Resolution No. 79721
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Y r a a
RESOiUTION NO. 7972
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VERNON APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND TETRA TECH,
INC.
4 1
WHEREAS, the City of Vernon ("City") is proceeding at this
time to develop a 134 MW Combined Cycle Power Plant officially named
the Malburg Generating Station (the "Malburg Project") for the purpose
of installing additional generating capacity that will yield an
efficient, cost-effective, and reliable source of electric generation
to the City of Vernon; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the cooling water
supply for the Malburg Project must be provided by reclaimed water that
will require the construction of a pipeline extension (the MGS
Reclaimed Water System") as well as a pump station and associated
pressure reducing facilities on the Central Basin Municipal Water
District system (the "Vernon Booster Pump Station"); and
WHEREAS, the Central Basin Municipal Water District agrees
that the City should proceed with the construction and that the City
will be reimbursed for the cost of construction under the Agreement
between the City and the Central Basin Municipal Water District for the
provision of reclaimed water for the Malburg Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it needs the services
of a consultant that possesses the technical knowledge and expertise to
provide design, engineering and construction management services and
requested proposals from engineers with extensive experience in this
field; and
r .t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the City's staff has determined that because Tetra
Tech, Inc. ("Tetra Tech") designed a proposed extension of reclaimed
water through the City in 1993, it is familiar with the alignment and
construction issues in the City and Tetra Tech possesses the expertise
to undertake the MGS Reclaimed Water System and Vernon Booster Pump
Station projects; and
WHEREAS, Tetra Tech submitted a proposal dated April 30,
2002, for the MGS Reclaimed Water System that includes a description of
the proposed design, engineering and construction management services
and the cost of the services; and
WHEREAS, Tetra Tech submitted a proposal dated April 25,
2002, for the Vernon Booster Pump Station that includes a description
of the proposed design, engineering and construction management
services and the cost of the services; and
WHEREAS, on May 7, 2002, the Finance Committee recommended
that the City Council approve the recommendation of Bruce V.
Malkenhorst, Director of Finance, dated May 1, 2002, that an agreement
be entered into with Tetra Tech for the design, engineering and
construction of the MGS Reclaimed Water System and Vernon Booster Pump
Station projects; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon has
determined that, pursuant to the provisions of subsection (a) of
Section 2.27 of the Vernon City Code, it is in the public interest and
necessity to enter into an agreement with Tetra Tech setting forth the
terms and conditions of the services to be performed for the MGS
Reclaimed Water System and Vernon Booster Pump Station projects to
enhance services provided to the Vernon community.
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true
and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
approves the Agreement For Professional Consulting Services with Tetra
Tech, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a
part hereof.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute said Agreement for,
and on behalf.of, the City of Vernon.
SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
directs the City Clerk, or his designee, to send one fully executed
Agreement to:
Tetra Tech, Inc. Infrastructure Services Group
Attn. Terry L. Kerger, Project Manager
3280 E. Foothill Blvd., Suite 350
Pasadena, CA 91107
SECTION 5: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall
certify to the passage of this resolution, and thereupon and
thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22"d day of May, 2002.
ATTEST:
BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk
EONIS C. MALBdRG, May r
- 3 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No.
7972, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at an
adjourned regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Wednesday,
May 22, 2002, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor of the City
of Vernon.
(SEAL)
BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk
- 4 -
EXHIBIT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
low
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
(MGS RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINE EXTENSION AND
VERNON BOOSTER PUMP STATION)
THIS AGREEMENT is made, entered into and executed in
duplicate originals, either copy of which may be considered and used as
the original hereof for all purposes, as of this day of May, 2002,
in the City of Vernon, California
IBY AND BETWEEN
AND
THE CITY OF VERNON, (hereinafter
referred to as "the City")
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90058
TETRA TECH, INC. INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES Group hereinafter
referred to as "Consultant")
3280 East Foothill Blvd., Suite 350
Pasadena, California 91107
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to construct a pipeline extension
consisting of 1.8 miles of 18 inch pipe from the pipe terminus at the
intersection of Randolph Street and Newell to the Malburg Generation
Station located on 50th Street in the City of Vernon (hereinafter
referred to as the "MGS Reclaimed Water System"); and
WHEREAS, the City also desires to construct a pump station
and associated pressure reducing facilities on the Central Basin
Municipal Water District system (hereinafter referred to as the "Vernon
Booster Pump Station"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain Consultant to provide
design, engineering and construction management services for the MGS
Reclaimed Water System and Vernon Booster Pump Station; and
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
WHEREAS, Consultant submitted a proposal to the City dated
April 30, 2002 for the MGS Reclaimed Water System (hereinafter referred
to as the "Pipeline Proposal"), a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, which includes a
description of the proposed design, engineering and construction
management services and the cost of the services; and
WHEREAS, Consultant submitted a proposal to the City dated
April 25, 2002 for the Vernon Booster Pump Station (hereinafter
referred to as the "Pump Station Proposal"), a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference,
which includes a description of the proposed design, engineering and
construction management services and the cost of the services; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it is experienced in
performing pipeline and pump station design and construction management
services for reclaimed water systems and that it is qualified to
perform such services under this Agreement for Professional Consulting
Services (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain Consultant for the
(services hereinafter described.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS SET
FORTH HEREIN:
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
Consultant shall perform the "Scope of Work" outlined in the
Pipeline Proposal attached as Exhibit "A" and the "Scope of Services"
outlined in the Pump Station Proposal attached as Exhibit "B." The
Scope of Work for the Pipeline Proposal includes preparation of an
alignment study, utility research, field survey, preparation of
drawings, specification review, obtaining permits from railroads,
2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
preparation of a traffic control plan, geotechnical investigation, plan
submittals, preparation of a construction cost estimate, bid assistance
and construction assistance. The Scope of Work for the Pump Station
Proposal includes performing a preliminary design, a final design,
bidding support and construction support. Pothole investigation
subconsultant services are not included in the Pipeline Proposal and
plan check and permit fees for the City of Vernon and City of
Huntington Park are not included in the Pump Station Proposal. It is
understood and agreed that in the event of a conflict between the
Proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall
1prevail.
II. PROGRESS REPORTS.
Consultant shall submit written progress reports at least
once a month until the work hereunder is completed. Consultant shall
meet with City staff, upon City's request, or as needed, in order to
provide reports or information concerning the services being performed
by Consultant under this Agreement.,
III. TIME OF PERFORMANCE.
Consultant's services herewith shall commence upon signing of
(this Agreement and shall be completed unless otherwise terminated or
extended. Consultant shall complete the work under the Pipeline
Proposal and the Pump Station Proposal according to the respective time
schedules contained in the proposals attached as Exhibits "A" and "B."
Consultant agrees that all services provided will be conducted by the
principal and competent staff members, if any, under the supervision of
the principal, and that services will be performed and rendered
diligently. Consultant shall only perform additional services during
- 3 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
this time period when requested by the City Administrator and the
Director of Community Services & Water.
IV. COMPENSATION/PRICt.
Consultant agrees to perform the work associated with
the reclaimed waterline as described in the Pipeline Proposal for
$167,840.00. Consultant also agrees to perform the work associated
with the Pump Station Proposal for $255,009.00. The total cost of work
under the Agreement is $422,849.00.
1. Consulting Costs - Pipeline Proposal.
The City will pay Consultant on a time -and -materials basis
according to the "Manhour/Fee" section of the Pipeline Proposal and the
Hourly Charge Rate and Expense Reimbursement Schedule, a copy of which
is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this
(reference as though fully set forth. The total amount to be paid to
Consultant for the work on the Pipeline Proposal shall not exceed One
Hundred Sixty -Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and No Cents
($167, 840.00) .
2. Consulting Costs - Pump Station Proposal. The
City will pay Consultant on a time -and -materials basis according to the
"Fee Estimate" section of the Pump Station Proposal and the Hourly
Charge Rate and Expense Reimbursement Schedule, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this
reference as though fully set forth. The total amount to be paid to
Consultant for the work on the Pump Station Proposal shall not exceed
Two Hundred Fifty -Five Thousand Nine Dollars and No Cents
1 ($255, 009.00) .
3. Expenses. Expenses identified in the Pipeline
Proposal and the Pump Station Proposal may only be billed in accordance
- 4 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Ma
with the terms set forth respectively in Exhibits "A" and "B. In
addition to the payment for consulting services, reimbursable and
reproduction expenses identified in Exhibits "C" and "D" will be paid
and may only be billed in accordance with the terms set forth
respectively in Exhibits "A" and "B.11 Any other expenses not
identified in the Agreement may only be billed if advance written
approval has been obtained from the City Administrator.
V. METHOD OF PAYMENT.
Consultant shall submit within thirty (30) days after the
last day of any month in which services have been performed or costs
incurred hereunder an invoice to the City for payment. Invoices shall
contain an itemization of services rendered, directly related job
expenses and subcontract charges incurred by Consultant for which
compensation is due, and an estimate of the percentage completed for
each milestone or task. Consultant shall be responsible for paying any
subcontractors used in the performance of this Agreement. Sub-
contractors shall not bill the City directly.
Payment of the invoice shall be made after acceptance and
approval by the City within thirty (30) days of receipt. The City's
approval of the invoice shall not be unreasonably withheld.
VI. CHANGES AND EXTRA SERVICES.
The City reserves the right to request changes in or
additions to the services to be performed by Consultant. All such
changes shall be incorporated in written change orders executed by the
City and Consultant that shall specify the changes ordered and the
parties shall mutually negotiate an adjustment of compensation and
completion time if required.
- 5 -
7 l
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Any services added to the scope of this Agreement by a change
order shall be executed under all applicable conditions of this
Agreement. Consultant should be paid according to the Hourly Charge
Rate and Expense Reimbursement Schedules in Exhibits "C" and "D"
depending on whether the change order relates to the Pipeline Proposal
or the Pump Station Proposal. No claim for additional compensation for
services or extension of time shall be recognized unless contained in a
duly executed change order.
VII. PRODUCTS OF CONSULTING.
1. All reports, plans, studies, maps, drawings,
photographs, documents and other writings prepared by and for
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the
course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and
internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment
to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to
use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to
Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's
expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, maps, drawings,
photographs, documents and other writings to City upon written request.
All drawings shall be in Autocad 2000 or higher. All design documents
shall be in Microsoft Word format.
2. Maps, drawings and photographs produced by, the
Consultant shall conform to the best standards of that profession.
Information shall be organized in a logical and systematic manner.
Drawings shall contain as much information on a single drawing as can
be done without impairing clarity and quality.
3. City has relied upon the professional training and
ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material
- 6 -
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
linducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore
,provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to
perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by
Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable
legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to
be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of
expertise.
4. Consultant shall minimize changes to its key
project personnel. The City shall have the right to request key
project personnel changes and to review and approve key project
personnel changes proposed by the Consultant.
VIII. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
'1. Access to Confidential Information. The City may
provide Consultant with, or allow Consultant access to, certain
information not available to the public concerning the City, or
businesses located in the City. The information may include company
information, taxes, sales, value of assets, or other such information.
All such information shall be known as "Confidential Information" and
may not be used to circumvent the responsibility of either party to
this Agreement.
2. No Disclosure. Except as expressly permitted,
Consultant shall not disclose, permit the disclosure of, release,
disseminate, or transfer, whether orally or by any other means, any
part of such Confidential Information to any other person or entity,
whether corporate, governmental, or individual, without the express
prior written consent of an authorized representative of the City.
Consultant shall return any written Confidential Information, and all
copies made of such items, to the City upon the City's written request,
7 -
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IIM
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
M—M
but in any event not later than the date that Consultant has performed
all services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant
hereby agrees that such Confidential Information and any documents
provided may be used by Consultant only as authorized by the City.
Consultant shall take reasonable measures to avoid any disclosure of
any such Confidential Information to any unauthorized person.
3. Court Ordered Disclosure. Consultant shall
immediately notify the City of any court order or subpoena requiring
disclosure of Confidential Information, and shall cooperate with the
City's legal counsel in responding to any such order or subpoena.
Consultant may only disclose such Confidential Information after legal
counsel has exhausted any lawful and timely appeal or challenge.
4. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies that
it may have at law or in equity, the City shall be entitled to a
temporary and permanent injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction
against any breach or threatened breach of the Confidential Information
provisions of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that in case of
such breach or threatened breach, the City would have no adequate
remedy at law.
IX. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE.
1. Indemnification of Citv. Consultant shall
indemnify, defend, protect and hold the City and its officers, agents
and employees free and harmless from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, damages, liabilities, fines, charges, penalties,
orders, judgments and all costs of defense to the extent arising out of
the negligent services -or willful misconduct performed under this
(Agreement, except to the extent arising from or caused by the active
- 8 -
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
M,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MR
negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents or
Hemployees.
2. Insurance. Prior to commencing work hereunder,
Consultant shall provide the City with proof of insurance providing and
maintaining the coverage and endorsements set forth in the Insurance
Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and made a part hereof by
reference. Said proof of insurance shall also provide that said policy
or policies shall not be canceled or reduced in liability limits
without giving at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the
City. If Consultant fails to provide proof of insurance coverage as
specified above, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this
Agreement immediately.
Consultant shall not permit a subcontractor or vendor
to perform work on City premises unless and until a certificate of
insurance is obtained showing that such subcontractor or vendor has
workers' compensation coverage. If Consultant employs subcontractors
as part of the services rendered, Consultant's protective coverage is
required. Consultant may include all subcontractors as insureds under
its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each
subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein.
X. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
1. Independent Contractor. At all times during the
term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor
and shall not be an employee of the City. The City shall have the
right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, the City shall
not have the right to control the means by which Consultant
accomplishes services rendered pursuant to the Agreement except to the
- 9 -
r
Y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
no
extent that such services involve the use of City property or
�lConfidential Information.
2. Consultant Not Agent. Except as the City may
specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or
implied, to act on behalf of the City in any capacity whatsoever as an
agent. Consultant shall have no authority, expressed or implied,
pursuant to this Agreement to bind the City to any obligation
whatsoever.
3. Assignment Prohibited. Consultant may not assign
any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement except with the
express written consent of the City. Any other attempted or purported
assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall
be void and of no effect.
4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by
the City without cause on fifteen (15) days written notice to
Consultant. Consultant shall be entitled to the compensation earned by
it prior to the date of the termination notice, computed pro rata up to
and including that date, plus compensation for work performed during
the fifteen -day notice period and authorized in the termination notice.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement if City
breaches the Agreement. However, Consultant shall first notify City of
the alleged breach and give City a reasonable period of time to cure.
5. Notices. Notices to the parties, unless
otherwise requested in writing shall be sent to:
City: THE CITY OF VERNON
ATTN: BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
4305 SANTA FE AVENUE
VERNON, CA 90058-0805
- 10 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES GROUP
ATTN: TERRY L. KERGER, P.E., PROJECT MANAGER
3280 EAST FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 350
PASADENA, CA 91107
6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire
agreement of the parties. Consultant represents that in entering into
this Agreement, it has not relied on any previous representations or
understandings of any kind or nature.
7. Governing Law. The validity, interpretation and
performance of this Agreement shall be controlled and construed under
the laws of the State of California as enacted and in force at the time
this Agreement is fully executed.
8. Amendments. Except as may otherwise be
specifically provided herein, this Agreement may be modified or amended
only by a written document executed by both Consultant and the City.
9. Benefit of Agreement. This Agreement shall bind
and benefit the parties hereto and their heirs, successors, and
permitted assigns.
10. Forum Selection. Any action brought relating to
this Agreement shall be brought and held exclusively in a State Court
in the County of Los Angeles, California.
11. Recitals. All recitals are incorporated by
Ireference.
12. Waiver.. Any waiver at any time by either party of
its rights with respect to a default under this Agreement, or with
respect to any other matters arising in connection with this Agreement,
shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to subsequent default or
other matter.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13. Attorney's Fees. In the event that it becomes
necessary for either party to this Agreement to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the parties agree that a court of
competent jurisdiction may determine and fix reasonable attorney's fees
to be paid to the successful litigant.
14. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be considered
in to be in default in any of its obligations under this Contract when
a failure of performance shall be due to an uncontrollable force. The
term "uncontrollable force" shall mean any cause beyond the control of
the party affected, including, but not restricted to, flood,
earthquake, storm, fire, lightening, epidemic, war, riot, civil
disturbance or disobedience, labor dispute, labor material shortage,
sabotage, federal, state, or municipal action, statute, ordinance, or
regulation, embargoes of the United States Government or any other
government, which by exercise of due diligence such party could not
reasonably have been expected to avoid and by exercise of due diligence'.
has been unable to overcome. Either party rendered unable to fulfill
any of its obligations under this Agreement by reason of an
uncontrollable force, shall give written notice within five (5)
Business Days of such fact to the other party and shall exercise due
diligence to remove such inability with all reasonable dispatch.
- 12 -
MAY-21-2002 TUE 04:56 PM OLIVO & PLASCENCIA
FAX NO, 562 869 1883 P. 01
1
2,
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
1.1
12
1.3
14
15
1.6
1.7
18
10
20
21
i
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed by and through their authorized officers on the date, month
and year first written above.
ATTES`!' :
BRUCF V.MALKENHORST, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
EDUARDO OLI.VO, City Attorney
CITY OF VERNON
13y:
LEONIS C. MALBURG, Mayor
TE'r'TtA TECH, INC. INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES GROUP
By..
Name: W t C- RA cru C7 oJE►�
Title: j tR zr, c.. or t r�sl� � %✓�c C
By:
Name:
Title:
-- 13 -
EXHIBIT A
MWTETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Februafy 27, �842Apri1 30, 2002
Mr. Chuck Montoya
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Reference: Proposal for MGS Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension (Revised)
Dear Mr. Montoya:
Tetra Tech, Inc. enthusiastically submits our proposal for the Malburg Generating Station (MGS)
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension. The proposed Tetra Tech project team has been performing
pipeline design and construction management services for reclaimed water mains for over 20 years.
Our expertise in the area of water reclamation and pipelines make us ideally suited for this project.
Our project manager Mr. Terry Kerger, and our team members have the experience and knowledge to
successfully complete this project. The City can count on our extensive technical knowledge and
experience, effective communication skills, quick problem solving techniques, strong ability to
handle and coordinate issues, and excellent documentation and record keeping abilities.
Our proposal contains the following information for your review:
• Project Approach
• Project Team and Resumes
• Project Descriptions
• Scope of Work
• Proposed Design Schedule
• Manhour Spreadsheet and Estimate Fee
Hourly Rate Schedule
We trust that our proposal clearly establishes our expertise, knowledge and experience. We also wish
to express our willingness and enthusiasm to work with the City of Vernon on this project.
If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly o
T L. Kerg , P. .
Senior Man ing Engine
EV:cab
1lprop021p-007jrVevised letter.doc
3280 East Footh,ll Boulevard. Suite 350. Pasadena. CA 91 1,37
Tel 626.683.0066 �:rx 626.683 JO60
-ww [euatech..onl
The purpose of the project is to provide reclaimed water service to the Malburg Generating Station
(MGS) located at the intersection of Seville Avenue and 50`h Street in the City of Vernon. The
project will require extending an existing Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD)
reclaimed water line approximately 1.8 miles from its current terminus at the intersection of Randolph
Street and Newell. The currently proposed alignment runs west along Randolph Street, north along
Boyle Avenue and west along 50`h Street.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (formerly ASL Consulting Engineers) designed a reclaimed water pipeline in 1993 as
a part of CBMWD's Rio Hondo Water Reclamation Program that ran partially along the same
alignment in Randolph Street and Boyle Avenue. The project was never constructed. We were
hopeful that a portion of the previous design could be used for the new project; however, a gas
pipeline has been installed in Boyle Avenue in the location of the proposed reclaimed water pipeline.
Therefore, Tetra Tech, Inc.'s first task for the design of the new reclaimed water pipeline will be to
carry out an alignment study. This will require a comprehensive utility research study of Boyle
Avenue to determine if construction of the reclaimed water pipeline in this street is still feasible.
Based on our analysis of utilities, we will make alignment recommendations to the City and present
alternative alignments, if required.
Accurate information on the location of existing utility substructures is key to a design that will be
installed with a minimum of field changes or modifications. Tetra Tech, Inc. has developed a very
methodical approach to investigating utilities. We start by contacting Underground Service Alert
(USA) for a list of registered utility agencies within the project boundaries. Each of the agencies is
sent a letter explaining the project and requesting utility information. Two separate plan submittals
are made to each agency, one requesting information and a second requesting verification for
accuracy of their utilities on our drawings.
Critical utility locations will be potholed during design. We will prepare a list of the utilities we
consider critical and submit it to the City for concurrence on which utilities should be potholed during
design. Less critical utilities will be left for potholing prior to construction by the contractor. Non-
critical utilities will not be potholed. In addition, Tetra Tech, Inc. will field walk the alignment and
look for evidence of other utilities that may not have been shown on plans.
Once an alignment has been determined, Tetra Tech, Inc. will complete a field survey to establish
horizontal control and elevations for the design. The field survey data will be compiled and a base
map will be developed. Utility information will be plotted and an alignment will be shown.
Although Tetra Tech, Inc. will still do a thorough investigation of the utilities and right-of-way for the
new alignment, our efficiency in developing a portion of the plans will be enhanced because of the
previous design. We will also be able to save considerable time in developing the specifications, as
we do not anticipate that there will be significant changes to the technical portion of the specifications
we have on file from the previous project.
CITY OF VERNON
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
PROJECT APPROACH
Pao e I
We anticipate that if there is sufficient room in Boyle Avenue for locating the new reclaimed water
pipeline, portions will necessarily lie within Huntington Park city limits. Permits will be required for
the several railroad crossings.
We have included a Geotechnical Investigation as an optional service at this time. We will continue
our attempt to locate the previously completed Earth Technology "Environmental Site Assessment
and Geotechnical Investigation, Rio Hondo Water Reclamation Program...," 1992, to see if there is
information relevant to this project. If not, we recommend the City approve geotechnical services,
including field exploration, for the design of the reclaimed water pipeline. The geotechnical
investigation does not include research or testing for contaminated soils or hazardous materials. If
during the course of the project this issue becomes a concern, Tetra Tech can submit a cost for
providing this additional service to the City.
CITY OF VERNON
PRniu('T APPRAAP"
Kedairned Water Pipeline Extension Page 2
Tetra Tech, Inc.'s commitment to the City's project is demonstrated through the establishment of a
team comprised of highly experienced and responsive individuals. Mr. Terry Kerger, P.E. will be our
Senior Project Manager responsible for supervising Tetra Tech's staff and ensuring that the necessary
resources are committed to the project. He has over 30 years of experience in the design,
management, and construction inspection of pipelines.
Mr. Ken Berard, P.E. who has over 15 years of pipeline design experience will lead the design effort
as Project Engineer. Mr. Berard will be responsible for the preparation of plans, utility research,
specifications, cost estimate, and coordination of survey and traffic control plans. Mr. Berard will be
assisted by an experienced team of engineers and designers who have completed a number of
successful reclaimed water pipeline projects throughout Southern California. Among the team
members will be Mr. John Robinson, who has extensive reclaimed water experience working with
both Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts on the implementation of their reclamation
programs.
Survey will be coordinated by Mr. Larry Bateman, a registered land surveyor.
Mr. Terry Kerger will also administer our construction services. He will be supported by Ms. Lisa
Amador who will serve as Construction Office Engineer and Mr. Vince Steinhart who will serve as
Construction Observer.
A project team chart and resumes for these individuals are provided on the following pages. Also
provided is a summary of Tetra Tech, Ine.'s extensive reclaimed water_pipeline experience.
Tetra Tech, Inc. proposes to contract geotechnical services, if approved by the City, from Lowney
Associates. Lowney has provided geotechnical and geo-environmental services since 1969 for more
than 5,000 projects throughout California. The team for this project will be lead by Mr. Tom Benson,
who is a California licensed civil and geotechnical engineer. His resume is attached, including a list
of his recent pipeline experience.
CITY OF VERNON
Pon rcr-r Tc A n4
Keaaimed water Pipeline Extension Paoe I
City of Vernon Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
■ TERRY KERGER. P.E. ■
LISA AMADOR, P.E.
VINCE STEINHART
CITY OF VERNON
KEN BERARD. P.E.
•.► ;6 ► *
LARRY BATEMAN. P.L.S.
Optional
LOWNEY ASSOCIA
PROIF('T TFAM CHART
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
� 3
n i
TETRATECH, INC.
1* Infrastructure Services Group
Terry L. Kerger, P.E.
Mr. Kerger has over 30 of years experience with ASL in the design
Principal
and management of civil engineering projects, including water
supply, sewerage, water containment, flood control facilities,
bikeway, roadway design, grading plans, master plans, and agency
plan check programs. Varied experience includes design and
EDUCATION:
management of projects ranging from small water main
improvements to design and construction management of
El Camino College
$5 million groundwater production facility.
A.A. Architecture
Mr. Kerger has been Project Manager and Design Engineer for all
California State University Los
water projects for Rowland Water District. ASL has served this
Angeles
client for over 30 years completing over 400 projects, including
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1985
water distribution, system design, transmission main design, 54-
inch pipeline relocation, steel and concrete reservoir designs,
booster pump station design, MWD flow control facility design,
REGISTRATION:
telemetry system design, master planning, financial planning, and
construction administration and field inspection services.
Registered Civil Engineer
California No. 34896 As Project Manager for water system improvements projects for
the city of El Monte, his responsibilities included pipeline
improvements, well design, well head water treatment
investigation, well water blending investigations, hydraulic
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: modeling, capital improvement planning, telemetry system design,
feasibility studies for purchase of adjacent mutual water systems,
Southern California Water Utilities including system appraisal, financial options, and identifying
Association system upgrades.
American Water Works Association
Mr. Kerger was Project Manager for CADD mapping for Los
Past Chairperson ASCE Pipeline Angeles County Water Works District No. 8 and District No. 34 in
Technical Group (Los Angeles the Lancaster area. Projects included transferring mapping data
Chapter) from AutoCad format to Los Angeles County computer version
CADD format. Over 300 CADD maps were prepared and delivered
in hard copy and on diskette. ,
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Mr. Kerger is a qualified construction manager having provided
these services to several ASL Clients for the past 10 years. Mr.
Kerger was the construction manager for the City of Pomona 4 MG
Reservoir 2A; 4 Summit Reservoirs, Nicholas Beach Reservoirs;
Hasley Canyon Reservoir; Godde Hill Reservoir; California -
American Water Company 1.0 MG Longden Reservoir; seven
concrete and steel reservoirs for Rowland Water District; Kidneloa
Irrigation District Eucalyptus Reservoir expansion; and
reconstruction of Clarke Avenue for the city of Arcadia.
• Century Reclaimed Water Project, Central Basin Municipal
Water District — Involved approximately 26 miles of
reclaimed water pipeline ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-
inch in diameter.
• Industry Hills Civic -Recreation -Conservation Area —
Principal designer for ASL's contribution to this
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
L t
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Terry L. Kerger, P.E. award -winning project. Services including two 2.5 MG water
storage reservoirs, two 6500 gpm pumping stations, and six
miles of 36-inch reclaimed water transmission main. He was
responsible for the design of the telemetry and control system
including central control and remote sites for three reservoirs
and three pump stations.
• Rio Hondo Reclaimed Water Project, Central Basin
Municipal Water District — Involved approximately 33 miles
of reclaimed water pipeline ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-
inch in diameter.
• Pomona/Walnut/Rowland Joint Water Commission —
Relocation of five miles of 54-inch pipeline.
• City of Glendale — Design of ten miles of 34-inch to 36-inch
reclaimed water pipeline involving hydraulic investigation.
• City of El Monte — Replacement and upgrading of 4,500 feet
of pipeline due to excessive leaks.
• City of Lakewood — Replacement of distribution system
pipelines due to aggressive soils and pipeline corrosion
failures. Project was implemented in three phases for budget
purposes.
• San Gabriel County Water District — 'Replacement of
deteriorated distribution pipelines and extension of
transmission pipelines to improve transmission of well
production to meet District's service demands.
• City of Cerritos — Replacement of 1,500 feet of distribution
piping and services. New distribution piping and services were
located in the street in front of residences. Existing pipeline
and easements crossing back yards of residences were
abandoned.
• Pipeline Replacement, South Gate — Project Manager for the
installation of 39,000 feet of pipeline replacement. Project
included preparing 45 base map plan sheets using the city's
GIS database in Microstation format, and involved utility
record research, field verification of utility records, pipeline
and appurtenance design, project specifications, cost estimates,
bidding assistance, construction administration services, and
record drawings. Microstation format and the city's GIS data
allowed completion of the design phase in six weeks.
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
1* It
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard Mr. Berard has extensive experience in many facets of
Project Manager water/wastewater engineering. Mr. Berard has performed
numerous studies ranging from complete water master plans to
efficiency studies. His design experience includes preparing plans,
specifications, and cost estimates for sewers, reservoirs, pump
stations, wells, pipelines, chlorination facilities, and pressure
EDUCATION: reducing facilities. Mr. Berard also has extensive experience in
hydraulic modeling. He has used and is familiar with H2O NET,
University,
State Polytechnicrsity, Pomona, B.S. Civil Cybernet, EPA NET, FAAST, Kentucky Pipe, and Waterworks
Unive
Engineering, 1986 computer programs. In addition, Mr. Berard is familiar with other
computer programs including AutoCAD, Excel, Lotus 1-2-3,
Storm Plus (for open channel flows), and others. Rounding out Mr.
Berard's experience is work he has done in inspection, construction
REGISTRATION: administration, shop drawing review, and plan checking.
Registered Civil Engineer
California No. 45499 SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
• Sacramento County Reclamation and Reuse Study, U.S.
Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation — Project Manager
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
for a study performed in conjunction with the Sacramento
American Water Works
Regional County Sanitation District in an effort to determine
Association
the feasibility of recycling wastewater effluent for disposal as
well as water supply purposes. The study combined and
Inland County Water Association
integrated various previous studies and initiated a Feasibility
Report in compliance with the Bureau of Reclamation's Title
XVI guidelines. The study included a problem and needs
analysis, potential recycled water opportunities, market
assessment, assessment of legal opinions for water rights,
conceptual demonstration garden, public outreach assistance,
and specific project recommendations. GIS was used
extensively as a tool for the study and as a visual aid for the
public outreach assistance.
• Butterfield Park Recycled Water Pilot Project, City of
Corona — Project Engineer for approximately 5,000 feet of 12-
inch recycled water main including connection to treatment
plant and to retrofit of Butterfield Park. The alignment crossed
a sensitive habitat area including a stream and required permits
from the Army Corps of Engineers.
• Modifications of the Santa Fe Springs Reservoir and Pump
Station, Central Basin Municipal Water District — Design
Engineer for the conversion of an existing potable reservoir to
a non -potable reservoir.. The reservoir also allowed for a
supplementary connection to the potable system. The pump
station conversion re -piped the suction and discharge as well
as bring the station up to code.
• Non -Potable Water System Improvements - Navy, 29 Palms
Marine Base — Planned and prepared plans specifications, and
estimate for non -potable water system improvements
including over 30,000 feet of 6-inch through 16-inch water
main, a 3,600 gpm vertical turbine pump station, 1,500 gpm
axial flow propeller low head pump, 550 gpm vertical turbine
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard pump station, 0.4 and 0.5 MG steel reservoirs, and a 60 acre
turf irrigation system. Also provided support construction
management services.
• Hydraulic Analysis, Rio Hondo Non -Potable Water Design
Report — Engineer involved with the hydraulic analysis of the
non -potable water design report. The analysis incorporated the
Century and West Basin non -potable water projects. The total
study area extended from the cities of Santa Monica to
Whittier and from South Pasadena to Paramount. The
recommendations included pipe sizes and locations.
• 30-Inch Transmission Main, City of Glendora — Project
manager for the design of 20,000 feet of water main. Project
included a PDR addressing pipe material, hydraulic analysis,
and cost estimates. The construction documents were divided
into five construction phases to limit annual costs. The high
congestion of existing utilities required that smaller utilities,
such as gas lines, be relocated. Also, project manager for the
inspection during construction.
• State Street Feeder, Monte Vista Water District — Project
Manager for the preparation of environmental documentation,
permits, design report, design, and bidding assistance for
7,000 feet of 18-inch and 22-inch water pipe and 1,400 feet of
30-inch water pipe. Boring and jacking under two railroad
tracks and a flood control channel was required. Also
included Construction Administration.
• Topanga Canyon Valve Replacement, Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works — Design Engineer for this
project which included the replacement of over 600 shutoff
valves and 3,900 feet of 6-inch and 8-inch of water mains.
• Point Dume Water Main, Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works — Design Engineer for the design of
approximately 35,000 feet of 8-inch and 12-inch ductile iron
and steel water main and creek undercrossing.
• 60`h Street West Water Main, Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works — Design Engineer for the design
of approximately 3,000 feet of 16-inch water main and a
pressure reducing station.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Lancaster
— Design Engineer for the design of approximately 1,000 feet
of 12-inch diameter water main.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Pacific
Coast Highway — Design Engineer plans, specifications, and
cosh estimate of over 6,000 feet of 12-inch water main and two
pressure reducing stations in a state Highway. Provisions were
made for portions of the project which were located in an
ancient Indian burial ground.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Sierra
Highway — Design Engineer for the design of over 5,000 of
10-inch diameter water main.
• 12-Inch Water Main on Ave. J - Lancaster, Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works — Design Engineer for
the design of approximately 1,300 feet of 12-inch ductile iron
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
:r:ilTETRA TECH, INC.
TFW
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard water main in the City of Lancaster.
• Acton Well Disinfection and Water Main, Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works — Project Engineer for
plans, specifications and cost estimate for 150Ib chlorine
disinfection, provisions for future ammoniation, scrubber,
emergency generator, building enclosures, and approximately
6,000 feet of 12-inch steel water main, including a railroad
crossing.
• Sun Village Water Main, Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works — Project Engineer for plans, specifications and
cost estimate for 1501b chlorine disinfection, provisions for
future ammoniation, scrubber, emergency generator, building
enclosures, and approximately 6,000 feet of 12-inch steel
water main, including a railroad crossing.
• Water Main Replacement (3 Phases) Air Force, Vandenberg
Base — Project Engineer for the design of this project which
consisted of plans, specifications, and cost estimate for over
42,000 feet of 12-inch ductile iron pipe. The project was
located on Vandenberg Air Force Base in environmentally
sensitive habitat. Design included cathodic protection test
stations.
• Water Improvements Related to the San Bernardino County
Medical Center Relocation Project, City of Colton — Project
Engineer for this project which included approximately 4,900
feet of 12-inch and 20-inch steel water main and traffic control
plans.
• Non -Potable Water System Improvements — Navy, 29 Palms
Marine Base — Project Engineer for the preparation of plans,
specifications, and cost estimate for non -potable water system
improvements including over 30,000 feet of 6-inch through
16-inch water main, a 3,600 gpm vertical turbine pump
station, 1,500 gpm axial flow propeller low head pump, 550
gpm vertical turbine pump station, 0.4 and 0.5 MG steel
reservoirs, and a 60 acre turf irrigation system. Also provided
support construction management services.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Nicholas
Beach Reservoir — Design Engineer for two I mg steel
reservoirs, 1,600 feet of 16-inch water main, and 1,600 feet of
access road through canyon terrain.
CITY OF VERNON
Keclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
KFY 1PFRS0NNF.1
Fi73
John Robinson
Project Engineer
EDUCATION:
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
B.S., Civil Engineering, California
State University, Long Beach, 1993
REGISTRATION:
Engineering -in -Training, California,
1997,
Registration No. 109865
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Works Association
Mr. Robinson's experience encompasses a variety of wastewater
engineering, water reclamation and master plan projects. The
clients he has provided services to are mostly municipalities and
cities in California and Arizona. Process and mechanical design,
feasibility/master studies and planning, preparation of study and
design reports as well as construction plans and specifications, and
construction management are all included in the services he has
provided.
Mr. Robinson has served as both a project engineer and program
manager for several projects. As a project manager, he has on
numerous occasions successfully led my project teams to complete
the work within the project budgets and time schedules and with a
high degree of responsiveness to the clients. His project experience
includes municipal wastewater and recycled water pipelines, pump
stations and treatment facilities, master plans for water, sewer and
recycled water extensive recycled water customer coordination.
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Recycled Water Retrofits for Schools and Parklands, West
Basin Municipal Water District — Project Manager/Engineer
for preparation and approval for six recycled water retrofits for
Arlington Elementary School, Casimar Middle School,
McMaster Elementary School, Yukon Elementary School, as
well as Descando and Gueuser Parks, on the behalf of both
West Basin Municipal Water District and City of Torfance.
Prepared necessary documentation to obtain approval from the
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DOHS),
as well as biddable plans and specification, and construction
cost estimates. Preliminary cross connection testing was
performed at all sites. The remaining work, in progress,
involves construction oversight, final cross connection testing,
and preparation of "as -built" drawings. In total, Tetra Tech
has assisted both the West Basin and Central Basin Municipal
Water Districts in the conversion of 65 schools and 55 parks
from potable water to recycled water for irrigation purposes.
Recycled Water Retrofits for Landscape Irrigation/Industrial
Use, West Basin Municipal Water District — Project
Manager/Engineer for the design of recycled water retrofits for
the Caltrans 110/91 connection, Del Arno Park in Carson, and
Raytheon Systems in El Segundo. Work included preparation
of all necessary documentation to obtain approval from the
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, as well as
construction cost estimates and biddable plans and
specification for Raytheon. Tasks also included construction
oversight, preliminary and final cross connection testing, and
preparation of "as -built" drawings. As a result of its close
working relationship with Caltrans during this assignment,
identified five additional recycled water irrigation connections
that were reviewed by Caltrans and WBMWD. These
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
John Robinson recycled water connections are currently under design
• Program Management Team Member for both the West and
Central Basin Municipal Water Districts Water Reclamation
Programs — Provided various engineering services during the
design of treatment plants, pump stations, distribution systems,
and customer connections. In addition, assisted with the
identifications of potential reclaimed water customers,
developed on -site retrofit drawings, and prepared engineering
reports for industrial user for approvals by the state and county
health departments. Project included computer hydraulic
model of the District's recycled water distribution system.
• Program Management Team Member for the Long Beach
Water Department Phase ( Reclamation Expansion —
Provided various engineering services, including developed
on -site retrofit drawings; designed 6- and 8-inch recycled
water pipelines; prepared industrial engineering reports; and,
performed retrofit construction management. Project included
computer hydraulic model of Long Beach's recycled water
distribution system.
• Santa Ana Reservoir and Pump Station, Orange County
Water District — Project Engineer for modifications to the
Santa Ana Reservoir and design of a new pump station for the
Orange County Water District. Design involved modifying an
existing 6.0 million gallon potable water reservoir for
reclaimed water storage and design of a new pump station to
supply the Green Acres reclaimed distribution system with the
stored reclaimed water and modification of Factory 21 pump
station. In addition, project included a surge analysis and
report, computer hydraulic model (CyberNet 2.0), and update
of model .(CyberNet 3.0) of the Districts recycled water
distribution system.
• Program Management Team Member for the San Gabriel
Valley Recycled Water Demonstration Project for the Upper
San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District — Assisted the
District to implement a multi -million dollar program.
Potentially, 40,000 to 50,000 AFY of reclaimed water from
the County Sanitation district's San Jose Creek Plant will be
used for irrigation, industrial use, spreading (recharge) and
river discharge in a portion of the District. The phased
implementation plan is currently on schedule.
• Program Management Team Member for the City of
Phoenix Water Services Department, Cave Creek Road
Facilities Program Management — Provided various services,
including design consultant contract assistance, survey and
base sheet preparation, program coordination of design
consultants, schedule development and control, design
guidelines, reclaimed water guidance manual, utility
coordination, quality control reviews, cost estimates, agency
and department coordination and permitting, status reports,
invoice review, bid services and several other allowance tasks.
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
itTETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Larry S. Bateman, P.L.S. Mr. Bateman has 30 years of experience in land surveying, with
Survey Manager experience and hands-on involvement in construction/cadastral
surveying work from research through fieldwork to final product.
He has thorough knowledge in the operation of a surveying office.
He is familiar with survey techniques and procedures using both
EDUCATION: manual methods and electronic equipment, Trimble 4000si, Star -
Pasadena City College,
Net, TDS Data Collection, and Softdesk. He is experienced with
computers and has utilized various programs, including AutoCAD
Civil Engineering Tech./ Land Surveying R 14, Windows and WordPerfect.
Yavapai College
Basic AutoCAD
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
"Surveying Instrumentation &
Coordinate Computation"
Survey Supervisor and Office Surveyor, Civil Engineering
NGS 1988
and Land Surveying — specializing in land development.
"NAND 88" NGS 1991
Transportation projects by Caltrans District 7 and by
"Basic GPS Training"
Engineering Management Consultant, which is responsible for
Leica 1992
the design engineering of the Pasadena Light Rail Transit
Project. Projects included aerial topography control surveys,
"Photogrammetry" Pasadena
utilizing GPS methods, along with total station surveys and
City College 1966
mapping using Intergraph's ETI software; cross-section
surveys; utility location surveys; and construction surveys for
alignment modifications. Provided coordination with project
engineers/clients as required, reports and office support for
REGISTRATION:
field crews throughout projects.
• Vice President of Surveys, The SW Group — a civil
Professional Land Surveyor
engineering and land surveying firm. Projects included
California (1970) - No. 3757
commercial, residential, condominium and public works.
Successfully completed all services from field work to office
work, including aerial mapping control, preliminary research,
boundary surveys, legal descriptions, topography surveys,
construction surveys, ALTA surveys and subdivision map
preparation. Provided direction and supervision for surveying
staff, recruited, interviewed and hired support personnel.
• Dava and Associates, Prescott, Arizona, 1992 —1994 — Project
Surveyor for on -call contract with ADOT. Site -specific design
surveys and construction surveys throughout Yavapai County.
Project survey for site -specific survey for the Yavapai County
Engineer.
• David Evans and Associates, Phoenix, Arizona, 1994 —
1996 — Project Surveyor for large-scale residential subdivisions
in Maricopa County, including design surveys and staking for
the extension of roadway system.
• Lockheed -California Company, Palmdale, California, 1999 —
Aircraft Navigation System Calibration.
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Los
Angeles — Pasadena, California, 1990 — 14-mile Pasadena
Blue Line.
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Los
Angeles, California, 1991 — 7-mile East Los Angeles Red Line
Extension.
• Carmen Drive/SR 101, Ventura County — Provided quality
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Larry S. Bateman, P.L.S. control for the preparation of legal descriptions and right-of-
way exhibits for the acquisition of additional land required for
the construction of a new highway interchange.
• Magic Mountain Bridge Overcrossing, Los Angeles County —
Provided design topographic surveys and boundary surveys.
Prepared right-of-way mapping for the preparation of legal
descriptions and right-of-way exhibits for the acquisition of
additional land required for the construction of a new bridge
and roadway in the City of Santa Clarita.
• SR73, Parcel B, Orange County — Provided boundary survey
for the preparation of State of California Highway Right -of -
Way Mapping. Prepared legal descriptions and right-of-way
exhibits for the acquisition of additional land required to build
southbound transition bridge onto SR-55.
• Street of the Golden Lantern, Orange County — Street
widening project. Provided surveys for aerial mapping, design
topography and street centerline control. Supervised the
preparation of legal descriptions and right-of-way exhibits for
the acquisition of additional land required to widen said street.
• Springville Drive ((formerly Airport North)/SR 101, Ventura
County — Provided surveys for design topography and
supervised the preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for
the acquisition of additional land required to widen proposed
right-of-way and new freeway interchange for Springville
Drive bridge.
• Rancho Cucamonga/SR 66 (Historic), San Bernardino
County — Street widening project. Provided surveys for aerial
mapping,, design topography and street centerline control.
Supervised construction staking of widening for 12 kilometers,
including bridge widening and storm drain relocation.
• District 7, Los Angeles County — On -Call survey construction
staking of accident investigation sites.
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
irt;TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Lisa Ellen Amador Ms. Amador has more than five years experience in the field of
Construction Engineer construction management. She has managed all aspects of several
major construction projects, including public and private
structures, public works projects and water -treatment facilities.
Her experience ranges from planning and budgeting to permitting,
plan -checking, quality control and construction management.
EDUCATION: With her legal training, Ms. Amador is uniquely equipped to
Western State University College of negotiate and ensure compliance with contract documents as a
Law, Fullerton client advocate.
Juris Doctor, 1995
California State Polytechnic
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
University, Pomona
B.S., Civil Engineering, 1991
Hollywood Racetrack Stormwater and Wastewater
Treatment and Reclamation Systems, Churchill Downs of
California — Construction Engineer for the design and
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
construction of a grading, drainage and treatment plant
construction project. Provided construction management
American Society of Civil
support services to finalize construction within the three -
Engineers, 1991
month time frame, per a Cease and Desist Order issued by the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Churchill
Downs California Company (Hollywood Park) was required
to eliminate all non -storm water discharges and the 0.1-inch
of storm event to the existing City of Inglewood storm drain
main line, through construction of an on site treatment plant
facility and water reclaim program.
• Sewer Rehabilitation, City of Burbank — Construction
Engineer for the City of Burbank's citywide sewer
rehabilitation. Pipeline replacements were designed for
existing streets to improve the aging water system.
Cure -in -place and spiral wound sewer lining was selected to
minimize disturbance to residents and traffic, and was
required for inaccessible sewers where development and -
significant landscaping has encroached over the facilities.
Project management and construction observation services,
including television monitoring of existing mains for the
purpose of establishing the number and location of laterals
and pipe condition.
• Sewer Rehabilitation, City of Santa Monica — Construction
Engineer for the City of Santa Monica's city wide sewer
rehabilitation. Pipeline replacements were designed for
existing streets to improve the aging water system. Spiral
wound sewer lining was selected to minimize disturbance to
residents and traffic, and was required for inaccessible sewers
where development and significant landscaping has
encroached over the facilities. Project management and
construction observation services, including television
monitoring of existing mains for the purpose of establishing
the number and location of laterals and pipe condition.
• Norton Simon Museum — Project Manager for the design
and construction of the Norton Simon Museum Renovation.
Management of: environmental controls and monitoring of
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Lisa Ellen Amador asbestos abatement, design and construction of a new HVAC
system, design and construction of structural support
systems, installation of a new lighting system, and
implementation of the overall architectural design concept, as
well as the design and construction of an addition to the
existing structure and a man-made lake. Daily coordination
with client, architect, and contractors, as well as regulating
agencies.
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Vince Steinhart Mr. Steinhart has over eleven years of experience in construction
Construction Inspector observation and inspection of water system facilities. Mr. Steinhart
has provided field observation services for pipeline, reservoir, well,
pump station, and treatment plant projects for numerous cities,
counties, and water districts.
EDUCATION:
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
California State University, Los
Angeles
City of Burbank — Construction Observation of sewer
Public Works Construction
rehabilitation projects — Phases II, III, IV, and V.
Inspection
0 Amar Road, West Covina — A 31-inch steel cement -mortar
lined and cement -mortar coated water main.
California State University,
Rowland Water District — A 24-inch steel cement -lined and
Sacramento
cement -mortar coated break pressure reservoir feeder pipeline.
• Vantage Pointe Drive, Rowland Water District — A 12-inch
Water Distribution System
ductile iron pipe transmission main.
Operation and Maintenance
• California -American Water Company — A 16-inch ductile
iron water main in the city of San Marino.
American Construction Inspection
Peck Road, Arcadia — A 12-inch water line by-pass.
Association
Bechard Tract, Cerritos — An 8-inch ductile iron pipe potable
Continuing Education Program:
Water main.
Public Works
MG Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System, West Basin
Structural Concrete Inspection
Municipal Water District and Dominguez Water Corporation
Asphalt Institute - Paving
West Basin Municipal Water District — Construction of
Structural Masonry Inspection
underground wells and reverse osmosis desalter.
Certificate
Storm Drain Inspection, Arcadia
Confined Space and Trench
Reclaimed Water System Expansion, Cerritos/ Cerritos
Certificate
Redevelopment Agency
REGISTRATION:
ACI Concrete Field Testing
Technician - Grade I
MEMBER:
American Construction Inspectors
Association
American Concrete Institute
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
THOMAS C. BENSON, JR., P.E., G.E.
Vice President
Geotechnical Engineer
Summary of Experience
Tom Benson, Vice President and Manager of the Southern California office, has been a member of the
geotechnical consulting community in Southern California for more than 18 years. Since 1982, he has
worked on numerous commercial, industrial, residential and public works projects primarily in Los Angeles,
Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties; as well as geotechnical projects throughout the
United States. Since 1988, he managed geotechnical offices in Southern California, emphasizing timely and
value -adding consulting services. His management term has spanned difficult economic times and explosive
work loads, particularly following the January 17, 1994 Northridge Earthquake. To meet the needs of clients
following the quake, his Pasadena office rapidly expanded to roughly 90 civil engineers and related technical
personnel.
Mr. Benson's technical experience in Southern California has been broad, to meet the challenges of the
region. He has been the technical lead on numerous earthwork, shoring, dewatering, seismic, liquefaction,
slope stability, tunneling, rock stabilization, and soil improvement studies. In addition, he has managed
engineering geology tasks such as geologic mapping, hydrogeologic studies, fault studies, scour analyses, and
rock stability analyses. His projects have been in widely different geotechnical environments ranging from
Long Beach estuaries to Mount Wilson granitic peaks. Since much of this work has been in the urbanized
Los Angeles area, he has managed numerous geo-environmental projects dealing with fuel hydrocarbons,
solvents, lead, metals and other compounds in the soil and groundwater. Mr. Benson's geotechnical team
(engineers and geologists) won the 1996 Outstanding Project Award from the California Geotechnical
Engineers Association (CGEA), for the Dulzura Pipeline Restoration Project located in San Diego County.
This remote project required rock stabilization innovations and geotechnical exploration on inaccessible,
steep granitic slopes. Large boulders that could roll onto the pipeline were stabilized in -place with rock
anchors.
Registrations
V Registered Civil Engineer: CA No.37896
Registered Geotechnical Engineer: CA No.2091
V Registered Environmental Assessor: CA Class I REA-03817
Continuing Education
V Southern California Earthquake Center DMG Special Publication 117 (liquefaction) Seminar (1999)
V Seismic Evaluations for CDMG Review, AEG, at CSLA
V Lessons Learned from the Northridge Earthquake, ATC, at USC
V Seed Memorial Symposium, Berkeley, California
V 40-Hour Health and Safety Training, 29 CFR 1910
Education
V Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Michigan State University
V Master of Science, Geotechnical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
Professional Affiliations
V American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
V American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM)
V Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California (CELSOC), Los Angeles Section Treasurer
F
V American Institute of Architects (AIA), Los Angeles Section Member
V Southern California Water Utilities Association (SCWUA)
Select Project Experience
Mr. Benson has directed geotechnical engineering for representative projects listed below.
Selected Pipeline Project Experience
V Dulzura (San Diego County) CA: Dulzura Water Conduit Renovation: Renovation of 55,000-foot long
turn -of -the -century aqueduct, including open channels, tunnels, pipelines and flumes. For the City of
San Diego. 1988-1990 design. Construction initiated December 1993 and completed in 1996. Winner
of the 1997 California Geotechnical Engineers Association (CGEA) Award.
V La Crescenta, CA: Mr. Benson has been the geotechnical engineer of record for 14 different pipeline
projects for the Crescenta Valley Water District (CVWD), in 1999 through 2001, in Glendale, Montrose
and La Crescenta. Most of these projects consisted of 8-inch diameter pressurized cement mortar lined
and coated steel water pipelines, installed in residential streets typically 3-feet below grade.
V Los Angeles. CA: Geotechnical investigation for proposed Marina Interceptor Sewer (MIS) project, in
1996 and 1997. This alignment is primarily along Jefferson Boulevard east of Marina del Rey in the
Ballona Creek estuary area. Investigation was for the City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works.
Micro -tunneling was being considered rather than conventional cut and cover, to reduce environmental
impact, and traffic disruption.
V Montclair, CA: State Street Feeder pressurized pipeline for Monte Vista Water District. Jacked under
active railroad right-of-way.
V Pasadena, CA: El Molino Avenue Storm Drain between Allendale and Old Mill Roads. Crosses the
Raymond Fault. 24- to 30-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), 2,9000-foot long alignment.
December 1990 study, completed construction in 1992.
V Pasadena, CA: Garfield Avenue Storm Drain from Mountain Street to Orange Grove Boulevard.
Alignment 1,355 feet long consisting of 36- to 39-inch diameter RCP. Study completed summer 1993.
V Pasadena, CA: Union Street Extension and Storm Drains, between Hill and Wilson Avenues. Storm
drains 1,630 and 830 feet long, 24- to 45-inch diameter. May 1990 investigation, construction completed
in late 1992.
V San Pedro and Terminal Island CA: Studies for sewage pump stations 671, 681, and 691, including
associated force and gravity pipelines. Scope of work also included evaluation of micro -tunneling. For
the City of Los Angeles. 1989-1990 studies and design.
V Terminal Island CA: Final geotechnical investigation for the U.S. Navy Sanitary Sewer System, Mole
Area at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Terminal Island, Long Beach, California. Provided detailed
cost study of dewatering system, foundation recommendations for sewer lines and pump stations as well
as subsidence potential due to dewatering.
T Torrance, CA: Arnie Avenue stormwater force main. 1,800-foot alignment, 36-inch diameter. For the
City of Torrance. 1992 design. Construction pending.
V Twenty -Nine Palms CA: Geotechnical investigation for proposed non -potable water system
improvements at the Marine Corps Air -Ground Combat Center. Proposed construction included a
760,000 gallon equalization water tank and roughly 27,000-feet of new non -potable water pipeline.
Pipeline diameter will range from 6 to 8 inches. 1991 design.
V Yorba Linda, CA: Mr. Benson has been the geotechnical engineer of record during construction of the
Richfield Pressurized Water Main. The project consisted of installing 8,830 feet of 36-inch diameter
steel pipeline primarily in city streets in southwestern Yorba Linda and northeastern Placentia. The
pipeline connects the Yorba Linda Water District's Richfield well yard to the existing Highland
Reservoir. Pipe jacking was required under a storm channel and the railroad at Orangethorpe Avenue.
This project included asphalt density testing. Construction completed March 2001.
Tetra Tech, Inc. has successfully completed several reclaimed water pipeline projects. Listed
below is a selection of projects that illustrates our depth of experience in this area.
RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES
Rowland Water District Prepared project plans, specifications and construction cost
Reclaimed Water Mains estimates for installation of 1700 feet of 24-inch steel,
Phase I CML&C and 14,800 feet of 12-inch DIP reclaimed water
transmission main. Reclaimed water transmission main will
Rowland Water District be installed in existing public streets and private property
3021 South Fullerton Road easements. Portions of the alignment cross under Caltrans
Rowland Heights, CA 91748 freeway right-of-way in a bored and jacked steel casing and
over a County of Los Angeles flood control channel. Tetra
Contact: Tony Poli Tech prepared easements and obtained installation permits
(562) 697-1726 from State and County agencies.
Construction Cost: $2,000,000
Completion Date: 2002
Expansion of the Reclaimed Tetra Tech, Inc. prepared the final plans, specifications, and
Water Distribution System construction cost estimate for the construction of
approximately 28,000 linear feet of 24-inch trunk main and
Long Beach Water approximately 9,000 liner feet of 12-inch distribution main
Department for the Long Beach Water Department. This project was
1800 East Wardlow Road constructed in 2000.
Long Beach, CA 90807
Contact: Stephen Myrter
5621570-2352
Construction Cost: $13,800,000
Completion Date:2000
Newport Beach Pipeline Tetra Tech, Inc. provided the preliminary and final design for
Extension, Green Acres the Newport Beach Pipeline Extension for the Green Acres
Project — Phase 2 Project - Phase 2. The pipeline will bring reclaimed water to
the City of Newport Beach and consists of about 30,000
Orange County Water District lineal feet of 16-inch to 24-inch reclaimed water pipe. The
10500 Ellis Avenue project is located within a busy urban area and will require
Fountain Valley, CA 92728 extensive traffic control and utility research in addition to
pipeline relocation. The proposed pipeline extension will also
Contact: Steven R. Conklin include a bridle crossing of the San Diego Creek. Tetra Tech
7141378-321 / assisted the District in obtaining, permits from the Army
Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game
Construction Cost: $4,500,000 and the Coastal Commission.
Completion Date: 1998
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Pale 1
Reclaimed Water Pipeline
Projects
Moulton Niguel Water District
27500 La Paz Road
Laguna Niguel, CA 92656
Contact: Carlo Habash
9491448-4033
Construction Cost: $8,000,000
Completion Date: 1998
Zone C Reclaimed Water
Intertie Project
Santa Margarita Water District
26111 Antonio Parkway
Las Flores, CA 92688
Contact: Dan Ferons
7141459-6430
Construction Cost: $500,000
Completion Date: 1998
Several reclaimed water pipelines were designed for MNWD,
including:
• Lower Mission Viejo Reclaimed Water Pipelines: 11,000
linear feet of 12- through 16-inch reclaimed water
pipelines including the crossing of the I-5 Freeway.
• Cedarbrook Reclaimed Water Pipelines: 16,000 linear
feet of 4- through 12-inch reclaimed water pipelines.
• Pacific Park Reclaimed Water Pipelines: 14,000 linear
feet of 12-inch to 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline
within Oso Parkway and Pacific Park.
• Moulton Parkway Reclaimed Water Line: 30,000 linear
feet of 16-inch reclaimed water main.
Tetra Tech, Inc. prepared the preliminary and final design of
about 4,400 linear feet of 16-inch reclaimed water main as
part of the proposed intertie with Los Alisos Water District.
The project included a bridge crossing, extensive traffic
control and utility research.
Green Acres Intertie Project In response to political pressure, Irvine Ranch Water District
authorized Tetra Tech ASL in August 1996 to design the
Irvine Ranch Water District proposed intertie of IRWD's and Orange County Water
15600 Sand Canyon Avenue District's reclaimed water system. Due to a four party agency
Irvine, CA 92718 agreement, the proposed pipeline had to be in service by
September 1997. Tetra Tech ASL provided the preliminary
Contact: Greg Heiertz and final design of the 9,800 linear feet of 24-inch reclaimed
9491453-5560 water main under a fast track design schedule. The project
included a meter facility, bridge crossing, extensive traffic
Construction Cost: $2,000,000 control and a discharge facility at County Sanitation District
of Orange County. The design and construction of the project
Completion Date: 1997 were completed on schedule and under budget.
CITY OF VERNON
Reclaimed Water Pipeline
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Page 2
Reclaimed Water Facilities Provided planning and design for approximately 13,000 linear
feet of 30-inch and 36-inch reclaimed water transmission
Irvine Ranch Water District main along Culver Drive in the City of Irvine. The Culver
15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Drive Transmission Main will serve the reclaimed water
Irvine, CA 92718 demands of the prestigious Newport Coast area.
Contact: Greg Heiertz Designed more than 15,000 lineal feet of domestic and
9491453-5560 reclaimed water transmission main in Jamboree Road to serve
the Tustin Ranch Development.
Construction Cost: $5,600,000
Completion Date: 1997
San Joaquin Hills Road Tetra Tech, Inc. designed approximately 6,000 lineal feet of
Reclaimed Water System 8-inch reclaimed water distribution pipeline as part of the San
Joaquin Hills Road Reclaimed Water System. This proposed
City of Newport Beach pipeline will connect to Irvine Ranch Water District's
3300 Newport Boulevard reclaimed water system and could potentially provide
Newport Beach, CA 92659 reclaimed water service to 20 customers. Tetra Tech is
responsible for the design of the proposed pipeline and user
Contact: Mike Sinacori service connections and will provide assistance to the City for
9491644-3342 the on -site user modifications. The potential users consist of
cemetery, street parkway and median landscaping, two
Construction Cost: $450,000 possible school sites, a church and a park. Tetra Tech has also
prepared an Engineer's Report for the project.
Completion Date: Pending
Rio Hondo Reclamation After the Century Phase II was under construction, Tetra
Program Tech, Inc. was awarded a contract to evaluate the next phase
of the project. This phase, called the Rio Hondo segment, was
Central Basin Municipal hydraulically modeled using the Kentucky Pipe program. The
Water District modeling established pipe sizes, pumping plant performance
17140 S. Avalon Boulevard criteria, and system pressures.
Carson, CA 90746
Based on the hydraulic analysis, Tetra Tech, Inc. designed 36
Contact: Paul Shoenburger miles of reclaimed water transmission mains ranging from 6
310217-2222 to 36 inches in diameter. This program is capable of
delivering 49 CFS to reclaimed water users in the
Construction Cost $14,000,000 metropolitan Los Angeles area and required coordination with
I 1 different municipalities and more than 20 different _water
Completion Date: 1997 purveyors.
CITY OF VERNON
Reclaimed Water Pipeline
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Pa.-e 3
Reclaimed Water Main Since 1990, Tetra Tech, Inc. has worked with the City of
Glendale in the development of its reclaimed water program.
City of Glendale Phase I of the Verdugo Canyon Reclaimed Water Program
141 North Glendale Avenue consists of 22,000 lineal feet of 12-inch through 30-inch
Glendale, CA 91206 reclaimed water distribution piping. This phase delives 3,000
acre-feet per year of reclaimed water within the City.
Contact: Donald Froelich
8181548-2137 Tetra Tech, Inc. designed Phases II and III which involved
approximately 20,000 lineal feet of 16-inch reclaimed water
Construction Cost: $3,300,000 distribution piping. Tetra Tech is currently providing
Construction Management services for this project.
Completion Date: 1996
Chaparral Pines Provided engineering services for the reclaimed waterline for
Community & Golf Course lake replenishment and golf course irrigation serving the 600-
acre Chaparral Pines Community and Golf Course. The
Town of Payson and project includes 19,000 linear feet of 8-inch reclaimed water
Northern Gila County main.
Sanitary District
303 North Beeline Highway This project provided some interesting challenges such as
Payson, AZ 85541 coordination with the design of two pump stations, three
sewer lift stations, five domestic water wells, and a reservoir.
Contact: Joel Goode It required the designation of an alignment within a congested
6021474-5257 public utility easement heavily traveled roads including in
and across two state highways. It also required approval of
Construction Cost: $663,000 several agencies including Arizona Department of
Transportation, Northern Gila County Sanitary District,
Completion Date: 1995 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the Town
of Payson, Arizona.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Page 4
i
Reclaimed Water Facilities This project identified sites and capacities for pumping,
storage, and pipeline facilities required to extend the City of
City of Industry Industry reclaimed water system to meet present and future
15651 East Stafford Street reclaimed water demands of the Cities of Industry and West
City of Industry, CA 91744 Covina, Walnut Valley Water District, and Rowland Water
District. When constructed, these facilities will be capable of
Contact: John Ballas providing 20,000,000 gallons per day to customers in the
6261333-2211 Puente valley. A 10,000 acre-foot storage reservoir at Tres
Hermanos in Diamond Bar will provide reserve capacity to
Construction Cost: supply customers when treated reclaimed water is not
$3.5 to $4 million available from the main San Jose creek water reclamation
facility.
Completion Date: 1988
Designed the potable water system along with the reclaimed
water system for this award -winning project. The reclaimed
water system scope of services included system hydraulic
modeling and plans and specifications for:
CITY OF VERNON
Reclaimed Water Pipeline
• 29,000 linear feet of 36-inch steel pipe
• 5.O MG and 1.5 MG steel tank reservoirs
• Two 6,500 gpm reclaimed water pump stations
• Connection to the Whittier -Narrows pump station
• Connection to two lakes at Industry Hills
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Pa.ae 5
Ju ue- i ur. ue . ;�3 Nfl 'TETRA TECH PASADENA FAX NO. 626 963 0042
P. 02/06
Kick -Off Meeting
A kick-off sleeting with the design team and City staff will be scheduled. The meeting, will review
proposed pipeline ,alignment, connection to the existing reclaimed water pipeline, City requirements
and standards for design and drafting, CBMWD design standards and specifications, excavation,
trench resurfacing requirements, traffic control, and design and constriction schedule.
Tetra Tech, Inc. will prepare a meeting agenda outlining the Proposed discussion items. Meeting
minutes will be prepared and distributed for review and comment.
Akw mtit Stu&
Tetra "rech, Inc. proposes to cotichlct an alignment study to determine if there is room to construct the
proposed 18-inch reclaimed water pipeline in Boyle Avenue. The study will mcluire investigation of
the utilities in Boyle Avenue, and a determination of their location and depth. We will develop street
cross sections at critical intervals in order to make a recommendation on the alignment. Our analysis
may determine that an alternative alignment is required. If an alternate alignment needs to be
explored, Tetra Tech will propose it fee for the additional study. Tetra Tech, Inc. will present the
results of the alignment study in a technical memorandum.
Ut Iify Resmarcil
Utility rescarcll for the portion of pipeline in 561" ,Street (new design) will include initial contact with
each utility identified by Underground Service Alert (USA) as having facilities within the project
limits. Tetra Tech, Inc. will conduct a job walk to look for aboveground indication of additional
utilities or to confirm the location of the utilities being investigated. After the information is shown
on the plans along with the proposed pipeline alignment, Tetra Tech, Inc. will determine which
utilities require potholing. After USA has marked the areas for the potholes and after the potholes have been completed, the drawings will be checked against the USA markings and pothole
information. In addition, a follow up submittal will be made to each of the utilities for verification of
their utilities as shown oil the drawings.
For the, portion of the pipeline in Randolph Street and Boyle Avenue it will be necessary to update the
Previously completed design. 'This will include identifying any new utilities within the project areas
since 1994, Similar to tite utility research for the new design, utilities will bc: coMac(cd and
information regarding their facilities will be verified. flans will be updated with any new -or revised
information, A follow up submittal will be made to each of the utilities for verification.
Field Sul vey
Tetra'1'ech, Inc. proposes to perform a design survey aloof; the proposed 1.8 mile. pipeline alignment.
The desi� n survey will acc:omplisll the following: 1) establish horizontal control for the entire length
Of the project by defining street centerline; 2) check elevations along the previously surveyed portion
Of the alignment in Randolph Street and Boyle Avenue; 3) establish street centerline elevations at SO -
foot intervals along 50111 Street; and 4) locate physical characteristics along 50"' Street such as
CITY 01' VrANON
Reclaimed Wale, i'ipeline rixtcnsion SCOPE OIL WORK
Page I
nra ju uc ►uG ue:ej PM
TETRA TECH PASADENA
s
FAX NO. 626 963 0042
P. 03/06
manhole covers, valve box lids, curb and gutter. In the office, the data collected will be compiled.
For the pipeline plans in Randolph Street and Boyle; Avenue, the existing topographic and contour
mapping and will be digitized and overlaid on the surveyed street centerline to produce a strip base
map prepared to scale at I"=40'. The data will be adjusted with the elevation information collected
front the field. For the pipeline plans in 50"` Street strip base map will be created entirely from the:
field survey and will include street centerline, spot elevations and selected topography features within
the right-of-way.
Plan Pr('.p�uration
Tetra 'Tech, Inc. will prepare reclaimed water main plan and profile drawings to a scale of 1"=40'.
Drawings will show street right of way, existing curt) and gulier, street centerline, centerline street
surface cle;vations, and utility locations and cic;vations, Connections to the existing pipeline will be
detailed. All fittings, valves, adapters, will be identified. Total installed length and location of the
Proposed pipeline in relation to street ccnte;rline will be indicated. We anticipate the plan set to
include: 1) 'Title Sheet, 2) Location Map, Sheet Index, Legend and General Notes Sheet, 3) 11 Plan
and Profile Sheets, 4) Detail Sheets and 5) Traffic Control Plans.
�eci flea f in�ts
Technical specifications were previously prepared for the Vernon Connector Phase II. The
specifications will he reviewed for compliance with new standards/requirements and new sections
Will be added as required to produce a full and complete specification for the newly defined project.
I-ront-end documents including the bid tabulation form will be edited, as required. An original
hardcopy alul clectrunic version of the specifications will be provided.
Permits
It is anticipated that permits will be required from both the; City of Vernon and the City of Huntington
Park for potholing and construction within cite street riglit-of-way. Fees for these permits are not
included in this proposal. Tetra Tech, Inc, will also be required to obtain permits from the railroad
companies for pipeline crossing under their train tracks. Tetra Tech, Inc. will confirm that the criteria
used in the design of the previous crossings remains valid. We will use similar criteria in the design
of the new crossings, if applicable.
Traffic Control
Tetra Tech, Tmc. will prepare traffic control plans for only the pipeline alignment not in tide City of
Vernon. Tetra "Tech will utilize the latest Caltrans Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and
Maintenance 7.onc and Huntington Mari: requirements. Traffic control plans will be prepared in
AutoCAD format in 1"=10' scale on base nlr►ps. It is anticipated that a total of 12 traffic control plans
will be required for the following locations: Randolph Street (2 sheets), Randolph and Boyle and R/R
(2 sheets), Boyle Avenue (I sheet), Boyle Avenue zit Slauson (2 sheets), Boyle at R/R (2 sheet,),
Boyle at 1~rtitlind (2 shee(s), and Boyle at 501►' (l sheet).
CITY 01� VE: NON
Reclaimed W;xkr Ti )dine Extcn�ion
SCQYl-.- of Wolm
I'a-c 2
nrtt Ju-uL luc Ue:23 PM TETRA TECH PASADENA FAX NO. 626 963 0042 P. 04/06
Ceotechnical Ynvestieation
Tetra 'Tech, Inc. will subcontract with Lowney Associates for the geoteclinical investigation. The
investigation will include seven borings. The borings will require traffic control, health and safety
plan, photoioni7.ation detector (PID) for volatile organics, pavement coring and patching (backfilling
With soil cuttings) and conventional gcotechnical testing.
Plan Submittals
"'he following submittals will be made:
50% Design Review Package
The 50% drawings will show utility location's and the proposed pipeline alignment on the base plan.
Fivc (5) sets of plan will he submitted to the City for review, One plan review meeting will be
scheduled with City staff to review comments.
99% T ign Review Packaec
City commcrtls will be incorporated on the project plans. flans will be completed to 90%. Utility
polltolc inf(Irutation, utility depth and pipeline profile will be added. Plans will be completed
showing details of connection,, valve,, fittings, service location, typical trench sections, and
pavementm
resurfacing rcquircents. Five (5) sets of plans will be submitted for review and comment.
()Ile plant review meeting will be schedule(] with the City staff to review comments.
Final L)esign,Packaoc
90% Review Comments will be incorporated in this final plan. Final tnylar original drawings will be
prepared, signed And submitted to the City. AutoCAD files will be submitted on CD d4 kette.
Cost Lestintate
An Enbiucur's estimate of construction cost will be prepared and submitted with the final plans and
specifications package. The preliminary construction cost estimate will be based on latest published
construction cost data and past Tetra'I'ech, Inc. projects.
Bid Assistance
Bid assistgacc will be provided to respond to technical questions during the bid process. Tetra Tech,
lac. will review bids and make recommendation for award to the lowest responsible bidder. Tetra
Tech, Inc. will respond to technical questions resulting from conditions discovered in the bidding
process. Revised details and clarifications will be provided as required to meet field conditions.
Crry OF VFRNON
I:eclainu �t Watcr Pipeline Extension SC:OPF OF WORK
Paje,3
nrrc ,)u-uc lut: U2:23 PM TETRA TECH PASADENA FAX NO. 626 963 0042 P. 05/06
k
Construction Assistance
Tetra Tech, lnc, will attend pre-cowiniction Ind construction progress meetings as required. Shop
drawing and material submittals will be reviewed for compliance with specification requirements. A
maximum of six meelinds are included in our not -to -exceed fee. Tetra Tech, Inc. will provide part
time assistance during construction to assure contractor follows requirements of plans and
specifications. Contractor's installation procedures will be monitored and reviewed when requested
by the City. Final revisions to project drawim;s will be made based on construction installation
ch:M."Ics in.-Idu in the field.
C lly OF VKRNON
Kedain1CCl Watcc t'ipclinc C:xlcnsion sCont Ole WORK
Page 4
Attached is Tetra Tech's proposed design schedule. We estimate approximately four (4) months to
complete design. This includes two (2) weeks for the City to review the 50% and 90% design
submittals (for a total of four weeks).
CITY OF VERNON
Ci-ucnr IT c
Keciaimed Water Pipeline Extension
Page I
N
N
N
N
m
a m
E N
m
m
m
N
a
s
m
E
m
m
E
_
y
�
U)
w
a "
w
a`
a
0
a
Z
0
O
z
W
N
-
c
v
F W
X J
W O
®
O.
O
N
m
m
Z W
(n
r2
6
OaU
a
7
a N
ro
d
m
a[az
>cr w0
¢
¢
¢
0Qo
m
� 3:
e
a
Uwe
�O
a0
J
tLi
n
Q
•
O
C
3
c
m
J
o
E
c
o
3
N
¢
C
m
C
J
O)
C
N
C
J
N
O
m
(n
Q
a
I
r
E
iD
E
">
d
omi
m
m
m
c
m
W
v
C
D
cc
C
m
0
a
°
C
a
i
N
O
o
iQ
E
.q
E
c
m
¢
2
E
m
E
m
Z
¢
�'
m
c
m
g
n
ta'n
\
'm
cc$
m
I N
�
m
Cln
m
H
E
_�
..
N
Y^
N
r
IC7
¢
m
LL
a`
n
U
a`
m
0
la`
Ia
U
'ii
o
co
m
�
I
c �
�
I
�
O
•-
O
N
t7
�
O
u
m m
ao
Our estimated not -to -exceed fee for the design and bidding assistance of the MGS Reclaimed Water
Pipeline Extension is $130,288. This fee does not include pothole investigation subconsultant
services. The estimated not -to -exceed fee for assistance during construction is $37,552.
Included are Tetra Teeh's detailed manhour spreadsheet and hourly charge rate and expense
reimbursement schedule for 2002.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT FEE
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Page I
W'W'.
N N
(D (D'(D,
0)-(D
CD: :I-q N co'
p er. Co
.O_.'(O�V* co:Cl'.
fl- F- (D co M
-V'M "T CD (D!
(D N (D N O cm
-co co
N -00
C0
Co
V'V' Cl O V
(D `t COO (D
N
(A
O'..
e*.
(.(') (D
N (n N
-.V"
M_ It O) O
M COO co O'
O (n O cf) (f) (n
(0-
N
N It (D It t`
W)
CO
-It
N
N.o)tD.
^.._-�;�
- - - - 'EH �',
'..
O
N.M M'(C)N
n'
t`.
6Fi.69'
EA 69 �-
EA'' d 69 69'
6A 61Y, 69 T
69 69! 69 64 69j
V). 69
M
69' 69 6ii cm 69
M
(O
,�
69
E9
69:
69j
,
_.__
-
69
i69!
0
-
of0I0'O
O
O.O O O O:
Oi
— 0
�_ O O _�'O
to I
(Ai
0 _OIO M
'r T 01
O O.O O O
Ml-IM
M
0
O_!O O
Oiu)
O
MI
Efl
ER�d3id9!
!Lo!
69!69;E9 E9'(!3
6a 6-.
�)
00.
C6iE0
d'j
NI
6
H9;
C41
co co
N N
.O 0 co'-
(D
m--,ticm cw----
O' T: M;
co! !(D'��(D
r`:ti](DIM,
�t CO It CO- :O
co N cD N N
'M co
N 00
co--
(D
�C"V' O O',.dq
co: t co OI,co
(m
(Di
O
r'
�t CD
cm
NiOiN
M It 0 M
r`.I,.j00i(
h'�',r- �' M
co-
CD
T!M (D �t N
d,
r
r
69161.1
:N 'd'
69 (si
N'iMjd.''.!
d9��j69 E9!
^ T tfjl
EA�fRIE9IT�i
E9' ,d9 _-I
69; 69 69
- r -
V). 64
r',
IN'cm! co-N.N
:69:69 69:N� 69
col
Cl)
i(f)
T
r
'v
-:
---
-
- - —
N cD
*-
V tD
': N .-- � �
�'�tICDiN
0 (D !
CD'cD O N'
0 N
OIN' co
(D N
n
O'N O O co
O!
T i
..-'. N' CD!
T T
.-
M
co
N M It CO . N
cli
O'
Cl)
IN 1
N N
N N
O
qT IT It cm --
-N-N-C\l C\j
N N
_N_ ---- _�•
(D
V
00 'IT (D
I
co co
NLO
M..
NFt
O
Y U -
c to
_ (o N I t0
c 'O L,,, E c v). Cl 0) _ O Q NUJ
'21
3 c a) w c o rn: rn V Q a) p O cn Q
°),in T 3 c, o- ml� =_ c c c (n c m a) c � m
c m fL m > a o c .0 .Q � yHm Q 0 N y U Q OO
p T Co o in U) °� co
,� o o' o �!,�'(OA �;cD (n'« N; O 2 �' N 0, QIQ'
xlcl
o 0— ga)o w aoi £.''>'.cu io�c° ,3,� c�Q o > m c �� c m h-1-
Y' Q � c t� U. a � T 0 (X 0) o' c[ � ! fn t6' U) 0) i L ! o l ° i a ' Ir o a a in U a- D O 0,
e- CV M �. Lc) (O i h i O r N C.)
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
EXHIBIT "A"
2002
HOURLY CHARGE RATE AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
Professional
Engineering Intern/Technician ................... $ 44.00
Designer/CAD Operator/Engineer I ........... $ 82.00
Engineer II and III/Senior Designer .......... $ 92.00
Planner....................................................... $ 94.00
Senior Engineer/Landscape Architect........ $ 103.00
Project Engineer/Project Coordinator ........ $ 120.00
Project Manager/Sr. Project Coordinator... $ 135.00
Senior Project Manager .............................. $ 150.00
Program Director/Project Director............. $ 180.00
Administrative
Administrative Clerk .................................. $ 38.00
Word Processor/Admin. Support ............... $ 54.00
Graphic Designer ....................................... $ 90.00
SurveV/Mappin
Survey Technician ...................................... $ 87.00
Surveyor/Field Supvsr./Sr. Survey Tech.... $ 97.00
Two -Person Survey Party ........................... $ 172.00
Two -Person Survey Party with GPS .......... $ 210.00
Three -Person Survey Party ......................... $ 250.00
Survey Travel Time (Two -person) ............. $ 83.00
Survey Travel Time (Three -person)........... $ 118.00
Construction
Construction Observer ............................... $ 72.00
Senior Construction Observer .................... $ 78.00
Resident Engineer ...................................... $ 110.00
Construction Manager ................................ $ 140.00
Reproduction, special photography, postage, delivery services, express mail, out -of -area telephone calls, printing
and any other services performed by subcontractor, will be billed at cost plus 15%.
Reimbursable In -House Costs
Photo Copies (B&W 8.5"x I I") ...... $0.10/Each
Photo Copies (B&W 11"x17") ....... $0.35/Each
Color Copies (up to 8.5"x 11 ") ........ $1.50/Each
Color Copies (to l I" x 17") .............. $2.50/Each
Forensic Engineer ...................................................
Court Appearances, Expert Witness Testimony,
Depositions, and Preparation for Testimony..........
*Minimum $1,000.00 for half day plus expenses.
Blueprints ....................................... $ 0.35/S.F.
Computer Time ............................. $10.00/Hour
Mileage ........................................... $ 0.40/Mile
........................................................................... $250.W
...................................................................... $350A0*
NOTE: All rates are effective to October 1, 2002. There will be a negotiated increase in rates, 5% minimum per
year, for contracts extending beyond October 1, 2002.
LAAdminTormsExhibit A-B-C\LxhibitaCA.MA.OR TKWA2002.doc.doc
10, 614 "1 oil I wo. "
TETRA TECH, INC.
Tto Infrastructure Services Group
ion
April 25, 2002
Mr. Chuck Montoya
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Reference: Proposal for Vernon Booster Pump Station
Dear Mr. Montoya:
Tetra Tech, Inc. enthusiastically submits our proposal for the Vernon Booster Pump Station and
facilities. The design and construction of the Booster Pump Station along with the many other skills
and experience required for this project are assets that Tetra Tech takes pride in owning. The
proposed Tetra Tech project team has been performing preliminary design investigations, design, and
construction management services in Central Basin Municipal Water District since the creation of the
reclamation system. Our expertise and knowledge in the area of water reclamation makes us ideally
sited for this project.
An Experienced Project Team — Our Senior Manager, Mr. Terry Kerger, has over 30 years of
experience in water facility engineering. Our Preliminary Design Investigation and Final Design
engineers, Mr. Ken Berard and Ms. Elisa Ventura have over 25 years of experience in water
reclamation facility planning and design. In addition, all Tetra Tech team members have recycled
water planning, design and construction experience. This experience is necessary for the design and
construction in addition to making certain that all foreseeable potential issues are resolved prior to
bidding.
We believe our technical experience and team approach is critical to the success of this project. All of
our key team members and subconsultants have worked together previously on other similar projects
and have all work in Central Basin MWD service area.
Our Commitment to the Project — Upon the City's Notice -to -Proceed, we are ready to begin
immediately. We are fully committed and able to supply the hours estimated, or more if required. To
completed this project within the schedule. We have demonstrated in the past our ability- to prepare
high quality bidding documents under a very tight schedule.
Familiar with Central Basin MWDs' Standards — Our staff has previously completed the design
and construction management of the only two pump stations in Central Basin MWD (Vernon
Connector Unit — Cudahy Pump Station and Rio Hondo Pump Station). In addition, our staff
3280 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 350. Pasadena, CA 91 107
Tel 626.683.0066 Fax 626.683.0060
www.Eetratech.com
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Mr. Chuck Montoya
April 25, 2002
Page 2
completed the first and recent Master Plan update for Central Basin MWD in August 2000. We are
familiar with Central Basin MWDs' recycled specifications and standards. We plan to make use of
this past history and drawing library to minimize the preliminary design investigation and final design
effort.
Our goal with this proposal to demonstrate our dedication, commitment, quality, and eagerness to
serve you in an effort to continue our long lasting relationship. We want to thank you for us
the opportunity to propose and look forward to completing this assignment for you. Please do not
hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or desire additional information.
Te
Se
JR:cab
1:\prop02\p-039evUetter.doc
c Marc Serna, CBMWD
Our work plan will include scheduling an initial project kick-off meeting with the City of Vernon
(Vernon) and Central Basin Municipal Water District (District) to obtain available data on the
existing distribution system and proposed project sites. We will focus on two sites that have been
identified by Vernon and the District, one on the south side of Hollydale Park and the other along
Orange Avenue, south of Century Boulevard. We will then proceed with a systematic approach to
collecting data, including assessor maps, utilities, and permitting requirements through contact with
local governments and regulatory agencies.
Concurrently, we will perform the hydraulic analysis for preliminary sizing of the project facilities as
well as a surge analysis for the recommended pump station and pipeline. We will develop schematic
site plans and determine whether the proposed sites are adequate for the location of the proposed
pump station. We will coordinate with the local city representatives in obtaining site availability and
cost data from the landowners.
We will summarize our findings in a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) that will include a facility site
plan, a description of the operation and controls, a preliminary construction cost estimate and
schedule for each of the two sites. The PDR will make recommendations on the proposed facilities.
Once a site has been selected, Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) will complete a field survey to establish
horizontal control and elevations for the design. The field survey data will be compiled and a base
map will be developed. Easements and existing utilities and appurtenances will be plotted for a base
plan.
Critical utility locations will be potholed during design. We will prepare a list of the utilities we
consider critical and submit it to Vernon and the District for concurrence on which utilities should be
potholed during design. Less critical utilities will be left for potholing prior to construction by the
contractor. Non -critical utilities will not be potholed. In addition, Tetra Tech will do a thorough field
investigation of the site for evidence of other utilities or appurtenances that may not have been shown
on plans and to confirm the accuracy of record data.
Plans will include the following:
• Site Improvements, Yard Piping, Grading and Paving, Landscaping and Irrigation
• Booster Pump Station Building Construction and Access
• Pump Installation and Piping
Pump Station Ventilation
• Electrical Lighting, Power, Controls and Telemetry
Plans, specifications, bid proposal documents will be prepared and submitted to both Vernon and the
District for review and comments at 50%, 90% and 100% completion. Tetra Tech will meet with
Vernon and the District to discuss comments. Both Vernon and the District's comments will be
incorporated in final plans and specification documents. Original documents will be signed and
provided to both Vernon and the District for bidding.
Engineer's estimate of construction cost will be prepared based on historical construction cost data
for similar Tetra Tech projects. Costs for each item will be compared using Engineering News
Record (ENR) index value. If necessary, material and labor cost will be verified with local
contractors. A construction cost estimate may be prepared in the same format as the bid proposal for
comparison of bid prices.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT APPROACH
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 1
SENIOR MANAGER
Terry Kerger — Mr. Kerger will be the Senior Project Manager in charge of the project. Mr. Kerger
will be the person responsible for the delivery of the proposed services. The Senior Project Manager
is responsible for the overall execution of the project including financial resources, office and field
staff. The Senior Project Manager is responsible for assuring the appropriate staff is available for
assignment, the staff completes their assignments on schedule, management of the project budget,
overall, quality review, and coordination of project goals and submittals with both the City of Vernon
(Vernon) and Central Basin Municipal Water District (District) project managers. Our project team
organization chart indicates the Senior Project Manager will work directly with the design engineers.
This organization facilitates preparation and review of technical data required for incorporation in the
project plans, technical specifications and engineers' construction cost estimate.
DESIGN ENGINEERS
Ken Berard — Mr. Berard will be the Project Engineer responsible for the Preliminary Design
Investigation. Ken will be working on the data research and review, siting investigation, design
criteria development, facility development/site plan, and system control. Ken will be working very
close with Terry Kerger and Elisa Ventura in order to facilitate a positive location for the Vernon
Booster Pump Station.
Elisa Ventura — Ms. Ventura will be the lead design engineer for this Vernon Booster Pump Station.
Elisa will be responsible for evaluating the hydraulics of the existing system and preparing
calculations to properly select booster pumping equipment meeting all required system conditions.
Elisa will be responsible for coordinating the preparation of the booster station plans and
specifications.
John Robinson — Mr. Robinson will be a Project Engineer responsible for the Permits and Utilities for
the Preliminary Design Investigation as well as a Project Engineer responsible for the pressure
reducing station in the final design. John will be responsible for the utility investigation, permitting
and preliminary construction cost estimate. John will also be responsible for coordinating the
preparation of the pressure reducing station plans, specifications and final construction cost estimate.
Bob Parsons — Mr. Parsons will be the design engineer for the booster station electrical power,
lighting controls and telemetry equipment. Bob will be responsible for coordinating any change in
electrical service requirements, preparation of the pump power and control plans and technical
specification. Bob will also provide the construction cost estimate for the electrical work items.
Dale Wah — Mr. Wah will be the design engineer for the structural design of the booster station
building. Date will be responsible for the building plan, details, structural calculations, technical
specifications and construction cost estimate for building construction. This structure will be very
similar to our past projects for the District including Rio Hondo Pump Station in Central Basin and
Hyperion Pump Station in West Basin Municipal Water District.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM & QUALIFICATIONS
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page I
Louis Yu — Mr. Yu who is Tetra Tech's Chief Process Engineer will provide the quality control
review at various key points of the project progress as outlined in our company policy. Louis will not
be closely involved with the project will conduct four quality review for this project. The first and
second review will be conducted at the completion of the 75-percent preliminary design investigation
and the completion of the 100-percent Preliminary Design Report. The second and third quality will
be conducted at the completion of the 50-percent final design and the completion of the 100-percent
Final Design.
SUBCONSULTANTS
Geotechnical Subconsultant — Geotechnical services to determine soil bearing capacity for booster
station footing will be provided by our subconsultant Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Potholing Subconsultant — Potholing services to determine utility information of potential impacted
utilities and tie-in locations will be provided by our subconsultant Saf-r-Dig Utility Surveys, Inc.
Surge Subconsultant — Surge analysis to determine recommended pipeline and facility analysis will
be provided by our subconsultant Flow Science, Incorporated.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM & QUALIFICATIONS
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 2
o
r
U
U
�
ot
Cd
co
0-0
In
.fir
w
4z
<
Z F-4
CA
Z
CIO
Infrastructure Services Group TETRATECH, INC•
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Larry S. Bateman, P.L.S. Magic Mountain Bridge Overerossing, Los Angeles County —
Provided design topographic surveys and boundary surveys.
Prepared right-of-way mapping for the preparation of legal
descriptions and right-of-way exhibits for the acquisition of
additional land required for the construction of a new bridge
and roadway in the City of Santa Clarita.
• SR73, Parcel B, Orange County — Provided boundary survey
for the preparation of State of California Highway Right -of -
Way Mapping. Prepared legal descriptions and right-of-way
exhibits for the acquisition of additional land required to build
southbound transition bridge onto SR-55.
• Street of the Golden Lantern, Orange County — Street
widening project. Provided surveys for aerial mapping, design
topography and street centerline control. Supervised the
preparation of legal descriptions and right-of-way exhibits for
the acquisition of additional land required to widen said street.
• Springville Drive (formerly Airport North)/SR 101, Ventura
County — Provided surveys for design topography and
supervised the preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for
the acquisition of additional land required to widen proposed
right-of-way and new freeway interchange for Springville
Drive bridge.
• Rancho Cucamonga/SR 66 (Historic), San Bernardino
County — Street widening project. Provided surveys for aerial
mapping, design topography and street centerline control.
Supervised construction staking of widening for 12 kilometers,
including bridge widening'and storm drain relocation.
• District 7, Los Angeles County — On -Call survey construction
staking of accident investigation sites.
liprt.pl l_'\p-U 34c.1ha\rmen.J..c
M , �
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Louis Y. Yu, P.E. Tapia Sludge Pump Station No. 2, Las Virgenes Municipal
Water District — As a part of the Tapia Water Reclamation
Plant Expansion, designed the conversion of an aerobic sludge
digester tank into a 235 gpm sludge pump station. The unit
consisted of two sludge wet well and two 150-IIP progressing
cavity pumps to pump undigested sludge from the treatment
plant to the sludge digesters at Rancho Las Virgenes, three
miles away from the plant. The sludge force main was an
8-inch ductile iron pipeline that traversed the rugged terrain of
Tapia County Park and the heavily traveled Las Virgenes
Road_ Services provided included project management and
engineering during construction.
• North Richmond Pump Station, California — Design of a 300
cfs stormwater pump station serving the North Richmond area
near San Francisco. The pump station was equipped with four
natural gas engine driven vertical mixed flow pumps, standby
propane fuel system and 2,000 feet of 72-inch discharge force
main. The work performed included mechanical design and
field resident engineering during construction.
• Walker Street Well Reservoir and Pump Station, City of La
Palma — Project Manager and Design Engineer for a 2.0-
million gallon storage reservoir and a 3,900 gpm pump station.
The reservoir is an aboveground steel unit receiving water
from the Walker Well Pump. The pump station is equipped
with four horizontal split -case centrifugal pumps for pumping
the water from the reservoir into the City of La Palma water
distribution system. One water pump is equipped with a
variable frequency drive, while the other three are constant
speed units. Construction Management services were also
provided.
• Sludge Force Main, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District —
Project Manager for the design of three miles of 8-inch sludge
force main and a 250 gpm sludge pump station for the Las
Virgenes Municipal Water .District. The force main delivers
raw sludge from the Tapia Water Reclamation Facilities to the
Rancho Las Virgenes sludge processing facilities.
• Sludge Force Main, South Coast Water District — Project
Manager for the design of five miles of 6-inch sludge force
main for the South Coast Water District. The pipeline delivers
raw sludge from the Coastal Treatment Plant to the Aliso
Water Management Agency's Joint Regional Treatment Plant
at Laguna Niguel, California.
• Water, Sewer and Reclaimed Water Pipelines, Various
Clients — Design Engineer for various conveyance pipeline
projects, encompassing the preparation of construction plans,
specifications and estimates, such as the following:
— 24-inch water transmission main of approximately 5,000
feet in length through the busy streets of Arcadia,
California;
— A 36-inch water transmission line for the City of St.
Petersburg, Florida.
— Various reclaimed water and sewer lines in California and
various regions of the United States.
(Aprop12\p-039e,\v. do,
TIMOTHY KEUSCHER Geotechnical Engineering
Environmental Engineering
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley: M.S., Civil Engineering, 1993
Oregon State University: B.S., Geology, 1983
REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer: California No. 55027, 1995
California Registered Geotechnical Engineer, No. 2534, 2001
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc., Senior Engineer, 1986 to date
BSK & Associates, Staff Geologist, 1985-1986
REPRESENTATIVE SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Keuscher has 17 years of experience in geotechnical and environmental engineering on projects
throughout the western United States, including waste disposal sites, commercial developments,
industrial plants, water treatment facilities, pipelines, and bridges. He has been responsible for
design and supervision of subsurface exploration programs, soil laboratory testing, report
preparation, and engineering analysis. He has participated in foundation studies, geologic hazard
evaluations, geophysical` field studies, and slope stability analyses. His project management
experience includes designing and implementing cost-effective geotechnical and environmental
investigations; supervising staff, field crews, and drilling operations; preparing bid documents and
specifications; consulting with clients; and preparing cost estimates and work plans. Mr. Keuscher
has performed and evaluated construction and post -construction site monitoring and is
knowledgeable in construction techniques and requirements for engineering backfill, excavation and
backfill, and caisson and shoring construction. Mr. Keuscher is skilled in interpreting geologic and
hydrogeologic data; describing surface stratigraphic relationships using borehole data, downhole
geophysical methods, and trenchwall logging.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Eight Sewage Lift Stations and Associated Piping, Torrance, California: A geotechnical
investigation was conducted for eight lift stations and appurtenant piping. Preliminary
engineering studies revealed the need to improve the City's sewage system. Improvements
include reconstructing sewage lift stations and minor pipeline construction at eight locations with
the City's sewer system. Each lift station will consist of a pump station, a wet well, and
appurtenant piping and will be buried. -
Mr. Keuscher supervised the exploratory drilling and laboratory testing program and performed
the engineering analyses. He also developed recommendations that included allowable bearing
capacities, settlement estimates, lateral earth pressures, resistance to lateral loads, and allowable
uplift resistance. The recommendations also included the placement and compaction of backfill
behind walls below grade, bedding and backfilling requirements for pipelines, and parameters for
temporary shoring design.
Municipal Water Reservoirs, Garden Grove, California: Performed a geotechnical study that
provided criteria for the design of three large water storage reservoirs, two pump stations, and
appurtenant piping for the City of Garden Grove's (the City) water supply system. The City
implemented a program to improve some of its water storage and delivery facilities to
11prop02\p-039ev\KL U SC H E R. GT
TIMOTHY KEUSCHER
Page 2
accommodate increased water demand from redevelopment, high-rise construction, and increased
population. The reservoir facilities will be located at two sites. One site will contain two, four -
million -gallon reinforced concrete rectangular reservoirs, a pump station, and piping. The
second site will contain one, five -million -gallon circular prestressed concrete reservoir, a pump
station, and piping. The pump stations will be constructed at -grade and the three reservoirs will
be buried approximately 15 feet below grade. Each site had different soil conditions requiring
different design considerations. At one site, compressible clays existed directly below the
proposed invert depth of a reservoir necessitating remedial design measures.
Mr. Keuscher supervised the exploratory drilling and laboratory testing program and performed
the engineering analyses. Laboratory tests characterized the strength and consolidation
characteristics of the soil materials at the two sites. Mr. Keuscher's duties included evaluating
site seismicity, performing settlement analysis, developing design recommendations and report
preparation. Design recommendations included developing foundations design parameters for
reservoir and pumping facilities; developing design parameters for reservoir walls below grade,
including static and dynamic lateral earth pressures, backfill criteria, and drainage requirements;
evaluating stability of temporary construction slopes and provide parameters for shoring design;
and developing earthwork specifications.
Storm Drain Pipeline, Long Beach, California: A geotechnical investigation was conducted for
a storm drain pipeline in the City of Long Beach. The pipeline will include two mainline storm
drains and four laterals, and consists of approximately 16,800 linear feet of 24 to 90-inch-
diameter reinforced concrete pipe and about 1700 linear feet of 10-foot-wide by 7-foot-high
reinforced concrete box. Invert depth of pipeline will be about 9 to 26 feet below existing street
grade. The investigation was performed in accordance with specific guidelines by the Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works for drainage facilities.
• Mr. Keuscher supervised the drilling and exploratory laboratory testing programs and performed
the engineering analyses. He developed design recommendations that included lateral earth
pressures, resistance to lateral loads, allowable uplift resistance, bearing capacity, and settlement
estimates. In addition, he provided recommendations for temporary shoring design, temporary
dewatering, and bedding and backfilling criteria of the pipeline.
Modesto Water Treatment Plant, Modesto, California: Geomatrix Consultants performed a
design -level geotechnical study for this new $36-million, 35-million-gallon-per-day water
treatment plant. To present a low profile, the plant is being designed so that all major water -
containing structures will be buried. Geomatrix Consultants provided all geologic and
geotechnical information needed to design the various plant facilities. Buried structures at the
plant includes Ozone Contact Basins, Flocculation and Sedimentation basins, Filters Complex
and a 5 million gallon Treated Water Storage Reservoir. Surface structure include an
Administrative Building, Ozone Generation and Chemical and Feed buildings.
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
I:'\p,op02 %p-039ev',KEUSCH ER.GT I
Infrastructure Services Group TETRATECH, INC.
TETRATECH,INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
PUMP STATIONS
Vernon Connector Unit
(Cudahy) Pump Station
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Paul Shoenberger
310/660-6218
Construction Cost:
$6,000,000
Completion Date: 1997
Rio Hondo Water Reclamation
Pump Station
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Paul Shoenberger
310/660-6218
Construction Cost:
$1.8 Million
Completion Date: 1995 est.
Foothills Booster Station
City of Phoenix Water Services
Water Engineering
200 W. Washington, 8' Fl.
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Contact: Laxman Devkota
602/256-4273
Construction Cost:
$420,000 est.
Completion Date: 1999 est.
I yW, fAl2Ap41;9-V,1a d ,_ d_ Pegs 1 ,, 4
Prepared construction documents for this project which included
construction of a combination booster pump and pressure reducing
facility, and appurtenances. Pump station capacity is 5,000 gpm.
The site is a triangular piece of property located at the southwest
corner of the intersection of Otis Avenue and Elizabeth Street in the
City of Cudahy. Construction included an underground concrete
vault which houses the pump and pressure reducing equipment.
Pumping units consist of two horizontal split case pumps with
vertical turbine motors. One of the pumping units is controlled by a
variable speed drive. Other components consist of appurtenant
electrical and control equipment, piping, and site work.
The initial capacity of the pump station was 15,700 gpm, with a
discharge pressure of 125 psi. Three vertical turbine pumps were
provided at the initial stage. Two of the pumps were rated at 7,350
gpm each, and the remaining "jockey" pump with a rating of 1,000
gpm. All pumps designed were variable speed utilizing variable
frequency drives. In the future, the smaller pump will be replaced by
a larger unit and another large pump will be installed for firm
capacity of 22,000 gpm or 31 mod. The project included design and
construction support services.
Provided a detailed preliminary design report for this raw water
treatment plant, utilizing water from the Salt Water Project. The
PDR included an alternative alignment analysis, hydraulic
modeling, alternate site analysis, and pump station plan view with
mechanical solutions. Final design included the pump station, inlet
metering vault, discharge metering, electrical, controls, and site
work.
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
San Jacinto and Lee Lake
Booster Stations
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District
31315 Chaney Street
P.O. Box 3000
Lake Elsinore, CA 92531
Contact: Phillip Miller
909/674-3146
Construction Cost:
$875,000
Completion Date: 1999 est.
Emergency Pump Station
Huntington Library & Botanical
Gardens
1151 Oxford Road
San Marino, CA 91108
Contact: Laurie Sowd
626/405-2252
Construction Cost:
$850,000
Completion Date: 1999
El Rio Booster Pump Station
United Water Conservation
106 North 8`h Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Contact: John Dickenson
805/525-4431
Construction Cost:
$2,000,000
Completion Date: 1998
Provided preliminary and final design of two floating pump
stations. San Jacinto Booster Station conveyed 2,600 gpm of water
from Lake Elsinore to mitigated wetlands. Lee Lake Booster
Stations conveyed 3,200 gpm of water from Lee Lake to
agricultural users. Both stations' design included submersible
pumps, telemetry and controls, coordination with City of Elsinore,
property owners, Edison, County of Riverside, and environmental
consultants.
Prepared preliminary design report, plans, specifications, and
construction management for this 14,200 gpm irrigation and
emergency pump station which includes five pumps — 200, 1,000,
1000, 6,000, and 6,000 gpm which are all driven by electrical
motors. Two pumps are connected to a 250 kw emergency diesel -
driven generator. the two largest pumps are used for emergency fire
flow and the smaller pumps provide irrigation water. Project also
included a 16-inch pipeline and rehabilitation and repair of a
hopper -bottom, wood -roof rectangular reservoir originally
constructed in the 1930's.
This project included pump station layout, piping, and pump
selection. Design included four 400 hp vertical turbine pumps in
cans with variable frequency drives and 1-ton cylinder chlorination
facility. This project also included a new chlorination facility with
provisions for future aqua ammonia facilities for ehloramination.
I:•�r,r11�Na1:k.V.�I�t.J.arr,�v.c..k�P,,y `,yJ
TETRA TECH, INC.
InFO Infrastructure Services Group
Various Pump Stations
Moulton Niguel Water District
27500 La Paz Road
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Contact: Carlo Habash
949/448-4083
Construction Cost:
$3,000,000
Completion Date: 1998
Rolling Hills Pump Station
Moulton Niguel Water District
27500 La Paz Road
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Contact: Carlo Habash
949/448-4033
Construction Cost:
$3,000,000
Completion Date: 1996
Provided preliminary design, final design, and construction
management for the following pump stations projects:
• Rolling Hills Pump Station - 5,000 gpm
• Sheep Hills Pump Station - 6,500 gpm
• Pacific Park Pump Station - 7,500 gpm
• Southridge Reclaimed Water Pump Station - 3,000 gpm
• Lower Salada Sewer Lift Station - 2,000 gpm
• Del Avion Sewer Lift Station - 1,200 gpm
• Paseo de Valencia Lift Station - 800 gpm
All of these stations met strict architectural, aesthetic and noise
requirements, contained multiple pumps and natural gas engines for
emergency power source.
ASL has also provided design and construction services upgrading
the following pump stations:
• Big Niguel Pump Station
• Crown Point Pump Station Reclaimed Water Conversion
• Pacific Island Drive Pump Station III
• Rolling Hills Pump Station
Designed a 5,000 gpm pump station in Rolling Hills to serve the new
Aliso Viejo Development. The station was designed to meet an
initial demand of 3,000 gpm plus 3,500 apm fire flow. When the
Aliso Viejo Development was 60 percent complete, the station
pumped into a new 5.0 MG reservoir during off-peak hours. The
station consisted of four electric -driven, two -stage centrifugal pumps
and one natural gas/LPG-driven, single -stage centrifugal pump.
I-.''ff",PP-I3J"VCL.d:aR ir,.� J" P:,¢ .,9J
TETRA TECH, INC.
TZ Infrastructure Services Group
Stonegate Pump Station
and Hydropneumatic Tanks
Kaufman and Broad
21900 Burbank Boulevard,
Suite 300
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Contact: Teresa Sousa
818/887-5599
Construction Cost:
$1,500,000
Completion Date: 1995
MASTER PLANS
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Wyatt Won
3101660-6203
Plan Cost: $75,000
Completion Date: August 2000
West Basin Municipal Water
District/City of Los Angeles
Department of Water & Power
West Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Wyatt Won
310/660-6203
Master Plan Cost: $200,000
Completion Date: July 2000
Prepared plans, specifications, and estimates and provided
construction administration and deputy inspection services for the
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power facility including a
pump station with three 4000 gpm and one 70 gpm pumps; one 3000
gpm emergency pump, and two 10,000 gallon hydropneumatic tanks.
The facility boosts pressures to the higher elevations with Kaufman
and Broad's West Hills development. The project also included an
enclosed building, emergency power generator system (diesel back-
up), electrical and telemetry controls; and cooling and ventilation
system. Processed and obtained grading, retaining wall, public
works class "B", building and HVAC permits from the City of Los
Angeles. Managed the project through the design and construction
phases including all coordination with DPW, City of Los Angeles,
electrical, architectural, and geotechnical subconsultants, the
contractor, and the developer.
Water Recycling Program Master Plan - Analyzed the existing
operations and possible modifications or system expansion with
consideration of 41 water utilities in a service area covering 227
square miles and including 24 cities. The requirements of the master
plan included data assessment, database creation and modification,
conceptual pipeline routing, inter -agency interconnection, hydraulic
analysis with storage review, economic analysis and a phasing plan.
The master plan identified approximately 1,500 new potential
recycled customers with a potential recycled water demand of 30,000
acre-feet per year.
Provided a comprehensive recycled water master plan within the
WBMWD and LADWP service areas. The requirements of the
master plan included analysis of recycled water markets and potential
recycled water facilities for expansion with consideration of 14 water
utilities including LADWP in a study area covering over 200 square
miles and including 18 cities. The master plan was conducted to
identify and evaluate facilities for expansion, rank facilities based on
economics, demand and other factors and develop a
phasing/implementation plan for over 1,900 potential and non -
potential customers with a potential recycled water demand totaling
nearly 65,000 acre-feet per year.
1 ow.•.v<IauJ cf--d- Past, A r 4
Introduction
Geomatrix Consultants is a consulting firm that practices in the general fields of engineering and the applied
earth sciences. Founded in San Francisco, California, in 1984 by a small group of recognized authorities in
their disciplines, the firm has earned a reputation for providing clients with leading -edge technical knowledge
coupled with highly efficient and effective problem solving. The firm has strong capabilities in environmental
engineering, surface and groundwater hydrology, engineering geology, geotechnical and foundation
engineering, seismic geology, environmental health and safety, earthquake engineering, and geomarine and
coastal engineering.
Geomatrix's staff profile of nearly 300 technical and support professionals reveals considerable depth. Eighty
percent of the technical staff hold advanced degrees (NI.S., Ph.D.), and our principal and senior staff are
widely recognized in their disciplines, having an average of more than 15 years of experience in developing
and implementing state-of-the-art technologies. Our consulting engineers, geologists, and environmental
scientists, who are also the employee -owners of Geomatrixx, are valued, long-standing counselors to a broad
variety of clients, including some of the largest corporate and public entities in the United States and abroad.
Capabilities and Staff Qualifications
Geomatrix provides environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, geologic, seismologic, and water
resources services. The firm is recognized for outstanding technical services, quality reporting, and
responsiveness to clients. Our staff possess the full range of capabilities required to perform these services;
we can provide specialists in geotechnical, civil, chemical and process engineering; construction management;
geology; hydrogeology; geophysics; health and safety; toxicology and other environmental and earth sciences.
Our geotechnical engineers develop sound and innovative recommendations for foundation support of
structures, earthwork construction, and stabilization of sites. Our earth scientists are experienced in
incorporating geology, seismology, geophysics, earthquake engineering, and hydrogeology to facilitate the safe
and cost-effective siting, design, and operation of engineered structures. Our environmental scientists and
engineers provide timely recommendations and implement cost-effective programs for managing municipal,
industrial, and mining waste, protecting water resources, remediating soil and groundwater contamination,
and managing workplace health and safety. This range of capabilities is supported by a similarly ,vide range of
field expertise and equipment that enables us to provide thorough and cost-effective services tailored to each
project.
Successful implementation of projects requires diligent management, particularly with regard to quality
control/assurance, scheduling of personnel, and cost tracking. Selecting our team means that engineering
projects will be completed efficiently and within budget. Geomatrix incorporates standard procedures and
management systems that enable us to meet management requirements expeditiously. Quality
control/assurance procedures are set forth in protocols for all aspects of fieldwork. These procedures are
standardized where applicable so that personnel will perform field procedures consistently.
r
Laboratory Capabilities
Our laboratory is fully equipped to provide analytical results for a multitude of geotechnical tests. Mr. Loc
Tran, Geomatrix's laboratory manager, has more than eight years of experience in soil mechanics laboratory
testing, earthwork construction observation, field placement testing, concrete field testing and sampling,
groundwater monitoring and sampling, remedial site construction oversight, and verification sampling.
Tests performed in our geotechnical laboratory include the following:
➢ Moisture Content - ASTM-132216
➢ Moisture Content and Dry Density -
ASTM-132216 & D3550
➢ Compaction (4-inch diameter mold) -
➢ ASTM-D 1557
➢ Compaction (6-inch diameter mold) - ASTM-
D1557
➢ Sieve Analysis - ASTM-13422
Hydrometer - ASTM-13422
Sieve & Hydrometer - ASTM-422
Wash Analysis (#200 sieve) -
> ASTM-D422
➢ Atterburg Limits - ASTM-D4318
➢ Expansion Index - ASTM-134829
➢ Sand Equivalent (Calif. 217)
➢ Direct Shear - Consolidated Drained - ASTM-
D3080
> Consolidation - ASTM-132435
➢ Specific Gravity (Passing #4 Sieve) - ASTM-
D854
Specific Gravity (Retained #4 Sieve) - ASTM-
C127
> Unconfined Compressive Strength -
> ASTM-D2166
Infrastructure Services Group TETRATECH, INC.
The booster pump station to be designed will include a masonry pump station building, sitework,
pumps, motors, variable frequency drives, control instrumentation, switchgear, standby power
generator and fuel storage, suction and discharge piping, surge control features, and related
appurtenant equipment for a complete, operable facility. Design of a pressure reducing station will
also be included in the overall project.
TASK 1. PRELIMINARY DESIGN INVESTIGATION
This task will include, but not be limited to, information/data collection, siting investigation,
hydraulic analysis, surge analysis, conceptual design of the booster pump station equipment,
appurtenances, building, and site plan, conceptual design of a pressure reducing station, and permit
requirement identification. Specific task items are as follows:
1.1 Data Research & Review: Obtain available pertinent information on the existing distribution
system, local agency requirements, geotechnical studies, utilities, property boundaries,
easements, etc.
1.2 Utility Investigation: Perform utility investigation to determine existing utility impacts within
the project site(s). All known utility agencies within the project area will be contacted by
Tetra Tech for retrieval of utility plans. All costs associated with information acquisition will
be included under this task. Potholing of utilities will not be required until the final design
phase of the project.
1.3 Siting Investigation: Conduct siting investigation to determine feasible pump station facility
and pressure reducing station sites available. A maximum of two (2) sites will be
investigated. Siting analysis will include field investigations, coordination with Vernon and
District staff, local agencies, and landowners of potential sites, preliminary site layouts, and
evaluation of site availability and costs. Preliminary minimum site acreage requirements will
be determined. Additional sites can be investigated on a preliminary basis but minimal
amount of work will be performed in order to focus Tetra Tech's evaluations.
1.4 Hydraulic Analysis: Perform hydraulic analysis of the existing and proposed impacted
distribution system, as required, to adequately determine preliminary sizing of all project
facilities. Analysis will include verifying existing model data and performing necessary
model runs for adequate system head development, identification of pump station head
requirements, and network distribution system sizing. Tetra Tech will use the existing District
model developed with MWSoft H2ONet software. A surge analysis shall be included for the
recommended pipeline and facility analysis.
1.5 Design Criteria Development: Develop pump station and pressure reducing station design
criteria and system hydraulic parameters for adequate sizing and evaluation of pumping and
distribution facilities, including type of pumps, motors, valving, variable frequency drivers,
surge control, control instrumentation, switchgear, power and standby generator
requirements. Hydraulic parameters and design criteria will be established by Tetra Tech and
shall be approved by the District.
CITY OF VERNON
Vernon Booster Pump Station
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Pave I
t
1.6 Facility Development and Site Plan: Prepare conceptual layout/site plans of the proposed two
pump station alternatives, along with all pumping and piping configurations, bypass piping,
surge facilities, pressure reducing station, building type, landscaping, motor control center,
electrical, power, telemetry, appurtenances, etc., required for a complete, operable booster
pump station facility. Redundancy, reliability, constructability, accessibility, operation,
maintenance, aesthetics, noise control, site availability, and local impacts shall be addressed.
Architectural features for the proposed alternatives will not be conducted until the final
design phase for the selected pump station site.
1.7 System Operation and Control: A description of the proposed/recommended pump station
operation and controls sequence will be developed. A simplified control diagram will be
developed showing proposed control logic for the pump station operation.
1.8 Permitting: Determine all permit approval, coordination, and cost requirements for the
Project. Prepare a workplan that outlines realistic schedules for applications, reviews, and
approvals of each required regulatory permit. Permitting issues shall be coordinated with the
District's Environmental, Operations, and Water Quality Divisions.
1.9 Construction Cost Estimate: Prepare preliminary construction cost estimates for each pump
station site alternative.
1.10 Recommendations: Evaluate all alternatives and develop recommendations on proposed
pumping and distribution facilities.
1.11 Schedule: Prepare Project final design, bidding, and construction schedule for the
recommended alternative.
1.12 Preliminary Design Report: 75%, 100%, and Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
submittals will be bound and submitted (4 copies) to Vernon and the District for review and
comment. Comments to each submittal, if any, shall be addressed by Tetra Tech and re-
submitted (4 copies) for approval by the District. Following approval of the Final PDR,
design services will commence. A review period of one (1) week will be required for each
submittal for both Vernon and the District.
1.13 Meeting Attendance: Attend a minimum of four (4) two hour meetings (includes one (1)
kickoff meeting) with Vernon and District staff to review project status and discuss design
and construction related issues.
District will, at a minimum, provide the following information to Tetra Tech:
• Copy of CBMWD Recycled Water System Master Plan, July 2000.
• Model Data, including existing and ultimate recycled water system computer model (MWSoft
H2ONet), completed July, 2000.
• As -built plans required for tie-in to existing CBMWD pipeline facilities.
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page
TASK 2. FINAL DESIGN
Upon Vernon and District approval of the PDR, the final design of the Vernon Booster Pump Station
will be initiated. This task will include all design work required for the construction of the Booster
Pump Station and appurtenant facilities. Tetra Tech will provide final design drawings and contract
documents, bid schedule, technical specifications, and engineer's cost estimate. Specific task items
are as follows:
2.1 Construction Plans: Prepare construction plans and specifications for the construction of a
booster pump station including, but not limited to, three (3) vertical turbine pumps (at
approximately 1500gpm/75HP each) with variable frequency drives (or as approved in the
PDR), suction and discharge piping and appurtenances, tie-in connections, flow meters,
pressure transmitters/switches, pressure reducing station, telemetry, surge anticipatory
facilities, motor control center, electrical and control instrumentation facilities, standby power
generator and fuel storage, landscaping architectural features and fencing, and suitable
masonry housing. Construction plans shall, at a minimum, contain the following elements:
• Title Sheet
• General Notes, Vicinity Map, Location Map, Legend, Abbreviations, Benchmark & Basis
of Bearing, Utility Contacts
• Complete Pumping Station Site Plan(s)
• Complete Pressure Reducing Station Plans and Details
• Complete Piping Plan
• Mechanical Design and Details
• Electrical, Power, and Lighting Design and Details
• Instrumentation and Control System Design and Details
• Architectural Design and Structural Calculations
• Landscaping and Irrigation
• Civil Details
• Technical Specifications
2.2 Design Survey and Aerial Mapping: Tetra Tech will provide field control points for digital
base mapping of project site and surrounding impacted area. Right-of-way, street centerline,
and property boundary information will be obtained and digitally included.
2.3 Potholing: Upon determination of utility information, Tetra Tech will provide potholing of
potentially impacted utilities and tie-in locations. A minimum of ten (10) potholes will be
assumed for this task.
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
Vernon Booster Pump Station Pa(ye 3
2.4 Utility Verification: Utility research performed during PDR phase will be verified for the
project area.
2.5 Geotechnical Investigation: A geotechnical investigation will be performed at the proposed
project site by Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. A minimum of one (1) boring at the proposed
pump station site and one (1) boring at a second location will be performed to adequately
characterize soil and groundwater conditions for construction. Geotechnical investigation will
evaluate the nature and engineering properties of the soils, recommend standards for trench
backfill and bedding, and provide all geotechnical parameters required for adequate pump
station foundation design.
2.6 Permitting and Coordination with Agencies: Tetra Tech will obtain all necessary permits
required from pertinent jurisdictional agencies for project construction, including power,
telephone, traffic, encroachment, etc. Plan check and permit fees are not included.
2.7 Technical Review Meetings: Tetra Tech will conduct technical review meetings to discuss
design issues at appropriate stages. Agendas and meeting minutes will be prepared by Tetra
Tech. A minimum of four (4) two-hour meetings with Vernon and District staff will be
attended.
2.8 Engineer's Estimate: Tetra Tech will complete Engineer's Estimate and will be submitted at
90% and 100% plan submittals.
2.9 Construction Schedule: A project construction schedule will be completed at Tetra Tech's
100% plan submittal.
2.10 Contract Documents: A .complete Contract Document for construction bidding will be
completed by Tetra Tech and shall, at a minimum, include Vernon and the District front-end
documents, Bid Schedule, General Provisions, Special Provisions, Technical Specifications,
Geotechnical Report, District Standards, Permit requirements, and any pertinent appendices.
2.11 Plan and Contract Document Deliverables: 50%, 90%, and 100% submittals will be
submitted (4 copies) to both Vernon and the District for review and comment. Comments to
each submittal, if any, shall be addressed by Tetra Tech and re -submitted (4 copies) for
approval by both Vernon and the District. Final approved plans shall be in Mylar form and
completed in electronic format compatible with Vernon and District software
(AutoCAD2000).
TASK 3. BIDDING SUPPORT
Bidding support services will be provided for the Project. Specific task items are as follows:
3.1 Tetra Tech shall reproduce and distribute 15 sets of each contract bid package for
solicitation of bidder's proposal.
3.2 Provide assistance during bidding, including attendance of Pre -Bid meeting, develop and
maintain potential bidders list, address technical questions, and prepare/issue addenda.
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 4
3.3 Supply 10 sets of construction drawings and contract documents to successful contractor.
TASK 4. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Construction support services will be provided for the construction of the Booster Pump Station and
ancillary facilities. Specific task items are as follows:
4.1 Attend Pre -Construction meeting.
4.2 Respond to Requests for Clarification of designed elements.
4.3 Complete review of shop drawings for all project related equipment, materials, schedules,
etc., necessary to complete the work.
4.4 Consult on potential change order requests during project construction and assist District
with preparation and issuance of contract change orders, as necessary.
4.5 Attend construction meetings (minimum 4 meetings) at the project site, or in Vernon
offices, or in District offices to discuss project status, change orders, construction
problems, and provide review of construction issues.
4.6 Assist in final inspection and pump station start-up and testing.
4.7 Prepare final record as -built drawings and submit on mylars at end of construction.
4.8 Assist District with preparation of construction completion report, review O&M manuals
submitted, and attend final project walk-through.
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 5
Infrastructure Services Group TETRA T E C H1, INC.
♦ • .
Our estimated not -to -exceed fee for the preliminary design investigation, final design, bidding
support and construction support is $255,009. We have included geotechnical services and a unit cost
for pothole location of existing underground facilities. Tetra Tech has provided a fee schedule for
Task 1 through Task 4; however, the fee estimate may need modification depending on results of the
Task 1 Preliminary Design Investigation. Plan check and permit fees are not included.
Our current staff availability and project workload will allow sufficient manhours as identified on our
"Fee Estimate" spreadsheet, to be dedicated to complete this project within the anticipated ten (10)
week schedule. Approximately two (2) weeks is allowed for each of the two submittal reviews by
Vernon and District's staff.
Tetra Tech has taken into account the deadlines for the future City of Vernon Malburg Generating
Station and other existing and future system customers. The attached schedule is anticipated for the
project completion. Tetra Tech has taken the responsibility to review the project schedule of
Vernon's project deadlines. Tetra Tech will prepare and submit a revised schedule after the Notice to
Proceed and after the completion on Task 1 — Preliminary Design Investigation.
CITY OF VERNON
Vernon Booster Pump Station
FEE ESTIMATE/PROJECT SCHEDULE
Page t
CITY OF VERNON
VERNON 80CISTER PUMP STATION
FEE ESTIMATE '
1-1
1.2
1.3
PRELIMINARY DESIGN-
Data Research and Review
Utility Investigation
Siting Investigation
Field Investigation
Site Research
Preliminary Site Layout
S0e Evaluation
Hydraulic Analysis
Verify Exist. Model Data
Alternatives Analysis
Surge Analysis
2
4
4
8
8
4
8
8
4
16
6
2
4
10
22
$1.260
$2,108
$500
$1.260
S2.608
$1,412
$2,548
$3,832
14
24
S1.412
16
16
16
16
32
4
24
S2,548
36
$3,832
8
16
16
12
2
30
$3,452
$3,452
1.4
1.5 _
-
32
$3.568
$3,568
8
4
56
20
52
$5.920
$5,920
$1,932
$5,952
$7.500
$9,432
$5,952
Design Criteria Development
4
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
1.11
1 12
1.13
Facility Develop. & Site Plan -
- 4
4
--4-
4
16
46
- - 8
16
20
8
16
8
4
- --4
4
16
248
_24
24
_ _
16
52
$5,344
- --- - -
$5;344
System Operation and Control
4
20
$2.136
$2,136
Permitting
Construction Cost Estimate
Recommendations
8
8
8
4
A
2
28
20
$3,224
$3.224
$2.000
$2.000
$2.960
$1.068
28
10
$2.960.
Schedule
Preliminary Design Report
$1,068
75% Submittal
8
8
8
20
188
5
4
4
45
8
8
8
8
29
28
28
60
$2,746
$270
$3.016
100% Submittal
Final Submittal
$2.664
$200
$2.864
$2.864
$6.812
S2.664
$200
Meeting Attendance
$6.812
Task 1 Subtotal
72
599
$63,602
$8,670
S72,272
2.1
2.2
-
2.3
2.4
- 2 5-
2.6
- - -
2
2
12
4
4
- 8
4
8
4
4
-
_
8
16
4
8
4
a
4
100
4
4
4
2
4
10
160
- - -
16
B
24
16
16
24 - -
8
40
8
8
32
-
12
8
16
24
16
4
4
32
16 -
t6
16
364
24
24
4
4
4 _
6
16
8
4
4
50
1 686
4- .
24
60
$1.724
$3.532
$5.044
$15.780
FINAL DESIGN
16
16
16
60
20
34
50
156
$1,724
Construction Plans
Title Sheet
General Notes
Sue Plan
$3.532
$5,044
Pressure Reducing Sta.(3)
$15.780
Piping Plan
16
80
40
24
8
8
32
----
4
8
8
24
40
60
24
40
60
140
132
60
$6,136
$6,136
$14,040
Pump Station and Details
$14.040
Electrical (2 shts) -
$13.120
$13,120
$6,000
$10,104
$3.912
$2.872
S8.9110
---
$9.068
$2.466
Instrumentation
$6.000
Structurat/Archuect. (2 shts)
96
$10.104
Landscaping
Civil Details
Design St __
y
-------
16
16
4
8
4
40
28
72
20
$3,912
$1,332
$2,872
$7,568
_ -----
---
Potholing
$2.068
- -
$7.000
Utility Verification
8
24
$2,216
$250
Geotechnical Investigation
24
$2,744
$9.900
$12.644
Permitting and Coordination
8
6
8
4
24
2
2
2
48
$5.336
$5,336
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
3.1
3.2
3.3
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
Technical Review Meetings
Engineer's Estimate
20
24
16
8
- 8
8
8
60
36
20
72
30
$6,812
$6,812
$3.768
$2.128
$7.160
$3.952
$3,952
$3,768
Construction Schedule
$2.128
Specifications
Submittals
50 / - --
90%
$7.160
$3,452
$500
$500
30
$3,452
100%
30
$3.452
$500
$3,952
Task 2 Subtotal
_
416
328
74
1,282
$132,420
$19,982
$152,402
---------
$108
$6,824
$608
$7,540
$1,188
$2,344
$2,344
$4.203
$4,000
_ $2,824
$3.764
$2.128
$22.795
1 M5,009
BIDDING SUPPORT
24
- --
8
-------
2
4
---------
2
64
-----
$108
----
15 sets of Bid Docs.
Provide Tech Assistance
$6,824
10 sets of Constr. Docs.
Task 3 Subtotal
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Preconstruction Meeting
Respond to RFI's
24
16
16
13
16
16
--
16
93
1 721
8
_
16
24 -
40
1 421
2
8
2
4
4
8
8'
4 -
4
34
1 188
2
68
10
24
24
45
40
28
36 _
20
227
1 2,176
$108
S7,040
$1,188
$2.344
$2.344
$4.103
$4.000
$2,824
$3.264 ---
$2.128
$22,195
1 $225,257
$500
$500
$100
_ -
-- -$500
$600
1 s29,752
Submittal Review/Claribcations
Change Order
Construction Meetings (4)
Final Insp. And Startup --
Record_ Drawings
O&M - -
Task 4 Subtotal
TOTALI
I: pr0p02tp-039evpspr0posal. xls
O
0
O
O
m
c
E cW
O GN J
E>:)
L
O O W
�2
U U
.S2wU)
m
CD
rn
c
m
c
c
C
c
w
c
01
LL
cm
O
NN
a
_
c
2
IL
N
O
Of
._
I LL
O
c
._
I LL
b
ca
ll
o
O
li
O
\
a
�
O
t0
a
O
O
ti
O
li.
I
O
OD
11
w
O
e
2
O
_O
O
2
O
O
b
O
2
NO
O
to
O
i
N
N
n
O
2
N
N
n
O
N
O
O
Of
O
O
C
g°
O
cli
C
O
N
N
0
O
a
O
2
c
g
c
0
I
_m
rn
j
I
y
y
m
o
L I�
I�
u
Y
t
p,
T
o
W
C
E
c
m
p
E
a
to
rn
m
N
¢
Z
m
E
a
N
c
ii
a
m
a
c
y
m �
10
m
a
g
c
m
a
o
m
a
v
c
c
m
a
o
rn
a
cn
c
ca
I—c°
a
O
O
a
N
Ol
c
r
a
a
N
c
0
w0.
a
N
�
�
N
co
i
Y E
m E
H �
<n
c U
� m
X �
W a
O
m y
c y
O m
y 0
m O
a a a
> >
a v a
O O O
Q 2 2
Y
m
r
0 10 D
m E
m' cc
y
y
N
Y _ p
y O
� m a
Li3
Professional
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
EXHIBIT "A"
2002
HOURLY CHARGE RATE AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
Engineering Intern/Technician...................$
44.00
Designer/CAD Operator/Engineer I...........
$ 82.00
Engineer II and III/Senior Designer..........
$ 92.00
Planner........................................................
$ 94.00
Senior Engineer/Landscape Architect ........
$ 103.00
Project Engineer/Project Coordinator ........
$ 120.00
Project Manager/Sr. Project Coordinator...
$ 135.00
Senior Project Manager ..............................
$ 150.00
Program Director/Project Director .............
$ 180.00
Administrative
Administrative Clerk ..................................$ 38.00
Word Processor/Admin. Support ............... $ 54.00
Graphic Designer ....................................... $ 90.00
Survev/Mappin
Survey Technician ..................................... $ 87.00
Surveyor/Field Supvsr./Sr. Survey Tech.... $ 97.00
Two -Person Survey Party ........................... $ 172.00
Two -Person Survey Party with GPS .......... $ 210.00
Three -Person Survey Party ......................... $ 250.00
Survey Travel Time (Two -person)............. $ 83.00
Survey Travel Time (Three -person)........... $ 118.00
Construction
Construction Observer ............................... $ 72.00
Senior Construction Observer .................... $ 78.00
Resident Engineer ...................................... $ 110.00
Construction Manager ................................ $ 140.00
Reproduction, special photography, postage, delivery services, express mail, out -of -area telephone calls, printing
and any other services performed by subcontractor, will be billed at cost plus 15%.
Reimbursable In -House Costs
Photo Copies (B&W 8.5"x I I") ...... $0.10/Each
Blueprints ....................................... $ 0.35/S.F.
Photo Copies (B&W I I "x I7") ....... $0.35/Each
Computer Time $10.00/Hour
Color Copies (up to 8.5"x I l") ........ $1.50/Each
Mileage ........................................... $ 0.40/Mile
Color Copies (to 11"x17")..............$2.50/Each
ForensicEngineer................................................................................................................................
Court Appearances, Expert Witness Testimony,
$250.00
Depositions, and Preparation for Testimony.......................................................................................
$350.00*
*Minimum $1,000.00 for half day plus expenses.
NOTE: All rates are effective to October 1, 2002. There will be a negotiated increase in rates, 5% minimum per
year, for contracts extending beyond October 1, 2002.
L: Admin\Fortns\Exhibit A-B-C\exhibitaCA.MA.OR.TX.WA2002.doc.dcc
EXHIBIT C
Oo V,C)
O A GJ N
O
-OiO
W
W o C �.o
�c0 (°
c
�
� -Unip -n: co ,cn m Im i-s �.C� n "0iU)
< ° I(n. u� O Io ! Im
-• -1;� C'Djx
co
DAD
r r
-�
p
ton
�+ . (o o
O
IDiy m 0 = °' `c ,< -
c �.c
m a N ° ��� "o 0 �,
,m =_;a 0
�'- D!m :d a o o .� �c
O'=
D
m A N g N A
—�
.—iv
0 0
m N iC) C• C - C -Q �' n O. _ �:N
N Qo'�.� N M'3'p
r-;c
m07Dg o
r"fl:.mmo3-3.-33,5°
c(D o
0m,mvoN
CO
37;
0 Q
= m D
CD, 0 w 'co °' )u m 0 N
? � M c
Q. (o
0 y �,,y
, C — to 0
_y i0 . N .< i �O
c[) ,
N - 3 �Q.:7
.O
f�
7
1CD
O)
O OD w
A O O N
OW)
.
m
A
OD 00 N OD
p
(i
- - -
O A O)
-- --
D 3 —I
-
zm <
2a0
N
0 -n
A
�7
-------------
--- - — -
m v z
CD(D O
_z
m
---
(7)
A
c0 OD
OD
(fl to
O A OD
A
O
i
--------
-
A N
N N
A N N N N
N A A A
O
WA
:O
N
NcoA:WN
O
-
T iV
!O
OD O 0!N.O
v
N 0)
(7) Nip:N!N
j'' -'
0)t0
N I O) A j A
to'
A -+
in
It71•W
W
fA N fA1fA.fA!
N N W;N N
j9
-
I� fAi fA'
i�I61itA1(fl
H9l691AifA'
_
fA!69
A
N A:O);(o�-��
0 0 co;
O
� O)
IEA�
'W �A'V A;V
;W 1--`;-'-
AI(o N-+
A _N
EAib9
A:-�
- --_—
.N
AO OiA.O
A
Cl)
W
co N
W W
'N N,O) Nlp)
;O Oo,A co.A.
jO�ODIV'V.
W!O,ViV
-.OIA
CT�(o AIW-.
W A:O
N,O'N.
CA.1.
O)`A
.
—_.
0)-0)
OD; N Arco.
O) 0):OOi
OND;OODD
iN'
"EA
fA
A.
OOn'OO '(0J
0)p
-fOCAnliFAi6W9-�916WO9
I1�0'Ii
IfOA
:
(O40
O
O
1O
(OiOl0V
0I
:�00
.__—__
O.6OOW
yi0C0T ;
...►!
''O)
to
-fA
fA
-
---
- ----.. -__-.
----. -----
-W fA
N fAifA fA
W.N
WW69
''fA-fA.1A:fA
EA EA
t (.s.(pNAA(
� :.
EA:69
'6
:fAE
n
V A O) A
O) O OD A
N
-p
(T Ol (T O O7 O0AOO)O
(o0)!(ocoO
A:A
co
O)
W CO 0) V V
AA
W
N al N
O) LnOO
.O)m-NAco
:co.00-mO.
0)O0)
co
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
EXHIBIT "A"
2002
HOURLY CHARGE RATE AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
Professional
Engineering Intern/Technician ...................
$ 44.00
Designer/CAD Operator/Engineer I...........
$ 82.00
Engineer II and IIUSenior Designer..........
$ 92.00
Planner.......................................................
....................
Senior Engineer/Landscape Architect
$ 94.00
........
Project Engineer/Project Coordinator........
$ 103.00
$ 120.00
Project Manager/Sr. Project Coordinator...
$ 135.00
Senior Project Manager ..............................
$ 150.00
Program Director/Project Director .............
$ 180.00
Admin- rst- rative
Administrative Clerk ..................................$ 38.00
Word Processor/Admin. Support ............... $ 54.00
Graphic Designer ....................................... $ 90.00
Suryey/Mappine
Survey Technician ...................................... $ 87.00
Surveyor/Field Supvsr./Sr. Survey Tech.... $ 97.00
Two -Person Survey Party ........................... $ 172.00
Two -Person Survey Party with GPS .......... $ 210.00
Three -Person Survey Party ......................... $ 250.00
Survey Travel Time (Two -person) ............. $ 83.00
Survey Travel Time (Three -person)........... $ 118.00
Construction
Construction Observer ............................... $ 72.00
Senior Construction Observer .................... $ 78.00
Resident Engineer ......................................$ 110.00
Construction Manager ................................ S 140.00
Reproduction, special photography, postage, delivery services, express mail, out -of -area telephone calls, printing
and any other services performed by subcontractor, will be billed at cost plus 15%.
Reimbursable In -House Costs
Photo Copies (B&W 8.5"x 1 I") ...... $0.10/Each
Photo Copies (B&W I I "x I7") .. $0.35/Each
Color Copies (up to 8.5"x 11 ") ........ $ t .50/Each
Color Copies (to I 1 "x 17") $2.50/Each
Blueprints ....................................... $ 0.35/S.F.
Computer Time ............................. $ I0.00/Hour
Mileage ........................................... $ 0.40/Mile
Forensic Engineer ..........
Court A ........................
Appearances, Expert Witness Testimony,
Depositions, and Preparation for Testimony .......................
*Minimum $1.000.00 for half day plus expenses.
NOTE: All rates are effective to October 1. 2002. There will be a negotiated increase in rates, 5% minimum per
year, for contracts extending beyond October 1. 2002.
t.:\Admin\FonnstEthlbi( A-B-ClcxhibiwCA.MA.OR TKNA200240c doc
EXHIBIT D
VERNON BOOSTER PUMP STATION + s
FEE ESTIMATE
_ 17!ct MINARY DESIGN
- -
------
-"--- -
-
--
IA t
Data Research and Review
12
.-------------- -
Utilay Investigation
2
10
- - - -- -
S1.260
- -- - -- --
-
St.260
1.3
__.-._-_
Sainglnveslgation - _.. __.
8 8
- ._.
6
22
S2.108
S500
- --
---
- ._ 52.606
-
Field Investigation ..
----. -_
- -
__--
$1,412
Site Research --.. - ..
- _._ _- 6 - -
- _ --_.
--- 2
----14
$I_412--
24
24
52,548
--__
PreGminarySaeLayout _..._
.- 4 ...
16 4
.- - _.
- - .
0
-
-' ----
-
$2,548
$3.832
---
-------.-_
Site Evaluation
__ __.---.
--
16
- .. ._-_._
36
---
-16
Hydraulic Analysis
- - - - - __-.
---- _ - -_--
2
30
53,452
S3 452 '
-- --- --
- --- -
-
- --
- � E><ist. Model Data
.--- -
_m_._--
--- -
32
S3.5W
$3.5Wlysis
Alternatives Ana
26 16
56
- - -- - -
S5.920
-
5.920
--
-1.5
Surge Analysis
32 16
__ __--
__.
8
--- .---
$1.932
-- --
_ $7_500
- --
$9.432
_
-
De51gIry r1 Criteria Deveklpment
4 12
4
20
-
52
S5.952
-
_._
$5.952
1.6
Facility -
Develop.
p.6 Sae Plan
d
-
24 2d
-- __-_--_.
-_- -_ _
52
--
55.340
_
55,344
-----" _
-- _
System Operation and Control
4
2a
t6
4
_ ----
20
52,136
--
52.136
- --
1.8
----
Permitting
_- -..-_
___._t6_-- __ _
- -.---
28
_---------
$3.224
_
$3,224
1.9
- --- . _
Construction Cost Estimate
... ..
._.. __. _._ _. __ .
2 - 8
-_--
- ---_
S2.000
-_
110
0
.
'--_---
Recommendations
..
_. 8 8
4
20
_
$z,t>00
$2.000
_ ..
1.11
-.
Schedule
16 8
4
28
$2.960
-
112
--------- -
Preliminary Design Report
2
f0
--S1.068-----
._ ..
St.068--
75% Submittal-
4
4
SZ746
$270
$3,016
100%Submittal
8
5
-_-
8
29
Final Submittal -- -- -
4
..
4 8
-
4
8
28
$2.664
S200
$2.864
1.13
Meeting Attendance
4
- - -
4 8
_. -_ -
4
.. _-_ -- _
8
-- _
28
_ - _-- .
_ S2.664
$200
52,86a
$6,812
---- --
askLSubtotal
16
46
16 20
248 tab
8
- - -- -
60
-- ---
-
$6.812
563,602
S8,670
-- --
572,272
4S
72
S 99
-
--'----
FINAL DESIGN --
-
---
------ --
2-1
Construction Plans
-
-.. - --- - -.
- ---- ----
---------
------
---
Title Sheet --
-
$1.724
General Notes
4
16-
- .._ _
-
20
-_
$t 72a
--
S4e Plan - -
--
_16--
34
53.532
-
- -
53.532
Pressure Reducing Sta.(3) - - _
2
12
e
24
16
_
SS.Oda
S5_044
$15.780
Piping Plan
24 5p
- - -
60
---
- -
156
$15.780
60
$6.136
---
$6.136
Pump Station and Details -----
P
4
-- -- .. -
t6 16
2d
$14.040
$14.040
Electrical (2 shts)
16 80
40
140
$t 3,120
---------- -- _ - - _
Instrumentation
_ .. 9
2a---
__ s0
-__60____
132
-
St3,120
$6.000
..
__
StryduraaAfdlaed. (2 skits) -
4
-- 9
8 2a
4
24
60
$6.000
_
- -----.
Landscaping
-�
ao
- - ._
40
- -
__...
96
..- ---
S10, lOd
S1o.104
$3,912
Ci ----- ---- .
CivO Details ---- - -
-
8 8
-
16
- ---- -
4
-
40
_- -----
S3,912
2.2
---
Desgn Survey - - -
t6
-
28 -
--
$2,872
--$7.568 -
57,568
-
2.3
_. -- - -
Potholing
_
32 32
8
-
72
- - -
$t 332
---
S8.900
S2.068
4
-----__._-
Ut4ityVerification
-
12 a
_. _ --
4
--
20
----
S7.000
----
59,068
.-
25
Geotechnicallnvestgation
- - - - _
8
24
$2.216
S250
S2.466
24
--
S2744
59,900
2.6
Pertlitt' ^9 and Coordination
t6
--
-- _
-- -
512.64d
- - -
2.7
7ecMical Review Meetings
8
16
2a
- - � -_ _ _- ----
8
48
55,336
--
S5.336
$6
--
_
2.8
_ -
Eng near- a Estimate
- -
16---
t6
8
60
- _..
2
2.9
--
Construction Schedule -
_ a
a 24
4
36
---
S3.768
�t2
$3, 68
---
S2,t28
- -
210
----
-
< t6
_
_ _20
$2.128
2.r1
-ciications
- - - - - --
B
- -
32 8
24
-__
72
-- -
S7.160
$7.160
---
50%
- -- - - ----
4
16 9
2
30
S3.452
$500
S3.952
4
16
2
30
-----
S500
----..
S3.952
-
S3.452
- --
- - --
Task 2 Subtotal
--- ---' -
4
100
16 8
364 416
-----
_ 2
30
$3.452
SSW
$3.952
328
74
1,282
$132,420
$19,982
5152,402
BIDDING SUPPORT
_ 3.1_ _
15 sets of Bid Docs- ----- -
-
$108
3.2
-------
Provide Tech Assistance
-
-_
2
2
$108
33 -
tO sets o1 Conror. Docs. ---
----
---
24 Za
8
a
64
$6.824
-
$6.824
- -
- -----Task3Subtotal
4
24
_ _
2
------------
2
-----
5108
$Soo
------ -
$608
__.. _..
-------- __--
_ -
24
9
8
68
$7,040
SS00
S7,540
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
- -
- - -
- -
- - - -
- - - -
-
4.1
-
PreconStruetion Meeting
4
---
._ ---
42
---
Respond to Rfl's
-
..-..
2
-
10 .
S1.188
_--
_ -
S1-188
4.3
Sut>ttlftlal Review/Clarificatan-s-'--
--
4 16
__ ._ -
_ -
4
- - - - - -----
24
--
52,34a
- -_.-
_ _ _- , _
- - - --
S2,344
- -----
4.4
ChangeOrdet _ __ _
4 16
/
24
52.344
$2.344
4.5 Construction
------'---
Meetings (4)
2
6 13
16
8
45
- -
S4.t03
- -- 103
--- --
5100
54.203
4. . .
4.6 Finalln
._.-
SD_ Startup
t6 16
6
a0
S4,000
-
54,000
4.7 Record
And
- -
Drawngs
8 16
a
28
S2.824
$2.824
a.8 ow
- - - - -
4
24
4
36
S3.264 -
S500
$3.764
Task 4 Subtotal
10
SO
20
$2,128
S2,128
TOTAL
160
93
696
40
34
227
S22,19S
$600
S22,795
721
421
198
2.176
S22S.257
S29 752
S2S5.009
I pr0o021p-039evpsproposat. cis
1WXvollooltf
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
P&
EXHIBIT E
INSURANCE SCHEDULE (CONSULTANT)
The Consultant shall provide proof of insurance, including a standard certificate of insurance, in at least
the following amounts and coverage (combined single limit permitted):
I Coverage and Limits
Bodily Injury Property Damage
Hazards Each Person Each Accident Each Accident
Automobile Liability
Owned Automobiles $ 500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000
Hired Automobiles $ 500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000
Non -Owned Automobiles $ 500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000
Workers' Compensation $ Statutory
Employers' Liability $1,000,000 per employer
II. General and Professional Liability
General Liability
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Premises Operations
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Elevators (if applicable)
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Independent Contractors
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Products - Completed Operations
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Contract Liability
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Professional Liability
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
a. The general liability policy shall contain the following special endorsements which shall be noted on or
attached to the standard certificate of insurance:
I. An endorsement naming the City of Vernon, its officers, and employees as additional insureds u
the policy.
2. An endorsement providing the City of Vernon thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material
reduction of coverage.
3. An endorsement providing coverage for all operations under this Agreement.
4. Such other endorsement as may be required by addendum hereto.
b. In addition to the standard certificate of insurance, proof of general and professional liability coverage
shall be furnished in the form checked below. Only certification of the following proofs will be
accepted:
X For each policy, a notarized letter from the underwriter or carrier certifying that the coverage and
statements in the standard certificate of insurance (attached thereto) are true and correct and that
the signator is an officer authorized to so certify.
A copy of each policy certified by an officer of the underwriter or carrier and notarized.
EXHIBIT "E
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS
Memorandum
RISK MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL-
To: Nelly Giron, Assistant Chief Deputy City Clerk
From: Joan Francone, Risk Manager
Date: May 23, 2002
Re: Tetra Tech, Inc
Please be advised that the above referenced has provided acceptable
insurance coverage.
7972
No. 02-028
JF/kr
1
ACOR1D CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY: INSURANCkSLC0.I1 L DATE (MMIDD/YY)
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
Lyons Insurance Agency, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Powdermill Square HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
3844 Kennett Pike, Suite 210 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Wilmington DE 19807
Phone:302-658-5508 Fax:302-658-1253 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
Tetra Tech, Inc.
3280 E. Foothill Blvd. Ste 350
Pasadena CA 91107
COVERAGES
INSURER A: Hartford Insurance
INSURERB: Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
INSURER C:
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
DATE MMID
DATE MWDDIYY
LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 1000000
A
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
44UUNFU32 05
10 / 01 / 01
10/01/02
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire)
$ 30 00 00
CLAIMS MADE F OCCUR
MED EXP (Any one person)
$ 10000
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$ 1000000
GENERAL AGGREGATE
S 2000000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
s2000000
POLICY X PRO-
JECT LOC
A
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
X ANY AUTO
44UENFU3301
10/01/01
10/01/02
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$ 1000000
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per perms)
$
X HIRED AUTOS
X NON -OWNED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
$
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
$
OTHER THAN EA ACC
AUTO ONLY: AGG
$
ANY AUTO
$
EXCESS LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$ 10000000
A
X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE
44XHUFU0785
10/01/01
10/01/02
AGGREGATE
$ 10000000
$
DEDUCTIBLE
$
RETENTION $
B
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
44WBRMP3350 AOS
10/01/01
10/01/02
X TORY LIMITS I I ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$ 1000000
B
44WNMP3351 CA
10/01/01
10/01/02
E.L.DISEASE -EAEMPLOYEE
$1000000
E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT
$1000000
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
The City of Vernon, its officers and employees are additional insured per
attached CG 2010. Re: All operations, Vernon booster pump station and MGS
reclaimed water pipeline extension.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER I Y I ADDITIONAL INSURED: INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION
CTY VER
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED
reduced or materially changed before the expiration date
City of Vernon
thereof, the Issuing Insurer will mail 30 days written
Mr Chuck Montoya
4305 Santa Fe Ave
Vernon CA 90058
notice to the certificate holder name to the left.
[A=MREPRESENTjTNEio� NT t -
AGORD 25-5 (7197) OACORU CORPORATION 1933
,acaR� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID L
__.. _. sLco-1
DATE(MIYUODl0
- 05/0l/02
PRODUCER
Lyons Insurance Agency, Inc.
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Powdermill Square
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
3844 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Wilmington DE 19807
Phone:302-658-5508 Fax:302-658-1253
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURED
INSURER!- Greenwich Insurance Co an
INSURER B:
INSURERC:
Tetra Tech, Inc.
3280 E . Foothill Blvd. Ste 350
Pasadena CA 91107
INSURER D:
INSURER E:
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT,, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
DATE MFFC" E
M/DDIYY
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE MMIDD/YY
LIMITS
GENERAL LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fro)
$
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS MADE r OCCUR
MED EXP (Any one person)
$
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$
GE N'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$
RO-
POLICY PLOC
JECT
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
COMBINED
(Ea accident) SINGLE LIMIT
$
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
$
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
$
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
GARAGE LIABIUTY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
$
OTHER THAN EA ACC
$
ANY AUTO
$
AUTO ONLY: AGG
EXCESS LIABILITY
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
-OCCUR CLAIMSMADE
AGGREGATE
S
$
DEDUCTIBLE
$
RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
TORY LIMITS ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$
OTHER
A
Profess./Pollution
PEC0005771
10/01/01
10/01/02
See Below For Limits
E&O Legal Liab
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONS/VEMCLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS
LIMITS: $2,000,000 Ea. Occ./$2,000,000 Agg. and $250,000 Retention Ea. Cl.
CLAIMS MADE FORM: Maximum for all claims during the policy year.
Re: All operations, Vernon booster pump station and MGS reclaimed water
pipeline extension.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER I N I ADDITIONAL INSURED: INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION
CTY V, R
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED'
reduced or materially changed before the expiration date
City of Vernon
thereof, the Issuing Insurer will mail 30 days written
Mr. Chuck Montoya
notice to the certificate holder name to the left.
4305 Santa Fe Ave
A=Iw7pm REPRESENT TIVEE
r
Vernon CA 90058
ACORD 25-3 (7197) CACORIF CORPORATION 1988
POLICY NUMBER: 44UUNFU3205 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THE HARTFORD
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
ADDITIONAL INSURED —OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS (FORM B)
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
Name of Persons or Organization:
The City of Vernon, its officers and employees
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the
Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.)
WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an inured the person or organization shown
in the Schedule, but only with respects to liability arising out of "your work" for that insured by or for you.
The City of Vernon will have 30 days notice of cancellation or material reduction of coverage.
The coverage provided is for all operations under this agreement.
CG 20 10 1185 Copyright, Insurance Service Office, Inc. 1984
If
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
Seaview House
70 Seaview Avenue
Stamford, CT 06902-6040
(800) 688-1840
GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY
HOME OFFICE
1990 North California Blvd.
Suite 740
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(800) 688-1840
Policy Number: PEC000577101
Renewal of: PEC000577100
1: Named Insured TETRA TECH, INC.
Address 630 N. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
City/State/Zip PASADENA, CA 91107
2: Policy Period:
From 10/01/2001 To 10/01/2002
12:01 A.M. standard time at your mailing address shown above.
3: Limit of Liability, up to $20,000,000 each CLAIM
$20,000,000 Aggregate
(Inclusive of CLAIMS EXPENSE)
4: Retention: $250,000 each CLAIM
I certify that this is a true
5: Covered Professional Service(s): See Endorsement # 002 and complete copy of the above
referenced policy form.
Covered Contracting Service(s): See Endorsement # 002
6: Policy Premium:
7: Retroactive Date: 03/0711988 (Coverage A only) Ac c o u n Manager
8: Endorsements Attached to this Policy
GIC-CEL3D (5/01) Page 1
Broker Copy
GIC-CEL3CP Consultants Environmental Liability Policy
Endorsement No. 001
ENSVSE100 (07/99)
Schedule I
Endorsement No. 002
ENSVSE114 (07/99)
Professional Services or Contracting Services -
Blanket
Endorsement No. 003
ENSVSE131 (07/99)
Prior Claims or Circumstances Exclusion
Endorsement No. 004
ENSVSE111 (07/99)
Excluded Professional Contracting Services
Endorsement No. 005
ENSVSE106 (07/99)
Indemnity Agreement for Evidencing A Reduced
Retention Amount - Blanket
Endorsement No. 006
ENSVSE153 (07/99)
Transportation of Laboratory Samples
Endorsement No. 007
ENSVSE167 (07/99)
Waiver of Subrogation - Blanket
Endorsement No. 008
ENSVSE129a (07/99)
Knowledge of a Circumstance
Endorsement No. 009
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 010
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 011
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 012
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 013
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 014
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 015
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 016
MANUS
Manuscript Endorsement
Endorsement No. 017
ENSVSE-CA-1 (12/99)
Amendatory Endorsement - California
Endorsement No. 018
GIC-CA-NOT (06/01)
Important Notice to Policyholders - California
Broker. Lyons Insurance Agency, Inc.
3844 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
Wilmington, DE 198072305
NORT
KOZU
GIC-CEL3D (5/01)
10/30/2001
0000101188
Page 2
Broker Copy
Y*7 'j XOA
(Authorized Representative)
GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY
STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT
(A Stock Insurance Company Herein Called the "Company")
CONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY POLICY
COVERAGE "A" PROVIDES "CLAIMS MADE AND REPORTED" COVERAGE, AND HAS REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS DIFFERENT FROM THOSE FOR COVERAGE B. COVERAGE A REQUIRES THAT A
CLAIM BE MADE AGAINST THE INSURED AND REPORTED TO THE COMPANY DURING THE POLICY
PERIOD OR EXTENDED REPORTING PERIOD, IF ANY. PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE FORM CAREFULLY
THIS POLICY CONTAINS PROVISIONS WHICH LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF LEGAL DEFENSE EXPENSE THE
COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE TO PAY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS. LEGAL DEFENSE EXPENSES
SHALL BE APPLIED AGAINST ANY RETENTION AMOUNT AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE LIMITS OF
LIABILITY STATED IN ITEM 3.OF THE DECLARATIONS.
In consideration of the payment of the Policy Premium stated in Item 6. of the Declarations and in reliance upon
the statements contained in the Application and any other supplemental materials and information submitted -
herewith, and subject to all the terms and conditions of this Policy, the Company agrees with the NAMED
INSURED as follows:
1.INSURING AGREEMENT
A. Coverage A - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
To pay on behalf of the INSURED all LOSS in excess of the Retention amount stated in Item 4. of the
Declarations as a result of CLAIMS first made against the INSURED and reported to the Company, in writing,
during the POLICY PERIOD, Automatic Extended Reporting Period, or Optional Extended Reporting Period,
by reason of any act, error or omission in PROFESSIONAL SERVICES rendered or that should have been
rendered by the INSURED or by any person whose acts, errors or omissions the INSURED is legally
responsible.
Provided always that such act, error or omission must have been committed or alleged to have been
committed:
1. during the POLICY PERIOD, or
2. prior to the POLICY PERIOD and subsequent to the Retroactive Date(s) stated in Item 7. of the
Declarations.
B. Coverage B - CONTRACTOR'S POLLUTION LEGAL LIABILITY
To pay on behalf of the INSURED all LOSS, in excess of the Retention amount stated in Item 4. of the
Declarations, which the INSURED becomes legally obligated to pay as a result of an OCCURRENCE which
arises out of CONTRACTING SERVICES and which first commenced during the POLICY PERIOD. in the
event the OCCURRENCE continues through more than one policy placed with the Company, only one policy
will respond. The policy that will respond to any resulting LOSS is the policy in which the POLLUTION
CONDITION commenced.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 1
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
11. DEFINITIONS
A. BODILY INJURY means bodily injury, sickness, disease, mental anguish or shock sustained by any person,
including death resulting therefrom.
B. CLAIM(S) means a demand received by the INSURED for money or services that arises from
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES. The definition of CLAIM shall not necessarily
be limited to lawsuits, petitions, arbitrations or other alternative dispute resolution requests filed against the
INSURED.
C. CLAIMS EXPENSE means:
1. legal fees and expenses incurred by the Company in the investigation, defense and appeal of a CLAIM for
DAMAGES arising from PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES by attomey(s)
retained by the Company; or
2. all other fees, costs, pre -judgment interest, post judgment interest and expenses resulting from the
investigation, adjustment, defense and appeal of such CLAIM, if incurred by the Company, or with the
written consent of the Company, by the INSURED;
CLAIMS EXPENSE does not include salary charges of regular employees or officials of the Company or fees
and expenses of supervisory counsel retained by the Company. The time and expense incurred by the
INSURED in assisting in resolving a CLAIM, including but not limited to the costs of the INSURED's in-house
counsel, are not CLAIMS EXPENSE.
D. CLEANUP COSTS means costs, charges and expenses incurred in the investigation, removal or
neutralization of POLLUTION CONDITIONS, provided that such costs, charges and expenses are caused by
POLLUTION CONDITIONS arising outof.the performance or lack thereof, by or on behalf of the NAMED
INSURED of PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES stated in Item 5. of the
Declarations.
E. CONTRACTING SERVICES means the performance of those activities stated in Item 5. of the Declarations.
F. DAMAGES means a monetary judgment, award or settlement of compensatory damages. DAMAGES
includes CLEANUP COSTS. DAMAGES does not include fines, taxes, penalties, or punitive, exemplary, or
multiplied damages, injunctive or equitable relief, or the return of fees or charges for services rendered or
expenses incurred by the INSURED for redesign, changes, additions or remedies necessitated by a CLAIM.
However, DAMAGES does include fines, taxes, and penalties assessed against a third party for which the
INSURED is legally liable. The time and expense incurred by the INSURED in assisting in resolving a CLAIM
are not DAMAGES.
G. INSURED means the NAMED INSURED and:
1. any current partner, executive officer, director, or trustee of the NAMED INSURED solely while acting
within the scope of their duties as such;
2. any employee of the NAMED INSURED as specifically stated in Item 1. of the Declarations solely while
acting in their professional capacity on behalf of the NAMED INSURED;
3. any former partner, executive officer, director, or employee of the NAMED INSURED as specifically stated
in Item 1. of the Declarations solely while acting within their professional capacity on behalf of the NAMED
INSURED;
4. any retired partner, executive officer, director or employee while acting within the scope of their duties as a
consultant on behalf of the NAMED INSURED;
S. any LEASED WORKER solely while acting in their professional capacity on behalf of the NAMED
INSURED;
6. any NAMED INSURED with regard to its participation in a joint venture, but solely for the NAMED
INSURED's liability for the NAMED INSURED's performance of PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or
CONTRACTING SERVICES under the respective joint venture.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 2
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
7. Solely as respects Coverage B - Contractor's Pollution Legal Liability, the client for whom the NAMED
INSURED performs or performed covered CONTRACTING SERVICES as stated under Item 5. of the
Declarations, provided that an INSURED CONTRACT with that client is in effect between the NAMED
INSURED and the client, requiring the client to be insured under the NAMED INSURED's Consultants
Environmental Liability Policy. However, the client is included as an INSURED under this Policy solely to
the extent that the client is found liable based upon the CONTRACTING SERVICES negligently performed
by the NAMED INSURED or for which the NAMED INSURED is strictly liable. This Policy, within the
terms hereof, applies to clients of the NAMED INSURED up to the amount required by the INSURED
CONTRACT with the NAMED INSURED and subject to the Retention amount and Limits of Liability of this
Policy.
8. As respects the liability of each INSURED above as is otherwise covered herein, INSURED means the
heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and the legal representatives of each of the above INSURED's in
the event of death, incapacity or bankruptcy.
H. INSURED CONTRACT means that part of any written contract or written agreement under which the NAMED
INSURED assumes tort liability of the INSURED's client to pay for compensatory damages to persons other
than an INSURED, because of BODILY INJURY or PROPERTY DAMAGE resulting from an act, error or
omission or POLLUTION CONDITIONS solely to the extent that the client is found liable based upon
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES performed by the NAMED INSURED. However,
INSURED CONTRACT does not include any tortious conduct that otherwise would not be covered under this
Policy, nor if the tortious conduct was solely that of the person or persons for whom such liability under the
INSURED CONTRACT was assumed. For the purposes of this definition, INSURED shall exclude any
employee of the NAMED INSURED, solely while acting in their professional capacity on the behalf of the
NAMED INSURED.
I. LEASED WORKER means a person leased to the INSURED by a labor leasing firm under an agreem"'ent
between the INSURED and the labor leasing firm, to perform duties related to the conduct of the INS&RED's
business. LEASED WORKER does not include TEMPORARY WORKER.
J. LOSS means:
1. DAMAGES which the INSURED shall become legally obligated to pay as a result of a CLAIM; and
2. CLAIMS EXPENSE
K. NAMED INSURED means the individual, partnership, trust or corporation stated in Item 1. of the Declarations.
L. OCCURRENCE means a POLLUTION CONDITION, including continuous or repeated exposure to the same
general POLLUTION CONDITION.
M. POLICY PERIOD means the period from the inception date of this Policy to the Policy expiration date as
stated in Item 2. of the Declarations or its earlier termination date, if any.
N. POLLUTION CONDITIONS means the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot,
fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids or gases, waste materials or other irritants, contaminants or
pollutants into or upon land, the atmosphere or any watercourse or body of water, which results in BODILY
INJURY, PROPERTY DAMAGE or CLEANUP COSTS.
O. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES means the performance of those activities stated in Item 5. of the Declarations.
P. PROPERTY DAMAGE means:
1. physical injury to or destruction of tangible property including the resulting loss of use thereof, or
2. loss of use of tangible property that has not been physically injured or destroyed.
Q. TEMPORARY WORKER means a person who is furnished to the INSURED to substitute for a permanent
employee on leave or to meet seasonal or short-term workload conditions.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 3
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
7. Securities Violation
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of a violation of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended or any state Blue Sky or securities law or similar state,
federal, or other governmental law, statute and any regulation or order issued pursuant to any of the
foregoing statutes, unless endorsed hereon.
8. Contractual Liability
any CLAIM based upon or arising as a result of liability of others assumed by the INSURED under any
contract or agreement. This exclusion does not apply to liability for DAMAGES:
a. assumed in a contract or agreement that is an INSURED CONTRACT, provided the act, error or
omission or POLLUTION CONDITIONS occur subsequent to the execution of the contract or
agreement; or
b. that the INSURED would have in the absence of the contract or agreement.
9. Products Liability/Own Product
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of goods or products manufactured, sold, handled, distributed or
supplied by the INSURED or by others under license or trade name from the INSURED. This includes,
but is not limited to, any PROPERTY DAMAGE to the INSURED's own goods or products themselves.
10. Faulty Workmanship/Own Work
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of the cost to repair or replace the INSURED's work in any
construction, erection, fabrication, installation, assembly or manufacture. This includes, but is not limited
to, the cost to investigate the INSURED's work, or the cost of any materials, parts, labor or equipment
furnished in connection with such repair or replacement.
11. Nuclear Hazard
a. Under any Liability Coverage, to BODILY INJURY or PROPERTY DAMAGE
(1) with respect to which an INSURED under this Policy is also an INSURED under a nuclear energy
liability policy issued by Nuclear Energy Liability Insurance Association, Mutual Atomic Energy
Liability Underwriters or Nuclear Insurance Association of Canada, or would be an INSURED
under any such policy but for its termination upon exhaustion of its limits of liability; or
(2) resulting from the HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES of NUCLEAR MATERIAL and with respect to
which
(a). any person or organization is required to maintain financial protection pursuant to the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, or any law amendatory thereof, or
(b) the INSURED is, or had this Policy not been issued would be, entitled to indemnity from the
United States of America, or any agency thereof, under any agreement entered into by the
United States of America, or any agency thereof, with any person or organization.
b. Under any Liability Coverage, to BODILY INJURY or PROPERTY DAMAGE resulting from the
HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES of NUCLEAR MATERIAL, if
(1) the NUCLEAR MATERIAL
(a) is at any NUCLEAR FACILITY owned by, or operated by or on behalf of, an INSURED or
(b) has been discharged or dispersed therefrom; or
(2) the NUCLEAR MATERIAL is contained in SPENT FUEL or WASTE at any time possessed,
handled, used, processed, stored, transported or disposed of by or on behalf of an INSURED; or
(3) the BODILY INJURY or PROPERTY DAMAGE arises out of the furnishing by an INSURED of
services, materials, parts or equipment in connection with the planning, construction,
maintenance, operation or use of any NUCLEAR FACILITY, but if such facility is located within the
United States of America, its territories or possessions or Canada, this exclusion 11. b. (3) applies
only to PROPERTY DAMAGE to such NUCLEAR FACILITY and any property thereat.
c. As used in this exclusion:
(1) "HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES" includes radioactive, toxic or explosive properties;
(2) "NUCLEAR MATERIAL" means SOURCE MATERIAL, SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL or BY
PRODUCT MATERIAL;
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 5
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
III. TERRITORY
The Policy only applies to CLAIMS arising from PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES
rendered worldwide, provided that the suit is brought or CLAIM is made within the United States, its territories or
possessions or in Canada.
This policy shall not apply to any risk which would be in violation of the laws of the United States including, but not
limited to, U.S. economic or trade sanction laws or export control laws administered by the U.S. Treasury, State,
and Commerce Departments (e.g. the economic and trade sanctions administered by the U.S. Treasury Office of
Foreign Assets Control).
IV. EXCLUSIONS
This Policy does not apply to LOSS arising from:
1. Intentional DAMAGES and Dishonest Acts
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of any dishonest, intentional, fraudulent, malicious or knowingly
wrongful act, error or omission. Furthermore, such insurance as would otherwise be afforded under this
Policy shall be applicable with respect to each and every INSURED who did not personally commit or
personally participate in committing or personally acquiesce in or remain passive after having personal
knowledge of one or more of the dishonest, intentional, fraudulent or malicious or knowingly wrongful acts,
errors, or omissions described above.
2. Fiduciary Liability
any CLAIM arising from:
a. an officer, director, partner, trustee or employee of a business enterprise not stated in Item 1. of the
Declarations or: charitable organization or pension, welfare, profit sharing, mutual or investment fund
or trust; or
b. a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and its amendments or any
regulation or order issued pursuant thereto; or any other employee benefit plan.
3. Related/Affiliated Entities
any CLAIM made by any business enterprise which is operated or managed or owned, in whole or in part
by the INSURED or parent company or any affiliated, subsidiary or associated company.
4. Personal Injury
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of false arrest, humiliation, harassment, detention or imprisonment,
wrongful entry or eviction or other invasion of private occupancy, or malicious prosecution, abuse of
process, libel, slander, harassment, or other defamatory or disparaging material, or a publication or an
utterance in violation of an individual's right of privacy.
S. Discrimination
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of discrimination on the basis of age, color, race, sex, creed,
national origin, marital status, physical disability or sexual preference.
6. Discrimination for Handicap
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of discrimination on. the basis of handicap, unless such CLAIM
arises out of the failure to make reasonable accommodation under the Americans With Disabilities Act, as
amended, in the course of performance of covered PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING
SERVICES as stated in Item 5. of the Declarations.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 4
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
(3) "SOURCE MATERIAL", "SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL" and "BYPRODUCT MATERIAL" have
the meanings given them in,the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 or in any law amendatory thereof;
(4) "SPENT FUEL" means any fuel element or fuel component, solid or liquid, which has been used
or exposed to radiation in a NUCLEAR REACTOR;
(5) "WASTE" means any waste material
(a) containing BYPRODUCT MATERIAL; and
(b) resulting from the operation by any person or organization of any NUCLEAR FACILITY
included within the definition of NUCLEAR FACILITY under paragraph (6) (a) or (6) (b)
thereof;
(6) "NUCLEAR FACILITY" means:
(a) • any NUCLEAR REACTOR
(b) any equipment or device designed or used for separating the isotopes of uranium or
plutonium, processing or utilizing SPENT FUEL, or handling, processing or packaging
WASTE,
(c) any equipment or device used for the processing, fabricating or alloying of SPECIAL
NUCLEAR MATERIAL, if at any time the total amount of such material in the custody of the
INSURED at the premises where such equipment or device is located consists of or contains
more than 25 grams of plutonium or uranium 233 or any combination thereof, or more than
250 grams of uranium 235,
(d) any structure, basin, excavation, premises or place prepared or used for the storage or
disposal of WASTE, and includes the site on which any of the foregoing is located, all
operations conducted on such site and all premises used for such operations;
(7) "NUCLEAR REACTOR" means any apparatus designed or used to sustain nuclear fission in a
self-supporting chain reaction or to contain a critical mass of fissionable material;
(8) "PROPERTY DAMAGE" includes all forms of radioactive contamination of property;
12. Workers' Compensation
any CLAIM. based upon or arising under any worker's compensation, unemployment compensation or
disability benefits law or similar law.
13. Employer Liability
any CLAIM based upon or arising from injury to any employee, director, officer, partner, or LEASED
WORKER of the NAMED INSURED. With respect to injury to any employee, director, officer, partner, or
LEASED WORKER, this exclusion does not apply to liability assumed by the NAMED INSURED while
actively participating in covered PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES under an
INSURED CONTRACT.
14. Vehicles
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of the ownership, maintenance, use, operation,. loading or unloading
of any automobile, aircraft, watercraft, or rolling stock. However, this exclusion does not apply to
POLLUTION CONDITIONS arising out of the ownership, maintenance, use, operation, loading or
unloading of any automobile, aircraft, watercraft, or rolling stock within the boundaries of the job site(s).
15. Hostile Acts
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of any consequence, whether direct or indirect, of war, invasion, act
of foreign enemy, hostilities (whether war be declared or not), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection
or military or usurped power, strike, riot, or civil commotion.
16. Off -Site Waste liability
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of any waste or materials transported via automobile, aircraft,
watercraft, or rolling stock beyond the boundaries of the job site(s).
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 6
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
17. INSURED's Property/Bailee Liability
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of the INSURED'S ownership, rental, lease, maintenance, operation,
use, repair, voluntary or involuntary sale, transfer, exchange, gift, abandonment or condemnation of any
real or personal property.
This exclusion does not apply to any CLAIM for covered -LOSS against the INSURED by other than an
INSURED.
18. Insurance and Suretyship.
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of the advising or requiring of, or failure to advise or require or
failure to maintain any form of insurance, suretyship or bond, either with respect to the INSURED or any
other person, entity or company.
19. Express Warranties and Guarantees
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of express warranties and guarantees. However, this exclusion
does not apply to a warranty or guarantee by the INSURED that the INSURED's PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES or CONTRACTING SERVICES are in conformity with generally accepted architectural or
engineering standards.
20. Separately Insured Project
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of any project to which a project -specific professional liability policy
and/or a project -specific contractor's pollution legal liability policy applies and the INSURED is an
INSURED on that policy.
21. CLAIMS from Known Circumstances
any CLAIM based upon or arising out of any circumstance
a. known to the INSURED prior to the inception of the first POLICY PERIOD when consecutively
renewed; and
b. for which any partner, executive officer, senior officer, director, branch manager, operations manager
or project manager of the NAMED INSURED knew or could have reasonably foreseen thata CLAIM
would result.
22. CLAIMS Reported to Previous Insurers
any CLAIM for which the INSURED has a prior policy or policies which provide insurance for its liability
arising out of such circumstance, act, error or omission or POLLUTION CONDITION that is part of the
CLAIM, this Policy shall not apply to such liability whether or not the available limits of liability of such prior
policy or policies are sufficient to pay any liability or CLAIM or whether or not the Deductible provisions of
such prior policy or policies are different from this Policy, or whether or not such prior policy or policies
cover(s) a particular CLAIM.
V. EXTENDED REPORTING PERIOD - COVERAGE "A" ONLY
A. Automatic Extended Reporting Period
In the event of termination of this insurance by any reason of non -renewal or cancellation by the INSURED, or
if the Company shall cancel this Policy or terminate it by refusing to renew, for reasons other than the NAMED
INSURED's non-payment of premium and/or Retention amount and/or non-compliance with the terms and
conditions of this Policy, the INSURED shall be entitled to an Automatic Sixty (60) Day Extended Reporting
Period for no additional premium.
Except as may be otherwise provided herein, this extension of coverage granted hereunder shall be subject to
all the terms and conditions of this Policy and shall apply to CLAIMS first made against the INSURED and
reported to the Company, in writing, during the sixty (60) days immediately following the effective date of
cancellation or non -renewal. The Automatic Extended Reporting Period granted hereunder shall only apply as
respects any act, error or omission in PROFESSIONAL SERVICES rendered before such cancellation or non -
renewal and otherwise covered by this Policy.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 7
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
B. Optional Extended Reporting Period
In the event of the termination of this insurance by any reason of non -renewal or cancellation by the
INSURED, or if the Company shall cancel this Policy or terminate it by refusing to renew, for reasons other
than the NAMED INSURED's non-payment of premium and/or Retention amount and/or non-compliance with
the terms and conditions of the Policy, the INSURED shall be entitled to an extension of this coverage upon
payment of an additional premium of not more than 100% of the Policy Premium stated in Item 6. of the
Declarations. The extension of coverage granted hereunder shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of
this Policy and shall apply to,CIAIMS first made against the INSURED and reported to the Company, in
writing, during the three (3) consecutive three -hundred and sixty-five (365) day periods following immediately
upon the effective date of such cancellation or non -renewal, but only by reason of any act, error or omission in
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES rendered before such applicable cancellation or non -renewal date and
otherwise covered by this Policy. This interval of three (3) consecutive three -hundred and sixty-five (365) day
periods shall hereinafter be referred to as the Optional Extended Reporting Period. It is a condition precedent
to the operation of the rights granted under this clause that payment of the appropriate premium shall be made
not later than sixty (60) days after the effective date of cancellation or non -renewal of the Policy, without
regard to the Automatic Extended Reporting Period.
The quotation of a different Policy Premium and/or Retention amount and/or Limits of Liability and/or policy
conditions for renewal does not constitute a cancellation or refusal to renew for the purpose of this provision.
The fact that the period during which CLAIMS may be first made against the INSURED and reported to the
Company, in writing, under this Policy is extended by virtue of the Automatic Extended Reporting Period
and/or the Optional Extended Reporting Period shall not in any way increase the Limits of Liability of this
Policy.
VI. LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND RETENTION
COVERAGE A - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
A. Limits of Liability — Each CLAIM: The liability of the Company for each covered CLAIM for LOSS, in excess
of the Retention amount, including DAMAGES and CLAIMS EXPENSE, first made against the INSURED and
reported to the Company, in writing, during the POLICY PERIOD, Automatic Extended Reporting Period or
Optional Extended Reporting Period, if purchased, shall not exceed the amount stated in Item 3. of the
Declarations for each CLAIM.
B. Limits of Liability — Policy Aaaregate: Subject to Item A. above (Limits of Liability —Each CLAIM), the
liability of the Company shall not exceed the amount stated in Item 3. of the Declarations as Aggregate
including DAMAGES and CLAIMS EXPENSE as a result of all covered CLAIMS for LOSS first made against
the INSURED and reported to the Company, in writing, during the POLICY PERIOD, Automatic Extended
Reporting Period or Optional Extended Reporting Period, if purchased.
COVERAGE B - CONTRACTOR'S POLLUTION LEGAL LIABILITY
A. Limits of Liability — Each CLAIM: The liability of the Company for each covered CLAIM for LOSS, in excess
of the Retention amount, including DAMAGES and CLAIMS EXPENSE, made against the INSURED and
reported to the Company, in writing, shall not exceed the amount stated in Item 3. of the Declarations for each
CLAIM.
B. Limits of Liability —Policy Aggregate: Subject to Item A. above (Limits of Liability —Each CLAIM), the
liability of the Company shall not exceed the amount stated in Item 3. of the Declarations as Aggregate
including DAMAGES and CLAIMS EXPENSE as a result of all covered CLAIMS for LOSS made against the
INSURED and reported to the Company, in writing.
GIC-CEL3CP (5101) Page 8
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
COVERAGES A and B
A. Multiple CLAIMS — Coverage A and B Separately The inclusion herein of more than one INSURED or the
making of CLAIMS by more than one person shall not operate to increase the Company's Limits of Liability.
One or more covered CLAIMS for LOSS arising out of the same or related acts, errors, or omissions in
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES or the same or related OCCURRENCE resulting from CONTRACTING
SERVICES shall be considered a single CLAIM, and the Limits of Liability stated in Item 3. of the Declarations
as applicable to each CLAIM for LOSS shall apply and only one Retention amount shall apply thereto.
B. Multiple CLAIMS — Coverage A and B Combined: One or more covered CLAIMS for LOSS arising out of
the same or related acts, errors or omissions and OCCURRENCE under Coverages A and B of this Policy
shall be considered a single CLAIM and the Limits of Liability stated in Item 3. of the Declarations as
applicable to each CLAIM for LOSS shall apply and only one Retention amount shall apply thereto.
C. Retention: The Retention amount stated in Item 4. of the Declarations shall be bome by the INSURED and
shall not be insured. It shall include DAMAGES and CLAIMS EXPENSE, whether or not DAMAGES are paid.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the liability of the Company shall not exceed the Limit of Liability amount stated in
Item 3. of the Declarations as Aggregate_ including DAMAGES and CLAIMS EXPENSE as a result of all covered
CLAIMS for LOSS.
VII. DEFENSE, SETTLEMENT AND COOPERATION
A. With respect to the insurance afforded by this Policy, the Company shall defend any CLAIM against the
INSURED seeking DAMAGES to which this insurance applies, even if any of the allegations are groundless,
false or fraudulent. Defense counsel may be designated by the Company or designated by the INSURED,
subject to the Company's defense counsel guidelines and written consent. It is further agreed that the
Company may make such investigation of any CLAIM as it deems expedient, but the Company shall not. -be
obligated to pay DAMAGES or to defend or to continue to defend any CLAIM after the applicable limits of the
Company's liability have been exhausted by payment of DAMAGES and/or CLAIMS EXPENSE.
B. The INSURED shall cooperate with the Company and upon the Company's request shall submit to
examination and interrogation by a representative of the Company, under oath if required, and shall attend
hearings, depositions and trials and shall assist in effecting settlement, securing and giving evidence,
obtaining the attendance of witnesses and in the conduct of suits, as well as in investigation and/or defense,
all without charge to the Company. The INSURED shall further cooperate with the Company and do whatever
is necessary to secure and effect any rights of indemnity, contribution or apportionment which the INSURED
may have. The INSURED shall not, except at its own costs, make any payment, admit any liability, settle any
CLAIMS, assume any obligation or incur any expense without the written consent of the Company.
With respect to dispute resolution mechanisms agreed to by the INSURED prior to a CLAIM in written
contracts or agreements, the INSURED shall not assume any obligation thereunder after a CLAIM without the
written consent of the Company. However, assuming such obligations prior to a CLAIM shall not violate the
preceding condition.
C. The Company shall not settle any CLAIM without the consent of the INSURED. If, however, the INSURED
shall refuse to consent to any settlement recommended by the Company and shall elect to contest the CLAIM
or continue any legal proceedings in connection with such CLAIM, then the Company's liability for the CLAIM
shall not exceed the amount for which the CLAIM could have been settled plus CLAIMS EXPENSE incurred
up to the date of such refusal. Such amounts are subject to the Limits of Liability and Retention Section of the
Policy.
D. If any INSURED shall commit fraud in proffering any CLAIM as regards amount or otherwise, the insurance
shall become void as to such INSURED from the date such fraudulent CLAIM is proffered.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01)
KOZU 10/30/2001
Page 9
Broker Copy
Vlll. NOTICE
R
A. As a condition precedent to the coverage hereunder, in the event of a CLAIM, immediate written notice
containing particulars sufficient to identify the INSURED and also reasonably obtainable information with
respect to the time, place and circumstances thereof, and the names and addresses of available witnesses,
shall be given by or for the INSURED to the Company.
B. As a condition precedent to the coverage hereunder, if a CLAIM is made against the INSURED, the INSURED
shall immediately forward to the Company every demand, notice, summons, order or other process received
by the INSURED or the INSURED's representative.
C. Solely as respects to Coverage A, if the INSURED becomes aware of a circumstance for which this Policy
may apply, and if during the POLICY PERIOD, the INSURED gives written notice containing:
1. details of the alleged act, error or omission by reason of the PROFESSIONAL SERVICES rendered by or
on behalf of the INSURED, and
2. the specific nature and extent of the BODILY INJURY and/or PROPERTY DAMAGE which has been
sustained, and
3. how the INSURED first became aware of such circumstances,
then any CLAIM for that LOSS that may subsequently be made against the INSURED arising out of such
circumstances shall be deemed to have been made on the date first written notice of the circumstances
was received by the Company. This right conferred upon the INSURED in this Paragraph shall terminate
at the end of the POLICY PERIOD and shall not exist during the Automatic Extended Reporting Period or
the Optional Extended Reporting Period.
IX. OTHER CONDITIONS
A. Application: By acceptance of this Policy, the INSURED agrees that the statements in the application and
any supplemental materials and information submitted therewith are complete, then current and truthful
representations, that they shall be deemed material, that this Policy is issued in reliance upon such
representations, and that this Policy embodies all agreements existing between the INSURED and the
Company, or any of its agents, relating to this insurance.
B. Examination, Audit and Inspection: The Company may examine, audit and inspect the INSURED's books,
records, services and activities at any time during. the POLICY PERIOD and after the final termination of the
Policy, as far as they relate to the subject matter of the Policy.
The Company shall have the right to modify, amend or delete any of the terms and conditions of the Policy
including the right to charge additional premium and the right to withdraw, rescind or void the Policy, if its
examination, audit or inspection reveals any material risk, hazard or condition that was not previously
disclosed by the INSURED in the application or supplemental material, or which deviated from the information
disclosed in the application or supplemental material.
C. Cancellation: This Policy may be canceled by the NAMED INSURED by surrender thereof to the Company or
any of its authorized agents or by mailing to the Company written notice stating when thereafter the
cancellation shall be effective. This Policy may be canceled by the Company by mailing to the NAMED
INSURED at the address stated in Item 1. of the Declarations, written notice stating when, not less than thirty
(30) days (ten (10) days for non-payment of premium), thereafter, such cancellation shall be effective. The
mailing of notice as aforesaid shall be sufficient proof of notice. The time of surrender or the effective date
and hour of cancellation stated in the notice shall become the end of the POLICY PERIOD. Delivery of such
written notice either by the NAMED INSURED or by the Company shall be equivalent to mailing.
If the NAMED INSURED cancels, earned premium shall be computed in accordance with the customary short
rate table and procedure. If the Company cancels, earned premium shall be computed pro rata. Premium
adjustment may be made either at the time cancellation is effected or as soon as practicable after cancellation
becomes effective, but payment or tender of unearned premium is not a condition of cancellation.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 10
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
D. Premium Adjustment: When requested by the Company, the NAMED INSURED shall furnish the Company
with a signed statement of the INSURED's total GROSS RECEIPTS or other premium base. The actual
earned premium shall be computed thereon at the premium rate stipulated in the Policy. If the actual earned
premium is more than the deposit premium, the INSURED shall pay the difference to the Company; if less, the
Company shall refund the difference to the INSURED except that the Company shall be entitled to the Policy
Premium as stated in Item 6. of the Declarations. When used as a premium base, GROSS RECEIPTS means
the gross amount of money (less direct reimbursables) charged by the INSURED for PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES and/or CONTRACTING SERVICES, as applicable, rendered during the POLICY PERIOD.
E. Action Against Company: No action shall lie against the Company unless, as a condition precedent thereto,
there shall have been full compliance with all of the terms of this Policy, nor until the amount of the INSURED'
obligation to pay shall have been finally determined either by judgment against the INSURED after final
judgment has been rendered or by written agreement of the INSURED, the claimant and the Company. No
person or organization shall have any right under this Policy to join the Company as a party to any action
against the INSURED to determine the INSURED's liability, nor shall the Company be impleaded by the
INSURED or his legal representative. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the INSURED or the INSURED's estate
shall not relieve the Company of any of its obligations hereunder.
F. Assignment: This Policy shall be void if assigned or transferred without written consent of the Company.
G. Subrogation: In the event of any payment under this Policy, the Company shall be subrogated to all the
INSURED's rights of recovery therefor against any person or organization and the INSURED shall execute
and deliver instruments and papers and do whatever else is necessary to secure such rights. The INSURED
shall do nothing after a CLAIM to prejudice such rights.
H. Changes: Notice to any agent or knowledge possessed by any agent or by any other person acting on behalf
of the Company shall not effect a waiver or a change in any part of this Policy or stop the Company from
asserting any rights under the terms of this Policy; nor shall the terms of this Policy be waived`or changed,
except by endorsement issued to form a part of this Policy. -
I. Sole Agent: The first NAMED INSURED stated in Item 1. of the Declarations shall act on behalf of all
INSUREDS for the payment or return of premium, receipt and acceptance of any endorsement issued to form
a part of this Policy, giving and receiving notice of cancellation or non -renewal, and the exercise of the rights
provided in Section V. EXTENDED REPORTING PERIOD.
J. Other Insurance: Subject to Exclusions 20, 22. and Section VI., Limits of Liability and Retention, this
insurance shall be in excess of the Retention amount stated in Item 4. of the Declarations of this Policy and
any other valid and collectible insurance available to the INSURED whether such other insurance is stated to
be primary, pro rata, contributory, excess, contingent or otherwise, unless such other insurance is written only
as a specific excess insurance over the Limits of Liability provided in this Policy.
K. Severability: Except with respect to the Limits of Liability and any rights or duties specifically assigned to the
first NAMED INSURED stated in Item 1. of the Declarations such as those rights and duties in Condition I., this
insurance applies:
1. As if each NAMED INSURED were the only NAMED INSURED; and
2. Separately to each INSURED against whom CLAIM is made or suit is brought.
L. Headings: The descriptions in the headings of this Policy are solely for convenience and form no part of the
Policy terms and conditions.
M. Jurisdiction and Venue: It is agreed that in the event of the failure of the Company to pay any amount
claimed to be due hereunder, the Company and the INSURED will submit to the jurisdiction of the State of
New York and will comply with all the requirements necessary to give such court jurisdiction. Nothing in this
clause constitutes or should be understood to constitute a waiver of the Company's right to remove an action
to a United States District Court.
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01) Page 11
KOZU 10/30/2001
Broker Copy
N. Choice of Law: All matters arising hereunder including questions related to the validity, interpretation,
performance and enforcement of this Policy shall be determined in accordance with the law and practice of the
State of New York (notwithstanding New York's conflicts of law rules).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Company has caused this Policy to be signed by its President and Secretary and
counter -signed on the Declarations page by a duly authorized agent of the Company.
SECRETARY
GIC-CEL3CP (5/01)
KOZU 10/30/2001
Page 12
Broker Copy,
1
PRESIDENT
ENDORSEMENT #001
SCHEDULEI
NAMED INSURED TETRA TECH, INC.
POLICY NO. PEC000577101
ADVANCE ADVANCE
CLASSIFICATION SUB -LINE PREMIUM RATE PER PREMIUM PREMIUM-
& CLASS CODE $100 PRODUCTS/ ALL
BASIS RECEIPTS COMPLETED OTHERS
001) OPERATIONS
630 N. ROSEMEAD
BOULEVARD
PASADENA, CA 91107
POLLUTION LIABILITY - 350
INCLUDING CLEAN-UP COSTS 090120
COVERAGE, DEFENSE WITHIN
THE LIMITS
' I Basis of Premium: R = Revenues
ENSVSE100 (7/99)
KOZU 10/30/2001
(R) I$ 790,000,000 I FLAT I I r
Page 1
TOTAL I
ENDORSEMENT #002
This endorsement, effective 12:01 a.m., 10/01/2001 forms a part of Policy No. PEC000577101 issued to
TETRA TECH, INC. by Greenwich Insurance Company.
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OR CONTRACTING SERVICES - BLANKET
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
CONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY POLICY
PROFESSIONAL AND POLLUTION LIABILITY POLICY
This Policy applies to CLAIMS based upon or arising out of the following:
All PROFESSIONAL SERVICES of the NAMED INSURED(S) subject to the terms and conditions of the
Policy to which this endorsement is attached.
All CONTRACTING SERVICES of the NAMED INSURED(S) subject to the terms and conditions of the
Policy to which this endorsement is attached.
All other terms and conditions remain the same.
(Authorized Representative)
ENSVSE114 (7/99)
KOZU 10/30/2001
S
N C E
Co ined to ProtecdN Your 5uaess.
April 30, 2002
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Attn: Risk Management Department
Re: Insurance for City. of Vernon: All Operations
Policy Numbers: 44WBRMP3350, 44WNMP3351
Named Insured: Tetra Tech, Inc.
City Clerk,
3844 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
Wilmington, DE 19807
302-658-5508
800-456-5508
302-658-1253fax
Satellite Office: 419 Rehoboth Avenue
Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971
302-227-7100
www.lyonsinsurance.com
I hereby certify that the certificate of insurance attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference truly and accurately represents the above -cited insurance policies and the
insurance coverage of each for the named insured issued by Twin City Fire Insurance
Company.
The City of Vernon, its officers and employees are included in said policies as additional
insureds and the City of Vernon will be provided with thirty (30) days written notice of
cancellation or material reduction of coverage.
I certify that I am an authorized representative of the insurance carrier named herein and
that I am authorized to sign this certificate on behalf of said insurance carrier.
> gnature
Account Manager
ANNE MWJE WLAUMA Q, _. <)K- 9kr .
NOTARY KOLMO LMW
My � Expkn �. 25.2002 130� 2-tx�2
Professional ■ no ojy ■ Financiales N Commercial 0 Personal
.... --- _.} -__._< _.
S
_NCE
CommRted to Protecti" Your Success.
3844 Kennett Pike, Suite 210
Wilmington, DE 19807
302-658-5508
800-456-5508
302-658-1253fax
Satellite Office: 419 Rehoboth Avenue
Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971
302-227-7100
www.lyonsinsurance.com
April 30, 2002
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Attn: Risk Management Department
Re: Insurance for City of Vernon: All Operations
Policy Number(s) 44UUNFU3205, 44UENFU3301, 44XHUFU0785
Named Insured: Tetra Tech, Inc.
City Clerk:
I hereby certify that the certificate of insurance attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference truly and accurately represents the above -cited insurance policies and the
insurance coverage of each for the named insured issued by Hartford Fire Insurance
Company.
The City of Vernon, its officer sand employees are included in said policies ad additional
insureds and the City of Vernon will be provided with thirty (30) days written notice of
cancellation or material reduction of coverage.
I certify that I am an authorized representative of the insurance carrier named herein and
that I am authorized to sign this certificate on behalf of said insurance carrier.
Signature
Account Manager
Aires *UAM" 0,-. qn%441.:
M MM PUBUN)EIR 41 2002-
E1q m tit 2S, ssional ec nblogy N FlnanClc'il .5erviceS 0 Commercial ■ Personal
I
THE HARTFORD
4401 Middle Settlement Road
New Hartford, NY 13413
May 7, 2002
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon; CA 90058
Attn: Risk Management Department
RE: Insurance for City of Vernon: All operations
Policy Numbers 44UUNFU3205, 44UENFU3301, 44XHUFU0785
Named Insured: Tetra Tech Inc.
City Clerk:
I hereby certify that Richard Kavanaugh of Lyons Insurance is an authorized
representative of Hartford Fire Insurance Company.
Regards,
Cl"-~ ,Qalays�"
Executive Underwriter
ebalaguer@thehartford.com
IVJ/ U// VG 1Y. JY rAA OUV UYI 041*7 1XM MILKICV1(L. Q UUL _.
May 7, 2002
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
RE: Insurance for City of Vernon,
Vernon booster pump station and
MGS reclaimed water pipeline extension.
Policy # 44 WN W3351
Named Insured: Tetra Tech, Inc.
City Clerk:
I hereby certify that the certificate of insurance attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference truly and accurately represents the above cited insurance policies and the
insurance coverage of each for the named issued by Twin City Fire Insurance Company.
The City of Vernon, its officers, and employees are included in said policies and the City
of Vernon will be provided with thirty (30) days written notice of cancellation or material
reduction of coverage.
I certify that I am an authorized representative of the insurance carrier named herein and
that I am authorized to sign this certificate on behalf of said insurance carrier.
t
Signature/ _
Title
Hartfid Specialty Company
A Company of The Hartford
�03ro7i02 TO 14 ^47 FAX � _. -... •... �. BCS
la 4e4
w�a.t•�wt
sal } kvkmrd
eo s<k 06
V,M*. PVC 1934L46 A
P� bllfrlS7�fib67
wwwaimuvm
May 7, 2002
CRY of Vernon
4305 Sub Fe Avenue
Ver=4 CA 90058
Attu: Risk Mwagemat Dept
Ric: Lssnta= ft.City of Vsanao Co ombanim Bwkm=dd Liability
Policy NuffA . PECO005771
Named Insua+ad:Tatra Tech, Inc -
c
ity Clerk:
1 bavby 'that ft certsRcefa of i um=xttadW bm" wA wads, aart
p
havO by rcfee+ m tM Y And wcura* ropmeM the above cited in wra = policies Od
the iamnwe covemP of each far tho named hw=d issued by XL Envirom ww'
'flee City of Vwnar4 ita offmm and employe" aze included in said POW"
additiond insureds amd the City of Vernon will bo pwvkle d with thirty (30) dqs wrlum
wee of ca waadw or vmtaial redutan of +c0VM9c•
- .... •M I ctatit that I am an apWuwa tcPcq= alive of the i asmw= carria named
. •• ;l�rcir► and dW I am authaixed to sign this certif ooft on beWf of said iaffixam CuTier.
� r
r•
. K
r • t •
f .ti
VicerPrcaademt •
IN"W td ti air+va + sl Rkk our rat tawkw And t+ M & dr
FCC � • •Res Ri�dt Oxwd. Ise • rt-S u�+ws r, . Me • RCA fum' arlorat
CITY COUNCIL
LEONIS C. MALBURG
Mayor
THOMAS A. YBARRA
Mayor Pro -Tern
WM. 'BILL" DAVIS
Councilman
H. "LARRY" GONZALES
Councilman
W. MICHAEL MCCORMICK
Councilman
BRUCE V. MALKENHORST
City Administrator/City Clerk
FAX (323) 826-1438
April 29, 2002
CITY HALL
4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA 90058
TELEPHONE (323) 583-8811
Mr. Bruce V. Malkenhorst
City Administrator
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90058
EDUARDO OLIVO
City Attorney
FAX: (562) 869-1883
KEVIN WILSON
Director of Community Services & Water
FAX: (323) 826-1435
KENNETH J. DeDARIO
Director of Municipal Utilities
FAX: (323) 826-1425
STEVEN E. PARKER
Fire Chief
FAX: (323) 826-1407
BRUCE W. OLSON
Police Chief
FAX: (323) 826-1481
Re: Malburg Generating Station Project: Control of Design and
Construction of Reclaimed Water Svstem
Dear Bruce:
I request your authorization to have the design and construction
of the recycled water system, including the pipeline extension
and the pump station, be an activity under the Malburg Project
auspices. I will coordinate the activities with the Community
Services Department, Central Basin and the Project Manager. At
the completion of the design, construction and testing of the
pipeline extension in Vernon, the responsibility for operating
and maintaining the pipeline will be transferred to the
Community Services Department.
I have received a proposa from Tetra -Tech, nc. for the design
of the pipeline extension s a ion and would like to
submit the agreement with Tetra-Tec at the next feasible
Council meeting.
I have discussed this matter with Kevin Wilson, Ken DeDario and
the City Attorney.
FULLY EXECUTED
AGREEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
(MGS RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINE EXTENSION AND
VERNON BOOSTER PUMP STATION)
THIS AGREEMENT is made, entered into and executed in
duplicate originals, either copy of which may be considered and used as
the original hereof for all purposes, as of this _364'-day of May, 2002,
in the City of Vernon, California
IBY AND BETWEEN
11
12 AND
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THE CITY OF VERNON, (hereinafter
referred to as "the City")
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90058
TETRA TECH, INC. INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES Group hereinafter
referred to as "Consultant")
3280 East Foothill Blvd., Suite 350
Pasadena, California 91107
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to construct a pipeline extension
consisting of 1.8 miles of 18 inch pipe from the pipe terminus at the
intersection of Randolph Street and Newell to the Malburg Generation
Station located on 50th Street in the City of Vernon (hereinafter
referred to as the "MGS Reclaimed Water System"); and
WHEREAS, the City also desires to construct a pump station
and associated pressure reducing facilities on the Central Basin
Municipal Water District system (hereinafter referred to as the "Vernon
Booster Pump Station"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain Consultant to provide
design, engineering and construction management services for the MGS
Reclaimed Water System and Vernon Booster Pump Station; and
� 4 � s J. aticwl ♦ 1
}' 7Ty��� `} �{
M
��� i
�+ t R
h __
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, Consultant submitted a proposal to the City dated
April 30, 2002 for the MGS Reclaimed Water System (hereinafter referred
to as the "Pipeline Proposal"), a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, which includes a
description of the proposed design, engineering and construction
management services and the cost of the services; and
WHEREAS, Consultant submitted a proposal to the City dated
April 25, 2002 for the Vernon Booster Pump Station (hereinafter
referred to as the "Pump Station Proposal"), a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof by reference,
which includes a description of the proposed design, engineering and
construction management services and the cost of the services; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it is experienced in
performing pipeline and pump station design and construction management
services for reclaimed water systems and that it is qualified to
perform such services under this Agreement for Professional Consulting
Services (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain Consultant for the
services hereinafter described.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS SET
IFORTH HEREIN:
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
Consultant shall perform the "Scope of Work" outlined in the
Pipeline Proposal attached as Exhibit "A" and the "Scope of Services"
outlined in the Pump Station Proposal attached as Exhibit "B." The
Scope of Work for the Pipeline Proposal includes preparation of an
alignment study, utility research, field survey, preparation of
drawings, specification review, obtaining permits from railroads,
- 2 -
,q,� � a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
preparation of a traffic control plan, geotechnical investigation, plan
submittals, preparation of a construction cost estimate, bid assistance
and construction assistance. The Scope of Work for the Pump Station
Proposal includes performing a preliminary design, a final design,
bidding support and construction support. Pothole investigation
subconsultant services are not included in the Pipeline Proposal and
plan check and permit fees for the City of Vernon and City of
Huntington Park are not included in the Pump Station Proposal. It is
understood and agreed that in the event of a conflict between the
Proposals and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall
(prevail.
II. PROGRESS REPORTS.
Consultant shall submit written progress reports at least
once a month until the work hereunder is completed. Consultant shall
meet with City staff, upon City's request, or as needed, in order to
provide reports or information concerning the services being performed
by Consultant under this Agreement.
III. TIME OF PERFORMANCE.
Consultant's services herewith shall commence upon signing of
this Agreement and shall be completed unless otherwise terminated or
extended. Consultant shall complete the work under the Pipeline
Proposal and the Pump Station Proposal according to the respective time
schedules contained in the proposals attached as Exhibits "A" and "B."
Consultant agrees that all services provided will be conducted by the
principal and competent staff members, if any, under the supervision of
the principal, and that services will be performed and rendered
diligently. Consultant shall only perform additional services during
- 3 -
a
a +tit a .1"AA.— �}
J
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
this time period when requested by the City Administrator and the
Director of Community Services & Water.
IV. COMPENSATION/PRICE.
Consultant agrees to perform the work associated with
the reclaimed waterline as described in the Pipeline Proposal for
$167,840.00. Consultant also agrees to perform the work associated
with the Pump Station Proposal for $255,009.00. The total cost of work
under the Agreement is $422,849.00.
1. Consulting Costs - Pipeline Proposal.
The City will pay Consultant on a time -and -materials basis
according to the "Manhour/Fee" section of the Pipeline Proposal and the
Hourly Charge Rate and Expense Reimbursement Schedule, a copy of which
is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this
reference as though fully set forth. The total amount to be paid to
Consultant for the work on the Pipeline Proposal shall not exceed One
Hundred Sixty -Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and No Cents
($167,840.00).
2. Consulting Costs - Pump Station Proposal. The
City will pay Consultant on a time -and -materials basis according to the
"Fee Estimate" section of the Pump Station Proposal and the Hourly
Charge Rate and Expense Reimbursement Schedule, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by this
reference as though fully set forth. The total amount to be paid to
Consultant for the work on the Pump Station Proposal shall not exceed
Two Hundred Fifty -Five Thousand Nine Dollars and No Cents
($255,009.00).
3. Expenses. Expenses identified in the Pipeline
Proposal and the Pump Station Proposal may only be billed in accordance
- 4 -
..�., �.
+, .1 � � a a � "Wow e! .a � �+ • • a a i
1%L M
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
with the terms set forth respectively in Exhibits "A" and "B." In
addition to the payment for consulting services, reimbursable and
reproduction expenses identified in Exhibits "C" and "D" will be paid
and may only be billed in accordance with the terms set forth
respectively in Exhibits "A" and "B." Any other expenses not
identified in the Agreement may only be billed if advance written
approval has been obtained from the City Administrator.
V. METHOD OF PAYMENT.
Consultant shall submit within thirty (30) days after the
last day of any month in which services have been performed or costs
incurred hereunder an invoice to the City for payment. Invoices shall
contain an itemization of services rendered, directly related job
expenses and subcontract charges incurred by Consultant for which
compensation is due, and an estimate of the percentage completed for
each milestone or task. Consultant shall be responsible for paying any
subcontractors used in the performance of this Agreement. Sub-
contractors shall not bill the City directly.
Payment of the invoice shall be made after acceptance and
approval by the City within thirty (30) days of receipt. The City's
approval of the invoice shall not be unreasonably withheld.
VI. CHANGES AND EXTRA SERVICES.
The City reserves the right to request changes in or
additions to the services to be performed by Consultant. All such
changes shall be incorporated in written change orders executed by the
City and Consultant that shall specify the changes ordered and the
parties shall mutually negotiate an adjustment of compensation and
completion time if required.
- 5 -
2
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Any services added to the scope of this Agreement by a change
order shall be executed under all applicable conditions of this
Agreement. Consultant should be paid according to the Hourly Charge
Rate and Expense Reimbursement Schedules in Exhibits "C" and "D"
depending on whether the change order relates to the Pipeline Proposal
or the Pump Station Proposal. No claim for additional compensation for
services or extension of time shall be recognized unless contained in a
duly executed change order.
VII. PRODUCTS OF CONSULTING.
1. All reports, plans, studies, maps, drawings,
photographs, documents and other writings prepared by and for
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the
course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and
internal documents, shall become the property of the City upon payment
to Consultant for such work, and the City shall have the sole right to
use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to
Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's
expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, maps, drawings,
photographs, documents and other writings to City upon written request.
All drawings shall be in Autocad 2000 or higher. All design documents
shall be in Microsoft Word format.
2. Maps, drawings and photographs produced by the
Consultant shall conform to the best standards of that profession.
Information shall be organized in a logical and systematic manner.
Drawings shall contain as much information on a single drawing as can
be done without impairing clarity and quality.
3. City has relied upon the professional training and
ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material
- 6 -
1
2
3
4
51
61II
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
linducement to enter into this Agreement
Consultant shall therefore
1provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to
perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by
Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable
legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to
be expected of competent professionals in Consultant's field of
expertise.
4. Consultant shall minimize changes to its key
project personnel. The City shall have the right to request key
project personnel changes and to review and approve key project
personnel changes proposed by the Consultant.
VIII. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.
1. Access to Confidential Information. The City may
provide Consultant with, or allow Consultant access to, certain
information not available to the public concerning the City, or
businesses located in the City. The information may include company
information, taxes, sales, value of assets, or other such information.
All such information shall be known as "Confidential Information" and
may not be used to circumvent the responsibility of either party to
this Agreement.
2. No Disclosure. Except as expressly permitted,
lConsultant shall not disclose, permit the disclosure of, release,
disseminate, or transfer, whether orally or by any other means, any
part of such Confidential Information to any other person or entity,
whether corporate, governmental, or individual, without the express
prior written consent of an authorized representative of the City.
Consultant shall return any written Confidential Information, and all
copies made of such items, to the City upon the City's written request,
- 7 -
a r.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1but in any event not later than the date that Consultant has performed
all services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant
hereby agrees that such Confidential Information and any documents
provided may be used by Consultant only as authorized by the City.
Consultant shall take reasonable measures to avoid any disclosure of
any such Confidential Information to any unauthorized person.
3. Court Ordered Disclosure. Consultant shall
immediately notify the City of any court order or subpoena requiring
disclosure of Confidential Information, and shall cooperate with the
City's legal counsel in responding to any such order or subpoena.
Consultant may only disclose such Confidential Information after legal
counsel has exhausted any lawful and timely appeal or challenge.
4. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies that
it may have at law or in equity, the City shall be entitled to a
temporary and permanent injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction
against any breach or threatened breach of the Confidential Information
provisions of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that in case of
such breach or threatened breach, the City would have no adequate
remedy at law.
IX. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE.
1. Indemnification of City. Consultant shall
indemnify, defend, protect and hold the City and its officers, agents
and employees, free and harmless from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, damages, liabilities, fines, charges, penalties,
orders, judgments and all costs of defense to the extent arising out of
the negligent services or willful misconduct performed under this
Agreement, except to the extent arising from or caused by the active
- 8 -
J r •+ e a �r�� r�'+ .1 r r ad �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents or
employees.
2. Insurance. Prior to commencing work hereunder,
Consultant shall provide the City with proof of insurance providing and
maintaining the coverage and endorsements set forth in the Insurance
Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and made a part hereof by
reference. Said proof of insurance shall also provide that said policy
or policies shall not be canceled or reduced in liability limits
without giving at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the
City. If Consultant fails to provide proof of insurance coverage as
specified above, the City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this
Agreement immediately.
Consultant shall not permit a subcontractor or vendor
Ito perform work on City premises unless and until a certificate of
insurance is obtained showing that such subcontractor or vendor has
workers' compensation coverage. If Consultant employs subcontractors
as part of the services rendered, Consultant's protective coverage is
required. Consultant may include all subcontractors as insureds under
its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each
subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth herein.
X. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
1. Independent Contractor. At all times during the
term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent contractor
and shall not be an employee of the City. The City shall have the
right to control Consultant only insofar as the results of Consultant's
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement; however, the City shall
not have the right to control the means by which Consultant
accomplishes services rendered pursuant to the Agreement except to the
- 9 -
• s •1 sy atJ� a+�+ e s ...1 • 1 •♦ 1
J ♦ - 1 . • � •
1',
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
extent that such services involve the use of City property or
Confidential Information.
2. Consultant Not Agent. Except as the City may
specify in writing, Consultant shall have no authority, express or
implied, to act on behalf of the City in any capacity whatsoever as an
agent. Consultant shall have no authority, expressed or implied,
pursuant to this Agreement to bind the City to any obligation
whatsoever.
3. Assignment Prohibited. Consultant may not assign
any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement except with the
express written consent of the City. Any other attempted or purported
assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement shall
be void and of no effect.
4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by
the City without cause on fifteen (15) days written notice to
Consultant. Consultant shall be entitled to the compensation earned by
it prior to the date of the termination notice, computed pro rata up to
and including that date, plus compensation for work performed during
the fifteen -day notice period and authorized in the termination notice.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement if City
breaches the Agreement. However, Consultant shall first notify City of
the alleged breach and give City a reasonable period of time to cure.
5. Notices. Notices to the parties, unless
otherwise requested in writing shall be sent to:
City: THE CITY OF VERNON
ATTN: BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
4305 SANTA FE AVENUE
VERNON, CA 90058-0805
- 10 -
s d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Consultant: TETRA TECH, INC. INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES GROUP
ATTN: TERRY L. KERGER, P.E., PROJECT MANAGER
3280 EAST FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 350
PASADENA, CA 91107
6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire
agreement of the parties. Consultant represents that in entering into
this Agreement, it has not relied on any previous representations or
understandings of any kind or nature.
7. Governing Law. The validity, interpretation and
performance of this Agreement shall be controlled and construed under
the laws of the State of California as enacted and in force at the time
this Agreement is fully executed.
8. Amendments. Except as may otherwise be
specifically provided herein, this Agreement may be modified or amended
only by a written document executed by both Consultant and the City.
9. Benefit of Agreement. This Agreement shall bind
and benefit the parties hereto and their heirs, successors, and
permitted assigns.
10. Forum Selection. Any action brought relating to
this Agreement shall be brought and held exclusively in a State Court
in the County of Los Angeles, California.
11. Recitals. All recitals are incorporated by
reference.
12. Waiver. Any waiver at any time by either party of
its rights with respect to a default under this Agreement, or with
respect to any other matters arising in connection with this Agreement,
shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to subsequent default or
other matter.
r , a •J as a . day}'.. ,�.•a a A .t a
V
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13. Attorney's Fees. In the event that it becomes
necessary for either party to this Agreement to enforce any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the parties agree that a court of
competent jurisdiction may determine and fix reasonable attorney's fees
to be paid to the successful litigant.
14. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be considered
in to be in default in any of its obligations under this Contract when
a failure of performance shall be due to an uncontrollable force. The
term "uncontrollable force" shall mean any cause beyond the control of
the party affected, including, but not restricted to, flood,
earthquake, storm, fire, lightening, epidemic, war, riot, civil
disturbance or disobedience, labor dispute, labor material shortage,
sabotage, federal, state, or municipal action, statute, ordinance, or
regulation, embargoes of the United States Government or any other
government, which by exercise of due diligence such party could not
reasonably have been expected to avoid and by exercise of due diligence
has been unable to overcome. Either party rendered unable to fulfill
any of its obligations under this Agreement by reason of an
uncontrollable force, shall give written notice within five (5)
Business Days of such fact to the other party and shall exercise due
diligence to remove such inability with all reasonable dispatch.
- 12 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed by and through their authorized officers on the date, month
and year first written above.
CITY OF VERNON
By:
LEONIS C. MALB G, Mayyor
ATTEST:
BRUCE V. MALK HORST, City Clerk
APPEDVED AS TO FORM
�'C4'4
EDUARDO OLIVO, City Attorney
TETRA
TECH, INC.
INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES GROUP
By:
(�
Name:
144 <<
Title:
V, FEZ �Z►L
c� t LU�I r�:zt Xt5"4ee-,
By:
Name:
Title.
- 13 -
+ a sT t s• J y a y a !
... y y y • a*AA.
y y • • C + + . . • y • y y � .
EXHIBIT A
i
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Febf:uary=27,, 22002April 30, 2002
Mr. Chuck Montoya
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Reference: Proposal for MGS Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension (Revised)
Dear Mr. Montoya:
Tetra Tech, Inc. enthusiastically submits our proposal for the Malburg Generating Station (MGS)
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension. The proposed Tetra Tech project team has been performing
pipeline design and construction management services for reclaimed water mains for over 20 years.
Our expertise in the area of water reclamation and pipelines make us ideally suited for this project.
Our project manager Mr. Terry Kerger, and our team members have the experience and knowledge to
successfully complete this project. The City can count on our extensive technical knowledge and
experience, effective communication skills, quick problem solving techniques, strong ability to
handle and coordinate issues, and excellent documentation and record keeping abilities.
Our proposal contains the following information for your review:
• Project Approach
• Project Team and Resumes
• Project Descriptions
• Scope of Work
• Proposed Design Schedule
• Manhour Spreadsheet and Estimate Fee
• Hourly Rate Schedule
We trust that our proposal clearly establishes our expertise, knowledge and experience. We also wish
to express our willingness and enthusiasm to work with the City of Vernon on this project.
If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please feel free to contact us.
V6Mamg�
T.Sgine
EV:cab
I:\prop02\p-007jArevised letter.doc
3280 East Foothill Boulevard. Suite 350, Pasadena, CA 91 I07
Tel 626.683.0066 Fax 626.683-0060,
www.tetratech.com
a .y al � y• a a � a ya a
y y y y � y+ y
;S
The purpose of the project is to provide reclaimed water service to the Malburg Generating Station
(MGS) located at the intersection of Seville Avenue and 501h Street in the City of Vernon. The
project will require extending an existing Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD)
reclaimed water line approximately 1.8 miles from its current terminus at the intersection of Randolph
Street and Newell. The currently proposed alignment runs west along Randolph Street, north along
Boyle Avenue and west along 50`h Street.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (formerly ASL Consulting Engineers) designed a reclaimed water pipeline in 1993 as
a part of CBMWD's Rio Hondo Water Reclamation Program that ran partially along the same
alignment in Randolph Street and Boyle Avenue. The project was never constructed. We were
hopeful that a portion of the previous design could be used for the new project; however, a gas
pipeline has been installed in Boyle Avenue in the location of the proposed reclaimed water pipeline.
Therefore, Tetra Tech, Inc.'s first task for the design of the new reclaimed water pipeline will be to
carry out an alignment study. This will require a comprehensive utility research study of Boyle
Avenue to determine if construction of the reclaimed water pipeline in this street is still feasible.
Based on our analysis of utilities, we will make alignment recommendations to the City and present
alternative alignments, if required.
Accurate information on the location of existing utility substructures is key to a design that will be
installed with a minimum of field changes or modifications. Tetra Tech, Inc. has developed a very
methodical approach to investigating utilities. We start by contacting Underground Service Alert
(USA) for a list of registered utility agencies within the project boundaries. Each of the agencies is
sent a letter explaining the project and requesting utility information. Two separate plan submittals
are made to each agency, one requesting information and a second requesting verification for
accuracy of their utilities on our drawings.
Critical utility locations will be potholed during design. We will prepare a list of the utilities we
consider critical and submit it to the City for concurrence on which utilities should be potholed during
design. Less critical utilities will be left for potholing prior to construction by the contractor. Non-
critical utilities will not be potholed. In addition, Tetra Tech, Inc. will field walk the alignment and
look for evidence of other utilities that may not have been shown on plans.
Once an alignment has been determined, Tetra Tech, Inc. will complete a field survey to establish
horizontal control and elevations for the design. The field survey data will be compiled and a base
map will be developed. Utility information will be plotted and an alignment will be shown.
Although Tetra Tech, Inc. will still do a thorough investigation of the utilities and right-of-way for the
new alignment, our efficiency in developing a portion of the plans will be enhanced because of the
previous design. We will also be able to save considerable time in developing the specifications, as
we do not anticipate that there will be significant changes to the technical portion of the specifications
we have on file from the previous project.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT APPROACH
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Page I
a a
� , 1 � � 1
• a � �
{"a ad � + a a +a
t�
.. • n
.,q
_
d,
We anticipate that if there is sufficient room in Boyle Avenue for locating the new reclaimed water
pipeline, portions will necessarily lie within Huntington Park city limits. Permits will be required for
the several railroad crossings.
We have included a Geotechnical Investigation as an optional service at this time. We will continue
our attempt to locate the previously completed Earth Technology "Environmental Site Assessment
and Geotechnical Investigation, Rio Hondo Water Reclamation Program...," 1992, to see if there is
information relevant to this project. If not, we recommend the City approve geotechnical services,
including field exploration, for the design of the reclaimed water pipeline. The geotechnical
investigation does not include research or testing for contaminated soils or hazardous materials. If
during the course of the project this issue becomes a concern, Tetra Tech can submit a cost for
providing this additional service to the City.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT APPROACH
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Page 2
J
+ y • a
� i
Tetra Tech, Inc.'s commitment to the City's project is demonstrated through the establishment of a
team comprised of highly experienced and responsive individuals. Mr. Terry Kerger, P.E. will be our
Senior Project Manager responsible for supervising Tetra Tech's staff and ensuring that the necessary
resources are committed to the project. He has over 30 years of experience in the design,
management, and construction inspection of pipelines.
Mr. Ken Berard, P.E. who has over 15 years of pipeline design experience will lead the design effort
as Project Engineer. Mr. Berard will be responsible for the preparation of plans, utility research,
specifications, cost estimate, and coordination of survey and traffic control plans. Mr. Berard will be
assisted by an experienced team of engineers and designers who have completed a number of
successful reclaimed water pipeline projects throughout Southern California. Among the team
members will be Mr. John Robinson, who has extensive reclaimed water experience working with
both Central and West Basin Municipal Water Districts on the implementation of their reclamation
programs.
Survey will be coordinated by Mr. Larry Bateman, a registered land surveyor.
Mr. Terry Kerger will also administer our construction services. He will be supported by Ms. Lisa
Amador who will serve as Construction Office Engineer and Mr. Vince Steinhart who will serve as
Construction Observer.
A project team chart and resumes for these individuals are provided on the following pages. Also
provided is a summary of Tetra Tech, Inc.'s extensive reclaimed water pipeline experience.
Tetra Tech, Inc. proposes to contract geotechnical services, if approved by the City, from Lowney
Associates. Lowney has provided geotechnical and geo-environmental services since 1969 for more
than 5,000 projects throughout California. The team for this project will be lead by Mr. Tom Benson,
who is a California licensed civil and geotechnical engineer. His resume is attached, including a list
of his recent pipeline experience.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Pacye I
♦ a • j • t ,feral ' a++t. a { a � t ,a a
s • - � •
2 • t �
�� �
y� a �.. e+
_ ..�. t,-�'ib�` 1Y.e. - Kt ` "+n . �F". +.. �. � a :�' 'F.S�.3? 3' � mil. .. .. 'p.F,'. �.0 �
./+
City of Vernon Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
S TERRY KERGER, P.E.
LISA AMADOR. P.E.
VINCE STEINHART
KEN BERARD. P.E.
JOHN ROBINSON
LARRY BATEMAN, P.L.S.
Optional
LOWNEY ASSOCIATES
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM CHART
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
x t
• a a. fait � a� °r ♦ a a •: �
i t
s � �
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Terry L. Kerger, P.E. award -winning project. Services including two 2.5 MG water
storage reservoirs, two 6500 gpm pumping stations, and six
miles of 36-inch reclaimed water transmission main. He was
responsible for the design of the telemetry and control system
including central control and remote sites for three reservoirs
and three pump stations.
• Rio Hondo Reclaimed Water Project, Central Basin
Municipal Water District — Involved approximately 33 miles
of reclaimed water pipeline ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-
inch in diameter.
• Pomona/Walnut/Rowland Joint Water Commission —
Relocation of five miles of 54-inch pipeline.
• City of Glendale — Design of ten miles of 34-inch to 36-inch
reclaimed water pipeline involving hydraulic investigation.
• City of El Monte — Replacement and upgrading of 4,500 feet
of pipeline due to excessive leaks.
• City of Lakewood — Replacement of distribution system
pipelines due to aggressive soils and pipeline corrosion
failures. Project was implemented in three phases for budget
purposes.
• San Gabriel County Water District — Replacement of
deteriorated distribution pipelines and extension of
transmission pipelines to improve transmission of well
production to meet District's service demands.
• City of Cerritos — Replacement of 1,500 feet of distribution
piping and services. New distribution piping and services were
located in the street in front of residences. Existing pipeline
and easements crossing back yards of residences were
abandoned.
• Pipeline Replacement, South Gate — Project Manager for the
installation of 39,000 feet of pipeline replacement. Project
included preparing 45 base map plan sheets using the city's
GIS database in Microstation format, and involved utility
record research, field verification of utility records, pipeline
and appurtenance design, project specifications, cost estimates,
bidding assistance, construction administration services, and
record drawings. Microstation format and the city's GIS data
allowed completion of the design phase in six weeks.
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
! d a
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard Mr. Berard has extensive experience in many facets of
Project Manager water/wastewater engineering. Mr. Berard has performed
numerous studies ranging from complete water master plans to
efficiency studies. His design experience includes preparing plans,
specifications, and cost estimates for sewers, reservoirs, pump
stations, wells, pipelines, chlorination facilities, and pressure
EDUCATION: reducing facilities. Mr. Berard also has extensive experience in
hydraulic modeling. He has used and is familiar with HZO NET,
California State Polytechnic Cybernet, EPA NET, FAAST, Kentucky Pipe, and Waterworks
University, Pomona, B.S. Civil Engineering, 1986 computer programs. In addition, Mr. Berard is familiar with other
computer programs including AutoCAD, Excel, Lotus 1-2-3,
Storm Plus (for open channel flows), and others. Rounding out Mr.
Berard's experience is work he has done in inspection, construction
REGISTRATION: administration, shop drawing review, and plan checking.
Registered Civil Engineer
California No. 45499 SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
• Sacramento County Reclamation and Reuse Study, U.S.
Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation — Project Manager
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
for a study performed in conjunction with the Sacramento
Regional County Sanitation District in an effort to determine
American Water Works
the feasibility of recycling wastewater effluent for disposal as
Association
well as water supply purposes. The study combined and
integrated various previous studies and initiated a Feasibility
Inland County Water Association
Report in compliance with the Bureau of Reclamation's Title
XVI guidelines. The study included a problem and needs
analysis, potential recycled water opportunities, market
assessment, assessment of legal opinions for water rights,
conceptual demonstration garden, public outreach assistance,
and specific project recommendations. GIS was used
extensively as a tool for the study and as a visual aid for the
public outreach assistance.
• Butterfield Park Recycled Water Pilot Project, City of
Corona — Project Engineer for approximately 5,000 feet of 12-
inch recycled water main including connection to treatment
plant and to retrofit of Butterfield Park. The alignment crossed
a sensitive habitat area including a stream and required permits
from the Army Corps of Engineers.
• Modifications of the Santa Fe Springs Reservoir and Pump
Station, Central Basin Municipal Water District — Design
Engineer for the conversion of an existing potable reservoir to
a non -potable reservoir. The reservoir also allowed for a
supplementary connection to the potable system. The pump
station conversion re -piped the suction and discharge as well
as bring the station up to code.
• Non -Potable Water System Improvements - Navy, 29 Palms
Marine Base — Planned and prepared plans specifications, and
estimate for non -potable water system improvements
including over 30,000 feet of 6-inch through 16-inch water
main, a 3,600 gpm vertical turbine pump station, 1,500 gpm
axial flow propeller low head pump, 550 gpm vertical turbine
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
♦ i .a a3 � a •a� . a ' a i �
�� t �
• , . � a � - •
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard pump station, 0.4 and 0.5 MG steel reservoirs, and a 60 acre
turf irrigation system. Also provided support construction
management services.
• Hydraulic Analysis, Rio Hondo Non -Potable Water Design
Report — Engineer involved with the hydraulic analysis of the
non -potable water design report. The analysis incorporated the
Century and West Basin non -potable water projects_ The total
study area extended from the cities of Santa Monica to
Whittier and from South Pasadena to Paramount. The
recommendations included pipe sizes and locations.
• 30-Inch Transmission Main, City of Glendora — Project
manager for the design of 20,000 feet of water main. Project
included a PDR addressing pipe material, hydraulic analysis,
and cost estimates. The construction documents were divided
into five construction phases to limit annual costs. The high
congestion of existing utilities required that smaller utilities,
such as gas lines, be relocated. Also, project manager for the
inspection during construction.
• State Street Feeder, Monte Vista Water District — Project
Manager for the preparation of environmental documentation,
permits, design report, design, and bidding assistance for
7,000 feet of 18-inch and 22-inch water pipe and 1,400 feet of
30-inch water pipe. Boring and jacking under two railroad
tracks and a flood control channel was required. Also
included Construction Administration.
• Topanga Canyon Valve Replacement, Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works — Design Engineer for this
project which included the replacement of over 600 shutoff
valves and 3,900 feet of 6-inch and 8-inch of water mains.
• Point Dume Water Main, Los Angeles County Department of
Public Works — Design Engineer for the design of
approximately 35,000 feet of 8-inch and 12-inch ductile iron
and steel water main and creek undercrossing.
• 60`h Street West Water Main, Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works — Design Engineer for the design
of approximately 3,000 feet of 16-inch water main and a
pressure reducing station.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Lancaster
— Design Engineer for the design of approximately 1,000 feet
of 12-inch diameter water main.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Pacific
Coast Highway — Design Engineer plans, specifications, and
cost estimate of over 6,000 feet of 12-inch water main and two
pressure reducing stations in a state Highway. Provisions were
made for portions of the project which were located in an
ancient Indian burial ground.
• Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Sierra
Highway — Design Engineer for the design of over 5,000 of
10-inch diameter water main.
• 12-Inch Water Main on Ave. J - Lancaster, Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works — Design Engineer for
the design of approximately 1,300 feet of 12-inch ductile iron
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
. �
ay
f
! • � t
a 1 •
ai
�� �a
�. a
• a
a
a�
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
John Robinson Mr. Robinson's experience encompasses a variety of wastewater
Project Engineer engineering, water reclamation and master plan projects. The
clients he has provided services to are mostly municipalities and
cities in California and Arizona. Process and mechanical design,
feasibility/master studies and planning, preparation of study and
design reports as well as construction plans and specifications, and
EDUCATION: construction management are all included in the services he has
B.S., Civil Engineering, California provided.
State University, Long Beach, 1993 Mr. Robinson has served as both a project engineer and program
manager for several projects. As a project manager, he has on
numerous occasions successfully led my project teams to complete
REGISTRATION: the work within the project budgets and time schedules and with a
high degree of responsiveness to the clients. His project experience
Engineering -in -Training, California, includes municipal wastewater and recycled water pipelines, pump
1997, stations and treatment facilities, master plans for water, sewer and
Registration No. 109865 recycled water extensive recycled water customer coordination.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
American Society of Civil Engineers Recycled Water Retrofits for Schools and Parklands, West
American Water Works Association Basin Municipal Water District — Project Manager/Engineer
for preparation and approval for six recycled water retrofits for
Arlington Elementary School, Casimar Middle School,
McMaster Elementary School, Yukon Elementary School, as
well as Descando and Gueuser Parks, on the behalf of both
West Basin Municipal Water District and City of Torrance.
Prepared necessary documentation to obtain approval from the
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DOHS),
as well as biddable plans and specification, and construction
cost estimates. Preliminary cross connection testing was
performed at all sites. The remaining work, in progress,
involves construction oversight, final cross connection testing,
and preparation of "as -built" drawings. In total, Tetra Tech
has assisted both the West Basin and Central Basin Municipal
Water Districts in the conversion of 65 schools and 55 parks
from potable water to recycled water for irrigation purposes.
• Recycled Water Retrofits for Landscape Irrigation/Industrial
Use, West Basin Municipal Water District — Project
Manager/Engineer for the design of recycled water retrofits for
the Caltrans 110/91 connection, Del Arno Park in Carson, and
Raytheon Systems in El Segundo. Work included preparation
of all necessary documentation to obtain approval from the
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, as well as
construction cost estimates and biddable plans and
specification for Raytheon. Tasks also included construction
oversight, preliminary and final cross connection testing, and
preparation of "as -built" drawings. As a result of its close
working relationship with Caltrans during this assignment,
identified five additional recycled water irrigation connections
that were reviewed by Caltrans and WBMWD. These
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
John Robinson recycled water connections are currently under design.
• Program Management Team Member for both the West and
Central Basin Municipal Water Districts Water Reclamation
Programs — Provided various engineering services during the
design of treatment plants, pump stations, distribution systems,
and customer connections. In addition, assisted with the
identifications of potential reclaimed water customers,
developed on -site retrofit drawings, and prepared engineering
reports for industrial user for approvals by the state and county
health departments. Project included computer hydraulic
model of the District's recycled water distribution system.
• Program Management Team Member for the Long Beach
Water Department Phase I Reclamation Expansion —
Provided various engineering services, including developed
on -site retrofit drawings; designed 6- and 8-inch recycled
water pipelines; prepared industrial engineering reports; and,
performed retrofit construction management. Project included
computer hydraulic model of Long Beach's recycled water
distribution system.
• Santa Ana Reservoir and Pump Station, Orange County
Water District — Project Engineer for modifications to the
Santa Ana Reservoir and design of a new pump station for the
Orange County Water District. Design involved modifying an
existing 6.0 million gallon potable water reservoir for
reclaimed water storage and design of a new pump station to
supply the Green Acres reclaimed distribution system with the
stored reclaimed water and modification of Factory 21 pump
station. In addition, project included a surge analysis and
report, computer hydraulic model (CyberNet 2.0), and update
of model (CyberNet 3.0) of the Districts recycled water
distribution system.
• Program Management Team Member for the San Gabriel
Valley Recycled Water Demonstration Project for the Upper
San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District — Assisted the
District to implement a multi -million dollar program.
Potentially, 40,000 to 50,000 AFY of reclaimed water from
the County Sanitation district's San Jose Creek Plant will be
used for irrigation, industrial use, spreading (recharge) and
river discharge in a portion of the District. The phased
implementation plan is currently on schedule.
• Program Management Team Member for the City of
Phoenix Water Services Department, Cave Creek Road
Facilities Program Management — Provided various services,
including design consultant contract assistance, survey and
base sheet preparation, program coordination of design
consultants, schedule development and control, design
guidelines, reclaimed water guidance manual, utility
coordination, quality control reviews, cost estimates, agency
and department coordination and permitting, status reports,
invoice review, bid services and several other allowance tasks.
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
• + ! a �
+ . ! � •
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Larry S. Bateman, P.L.S. Mr. Bateman has 30 years of experience in land surveying, with
Survey Manager experience and hands-on involvement in construction/cadastral
surveying work from research through fieldwork to final product.
He has thorough knowledge in the operation of a surveying office.
He is familiar with survey techniques and procedures using both
EDUCATION: manual methods and electronic equipment, Trimble 4000si, Star -
Net, TDS Data Collection, and Softdesk. He is experienced with
Pasadena City College, computers and has utilized various programs, including AutoCAD
Civil Engineering Tech./ R14, Windows and WordPerfect.
Land Surveying
Yavapai College
Basic AutoCAD
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
"Surveying Instrumentation &
Coordinate Computation"
Survey Supervisor and Office Surveyor, Civil Engineering
NGS 1988
and Land Surveying — specializing in land development.
Transportation projects by Caltrans District 7 and by
"NAVD 88" NGS 1991
Engineering Management Consultant, which is responsible for
"Basic GPS Training"
the design engineering of the Pasadena Light Rail Transit
Leica 1992
Project. Projects included aerial topography control surveys,
"Photogrammetry" Pasadena
utilizing CPS methods, along with total station surveys and
City College 1966
mapping using Intergraph's ETI software; cross-section
surveys; utility location surveys; and construction surveys for
alignment modifications. Provided coordination with project
engineers/clients as required, reports and office support for
REGISTRATION:
field crews throughout projects.
• Vice President of Surveys, The SW Group — a civil
Professional Land Surveyor
engineering and land surveying firm. Projects included
Califomia (1970) - No. 3757
commercial, residential, condominium and public works.
Successfully completed all services from field work to office
work, including aerial mapping control, preliminary research,
boundary surveys, legal descriptions, topography surveys,
construction surveys, ALTA surveys and subdivision map
preparation. Provided direction and supervision for surveying
staff, recruited, interviewed and hired support personnel.
• Dava and Associates, Prescott, Arizona, 1992 —1994 — Project
Surveyor for on -call contract with ADOT. Site -specific design
surveys and construction surveys throughout Yavapai County.
Project survey for site -specific survey for the Yavapai County
Engineer.
• David Evans and Associates, Phoenix, Arizona, 1994 —
1996 — Project Surveyor for large-scale residential subdivisions
in Maricopa County, including design surveys and staking for
the extension of roadway system.
• Lockheed -California Company, Palmdale, California, 1999 —
Aircraft Navigation System Calibration.
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Los
Angeles — Pasadena, California, 1990 — 14-mile Pasadena
Blue Line.
• Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Los
Angeles, California, 1991 — 7-mile East Los Angeles Red Line
Extension.
• Carmen Drive/SR 101, Ventura County — Provided quality
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
TETRATECH, INC.
TOM Infrastructure Services Group
Larry S. Bateman, P.L.S. control for the preparation of legal descriptions and right-of-
way exhibits for the acquisition of additional land required for
the construction of a new highway interchange.
• Magic Mountain Bridge Overcrossing, Los Angeles County —
Provided design topographic surveys and boundary surveys.
Prepared right-of-way mapping for the preparation of legal
descriptions and right-of-way exhibits for the acquisition of
additional land required for the construction of a new bridge
and roadway in the City of Santa Clarita.
• SR73, Parcel B, Orange County — Provided boundary survey
for the preparation of State of California Highway Right -of -
Way Mapping. Prepared legal descriptions and right-of-way
exhibits for the acquisition of additional land required to build
southbound transition bridge onto SR-55.
• Street of the Golden Lantern, Orange County — Street
widening project. Provided surveys for aerial mapping, design
topography and street centerline control. Supervised the
preparation of legal descriptions and right-of-way exhibits for
the acquisition of additional land required to widen said street.
• Springville Drive (formerly Airport North)/SR 101, Ventura
County — Provided surveys for design topography and
supervised the preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits for
the acquisition of additional land required to widen proposed
right-of-way and new freeway interchange for Springville
Drive bridge.
• Rancho Cucamonga/SR 66 (Historic), San Bernardino
County — Street widening project. Provided surveys for aerial
mapping, design topography and street centerline control.
Supervised construction staking of widening for 12 kilometers,
including bridge widening and storm drain relocation.
• District 7, Los Angeles County — On -Call survey construction
staking of accident investigation sites.
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
! �s2' +2. y + � ae
�♦ .a � �' a
s - �y
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Lisa Ellen Arnador Ms. Amador has more than five years experience in the field of
Construction Engineer construction management. She has managed all aspects of several
major construction projects, including public and private
structures, public works projects and water -treatment facilities.
Her experience ranges from planning and budgeting to permitting,
plan -checking, quality control and construction management.
EDUCATION: With her legal training, Ms. Amador is uniquely equipped to
negotiate and ensure compliance with contract documents as a
Western State University College of client advocate.
Law, Fullerton
Juris Doctor, 1995
California State Polytechnic
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
University, Pomona
B.S., Civil Engineering, 1991
Hollywood Racetrack Stormwater and Wastewater
Treatment and Reclamation Systems, Churchill Downs of
California — Construction Engineer for the design and
construction of a grading, drainage and treatment plant
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
construction project. Provided construction management
American Society of Civil
support services to finalize construction within the three -
Engineers, 1991
month time frame, per a Cease and Desist Order issued by the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Churchill
Downs California Company (Hollywood Park) was required
to eliminate all non -storm water discharges and the 0.1-inch
of storm event to the existing City of Inglewood storm drain
main line, through construction of an on site treatment plant
facility and water reclaim program.
• Sewer Rehabilitation, City of Burbank — Construction
Engineer for the City of Burbank's citywide sewer
rehabilitation. Pipeline replacements were designed for
existing streets to improve the aging water system.
Cure -in -place and spiral wound sewer lining was selected to
minimize disturbance to residents and traffic, and was
required for inaccessible sewers where development and
significant landscaping has encroached over the facilities.
Project management and construction observation services,
including television monitoring of existing mains for the
purpose of establishing the number and location of laterals
and pipe condition.
• Sewer Rehabilitation, City of Santa Monica — Construction
Engineer for the City of Santa Monica's city wide sewer
rehabilitation. Pipeline replacements were designed for
existing streets to improve the aging water system. Spiral
wound sewer lining was selected to minimize disturbance to
residents and traffic, and was required for inaccessible sewers
where development and significant landscaping has
encroached over the facilities. Project management and
construction observation services, including television
monitoring of existing mains for the purpose of establishing
the number and location of laterals and pipe condition.
• Norton Simon Museum — Project Manager for the design
and construction of the Norton Simon Museum Renovation.
Management of: environmental controls and monitoring of
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
`i .a
+ a . . _S
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Lisa Ellen Amador asbestos abatement, design and construction of a new HVAC
system, design and construction of structural support
systems, installation of a new lighting system, and
implementation of the overall architectural design concept, as
well as the design and construction of an addition to the
existing structure and a man-made lake. Daily coordination
with client, architect, and contractors, as well as regulating
agencies.
CITY OF VERNON
KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
i2 +'L.
y
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Vince Steinhart Mr. Steinhart has over eleven years of experience in construction
Construction Inspector observation and inspection of water system facilities. Mr. Steinhart
has provided field observation services for pipeline, reservoir, well,
pump station, and treatment plant projects for numerous cities,
counties, and water districts.
EDUCATION:
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
California State University, Los
Angeles
City of Burbank — Construction Observation of sewer
rehabilitation projects — Phases II, III, IV, and V.
Public Works Construction
Amar Road, West Covina — A 31-inch steel cement -mortar
Inspection
lined and cement -mortar coated water main.
California State University,
Rowland Water District — A 24-inch steel cement -lined and
Sacramento
cement -mortar coated break pressure reservoir feeder pipeline.
• Vantage Pointe Drive, Rowland Water District — A 12-inch
Water Distribution System
ductile iron pipe transmission main.
Operation and Maintenance
0 California -American Water Company — A 16-inch ductile
iron water main in the city of San Marino.
American Construction Inspection
0 Peck Road, Arcadia — A 12-inch water line by-pass.
Association
o Bechard Tract, Cerritos — An 8-inch ductile iron pipe potable
Continuing Education Program:
water main.
0 MG Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System, West Basin
Public Works
Structural Concrete Inspection
Municipal Water District and Dominguez Water Corporation
Asphalt Institute - Paving
West Basin Municipal Water District —Construction of
Structural Masonry Inspection
underground wells and reverse osmosis desalter.
Certificate
0 Storm Drain Inspection, Arcadia
Confined Space and Trench
0 Reclaimed Water System Expansion, Cerritos/ Cerritos
Certificate
Redevelopment Agency
REGISTRATION:
ACI Concrete Field Testing
Technician - Grade 1
MEMBER:
American Construction Inspectors
Association
American Concrete Institute
CITY OF VERNON KEY PERSONNEL
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension
f 2 .t f
� 1 1 1 . , i f
• 3
�
J J
J J
r r
..
..
THOMAS C. BENSON, JR., P.E., G.E.
Vice President
Geotechnical Engineer
Summary of Experience
Tom Benson, Vice President and Manager of the Southern California office, has been a member of the
geotechnical consulting community in Southern California for more than 18 years. Since 1982, he has
worked on numerous commercial, industrial, residential and public works projects primarily in Los Angeles,
Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties; as well as geotechnical projects throughout the
United States. Since 1988, he managed geotechnical offices in Southern California, emphasizing timely and
value -adding consulting services. His management term has spanned difficult economic times and explosive
work loads, particularly following the January 17, 1994 Northridge Earthquake. To meet the needs of clients
following the quake, his Pasadena office rapidly expanded to roughly 90 civil engineers and related technical
personnel.
Mr. Benson's technical experience in Southern California has been broad, to meet the challenges of the
region. He has been the technical lead on numerous earthwork, shoring, dewatering, seismic, liquefaction,
slope stability, tunneling, rock stabilization, and soil improvement studies. In addition, he has managed
engineering geology tasks such as geologic mapping, hydrogeologic studies, fault studies, scour analyses, and
rock stability analyses. His projects have been in widely different geotechnical environments ranging from
Long Beach estuaries to Mount Wilson granitic peaks. Since much of this work has been in the urbanized
Los Angeles area, he has managed numerous geo-environmental projects dealing with fuel hydrocarbons,
solvents, lead, metals and other compounds in the soil and groundwater. Mr. Benson's geotechnical team
(engineers and geologists) won the 1996 Outstanding Project Award from the California Geotechnical
Engineers Association (CGEA), for the Dulzura Pipeline Restoration Project located in San Diego County.
This remote project required rock stabilization innovations and geotechnical exploration on inaccessible,
steep granitic slopes. Large boulders that could roll onto the pipeline were stabilized in -place with rock
anchors.
Registrations
V Registered Civil Engineer: CA No.37896
T Registered Geotechnical Engineer: CA No.2091
T Registered Environmental Assessor: CA Class I REA-03817
Continuing Education
V Southern California Earthquake Center DMG Special Publication 117 (liquefaction) Seminar (1999)
V Seismic Evaluations for CDMG Review, AEG, at CSLA
V Lessons Learned from the Northridge Earthquake, ATC, at USC
V Seed Memorial Symposium, Berkeley, California
V 40-Hour Health and Safety Training, 29 CFR 1910
Education
V Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, Michigan State University
V Master of Science, Geotechnical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
Professional Affiliations
V American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
V American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM)
V Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California (CELSOC), Los Angeles Section Treasurer
V American Institute of Architects (AIA), Los Angeles Section Member
V Southern California Water Utilities Association (SCWUA)
Select Project Experience
Mr. Benson has directed geotechnical engineering for representative projects listed below.
Selected Pipeline Project Experience
V Dulzura (San Diego County), CA: Dulzura Water Conduit Renovation: Renovation of 55,000-foot long
turn -of -the -century aqueduct, including open channels, tunnels, pipelines and flumes. For the City of
San Diego. 1988-1990 design. Construction initiated December 1993 and completed in 1996. Winner
of the 1997 California Geotechnical Engineers Association (CGEA) Award.
V La Crescenta, CA: Mr. Benson has been the geotechnical engineer of record for 14 different pipeline
projects for the Crescenta Valley Water District (CVWD), in 1999 through 2001, in Glendale, Montrose
and La Crescenta. Most of these projects consisted of 8-inch diameter pressurized cement mortar lined
and coated steel water pipelines, installed in residential streets typically 3-feet below grade.
V Los Angeles, CA: Geotechnical investigation for proposed Marina Interceptor Sewer (MIS) project, in
1996 and 1997. This alignment is primarily along Jefferson Boulevard east of Marina del Rey in the
Ballona Creek estuary area. Investigation was for the City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works.
Micro -tunneling was being considered rather than conventional cut and cover, to reduce environmental
impact, and traffic disruption.
V Montclair, CA: State Street Feeder pressurized pipeline for Monte Vista Water District. Jacked under
active railroad right-of-way.
V Pasadena, CA: El Molino Avenue Storm Drain between Allendale and Old Mill Roads. Crosses the
Raymond Fault. 24- to 30-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), 2,9000-foot long alignment.
December 1990 study, completed construction in 1992.
V Pasadena, CA: Garfield Avenue Storm Drain from Mountain Street to Orange Grove Boulevard.
Alignment 1,355 feet long consisting of 36- to 39-inch diameter RCP. Study completed summer 1993.
V Pasadena, CA: Union Street Extension and Storm Drains, between Hill and Wilson Avenues. Storm
drains 1,630 and 830 feet long, 24- to 45-inch diameter. May 1990 investigation, construction completed
in late 1992.
V San Pedro and Terminal Island, CA: Studies for sewage pump stations 671, 681, and 691, including
associated force and gravity pipelines. Scope of work also included evaluation of micro -tunneling. For
the City of Los Angeles. 1989-1990 studies and design.
V Terminal Island, CA: Final geotechnical investigation for the U.S. Navy Sanitary Sewer System, Mole
Area at the Long Beach Naval Shipyard, Terminal Island, Long Beach, California. Provided detailed
cost study of dewatering system, foundation recommendations for sewer lines and pump stations as well
as subsidence potential due to dewatering.
V Torrance, CA: Arnie Avenue stormwater force main. 1,800-foot alignment, 36-inch diameter. For the
City of Torrance. 1992 design. Construction pending.
V Twenty -Nine Palms, CA: Geotechnical investigation for proposed non -potable water system
improvements at the Marine Corps Air -Ground Combat Center. Proposed construction included a
760,000 gallon equalization water tank and roughly 27,000-feet of new non -potable water pipeline.
Pipeline diameter will range from 6 to 8 inches. 1991 design.
V Yorba Linda, CA: Mr. Benson has been the geotechnical engineer of record during construction of the
Richfield Pressurized Water Main. The project consisted of installing 8,830 feet of 36-inch diameter
steel pipeline primarily in city streets in southwestern Yorba Linda and northeastern Placentia. The
pipeline connects the Yorba Linda Water District's Richfield well yard to the existing Highland
Reservoir. Pipe jacking was required under a storm channel and the railroad at Orangethorpe Avenue.
This project included asphalt density testing. Construction completed March 2001.
s a . . a �
Tetra Tech, Inc. has successfully completed several reclaimed water pipeline projects. Listed
below is a selection of projects that illustrates our depth of experience in this area.
RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES
Rowland Water District Prepared project plans, specifications and construction cost
Reclaimed Water Mains estimates for installation of 1700 feet of 24-inch steel,
Phase I CML&C and 14,800 feet of 12-inch DIP reclaimed water
transmission main. Reclaimed water transmission main will
Rowland Water District be installed in existing public streets and private property
3021 South Fullerton Road easements. Portions of the alignment cross under Caltrans
Rowland Heights, CA 91748 freeway right-of-way in a bored and jacked steel casing and
over a County of Los Angeles flood control channel. Tetra
Contact: Tony Poli Tech prepared easements and obtained installation permits
(562) 697-1726 from State and County agencies.
Construction Cost: $2,000,000
Completion Date: 2002
Expansion of the Reclaimed Tetra Tech, Inc. prepared the final plans, specifications, and
Water Distribution System construction cost estimate for the construction of
approximately 28,000 linear feet of 24-inch trunk main and
Long Beach Water approximately 9,000 liner feet of 12-inch distribution main
Department for the Long Beach Water Department. This project was
1800 East Wardlow Road constructed in 2000.
Long Beach, CA 90807
Contact: Stephen Myrter
5621570-2352
Construction Cost: $13,800,000
Completion Date:2000
Newport Beach Pipeline Tetra Tech, Inc. provided the preliminary and final design for
Extension, Green Acres the Newport Beach Pipeline Extension for the Green Acres
Project — Phase 2 Project - Phase 2. The pipeline will bring reclaimed water to
the City of Newport Beach and consists of about 30,000
Orange County Water District lineal feet of 16-inch to 24-inch reclaimed water pipe. The
10500 Ellis Avenue project is located within a busy urban area and will require
Fountain Valley, CA 92728 extensive traffic control and utility research in addition to
pipeline relocation. The proposed pipeline extension will also
Contact: Steven R. Conklin include a bridge crossing of the San Diego Creek. Tetra Tech
7141378-3211 assisted the District in obtaining permits from the Army
Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game
Construction Cost: $4,500,000 and the Coastal Commission.
Completion Date: 1998
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Page 1
� t � l •� si e + 1r ! • ,� •!
eyes
IV _., .. «x 777
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Several reclaimed water pipelines were designed for MNWD,
Projects including:
Moulton Niguel Water District 0 Lower Mission Viejo Reclaimed Water Pipelines: 11,000
27500 La Paz Road linear feet of 12- through 16-inch reclaimed water
Laguna Niguel, CA 92656 pipelines including the crossing of the I-5 Freeway.
• Cedarbrook Reclaimed Water Pipelines: 16,000 linear
Contact: Carlo Habash feet of 4- through 12-inch reclaimed water pipelines.
9491448-4033 0Pacific Park Reclaimed Water Pipelines: 14,000 linear
feet of 12-inch to 16-inch reclaimed water pipeline
Construction Cost: $8,000,000 within Oso Parkway and Pacific Park.
• Moulton Parkway Reclaimed Water Line: 30,000 linear
Completion Date: 1998 feet of 16-inch reclaimed water main.
Zone C Reclaimed Water Tetra Tech, Inc. prepared the preliminary and final design of
Intertie Project about 4,400 linear feet of 16-inch reclaimed water main as
part of the proposed intertie with Los Alisos Water District.
Santa Margarita Water District The project included a bridge crossing, extensive traffic
26111 Antonio Parkway control and utility research.
Las Flores, CA 92688
Contact: Dan Ferons
7141459-6430
Construction Cost: $500,000
Completion Date: 1998
Green Acres Intertie Project In response to political pressure, Irvine Ranch Water District
authorized Tetra Tech ASL in August 1996 to design the
Irvine Ranch Water District proposed intertie of IRWD's and Orange County Water
15600 Sand Canyon Avenue District's reclaimed water system. Due to a four party agency
Irvine, CA 92718 agreement, the proposed pipeline had to be in service by
September 1997. Tetra Tech ASL provided the preliminary
Contact: Greg Heiertz and final design of the 9,800 linear feet of 24-inch reclaimed
9491453-5560 water main under a fast track design schedule. The project
included a meter facility, bridge crossing, extensive traffic
Construction Cost: $2,000,000 control and a discharge facility at County Sanitation District
of Orange County. The design and construction of the project
Completion Date: 1997 were completed on schedule and under budget.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Page 2
t a a a • . a t
r i ��. a t• a a
`•
a • r r a • r
a
r
^�
.. _ .. .,
- , �
- :�
y �,Y..,
- �
..
_
.. - 1:,
',3 .
Reclaimed Water Facilities Provided planning and design for approximately 13,000 linear
feet of 30-inch and 36-inch reclaimed water transmission
Irvine Ranch Water District main along Culver Drive in the City of Irvine. The Culver
15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Drive Transmission Main will serve the reclaimed water
Irvine, CA 92718 demands of the prestigious Newport Coast area.
Contact: Greg Heiertz Designed more than 15,000 lineal feet of domestic and
9491453-5560 reclaimed water transmission main in Jamboree Road to serve
the Tustin Ranch Development.
Construction Cost: $5,600,000
Completion Date: 1097
San Joaquin Hills Road Tetra Tech, Inc. designed approximately 6,000 lineal feet of
Reclaimed Water System 8-inch reclaimed water distribution pipeline as part of the San
Joaquin Hills Road Reclaimed Water System. This proposed
City of Newport Beach pipeline will connect to Irvine Ranch Water District's
3300 Newport Boulevard reclaimed water system and could potentially provide
Newport Beach, CA 92659 reclaimed water service to 20 customers. Tetra Tech is
responsible for the design of the proposed pipeline and user
Contact: Mike Sinacori service connections and will provide assistance to the City for
9491644-3342 the on -site user modifications. The potential users consist of
cemetery, street parkway and median landscaping, two
Construction Cost: $450,000 possible school sites, a church and a park. Tetra Tech has also
prepared an Engineer's Report for the project.
Completion Date: Pending
Rio Hondo Reclamation After the Century Phase II was under construction, Tetra
Program Tech, Inc. was awarded a contract to evaluate the next phase
of the project. This phase, called the Rio Hondo segment, was
Central Basin Municipal hydraulically modeled using the Kentucky Pipe program. The
Water District modeling established pipe sizes, pumping plant performance
17140 S. Avalon Boulevard criteria, and system pressures.
Carson, CA 90746
Based on the hydraulic analysis, Tetra Tech, Inc. designed 36
Contact: Paul Shoenburger miles of reclaimed water transmission mains ranging from 6
3101217-2222 to 36 inches in diameter. This program is capable of
delivering 49 CFS to reclaimed water users in the
Construction Cost: $14,000,000 metropolitan Los Angeles area and required coordination with
11 different municipalities and more than 20 different water
Completion Date: 1997 purveyors.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Page 3
• • . . a �
a • , a b�. i •S' a a •
Reclaimed Water Main Since 1990, Tetra Tech, Inc. has worked with the City of
Glendale in the development of its reclaimed water program.
City of Glendale Phase I of the Verdugo Canyon Reclaimed Water Program
141 North Glendale Avenue consists of 22,000 lineal feet of 12-inch through 30-inch
Glendale, CA 91206 reclaimed water distribution piping. This phase delives 3,000
acre-feet per year of reclaimed water within the City.
Contact: Donald Froelich
8181548-2137 Tetra Tech, Inc. designed Phases II and III which involved
approximately 20,000 lineal feet of 16-inch reclaimed water
Construction Cost: $3,300,000 distribution piping. Tetra Tech is currently providing
Construction Management services for this project.
Completion Date: 1996
Chaparral Pines Provided engineering services for the reclaimed waterline for
Community & Golf Course lake replenishment and golf course irrigation serving the 600-
acre Chaparral Pines Community and Golf Course. The
Town of Payson and project includes 19,000 linear feet of 8-inch reclaimed water
Northern Gila County main.
Sanitary District
303 North Beeline Highway This project provided some interesting challenges such as
Payson, AZ 85541 coordination with the design of two pump stations, three
sewer lift stations, five domestic water wells, and a reservoir.
Contact: Joel Goode It required the designation of an alignment within a congested
6021474-5257 public utility easement heavily traveled roads including in
and across two state highways. It also required approval of
Construction Cost: $663,000 several agencies including Arizona Department of
Transportation, Northern Gila County Sanitary District,
Completion Date: 1995 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the Town
of Payson, Arizona.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Page 4
s •
• j ' 1
a �.
��, i'l.
1 • � •x v
HrR-au-ue lUlr UL:Zd FM TETRA TECH PASADENA FAX NO. 626 963 0042
P. 02/06
Kick -Off Meeting
A kick-off meeting with the design tram and City staff will be scheduled. The meeting will review
proposed pipeline alignment, connection to the existing reclaimed water pipeline, City requirements
and standards for design and drafting, CBMWD design standards and specifications, excavation,
trench resurfacing requirements, traffic control, and design and construction schedule.
Tetra Tech, Inc. will prepuce a meeting agenda outlining the Proposed discussion items. Meeting
minutes will be prepared and distributed for review and conllllent,
Alignment Study
'Petra Tech, Inc. proposes to conduct an alignment study to determine if there is room to construct the
proposed 18-inch reclaimed water pipeline in Boyle Avenue. The study will require investigation of
the utilities in Boyle Avenue, and a doterminntion of their location and depth. We will develop sweet
cross sections at critical intervals in order to make a recommendation on the alignment. Our analysis
may determine that an alternative alignment is required. If an alternate alignment needs to be
explored, Tetra Tech will propose a fee for the additional study. 'Petra Tech, Inc. will present the
results of the alignment study in a technical memorandum.
1100fy Researelt
Utility research for the portion of pipeline in 50`u' Street (new design) will include initial contact with
each utility ideritifted by Underground Service Alert (USA) as !laving facilities within the project
limits. Tctra Tech, Inc. will conduct a job walk to look for aboveground indication of additional
utilities or to confirm the location of the ittilities being investigated. After the information is shown
on the plans along with the proposed pipeline alignment, Tetra Tech, Inc. will determine which
utilities require potholing. After USA has marked the areas for the potholes and after the potholes
have been completed, the drawings will be checked against the USA markings and pothole
information. In addition, a follow up submittal will be made to each of the utilities for verification of
their utilities as shown on the drawings.
For tune. portion of the pipeline in Randolph Street and Boyle Avenue it will be necessary to update the
previously completed design. This will include identifying any new utilities within the project areas
since 1994. Similar to the utility research for the new design, utilities will be conlacled and
information regarding their facilities will be verified. flans will be updated with any new or revised
information. A follow up submittal will be made to each of the utilities for verification.
Field Survey
Tetra Tech, Inc. proposes to perform a design survey Mona the proposed 1.8 rllile pipeline alignment.
The dcsiL n survey will accomPli�h the following: 1) establish horizontal control for the entire length
Of the Project by defining street centerline; 2) check elevations along the previously surveyed portion
Of the alig.nmcnt in Randolph Street and Boyle Avenue; 3) establish street centerline elevations at SO -
foot intervals along 50i1' Street; and 4) locale physical characteristics along 50"' Street such as
CITY ot' 'Vt: NON SCOPE, OF WORK
Reclaimed Watci t'ipelinc Extension Page t
fiFK-Ju-(J2 WE U2:23 PM TETRA TECH PASADENA FAX NO. 626 963 0042 P. 04/06
Geotechnical investigation
Tetra 'Tech, Inc. will subcontract with Lowney Associates for the geotechnical investigation. The
investigation will include seven borings. The borings will require. traffic control, health and safety
plan, plaotojol)Wttion detector (11ID) for volatile organics, pavement coring and patching (backfilling
with soil cuttings) and conventional geotechnical lesling.
Plan Submittals
The following Submittals will be made:
50% Dosign Review Package
The 50% drawings will show utility locations and the proposed pipeline alignment on the base plan.
Five (5) sets of plan will he submitted to the City for review, One plan review meeting will be
scheduled with City staff to review comments.
9Q%0 T)csiyn Review Package
City eornntents will be incorporated on the project plans. flans will be completed to 90%. Utility
pothole information, utility depth and pipeline profile will be added. Plans will be completed
showing dctails of connections, valvos, fittings, service location, typical trench sections, and
pavement resurfacing rcquircrnents. Five (5) sets of plans will be submitted for review and comment.
One plan review meeting will be scheduled with (Ile City staff to review comments.
jual i)esign.Packape
90% Review Comments will be incorporated in this final plan. Final mylar original drawings will be
prepared, signed and submitted to the City. AutoCAD files will be submitted on CD diskette.
Cost , stintate
An Pngittcer's estimate of construction cost will be prepared and submitted with the final plans and
specifications package. The preliminary construction cost estimate will be based on latest published
construction cost data and past Tetra 'Tech, Inc, projects.
Md Assistance
Bid assistance will be provided to respond to technical questions during the bid process. Tetra Tech,
Inc. will review bids and make recommendation for award to the lowest responsible bidder. Tetra
Tech, Inc. will respond to technical questions resatlling from conditions discovered in the bidding
process. Rcvi.sccl details and clarifications will be provided as required to meet field conditions.
C i'ry OF VFRNON ScoPF, of WORK
Reclaitlival W;iwr Pipeline Extension Page. 3
,. � -
eS. ,`i•
�' � a . ` '
rtrK—Ju—uL tut: ue:;�3 PM TETRA TECH PASADENA FAX NO. 626 963 0042 P. 05/06
Construction Assistance
Tetra Tech, Inc, will attend pre-congImCdon and construction progress meetings as required. Shop
drawing and material submittals will be reviewed for compliance witli specification requirements. A
maximum of six meetings are included in our not -to -exceed fee. Tctrd Tech, Inc. will provide part
time assistance during construction to assure contractor follows requirements of plans and
spccitie0ri0ns. Contractor's installation procedures will be monitored and reviewed when requested
by the City. Final revisions to project drawings will be made based on construction installation
charl-cs 111ado in c110 field.
CITY 01 VERNON Smelt Ole WORK
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Fxrensiun Page 4
r
a i a s
+ a
� •
�
a M �
•
� �
y 1�
a �
�
r ♦
•
1 i
+
i J
a
a
m
N
II
N
N
0
� m
E N
m
m
N m
�n
m
N
Q
m
m
¢
m
�
E
m
w
O
a`
v
o
O
a
W
F W
w J
W p
_
a
U)
N
m
O
a
Zw
Z — _
O W
N
a
D
O
a
a
D
Z W N
m
m
m
¢—Z
w a O
o
¢
0
¢
0
¢
m
>¢U)ui
O , W
¢p
Q
o
m
a
�3°
50U
W
a
2
¢O
J (f
C) a
w
cl
0
N
c
F
E
�
N
m
E
m
c
(n
2
m
C
m �
C
-
J
C
1
N
.Q
m
a
C
C
g
T
U
a
m
N
m
w
m
m
m
i0
a�
°
a�
m
_
a
o
U
m
E
E
c
m
c
¢
2
'�
0
n
_g
m
m
u
o
m
m
m
.
m
H
o
m
y
¢
m
n
m
I¢
d
n
m
E
2
c
No
Z
Y
0
0
<
C[
iZ
a
U
a`
m
I U
a
a
U
ii
C o
F-
F
F
a`o
-
s,
�
Y
I
Vf
kit'
�f'
S.
1
{
13
' -•'.
f
I 7
c
fa7
�
t
�
r
a
1
3 ,
r
r !
,
-
i
!T..- .-
Our estimated not -to -exceed fee for the design and bidding assistance of the MGS Reclaimed Water
Pipeline Extension is $130,288. This fee does not include pothole investigation subconsultant
services. The estimated not -to -exceed fee for assistance during construction is $37,552.
Included are Tetra Tech's detailed manhour spreadsheet and hourly charge rate and expense
reimbursement schedule for 2002.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT FEE
Reclaimed Water Pipeline Extension Page 1
�
�
.
e + •
i � a •
•
♦
,�
� 1
�'p`wW ii MT�'1� tin 1, r
'S�
n`* ��'� +*�
i.•"
... 2. I..t... _ _! :!tiE
EXHIBIT B
'a j �t
•.
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
it
4 April 25, 2002
Mr. Chuck Montoya
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Reference: Proposal for Vernon Booster Pump Station
Dear Mr. Montoya:
Tetra Tech, Inc. enthusiastically submits our proposal for the Vernon Booster Pump Station and
facilities. The design and construction of the Booster Pump Station along with the many other skills
and experience required for this project are assets that Tetra Tech takes pride in owning. The
proposed Tetra Tech project team has been performing preliminary design investigations, design, and
construction management services in Central Basin Municipal Water District since the creation of the
reclamation system. Our expertise and knowledge in the area of water reclamation makes us ideally
sited for this project.
An Experienced Project Team — Our Senior Manager, Mr. Terry Kerger, has over 30 years of
experience in water facility engineering. Our Preliminary Design Investigation and Final Design
engineers, Mr. Ken Berard and Ms. Elisa Ventura have over 25 years of experience in water
reclamation facility planning and design. In addition, all Tetra Tech team members have recycled
water planning, design and construction experience. This experience is necessary for the design and
construction in addition to making certain that all foreseeable potential issues are resolved prior to
bidding.
We believe our technical experience and team approach is critical to the success of this project. All of
our key team members and subconsultants have worked together previously on other similar projects
and have all work in Central Basin MWD service area.
Our Commitment to the Project — Upon the City's Notice -to -Proceed, we are ready to begin
immediately. We are fully committed and able to supply the hours estimated, or more if required. To
completed this project within the schedule. We have demonstrated in the past our ability to prepare
high quality bidding documents under a very tight schedule.
Familiar with Central Basin MWDs' Standards — Our staff has previously completed the design
and construction management of the only two pump stations in Central Basin MWD (Vernon
Connector Unit — Cudahy Pump Station and Rio Hondo Pump Station). In addition, our staff
4
3280 East Foothill Boulevard, Suite 350, Pasadena, CA 91 107
Tel 626.683.0066 Fax 626.683.0060
www.tetratech.com
�l
Ll
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Mr. Chuck Montoya
April 25, 2002
Page 2
completed the first and recent Master Plan update for Central Basin MWD in August 2000. We are
familiar with Central Basin MWDs' recycled specifications and standards. We plan to make use of
this past history and drawing library to minimize the preliminary design investigation and final design
effort.
Our goal with this proposal to demonstrate our dedication, commitment, quality, and eagerness to
serve you in an effort to continue our long lasting relationship. We want to thank you for giving us
the opportunity to propose and look forward to completing this assignment for you. Please do not
hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or desire additional information.
Senior
JR:cab
\\NTSOI PAS\wpmisc\prop02\p-039ev\letter.doc
c Marc Sema, CBMWD
4
Our work plan will include scheduling an initial project kick-off meeting with the City of Vernon
(Vernon) and Central Basin Municipal Water District (District) to obtain available data on the
existing distribution system and proposed project sites. We will focus on two sites that have been
identified by Vernon and the District, one on the south side of Hollydale Park and the other along
Orange Avenue, south of Century Boulevard. We will then proceed with a systematic approach to
collecting data, including assessor maps, utilities, and permitting requirements through contact with
local governments and regulatory agencies.
Concurrently, we will perform the hydraulic analysis for preliminary sizing of the project facilities as
well as a surge analysis for the recommended pump station and pipeline. We will develop schematic
site plans and determine whether the proposed sites are adequate for the location of the proposed
pump station. We will coordinate with the local city representatives in obtaining site availability and
cost data from the landowners.
We will summarize our findings in a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) that will include a facility site
plan, a description of the operation and controls, a preliminary construction cost estimate and
schedule for each of the two sites. The PDR will make recommendations on the proposed facilities.
Once a site has been selected, Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) will complete a field survey to establish
horizontal control and elevations for the design. The field survey data will be compiled and a base
map will be developed. Easements and existing utilities and appurtenances will be plotted for a base
plan.
Critical utility locations will be potholed during design. We will prepare a list of the utilities we
consider critical and submit it to Vernon and the District for concurrence on which utilities should be
potholed during design. Less critical utilities will be left for potholing prior to construction by the
contractor. Non -critical utilities will not be potholed. In addition, Tetra Tech will do a thorough field
investigation of the site for evidence of other utilities or appurtenances that may not have been shown
on plans and to confirm the accuracy of record data.
Plans will include the following:
• Site Improvements, Yard Piping, Grading and Paving, Landscaping and Irrigation
• Booster Pump Station Building Construction and Access
• Pump Installation and Piping
• Pump Station Ventilation
• Electrical Lighting, Power, Controls and Telemetry
Plans, specifications, bid proposal documents will be prepared and submitted to both Vernon and the
District for review and comments at 50%, 90% and 100% completion. Tetra Tech will meet with
Vernon and the District to discuss comments. Both Vernon and the District's comments will be
incorporated in final plans and specification documents. Original documents will be signed and
provided to both Vernon and the District for bidding.
Engineer's estimate of construction cost will be prepared based on historical construction cost data
for similar Tetra Tech projects. Costs for each item will be compared using Engineering News
Record (ENR) index value. If necessary, material and labor cost will be verified with local
contractors. A construction cost estimate may be prepared in the same format as the bid proposal for
comparison of bid prices.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT APPROACH
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 1
s
�a ♦° � Y 1 • s �
a
'
;' � +i •. `' :� i '[::Z.'. ,i;2..i' ., ._ (_ ..r ;.; .'fib`+ � b : n'� �'d•,
x • 'Iij4 .x ivf-is
CA: 40f
f.
=,sir 0 1
510, o 1 Mo v quiq ., . et . 1 >,ti.'ijl...1 A
..t..in, vom-
r�
;Ir_: '_ ,. ':S'...k 1�!Ff.. S3_"Ps tr�.•.,. .. _ '':J, t1 '.s.:'i� .. .. ..:::;
..i` ,?S.in!My, a
t ,. .. .. +. .., •-. - l'._s;: � �; .. 't::fi F? t. �r:' :E:... .. v ?.1. !{.ark. '
. _ .. � .. F't.t J s. L•.... .- : �i:. , .. +ii :t. `t: �FY p r:e e, Y�.:.i!-'it. .....idrl
-v haw i('S to:._' t:: '>v s t .. `i i . i, i:3!'i: RKI
not 100,
ii' 1I' _ • r3„ i ie ?I.''..$$/�+t$6c'. s'3G a:t
i diW amino no ,Gf
.. - s r .:1 - .. _ .zs"t y. �It. i`>? ._ .. .1 • :F :f� ... ... 2 [:'�: !1.'--F�i.j�
.. •�:.r - ��''', fir.
11
E
1
A
SENIOR MANAGER
Terry Kerger — Mr. Kerger will be the Senior Project Manager in charge of the project. Mr. Kerger
will be the person responsible for the delivery of the proposed services. The Senior Project Manager
is responsible for the overall execution of the project including financial resources, office and field
staff. The Senior Project Manager is responsible for assuring the appropriate staff is available for
assignment, the staff completes their assignments on schedule, management of the project budget,
overall, quality review, and coordination of project goals and submittals with both the City of Vernon
(Vernon) and Central Basin Municipal Water District (District) project managers. Our project team
organization chart indicates the Senior Project Manager will work directly with the design engineers.
This organization facilitates preparation and review of technical data required for incorporation in the
project plans, technical specifications and engineers' construction cost estimate.
DESIGN ENGINEERS
Ken Berard — Mr. Berard will be the Project Engineer responsible for the Preliminary Design
Investigation. Ken will be working on the data research and review, siting investigation, design
criteria development, facility development/site plan, and system control. Ken will be working very
close with Terry Kerger and Elisa Ventura in order to facilitate a positive location for the Vernon
Booster Pump Station.
Elisa Ventura — Ms. Ventura will be the lead design engineer for this Vernon Booster Pump Station.
Elisa will be responsible for evaluating the hydraulics of the existing system and preparing
calculations to properly select booster pumping equipment meeting all required system conditions.
Elisa will be responsible for coordinating the preparation of the booster station plans and
specifications.
John Robinson — Mr. Robinson will be a Project Engineer responsible for the Permits and Utilities for
the Preliminary Design Investigation as well as a Project Engineer responsible for the pressure
reducing station in the final design. John will be responsible for the utility investigation, permitting
and preliminary construction cost estimate. John will also be responsible for coordinating the
preparation of the pressure reducing station plans, specifications and final construction cost estimate.
Bob Parsons — Mr. Parsons will be the design engineer for the booster station electrical power,
lighting controls and telemetry equipment. Bob will be responsible for coordinating any change in
electrical service requirements, preparation of the pump power and control plans and technical
specification. Bob will also provide the construction cost estimate for the electrical work items.
Dale Wah — Mr. Wah will be the design engineer for the structural design of the booster station
building. Dale will be responsible for the building plan, details, structural calculations, technical
specifications and construction cost estimate for building construction. This structure will be very
similar to our past projects for the District including Rio Hondo Pump Station in Central Basin and
Hyperion Pump Station in West Basin Municipal Water District.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM & QUALIFICATIONS
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page I
rt �qT�
•�� 4 � '"�'f � e � � � '�. •"ram �� �N� ', � ,�?2 � `+ �r� 4^„..* �� � �
0:51 11A A 111 q a+-.
• .. _, :fir t -.t":. '. .N.. ,.. 43t:, _. _... .. _„_
+,'(
1. _ i;..i7. U..
.. - .... •; t a1C , i'3^. 1'i; _-fa. .. ,- l: _ ._. -,.. ,r, ) vurn, any! wSOM
.. c. 'St '�; ., i�.:-.. ."i #. ? fr J=) : �. �F i ., �. .. -� .... �ii• ... � S. . ',Na'x .. ..
ii$; .d
�i- .>:• t7[l zr' � �`;'' ii1 :YfT_ ?: `9. .. '. >.. `'3y'tf.
AwR
>
tr S -
A
1
A
Louis Yu — Mr. Yu who is Tetra Tech's Chief Process Engineer will provide the quality control
review at various key points of the project progress as outlined in our company policy. Louis will not
be closely involved with the project will conduct four quality review for this project. The first and
second review will be conducted at the completion of the 75-percent preliminary design investigation
and the completion of the 100-percent Preliminary Design Report. The second and third quality will
be conducted at the completion of the 50-percent final design and the completion of the 100-percent
Final Design.
SUBCONSULTANTS
Geotechnical Subconsultant — Geotechnical services to determine soil bearing capacity for booster
station footing will be provided by our subconsultant Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Potholing Subconsultant — Potholing services to determine utility information of potential impacted
utilities and tie-in locations will be provided by our subconsultant Saf-r-Dig Utility Surveys, Inc.
Surge Subconsutlant — Surge analysis to determine recommended pipeline and facility analysis will
be provided by our subconsultant Flow Science, Incorporated.
CITY OF VERNON PROJECT TEAM & QUALIFICATIONS
Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 2
P
a
{ + 4 J i • a
,a •a • E�. is a a
�:� � & �Yt. �?`mdr,.e9` _s �;:QY..��'.as � ��.x, 'S7• �.. :'rSx'< a2u?=� .. �. �,. a d�.:'�'R ~;
m
r
I-
LU
LU
CO
Ot
4
i
1.
I
zi
A
l
Uo
gz
ts
QK
#.
r ti r •# • • ♦� s� w • •
-£
ra
s
�
i.e.,ku
i.e.,ku
sal
?
iv
'9 b
to
s.
'
��•� �
t this
Infrastructure Services Group T E T RA T E C H, INC.
• R.
R.�
t
.�
tt.:�9:"'&.-':vt.. sVs<e,.�X�..:-i;,. .,_.. . z.'a:. _�.g�. '^i,,?.-«@-`.�^:F ::.'3$;'-:tom'.-.htM,;,;-. :. � J:-i`.-��+�'ia..4,.3;u?:i��rX'F€o'!_-:'
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Terry L. Kerger, P.E. failure alarms. Engine start and stop signals supplied from
discharge pressures switch gauges.
• Zones III and IV Booster Stations, Rowland Water District —
Project Manager for the design of these two facilities. The
former was a remodel of an existing station (add two at 600
gpm) and the latter involved a new facility inside a building
(three at 500 gpm).
• Reclaimed Pump Station, Industry — Project Manager of a
facility with seven pumps and 17,000 gpm to provide
reclaimed water to four purveyors. Project included a masonry
building.
• La Vina Booster Stations, Lincoln Avenue Water Company —
Project Manager for the design of three booster stations to
serve a private water company. The capacities are 2,000,
2,000, and 1,000 gpm. Two are located inside buildings.
• El Rio Booster Station, United Water Conservation District —
Project Engineer for a 23,700 gpm booster station capable of
pumping as low as 0.2 cfs with bypass facilities and variable
speed drives on all units. Project included a separate electrical
building.
• Century Reclaimed Water Project, Central Basin Municipal
Water District — Involved approximately 26 miles of
reclaimed water pipeline ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-
inch in diameter.
Area —
• Industry Hills Civic -Recreation -Conservation
Principal designer to this award -winning project. Services
including two 2.5 MG water storage reservoirs, two 6500 gpm
pumping stations, and six miles of 36-inch reclaimed water
transmission main. He was responsible for the design of the
telemetry and control system including central control and
remote sites for three reservoirs and three pump stations.
• Rio Hondo Reclaimed Water Project, Central Basin
Municipal Water District — Involved approximately 33 miles
of reclaimed water pipeline ranging in size from 8-inch to 24-
inch in diameter.
• Pomona/Walnut/Rowland Joint Water Commission —
Relocation of five miles of 54-inch pipeline.
• City of Glendale — Design of ten miles of 34-inch to 36-inch
reclaimed water pipeline involving hydraulic investigation.
• City of El Monte — Replacement and upgrading of 4,500 feet
of pipeline due to excessive leaks.
• City of Lakewood — Replacement of distribution system
pipelines due to aggressive soils and pipeline corrosion
failures. Project was implemented in three phases for budget
purposes.
• San Gabriel County Water District — Replacement of
deteriorated distribution pipelines and extension of
transmission pipelines to improve transmission of well
production to meet District's service demands.
• City of Cerritos — Replacement of 1,500 feet of distribution
piping and services. New distribution piping and services were
located in the street in front of residences. Existing pipeline
and easements crossing back yards of residences were
abandoned.
:J
I.\prop02\p-039evVCerger.doc
as �
� $ r t '
• r
�
k e';
tea
}
e
s!kr
.6..
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard Mr. Berard has extensive experience in many facets of
engineering. Mr. Berard has performed
Project Manager water/wastewater
studies ranging from complete water master plans to
numerous
efficiency studies. His design experience includes preparing plans,
specifications, and cost estimates for sewers, reservoirs, pump
stations, wells, pipelines, chlorination facilities, and pressure
EDUCATION: reducing facilities. Mr. Berard also has extensive experience in
hydraulic modeling. He has used and is familiar with H2O NET,
California State Polytechnic Cybernet, EPA NET, FAAST, Kentucky Pipe, and Waterworks
University, Pomona, B.S. Civil computer programs. In addition, Mr. Berard is familiar with other
Engineering, 1986 computer programs including AutoCAD, Excel, Lotus 1-2-3,
Storm Plus (for open channel flows), and others. Rounding out Mr.
Berard's experience is work he has done in inspection, construction
administration, shop drawing review, and plan checking.
REGISTRATION:
Registered Civil Engineer SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
California No. 45499
(Pump Station)
• Sun Village Pump Station, Los Angeles County Department
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: of Public Works — Project Engineer for the design of a three
vertical turbine pump 2,000 gpm pump station, with provisions
American Water Works for two additional pumps enclosed in masonry and wood roof
Association structure.
• Non -Potable Water Systems Improvements, Navy —
Inland County Water Association Twentynine Palms Marine Base -- Project Engineer for plans,
specifications, and cost estimate for non -potable water system
improvements including over 30,000 feet of 6-inch through 16-
inch water main, a 3,600 gpm vertical turbine pump station,
1,500 gpm axial flow propeller low head pump, 550 gpm
vertical turbine pump station, 0.4 and 0.5 MG steel reservoirs,
and a 60 acre turf irrigation system.
• Reservoir 4A and Pump Plant No. 6, La Habra Heights
County Water District — Design Engineer for the plans
specifications and cost estimates including a cathodically
protected 3.0 MG steel reservoir on a piling foundation and a
1,500 gpm pump station with two vertical turbine pumps. Also
required were a retaining wall up to 40 feet high around 70%
of the project, 500 feet of RCP storm drain, and 1,400 feet of
8-inch and 16-inch water main. A planted and irrigated
screening berm mitigated visual impacts.
• El Rio Facilities Improvement, United Water Conservation
District — Project Engineer for portions of this project. The
major components of the project were a 30,000 gpm variable
speed pump station with 4 vertical turbine pumps, new 8.4 MG
floating cover reservoir, improvements to an existing floating
cover reservoir, settling basin, and 2,700 feet through 42-inch
steel water main.
City of South Gate — Design for three 1.67 MG reservoirs, a
7,500 gpm pump station with chlorination and scrubbing
back-up
capabilities, and a natural gas/liquid propane gas
engine and generator.
• Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms — Design of 1,800
gpm supply of potable water. Project consisted of two separate
contracts; the fast being the design of three wells; and the
Mprop02�p03 hv\Berard. doc
Rev. 5/31/01
�
s •' r
♦ Y'
d •
a
•+' a'
a
.. .. ._
,+. •. i oi.!` \.:: is .. .f�'y
-• _
,
- ..R s.i'i'3S.' .,.. ...
� _ _. ai�T L"; .a f{'•. �.
k ::CS-�f?": ...
Y.
.,
1 tt
•-. -. FAA: �
.. :l +f�qi �y - -.
`t>f3}:,'.bg
.tr.
? , vt
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Kenneth R. Berard second consisting of three miles of piping, a pump house, and
well pump and motor. For the piping, an economic analysis
was conducted as part of the engineering design.
• Well No. 39, City of Ontario - Project Manager for completion
of the design and the construction administration for the
drilling and equipping of Well No. 39. A 350 hp motor was
used to drive the 1,000' deep, 3,000 gpm well. 150 lb chlorine
cylinders provided disinfection. The concrete block building
used to house the well and chlorination station included a
removable roof over the well. Due to aesthetic concerns, the
building included a courtyard for the well discharge piping.
• DesignlBuild, Well No. 20, City of Upland — Project Manager
for the design and construction administration for the drilling
and equipping of Well No. 20. Made applications for the
necessary permits including the Domestic Water Source
Assessment Program (DWSAP) portion of the State Health
14, Department permit. A 200 hp motor was used to drive the
1,000' deep, 1,200 gpm well. Disinfection was provided by an
on -site chlorine generator.
Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms — Design of 1,800
gpm supply of potable water. Project consisted of two separate
contracts; the first being the design of three wells; and the
second consisting of three miles of piping, a pump house, and
well pump and motor. For the piping, an economic analysis
was conducted as part of the engineering design.
(Water Master Plan)
• Water Master Plan, Mission Springs Water District — Project
Manager of a master plan that included an evaluation of the
water supply, distribution system and a hydrogeologic
assessment of the groundwater basin. The study planned for a
population that was projected to ultimately increase fourfold.
The water supply evaluation included groundwater and an
evaluation of future imported water for spreading. The
distribution system was comprised of three separate systems,
26 pressure zones, and 9,500 services. An efficiency
evaluation was performed for pump stations as well as a
reconfiguration of pressure zones. The hydrogeological
evaluation of the groundwater basin included identification of
potential well sites and short and long term assessments of
basin capacity and water quality.
• Water Master Plan, La Canada Irrigation District — Project
Manager of a master plan to address increased water demands
due almost entirely to redevelopment. The distribution system
included four pressure zones and 2,900 services. Surface
water, groundwater, and imported water supplies were
evaluated. The storage analysis and recommendation was
critical due to lack of sites for additional reservoirs. H2O Net
software was used to develop the calibrated hydraulic model.
• City of Long Beach — Project Engineer for developing the
8,000 pipe model. The H2O Net model was developed with a
link to the City's GIS system and GIS data was used in the
development of the model.
Vprop02Np-039cv\8erard.doc
Rev. 5/31/01
a -....,a' ...
.E
w 4
Jr
is ... ..
,kyi_rTf
t
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services
Group
Elisa Ventura, P.E.
Ms. Ventura has over 15 years of experience in the development
Project Engineer
of conceptual studies for domestic water and reclaimed water
systems, as well as final design for water distribution and
transmission systems, sewer conveyance facilities, and utility
relocations.
EDUCATION:
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Stanford University
M.S. Civil Engineering, 1986
0 Recycled Water Project, Phase I, Long Beach Water
Department — Project Engineer responsible for the design of
Loyola Marymount University
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1985
approximately 27,000 feet of 8- and 6-inch diameter
reclaimed water pipeline, a 7,200 gpm pump station and
potable -to -reclaimed water reservoir conversion.
Transmission Pipelines Phase IA, West Basin Municipal
REGISTRATION:
Water District — Project required extensive utility research,
alignment study, alternative alignment cost estimates, plan
Registered Civil Engineer
and profile, and permit coordination. Participated in the
California No. 46894
design of approximately 4.5 miles of 24-, 16-, and 8-inch
diameter pipe through the heavily congested Los Angeles
Airport area.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
0Pomona Pump Station No. 2 — Project Engineer for the
design of Pomona Pump Station No. 2. Developed
American Society of Civil
preliminary design report and completed design of the 4,800
Engineers — Los Angeles Section
gpm capacity, below grade sewage pump station and 320
linear feet of force main.
Tau Beta Pi — National
0 Water Reuse Feasibility Study for the City of Diamond Bar
Engineering Society
— Project Engineer for developing a program for the phased
implementation of an expanded water reuse system, including
facility requirements and cost estimates for reclaimed water
supply, storage, pumping and distribution.
Water Replenishment District of Southern California
Chandler Quarry Groundwater Recharge Feasibility Study -
Phase H — Project Manager for the study involving the
examination of several alternative sources of water, including
storm, imported and reclaimed water, to recharge the West
Coast Basin.
Orange County Reclamation and Reuse Feasibility Study —
The goal of the study was to identify regional facilities which
would increase water reclamation potential in Orange
County.
• Hollywood Park Operations Company Storm Drain
Modifications — The project is under design for compliance
with Regional Water Quality Control Board discharge
requirements. Project includes design of 500 feet of sewer
and force main and 600 gpm pump station.
• Title XVI Feasibility Analysis for Countywide Water
'
Recycling Program, Phase I, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
and Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District —
Project Engineer for the feasibility study which investigated
water reuse opportunities in Sacramento County. The study
included an analysis of existing and future regulatory
requirements and projected water supplies, and developed
alternative recycled water projects that may respond to future
needs for alternative methods of treatment or supplies.
1Aprop02\p-039ev\V mturadx
ra
♦ a , • � •
� a • a
•a •
� p
w
.F izii—
n
♦ JI $� - rr. I_. .�}Y �'�'Ti '.. t. .. � .. a
FJ� �Ci`. �tr .~ L X � � ;:'�
t
t
JA
4.G,.
T
`t ' ' _.Sv..
v
r
jT y - : -: t Y ♦Ya 4.. :. S s.
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Elisa Ventura, P.E. Emergency Waterline Connections, West Basin Municipal
Water District — To provide an emergency backup water
supply to the California Water Service Company in the event
other sources of supply are interrupted.
• Various Domestic Water System Improvements, Orange
County Water District — Services included the following:
— Category III Water System Improvements involving
computer modeling for the existing water distribution
system and the preparation of a predesign for facilities to
achieve adequate fire flows to the area, and preliminary
report, and construction plans and specifications for
more than 7,000 feet of 8-inch diameter distribution
pipeline.
— Category V Water System Improvements encompassing
design, including preparation of construction plans and
specifications, and engineering services during bidding
and construction for more than 4,000 feet of 8-inch
diameter distribution pipeline, service laterals and
connections.
-
Category VI Water System Improvements involving the
preparation of construction plans for over 5,000 feet of
8-inch diameter distribution pipeline.
4
ItI:\prop02\p-039ev\Vendvad0e
a +
N � •
a y
a a
� f • a j
� � a
�:
I\�.
;' ,
�..,
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
John Robinson
Mr. Robinson's experience encompasses a variety of wastewater
Project Engineer
engineering, water reclamation and master plan projects. The
clients he has provided services to are mostly municipalities and
cities in California and Arizona. Process and mechanical design,
feasibility/master studies and planning, preparation of study and
design reports as well as construction plans and specifications, and
EDUCATION:
construction management are all included in the services he has
provided.
B.S., Civil Engineering, California
State University, Long Beach, 1993
Mr. Robinson has served as both a project engineer and program
manager for several projects. As a project manager, he has on
numerous occasions successfully led my project teams to complete
REGISTRATION:
the work within the project budgets and time schedules and with a
high degree of responsiveness to the clients. His project experience
Engineering -in -Training, California,
includes municipal wastewater and recycled water pipelines, pump
1997,
stations and treatment facilities, master plans for water, sewer and
Registration No. 109865
recycled water extensive recycled water customer coordination.
:1
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
American Society of Civil Engineers 0Water/Wastewater Master Plan, City of Oceanside — Lead
American Water Works Association Engineer for the sewer remodeling task for the City of
Oceanside Water and Wastewater Master Plan. Evaluated
several available computer sewer modeling software
packages for purchase by the client. Developed a computer
sewer model of all sewer pipes 10 inches and larger in the
master planning area, utilizing HydraGraphics 20. Developed
flow projections based on existing land use and zoning data.
Developed and implemented a series of model computer runs
to map deficiencies in the collection system. Conceptualized
several alternatives for relief of major capacity deficiencies
and analyzed their feasibility through computer model runs.
Assisted in preparation of the CIP and Master Plan reports,
and trained the client's staff to use HydraGraphics.
• West Basin Municipal Water DistrictlCity of Los Angeles
Department of Water & Power Water Recycling Program
Master Plan — Project Engineer on a comprehensive recycled
water master plan within the WBMWD and LADWP service
areas. The requirements of the master plan included analysis
of recycled water markets and potential recycled water
facilities for expansion with consideration of 14 water
utilities including LADWP in a study area covering over 200
square miles and including 18 cities. The master plan was
conducted to identify and evaluate facilities for expansion,
rank facilities based on economics, demand and other factors
and develop a phasing/implementation plan for over 1,900
potential and non -potential customers with a potential
recycled water demand totaling nearly 65,000 acre-feet per
year.
• Central Basin Municipal Water District Water Recycling
Program Master Plan — Project engineer to analyze the
existing operations and possible modifications or system
1:1prop02\p-039evUtobinsonJ.doc
Ila
+d1:,-
4.
t z
..
..
Awl
01...
.t# . f
..
PAX
a-
„`�"'w�'
bay i
_
c
-4' _ . �1 .-.tip__ t -'f
..
r. .w •r..�
..
IN
r?
if 9 t
..
hit
,.,
x
NQ
k
NNW,TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Robert B. Parsons, P.E., E.E.
Electrical/Instrumentation
Engineer
�j
EDUCATION:
California State University Long
Beach
B.S. Electrical Engineering
REGISTRATION:
Electrical Engineer
California No. E9810
Arizona No.
New Mexico No.
Colorado No.
Utah No.
Wyoming No.
Washington No.
Oregon No.
Mechanical Engineer
California No. M21096
New Mexico No.
Utah No.
:J
F7
Contractors Licenses
General Electrical C 10 and
Building B
L \prop02\p-039ev\parsons. doc
R07/01
Mr. Parsons is a highly skilled, multi -disciplined engineer,
accomplished in management, project planning and control,
systems design and project implementation. Extensive experience
in the preparation and implementation of construction documents
for wastewater and water plants, petroleum and chemical process
facilities, high-tech computer facilities, sensitive compartmented
information facilities, and multi -storied structures. Proficient in
the design of large and small power, control and life and safety
systems, with hands-on office and field experience in solving
engineering problems.
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
Huntington Library, Pasadena, CA - Designed a pump station
consisting of one 10-hp jockey pump, two 50-hp irrigation
pumps, and two 250-hp fire flow pumps. Pumps were
controlled automatically based on pressure using a PLC with
backup redundant controls for the fire flow pumps. Design
also included a 400-kw emergency generator to provide backup
power for a fire flow pump during an emergency.
La Habra Heights County Water District, La Mirada
Reservoir Replacement - Project consisted of the relocation
and replacement of the existing pump station with a new pump
station and chemical facility. Design included three 75-hp
pumps and associated controls, lights and receptacles, chemical
injection power and controls, reservoir controls, and relocation
of the existing telemetry system.
• Vallecitos Water District, Wulff Pump Station Replacement -
Project consists of the relocation and replacement of the
existing pump station with a new pump station. Design
includes the relocation the existing three 75-hp motors, new
electrical service and motor control center, connection for a
portable emergency generator, new lights and receptacles,
interface with the reservoir controls, and relocation of the
existing telemetry system.
• Coachella Valley Water District, Canyons @ Bighorn 940
Booster Pump Station - Project consisted of three 50-hp
pumps and associated controls, reservoir controls, chemical
injection controls, and connection for a portable emergency
generator. All telemetry signals interfaced with the Owner -
supplied telemetry system.
• Second SDCE Pumping Station, Ramona Municipal Water
District, California - Project included three 125-hp pumps with
solid-state starters, hydrotank controls, provisions for portable
engine -generator, and lighting.
• Intake Pumping Station, City of Rockville, Maryland
project included three 250-hp pumps with one variable
frequency drive and solid-state starters, associated controls,
lighting, 2.4-kv and fiber-optic distribution from the treatment
plant. Fiber optics were utilized to transmit telephone, PLC,
and CCTV signals from the pumping station to a control
console at the treatment plant.
• Yorba Linda Water District Wells No. 11 - Project include the
replacement of the existing electrical and control system.
Design include a 250-hp pump with a solid-state starter and
TETRA TECH, INC.
lima I Infrastructure Services Group
Robert B. Parsons, P.E., E.E. associated controls and coordination with a new chemical
I facility which was in the middle of construction.
• Water Well No. 12, Quartz Hill Water District, California -
Project included a 150-hp pump with a solid-state starter and
provisions for a future chlorine pump.
• Water Well No. 13, City of Santa Paula, California - Project
included a 300-hp pump using a variable frequency drive and
associated controls, a chemical control panel, lighting, and
provisions for a portable engine -generator.
• Water Well No. 4, Los Alisos Water District, California -
Project included a 50-hp pump with a solid-state starter and
I associated controls.
• Water Well Site No. I and No. 2, Madero Ranchos,
California - Each site consisted of a 75-hp submersible pump
with a solid-state starter and associated controls, a chemical
control system, lighting, and provisions for a portable engine -
generator.
U
DV21p-039ev\pazsom doc
R07101
_ _
� _ z:,
,. � .
.. �
..
.
...:.
>t.
�.
..
...
., ,
�.
....�
't_.
_
TETRA TECH, INC.
I lrb
Infrastructure Services Group
Wd
Dale E. Wah, P.E., S.E. Mr. Wah heads the structural division of Tetra Tech with over 22
Chief Structural Engineer years of experience in the design of structural projects. He is
experienced in prestressed, poured -in -place, and tilt -up concrete,
masonry, steel, and wood frame design and construction. Mr. Wah
has been involved in the design of a number of multi -story office
buildings, school buildings, industrial warehouses, single family
EDUCATION: residential and condominium units, institutional facilities, pump
stations, steel and concrete reservoirs, storm drainage structures,
California State Polytechnic and underground vaults for both public agencies and private
University, Pomona developments. He has been involved in the design of dozens of
B.S. Civil Engineering, 1977 prestressed concrete highway bridges over rivers, flood control
channels, and interstate highways.
REGISTRATION: He has served a number of city and county agencies in providing
on -call structural engineering services on an as -needed, on -call
Registered Civil Engineer basis including the Los Angeles County Department of Public
California No. 30973 Works (Waterworks -Sewer Division), the County of Los Angeles
Community Development Commission (CDC), the Port of Long
Registered Structural Engineer
Beach, the Port of Los Angeles, the State of California Division of
California No. 2582
Arizona No. 31093 the State Architect (DSA), the City of Santa Ana and others.
SUMMARY OF RELATED EXPERIENCE:
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Mr. Wah has been involved in the design of over 50 pump/booster
stations, sewer lift stations, pressure reducing stations and flow
International Conference of Building control facilities. This has included both above grade and below
Officials (I.C.B.O.) grade facilities, some as deep as 25 feet.
Structural Engineers Association of
Appian Way Pumping Plant, City of Lomita, County of Los
Southern Califomia
Angeles - Partially buried reinforced masonry pump station
American Society of Civil Engineers with a gabled wood framed roof utilizing prefabricated wood
trusses. Facility also included handicap accessible restroom
American Institute of Steel facilities.
Construction Lower Salada and Del Avion Sewer Lift Stations, Moulton
Niguel Water District - Two above grade sewer lift stations
American Concrete Institute with below grade pump rooms and wet wells. Above grade
portion included sound isolated generator rooms. Construction
Tau Beta Pi
(All Engineering) is of reinforced masonry with a prefabricated trussed wood
roof for the above grade portion and cast -in -place reinforced
Chi Epsilon concrete for the below grade portions.
(Civil Engineering) Zone 6 Pump Station, Irvine Ranch Water District - Below
grade reinforced concrete pump station with multiple
equipment access openings in the roof slab and staircase access
from ground surface.
• Rolling Hills, Pacific Park and Sheephills Pump Stations,
Moulton Niguel Water District - Three separate pump station
facilities each similar in design and construction, each with
separate soundproof generator and pumping rooms.
Construction was of reinforced masonry design with a gabled
wood roof of prefabricated roof trusses.
• Bush Way Water Production Facility, City of Chandler, AZ -
Structural design of a 2,500 square foot, 5,000 gpm pump
station utilizing four vertical turbine pumps. The pump station
structure is constructed of concrete masonry block with a wood
framed roof and houses a pump room, diesel generator room,
1:VoP021j,039c n\W n &,
� : • y S • } A•
a
y• s
1
r
TETRA TECH, INC.
I
Tro Infrastructure Services Group
Tit
Dale E. Wah, P.E., S.E. electrical/instrumentation control room as well as restroom
facilities. Roof skylights over each pump were incorporated
into the design in order to provide maintenance access for each
of the pumps. The building design includes many exterior
architectural treatments to ensure its blending in with the
surrounding residential community such as a tile mansard roof
and ceramic tile wainscoat all around the perimeter of the
building. Mr. Wah served as the Principal Structural Engineer
on this project.
• Zone C Non -Potable Water Pump Station, Los Alisos Water
District, Lake Forest, CA - Structural design of an open air
PUMP station to accommodate two horizontal split case pumps
with a total pumping capacity of 4,500 gpm. The pump station
structure consists of cast -in -place concrete retaining walls at
three sides with a maximum height of 15 feet. The cast -in -
place concrete slab -on -grade not only serves as the floor of the
pump station, but also as the foundation for the retaining walls.
Mr. Wah served as the Principal Structural Engineer on this
project.
• Sun Village Pump Station, Los Angeles County Waterworks
District No. 40, Antelope Valley, CA — Structural Design of a
1,600 square foot, 3,300 gpm pump station utilizing 5 vertical
turbine pumps. The pump station structure is constructed of
concrete masonry block with a gabled wood framed trussed
roof and houses the pumps as well as the
electrical/instrumentation control panels. Roof skylights over
each pump were incorporated into the design in order to
Wah
provide maintenance access for each of the pumps. Mr.
served as the Principal Structural Engineer on this project.
• Santiago Hills Pump Station, Santiago County Water
District, Tustin, CA - Structural design of an 1,100 square
foot, 2,400 gpm pump station utilizing three vertical turbine
pumps. The pump station structure is constructed of concrete
masonry block with a wood framed roof and houses a pump
room, diesel generator room, as well as an
electrical/instrumentation control room. Roof skylights over
each pump were incorporated into the design in order to
provide maintenance access for each of the pumps. The
aesthetic design of the building includes low maintenance
standing seam metal deck mansard roof all around the
perimeter of the building. Mr. Wah served as the Principal
Structural Engineer on this project.
• Southridge Reclaimed Water Pump Station, Moulton Niguel
Water District, Mission Viejo, CA - Structural design of a
1,300 square foot pump station utilizing horizontal split case
pumps with a total pumping capacity of 6,400 gpm. The pump
station structure is constructed of concrete masonry block with
a gabled wood framed trussed tile roof and houses the pumps
as well as the electricaltinstrumentation control panels. Inlet
and discharge piping pipe trenches, covered with metal
grating, are incorporated into the design of the concrete floor
slab. Roof skylights over each pump were incorporated into
the design in order to provide maintenance access for each of
the pumps. Mr. Wah served as the Principal Structural
Engineer on this project.
1-*opO2"39cv\Wandoc
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Louis Y. Yu, P.E.
Tapia Sludge Pump Station No. 2, Las Virgenes Municipal
Water District — As a part of the Tapia Water Reclamation
Plant Expansion, designed the conversion of an aerobic sludge
digester tank into a 235 gpm sludge pump station. The unit
consisted of two sludge wet well and two 150 11P progressing
cavity pumps to pump undigested sludge from the treatment
plant to the sludge digesters at Rancho Las Virgenes, three
miles away from the plant. The sludge force main was an
8-inch ductile iron pipeline that traversed the rugged terrain of
Tapia County Park and the heavily traveled Las Virgenes
Road. Services provided included project management and
engineering during construction.
• North Richmond Pump Station, California — Design of a 300
cfs stormwater pump station serving the North Richmond area
near San Francisco. The pump station was equipped with four
natural gas engine driven vertical mixed flow pumps, standby
propane fuel system and 2,000 feet of 72-inch discharge force
main. The work performed included mechanical design and
field resident engineering during construction.
• Walker Street Well Reservoir and Pump Station, City of La
Palma — Project Manager and Design Engineer for a 2.0-
million gallon storage reservoir and a 3,900 gpm pump station.
The reservoir is an aboveground steel unit receiving water
from the Walker Well Pump. The pump station is equipped
with four horizontal split -case centrifugal pumps for pumping
the water from the reservoir into the City of La Palma water
distribution system. One water pump is equipped with a
variable frequency drive, while the other three are constant
speed units. Construction Management services were also
provided.
• Sludge Force Main, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District —
Project Manager for the design of three miles of 8-inch sludge
force main and a 250 gpm sludge pump station for the Las
Virgenes Municipal Water District. The force main delivers
raw sludge from the Tapia Water Reclamation Facilities to the
Rancho Las Virgenes sludge processing facilities.
• Sludge Force Main, South Coast Water District — Project
Manager for the design of five miles of 6-inch sludge force
main for the South Coast Water District. The pipeline delivers
raw sludge from the Coastal Treatment Plant to the Aliso
Water Management Agency's Joint Regional Treatment Plant
at Laguna Niguel, California.
• Water, Sewer and Reclaimed Water Pipelines, Various
Clients — Design Engineer for various conveyance pipeline
projects, encompassing the preparation of construction plans,
specifications and estimates, such as the following:
— 24-inch water transmission main of approximately 5,000
feet in length through the busy streets of Arcadia,
California;
— A 36-inch water transmission line for the City of St.
Petersburg, Florida.
— Various reclaimed water and sewer lines in California and
various regions of the United States.
1:\prop02\p-039ev\Yudoe
s
+A �
e .1�
o vb • a ¢
.. + +' �•
a a +
+
vw
- 1 .
t
`i
i�
.... .. .. c[. r
lf. I :s'
TIMOTHY KEUSCHER Geotechnical Engineering
Environmental Engineering
EDUCATION
University of California, Berkeley: M.S., Civil Engineering, 1993
Oregon State University: B.S., Geology, 1983
REGISTRATION
Civil Engineer: California No. 55027, 1995
California Registered Geotechnical Engineer, No. 2534, 2001
PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc., Senior Engineer, 1986 to date
BSK & Associates, Staff Geologist, 1985-1986
REPRESENTATIVE SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Keuscher has 17 years of experience in geotechnical and environmental engineering on projects
throughout the western United States, including waste disposal sites, commercial developments,
industrial plants, water treatment facilities, pipelines, and bridges. He has been responsible for
design and supervision of subsurface exploration programs, soil laboratory testing, report
preparation, and engineering analysis. He has participated in foundation studies, geologic hazard
evaluations, geophysical field studies, and slope stability analyses. His project management
experience includes designing and implementing cost-effective geotechnical and environmental
investigations; supervising staff, field crews, and drilling operations; preparing bid documents and
specifications; consulting with clients; and preparing cost estimates and work plans. Mr. Keuscher
has performed and evaluated construction and post -construction site monitoring and is
knowledgeable in construction techniques and requirements for engineering backfill, excavation and
backfill, and caisson and shoring construction. Mr. Keuscher is skilled in interpreting geologic and
hydrogeologic data; describing surface stratigraphic relationships using borehole data, downhole
geophysical methods, and trenchwall logging.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Eight Sewage Lift Stations and Associated Piping, Torrance, California: A geotechnical
investigation was conducted for eight lift stations and appurtenant piping. Preliminary
engineering studies revealed the need to improve the City's sewage system. Improvements
include reconstructing sewage lift stations and minor pipeline construction at eight locations with
the City's sewer system. Each lift station will consist of a pump station, a wet well, and
appurtenant piping and will be buried.
Mr. Keuscher supervised the exploratory drilling and laboratory testing program and performed
the engineering analyses. He also developed recommendations that included allowable bearing
capacities, settlement estimates, lateral earth pressures, resistance to lateral loads, and allowable
uplift resistance. The recommendations also included the placement and compaction of backfill
behind walls below grade, bedding and backfilling requirements for pipelines, and parameters for
temporary shoring design.
■ Municipal Water Reservoirs, Garden Grove, California: Performed a geotechnical study that
provided criteria for the design of three large water storage reservoirs, two pump stations, and
appurtenant piping for the City of Garden Grove's (the City) water supply system. The City
implemented a program to improve some of its water storage and delivery facilities to
LV rop021p-039ev\KEUSCHER.Gr I
r
TIM
OTHY KEUSCHER
Page 2
accommodate increased water demand from redevelopment, high-rise construction, and increased
population. The reservoir facilities will be located at two sites. One site will contain two, four -
million -gallon reinforced concrete rectangular reservoirs, a pump station, and piping. The
second site will contain one, five -million -gallon circular prestressed concrete reservoir, a pump
station, and piping. The pump stations will be constructed at -grade and the three reservoirs will
be buried approximately 15 feet below grade. Each site had different soil conditions requiring
different design considerations. At one site, compressible clays existed directly below the
proposed invert depth of a reservoir necessitating remedial design measures.
■ Mr. Keuscher supervised the exploratory drilling and laboratory testing program and performed
the engineering analyses. Laboratory tests characterized the strength and consolidation
characteristics of the soil materials at the two sites. Mr. Keuscher's duties included evaluating
site seismicity, performing settlement analysis, developing design recommendations and report
preparation. Design recommendations included developing foundations design parameters for
reservoir and pumping facilities; developing design parameters for reservoir walls below grade,
including static and dynamic lateral earth pressures, backfill criteria, and drainage requirements;
evaluating stability of temporary construction slopes and provide parameters for shoring design;
and developing earthwork specifications.
■ Storm Drain Pipeline, Long Beach, California: A geotechnical investigation was conducted for
a storm drain pipeline in the City of Long Beach. The pipeline will include two mainline storm
drains and four laterals, and consists of approximately 16,800 linear feet of 24- to 90-inch-
diameter reinforced concrete pipe and about 1700 linear feet of 10-foot-wide by 7-foot-high
reinforced concrete box. Invert depth of pipeline will be about 9 to 26 feet below existing street
grade. The investigation was performed in accordance with specific guidelines by the Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works for drainage facilities.
■ Mr. Keuscher supervised the drilling and exploratory laboratory testing programs and performed
the engineering analyses. He developed design recommendations that included lateral earth
pressures, resistance to lateral loads, allowable uplift resistance, bearing capacity, and settlement
estimates. In addition, he provided recommendations for temporary shoring design, temporary
dewatering, and bedding and backfilling criteria of the pipeline.
■ Modesto Water Treatment Plant, Modesto, California: Geomatrix Consultants performed a
design -level geotechnical study for this new $36-million, 35-million-gallon-per-day water
treatment plant. To present a low profile, the plant is being designed so that all major water -
containing structures will be buried. Geomatrix Consultants provided all geologic and
geotechnical information needed to design the various plant facilities. Buried structures at the
plant includes Ozone Contact Basins, Flocculation and Sedimentation basins, Filters Complex
and a 5 million gallon Treated Water Storage Reservoir. Surface structure include an
Administrative Building, Ozone Generation and Chemical and Feed buildings.
AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil Engineers
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
I:\prop02\p039ev\KEUSCHER.GT1
Li
Ll
1*
PUMP STATIONS
Vernon Connector Unit
(Cudahy) Pump Station
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Paul Shoenberger
310/660-6218
Construction Cost:
$6,000,000
Completion Date: 1997
Rio Hondo Water Reclamation
Pump Station
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Paul Shoenberger
310/660-6218
Construction Cost:
$1.8 Million
Completion Date: 1995 est.
Foothills Booster Station
City of Phoenix Water Services
Water Engineering
200 W. Washington, 8a' Fl.
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Contact: Laxman Devkota
602/256-4273
Construction Cost:
$420,000 est.
Completion Date: 1999 est.
Prepared construction documents for this project which included
construction of a combination booster pump and pressure reducing
facility, and appurtenances. Pump station capacity is 5,000 gpm.
The site is a triangular piece of property located at the southwest
corner of the intersection of Otis Avenue and Elizabeth Street in the
City of Cudahy. Construction included an underground concrete
vault which houses the pump and pressure reducing equipment.
Pumping units consist of two horizontal split case pumps with
vertical turbine motors. One of the pumping units is controlled by a
variable speed drive. Other components consist of appurtenant
electrical and control equipment, piping, and site work.
The initial capacity of the pump station was 15,700 gpm, with a
discharge pressure of 125 psi. Three vertical turbine pumps were
provided at the initial stage. Two of the pumps were rated at 7,350
gpm each, and the remaining "jockey" pump with a rating of 1,000
gpm. All pumps designed were variable speed utilizing variable
frequency drives. In the future, the smaller pump will be replaced by
a larger unit and another large pump will be installed for firm
capacity of 22,000 gpm or 31 mgd. The project included design and
construction support services.
Provided a detailed preliminary design report for this raw water
treatment plant, utilizing water from the Salt Water Project. The
PDR included an alternative alignment analysis, hydraulic
modeling, alternate site analysis, and pump station plan view with
mechanical solutions. Final design included the pump station, inlet
metering vault, discharge metering, electrical, controls, and site
work.
4 1:V opo2Vp039e Mehvd up.l—.6.c P.I.1 of 4
� r ' � s r • • `��
a ry` . r Y i ♦ r
� • � . . a♦ • • . r
a
.....>.. -.. _- s
D
I
11
01
Cl
TETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
San Jacinto and Lee Lake
Booster Stations
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water
District
31315 Chaney Street
P.O. Box 3000
Lake Elsinore, CA 92531
Contact: Phillip Miller
909/674-3146
Construction Cost:
$875,000
Completion Date: 1999 est.
Emergency Pump Station
Huntington Library & Botanical
Gardens
1151 Oxford Road
San Marino, CA 91108
Contact: Laurie Sowd
626/405-2252
Construction Cost:
$850,000
Completion Date: 1999
El Rio Booster Pump Station
United Water Conservation
106 North 8 h Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Contact: John Dickenson
805/525-4431
Construction Cost:
$2,000,000
Completion Date: 1998
Provided preliminary and final design of two floating pump
stations. San Jacinto Booster Station conveyed 2,600 gpm of water
from Lake Elsinore to mitigated wetlands. Lee Lake Booster
Stations conveyed 3,200 gpm of water from Lee Lake to
agricultural users. Both stations' design included submersible
pumps, telemetry and controls, coordination with City of Elsinore,
property owners, Edison, County of Riverside, and environmental
consultants.
Prepared preliminary design report, plans, specifications, and
construction management for this 14,200 gpm irrigation and
emergency pump station which includes five pumps — 200, 1,000,
1000, 6,000, and 6,000 gpm which are all driven by electrical
motors. Two pumps are connected to a 250 kw emergency diesel -
driven generator. the two largest pumps are used for emergency fire
flow and the smaller pumps provide irrigation water. Project also
included a 16-inch pipeline and rehabilitation and repair of a
hopper -bottom, wood -roof rectangular reservoir originally
constructed in the 1930's.
This project included pump station layout, piping, and pump
selection. Design included four 400 hp vertical turbine pumps in
cans with variable frequency drives and 1-ion cylinder chlorination
facility. This project also included a new chlorination facility with
provisions for future aqua ammonia facilities for chloramination.
a
J.WoP�%*d>tea upaim doc rage 2 of
a
I
I
I
I
I
■
5
�I
I
I
■
Cl
C1
itTETRATECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
Various Pump Stations
Moulton Niguel Water District
27500 La Paz Road
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Contact: Carlo Habash
949/448-4083
Construction Cost:
$3,000,000
Completion Date: 1998
Rolling Hills Pump Station
Moulton Niguel Water District
27500 La Paz Road
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Contact: Carlo Habash
949/449-4033
Construction Cost:
$3,000,000
Completion Date: 1996
Provided preliminary design, final design, and construction
management for the following pump stations projects:
• Rolling Hills Pump Station -
5,000 gpm
• Sheep Hills Pump Station -
6,500 gpm
• Pacific Park Pump Station -
7,500 gpm
• Southridge Reclaimed Water Pump Station -
3,000 gpm
• Lower Salada Sewer Lift Station -
2,000 gpm
• Del Avion Sewer Lift Station -
1,200 gpm
• Paseo de Valencia Lift Station -
800 gpm
All of these stations met strict architectural, aesthetic and noise
requirements, contained multiple pumps and natural gas engines for
emergency power source.
ASL has also provided design and construction services upgrading
the following pump stations:
• Big Niguel Pump Station
• Crown Point Pump Station Reclaimed Water Conversion
• Pacific Island Drive Pump Station III
• Rolling Hills Pump Station
Designed a 5,000 gpm pump station in Rolling Hills to serve the new
Aliso Viejo Development. The station was designed to meet an
initial demand of 3,000 gpm plus 3,500 gpm fire flow. When the
Aliso Viejo Development was 60 percent complete, the station
pumped into a new 5.0 MG reservoir during off-peak hours. The
station consisted of four electric -driven, two -stage centrifugal pumps
and one natural gas/LPG-driven, single -stage centrifugal pump.
t:WopoZ"39"Velatul ecpaim doc Pap 3 ofI
J
4
Ll
[NwbjTETRATECH, INC.
, Infrastructure Services Group
Stonegate Pump Station
and Hydropneumatic Tanks
Kaufman and Broad
21900 Burbank Boulevard,
Suite 300
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Contact: Teresa Sousa
818/887-5599
Construction Cost:
$1,500,000
Completion Date: 1995
MASTER PLANS
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
Central Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson,CA 90746
Contact: Wyatt Won
310/660-6203
Plan Cost: $75,000
Completion Date: August 2000
West Basin Municipal Water
District/City of Los Angeles
Department of Water &Power
West Basin Municipal
Water District
17140 So. Avalon Boulevard
Suite 210
Carson, CA 90746
Contact: Wyatt Won
310/660-6203
Master Plan Cost: $200,000
ICompletion Date: July 2000
Prepared plans, specifications, and estimates and provided
construction administration and deputy inspection services for the
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power facility including a
pump station with three 4000 gpm and one 70 gpm pumps; one 3000
gpm emergency pump, and two 10,000 gallon hydropneumatic tanks.
The facility boosts pressures to the higher elevations with Kaufman
and Broad's West Hills development. The project also included an
enclosed building, emergency power generator system (diesel back-
up), electrical and telemetry controls, and cooling and ventilation
system. Processed and obtained grading, retaining wall, public
works class "B", building and HVAC permits from the City of Los
Angeles. Managed the project through the design and construction
phases including all coordination with DPW, City of Los Angeles,
electrical, architectural, and geotechnical subconsultants, the
contractor, and the developer.
Water Recycling Program Master Plan - Analyzed the existing
operations and possible modifications or system expansion with
consideration of 41 water utilities in a service area covering 227
square miles and including 24 cities. The requirements of the master
plan included data assessment, database creation and modification,
conceptual pipeline routing, inter -agency interconnection, hydraulic
analysis with storage review, economic analysis and a phasing plan.
The master plan identified approximately 1,500 new potential
recycled customers with a potential recycled water demand of 30,000
acre-feet per year.
Provided a comprehensive recycled water master plan within the
WBMWD and LADWP service areas. The requirements of the
master plan included analysis of recycled water markets and potential
recycled water facilities for expansion with consideration of 14 water
utilities including LADWP in a study area covering over 200 square
miles and including 18 cities. The master plan was conducted to
identify and evaluate facilities for expansion, rank facilities based on
economics, demand and other factors and develop a
phasinglimplementation plan for over 1,900 potential and non -
potential customers with a potential recycled water demand totaling
nearly 65,000 acre-feet per year.
I1:*,oPOZP-039ev1,dwd .pi—.d. Page. 44
4
970-
Introduction
Geomatrix Consultants is a consulting firm that practices in the general fields of engineering and the applied
earth sciences. Founded in San Francisco, California, in 1984 by a small group of recognized authorities in
their disciplines, the firm has earned a reputation for providing clients with leading -edge technical knowledge
coupled with highly efficient and effective problem solving. The firth has strong capabilities in environmental
engineering, surface and groundwater hydrology, engineering geology, geotechnical and foundation
engineering, seismic geology, environmental health and safety, earthquake engineering, and geomarine and
coastal engineering.
Geomatrix's staff profile of nearly 300 technical and support professionals reveals considerable depth. Eighty
percent of the technical staff hold advanced degrees (M.S., Ph.D.), and our principal and senior staff are
widely recognized in their disciplines, having an average of more than 15 years of experience in developing
and implementing state-of-the-art technologies. Our consulting engineers, geologists, and environmental
scientists, who are also the employee -owners of Geomatrix, are valued, long-standing counselors to a broad
variety of clients, including some of the largest corporate and public entities in the United States and abroad.
Capabilities and Staff Qualifications
Geomatrix provides environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, geologic, seismologic, and water
14 resources services. The firm is recognized for outstanding technical services, quality reporting, and
responsiveness to clients. Our staff possess the full range of capabilities required to perform these services;
we can provide specialists in geotechnical, civil, chemical and process engineering; construction management;
No geology; hydrogeology; geophysics; health and safety; toxicology and other environmental and earth sciences.
Our geotechnical engineers develop sound and innovative recommendations for foundation support of
structures, earthwork construction, and stabilization of sites. Our earth scientists are experienced in
incorporating geology, seismology, geophysics, earthquake engineering, and hydrogeology to facilitate the safe
and cost-effective siting, design, and operation of engineered structures. Our environmental scientists and
engineers provide timely recommendations and implement cost-effective programs for managing municipal,
industrial, and mining waste, protecting water resources, remediating soil and groundwater contamination,
and managing workplace health and safety. This range of capabilities is supported by a similarly wide range of
field expertise and equipment that enables us to provide thorough and cost-effective services tailored to each
project.
Successful implementation of projects requires diligent management, particularly with regard to quality
control/assurance, scheduling of personnel, and cost tracking. Selecting our team means that engineering
projects will be completed efficiently and within budget. Geomatrix incorporates standard procedures and
management systems that enable us to meet management requirements expeditiously. Quality
control/assurance procedures are set forth in protocols for all aspects of fieldwork. These procedures are
standardized where applicable so that personnel will perform field procedures consistently.
VS Aq
74
F
lit
aZ it
4
Laboratory Capabilities
Our laboratory is fully equipped to provide analytical results for a multitude of geotechnical tests. Mr. Loc
Tran, Geomatrix's laboratory manager, has more than eight years of experience in soil mechanics laboratory
testing, earthwork construction observation, field placement testing, concrete field testing and sampling,
groundwater monitoring and sampling, remedial site construction oversight, and verification sampling.
Tests performed in our geotechnical laboratory include the following:
➢ Moisture Content - ASTM-132216
➢ Moisture Content and Dry Density -
ASTM-D2216 & D3550
➢ Compaction (4-inch diameter mold) -
➢ ASTM-131557
➢ Compaction (6-inch diameter mold) - ASTM-
D1557
➢ Sieve Analysis - ASTM-D422
➢ Hydrometer - ASTM-D422
➢ Sieve & Hydrometer - ASTM-422
➢ Wash Analysis (#200 sieve) -
➢ ASTM-13422
➢ Atterburg Limits - ASTM-D4318
➢ Expansion Index - ASTM-D4829
➢ Sand Equivalent (Calif. 217)
➢ Direct Shear - Consolidated Drained - ASTM-
D3080
➢ Consolidation - ASTM-D2435
➢ Specific Gravity (Passing #4 Sieve) - ASTM-
D854
➢ Specific Gravity (Retained #4 Sieve) - ASTM-
C 127
➢ Unconfined Compressive Strength -
➢ ASTM-D2166
r - w • ♦ d Y Y
i
i
��
' �
,-,.. - .. .:. ..•. +".t8'+,;.-�7, :.;;,:... .. -.. ,_.. "1`:L.a � a_�,� .'���,-+�- :�.-:s+�a,... .>.. ar .;:;s�+L�" r.�1-. ,:K 2a•:.y.+PY _�8}�.$.".' ., .r+a '�",�'--". .. ='a' �- .. •: .. �:�
'�
Iri
1.6 Facility Development and Site Plan: Prepare conceptual layout/site plans of the proposed two
pump station alternatives, along with all pumping and piping configurations, bypass piping,
surge facilities, pressure reducing station, building type, landscaping, motor control center,
electrical, power, telemetry, appurtenances, etc., required for a complete, operable booster
pump station facility. Redundancy, reliability, constructability, accessibility, operation,
maintenance, aesthetics, noise control, site availability, and local impacts shall be addressed.
Architectural features for the proposed alternatives will not be conducted until the final
design phase for the selected pump station site.
1.7 System Operation and Control: A description of the proposed/recommended pump station
operation and controls sequence will be developed. A simplified control diagram will be
developed showing proposed control logic for the pump station operation.
1.8 Permitting: Determine all permit approval, coordination, and cost requirements for the
Project. Prepare a workplan that outlines realistic schedules for applications, reviews, and
approvals of each required regulatory permit. Permitting issues shall be coordinated with the
District's Environmental, Operations, and Water Quality Divisions.
1.9 Construction Cost Estimate: Prepare preliminary construction cost estimates for each pump
14
station site alternative.
1.10 Recommendations: Evaluate all alternatives and develop recommendations on proposed
1-4
pumping and distribution facilities.
1.11 Schedule: Prepare Project final design, bidding, and construction schedule for the
itrecommended
alternative.
1.12 Preliminary Design Report: 75%, 100%, and Final Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
(4 copies) to Vernon and the District for review and
IN
submittals will be bound and submitted
comment. Comments to each submittal, if any, shall be addressed by Tetra Tech and re-
submitted (4 copies) for approval by the District. Following approval of the Final PDR,
design services will commence. A review period of one (1) week will be required for each
itsubmittal
for both Vernon and the District.
1.13 Meeting Attendance: Attend a minimum of four (4) two hour meetings (includes one (1)
kickoff meeting) with Vernon and District staff to review project status and discuss design
and construction related issues.
District will, at a minimum, provide the following information to Tetra Tech:
• Copy of CBMWD Recycled Water System Master Plan, July 2000.
• Model Data, including existing and ultimate recycled water system computer model (MWSoft
H2ONet), completed July, 2000.
• As -built plans required for tie-in to existing CBMWD pipeline facilities.
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page 2
Vernon Booster Pump Station
•
.• y ♦ • � a
•
.. !':i .. 4 _
fc•_.• • _ fit':..
4 t:�.. ..
..�..'�` .. t..RS
an)
own
!f
- i,S'-.
IN TASK 2. FINAL DESIGN
Upon Vernon and District approval of the PDR, the final design of the Vernon Booster Pump Station
will be initiated. This task will include all design work required for the construction of the Booster
Pump Station and appurtenant facilities. Tetra Tech will provide final design drawings and contract
documents, bid schedule, technical specifications, and engineer's cost estimate. Specific task items
are as follows:
2.1 Construction Plans: Prepare construction plans and specifications for the construction of a
booster pump station including, but not limited to, three (3) vertical turbine pumps (at
approximately 1500gpm/75HP each) with variable frequency drives (or as approved in the
PDR), suction and discharge piping and appurtenances, tie-in connections, flow meters,
pressure transmitters/switches, pressure reducing station, telemetry, surge anticipatory
facilities, motor control center, electrical and control instrumentation facilities, standby power
generator and fuel storage, landscaping architectural features and fencing, and suitable
masonry housing. Construction plans shall, at a minimum, contain the following elements:
• Title Sheet
• General Notes, Vicinity Map, Location Map, Legend, Abbreviations, Benchmark & Basis
of Bearing, Utility Contacts
• Complete Pumping Station Site Plan(s)
• Complete Pressure Reducing Station Plans and Details
• Complete Piping Plan
• Mechanical Design and Details
• Electrical, Power, and Lighting Design and Details
• Instrumentation and Control System Design and Details
• Architectural Design and Structural Calculations
• Landscaping and Irrigation
• Civil Details
• Technical Specifications
2.2 Design Survey and Aerial Mapping: Tetra Tech will provide field control points for digital
base mapping of project site and surrounding impacted area. Right-of-way, street centerline,
and property boundary information will be obtained and digitally included.
2.3 Potholing: Upon determination of utility information, Tetra Tech will provide potholing of
potentially impacted utilities and tie-in locations. A minimum of ten (10) potholes will be
assumed for this task.
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
Vernon Booster Pump Station
Page 3
i � w��w f ♦ 9 a a w •
01
2.4 Utility Verification: Utility research performed during PDR phase will be verified for the
project area.
2.5 Geotechnical Investigation: A geotechnical investigation will be performed at the proposed
project site by Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. A minimum of one (1) boring at the proposed
pump station site and one (1) boring at a second location will be performed to adequately
characterize soil and groundwater conditions for construction. Geotechnical investigation will
evaluate the nature and engineering properties of the soils, recommend standards for trench
backfill and bedding, and provide all geotechnical parameters required for adequate pump
station foundation design.
2.6 Permitting and Coordination with Agencies: Tetra Tech will obtain all necessary permits
required from pertinent jurisdictional agencies for project construction, including power,
telephone, traffic, encroachment, etc. Plan check and permit fees are not included.
2.7 Technical Review Meetings: Tetra Tech will conduct technical review meetings to discuss
design issues at appropriate stages. Agendas and meeting minutes will be prepared by Tetra
Tech. A minimum of four (4) two-hour meetings with Vernon and District staff will be
�.
attended.
2.8 Engineer's Estimate: Tetra Tech will complete Engineer's Estimate and will be submitted at
90% and 100% plan submittals.
2.9 Construction Schedule: A project construction schedule will be completed at Tetra Tech's
100% plan submittal.
2.10 Contract Documents: A complete Contract Document for construction bidding will be
completed by Tetra Tech and shall, at a minimum, include Vernon and the District front-end
documents, Bid Schedule, General Provisions, Special Provisions, Technical Specifications,
Geotechnical Report, District Standards, Permit requirements, and any pertinent appendices.
2.11 Plan and Contract Document Deliverables: 50%, 90%, and 100% submittals will be
submitted (4 copies) to both Vernon and the District for review and comment. Comments to
each submittal, if any, shall be addressed by Tetra Tech and re -submitted (4 copies) for
approval by both Vernon and the District. Final approved plans shall be in Mylar form and
completed in electronic format compatible with Vernon and District software
(AutoCAD2000).
TASK 3. BIDDING SUPPORT
Bidding support services will be provided for the Project. Specific task items are as follows:
01 3.1 Tetra Tech shall reproduce and distribute 15 sets of each contract bid package for
solicitation of bidder's proposal.
3.2 Provide assistance during bidding, including attendance of Pre -Bid meeting, develop and
maintain potential bidders list, address technical questions, and prepare/issue addenda.
If
CITY OF VERNON SCOPE OF SERVICES
01 Vernon Booster Pump Station Page 4
x' St
_. ., P .�,_ � .. - ..
3.3 Supply 10 sets of construction drawings and contract documents to successful contractor.
TASK 4. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Construction support services will be provided for the construction of the Booster Pump Station and
Itancillary facilities. Specific task items are as follows:
4.1 Attend Pre -Construction meeting.
14 4.2 Respond to Requests for Clarification of designed elements.
4.3 Complete review of shop drawings for all project related equipment, materials, schedules,
etc., necessary to complete the work.
4.4 Consult on potential change order requests during project construction and assist District
with preparation and issuance of contract change orders, as necessary.
4.5 Attend construction meetings (minimum 4 meetings) at the project site, or in Vernon
offices, or in District offices to discuss project status, change orders, construction
problems, and provide review of construction issues.
4.6 Assist in final inspection and pump station start-up and testing.
4.7 Prepare final record as -built drawings and submit on mylars at end of construction.
4.8 Assist District with preparation of construction completion report, review O&M manuals
submitted, and attend final project walk-through.
EJ
It
In
CiTV nF VF.RNnN
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INVernon Booster Pump Station Page 5
S s •
* i . qi r 4 1 • ndo
• • 40 . '
w
7
M
Our estimated not -to -exceed fee for the preliminary design investigation, final design, bidding
support and construction support is $255,009. We have included geotechnical services and a unit cost
for pothole location of existing underground facilities. Tetra Tech has provided a fee schedule for
Task 1 through Task 4; however, the fee estimate may need modification depending on results of the
Task 1 Preliminary Design Investigation. Plan check and permit fees are not included.
Our current staff availability and project workload will allow sufficient manhours as identified on our
"Fee Estimate" spreadsheet, to be dedicated to complete this project within the anticipated ten (10)
week schedule. Approximately two (2) weeks is allowed for each of the two submittal reviews by
Vernon and District's staff.
Tetra Tech has taken into account the deadlines for the future City of Vernon Malburg Generating
Station and other existing and future system customers. The attached schedule is anticipated for the
project completion. Tetra Tech has taken the responsibility to review the project schedule of
Vernon's project deadlines. Tetra Tech will prepare and submit a revised schedule after the Notice to
Proceed and after the completion on Task 1— Preliminary Design Investigation.
■
■
CITY OF VERNON FEE ESTIMATE/PROJECT SCHEDULE
Vernonno Booster Pump Station Page 1
., ... ...4y
ijF{ _
..
.. ;, a .i^ •.
� •'+�'
". [`
!� .,;T ♦ �
g �-'� �` -- q� Y ski F
4
.may
-.+a
.
_• � ;per
�.�y
�'r�.
0
Ll
Ll
4
4
Ll
4
7 -_�
::11
Ll
0
0
N
�
3
Q
N
Y
m
E
E
A
�
m
C
�
U
LL
m
W
O
a-
C
Y
;
_
U
m
p
Y
3
N
'
O�
C
O
»
a)
N
i0
>
�c
;
o
m
m
Un
O
Z
to
N
o-
ca_-
co
a
7
D
::)
D
n
V
O
V
V
N
m
m
N
Q
Q
Q
O
0
O
CO
m
C
OW
U)
C C
O N J
n
E >
Y
3
CD C) C)
i L
Q
e
m
r W
a
o_o
JE
Y
.
U �U
N
C
(`
F
Q1
,
y
m
Q
�
m
♦f-
O
0
m
E
E
�
U)
fr
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
C
P
-
CD
N
(`')
ia
C
O
co
l0
�3
N
(e
O a
co
CD
jL
0
LL
LL
LL
LL
'-
LL
LL
LL
c
LL
LL
LL
_
N
N
C,
o
fD
N
O
a
N
Cl
a
N
O
a
N
O
m
N
O
N
O
m
C
N
O
�
O
O
a
a
O
a
C
m
in
C
0
0
0
0
0
g
0
0
0
N
N
c
0
rn
c
0
rn
FR
(n
a
r
a
C
v
N
C
U
a
co
U
CD
a
to
m
m
cn
v
r
0
m
rn
E
m
m
m
m
y
r
>
o
D
o
m
m
LL
L
a
c
N
m
N
m
0
a
N
o
an d
E o
d
w
d
m
a
a
N
Oc
ad
Z
m V
+
_
C:
p
o
0
t7
q
OO N
E V
r
0
z
V
`1
C
0
m O
U
m y
d �
_
+r
1__
3
& �
t
a ,
' 3
a
f
i
I
_
j
+
1
:
i
C
Z m �
O .8 w
z0-w
(r LL
w N w
O -o =
O Z
f}— . Q
., m 2
00 OD. CD CD'CD`: :0OfttiN'OD
NN 0'Ol
'(D CD ItCD;O;-�'Ooi,1.
d' n h
00 _:CD Cf);C7N ' CD''
OD; 0 Oi 100,00
NN N'OD
OD 'cf' IO'O V
a0 CID CO!O'CD
N
LO
O
IT:cO':O
,:r.(D'
CO (D N CO N - CM
T'"t N T V': TIN
d• , M : 0 OD 00 CF): CD 0)0 N 0'�
Cr; lL6-.cAr
cA_ CD CA co : T
T, r:r
N N d:I CO ! V f�
O N `C9 ChI(O:N
cA
n�
00
Ef9;tA 6!9 N9 EA!d
.cA;
Itfl.tfl EAVi fA tfl:ifl;fR�t»I
E9i tAi�i
T; V9;lf9�Vi;69�
f9 I
T'
H'
0'
,Oj' 010I�0I,I0'O�
0 ;0'0
O
O
O i
� 0j0 O
O
OT.
Oi
—
I^1Oi .:
fTOfO9 I I
IiO9
I �4T(�r
jT
I I 1�TII :
Nf?EA
I
COI
O:l)(%
�I lC6
fA
.1
I
IO
69'
cm!
IfAI
00 co'. (O (o I�cO 100 d' I N i CD I CD CD st (D' I l d' OD d' Co O OD' 00
1001 I� I f� (D M COI N co N N l N Co
0 , -- st i l 0 0 It
CO . CD OD O CD
C4,
COI
O
T
N N O)' T (O 0 r j
d: CD" NIOlN I� CA tnI hJI-fco.CO, 1 If�l * 1\ Nt 'CO! 'co,--:
(D TIa) CO 'q N
,r
r tt Nir 'T N Olt' Ir ' �10� i !�IT r iT ITIr
fJ9 64, fAICA�r 69 d' Ef9 Efl• "IZ9lcA,T EA ff9 Efil d91d9
r 'N1N C:9IN;N
r 699Ito �fA N cH
C61
M
IU)
ct
fR, I
tfl�
b91
Ir
I � I
� I
, sA.
NI(O. d:(Oir d ditOINI 'COj(OiOiN OIN OIN !col ico!N
�-.�• N r �I r T O,cD; T r'N CD; T T T ri :T TIT
---
r- OICN Olao
c0 NIC9 d COIN
O
O
i
N,N, -- —N N' 0 - N N Nj d I N'CV
-N— -
r
,
I
A
L w —v aD : d co — 'CD CD! v
CD:�
;
(D
, I
-----._.._-------------------_ _..._—.._
s-
O
v
a} qp
C• W h'. I
U_
--
tD . --- ---- ----- - - ---- V
It
OD . N0 0; 00
co v v
iti
g:
-------
---
z
: r M •rust• r
y'
tO:00i — U)'—iNtOTO7'q'- OD: OD 0 tO; ICO, d
co
CD
I
Or T,
III
—.
co! cm:d CD �i 1�; ? :N'N
,
cn
co�"
I w I I �;
i
C0
rn',t �E' o >;� I oI Q
c'o 0 �,.0 c c rn � rn� Cr�'U ��
y m c'm�-v
Q d �, �O o
N'm
H
` N O. T 3 3: C c as r r�,. --: C I C �: y
C 2 () a) c C.)'
mQ
J
C y •- �. >'m S c qI CIO
o co w
-i
H
Ono
= m
> o° m
N c6. 7, d t: N V: y (0 V: U 7 EI(n Eicn. �: y� C) 3
O E E 3(n �cn°� .�� o 6 o u dm n �:—«Iari�._ m
F- c y m
O' i O (` •`• COO
.. y y'
~ cl
JjJ
QQ
o Y cir o O a cc �,;a 01 ni E >, > - � « � o Z: �I y Ql'o �
:(n — — c o d diF
g d �'v a a°) ao cn:�lmiii o ����CC
�'' m o �i c m
m o CL_ a` c'n u'
m!
F- I-
00
,Tiol
Ya�_`LLLa cn:a F-c7a1 cam,
--
m: v:
0:N'
OOP
t7
TIN: Vi. d''ui. (D CO 0)'.r
4q,
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
EXHIBIT "A"
2002
HOURLY CHARGE RATE AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
Professional
Engineering Intern/Technician ................... $ 44.00
Designer/CAD Operator/Engineer I ........... $ 82.00
Engineer II and III/Senior Designer.......... $ 92.00
Planner.......................................................$ 94.00
Senior Engineer/Landscape Architect........ $ 103.00
Project Engineer/Project Coordinator........ $ 120.00
Project Manager/Sr. Project Coordinator... $ 135.00
Senior Project Manager .............................. $ 150.00
Program Director/Project Director ............. $ 180.00
Administrative
Administrative Clerk .................................. $ 38.00
Word Processor/Admin. Support ............... $ 54.00
Graphic Designer ....................................... $ 90.00
Survey/Mapping
Survey Technician ...................................... $ 87.00
Surveyor/Field Supvsr./Sr. Survey Tech.... $ 97.00
Two -Person Survey Party ........................... $ 172.00
Two -Person Survey Party with GPS .......... $ 210.00
Three -Person Survey Party ......................... $ 250.00
Survey Travel Time (Two -person) ............. $ 83.00
Survey Travel Time (Three -person)........... $ 118.00
Construction
Construction Observer ............................... $ 72.00
Senior Construction Observer .................... $ 78.00
Resident Engineer ...................................... $ 110.00
Construction Manager ................................ $ 140.00
Reproduction, special photography, postage, delivery services, express mail, out -of -area telephone calls, printing
and any other services performed by subcontractor, will be billed at cost plus 15%.
Reimbursable In -House Costs
Photo Copies (B&W 8.5"xl t") ......
$0.10/Each
Photo Copies (B&W I t "x 17") .......
$0.35/Each
Color Copies (up to 8.5"x t l ") ........
$1.50/Each
Color Copies (to 11"x 17")..............
$2.50/Each
Blueprints ....................................... $ 0.35/S.F.
Computer Time ............................. $10.00/Hour
Mileage ........................................... $ 0.40/Mile
ForensicEngineer................................................................................................................................ $250.00
Court Appearances, Expert Witness Testimony,
Depositions, and Preparation for Testimony........................................................... ............................ $350.00*
*Minimum $1,000.00 for half day plus expenses.
NOTE: All rates are effective to October I, 2002. There will be a negotiated increase in rates, 5% minimum per
year, for contracts extending beyond October 1, 2002.
L: Admin\Forms\Exhibit A-B-C\exhibitaCA.MA.OR.TX.WA2002.doc.doe
a A J � • �
e • � y i
� 1 � +
i
k'
y-:
., ��
EXHIBIT D
r � '� l+ 1
a - � � s
1 l � 1 l � {
• { � �
� - r • � a
CITY OF VERNON
VERNON BOOSTER PUMP STATION
FEE ESTIMATE
0
L-1
:1
:1
OEM
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
77
1.1
Data Research and Review
2
8
10
$1,260
$1,260
1.2
Utility Investigation
8
8
22
$2,108
$500
$2,608
1.3
Siting Investigation
Field Investigation
4
8
2
14
$1,412
$1,412
Site Research
16
4
4
24
$2,548
$2,548
Preliminary Site Layout
4
16
16
36
$3,832
$3,832
Site Evaluation
4
16
B
2
30
$3,452
$3,452
1.4
Hydraulic Analysis
Verify Exist. Model Data
16
16
32
$3,568
$3,568
Alternatives Analysis
32
16
8
56
$5,920
$5,920
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.B
1.9
Surge Analysis
Design Criteria Development
Facility Develop. & Site Plan
System Operation and Control
Permitting
Construction Cost Estimate
4
4
4
24
8
16
20
8
12
24
24
8
8
16
4
4
4
20
52
52
20
28
20
$1,932
$5,952
$5,344
$2,136
$3,224
$2,000
$7,500
$9,432
$5,952
$2,344
136
$2,136
$3,224
$2.000
1.10
Recommendations
16
8
4
28
$2,960
$2,960
1.11
Schedule
8
2
10
$1,068
$1,068
1.12
Preliminary Design Report
75% Submittal
4
4
8
5
8
29
$2,746
$270
$3,016
100% Submittal
4
4
8
4
8
28
$2,664
$200
$2,864
Final Submittal
4
4
8
4
8
28
$2,664
$200
$2,864
1.13
Meeting Attendance
16
16
20
8
60
$6,812
$6,812
Task 1 Subtotal
46
248
188
45
72
599
$63,602
$8,670
$72,272
FINAL DESIGN
2.1
Construction Plans
Title Sheet
4
16
20
$1,724
$1,724
General Notes
2
16
16
34
$3,532
$3,532
Site Plan
2
8
24
16
50
$5,044
$5,044
Pressure Reducing Sta. (3)
12
24
60
60
156
$15,780
$15,780
Piping Plan
Pump Station and Details
4
4
16
16
16
80
24
40
60
140
$6,136
$14,040
$6,136
$14,040
Electrical (2 shts)
8
24
40
60
132
$13.120
$13.120
Instrumentation
4
8
24
24
60
$6,000
$6,000
Structural/Archdect.1 shts)
8
40
8
40
96
$10,104
$10,104
Landscaping
4
8
8
16
4
40
$3,912
$3,912
Civil Details
4
8
16
28
$2,872
$2,872
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Design Survey
Potholing
Utility Verification
Geotechnical Investigation
32
12
8
16
32
4
8
8
8
4
8
72
20
24
24
$7,568
$2,068
$2,216
$2,744
$1,332
$7,OD0
$250
$9,900
$8,900
$9,068
$2,466
$12,644
2.6
Permitting and Coordination
8
24
8
8
48
$5,336
$5,336
2.7
Technical Review Meetings
16
16
20
8
60
$6,812
$6,812
2.8
Engineer's Estimate
4
4
24
4
36
$3,768
$3,768
2.9
Construction Schedule
4
16
20
$2,128
$2,128
2.10
Spedications
8
32
8
24
72
$7,160
$7,160
2.11
Submittals
50%
4
16
8
2
30
$3,452
$500
$3,952
90%
4
16
8
2
30
$3,452
$500
$3,952
100%
4
16
8
2
30
$3,452
$500
$3,952
Task 2 Subtotal
100
364
416
328
74
1,282
$132,420
$19,982
$152,402
BIDDING SUPPORT
3.1
15 sets of Bid Docs.
P24
2
2
$108
$108
3.2
Provide Tech Assistance
4
24
8
4
64
$6,824
$6,824
3.3
10 sets of Constr. Docs.
2
2
$1D8
$500
$608
Task 3 Subtotal
4
24
8
8
68
$7,040
4500
$7,540
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
4.1
Preconstruction Meeting
4
4
2
10
$1,188
$1,188
42
Respond to RFI's
4
16
4
24
$2,344
$2.344
4.3
Submittal Review/Clarifications
4
16
4
24
$2,344
$2,344
4.4
Change Order
2
6
13
16
8
45
$4,103
$100
$4,203
4.5
Construction Meetings (4)
16
16
8
40
$4,000
$4,000
4.6
Final Insp. And Startup
8
16
4
28
$2,824
$2,824
4.7
Record Drawings
4
4
24
4
36
$3,264
$500
$3,764
4.8
O&M
4
16
20
$2,128
$2,128
Task 4 Subtotal
10
s0
93
40
34
227
$22,195
$600
1 $22,795
TOTAL
160
686
721
421
188
2,176
$225,257
$29,752
1$255,009
I:prop021p-039evpsproposal.xls
•
xs:.
-
R
,
t •
+
,
s-
SI
TETRA TECH, INC.
Infrastructure Services Group
2002
HOURLY CHARGE RATE AND
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE
Professional
Engineeringlntern/Technician...................$
44.00
Designer/CAD Operator/Engineer I ...........
$ 82.00
Engineer II and III/Senior Designer..........
$ 92.00
Planner.......................................................
$ 94.00
Senior Engineer/Landscape Architect........
$ 103.00
Project Engineer/Project Coordinator........
$ 120.00
Project Manager/Sr. Project Coordinator...
$ 135.00
Senior Project Manager ..............................
$ 150.00
Program Director/Project Director .............
$ 180.00
Administrative
Administrative Clerk .................................. $ 38.00
Word Processor/Admin. Support ............... $ 54.00
Graphic Designer ....................................... $ 90.00
Survey/Mapping
Survey Technician ...................................... $ 87.00
Surveyor/Field Supvsr./Sr. Survey Tech.... $ 97.00
Two -Person Survey Party ........................... $ 172.00
Two -Person Survey Party with GPS .......... $ 210.00
Three -Person Survey Party ......................... $ 250.00
Survey Travel Time (Two -person) ............. $ 83.00
Survey Travel Time (Three -person)........... $ 118.00
Construction
Construction Observer ............................... $ 72.00
Senior Construction Observer .................... $ 78.00
Resident Engineer ...................................... $ 110.00
Construction Manager ................................ $ 140.00
Reproduction, special photography, postage, delivery services, express mail, out -of -area telephone calls, printing
and any other services performed by subcontractor, will be billed at cost plus 15%.
Reimbursable In -House Costs
Photo Copies (B&W 8.5"xI l") ...... $0.10/Each
Blueprints ....................................... $ 0.35/S.F.
Photo Copies (B&W I l "x 17") ....... $0.35/Each
Computer Time ............................. $10.00/Hour
Color Copies (up to 8.5"x l I") ........ $1.50/Each
Mileage ........................................... $ 0.40/Mile
Color Copies (to 1 I"x 17").............. $2.50/Each
ForensicEngineer................................................................................................................................
$250.00
Court Appearances, Expert Witness Testimony,
Depositions, and Preparation for Testimony ..............................................
.................................. ........ $350.00*
*Minimum $1,000.00 for half day plus expenses.
NOTE: All rates are effective to October 1, 2002. There will be a negotiated increase in rates, 5% minimum per
year, for contracts extending beyond October 1, 2002.
L: Admin\Forms\Exhibit A-B-C\exhibitaCA.MA.OR.TX.wA2002.doc.doc
� * It � r 1
• • �
r �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT E
INSURANCE SCHEDULE (CONSULTANT)
The Consultant shall provide proof of insurance, including a standard certificate of insurance, in at least
the following amounts and coverage (combined single limit permitted):
I Coverage and Limits
Bodily Injury Property Damage
Hazards Each Person Each Accident Each Accident
Automobile Liability
Owned Automobiles $ 500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000
Hired Automobiles $ 500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000
Non -Owned Automobiles $ 500,000 $1,000,000 $ 500,000
Workers' Compensation $ Statutory
Employers' Liability $1,000,000 per employer
H. General and Professional Liability
General Liability
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Premises Operations
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Elevators (if applicable)
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Independent Contractors
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Products - Completed Operations
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Contract Liability
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Professional Liability
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
a. The general liability policy shall contain the following special endorsements which shall be noted on or
attached to the standard certificate of insurance:
1. An endorsement naming the City of Vernon, its officers, and employees as additional insureds u
the policy.
2. An endorsement providing the City of Vernon thirty (30) days notice of cancellation or material
reduction of coverage.
3. An endorsement providing coverage for all operations under this Agreement.
4. Such other endorsement as may be required by addendum hereto.
b. In addition to the standard certificate of insurance, proof of general and professional liability coverage
shall be furnished in the form checked below. Only certification of the following proofs will be
accepted:
X For each policy, a notarized letter from the underwriter or carrier certifying that the coverage and
statements in the standard certificate of insurance (attached thereto) are true and correct and that
the signator is an officer authorized to so certify.
A copy of each policy certified by an officer of the underwriter or carrier and notarized.
EXHIBIT "E'
r � ` .. • a
� � . r �. � r
� !r _ s � ,s :w v r