Loading...
Resolution No. 87351 2 3 4 5. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 8735 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SERVICES AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERNON AND LIM AND NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR 26TH STREET EXTENSION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Vernon is in the process of extending 26th Street from Atlantic Boulevard to Bandini Boulevard in connection with the I -710 Bandini Interchange Project, which construction is scheduled to begin in July 2005 and encompasses a new bridge, a new roadway and a storm drain pump facility (the "26th Street Extension Project "); and WHEREAS, the City of Vernon needs the services of consultant to provide construction management services for the construction of the 26th Street Extension Project; and WHEREAS, on January 5, 2005, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Resolution No. 8633 approving a Request for Proposal for Construction Management Services for the 26th Street Extension Project ( "RFP "); and WHEREAS, the RFP was sent and responses were received from the following five firms: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation, Vali - Cooper and Associates, Inc., Washington Group International, Harris and Associates and Willdan, all of which were reviewed and evaluated by the Community Services & Water Department; and WHEREAS, the Community Services & Water Department deemed Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation ( "Lim and Nascimento ") to be the most qualified contractor in terms of experience and technical expertise submitting a proposal; and WHEREAS, by letter dated April 18, 2005, Bruce V. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Malkenhorst, City Administrator /City Clerk, recommended that an agreement with Lim and Nascimento be approved and executed for the 26th Street Extension Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby accepts the proposal of Lim and Nascimento and approves the Services Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute said Agreement for, and on behalf of, the City of Vernon and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to attest thereto. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby directs the City Clerk, or his designee, to send one fully executed Agreement to: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation Attn. Peter Lim, Chief Executive Officer 12 L Mauchly Irvine, CA 92618 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 5: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage of this Resolution, and thereupon and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 2005. ATTEST: BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk 3 LEONIS C. MAL RG, M.yor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 8735, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Wednesday, May 4, 2005, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor of the City of Vernon. (SEAL) BRUCE V. MALKENHORST, City Clerk EXHIBIT A SERVICES AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made, entered into and executed in duplicate originals, either copy of which may be considered and used as the original hereof for all purposes, as of this 4th day of kilanoh, 2005, in the City of Vernon, County of Los Angeles, California May BY AND BETWEEN AND CITY OF VERNON, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City" 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, California 90058 LIM AND NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORPORATION, an independent contractor, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor" 12 L Mauchly Irvine, California 92618 RECITALS WHEREAS, the City has determined to retain the services of an independent contractor to perform construction management services for the construction of the 26th Street extension project and WHEREAS, Contractor has prepared a proposal dated February 7, 2005, for the Services, which includes Contractor's Cost Information (Hourly Rate Schedule, Other Direct Costs and Estimated Total Costs), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference (the "Proposal "); and WHEREAS, Contractor represents that it is qualified and capable of furnishing the labor, materials and expertise necessary to perform the Services that the City requires, as set forth in this Agreement, and is willing to do so on the terms and conditions set forth below; and WHEREAS, the construction management services have been bid, and Contractor's cost proposal is acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement with Contractor to provide the construction management services for the 26th Street extension project on a contract basis as defined in the terms and conditions set forth below. Page 1 of 19 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. TERM OF CONTRACT 1.01. This Agreement will become effective on 05/15/05 , and will continue in effect until such time as the 26th Street extension project is complete and the City has received all project close -out documents and received any claims support necessary, or until terminated as provided in this Agreement. SECTION 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS 2.01. Whenever used in the Agreement, the following terms shall mean: A. "Agreement" shall mean that formally executed Agreement or Contract which includes the Contract Documents attached. The Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to its subject matter. B. "City" shall mean the City of Vernon, California, the entity which has executed the Agreement and, where applicable, its affiliated companies, and its officers, directors, employees, representatives and agents. C. "Contractor" shall mean Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation and where applicable, its affiliated companies, and its officers, directors, employees, representatives and agents. D. "Contract Documents" shall include any inquiry, invitation to bid, or proposal which may have, but not necessarily, preceded execution of the Agreement, and including the General Provisions and all exhibits and schedules attached to the Agreement and all plans and specifications identified in the Contract Documents. E. "Contract Price" shall mean the compensation set forth or provided for in Section 4.01 of this Agreement. Whether it expressly provides for the reimbursement of costs incurred by Contractor or simply for the payment of a lump sum of money, it is intended to be the full and complete payment for satisfactory completion of the Work and, unless otherwise stated, to cover all costs whether for materials, equipment, tools, labor, services and taxes and all overhead, rentals and profit or fee, if any. F. "General Provisions" or "General Conditions" shall mean the General Provisions as set forth in this Agreement. Page 2 of 19 G. "Premises" shall mean the physical premises under City's control or ownership where Work hereunder is to be performed. H. "Proprietary Information" and "Confidential Information" shall mean all Information, whether written or oral, which Contractor acquires from, through or on behalf of City, directly or indirectly, or which arises out of the Work, concerning the Work or proprietary processes involved in the Work including, without limitation, information concerning past, present or future business plans of City, information about the operations of City's Premises, and other City information or know -how obtained during the Work, except information falling into any of the following categories: 1. Information which, at the time of disclosure hereunder, is in the public domain; 2. Information which, after disclosure hereunder, enters the public domain, except where such entry is the result of Contractor's or any entity within Contractor's control breach of this Agreement; 3. Information which, prior to disclosure hereunder, was already in Contractor's possession without limitation regarding disclosure to others; or 4. Information which, subsequent to disclosure hereunder, is obtained by Contractor from a third party who is lawfully in possession of such information and not subject to a contractual or fiduciary relationship to City with respect to said information and who does not require Contractor to agree to refrain from disclosing such information to others. I. "Subcontractor" shall mean any first or lower -tier subcontractor and its employees, representatives, agents, subcontractors or other personnel who have been approved in the manner required by this Agreement. J. 'Work" or "Services" shall mean the work performed by Contractor and required to be performed from time to time by City under this Agreement. Page 3of19 SECTION 3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR Specific Services 3.01. Contractor's Services shall include, but will not be limited to, providing construction management services for the 26th Street extension project. The Contractor's Services are more specifically detailed in the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Change of Services 3.02. City may at any time, by written change order executed by the City Administrator, make changes only to extend the Work duration and total compensation of Contractor's Work. Changes in the scope of Work, or duties and obligations, shall be authorized only by the City. 3.03. City may make "Changes" by increasing, reducing or deviating from the requirements of the scope of Work. A form of Change Order is set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Timing of Services 3.04. Contractor's Services shall commence upon the execution of this Agreement by both parties and award by the City Council and shall end at such time as the 26th Street extension project is completed, the City receives all project close -out documents and receives all necessary claims support, unless this Agreement is otherwise terminated according to Section 6 of this Agreement or extended according to the conditions and terms set forth in this Agreement. 3.05. Time is of the essence for all Work contemplated by this Agreement. Contractor shall start performing Services under this Agreement only after notification by the City. Method of Performing Services 3.06. Contractor will determine and is responsible for the method, details, and means of performing the above - described Services. Page 4 of 19 Status of Contractor 3.07. Contractor enters into this Agreement, and will remain throughout the term of this Agreement, as an independent contractor. Contractor agrees that it is not and will not become an employee, partner, agent, or principal of City while this Agreement is in effect. Contractor agrees it is not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to City's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Contractor is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, and other insurance, worker's compensation, training, permits, and licenses for itself and for its employees and subcontractors. Contractor shall have complete and sole control over its employees, the details of the Services and methods by which the Services are accomplished, it being understood that City is interested only in the results to be obtained by Contractor. 3.08. Contractor has no authority to enter contracts or agreements on behalf of City. This Agreement does not create a partnership or joint venture between the parties. Payment of Taxes 3.09. Contractor is responsible for paying when due all income taxes, including estimated taxes, incurred as a result of the compensation paid by City to the Contractor for Services under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to indemnify City for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by City resulting from Contractor's failure to comply with this provision. 3.10. Payroll taxes including federal, state and local taxes shall not be withheld or paid by City on behalf of Contractor or for the employees of the Contractor. Contractor shall not be treated as an employee with respect to the Services performed hereunder for federal or state tax purposes. Contractor shall be responsible to pay taxes mandated by law. 3.11. Since Contractor is not an employee of City, Contractor is not eligible for and shall not participate in any employee benefit of City, including pension, health or other fringe benefits. Page 5of19 • SECTION 4. COMPENSATION 4.01. In consideration for the Services to be performed by Contractor, described in Section 3 of this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in the Contractor's Cost Information, which includes the Contractor's Hourly Rate Schedule, Other direct Costs, Estimated Total Costs and assumes a full time Resident Engineer for the duration of the Services (the "Contract Price "). The Contract Price, including a full time Resident. Engineer for the duration of the Services, shall not exceed Seven Hundred Twenty Six Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Two and 09/100 Dollars ($726,962.09). Entire Compensation 4.02. The Contract Price is full and complete compensation, and constitutes the entire compensation due Contractor for the Services and any and all of Contractor's obligations hereunder. The Contract Price set forth above is not subject to escalation for any reason except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. No adjustments in compensation shall be made as a result of changes in the value of any currency. The Contract Price shall only be adjusted by formal, written Change Order or amendment to this Agreement. Payment of Compensation 4.03. For Services rendered under Section 3 of this Agreement, Contractor shall be entitled to receive monthly payments. Contractor shall submit to City a monthly invoice and statement of Services, prepared in accordance with City requirements, by the fifteenth (15th) of each month, for the prior calendar month's completed Work. City will make payments to Contractor within thirty (30) days after acceptance and approval of the invoice received from Contractor. 4.04. Contractor shall be responsible for paying any subcontractors used in the performance of this Agreement. Subcontractors shall not bill the City directly. Expenses 4.05. City shall not be liable to Contractor for any expenses paid or incurred by Contractor. Expenses may only be billed if advance written approval has been obtained from the City Administrator. Page 6 of 19 Compensation for Changes 4.06. The compensation due Contractor, or the credit due City, for changes may not be established verbally, and shall be established in a written change order signed by City as described in Sections 3.03 and 3.04 of this Agreement. Compensation adjustments in each such change order shall be established by one or more of the following bases, as determined by City: (a) a lump sum price to be negotiated between the parties; or (b) Work unit rates to be negotiated between the parties. Once established, the amount of the compensation due Contractor or credit due City for a change shall not be subject to adjustment for any reason, including changes in the value of any currency. SECTION 5. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 5.01. Contractor is responsible for meeting all conditions of this Agreement and City Standards & Details for all Work performed. Substandard Work, as determined solely by the City, shall be redone at the expense of the Contractor. Products of Consulting 5.02. All products of consulting services including, but not limited to, manuals, documents and /or computer software, shall become the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City before the end of the performance of this Agreement. Basic notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data shall be made available to City without restriction or limitation on their use. Liability Insurance 5.03. Contractor and its subcontractor(s), if any, shall, prior to commencement of any Work and for the duration of this Agreement, obtain and maintain at its own expense, those minimum levels of insurance coverage as set forth below. Prior to commencing Work hereunder, Contractor shall provide the City with proof of insurance providing and maintaining the coverages and endorsements set forth below. Said proof of insurance shall also provide that said policy or policies shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage without giving at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 5.04. The insurance coverage as listed herein, shall be properly endorsed to include those contractual obligations which may be identified further within this Agreement and shall be endorsed to provide City all the rights and privileges of an additional insured. Page 7 of 19 5.05. Contractor shall cause its insurers to issue, including but not limited to, Certificates of Insurance or, upon request, certified copies of the insurance policies evidencing that the coverages and policy endorsements required under this Agreement, are maintained in force. 5.06. Contractor shall ensure its subcontractor(s), if any, maintain those insurance requirements as specified in this Agreement and are endorsed as additional insured(s) on all required Contractor insurance coverages. Contractor and its subcontractor(s), if any, shall maintain in effect the following minimum insurance coverages on an Occurrence Form Policy: 1. Workers Compensation within the statutory limits, including occupational illness or disease coverage in accordance with the laws of the nation, state, territory, or province exercising jurisdiction over Contractor's employees. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance shall have a minimum limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Contractor further agrees to hold harmless and indemnify City for any and all claims arising out of an injury, disability, or death of any of Contractor's employees or agents. 2. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, including, but not limited to, Contractual Liability, Products and Completed Operations Liability, Broad Form Property Damage and Bodily Injury Liability, and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Liability, with a minimum combined single limit of $2,000,000 per occurrence. 3. Comprehensive Automobile Insurance, including, but not limited to, all owned, non -owned or hired vehicles with a minimum combined single limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. 4. Excess Liability Insurance with limits of $2,000,000. Such evidence of insurance can either be through the primary insurance coverages or through an excess policy. Such insurance shall at all times be on an occurrence form and provide policy conditions as broad as those required in the primary insurance. 5. Professional Liability Insurance with limits of $2,000,000. 5.07. Contractor agrees to provide insurance in the amounts and forms specified above. Contractor shall submit to the City documentation indicating compliance with these minimum requirements no less than one (1) day prior to the beginning of performance under this Agreement. Contractor shall not commence Page 8 of 19 performance of its Work under this Agreement until the above insurance has been obtained and proof of insurance has been filed with and approved by the City. 5.08. Contractor shall not permit a subcontractor or vendor to perform work on City premises unless and until a certificate of insurance is obtained showing that such subcontractor or vendor has worker's compensation coverage. If Contractor employs subcontractors as part of the Services rendered, Contractor's protective coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth above. Representations 5.09. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees from all claims, suits, actions, demands, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, settlements, and penalties, losses, fines, and all costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith, including reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of defense, arising out of or attributable to the negligent or wrongful acts of Contractor or its employees or agents under this Agreement, except to the extent arising from or caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents or employees. The terms of this indemnity shall survive the termination of this Agreement. The obligations in this Paragraph are in addition to Contractor's duty to provide insurance and shall not be limited by any limitation on the amount or type of insurance coverage carried by Contractor. 5.10. Contractor and City represent that each has read and understands the Agreement and Contract Documents. The Contractor represents it understands the City's regulations concerning Premises access, badges, parking, security, safety, fire, prohibited drugs and alcohol, and smoking and other rules, and that Contractor has visited Premises where the Work is to be done and is familiar with the local conditions under which it is to be done. Contractor also represents that it is experienced in performing and competent and qualified to perform the kind of tasks or assignments included in the Work and employs or has available for employment in sufficient numbers all unskilled, skilled, administrative, supervisory, professional and managerial or other personnel required to perform the Work as required by this Agreement. 5.11. Contractor represents that it has the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of City. This means Contractor is able to fulfill the requirements of this Agreement. Failure to perform all the Services required Page 9 of 19 under this Agreement constitutes a material breach of the Agreement. Contractor has complete and sole discretion for the manner in which the Work under this Agreement will be performed. 5.12. Contractor declares and states that is has complied with and will continue to comply with all federal, state and local laws regarding business permits and licenses that may be required to carry out the Services to be performed under this Agreement. 5.13. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City free and harmless from all claims, demands, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries and deficiencies, including interest, penalties, attorney's fees and costs, that City may incur as a result of a breach by Contractor of any representation or provision contained in this Agreement or any negligent or intentional acts or omissions by Contractor, it subcontractors, agents, and employees or based on any claim that any software program or other product used or furnished by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement constitutes an infringement of any United States patent or copyright. 5.14. Contractor's rights under this Agreement may not be assigned nor may its duties be delegated or subcontracted without the prior written consent of City. 'Any assignment or delegation or subcontract in violation of this Section shall, at City's sole discretion, be void. Consent by City shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for performance of Contractor's obligations hereunder. City may assign all or any part of this Agreement at any time effective immediately upon written notification to Contractor. 5.15. At all times while Work is being performed on the Premises each party shall be represented thereon by a designated representative. Each party may notify the other in writing of the identity of such persons from time to time. Work Injury 5.16. The treatment and care of injuries sustained by Contractor's employees, subcontractors, representatives or other personnel shall be and remain the responsibility of Contractor. City's first aid facilities, if any, however, will be made available to Contractor's employees in emergency cases which are the direct result of accidents occurring on the Premises. City shall incur no liability for, and Contractor hereby agrees to indemnify City against, any causes of action, claim, liability or costs, including attorney's fees, arising in whole or part out of the furnishing of such first aid facilities or assistance to Contractor's employees, subcontractors, representatives or other personnel, or out of the failure to furnish such facilities or assistance. Page 10 of 19 Records, Inspection and Audit 5.17. During the course of Work being performed, Contractor and any of its subcontractors, shall maintain and retain, not less than three (3) years after completion thereof, complete and accurate records of the Contractor's costs which are chargeable to the City under this Agreement. City or its designated, authorized representatives, shall have the right during this three (3) year period, upon written reasonable notice, to inspect and audit those records. Such records to be maintained and retained by the Contractor shall include: (a) payroll record accounting for the total time distribution of the Contractor's employees working full or part time on the Work (to permit tracing to payroll payments in cash); (b) invoices for purchases, receiving and issuing documents, and all the other unit- inventory records for the Contractor's stores, stock or capital items; (c) paid invoices and canceled checks for material purchased and for the subcontractor's and any other third parties' charges; and (d) any other documentation City deems necessary to support costs and charges under this Agreement. Corporate Conduct 5.18. Contractor, its employees, agents or representatives shall not offer or give to an officer, official or employee of City gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other gratuities to influence the award of a contract or obtain favorable treatment under this Agreement or any other contract. Standard of Care 5.19. Contractor agrees that all Services provided will be conducted by the principal and competent staff members, if any, under the supervision of the principal, and that Services will be performed and rendered diligently. Contractor represents that it has, or shall secure, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform Contractor's Services under this Agreement, but at all times shall be responsible for the Services of such personnel. Contractor may not employ any subcontractor without the prior written approval of the City. Indemnity Process 5.20. The City shall notify Contractor in writing of any suits, claims or demands covered by any indemnity contained in this Agreement. Promptly after receipt of such notice, Contractor shall assume the defense of such claim with counsel reasonably satisfactory to City. If Contractor fails, within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice, to assume the defense with counsel reasonably satisfactory to City, or if, in the reasonable judgment of City, a direct or indirect conflict of interest exists between the parties with respect to the claim, or if in the Page 11 of 19 sole judgment of City the assumption and conduct of the defense by Contractor would materially and adversely affect City in any manner or prejudice its ability to conduct a successful defense, then the City shall have the right to undertake the defense, compromise and .settlement of such claim for the account and at the expense of Contractor. Notwithstanding the above, if the City in its sole discretion so elects, City may also participate in the defense of such actions by employing counsel at its expense, without waiving the Contractor's obligations to indemnify or defend. Contractor shall not settle or compromise any claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of the City and without an unconditional release of all liability by each claimant or plaintiff to the City. Treatment of Confidential and Proprietary Information 5.21 For ten (10) years after the effective date of this Agreement, Contractor shall refrain from using any Confidential or Proprietary Information except in connection with the Work or from disclosing it to any third party other than to employees of Contractor who require it in performance of the Work and except to such other third persons as City may authorize in writing. If disclosure to such an employee or to other third persons is so authorized, Contractor shall enter into with said party a confidentiality agreement containing provisions with respect to use and disclosure of Proprietary Information substantially the same as those contained in this Agreement. 5.22. Contractor shall take reasonable precautions to safeguard any documents containing Proprietary Information which City may supply to Contractor hereunder. Contractor may copy, in whole or part, such documents to the extent necessary for the performance of the Work, and Contractor shall return to City upon the completion of the Work or request by City all such documents and copies. 5.23. Except as expressly permitted by prior written consent of the City, Contractor and /or its subcontractors shall not disclose, permit the disclosure of, release, disseminate, or transfer, whether orally or by any other means, any part of such Confidential Information to any other person or entity. Contractor and /or its subcontractors shall return any written Confidential Information and all copies made of such items to the City upon the City's written request, but in any event not later than the date that Contractor has performed all Work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor hereby agrees that such Confidential Information and any documents provided may be used by Contractor and /or its subcontractors only as authorized by the City. Contractor shall include a provision in its agreements with subcontractors that binds the subcontractors to this non - disclosure requirement. Page 12 of 19 5.24. All reports, plans, data, studies, maps, drawings, models, photographs, documents and other writings prepared by and for Contractor, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, with the exception of working notes, internal documents. and Confidential Information provided by businesses located in City, shall be considered the property of City. Contractor shall deliver such documents and materials to the City as they are generated; however, Contractor may take and retain copies of said documents and materials that are not Confidential Information, as desired. 5.25. All reports, information, data and exhibits prepared or assembled by Contractor in connection with the performance of its Services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public and Contractor agrees that such documents shall not be available to any individual or organization without the written consent of the City prior to such release. 5.26. No reports, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Contractor. Compliance with Authority 5.27. Contractor shall comply with all laws, regulations, executive orders and other applicable requirements of any governmental agencies having jurisdiction including the Fair labor Standards Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act and all those relating in any way to employment practices and protection of the environment. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or any applicant for employment for reasons of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual preference, age or national origin. 5.28. Contractor shall make timely payment of all employment taxes and of all social security and other contributions of every kind required to be made with respect to or measured by the wages and salaries of persons employed by Contractor. 5.29. Contractor shall indemnify City against, and hold City harmless from, any liability or loss including liability or loss from fines or penalties arising out of Contractor's failure to perform the obligations imposed upon it by Sections 5.28 and 5.29 of the Agreement. Page 13 of 19 Progress Reports 5.30. Contractor shall meet with City staff, upon City's request, or as needed, in order to provide reports or information concerning the Services being performed by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor's License Classification 5.31. Contractor shall possess all appropriate licenses for the duration of this Agreement. SECTION 6. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 6.01. Unless otherwise terminated as provided in this Section, this Agreement will continue in effect until such time as the 26th Street extension project is complete, the City receives all project close -out documents and receives all necessary claims support, unless otherwise extended according to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Non - Default Termination 6.02. City, at its sole discretion, may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Contractor and such termination shall be effective in the manner specified in such notice and shall be without prejudice to any claim that either party may have against the other. During the thirty (30) day period after such notice is sent, the parties shall continue to act toward each other in good faith. 6.03. In the event of any such termination, in full and complete settlement for the termination of the Work, City shall pay Contractor for those Services performed prior to the date of delivery of the termination notice, plus compensation for (i) necessary Work performed during the notice period and authorized in the termination notice, and (ii) all costs reasonably and necessarily incurred by Contractor directly attributable to termination which could not reasonably have been avoided and for which Contractor is not otherwise compensated that are incurred through the date of termination and effectuating the termination ( "Termination Expenses "). Termination Expenses shall not include lost profits, lost opportunities, consequential damages, or the like. In no event shall total payment exceed the Contract Price. Page 14 of 19 Termination on Occurrence of Stated Events 6.04. This Agreement will terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: A. Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; or B. Sale of the Contractor; or C. Assignment of this Agreement by Contractor without City's written consent. Termination for Default 6.05. If Contractor defaults in the performance of this Agreement or materially breaches any of its provisions, City may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Contractor indicating the effective date of such termination. Termination will take effect immediately upon the date specified in the notification. For the purposes of this paragraph, material breach of this Agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following: A. Contractor's failure to perform, in a manner satisfactory to the City in its sole discretion, the Services specified in Section 3 of this Agreement; or B. Contractor's material breach of any obligation or provision contained in Section 5 of this Agreement. 6.06. The waiver by either party of a breach or default by the other party shall not be deemed a waiver of any different or later breach; nor shall any delay or omission by either party to exercise any right it may have hereunder operate as a waiver of any breach or default of such a right. The failure of either party to this Agreement to exercise any of its rights under this Agreement does not constitute a breach thereof and shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any subsequent breach. 6.07. In the event of any termination of this Agreement or reduction in the scope of the Work, Contractor shall not be entitled to damages for loss of profits for the unexecuted portion of the Work or any other damages because of such termination or reduction. Page 15 of 19 SECTION 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS Notices 7.01. All notices, approvals, consents and other communications between the parties shall be in writing, and shall be sent by fax or by certified mail (return receipt requested) to the respective addresses set forth below, or at such other address as may be furnished by either party to the other in writing. Faxed notices, confirmed by copy thereof, shall be deemed communicated as of the day the facsimile was sent. Mailed notices will be deemed communicated as of the day of receipt or the third (3rd) day after mailing, whichever occurs first. Contractor - Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation Attn: Peter Lim, Chief Executive Officer 12 L Mauchly Irvine, CA 92618 Fax: 949 -450 -2805 Telephone: 949 -450 -2800 City - City of Vernon Attn: Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Administrator /City Clerk 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Fax: 323 - 826 -1438 Telephone: 323 - 583 -8811 ext 260 Entire Agreement of the Parties 7.02. This Agreement supercedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the rendering of Services by Contractor for City and contains all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and the rendering of those Services. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not contained in this Agreement, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement or a subsequent amendment or change order shall be valid or binding. No amendment or change in the provisions of this Agreement shall be made, except in a formal written amendment signed by Contractor and an authorized representative of the City, or in a written change order. Contractor expressly waives all claims for compensation based upon quantum merit, implied contract or oral contract. Each party represents and warrants that it has read and fully familiarized itself with this Agreement, and that such party has been fully authorized to sign this Agreement. Page 16 of 19 7.03. This Agreement shall be comprised of these included provisions, together with Exhibits A and B, which are all attached. In the event of conflict between this Agreement and any of the exhibits, including the Proposal, this Agreement shall prevail. Partial Invalidity 7.04. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Law and Arbitration 7.05. All disputes arising out of or related to this Agreement, the conduct of either party in connection with this Agreement, and the relationship and rights of the parties in connection with this Agreement, whether characterized as breach of contract, tort, or otherwise (except for those requesting injunctive relief) shall be determined by binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of this Section. The submittal of all matters to arbitration in accordance with the terms of this Section is the sole and exclusive method, means and procedure to resolve any and all claims, disputes or disagreements arising under this Agreement, except for claims by either party which seek injunctive relief, which claims shall be resolved by suit filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California, the decision of which court shall be subject to appeal pursuant to applicable law. The parties hereby irrevocably waive any and all rights to the contrary and shall at all times conduct themselves in accordance with the terms of this Section, relying on arbitration as the sole means of resolution of disputes. Arbitration of all matters required to be arbitrated hereunder shall take place before a panel of three retired judges of the Superior Court of the State of California (the "Arbitrators ") under the auspices of Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services, Inc. ( "JAMS "). Such arbitration shall be initiated by the parties, or either of them, within ten (10) calendar days after either party sends notice of a demand to arbitrate (the "Arbitration Notice ") to the other party and to JAMS. The Arbitration Notice shall contain a description of the subject matter of the arbitration, the dispute with respect thereto, the amount involved, if any, and the remedy or determination sought. Each party shall select a retired judge from the JAMS panel, and the two selected judges shall mutually agree on the third retired judge from the JAMS panel. If one of the parties does not select a retired judge from the JAMS panel within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the Arbitration Notice, JAMS will select the second judge, and the judge selected by JAMS and the judge selected by the other party will select the third judge for the panel. The third judge is to be selected within ten (10) calendar days following the selection of the first two judges. The three judges will together serve as the Arbitrators. Page 17 of 19 The arbitration shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California. Any party may be represented by counsel andfor other authorized representative. In rendering a decision(s), the Arbitrators shall determine the rights and obligations of the parties according to the substantive and procedural laws of the State of California and the terms of this Agreement. The decision of the Arbitrators shall be based on the evidence introduced at the hearing and accompanied by a written statement of decision as to each of the principal controverted issues. The agreement of two of the three Arbitrators as to the resolution of the dispute shall be a conclusive resolution. The Arbitrators shall deliver the written decision to the parties within thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the selection of the last of the Arbitrators. The decision shall be conclusive and binding, and it may thereafter be confirmed as a judgment by the Superior Court of the State of California, subject only to challenge on the grounds set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1286.2. The validity and enforceability of the decision of the Arbitrators is to be determined exclusively by the California courts. Attorney's Fees 7.06. In the event a dispute, claim or litigation arises regarding this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for reasonable attorneys' fees and actual costs, which may be set by the arbitrators or the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief which is obtained. 7.07. Neither party shall be considered in default in any of its obligations under this Agreement when a failure of performance shall be due to an uncontrollable force. The term "uncontrollable force" shall mean any cause beyond the control of the party affected, including, but not restricted to, flood, earthquake, storm, fire, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance or disobedience, federal, state, or municipal action, statute, ordinance, or regulation, embargoes of the United States Government or any other government, which by exercise of due diligence such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid and by exercise of due diligence has been unable to overcome. Either party rendered unable to fulfill any of its obligations under this Agreement by reason of an uncontrollable force shall give written notice within five (5) business days of such fact to the other party and shall exercise due diligence to remove such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 7.08. Except as may otherwise be specifically provided herein, this Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Contractor and the City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Page 18 of 19 7.09. The captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of the Agreement or any part thereof. 7.10. City reserves the right to award similar contracts to multiple contractors to ensure the City has adequate services. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Agreement on the dates shown below. Executed at , California, on City: City of Vernon Name: Leonis C. Malburg, Mayor Date: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Clerk Eric T. Fresch, City Attorney Contractor: Lim and Nas Engineering Corporation Name: PE i el< two Title: /k ry c i pi�"Z.� Cii4e1 cx.e Fa h'Vt Ce r'(a6 0) er i otk tr Date: 03 35 --06 l WILLIAM NA IMENTO Name: Title: Przr,., G, P 4 L.- C l 6 o cial cef C Cm) Date: 3- a S- 05 Page 19 of 19 _ - ortact , •, EtillaajOrtlErie Services - 26th Street Extension Project Lim And Nascimento Engineering Lim And Nascimento Engineering Corporation February 7, 2005 •City of Vernon Department of Community Services and Water 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Attention: Mr. Samuel Kevin Wilson, PE Director of Community Services and Water Subject: Construction Management Services — 26th Street Extension Project Dear Mr. Wilson: Lim And Nascimento (LAN) Engineering is pleased to submit this proposal for your evaluation to provide construction management services for the 26th Street Extension Project. Our efforts in preparing for this project have included assembling a team of highly qualified construction professionals that have outstanding track records, relevant local experience, and a comprehensive understanding of the project necessary to meet the goals of the 26th Street Extension Project. We have reviewed the available contract documents (plans and specifications) and visited the project site; through this, we have gained a thorough understanding of what is required for the successful completion of the project. Since the beginning, LAN has adhered to a strict policy of placing the interests of our clients and the projects we served above everything else. Perhaps this explains why LAN Engineering has been considered the most dynamic, full service transportation engineering consulting firm in Southern California. Our recent extensive roadway/bridge engineering and construction project experience, on similar construction management assignments, gives us a unique perspective for the completion of this project. Along with our experience and our commitment, flexibility, and responsiveness will allow us to assist the City of Vernon in a timely and successful completion of the 26th Street Extension Project. We are excited about this opportunity and would like to highlight the following unique benefits: Experience: Since its founding in 1994, LAN has been providing highway/bridge engineering, design and construction management services exclusively in bridge related transportation infrastructure projects to public agencies. Within the last have five (5) years, LAN has successfully managed the largest and most complex bridge construction projects in California than any of our competing colleagues. Commitment: Our commitment to serve our client's needs, guides our professional endeavors and excellence. We accomplish this commitment through effective project management, the excellence of our staff, and attention to every detail. Flexibility and Responsiveness: We encourage you to contact our past and current clients to testify to our flexibility and responsiveness to our clients. As we begin a project, we are known for being flexible and responsive to the changing needs of our clients and the changing needs of the project we managed. 12 L Mauchly (949) 450 -2800 Irvine, CA 92618 Fax (949) 450 -2805 Letter to Mr. Samuel Kevin Wilson, PE Director of Community Services and Water 26th Street Extension Project City of Vernon Excellence of Our Staff: Not only are the integrity and commitment of our firm important, but most important are the people we are proposing to manage your project, because we understand the "people that will deliver your protect ". Hence, we have assembled a team of construction engineers that have managed some of the most successful construction projects along the Alameda Corridor. References: We are unmatched in the services we provide our clients. As a testament to our claim we encourage the City to contact our past and current clients. Name Title Agency Telephone Mr. Shahin Pourvahidi, PE Contract Manager Mr. John Koo, PE HBRR Bridge Program Manager Mr. John Doherty, PE Caltrans Office of Structure Contract Management City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering CEO and Director of Alameda Corridor Engineering and Construction Transportation Authority Mr. Herald Lantis, PE Construction Manager Mr. Tim Hughes, PE Project Manager Mr. Tim Buresh, PE Former Director of Engineering and Construction San Bernardino Association of Governments 916.947.6520 916.227.8500 213.847.5625 310.233.7480 760.802.7730 City of Palmdale 661.237.5319 Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority 213. 241.4133 DBE Utilization: LAN, having "graduated" from the DBE program, understands the importance of City of Vernon DBE program and is prepared to exceed or fulfill the DBE goal of 13% set by the City for this contract. Not only we are committed to exceed the 13% goal but will also assist our DBE sub - consultant in their cash flow. LAN is probably the only engineering consultant firm that pay our DBE sub - consultant within seven (7) of receiving their invoices, regardless as to whether we receive payment form our clients. A testament to this claim is our current DBE firms S &T Engineering, SafeWorks, Inc., Anil Verma & Associates, Inc. and G- Force, Inc. Insurance: We have carefully reviewed Exhibit A "Insurance Requirements" and Exhibit B "Indemnification Form" of the RFP, we believe that LAN's current insurance policy will meet or exceed your insurance coverage requirements and is committed to obtain additional policy, if deems necessary.. Letter to Mr. Samuel Kevin Wilson, PE Director of Community Services and Water 26th Street Extension Project City of Vernon Proposal Organization: To better facilitate the review of our proposal that response to your evaluation criteria and the format and content listed on page 9 and page 10 of the RFP. Below is table summarizing as to how we organize our proposal. Section 1 Section 2 Background and Approach Methodology Section 3 Work Plan Section 4 Relevant Experience Section 5 Resumes Separate Sealed Cost Information Envelope • Brief introduction to the LAN Team: LAN and sub - consultants • Summary of our overall Project Approach • Project Understanding and its Key Issues • Management Approach and Management Plan ✓ Project Team. Organization Chart ✓ Qualifications Brief of our proposed Key Personnel ✓ References for each proposed Key Personnel ✓ Key Personnel Role and their Responsibilities • Technical Approach ✓ Key Project Constraints and Opportunities ✓ Summary describing our proposed Scope of Services ✓ Our Approach describing in detail for accomplishing the work ✓ List of Material Tests to be performed by LAN, as requested on page 10 of the RFP • Conclusion • Work Plan Matrix • Relevant Project Experience Matrix • Details of Relevant Project Experience and References • Resumes of proposed personnel listed on the Organization Chart • Staffing Plan • Hourly Rate Schedule • Other Direct Costs • Estimated Total. Costs (Not to Exceed) We thank you for taking the time to review our proposal and pledge to you the commitment of our team. Very truly yours, Lim And Nascimento Engineering Corporation Peter Lim, PE; Chief Executive Officer Project Manager Section 1 Contract Management Services 26t'' Street Extension Project Background + Approach Project Team Background Project Understanding + Key Issues 1 Project Team Background Lim And Nascimento (hereafter referred to as the LAN team), is pleased to submit this Technical Proposal to the City of Vernon in response to your Request for Proposal to provide Construction Management Services for the 26th Street Extension Project. We have carefully reviewed all of the available information and documents (PS &E) on the 261 Street Extension project. As a result, we have elected to pursue the Construction Management services, for which we feel the LAN team is best qualified. The LAN team is comprised of LAN, as the Prime Consultant, supported by three (3) highly qualified DBE subconsultants with significant construction management, engineering and inspection and materials testing experience. In the spirit to comply and/or exceed the City of Vernon DBE participation requirements, we have carefully selected three (3) DBE sub - consultants to support LAN in providing full Construction Management services for the 26th Street Extension project. All the proposed sub - consultants have relevant experience in their respective fields and have successfully completed numerous CM assignments as sub - consultant to LAN. LIM AND NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORPORATION (LAN) - PRIME CONSULTANT LAN, a California Corporation established in March 1994, is a specialized bridge /roadway /railroad engineering firm, with its professional practice exclusively in construction management and inspection, analysis, and design of rail/bridge /roadway- related projects. LAN is at the pinnacle of highway and bridge construction with Regional Transportation Authorities and Local Agencies in California, providing typical bridge replacement and widening including long -span bridge construction management services. Since its formation in 1994, LAN has established itself as a leader in bridge/highway /rail construction and design. In less than 10 years, LAN, as Prime Consultant, has successfully completed over 100 bridge construction management and design projects involving over 20 miles of highway /roadway and 200 bridge structures. S &T ENGINEERING /SEQUOIA CONSULTING - MATERIAL TESTING S & T Engineering Inc. (S & T) is a DBE certified materials testing and inspection firm specializing in materials engineering, testing and inspection services headquartered in the City of Industry, California. The team proposed for this project has been providing materials testing and inspection services throughout their consulting engineering careers for local, state and federal governmental agencies. S & T has its own full service Caltrans certified of the art laboratory located in City of Industry. S & T as a sub - consultant to LAN providing materials testing services for the Burbank Boulevard Bridge Widening project in the City of Burbank, COAST SURVEYING — QA SURVEY (AS -NEED) Coast Surveying, Inc., a Caltrans certified DBE firm, was founded in 1981 and has over twenty-two years of surveying, mapping and right of way engineering experience working for such governmental agencies as: Caltrans - Districts 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12; counties of Orange and Los Angeles; and numerous cities throughout the area, as well as numerous private engineering companies. CNS ENGINEERS, INCORPORATED — DOCUMENT CONTROL SUPPORT CNS Engineers, a DBE/WBE firm Certified in the State of California, provides quality and cost - effective Program and Construction Management and Document Control services, on public works projects, to a multitude of clients throughout the State. As a sub - consultant to LAN, CNS Engineers is currently providing construction support services to the City of Los Angeles on their HBRR Bridge Program. Why Choose the LAN Team: ✓ Our Proposed Resident Engineer, Peter Ho, PE, with the local road/bridge construction experience. ✓ Proven Willingness, Responsiveness, and Flexibility in meeting Clients' requirements in our previous contracts. ✓ Thorough understanding of Caltrans bridge construction and public works construction laws and regulations. ✓ Unmatched Commitment from the Principals of the Firm who will serve as the Project Manager. ✓ Key Personnel with extensive roadway and bridge construction experience. ✓ Project Manager with unique qualifications (both design and construction experience) committed to "Do Whatever It Takes" for the success of this project. ✓ LAN's RE and Inspectors are among the very few CM professionals that have the capability to perform temporary work (falsework, shoring, and trenching) review, design, and approval. ✓ As part of LAN's Overhead Payroll we propose Jon Mehtlan, PE, a 40 -year veteran in roadway and bridge construction, to support the LAN Team as the QA /QC Officer. 2 6t Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN Project Underst c! key lssue (Project Bile oundX, The City of Vernon is requesting proposals for consultant services to provide complete construction management, inspection, and quality control and material testing services for the construction of the 26th Street Extension project. The 26th Street Extension project limits begin approximately 150 -meter west of Atlantic Boulevard and continue the 26th Street at Bandini Boulevard. The total length of the roadway improvement is approximately 455 meters. The proposed roadway improvements are located on the east side of State Route 710. Based on the project documents (plans and specifications), LAN has identified the key features of the project to include the following: • 26th Street Extension (Roadway Improvements) • Construction of a new cast -in- place reinforced concrete box girder bridge structure over Atlantic Boulevard that include a 2.4 -meter sidewalk Construction of a new pump station on 26th Street on the west of Atlantic Boulevard • Mechanical and electrical equipment for the pump station • Trenching and shoring for the pump station construction • Construction of 5 retaining walls (total length approximately 275 meters) ■ Roadway and structural excavation • Roadway signing and stripping • Drainage facilities • Electrical and traffic signal facilities • Street Lighting System • Fencing • Street Tree and Landscape Installation For the successfully completion of the 26th Street Extension project, the selected consulting firm must only posses the knowledge of construction administration of a typical roadway/bridge construction project in an urban environment but also require to have the experience with local construction practices. LAN is well known for its ability to provide Construction Management Services on roadway improvements and bridge projects in urban environment within the State of California. Our current and previous clients recognize our "hands -on" management style, resources, experience, and construction planning skills. These are all important attributes, but most of all they appreciate our willingness, flexibility, and responsiveness to changing project needs. Having identified the project requirements and visited the project site in numerous occasions, we have developed a project team that have the identical experience similar to the 26th Street Extension project to achieve the project objectives. The primarily objectives of the project is the successfully completion of the project on schedule and budget with minimal interruption to local businesses and a goal no injury to commuting public and workers at large. In developing our approach to the 26th Street Extension project, we began by building a Construction Planning Team, comprised of the Project Manager, Peter Lim, PE; Resident Engineer, Peter Ho, PE; Assistant Resident Engineer, Chris Mockus, PE; Lead Bridge Engineer, Chuck Tran, PE and Senior Civil Engineer, Benny Quintana, PE. We understand that constructing a sound strategy begins with a plan — an important bridge to the successful completion of the project. Our Construction Planning Team will help the City of Vernon build this plan through a systematic four -step program, designed to help the City of Vernon achieve its project goals through a 4 -step process. This 4 -step process is illustrated in the figure on the following page. 26t Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 1 Project Understanding and Key issues 'Proy t B lc :kgr't Ind) A Proven, Systematic Process For Building A Successful Project Step 4 Ongoing Evaluation & Management ✓ Review and Reporting ✓ Corrective Action ✓ Identify Changing Project Needs L Step 1 Getting to Know the Project ✓ Establish Project Objectives ✓ Budget, Schedule & Safety ✓ Excellent Public Perception Step 3 Smooth Project Execution & implementation ✓ Understanding of Scope of Services Required ✓ Ensure Seamless Coordination ✓ Ultimate Compliance to Contract Documents ✓ QA/QC, Claims, and Delay Avoidance Step 2 Build a Project Team that Matches the Client's Needs and Project Objectives ✓ Personnel with Relevant Experience ✓ Flexible, Responsive & Reliable ✓ Proven Track Record Step 1: Getting to Know the Project Objectives: Develop a Complete Understanding of the Project and its Key Issues Our key personnel have visited the project site, reviewed the contract documents, and discussed the project with our in -house designers to develop a thorough understanding of the project issues and services required. Our understanding of the project and its key issues is summarized this section of the proposal. A detailed discussion of the additional key issues is further discussed in Step 3 — Smooth Project Execution & Implementation (Technical Approach) illustrated in Section 2 — Methodology of this Technical Proposal. Key Issues: Having identified the significant features of the 26th Street Extension project, we have summarized some of the key issues that shall be considered by the CM Team within the constructability review phase of the project, and issues that we will be aware of during construction. With this in mind, and in addition to our understanding of the project, the following are critical concerns that need to be carefully considered by the selected CM team. A more detailed discussion is provided in a subsequent section of this Proposal. Comprehensive review of contract documents to provide the City with a quality set of construction documents that will provide the most cost- effective means for construction. Identify potential challenges and resolutions. Identify different site conditions. As part of the LAN team, we have assembled a constructability review task force to provide a final review of the contract documents. In addition to helping develop a quality set of contract documents, this task will identify construction challenges and provide a constructable and biddable project, with minimum impacts /delays. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 1 Project UnderstGi -tin and Rey les (Project Bite ntl) Coordination Update LAN's current RE Manual to address the document control process, coordination and communication process with the City, Designer, Utility Companies and Community Outreach procedures. Schedule Imperative that the project is on schedule with no delay, so the City of Vernon can operate 26th Street Corridor at full capacity. Budget Budget is $5.2 Million. We will provide a final review of the document control and coordination process between the City and designer to ensure that the project is buildable, yet meets all of the environmental requirements. Mobilize a team that has identical experience and has established working relationships with local utility companies. We will provide a comprehensive Constructability Review assignment to eliminate inconsistencies within the contract documents, which can save construction dollars during construction, and avoid different site condition claims. Local Community Access Ensure that access to adjacent property owners and business is maintained. Provide team members that are instrumental regarding public information and establish a web - based information system that allows the City Management and the public to know the progress of construction. Construction Staging Interfaces Ability of CM staff to identify the work interfaces between construction stages. Eliminate delay claims. Utility Relations Maintain construction schedule and avoid any surprises. Ensure no Right -of -Way delay claims; The LAN Constructability. Review Team, and the proposed RE, will assure the City that the work performed by the contractor involves clearly defined staging interfaces, especially overlapping staging that may impact the approved Baseline Schedule. Provide key personnel with proven track records working with SCE and private utility owners. Implement an electronic tracking system. Community Outreach Achieve a positive public perception of the 26th Street Extension construction project. Involve the local businesses prior and during construction to mitigate potential negative community response to the project. Peter Ho, PE, our proposed Resident Engineer, has recent local experience in this regard. He will provide business and community relations in resolving and addressing community concerns. Advise the City on impacted businesses. Piling Operations Noise control during piling operation, often cause negative public perception. 4 Our proposed RE and inspectors have the experience in implementing noise control measure specified in the specifications and hours of piling operations. Their recent experience includes the Redondo Junction Grade Separation, Soto Street/UPRR and Downey Road/BNSF Bridge projects. Temporary Work Reduce turnaround time, significantly, in review and approval of temporary work such as bridge falsework and trenching and shoring for pump station construction 26t Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Lead Bridge Engineer, Chuck Tran, PE and Resident Engineer, Peter Ho, PE can provide on- site review and approval of temporary works. • 1 Section 2 Contract Management Services 26th Street Extension Project Methodology Management Approach Technical Approach 2. Methodology: Maria go • 'rent Approach Step 2: Build a Project Team that Matches the City's Needs & Project Objectives Goal: Develop a Sound and Solid Staffing Plan for the Project that is flexible and responsive With our understanding of the project and its key issues completed in Step 1 illustrated in Section 1 "Project Background" of this Technical Proposal, we began building a team that matches the project needs. Our team building process begins with developing a sound management plan that selects our project team members. Management Plan The most successful CM Services contracts are preceded by a sound management approach that identifies the staffing availability within their organization and the appropriate level of experience. Very simply stated, our management approach is committing our best people to this project. The way we achieved this approach is to take - on one major assignment at a time. As in the past, time - after -time, we have successfully maintained this track record with our past clients. Another key factor in our management style is to ensure that there is no turn over among our key staff. That is, once the key personnel are assigned to a project, he or she will remain on the project until project completion. Among our competing colleagues in the arena of providing Construction Management services contract, LAN staff turnover is the lowest and, as a matter of fact, LAN has not lost a key CM staff member in its 11 -year history. Experienced CM Staff. The foremost important aspect of any project is the ability to assemble a team of construction engineers having the relevant experience. We have just such a team for this project. We can say that we probably are the only firm that can provide the City with a structure inspector that has the experience in falsework design, trenching and shoring design, post- tensioning, and pump station construction, resulting in lower CM cost. This will eliminate the City from having multiple structure inspectors for each of the structural elements. In summary, no other firm in California has managed more bridge construction and pump station projects within metropolitan Los Angeles in the last five years than LAN Engineering. Our proposed RE, Peter Ho, had successfully completed his assignment as RE for the Redondo Junction Grade Separation project prior to moving to managing the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation for the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority. Under Peter Ho's leadership, the PCH Grade Separation project is far ahead of schedule and has successfully completed one (1) month ahead of schedule with no outstanding claims. Having successfully completed the PCH project, Peter is currently 100% and is ready to serve the City of Vernon for the 26th Street Extension project. In addition to Peter Ho, PE, Chris Mockus, PE, PE, the Assistant Resident Engineer, Lead Bridge Engineer, Chuck Tran, PE and Senior Civil Engineer, Benny Quintana are available immediately. All these key individuals have either worked on the Redondo. Junction and/or PCH Grade Separation projects for the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority. Key Project Team Members Although the LAN team's overall credentials and commitment are important, the key to any project are the individuals who will actually be performing the work. In this regard we have provided you with two (2) references for each of the proposed key personnel. With this in mind, LAN team has assembled a highly qualified team of engineers each with a minimum of 15 years of construction management and inspection experience who are committed and dedicated to this effort. The proposed key staff members were chosen based on their extensive experience in bridge and pump station construction in urban environment. • 2e Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Methodology: Management Approach Our strong record of experience in bridge and roadway construction projects allows the project team to offer unparalleled level of experience in the requisite disciplines. The team's professionals have consistently demonstrated their ability in managing bridge /road construction projects that involve multi disciplines and multiple agency coordination. The Project Organization Chart shown below depicts that the LAN Team has the personnel and resources necessary for the successful completion of the 26th Street Extension project that may awarded to us, for the duration this contract. Our proposed pool of over 10 engineers in various technical disciplines, demonstrates that we have both the number and the depth of experienced staff to be assigned. The project organization chart outlines the major assignments for all key personnel. Qualification briefs of our key team members are summarized below. Details of individual credentials are included in Section 5 "Resumes" of this Technical Proposal. LAN Organization Chart Experience Track Record Committment 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Blvd. Legend L S C Project D,recto ?a,e f�crler CN 11 LAN Engineering (SBE) S 8 T Engineenng/Sequda Consulting Coast Surveying CNS Engineers Support Role MuKiole Roles Project Manager Peter Lim, PE Construction Contract Ac•rninistat ion Chris Mockus, PE iii Assistant Resident Elui:rs' er Costruction Engineering + Inspection Peter Ho, fir. IL) Senior l= )sricigr, Engineer Bridge EICJ[tiBL' ff ce c.l3C ;[[t £,er /LOCtliri &`V ?t C. ,,tifriJi Constnrctahilay Oeview Peter Ho, PE Chr is P ieci ris PR ctrical + Utility inspe Javier E3, rientos Tim i enr,�oai'` schedule + Claim, Pndinc Chris Mockus !L) Victoria Butler JD "As- Needed" Support Servcies Safety Compliance Officer Ray Ruggles (t) SWPPP + Compliance Officer Don Newberry (1) f1,l;c?C Mater,-2/ i "esr r Pri t)esliva, PE. -.1H. Tess Pe ez Project Administration Support OA Survey Check Grace Elarmot'! Ken Kasbonrn, PLS Raul Del C stiuo. PLS 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Management Approach Below are the qualifications brief of our proposed key management staff: Peter Lim, PE ROLE: Project Manager Title Chief Executive Officer Registration: CA Professional Engineer a -Mail: Peter.Lim@LANengineering.com Peter has dedicated 22 years of his entire career in bridge design and construction. He has risen from the ranks as bridge construction engineer for the Petronas Rail Link, involving six bridge structures, to bridge designer and Project Manager. Peter's bridge design background enables him to provide invaluable expertise to the City of Vernon in performing constructability review and bid support for the 26th Street Extension project. Most recently, Peter has successfully completed his assignment as Project Manager managing the Construction Management Team for the successful completion of the Redondo Junction Grade Separation, PCH Grade Separation, Soto Street/UPRR, Downey Road/BNSF, Long Beach Extension and Farragut Avenue Extension projects for Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority and is currently completing his assignment as Project Manager for the SR -210 Segments 9, 10 and 11 construction projects for SANBAG. The above experience has established Peter's comprehensive understanding of bridge construction issues in urban environment. As PM, Peter is unmatched for his commitment to meeting the changing needs of his clients during the course of his assignment. Time after time, Peter has proven his willingness and responsiveness to his clients and to changing project needs. Education: BSCE, MSCE- Tr'ansportatio Peter Ho, PE ROLE: Resident Engineer + Lead Construction Engineer Title: Senior Resident Engineer Registration: CA PE and Structural Engineer ducation: BSCE e -Mail: Peter.Ho[,LANengineering.com Peter Ho has over 25 years of exclusive highway and bridge construction experience in small and large -scale transportation projects. His broad based experience includes heavy construction applications with demonstrated expertise in construction, inspections, construction start-ups, contract administration, change orders and negotiations. As Resident Engineer, he has extensive knowledge in highway/bridge construction within the Caltrans freeway system. In addition, Peter has recent experience in cast -in -place and balanced cantilever prestressed concrete bridges and railroad steel truss bridge structures. Most recently, Peter Ho has served as Resident Engineer for seven (7) highway/bridge construction projects along the Alameda Corridor in Los Angeles. Chris Mockus, PE ROLE: Assistant Resident Engineer + Claims Engineer Title: Resident. Engineer ' Registration: CA Professional Engineer ucation: BSCE. 4ai1: Chris.Mockt Christopher Mockus has over 13 years of experience managing large -scale highway and bridge construction projects and programs. His vast construction management experience includes processing and negotiating CCO; preparing monthly progress reports; coordinating construction activities; supervising inspectors' daily operations; reviewing CPM schedule; Claims Mitigation, utilities coordination; field engineering; inspections; review and approval of temporary work drawings; monitoring storm water prevention program, monitoring traffic control and safety plans; office engineering in both roadway and structural projects, including bridge, retaining and sound walls, large diameter, drainage and sewer systems, asphalt and concrete pavement, and subgrade and aggregate base material. Prior to joining LAN, Chris was also responsible in developing several construction schedule training programs for Caltrans District 12 Construction. 26`x' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IAN Methodology Management Approach Chuck Tran, PE ROLE: Lead Bridge Engineer /Inspector aucatiotz- e -Mail: Chuck Tran ANengineering.cont Registration: CA Professional Engineer Chuck has over 19 years of exclusive bridge construction experience in California. All of Chuck's experience in the construction management and inspection has been in typical cast -in -place pre - stressed concrete box girder and several large bridge construction projects. He has intimate knowledge of post- tensioning operations and fabrication and erection large structural steel bridges over navigable waterway, cast -in -place post - tensioned concrete box girder type bridge construction in urban environment and California Freeway System. In addition Chuck has extensive experience in the areas of Caltrans construction contract administration and management, constructability reviews, construction survey, materials sampling, quality control and construction inspection. Benny Quintana, PE ROLE: Senior Civil Engineer /Inspector Title: Senior Resident Engineer /Associate Registration: CA Professional Engineer Education: BSCR e -Mail: Benny .Quintana®LANengineering.com Benny Quintana has over 17 years of engineering experience in construction management and administration of heavy civil and highway facilities with Caltrans, as well as, County and Local Agencies. Benny has risen from the ranks of civil /roadway inspectors to resident engineer to construction manager. Not only he has the experience in civil work construction but also construction of traffic signals interconnects, traffic staging and detours. At LAN Engineering, his responsibilities included resident engineering and Quality Assurance of construction management contract activities in order to guarantee quality service and satisfaction to our Clients. Prior to joining LAN, Benny served as Quality Assurance Engineer, Construction Manager, and Resident Engineer on various construction projects for Caltrans District 12 in Orange County. Peter Bizzigotti, PE ROLE: Bridge Engineer /Inspector Title:. Senior Bridge Engineer Education: BSCE Registration: CA Professional Engineer e-Mail: Peter .Bizzigotti@LANengineering.com Peter Bizzigotti has over 40 years of experience as a Bridge Engineer, Field Bridge Construction Inspector, Resident Engineer, Structures Representative, and Assistant Structures Representative on small and large bridge and structures projects within California. Out of his 40 years construction experience, Peter spent 38 years of his career with Caltrans Construction and OSC exclusively in bridge construction. Most recently, Peter Bizzigotti has successfully completed his assignment as Lead Bridge Construction Engineer/Inspector for the Pacific Coast highway Grade Separation project for Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Elmo Delos- Santos, PE ROLE: Office Engineer /Document Control Title: Resident Engineer Education: BSCE,MSCE e -Mail: Elmo.SantosANengineering.com Registration: CA Professional Engineer Elmo Delos -Santos has over 18 years of exclusive experience in the design and construction of transportation infrastructure projects. He has been involved with all facets of bridge/highway design and construction in Southern California. He is proficient in the areas of contract administration, construction management, document control, schedule control, cost control, design and constructability reviews, quality control and quality assurance, construction inspection, claims mitigation, claims analysis, contract change order processing, and construction office management. Elmo developed the first Resident Engineer Manual for ACTA that was utilized and administering the Alameda Corridtr North End and South End Construction projects. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Methodology: Management Approach Registration :` Dave Boger has been instrumental in the successfully completion of the $1.6 billion Alameda Rail Corridor. Due his tenure at ACTA, Dave served as Assistant Director of Construction in charge of all the north end and south end construction projects with construction exceeding $300 million. Jon Mehtlan, PE ROLE: QC Engineer Title: Director of Constrtictio # Services Registration: CA Professional Engineer e -Mail: Jon.a' INengineering.com In our Technical Support role and QA/QC personnel performance audit will be Jon Mehtlan, PE. Most recently, Jon retired from Caltrans Office of Structure Construction as Area Bridge Construction Manager. He brings us over 35 years of exclusive bridge construction experience. While working for Caltrans as the ACM, Jon was responsible for construction contracts administration and QC inspection of all bridge construction projects throughout Caltrans Districts 8, 9, and 12. During his tenure with Caltrans, Jon authored the Caltrans bridge construction procedures ( "Outline of Field Construction Procedures") which is being used by Caltrans Bridge Construction Engineers. As part of LAN's QA /QC program, and on LAN's overhead payroll, Jon will be responsible for the assurance of performance of our assigned field personnel and will also perform independent audits to observe that the construction safety orders are fully complied to. References for Proposed Key Personnel OUTLINE OF FIELD fONSTRUCTION PROCFD 1RES Office of Structure Construction DWUIon of Structures California Department of Transportation Key Staff /Role Reference No. 1 Reference No. 2 Peter Lim, PE Project Manager Mr. Shahin Pourvahidi, PE (916) 947 -6520 Caltrans Contract Manager Office of Structure Contract Management Mr. Herald Lantis, PE (760) 802 -7730 Caltrans Area Construction Manager Caltrans Office of Structure Construction Peter Ho, PE Resident Engineer Mr. John Doherty, PE (310) 233.7480 Chief Executive Officer Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Mr. Art Goodwin, PE (310) 233.7480 Assistant Director of Construction Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Chris Mockus, PE Assistant RE Ms. Gail Farber, PE (562) 801 -4767 Public Works Director City of Pico Rivera Mr. Jim Biel, PE (949) 724 -2000 Deputy Director Project Management Caltrans District 12 Chuck Tran, PE Lead Bridge Engineer Mr. Shahin Pourvahidi, PE (916) 947 -6520 Caltrans Contract Manager Office of Structure Contract Management Mr. Brian Boal, PE (510) 262.6810 Caltrans Bridge RE Office of Structure Construction Peter Bizzigotti, PE Structure Representative Mr. Dave O'Halloran, PE (805) 781 -4387 County Construction Engineer San Luis Obispo-County Mr. John Doherty, PE (310) 233 7480 Chief Executive Officer Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Benny Quintana, PE QC Engineer Mr. Tim Hughes, PE (661) 237.5319 Project Manager — Avenue S City of Palmdale 4 Mr. John Doherty, PE (310) 233.7480 Chief Executive Officer Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN 2. Methodology: Mcai ndgmellt Approach Step 3: Smooth Project Execution and Implementation Goal: Successful Completion of the 26`h Street Extension Project within Schedule, Budget, No Injury and Positive Public Perception and Support Having identified the key project team members, our project team members will begin to formulate a project execution and implementation plan, illustrated below for successfully completion of the 26th Street Extension Project, beginning assigning key personnel role and responsibilities. Key Personnel Role and Responsibilities Our proposed key personnel have completed the review of the 90% PS &E documents provided by the City and we understand the nature of work required for successfully completion of the 26th Street Extension Project. For each CM project assignment, we developed a Key Personnel Responsibility Matrix to ensure that each proposed team member understand their role. Attached is our proposed Key Personnel Responsibility Matrix (KPRM), this KPRM will be mounted (22 x 34 format) and posted in the field office. Utilizing the Key Personnel Responsibility Matrix, the next step in this phase of our planning is to complete our review of the contract documents and identify additional key project constraints and/or opportunities, listed below that may become an issue during construction. Additional Key Project Constraints: Utility Relations: Aside from unanticipated different site conditions encountered during foundation construction, utilities are by far the most cause of construction delays in any transportation infrastructure construction projects. This project is no exception; thus, careful and deliberate coordination is a prerequisite for the success for this project. Due to the shear magnitude of utilities within the footprint of the project site, including "cluster" utility lines, which cross Atlantic Boulevard and along 26th Street Corridor, it is imperative that a thorough utility search program be implemented to avoid surprises from unforeseen utility interference. Utility Tracking System: The LAN CM team will utilize a utility tracking system, which will list each utility, the owner, the owner's contact person, and to -date disposition of any action required of the utility. This tracking system will be continuously updated, in order to keep constant attention on the relocation activities of each utility affected by the construction. Contract Special Provisions: Utility Relocations are often the cause of delays and additional costs. As part of our scope, we will provide constructability review for this project and suggest that the Special Provisions be very clear on this issue. There should be no doubt as to whom, when, and how, the relocation of utilities will be accomplished. A construction schedule for utility relocation work should be included in the Special Provisions. .If utility work is completed before the contract is awarded to the lowest bidder, the person responsible for the utility relocation contract must certify that the work has been completed. Regular meetings among utility companies, the contractor and the RE will help provide the necessary communication to assure effective coordination. LAN will not only manage the coordination of the utility companies to prevent any potential delays, but will also thoroughly document their activities to protect the City from any potential delay claims. LAN knows that during all construction projects, things will change. It is how these changes are effectively managec?that keeps the job on schedule. 26m Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard P - Primary Responsibility S - Support Role R - Review C - Consult if Necessary A - Approve Mockus, PE (toria Butler, JD Pri DeSilva, PE Ruel DelCastillo, PLS QA Survey Constructability Review PRE - CONSTRUCTION PHASE RE Manual (Procedures Manual) Public Outreach Pre -Bid Support S &R 1 S &R Master Schedule, Schedule Support & Update Pre - Construction Meeting Pre- Condition Survey (Photos / Documentation Progress Management - Consultant Contract Construction Contract Administration Progress Schedule Changes / Claims P Construction Safety Utility Coordination Quality Assurance & Control Inspection Materials Testing and Support Services Environmental Services - SWPPP & Hazardous Progress Payments Submittals, RFIs, RFCs, Permits Falsework, Trenching & Shoring Conferences / Meetings Reports and Records Review of Traffic Plans (Detours and Lane Closures) Survey Support (QA) Services Public Outreach Document Control P Contractor Insurance Labor Compliance and DBE Monitoring As -Built Drawings Other Services as Required Contract Closeout As -Built Drawings (Red Line) 26th Street Extension Project City of Vernon 2. Methodology: Management Approach Utility Coordination: The key to utility coordination is being familiar with the construction activities, planning ahead, and continuously updating the team with the status of the work. Regular, separate utility meetings will be scheduled to coordinate all of the entities involved. All parties need to be aware of what others are doing in order to have successful project coordination and maintain project schedule. Our project inspectors will ensure that the Underground Service Alert is notified by the contractor in a timely manner and will monitor any potholing operations necessary to locate and protect existing facilities. Because of our ability to provide effective utility coordination, the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation Project managed by Peter Ho, PE is one (1) month ahead of schedule. Our reference to this claim is Mr. John Doherty, PE, Director of Engineering and Construction (310.233.7480) for ACTA. 26th Street Bridge Structure: LAN is well known for its bridge engineering and construction expertise. LAN, as Prime Consultant, has provided construction services for some of the largest bridge construction projects in California, including the Redondo Junction and PCH Grade Separation projects and New Carquinez Suspension Bridge, New Benicia - Martinez Segmental Bridge and the I- 680 /780 Interchange. Peter Lim, PE; Peter Ho, PE; Elmo Delos Santos, PE; Chuck Tran, PE; Peter Bizzigotti, PE and Jon 1Vlehtlan, PE, have over 100 years of bridge engineering and construction experience on transportation projects in California. The 26th Street Bridge over Atlantic Boulevard a cast-in-place box girder structure. Similar structures successfully completed by our proposed Resident Engineer, Peter Ho, PE, and Lead Bridge Engineer, Chuck Tran, PE includes Segment 5 of the Redondo Junction Grade Separation project, Downey Road/BNSF Bridge and I- 15 /Oakhill Road Interchange. Key technical elements for the bridge structure include falsework, post- tensioning, CIDH concrete piling; earth work, soil mix headwall and retaining walls at the abutments. Falsework and Temporary Construction Work. Falsework is a critical element of construction of the cast -in -place prestressed concrete box girder structure. Not only are the analysis, review, and approval important, and equally important is the erection and demolition sequence of the falsework. We recommend that the falsework and/or any temporary work submittals by the contractor be reviewed and approved by our proposed Resident Engineer, Peter Ho, PE, and/or Lead Bridge Engineer, Chuck Tran, PE. In addition to their ability of falsework analysis and design, the field staff will be required to have the capability to perform camber strips calculations and 4 -scale plans for this CIP concrete box girder bridge structure. In addition to our in -house Trenching and Shoring design computer programs (mentioned earlier); we have also developed several falsework design computer programs that are readily available for use in this project. This arrangement that the falsework being reviewed by the CM Team will not only expedite the review and approval time but also save engineering cost for the City, because the RE and Lead Bridge Engineer time is already being accounted for in their construction administration duties. LAN is among the very few full- service CM firms with construction engineers having the ability to review and approval falsework and temporary work. Most recently, LAN was retained by the Caltrans Office of Structure Construction (Contract No. 59A0269, Task Order Fee: $1.3 Million) to provide an independent audit of Caltrans Falsework procedures and processes. Under this contract, LAN is responsible for evaluating Caltrans existing falsework procedures, independent falsework analysis for bridges statewide, and providing a written report as to the adequacy of the Caltrans falsework procedures. Our ability to perform such an analysis will reduce review time of contractors' submittals. 26m Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology° Mailagernent Approach 26th Street Pump Station: Trenching and Shoring: The construction of the pump station involves extensive excavation and trenching along 26th Street, requiring extensive temporary shoring and retaining wall construction. The construction activities to be inspected are routine activities in the context of trenching and shoring in an urban environment. The technologies anticipated are well -known with proven solutions, albeit that the scale of some activities is large. LAN has developed several proprietary analysis and design computer programs for trenching and shoring within railroad right -of -way. The programs have been used extensively on the Redondo Junction, PCH and Washington Grade Separation projects. In addition to this work, we have also been retained by contractors to provide trenching and shoring design submittals. Excavation Safety: Open excavations are an obvious hazard associated with foundation construction or open utility trenches. Excavation for footing construction work presents special safety concerns including limited access, limited work area, damp or wet footing and deep excavations. All LAN Construction Inspectors are trained in excavation safety, and are familiar with the provisions of Article 6 "Excavations" of the Construction Safety Orders, and the provisions for safe access in terms of adequate walkways, rails, ladders, or stairs into and out of the lower levels. Storm Water/Water Line Installation: For the water line installation, particular attention shall be placed to monitor thrust block locations for proper installation. Excavation and placement of trench bedding and backfill will be monitored on a full -time basis, and the shoring protection requirements of Cal -OSHA will be fully adhered to. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP): Relations with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will be especially critical to the success of the project. Erosion control has been a major issue in California over the past five years. The requirements of the RWQCB are strict and enforcement is thorough. LAN staff members have worked successfully with the RWQCB personnel on other projects. We will attempt to include the RWQCB in accepting the contractor's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP). This will be a proactive step in alleviating problems when construction starts. Traffic Control: Our team is experienced with the contract requirements for traffic control; specifically, the WATCH Manual and Caltrans procedures for maintaining traffic and setting up roadway lane closures. Before construction, the contractor's traffic control system will be thoroughly reviewed for compliance with the contract documents. We will work with the contractor in gaining these documents' approval, ensuring the timeliness of submittal review. An important feature of all traffic control is proper public awareness for any scheduled changes. Upon implementation, the system will be assessed for safety, bottlenecks, and overall effectiveness, on a daily and "as- needed" basis. Our traffic control expertise goes beyond our strict enforcement of the contract traffic requirements. Just as important, LAN is also well trained in responding to unexpected or emergency traffic situations. As on all of our projects, we make safety of both the traveling public and the work crew a number one priority. Earthwork Quantities: Pump Station construction requires extensive earthwork excavation and backfill for the roadway grading. Properly measuring and tracking the earthwork quantities is extremely important, given the shear magnitude of earthwork and staged construction of this project. LAN will calculate earthwork quantities and agree With the contractor on quantities before earthwork begins. This will include agreeing on existing ground lines. During the constructability review, we will verify that the Special Provisions are clear regarding measurement and payment for Roadway Excavation, Imported Borrow, and different types of Structure Excavation and Backfill. Our similar experience on the Nogales Avenue Shoofly and Grade Separation projects will assure the City that there will be no disagreements on the earthwork quantities. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Management Approach Construction Staging. Construction staging will be one the most important elements. As a part of our pre- construction document review, our key staff will closely analyze the construction staging plans to identify construction efficiency and traffic safety issues. During construction, LAN staff will regularly coordinate with the contractor to achieve proper construction staging and minimal disruption to the traveling public. Environmental and Hazardous Issues: A major portion of this project site is on existing roadway. Being in a vehicular travelway, we can be assured that we will encounter hazardous waste (lead contaminated soil). Hazardous waste and contaminated soil found on site, often causes delays and added costs. We will recommend to the City, that the contract document include an item (LS) to determine if there are hazardous materials at the site and, if there is, to what extent. There should also be an item for the disposal of hazardous materials. This item could be at unit cost — cu meters, and might include an estimated quantity, say 10,000 cu meters, (to have a competitive bid). The payment clause should include means to increase the item (force account — to control costs) and also means to delete the item, at no cost to the City if no hazardous materials are found. Coordination with Local Businesses: This project is located within an area of industrial and commercial businesses, which will impact both commuters and commercial establishments. LAN will establish a public relations program; we also suggest a number of public meetings prior to construction in order to make sure that local businesses know what to expect, who to call for problems, and how the work is planned. Submittal Turnaround - Construction processes rely on rapid and reliable submittal turnaround. With the diverse parties involved, lead and review time for submittals is crucial. LAN can provide review of contractor's submittals to ensure that all construction safety requirements are met prior to submitting to the designer for final approval. Our success in managing timely submittal review and approval begins with developing a submittal log. This document identifies the nature of the submittal, the party responsible for review and approval of the submittal, and the nature of work that will be impacted by each submittal. This submittal log will be maintained electronically using Expedition and can be sorted -out by submittal number, date, and/or submittal type. In addition, we will implement an alarm system in the computer to beep if a submittal is due within three days or another time frame as determined by the RE. This submittal log (electronic file) can be accessed by the City, Contractor, or Designer via the internet. Labor Compliance: With Assembly Bill No. 1506 enacted, a new focus has been put on Labor Compliance Programs relating to public works for the CM staff that perform duties as inspectors and material testers, thus requiring the CM firm to pay prevailing wages. This project is no exception. We have an in -house full -time Labor Compliance Officer that can meet the project needs and ensure that the City is in compliance; thus, we do not violate and State and/or Federal laws. We have in the past, assisted other Local Agencies in developing a customized Labor Compliance Program in their specific Districts and submitted to the Department of Industry Relations (DIR) for approval, as needed. CM Contract - Project Control and Administration. One of LAN's most important tools in administering and overseeing individual efforts is the APCS (Automated Project Control System), internally developed for managing contract costs. Weekly Progress Reports and Schedule Updates of the consultant contract, as well as the construction contract, will be provided at the weekly construction meeting. The objective of APCS is to provide accurate invoices and an effective contract management system that gives management timely and auditable data for determining engineering contract cost, and schedule status. The overall goals of Project Control are to achieve: • Accountability • Accuracy in Project Reporting • Responsiveness • Cost- Effective Services. We believe that LAN has proven to be the most cost - effective CM service firm among all other CM firms working on the recent Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority construction projects. Our testament to this claim is that we successfully completed our assignment as CM for the Redondo Junction Grade Separation project with $600,000 under the authorized budget and are currently $1,200,000 under budget in our CM cost for the PCH Grade Separation project. Our testament to this claim is Mr. John Doherty, PE; CEO, ACTA. 26aa Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Scope of Services Upon notification of selection, LAN will begin to mobilize for the project. As LAN mobilizes for the project, three main tasks must be accomplished. First, in consultation with the City, and with a collaborative effort, we will update our existing Resident Engineer's Manual and our existing project controls system, as needed, to conform to City reporting requirements. Concurrently with the institution of project controls, our second major task will be to work with DMJM, the Project Designer, to complete our understanding of the project requirements and constraints and resolve all outstanding questions that arise form our constructability review, and to begin to build a collaborative problem - solving team. Thirdly, with a collaborative effort from the Project Designer and the City, LAN will develop a complete list of project stakeholder' names, addresses, and contact numbers. Our Technical Approach for the 26t' Street Extension Project was developed to address the key project issues previously identified and also summarized below. Having identified the key project issues, our approach is to achieve smooth execution and implementation with the following goals: ✓ Provide a quality project that meets all the requirements of the contract documents, at every step of the way ✓ Assist the Contractor to complete the project in the least amount of time possible and "do it right the first time" ✓ Ensure that the project is completed within the specified schedule and the allotted budget ✓ Positive public perception for the project and a good project image ✓ Foster an atmosphere of trust and fairness among all project participants ✓ Be flexible and responsive to the City and any other stakeholders for issue resolution ✓ A safely constructed project, with a goal of "No Injuries" Successful delivery of the 26th Street Extension Project begins with providing the City assistance in all five (5) vital phases of the project: Phase 0 - Project Start-Up Phase 1 - Begin Constructabllity Review Phase 2 - Pre - Construction: Bid Support Including Final Constructability Review and Analysis Phase 3 - Construction Phase 4 - Post - Construct /on Phase 0 Project Start -Up The objective in this phase of the project is to gain a complete understanding of the project elements and its requirements. We have performed a thorough reviewed of the available contract documents (PS &E) and have gained a thorough understanding of the project and its key issues identified in Section 1 - Project Background. With the key issues of the project identified, we than developed a management plan building a core project team member (Project Organization Chart) for this construction management assignment. Details of the management plan are included Section 2 - Methodology: Management Approach of this Technical Proposal. Also during this Phase, LAN will review the list of utilities to be relocated to determine if a Pre- Construction Utility Relocation Package should be issue in order to relocate those utilities that may interfere with the main contractor's construction schedule. This was successful achieved during the ACTA PCH Grade Separation Project. 26`F Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Phase 1- Begin Constructabiiity Review To gain a better understanding of this project and in preparation for this assignment, we have started and completed constructability analysis and review of the 90% PS &E documents. Below are some of the excerpts of the constructability analysis and review of the 90% PS &E documents. We have completed the review of the 90% PS &E provided by the City and has complied 23 sheets of comments. Below are some examples that illustrate our attention to details in our constructability review: Specifications Page F-5: Uniform Cold Plane Cutting of AC Pavement "Removal and disposal shown on plans. Payment will be made per square foot of the cut areas 1. It shall be change to square meters as indicated on Bid Item 13 Sheet C -5 Specifications Page F-7: Asphalt Concrete Pavement Compaction "....The contractor shall provide the test results for the filed density.... asphalt- testing device "' 1. This implies that the contractor is responsible for testing, if so, need to specify method of payment 2. Need to specify a test method and frequency of test to avoid potential claims. Specifications Page B-4: 12. Deductive Items "Attention should be paid to Deductive Bid Items. These items have been listed in Bid Price section" 1. There were no "Deductive Bid Items" identified in the proposal form Sheets C -1 thru C -27. Plan Sheet 1 of 84: General Note 4 "Construction shall comply with Standard Specs for Public Works Construction ... Associated General Contractors of America and Caltrans Standard Specs." 1. This Note fails to specify applicable edition of either specs. Note per 1997 Edition of the Green Book, the first unnumbered page indicates that The Book is now the work of the "Public Works Standards, Inc ", and no longer the work of APWA and AGC" as stated in Note 4. This is an example of outdated notes being copied and reused year after year without the design firm verifying the accuracy. Specifications Page F-1: Section I - Traffic Control: Requires 1 -lane in each direction at all times. 1. Past experience — full closure will be required for the sake of public safety during erection and removal of falsework for superstructure construction 2. Specifications specify there is "no extra compensation is to be paid to the contractor" — this contradicts Bid Item No. -39 "Traffic Control" Lump Sum. Specifications Page D-10 Section 28: Excavations: Excavation Safety - Need the most recent Caltrans Version which: 1. Need to include: Calculations to support the Registered Engineer's Plans 2. Need to include the time allowed for the owner's review and approval. Specifications Page D-10 Section 29: Extra Work • 1. Need to address — How adjustments to contract time will be determined Specifications Page D-8 Section 27: Need to define days of week and hours of day for closure of some or all lanes of Atlantic Boulevard will be allowed for construction operations such as 1. Bridge Pier 2 Excavation, shoring, CIDH piling; footing, pier walls and concrete barrier placement 2. Erection and Removal of bridge falsework 3. New slope paving and sidewalks 4. Street resurfacing and re- stripping 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN Methodology: Technical Approach Plan Sheet 25: Notes 6 and 7: Conflict 1. Recommend to delete Notes 6 and 7 2. These are addressed in Specifications Page D -7 and Caltrans Standard Specs Section 51. Specifications Page F-3, Plan Sheet 1, 3, and 59: Surveying: BM #33 Plan Sheet 1 & 59 provide 2- Elevations (45.509 and 43.454), whereas Plan Sheet 3 only provides only 1- elevation (45.509) 1. Since this section of the specs, requires the contractor to provide construction surveying, the contract documents must be clear as to which elevation is to be used for BM #33 for construction survey. 2. Given that 2 Elevations are listed for BM #33, which elevation was used for: 2.1 Log of Test Borings (Sheet 81 thru 84) 2.2 Bridge Foundation Plan Contours, Sheet 59 2.3 Utility Potholing, although there are no pothole elevations on Sheets 20 thru 22 2.4 Existing drainage flow line elevations 2.5 Joining of 26`1. Extension to existing 26th Street, Sheet 4 Profile Plans Sheets 20, 21 and 22: Utility Plans 1. The Legend has no code for utility relocation. Does this imply that no relocations are anticipated? 2. Yet Bridge Foundation Plan — indicates that numerous utilities are to be relocated. 3. Specs Page D-7 - Section 26: Utility Relocation: We recommend the following language to be incorporated: 3.1. List all utilities to be relocated, and for each one specify if relocation is anticipated to occur before or during construction. 3.2. For those to be relocated during construction, specify if City or contactor to notify utility owner, specify how many days advance notice is required prior to begin relocation, and how many days contractor must allow for relocation to prevent ROW delay claims. 3.3. Specify how contractor will be compensated for utility relocation delays, both monetarily and adjustment to contract time. Plans Sheets 24 thru 50: Pump Station 1. Sheet 24 — Should show approx OG Elevation 2. Sheet 4 — Indicates is to be about 45.6m 3 Depth of excavation would be about 10.5 meters, is there sufficient work area to slope the excavation, or is shoring needed?? If shoring is required, should be indicated on the plans to avoid claims. 4 Need to provide drawings depicting Limits of Payment for Excavation and Backfill — Pump Station, for Bid Items 72 and 73, Specs Sheet C-20. Plan Sheet 38: Note 1: "Prior to bidding " 1. The designer shall verify all utility company requirements before the 100% PS &E and address all requirements in the plans and specs issued for bidding. Requiring the contractor to verify utility company requirements opens the door to Bidders Questions, the need for Addendums or Change Orders and possible disputes and claims, if the contractor interpreted the utility company's requirements inadequately during the bidding phase. Plan Sheet 54: Requires K -Rail at West End of 26th Street construction. 1. A Bid Item is needed for Temporary Railing (Type K), details should show that reflectors attached to the Temporary Railing (Type K). Plan Sheet 72: Structure Approach Type EQ (3): 1. Need special rebar details of the irregular shape of the south end of Abutment' Approach Slab depicted' on Sheet 56 26`x` Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Phase 2 - Pre - Construction: Bid Support Leading our effort in the pre- construction phase, will be our Project Manager, Peter Lim, who brings to the project the expertise of managing numerous bridge /roadway construction projects in California. In this phase, we will work with the City of Vernon, DMJM, local businesses, utility companies, and other stakeholders, to establish the lines of communication and relationships that will be essential to our effective management of thh project. We will also become familiar with the technical requirements and design criteria upon which the project is based. Project Kick -Off Meeting: Upon receipt of the notice -to- proceed, LAN will request a meeting with the City to understand the overview of the project from the City's perspective. LAN will request from the City all the pertinent documents of the project such as the latest contract documents, Caltrans Cooperative Agreement, and Utilities Cooperative Agreement. This meeting is the first opportunity for the project core team to meet and is also an opportunity for LAN to explain our pro- active, fair, non - confrontational approach to problem solving and team building. In this meeting, we will identify the roles and responsibilities of our proposed project team members and make changes to our Key Personnel Responsibility Matrix, if the City deem necessary, CM contract administrative procedures and reporting formats; identify all project stakeholders and the goals and objectives of each project stakeholders, and review the existing status of the design, schedule, and potential impediments. Having an understanding of the City's view and perspective of the project, we will modify our current Resident Engineer Manual to meet these needs and project objectives. Finalized Constructability Analysis and Review: LAN has already begun the constructability review of the contract plans and has identified several conflicting elements, excerpts of our 90% constructability review are provided on the preceding page of this Section of our Technical Proposal. Concurrently with the development of the RE Manual, we will continue to complete our constructability analysis that we have already started. It is a known fact the designers for transportation infrastructure projects have not been involved in the fmal construction aspect of the project. Thus, it is a prudent investment for the City to engage the selected CM to ensure, as a minimum, that the project is constructable for each controlling operation within its own schedule. LAN, as Prime Consultant, has successfully completed over 100 bridge construction projects as Construction Manager and over 50 bridge design projects as Project Designer. With this experience behind us, LAN can provide the City with a comprehensive constructability analysis and a practical approach to construction that will ensure the project is constructable and biddable. Our most recent experience, as Construction Manager, includes design oversight of the designer for the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation project. We provided the client valuable comments from a construction perspective during the design phase, resulting that the PCH Grade Separation project has been successfully completed one (1) month ahead of schedule. Upon completion of the final contract documents, and prior to advertising, LAN will perform a final review of the contract documents to make sure that nothing has fallen through the cracks. LAN will provide a comprehensive constructability analysis for features regarding early construction contracts, utilities, hazardous wastes, traffic detour, staging construction, access during construction, as well as design elements. Tasks include review of plans, specifications, technical reports, resident engineer's files, and associated items in order to verify completeness of the contract documents. Crucial elements in the constructability analysis are the consistency between the pay item list and the payment clause specified in the specifications, quantity discrepancies, potential conflicts, constructability and bidability, consistency between plans and specifications and resident engineer's pending files and associated items in order to verify completeness and consistency throughout the Project Upon completion of this task, we will submit to the City our fmal constructability review comments in a form of a matrix. We will incorporate this constructability review checklist in an electronic format that can be sorted -out by plan sheet number, specifications number or page number, pay item, key elements, etc. We recommend that the City provide these constructability comments to the designer and request a response from the designer during the Project Team Coordination Meeting. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Methodology: Technical Approach Resident Engineer's (RE) Manual. In the past, the LAN team has developed a comprehensive Resident Engineer's (RE) Manual for each construction project we managed. The backbone of the LAN RE Manual is based upon the Caltrans Construction Manual and Caltrans Records and Procedures Manual (commonly referred to by Caltrans as the CRAP Manual). This manual has proven to be a valuable tool, which will provide information on procedures and guidelines that will be implemented for the LAN team members assigned to the project. This manual also establishes project specific policies and describes duties for field and administrative personnel for administering the construction contracts. The Manual is intended to be a living document and will be updated throughout the life of the project. LAN will tailor its existing RE Manual to conform to the City's project objectives. Revisions to this existing RE Manual shall be structured so that it is in conformance with the contract documents and in close consultation with the City of Vernon, and meets specific (MTA) funding requirements. On ACTA's Redondo Junction Project, LAN team members developed the only approved RE Manual. This manual became the catalyst for the standardized RE Manual adopted by ACTA and was being utilized for the entire Alameda Corridor construction projects, both in the south and north end projects. RESIDENT ENGINEER MANUAL Topics to be included in the Resident Engineer's Manual will include: ✓ Project Personnel Organization Authority ✓ Filing System and Survey Request ✓ Engineering Control and Job -Site Communications ✓ Office Administration and Project Administration ✓ Schedule and Cost Control and Progress Payment Procedures ✓ Change Order Process, Claims Handling Procedures, and Force Account Work ✓ Quality Control Guidelines and Source Inspection Guidelines ✓ Right -of -Way and Construction Easements and Specialist Services ✓ Pre- Construction and Construction Meeting Minutes ✓ Submittal Processing, Handling, and Approval ✓ Designer and/or CM Responsibilities for Shop Drawing and Temporary Work Review and Approval ✓ Material Sampling and Testing Request and Acceptance ✓ Construction Safety Control and Safety Training ✓ Traffic Control Plans, Submittals, and Approval Process ✓ Hazardous Waste Procedures and Environmental Compliance ✓ Procedures for Issuing Non - Conformance Reports and Stop Work Procedures ✓ Specific Forms for Daily Reports and Benchmark Inspection ✓ Labor Compliance Requirements and General Administrative Forms ✓ DBE Reporting Procedures, Prevailing Wage, and Certified Payroll Reporting Procedures ✓ Procedures for daily update of the "As-Built" Drawings 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Project Team Coordination Meeting: LAN's approach is to become pro - active members of the team; we will assist in establishing a coherent, active team prior to construction �f the project. We will request that this meeting be limited to the Project Designer (DMJM) and the City staff. In this meeting, we will request that the designer (DMJM) be prepared to present the technical elements of the project, discuss the current status of the design, significant issues that need special attention, response to LAN's Constructability Review Comments, and any potential challenges that may be encountered during construction. It is the starting point for establishing the project roles of the designer and construction manager. Our desire is to have an informal, but structured, meeting to facilitate the transfer of project information. An example of successful coordination on a recent project is the construction of the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation Project. We successfully relocated several miles of "high risk" utilities and provided proper coordination to local businesses regarding traffic detours prior to foundation construction. These efforts resulted in an excellent public perception and extremely positive support from the local businesses. With proper utility coordination and local community support, the project was completed two months ahead of schedule. The objective of this meeting is to integrate ourselves into the existing team relationships and understand the decision making process. We will begin to revise and finalize our strategy for completion of the design phase, and proceed on the completion of the Construction Management Plan (CMP). Complete Construction Management Plan (CMP): LAN has already begun gathering available valuable information on the project, and will continue to identify all applicable laws, codes and regulations that guide and govern the project. At the same time, we intend to meet with the City and other project participants to determine project roles and the relationship between all parties, in order to further unify the team and maintain the focus on completing the project as expeditiously as possible: Once we have met with all of the project stakeholders, we will report on the current status of the project, recommend any improvements to procedures currently in use, and then meet with City staff to review the funding sources of the project, our findings, and finalize our CMP to meet the established City objectives and project goals. In the process of developing our CMP, there are a number of components of the CMP that are extremely significant. Among those, is our approach to electronic document control procedures utilizing Expedition Version 9.1 software. In addition to the electronic document control procedures, the next most important element of our CMP is our approach in managing the cost and schedule of the project. The key tool we use to tie cost and schedule together, is the Primavera P3e/c software to ensure that no activity gets omitted. One recent experience where we customized our standard document control and management procedures to meet the specific needs of the Alameda East Construction Authority (ACE) is the $17 Million Nogales Avenue Shoofly Grading and Nogales Grade Separation projects. We modified our standard operating policies, procedures, and electronic document control system to meet ACE 's reporting requirements, which included setting an (web- based) Expedition Version 9.1 that, allows ACE access to LAN's Server. Additionally, our proposed Office Engineer, Elmo Delos Santos, PE, provided Expedition training to the ACE Project Managers on electronic document control procedures that include navigating through the web; sorting the RCIs, RFCs, CCOs, and submittals; utility issues; photographic documentation; etc. Our reference to this procedure is Mr. Bruce Armstead, PE, (626.962.9292) Project Manager and Construction Manager of the Alameda East Construction Authority. Upon understanding of the City's needs, we will develop web -base information and a document control system that the City Project Staff can access from their office through the internet. We will implement a web -base Expedition 9.1, so that the City will not be required to buy additional licenses for the software. LAN will be responsible for acquiring and maintaining the software license. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Develop the Master Schedule. One crucial element in our CMP is the development of a Master Schedule for the project. In parallel with the constructability analysis and review task, we will prepare a summary-level master schedule using Primavera P3e/c software that highlights, in broad terms, the entire project. This Master Schedule will be posted through the interne and can be accessed by project team members and the City. Elements in our Master Schedule will include designer's review of submittals milestone dates; milestones for each phase of construction controlling operation; materials procurement timetables; utility relocation schedules; review times for submittals; and other potential schedule impacts that will be noted. The master schedule will be used in coordinating work with the contractor, ordering of long lead items, and submittal management. This will provide the City with the information required to fully understand the status of the project at any time, and the potential impact to the overall completion in the event that obstacles develop during construction. Chris Mockus and Victoria Butler of our team also bring a wealth of experience in the review of cost - loaded construction schedules, and are prepared to incorporate this information, as well as the information developed in our cost management procedures below, in our monthly reports to the City. Develop Cost Control Procedures (CM Contract and Construction Contract): As part of our CMP, we will share with the City our current project reporting and cost control procedures. We will propose that the City to use our proven cost control procedures that are and have been utilized in our current and past CM contracts. We will meet with the City to review the City's current accounting systems and standards so that we can modify our existing procedures to meet the needs of the City. Our current cost control system is coordinated with our document control procedures and is electronically integrated with the Expedition 9.1 software package. It can be easily modified to address the needs of the City and the reporting requirements of the project participants. The cost control system established will be capable of producing reports incorporating the project budget, expenditures, and variances to- date, and will project the project cost, at completion, and the impacts on the project budget. For the CM contract, the cost control system will allow the LAN team to adjust any facet of the project, including changes in staffing plan and potential changes in equipment needs. Develop Public Outreach Program Procedures: The next most important elements to project success, after safety, are the public's perception on the project and construction impacts on local businesses and commuters. Our proposed RE, Peter Ho, PE, has the experience in developing public outreach campaigns for construction projects. Peter Ho's recent experience includes the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation and the Redondo Junction Grade Separation projects. The project team will develop a Business and Commuter Resolution Process. Our proposed Public Outreach Program will be adjusted to meet the needs of the City, and is intended to minimize any negative impact from this set of projects on the local community. As a minimum, we will initiate a Public Information Program prior to beginning construction. The Public Information Program may include Town Hall Meetings, Project Newsletters, and news releases to local media. Construction information will be distributed throughout the construction of the project. LAN utilized billboards, on the PCH Project, to advise commuters and local residents and businesses, how long, in time, construction detours would occurs. By advising the public of the length of these detours, LAN was able to keep the public well informed of the status of the project. We will involve the public prior to, and during, construction to mitigate potential negative community response to the project. This will minimize the amount of complaints directed to the City office or to the City Hall. Critical elements such as dust, noise, and traffic congestion are all potential public relations issues. Good public perception with the surrounding community is important to the success of the project. Construction noise and inconvenience can be disruptive to commuters and residents in the area. LAN field staff will be the first line of defense for preventing negative public impact. We will work with the contractor to address issues and concerns brought forth by the public and property owners. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Within the project limits are property owners and community facilities. Our role, as your CM, will be to minimize impacts to the property owners during construction. This includes implementing adequate noise and dust control measures by the contractor and keeping the community informed of the progress of the work and the construction impacts. LAN has often performed public relations for projects with similar requirements as in this project. We propose to utilize LAN's web -based information dissemination expertise. In addition, we will include some of the measures that we have successfully used in the past: ✓ Establishing and posting a project information hotline by publicizing "hotline" numbers ✓ Maintaining a log of all phone calls /complaints ✓ Face-to-face contact with each property owner and hold community public information meetings ✓ Distributing updated construction information flyers through a monthly newsletter ✓ Listening to citizen complaints and offering appeasement ✓ Working with the contractor to resolve complaints promptly The purpose of establishing a framework for the development and distribution of project information is twofold. First, our approach will ensure that the City and all elected officials are informed of project developments. Second, our distribution of project information can be tailored to the focus on those businesses and citizens that are truly affected by the project. We believe that a portion of the ultimate success of this project relies on the ability of our front line personnel, working in conjunction with City staff, to know, understand, and effectively communicate with every business owner or resident along the project route. We routinely provide customer service training to all our CM personnel prior to the start of, and during, construction. Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Procedures: LAN's QAP is a result of our prior experience in numerous complex transportation infrastructure construction projects. We will modify our current QAP to meet additional City requirements and project requirements. This QAP will be incorporated into the CMP and Resident Engineer's Manual, with appropriate quality control procedures and personnel performance requirements. The single most important aspect of our QAP, during the preconstruction phase is to ensure that our proposed field staff (beginning with the RE to the inspectors) thoroughly understand the contract documents and anticipate potential problems and/or delays during construction. This is to ensure that our field personnel know the contract document; thus the contractor and LAN are always out ahead, resolving issues and keeping the project on track. Prior to construction, our QAP Officer, Jon Mehtlan, PE, will have a meeting with our field staff to ensure that they .have a complete understanding of the project and can hit the ground running from day one. Our QAP will then extend into the construction phase, with periodic visits by Jon Mehtlan. Attend Pre -Bid Conference and Answer Questions: LAN will support the City in this crucial function of reviewing pre -bid questions and coordinate with designers and the City in preparing answers to potential bidders. These questions and answers will be documented and made available to the contractors. The LAN team strongly believes that well clarified project documents will result in reducing potential claims. LAN will also assist the City in advertising about this project. LAN is well known to major roadway/bridge contractors in California and will contact major contractors to advise them that the project is, or will be; out for bid and that the LAN team from ACTA's PCH and Redondo Junction projects will be the CM team. ACTA enjoyed receiving many bids, which were competitive, once contractors were aware that LAN would be the CM. Our reference to this claim is Mr. John Doherty, PE, CEO and Director of Engineering and Construction of ACTA. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IPAI Methodology: technical Approach Evaluation of Contractor's Bids (Support): LAN will assist in reviewing the contractor's bid documents for compliance with contract terms and bid provisions. LAN's staff has many years of experience with most of the contracting community. We will concentrate on identifying any defective bids or unbalanced bid components, and make appropriate recommendations for completing the procurement process as efficiently as possible within the established timeline. This comprehensive review will focus on internal consistency and can eliminate or reduce grounds for claims. The LAN team will assist the City in administering bid openings for the project, reviewing bids, bid bonds, insurance certificates, DBE requirements, and related submittals, and will provide assistance in the selection of qualified bidders. Contract Award Support: LAN shall assist the City, as requested, with the following tasks: ✓ Review of bid for completeness and responsiveness ✓ Perform bid analysis ✓ Development of contractor payment schedules, and other procedural items ✓ Checking Contractor references, licenses, insurance, and sureties ✓ Coordination with prospective Contractor for award of construction contract ✓ Ensure the bid process is consistent with the procedures outlined by the policies of MTA for Special Funded Programs and Local Assistance Procedure Manuals Pre - Construction Condition Documentation: Documenting the site prior to construction is essential. Good and proper documentation can often mitigate disputes between the City, contractor, and other project stakeholders. The LAN team will perform detailed pre- construction project condition documentation. Documentation will include photographic and written records taken by our staff. The photographs taken during the pre - construction survey will be carefully cataloged and maintained in the field office in accordance with the approved RE Manual and the City administrative filing system. Our team of construction engineers and inspectors are knowledgeable and aware of the critical pre - construction issues. Summary: Phase 2: Pre- Construction Services The Pre - Construction Phase is key to managing a successful project. Our experienced team will hit the ground running and, in fact, is prepared to give 100% commitment to the City. The process of creating a Construction Management Plan (CMP) will set the foundation for all of the activities to be undertaking during the Pre- Construction Phase. We will have built relationships with City staff, utilities, and the designer (DMJM), and will have verified the roles and responsibilities of all parties and stakeholders to the construction process, which will minimize the potential for confusion and delay. After the bid opening, LAN's RE will immediately work on the pre - construction meeting agenda and gather information required to be distributed to the contractor, including a list of submittals and certificates/licenses. In addition, we will immediately mobilize our field staff and evaluate the need for our CM firm to procure a field office on behalf of the City. Mobilize Team and field Project Office: We understand that either the City or the Contractor will provide a full - service field office for managing the construction contract. After bid opening, and prior to contract award and depending on the bid cost for the field office, we will make recommendations to the City as to whether to take a credit from the contractor or utilize the City office for managing the contract, or require the LAN team to establish a Resident Engineer's office. LAN has extensive experience in establishing a full- service Field Project Office with high -speed internet access utilizing either DSL or T1 Line. As Construction Manager, our most recent experience included establishing two (2) field offices for the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), currently being used for managing the I -10 Widening Project in Yucaipa and SR -210 Projects in San Bernardino. 2 6`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard INV 0 0 0 0 0 Methodology: Technical Approach Step 4: On -Going Evaluation and Management Goal: Achieve a successful project that is in compliance of contract documents within schedule and budget. Phase 3 - Construction Phase In the construction phase, the front line of our QAP is our experienced engineers and inspectors, who have been trained to not just observe the construction process, but to make sure the processes and procedures employed by the Contractor will result in full compliance with the contract documents. It is our goal, as Construction Manager, to work as a team with the Contractor; to try to prevent him from running into problems and delays; and to make sure that each new construction process starts out in conformance to the project documents. This will ensure that rework is kept to a minimum and that the project stays on schedule and minimizes the issuance of "non- conformance" reports. The key attitude that allows us to work so effectively with the Contractor is that of being in "partnership" with them, with a commitment to get the project completed on time and within budget, as opposed to an attitude of looking for errors and mistakes. Submittals' Identification: Concurrently in performing Constructability Analysis (Phase 1), LAN will also identify all submittals required by the contractor, in checklist format, and will provide this information to the City and the contractor during the pre- construction meeting. Submittals will also be maintained in a computer database, sorted by category, technical discipline, date required, CM review time, and level of designer's involvement. The following is a list of topics to be discussed with the Contractor during the initial construction meeting. ✓ Communication Protocol (all correspondence is through the Resident Engineer) ✓ Site Access, Material Staging Area ✓ Filed Office Location and Traffic Control ✓ Labor Compliance Reporting ✓ Certification of Materials ✓ List of Submittals and their Due Dates ✓ Contractor Baseline Schedule, Order of Work, and Schedule Updates ✓ Permit and Utility Agreements ✓ Date and Time of Weekly Meetings ✓ Pay Requests and Quality Control Procedures ✓ Environmental Conditions ✓ Basis for Dispute Resolution in the Field Certificates /Licenses: In addition, we will develop a list of certifications and/or licenses required for each assignment of the consultant and contractor QC personnel, such as a PE License for the Resident Engineer, Senior Bridge Engineer, Senior Civil Engineer, AWS CWI certificates for Welding Inspectors, Caltrans (TL -0111) Certificate of Proficiency for Material Testing for Materials Testing Technicians. Any questions or apparent issues that may be present at this time are discussed in order to be resolved prior to the contractor's mobilization. An agenda, action items, and meeting minutes will be prepared. Administrating the construction contract is two -fold, namely Construction Contract Administration to ensure proper documentation and records and Construction Engineering and Inspection that assure that the work incorporated are in accordance to contract documents. Below are the details as to how, LAN team as Construction Manager performs Construction Contract Administration and Construction Engineering and Inspection. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Phase 3: Construction Phase - Construction Contract Administration Implementation Construction Management Plan (CMP) and Quality Assurance Program (QAP): As we mobilize our staff to the project, they will review all pertinent portions of the CMP, and then our PM and RE will lead a round -table discussion with our staff and our subconsultants to make sure that everyone understands the requirements, roles, responsibilities, goals, and objectives specific to this project. This discussion will also focus on the QAP requirements, particularly how the team will handle non - conforming materials, QA records, records of corrective action taken, and audits of QA records. The CMP is a living document and, as the project progresses, parts of the CMP pertaining to communication and coordination will need to be revised to more effectively deal with the Contractor's specific operations and procedures. These individual changes will be circulated, as they are made. Once project participants have reviewed the plans, specifications, CMP, and QAP procedures, we will be ready to resume communication with utilities, local agencies, and other affected parties. Communication: Our basic approach to effective communication will be provided in our CMP, which will have been reviewed and approved by the City prior to the start of construction. A proven communication protocol is that all project communication must be routed through the Resident Engineer. The Resident Engineer is the hub of communication with the contractor, City, Designer, utilities, and other project stakeholders. This approach ensures that the contractor only receives information from a single source. In order to facilitate effective communication among all parties associated with the contract, weekly meetings (day and time of the week established in the pre - construction meeting) will be held to discuss project progress and pending issues. Weekly Meeting: The RE will coordinate and conduct weekly meetings with the contractor, the City of Vernon's representative, the Designer, and interested parties. Job progress, project issues, concerns and resolutions, upcoming construction, schedule, safety, team coordination, and third party coordination will be principle topics. Special meetings will be conducted, as necessary. The RE will prepare minutes of the meeting and distribute to respective attendees. On an "as- needed" basis, LAN will arrange an Owner meeting with the City, regulatory agencies, utilities, and others, each week to discuss project issues. This approach of having a separate meeting with the Owner and other agencies, prior to meeting with the contractor, eliminates the potential of open disagreement amongst the team in front of the contractor. Utility Coordination Meeting: LAN's Resident Engineer will assume primary responsibility for coordinating utility work. Due to the shear magnitude of anticipated utilities, a regular utility meeting schedule will be set up and continued through the construction.phase. It is anticipated that a utility coordination meeting will occur every other week and prior to all major relocations. This will normally occur before the regular weekly meeting, on an "as- needed" basis, until the utility work is complete. In addition to the utility companies and Resident Engineer, the contractor and its subcontractors will be in attendance. Agendas and minutes will be prepared and distributed for all meetings. This approach will ensure that we clear the right -of -way for the contractor to perform their work and to eliminate any utility delay impact claims. Maintain Effective Public Outreach Program: To maintain an effective public outreach program, LAN inspectors and field personnel will contact individual business owners along the alignment, in advance of construction operations, and regularly during the course of construction. Our approach will be to mail a 30-day notice and, if necessary, the posting of a 5 -day notice by door hanger prior to construction operations. Each notice will have our phone number and the name of the contact person. All calls will be documented, including date, time, name of caller, address, and specific issue or concern. We will follow -up each call and provide documentation of the action taken to address the concern or issue. It is our intent to meet, in person, with every citizen who has a repeated concern. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Environmental Issues - ( SWPPP). The Resident Engineer will implement the current SWPPP requirements, and ensure compliance. Tasks including monitoring and making erosion control around the project are a top priority due to the extent of work on this project. Our proposed RE, Peter Ho has recent similar experience on the Redondo Junction Project that will ensure full environmental and SWPPP compliance. In addition, we will appoint Don Newbery, to monitor and audit for SWPPP compliance, on a bi- weekly basis, or as necessary, to ensure the project is in compliance with all regulations. Don's experience in SWPPP is not only as a construction engineer enforcing contractor SWPPP plans, but also as an instructor and auditor providing SWPPP training to other consultants' personnel. Just as environmental issues require constant vigilance and observation, the project progress requires the construction management team to be proactive in utility coordination and to be constantly monitoring the schedule, cost, and project documents. Phase 3: Construction Phase - Construction Contract Progress Management: The LAN team will be responsible for ensuring the Contractor follows their respective schedule and accomplish their work on time. Specific items to ensure the project is being executed smoothly include: ✓ Identfying potential schedule slippages and cost overruns, notifying the Contractor, and discussing their recovery plans, and making recommendations to the City regarding corrective action plans. ✓ Assisting the Contractor in coordination and issue resolution with the City, Designer, and utilities. ✓ Monitoring the status of permits, submittals, shop drawings, material procurement, and delivery. Review of Contractor's Construction Schedule: Effective schedule management throughout the course of the project provides significant impact in reducing or eliminating exposure to potential claims. The most critical element is establishing a proper baseline schedule by the Contractor, acceptable to all parties, that accurately represents how the Contractor will build the project. The LAN team will review the baseline schedule for compliance with known milestone dates; the City furnished material delivery dates, and critical interface points involving utility shutdown and tie -ins. The LAN team will provide the Contractor's monthly schedule to the City and will advise of any schedule delay with recommendations for schedule recovery. Monitor Construction Schedule: The CPM schedule is a critical tool for schedule management. We will review the updated schedules for slippages, logic revisions, and other changes using Primavera P3e /c. We will work with the Contractor to eliminate and/or mitigate the impacts of any delays. In addition to reviewing the Contractor's schedule, we will prepare and maintain an "as- built" schedule. The "as- built" schedule is updated daily with the Contractor's activities. This schedule is beneficial in negotiating change orders and analyzing time extension requests and for claims analysis purposes. Upon review of the contract documents attached with the RFP, except as specified in Caltrans Standard Specifications, we realize that there is not a clause and pay item relating to Contractor submitting and updating construction schedule. LAN recommends the specifications contain specific language regarding the format, content, and requirements for the CPM schedule submittal by the Contractor. We recommend that a specification clause and a separate pay item that requires the contractor to submit a CPM schedule using Primavera P3e/c be added. We would additionally recommend a mandatory meeting with the Resident Engineer, Contractor, and the City prior to schedule development and submittal. The meeting should cover a number of items which will improve our ability to manage the project, including requesting activity codes be included in the schedule; the maximum duration of activities; withholding of payment for failure to submit updates in a timely manner; look ahead schedules to be submitted weekly; revision and recovery schedule requirements; and other schedule requirements that will make the Contractor's CPM schedule a useful tool in the management of the project. In addition to monitoring the project CPM schedule, LAN's Resident Engineer will prepare a weekly status and order of work to the Contractor, which provides an evaluation of the progress of the contract, an assessment of the current controlling item of work, and advising the Contractor the amount of time remaining in the contract. This weekly report is a key ingredient in maintaining project progress, as it establishes a record of the CM team's assessment of current project issues and progress. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Project Issue Management: Our project issue management approach begins in the field, on a daily basis, and is led by our experienced inspectors while they are performing their inspection duties. LAN considers any item that has the potential to result in additional project cost or time impact, as a project issue. Our approach to project issue management is included in our CMP. It provides a tool to identify and track all project documents related to any specific issue within our electronic document control system. The ability to retrieve all project documents related to a specific issue allows the City to have access to the entire record in a timely manner. By tracking issues, the City is always aware of items having the potential to impact the project budget or schedule; thus we are able to fairly evaluate the Contractor's concerns before they become a potential claim. Progress Payments. In order to process the payments for the contract items, the RE and its lead inspectors will continuously inspect the progress of contract work items and perform quantity calculations for monthly partial payments. Each month, LAN's Engineers will provide accurate calculations for all items of work completed and accepted to allow for progress payment. The quantity of each item will be field measured, if necessary, to prevent overpayment or underpayment. Payments on progress estimates must be traceable to checked source documents that are field - measured or calculated quantities. Upon completion of progress payment verification, LAN's RE will provide the monthly progress payment recommendation to the City for review, and approval, and payment. We will also log incoming material certifications in the same way as other submittals, and maintain a running total of all materials released by Certificates of Compliance, in order that only materials tested or certified are included for payment. Project Budget Management LAN will review the Contractor's progress pay estimate request and schedule of values for reasonableness and ease of monitoring, and will compare this information to the quantity records generated by our inspectors and maintained by the RE. In addition, LAN will monitor total project costs, including current and forecasted costs to complete, and advise the City, on a regular basis. Utilizing the cost control procedures detailed in the CMP, we will input the progress payment information into the system and then monitor expenditures. The reports will provide an estimated cost required to complete the project, and report any potential cost impacts to the City. The cost reporting will include the cost of potential changes as we become aware of them; the estimated exposure on potential costs, which cannot be quantified at the time of each report; and potential issues, which we expect to occur, that may have cost impacts. There will also be a section of the cost report that tracks the funds committed by the City to the project, funds expended on the project, funds available to the project, and funds required for project completion. This cost information will then be integrated into the project schedule. Changes, Claims, and Disputes: The goal of the LAN CM Team, through its RE, is to avoid all unnecessary Contract Change Orders. Change Orders can be generated from a number of sources and reasons, including changes directed by the designer or the owner and field- originated changes arising from unforeseen site conditions. If a Change Order is unavoidable, the LAN team will provide estimating and effective cost management by properly monitoring and tracking contract change orders. The RE will evaluate all proposed change orders to determine need, merit, and project impact. The team will provide cost estimates and schedule impacts, and a rationale for approval or rejection, and with the concurrence from the City, the RE will negotiate change orders with the Contractor and prepare change order documentation for approval and signature by the City. LAN's RE's have vast knowledge of initiating, reviewing, estimating, and writing complicated contract change orders, including Cost Reduction Incentive Proposals. They have expert knowledge in determining the appropriate types of payment and methods of performing cost analysis to apply to each specific contract change order. The LAN team will be pro- active in its efforts to prevent all foreseeable claims and disputes. The effectiveness of our support to the City in claims avoidance on the bridge widening project, is based on extensive construction experience on projects of similar scope, size, and complexity, as well as our expertise in construction claims analysis and resolution. LAN Construction Engineers comprise of personnel with an average of 15 years of exclusive bridge/highway /grade separation construction experience. 264 Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Document Control: The LAN team will adhere to the Electronic Document Control Procedures, as outlined in the approved RE Manual, and processes established by the City of Vernon. Using .Primavera Expedition Version 9.1 software, LAN will maintain a computerized tracking control system for all documents including correspondence, contract drawings, RFIs, RFCs, CCO logs, utility notices, submittals, and reports, as well as, maintaining hard copy and electronic files, as required. LAN team members have played an integral role iri the development and refinement of the document control system currently being used on several of our bridge, roadway, and grade separation construction projects. Our goal is to ensure that the status of all contract documents is known at all times and that current revisions of contract documents are distributed to key and appropriate personnel in a timely manner. The LAN team will have no- learning curve in this area and no- surprises. The advantage of utilizing our electronic document control system is that, on a daily basis, the RE at a glance can review items due today, overdue items, and items due in the next week. The RE will also program in the computer to set -off an alarm for overdue items, items due today, and items due for the next weekly meeting. In addition to tracking on -going project documents, we also utilize the information generated from our electronic document control system to prepare monthly detailed progress reports to the City. Progress Reports: We will prepare a monthly progress report to a level of detail as required by the City. The report will be prepared to a level of detail that ensures the City is aware of outstanding issues and their impacts to the schedule of the project. We anticipate providing reporting in project progress, schedule, and status of budget. The format of each report will be as determined during our kick -off meeting, and modified, as necessary, over the life of the project to meet the needs of the City. The Project Progress will be reported in terms of contract time and contract cost, as well as outlining work completed last month, work completed this month, and work expected to be completed next month. This information will be reported with charts and text to completely convey the status of the project, and any outstanding issues that require resolution. In addition, we will report on any issues arising from job -site meetings, labor relations issues, disposition of any issues that arose last month, and the status of any items requiring review or approval by external agencies. The Progress Report will also contain the successes in the public information campaign, as well as any impacts or issues arising from utility coordination. Deliberate utility and permitting agencies coordination will eliminate any potential to negatively impact the project schedule and, thereby, project cost, thus until the permitting agencies or utilities cease to be a potential issue, they will be tracked, monitored, and reported on continually. The Project Schedule will be reported in specific activities completed, the current controlling operation of work, the status of long -lead items or material impacts upon the schedule, any changes in sequencing or approach to the work, and the CM team's evaluation of all schedule impacts and issues, and suggestions to recover any schedule delays. The Project Budget reporting will include the status of any bid items which are materially over- or under- running the original project bid; evaluation of any cost variances or changes in cash flow; a summary of potential impacts not resolved at the time of reporting; and a thorough evaluation of the project cost to complete. In addition, if any, the cost of Force Account work will also be reported in this monthly Progress Report. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Methodology: Technical Approach Phase 3: Construction Phase - Construction Engineering and Inspection: Construction Safety Oversight: The Contractor has sole responsibility for compliance with safety requirements on the project, but the CM staff will monitor compliance with the safety program, note the information on Daily Reports, and advise the Contractor and City of observed deficiencies. In addition, we will review the contractor's safety plan for CaIOSHA safety requirements. LAN will oversee the contractor's compliance with the construction . project specific safety plan. All of our key team members have received safety orientations provided by Caltrans, and CaIOSHA, and have knowledge of, and are familiar with, the Roadway Worker Safety requirements, as well as, The Construction Safety Orders. LAN will also provide safety training as part of our "Lessons Learned Meeting" to all of our construction professionals on a monthly basis. Key activities that will be performed by our staff include: ✓ Review and monitor compliance of the contract specific safety program developed by the contractor. ✓ Conduct a weekly tailgate safety meeting. ✓ Document safety concerns and corrective actions. ✓ Issue a Stop Notice to contractor, if safety warranted. ✓ Review and comment on safety related submittals: • Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) Debris Handling and Disposal Plan • Hazard Communication Program (HCP) • Emergency Action Plan • Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) • Incident and Injury Reports Quality Assurance Inspection: LAN, as the Prime Consultant, has been involved in over 50 highway /roadway, and bridge construction projects comprising of over 200 bridges within Southern and Central California. LAN Bridge Construction Engineers/Inspectors bring a wealth of experience to the project. The role of quality assurance inspection is much more than approving or rejecting work as it is completed. Our approach to quality assurance inspection is where we develop a trust with the Contractor, whereby the Contractor diligently works with our Resident Engineer and Inspectors, and the rest of the project team to complete every task correctly and expeditiously the first time. Cooperative solutions that are developed during the course of the project improve quality and minimize rework. When we identify problems in the field, the Contractor is notified immediately and solutions are developed in association with the designer and City, if necessary, before work progresses. Specific elements of Quality Assurance Inspection include: ✓ Identtfying actual and potential problems associated with the construction and providing solutions. ✓ Provide constant communication and timely notification to the City, as required for relevant inspection elements. ✓ Provide continuous inspection to ensure that the contractor's work is in compliance with the contract documents and the designer's intent, and maintain weekly video and photographic documentation of project (special, sensitive, potential claim, and milestone work). ✓ Review Contractor prepared Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and inspects and ensures that the work is in compliance with the approved SWPPP plan. ✓ Review Contractor QC Welding plans to make sure that they are in compliance with the AWS Code and that the plans are prepared by a Certified Welding Inspector certified by the American Welding Society (AWS). ✓ LAN's in -house Certified Welding Inspector will provide source and on -site inspection to make sure that the Contractor's work is in compliance with the approved QC Welding Plan. ✓ Certj quantity calculations for progress pay estimates and changes. ✓ Resolve construction issues by proposing field changes to facilitate construction and avoid delays. 26`k Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach ✓ Coordinate all design changes and change orders with designers and the City. ✓ Maintain comprehensive and updated computerized Change Order Log, including anticipated changes to avoid construction rework in the field. ✓ Review of Contractor submittals such as material submittals, mix designs, temporary work design, customized construction equipment design, erection girder design, shoring and falsework design, shop - drawings, certificates of compliance, progress payments, and extra work reports. Concrete Batch Plant Inspection: LAN will provide an experienced batch plant inspector to monitor compliance whenever concrete is being produced to ensure that all ballast delivered to the site and concrete pours will meet the contract requirements. The plant inspector will immediately notify any materials that are out of Operating Range or Contract Compliance, to the RE for his action. We recommend that the construction contract documents require the contractor to submit a quality control plan for all batch plant operations. LAN will then institute a QA sampling and testing program to ensure the Contractor's QC plan is effective. Electrical Inspection: Electrical work, involving street lighting, bridge lighting, traffic signals, illuminated signs, and electrical devices, requires a specialized knowledge. This project will require such inspection and the LAN Team will provide a seasoned electrical inspector as our specialist in signals and lighting. Signal and lighting construction often involves many agreements and requires coordination of activities with outside agencies and utilities. As Resident Engineer, Peter Ho will review the job file given to him at the start of the project, and will be aware of such agreements. The Resident Engineer will obtain a list of equipment and materials from the Contractor of the material he proposes to install. From this list, the Resident Engineer will clearly check the identification of materials by the manufacturer's names, catalog numbers, and appropriate listings to be provided in the lists to permit proper checking for conformance with the contract. Underground work must be inspected while it is actually underway, because such inspection cannot be done, nor can it be checked, when the work is completed. This includes placing conduit, excavating for and pouring signal standard and electrolier bases, and similar items. Permits. The LAN CM Team, through its Resident Engineer, will review each permit for compliance and will coordinate with the City, designer, and other City consultants to insure that necessary permits are obtained. The RE will assist the City in the coordination, timely processing, and verification of approval for all permits and maintain permits and permit documentation on site. Material Testing and Support Services. With reference to the Addendum dated January 24, 2005 of the RFP, the selected CM firm will be responsible for QC Materials Testing services. Our proposed Resident Engineer will manage and coordinate material testing and support services, as required. We have assembled a team of experienced and certified inspectors, technicians, and engineers to perform all the necessary materials sampling and testing for the project. We will also maintain testing summaries, to monitor that unacceptable work, is corrected, with the correction recorded, and not covered up, by the Contractor. Our testing program includes the provision for qualified plant inspectors for structural steel fabrication, concrete batch plants and asphalt concrete production, and that all materials delivered to the project will be inspected and documented in accordance with the project QC program. All testing and sampling activities will be coordinated by the Resident Engineer or the project office engineer, and will verify that work performed and materials furnished are of the quality required to be in compliance with the contract documents. In addition, we will also provide certified testers that perform field quality assurance testing. They will utilize testing sampling procedures outlined in the Caltrans Standard Testing Methods Volumes 1, 2, and 3, of the sample frequency and location of sampling and testing presented in Chapter VIII of the Caltrans Construction Manual. The technician will attend the weekly staff meeting with the LAN Construction Engineer to stay current with the construction schedule and testing requirements. A daily diary of activities and testing requests, as well as hours 26th Street. Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard • 2. Methodology: Technical Approach worked, will be maintained. Our field testers will report laboratory and field results on standard forms provided in the approved RE Manual, and will complete and keep current the materials testing log. They will communicate with the inspectors to determine material quantities and testing frequencies, and to advise the independent assurance tester. All results will be presented to the individual ordering the test, as soon as the values are available. Samples of Portland cement concrete for compression testing will be shipped to the laboratory in accordance with provisions of California Test 540. We will review laboratory, shop, and mill test reports of materials and equipment, and coordinate, as required, with the engineer-of-record. Below is a list of anticipated Materials Tests to be performed during construction: ■-• Description of Test List of Material -tests . .,. Relative Compaction 1 231 :_ir-, Sampling Fresh Concrete ..- ''''' - Sieve Analysis 1 202 :* - Slump R-Value 301 1 , Molding & Curing Specimens Sand Equivalent .• 217 1 - Air Content f LA Rattler 211 1 C131 Unit Weight Yield 1 _ ..,...._ Specific Gravity 1 1 C127 4=i4r, Compressive Strength I . Durability Index I 229 " - Flexural Strength Drying Shrinkage C143 C31 I C173/C231 C138 C39 C78 Cement Masonry Units C90 Aggregate - LA Rattler Grout U1fl1O Aggregate - Sieve Analysis Aggregate - Sand Equivalent 530 211 In-Place Density 1 375 Aggregate - Cleanness Value 202 1 --- — — - Moisture 1 310/331/370 1 Bituminous Mix. for Testing I 304 i Aggregate - Organic Impurities Aggregate - Mortar Strength Rel. to Ottawa Sand -:- • Extraction by Ignition Method 1 382 1 Aggregate - Soundness 1 217 227 213 515 214 Stabilometer Value 1 366 1 Prequalification of Concrete Aggregate 549 Laboratory Test Max Density 1 375 Sample - Sieve Analysis 1 202 1 C136/C117 Welding Inspection I AWS AWS -1- Non-Destructive Testing 1 AWS I AWS 1 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Stressing Tendon Grout 541 Reinforcing Steel Mechanical Couplers Resistance Welded Hoops Tensile Strength & Bend Tests 1 670 A370 A370 Methodology: Technical Approach Specialty Inspectors: We have two Certified Welding Inspectors in- house, as well as electrical and mechanical engineers, to provide these services on an "as- needed" basis. These personnel are all experts in their field, certified to perform inspections, and stand ready to perform on -call, as necessary. In addition, we have provided for environmental specialists in the areas of hazardous waste identification and disposition, lead contaminated soil analysis, and industrial safety. These resources are available when called upon. Timely Coordination of Surveying Services: The RFP and the Addendum to the RFP did specifically mention the need for QA Surveying and not QC Surveying services as part of the CM scope of services. As part of the LAN team, we have included Coast Surveying to perform QA Surveying services, if the need arises. In addition, our proposed team of field engineers has extensive experience in field survey themselves. LAN maintains a complete set of survey equipment that will be provided to our field engineers. Field survey equipment that will be provided to the City at no cost are one total station, one transit, one laser level and one dumpy level, and three lenker rods. Requests for Information (RFI): A typical RFI and RFC process starts with a request forwarded from the contractor, which LAN will review and determine if the CM team can provide an answer, within the guidelines established by the City. In general terms, if there is no cost and/or schedule impact and no change to the permanent construction, we will answer and process the RFI and/ RFC, and transmit a record of the request to the City. If the RFI or RFC has either cost or schedule impact, or a change in permanent construction, or an answer cannot be made at the project level, we will take the next step and transmit design - related RFI's to the designer and a copy to the City. Upon receipt of an answer from the designer, we will verify that the question asked has been adequately answered, and if not, obtain additional information in order to provide a full and complete answer to the contractor. Then, having obtained a complete answer, we will forward the answered RFI to the contractor. At each step along the way, the transmittal will be tracked in our electronic document control system, so that no RFIs or RFCs fall through the cracks. Utilizing our electronic document control system developed for the submittals tracking purpose, LAN will ensure that the contractor submittals and RFI's are distributed to the responsible persons. In addition, the review time will be monitored to avoid delay claims to the contract. Pending RFIs and RFCs will be a standing agenda item discussed at each weekly jobsite meetings. Submittals and Shop Drawings Tracking: Our goal in submittal management is to achieve timely responses from all associated parties. If the Contractor requires interpretations of the meaning and/or intent of the drawings or the specifications, we will assist with the resolution of questions. We recommend to the City that the review and approval of all temporary work (falsework, trenching, and shoring) be accomplished by our Resident Engineer or Structure Representative, rather than transmitting to the designer. This approach will not only reduce the review time, but also the CM cost, since the time of our RE and Structure Representative is already being accounted for in the days' work. If necessary, upon review of the contractor's submittals, we will provide coordination with respective permitting agencies, and utility companies for their respective approvals. Our approach to properly managing the submittal process (including shop drawings) is to start early and stay ahead of the Contractor. We will request that the Contractor provide a list of required submittals for our review, and will check these against our own expected submittal list developed in our constructability analysis. We will also require that submittals, and the appropriate review times, be shown on the Contractor's Baseline Schedule and Schedule Updates. Working with the City, our CM team will develop a distribution list to identify responsible parties for review and acceptance of submittals. In order that all submittals are tracked at every stage of the process, we will use a submittal log in our electronic document control system and manage the shop drawings and sample/submittal process, and will review the status of all submittals during the weekly progress meeting. In order to focus attention on the importance of submittals on the project, reviewing the status of submittals will be a standing agenda item discussed at each weekly jobsite meeting. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach On -Going Inspection Reports and Records: Prepare reports to the level of detail and format as outlined in the RE Manual and ensure that they are in conformance with City construction records and procedures. These reports will include the following, and many others, as specified in the RE Manual: • Monthly Reports (Progress Project Reports — Construction Contract Administration) • Detailed Cost and Schedule Reports and Job Photographs • Resident Engineer Daily Diary and Inspector's Daily Reports • Change Orders /Claims Logs, Submittals, RFIs. and RFCs Logs • DBE Reporting • Action Items Report (AIR) and Non - Conformance Report (NCR) • Safety and Quality Records Review Traffic Plans (Detours and Closures): The RE will review traffic- detour and street closure plans prepared by the Contractor. We have years of experience in the preparation, review, approval, and implementation of traffic control and detours; we will provide comments and recommendations prior to forwarding them to the City of Vernon for the plan approval. Based on our previous experience, we anticipate timely approval by the City and will assist in the resolution of any issues delaying traveling public and local business delivery trucks. On -Going Labor Compliance and DBE Monitoring: Since a portion of the project may be funded by MTA, proper documentation of DBE and Labor Compliance is essential in the contract close -out audit by MTA and for funding reimbursement. The LAN team will support the City by obtaining the certified payrolls from the Prime Contractors and all their subcontractors, forwarding them to the City. The LAN team will review the Contractor's DBE program and the scope of work for each DBE subcontractor. We will monitor the job progress to ensure that the DBE's are actually performing the work in their scope, and forward the Contractor's DBE compliance reports to the City. As -Built Drawings: LAN inspectors will check and ensure that the Contractor maintains complete and accurate, as- built drawings in accordance with the contract requirements during the construction and at project closeout. We will also track all RFIs and track all design changes and will periodically review the Contractor's as-built plans to verify accuracy of the plans and to ensure they are updated as changes occur during the construction phase. Claim Avoidance and Mitigation: LAN believes our investment in comprehensive constructability analysis and review of the contract documents, prior to advertising for bid, can mitigate a substantial amount of claims that may arise during the course of construction. In addition to diligent constructability analysis, along with our CMP, QAP, electronic document control process, and by our team of highly experienced professional who specialize in managing bridge /roadway construction projects, we can assure the City that construction claims and schedule can be completely minimize or eliminated. Our team is made up of individuals who, during the last ten (10) years, have dedicated their entire career in managing bridge /roadway projects. In addition, their passion to be Construction Managers, make them want to understand the complete "in and outs" of the project prior to construction, so that they are always a few steps ahead of the Contractor and in control of the project. With the CM's preparation and passion for the project, they are prepared for mitigating potential issues before they can become issues. More importantly, they pay attention to every detail and aspect of the project, and will ensure that the primary project objectives are met; the project is completed on schedule and within budget; complies with the contract documents; and has a positive public perception during construction and after project completion. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Partnering: LAN focuses on teamwork; all participants on the project must assume responsibility for their particular expertise and roles, but must also operate as a team with project goals and objectives as a measure of success. LAN will consult with the City regarding details of a partnering program to establish a working relationship among the contractor, key subcontractors, the Designer, and the City of Vernon' Project Manager. Our experience in successful partnering on construction projects like the Redondo Junction and Pacific Coast Highway projects and 37 Caltrans Bridge Replacement and Retrofit Construction Projects involving 137 bridges, as well as our other current on -going bridge, roadway, and grade separation construction projects, is proof that this tool is a valuable investment. LAN experience is that most contractors readily accept partnering, since they regard it as beneficial to all parties involved in the process. Phase 4: Post- Construction Services Our approach of post - construction services begin with utilizing our proven, systematic (4 -Step) process for building a successful project, beginning with understanding your project, building a team that matches the project needs, implementing our proven CMP and QAP, and continuously providing changes and updates to our CMP and QAP to achieve a broad -based acceptance of the project. Using our CMP, we have already instituted all of the project implementation procedures we discussed in the previous section of our proposal, which will allow us to achieve project closeout with minimum effort. We begin the process by getting to know your project and creating a vision of what is needed for successful completion and acceptance, and work diligently throughout the project to resolve issues as they come up, to maintain "as- built" records concurrently, and to complete the project documentation as we go. With this approach, we can minimize the amount of time required to close the project out and, thus, minimize the project closeout costs to the City. Our procedures at closeout begin with punch listing of completed work and informing the City that the construction is substantially complete. Construction Substantially Complete: In this task, LAN will perform the following key activities to ensure that the construction is substantially completed in compliance to the contract documents: ✓ If the Contractor's work or a designated portion thereof, is incomplete or noncompliant, LAN will compile a list of incomplete or unsatisfactory items and a schedule for their completion. LAN will conduct final inspections and coordinate the correction and completion of the work. ✓ Develop "Punch List" items to be completed. ✓ Perform final job walk through with contractor and with the City and designer (DMJM) for their input in the process "and to expedite the completion of the project." ✓ If necessary, assist the City in reimbursement application for portions of the work from any external funding sources "As- Built" Drawings. Our team will verify that an up -to -date set of as-built drawings is kept from the first day of the construction phase until the completion of the project. This information will be transmitted to the designer for preparation of the final "as- built" record drawings in digital format that will ultimately be transferred to the City and other stakeholders, as required. 26m Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Contract Closeout: LAN's construction management approach has, and will continue to be, that of active, aggressive, and continuous involvement in all project activities. Contract closeout activities start on day one of the contract. As construction is completed, LAN will continuously maintain the project documents that are consistent with the goals and objectives of the project and to achieve a seamless project acceptance. Our broad -based electronic document control procedures, utilized during the construction phase, will be extremely useful in maintaining project documentation that will meet the City program requirements. LAN has a goal of completing this portion of the work within 60 days following substantial completion. Project closeout documents will include the following: ✓ Delivering bound and indexed project documentation ✓ Resolution to outstanding contractual issues, changes, claims, and deficiency reports ✓ Preparing and indexing materials certificate and manufacturers warranty certificate ✓ Providing certification on the completeness and accuracy of the "As- Built" plans ✓ Providing a final detailed "As- Built" or actualized schedule ✓ Change order summary ✓ Assessment of liquidated damages, as applicable ✓ Preparing and processing final payment ✓ Preparing Final Project Completion Report ✓ Providing Final Detail Estimate and "As- Built" Cost ✓ Coordinating with the City for project acceptance ✓ Final report of DBE utilization ✓ Assisting the City of Vernon Contract Closeout Audit by MTA, if necessary. Conclusion The cornerstones of our ability to deliver a successful project are our commitment to high client satisfaction, our construction management approach, and our procedures, which are the basis of our proven reputation. These are our willingness, flexibility and responsiveness, communication skills, safety, accuracy in project reporting, and timeliness in resolving projects issues. Our proposed team is structured to provide considerable depth and breadth of resources, positive attitude, and innovative problem- solving techniques to manage the most challenging projects with great success. We believe that the key qualities described in this Section of this proposal, will distinguish the winning consultants and their ability to provide the required individuals that have recent bridge and roadway construction experience on a relatively short notice. This requires the team to be flexible, responsive, and with a great depth of expertise in bridge /roadway construction in an urban environment. Therefore, we feel that we have the ability and rcsourccs to provide the high quality of service that is demanded in this project. Although the LAN team may comprised of subconsultants for materials testing and construction survey, all the work will be processed by our designated PM, Peter Lim, PE, and/or RE, Peter Ho, PE. Whether performed by LAN personnel or subconsultant personnel, or a combination of both, once a specific assignment is identified, we will provide, with City approval, the team members who are most qualified. All personnel will be screened by our Project Manager and Resident Engineer, prior to their assignment on this project. 26M Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN • a 0 0 a i 2. Methodology: Technical Approach Finally, we believe that our project management expertise and bridge construction in urban environment construction experience enables us to successfully complete the 26th Street Extension Project within the schedule established by the City. Moreover, the experiences gained while working on the recent bridge construction project along the Alameda Corridor has given us a thorough understanding of the comprehensive procedures, regulations, and standards set forth by the contract documents. We will have all our key personnel available to focus their attention on the project to ensure completion of a quality professional product within your specified timeframe. The LAN Team is ideally suited for the 26th Street Extension Project because we have: ✓ A Firm (LAN) with both bridge design and construction capabilities. ✓ Commitment to be Responsiveness and Flexibility to meet any City requirements. ✓ PM, RE, and Lead Construction Engineers have very similar experience required for this project. 1 Construction Engineers have the ability to perform temporary work (falsework, trenching, and shoring) analysis and construction staking. ✓ A Detailed, Thought -Out Approach which involves the establishment of strong working relationships with Regional Environmental Agencies, Utility Companies, and Designer (DMJM) ✓ A team that has extensive experience in managing bridge construction projects in urban environment requires no learning curve, no mobilization time, and no surprises and provides the most cost - effective CM services. ✓ Finally, we have the identical team members that successfully completed their respective assignments for the Redondo Junction and PCH Grade Separation projects for ACTA. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 4110 Contract Management Services 26th Street Extension Project Section 3 Work Plan 3. Work Plan For each project we pursue, we develop a comprehensive Work Plan for the successfully completion of our assignment. The 26th Street Extension Project is no different. Our Work Plan is attached on the following page and is summarized in a matrix format. The Work Plan shown on the following page comprise of five (5) phases, beginning Phase 0 — Project Start-Up Phase end ending in Phase 4 — Post Construction Phase for project close -out. In preparation for the 26th Street Extension Project, we have completed Phase 0 and Phase 1 of the project. In Section 2: Methodology — Management Approach of this Technical Proposal, we described as to how we build a project team for the successful completion of the 26th Street Extension Project. With completion of Phase 0 — Project Start-Up, we begin Phase 1 — Constructability Analysis and Review (90% PS &E) of the project. As demonstrated in Section 2: Methodology — Technical Approach of this Technical Proposal we have completed the review of the 90% PS&E documents that identified several key issues of the projects. With completion of Phase 1 — Constructability Review (90% PS &E), we are confident that our proposed project team possessed the intimate knowledge of the project that can hit the ground running from day one of our assignment. The objectives of the remaining phases of the project are summarized below: Phase 3: Pre - Construction Phase Achieve a Biddable and Constructable set of PS &E documents. Phase 4: Construction Phase Successfully completion of the 26th Street Extension Project within Schedule and Budget with No Injury. Phase 5: Post - Construction Phase Deliver a complete Project Close -Out Records to City with No Outstanding Claims. 26t"' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IAN Work Plan: 26 t" Street Extension Project of sh 1 „,,t �.F,z S'"1 �-rss ..r: ": �. � `�� y tr ,'#y,� .i; ,... ,,.: ... .. .,, a w x yr gi-i „ rr s;. '# Y, .::�g�j1 1/4 �1� "_ ITAfiC �! d ;i' - 4 h �:.. � , P �.�;�"a yy �" �'��, t..r°.. ��.. ;� �r � � s� ..tat �. rill c� . �e.. r �r, �z r, y, N•. ;•,. �' : � - --1-A-7,14%.0 r°,.•,.�wct'��cR -/ ,., . }��r ')as�..�..z;t! �� '`"�+•a'�'"�,ctll �..v�� °.K�.� ,'':'",,fs: CM Project Management Plan Getting to know the Project Final Contract Document Review Implementation of CMP & QAP Obpotive: Objectives: Objectives: Objectives: Objectives. ✓ Achieve Functional Organization ✓ Thorough Understanding of the Project ✓ Achieve Error Free Contract Documents ✓ Achieved Broad-Based City Project Records that mast the ✓ Effective Staffing Plan ✓ Establish Project needs and Objectives Statement ✓ Minimize/Eliminate CCO Successful Completed pleted on of the project requirements oft a City and MTA Funding ✓ 'Error Free' ✓ Project d P sleted on Schedule & Budget City against with sufficient intonation to defend the Project Reporting ✓ Identify Key Issues & Develop Resolution Plan ✓ Eliminate Different . Site Condition Claims ✓ Adnleved Positive Public Perception City against conatrudion claims. ✓ Consistency Between Plans/Specs Significant Elements: ✓ Achieved Feasibility/Practicality Significant Elements: Construction Contract Management Project Close-Out ✓ Functional project is Buildable (Schedule + Budget) 1. initiate Kick•Off Meeting ✓ ✓ Partnering - Mobilize Project Team ✓ Certify Construction is Substantially Complete ✓ Finalized Resident Engineer's Manual with City's Approval ✓ Identify Submittal/Pemnt Requirements ✓ Develop Punch -List ✓ CM Team Management Significant Key Project Issues: ✓ Compote Constructabgky.Anaysis ✓ Develop a List of Certificates/Licenses ✓ Finalized "As -Buck" Drawings • Personnel Assignment ✓ Utility Relations ✓ Initiate Project Team Coordination Meeting ✓ Pre—Construction Meeting ✓ Bound & Indexed Final Documents • Progress Reports ✓ CIP Bridge (Falsework Opening) ✓ Complete Construction Management Plan ✓ Implement Construction Management Pon ✓ Resolution to Outstanding Issues • Administer Leave ✓ Falsework & Temporary Work ✓ Develop Master Schedule Development ✓ Establish Communication Protocol ✓ Deliver Indexed Materials Certificates Fonation ✓ P Coro Tenn Conlin ✓ Trenching & Shoring for Pump Station & Retaining Walls ✓ Baseline Cost Development (Cost Control Procedures) ✓ Weekly Meetings & Coordination ✓ Provide "As- Built" & Actualized Schedule ✓ Elements of Structural Steel and Reber Welding ✓ Develop Public Outreach Program Procedures ✓ Environmental Services - SWPPP ✓ Prepare Change Order Summary • Acceptance of Personnel ✓ Excavation Safety ✓ Develop Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Procedures ✓ Maintain Effective Public Outreach Program ✓ Assessment of Liquidated Damages • Integration of Personnel with Cakrans ✓ SWPPP (review, approval and implementation) ✓ Attend Pre-Bid Conference and Answer Questions ✓ Prepare and Process Final Payment ✓ Compile LAN's Resident Engineer's Manual ✓ Traffic Control ✓ Evalut ation of Contractors Bid (Support) ) Construction Contract Progress Management ✓ P repare Final Project Com p otion Report Compile LAN's Conroror cdon Management Plan ✓ Fa work Quantities Verification ✓Assist City in Contract Award ✓Review & Approve Contractors Schedule ✓Prepare Final Estimate and "As -RUIN Cost ✓ Compile LAN' Quality Assurance Pon ✓ Submit CM Contract Management Plan to City ✓ Pre- Construction Condition Documentation ✓ Monitor Construction Schedule ✓ ✓ Availability of Experienced CM Staff ✓ Identify Submittals & Permits Requirements 1 Conduct First Walk-through City for ✓ CM Contract Project Control Procedures ✓ Partnerin Project Issue men s & Management ✓ Coordinate wile the Cite for Project Acceptance ✓ Coordination with Local Communitles g ✓ Progress jec Budget Management & Progress Reports ✓ Final DBE Utilization ofdon ect Do ✓ Project Budget Management ✓ Digital Format of Project Documents ✓ Submittal Timeline Materials Management ✓ Changes, Claims & Disputes ✓ Assist City in Cakrans Contract Close -Out Audit ✓ Develop Labor Compliance Procedures ✓ Prepare QC Plan & Mobilze Testing Lab ✓ Assist Cky in Funding Reimbursement ✓ Finalized List Materials 10 be Tested Construction Engineering and Inspection: ✓ Construction Safety Oversight Claims Support (If Required) ✓ Quality Assurance inspection Claims Foamy &.Assessment • Civil, Structures and Bridges ✓ identification of Additional Analysis • Traffic Signals and Lighting (Electrical) ✓ Assessment of Potential Magnitude of • Drainage, Pump Station & Landscape City's Liability & Exposure ✓ Permits ✓ Coordination of Surveying Services Derail Claims Analysis ✓ Responses to RFIs, RFCs, & Shop Drawings ✓ Schedule/Delay Analysis ✓ Inspection Reports & Records ✓ Cost/Damage Analysis ✓ Review Traffic Plans (Detours & Closures) ✓ Labor Compliance & DBE Monfodng Mediation, Arbitration & Uttgadon Support ✓ "As•Buir Drawings Update ✓ Partnering ✓ DeVeiop JobSp�O � ' � ita)Ifemta.Cpnsjftltjbti $ate Orders ✓ , ' s / r S �,, v y i ')",,x° 4.$4, ✓, Implement Safety Plowtsi"k Session ✓ Pill 4d Safety Training for Field MO ✓' ` r 4:- ` * i4 ' ter,, ��ll _.. -I . iz _ _ 7a� l •,� I ' +'1F r �,�) ga+i! . ; °t � i j�:9ry�r�I( ' �� 4i��� °Y 1'��ii �I• r; ';'I ,Y; W,. - — ..�_. - - _. - _. r 1 I t•1 rail, •p, •h CM Contract Management: Effective Communication + Accurate and Timely Project Reporting + Accurate and On -Thee Invoicing 1 Management Philosophy: "WE LISTEN" + WE ARE FLEXIBLE + WE PROVIDE IMMEDIATE RESPONSE Contract Management Services 26th Street Extension Project Section 4 Related Experience ..'p 0 IP 40 • ri40 ••0 0 0 4144 ••7••0 •••i•••••••0 14 ••••4D •4 [ w C+ 7� er 1 V + i 0505b5 8 1 4 i i i City of Los Angeles HBRR Bridge Program i Ina �T 1 n3- Z $ ......... 0 _ .....„ I p, ,.., S S H S ft City of Los Angelus, Bureau of Engineering it o o i I3 tins m n 'm 1- 5 '� F .. v P. °o .. C 760.802.7731 760.802.7730 -. t o ... C 9,° N Y C W Con'. o N ,•. S ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • Pear Lm, PE; Project Manager 9 ■ • ■ ■ • • • • • 0 Peter Ho, PE; Resident Engineer • • Chris Mockno, PE, Assistant RE ■ • • ■ 1 Chock Trao, PE; Senior Bridge S • ■ • ■ • Elmo Srnos, PE; Office Engineer 0 ■ • • • • Benny Quintoo, PE; Senior Cinl • • 0 Pete Biragotli, PE; Bridge Eugr. • • • • • • Victoria Buda, JD; Scheduler/Claims • ■ • • Javier Brriemos, ElecuicaUPump Station Eng. • • ■ • • • • • • • • Construction Management • ■ ■ ■ • ■ • ■ Construction Engineering +Inspection ■ • ■ • ■ ■ • • • • ■ Bridge Const. in Urban Environment 9 ■ • ■ • • • • - ■ • • ■ 0 Roadway Widening • • • • • • • ■ ■ ■ Utility Relocations + Storm Drain ■ ■ • Ptmp Station 0 ■ ■ • • ■ • • ■ • ■ ■ Staging +Traffic Control" ■ • • • • • ■ • ■ • • QA/QC Materials Testing + Surveying ■ ■ • ■ • • ■ • ■ • ■ Scheduling & Claims Redondo Junction Grade Separation LIM AND NASCIMENro (LAN ENGINEERING) was retained by the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) as Prime Consultant to provide Construction Management Services that Included QC Materials Testing and QA Surveying Services for the Redondo Junction Grade Separation (RJGS) Project, one of the North End Alameda Corridor projects. The project is an existing at -grade rail to rail crossing located near the Los Angeles River and Washington Boulevard. This project grade separates Redondo Junction to eliminate conflicts between freight trains that will use the Alameda Corridor and passenger trains using the BNSF /Amtrak/Metrolink tracks. Main project features included, a pump station, local street traffic detour and signals, utility relocation and the Redondo Junction structure is slightly less than a mile long and has 9 bridge segments. It is comprised of 1,600 feet of MSE wall - supported embankment at both -ends, tie -back walls, 1,800 feet of precast prestressed concrete bridge spans, and 2,200 feet of steel bridge spans. It crosses not only the corridor tracks, but also Washington Boulevard, the Los Angeles River, and Soto Street. The project site is located in the City of Los Angeles. The project limits extended from the existing trackage near Olympic Boulevard on the north to the existing trackage east of the LA River between Soto Street and Downey Road. Client :: Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority One Civic Plaza, Suite 600 Carson, CA 90745 Reference/Contact ` Mr. John Doherty, PE Chief Executive Officer/Director of Construction Telephone: 310233.7480 Mr. Gray Crary ACTA North End Construction Manager Telephone: 213.452.0275 + 213.305.8475 Project Duration: April 1999 to June 2002 Summary of Services: Develop Resident Engineer Manual Constructability Review + Bid - Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Project Close -Out CM Contract Budget: Actual CM Cost: $ 5.1 Million $ 3.8 Million Construction,Yalue: $ 52 Million Kel Pcrsornrel worked on arc pro! ct and crrc tx ohoscd ) tlantic Bold( ° laid Project Project Manager Resident Engineer (Phase 2) Resident Engineer (Phase 1) Assistant Resident Engineer Office Engineer Lead Bridge Engineer + Inspector Assistant Director of Construction QC/Training Officer Assistant Project Manager 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Project start -up, monitor on -going staffing requirements, monthly CM contract progress reports and monthly meeting with ACTA Peter Ho started as Assistant RE and later was promoted to RE when Ben Quintana was transferred to another ACTA project. Started as RE and was later transferred to another ACTA project as RE replacing another consulting firm(Washington Blvd and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation projects) Assist RE in all contract administration and coordination Document Control: CCO, submittals, schedule update Responsible for all structure construction engineering and inspection of all construction work. Assist RE in staffing of construction inspectors to ensure sufficient and efficient inspection personnel Responsible for the implementation of the CM team and the contractor Perform monthly QA audit on CM personnel performance Responsible for scheduling of construction and utilities for contractor Pacific Coast Highway Grade separation + PCH Duct Bank ACTA under a unique cooperative agreement with Caltrans and MTA undertook design and construction of the project. LIM AND NASCIMENTo (LAN ENGINEERING) was retained by the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) as Prime Consultant to provide Design Oversight, Constructability Review, Construction Management Services that included QC Materials Testing and QA Surveying Services for the PCH (SR 1) Project. The PCH Corridor is an existing at -grade rail to rail crossing located in Los Angeles. This project grade separates PCH to eliminate conflicts between freight trains that will use the Alameda Corridor and passenger trains using the BNSF /Amtrak/Metrolink tracks. The PCH structure is a pre -cast prestressed concrete girder bridge is over 2,200 feet long comprise of 3 bridge segments. It also is comprised of 1,200 feet of tie -back wall - supported embankment at both ends. The construction of PCH Grade Separation is to be constructed under a compressed schedule and encompass 3 distinct construction contracts: Early Utility Contract, PCH Duct Bank Contract and the Main PCH Structure. The PCH project is being constructed while maintaining access to businesses along PCH, and this will have an effect on the construction staging and final design. All schedule and budget risk factors will be evaluated to arrive at the means and methods of construction that minimizes those risks. The project is being funded by Caltrans under the Local Agency Assistance Program Construction Management services include managing and coordinating the efforts of the general contractor, numerous subcontractors, Alameda Corridor staff, LADOT, DWP, railroad and adjacent construction contracts and local business owners. This is a fast track project, which requires the viaduct to be completed and open to traffic in 10 months. Client: Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority One Civic Plaza, Suite 600 Carson, CA 90745 Reference/Contact Mr. John Doherty, PE Chief Executive Officer/Director of Construction Telephone: 310.233.7480 Project Duration: August 2003 to October 2004 Summary of Services: Develop Resident Engineer Manual Design Oversight ' Review + Bid- Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Project Close -Out CM Contract Budget: Actual CM Cost: $ 5.0 Million $ 3.2 Million Construction Value: $ 42 Million fier Personnel n'orker oir thcl)ro/c-Tt ctn(! ure hroposccl for the �h .S�; cc�t';itlauttrc 30111c°ru, i Project Manager Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance Resident Engineer Assistant Resident Engineer Lead Bridge Engineer + Inspector inntoo Assistant Director of Construction QC/Training Officer 26t1 Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard As RE, Peter Ho was responsible for all aspects of construction administration, engineering and inspection of the project to ensure that the project is being constructed in accordance to contract documents within schedule. Assist RE in all contract administration and coordination Document Control: CCO, submittals, schedule update Responsible for all structure construction engineering and inspection of all construction work. Assist RE in staffing of construction inspectors to ensure sufficient and efficient inspection personnel Responsible for civil work and utilities inspection Responsible for the implementation of the CM team's responsibilities Perform monthly QA audit on CM personnel performance a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) ) City of Los Angeles - Bridge fmprovement Program LIM AND NASCIMENTO (LAN ENGINEERING) as Prime Consultant was selected and ranked No. 1 Consultant among thirty- seven consulting firms by the City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering to provide Design Support, Bid Support, Constructability Review Construction Management Services under the City of Los Angeles HBRR Bridge Improvement program. Out of the thirty-seven (37) firms, the City of Los Angeles retained ten (10) consulting firms and LAN was ranked No. 1 to provide construction management services for over 60 bridge structures. Due to LAN's extensive experience in HBRR projects and our ability to provide immediate response, prior to execution of LAN contract, under a special arrangement, the City of Los Angeles retained LAN to develop a comprehensive construction manual (RE Manual). The purpose of this RE Manual is for the City distribution to the remaining nine (9) firms that ensure consistency in their construction administration and documentation procedures. Following the successfully completion of the RE Manual assignment, the City issued a separate Task Order to provide design and bid support and constructability review services for the First Street Bridge Over Los Angeles River (Bridge No, 53C- 1166). LAN is currently completing this assignment and will be providing Construction Management services during the construction of the First Street Bridge. The First Street Bridge is a historical concrete arch bridge comprise of three (3) distinct structure frames. The main features of this bridge reconstruction project are to widen First Street Bridge to accommodate future transit rail traffic. Client: City of Los Angeles Bridge Improvement Program Bureau of Engineering 250 East le Street, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Reference/Contact Mr. John Koo, PE Chief Bridge Program Manager Telephone: 213.847.5625 or 213.923.3136 Project Duration: August 2004 to February 2005 (Task 1 and Task 2) Develop Resident Engineer Manual Design Oversight, Constructability Review + Bid - Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection (to be provided at later date) Project Close -Out CM Contract Budget: Actual CM Cost: $ 8.0 Million $ TBD Construction Value: $ 28 Million (First Street Bridge Over Los Angeles River) Crsor.nel a o/I,Cd ort the project urrl nre prof: ersonnel tl :e 2( . -111anric Bolt m, Mockus, PE Project Manager Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance 'eter Ho, PE raining Officer George Plaas, PE RE Manual Task Leader Constructability Reviewer 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard As RE Manual Task Leader, Chris was responsible for the development and editing of a new RE Manual that not only meet HBRR funding requirement but also internal City of Los Angeles construction contraction administration procedures. Performed Constructability Review of the First Street Bridge project Perform monthly QA audit on CM personnel performance Washington Boulevard and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation Prc LIM AND NASCIMENTO was retained by the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA), under a special arrangement to provide a Resident Engineer and Project Manager providing Construction Management Services for the Washington Boulevard Grade Separation and Santa Fe Grade Separation projects at the northern end of the Alameda Corridor. The rest of the construction management staff, under LAN Resident Engineer (Benny Quintana), is from the firm of Carter & Burgess, who was previously retained by ACTA as the Prime Consultant. It was due to LAN's outstanding performance as Construction Manager managing the Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project, that ACTA replaced the Resident Engineer, Carter & Burgess, with a Resident Engineer from LAN Engineering. The project site is located in the City of Los Angeles and City of Vernon, South of Interstate 10, West of Interstate 1 -5, and West of the Los Angeles River. This $38 million project consists of five grade separation structures (three bridges, two rail underpass structures, and one highway overpass) to separate roadway traffic from the proposed Alameda Corridor railroad tracks, and the relocation of the major Los Angeles County Flood Control storm drain sub - structure. Two of the structures will carry railroad traffic for the BNSF and UPRR, and the other will relocate Santa Fe Avenue roadway traffic. LAN's tasks include managing a team of construction engineers for quality control inspection; document control; material management; construction engineering for temporary works (shoring and falsework); construction safety oversight; progress payments; negotiating CCO; as -built drawings; project close -out; third party coordination; and inspection services, including specialty inspections. Reference/Contact Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority One Civic Plaza, Suite 600 Carson, CA 90745 Mr. John Doherty, PE Chief Executive Officer/Director of Construction Telephone: 310.233.7480 Project Duration: August 1999 to December 2001 Summary of Services: Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Project Close -Out CM Contract; Budget: $ 1.2 Million Construction`, Value: $ 38 Million leer Personnel ii'orked on the projec proposal Ibr the'(' 4thrntic G Dave Boger Assistant Director of Construction Titl Project Manager Resident Engineer 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance As RE, Benny was responsible for all aspects of construction administration and engineering to ensure that the project is being constructed in accordance to contract documents within schedule. Responsible for the implementation of the CM team's responsibilities • Caltrans OSC - Toll Bridge Construction Adminitiration and Inspection PROJECTS New Carquinez Suspension Bridge 1 Geometry control during cable spinning operation and deck erection Task Order No. 2 EA: 04-013014 1 Orthotropic steel deck box girder fabrication & erection 1 $225M suspension bridge + long span bridge over marine environment 1 Structural steel fabrication audit and erection 1 $300M CIP/PS concrete segmental bridge New Benicia-Martinez Bridge 1 ,( Task Order No 3 EA: 04-006034 11 i Benicia-Martinez Toll Plaza Task Order No. 4 1 I EA: 04-006044 1 r " cia- Martinez Bridge Retrofit Task Order 5S-1 EA: 04-0440(11 i ,f I-680/780 Interchan V g Task Order No.6e EA: 04-006064 Crockett Interchange Task Order No 7 EA: 04-013054 I Statewide Caltrans Falsework Procedures Review Task Order No 8 EA: 04-013054X Deep foundation construction over marine environment Temporary work analysis and approval Tight geometry control fir pier segment construction and segment casting 3 stories.- 2,600sq meters toll plaza & 17 toll booths Toll operation & collection systems Underground access tunnel, parking facilities and courtyard Retrofit construction of the existing Benicia-Martinez Bridge Structural steel erection and pier wall retrofit Construction over marine environment $64M Interchange 5 new CIP/PS box girder bridges, 1 bridge widening 6 retaining walls, 2 MSE walls and 1 electrical substation building 4 new CIP/PS box girder structures, 1 welded steel box girder bridge 1 CIP concrete segmental bridge, Bridge demolition Solider pile Tie-Back walls & MSE walls Caltrans OSC retained LAN to provide technical professional support services in review of existing Caltrans OSC Falsework Procedures Review + Audit. LAN scope of services included review of the current Caltrans OSC falsework procedures, make recommendations and modifications of the current procedures and policies and development of basic training program for training construction in the review and approval of contractors' falsework submittal. An initial task, LAN investigated the reasons for falsework failures during construction and determine as to whether materials deficiency, level of inspection and/or the inexperience of field personnel. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN C� ltrans OSC - Toll E1ridge Construction Aclrninistration and Inspection Due to Lim And Nasclmento (LAN Engineering) reputation as bridge engineers in California and past performance in similar assignments with Caltrans, Caltrans Office of Structure Construction retained LAN under a Prime Consultant Contract (Contract No. 59A0269) to provide Bridge Construction Administration, Engineering and Inspection Services for several toll and non -toll bridge construction projects located in San Francisco - Oakland Bay Area. Under this 59A0269 Contract through 9 Task Orders, at the peak, LAN provided 32 construction and support personnel to support Caltrans OSC for the 7 projects listed below. These projects range in size from $35 Million to $350 Million in construction cost. Classification of LAN personnel assigned ranges from Senior Bridge Engineers, Cable Specialist, Tower Erection Specialist, Orthotropic Steel Fabrication and Erection Specialist, Segmental Bridge Specialist to Transportation Engineers (Range C & D), Construction Inspectors to Senior Claims Engineer. 1 c t Per•\ 0 1 lrroicc? and arc pro/koc(1 imtlic 13otrlcr0rd 1'r oje'c? Project Manager All nine (9) Task Orders Lead Bridge Engineer Carquinez Suspension Bridge Lead Bridge Engineer 1-680/780 Interchange Rudy Chong, PE Jon Mehtlan, PE 26m Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Evaluate each Task Order, screen qualified personnel and assigned to each project in a timely manner. Monitor on -going staffing requirements Monthly evaluation of performance of each assigned performance Prepare monthly progress report and attend weekly meeting with Caltrans Seniors Chuck served as Orthotropic Steel Box Girder fabrication and erection specialist for the New Carquinez Suspension Bridge project. As Field Lead Bridge Engineer, Jim was responsible for the construction engineering and inspection of I- 680/780 Interchange project. Perform monthly QA audit on CM personnel performance LAN State Route 210. Segments 9, 10 + 11 LIM AND NASCIMENTO (LAN ENGINEERING) was selected by San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) to provide Construction Management Services for the construction of SR 210 Segments 9, 10, 11. The SR 210 Segments 9, 10 and 11 comprise of four (4) distinct construction contracts, namely; Early Segment 9, Early Segment 10, Early Segment 11 and Segment 9, 10 and 11 Mainline construction projects. LAN responsibilities include project management, contract administration; construction engineering; and inspection to ensure that the construction is in compliance to contract documents. Specific contract administration duties include, environmental compliance (SWPPP), safety, processing of CCO and progress payments, labor compliance, document control in accordance to Caltrans Construction Manual, develop of baseline schedule, CPM analysis and monthly schedule update. Construction Engineering and inspection elements include inspection of test piles and drilled shafts; trenching and shoring, falsework review and approval, mass concrete monitoring; rubberized asphalt paving, QA construction staking, materials management, inspection of post- tensioning operations; electrical and mechanical; and instrumentation facilities. The State Route 210 Freeway Project is a new freeway being developed by SANBAG in cooperation with the Caltrans District 8. The adopted route extends from the Los Angeles/San Bernardino County line in the City of Upland to Interstate I -215 in the City of San Bernardino adjacent to existing State Route 30. Within San Bernardino County, the freeway project has been divided into eleven freeway segments. Seven segments were constructed and is currently opened to traffic. Of the remaining four segments, SANBAG is responsible for design of two and construction of the portions that are described below. These projects will be constructed under Caltrans Encroachment Permits. State Route 210 - Segments 9,10 & 11 Mainline and Early Segment 11: ✓ Construction of the Cactus Channel and Lilac OC structures, Lytle Creek Bridge, Riverside Avenue Interchange ✓ Highland Street Improvements; OC Structure and Pepper Avenue UC Bridge and California Avenue UC Bridge ✓ Construction of 8 tie -back walls, soundwalls and retaining walls with a combined length of 12,000 LF ✓ Completion of a 6 -lane freeway State Route 210, Early Construction in Segment 9: ✓ Construction of the OC structure at Ayala Drive. ✓ Construction of the Cactus Channel begins just East of Sierra Avenue in the City of Fontana and continuous along the north side of the freeway alignment. The channel outlets south of the freeway between Ayala and Spruce. Construction of the Cactus Basin, at the outlet point, will be under separate contract by San Bemardino County. The construction of the Segment 8 Mainline will be under separate contract by Caltrans. State Route 210, Early Construction in Segment 10: ✓ Highland Avenue will be realigned to the north side of its existing alignment. An interim alignment will be constructed for Highland Avenue, between Oakdale Avenue and the reconnection with the existing alignment for Highland Avenue. Construction of the OC structure at Riverside ✓ Construction of minor drainage facilities. ✓ Concrete block sound walls will be constructed as part of this contract. ✓ Cul -de -sacs at Willow Avenue, Alice Avenue and Acacia Avenue will be constructed as part of this contract. Client: Reference/Contact.' Project Duration: San Bernardino Association of Governments 444 North Arrowhead Avenue Suite 203 San Bernardino, California 92401 Mr. Herald Lantis, PE; SANBAG Construction Manager Telephone: 760.802.7730 June 2003 to April 2007 Constructability Review + Bid - Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection CM Contract Budget end Actual CM Cost:: $ 16.2 Million (Budget) and TBD Construction Value: $ 165 Million Key Petsounc>/ crooked on the projt>ct anti arc pr, '71 too ire 26`''. Steer t .17,1,07:!, 17, ult° Project Manager QA/QC Engineer 26a' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance Perform monthly personnel performance audit I4.0 Truck Climbinb Lane San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) retained LAN Engineering under a Prime Consultant Contract to provide full Construction Management, Engineering and Inspection services for the construction of 3 -mile corridor of widening the I -10 Freeway. The total construction cost of the project is estimated to be $21 Million. LAN responsibilities include project management, contract administration; construction engineering; and inspection to ensure that the construction is in compliance to contract documents. Specific contract administration duties include, environmental compliance (SWPPP), safety, processing of CCO and progress payments, labor compliance, document control in accordance to Caltrans Construction Manual, develop of baseline schedule, CPM analysis and monthly schedule update. Construction Engineering and inspection elements include inspection of test piles and drilled shafts; trenching and shoring, falsework review and approval, mass concrete monitoring; rubberized asphalt paving, QA construction staking, materials management (QA testing and plant inspection), inspection of post - tensioning operations; electrical and mechanical; and landscape inspections. This project currently schedule for completion in December 2004, proposes to construct a truck climbing lane and an auxiliary lane on eastbound Interstate 10. These improvements are expected to reduce eastbound traffic congestion and improve operational problems caused by a sustained upgrade averaging over four percent. Specific project elements comprise of the following: ✓ Construction of a truck climbing lane from Ford Street, in the City of Redlands, to Live Oak Canyon Road, in the City of Yucaipa. ✓ Construction of an auxiliary lane between the Ford Street on -ramp and the Yucaipa Boulevard off -ramp. ✓ Construction of a median barrier, including paving the median. ✓ Construction of soundwalls, retaining walls, and tie -back walls. Reference/Contact San Bernardino Association of Governments 444 North Arrowhead Avenue Suite 203 San Bernardino, California 92401 Mr. Herald Lantis, PE; SANBAG Construction Manager Telephone: 760.802.7730 Project Duration: June 2003 to March 2005 Summary of Services: Constructability Review + Bid - Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection CM Contract Budget and Actual CM Cost: $ 1.2 Million (Budget) and TBD Construction Value: $ 21.5 Million Key Personnel a orhe(' on the project oat, al pi o; it for the 26 Sweet Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance Project Manager QA /QC Engineer 2e Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard tre Botrlet and Prc�icC Perform monthly personnel performance audit Due to LIM AND NASCIMENTO (LAN ENGINEERING) outstanding CM performance on the Highland Street Improvement and Amagosa Creek Bridge Replacement projects, under a separate Prime Consultant agreement, the City of Palmdale retained LAN Engineering to provide Construction Management Services that included QA Materials Testing and QA Surveying Services for the Avenue "S" Grade Separation and Avenue "S" Corridor Improvement projects. The project included widening of Avenue S from two traffic lanes to four traffic lanes, from State Highway 14, to just east of 20th Street East. The project also includes construction of a bikeway; replacing the .existing railroad bridge with two new bridges; installing new traffic signals at the intersections of Avenue S, with 5th Street East and 10th Street East; and upgrading the existing traffic signals and installing a traffic signal interconnect to improve signal timing and traffic flow from State Highway 14 to 40th Street East. Improvements will expand traffic capacity and enhance safety among other things by: • Widening of Avenue S to a four -lane roadway and realigning and widening 20th Street East. • Upgrading and expanding the traffic signal systems. • Providing accommodations for pedestrian and bikeway traffic. • Upgrading the existing Metrolink Railroad crossing near Sierra Highway. • Upgrading the accommodations for AVTA bus riders. • Providing an aesthetically pleasing corridor for property owners, pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. These improvements will be accomplished through the following: • Two new bridges to replace the existing bridge crossing the Union Pacific railroad tracks between Casa Verde Drive and 20th Street East. • Upgrade traffic signals at the Antelope Valley Freeway, Park and Ride Drive, Sierra Highway, Casa Verde Drive, 20th, 25th, 30th, 35th, and 40th Streets East. • New traffic signal interconnection and synchronization. • New warning lights and crossing gates at Metrolink RR crossing at Sierra Highway. • New street lights, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bikeways, pavement, and shoulders. • New drainage systems, trees and other landscaping, bus turnouts, benches, and shelters. Client: erence/Contact Project Duration: Summary o Services: <, CMCoi tact Budget and Actual CM Cost: Construction Value: City of Palmdale, Department of Public Works 38250 Sierra Highway Palmdale, California 93550 Mr. Tim Hughes, PE Project Manager Telephone: 661267.5319 June 2003 to April 2005 Develop Resident Engineer Manual Constructability Review + Bid - Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Project Close -Out $ 1.9 Million (Budget) and $ 1.8 Million (Actual) $ 18 Million Ke1' Personnel oil 1170 project (1101 0 prohosc(l jor the .26' 37 tluutic l3oulercn Project Manager Resident Engineer Assistant Resident Engineer Lead Field Engineer + Inspector 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance As RE, Benny was responsible for all aspects of construction administration, engineering and inspection of the project Assist RE in all contract administration and coordination Responsible for inspection of all construction work. Soto Street /UPRR Bridge and Dow ley and/BNSF Bridge Because of LAN's excellent performance on the Redondo Junction Grade Separation and the Washington Boulevard and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation projects, under a prime consultant agreement, ACTA retained LAN as the Construction Manager, replacing another consulting firm, to provide CM Services for the Soto Street/UPRR Bridge and Downey Road/BNSF Bridge projects. Key reasons that led to these additional assignments are mainly due to our ability to provide immediate response to the changing needs of the project requirements, willingness to be responsiveness to ACTA needs, and flexibility/ability of our personnel. The Downey Road BNSF project included a separate shoofly grading project and widening of an existing BNSF Railroad Bridge structure. The Soto Street — UPRR project included extensive MSE Walls and a bridge replacement a UPRR Railroad bridge to accommodate additional tracks. Client: erence/Contact Project Duration; Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority One Civic Plaza, Suite 600 Carson, CA 90745 Mr. John Doherty, PE Chief Executive Officer/Director of Construction Telephone: 310.233.7480 03/2001 to 02/2002 (Soto Street) and 08/2001 to 12/2001 Downey Road Summary of Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Project Close -Out CM Contract Budget: $ Utilize part of Redondo Junction Budget Construction Value: $ 6.6 Million (Soto Street) and $4.5 Million (Downey Road) lien Poi sottttcl Ito! I,' onn M �* KtPersel I ou the proioet carte ' proposod `;p�,� � � � 1tt4 �' for tilc 26 '. Streeri,it/cutrre!3,',LIcrt,/ I',,, , c? 9 8 i 1 Pet Lrm, P Project Manager Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance PterIb, l'L 3 j Resident Engineer As RE, Peter Ho was responsible for all aspects of construction administration, engineering and inspection of the project to ensure that the project is being constructed in accordance to contract documents within schedule. P D ut tos, E < Assistant Resident Engineer Assist RE in all contract administration and coordination aantos l'P "; Office Engineer Document Control: CCO, submittals, schedule update ('buck 'ran{ PE ` Lead Field Engineer + Inspector Responsible for all field construction engineering and inspection r1 ave Bo er Civil Inspector Responsible for the implementation of the CM team's responsibilities ,� Jon it ehilan I'E : QC/Training Officer Perform monthly QA audit on CM personnel performance 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Long Beach Lead Extension and Farragut Avenue Extension Projects Due to LAN outstanding performance on previous projects, under a separate Prime Consultant Agreement, ACTA retained LAN to provide Construction Management services for the Long Beach Lead Track and Farragut Avenue Extension construction projects. Both of these projects consists of the construction of and realignment of ACTA mainline tracks and supplementary railroad tracks, including track bed, track signalization, relocation of utilities, and construction of crash walls, drainage systems, and appurtenant work. Significant features of the projects include: ✓ Construction of continuous railroad tracks including connections into active track ✓ Realignment of the existing tracks and spur track, including tie -in connections to operating track ✓ Relocation of utilities including three active oil lines ✓ Excavation and disposal of contaminated soils; collection treatment and disposal of ground water • Demolition work including removal of abandoned railroad track, ties, ballast, and rail facilities ✓ Construction of surface drainage systems and underground storm drain systems ✓ Containment and removal of hazardous materials ✓ Construction of concrete crash walls and railroad communication (fiber optic) and signal devices Trackwork Construction Summary: Construction portions of the ACTA Main Tracks to the Port of Long Beach (POLB); the realignment and reconstruction of a portion of the UPRR San Pedro Branch; the construction of the east and west leg of the Wye; and the connection of the Hanjin Leads to the existing POLB tracks and connections to existing tracks. ✓ Construction of the ACTA Main Tracks using Contractor furnished new rail, concrete ties, and associated OTM. ✓ Construction of East and West Wyes and connections using Contractor furnished new rail, timber ties, and OTM. ✓ Construction and realignment of the UPRR San Pedro Branch, Manual sliding track and Praxair Lead track. ✓ Construction of Hanjin Lead (Tilt) track connections using Contractor supplied new rail, concrete ties and OTM. ✓ Several At -Grade Rail Crossings. LAN's tasks include managing a team of construction engineers for quality control inspection; document control; material management; construction engineering for temporary works (shoring and falsework); construction safety oversight; progress payments; negotiating CCO; as -built drawings; project close - out; third party coordination; and inspection services, including specialty inspections. Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority One Civic Plaza, Suite 600 Carson, CA 90745 Mr. John Doherty, PE Chief Executive Officer/Director of Construction Telephone: 310.233.7480 ifroject puration., August 2001 to July 2002 Summary of Services. CM Co>ttrac Construction - ;`Value: et, lic'1' PCPSO1111c'l11'(1 Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection and Project Close -Out $ 1.4 Million (total for both projects) $ 12 Million (total for both projects) (1 at c ) / Osccl for thc 7 Strcct 1 rla 111( Boulcrcu rl Pro�c °ct Resident Engineer Office Engineer Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance As RE, Elmo was responsible for all aspects of construction administration and engineering to ensure that the project is being constructed in accordance to contract documents within schedule. Document Control: CCO, submittals, schedule update Construction Engineer + Inspectorl Responsible for all construction engineering and inspection 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard River Road Bridge Over Salinas River Due to LIM AND NASCIMENTO (LAN ENGINEERING) outstanding CM performance on the Chimney Rock Bridge construction project, under a separate Prime Consultant agreement, the County of San Luis Obispo selected LAN Engineering to provide Construction Management Services that included QA Materials Testing and QA Surveying Services for the River Road Bridge Over Salinas River project. The River Road Bridge spans over the Salinas River in San Miguel, CA and was scheduled for seismic retrofitting in 1999, also supervised by LAN Engineering. However, while under construction, the existing footings revealed excessive and extreme cracking, and required additional testing for the structural stability of the existing structure. The cause of the structural defects was determined to be due to the use reactive aggregates in the original concrete. The load carrying capacity of the existing bridge was severely reduced, making it unsafe for long -term vehicular use. Therefore, the project was placed under suspension, and the bridge replacement project was initiated. The new two -lane bridge project consists of a Cast -In- Place, post- tensioned, reinforced concrete box girder constructed immediately upstream (South) and approximately 10 feet from the existing bridge. The new structure is approximately 1100' in length and consists of 8 spans supported on 7 piers placed within the river bed. Each pier consists of a 5' -6" Diameter column constructed over a single 7' -0" Diameter Cast -In- Drilled -Hole Pile approximately 85' to 95' deep. The bridge will be supported at each end by concrete abutments placed on steel piles over built -up embankments and rock slope protection. The project also consists of the abandonment and/or relocation of several existing major utilities that will be supported within the new structure. Four new drainage facilities will be installed, and the re- grading of existing embankments and roadway cross sections will improve the storm water drainage characteristics of the new bridge. Prior to the demolition of the existing bridge, the roadways at each end will be realigned and paved with asphalt, and the new bridge will be opened to traffic. LAN's responsibility is to provide full construction management services for the pre - construction phase, bid support, and construction phase of the River Road Bridge Replacement Project. Typical contract administration and inspection duties include the following: development and processing of contract change orders and progress pay estimates; coordination of materials sampling and testing, and surveying; review and approval of submittals; responding to RFI's; implementation of Federal employment requirements; review, implementation and enforcement of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, as well as the permit requirements of other environmental agencies. LAN was also responsible to ensure that all aspects of the project are in conformance with Federal, State and County regulations, the Standard Specifications, Project Special Provisions, and contract plans. Other duties include the creation and maintaining of construction records, generating correspondences and responding to other job related issues as required. LAN Engineering facilitates all meetings coordination between the Contractor, County, Environmental Agencies, Caltrans, Utilities and other job related entities. erence/Contact Ct Project Duration; County of San Luis Obispo, Department of Public Works County Government Center, Room 207 San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Mr. Dave O'Halloran, PE County Chief Construction Engineer Telephone: 805.781.4387 Summary of Services: June 2003 to April 2005 Develop Resident Engineer Manual Constructability Review + Bid - Support Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Project Close -Out CM Contract Budget and Actual CM,( Construction Yap $ 890,000 (Budget) and $ 675,000 (Estimate) $ 8 Million lice Personnel ,rorkcd ort the' praicct and arc proposed ter the° 26'. . i?k<<ntic Boulcv and Project Project Manager Assistant Resident Engineer Lead Field Engineer + Inspector 26`x' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Monitor on -going staffing requirements + performance Assist RE in all contract administration and coordination Responsible for inspection of all construction work. IPN • Contract Management Services 26th Street Extension Project Section 5 Key Personnel Resumes Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ 22 Years of exclusive bridge engineering and construction management experience 1 Project Manager -for eight (8) Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority construction projects ✓ Extensive local construction project experience ✓ Large Diameter Pile Shaft Construction Experience ✓ Construction Survey Experience ✓ Received PM & Construction Firm of the Year 2002 Award from the Mayor's Office of Los Angeles Project Assignment Project Manager Education BS, Civil Engineering University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, Canada MS — Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA ME — Structural Engineering U. of South Carolina Columbia, SC Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -45245 Peter has dedicated his entire 22 years of experience in project management, planning, engineering and construction of highway/bridge related projects. Out of 22 years, he has worked 19 years as an engineer and project manager and three years as construction inspector. Peter has risen in rank from construction inspector, draftsman to bridge engineer to project manager. Prior to becoming an engineer, Peter spent five years as Construction Inspector and was later promoted to Superintendent for a Contractor working on a major railway /freeway project (North/South Highway). Peter's construction experience includes evaluation of pre - construction, construction, and post construction activities, which includes as -built plans, project close -out documentation, development of cost reporting format and procedures, preparation of IDR, field inspection including earthwork, pile driving operations, temporary shoring system, material testing and sampling, and traffic control measures. Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Peter served as Project Manager: Project Manager: River Road Bridge Replacement Over Salinas River: San Luis Obispo County — Department of Public Works retained LAN as the Construction Manager to provide CM Services for the River Road Bridge Replacement over Salinas River. As Project Manager, Peter was responsible for constructability review, pre - construction services, project set -up and day -to -day management of the CM team and project close -out. The River Road Bridge Project is part of Federal HBRR program with Caltrans oversight. Project Manager: Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation: Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) retained LAN as the Construction Manager to provide CM Services for the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation project in Long Beach. Through a coop agreement between ACTA and Caltrans, the project was funded through sources including HBRR, Caltrans, UPRR and ACTA. The fmal construction cost of this project is $42 million. Project Manager: Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project. Peter served as Project Manager providing construction management services of the Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project along the Alameda Corridor. The project elements include complex traffic control and stage construction, bridge demolition and new bridge construction, construction over flood control channel (LA River), traffic signal installation, pump station, mechanical equipment, complex utility coordination and relocation and railroad coordination. The total construction cost of this one -mile long viaduct (comprised of nine bridge segments) is $52 million 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Peter Lim, PE Page 2 of 2 Project Manager: Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority - Construction Management Services for Grade Separation Projects - Package B. Peter is currently completing his assignment as Project Manager leading the construction management team to provide CM services for four (4) grade separation projects: Nogales Street Grade Separation (Shoofly Construction) will be completed in May 2004, Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation, Baldwin Avenue Grade Separation, and Brea Canyon/UPRR Grade Separation. The total construction of all the four (4) grade separation projects is over $75 Million. Project Manager; Caltrans Structures Construction, Construction Administration, Inspection and Support, Caltrans District 8 (96/00 - LAN): Peter as Project Manager successfully completed his assignment providing Construction Engineering and Inspection services of thirty-eight (38) bridge construction projects for Caltrans District 8, 9, & 11 Structure Construction. The project involves the construction administration, engineering and inspection of bridge retrofit and replacement of over 100 bridge structures along Routes 10, 111, 215, 15, 91 etc. At the peak, Peter led a team of more than 40 construction engineers and support personnel on this 38 construction projects. Peter's duties included screening and assigning qualified staff to Caltrans; ensuring performance of assigned personnel; developing schedule and budget for each personnel assigned; providing continuous training, continuous monitoring, and evaluation of assigned personnel; and attending regular meeting with Caltrans Area Senior to ensure the performance of our personnel met or exceeded Caltrans expectation. Project Manager: Caltrans Toll Bridge "On -Call" Construction Support and Inspection ..(Contract No. 59A0269), Caltrans Office of Structure Construction, Bay Area, California. Peter has been tremendously successful, and has successfully completed his assignment as Project Manager for this Caltrans Toll Bridge "On- Call" Construction Engineering and Inspection Contract. This Contract No. 59A0269 involves providing technical expertise, structure construction engineering, administration and inspection, construction staking, and claims support for the construction of New Carquinez Suspension Bridge, New Benicia - Martinez Segmental Bridge, New Benicia- Martinez Toll Plaza, I- 680/780 Interchange, Crockett Interchange, and Marina Vista Interchange. Upon receiving written Task Order, in a timely manner, Peter assembled a team of highly qualified construction engineers regarded as experts in their respective disciplines to assist Caltrans. Special expertise provided by LAN employees included suspension cable installation specialist; suspension tower erection specialist; orthotropic steel box fabrication and erection specialist; segmental bridge construction specialist; segmental bridge geometry control engineer; Prestressing specialist; foundation construction specialist; and falsework engineer. At the peak, Peter led a team of more than 30 construction engineers and support personnel on this "on -call" contract. Together with Jon Mehtlan, PE (Director of Construction at LAN) and Rudy Chong, PE, Peter's duties included screening and assigning qualified staff to Caltrans; ensuring performance of assigned personnel; developing schedule and budget for each personnel assigned; providing continuous training, continuous monitoring, and evaluation of assigned personnel; and pro - actively meeting with Caltrans Area Senior Engineers to ensure that the performance of our personnel met or exceeded Caltrans expectation. On a weekly basis, Peter met with all field personnel assigned to Caltrans, to discuss ways to improve our services to Caltrans. Peter Lim, as Project Manager, was responsible for the following CM Projects Undertaken by LAN: ✓ Soto Street/UPRR and Downey Road/BNSF Bridge Construction, ACTA, Los Angeles ✓ Long Beach Lead and Farragut Avenue Extension, ACTA, Los Angeles ✓ Market Street Bridge over Santa Ana River, Riverside County ✓ River Road and Chimney Rock Bridges, San Luis Obispo ✓ Highland Street/25th. Street Bridge Replacement, Palmdale ✓ City of San Bernardino, City Wide Bridge Program. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Peter Gerald Ho. PE Resident Engineer Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ 25 years of exclusive bridge/highway construction experience. ✓ Last 15 years of exclusive highway/bridge construction in California ✓ Extensive highway/bridge construction experience in urban environment ✓ Recent local resident engineering experience in highway/bridge construction Project Assignment Resident Engineer Senior Bridge Const. Engineer Education BS, Civil Engineering University of Saskatchewan Saskatchewan, Canada Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -55659 Peter Ho has over 25 years of exclusive highway and bridge construction experience in large -scale transportation projects. His broad based experience includes heavy construction applications with demonstrated expertise in construction, inspections, construction start-ups, contract administration, change orders and negotiations. As Resident Engineer, he has extensive knowledge in highway/bridge construction within the Caltrans freeway system. In addition, Peter has recent experience in cast -in -place and balanced cantilever prestressed concrete bridges and railroad steel truss bridge structures. Most recently, Peter Ho has served as Resident Engineer for seven (7) highway/bridge construction projects along the Alameda Corridor in Los Angeles. Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Peter Ho served as Resident Engineer: Resident Engineer: Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation: Due to Peter Ho outstanding performance as Resident Engineer for the previous projects, ACTA retained LAN, under a separate contract, to provide construction management, engineering and inspection, surveying, and material testing services for this $42M highway/bridge construction project. Peter has successfully completed his assignment as the Resident Engineer responsible for all facets of the construction management ensuring the construction is in compliance with contract documents. The PCH viaduct comprises of multiple segments of bridges, primarily cast -in -place p/s box girder structures and precast p/s concrete girder structure types, and MSE wall at the approaches. The project was completed two (2) months ahead of schedule and has no change order and claims issues at project close -out. Resident Engineer: Redondo Junction Grade Separation (RJGS) Project. As Resident Engineer, Peter Ho was responsible for the construction management for the construction of RJGS. The RJGS project ($52M) was awarded best managed construction project along the entire $1.8 Billion rail corridor undertaken by ACTA. In addition, under the leadership of Peter Ho as Resident Engineer, LAN was retained to replace another consulting firm as Construction Manager responsible for the construction contract management of the Washington Boulevard Grade Separation and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation projects. The total construction cost of the three projects is $86M. Resident Engineer: ACTA Multiple Construction Contracts (Contract No. C0064). Due to Peter's outstanding performance in managing the RJGS construction project, ACTA retained LAN and commissioned Peter Ho and Elmo Delos- Santos, PE to be the Resident Engineer and Office Engineer (Document Control) respectively replacing another consulting firm providing construction management, engineering and inspection services for the UPRR/Soto Street Bridge, Downey Road/BNSF Bridge, Long Beach Lead and Farragut Avenue Extension construction projects. The total construction cost of these bridge structures are $22M 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IAN Peter Gerald Ho, PE Page 2 of 2 Bridge Resident Engineer and Structure Representative: Oak Hill Road /l -15 Interchange Improvements, Victorville. Peter Ho served as Principal Bridge Construction Engineer and as Bridge Resident Engineer responsible for construction inspection and administration of Oak Hill Road OC Bridge Replacement and its associated ramps improvements. He assisted Caltrans in performing construction management activities and was responsible for processing CCO orders as it relates to structure work. Structure Representative /Bridge RE: Caltrans Structures Construction, Construction Administration, inspection and Support, Caltrans District 8, 9 & 1.1. Peter Ho served as the Senior Bridge Construction Engineer (Structure Representative/Bridge RE) and was responsible for structure construction administration, engineering and inspection, supervising, coordinating, and training field personnel; negotiating contract change orders, reviewing shop and falsework drawings and calculations; generating pay estimates, performing bridge inspection, surveying line and grade, and interpreting contract plans and specification. Out of the thirty-eight (38) projects, LAN was responsible for the structure construction administration; Peter Ho was responsible for eight (8) bridge construction projects that comprise of 22 bridge structures. Resident Engineer: Telegraph Road /Norwalk Blvd Intersection Improvements: Peter has successfully completed his assignment as Resident Engineer and Structure Rep for this $6M construction project. Duties include contract management, review and approve contract change orders, falsework and shop drawings review & approval, materials and record management, address public and business concerns. Bridge Construction Engineer: 1- 110/1 -105 Century Freeway; Caltrans District 7; Los Angeles. As Bridge Construction Engineer, Peter Ho was responsible for construction inspection and assisted the Caltrans Structure Rep (Jon Mehtlan) responsible for structure construction administration, engineering and inspection for contract compliance for the I -110/1 -105 Connector. 26M Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN Christopher E. Mockus, PE Assistant Resident Engineer Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ 13 years of bridge/highway construction experience. ✓ Extensive highway/bridge construction experience in urban environment ✓ Extensive experience in Primavera Scheduling, contract change orders and claims experience ✓ Expertise in Caltrans Construction Manual and Local Assistance Procedure Manual Project Assignment Assistant Resident Engineer Education BS, Civil Engineering University of Rhode Island Rhode Island Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -54398 Christopher Mockus has over 13 years of experience managing large -scale highway and bridge construction projects and programs. His vast construction management experience includes processing and negotiating CCO; preparing monthly progress reports; coordinating construction activities; supervising inspectors' daily operations; reviewing CPM schedule; Claims Mitigation, utilities coordination; field engineering; inspections; review and approval of temporary work drawings; monitoring storm water prevention program, monitoring traffic control and safety plans; office engineering in both roadway and structural projects, including bridge, retaining and sound walls, large diameter, drainage and sewer systems, asphalt and concrete pavement, and subgrade and aggregate base material. Prior to joining LAN, Chris was also responsible in developing several construction schedule training programs for Caltrans District 12 Construction. Office Chief Construction /Claims Engineer: 1- 405/55 Connector (MOS 1) As Caltrans District 12 Office Chief Construction, Chris served as Claims Engineer supporting Caltrans/OCTA in negotiating a $2 million construction claims on the I- 405/55 Connector bridge construction project. Resident Engineer: 1-5 Reconstruction Project - 3 of 9 Contracts, Segment A -2, A-3 and A-5 Anaheim and Santa Ana (Orange County), CA As Senior Resident Engineer for Caltrans, Chris duties included managing the claim process and requirements of the project for submittals reviews, SWPPP, Contract Administration, Engineering and Inspection and analysis of CPM during construction. At the peak, Chris led a team of over 15 construction personnel administering this $110,000,000 construction project. The project scope was full freeway reconstruction for 3 miles, new HOV connectors, local access (on- and off -) ramps and reconstruction of adjacent local streets in a highly urbanized area. The construction improvements included 8 new bridges, 3 bridge demolition and reconstruction, MSE walls, cut and cover tunnel construction, and tieback walls, drainage installation of large diameter drainage pipes (84" and 96 ") PCC and AC paving. Caltrans Partnering Award was granted for successfully completing I -5 Reconstruction Project Segment A2 and A3 on time, within budget and with no claims Resident Engineer: 405/73 Interchange Project, Costa Mesa, CA As Senior Resident Engineer for Caltrans, Chris duties included managing the claim process and requirements of the project for submittals reviews, SWPPP, Contract Administration, Engineering and Inspection and analysis of CPM during construction. At the peak, Chris led a team of 7 construction personnel administering this $40,000,000 construction project This project consisted freeway outside widening, new 73/405 Connector and reconstruction of local access (on- and off -) ramps at Fairview and Harbor Interchanges. The construction improvements included 2 new bridges, 2 bridge widening, MSE walls, Sound walls, realignment and Construction of the Gisler Channel, tieback walls, PCC and AC paving. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 1 1 Christopher E. Mockus. PE Page 2 of 2 Resident Engineer: Emergency Storm Damage Repairs, Pico Rivera, CA Provided Construction Management services to the City of Pico Rivera to evaluate, design and manage the construction of emergency repair for five storm - damaged sites, located at Rosemead Boulevard Underpass at Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), Paramount Boulevard Underpass at BNSF, Rosemead UPRR, Paramount UPRR and Whitter UPRR. Services for the emergency repairs portion of the work included assisting the City with Contract Procurement, Contract Administration, Materials Management, monitoring of safety and traffic control, and contractor payments. The scope of the services was broken, down into two phases. The first phase was to identify repairs strategies and managed the Construction of these strategies to stabilize the 5 locations with a total construction cost of $250,000. These strategies included installing soil nails and slurry backfilling identified void locations. The second phase was to prepare an Engineering Assessment Report of the five underpass sites. The purpose of the Engineering Assessment Report is to provide key information for City's decision makers regarding the future repair at these five sites and recommended short term and long term repairs. Senior Construction Manager: Bridge Improvement Program, City of Los Angeles, CA As LAN's Senior Construction Manager, Christopher Mockus has successfully developed a Construction Procedures Manual for the City of Los Angeles Bridge Improvement Program. The cities Bridge Improvement Program is a $300 million in design and construction funds from the Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (HBRR) program. The Bridge Improvement Program will be responsible for managing the design and construction of 80 bridge .� improvement projects which consist of bridge replacements, widening, seismic retrofits, structural improvements, and historical renovations. The scope of the work included: 0 1 1 Senior Construction Manager: Bolsa Chica Wetland Restoration Project, Hunt. Beach CA 10 Because of Chris Mockus construction contract administration capabilities, LAN was retained by another consultant, Moffat & Nichol Engineers in the Construction Management of the portion of the Bolsa Chica Wetland Restoration Project within Caltans Right of Way. The work within Caltrans Right of Way consisted of replacing a portion of the existing PCH with a new 4 lane bridge to create an inlet channel from the ocean to the wetlands. The estimated construction value of this work is $16 million. Chris duties were to ensure the contract administration conform are done in accordance with Caltrans Construction Manual, Caltrans Bridge Construction Records and Procedure Manual and Local Assistance Manual for all phases of the work including Document Control, Contract Administration, CCO, Materials Inspection and Management, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Area Construction Manager: Caltrans Orange County Construction Program, Orange County, CA While working for Caltrans District 12 Construction, Chris served as Area Construction Manager, has successfully managed capital improvement construction program of $250 million in Orange County for Caltrans District 12. Duties 0 included overseeing a staff of 110 employees with an average of 50 on -going construction projects ranging from $50,000 to $60,000,000. Mr. Mockus duties included ensuring staff compliance with Caltrans Construction Manual for Contract Administration, Inspection, Materials Control and Management, Contract Change Order preparation, project closeout and Claims preparation. In addition, he also performed analysis on complex cost and time issues, managing partnering program and facilitating dispute resolution process on projects, and provided on the job training for claims analysis, contract administration and CPM. 1. Review Cities Procedures and process during Construction for conformance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), CT Construction Manual and federal contract requirements. 2. Recommend changes to City's Procedures to ensure compliance with CT LAPM and federal contract requirements. 3. Develop a Construction Procedures Manual to ensure the Construction Management and Administration done on the 80 bridge improvements projects in the City of Los Angeles is done consistently and compliance is achieved with CT LAPM and federal contract requirements. Assistant Project Manager: Seismic Retrofit Program, Phase 1 and 2, Caltrans District 12, Orange County, CA As Assistant Project Manager, Chris overall duties was to manage the overall cost, scope and schedule for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 Seismic Retrofit program in Orange County from inception through construction by effectively applying the principles of project management. The Phase 1 and 2 Program in Orange County had all projects, over 50 projects, completed by the Statewide mandated goal. Key accomplishments: managed the utility and environmental process to fast track the clearance of all projects; creating a structures design team from available Districtl2 staff, tracking and managing individual projects schedule and cost; effectively managed resources by utilizing consultant designs with in- house design to ensure individual project schedules met programmatic goals. 26`'' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard 1 LAN Chuck Tran, PE Senior Bridge Engineer Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ 19 years of exclusive Caltrans bridge construction experience ✓ 10 years tenure with Caltrans Office of Structure Construction ✓ Extensive CIP P/S concrete box girder construction experience both in Metric and English units ✓ AWS Certified Welding Inspector ✓ Construction survey & materials testing ✓ Developed computer programs for field construction engineering, including Falsework, Trenching + Shoring Analysis and Design Project Assignment Senior Bridge Engineer Education BS, Civil Engineering Cal State University Long Beach Long Beach, CA Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -55659 American Welding Society CWI 04090291 Chuck has over 19 years of exclusive bridge construction experience in California. All of Chuck's experience in the construction management and inspection has been in large bridge construction projects. He has intimate knowledge of fabrication and erection large structural steel bridges over navigable waterway, cast -in -place post - tensioned concrete box girder type bridge construction in urban environment and California Freeway System. In addition Chuck has extensive experience in the areas of Caltrans construction contract administration and management, constructability reviews, construction survey, materials sampling, quality control and construction inspection. Following is a list of relevant bridge construction projects where Chuck Tran served as Structure Representative (Bridge Construction Engineers): - Bridge Construction Engineer: Orthotropic Steel Box Fabrication and Erection, New Carquinez Suspension Bridge, Caltrans OSC. As LAN resident expert in fabrication and erection of structural steel bridge structures, Chuck was assigned to Caltrans and has successfully completed his assignment as the Lead Bridge Engineer responsible for monitoring and inspection for the orthotropic steel box girder fabrication in Japan to ensure that the bridge superstructure is being fabricated in compliance to contract documents. In addition, Chuck provided recommendations and suggestions of engineering . solutions to the shop fabrication issues as it occurs. Chuck was also responsible for the construction engineering, erection and inspection of the Carquinez Bridge Superstructure construction. Senior Structure Representative (Bridge Engineer): (ACTA) Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project: Chuck has successfully completed his assignment as Senior Structure Representative (Bridge Construction Engineer) and Principal Assistant to the Resident Engineer, leading a team of 8 bridge construction engineers and inspectors responsible for construction inspection of this $52 million bridge construction project. Primarily Chuck was responsible for the precast p/s concrete girder and structural steel fabrication and erection of bridge main span over Los Angeles River. In addition, he is also responsible for contract compliance, third parties coordination, schedule /updates, claims, survey, reviewing and approving shop drawings, falsework designs and shoring designs. Assisting the Resident Engineer, Peter Ho, PE, Chuck was assigned to provide documentation for independent audit of the project documentation and safety compliance and assurance of personnel performance of the Redondo Junction Construction Management Team. Bridge Construction Engineer: Telegraph Road /Norwalk Blvd Intersection Improvements: Chuck served as Bridge Construction Engineer, assisting the RE, Peter Ho responsible for the construction engineering and inspection of the Telegraph Road Bridge in the City of Santa Fe Springs. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Chuck Tran. PE Page 2 of 2 Structure Representative & QA/QC (Deputy Bridge Construction Manager): Ca!trans Structure Construction, Construction Administration, inspection and Support, Ca!trans District 8. Chuck was responsible for contract compliance of 5 bridge construction projects involving over 16 bridge structures for Caltrans District 8 Structure Construction. Chuck was also responsible for supervising :11 Bridge Construction Engineers in the technical aspects of bridge retrofit and new bridge construction in San Bernardino, Inyo, San Diego and Riverside Counties. He has most recently completed his assignment as Claims Analyst assisting Caltrans Resident Engineers and Area Seniors and Caltrans' Attorneys in resolving claims as well as arbitration preparation for six construction contracts in resolving claims for six construction contracts. Bridge Construction Engineer: Oak Hill Road /I -15 Interchange Improvements, Victorville. Chuck Tran served as Bridge Construction Engineer assisting Peter Ho responsible for construction inspection and administration of Oak Hill Road OC Bridge Replacement and its associated ramps improvements. He assisted Caltrans in performing construction management activities and was responsible for processing CCO orders as it relates to structure work. Assistant Resident Engineer /Senior Bridge Construction Engineer: Highland Street Bridge Replacement and Armagosa Creek Realignment, Palmdale, CA. Chuck served as Senior Bridge Construction Engineer as well as Assistant Resident Engineer responsible for the construction administration, engineering and inspection of the Highland Street Bridge Replacement project. The project consisted of realigning and widening the Armagosa Creek, by replacing the existing structural steel bridge with a longer and wider pre -cast p/s girder bridge. In addition to managing the project, Chuck also took an active role in source inspection of the pre -cast girder fabrication, as well as performing Quality Assurance inspections of other Contractors work within this contract under encroachment permits. The new Highland Street Bridge won the Antelope Valley Public Work's (AVPW) top award for new bridge construction. Bridge Construction Engineer:1- 110 /1 -105 Interchange. Chuck served as Construction Engineer and Bridge Rep under the supervision of Jon Mehtlan, PE (LAN QA/QC Officer) assigned to this construction project representing Caltrans. His duties include all aspects of contract administration and inspection for the construction of 6 bridge structures for the I -110/1 -105 Interchange and its associated improvements. Specifically his duties included monitoring the construction and engineering cost, survey, reviewing and approving shop drawings, falsework designs and shoring designs Senior Bridge Construction Engineer (Structure Representative): 1 -5/405 IC (El Toro Y Project), Irvine. While working for Caltrans, Chuck was responsible for structure construction inspection and contract administration. In addition to leading a team of seven Bridge Engineers, he also assisted the Resident Engineer in monitoring the Engineering Cost; reviewing and approving shop drawings submittals, falsework and shoring designs; initiating and processing contract change orders; and preparing structure "as- built" drawings. He coordinated utility relocation/installation to avoid schedule conflicts; monitored the contractor CPM progress schedule /updates; and handled contractor claim issues related to structure works. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Elmo Delos - Santos. PE Office Engineer /Document Control Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Dedicated his entire of 18 years career in highway/bridge engineering ✓ Last 15 years of exclusive highway/bridge construction in Southern California ✓ Experience in both metric and English units ✓ Roadway /Civil/Bridge construction in urban environment and over waterway Project Assignment Field Office Engineer Document Control Education MS /Civil Engineering University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA BS /Civil Engineering University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -48975 Elmo Delos -Santos has over 18 years of exclusive experience in the design and construction of transportation infrastructure projects. He has been involved with all facets of bridge/highway design and construction in Southern California. He is proficient in the areas of contract administration, construction management, document control, schedule control, cost control, design and constructability reviews, quality control and quality assurance, construction inspection, claims mitigation, claims analysis, contract change order processing, and construction office management. Elmo developed the first Resident Engineer Manual for ACTA that was utilized and administering the Alameda Corridor North End and South End Construction projects. Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Elmo served as Resident Engineer, Assistant RE and /or Office Engineer: Resident Engineer: Long Beach Track Extension and Farragut Avenue Extension Project, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority. Elmo was the Resident Engineer successfully completed his assignment for these projects. Located primarily in the City of Los Angeles, this project consist of the construction of and realignment of mainline and supplementary railroad tracks including track bed, relocation of utilities (Equilon/Shell, DWP, ARCO and Ultramar Pipelines), construction of crash walls, drainage systems, and appurtenant work. The work to be performed is the construction portions of the ACTA Main Tracks to the Port of Long Beach (POLB), the realignment and reconstruction of a portion of the UPRR San Pedro Branch, the construction of the east and west legs of the Wye, and the connection of the Hanjin Leads to the existing POLB tracks and associated connections to the existing tracks. Office Engineer /Assistant Resident Engineer: Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project + 5 Other ACTA North End Construction Projects: Ehno Delos -Santos was a key participant in the Construction Management and Inspection of the $52 million, one -mile long Redondo Grade Separation Structure in Los Angeles. In addition to his duties of document control, Elmo also responsible for review of contractor's submittals including falsework, trenching and shoring submittals, and all facets of structure construction engineering. Elmo performed field inspections at times when field engineers are either on vacation and/or sick leave. Because of his outstanding performance, our client, ACTA, under a sole contract with multiple task orders, retained LAN as the CM for 5 construction projects, including the UPRR/Soto Street Bridge and Downey RoadJBNSF Separation structure, totaling of over $75 million along the Alameda Corridor where he served as Assistant RE and Lead Office Engineer in charge of document control and schedule updates and CPM analysis. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Elmo Delos- Santos, PE Page 2 of 2 Office Engineer: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Grade Separation Project, ACTA. Most recently, Elmo has successfully completed his assignment as Field Office Engineer responsible for the document control and construction administration of the Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation project for ACTA. Elmo duties included assisting the Resident Engineer in review and approval of contractors' submittals, write contract change orders, construction progress schedule management and utilities coordination. In addition, Elmo also assisted the Resident Engineer providing construction inspection at times when his duty as Office Engineer is not required. The PCH viaduct comprises of multiple segments of bridges, primarily cast-in-place p/s box girder structures and precast p/s concrete girder structure types, and MSE wall at the approaches. The project was completed two (2) months ahead of schedule and has no change order and claims issues at project close -out. Resident Engineer: Ramona Avenue Grade Separation Project, ACE Construction Authority. Elmo is currently completing his assignment as the Resident Engineer for the Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation Project in the City of El Monte. This project generally consists of construction of a grade separation at the UPRR, a pump station and Metrolink crossings at Ramona Boulevard. Ramona Boulevard will be lowered under the two existing tracks and will accommodate one future track. Two bridge structures will be constructed. The substructure for the future northerly bridge will also be constructed. In addition, this project also entails constructing a pump station, various retaining walls, a water line and several storm drain lines. Assistant Resident Engineer /Office Engineer: Nogales Avenue Grade Separation Project, West Covina. As Assistant Resident Engineer /Office Engineer, Elmo was responsible for the construction contract administration and document control of this $21 Million construction project. His duties included submittals reviews, approval, schedule management, and progress payment estimates. This project consists of construction of a grade separation at the UPRR Alhambra Branch crossing at Nogales Street. This work consists of major components including, but not limited to, UPRR Nogales Grade Separation Bridge, Valley Blvd. Overcrossing, retaining walls, depressed Nogales Street, Loop Connector road, utility relocations, pump station, detour roads, landscaping and irrigation, drainage & sewer, and signalization & lighting and other miscellaneous items of work. 26`x` Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IAN Benny Quintana, PE Senior Civil Engineer /Inspector Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Dedicated his entire of 17 years career in highway/bridge construction experience ✓ Last 15 years of exclusive highway/bridge construction in Southern California ✓ Experience in both metric and English units ✓ Roadway /Civil/Bridge construction in urban environment and over waterway Project Assignment Senior Civil Engineer and Senior Civil Inspector Education BS, Civil Engineering U. of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Los Angeles, CA Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -49601 Benny Quintana has over 17 years of engineering experience in construction management and administration of heavy civil and highway facilities with Caltrans, as well as, County and Local Agencies. Benny is an Associate for LAN Engineering. His responsibilities include Quality Assurance of construction management contract activities in order to guarantee quality service and satisfaction to our Clients. Prior to joining LAN, Benny served as Quality Assurance Engineer, Construction Manager, and Resident Engineer on various construction projects for Caltrans District 12 in Orange County. Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Benny Quintana served as RE and /or Senior Construction Engineer: Resident Engineer: Avenue S Corridor Improvement Project, Palmdale. Resident Engineer for the Construction Management and Inspection of the $19M construction project including. Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Grade Separation Replacement (with two new bridges), Widening of Avenue S Corridor (2.5 miles), Retaining Walls, Class I Bike Path Improvement, Traffic Signal Interconnect Improvement (including home -run to City's Traffic Management Center), Relocation/Reconstruction of 8 " -24" Waterline Facilities, and various local improvements. Leading a team of six (6) construction engineers and materials technicians, Benny' duties encompassed all aspects of construction management, project documentation, claims mitigation program, safety compliance and inspection. Resident Engineer Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project, ACTA Benny started as Resident Engineer for the Redondo Junction Grade Separation project and at the request of ACTA (the client); Benny was replaced by Peter Ho. Benny replacement was mainly due to his outstanding performance and Peter Ho availability to serve as RE for the project. ACTA commissioned Benny to be the RE replacing another consulting firm on the Washington Boulevard and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation projects. Resident Engineer: Washington Boulevard and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation Projects, Los Angeles, CA. Due to his outstanding performance on the Redondo Junction Project, ACTA (the Client) requested Benny to take on the responsibilities as Resident Engineer replacing another consulting firm for the Washington Boulevard and Santa Fe Avenue Grade Separation Projects and had successfully completed this most recent assignment. Benny responsibilities included reorganizing the CM team and managed all the aspects of the construction as Construction Manager and Resident Engineer for this project. The main aspects of the project included: a CIP Highway Viaduct Bridge, UPRR Steel Girder Bridge, BNSF Truss Bridge, and various local improvements. Benny' duties encompassed all aspects of construction management, project documentation, claims mitigation program, safety compliance and inspection. Ben furthered his experience by working with various regulatory agencies, including PUC, UPRR, BNSF, Metrolink, Caltrans, FHWA, City of LA, County of LA, and other local jurisdictions. 26`x' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Benny Quintana. PE Page 2 of 2 Principal Assistant/Resident Engineer: 1-5/405 Interchange El Toro "Y" Project. While working for Caltrans District 12 Construction, Benny served as Principal Assistant and later promoted to RE for the construction of the $45M I -5/405 Interchange Project. Responsibilities included preparation of contract CCO, preparation of "progress pay estimates," construction inspection, document control, review of CPM, claim resolution, monitoring contract progress, coordination of utility relocations, review of storm water pollution prevention plan, and coordination of construction activities with adjacent State and local agency contracts. Quality Assurance Engineer: Orange County Toll Road Construction Liaison. While working for Caltrans District 12 Construction, Benny assisted with the development and construction standards of the Eastern Transportation Corridor, Foothill Transportation Corridor and San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor. Duties included safety reviews, plan and field constructability reviews, review of field changes to ensure compliance with Caltrans' standards, field procedures manuals and QA/QC manuals Senior Construction Engineer/Third Party Coordinator: MTA Metro Rail Construction Contracts. Benny served as Construction Engineer on several MTA Metro Rail contracts. Due to his prior experience with Caltrans Construction, Benny was designated as the Construction Engineer and Third Party Coordinator for MTA Metro Rail Projects. His duties included managing construction activities to support planned construction; participated in negotiations with and/or obtaining approvals from agencies that have jurisdiction for the work to be performed; resolving utility conflicts with planned construction; and ensuring construction of third party facilities meet standards and expectations of facility owners. Construction projects included: ✓ Bridge over Freeway 101, with on/off ramps, Los Angeles, CA ✓ Park & Ride Bus Facility, Los Angeles, CA ✓ Lankershim Boulevard Bridge and Street Widening, Los Angeles ✓ Pedestrian Underpass and Ventura Blvd., Widening Bridge over Freeway 101 with on/off ramps Park & Ride Bus Facility, Los Angeles Assistant Resident Engineer /Resident Engineer: Various Caltrans District 12 Highway Construction Projects. While working for Caltrans District 12 Construction, Benny worked on numerous highway construction projects throughout Orange County, including Widening of the I -5 and SR 55 freeways construction projects. Responsibilities included preparation of CCO, "progress pay estimates," review of CPM, claim resolution, monitoring contract progress, coordination of utility relocations, review of SWPPP and coordination of construction activities with adjacent State and local agency contracts. Field Office Engineer: Various Caltrans District 12 Highway Construction Projects. During his first five (5) years tenure with Caltrans District 12 Construction, Benny served as Office Engineer responsible for the review and approval of all construction related change orders. Duties included review of change orders for compliance with contract specifications, construction manual, and District's policies and procedures. In addition, responded to "bidder's questions" for newly advertised contracts, prepared as -built drawings for records management, performed PS &E reviews, and addressed public concerns for various construction contracts. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Peter Bizzigotti, PE Bridge Engineer /irnspector Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Over 40 years of exclusive bridge/highway construction experience ✓ Experience in both Metric and English units of bridge construction ✓ Recent local bridge construction experience in highway/bridge construction Project Assignment Bridge Engineer/Inspector Education BS, Civil Engineering Worchester Polytechnic Institute and State University Massachusetts Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -26857 Peter Bizzigotti has over 40 years of experience as a Bridge Engineer, Field Bridge Construction Inspector, Resident Engineer, Structures Representative, and Assistant Structures Representative on small and large bridge and structures projects within California. Out of his 40 years construction experience, Peter spent 38 years of his career with Caltrans Construction and OSC exclusively in bridge construction. During his 40 years career, Peter experience includes Field Bridge Construction Inspector for over 20 separate projects; Resident Engineer for three bridge replacement jobs, bridge deck rehabilitation, rail replacement, and hinge restrainer installation jobs. On 23 separate projects, he provided bridge construction inspection; on six separate construction projects, he performed the duties of a Structures Representative; and for 15 years, encompassing seven projects with bridge work exceeding $30 -$50 million, he was the Principal Assistant Structures Representative. As Principal Structures Representative on his projects, he supervised five to eight inspectors, directing them and checking their work on all aspects of bridge construction. He also coordinated all field related inspection, answered construction and plan questions, and dealt with the contractor (prime and subs), designers, and the District to solve problems, conflicts, omissions, or changes that occur. He also wrote change orders and did the monthly pay estimates for bridge work. Senior Bridge Construction Engineer: Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation: Assisting LAN's Resident Engineer, Peter Bizzigotti was responsible for all aspects of structure construction engineering and inspection and structural materials testing for this $42M highway/bridge construction project. Peter has successfully completed his assignment as the Senior Bridge Construction Engineer responsible for all facets of the structure construction engineering and inspection ensuring the construction is in compliance with contract documents. The PCH viaduct comprises of multiple segments of bridges, primarily cast -in -place p/s box girder structures and precast p/s concrete girder structure types, and MSE wall at the approaches. Senior Bridge Engineer /Assistant Resident Engineer: River Road Bridge over the Salinas River, San Luis Obispo County, CA. Peter is currently completing his assignment as Senior Bridge Engineer /Assistant Resident Engineer assisting LAN's Resident Engineer providing structure construction engineering and inspection services for the construction of River Road Bridge Replacement Project. The project includes a major bridge replacement over the Salinas River; roadway approach improvements; bridge demolition; and traffic staging. The bridge structure is a cast -in- place, prestressed concrete box girder structure, supported on pile - column extensions, with 84 -inch diameter CISS piles. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Peter Bizzigotti, PE Page 2 ©f 2 Senior Bridge Construction Engineer /Assistant Resident Engineer: 13th Street Improvements and Bridge Widening; Paso Robles, CA. As Senior Bridge Construction Engineer and Assistant Resident Engineer, Peter was responsible for all contract issues, quality control, inspection and testing, construction staking for all structural elements of the 13th Street Bridge Widening project. His responsibilities include responding to bridge RFIs; tracking bridge construction status; and bridge inspection to ensure that work is being completed in conformance with the contract documents. The total cost of the project is estimated at $12 million. The project involves the widening of an existing major bridge structure; roadway and approach improvements; traffic staging; and retaining walls. Bridge Construction Engineer (Structure Representative): Route 56/5 and the 125 /94 Interchanges, San Diego, California. While working for Caltrans OSC District 11, Peter worked as Structures Representative responsible for the structure construction engineering, administration and inspection for this $40 million bridge /interchange project. In addition to this recent project, Peter has worked on over 25 bridge construction projects during his 38 years career with Caltrans Office of Structure Construction. 266 Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IPN Jim Hannigan. PE Bridge Engineer /inspector Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ 16 years of exclusive bridge/highway construction experience ✓ Experience in both Metric and English units of bridge construction ✓ Extensive highway/bridge construction experience in urban environment ✓ Recent local bridge construction experience in highway/bridge construction Project Assignment Bridge Engineer/Inspector Education BS, Civil Engineering San Diego State University San Diego, CA Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -52336 Jim Hannigan is a Registered Civil Engineer with 16 years of experience in the construction of transportation infrastructure projects. Jim begin his career as Bridge Construction Engineer with Caltrans Office of Structure Construction, Caltrans District 11 in San Diego. Jim has been directly involved as Bridge Construction Engineer in the construction of over twenty (22) new bridges, four bridge widening, as well as numerous retaining walls and sound walls of various types. Most recently, Jim managed and mitigated the problems associated with the construction of deep large diameter wet CIDH piles in unstable geologic conditions on the I- 680/780 Interchange project where LAN provided structure construction engineering and support services to Caltrans OSC. Bridge Construction Engineer: Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation: Assisting LAN's Resident Engineer, together with another Senior Bridge Construction Engineer (Peter Bizzigotti), Jim was responsible for all aspects of structure construction engineering and inspection and structural materials testing for this $42M highway/bridge construction project. The PCH viaduct comprises of multiple segments of bridges, primarily cast -in -place p/s box girder structures and precast p/s concrete girder structure types, and MSE wall at the approaches. Jim's specific duties included: ✓ Researching and responding to contractor RFI's ✓ Scheduling Inspector work assignments ✓ Performing engineering calculations for falsework and shoring submittals ✓ Preparing contract change orders ✓ Reviewing and approving submittals and reviewing CPM logic. ✓ Mitigating problems associated with the construction of deep, large diameter wet CIDH piles in unstable difficult geology. ✓ Met with Caltrans to setup and monitor welding testing and review procedures for the project. Bridge Construction Engineer: 1- 680/780; Benicia, CA. Jim on behalf of LAN Engineering lead a team of four (4) bridge construction engineers assisted Caltrans OSC in structure contract administration, engineering and inspection of this $70 million 4 -level interchange project. Jim responsibilities included: ✓ Researching and responding to contractor RFI's ✓ Scheduling Inspector work assignments ✓ Performing engineering calculations for falsework and shoring submittals. ✓ Writing Excel based programs to calculate parabolic soffit geometry, combined with "soffit- shift" associated with high superelevations (10 %) on 100 -foot tall Bridge Connectors ✓ Preparing and negotiating contract change orders 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN Jim Hannigan. PE Page 2 of Assistant Bridge Construction Engineer: Caltrans Office of Structure Construction SR- 94/125; San Diego. While working for Caltrans Office of Structure Construction, Jim served as the Assistant Structure Representative (Bridge Construction Engineer) responsible for the construction inspection of this 4- level, $65 million construction project. Primarily responsibility was to ensure that the bridge is being constructed in accordance ,documents. Jim other responsibilities included: ✓ Researching and responding to contractor RFI's ✓ Delegating engineering tasks to and training the nine inspectors under his direction. ✓ Performing engineering calculations for falsework and shoring submittals. ✓ Preparing and negotiating contract change orders. ✓ Attending weekly meetings with contractor. ✓ Meeting with homeowners to address their concerns. ✓ Reviewing and approving submittals and reviewing CPM logic. Bridge Construction Engineer: Caltrans OSC Bridge Construction Projects; Oceanside, CA. As Bridge Construction Engineer (Structure Representative), Jim's responsibilities included: administration for three bridge construction projects along SR -76 corridor, one retaining wall project and two permit jobs simultaneously, with structure construction cost total in excess of $20 million. The contracts included simple and multi -span bridges as well as various types of retaining walls, masonry block sound walls, and masonry block — transparent sound walls. Typical duties included: writing and negotiating CCO's; consulting with State experts to resolve site foundation problems; conferring with the designers of record to mitigate plan deficiencies; maintaining close contact with SANDAG, the City of Oceanside, and various utilities; and supervising a staff of four consultant engineers. Bridge Construction Engineer: Caltrans OSC Bridge Construction Projects; Oceanside, CA. As Bridge Construction Engineer (Structure Representative), Jim's administered multiple contracts simultaneously supported by a team of junior bridge construction engineers. The contracts included three (3) bridges over Interstate 5, widening of ramps off and onto I -5, as well as several columns and one bent retrofit. Wrote and negotiated CCO's, performed supervisory tasks, made engineering decisions, and met with concerned homeowners. These contracts were completed without any claims against the State. 26`"' Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IAN Javier Barrientos Utility/Electrical Inspector Qualifications & Experience Highlights: 1 16 years construction engineering, management and inspection experience Experience in all facets of construction including as construction contractor Schedule/Primavera /Expedition Experience Extensive traffic signals and utilities relocation experience Roadway /Civil/Bridge construction in urban environment Project Assignment "As- Need" Civil, Utility and Electrical Inspector Education BS /Construction Management California Polytechnic and State University Pomona, CA Javier Barrientos has over 16 years of exclusive constriction experience in the public works infrastructure projects in California. He has been involved with all facets of bridge/highway construction and construction management. He is proficient in the areas of coordination, contract administration, schedule control, cost control, design and constructability reviews, quality control and quality assurance, construction inspection, claims mitigation, claims analysis, contract change order processing, and construction office management. Construction Engineer: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Grade Separation Project, ACTA. Javier served as Construction Engineer at LAN Construction Management Division for the PCH Grade Separation Viaduct and DWP Duct Bank Installation projects. His duties include utilities coordination and relocation inspection and construction administration, engineering, inspection and safety compliance. His major assignment for this project was responsible for the construction of the pump station and instrumentation of "witnessed test: The PCH viaduct comprises of multiple segments of bridges, primarily cast -in- place p/s box girder structures and precast p/s concrete girder structure types, and MSE wall at the approaches. The project was completed two (2) months ahead of schedule and has no change order and claims issues at project close -out. Assistant Project Manager: Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project, Los Angeles. Javier worked as Assistant Project Manager while working for Shimmick Construction (contractor), was responsible for the construction of the Redondo Junction Grade Separation. The project consisted of construction of a new railroad flyover bridge structure located near the Los Angeles River and Washington Blvd. The work included: general earthwork, MSE retaining walls, CIDH concrete piling, reinforced concrete structure, pre- cast/pre- stressed concrete girders, structural steel inverted truss span, 3 spans of plate girder bridges and 1 truss bridge, railroad track work and traffic control. Construction Engineer: Calle Mayor Pump Station /Walteria Pump Station, Torrance. As Construction Engineer, Javier was responsible for the construction of Subterranean Pump Station with remote control instrumentation to provide assistance at peak demand periods for city supplied water district. His duties included preparation of trenching and shoring submittals, progress payment, scheduling and ensure that the construction of the pump station and its equipment is in contract compliance including performing "witnessed tests" on the mechanical instrumentation. Construction Engineer: New Dock Street/Henry Ford Avenue Grade Separation Project: Javier served as a Construction Engineer/Project Engineer working for the construction contractor responsible for the construction of the New Dock Street/Henry Ford Avenue Grade Separation project. This project consisted of construction of new railroad tracks, new roadways, 2 new railroad bridges, roadway signage /striping, street lighting, seal slab structures, including tremie slab, stone columns, grading, embankment fills, pump station, storm drain, waterline systems, roadway warning devices, piling, waterproofing, demolition of buildings, asbestos abatement work, and relocation of existing railroad tracks. In addition to his field responsibilities, his duties also included project site mobilization and set up, prepare submittal, RFI, RFC, RFQ, design change tracking, and correspondence, job costing, cost analysis and cost reports. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Tim Hannibal Electrical Inspector Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ 20 years construction engineering and inspection experience in transportation infrastructure projects ✓ Extensive traffic signals installation and testing experience ✓ Roadway /Civil/Bridge construction in urban environment Project Assignment "As- Need" Electrical Inspector Professional Registration Not Applicable Tim Hannibal has over 20 years of experience in construction inspection of transportation projects. His duties have included: quality assurance inspection and contract compliance with daily reports and documentation; progress payment estimates; contract change orders and extra work bills; quantity calculations; and item adjustments. He maintains project files; does supplemental design to accommodate field conditions; trains new employees; survey layouts; photo /video logs; coordinates calendars with outside entities; environmental mitigation; storm water pollution control; claims resolution; monitoring of contractor's safety program; remediate public concerns related to the project; and "as- built" drawings. Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Tim served as Construction Inspector: Electrical /Civil Inspector: SR -210, Segments 4, 5 and 7, SANBAG; San Bernardino County. Tim served as Construction Inspector for the construction of SR-210 Segment 4, 5 and 7. The project entailed this new freeway connecting the I- 210 at the SR -57 in San Dimas, to the I -215 in San Bernardino. Each project was approximately two miles long of the total 13+ miles. His primary responsibilities included drainage (inlets, RCP, AP, CSP, and CSSP) and electrical (traffic signals, ramp metering, lighting and sign illumination, and communication). He was also involved in all aspects of the project including AC paving, PCC paving, metal beam guard rail (MBGR), AC dike, erosion control, signs, staging, and detours per Caltrans Standards Electrical Inspector: SR -210 Segments 9, 10 and 11, SANBAG, San Bernardino County. As Electrical Inspector for the LAN Construction Management Team, Tim was responsible for inspection of all electrical systems including signals and lighting to ensure contract compliance. The total construction cost of these final three (3) segments of the SR -210 is approximately $150 million. The major elements of the project included six (6) interchanges and twelve (12) bridge structures. LAN is providing all construction engineering and inspection personnel, including resident engineer, structure representative, and inspectors for this SANBAG project. Construction Inspector: Harbor Freeway Widening of the 1-110. The project involved the widening of the I -110, with ramps, to accommodate the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes through a highly congested area of south central Los Angeles at Martin Luther King Blvd. and the L.A. Coliseum. He was an inspector in charge of earthwork grading, drainage, soundwalls, detours, traffic control for freeway lane closures, ramp metering, and paving. Construction Inspector: Glen Anderson,1 -105 and San Diego 1-405 Freeways Interchange; El Segundo. As Construction Inspector, Tim responsibilities included accepting line and grade on lower structural section of ramps, freeway connectors, tunnels, and freeway widening along with local streets, per Caltrans Standards. The project included roadway excavation, subgrade, aggregate base/sub -bases, and traffic control for freeway lanes closures with COZEEP. His responsibilities included inspection of asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete paving; signing; striping; detours; traffic control; soundwalls; retaining walls; metal beam guard rail; barrier rail; drainage; sewer; and electrical. All work was performed according to Caltrans Standards. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN • a a a 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 Don Newberry SWPPP Compliance Officer Qualifications & Experience Highlights: 1 30 years construction engineering and inspection experience Extensive SWPPP and Environmental construction compliance experience Roadway /Civil/Bridge construction in urban environment Project Assignment "As- Need" SWPPP Compliance Officer Education Certificate of Completion Inspector for Water Pollution Control on Construction Sites Professional Registration Not Applicable Don Newberry has over 30 years of construction engineering and inspection experience in California. He specializes in heavy civil construction inspection, testing and surveillance for major cities, counties and states. Projects have included Storm Water Compliance Inspections for the California Department of Transportation, Electrical Power Generating Instruments, Water Pipeline and interstate highway/bridge construction projects serving as Project Coordinator, Lead Construction Inspector, Construction Supervisor, Quality Engineer, Field Engineer, materials inspection and testing of concrete, steel and soils Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Tim served as Construction Inspector: Construction Inspector /Supervisor: San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. Units 1. 2 and 3, San Clemente. Served as Construction Inspector representing the client to support the Project Management, Construction and Engineering Support Organization for the generating station security upgrades project. Responsibilities included supervision and inspection of work performed by the various contractors in the field. Storm Water Task Force Leader: Caltrans Statewide Construction Projects. Don served as SWPPP task force Inspector, traveled to various Caltrans projects through out California, performing inspections and SWPP compliance audits for the implementation of storm water prevention measures being installed and maintained. SWPPP /Civil Inspector: Highway 41 South, Fresno California. Don worked as SWPPP /Construction Inspector responsible for the construction inspection of the Highway 41 Improvement project. The project included addition of 15 miles of 2 and 4 lanes highway. In addition to his SWPPP duties, he was also responsible for the inspection of the asphalt concrete, lean concrete base and the portland cement concrete pavement placement along the 15 miles of highway improvement. Responsibilities also included the inspection of saw cutting and sealing of the weaken plane joints both transverse and longitudinal, striping and shoulder work. Construction Inspector: San Joaquin Hills Toll Road, Orange County, California. As Construction Inspector, DON was responsible the QA constriction inspection of this $350 million project. The project of 17 miles of new roadway, 10 interchanges and 78 Post Tension concrete girder bridges. As a team member of the Construction Engineering Manager (CEM) it was the CEM's responsibility to ensure that plans and specifications were followed, and that the contractor's quality control effort was effective and. performed by qualified people. Additional responsibilities included overseeing environmental efforts and materials oversight for the total project, coordinate the testing and review contractor's test reports. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Sharon Dearbon Labor Compliance Officer Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Extensive experience in construction prevailing wage requirements and labor compliance ✓ Currently LAN CM Division's Labor Compliance Officer for all construction projects undertaken by LAN Engineering Project Assignment "As- Need" Labor Compliance Officer Education BS/Business Administration Professional Registration Notary Public CA #986490 Sharon Dearbon has 37 years of experience in the construction industry. She has worked for major contractors, consultants and international construction firms. Her broad experience includes overall accounting functions for project administration and corporate office duties. Her recent experience includes field manager of accounting on a large design -build project for the Construction Engineering Management Team. She is particularly skilled in labor compliance, accounting, cost, and facilities management. Labor Compliance Officer: SR -210 Segments 9, 10 and 11, SANBAG, Bernardino County. Sharon served as Labor Compliance Officer on this $150 million construction project. Her duties included verification of all labor compliance requirements are met in accordance to the latest state requirements including the prevailing wage rate compliance. The project includes interchanges and bridge structures. LAN is providing all construction engineering and inspection personnel, including resident engineer, structures representative, and inspectors for this San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Project. Labor Compliance Officer: Caltrans District 7 - On Call; Los Angeles, As Labor Compliance Officer, Sharon was responsible for certified payroll, fringe benefit statements, compliance of State of California Public Works Law, and invoicing client. Labor Compliance Officer: Mission Valley East LRT Extension; San Diego. Labor Compliance Officer responsible for all personnel who must conform to the public works laws. This project consists of four phases, each with a contractor and approximately 30 to 60 subconsultants. The construction cost is estimated to be $540 million. Labor Compliance Officer: CM Services Grade Separation Projects Package B, ACE Construction Authority: Sharon served as Labor Compliance Officer for LAN Construction Management Team providing CM Service for the construction of four (4) grade separation projects to Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority. The 4 grade separation projects included the Nogales Avenue Grade Separation, Ramona Boulevard Grade Separation, Baldwin Avenue Grade Separation and the Brea Canyon Grade Separation projects. The total construction cost for these four (4) grade separation projects is over $7 million. Project Field Accountant: Eastern Transportation Corridor; Orange County, CA. Field Accountant responsible for invoicing, labor compliance, purchasing, cost tracking, accounts payable, and receivable. This was a design/build project consisting of 29 miles of toll roads. This project was completed 18 months ahead of schedule and under budget, largely due to the CM Team efforts. The construction cost was $550 million. 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Ray Ruggles Safety Officer Project Assignment: Safety Officer (Auditor) Education: Palomar Junior College, San Diego, CA Ray has worked his entire 45 year working career in civil engineering. He began working for Caltrans in 1961 during the early stage of the Interstate Highway program. Ray's Caltrans career consisted of several important phases of the highway program: 3 years as Construction Surveyor, 2 years Environmental Liaison Engineer and then concurrently 20 years as Caltrans, District 11's Construction Safety Coordinator and Construction Personnel Administrator. Ray's 19 years construction experience included making staff assignments to all projects, ensure that Caltrans Affirmative Action goals were met, attending Pre -Job construction meetings to discuss project safety concerns, provide and do safety training, do oversight field safety inspections on active highway construction projects and ensure that Caltrans met CaIIOSHA's safety requirements. After retiring from Caltrans in 2001 Ray has developed a work zone traffic control training company, CAL CONE ZONE INSTRUCTORS, LLC and currently worked for LAN as Independent Consultant ensuring that all LAN construction projects are in safety compliance on a weekly basis. He has trained over 1500 employees throughout California, including employees from Caltrans, Cities, Counties, Utilities and construction contractors. Ray's students receive certificates in either: Traffic Control Inspection, Traffic Control Technician or Traffic Control Flagger. Safety Training Officer: Work Zone Traffic Control Inspection - Caltrans Employees, Consultant Contract to train 700 Caltrans Engineers. As Safety Training Officer, Ray developed a two day work zone traffic control course emphasizing Caltrans specifications and utilized the California Manual of Traffic Controls and Caltrans Standard Plans as the basic reference documents. Elements of the Construction Zone Enforcement Enhancement Program (COZEEP) and Work Zone Flagging were also added to make the course more comprehensive. Construction Safety Coordinator: 1 -15, 8 -Lane Freeway and 4 Overcrossings, Caltrans, District 11. As Construction Safety Coordinator, Ray attended the Pre -Job meeting to ensure Caltrans safety concerns were addressed. He attended and lead several work site Safety Tailgate meetings. COZEEP coordination was an issue on this project. Ray recommended the use of Traffic Drums on this project. Traffic Drums were included as a contract item. Field Safety Reviews were done on periodically. The project RE or the RE's representative would accompany Ray on his inspections. Caltrans field office safety records were inspected as well as the Safety Information Bulletin Board was observed for content. Construction Safety Coordinator: 1 -125 (SANDAG Project); 6 -Lane Freeway, Stage 3. As Caltrans, District 11, Construction Safety Coordinator, Ray attended the Pre -Job meeting to ensure Caltrans safety concerns were addressed. He attended and lead several work site Safety Tailgate meetings. Motorist accidents by teenagers were a problem on this contract. Coordination with the nearby High School was recommended and extra delineations was added on the project. Field Safety Reviews were done on periodically. The project RE or the RE's representative would accompany Ray on his inspections. Caltrans field office safety records were inspected as well as the Safety Information Bulletin Board was observed for content. Construction Safety Coordinator: 1 -125 (SANDAG Project), New Interchange. As Caltrans District 11, Construction Safety Coordinator, Ray attended the Pre -Job meeting to ensure Caltrans safety concerns were addressed. He attended and lead several work site Safety Tailgate meetings. Crane safety and demolition was a concem on this project. Each crane was inspected to make sure they had current operating permits. Field Safety Reviews were done on periodically. The project RE or the RE's representative would accompany Ray on his inspections. Caltrans field office safety records were inspected as well as the Safety Information Bulletin Board was observed for content. Construction Safety Coordinator: SR -76 (SANDAG Project) 4-Lane Expressway. As Caltrans, District 11, Construction Safety Coordinator, Ray attended the Pre -Job meeting to ensure Caltrans safety concerns were addressed. He attended and lead several work site Safety Tailgate meetings. Field Safety Reviews were done on periodically. The project RE or the RE's representative would accompany Ray on his inspections. Caltrans field office safety records were inspected as well as the Safety Information Bulletin Board was observed for content. Traffic conflicts . with the contractors equipment was a problem on this project. Additional delineation including additional Changeable Message Signs were recommended for this project 26'h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Jon Mehtlan, PE Quality Assurance Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Author of Caltrans "Outline of Field Construction Procedures" ✓ 34 years exclusive bridge construction experience in California ✓ Served on Dispute Review Board ✓ Understands all facets of Caltrans Construction Procedures and Documentation Project Assignment QA/QC Officer Education BS, Civil Engineering San Jose State College Santa Rosa, CA Professional Registration Civil Engineer /California C -30674 OUTLINE OF FIELD CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES ...«w for use b the Office of Structure Construction Division of Structures California Department of Transportation w .Nn M16110n, P.E. Fell ,in .YAWN, N.. Jon Mehtlan has over 40 years of construction management experience, all of which are with Caltrans. He has spent 6 years of his career with Division of Highways and 34 years with Office of Structure Construction, rising from rank of Transportation Engineering Technician through Assistant Bridge Engineer, Associate Bridge Engineer, Senior Bridge Engineer to Area Construction Manager and retired from Caltrans as one. Jon is highly experienced in managing construction personnel's quality assurance program, contract administration for structures- related construction projects, training, staffing and personnel evaluation Jon's duties while at Caltrans included all facets of bridge construction, - surveying techniques, falsework analysis and inspection, box girder construction, pre and post tension prestressing, structural steel erection, contract administration, traffic control and claims resolution. He has supervised staff of over 30 engineers during construction stages of numerous highway /freeway projects. His area of responsibilities included all State -owned structures within Caltrans District 8, 9, 100 and 11 under construction as well as oversight of all local agency structures under construction within State right -of -way. QA/QC Personnel Performace & Training Officer: Consutrion Mangement Services of Grade Separation Projects "Package B"; Alameda Corridor East (ACE) Construction Authority, Irwindale, CA. Under LAN's overhead payroll Jon is currently serving as QA/QC Personnel Performace & & Tranining Officer for the construction of the 4 grade speration projects. The total construction cost of the 4 grade projects (Nogales Street Grade Separation, Brea Canyon Grade Separation, Ramona Avenue Grade Separation and Baldwin Avenue Grade Separation projects) are estimated to be $120 Million. QA/QC Personnel Performace & Training Officer- Caltrans Toll Bridge "On- Call" Structure Contract Adminstration and Inspection Contract, Caltrans OSC. Under LAN's overhead payroll Jon has succesfully completed his assignment as QA/QC Personnel Performace & Traning Officer. Jon duties include perfoming audit and inetrview of the assigned field personnel to ensure that their performance meets or exceeds Caltrans expectation. This "On- call" includes assisitng Caltrans in costruction inspection and structure construction engineering for the construction of the New Carquinez Suspension Bridge, New Benicia - Martinez Segmental Bridge, I- 680/780 Interchange, Crockett Interchange, marina Vista Interchange and the Marina Vista Interchange projects. The total construction cost of this Toll Bridge Project is over $800 Million. QA/QC Personnel Performace & Constructability Constructabllity Review Engineer: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Grade Speartion Project; Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Los Angeles. Under LAN's overhead payroll Jon has succesfully completed his assignment as QA/QC Personnel Performace & Constructability Review Engineer for the construction of this $42 Million PCH Viaduct 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Jon Mehtlan, PE Page 2 of 2 QA/QC Personnel Performace & Constructability Constructability Review Engineer: SR -210 Segment 9, 10 and 11 Projects, San Bernardino Association of Goverments, San Bernardino County. Under LAN's overhead payroll Jon is currently serving as QA/QC Personnel Performace and Training Officer for the final segments (Segment 9, 10, & 11) construction for the completion of SR 210 Freeway in San Bernardino County. The toal project undertaken by LAN as Construction Manager is estimated over $150 million for all the final theree (3) segments of SR -210 freeway. QA/QC Personnel Performace & Constructability Constructability Review Engineer: 1 -10 Truck Climbing Lane, San Bernardino Association of Goverments, San Bernardino County. Under LAN's overhead payroll Jon is currently serving as QA/QC Personnel Performace and Training Officer ensuring CM personnel performance responsible for the constuction of I -10 Truck Climbing Lane project in the City of Yucaipa. While working for Caltrans Office of Structure Construction, following is a list of relevant bridge construction projects where Jon Mehtlan, PE served as either Senior Bridge Construction Engineer or Bridge Construction Engineer: Caltrans OSC (District 8, 9, & 11)- Area Construction Manager - Seismic Retrofit Construction (55 Projects 246 Bridges). Jon served as Area Construction Manager responsible for the seismic retrofit construction of 137 seismic retrofit bridge construction projects within San Bernardino County, Riverside, San Diego and Inyo Counties. Caltrans OSC - Senior Bridge Engineer /Structure Representative - 1-105 / 1 -110 Interchange, Los Angeles, CA. Senior Bridge Engineer /Structure Representative responsible for structure construction management, engineering and inspection of this $120 I- 105 /110 Interchange. Jon duties included leading a team of construction engineers monitoring the construction of this interchange to ensure that the structures were built in compliance to contract documents. Caltrans OSC - Senior Bridge Engineer /Structure Representative-1-110 Transit Way Viaduct at R -91, Los Angeles. Senior Bridge Engineer /Structure Representative responsible for structure construction management, engineering, inspection, surveying, contract administration, traffic control and claims resolution Caltrans OSC - Associate Bridge Engineer /Styructure Representative -1 -5 at Mexican Border, San Ysidro, CA. As an Associate Bridge Engineer /Structure Representative, Jon led a team of 10 bridge construction engineers responsible for structure construction management, engineering, inspection, surveying, contract administration, traffic control and claims RESOLUTION Caltrans OSC - Associate Bridge Engineer /Senior Styructure Representative- R -78 /1-15 Interchange, Escondido, CA. Senior Structure Representative directing inspection and structure contract administration duties of 8 bridge construction engineers on these 9 bridge structures. Caltrans OSC - Associate Bridge Engineer /Senior Structure Rep.-1-15 / Lilac Road Arch Overcrossing, San Diego. Jon, as Senior Structure Representative, was responsible for the geometry control of this spandrel arch structure, contract administration and inspection during construction. Caltrans OSC - Associate Bridge Construction Engineer: R56/ 1 -15 Interchange, San Diego Caltrans OSC - Associate Bridge Construction Engineer: R -52 / 1 -15 Interchange, San Diego Caltrans OSC - Associate Bridge Construction Engineer: 1 -15 Reversible HOV Lanes, San Diego 26hi Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Dave Boger, P. Eng, Project Principal Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Over 30 year experience in public works infrastructure and railroad construction projects ✓ Last 10 years of exclusive highway/bridge construction in Southern California ✓ Extensive highway/bridge construction experience in urban environment ✓ Recent local resident engineering experience in highway/bridge construction Project Assignment Project Principal Education BS, Civil Engineering Professional Registration Professional Engineer Ontario, Canada Dave Boger has been instrumental in the successfully completion of the $1.6 billion Alameda Rail Corridor. Due his tenure at ACTA, Dave served as Assistant Director of Construction in charge of all the north end and south end construction projects with construction exceeding $300 million. As Project Principal to this project, Dave will be under LAN's overhead payroll (at no cost to the City) will ensure that the project will be on schedule and that LAN CM Team performance will meet and/or exceed City's expectation in every aspects of this assignment. To accomplish his responsibilities, Dave is committed to meet with the Resident and key project personnel on a weekly basis for establishing weekly project progress expectations and provide an independent audit of the document control process. In addition to his recent construction experience with ACTA, Dave is also a noted railroad specialist with a broad background in railroad operations and the management of major construction projects. His experience includes major participation in the Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (ACTA) Project, which is a $2.4 billion rail construction project, and a 20 -year career with the Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Company, which was acquired by the Union Pacific Railroad. The knowledge and hands -on expertise comes from the completion of projects that have included the management of total capital budgets exceeding $1.5 billion and the construction, maintenance, and improvements of a 6,500 -mile long railroad system, encompassing high tonnage tracks, structures, signals, and communications. Additional strengths are in claims negotiations, partnering, and the institution of review processes and quality control programs. Most recently, Dave as Assistant Director of Construction with Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority successfully completed the following projects: 1 Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation Project ($42 Million) ✓ Redondo junction Grade Separation Project ($52 Million) 1 Soto Street/UPRR Bridge Project ($12 Million) ✓ Downey Road/BNSF Bridge Project ($9 Million) ✓ Farragut Avenue Extension Project ($11 Million) ✓ Long Beach Lead Extension ($2 Million) ✓ Henry Ford Grade Separation Project ($81 Million) ✓ Compton Creek Rail Bridge ($15 Million) • Dominguez Channel UPRR Storage Track Bridges ($6 Million) ✓ 10 Other Miscellaneous Projects ($35 Million) 26`h Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard IAN 0 Victoria Butler Scheduler Qualifications & Experience Highlights: ✓ Dedicated her entire 20 years career in construction industry ✓ Last 15 years of exclusively worked in the area of construction claims and schedule management Project Assignment Scheduler Education J.D., California Southern Law School Riverside, CA 2005 BS /Computer Science Kennedy- Western University Agoura Hills, CA Professional Registration Contractor C- 774118 Victoria Butler has over 20 years of experience in the construction industry, with extensive involvement in computer and information technology and construction contract scheduling and claims. Victoria is currently the Chief Scheduler at LAN Engineering, in addition to providing scheduling support to all LAN CM assignments; she is also responsible for organized and trained LAN Construction Engineers in schedule management utilizing Primavera software. Victoria is proficient in many scheduling, project controls and graphics applications. Her current duties include project management, projects controls specialist, schedule development and analysis, cost - schedule integration, alternative dispute resolution participation, litigation support, exhibits development, document management, claims assessment, and defense. Following is a list of relevant projects where Victoria Butler served as Scheduler and Claims Engineer: Scheduler: River Road Bridge Replacement over Salinas River, San Luis Obispo County, CA. Ms. Butler was the Scheduler for the River Road Bridge Replacement project. Her responsibilities include monthly schedule update and estimating. Scheduler /Claims Engineer: ACE Authority - Construction Management Services for the Nogales Avenue Grade Separation. Victoria served as Project Scheduler and Claims Engineer assisting the Resident Engineer in establishing construction baseline schedule, monthly schedule update and negotiating contract change order relating to time extension. Scheduler: ACTA Pacific Coast Highway Grade Separation Projects; Los Angeles County, CA. Victoria worked as Project Scheduler responsible in reviewing and approving the contractor's baseline schedule and monthly schedule updates for this $50 million bridge construction project. Scheduler: 1 -210, Segments 9, 10 & 11; San Bernardino County, CA. Scheduler for the construction management of this $220 million interchange project. The project includes interchanges and bridge structures. LAN is providing all construction engineering and inspection personnel, including resident engineer, structures representative, and inspectors for this San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Project. Scheduler: 1 -10 Truck Climbing Lane (1 -10 Widening); San Bernardino County, CA. Scheduler for the construction management of this $220 million interchange project. The project includes interchange reconfiguration and three bridge widening structures. LAN is providing all construction engineering and inspection personnel, including resident engineer, structures representative, and inspectors for this San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Project. 26m Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard LAN Grace Elornio Contract Administrator Qualifications & Experience Highlights: 21 years of experience as Project Controller Last 8 years of exclusive construction field office (document control) experience Extensive experience in Expedition V.9 for construction contract document control Project Assignment Contract Administrator Document Control Education BS /Accounting Saint Scholasticas College Philippine Professional Registration CPA Grace Elarmo has over 21 years of exclusive experience as Project Controller for consulting firm specializing in construction management services. Her relevant expertise includes: ✓ All Facets of Construction Management, including preparation of contract change orders, project files and document processing. ✓ Extensive experience in Pre - Construction Activities (Bid- Support) ✓ Document Control, Primavera/Expedition and Project Set -up and Close -Out ✓ Field Office Administrator for Redondo Junction Grade Separation project + 5 other ACTA projects Following is a list of relevant highway /bridge construction projects where Grace served as Field Office Administrator: Field Office Administrator /Lead Document Control: Pacific Coast Highway (SR -1) Grade Separation Project, ACTA. Grace has successfully completed her assignment as Field Office Manager on this $ 42 million PCH Grade Separation project. Her duties included contract administration, office management, Submitals/RFURFC/CNs processing, claims, schedule update and daily reporting, document contract control using Expedition and recording of digital project photographs using Cumulus. Field Office Manager /Lead Document Control: Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project + 5 Other ACTA North End Construction Projects: Grace successfully completed her assignment as Field Office Manager supporting the Resident Engineer and Office Engineer for the construction of Redondo Junction Grade Separation Project. Grace is responsible for all aspects of document control, submittals/RFIs/RFCs /CNs, coordination and reports for the project. The construction cost of the project is $52 million. Field Office Administrator /Lead Document Control: Long Beach Track Extension and Farragut Avenue Extension Project, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority. Responsible for the Construction Management and document control of four separate construction projects, with a total construction cost of $35 Million. Her duties typically include processing of Submittals/RFIs/RFCs/CNs, claims, schedule update, and utilities contact. Office Manager: GV Diversified, Inc., CM Consulting Firm, Los Angeles ✓ Managed every aspect of accounting (general ledger, bank reconciliation, financial statements, accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll). ✓ Responsible for setting up the accounting system and controls using the MAS90 program. ✓ Coordinated with project managers and engineers regarding project status and percent of completion to assure that projects were completed on schedule + budget. ✓ Prepared and maintained cash flow projections and cost analysis. ✓ Handled various project completion audits. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard CNS Engineers, Inc. Pri DeSilva> PE Materials Engineer /Tester Finn Affiliation: Pacific Consulting Group, Incorporated Project Assignment: "On- Call" QA/QC Materials Tester Education: BS, Civil Engineering (1989), Rutgers University, NJ MS, Civil Engineering (1991), Rutgers University, NJ Registration: Civil Engineer, State of California, #C63915 SNT- TC -1A, Level II UT Nuclear Density Gauge Operator Radiology Safety Officer Qualifications and Experience Highlights: Mr. DeSilva is an experienced materials engineer and tester with a major emphasis in transportation and infrastructure construction projects. Mr. DeSilva possesses over 9 years of experience in construction materials testing and inspection. His work in material evaluation includes concrete and asphalt mix designs, evaluation of existing bridge decks through comprehensive analysis of cores and non - destructive analysis of corrosive activity of rebar and testing/analysis of a full spectrum of construction materials including soils, concrete, masonry, steel and asphalt concrete. He has developed and implemented quality assurance /control programs for fabrication and erection of structural steel and prestressed concrete structural systems as well as procedures for testing various types of bridge bearings. Mr. DeSilva also has a background in geotechnical investigation and subsurface exploration that includes development of design recommendations for foundations. Relevant Project Experience: Materials Testing and Inspection (Bridge & Highway) • Redondo Junction Grade Separation, ACTA, Los Angeles, CA • SR -125 Gap /Connector and Toll Road, San Diego, CA • Route 56 Widening (8 Overhead Crossings), San Diego, CA • City of Irvine Street Rehabilitation, Irvine, CA • Route 57/60 Interchange, Diamond Bar, CA • Route 241 /133 Interchange, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Route 134- Riverside Dr, Undercrossing, Glendale, CA • Route 73/133 Grade Separation, Laguna, CA • MTA San Fernando Valley BRT, Los Angeles, CA • MTA Eastside Extension, Los Angeles, CA • MTA — Various Transportation Facilities, Los Angeles, CA • Nogales Street Grade Separation (ACE), Los Angeles, CA • Alisos Creek Bridge (TCA), Rancho Santa Margarita, CA • Victoria Gardens, City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA • Route 60 /215 /91 Interchange, CA • Santa Margarita Ramp Widening (Toll Road 241), Rancho Santa Margarita, CA • Rehabilitation of 150th Street Bridge, Bronx, NY • 158th Street Bridge, Queens, NY • Hunts Point Avenue Bridge, Bronx, NY • Madison Avenue Bridge, Bronx, NY 261 Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Pacific Consulting Group, Inc. Sajjad R. Hussain Materials Engineer, /Tester Firm Affiliation: S & T Engineering Inc. Project Assignment: "On- Call" QA/QC Materials Tester Education: MS Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada, 1990 Registration: Association of Professional Engineers, Alberta, Canada Geologist and Geophysics of Alberta, Canada Qualifications and Experience Highlights: Mr. Hussain has over 15 years of experience as a materials engineer. He is experienced in the area of materials testing and engineering of soils, concrete and asphalt concrete. Mr. Hussain's project experience includes project management, coordinating and performing inspection and troubleshooting during construction, materials engineering, review of field and laboratory test results for soils, Portland cement concrete and asphalt concrete. Mr. Hussain is responsible for technical oversight, training, assigning and monitoring personnel, maintaining contract budget and schedules, and document control. Relevant Project Experience: Materials Testing and Inspection (Bridge & Highway) Nogales Grade Separation, City of industry, California Materials Engineer responsible for providing materials testing for soils, concrete, asphalt concrete per Caltrans standards for the construction of grade separation. The estimated construction cost of the project was 16 million dollars. The project involves a bridge construction, relocation of underground utilities and construction of approach roads as part of Alameda Corridor East. Long Beach Freeway (1 -710) Pavement Rehabilitation Project from Route 1 to 1-405, Long Beach. Materials Engineer for the Quality Assurance /Control of hot mixed asphalt concrete testing per Caltrans standards for the rehabilitation of 2.5 miles stretch of Long Beach freeway. The project involved placement of over 120,000 tones various types of hot mixed asphalt concrete. This unique pilot project to produce asphalt (flexible) Pavement incorporated new asphalt concrete mix designs, more strict material and construction specifications and pavement structural design concepts that was very different from traditional methods. The project also involved 55 hours continuous paving where over 15,000 tones of asphalt concrete was placed during these shifts. Garden Grove Freeway (SR 22) Improvement, Garden Grove California Materials Engineer responsible for providing quality control testing of the hot mixed asphalt concrete and concrete per Caltrans Standards for the improvement of 12 miles of freeway for Granite- Meyers -Rados joint Venture. The Design -Build project involves placement of over 150,000 tones of various types of asphalt concrete, construction of major new interchanges along the SR 22, improvement of on and off ramps and an addition of an HOV lane each way. Reservoir /East End Street Bridge, Pomona, California Materials Engineer responsible for providing quality assurance field and laboratory testing for concrete and soils for the construction of new bridge at Reservoir/East End street for Alameda Corridor East. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard S & T Engineering, Inc. Tess C. Perez Materials Lab Manage Firm Affiliation: S & T Engineering Inc. Project Assignment: "On -Call" QA/QC Materials Tester Education: BS Civil Engineering, Philippines Registration: NICET Level II for soils, concrete and asphalt concrete Caltrans Certified Materials Tester and Sampler for soils, concrete and asphalt concrete Radiation Safety Officer Licensed Nuclear Gauge Operator 40 -Hour HAZWOPER, Qualifications and Experience Highlights: Ms. Perez has over 11 years of experience in soils and materials testing, inspection, geotechnical engineering, land development and vertical construction. As a Staff Professional, she assisted in project and client management. She worked as Laboratory Manager responsible for laboratory testing of soils, aggregates, concrete and asphalt concrete; review and reporting of laboratory test results; training, performance review and certification of technicians; responsible for laboratory certification, among other responsibilities. Substantial contributions as Laboratory Manager included setting up the laboratory for various laboratory tests; lab inspection, assessment and accreditation by Caltrans, CCRL, AMRL, City of LA and DSA; renewal of laboratory certifications; creation of Quality System Manual. Relevant Project Experience: Materials Testing and Inspection (Bridge & Highway) Long Beach Freeway (1 -710) Pavement Rehabilitation Project from Route 1 to 1-405, Long Beach Laboratory manager for laboratory testing of hot mixed asphalt concrete per Caltrans standards for the rehabilitation of 2.5 miles stretch of Long Beach freeway. The project involved placement of over 120,000 tones various types of hot mixed asphalt concrete. Majority of the paving operations were completed during the night. Ms. Perez was responsible for performing and reporting of the laboratory test results within 24 hours of the completion of the paving operations. PCH Grade Separation, Long Beach, California Assistant Project Manager and laboratory manager responsible for materials testing, soils testing, concrete and asphalt concrete testing per Caltrans standards for construction of grade separation. The project involves a bridge construction, relocation of underground utilities and construction of approach roads as part of Alameda Corridor East. City of Camarillo, Freeway 101, Camarillo, California Laboratory manager responsible for performing quality control testing services for the hot mixed asphalt concrete per Caltrans test methods for the City of Camarillo, Carmen Drive, US 101 freeway. On -Call Materials Testing For Vulcan Materials Laboratory manager responsible for performing laboratory testing services for the hot mixed asphalt concrete, soils, concrete and aggregate for materials produced from various pits. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard S & T Engineering, Inc. Yusuf Malik Materials Technician /Tester Firm Affiliation: S & T Engineering Inc. Project Assignment: "On -Call" QA/QC Materials Tester Education: Project Management Certificate/ Cal. State Fullerton Registration: NICET Level II (Soils, Concrete, and Asphalt) CALTRANS CTM test methods ACI Field Testing — Grade 1 City of Long Beach Pilings Inspector CPN Certified Nuclear Gauge Technician 40- Hr HAZWOPER Qualifications and Experience, Highlights: Mr. Malik has over 5 years experience in soils and materials testing. His responsibilities have included observation of mass grading, back -fill, testing of compacted soils using sand cone and nuclear gauge, inspection and testing of placed asphalt concrete, pile monitoring, in -situ density testing of ballast and sub - ballast for railroad, and concrete field testing. He performed soil sampling using manual auger, monitored VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) content level in the soil using OVA (FID) and PID instruments, managed hazardous waste. Mr. Malik has performed laboratory testing of soils and asphalt concrete like sieve analysis, in -situ moisture - density, direct shear, consolidation, laboratory compaction test, Marshall fabrication of briquettes, asphalt content by ignition oven, and AC moisture content by microwave. He conducted peel and shear testing of HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) 80 Mil and destructive sampling of geomembrane Relevant Project Experience: Materials Testing and Inspection Mega Terminal, Pier G, Long Beach, California Led a team of four technicians providing QA testing and inspection of compacted soils, aggregate base, and crushed miscellaneous base; performed density testing of placed and compacted asphalt concrete totaling 45,000 tones; observed grading of various roads and parking lots; inspected rail roads, back -fill of storm drain, sewer, water and utilities trench; pile monitoring; concrete testing. 1 -710 Pavement Rehabilitation Project from Route 1 to 1 -405, Long Beach California This is a unique pilot project to produce an asphalt (flexible) pavement that incorporated new asphalt mix designs, more strict material and construction specifications and pavement structural design concepts that are very different from traditional methods. Project involved over 120,000 tones placed hot mix asphalt concrete of various Caltrans type of mixes. Provided inspection, compaction testing and sampling of asphalt concrete per Caltrans standards. Moulton Parkway Pavement Rehabilitation, Laguna Woods, California Performed Quality Assurance testing and inspection of placed and compacted base course and asphalt concrete. The project consisted of cold milling of the existing bituminous pavement, constructing base course, asphalt concrete on base course and AC overlay. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard S & T Engineering, Inc. ) ) 1 1 Riiel del Castillo, P.L.S. QA Surveyor Firm Affiliation: Coast Surveying, Incorporated Project Assignment: QA Surveyor (As -Need) Education: Land Surveying and Public Service Administration, Santa Ana College Registration: 1975 / Professional Land Surveyor / # 4212 / California Qualifications and Experience Highlights: Mr. del Castillo has over 39 years of experience in managing both field and office operations for all phases of construction and design survey and mapping services. He has managed 30 "on -call" contracts directly for, or in support of, many federal, state and local agencies including the Caltrans, Counties of Los Angeles and Orange, the U.S. Forest Service, various U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Districts, the U.S. Navy - Southwest Division and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Water District (MWD) performing construction surveying and/or design surveying services. He has a "hands -on" working knowledge of various land surveying services including QA construction staking, QC construction staking, boundary surveys & analysis, GPS surveys, topographic surveys, utility location surveys, large -scale aerial and geodetic control, and monitoring quantities. For example, while working directly for the County of Orange, Mr. del Castillo was responsible for all boundary surveys, first order /second order vertical and horizontal control surveys, photogrammetric mapping, control surveys and centerline surveys. Relevant Project Experience Project Surveyor: SR 55 Freeway - Taft Avenue to SR 91 Freeway in Orange, OCTA Work consisted of horizontal and vertical control, photo control, aerial photogrammetric mapping, right -of -way mapping and design surveys on 2.0 miles of freeway in connection with design of additional HOV and auxiliary lanes in the freeway and reconstruction of the Lincoln Avenue interchange and Meats Avenue Bridge. Design surveys consisted of cross- sections along the freeway and cross - streets, drainage and utilities location and bridge detail surveys. Data was delivered in metric in Microstation and ASCII digital file format. Project Surveyor: SR- 55/1 -5 Interchange in Santa Ana and Tustin for Caltrans District 12 Prepared Record of Survey for static GPS control by RBF. Researched and analyzed adjoining maps and centerline ties in various cities and agencies for right of way determination, surveyed existing monumentation, monumented new R/W lines, and prepared metric Record of Survey. Project Surveyor: SR- 57/SR -91 Interchange in Orange County for OCTA Project was along SR91 from State College Boulevard to La Palma Avenue and along SR57 from SR91 to Orangethorpe Avenue for HOV lanes, HOV connector ramps and freeway widenings. Work consisted of cross - sections: across both sides of each freeway; along all eight connector ramps; along all on -off ramps at Orangethorpe Avenue and at State College Boulevard; and on State College . Boulevard, Orangethorpe Avenue, Miraloma Avenue and Sunkist Avenue. Also prepared detailed topographic surveys of existing sound walls and proposed sound wall locations, existing overpass bridges and existing utilities. Right of way base mapping was also prepared for this project. 1 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Coast Surveying, Inc. s • Kenneth Kasbohm, P.L.S. Survey Party Chief Firm Affiliation: Coast Surveying, Incorporated Project Assignment: QA Surveyor (As -Need) Education: Civil Engineering Technology/ 1976/ North Dakota StateSchool of Science Registration: 1997 /Professional Land Surveyor/ #7371 / California Qualifications and Experience Highlights: Mr. Kasbohm has over 25 years of surveying experience in the field performing all types of surveying including vertical and horizontal control, photo control, GPS surveys, topographic surveys, design surveys, boundary surveys, right of way surveys, and construction layout. Mr. Kasbohm is a Professional Land Surveyor in California, a Certified Party Chief and has been Hazmat trained since 1986. Relevant Project Experience Construction Surveyor: Route 91 Freeway from 1 -15 Freeway to McKinley Street in Corona for the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Work consisted of construction staking for freeway widening, addition of auxiliary lanes, retaining walls, and slope staking. Construction Surveyor: Bristol Street / 1-405 Interchange in Costa Mesa, California for the City of Costa Mesa thru Kasler Corporation. Work consisted of construction staking for three new on-off ramps, bridge widening on Bristol Street over the 405 Freeway and widening of Bristol Street north and south of the freeway. Construction Surveyor: Route 241 Freeway (Foothill Corridor) - Portola Parkway to Lake Forest Drive in Lake Forest, California for the Transportation Corridor Agencies thru Ebensteiner Co. Work consisted of construction staking of 1.7 miles of new freeway (Foothill Corridor) for the Transportation Corridor- Agencies to Caltrans' specifications and standards: rough grade /slope stakes for both sides and centerline of freeway, eight ramps, access roadway; layout stakes for box culverts, R.C.P., pre-cast concrete drain lines, and drain inlets; finish grade offset stakes for both sides of eastbound and westbound roadways, centerline, eight ramps, Lake Forest Drive and Portola Parkway; construction layout for six bridges; staking for fence on right -of -way; prepare slope stake listing; final monumentation; and vertical and horizontal control. QA/QC Construction Surveyor: Route 91 Freeway HOV - Route 55 to Riverside County Line in Anaheim, & Yorba Linda, California for the California Private Transportation Corp. thru Kiewit 91. The scope of work involved providing quality control/quality assurance verification surveys as needed for the construction of 10 miles of new privatized HOV tollways. The project included numerous retaining walls, median paving, bridge widening, major interchange redesign, detours, and all associated survey control - conventional and GPS. Design Surveyor: San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor State Route 73) in Orange County, California for the Transportation Corridor Agencies. Work consisted of: preparation and/or review of legal descriptions and sketches, acreage calculations, and exhibits for various properties; preparation and revision of constraints maps; review preliminary title reports along with revisions or updates; provide fee credit acreage calculations and exhibit maps; reviewing final policies of title and policy binders for accuracy of descriptions; field reconnaissance with builders surveyor of all horizontal and vertical control monumentation; maintain primary control network; staking the perimeters of no -work or limited -work areas designated as archaeological or biological resources; providing oversight verification surveys as directed by the Construction Engineering Manager (CEM) for bridges, structures, walls, drainage, slopes, and finished surfaces as needed for the construction of 20 miles of new tollways. 26th Street Bridge Over Atlantic Boulevard Coast Surveying, Inc. Nor City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project LABOR + ODC TOTAL $ 91,927.76 $ 4,897.44 0 (1 in N CO tD 0) ca $4,841.26 $ 625,295.63 $ 726,962.09 _1 a I- O I-- CO $91,927.76 $4,897.44 $96,825.20 $4,841.26 $625,295.63 0) ° tV co 0) N O $36,050.00 $84.00 o (0 O ti O O O ,- ci cx (.0 O ti O el co d... C O CO $55,877.76 $4,813.44 o N o O 6 $3,034.56 $608,305.63 0 (•) r ch ° N (.0 Ea SUB - CONSULTANTS S &T Engineering /Sequoia Coast Survey TOTAL SUB - CONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANT ADMINISTRATION FEE (5 %) PRIME CONSULTANT (LIM & NASCIMENTO) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project COST PROPOSAL: BILLING RATE (SCHEDULE) Classification Total Fee Total DL + OH 9% Loaded Rate Project Director $133.78 $12.04 $145.82 QA/QC Engineer $133.78 $12.04 $145.82 Project Manager (1) $175.78 $15.82 $191.60 Resident Engineer $129.58 $11.66 $141.24 Assistant Resident Engineer $116.98 $10.53 $127.51 Office Engineer $110.68 $9.96 $120.64 Senior Bridge Engineer $116.98 $10.53 $127.51 Bridge Engineer $110.68 $9.96 $120.64 Senior Civil Engineer $116.98 $10.53 $127.51 Inspectors $91.78 $8.26 $100.04 Materials Tester $89.00 $8.01 $97.01 Surveyor (2 -Man Crew) $138.00 $12.42 $150.42 Scheduler $102.90 $9.26 $112.16 Administrative Aide $61.00 $5.49 $66.49 Notes: (1): During the Construction Phase, most of PM time and efforts will be on company OH payroll (2): "On -Call" As- Needed Basis (3): Direct Rate to comply with prevailing wage rate (4): Administrative Aide position not be required (5): Project Director and QA/QC time will be on company OH payroll (6): There will no charges for home office support (7): Loaded Rates Includes Vehicle, Cellular and Direct Salary + OH + Fee 26th Street Extension Project BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS BY HOURS PER MONTH uogeJna uoganJ suoa pewnssy 12 Months o o 128 2224 1064 208 co 576 I 32 08 5288 uo!3nnsuo3-lsod :£ aseyd "+ '" At No Cost to the City (on LAN's Overhead Payroll) At No Cost to the City (on LAN's Overhead Payroll) I CO co o 0 o N Phase 2: Construction CO m °m co v Q �. m �0 0o tD aoo c0 O ."r CO CO O CO CO a°o m v w° co CO m m °m ti en CO m m ao `r a°o co O °v ao CO CO CO a°o v `° m CO CO CO m CO c0 CO O m co co m c"., co .0 m co CO Q a CO CO co CO CO o m m v cn CO .n cn m CO co co CO o m m v v ti N m c0 c0 co CO o m m V m m ssAIeuy Iigei3i ;suo3 :1 ase4d 2 N ° v N m co m Of ddn-Ue4S :0 ase4d Q o Alin a4} 01 Soo oN 1V SUB -TOTAL PERSONNEL c o 0 F h an CO a Month Name Dave Boger, P. Eng. Jon Mehtlan, PE Peter Lim, PE Peter Ho, PE Chris Mockus, PE Elmo Delos- Santos, PE Chuck Tran, PE Peter Bizzigotti, PE Benny Quintana, PE m rn c c co S c 8 S &T /Sequia Consulting Coast Surveying Victoria Butler Grace Elarmo c O O w so 0! N U c 0 0 E b 01 V Project Director QA/QC Engineer Project Manager (1) Resident Engineer Assistant Resident Engineer Office Engineer Senior Bridge Engineer Bridge Engineer Senior Civil Engineer Inspectors Materials Tester Surveyor (2 -Man Crew) 0) 5 L Administrative Aide most of PM time and efforts will be on company OH payroll Note: (1): During the Construction Ph City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project LABOR DOLLARS _Classification Hours Billing Rate Labor Dollars Project Director # 0 $145.82 $ - QA/QC Engineer 0 $145.82 $ - Project Manager (1) 128 $191.60 $ 24,524.83 Resident Engineer 2224 $141.24 $ 314,122.65 Assistant Resident Engineer 1064 $127.51 $ 135,668.72 Office Engineer 208 $120.64 $ 25,093.37 Senior Bridge Engineer 976 $127.51 $ 124,448.00 Bridge Engineer 0 $120.64 $ - Senior Civil Engineer 0 $127.51 $ - Inspectors 0 $100.04 $ - Materials Tester 576 $97.01 $ 55,877.76 Surveyor (2 -Man Crew) 32 $150.42 $ 4,813.44 Scheduler 80 $112.16 $ 8,972.88 Administrative Aide 0 $66.49 $ - TOTAL HOURS # 5288 TOTAL DOLLARS $ 668,996.83 City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project TOTAL , 63 49 43 $ 1,500.00 $ 700.00 0 o o N_ 44 $ 1,500.00 $ 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 5,500.00 0 o 0 w N 43 0 0 0 o 1[) 69 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 84.00 0 0 o 0 1O N H4 $ 53,124.00 S&T /Sequoia O • 0 O O ca 69 O O OO aD 40) Coast Survey O O 03 VP $84.00 z $1,500.00 8 O O H $1,200.00 $1,500.00 8 0 64 8 O n 64 0 8 0 b » 8 O ID 49 $1,500.00 0 LO 64 O 0°> Of r Quantity Included In Billing Rate Included In Billing Rate 1 Included In Billing Rate .- N r N .- N 001. 0 tp N 200 ..- TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS Unit Cost u7 O co 44 $1,200.00 O ti f9 O r f9 O n V4. O h Vi. $295.00 O 0 644 tri 69 $0.42 o° 0 o Id CO 69 N a d3 C o N 49 D LS Each Each Each Each Each Each Each LS Each d LS m LS DESCRIPTIONS / PROJECTS Vehicle Usage (Pick -Up Truck) Communication Equipment (Cellular Phone) Monthly Cellular Charges (2 Inspectors + RE) Misc Office Furnishings + Safety Equipment Cameras (2 Digital) HIGH SPEED SCANNER Computer Hardware Printer HP4100N HP 11 x 17 Color Printer Computer Networking Computer Software (MS OFFICE XP) Film & Film Development Express Delivery Services (Fed EX) Mileage Travel (Material Testers & Samplers) Materials Testing Cost (Actual NTE) Mileage Travel (Surveyor) MISCELLANEOUS ODC 0 0 O U t a 0 a) v 0 0. -ai .o CO CO t tl) LL 8 LL V N C a) Q m a) 0 n Z E 0 is 0 For Computer Equipment and /or Field Office Fumishings purchased for this project will remain the property of City of Vernon at the end of t EXHIBIT B CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT CHANGE ORDER NO. SUPPLEMENT NO. SHEET OF SHEETS PROJECT: P.O. NO. TO: REQUESTED BY: CONSULTANT You are hereby directed to make the herein described chances from the oricinal scone of work of this agreement. c: City Administrator /Purchasing/Project File /Consultant Contract Amount (Base Bid) $ Amount of This Change Order I $ Amount of Previous Change Orders $ Total Change Orders Modified Agreement Amount $ By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: Approved: Date: City Administrator We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Accepted Date: Consultant: By: Title: c: City Administrator /Purchasing/Project File /Consultant SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SERVICES AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made, entered into and executed in duplicate originals, either copy of which may be considered and used as the original hereof for all purposes, as of this 4th day of Masada, 2005, in the City of Vernon, County of Los Angeles, California May BY AND BETWEEN AND CITY OF VERNON, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City" 4305 Santa. Fe Avenue Vernon, California 90058 LIM AND NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORPORATION, an independent contractor, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor" 12 L Mauchly Irvine, California 92618 RECITALS WHEREAS, the City has determined to retain the services of an independent contractor to perform construction management services for the construction of the 26th Street extension project and WHEREAS, Contractor has prepared a proposal dated February 7, 2005, for the Services, which includes Contractor's Cost Information (Hourly Rate Schedule, Other Direct Costs and Estimated Total Costs), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference (the "Proposal "); and WHEREAS, Contractor represents that it is qualified and capable of furnishing the labor, materials and expertise necessary to perform the Services that the City requires, as set forth in this Agreement, and is willing to do so on the terms and conditions set forth below; and WHEREAS, the construction management services have been bid, and Contractor's cost proposal is acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement with Contractor to provide the construction management services for the 26th Street extension project on a contract basis as defined in the terms and conditions set forth below. Page 1 of 19 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. TERM OF CONTRACT 1.01. This Agreement will become effective on 05/15/05 , and will continue in effect until such time as the 26th Street extension project is complete and the City has received all project close -out documents and received any claims support necessary, or until terminated as provided in this Agreement. SECTION 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS 2.01. Whenever used in the Agreement, the following terms shall mean: A. "Agreement" shall mean that formally executed Agreement or Contract which includes the Contract Documents attached. The Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to its subject matter. B. "City" shall mean the City of Vernon, California, the entity which has executed the Agreement and, where applicable, its affiliated companies, and its officers, directors, employees, representatives and agents. C. "Contractor" shall mean Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation and where applicable, its affiliated companies, and its officers, directors, employees, representatives and agents. D. "Contract Documents" shall include any inquiry, invitation to bid, or proposal which may have, but not necessarily, preceded execution of the Agreement, and including the General Provisions and all exhibits and schedules attached to the Agreement and all plans and specifications identified in the Contract Documents. E. "Contract Price" shall mean the compensation set forth or provided for in Section 4.01 of this Agreement. Whether it expressly provides for the reimbursement of costs incurred by Contractor or simply for the payment of a lump sum of money, it is intended to be the full and complete payment for satisfactory completion of the Work and, unless otherwise stated, to coverall costs whether for materials, equipment, tools, labor, services and taxes and all overhead, rentals and profit or fee, if any. F. "General Provisions" or "General Conditions" shall mean the General Provisions as set forth in this Agreement. Page 2 of 19 G. "Premises" shall mean the physical premises under City's control or ownership where Work hereunder is to be performed. H. "Proprietary Information" and "Confidential Information" shall mean all information, whether written or oral, which Contractor acquires from, through or on behalf of City, directly or indirectly, or which arises out of the Work, concerning the Work or proprietary processes involved in the Work including, without limitation, information concerning past, present or future business plans of City, information about the operations of City's Premises, and other City information or know -how obtained during the Work, except information falling into any of the following categories: 1. Information which, at the time of disclosure hereunder, is in the public domain; 2. Information which, after disclosure hereunder, enters the public domain, except where such entry is the result of Contractor's or any entity within Contractor's control breach of this Agreement; Information which, prior to disclosure hereunder, was already in Contractor's possession without limitation regarding disclosure to others; or 4. Information which, subsequent to disclosure hereunder, is obtained by Contractor from a third party who is lawfully in possession of such information and not subject to a contractual or fiduciary relationship to City with respect to said information and who does not require Contractor to agree to refrain from disclosing such information to others. 1. "Subcontractor" shall mean any first or lower -tier subcontractor and its employees, representatives, agents, subcontractors or other personnel who have been approved in the manner required by this Agreement. J. 'Work" or "Services" shall mean the work performed by Contractor and required to be performed from time to time by City under this Agreement. Page 3 of 19 SECTION 3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR Specific Services 3.01. Contractor's Services shall include, but will not be limited to, providing construction management services for the 26th Street extension project. The Contractor's Services are more specifically detailed in the Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Change of Services 3.02. City may at any time, by written change order executed by the City Administrator, make changes only to extend the Work duration and total compensation of Contractor's Work. Changes in the scope of Work, or duties and obligations, shall be authorized only by the City. 3.03. City may make "Changes" by increasing, reducing or deviating from the requirements of the scope of Work. A form of Change Order is set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Timing of Services 3.04. Contractor's Services shall commence upon the execution of this Agreement by both parties and award by the City Council and shall end at such time as the 26th Street extension project is completed, the City receives all project close -out documents and receives all necessary claims support, unless this Agreement is otherwise terminated according to Section 6 of this Agreement or extended according to the conditions and terms set forth in this Agreement. 3.05. Time is of the essence for all Work contemplated by this Agreement. Contractor shall start performing Services under this Agreement only after notification by the City. Method of Performing Services 3.06. Contractor will determine and is responsible for the method, details, and means of performing the above- described Services. Page 4 of 19 Status of Contractor 3.07. Contractor enters into this Agreement, and will remain throughout the term of this Agreement, as an independent contractor. Contractor agrees that it is not and will not become an employee, partner, agent, or principal of City while this Agreement is in effect. Contractor agrees it is not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to City's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Contractor is responsible for providing, at its own expense, disability, unemployment, and other insurance, worker's compensation, training, permits, and licenses for itself and for its employees and subcontractors. Contractor shall have complete and sole control over its employees, the details of the Services and methods by which the Services are accomplished, it being understood that City is interested only in the results to be obtained by Contractor. 3.08. Contractor has no authority to enter contracts or agreements on behalf of City. This Agreement does not create a partnership or joint venture between the parties. Payment of Taxes 3.09. Contractor is responsible for paying when due all income taxes, including estimated taxes, incurred as a result of the compensation paid by City to the Contractor for Services under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to indemnify City for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by City resulting from Contractor's failure to comply with this provision. 3.10. Payroll taxes including federal, state and local taxes shall not be withheld or paid by City on behalf of Contractor or for the employees of the Contractor. Contractor shall not be treated as an employee with respect to the Services performed hereunder for federal or state tax purposes. Contractor shall be responsible to pay taxes mandated by law. 3.11. Since Contractor is not an employee of City, Contractor is not eligible for and shall not participate in any employee benefit of City, including pension, health or other fringe benefits. Page 5ofl9 SECTION 4. COMPENSATION 4.01. In consideration for the Services to be performed by Contractor, described in Section 3 of this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in the Contractor's Cost Information, which includes the Contractor's Hourly Rate Schedule, Other direct Costs, Estimated Total Costs and assumes a full time Resident Engineer for the duration of the Services (the "Contract Price "). The Contract Price, including a full time Resident Engineer for the duration of the Services, shall not exceed Seven Hundred Twenty Six Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Two and 09/100 Dollars ($726,962.09). Entire Compensation 4.02. The Contract Price is full and complete compensation, and constitutes the entire compensation due Contractor for the Services and any and all of Contractor's obligations hereunder. The Contract Price set forth above is not subject to escalation for any reason except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. No adjustments in compensation shall be made as a result of changes in the value of any currency. The Contract Price shall only be adjusted by formal, written Change Order or amendment to this Agreement. Payment of Compensation 4.03. For Services rendered under Section 3 of this Agreement, Contractor shall be entitled to receive monthly payments. Contractor shall submit to City a monthly invoice and statement of Services, prepared in accordance with City requirements, by the fifteenth (15th) of each month, for the prior calendar month's completed Work. City will make payments to Contractor within thirty (30) days after acceptance and approval of the invoice received from Contractor. 4.04. Contractor shall be responsible for paying any subcontractors used in the performance of this Agreement. Subcontractors shall not bill the City directly. Expenses 4.05. City shall not be liable to Contractor for any expenses paid or incurred by Contractor. Expenses may only be billed if advance written approval has been obtained from the City Administrator. Page 6 of 19 Compensation for Changes 4.06. The compensation due Contractor, or the credit due City, for changes may not be established verbally, and shall be established in a written change order signed by City as described in Sections 3.03 and 3.04 of this Agreement. Compensation adjustments in each such change order shall be established by one or more of the following bases, as determined by City: (a) a lump sum price to be negotiated between the parties; or (b) Work unit rates to be negotiated between the parties. Once established, the amount of the compensation due Contractor or credit due City for a change shall not be subject to adjustment for any reason, including changes in the value of any currency. SECTION 5. OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES 5.01. Contractor is responsible for meeting all conditions of this Agreement and City Standards & Details for all Work performed. Substandard Work, as determined solely by the City, shall be redone at the expense of the Contractor. Products of Consulting 5.02. All products of consulting services including, but not limited to, manuals, documents and /or computer software, shall become the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City before the end of the performance of this Agreement. Basic notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data shall be made available to City without restriction or limitation on their use. Liability Insurance 5.03. Contractor and its subcontractor(s), if any, shall, prior to commencement of any Work and for the duration of this Agreement, obtain and maintain at its own expense, those minimum levels of insurance coverage as set forth below. Prior to commencing Work hereunder, Contractor shall provide the City with proof of insurance providing and maintaining the coverages and endorsements set forth below. Said proof of insurance shall also provide that said policy or policies shall not be canceled or materially reduced in coverage without giving at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 5.04. The insurance coverage as listed herein, shall be properly endorsed to include those contractual obligations which may be identified further within this Agreement and shall be endorsed to provide City all the rights and privileges of an additional insured. Page 7of19 5.05. Contractor shall cause its insurers to issue, including but not limited to, Certificates of Insurance or, upon request, certified copies of the insurance policies evidencing that the coverages and policy endorsements required under this Agreement, are maintained in force. 5.06. • Contractor shall ensure its subcontractor(s), if any, maintain those insurance requirements as specified in this Agreement and are endorsed as additional insured(s) on all required Contractor insurance coverages. Contractor and its subcontractor(s), if any, shall maintain in effect the following minimum insurance coverages on an Occurrence Form Policy: 1. Workers Compensation within the statutory limits, including occupational illness or disease coverage in accordance with the laws of the nation, state, territory, or province exercising jurisdiction over Contractor's employees. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance shall have a minimum limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Contractor further agrees to hold harmless and indemnify City for any and all claims arising out of an injury, disability, or death of any of Contractor's employees or agents. 2. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, including, but not limited to, Contractual Liability, Products and Completed Operations Liability, Broad Form Property Damage and Bodily Injury Liability, and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Liability, with a minimum combined single limit of $2,000,000 per occurrence. 3. Comprehensive Automobile Insurance, including, but not limited to, all owned, non -owned or hired vehicles with a minimum combined single limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. 4. Excess Liability Insurance with limits of $2,000,000. Such evidence of insurance can either be through the primary insurance coverages or through an excess policy. Such insurance shall at all times be on an occurrence form and provide policy conditions as broad as those required in the primary insurance. 5. Professional Liability Insurance with limits of $2,000,000. 5.07. Contractor agrees to provide insurance in the amounts and forms specified above. Contractor shall submit to the City documentation indicating compliance with these minimum requirements no less than one (1) day prior to the beginning of performance under this Agreement. Contractor shall not commence Page 8of19 performance of its Work under this Agreement until the above insurance has been obtained and proof of insurance has been filed with and approved by the City. 5.08. Contractor shall not permit a subcontractor or vendor to perform work on City premises unless and until a certificate of insurance is obtained showing that such subcontractor or vendor has worker's compensation coverage. If Contractor employs subcontractors as part of the Services rendered, Contractor's protective coverage is required. Contractor may include all subcontractors as insureds under its own policy or shall furnish separate insurance for each subcontractor, meeting the requirements set forth above. Representations 5.09. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees from all claims, suits, actions, demands, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, settlements, and penalties, losses, fines, and all costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith, including reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of defense, arising out of or attributable to the negligent or wrongful acts of Contractor or its employees or agents under this Agreement, except to the extent arising from or caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents or employees. The terms of this indemnity shall survive the termination of this Agreement. The obligations in this Paragraph are in addition to Contractor's duty to provide insurance and shall not be limited by any limitation on the amount or type of insurance coverage carried by Contractor. 5.10. Contractor and City represent that each has read and understands the Agreement and Contract Documents. The Contractor represents it understands the City's regulations concerning Premises access, badges, parking, security, safety, fire, prohibited drugs and alcohol, and smoking and other rules, and that Contractor has visited Premises where the Work is to be done and is familiar with the local conditions under which it is to be done. Contractor also represents that it is experienced in performing and competent and qualified to perform the kind of tasks or assignments included in the Work and employs or has available for employment in sufficient numbers ail unskilled, skilled, administrative, supervisory, professional and managerial or other personnel required to perform the Work as required by this Agreement. 5.11. Contractor represents that it has the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the Services under this Agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of City, This means Contractor is able to fulfill the requirements of this Agreement. Failure to perform all the Services required Page 9 of 19 under this Agreement constitutes a material breach of the Agreement. Contractor has complete and sole discretion for the manner in which the Work under this Agreement will be performed. 5.12. Contractor declares and states that is has complied with and will continue to comply with all federal, state and local laws regarding business permits and licenses that may be required to carry out the Services to be performed under this Agreement. 5.13. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City free and harmless from all claims, demands, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries and deficiencies, including interest, penalties, attomey's fees and costs, that City may incur as a result of a breach by Contractor of any representation or provision contained in this Agreement or any negligent or intentional acts or omissions by Contractor, it subcontractors, agents, and employees or based on any claim that any software program or other product used or furnished by Contractor in the performance of this Agreement constitutes an infringement of any United States patent or copyright. 5.14. Contractor's rights under this Agreement may not be assigned nor may its duties be delegated or subcontracted without the prior written consent of City. Any assignment or delegation or subcontract in violation of this Section shall, at City's sole discretion, be void. Consent by City shall not relieve Contractor of responsibility for performance of Contractor's obligations hereunder. City may assign all or any part of this Agreement at any time effective immediately upon written notification to Contractor. 5.15. At all times while Work is being performed on the Premises each party shall be represented thereon by a designated representative. Each party may notify the other in writing of the identity of such persons from time to time. Work Injury 5.16. The treatment and care of injuries sustained by Contractor's employees, subcontractors, representatives or other personnel shall be and remain the responsibility of Contractor. City's first aid facilities, if any, however, will be made available to Contractor's employees in emergency cases which are the direct result of accidents occurring on the Premises. City shall incur no liability for, and Contractor hereby agrees to indemnify City against, any causes of action, claim, liability or costs, including attorney's fees, arising in whole or part out of the furnishing of such first aid facilities or assistance to Contractor's employees, subcontractors, representatives or other personnel, or out of the failure to furnish such facilities or assistance. Page 10 of 19 Records, Inspection and Audit 5.17. During the course of Work being performed, Contractor and any of its subcontractors, shall maintain and retain, not less than three (3) years after completion thereof, complete and accurate records of the Contractor's costs which are chargeable to the City under this Agreement. City or its designated, authorized representatives, shall have the right during this three (3) year period, upon written reasonable notice, to inspect and audit those records. Such records to be maintained and retained by the Contractor shall include: (a) payroll record accounting for the total time distribution of the Contractor's employees working full or part time on the Work (to permit tracing to payroll payments in cash); (b) invoices for purchases, receiving and issuing documents, and all the other unit- inventory records for the Contractor's stores, stock or capital items; (c) paid invoices and canceled checks for material purchased and for the subcontractor's and any other third parties' charges; and (d) any other documentation City deems necessary to support costs and charges under this Agreement. Corporate Conduct 5.18. Contractor, its employees, agents or representatives shall not offer or give to an officer, official or employee of City gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other gratuities to influence the award of a contract or obtain favorable treatment under this Agreement or any other contract. Standard of Care 5.19. Contractor agrees that all Services provided will be conducted by the principal and competent staff members, if any, under the supervision of the principal, and that Services will be performed and rendered diligently. Contractor represents that it has, or shall secure, at its own expense, all personnel required to perform Contractor's Services under this Agreement, but at all times shall be responsible for the Services of such personnel. Contractor may not employ any subcontractor without the prior written approval of the City. Indemnity Process 5.20. The City shall notify Contractor in writing of any suits, claims or demands covered by any indemnity contained in this Agreement. Promptly after receipt of such notice, Contractor shall assume the defense of such claim with counsel reasonably satisfactory to City. If Contractor fails, within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice, to assume the defense with counsel reasonably satisfactory to City, or if, in the reasonable judgment of City, a direct or indirect conflict of interest exists between the parties with respect t� the claim, or if in the Page 11 of 19 sole judgment of City the assumption and conduct of the defense by Contractor would materially and adversely affect City in any manner or prejudice its ability to conduct a successful defense, then the City shall have the right to undertake the defense, compromise and settlement of such claim for the account and at the expense of Contractor. Notwithstanding the above, if the City in its sole discretion so elects, City may also participate in the defense of such actions by employing counsel at its expense, without waiving the Contractor's obligations to indemnify or defend. Contractor shall not settle or compromise any claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of the City and without an unconditional release of all liability by each claimant or plaintiff to the City. Treatment of Confidential and Proprietary Information 5.21. For ten (10) years after the effective date of this Agreement, Contractor shall refrain from using any Confidential or Proprietary Information except in connection with the Work or from disclosing it to any third party other than to employees of Contractor who require it in performance of the Work and except to such other third persons as City may authorize in writing. If disclosure to such an employee or to other third persons is so authorized, Contractor shall enter into with said party a confidentiality agreement containing provisions with respect to use and disclosure of Proprietary Information substantially the same as those contained in this Agreement. 5.22. Contractor shall take reasonable precautions to safeguard any documents containing Proprietary Information which City may supply to Contractor hereunder. Contractor may copy, in whole or part, such documents to the extent necessary for the performance of the Work, and Contractor shall return to City upon the completion of the Work or request by City all such documents and copies. 5.23. Except as expressly permitted by prior written consent of the City, Contractor and /or its subcontractors shall not disclose, permit the disclosure of, release, disseminate, or transfer, whether orally or by any other means, any part of such Confidential Information to any other person or entity. Contractor and /or its subcontractors shall return any written Confidential Information and all copies made of such items to the City upon the City's written request, but in any event not later than the date that Contractor has performed all Work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor hereby agrees that such Confidential Information and any documents provided may be used by Contractor and /or its subcontractors only as authorized by the City. Contractor shall include a provision in its agreements with subcontractors that binds the subcontractors to this non - disclosure requirement. Page 12 of 19 5.24. All reports, plans, data, studies, maps, drawings, models, photographs, documents and other writings prepared by and for Contractor, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, with the exception of working notes, internal documents and Confidential Information provided by businesses located in City, shall be considered the property of City. Contractor shall deliver such documents and materials to the City as they are generated; however, Contractor may take and retain copies of said documents and materials that are not Confidential Information, as desired. 5.25. All reports, information, data and exhibits prepared or assembled by Contractor in connection with the performance of its Services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the City to the public and Contractor agrees that such documents shall not be available to any individual or organization without the written consent of the City prior to such release. 5.26. No reports, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Contractor. Compliance with Authority 5.27. Contractor shall comply with all laws, regulations, executive orders and other applicable requirements of any governmental agencies having jurisdiction including the Fair labor Standards Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act and all those relating in any way to employment practices and protection of the environment. Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or any applicant for employment for reasons of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual preference, age or national origin. 5.28. Contractor shall make timely payment of all employment taxes and of all social security and other contributions of every kind required to be made with respect to or measured by the wages and salaries of persons employed by Contractor. 5.29. Contractor shall indemnify City against, and hold City harmless from, any liability or loss including liability or loss from fines or penalties arising out of Contractor's failure to perform the obligations imposed upon it by Sections 5.28 and 5.29 of the Agreement. Page 13 of 19 Progress Reports 5.30. Contractor shall meet with City staff, upon City's request, or as needed, in order to provide reports or information conceming the Services being performed by Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor's License Classification 5.31. Contractor shall possess all appropriate licenses for the duration of this Agreement. SECTION 6. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 6.01. Unless otherwise terminated as provided in this Section, this Agreement will continue in effect until such time as the 26th Street extension project is complete, the City receives all project close -out documents and receives all necessary claims support, unless otherwise extended according to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Non - Default Termination 6.02. City, at its sole discretion, may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Contractor and such termination shall be effective in the manner specified in such notice and shall be without prejudice to any claim that either party may have against the other. During the thirty (30) day period after such notice is sent, the parties shall continue to act toward each other in good faith. 6.03. In the event of any such termination, in full and complete settlement for the termination of the Work, City shall pay Contractor for those Services performed prior to the date of delivery of the termination notice, plus compensation for (i) necessary Work performed during the notice period and authorized in the termination notice, and (ii) all costs reasonably and necessarily incurred by Contractor directly attributable to termination which could not reasonably have been avoided and for which Contractor is not otherwise compensated that are incurred through the date of termination and effectuating the termination ( "Termination Expenses "). Termination Expenses shall not include lost profits, lost opportunities, consequential damages, or the like. In no event shall total payment exceed the Contract Price. Page 14 of 19 Termination on Occurrence of Stated Events 6.04. This Agreement will terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: A. Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party; or B. Sale of the Contractor; or C. Assignment of this Agreement by. Contractor without City's written consent. Termination for Default 6.05. If Contractor defaults in the performance of this Agreement or materially breaches any of its provisions, City may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to Contractor indicating the effective date of such termination. Termination will take effect immediately upon the date specified in the notification. For the purposes of this paragraph, material breach of this Agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following: A. Contractor's failure to perform, in a manner satisfactory to the City in its sole discretion, the Services specified in Section 3 of this Agreement; or B. Contractor's material breach of any obligation or provision contained in Section 5 of this Agreement. 6.06. The waiver by either party of a breach or default by the other party shall not be deemed a waiver of any different or later breach; nor shall any delay or omission by either party to exercise any right it may have hereunder operate as a waiver of any breach or default of such a right. The failure of either party to this Agreement to exercise any of its rights under this Agreement does not constitute a breach thereof and shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any subsequent breach. 6.07. In the event of any termination of this Agreement or reduction in the scope of the Work, Contractor shall not be entitled to damages for loss of profits for the unexecuted portion of the Work or any other damages because of such termination or reduction. Page 15 of 19 SECTION 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS Notices 7.01 All notices, approvals, consents and other communications between the parties shall be in writing, and shall be sent by fax or by certified mail (return receipt requested) to the respective addresses set forth below, or at such other address as may be fumished by either party to the other in writing. Faxed notices, confirmed by copy thereof, shall be deemed communicated as of the day the facsimile was sent. Mailed notices will be deemed communicated as of the day of receipt or the third (3'ti) day after mailing, whichever occurs first. Contractor - Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation Attn: Peter Lim, Chief Executive Officer 12 L Mauchly Irvine, CA 92618 Fax: 949- 450 -2805 Telephone: 949 -450 -2800 City - City of Vernon Attn: Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Administrator /City Clerk 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Fax: 323- 826 -1438 Telephone: 323 - 583 -8811 ext 260 Entire Agreement of the Parties 7.02. This Agreement supercedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the rendering of Services by Contractor for City and contains all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and the rendering of those Services. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not contained in this Agreement, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement or a subsequent amendment or change order shall be valid or binding. No amendment or change in the provisions of this Agreement shall be made, except in a formal written amendment signed by Contractor and an authorized representative of the City, or in a written change order. Contractor expressly waives all claims for compensation based upon quantum merit, implied contract or oral contract. Each party represents and warrants that it has read and fully familiarized itself with this Agreement, and that such party has been fully authorized to sign this Agreement. Page 16 of 19 The arbitration shall be conducted in Los Angeles, California. Any party may be represented by counsel and /or other authorized representative. In rendering a decision(s), the Arbitrators shall determine the rights and obligations of the parties according to the substantive and procedural laws of the State of California and the terms of this Agreement. The decision of the Arbitrators shall be based on the evidence introduced at the hearing and accompanied by a written statement of decision as to each of the principal controverted issues. The agreement of two of the three Arbitrators as to the resolution of the dispute shall be a conclusive resolution. The Arbitrators shall deliver the written decision to the parties within thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the selection of the last of the Arbitrators. The decision shall be conclusive and binding, and it may thereafter be confirmed as a judgment by the Superior Court of the State of California, subject only to challenge on the grounds set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1286.2. The validity and enforceability of the decision of the Arbitrators is to be determined exclusively by the California courts. Attorney's Fees 7.06. In the event a dispute, claim or litigation arises regarding this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for reasonable attorneys' fees and actual costs, which may be set by the arbitrators or the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief which is obtained. 7.07. Neither party shall be considered in default in any of its obligations under this Agreement when a failure of performance shall be due to an uncontrollable force. The term "uncontrollable force" shall mean any cause beyond the control of the party affected, including, but not restricted to, flood, earthquake, storm, fire, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance or disobedience, federal, state, or municipal action, statute, ordinance, or regulation, embargoes of the United States Govemment or any other government, which by exercise of due diligence such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid and by exercise of due diligence has been unable to overcome. Eitherr party rendered unable to fulfill any of its obligations under this Agreement by reason of an uncontrollable force shall give written notice within five (5) business days of such fact to the other party and shall exercise due diligence to remove such inability with all reasonable dispatch. 7.08. Except as may otherwise be specifically provided herein., this Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Contractor and the City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Page 18 of 19 7.09. The captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of the Agreement or any part thereof. 7.10. City reserves the right to award similar contracts to multiple contractors to ensure the City has adequate services. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Agreement on the dates shown below. Executed at , California, on City: City of Vemon ame: Leonis C. ±alburg, ayor Date: ATTEST. Bruce V. Malkenhorst, City Clerk Contractor: APPROVED AS T FORM: Eric T. Fres h, Ci orney Lim and Naspiinento Engineering Corporation Name: /99767'z i &.v Title: Ncr pA2 --CGS+ Trecuh'V. a Jc€J Date: ILL TAM NA Name: Title: PQi,./c d P/4-1- 3 —z5' -a� Date: Page 19of19 RELIVED NOV 1 2008 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT A EEMENT CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 SUPPLEMENT NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS PROJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Imrprovement P.O. NO. TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation REQUESTED BY: City of Vernon CONSULTANT You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the original scope of work of this agreement. Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the original agreement remain in full force and effect, and apply to the additional work as if said work was originally included in the agreement. The City of Vernon and Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation herein agree to the adjustments in compensation of the following work: Furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required to complete the Paleontological /Archeological work through September 2008. The services shall be included in the amount not exceed $3,923.57 (Three Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Three dollars and fifty seven cents). (Resolution No. 8735) Agreement Amount (Base Bid) $ 726,962.00 Amount of This Change Order $ 3,923.57 Amount of Previous Change Orders $ 176,043.00 Total Change Orders $ 179, 966.57 Modified Agreement Amount $ 906,928.57 By reason of this change order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: Approved: Date: (G 2 ei Dir. ctor o Community Se vices& Water that we will provide all work above specified, and ,E-NG. Cox_ t. We the undersigned Consultant have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, labor, equipment and materials, including overhead „except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Accepted Date: /1 /1 08 Consultant: L/M i AM- SCI MC-Nto By: / IP Title: Pc S I. g”) G ' d 1 LA--I & ,... I ✓ f{-5 CJT o c: Project File /Consultant/Purchasing Rev. 06/08 AE Applied EarthWorks` TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Attn: Mr. Kevin Tran, PE 20 Empire Drive Lake Forest, CA 92630 INVOICE Corporation DATE: INVOICE: TERMS: 30 April 2008 1575 -10 Net 30 days DATES OF SERVICE: February 1, 2008 Through April 30, 2008 FINAL INVOICE Archaeological Literature and Records Search for the Cultural Resources and Paleontological Monitoring During Construction for the 26`h Street Extension Project, City of Vernon, CA AMOUNT DUE $ 3,923.57 J se I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that these costs have been incurred, expended, and paid. (see attached spreadsheet for detail) PLEASE REMIT TO (new address): Applied EarthWorks, Inc. 1391 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite C Fresno, CA 93711-3600 (559)229 -1856 Applied EarthWorks, Inc. Job #1575 LAN Engineering 26th Street Extension Project City of Vernon Labor Category j This Flours period Rate Total Cost Principal Archaeologist (SKG) I 127.40 254.80 Project Manager (VM) 9.5 69.60 661.20 Cultural Resources Monitor (CC) 3,918.48 46.50 2,505.60 Cultural Resources Monitor (CC) [over/im: (1,412.88) 69.75 6,175.20 , Graphics Specialist (MM /CI) 0.4 59.40 23.76 Field Techinicians (ED) . 104.63 47.90 1,116.00 Staff Archaeologist/Monitor (TF) 7.5 50.20 376.50 Admin Assistant (SB) 0.8 58.20 46.56 Totals 18.2 1,108.02 Other Direct Costs Postage / Duplication Communications / Supplies 22.52 Total ODC Costs 22.52 Outside Services Archaeological Info Center Fees Paleo Environmental Associates, Inc: Principal Investigator (BL) Supervisor (MR) Field Technician (DA) Field Technician (JC) Field Technician (DD) Field Technician (GT) Senior Verebrate Paleontologist Senior Inverebrate Paleontologist LACMIP /LACMVP Storage Fees Museum Access Fee Mileage Screening Machine Use Supplies AMS C -14 Dates (2) Micropaleo Consultants Reproduction Postage / Shipping 10.5 $81.75 858.38 2.0 $65.75 131.50 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 16.0 $50.00 800.00 3.0 $73.00 $73.00 219.00 U6•May -08 Cumulative Hours Cost Bud Hours, eted Cost Remaining Hours Cost 2.0 254.80 2.0 254.80 56.3 3,918.48 36.0 2,505.60 (20.3) (1,412.88) 132.8 6,175.20 , 188.0 8,742.00 55.2 2,566.80 1.5 104.63 16.0 1,116.00 14.5 1,011.38 1.8 106.92 5.0 297.00 3.2 190.08 36.8 1,762.72 (36.8), (1,762.72) 54.9 2,755.98 (54.9) (2,755.98) 1.7 98.94 ' (1.7) (98.94) 287.8 15,177.67 247.0 12,915.40 (40.8)_ (2,262.26) 4 41.78 4 7.13 48.91 100.00 58.22 100.00 92.87 200.00 151.09 203.15 300.00 26,502.48 5,763.39 2,893.00 5,900.00 5,625.00 650.00 800.00 584.00 96.85 26,502.48 (5,763.39) (2,893.00) (5,900.00) (5,625.00) (650.00) (800.00) (584.00) 350.00 60.60 47.03 65.97 4.60 Total Outside Services 2,537.08 Travel/Transportation Mileage Per Diem - Food / Lodging Parking/Tolls Total Travel/Transpbrtation Equipment/Supplies Vehicle Rental Fuel Supplies /(equipment Total Equipment/Supplies TOTAL LABOR 1,108.02 TOTAL ODC'S 22.52 TOTAL TRAVEL/TRANSPORTATION OTAL OUTSIDE SERVICES 2,537.08 TOTAL EQUIPMENT /SUPPLIES 'FEE a 10% (non labor) 255.96 TOTAL 350.00 13.0.00 2,123.59 600.00 177.43 965.00 (350.00) (130.00) (2,123.59) (600.00) (177.43) (965.00) 124.15 82.03 (124.15) (82.03) 26,970.74 26,802.48 (168.26) 23 233.32 203.14 44 5.00 441.46 1,920.00 (233.32) 1,716.86 (5.00) 1,920.00 1,478.54 I 190.41 2 68.02 258.43 1,430.00 1,239.59 300.00 231.98 1,730.00 1,471.57 15,177.67 48.91 12,915.40 200.00 441.46 26,970.74 1,920.00 26,802.48 258.43 2.771.95 1,730.00 3,065.25 (2,262.26) 151.09 1,478.54 (168.26) 1,471.57 293.29 3,923.57 45,669.16 46,633.13 963.97 rLdi" ftion• NNW, WI O cC RauU w Employee Namb. N O O N CO O 0 C� U IYq Q r U co O c o al a 0 E ` a z o E z MINIM C F- 0 0 EMMEN 0 r a bq 0 O l 0 8 N CO n cc 0 LO r O N la 0 0 0 N 0 0 a. co O 0 0 a a °o "o' 8 A N • 0 0 8 N 0 0. a 28 alL A CO 0 0 N 0 0 a. 0 O O 0 N ta r a 0 0 .N' 0 N (0 0 0 R CO Ua 0 0 O ci 0 0 N 0 N 0 0/ A 0. co 0 Q. 8 N u Sce or as �0 O CO 0 a 0 co co 0 0 (/J Y ` s~ 0 N 0 0 v°S r O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O O 0 T O U7 0 0 O O 0 ma '- 0 O >. t� t*S) CO 0 2 O O u7 .Q. O "0 0 N' O U7 0 O 0 0 • O 0 O 1 O N O O N O O O O O O O 0 0 111 0 O O 0 0 M O 0 O u7 01 0 O u7 0) 0 ..00._. O O 1 a 5 8 0 x • a) O o u. 4 LL to 0 u. f0 .0 ri 0 O 0 g~�E A.iri uutic 1 a 0 qiie.. . . . .. < c U 0 ar m to Employee Name: u w Employee Number: • (/) C m 0 o O o CL N E - I- 0 _ O La w =a a ma I-• b r ca m a c r ca 12 so V) N 1A N N ti N N 1! tl d Y 00 m O N r E ° Y y S. r a Y T r Y T T G O O T T T T o o O O 0 0 O O 0 0 00 0 00 00 - a T 4.- T r 6 CL a . a a 2 2 g a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 8x $ . U Qo p fp QQ QQ N n 0 A O 5 E .S€€R 'e 2 41 0 8a y > $ °'0 o h ° .de m z N FEE s N. z~ " it t — — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0 O N O O to O 0 O .0.....0....x.. O r M r O N O N r r r O N O .......0. ........ N O M O 0 O 10 0 0 O O O O O 0 O 10 O Ot1 O 1) O O O 0. • O N • O O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 2 E • z 0 Q .0 ti .0 u. 4 d 4 M r = gloss *.ss um= O LLI CO Employee Name: FJIJIIl a° N G O IMMEEMINE z3Y I E a. Y A 3 a o ° g" n c c E .e 1 H a O O O O O O O O O ° ° - cD N r Q O= O0O O 3 O 2 m O al v � En O ch N O ..0.. � N 1.... � } It N e 11111 co m h �... pG�.. V V m s o ° rc o o :111111111111! O c o Lo a ill x al o W _ Lai r IN: _ CO 73 03 z R cn W O III CO 0 0 W a .n to h .... 0. IS) ... 0 0 e- 2 2 a 0 0 - a ...... •• a. (0 G 0 8 0 0 Employee Name: to' > co -o 0. E ° -a- 0 c gr. Cl 4-• ./) I ca ce) 02 0 0 0. 0 CO 0 111 .. . qv- 0 0 0 0 1-• 0 0 a. 0 A 0 0 0 0 a. 0. 15 ei P = 11-1 CO 1. re. c-z• a.. 8 to 0 0 2 o_ 0. • -5 S 2 re g 0. ID 1.61 0 0 0 0 o 0 s-- ... -• N-• 0 0 z U. 7 3 5 c o o z 0 !-* 0 • E .0 i. e Employee Number: 0:1 tg t•- o 2 -c; co 12 lg" a u) Nir . '0" 0 c:3 c:3 cp cll 0) a a a a 3 8 2 .05 2 a 2 C■1 Employee Name: "CS loccS a anon oQ D u co Usti Employee Number: t0 m a E o o g o o ce U O ca— • 0 ti 00 O U 4) c Z 1Q- 0 0 m m C � N 7 V t0 C sr a v cn m .0 O sr la N_ m 0 UMBRIONIMMOM onommommannom moromorm 1 11 11 111 IIIIIIii IIIIIIii O O O O M O O O O O O O 1 O (0 O O O O M O 0 0 O O o�O O .0 w ° v 5 P. E .p m CO O N O O O O Oa O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 fi n • Q • f0 o t co m S c > Employee Name: i O O 0 0 0 41 a o 0 u d cc V 0 2 to Employee Name: U o co 0 o 0 U 0 .0 0 o a 2 a. 2 a. k k a. 6 Cle :'• t m V e o y E P n n E At a a a E c m y < a pp n 3 pE r m a n 2 m < N Q o K > in v o �0 0: J9 E a m U .0 a z �R N N LL 8 N e 54 a °o'.N c� in m `.1 LL p ^. �p CO Lil ° o '°n coo o o° $ N pa o °a o 0 0 ttt ...1 Lil O o • N O tl) O ._ o 0 0 0 0 00 0 - 0 0 00 0 Employee Number: tO CO b T IQ ul — L C o W M. C 1 l I e !. m w '0 N aV fa V. 0 ° "II" O p o N O O 0 (0 0 0 (0 N O O 0 o.. O O 0 .0 •10 d 0 0. eF 0. QQ I0 o. f0 `0. Employee Name: Vanessa Mirro liommannimmommir Employee Number. 213 42 Applied Week of: 4/19 to 4/25 2008 EarthlNork� Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Friday 4/22 4/20 4/23 TOTAL Job Project Position WBSC Task Rate G/L Primavera 4/24 4/25 HOURS Number Name Title Code I.D. Code Account Code* O OO 1795 Steve !antis: 5 acees Cherry PMPM 10011 15 5100 1.00 1 00 2 OO 1150 SR79 PMPM 10011 18 15 5100 0 50 0;50 1780 FF Deveip Cantabria mnt PMPM 10011 15 5100 1.00 2.00 3 00 6 00 1150 SR79 PMPM 10011 19 15 5100 Family .0 00 1786 Development- PMPM 10011 15 7104 TR A'a550 9.50 9.50 Ot' PMPM 10011 DeveloPfpment 15 7217 0 00 1150 SR79 PMPM 10011 20 15 5100 0.{50 ■ 0.50 1376 Airport Blvd. BST PMPM 10011 17 15 5100 0.00 1777 t tegaland: Ayala Property PMPM 10011 15 5100 1.00 0;50 1 50 1376 CVWD: Ave 62 PMPM 10011 16 15 .5100 2.50 500 4 50 13 00 1206 P &D: SOS PMPM 10011 15 5100 2.00 2.100 0 50 0.50 5 00 B&P r 15 7105 1.00 1 00 1656 PD.SDB- PMPM 10011 South Reach PM 15 5100 d.50 0 50 1575 City of Vernon PMPM 10011 15 5100 0 00 1770 Helx EMWD PMPM 10011 Diamond Tank 15 5100 I 0.0 0 50 1376 CV": Well 4815 PMPM 10011 - 15 15 5100 0 0 00 1 0.00 10.i30 10.00 10.00 0;00. 40!00! N, B.: Paychecks will be mailed tome address shown on the em I i p oyee's W-4, unless a Paycheck DallveryAddress Farm is received before payday by me payroll Department in Fresno. if applicable Date Explanation of overhead Charges—Activity 9 ty (including TOH, B&P, Mktg., etc.) 21 Apr BSP - SARI'S; Boyle: Diamond Tank 22 -Apr IMP - SARIS; Boyle: Diamond Tank; CVWO �` 4/28/2008 23-Apr B&P - sARTS Employees Signature Date 24 -Apr S&P -cvwo 25-Apr 02A g REVIEWE lAPR pervisor's Signature Date o U U b CC U Q • v N 7, 13 Fs a C V j 00 N CO 0 0 0 0 O N iO U) co O O 0 0 0 O • 0I O to N 0 0 to 0 O O O0 N r 0 0 y 0 O (O O O co O 0 n N 0 a. a u° =E0 LL t p CO O O 0 O0 0. a ❑ 0 ... ). • N N 0 0 0. N 0 O O 0 0 N N•• 0 N O 1n O O O n O 0 O 0 • N 0 N CO 0 a g Sz< CO O N O O O r O0 N 0 a 0. 0 VJ 0. 0. O (.4 O O M O 0 0 O 0 ... O to O O to O N O O 8 N 0 a U ce g a,0 O O h ;O. O 0) N 0 0 E U N O N O N 0 0 0. a O W =O 0 O O O O 0 • 4, 00 N a U »> v n O t() O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 O O O 0 t- ..sa0, O O O t-- O O O 0 O 0 0. 1. a 0 Employee Name: Q U w 0 O O O O O O O O p p 0 Ui U'7 N l() In Ui U) N N N N CO N W CO CO CO CO CO O O O O O O O O O O O O 6.2,4 lh-i t C5 0.y KR c E itry D N C E V > Z 7 0 A u v n • a m i5 > ; = m a. a U N Q d 0 C'4 M .b CD - 0 0 0 0 r� O (1.0- r` I,- r- n ti n ti m: O 07 O O O O d M ZO I`-: O 0 CO CS O O fV O O O p 10 F N CO O N O h 0 0 0 O O a 0 O 0 w 0 8, 3 8 5TI F ARCH • i25 Yb o c ® 3 U 0 ° CU 'd OO OO NNNN b 0 0 OO OO 0 N y A • wtj Cle 0 o a .b >w • (r) Q~ o „ co.) (/) cn c.n : E" H U H U H U WU ti) E i - u (.1) a icd AA .0� W o Cal a 3 u�`°� ....1 c....) 2 > y >, a d Z 4 � H Employee Number: 0 00 0 N 0 U W U 0 zr 00 00 co Z z 0 0 w w 3 a tel rn o 0 N 0 O rn N 0 O 0 ON N 0 0 O O O 0 O O rn 0 O O o, 0 O _O o` 0 0 U 00 O .-r 00 N 00 0 N 00 O 00 00 0 N 00 O N 00 0 N 00 O w H 00 W Ey U U V V 8 C�+ f� o .a aZ a' 00 0 N 0 ¢'a" U 3° UQ tit 174 L0 43 o ti z 0 0 N m ■.o s N n M 1 0 9 0 o' g 7:4 Ey h co .0 ftti 0 u > v co t a d z4 0 \r J 1O tot) L4 v Q O n6 0 1 0 kri c' Hv a 1) vs a 4. :3 00 N 0 a 00 } 3 IINITIME Employee Name: q it fill W Employee Number: Q 4-5515n44--t- � oo o= __ �, est M Csd a c. VI -b ^ 2 H >, b .-.. - v 3 „.. ! 00 b 0 co 0 ccl 'O O V] cct^ c. til rn U • v G: \PROD\FORMS\ADMIN\Tf MECARD.WPD Fresno Postage Allocation - February 2008 Date Project Recipient Amount 2/13 866 RBF 0.41 866 Total 0.41 2/13 919 UCSB 0.41 919 Total 0.41 2/15 1058 City of Santa Barbara 0.49 1058 Total 0.49 2/7 1150 CH2M Hill 1.82 1150 Total 1.82 2/25 1165 K. Gobalet 0.41 1165 Total 0.41 2/20 1261 DMJM H &N 0.41 1261 Total 0.41 2/15 1279 K B Home 0.41 1279 Total 0.41 2/13 1317 Trigon 0.41 2/22 1317 Central CA Info Center 0.41 1317 Total 0.82 2/13 1376 Coachella Valley WD 0.97 1376 Total 0.97 2/8 1444 Aspen 2.30 1444 Total 2.30 2/15 1481 City of Santa Barbara 0.49 1481 Total 0.49 2/15 1503 Rincon 0.58 1503 Total 0.58 2/13 1507 FedEx 0.20 1507 Total 0.20 2/5 1543 Furlong Consulting 0.41 2/22 1543 Furlong Consulting 0.41 1543 Total 0.82 2/13 1547 Madera County Road Dept. 0.41 1547 Total 0.41 2/15 1548 City of Los Angeles 4.60 2/20 1548 Paleo Res. Mgt. 0.20 1548 Total 4.80 2/13 1561 C. Lebow 0.41 2/25 1561 C. Lebow 0.21 1561 Total 0.62 2/13 1575 Lim & Nascimento 1.14 2/20 1575 Paleo Res. Mgt. 0.21 1575 Total 1.35 2/14 1585 Dudek 0.41 1585 Total 0.41 2/13 1591 Kenneth Gobalet 0.41 2/13 1591 ManTech SRS 0.19 1591 Total 0.60 2/5 1592 C. Lebow 0.41 2/13 1592 ManTech SRS 0.19 2/25 1592 C. Lebow 0.20 2/29 1592 Moore Mill 7 Lumber 0.41 1592 Total 1.21 2/6 1594 5 @ $0.41 `2.05 2/13 1594 Rincon 0.41 Fresno Postage Allocation - March 2008 Date Project Recipient Amount 3/13 866 RBF 0.41 3/26 866 M. Moratto 0.41 866 Total 0.82 3/14 1058 City of Santa Barbara 0.58 1058 Total 0.58 3/10 1150 CH2M Hill 1.48 1150 Total 1.48 3/14 1165 Plain Exploration 0.41 1165 Total 0.41 3/27 1252 R. Sheets 0.41 1252 Total 0.41 3/14 1279 K.B. Home 0.41 1279 Total 0.41 3/13 1376 Coachella Valle ry Water Dist 0.58 1376 Total 0.58 3/13 1444 Aspen 0.99 1444 Total 0.99 3/28 1455 Sandy Flint 0.41 1455 Total 0.41 3/24 1497 D. McDougall 0.41 1497 Total 0.41 3/7 1503 Galvin 0.41 3/14 1503 Rincon - Jessica Hart 0.58 1503 Total 0.99 3/3 1507 Cen Cal Info Center 1.41 3/3 1507 S. Flint, Devine Tarbell 0.41 3/6 1507 Eldorado National Forest 0.41 1507 Total 2.23 3/13 1547 Madera County 0.41 1547 Total 0.41 3/14 1548 City Of Los Angeles 4.60 1548 Total 4.60 3/14 1561 OSU College Forests 0.41 3/19 1561 Clay Lebow 0.41 1561 Total 0.82 3/7 1575 Paleo. Resource Mgt 0.41 1575 Total 0.41 3/17 1576 LA County Public Works 4.60 3/17 1576 ESA 4.60 1576 Total 9.20 3/17 1591 Specialty & Color Svc. 0.41 1591 Total 0.41 3/6 1592 Enterprise 0.41 1592 Total 0.41 3/6 1593 Aspen 1.14 1593 Total 1.14 3/13 1594 Rincon 0.41 1594 Total 0.41 3/4 1620 FedEx 0.41 1620 Total 0.41 3/6 1623 K. McLean 0.41 3/6 1623 M. Linder 0.41 H EM Er POSTAGE CHARGE LOG ADVICE _ASE FORWARD ih,OnTrac YOUR PAYMENT TO PP' Department# 1664 Los Angeles, CA 90084-1664 Trac On Time Delivery for Less APPLIED EARTHWORKS 1391 W. SHAW AVE., STE. C FRESNO CA 93711 DETACH HERE ACCOUNT NUMBER 114814 I4/19/2008 DATE CURRENT INVOICE DETAIL INVOICE NO AMOUNT 107.64 6052770 PAST DUE IPLEASE INDICATE PAYMENT AMOIJ TO INSURE PROPER CREDIT PLEASE RETURN THIS STUB WITH YOUR REMITTANCE ACCOUNT NO. PAGE DATE 114814 4/19/2008 FOR BILLING INQUIRIES PLEASE CALL INVOICE NO. 6052770 • •A .I,Aia7): 0 0 (877) 227-5139 - Califomia Ovemight is now OnTracl Same company. Same great service. Brand new name! Visit ontrac.com. — Date / SVC- ------DELIVERY COMPANY POD INFO-- Tracking # DELIVERY ADDRESS CITY DEL TIME 4/15/2008 S ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GR 91301-4316 front desk D10010168432379 30423 CANWOOD ST AGOURA Hlt 09:54 AM --- FUEL- GHARGE:-$1721 • LTR . SAT CHARGES 1641 0 0 ,. $8.87 .4/17/2008 S - APPLIED EARTHWORKS, INC 93711-3600 FRONT DESK TOH 1 1 $8.87 D10010168800287 1391 W SHAW AVE FRESNO 07:36 AM ••••. ___. _ _ _ FUEL CHARGE: $1.21 0 N 4/17%2008 LAN ENGINEERING CORP / KI 92630 gina 1575 --- Di 0010168814692---20- --EMPIRE DRIVE-- ----LAKE -FORE: 10.07 AM WRONG ADDRESS: $10.00. -N FUEL CHARGE: $1.28" 5 $18.94 4/17/2008 S APPLIED EARTHWORKS, INC D10010168826435 3292 E FLORIDA AVE EUELCHARGE;-$1.21 4/17/2008 S - APPLIED EARTHWORKS, INC D10010168830581 515 E OCEAN AVE FUEUCRAMETS1.21 • 4/18/2008 S -KEITH WARREN —D100404-68943095--226--MAPLE-RD-,-- FUEL CHARGE: $1.21 4/18/2008 S VULCAN MATERIALS COMM! D1ObT0168943665 201 JOHN ST . . FUEL CHARGE: $1.21 -4/18/2008 - --FEDERATED INSURANCE ---- D10010168977276 . 83392 SAN ASIS FUEL CHARGE: $121 92544-4941 ft desk TOH HEMET 12:15 PM 0 $8.87 N 93436-6926 cust. contact 1697 LOMPOC 09:32 AM 91320-4720 f. door 1789 NEWBURV-F 08:56-AM 1 1 $8.87 —N 4/18/2008 S INNOVATIVE LAND CONCEPT •D10010168977557 51245 AVENIDA RUBIO ELIELCHARGE• $1.21 4/18/2008 5 IMPACT SCIENCES 93012-9459 lisa D10010168978349 803 CAMARILLO SPRINGS 1 CAMARILLO 09:59 AM —FUEL CHARGE:11:21- 4/18/2008 S RIVERSIDE CO. PLANNING DI 1 •4 0 N $8.87 93901-3345 fdoor SALINAS 10:25 AM • ' . • • 1789 0 - 92236-5532 - -DT00839000 front doo 1623 1 6 $8.87 COACHELLA 03:13 PM 0 N 92253-3095 per paul front door 1623 1 6 LA QUINTA 10:32 AM 0 N $8.87 1623 1 7 0 N $8.87 • : D100.10168978836-- 38686-EL-CERRITO RD FUEL CHARGE: $1.21 92211-1191 Elizabeth • 1623 • 1 6 $8.87 • PALM.DESEI - _O. .a • • _ 1641 -odc-1030po 8.87 1575 -odc-1030po 18.94 Approva):__ oArE. 17 _Adjustment DetailOTHER41, 1697 -odc-1030po 8.87 . 1789 -odc-1030po 17.74 l'FOUNi$ /0.7 6 y 1623 -odc-1030po 35.48 ' • 7205 17.74 Total Charges NetBill $107.64 n , f S=SUNRISE,_GESUNRISE.GOLD(PRIORITY)HFHEAVY_WEIGHTAtSATURDAY DEL,_ M=MONTHLY OROS. C=CALTRAK NVOICE AND STATEMENT PAYMENT DUE ON RECEIP PALE° ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Paleontologic Resource Management 2248 Winrock Avenue Altadena, CA 91001 -3205 626/797-9895 tel., fax paleo @earthlink.net 1731 New Hampshire Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714/241 -8880, 299 -4150 mroederl@earthlink.net April 9, 2008 Applied EarthWorks, Inc. Accounts Payable 1391 West Shaw Avenue, Suite C Fresno, CA 93711-3600 INVOICE 2007 -7 -10 (final) Bill for paleontologic monitoring program Vernon 266 Street Extension Period Covered: February 1 to April 9, 2008 Task 1: Monitorin Budget: Budget Used: Under Budget: 0015')6 S aZO t DES 4A 537.og $10,614.25 - 9,745.79 $868.46 Task 2: Sample Recovery/Processing, Fossil Treatment Salaries: Principal Investigator (E. Bruce Lander: 10.5 hours @ $81.75/hour): Senior Paleontologist (Lindsey T. Groves: 3 hours @ $73.00/hour): Supervisor (Mark A. Roeder: 2 hours @ $65.75/hour): Technician (David A. Alexander: 0 hours @ $50.00/hour): Technician (Gary T. Takeuchi: 16 hours @ $50.00/hour): Supplies: Reproduction: Postage /Shipping: Screening Machine Use (0 hours @ $15.00/hour): LACMIP/LACMVP Storage Fees: Mileage (120 mi @ $0.485/mi): Subtotal: $858.38 219.00 131.50 0.00 800.00 47.03 65.97 4.60 0.00 350.00 60.60 52,537.08 Budget: Budget Used: Over Budget: $16,153.70 - 16.921.81 - $768.11 Task 1 & Task 2 Budgets: Budget Used: Under Budget: $26,767.95 - 26.766.96 $0.99 TOTAL: $2,537.08 Please make check payable to Paleo Environmental Associates, Inc. and remit to Altadena address. Thank you. ft/ atural History of Los Angeles County Billing Address: Paleo Enviromental Associates 550 High Street Suite 108 Auburn, CA 95603 USA Invoice 4/4/2008 NH00300 Remit Payment to: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Finance Department 900 Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90007 (213). 763 -3443 Comment: Attn.: Dr. Bruce E. Lander Storage of invertebrate fossils (volume of one Lane cabinet drawer) from the 26th Street Extension Project, Vernon, CA (cataloged as LACMIP localities 17869 and 17870). [R &C Programs, #1 -1 -1- 162 - 000 :3500.] Description of Charge IP080404A (4- 4 -08). Quantity Unit Price Amount Sales Tax Payment Terms: Net 30 Days Pleasa'Ieturn stub with payinont Customer Name Paleo Enviromental Associates Description IP080404A (4 -4-08). 1 $200.00 Sales Tax: Total: Invoice Number Invoice Date Quantity Unit Price ■ $200.00 NH00300 4/4/2008 Amount $0.00 $200.00 Please Remit to: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Finance Department 900 Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90007 (213) 763 -3443 1 $200.00 Tote Amount Due... Due Date $200.00 $200.00 5/4/2008 atural His to use um of Los Angeles County Billing Address: Paleo Enviromental Associates 550 High Street Suite 108 Auburn, CA 95603 USA Invoice 4/4/2008 NH00304 Remit Payment to: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Finance Department 900 Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90007 (213) 763-3443 Comment: Attn.: Dr. E. Bruce Lander Permanent curation and storage of one (1) collection of approx. 37 vertebrate fossils from paleontological salvage mitigation for the Vernon 26th Street Extension, Los Angeles County. [R &C EIR #1 -1 -1- 164 - 000:3500] Description of Charge VP080404A (4- 4 -08). Quantity Payment Terms: Net 30 Days Please return stub with payment Customer Name Paleo Enviromental Associates Description VP080404A (4- 4 -08). Unit Price Amount Sales Tax $150.00 Sales Tax: Total: Invoice Number Invoice Date Quantity Unit Price $150.00 NH00304 4/4/2008 Amount $0.00 $150.00 Please Remit to: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Finance Department 900 Exposition Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90007 (213) 763 -3443 1 $150.00 Tota Amount Due... Due Date $150.00 $150.00 5/4/2008 SAN DIEGO NATURA..iL HISTORY MUSEUM BALBOA PARK - SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY - ESTABLISHED 1874 1 February 2008 Mr. Mark A. Roeder 1731 New Hampshire Costa Mesa, CA 92626 RE: Paleontological Curation; Vernon Invoice No. 03363 Curation Costs Curation supplies (at cost) Trays Vials $ 32.20 14.83 Total: S 47.03 Payment should be made to: San Diego Natural History Museum P.O. Box 121390 San Diego, CA 92112 -1390 Post Office Box 121390 • San Diego, California 92112 -1390 • Telephone 619-232-3821 • FAX 619 - 232 -0248 • www.sdnhm.org CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTRACT EXTRA ORDER NO. 1 SUPPLEMENT NO. PROJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement off- 051 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation REQUESTED BY: City of Vernon CONTRACT NO. 575 CONSULTANT You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract. CONTRACT AMOUNT ADDITION The City of Vernon and Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation. herein agree to the adjustments in compensation of the following work: Increase contract unit costs by a cost of living increase of 4.5% for 11/2 years in the amount not to exceed $32,848.00 (Thirty Two Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Eight dollars) due to the delay in the construction contract. Furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required to provide archaeological and paleontological monitoring services in the amount not exceed $30,700.00 (Thirty Thousand Seven Hundred dollars) according to your proposal dated January 4, 2007. Contract Amount (Base Bid) $ 729,962.00 Amount of This Change Order $ 63 548.00 Amount of Previous Change Orders $ 0 Total Change Orders $ 63,548.00 Modified Contract Amount $ 793, 510.00 By reason of this order the time of None completion will be adjusted as follows: Approved: Dir- • •f onununity Services & Water We the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown above. Date: 3 -1 f--(17 Accepted: Date: jj l Contractor: By: Title: fryt 4vret Ct.0 TO: FROM: DATE: January 31, 2007 SUBJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract 575 — Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) — Contract Change Order No. 1 /' //1/ x J'9// �`/ ufu7 7 �' RAC Ufl M �3 /7/�, f `�H0P52007 COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTM ERK'S OFFICE OFFICE MEMORANDUM Eric Fresch, Acting City Administrator fECo NiMG gia Samuel Kevin Wilson, irector of Community Services & Water FL- 2 fnt 61 The City of Vernon awarded a consultant contract for construction inspection and project management services to LAN in May 2005 for the 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract No. 575. The project construction was to have started in August 2005 and been completed in August 2006, however, the City of Vernon discovered that the existing Exxon -Mobil Gasoline Line was in direct conflict with the construction. Exxon -Mobil was requested to relocate their gasoline line and the City of Vernon was required to wait until this relocation was completed because the relocated gasoline line impacted the method by which the bridge and stormwater wet well were to be constructed. The relocation was completed and a record drawing was received in December 2006. The project was bid and awarded to Powell Constructors, Inc. with a new start date of early February 2007. The delay has caused an increase in the contract unit costs for LAN and they have requested a cost of living adjustment. Based upon the Consumer Price Indexes for Los Angeles- Riverside -Orange counties, the rate of increase for the period May 2005 through December 2006 was 4.5%. I recommend the increase of 4.5% o to the unit costs of the contract to LAN which will increase their contract amount from a not to exceed $729,962.00 to a not to exceed $762,810.00. In addition, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program approved as part of the Environmental Impact Report for this project required the employment of an archaeological/paleontological consultant during the excavation of any of the underground construction. LAN has secured the services of a firm, Applied Earthworks, that will provide these services on as needed basis at a not to exceed cost of $30,700.00. LAN will effectively coordinate the inspection monitoring with Applied Earthworks instead of having a separate firm secured by the City of Vernon inspecting the site. I recommend adding this contract amount to the contract for LAN for the archaeological /paleontological services on an as needed basis. Please approve the attached Change Order No. 1 for LAN Engineering to reflect the Consumer Price Index increase and Archeological and Paleontological Monitoring costs. SKW /sn Enclosure CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTRACT EXTRA ORDER NO. 2 ocac1 SUPPLEMENT SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS NO. PROJECT: 26"' Street Bridge and Street Improvement CONTRACT NO. 575 TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation REQUESTED BY: City of Vernon CONSULTANT You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications on this contract. CONTRACT AMOUNT ADDITION The City of Vernon and Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation. herein agree to the adjustments in compensation of the following work: Furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required to provide archaeological and paleontological investigation and testing services in the amount not exceed $19,374.00 (Nineteen Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Four dollars) according to your proposal dated August 21, 2007. Contract Amount (Base Bid) Amount of This Change Order Amount of Previous Change Orders Total Change Orders Modified Contract Amount $ 729,962.00 $ 19,374.00 $ 63,548.00 $ 82,922.00 $ 812,884.00 By reason of this order the time of None completion will be adjusted as follows: Approved: Date: Ali --"7 Dire for . Communit Services & Water We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown above. o ? —(z -207 Accepted: Date: Contractor: By: Title: 11W Ereenl pouct PII- TO: FROM: DATE: c. 1 /'D /tea' /'- COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM Robert Toering, Executive Director Samuel Kevin WilsoI Iirector of Community Services & Water September 25, 2007 SUBJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract 575 — Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) — Contract Change Order No. 2 The City of Vernon awarded a consultant contract for construction inspection and project management services to LAN in May 2005 for the 26"' Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract No. 575. The archaeological /paleontological consultant who works under LAN, Applied Earthworks, has found artifacts during the excavation of the wet well and is required to investigate and determine the necessary actions to mitigate the impacts of these artifacts on the construction of the 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement. LAN Engineering has requested a change order in the amount of $19,374.00 to cover the costs of the investigation and mitigation for the archaeological /paleontological services. The City is required to complete this work to comply with the mitigation measures established for this project. Please approve the attached Change Order No. 2 for LAN Engineering. SKW /sn Enclosure o g - a Cl REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 SUPPLEMENT NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS P.O. NO. CONSULTANT PROJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation REQUESTED BY: City of Vernon You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the original scope of work of this agreement. Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the original agreement remain in full force and effect, and apply to the additional work as if said work was originally included in the agreement. CONTRACT AMOUNT ADDITION to the adjustments and oversight until One Thousand Five The City of Vernon and Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation herein agree in compensation of the following work: Furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required to provide additional inspection June 2008. The services shall be included in the amount not exceed $51,535.00 (Fifty Hundred Thirty Five dollars) according to your proposal dated February 11, 2007. Agreement Amount (Base Bid) $ 729,962.00 Amount of This Change Order $ 51,535.00 Amount of Previous Change Orders $ 82,922.00 Total Change Orders $ 134,457.00 Modified Agreement Amount $ 864,419.00 By reason of this change order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: Approved: Date: 1---i -03 _X7 Air r.- or o (Co munity Services & Water We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all labor, equipment and materials, including overhead, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Accepted Date: 0 (/'r 24--00 Consultant: Lim 0 Al(40 a �n:een V vr By: ` Title: l/ A G� /Prje-f I' �'"" c: Project File /Consultant/Purchasing tea° -/ /z/ COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Toering, Executive Director FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water DATE: February 25, 2008 SUBJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract 575 — Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) — Contract Change Order No. 3 The City of Vernon awarded a consultant contract for construction inspection and project management services to LAN and the construction has progressed steadily since the start of the work in February 2007. However, the delays caused by the discovery of So. Calif. Edison electrical lines, the addition of time to construct added features and the delay due to weather have increased the time of completion of this project by three months. The additional time and work will require LAN Engineering to provide the inspection and oversight for this time period. The costs for the additional work and time has been estimated by LAN Engineering to be $51,535.00 and they have requested a change order to add this amount to their contract. Please approve the attached Change Order No. 3 for LAN Engineering. SKW /sn Enclosure REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 SUPPLEMENT NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS PROJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation REQUESTED BY: City of Vernon P.O. NO. CONSULTANT You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the original scope of work of this agreement. Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the original agreement remain in full force and effect, and apply to the additional work as if said work was originally included in the agreement. CONTRACT AMOUNT ADDITION to the adjustments and oversight until in the amount not proposal dated May The City of Vernon and Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation herein agree in compensation of the following work: Furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required to provide additional inspection July 2008 and include project closeout and documentation. The services shall be included exceed $24,640.00 (Twenty Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty dollars) according to your 26, 2008. Agreement Amount (Base Bid) $ 729,962.00 Amount of This Change Order $ 24,640.00 Amount of Previous Change Orders $ 134,457.00 Total Change Orders $ 159,097.00 Modified Agreement Amount $ 889,059.00 By reason of this change order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: Approved: '/ Date: 6.-24 . og Director crt" y 'ervices & Water We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all labor, equipment and materials, including overhead, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Accepted Date: June 25, 2008 Consultant: Lim & Nascimento Engineering (LAN) By: Title: Project Manager / CEO c: Project File /Consultant /Purchasing City of Vernon Lim And Nascimento Engineering Corporation LAN Construction Field Office May 26, 2008 City of Vernon Department of Community Services 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Tel: (323) 583 -8811 Attention: Mr. Sherwood Natsuhara, P.E. Deputy Director of Community Services 26th Street Extension Project City of Vernon Subject: LAN BUDGET PROPOSAL — CHANGE ORDER REQUEST NO. 4 Dear Mr. Natsuhara: Per our previous discussion, LAN is requesting a change order for the estimated cost increase for LAN budget due to the extension of anticipated completion of the 26th Street Extension Project, June 30, 2008. The cost estimate for this change is $24,640. If you have questions or comments, please contact me at (949) 768 -8888 or Kevin Tran at (951) 712 -0800. Sincerely, Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation Peter Lim, PE Project Manager cc: File 1 of 1 City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS From May 1, 2008 to Completion, Jun 30, 2008 N ti 9 d' M CA L) CY) L() CA Cr) CA N l'.-- Ea CO. Ef} $864,419 $763,800 $100,619 $125,259 $24,640 Initial Contract Amount Change Order No.1 (Cost of Living Adjustment + Environmental Monitoring) Change Order No.2 (Environmental Monitoring) Change Order No.3 (LAN additional fee to June 2, 2008) Total Contract Authorized Amount Total Cost Expended Ending April 30, 2008 Budget Remaining Ending April 30, 2008 Estimated Budget Required to Project Completion, Jun 31, 2008 Request for Change Order No.4 City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS BY HOURS PER MONTH uoneina uoi }ona}suoa awnssv O H N O cv co - N 0 CO O O co O co co uoi }ona }suoa }sod 0 Budget Expended= $763,800 CO 0 0 N ti 01 CO co O CO N ti CO O O O N CO O CO O O O O N ti O 0 N r C O 2 G) E Z Peter Lim, PE Kevin Tran, PE E co 2 Mike Travis Grace Elarmo S &T /Sequoia Consultants Applied Earth Coast Surveying Classification Project Manager Resident Engineer Assistant Resident Enginner Specialty Inspector Administrative Aide Materials Tester /CWI Archeology & Paleotology 3 Man Crew: Party Chief SUB -TOTAL PERSONNEL Note: (1): During the Construction Phase, most of PM time and efforts will be on company OH payroll City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS From May 1, 2008 to Jun 30, 2008 _ To I N Ef} O o N on ap $31,713.50 $12,315.20 O O oo O Ef} O O co 0) EA $117,463.34 $110,503.34 Loaded Rates (all inclusive) $200.22 0 CO ti ,r. Ef} $133.25 $153.94 $52.00 0 0 co Eft 00.0L$ Hours N 000 d- CO CO 0) w E co Z Peter Lim, PE Kevin Tran, PE Matt Smith Mike Travis Grace Elarmo S &T /Sequoia Consultants Applied Earth Coast Surveying SUB -TOTAL PERSONNEL LAN Labor (less Materials Tester & Arch /Paleo) Classification Project Manager Resident Engineer Assistant Resident Engineer Specialty Inspector Administrative Aide Materials Tester /CWI Archeology & Paleotology 3 Man Crew: Party Chief City of Vernon 26th Street Extension TOTAL EA (A EFT 0 0 O o Ef3 �$ 1,200.00 o o O o co b4 0 0 0 lb r N ER S&T /Sequoia 0 0 0 LO 0 69 $650.00 Coast Surveying 0 0 o co ER 0 O 0 O M V? z J N $1,200.00 o 0 0 O O N- Quantity Included in Billing Rate Included in Billing Rate Included in Billing Rate 10 06 TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS Unit Cost 0 0 O CD C•1 CO- 4- C Days Days LS DESCRIPTIONS Vehicle Usage (Pick -Up Truck) Communication Equipment (Cellular Phone) Monthly Cellular Charges (2 Inspectors + RE) Rental Vehicle for Material Testers (Sequoia) Per Diem (Mike Travis) MISCELLANEOUS ODC 0 z City of Vernon 26th Street Extension 00 O O N O M a) 7 O 00 O O N A E O L U 0 0 m J TOTAL co O O Cfl I` 64 O O O O co L6 64 ' 64 O O O r O N 0)- $ 645.50 $ 125,258.84 U 0 0 $ 650.00 O O O in 0) O 10 f— d' 64 0 O O 0 N r' 0 Lo N C) %-• N LABOR 00'096`9 $ 0 0 0 cc a 6), $ 598.00 $ 123,061.34 Coast Surveying Others Miscellaneous SUBCONSULTANT ADMINSTRATION FEE (5 %) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Toering, Executive Director FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson,birector of Community Services & Water DATE: June 26, 2008 SUBJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract 575 — Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) — Contract Change Order No. 4 The City of Vernon awarded a consultant contract for construction inspection and project management services to LAN and the construction has progressed steadily since the start of the work in February 2007. However, the additional delays caused by the weather, additional work and site conditions have increased the time of completion of this project by one month through June 2008. The additional time and work will require LAN Engineering to provide the inspection and oversight for this time period. The costs for the additional work and time has been estimated by LAN Engineering to be $24,640.00 and they have requested a change order to add this amount to their contract. Enclosed is the attached Change Order No. 4 for LAN Engineering for your records. SKW /sn Enclosure REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF VERNON COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 SUPPLEMENT NO. SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS PROJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Imrprovement P.O. NO. TO: Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation CONSULTANT REQUESTED BY: City of Vernon You are hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the original scope of work of this agreement. Except as specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the original agreement remain in full force and effect, and apply to the additional work as if said work was originally included in the agreement. The City of Vernon and Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation herein agree to the adjustments in compensation of the following work: Furnish all labor, equipment, and materials required to provide additional inspection and oversight through August 2008 and include project closeout and documentation. The services shall be included in the amount not exceed $16,946.00 (Sixteen Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Six dollars) according to your proposal dated August 12, 2008. (Resolution No. 8735) Agreement Amount (Base Bid) $ 729,962.00 Amount of This Change Order $ 16,946.00 Amount of Previous Change Orders $ 159,097.00 Total Change Orders $ 176,043.00 Modified Agreement Amount $ 906,005.00 By reason of this change order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: t Approved: Date: e- 2 1 -Oa Direc it r Co mum y Services & Water We, the undersigned Consultant, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, labor, equipment and materials, including overhead, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the will accept as full payment therefore the prices shown above. Accepted Date: Sl / If /0 Consultant: L JM L NIA S C. � that we will provide all work above specified, and CA- S - h Aer' 1 By: ie,f/ve C -O Title: CO h ftrb a fe/Y' c: Project File /Consultant /Purchasing ev. uoiue City of Vernon Lim And Nascimento Engineering Corporation LAN Construction Field Office August 12, 2008 City of Vernon Department of Community Services 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Tel: (323) 583 -8811 Attention: Mr. Sherwood Natsuhara, P.E. Deputy Director of Community Services 26th Street Extension Project City of Vernon Subject: LAN BUDGET PROPOSAL — CHANGE ORDER REQUEST NO. 5, Dear Mr. Natsuhara: LAN is requesting a change order for the estimated cost increase for LAN budget due to the extension of anticipated completion of the 26th Street Extension Project, August 25, 2008. The cost estimate for this change is $16,946. If you have questions or comments, please contact me at (949) 768 -8888 or Kevin Tran at (951) 712 -0800. Sincerely, Lim & Nascimento Engineering Corporation Peter Lim, PE Project Manager cc: File 1 of 1 c c O O 2 .2 L u) c 45 X O w > 4.• 61) L a•+ N BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS From August 8, 2008 to Completion, August 30, 2008 d:' ti M dam- l[) co L!) CO co so, N N- d' N- $889,059 $885,425 $3,634 $20,580 , o) Cfl EA- Initial Contract Amount Change Order No.1 (Cost of Living Adjustment + Environmental Monitoring) Change Order No.2 (Environmental Monitoring) Change Order No.3 (LAN additional fee to June 2, 2008) Change Order No.4 (LAN additional fee to Jun 30, 2008) Total Contract Authorized Amount Total Cost Expended August 8, 2008 Budget Remaining Ending August 8, 2008 Estimated Budget Required to Project Completion,August 30, 2008 Request for Change Order No.5 City of 'Vernon 26th Street Extension Project BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS From May 1, 2008 to Jun 30, 2008 Total d0. o O 0) o d, rn co I $20,579.80 O co oi ~ to N LLoaded Rates (all inclusive) N N O O N Eft 0 C0 !. .4- N-- 69 $133.25 $153.94 $52.00 $87.00 00'0L$ Hours O N r M M d E as z Peter Lim, PE Kevin Tran, PE Matt Smith Mike Travis Grace Elarmo S &T /Sequoia Consultants Applied Earth Coast Surveying SUB -TOTAL PERSONNEL LAN Labor (less Materials Tester & Arch /Paleo) 1 Classification Project Manager Resident Engineer Assistant Resident Engineer Specialty Inspector Administrative Aide Materials Tester/CWI Archeology & Paleotology 3 Man Crew: Party Chief City of Vernon 26th Street Extension Project BUDGET PROPOSAL: PERSONNEL EFFORTS BY HOURS PER MONTH uoneina uogon.nsuo9 awnssv a) C uonon.nsuo0 isod Budget Expended= $763,800 CO 0) E z Peter Lim, PE 0 c 0) E F- 0 E a) Es S &T /Sequoia Consultants Coast Surveying Classification Project Manager Resident Engineer Resident Enginner Specialty Inspector Administrative Aide Materials Tester /CWI Archeology & Paleotology 3 Man Crew: Party Chief SUB -TOTAL PERSONNEL Note: (1): During the Construction Phase, most of PM time and efforts will be on company OH payroll COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Toering, Executive Director FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water DATE: August 21, 2008 SUBJECT: 26th Street Bridge and Street Improvement, Contract 575 — Lim and Nascimento Engineering Corporation (LAN) — Contract Change Order No. 5 The City of Vernon awarded a consultant contract for construction inspection and project management services to LAN and the construction has progressed steadily since the start of the work in February 2007. However, the additional delays caused by additional work and site conditions have increased the time of completion of this project through August 2008. The additional time and work will require LAN Engineering to provide the inspection and oversight for this time period. The costs for the additional work and time has been proposed by LAN Engineering to be $16,946.00 and they have requested a change order to add this amount to their contract. I have enclosed the attached Change Order No. 5 for LAN Engineering for your records. SKW /sn Enclosure