ INIIIIIIIIm 11111111111111mun■e■ *2 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ees■■■a■■■■■■■■■■■■s■■■■■■■a■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e ■■■■■■■■■■e■e■■t■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■■ ■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■s■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ :iiiiisi��iiiii�r■iiiiii®iOEM iieii®iisiiiiiiiii ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■,■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■ \■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■sa►e■o■,•■.r►..■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..■.■.►■©.►■.•e■■■■■■im ■■■■■■■■ ■ \\\i\■ssks ► \ssIss ■�.\■■■■■■■■ I� V1U1Qf�A�iA���dd�dddddd �.-.�D dMM'1MMM�I�NNN NNNNNOIQUh�OU!'. AbJACNT LAND U31$ IN / BUSINE$3 j R COMMGW WD LIMIT 1, 46 MRH -. SR FD: LIMA` CHANE3 INCREASE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY OF VERNON sj vI LEON S BOULEVARD DATE: 2/18/2009 BOYLE AVENUE TO DOWNEY ROAD SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 100 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK SEED CUMMULATIVE 20 PERCENT 40 60 80 100 60 x 100.0% .� 59 x 100.0°� 58 x 100.0% 57 x 100.0°� Sol x 100.0°k 160.00A 54 x 100.0% 53 100.0% 52 X 100.0°�O 1x 100.0% 100.0% 49 x 100.09/0 48 100.0°r6 j 47X 98.5% J461 x 97.0% 451 x 97.0%0 44 x 95.5% 43 x 93.30A J 1 42 x 90.3% 41 x 85.1% 40 79.9% - - -85PCT 39 x 77.6% 38 x 74.60A}PACE 37 x 68.7% }PACE 38 x 57.5% }PACE x 52.2% }PACE 34 x 45.50A 1PACE - - -MEAN 33 x 40.3% }PACE ` 32 x 34.3% }PACE 31 x 28A% }PACE x 26.1% ?PACE 29 x 19.4% }PACE 28 x 12.7% - - -15PCT 27 X. 11.90/0 26 x 7.5% 25 x 3.7% 24 x 3.0% 23 x 1.5% 22 x 0.0% 21 x 0.0% 0 x 0.0% 19 x 0.0% 18 x 0.0°% 17 X 0.0% 16 x 0.0"6 - 15 x 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: _41.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 25.4 % ' MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 61.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.77 LarW29 C� ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON PACIFIC BOULEVARD SANTE FE AVENUE TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS DATE: 2/26/2009 SURVEY BY: C. SUEN IA TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:OO:PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF 49TH DATE OF SURVEY 2/26/2009 85th PERCENTILE 41.5 MPH 10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 75.5 °/b i POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH 36 2 8 0.67 ACCIDENTS TRAFFIC FACTORS R YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 18,150 LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SANTE FE / LEONIS / FRUITLAND CROSSWALKS AT SANTE FE / LEONIS / FRUITLAND PEDESTRIANIBICYCLES YES ! FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER. AREAS OF RED & GREEN CURB ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.78 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE -SWEEPING "C" CURVE (Blwn Santo Fe to 46#1 St) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES 1 1 RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCICY OF VERNON SOUTH PAC FIC BOULEVARD SANTE FE AVENUE TO CITY LIMITS rDATE: 2/=009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDtA TIME: 2:30 PM - . 3:00 PM CH§CKEF 8Y: JERRY STOCK 100.0% 59 x 100.0% 57 100. 100.0% 1 100.0% 54 100 0°% 53 x 100.0% 100:0A T� all 100.0% 100.0% 49x 100.0% fi 100.00/ .1 98.7% X 97.4% 44 x 93.4% x o t.4% x )PACE 1 X 82.1 % )PACE = - -85PCT 40!x 73.5°% }PACE, x 38 x 55.0% )PACE _ ` 37 x 45.711/o }RACE - --MEAN X. 36.40/9 }PACE 35 x - 29.8% ?PACE x PA 33 9.2% }PACE 32 x 11.9°% - - -16PCT 7.3% x 5.0°% =30 29 x 2.0% 28 x 0.7°% 2? x 0.7% 28 X 0.7°% 24 x 0.0% 23 x 0.096 22 x 0.096 21, X 19 x 0.% 18 X 0.0°% 17 x 0.095 18 X 0.096 0.0% UPPER LIMIT" 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE; 12.6 % MECIAN SKIM. 37.5 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 75.5 % 1Sth PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.9- LQ r Onk 888�8B�B88�B80B8888��08���� ON ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ no no ■ ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HCr SANTE FE AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMITS WTH ST) TO T� DATE: 221=009 SURVEY BY: Q. BLIENDIA' TIME 1:45 PM 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPIN DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF 25TH ST DATE OF SURVEY 2/28/2009 Oft PERCENTILE 36.6 MPH 10 MPH PACFI 29 - 38 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 81.0 °/b P2MO SP LIMIT 35 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 7 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACCJMILLI,ON VEH. MILES 0.00 ACCID NTS PER MVM SP ED R LATED ONL TRAFFIC FACTOR AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 32,750 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - 25TH-26TH ! 27TH / 28THi 37TH! 38TH CROSSWALKS AT 25TH-26TH 127TH / 28TW 37THl 38TH PEIDESTRIANBICYCLES YES / FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) O STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (ENTIRE AREA) NO SHOULDERS ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.44 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTALCURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES ! YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES OT iRR _ MANY Cft0$$ STREET i RME TRAFFIC, _a ADJACENT LAN _ US INDUSTRIAL i BUSIN Si-/ CON�NERCWL ImMmNog000lib LIMIT 35 MPH SP 0M CHANGE' IJOHANGE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HCICITY OF VERNON SANTE FE AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMITS (25fH Sn TO 38TH STREE DATE: 2/ WO09 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:15 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK r, S20 CUMMULATIVE PERCENT, 40 60 80 100 100.(r 59 x 100.0'.6 58 x 100.0% x 100.00A l57 100.0% 1 100.0%, 54 X 100.0% 53 x 100.0'% 52 x 100.0% 51 100.0% 100-OOA 49 x 100.0% 100.00A 100.0°A 100.0% 44 X 99.30A 43 x 98.60 = 42 x 97.9% 41 x 97.2°A 40- x 96.50A 39 x 94.4% 38 x 92.3°A}PACE 37 x 86.6°A TPACE 311 x 82.40% )PACE - - -85PCT x 73.2% )PACE x 64.1 % )PACE 33 x 53.59A )PACE x 45.1% }PACE ---MEAN 31 x 34.5% )PACE x 27.5°A }PACE 29 18.3% )PACE 281 x 11.3% -- -15PCT 27 x 6.3 28 2.80A x 1.4% .24 x 0.0% 23 x 0.0% 22 x 0.0% 21 x 0.0% 0.096 19 x 0.09A 18 x 0.0% 17 x 0.0% 16 x 0.0° 15 x 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: , 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.7 % MEDIAN SPEED- 32.6 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 81.0 %15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.3 % ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HCI SANTE FE AVENUE 38TH STREET TO FRUITLAND AVEN DATE:6 009SURVEY BY: C. BED A ` TIME 1:00 PM IAS PM CHECKED BY JERRY STOCK LOCATION OF SURVEY DATE OF SURVEY 85th PERCENTILE 10 MPH PACE PERCENT IN PACE POSTED SPEED LIMIT SOUTH OF 38TH ST 2/26/2009 37.6 MPH 28-37MPH 73.9 "/o 35 MPH 125 MPH' ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 8 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 28 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 2.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES I 0.18 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONL I ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.81 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD ` SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER MANY CROSS STREETS 12 WAY LEFT TURN LANE ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / SCHOOL / FIRE STATION RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:, I W MPH SPEEQ LIMIT CHANGE -NO CHANGE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CI CITY OF VERNON T" SANTE FE AVENUE 38TH STREET TO FRUITF AND AVENUE DATE: 2/2&2009 SURVEY BY: C. SUENDIA TIME: IMO PM - 1,45 PM CI{E KEQ BY: JERRY STOCK P20 ion 100.0% 59 100.0%' 57 100:0°% _ X 10M0°% 100.0% 54 ODA 100.0% 5523 100.0% 51 1000°% 100.0°% -50 100:0°% 49 1000°% 48 1100.0% 100.0°% 47 1000% 46 1000% 100.0% 100.0°% 42 99.3°% Alx 97.9% 40 39 x x 95.8% 8 ( - 38 37 x 86.4% .6% 38 x 82.4% }PACE--- 86PCT x 77.5°% )PACE 34 x 73.2°% ;PACE 33 x 61.3°A }PACE 32 x 52.8°% )PACE x 47.9% }PACE - - -MEAN 1:. x 35.9°% )PACE 30 29 x x 30.3% }PACE 21.1% WALE 28, x 15.5% )PACE 8.5°A - - -15PCT x 4.9% y 24 x 2.8°% 0.% 23 0.0%0% 1 ; 0.0% . 0.0% ` 19 x 0.0% 18 x 0.0% ! x 0.0%0.0% 17 0.096 - UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE:. 28 MPH 80th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.4 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 73.9 % 15t#i PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE, 8.5 4 p W mc cr ry —00co to*004*144N MEEEENNEENMME ■ommmumm■mmom momm■m■mmumuE ■o■m■ommummuE ■NN■EM■NNMMEE ■■■■■■■err■■■ ■■M■MMEEMMEME ■ENMENEEMEM■E ■M■ME■EMEEMM■ ■mmommommummm ■E■EM■SMEEMM■ ■■NEM■M■MEMEM ■mEMmmu■mmumm ■■num■o■mu■mM MEEMMENmMEMMN ■MEMMEMENEMEM ■m■som■ommons ■ENMENN■MMEM■ mmummmummomus ■■EMMMMMENMEM Emmons ■EN■E■ ■EMNO■ ■ENNE■ ■■NSON MEMNMM MR �A Ni rr ENMMMMM ■EMMMu■ ■OMMMM■ ■■EMME■ ■MENEM■ ■EM■EM■ ■E■M■M■ ■M■■ME■ ■■MN■E■ ■■ENE■■ ■■M■MEM ■E■EME■ SOMEONE M■MMEM■ ■EM■E■■ Vr ONE son MEEK ONE MEN ■muss■■ ■EME■M■ ■EMEMM■ ■EMMME■ NEMESES ■ME■M■■ ■■MOM■■ MEMMEM■ ■EME■E■ ■E■MME■ ummumm■ MONSOON M■■ME■■ ■EMM■mM MMEMEM■ so ME ii ■EMNO■ ■ommom FEMME■ b3•MEm■ \\EOM■ iIC1[1�MN^ N N N N N NONE NONE ■ ■ ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON ci SANTE FE AVENUE FRUITt MD AVENUE TO SOUTH CITY UMrrS 57TH 2126/2mg SURVEY Y: C. BUENDIA TIME: 12:16 PM 12:46 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.35 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT CURVE (btym 52nd-53rd) / LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDCWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES I YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER MANY CROSS 3TREET3 / 2 WAY LEFT TURN E ' AWACW LARD USE' BUSINESS / C§MMERCIAL I SCHOOL RECOMMEND D SP :. p LIMIT 3$ MPH SPELQ LIMI CHANGE; NO CWANGIz 3 RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET CITY OF VERNON HCI SANTE FE AVENUE FRUITLAND AVENUE TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS (: DATE: .2/2612009 SURVEY BY: C. SUENDIA ` TIME: 12A5 PM - 12:45 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK 20 4060 100 100.0% 59 x 100.0% 100.0°A 57 100.0% 56 100.0•A . _ 1 1 5 100.ODA 54 100.0°A 100.0% 5523 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.096 48 x 100.0% 47 X 99.4°A 46 99.4°A 451 99.4°A 4'1 98.1 % 43 x 97.4% 42 x 96.8% 41 x 96.8% 40 X 95.5°A 39 x 92.9°k 38 x 88.4°A )PACE 37 x 83.2% }PACE -- -86PCT36 x 71.6°A,}PACE 35 x 07.1% }PACE 1ACE 34 x o 33 32 x 47.1% PACE ---MEAN x 31 X 32.3% SPACE 29 x 20.0% }PACE 28 x 16.1% }PACE 27 x 9.7% - - -15PCT 6.5% x 3.9% 25 x 1.9% 24 x 1.3% 23 x 1.3°A 22 21 z °A 0.6 0.0% 19 x x 0.(rA 0.096 le r s 17x 0 1 g X 0.0"% 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: _ 37.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 78.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.7 i i 47 4 C C n w ic cc ry- ON ERNE NONE Room mass Emma M■MMEM Monona Emmaus EONS■■ MONSON MEMNO■ SOONER NammsmEEEME mommENmmoss OEEmmEMmmon mommunMMmmm NNOMMNRM IRM mommummomms ■EMEMNMMMMM ■MMMMEMMMNM MENMEMMENEE Mmamommmons MENMRMMEENM ■ M a NEERNEEMEMEMMEME ■ommMEOMOmmmomms ■oommommommomomm MEMEMENNMMM■MMMM MEEEMEMMMMNMME■■ ENNEMMEMEEMMENEM mmmmMMMMMMR ■mmMMm■MM■M MMMm■■MM■MM ■■M■MMMMMM■ MmmMMMMMMMo EMo■ Mass CRIME 1a112a 1RI1■ SIN[ ■ MEMO Nunn Noun NOUN Mass soon NEON moan ■Ilan an ME an no Pj ENGINEERINGAND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON HeT SLAUSON AVENUE BOYLE AVE-STATE ST TO DOWNEY ROAD ` DATE: 3/11/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ALCOA DATE OF SURVEY 3/11/2009 851h PERCENTILE 36.9 MPH 10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 70.9 POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED-RELATEDACCIDENTS 3 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 13 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 1.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC./MILLION VEH. MILES 1 0.17 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 34,100 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - DOWNEY / ALCOA / DOWNEY CROSSWALKS AT DOWNEY / ALCOA / DOWNEY PEDESTRIAWBICYCLES YES i FEW TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING YES OTHER AREAS OF NO STOPPING ANYTIME TOW AWAY AREAS OF RED CURB 1 DENSE TRAFFIC ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.48 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT CURVE (west of Downey) LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR SIDEWALKS(DRIVEWAYS' YES / YES (MANY) STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER I PAINTED MEDIAN IS ND RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET r CITY OF VERNON SLAUSON AVENUE BOYLE AVE-STATE ST TO DOWNBY ROAD DATE: 3I11=9 SURVEY BY: C. RUENDIA - TIME; 10:00 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK �1 WFJW 20 so Ion -x 100.00k, 59 x 100.0% se x ot to°0o.` 100.0% ,1 1000% 100.00 53 x 100.0% 52 x 100.0% 1 x 100.0% 100.0%` 49 x 100.0% l 48 x 100.0% 1J 47 x 100.0% 48 100A%' 100.0'% 44 x 100.00A 1 43 X .99.4% j 42 X 98.3% 41 X 98.3% 401 x 95.5% r 39 x 93.3% - x l _ 37 x 85.6% )PACE 36 79.994 )PACE - - -85PCT 35 x 75.4% }PACE 34 x 67.6% }PACE 33 x 55.9% )PACE 32 x 52.6% )PAC 3 x 41.3% )PACT . - -MEAN x - 34.1 % )PACE ` 29 x 28.5% )PACE 28 x 21.2% )PACE 277 x 14.5% - - -15PCT 26 x 11.2% 8.996 y x x 23 x 3.4% 22 x 2.6% x 1.1% ` 0.0°A 19 x 0.0% 18 x 0.09A - ; 17 x 0.0% 16 X 0.096 0.096 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE; 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.8 MPH PERCENT IN PACE:- 70.9 % 151h PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.1 MPH PERCENT, UNDER PACE: 14.5 "/o aeeee�MINE��o���a��eoe�eaeae����e�������� 1 rr� rr, �� V ■ ®■ • In MINIM ■■■N■■NNE■■EE■E■■■■■■■■■■■oN■■■■Ne■■ ■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■EE■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■Oa■■■ ■■■■■■■■■s■■s■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■NO■■OEOE ■o■■■■■■■NE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■nN■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■E■■■Ea■E■O■e■■■N■■■EE■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■eN■NN■■■■E■■e■E■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■e■■■■■os■NEosne■■■o■■O■on■■■ •Man ■■■■■■.■■■■■■s■N■E■■E.e■■■e■O■OOE■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■e■e■■NeE■■■en■EN■■se■■■■NONE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■ENO■O■■■seno■■■■N■e■■■o■E Monsoon . ■■■■■■■■■■NOON■■■■see■onssonE■osasserno■s■■eN■ ■■■■■■■■r■■■■■■■E■e■a■■■■■Ns■EE■sa■■asN■■OO■N■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■O■■OE.■esE■N■■■eNe■e■■■■■ „■N■■■■■■■■■EN■■■■■■■■■■■■Oe■e■■■n■e■■■■■■or■mom ON so ® ie ■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■�■■■■■■■■■NNE■■■■■■■ ' ■■■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■NOON■\\\.■.•a■■\■■■■■■■■■■eN■ . • NOON■a■■■■■■o■■■■■■���..�►�.��■.�■■N,■■■■■N■■■ ��BBB8�80��886888�8��60��880�8��88888088�689��� a® MEN loom IEEE MEN ■■■■a■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■O■O■■s■� .■■.'E■■■ MIEN SERUM ■N■■■O■■O■ ■■■■■ MIEN ERROR �, n.■r■■■■.■■■■■ ■Oe■nN■E■■■N■■■N■■E■■■■ moon oOMIN N■r■s SEEMS ■■E■■■■O■■■■■■■■■■e■■■O■ ■■■■■E■■■■o■■■■■■■■■NEE■■ Hiffiffiffiffiffifliffilm ■■■e■■■■■■■Nee■■■■e■■ENE■ P■en■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■ses■es■s■®■O■■■■■■■■■■■ '■■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■E■■■o■o■■oonNe■■■■■■■Nee■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■■■■■r■■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■Ee■■■■E■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■O■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ %1. ■■■■■E■■■■■EEO■■■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■ ■■■■O■■■■■■■■N■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■O■ ■■■ ■■■ ONE ■■n ■■■ OrdH0*0--1.0 ' "—*NN PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF BANDINI DATE OF SURVEY 3/3/2008 85th PERCENTILE 38.0 MPH 10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 72.63b POSTED SP D LIMIT , 35 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEMRELATED ACCIDENTS 1 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 16 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) , ACCJMILLION VEH. MILES 0.04 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONL TRAFFIC FA TORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 39,300 LANE: CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS_ SIGNAL 26TH I FIRE STN / BANDINI 37TH / FARMER JOHN ENT./ VERNON CROSSWALKS AT 26TH/ FIRE STN I BANDINI-37TH / FARMER JOHN ENTJ VERNON PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING, ANYTIME (ENTIRE AREA) NO SHOMERS / MAJORITY RED CURB ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.81 VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES' STREET LIGHTING YES OTMER MANY_CROS3 ST EaTS / 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE ADJACBNT LAND W, 1 COMMSRCIAI,,I 1NDlJSTRIAL / FIRE STATION RECOMMENDEID $P PD LIMIT 35 MPH $OWD MtT CHANO NO CHANGP File. Soto m A RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET j_%�% CITY OF VERNON l[ l SOTO STREET NORTH CITY LIMITS (26TH ST) TO VERNON AVE DATE: 302009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA ml .J .1 STOCK 100.(r 100.0% 100.0% 100.0°% lw.0°% 100.0% 100.0•% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% IOo.o°% 100.0% �00.0° 99.4% 99.4% 99.4% 98.9°% 98.90A 97.7°A 95.4°A 93.7% 90.3°A 85.1 % }PACE 81.1 % $PACE - -85PCT 72.0°% )PACE. 68.6% )PACE 54.9°% )PACE 46.9°A )PACE ---MEAN 37.7% )PACE 33.1 % )PACE 23.4% )PACE 18.9% )PACE 12.60A - - -15PCT 9.1% 6.9% 4.6% 3.4°% 2.9% 2.3"% 1.7% 1.7°% 0.6% 0.O°% 0.0°% 0.0% 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10.MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 ` "lo MEDIAN SPEED: 33.4 MPH PERCENT IN PACK: 72.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 12.6 ��sa l 7 J 7 .I I RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET VERNON CITY OF HciO SOTSTREET VERNON AVENUE TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS (5TfH S DATE: 302009 SURVEY BY. C. BUENDIA TIME: 2:15 PM - 3,00 PM CHEC D BY: J . RY STOCK SPEEDCUMMULATIVE 2 PERCENT 40 Go 80 100 100.0% as X 100.E r 57 100.0% 100.0% 10M0% 54 100.0% 53 100.0% �1 52 1W.09A l 100.0% 100.00A 4$ X 100.09A 48 x 100.0% 47 X 99.4% ` 48, 99.40A 98.9"% 44 x 97.1°/u x 971% J43, J 42 x 97.1° 41 x 94.3% 40 x 93.7% TPACE 39 x 88.60A )PACE 38 x 84.6% )PACE - - -85PCT _ 37 x 76.6% )PACE 36 x 70.9% )PACE 57.7% 1PACE 34 x 44.6% )PACE - --MEAN 33 x 35.40A )PACE 32 x 28.09/6 }PACE 31 18.3°A )PACE x 13.1% .. -15PCT 29 x 8.0"A 28 x 6.3% 27 x 6.1% 211 x 2.9% 2.3% 24 x 1.1% 23 x 0.6% 22 x 0.60A 1 x O.ocA ` 19 0.0% 18 x 0.09A 17 x 0.0% 10 0 UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.4 °Ib MEDIAN $PEED: 34.4 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 80.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.4 MPH C �: PERCENT UNDER PACE 13.1 same.. • Ii 4 I SEEMS ® AlmEl ® im®ii ■E■EM ■ENE■ ■■..■ SNEER ■ENE■ ■EN■■ ■■R■■ MOOR■ ■EN■■ ■EN■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■■■.■ ■ENNE■ M■NNEN IEEE■■■■■■■M.■■■■�■�.a►■e■.■■■■■■■■se �oee0oa6e0eoeea�00e������e�ee��eOea�E II I II �Or �vr�elr III II IEEE.■e■.s■■■.■■■■■■■■.■■.■■s■■■■■■■■ ■■■■.■■..SENSE\■111�\\7\\\\■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ T� ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY � ��CITY OF VERNON VERNON AVENUE ALAMEpA STR�lrT TO $ANTE"s FE AVENUE DATE: 2r25/20 8 ' BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK `I RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET Cj CITY OF VERNON _` VERNON AVENUE ALAMEDA STREET TO SANTE FE AVENUE DATE: 2/2612009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA TIME: 1:45 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: J - RRY STOCK SP E 20 40 100.0°% 59 100.0% se x 100.0% 57 x 100.(r, 100.0% ` 900.0% 100.0°% 53 x 100.096 52 x 100.0°% 100.0% 100.0% 49 x 98.6% t 48 x 98.6°% ] 47 X 98.6°% 46 98.6%• 45 x 97.3% 44 x 94.6% 431 x 92.6% 42 x 88.5°% 41 x 85.1°% ?PACE 401 x 77.0°% }PACE - - -85PCT 39 x 69.6"% )PACE 38 x 65.5% }PACE 37 x 57.4°% }PACE 36 x 50.7% }PACE 35 x 43.2°% )PACE - - -MEAN 34 x 32.4% )PACE 33 x 23.0°A }PACE 32 X 19.6% }PACE 31 x 13.5°% - - -15PCT 29 x 8.1 % 28 x 6.8°�& 27 x 4.7% 26 x 2.7 0/9 25 x 1.4p J 24 x 1.4% 1.4% 22 x 0.7% 1 x 0.7°% 0.7°� 1 x ' 0.0% 19 x 0.0% 17 x , 0.0 °% 16 x 0.0% . - Ism 0.0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 859t PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.0 MPH ' PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.9 %° MEDIAN SPEEDc 35.9 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 71.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 13.5 ._ _ Vanpr37 - G7 4 262331220aCEr w ■■■■■■■■■■■®NOON■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ EE■E■■■nEEEEE■ ■■■■■■■E■EENE■ ■■■■■OE■■■E■E■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■Eon■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■NEE■ EN■■■■■■■■■■■■ • � ■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■ NOON■■ ■ so N ■ NONE soon mono ■UNN NNE■ mono NONE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■E■EE■NNE■ ONES wom■ENNnmE ■■■■■EEEE■■N■E■ ■■■E■■■■E■■■■■■ \N1\1�Eirl\ICE\\�\Eb`1EE1,\,�tt� NEON■ ■ ■ ;y ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY ICI CITY OF VERNON VERNON AVENUE SANTE FE AVENUE TO SOTO STREET DATE: 319/2009 SURVEY BY: C. DUENDIA TIME: 1:00 PM 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK PREVAILING SPEED DATA LOCATION OF SURVEY WES OF JEWEL DATE OF SURVEY 3/912009 85th PERCENTILE 31.3 MPH 10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH PERCENT IN PACE 79.4 °!o POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH ACCIDENT HISTORY NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 9 TOTAL ACCIDENTS 6 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.33 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) ACC.IMILLION VEH. MILES 0,17 ACCIDENTS PER MVM SPEED RELATED ONLY) TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 9,100 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SANTE FE / SOTO CROSSWALKS AT SANTE FE / SOTO PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES (on sidewalk) TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (ENTIRE AREA) NO SHOULDERS ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.60' VERTICAL CURVE HORIZONTAL, CURVE NONE NONE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES RYES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER I SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE 104 JACENT LAND U3E INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS RECOIIAINENDW) Wei) LIMIT-' 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT CHANGE1 NO CHANGE IUSTIFICATION. The recommended 30 mph is 1.3 mph I*Iow the 85th percentile speed. Pile: vermxMae RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET Hci CITY OF VERNON VERNON AVENUE SAUTE FE AVENUE TO SOTO STREET' DATE: 31912009 SURVEY BY: C. 6UENDIA ` TIME: 1:00 PM . 2:00 PM CH Mg BY: JERRY STOCK CLARMEJUMPIMENT 100 100.0°% 100.0°% 57x 100.0°% 100.0°% 54 100.0% _ 83 100.0% 100.0°% 52 1 1(0,0°A ` 50 49 100.0% 48 100,0% 100.0°A 47 : 100.�% 461 100.0°% 100.0% 100.0%% ' 42 100.09 1 x 100.0% x100.0•% 411 100.0% =39 378 100.0% 99.2%, 1 _ l\ 3 99.2% 381 99.2% 34 97.7% 33 x 95.4°% x 94.7% )PACE x 88.6% }PACE 311 x 83.2% }PACE- - -85PCT f3M x 76.3°% }PACE 7I29 28 N 59.5°% }PACE 2 x _ 51.1% }PACE 39.7% NrACE - - .MEAN ` 26 x 32.1% }PACE x 29.0% }PACE, , _.� 23 x 2Q.6%u }PACE 22 x 15.30A 13.0% _ _ .15PCT 21 11.5% 19 x 8.4% 4.6"6 18 x 33% 18 X 0.8% 0.80A 15 0 0% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PAGE: 33 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENTIN PACE-- 79.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 15.3 4 ■ ■ MOMMONEW NONSENSE mosommom MOSER 1'®r&lmsR' mmOm aj ONE SON ONE ONE avai ■ 14 ■s■■■■M■ M■MMM■■■ ■NM■MM■M ■OMM■■■■ ■■MM■MES ■NMN■N■■ ■NN■N■■■ NMMMN■N■ ■■■MNN■■ MONSOONS NONSENSE ■■M■■M■■ ■■■■SM■■ MONSOONS ■■M■■■■■ ■NMNMM■N MMNNMM■N ■MMM■M■■ ■■■■■■M■ ■MMM■■■■ ■N■MM■M■ ■ M �1 ■ ■ on ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF VERNON MCI VERNON AVENUE SOTO STREET TO DOWNEY ROAD A 2 /2009 SURVEY NDIA ` TIME: 1:00 PM 1:45 RM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK ACCIDENT HISTORY NO OF MONTHS OBSERVED 36 SPEED -RELATED ACCIDENTS 0 ` TOTAL ACCIDENTS 12 ANNUAL ACCIDENT RATE 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR (SPEED RELATED ONLY) AC ./AAILLION vEH. MILES 0.00 ACCIDENTS PER MVM LSLEED RELATED ONLY) ` TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 10,050 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION ' TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SOTO / DOWNEY / STOP - BOYLE CROSSWALKS AT SOTO / BOYLE / DOWNEY PEDESTRIAWBICYCLES YES / YES (on sidewalk) TRUCK TRAFFIC YES (HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (ENTIRE AREA) NO SHOULDERS ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.60 ` VERTICAL CURVE NONE HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE LATERAI„ VISIBILITY. GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIOSWALKSIORIVEWAYS YES" / YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHERI SOLID DSL YELLOW ENTERLINE 3 - { AIJAC, LAND USE 7,7 INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS i SPEFDLIMIT 30 MPH SP _ LIMIT . MANGE IVO CHANGE RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HC'I CITY OF VERNON VERNON AVENUE SOTO STREET TO DOWNEY ROAD DATE: 2/25/2009 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA ` TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:45 PM CUMMULATIVE PERCENT CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK SPEED 20 40 8 100.0% 59 x 100.0% 100.00/0 57 x 100.0% 100.00A ` 100MA 5q 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1 x 100.0% 501 100.0% 49 100.0% 48 100.0°% 47 100.0% 46 100.0% 100.00A 44 X 100:0OA ` 100.0% 42 x 100.0% 41, 100.0% '� 100.0% 39 x 100.0% 3377 0 997g ` X , 90A 95.8°% 35 x 93.1% 34 x 0 33 x 82.60A }PACE - - -85PCT 32 X 75.7% }PACE 3 x 69.4% }PACE x 65.3°A }PACE 29 x 56.9% )PACE ` 28 x 46.5% '}PACE - - -MEAN 27 X 42.4% )PACE 28 x 37.5% }PALS x 32.6% }PACE 24 x 28.5% )PACE 23 x 18.8% 22 x 17.4% 21 X 13.9% - - -15PCT x 19 X 6.% 18 x 5.6% - 17 x _ . 3.5% 16 x 1.4% 1.4% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 17.4 °fo MEDIAN SPEED; 28.3MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 63.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED. 21.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.8 °r6 vomwk-n E w wc ■ ■ Emmons Emmons Emmons womm.n .mv..v MENNE. Kosovo ■u■mm E.■.N. KEN■■■ .m■mmm■mm.■ mmmmm..mmmm ■nn■mm■mm.m N.mm.ss.mm■ ■■m.n..on.m ■ommmmmmmm. I�PW t flv I-] ■ ■ 2 �i ■ TRAFFIC FACTORS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 19,700 LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES EACH DIRECTION TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL- DOWNEYI INDIANA CROSSWALKS AT DOWNEY I INDIANA ` PEDESTRIANBICYCLES NO / NO TRUCK TRAFFIC YES `(HEAVY) ON -STREET PARKING NO OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME TOW AWAY NO SHOULDERS UNDER RAILWAY BRIDGE ROADWAY FACTORS LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES) 0.97 y VERTICAL CURVE HORIZONTAL CURVE UP -DOWNHILL GRADE UNDER RxR BRIDGE (E.ot Downey) GRADUAL "S" CURVE LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD SIDEWALKSIDRIVEWAYS YES / YES STREET LIGHTING YES OTHER PAINTED ISLAND ADJACENT LAND USl3 INDUSTRIAL R , OMMEND SPEBD LIMIT 49 MPH - � u�PBED l�IMIT CHAN . E NO CHANGE i RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET HC CITY OF VERNON WASHINGTON BOULEVARD D©WNEY ROAD TO EAST CITY LIMITS (INDIANA S7 ` DATE: $11012009 SURVEY BY: C. BUEN©iIA TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:16 PM CHECKED BY: JERRY STOCK CommuompmeNT SPEED 20 60 a too v 59 100.E 51X 100,00, r 57 X 100.0% 100.0°% 1W.0% 100.0°% 99.5% 9.1 99.5% 98.4% 49 X 48 x - 92.50A 47 - x 46 x 85.'0% 45 x 82.4% , . -85PCT 43 x x 80.2% 76.5% }PACE 441 2 X 844.22% }PACE 39 59.9% )PACE 38 x 51.9"% IPACE ( x 48.1% }PACE -MEAN -MEAN 37 x 40.6% 1PACE 36 x 35.9% }PACE 35 x 29.4% }PACE 34 x 25:7% }FACE' 33 20.3% 32 x 17.1% 311 X_ 14.4°A - - -15PCT 30 29 x9.1% x 5.396 28 1, 27 x 3.7% " 26 X . 2.10.E moth 23 1.10% x21 0.0% 2 x 0.0% 0.0% 18 x 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% ? 18 x 0.0° > _ isx 0 00%% UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85tn PERCENTILE SPEED: 46.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 23.6 °lo MEDIAN SPEEIJ: 38.5 MPH PERCENT IN PACE: 66.1 %b I ft PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 20.3 vai�uNi��°naav�v�aa+v 1 A lit �1 ■■■■MEMO ■■■■■■■■■■■s■ 4 ■■■■■■■moss ■M■■NM■■■■■ mmm■■e■N■M■ ■Nomommmmm■ ■■■■■■moo■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■s■■■■MMM■ mmmmmmmm■s■ ■■mm■s■m■■■ ■■m■■■mmos■ .r■■■■■■■moo■■■■■■ M ■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■ INN "I -■ w■m■■■ooe■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■o■e■m■■■mew■■ a ■■■■■■■■■■■■sew■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■meM■■■■Em■s■■O■E ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■M■■■■ENoo■■■E■EMEN ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■Nos■owmmN■■s■■■■e■N■■■ss■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■eeoe■■■■■■■■M■NNEN■N■■■■ :iis:i�i::iiiiii■niiii:�iiiiiiiisiimiiieiir:iii ■■■■■■■■■em■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■SOME■■■ ;■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■E■■■N■■■eowommo■ usimmumm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■see■■■►■N■■e■■■s■mm■mm■■wow■ ®■■■■■■■■■■■■.■ems■■■■■■■�■N■■■■wow■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■MM■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■■mew■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■M■■■■■■wM.N,N■w■■■■■■■em■■■■■■■' ■■■■■■■■■MEMMEe■■■■■■■,■.•ew■■w■m■■■■■■■■■■■see E _ MEMO ■■■■■■■■■m■■■■oew■wm\■wmew■■■■■e■e■■mew■■■ ®■■■mNEON■■■■ • ■■■■■■■■ammo■■■■■■■■:�ww\.�\\ew\w■■\■■memo■■see■ ME j TRAFFICRADAR CERTIFICATION RHF Inc. TESTED TO NMWA SPECIFICATIONS / UCP 01171M PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Radar Repair QQn`SA) National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration. (IACP) International Association of Chiefs of Police. I6202 Keats Circle Westminster Call R.H.F. is a.certified independent testing and repair facility. f.92683 i TEST ID Date Received Certification Number — Z _ C s-3a 2 T- 2 DEVICE ID Make., Kustom Electronics Model: KR-10SP Type (1-M 1V Directional radar 0 Yes Pr No Some direction Countin uni /N 0 Yes it No 36 S/ Antenna -I SIN �' Antenna-2 SIN 3 § 2.41 § 5.4 TUNING Low sp d fork SIN X Last 4ata calib. Freq. (Hz) Sped (mph) Moagured y) lCALIBRATION FORK High speed fwk SIN 7,C) Last date calib. Freq. (Hz) 3 S' Speed (mph) L Measured ) PASS FAIL J Lo fork Hi forkZ Fork speed (mph) 35 65 Stationary mode § 2.5 / § 5.5 RADAR DEVICE Disp. Speed (mph) `3 f 6 5— 4 TUNING FORK Moving mode TARGET SPEED Expected. Displayed. PASS FAIL TESTS Opposite Direction (Hi fork -Lo fork) (Mph) 30O O 1 Moving mode TARGET SPE>rD Expected. Displayed. J Same Direction Hi fork + Lo fork Ho for_ - Lo fork (mph) NSA (mph) N/A / § Standard supply Vol a 13.6 V Antenna I Prea, GHz 2 5/, /6 i Antenna 2 Freq. GHz 5 ANS SIO TRANSMISSION FREQUENCY .Standard supply voltage — % 10.8 V Antenna 1 Fr Gliz Antenna PASS FAIL STABILITY Standard supply . 7 Antenna 1 Fr . GHz Antenna 2 . volts + 20% 16.3 V -Freq. GHz Z 5". /� -7 Frog. GHz 6 § 2.6.5 / § 5.6.5 POWER DENSITY Mfg. Spec. (max mW/cm) 55 Antenna I Power (mW/cm) c�/ Antenna 2 Power (mW/cm) PASS FAIL 7 § 2.8 / § 5.8 LOW VOLTAGE Mfg: spec. 510.8 V LVA activates U, / LVA deactivates /(j, 7 PAS FAIL 8 § 2.9.1 ! § 5.9.1 A. Audio tone correlates with received Doppler signal 9' Yes ❑ No DOPPLER AUDIO B. Functioning audio volume -adjustment control 9Yes ❑ No PASS FAIL § 112.41 § 5.12.4 Mfg. Spec. Test results 9 INTERNAL CIRCUIT 32 3 PASS FAIL 10 § 2.12.6.5 ! § A. Selects only targets moving towards radar 0 Yes ❑ No 9-N.A. 5.12.6.5 DIRECTIONAL B. Selects only targets moving away from.radar ❑ Yes ❑ No 9' N.A. PASS FAIL Stationary mode: Low speed spec. 15 Lo speed disp. target channel (mph) Hi, speed spec. 175 M speed di 11 5.12.7 / 5.12.8 ' LOW AND HIGH Moving Mode Low speed spec. 20 Lo speed disp. Z G SPEED DISPLAY target channel (mph) Hi speed spec. 155 Hi speed disp. PASS FAIL TEST Moving Mode: Low speed spec. 20 Lo speed disp. 2 G patrol channel (mph) Hi speed spec. so Hi speed disp. � 12 S.l3 1 TEST PASS FAIL 13 LABORATORY; COMMENTS This radar device R-pa&w O ftils the equMement's to meet or exceed the minbnal NHTSA/IACP operational standards of the National 7ia, ffle Highway Safety Adndnistradon. California Vehicle 14 CERTIFICATION Code Section 40802 Certified by: / ` Datc: �� Sr — Z g —G IS INVENTORY ❑ Fork Cert 0 Manual O 2 AM. 0 Remota ❑Bat. 0 C 'n C Other: lease list PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforementioned; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of EASTERN GROUP PUBLICATIONS' EASTSIDE SUN, MEXICAN AMERICAN SUN NORTHEAST SUN, BELL GARDENS SUN VERNON SUN, COMMERCE COMET CITYTERRACE COMET, MONTEBELLO COMET MONTEREY PARK COMET, E.L.A. BROOKLYN BELVEDERE COMET AND WYVERNWOOD CHRONICLE, newspapers of general circulation, printed and published THURSDAYS in the County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of JUNE 21, 1966, CASE NUMBER 884861; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: MAY 21, all in the year 2009. 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at LOS ANGELES, California, this 2161day of MAY, 2009. --This space is for the -County -Clerk's -Filing Stamp CITY OF VERNON Proof of Publication of City of Vernon City Council Meeting May 11, 2009 Ordinance No. 1155 Summary Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforementioned; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of EASTERN GROUP PUBLICATIONS' EASTSIDE SUN, MEXICAN AMERICAN SUN NORTHEAST SUN, BELL GARDENS SUN, VERNON SUN, COMMERCE COMET, CITYTERRACE COMET, MONTEBELLO COMET MONTEREY PARK COMET, E.L.A. BROOKLYN BELVEDERE COMET AND WYVERNWOOD CHRONICLE, newspapers of general circulation, printed and published THURSDAYS in the County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of JUNE 21, 1966, CASE NUMBER 884861; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: MAY 21, all in the year 2009. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at LOS ANGELES, California, this 21--5-Iday of MAY, 2009. This -space -is -for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp_ CITY OF VERNON Proof of Publication of City of Vernon City Council Meeting May 11, 2009 Ordinance No. 1155 Summary Signature CITY OF VERNON CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 27, 2009 ORDINANCE NO. 1155 SUMMARY A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FULL TEXT OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1155 IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK LOCATED AT 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA. Ordinance No. 1155 was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Vernon held. on April 27, 2009. Ordinance No. 1155 is scheduled to be approved and adopted by said Council at a regular meeting to be held on May 11, 2009. Vernon City Code Section 16.15 determines the speed limit of certain City streets at forty (40) miles per hour, and Vernon City Code Section 16.16 determines the speed limit of certain City streets at thirty-five (35) miles per hour. On May 11, 2009, the City Council of the City of Vernon is proposing to adopt Ordinance No. 1155 amending Vernon City Code Sections 16.15 and 16.16 of Article I, Motor Vehicles and Traffic: General, of Chapter 16, Law Enforcement, as follows: 1. To change the designation of Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Downey Road to Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue and Leonis Boulevard from Boyle Avenue to Downey Road. 2. To increase the current speed limit of thirty-five (35) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Downey Road to forty (40) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Pacific Boulevard to Boyle Avenue and forty (40) miles per hour on Leonis Boulevard from Boyle Avenue to Downey Road. 3. To establish the speed limit for newly constructed street designated as Pennington Way from 26th Street to Bandini Boulevard at thirty-five (35) miles per hour. Manuela Giron, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, does hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1155 was duly introduced to the City Council of the City of Vernon.at a regular meeting held on April 27, 2009 and said Ordinance is scheduled to be approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council to be held on May 11, 2009. Dated: 1�e l 9 Manuela Giron, it Clerk