Loading...
Resolution No. 2770 CD "II) 28 z ~o.. o ..0.. ><> z ~ 01 ; 01ll0"::!" 29 ...o.ZZ"'z~ o D:~.D:O ~~e>~ ~ g 30 ii:1-~~=J..I ~z>..:J:<C~ 1d!:!:5u ~ 31 UoO 0 i .. ~ · 0 d > g z .. ~~ 32 > " 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2770 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON SUPPORT ING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF SUCH BILL B 3 THE ASSEMBLYAND THE SENATE-AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THE GOVENOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 4 5 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 6 WHEREAS". Assembly Bill No. 2050 as introduced at the 1965 7 Regular Session of the Legislature would enable the City of Santa Monica. the 8 City of Los Angeles". and the County of Los Angeles to work cooperatively. 9 through a Joint Powers Agreement". to construct and operate an off-shore cause- 10 way". to be known as the Santa Monica Causeway. in Santa Monica Bay; and 11 WHEREAS". the Santa Monica Causeway would be of immense 12 benefit to the citizens of the Santa Monica Bay area. of the Los Angeles metro- 13 politan area". and of the State of California for the following reasons: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. It would provide an off-shor.e right-of-way for the proposed new State Route 60-1 Freeway extending from Topanga Canyon through the City of Santa Monica". including that portion of the City of Los Angeles lying between Topanga Canyon and the City of Santa Monica. without disloca- tion of property owners". without bisection of existing communities. and 2. without removal of property from the tax rolls. It would provide approximately 5 1/2 miles of new public recreational beach. complete with ample space for parking and ancillary facilities. helping to meet a critical need for additional recreational beach facilities in the Santa Monica Bay area and the Los Angeles metropoli1a area to serve the present and future millions of California residents 3. seeking outdoor areas for recreation purposes. It would provide vast areas of protected waterways suitable for all-year cruising". sailing". and other aquatic recreation activities such as water skiing". fast boating and speed boat regattas". in which there has been an 4. astounding increase in public interest in the last ten years. It would complement and greatly enhance the usefulness and attractive- ness of the present Marina del Rey berthing facility by placing protec1e sailing and cruising channels and basins within easy reach of that -1- .. " . 1 2 3 4 5. facility. It would provide. additional berthing space for large numbers of small craft. alleviating a projected shortage of such facilities in the very nea future. 5 6. It would result in the creation of an attractive. complete new marine 6 7 community. including all residential, commercial, tourist. and vacatio facilities appropriate to such community . 8 7. It would result in the addition of property to the combined tax rolls of 9 10 the City of Santa Monica. the City of Los Angeles, and the: County of Los Angeles having an esnmatedmarket value of $600,000.000.00. 11 8. All of the foreg,oing benefits would be achieved without cost to the City 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 of Santa Monica" the City of Los Angeles. or the County of Los Angeles and without cost to the State of California over and above the amount which the Department of Public Works would otherwiseexpenti for an - inland alternative right-of-way for the proposed new State Route 69-1 Freeway to serve the same area and the amount which the 'Division of Parks and Recreation would expend for comparable unimproved beach within the. area. NOW~\ THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Vernon hereby 21 places itself on record in support of Assembly Bill 2050 and urges the passage 22 of such Bill by the Assembly and the Senate and the approval thereof by the 23 Govenor of the State of California. 24 SECTION 2: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify 25 to the passage of this Resolution". and thereupon and thereafter the same shall 26 be in full force and effect. 27 ADOPTED and APPROVED this 18th day of May, 1965. CD Z ~ 8 .. 28 o ..0.. ><>z~Ol ; 0"'01ll:! .. 29 It./LZz'' Z ;t o lI~oClIg li~i!l!:~ :~CityClerk > ~ _~..I.~.. .. - _.. ..... RJ iI.-; . .-,' : .- - f/ ~ - . .. ....... ., '"-..- ...2- " .. 1 STA TE OF CALIFORNIA ) ( SSe 2 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) 3 I". F. A. ZIEMER~ City Clerk of the City of Vernon~ do hereby 4 ce rtify that the foregoing Resolution". being Resolution No. 2770". was duly 5 adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon". and approved by the Mayor 6 of said City at a regular meeting of the City Council held May 18. 1965. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 24 25 26 27 CD ~II) 28 z zO.. o ..0.. ><>z~Ol ; 01ll0"::!" 29 "o.zz..z~ o.~~~D:g ~O::I->z~g 30 ii:1-~~:J..I ~z>..:J:<C~ 1d1-!:5U 0 31 u-oo . ~ Zo "z.. - 0 0 ~ > 0 z .. ~ffi 32 > ...3... ,..-;-- t', . &4 7:E1~-~ Mayor R. J. Furlong 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California D~ar Mayor Furlong: ~~1V~~.~ ~~ CITY OF SANTA M A CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR April 13, 1965 /lPR fJ ~o IBB9: ~A~~ ~ .4- ,8, .)a.r-d The Division of Highways, Department of Public Works, State of California, has a legislative man.date to create a "Coast Freeway" and is currently preparing route studies for the Santa Monica Bay Area link, The hearing on alternative routes has been delayed pending, in part, the disposition of AB 2050, The bill is an Enabling Act which would provide the opportunity for a locally approved alternative to (a) either a north- south freeway through the residential and commercial areas of our city and areas north of Santa Monica to Topanga Canyon or (b) a north-south freeway along and through public and private beach areas in the same vicinity. The principal features of the enabling act are as follows: The Bill Does Not Create or Require a Causeway Establish a Causeway Alignment Establish a Land Use Pattern The Bill Does Prohibit The Use of Public Credit ------------_._- Any_Cost increase .!o_the_Sta..!,e Any _Exce~sive .!-'and .E-~clamation The Bill Will Pe rmi t Protection of the Present Beach Areas Creation of a Protected Water Area Creation of 5 1/2 miles of New Beach PROVIDED THAT SANTA MONICA AND LOS ANGELES CITY AND COUNTY CAN DO SO UNDER A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AND WITH PRIVATE CAPITAL. ... r -) April 13, 1965 Page 2 Customarily, I would not solicit your support for a locally sponsored bill. However, AB 2050 represents a philosophy of government which is of importance to every local public agency in California. It proposes and is consistent with the principles of: Cooperative local solutions for local problems Local responsibility for financing as well as planning Reliance upon private capital as opposed to public funds I would, therefore, solicit your support and that of your City Council by the adoption of the enclosed resolution at the earliest possible date with a certified copy directed to my attention. I and the members of the Santa Monica City Council, as well as the City Manager, are prepared to make personal pre- sentations of this project to your City Council if you believe this would be desirable prior to the adoption of the resolution. Cordially yours, REX H. MINTER Ma yo r .t~ ...., . .. RESOL UTION A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF SUCH BILL BY THE. ASSEMBL Y AND THE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 2050 as introduced at the 1965 Regular Session of the Le gis1ature would enable the City of Santa Monica, the City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles to work cooperatively, through a Joint Powers Agreement, to construct and operate an off-shore causeway, to be known as the Santa Monica Causeway, in Santa Monica Bay; and WHEREAS, the Santa Monica Causeway would be of immense benefit to the citizens of the Santa Monica Bay area, of the Los Angeles metropolitan area, and of the State of California for the following reasons: 1. It would provide an off-shore right-of-way for the proposed new State Route 60-1 Freeway extending from Topanga Canyon through the City of Santa Monica, including that portion of the City of Los Angeles lying between Topanga Canyon and the City of Santa Monica, without dislocation of property owners, without bisection of existing com- munities, and without removal of property from the tax rolls. 2. It would provide approximately 5 1/2 miles of new public recreational beach, complete with ample space for parking and ancillary facilities, helping to meet a critical need for additional recreational beach facilities in the Santa Monica Bay area and the Los Angeles metropolitan area to serve the present and future millions of California residents seeking outdoor areas for recreation purposes. 3. It would provide vast areas of protected waterways suitable for all- year cruising, sailing, and other aquatic recreation activities such as water skiing, fast boating and speed boat regattas, in which there has been an astounding increase in public interest in the last ten years. 4. It would complement and greatly enhance the usefulness and attractive- ness of the present Marina del Rey berthing facility by placing protected sailing and cruising channels and basins within easy reach of that facility. 5. It would provide additional berthing space for large numbers of small craft, alleviating a projected shortage of such facilities in the very near future. -1- .. ... t ,.. . . " ,. 6. It would result in the creation of an attractive, complete new marine community, including all residential, commercial, tourist, and vacation facilities appropriate to such community. 7. It would result in the addition of property to the combined tax rolls of the City of Santa Monica, the City of Los Angeles, and the County of Los Angeles having an estimated market value of $600,000,000.00. 8. All of the foregoing benefits would be achieved without cost to the City of Santa Monica, the City of Los Angeles, or the County of Los Angeles, and without cost to the State of California over and above the amount which the Department of Public Works would otherwise expend for an inland alternative right-of-way for the proposed new State Rqute 60-1 Freeway to serve the same area and the amount which the Division of Parks and Recreation would expend for comparable unimproved beach within the area. NOW, THE;Rt::FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Vc;!? IV () rV THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY PLACES ITSELF ON RECORD IN SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2050 AND URGES THE PASSAGE OF SUCH BILL BY THE ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Adopted and Approved this I y-- day of MAY , , 1965. Attest: City Clerk Ma yor I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was of the City of at a held on the day of , 1965. duly adopted by the City Council meeting thereof, City Clerk SACRAMENTO ADDRESS ROOM 5119 STATE CAPITOL 95814 COMMITTEES CHAIRMAN, JUDICIARY FINANCE AND INSURANCE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION PUBLIC HEAL.TH MEMBER, JUDICIAL COUNCIL ASSEMBLY OFFICE 3400 FLORENCE AVENUE HUNTINGTON PARK PHONES: {LU CLOW 5.1294 LU CLOW 9-5354 RECEIVED ~-~.r(pJ' F. A. ZIEMER CITY CU=:RI:\. GEORGE A. WILLSON MEMBER OF ASSEMBLY, FIFTY-SECOND DISTRICT CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY ~ July 7, 1965 F. A. Ziemer, City Clerk City of Vernon City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon 58, California Dear Mr. Ziemer: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of May 19, 1965, with a copy of your Resolution No. 2770 in support of AB-2050. Please inform the Mayor and members of the City Council that this bill passed both houses of the Legis- lature and is now awaiting the Governor's consideration for enactment. Yours truly, ~ .tLo!~ GEOR~. WILLSON GAW: ch CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA May 19, 1965 ~ Honorable Thomas M. Rees . ASSemblyman,. 52ndDistrict . State Capitol sacramento,California Dear Sir: o 1 Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution No. .2770 .. A RESOUJTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF SUCH BILL BY THE ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNtA, which was adopted by the City Council 7at its regular meeting held on May 18, 1965. Yours very truly, CITY OF VERNON F. A. Zlaner, City Clerk FAZ:l1. enc. CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA May 19, 1965 U.aonorabl.. Ceo rle A..' Willson Assemblyman. 52nd District ,state Capitol Sacramento . California Dear Sir: o i Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution No. 2770 .. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSACE OF SUCH BILL BY THE ASSEMBLY AND TIlE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THE GOVERNOR OF THE STA.1.'E or CALIFORNIA. Which wa.adoptedby the City Council 'at ite regular meetins held on May 18, 1965. Yours very truly. CITY or VERNON F.. A. Ziem..... City CleJ:'k FAZ:Il. enc. CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA May 19, 1965 ~ CU;yof santa """,tea . C..Uf<>rnia 1685 MAlin Street santa Monica, California Attention: Mayor RexU.. Minter Gentlemen: Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution Nq..2770 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF SUCH BILL BY THE ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THIGOVERNOR ,or TUB STATE OF CALIFORNIA, which wa. adopted by the City COUDcil at its !:'esu1ar meetincheld on May 18, 1965. Yours very truly. CITY OF VERNON P. A. Ziemer, City Clerk PAZ:1l. enc. CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA May 19. 1965 ~ Mr . Daniel J. Creedon E1Mlrador Hotel 13th & N Street Sacramento. California Dear Sir: Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution No. 2770 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY or VDNON SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF. SUCH BILL BY THE ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY nil GOVllUlOR or THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, which was adopted by the City Council 'at its regular meeting held on May 18, 1965. Yours very truly, CITY OF VERNON F. A.Ziemer t City Clerk PAZ: 11. enc. CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA May 19, 1965 ~ League of California Cities Hotel Claremont Berkeley, California Gentlemen: Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution No. 2770 - A RlSOUJrl0N OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY OF VERNON SUPPOtlTING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF SUCll BILL .BY THI ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AND THE A>>aOVALTHEREOF BY THEOOVERNOR OF THE STATE or CALIFORNIA, which "a. adopted by the ettyCouneil at its regular .atins held on May 18. 1965. r Yours very truly, em or VERNON F. A. Zi_er, City Clerk rAZ: 11. ene. CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA May 19, 1965 ~ League of Ca1ifornfaCitie8 Los Angeles County Division 1424 Mission St. South Pasadena. Calif. Attention: Mr. Burton E. Jones, President Gentlemen: Enclosed you will find a copy of Resolution No. 2770- A RESOWI'ION OF THE CITY COUNC.IL OF THE CITY OF VERNON SUPPORTING ASSBKBLYBILL NO. 2050 AND URGING THE PASSAGE OF .$UCH BILL BY THE ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AND THE APPROVAL THEREOF BY THE GOVERNOR or THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. which was adopted by the City Council at ita regular meeting held on May 18. 1965. Yours very truly, CITY OF VERNON r. A. Zi_er, City Clerk FAZ:ll. enc.