Loading...
Resolution No. 2957 ~ .... ' # .J. RESOLUTION NO. 2957 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON, URGING THE 3' ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 425. 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 5' WHEREAS, state Senator H. L. Richardson, with the 6 cooperation of other State Senators and Assemblymen of the 7 California State Legislature, has introduced Senate Bill No. 425, 8 and 9 WHEREAS, Senate Bill No. 425 is aimed to restoring to 10 local government the authority to respond quickly to local need, 11 and to place the primary responsibility for the preservation of 12 peace at the local level, and 13 WHEREAS, recent ,appellate court decisions in the State 14 of California and on the federal level have failed to adequately 15 define which areas of local authority have or have not been pre- 16 empted by state authority, 17 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON 18 DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 19 SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon does 20 hereby urge the Legislature of the State of California to enact as 21 State law Senate Bill 425 as presented by Senator H. L. Richardson 22 and others. 23 SECTION 2: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall 24 certify to the passage of this resolution, and thereupon and 25 thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. . I 26 ADOPTED and approved this 16th day of AprL1, 1968. 30 31 32 ATTEST: ~~ F. A. Z1emer, city Clerk ~ /7 () It 1//w4~ " iiJI/ rlong, ayi! \J 27 28 29 1. .. . .'. ..... ' . .1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) SSe 2 COUNTY OF, LOS ANGELES ) 3 4 I, F. A. ZIEMER, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do 5 hereby certify that the foregoing ResiLution, being Resolution 6 No. 2957, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of 7 Vernon, and approved by the Mayor of said City at a regular 8 meeting of the City Council held on April l6, 1968. , 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 . ~r, C~ty Clerk 2. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ,t1en,/,,;; e; ~tnatt <!hambtr STATE CAPITOL, SACRAMENTO Hearings on---J:~6-?f____&_/L____~~___Cd~___&/eJ will be held before the Senate Committee on nh------------------------------Ja~C-LiU!"'_7-------------------------------------------------_ Datea~~.r;---t!{~ & :~::~~~~~~~:- d,jl:L~An- "h,d_lIllI 1717-850 1-68 800 asp e e', e e . ,j AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 3, 1968 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 23, 1968 SENATE BILL No. 425 Introduced by Senators Richardson, Harmer, Bradley, Cologne, G~ky, Whetmore, Deukmejian, Lagomarsino, Cusanovich, Bur- gener, and Schrade (Coauthors: As~embl;ymen Porter, Barnes, Russell, Moorhead, Conrad, Monagan, Mulford,. Lanterman, Campbell, Schabarum, Collier, Ketchum, Wakefield, Powers, and MacDonald) February 22, 1968 ~RED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY An act to add StJutien Bfl48 SECTIONS 9618 AND 9619 to the Government, Code, relating to construction of statutes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 9618 is added to the Government Code, 2 to read: 3 9618. A statute shall not 'be construed to interfere with or 4 preclude local,pol,ice, sanitary, and other regulations author- 5 izedby Section 11 of Article XI of the Constitution and local 6 regulations shall be permitted notwithstanding a statute on the 7 same Or a related' subject, except only, in the following,cases: 8 1. When tIle regulation duplicate~ general law-. LEGISLATIVE, COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 425, as amended, Richardson (Jud.). Construction of statutes. Adds. Sec. 9618" Gov.C. SpecifrescircumstanceS under. which state statute. shall be considered, to prevail over local, police, sanitary, and other regulations adopted by a city Or county. ' Pl'ohibitspoUtiqq,l ,subdivisions from regulating employer-employee relations, water districts,or agencies, and public utilities except as could be regulated prior to effective date of act. !J!e,beeome eperativ{} ffl:l, t.he 'eRaetmeBt ~ Assembl~' Bill N&.- ~ ~ RebuIa:!' ~ ~. the f:JcgislatHFe. Vo,te-Majority; Appropriation-No; Fiscal Committee-No. , l' SB'U5 '\ -2- 1 ,2. When the regulation authorizes, or purports to. author- ... 2 ize that which is expressly prohibited by general law. ,., 3 3. When the regulation prohibits or purports to prohibit 4 that which is expressly permitted by general law. 54,'> When there isacomprehensive scheme of legislation on 6 the same subject hy general law, and such .general law : 7 ( a) Expr.essly provides that it has oCGupied the entire field 8 of such legislation; or 9 (b) Expressly prohibits other and further regulation in the 'e 10 field of such legislation. 11 $EC. 2.. Section 9619 is added to. the Government Code, , 12 to read: ' 13 9619. SectionM18 shall not be deemed to authorize any 14 political .8u;bdivision. of the,state,asaefined in, Section 1'721 15 of the Labor Code, to regulate employer.ernployee relations, 16 water districts or agencies, o,r any. public utility or, related 17 business refJulated by the Public Utilities Code, eXl;ept as such 18 su~divisioncould ,lawfully regulate prior to the effective date '19 of Section 9618. . ' , ',' ,,20 Soo-:,.~ . !l1his aet shttR become opeFativc ~H MsemBly '21 ;gm Ne.: .~'...~ the~ RegulaI' Session is ci'laeted,~ the 22 Legislature, fl>ftti ffi Sl:tefl, e&Se at, the I'lfl;ffte time, as AoocmBl;y 23 Bill, 'Ne.: ~. ~ efEee.t:. o -, 'e -- DISTRICT OFFICE 359 SOUTH ROSEMEAD PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91107 (213) 795-9726 SACRAMENTO ADDRESS STATE CAPITOL 95614 (916) 445-3688 H. L. RICHARDSON COMMITTEES AGRICUL. TURE EDUCATION LEGISL.ATIVE REPRESENTATION LOCAL. GOVERNMENT ./ WATER RESOURCES ~ VICE CHAIRMAN NINETEENTH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ~ LEGISLA TURERECEIVEU j~ 7--~ ~/ 1~11 ./TV CALIFORNIA .e tt a t ~ E. A. ZiEMER CITY CLERK May 6, 1968 Re: Senate Bill 425 - Richardson Home Rule Bill Last week the Senate Judiciary Committee held over S. B. 425 for study of amendments. For your information, the hearing has been re-set for Thursday evening, May 9, at 8:00 p.m., in Room 4203 of the State Capitol. The amended bill is enclosed for your perusal. Sincerelyu --;z;h 4/~ H. L. RICHARDSON HLR: lk ,,"- DISTRICT OFFICE ~ 359 SOUTH RO'SEMEAD PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91107 (213) 795.9728 SACRAMENTO ADDRESS STATE CAPITOL. 95814 (916) 445.3688 H. L. RICHARDSON COMM ITTEES AGRICUL. TURE EDUCATION LEGISL.ATIVE REPRESENTATION LOCAL. GOVERNMENT WATER RESOU RCES VICE CHAIRMAN NINETEENTH SENATORIAL. DISTRICT (.,.U ~~ ~ ""Yyu.) ~ CALIFORNIA LEGISLA TURE APR 1 G 1968 ~tuatt ~~. Mayor R. J. Furlong City of Vernon City Hall 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California Dear Mayor Furlong: Local governments are faced with a number which restrict or deny local regulation. the same time fail to give guidance as to may regulate. This should be corrected. of court decisions These decisions at which subjects they It is for the foregoing reason that I have introduced Senate Bill 425. SB 425 is co-authored by both Republican and Demo- cratic Senators and Assemblymen. SB 425 is aimed at restor~ng to local government the authority to respond quickly to local need. It will place the primary responsibility for the preser- vation of peace at the local level. I need your help in getting Senate Bill 425 enacted into law. Your help can take two forms: the first is to supply me with any information or incidents that you are aware of where preemption has affected your local government: the second is to actively support the legislation through publications, resolutions, etc. I would deeply appreciate your cooperation, and I leave you with the thought that if current judicial trends continue, and if the State Legislature does not act, local government is jeopardized.. Sincerely, ~A. H. L. RICHARDSON State Senator HLR/g enol.. I . . . e . SENATE. BILL No. 4~5 " ... .. .. ......" " ',,','''''', r Ia~oduCedby $enaton Richardson, Barmer, BradJ,eYI Oologne, Grunsky, ,Whetmo~e, Deukmejian; . Lagomarsino, Ousanovich, Bur- g&ner, Schrade, lUld Kennick. ~' (C()all.thors : Assemblymen. Porter, Barnes; Russell, Moorhead, Conrad, , Hanagan, Mul1ord, Hane;y Johnson;' Iianterman, Campbell; Scha.- barum,Collier, Ketchum, Wakefield, Powers, and MacDonald) Fe bruary 22, 1968 ,~ REFERRED 'l'() OOMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY An f,Wtta add Section 9613 t()theGave~ent Obite, reliiting ta (jon~tr~ctian at str#ut~s~ The peaple althe State at Oalifarrtiada enadas fallaws: \ 1 2 3 4 5 (3 7 8 9 10 '11 12 13 '14 15 16 17 18 S~CTION 1. Section 961S'is added.to'the Government Code, to read : 9613.. A st{ttuteshallnot he .co:nstrued to int(lrfere witho:r. preclude local,.fpolice, sanitary, . and . other regUlations authorc ized by Section 11 of Article XI o,f the Constitution and . local regulations shall, be permitted notwithstanding a statute on the same ora related subject, except only in the following cases : L When the regulation duplicates generallaw. 2. When the regulation ,. authorizes or purports to author- ize that whicliis expressly prohibited by general law. , 3. When the regulation J}rohibits or . purJ}orts to prohibit that which is expressly permitted by generallaw. 4. . When there is' a comprehensive sch~me of legislation .on the sl1:me subject by general law, .atldsuch general law: ,~ (a) Expressly provides that it has occupied the entire field ohuch legislation;. or, " .' '.,' (h') Expressly prohibits other and further regUlation in ,the field of such legislation. I,-EGISLAT'IVECOUNSEL'S DIGEST . 1 SB.425,asintrodueed, ,Richardson (Jud.) , Oon$truction' &f statutes. Adds Sec. 9613, Gov.C." ".', " .,', ' . .S~ifies .circlWStances Wlderwhich statestat1ltesh~lbe co~id~d,' . to. prevail. over .local,' police, sanitary, and other 'r~gulations ad(>pted by acityorcQunty,. . ' . " '-I 'Vote--M;ajority; AI?propriation-No; F~al Committee-No. 2487-614 Reprinted 3.22-68 1,500 o ,;J '. NEWS RELEASE - IMMEDIATE SUBJECT: SB 425 - Home Rule FEBRUARY 22t 1968 FROM THE OFFICE OF SENATOR Ho Lo RICHARDSON Sacramentog (916) 445~3688 District: (213) 795-9728 Senator Ho Lo "Bill" Richardson (R-19), Arcadiat today intro- duced legislation (SB 425 - The Richardson Home Rule Bill) aimed at reinforcing the bulwark of home ru1eo The legislation will be carried on the Assembly side by Assemblyman Carley Vo Porter (D-38, Chairman of the LoAo County Legislative Delegation) once it has cleared the Senateo This bill has been co-authored by a number of Senators and Assemblymen 0 The legislation is supported by the powerful District Att~rneys Association of California and the California Peace Officers Associationo It also has the support of the Governor and is expected to gain quick approval by the League of California Cities9 as well as the California Supervisors Associationo Additiona11Yt a number of civic organizations from throughout the State are expeoted to urge the passa.ge of the legislationo In expressing the intention of the legislation, Senator Richardson sa'id 9 "The more complex our California society becomes, the more dependent we must be on home rule9 not State ruleo Home rule is a basic concept of our form of government 0 Centralizing all authority in Sacramento and Washington is proving to be a poor practiceo To fight the problems that our communities face today, such as crime, juvenile delinquencY9 immorality as seen in the forms of topless bars, etc09 the citizen must have the ability to act at the local 1evelo This will be one of the best ways to encourage local initiative in solving local problems and protecting our freedomso "Such reinforcement of the time-honored tradition of home rule is necessary at this time because our local elected officials are at a loss to know whether they can enact local ordinances regulating -1... 3 ~ many areas of conduct~ such as the regulation of weapons~prohibition of topless exhibitions~ licensing of taxi cab drivers. control of intoxi- cation and other forms of public vagrancy 0 SB 425 treats the pre- emption problem head-on and decides the issue clearly and squarely in favor of local government 0 The division of the power of government to enact police and sanitary regulations between State and local governmental entities is aptly defined by the State Constitution 0 Section 11 of Article 11 of the Constitution affirmatively grants local communities the righ~ to regulate through their city councils and boards of supervisors such local~ police~ sanitary and other regula- tions which are not in conflict with already existing State law 0 This authority. which has been vested in local officials since the Consti- tution was adopted in 1879. was seriously jeopardized in 1962 by the State Supreme Court in its now infamous Carol Lane decisiono In that case the court held a Los Angeles city ordinance designed to curb prostitution (technically called UresortingU) invalid because there was already a State statute prohibiting prostitution ~~ even though this city ordinance in no way conflicted with that State statuteo The court was not~ however~ deterred by this fact. and through a clever exercise of legal gymnastics. announced the troublesome principle of UState preemption by implicationU =~ that is~ since the State statute prohibited prostitution and the State had not itself attempted to regu- late UresortingU the State thereby intended~ albeit silently. to per- mit resortingo A municipal ordinance prohibiting that which the State had thus uimpliedlyU permitted was~ quite definitely (in the court's eyes at least) in conflict with State lawo The courtUs logic is founded on complete and utter fiction that the Legislature. by entering tha field toprohiliit prostitution intended to preempt all local regulation supplementary to that State regulation with which it had not dealt; -2- q '. .. ioeo, that the Legislature consciously rejected the notion of prohi- biting tresortingo' Nothing could be farther from the truth. The Legislature simply does not consider every type of conduct in every field in which it enters. What is wrong with leaving further regula- tion in those fields in which the State does enter up to local option?", Senator Richardson asks. "Senate Bill 425 will remove the cloud which the Carol Lane - decision has cast upon the present validity of local ordinances which now are on the books of the municipal codes of every city and every county in this State. SB 425 will reinvest those ordinances with the dignity of the presumption of validity, and local officials will not then be asked to enforce ordinances whose validity is in question. Further, SB 425 is a morale boost for local governments, and shows each of the local juriSdictions of this great State that the State govern- ment does have faith in their ability to solve their own problems. "At the present time, if a problem develops which is pecu- liar to a particular community, that community must now travel to Sacramento to get the approval of the representatives of the entire state populationt even though that community's problem may not be of statewide concern. Such a trek, even if successful, is, needless to say. not only time consuming but expensive, not, to add, ridiculous. Numerous local officials have in the past six years under the Lane law often been met in Sacramento with indifference on the part of legislators representing communities unaffected by their particular problemo SB 425 will insure that problems which are peculiar to com- munities can be met at the local level almost instantaneously by con- certed action of the city councilor board of supervisors. Letts re- turn to local officials the authority to do the job in meeting local problems," the Senator concluded. ---30--- -3- s- ,# ,.." .,# REMARKS OF CARL We ANDERSON. Deputy District Attorney of Alameda County. represent~ng J. F. Coak1ey~ the District Attorney of Alameda County. in his capacity as Chairman of the Law and Legislative Committees of the District AttorneysU Association of California and the California Peace Officers' Association. Before the California Advisory Council of County Officials meeting at the El Dorado Hotelo Friday~ March 1St 1968. The California Peace Officersu Association and the District Attorneys' Association and the District AttorneysU Association of California have joined together for the purposes of promoting their legislative goals. SB 425 We are concerned that time=honored~ long-standing local city and county ordinances are suddenly and continually questioned as invalid. We are concerned that police are called upon to arrest those who vio- late ordinances generally considered to be "invalid" -- subjecting them to ridicule and generating disrespect for the law. We are concerned that prosecutors must prosecute those who are arrested for the violation of such "invalid" ordinances. We are concerned that local governments are no longer able to enact speedy solutions to purely regional problems -- riot control, new weapons control~ topless and other sexual fadst public intoxication. etc. etc. etco In short, we are concerned that the arms of local government are bound and that the lips of its spokesmen are stopped. We urge the enactment of SB 4250 which removes the question concerning the validity of these ordinances by requiring the state legislature to affirmatively specify when local authorities may not enact ordinances in a partiuc1ar field. It is patterned after Assemblyman Thielan's bill of 1965 -- AB 23. We support SB 425 to abolish the ridiculous doctrine of preemption by implication. We support SB 425 to reinvest existing ordinances with the dignity of validity 0 We support SB 425 to promote respect for law and order by requiring police to enforce ordinances recognized generally as valid instead of subjecting them to mockery and ridicule in enforcing so-called "pre- empted" ordinances. We support SB 425 to restore local governmental bodies with the author- ity to respond quickly in crisis. We support SB 425 to place the primary responsibility for government and the preservation of the peace at the local level -- where the enforcement is!!1 -1- ~ t('. ........... REMARKS OF CARL We ANDERSON - continued We support SB 425 to reassert our own confidence in our ability to do the job at home. In supporting SB 425 we also realize that its enactment would be bene- ficial to the Legislature itself -- by relieving our state lawmakers of the duty to resolve purely local problems which are not of state- wide concern 0 In supporting SB 425 we further realize that its enactment would have a beneficial effect upon the judiciary -- by relieving court calendars of the many many cases concerning this troublesome division of govern- mental authority. We expect a fight in getting SB 425 enacted a Opposition in the past has come, both behind the scenes and on staget from the liquor interests and other pressure groups harboring deep-seeded distrust for local authorities. [We solicit your assistance in getting your legislator on our (band)wagono] Senator Richardson, who is authoring SB 425 with Assemblyman Carley Porter, is dedicated to devoting full time to the enactment of SB 425. We have 28 of the 120 legislators already convinced, and they appear as coauthors on the billa SB 425 goes first to Senate Judiciary where we need 7 votes for a "do pass" recommendation -- six members of that committee have coauthored the billa Should we be fortunate enough to get to the Assembly, we will need assignment to a favorable committee, for we sincerely believe that the majority of both houses of both parties are in favor of reasserting their faith in local home rule. But we do need every legislator contacted -- "KEEP LOCAL GOVERNMENT ALIVE -- VOTE SB 425" -2- 7 -r-.,. - " ,'~ LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ITS NEEDS Mrs. Kline M. Dolan 9oundc.'t 368 c;;$outh cRifnp'a'f !l3ouLeua'td · /!.C~ dfnge!u, CaLifC!'tnia. 90005 March 28, 1968 Senator H. L. Richardson State Capitol Building Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Senator Richardson: The Board of Advisors of Law Enforcement and .Its Needs extends its grateful appreciation to you for your authorship of the vitally needed Preemption Bill SB #425 as one of our :1.968 affirmative measures to aid the law enforcement agencies in this state. The reasons outlined in our support are explained thusly: This bill clarifies the right of local authorities to enact local legislation which is not a duplication of, or in conflict with, existing state laws, etc. It adds Section 9613 to the Govern- ment Code to read: If A statute shall not be construed to interfere with or preclude, local, police sanitary, and other regulations authorized by Section 11, Article XI of the Constitution and local' regulations shall be permitted notwithstanding a statute on the same or a related subject. II (Exceptions are Hsted 1 through 4 a and b) The right to enact local legislation was limited in a California Supreme Court decision in 1962. For the past six years local authorities have been handicapped by this decision for it erased their statutory right to enact. ' The right should be returned because: Local ordinances can be passed within days, whereas at the state level it may take years. Secondly: a state law encompasses all of our citizens and our needs are not all the same. San Francisco may need a certain . law to curtail prostitution. Los Angeles may need a law to control a 'newly invented weapon. San Joaquin may need laws regulating special agriculture problems. Thirdly: Local ordinances can many times be th~ best sampling grounds for future state laws. If, on the other hand, the state finds any law interfering with the free flow of persons and commerce, the State Legislature is always free to enact a law forbidding local regulation in that field.' Respectfully yours, ~.~;f ~) Doris L,. Dolan President DLD:lr "dedicated to the uigo7.ou1. ~UpP07.t of 011.7. LatlJ enfo7.cefnent .:tgencie1." non-profit. . . non-partisan. . . non-sectarian OFFICERS Don Belding {!haitman Mrs. Kline M. Dolan !P'tE..id"nt Dr. C. Erwin Piper <Vi"" fP",.idmt Mrs. Lorene Read cSuutM!} Frank L. King, Sr. 9' 'tE.a.u 'tE.'t COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN Mrs, James W. Kyle <:3 in.an.ce, Mrs. Lyndon E. Robb dU."mGmhip Mrs. Homer T oberman cSpc.dal E17"nh Lyman Garber cSPE.akl:'t. !Bu,,,,,,u BOARD OF ADVISORS Mrs. Harry M. Bennell, Jr. Lowell W, Berry Daniel P. Bryant Mrs. Wm. H.. N. Bryant, Jr, Mrs, G, Earl Carson Hugh H.Evans, Sr, George R. Hearst, Jr. Mrs. Edgar R. Hill Robert O. Hunter Kai Jorgensen Reibert 0, Kahse Miss Beatrice Kay John W. Kennedy, Jr. Mrs, f'atrick James Kirby , Fred W. Kline Governor Goodwin J. Knight Cyril Magnin Mrs, Neil G. McCarroll Thomas C. McCray Arthur R, McKenzie Mrs, Walter J. Mania Edward Montgomery . Robert D, Nelson Bruce 1. Odou, M.D, Mrs. Thomas J, Pinchback Aaron Raboff , Arthur K, Snyder Carlyle F, Stout, M,D. Max Streicher Dr. William J. Teague Dr.' Norman Topping Dr. M. Norvel Young Mrs. Daniel C. Waters Mrs. Edward D. Wylie g' (916) 445.3688 CALIFORNIA LEGISLA TURE ~~uat~ ReCEIVED ~- )1/ tot F. A. ZIEMER CITY CLEE April 26, 1968 Mr. F. A. Ziemer City Clerk City of Vernon City Hall 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California Dear Mr. Ziemer: senate Bill 425, my Home Rule Bill, will be heard by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, May 2, 19Q8 at 8:00 p.m. in Room 4203 of the State Capitol in sacramento. Your response supporting SB 425 is appreciated. Sincerely, ~~~ ' l!. L. RICHARDSON State Senator .. HLR/9 SACRAMENTO ADDRESS 4160 STATE CAPITOL. SACRAMENTO, CALIF. 9S9t4 TELEPHONE: 445..7952. j~,1~~ ~,,~ DISTRICT OFFICE 7707 STATE STREET HUNTINGTON PARK, CALIF. 90255 TELEPHONE: 582-0939 ~zz~mhI~ Ohdifornht Ifi~Bizhdun COMMITTEES CRIMINAL. PROCEDURE CONSERVATION AND WILDL.IFE NATURAL. RESOURCES, PLANNING, AND PUBLIC WORKS REPLY TO: 0 DISTRICT o CAPITOL FLOYD L. W AKEFI ELD 'R'" E eEl V .- '," , ' t.u 7(-,2 y-& 8 ASSEMBLYMAN. FIFTY.SECOND DISTRICT ~ F. A. ZjEr,AER CITY' CU..RK April 22, 1968 Mr. F. A. Ziemer City Clerk City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Vernon, California Dear Mr. Ziemer: Thank you for your letter of April 16 advising me of the Council's support of SB 425. I appreciate having this information. FLW:mt l cc: Creedon CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA April 16, 1968 Assemblyman Floyd, t..Wakefield 5211.d District 4160 State Capitol Sacramento, Californta95814 Dear Sir: Enclosed p1ea$efind a, certified copy of Res.olution<No. 2957 - A RESOLUTIONQF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERJ'{ON. URGING THE ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 425. which was adopte4 "bY the City Council at its regular meeting of, April 16,.1968. Yours very truly. rAZ:ll. he. F. A. Z:te111er, City Clerk ...... cc: ' Creedon CITY OF VERNON CALIFORNIA April 17. 1968 Senator H.L. Richardson Nineteenth Senatorial Di.trict Stat. Capitol Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Sir: Enclosed pleas. find, a certified copy of Resolution No. 2957 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL or. THE. CITY or VERNON. URGING THE ADOPTION OF SENATE BILL 425, which was adopted by the CIty Couaell .at it. regular meeting of April 16,1968. Yours very truly, F. A.. Ziemer, City Clerk. rAZ:ll. enc. cc:' Creedon CITY OF 'VERNON CALIFORNIA April 16, 1968 Senator LawrenceE. Walsh Thirtieth District 5059 State CapitQt Sacr$Dento, California 95814 Dear Sir: Inclosed please find a certified eopy of ResolutionNC). 2957 - A RESOLUTION or THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY or VERNON, URGING THE ADOPTION or SENATE BILL 425, whieh ,was adC)pted by the City Council at its repl.. meeting of April 16, 1968. Yours\tery truly, F. A. Ziemer, City Clerk PAZ:ll. ene.