Resolution No. 5873
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 5873
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
PROJECT PLANNING AGREEMENT RESPECTING
THE MEADjMCCULLOUGH-VICTORVILLEjADELANTO
TRANSMISSION PROJECT (DWP NO. 10180)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted
Resolution No. 5154 on December 18, 1984, which approved the
terms and conditions of the Project Planning Agreement between
the Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles,
the cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Burbank, Colton,
Glendale, Pasadena, Riverside, and Vernon, the M-S-R Public
Power Agency, and the Western Area Power Administration
(hereinafter "Parties"), to conduct feasibility studies and to
provide for funding of Planning Work on a new 500 kV
transmission line with appurtenant facilities between Southern
Nevada and Southern California; and
WHEREAs, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted
Resolution No. 5211 on September 3, 1985, to. increase the
planning funds for said project from $3,500,000 to $9,500,000;
and
WHEREAS, the construction, operation and maintenance
plan for said project is substantially completed; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to provide additional funding
of $2,000,000 to conduct further activities related to the
continuation of Planning Work for which the City of Vernon will
pay 6.25% or $125,000.00.
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
2 THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
3
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon
4 hereby approves Amendment No. 2 to the proj ect Planning
5 Agreement, Mead/McCullough-Victorville/Adelanto Transmission
6 Project, a copy of which Amendment has' been presented to the
7 City Council concurrently with this Resolution, and the city
8 Council hereby orders said Amendment to be received and filed by
9 the City Clerk.
10
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon
11 hereby authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute said
12 Amendment No. 2 for, and on behalf of, the City of Vernon.
13
SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall
14 certify to the passage of this resolution and thereupon and
15 thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
16 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of January, 1991.
17
18
--~'
//<<C~
MALKENHORST, City Clerk
19
ATTEST:
//
BRUCE V.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
. .
1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)ss
2 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
3 I, BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk of the City of
4 Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being
5 Resolution No. 5873, was duly adopted by the City Council of the
6 City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the city Council duly
7 held on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, and thereafter duly signed by
8 the Mayor of the City of Vernon.
9
10
11
12 (SEAL)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
/>,4 ,v~;"~Ph
BRUCE v. MALKENHORST, ci ty Clerk
~~~lffi~ (Q)ff W@1~~1f <IDlffi@ IP(Q)~~1f
~ G'?~
~1h~ (Cn~~ (Q)ff W$5 ~n~
t
>
..
TOM BRADLEY
Mayor
Commission
MICHAEL J. GAGE, President
RICK J. CARUSO, Vice President
ANGEL M. ECHEVARRIA
DOROTHY GREEN
MARY D. NICHOLS
JUDITH K. DAVISON, Secretary
DANIEL W. WATERS, General Manager and Chief Engineer
ELDON A. COTTON, Assistant General Manager - Power
JAMES F. WICKSER, Assistant General MaMger - Water
NORMAN L. BUEHRING. Assistant General Manager- External Affairs
NORMAN J. POWERS, Chief Finoncial Officer
March I, 1991
MeadjMcCullough-VictorvillejAdelanto
Planning Participants
(See attached list)
Gentlemen:
Executed Copies of Amendment No. 2 to the
proiect Planninq Aqreement lDWP No. 101801
Enclosed for your files is one fully conformed copy of
Amendment No. 2 (Amendment) to the above-referenced Agreement
with all thirteen (13) countersignature pages. The Amendment is
dated and effective as of March I, 1991.
The Amendment provides for the continuation of Planning
Work and provides an additional $2.0 million for Planning Work
Costs.
Should you have any questions, or if further
information is desired, please contact me at (213) 481-5296 or
have your staff contact Mr. Peter J. Fehervari at (213) 481-8747.
4;;';"~
.~:.
sincerely,
~
DONAL[) M. ~
Manager of Power Contracts
Enclosure
c: Mr. Peter J. Fehervari wjo enclosure
S.
" J
~.,
-'
III North Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 0 Mailing address: Box III, Los Angeles 90051-0100
Telephone: (213) 4814211 Cable address: DEWAPOLA FAX: (213) 481-8701
Recy<:lallle'no maoe _ <ecyOeO "'IS'. @
t
.
MEAD-MCCULLOUGH-VICTORVILLE/ADELANTO
PLANNING PARTICIPANTS
City of Anaheim
Mr. Dale L. Pohlman
AGM-power Resources
Anaheim Public utilities Dept.
222 s. Harbor Blvd., 1st Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
city of Pasadena
Mr. David C. Plumb
General Manager
150 S. Los Robles Ave., Ste. 200
Pasadena, California 91101
City of Banning
Mr. Terry Collins
Public utilities Director
P. o. Box 998
Banning, California 92220
City of Riverside
Mr. Bill D. Carnahan
Director of Public utilities
Riverside Public utilities Dept.
3900 Main street
Riverside, California 92522
City of Vernon v'
Mr. Bruce V. Malkenhorst
City Administrator
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90058
City of Azusa
Mr. Joseph F. Hsu
Director of utilities
213 E. Foothill Blvd.
Azusa, California 91702
City of Burbank
Mr. Ronald V. stassi
General Manager
Burbank Public Service Dept.
P. o. Box 631
Burbank, California 91503
M-S-R Public Power Agency
Mr. Kenneth H. McKinney
General Manager
P. o. Box 4060
Modesto, California 95352
City of Colton
Mr. Gale A. Drews
Electrical utility Manager
650 N. La Cadena Dr.
Colton, California 92324
Salt River project
Mr. Darrell E. smith
P. o. Box 52025
Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2025
City of Glendale
Mr. Michael P. Hopkins
Director of Public Service Dept.
119 N. Glendale Ave., Rm. 600
Glendale, California 91206
Western Area Power Administration
Mr. Thomas A. Hine
Phoenix Area Manager
P. o. Box 6457
Phoenix, Arizona 85005
. " ..
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 ,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
')::1
.~ -.J
~M~~)~~~1T~
(Ri fDJ ,-: r(~ :1 r\..H fA\. n
LllJ~~UlQ]UU~iklS _
MEAD/MCCULLOUGH-VICTORVILLE/ADELANTO
TRANSMISSION PROJECT
AMENDMENT No. 2
to the
PROJECT PLANNING AGREEMENT
between the
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
and
CITY OF ANAHEIX
CITY OF AZUSA
CITY OF BANNING
CITY OF BURBANK
CITY OF COLTON
CITY OF GLENDALE
CITY OF PASADENA
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF VERNON
ll-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL
IllPROVEllEN'l' AND POWER DISTRICT
WESTERN AREA POWER ADllINISTRATION
.
Amendment No. 2
DWP No. 10180
.
.
. .f
y
1
AMENDMENT NO. 2
2
:;
TO THE
PROJECT PLANNING AGREEMENT
4
5
6
1. PARTIES: The Parties to this Amendment No.2 ("Amendment"),
effective as of H~f"~L I I <TOY I , to the Mead/McCullough-
I
7
8
Victorville/Adelanto Transmission Project Planning Agreement
as amended by Amendment No.1 thereto ("Agreement"), are the
9
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
10
11
12
("Los Angeles"), a department organized and existing under
the Charter of the City of Los Angeles, a municipal
corporation of the State of California, and the CITY OF
13
ANAHEIM, CITY OF AZUSA, CITY OF BANNING, CITY OF BURBANK,
CITY OF COLTON, CITY OF GLENDALE, M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY,
CITY OF PASADENA, CITY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF VERNON, the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA acting through the WESTERN AREA
POWER ADMINISTRATION and the SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 2.
IMPROVEMENT AND POWER OISTRICT, an agricultural improvement
district organized and existing under and by virtue of the
laws of the State of Arizona (hereinafter referred to
individually as "Party" and collectively as "Parties").
RECITALS: This Amendment is made with reference to the
23 following facts and understandings among others:
24 2.1 The Parties hereto executed the Agreement (OWP No.
25
26
10180, dated April 1, 1985) to conduct and provide for
27
funding of Planning Work on a new transmission facility
between Southern Nevada and Southern California.
Q:)
.~,j
- 1 -
, ,
"
, '
'"
, " " " "
,',-', '
, .~
..
, 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.
2.2 The Parties, hereinafter also referred to as Planning
Participants, appointed Los Angeles as the Project
Manager.
2.3 The Parties entered into Amendment No.1 to the Project
Planning Agreement effective as of December 31, 1985
which Amendment No. I, among other things, increased
the limit of expenditure for Planning Work to
$9,500,000.
2.4 The Project Manager completed a portion of the studies
necessary for the determination of the feasibility of
the DC Alternative, and presented the result of such
studies to the Coordinating Committee. The
Coordinating Committee concluded that an AC
transmission line would better serve the needs of the
Project Participants and directed the Project Manager
to conduct further feasibility studies.
2.5 On June 24, 1988, the Project Manager obtained from the
u.s. Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") a right-of-way
grant which authorizes construction of a transmission
line by the Project Participants on land owned by BLM.
Pursuant to applicable Federal regulations, the right-
of-way grant may be forfeited if not utilized within
any continuous five year period.
2.6 The $9,500,000 approved for Planning Work has been
fully expended. The Planning participants wish to
provide for additional funding to the project Manager
which shall conduct further activities related to the
continuation of Planning Work consisting of the
- 2 -
.....
.., '
.. ,
" '>
t 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
r-
t:;,)
24
25
26
27
Q:;)
.~ ...J
preparation of a construction, operation and
maintenance plan to obtain permission from BLM to
commence construction of the Project transmission line
and prevent forfeiture of the right-oi-way.
3.
AGREEMENT: In consideration of the mutual covenants herein,
,
the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as set forth
4 . AMENDMENTS:
herein.
4.1 Limit on Planning Work Co~ts: Delete Subsection 7.1 of
the Agreement and replace it with the following text:
"7.1 Limit on Planning Work Costs:
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the
Agreement and this Amendment, the aggregate cost
for Planning Work under the Agreement and this
Amendment shall not exceed $11,500,000. Such
aggregate cost shall include costs for Planning
Work incurred by any Party, prior to the effective
date of the Agreement or prior to the effective
date of this Amendment."
4.2 Planning Work Budget: Delete Subsection 7.2 to the
Agreement and replace it with the following text:
"7.2 Planning Work Budget: The Parties hereby approve
the budget for Planning Work Costs as set forth in
Appendix B, Revision 2, attached hereto and made a
part hereof. Any increase in such budget shall be
subject to the prior review and approval of the
Coordinating Committee."
- 3 -
:
..
~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 8.
5.
ALLOCATION OF PAYMENT FOR PLANNING WORK COSTS:
Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary in the
Agreement, the Parties hereto agree that the responsibility
for and allocation of those Planning Work Costs authorized
under this Amendment No.2, which costs are in excess of
amounts previously authorized by the Agreement, shall be in
accordance with Column C of Appendix A, Revision 1, which
Appendix is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Such
reallocation of Planning Work Costs shall not affect the
allocation of voting rights or Election Rights which remain
allocated pursuant to Column B of Appendix A, Revision 1.
6.
EXECUTION OF THE AMENDMENT IN COUNTERPARTS: This Amendment
No. 2 shall be executed in counterparts and each Planning
Participant shall deliver its executed counterpart signature
page to the project Manager.
7.
EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM: This Amendment No. 2 shall become
effective upon the date first written above, which shall be
the date when all Planning Participants have delivered to
the Project Manager one fully executed signature page. Thi.s
Amendment No. 2 shall terminate concurrently, and in
accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
ALL OTHER SECTIONS TO REMAIN THE SAME: All other sections
23 of the Agreement that are not amended herein shall remain
24 the same and in full force and effect.
25 9
.
SIGNATURE CLAUSE: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the signatories
26 hereto represent that they have been appropriately
27 authorized to enter into this Amendment No. 2 to the project
?:::l
.~ oJ
- 4 -
1
2
Planning Agreement, as of the date first written above, on
behalf of the Party for whom they sign.
3
4
~.
-t
5
;:n
N
rr'1
C
OJ
-<
;;c
,.."
$I>
~:>
~
N
'~
~
5
6
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
I,P?~OV::O ASTOmFM.AND 1~~'l.nY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
J ".r" K. H'~~'l C'T'.' ~-,,:'l~'"
;~~lW __..c.. h.:I\, ..ill 'd.""'.........b
~F THE CI~Y OF LOS. ANGELES
~. . R.D.\VEis~~' B- ~Uj .uj~~
sis nt QI;l AUam~ Y general Mlllla&tlr ana "Mm (n&mlll
and~~~
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
CITY OF ANAHEIM
14
By
(Seal)
15
16
Attest:
17
18
19
CITY OF AZUSA
20 (Seal)
21 Attest:
22
r-
G,)
24
25
26 (Seal)
27 Attest:
23
By
CITY OF BANNING
By
- 5 -
< .f
1
2
Planning Agreement, as of the date first written above, on
behalf of the Party for whom they sign.
3
4
5
6
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
by
BOARD OF WATER AND POWER COMMISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
By
and
Secretary
(Seal)
By
15
16 ~~J(S'4-
17
18
19
Alan R. Watts
Special Counsel
City of Anaheim
Dated: February 7, 1991
CITY OF AZUSA
20 (Seal)
21 Attest:
22
ro-
t::."
24
25
26 (Seal)
27 Attest:
23
By
CITY OF BANNING
By
- 5 -
, "I
1
2
3
4
5
6
Planning Agreement, as of the date first written above, on
behalf of the Party for whom they sign.
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
by
7
BOARD OF WATER AND POWER COMMISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
8
9
10
11
By
and
Secretary
12
13
14
CITY OF ANAHEIM
By
(Seal)
15
16
Attest:
17
18
19
20
21
22
(Seal)
CITY OF AZUSA
By i ~PV
1'1l~
i/
/
23
24
25
26
CITY OF BANNING
By
(Seal)
27
Attest:
23
- 5 -
'\
. ,
1
Planning Agreement, as of the date first written above, on
2
behalf of the Party for whom they sign.
:;
4
5
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER
OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
6
by
7
BOARD OF WATER AND POWER COMMISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 (Seal)
15 Attest:
16
17
18
19
20 (Seal)
21 Attest:
22
By
and
Secretary
CITY OF ANAHE IM
By
CITY OF AZUSA
By
23
25
26 (Seal)
:: A~.->~~L~
- 5 -
24
"
1
2
3
4
5
:;TY OF BURBZd~
APPROVED lts TO FORM .
Date
(Seal)
Attest:
6
~;;w~
By
Title
7
8
9 CITY OF COLTON
10 By
11 (Seal)
12 Attest:
13
14
15
16 CITY OF GLENDALE
17 By
18 (Seal)
19 Attest:
20
21
22
,,-
Go)
24
25 (Seal)
Attest:
26
27
9:)
OJ"";
CITY OF PASADENA
By
- 6 -
1
2
3
4
(Seal)
5
Attest:
6
7
8
9
10
11 ( Seal)
12 I Attest:
13. Y~a* ,(l~
I
14
15
16
17
18 (Seal)
19 Attest:
20
21
22
,..-
G.)
24
25 (Seal)
Attest:
26
27
23
CITY OF BURBANK
By
C~F~ON . ~
~d A-/~/
::~T:{1J~
Alan R. atts
Special Counsel
City of Colton
Dated: January M-, 1991
CITY OF GLENDALE
By
CITY OF PASADENA
By
- 6 -
., ~
"
1
2
;)
4
(Seal)
5
Attest:
6
7
8
9
10
11 (Seal)
12 Attest:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
,..-
,,"
24
25
26
27
23
(Seal)
Attest:
~r$/3.g;t#
.. -'. .. :-./' I'. '..' .'. -.. 'd ---
_'. f. .'...- ._. ._._ ." ._ _. .'-
(Seal)
Attest:
CITY OF BURBANK
By
CITY OF COLTON
By
By
CITY OF PASADENA
By
- 6 -
1
2
CITY OF BURBANK
3
4
(Seal)
5
Attest:
6
7
8
9
10
11 (Seal)
12 Attest:
13
14
15
16
17
18 (Seal)
19 Attest:
20
21
By
CITY OF COLTON
By
CITY OF GLENDALE
By
22
24
25
26
(Seal)
CITY OF PASADENA
By a;~ti:f Hart~'r
City Manager
23
, '
(; , \ I
ttest:~, .,' . . .
.~,,,~
Marv;I! lL ~ '~erreh' Z1U/"1
CitY'lClerk '
, I
\
, -'1
._1,)
APPROVED AS TO Fj)'\M: #I J
This ~Of.If:lfl.. 19JL-
By r 'irY~
AsSistant General Counsel
27
23
- 6 -
. . . t
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2
3 ( Seal)
4
Attest:
5
CM..viL d.<-fl h?" J -'
--ui:ty ~
6
7
8
(Seal)
9
Attest:
Attest:
17
18
19
20
21
Attest & Countersign:
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By ~'1~7??~
CITY OF VERNON
By
M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
By
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL
IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT
By
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
By
- 7 -
. .
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3 ( Seal)
4 Attest:
5
6
7
8
(Seal)
Attest:
/L-
Attest:
20
21
22
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By
CITY OF VERNON
By..- t~~~~:;.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
BY~
DAVID B. BREARLE~
CITY A'i'TORNEY
'dAN 1 5 199J
M-S-R PUBLIC-POWER AGENCY
By
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL
IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT
By
Attest & Countersign:
ro-
G.)
24
25
26
27
23
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
By
- 7 -
f
1
2
3 ( Seal)
4 Attest:
5
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By
6 CITY OF VERNON
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
7 By
8 ( Seal)
9 Attest:
Lj'~wc
.-
-
18
19
20
21
22
Attest & Countersign:
,..-
,,"
24
25
26
27
28
"';" ,,,' ';' ,',"'"
, , "
H-S-R PUBLIC PO~_ AGE~
By ~ ~~..7
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL
IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT
By
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
By
- 7 -
"
" , ,," ." , "
, ,
. .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
,..-
G~
24
25
26
27
23
(Seal)
Attest:
(Seal)
Attest:
Attest:
BY
DATE
Attr} .' Countersign.
11 ~A.,D~({)wAP,
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By
CITY OF VERNON
By
M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
By
By
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
By
- 7 -
. .
1
2
3 ( Seal)
4 Attest:
5
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
By
6 CITY OF VERNON
7 By
8 ( Seal)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
",
9 Attest:
Attest:
Attest & Countersign:
,..-
G':>
24
25
26
27
23
M-S-R PUBLIC POWER AGENCY
By
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL
IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT
By
:STE~ ~o; ~TION
- 7 -
:
~
".:: .::'" .
-.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
APPENDIX A TO PROJECT PLANNING AGREEMENT, REVISION 1
SCHEDULE OF PT.ANNING WORK COST S~ES AND ELECTION RIGHTS
The Planning Work Cost Share and Election Right of each
Planning Participant shall be the indicated percentage set forth
opposite its name in the following'schedule.
Planning Work
Election Right Cost Share & Planning Work
Percentage Only Election Right% Cost Share Only
AC Project DC Alternative AC Project
Planning Column A Column B ColuIijt). C
Participant MW % MW % JfiL %
Anaheim 150 14.286 200 10.000 110 9.1666
Azusa 6.3 .600 15 .750 18 1. 5000
Banning 4.3 .410 8 .400 11 . 9 167
Burbank 50 4.762 80 4.000 94 7.8334
Colton 5.3 .505 12 .600 21 1. 7500
· Glendale 50 4.762 78 3.900 90 7.5000
Pasadena 30 2.857 58 2.900 70 5.8334
Riverside 60 5.714 150 7.500 110 9.1666
Vernon 35 3.333 65.9 3.295 75 6.2500
Los Angeles 373.47 35.568 583.1 29.155 291 24.2500
M-S-R 100 9.524 250 12.500 210 17.5000
SRP 0 0 200 10.000 0 0
Western 185.63 17.679 300 15.000 100 8.3333
Total 1,050.00 100.000 2,000 100.000 1,200 100.0000
, "
:" "
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
,
"
1
2
3
APPENDIX B TO PROJECT PLANNING AGREEMENT
4
5
6
PLANNING WORK BUDGET
REVISION 2
This Revision 2 to the Mead-Adelanto Planning Work
Budget shown below authorizes expenditure of a $2 million
increase in Planning Work Costs.
7
8
BUDGET
PLANNING WORK
1)
Additional funding for Planning Work $ 1,765,000
to be performed by the Project Manager
for activities consisting of the
preparation of a construction, operation
and maintenance plan to obtain permission
from BLM to commence construction of the
project transmission line and prevent
forfeiture of the right-of-way*
Additional funding for work to be $ 235,000
performed by Salt River Project pursuant
to Letter Agreement between the Project
Manager and SRP dated August 9, 1990**
2)
$ 2,000,000
*
As long as total expenditures do not exceed
$1,765,000, the Project Manager may expend,
in any month, up to 120% of the following
monthly budgeted amounts:
Jan 1991 $ 125,000
Feb 91 200,000
Mar 91 225,000
Apr 91 255,000
May 91 255,000
June 91 315,000
July 91 390.000
TOTAL $ 1,765,000
** Authorized by the Mead-Adelanto Coordinating
25 Committee pursuant to a motion approved at its meeting held
December 7, 1990 in Ontario, California.
26
27
23
,
" ,
,
,', ,"'
:. ::.>>: ,,"'> ':".'''',:
,
,,'.