Resolution No. 100521
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 10,052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VERNON ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 7910
WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the Government Code requires the
governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution,
an appropriations limit for each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2008-
2009 was $283,390,896; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California passed
Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990; and
WHEREAS, under Proposition 111, a City is allowed to use
either (a) the change in California Per Capita,income from the
preceding year or (b) the percentage change in the local assessment
roll from the preceding year due to increases in nonresidential
1construction; and
WHEREAS, the documentation used in the determination of the
appropriations limit provided for herein has been made available for
inspection by the public fifteen (15) days prior to this meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
intends to establish the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2009-
2010.
NOW,- THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
establishes $304,135,110 as the amount of the appropriations limit for
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
the fiscal year 2009-2010 in accordance with the provisions of
Proposition 111. The computation is attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated by reference.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon approved
a budget by adopting Resolution No. 10,051 on August 26, 2009, which
will not exceed the appropriations limit for the 2009-2010 fiscal year.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
declares that the budget established by Resolution No. 10,051 complies
with the requirements of Government Code Sections 7900, et seq.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall
certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and
the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and
her certification to be entered in the Book of Resolutions of the
Council of this City.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2009.
ATTEST:
MANUELA GIRON, C ty Clerk
Hilar_io Gonzales
Name:
Title: Mayor '
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
f
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, MANUELA GIRON, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 10,052, was
duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Vernon at a special meeting of the City Council duly held on Wednesday,
August 26, 2009, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or Mayor
Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon.
Ik
Executed this day of August, 2009, at Vernon,
California.
(SEAL)
A"�� A-�l
MANUELA GIRON, City. Clerk
- 3 -
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE
GOVERNMENT CODE
A. CALCULATION OF BASE YEAR 1978-79
STEP 1.
1. Proceeds from Taxes
Property taxes
1,061,619
Other taxes
4,890,969
Investment earnings
302,913
Revenue for Other -Agencies 831,739
Less: Railroad Crossing Grant 9,277
822,462
'Sub -Total
7,077,963
Contribution from Enterprise Fund
1,549,490
Miscellaneous 5,306 TOTAL 8,632,759
2. Non -Proceeds from Taxes
A. User Fees by Function
Public Works
Construction Permits
121,551
Streets & Curbs
1,604
Engineering Services
82,706
SUB -TOTAL
123,155
Health
Food Vehicle Permits
15,516
Public Health Permits
47,578
SUB -TOTAL
63,094
Police
Police Services
5,944
SUB -TOTAL
186,249
SUB -TOTAL
88,650
TOTAL USER FEES
274,899
EXHIBIT "A"
A-1
Page 2 of 10
2. B. Interfund Service Charges -0-
C. Cost -Reimbursement Items -0-
D. Donations and Grants (non -State)
Railroad Crossing Grant %277
E. Exempt Revenues - (Mandated Cost
Reimbursement, Fines, Proceeds from
Bond Issues)
Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties 67,383
TOTAL NON PROCEEDS FROM TAXES (2) 351,479
TOTAL 1 AND 2 8,984,238
STEP 2
1. Match Cost to User Fees.
2. Revenues less than Costs.
3. No portion of User Fees considered
"Proceeds of Taxes"
STEP 3
1. All Revenues of the City 8,984,238
2. Non Proceed of Taxes -351,479
3. User. Fees in excess,of Costs + -0-
4. Less Debt Service Appropriations - -0-
8,632,759
STEP 4
f. Total all actual Appropriations,
as amended for 1978-79 . 8,586;750
Transfers to Reserves . 3,988,675
1978-79 Total Appropriations 12,575,425
2. Subtract Non Proceeds of Taxes 351,479
BASE YEAR LIMIT (1978-79) 12,223,946
B. 1979-80 APPROPRIATION
1978-79 Appropriation Limit $12,223,946
CPI change 10.17%
Vernon population change 1.15%
1.017X1.0115=1.11437
.1979-80 Appropriation Limit $12,223,946 X 1.11437=13,621,999
EXHIBIT "A"
A-2
Page 3 of 10
C. 1980-81 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1979-80 Appropriation Limit $13,621,999
CPI change 12.11%
Vernon population change -1.14%
1.1211 X .9886 = 1.1083
1980-81 Appropriation Limit $13,621,999 X 1.1083 = $15,097,261
D. 1981-82 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1980-8-1 Appropriation Limit $15,097,261
Per Capita income change 9.12%
Vernon population change 4.60%
1:0912 X 1.0460 = 1.1414
1981-82 Appropriation Limit $15,097,261 X 1.1414 = $17,232,014
E. 1982-83 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1981-82 Appropriation Limit $17,232,014
Per Capita income change 6.79%
Vernon population change -4.35%
1.0679 X .9565 = 1.0214464
1982-83 Appropriation Limit $17,232,014 X1.0214464=$17,601,578
F. 1983-84 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1982-83 Appropriation Limit $17,601,578
Per Capita income change 2.35%
Vernon population change 2.30%
1.0235 X 1.0230 = 1.0470
1983-84 Appropriation Limit $17,601,578 X 1.0470 = $18,428,852
G. 1984-95 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1983-84 Appropriation Limit $18,428,852
Per Capita income change. 4.74%
Vernon population change -5.37%
1.0475 X .9463 = .9912
1984.-85 Appropriation Limit $18,428,852 X .9912 = $18,266,678
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 4 of 10
H. 1985-86 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1984-85 Appropriation Limit $18,266,678 .
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.74%
Vernon population change -3.46%
1.0374 X .9654 = 1.0017 '
1985-86 Appropriation Limit $18,266,678 X 1.0017 = $18,297,731
I. 1986-87 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1985-96 Appropriation Limit $18,297,731
U.S. Consumer price index change 2.30%
Vernon population change 6.17%
1.0230 X 1.o617 = 1.0861
1986-87 Appropriation Limit $18,297,731 X 1.0861 = $19,873,166
J. 1987-88 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1986-87 Appropriation Limit $19,873,166
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.04%
Los Angeles County population change 1.91 %
1.0304 X 1.0191 = 1.051
1987-88 Appropriaton Limit $19,873,166 X 1.0501 = $20,868,812
K. 1988-89 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1987-88 Appropriation Limit $20,868,812
U.S. Consumer price index change 3:93%
Los Angeles County population change 1.62%
1.0393 X 1.0162 = 1.0562
1988-89 Appropriation Limit $20,868,812 X 1.0562 = $22,041,639
L. 1989-90 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1988-89 Appropriation Limit $22,041,639
U.S. Consumer price index change 4.98%
Los Angeles County population change 1.14%
1.0498 X 1.0114 = 1.0618
1989-90 Appropriation Limit $22,041,639 X 1.0618 = $23,403,812
EXHIBIT "A"
A-4
Page 5 of 10
M. 1990-91 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1989-90 Appropriation Limit $23,403,812
Per Capita income change 4.21 %
Los Angeles County population change 1.36%
1.0421 X 1.0136 = 1.0563
1990-91 Appropriation Limit $23,403,812 X 1.0563 = $24,721,447
N. 1991-92 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1990-91 Appropriation Limit $24,721,447
Per Capita income change 4.14%
Los Angeles County population change 1.73%
1.0414 X 1.0173 = 1.0595
1991-92 Appropriation Limit $24,721,447 X 1.0595 = $26,192,373
------------
O. 1992-93 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1991-92 Appropriation Limit $26,192,373
Increase in Nonresidential. construction 32.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.49%
1.3224 X 1.0149 = 1.3421
1992-93 Appropriation Limit $26,192,373 X 1.3421 = $35,152,784
P. 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1992-93 Appropriation Limit $35,152,784
Per Capita income change 2.72%
Los Angeles County population change .96%
1.0272 X 1.0096 = 1.0371
1993-94 Appropriation Limit $35,152,784 X 1.0371 = $36,456,952
EXHIBIT "A"
A-5
Page 6 of 10
Q. 1994-95 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1993-94 Appropriation Limit $36,456,952
Increase in nonresidential construction 4.84%
Los Angeles County population change .75%
1.0484 X 1.0075 = 1.056217
1994-95 Appropriation Limit $36,456,952 X 1.05627 = $38,508,385
R. 1995-96 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1994-95 Appropriation Limit $38,508,385
Per Capita Income change 4.72%
Los Angeles County population change .33%
1.0472 X 1.0033 = 1.0507
1995-96 Appropriation Limit $38,508,385 X 1.0507 = $40,460,760
S. 1996-97 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1995-96 Appropriation Limit $40,460,760
Per Capita Income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change .48%
1.0467 X 1.0048 = 1.0517
1996-97 Appropriation Limit $40,460,760 X 1.0517 = $42,552,581
T. 1997-98 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1996-97 Appropriation Limit $42,552,581
Per Capita Income change 4.67%
Los An County population change 1.24%
1.0467 X 1.0124 = 1.0597
1997-98 Appropriation Limit $42,552,581 X 1.0597 = $45,092,970
EXHIBIT "A"
A-6
Page 7 of 10
U. 1998-99 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1997-98 Appropriation Limit $45,092,970
Increase in nonresidential construction 9.91%
Los Angeles County population change 1.39%
1.0991 •X 1.0139 = 1.11
1998-99 Appropriation Limit $45,092,970 X 1.11 = $50,053,197
V. 1999-2000 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1998-99 Appropriation Limit $50,053,197
Increase in nonresidential construction 15.35%
Los Angeles County population change 1.78%
1.1535 X 1.0178 = 1.17
1999-2.000 Appropriation Limit $50,053,197 X 1.17 = _$58.562.240
W. 2000-2001 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1999-2000 Appropriation Limit $58,562,240
Increase in nonresidential construction 10.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.7.5%
1.1024 X 1.0175 = 1.1217
2000-2001. Appropriation Limit $58,562,240 X 1..1217 $65.689.265
X. 2001-2002 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit $65,689,265
Increase in nonresidential construction 25.96%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.2596 X 1.0166 = 1.2805
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit $65,689,265 X 1.2805 _$84.115.104
EXHIBIT "A"
A-7
Page 8 of 10
Y. 2002-2003 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit $ 84,115,104
Increase in nonresidential construction 27.25%
Los Angeles County population change 1.77%
1.2725 X 1.0177 = 1.2950
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit $84,115,104 x 1.2950 _ $108.929.060
Z. 2003-2004 APPROPRIATION L11VHT CALCULATION
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit $108,929,060
Increase in nonresidential construction 19.80%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.1980 X 1.0166 = 1.2179
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit $108,929,060xl.2179 = �132.664.702
AA. 2004-2005 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit $132,664,702
Increase in nonresidential construction 22.03%
Los Angeles County population change 1.38%
1.2203 X 1.0138 = 1.2371
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit $132,664,702 x 1.2371 = $164.119.503
BB. 2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118 = 1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503 x 1.0650 = $174.787.271
EXHIBIT "A"
A-8
Page 9 of 10
BB. 2005 2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118 = 1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503 x 1.0650 = $174JU 271
CC. 2006-2007 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit $174,787,271
Increase in Non-residential construction 29.41 %
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.2941 x 1.0078 = 1.3042
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit $174,787,271 x 1.3042 = $ 227 57.559
DD. 2007-2008 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit $227,957,559
Increase in Non-residential construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change .72%
1.0944 x 1.0072 = 1.1023
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit $227,957,559 x 1.1023 = $251.277.617
EE. 2008-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit $251,277,617
Increase in Non-residential construction 11.82%
Los Angeles County population change .86%
1.1182 x 1.0086 = 1.1278
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit $251,277,617 x 1.1278 = $283,390,896
EXHIBIT "A"
A-9
FF. 2009-2010 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit $283,390,896
Increase in Non-residential construction 6.36%
Los Angeles County population change .90%
1.0636 x 1.0090 = 1.0732
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit $283,390,896 x 1.0732 = $304.135.110
EXHIBIT "A"
A-10
Page 1 of 1
Medina, Krystal
From: Medina, Krystal
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:04 AM
To: Barrett, Sharon; Burnett, Rory; Leon., Joaquin; Higa, Masami
Cc: Juarez, Debbie
Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 10,052-ADOPTING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR
ENDING JUNE 30, 2010
Attachments: Resolution No. 10,052.pdf
Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 10,052, approved by the City Council on August 26, 2009,
adopting an appropriations limit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010 pursuant to Government Code Section
7910.
Thank you,
Krystal Medina
9/2/2009
CITY CLERK DISTRIBUTION
AUG 2 4 2009VVA
C11Y CLERK'S OFFICE STAFF REPORT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT.
DATE: August 24, 2009
TO: Honorable Mayor and City CouncAvs�m
FROM: Rory Burnett, Director of Finance
RE: Fiscal Year 2009 2010 Appropriations Limit
The appropriations limit for fiscal year 2008-2009 was established by City Council in the
amount of $283,390,896.
Based on all the documentation used to calculate the City's appropriations limit for fiscal
year 2009-2010, it has been determined that the appropriationslimit for the City's be
established in the amount of $304,135,110.
The notice indicating that documentation used in the determination of the appropriations
limit provided for herewith has been available for inspection by the public was posted.
Recommendation:
The City Administrator and the Finance Director are hereby recommending that the
City's Appropriation Limit for fiscal year 2009-2010 be established in the amount of
$304,135,110.
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit Calculation 5/12/09
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit $283,390,896
Increase in Non-residential construction 6.36%
-LosAngeles County population change .90%
1.0636 x 1.0090 = 1.0732
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit $283,390,896 x 1.0732 = $304,135,110
Calculation prepared by Sharon L. Duckworth .�
Calculation verified -by Rory Burnett&—�g
^86-MuN2009 01:20pm From -ASSESSOR EXC
+ f
A
x kx
RICK AUERBACH
ASSESSOR
E 020
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELEE
OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR
50.0 W. TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANCELES, CALIFORNIA 90012,2770
Mpylossesstw. a0.la.ss: w
May 5, 2009
T-719 P.002/003 F-009
Ms. Sharon Duckworth
City Treasurer
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California .90058
Dear Ms. Duckworth:
Your agency, the .Ciity of Vernon, in order to effect an adjustment of its Gann Limit,
has req>uosted.. that. the Assessor's Office supply Aw perc6ntage change in total
assessed valuation for the city over that of the preceditg year, due to nonresidential
new construction.:
For the . City of ,.Vernon, the 2008-2009 net a in nonresidential new
construction, applicable to the 2009-2010 budget, i,.6 a:
If we. can be of f ether service, please call Ventura 66n6a at (213) 974-9221.
Very truly yours,
Dan Kinoshita
Senior Information Systems Analyst
Research and Development.
DK:mf
fvNT p�
aI i
CA��FC0.N�� r I N A N C E 91 5 L STREET 0 SACRAMENTO CA N 9581 R-3706 ■ WWW.DDF.CA.GCV
May 2009
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
The California Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 2227,•mandates the Department of Finance
(Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each
local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2009, in conjunction
with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year
2009-2010. Enclosure I provides the change in California's per capita personal income and an example
for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2009-2010
.appropriations limit. Enclosure II provides city and unincorporated county population percentage
changes, and Enclosure IIA provides county and incorporated areas summed population percentage
changes. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state'institutionalized populations
and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and Taxation
Code, Section 2228, for further information regarding the appropriation limit. You can access the Code
from the following website:"htto://www.leainfo.c6.aov/calaw.html" check box: "Revenue and Taxation
Code" and enter 2228 for the search term to learn more about the various population change factors
available to special districts to calculate their appropriations limit. Article XIII B. Section 9(C), of the
State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate.
Consult the following website: "http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.constt.article_13B" for additional information.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation -as part
of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on,this issue should be referred to their
respective county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself. No state agency
reviews the local appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation Code
Section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the
current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to
the State Controller by June 1, 2009.
Please Note: Prior year's city population estimates may be revised.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit
at (916) 323-4086.
MICHAEL C. GENEST
Director
By:
ANA J. MATOSANTOS'
Chief Deputy Director
Enclosure
Fiscal Year 2009-201-0
May 2009
Enclosure I
A. Price Factor Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their
cost -of -living factor.to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing
body. The cost -of -living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the
percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage
change to be used in setting the 2009-2010 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2009-2010 0.62
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a.2009-2010
appropriation limit.
2009-2010:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 0.62 percent
Population. Change = 1.11 percent
Per Capita .Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 0.62 + 100 - = 1.0062
100
Population converted to a ratio: 1.11 + 100 = 1.0111
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2009-2010:
1.0062 x 1.0111 = 1.0174
Fiscal:Year 2009-2010
Enclosure 11
Annual Percent Change in Population
Minus Exclusions
January 1, 2008 to January 1, 2009 and Total Population, January 1, 2009
Total
County
Percent Change
--- Population Minus Exclusions--amExclusions-=am
Population
City
2008-2009
1-1-08
1-1.09
10-2009
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills
0.58
23,203
23,337
23,337
Alhambra
0.47
88,754
89,171
89,171
Arcadia
0.67
56,169
56,547
56,547
Artesia
0.55
17,455
17,551
17,551
Avalon
0.80
3,512
3.540
3,540
Azusa
0.94
48,475
48,932
48,932.
Baldwin Park,
0.40
81,122
81,445
81,445
Bell
0.56
38,543
38,759
38,759
Bellflower
0.63
76,713
77,194
77,194
Bell Gardens
0.62
46,499
46,786
46,786
Beverly Hills
0.88
35,774
36,090
36,090
Bradbury
1.17
942
953
953
Burbank
0.62
107,412
108,082
108,082
Calabasas
0.61
23,590
23,735
23,735
Carson
0.35
97,818
98,159
98,159
Cerritos
0.38
54,649
54,855
54,855
Claremont
1.95
37,057
37,780
37,780
Commerce
0.67
13,460
13,550
13,550
Compton
0.77
98,674
99,431
99.431
Covina
0.65
49,271
49,541
49,541
Cudahy
0.59
25,728
25,880
25,880
Culver City
0.48
40,464
40,657
40,657
Diamond Bar
0.65
60,015
60,407
60,407
Downey
0.65
112,735
113,469
113,469
Duarte
1.16
22,826 .
23,090
23,090
El Monte
0.78
125,336
126,308
126,308
ElSegundo
0.57
16,903
16,909
16,999
Gardena
0.62
61,430
61,810
61,810
Glendale
0.64
205,980
207,303
207,303
Glendora
0.78
52,067
52.474
62,474
Hawaiian Gardens
0.47
15,810
15,885 .'
15,885
Hawthorne
0.54
89,498
89,979
89,979 -
Hermosa Beach
0.33
19.426
19,491
19,491
Hidden Hills'
0.50
2.003
2,013
2,013
Huntington Park
0.38
64,374
64,617
64,617
Industry
0.38
794
797.
797
Inglewood
0.56
118,201
118,868
118,868
Irwindale
0.76
1,714
1,727
1,727
La Canada Flintridge 0.30
21,155
21.218
21,218
(`)_Exclusions Include residents on federal military Installations
and group quarters residents In state mental Institutions, state and federal
corredtlonal institutions and veteran homes.
Page 1
Fiscal Year 2009-2010
Enclosure II
- Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions.
January 1, 2008 to January 1, 2009 and Total Population, January 1, 2009
Total
County Percent Chanue --- Population Minus Exclusions --- Population
City 2008-2009 1-1-08 1.1-09 1-1-2009
La Habra Heights_
0.75.
6,165
6,151
6,151
Lakewood
0.61
83,005
83,508
83,508
Le Mirada
0.24
49,818
49,939
49,939
Lancaster
1.19
138,488
140,136
145,074.
La Puente
0.60
43,009
43,269
43,269
La Verne
0.36
33,858
33,981
33,981
Lawndale
0.74
33,346
33,593
33,593
Lomita
0.25
20,936
20,989
20,989
Long Beach
0.58
489,800
492,625
492,682
Los Angeles
1.09
4,017,760
4,061,730
4,065,585
Lynwood
0.60
72,740
73,174
73,174
Malibu
0.65
13,624
13,712
13,712
Manhattan Beach
1.11
36,315
36,718
36,718
Maywood
0.62
29,800
29,984
29,984
Monrovia
1.09
39,103
39,531
39,531
Montebello
0.58
65,291
65,667
65,667
Monterey Park
1.09
64,176
64,874
64874
Norwalk
0.48
108,250
108,768
109:567
Palmdale
3.51
146,209
151,346
151.346
Palos Verdes Estates
0.57
13,967•
14,046
14,046
Paramount
0.41
57,638
57,874
57,874
Pasadena
1.96
147,293
150.185
150,185
Pico Rivera
0.39
66,640
66,899
66,899
Pomona
0.47
162,201
162.961
163,408
Rancho Palos Verdes
0.16
42,720
42,800
42,800
Redondo Beach
0.82
67,099
67,646
67,646
Rolling Hills
0.66
13956.
1,969
1.969
Rolling Hills Estates
0.14
8,138
8,149
8,149
Rosemead
0.87
57,095
57,594
57,594
San Dimas
0.57
36,669
36,878
36,878
San Fernando
0.83
25,083
25,292
25,292
San Gabriel
0.72
42,521
42,829
42,829
San Marino
0.11
13,318
13,393
13,393
Santa Clarita
0.64
176,030
177,150
177,150
Santa Fe Springs
0.54
17,689
17,784
.17,784
Santa Monica
1.72
90,926
92,494
92,494
Sieira Madre
0.29
11,051
11,083
11,083
Signal Hill.
0.82
11,337
.11,430
11,430
South El Monte
1.58
22,264
22,615
22,615
South Gate_
0.53
102,225
102,770
102,770
South Pasadena
0.73
25.644
25,832
25,832 .
(`) Exclusions Include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents In state mental Institutions, state and federal
correctional Institutions and veteran homes.
Page 2
Fiscal Year 2009-2010
I
Enclosure it
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions
January 1, 2008 to January
1, 2009 and Total Population, January 1, 2009
Total
County
Percent Channe
--- Population Minus Exclusions ---
Population
City'
2008-2009
1.1.08
1.1.09
1.1-2009 .
Temple City
0.75
35,480
35,747
35,747
Torrance
0.67
148,115•
149,111
149,111
Vernon
0.00
95
95
95
Walnut
1.16
32,112
32,486
32,486
West Covina
0.56
112,022
112,648
112,648
West Hollywood
0.62
37,348
37,580
37,580
Westlake Village
0.50
8,814
8,858
8,858
Whittier
0.39
86,452
86,788
86,788
Unincorporated
1,082,750
1,091,340 ..
1,091,978
County Total
0.90
10,289,936
10,382,451
10,393.185
(') Exclusions include residents on federal military Installations and group quarters residents in state mental Institutions, state and federal
correctional institutions and veteran -homes.
Page 3
Page 9 of 9
BB. 2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118 = 1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503 x 1.0650 = 174.787.271
CC. 2006-2007 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit $174,787,271
Increase inNon-residential construction 29.41%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.2941 x 1.0078 = 1.3042
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit $174,787,271 x 1.3042 = $ 227.957.559
DD. 2007-2008 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit $227,957,559
Increase in Non-residential construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change .72%
1.0944 x 1.0072 = 1.1023
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit $227,957,559 x 1.1023 = $251,277.617
EE. 2008-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit $251,277,617
Increase in Non-residential construction 11.82%
Los Angeles County population change ..86%
1.1182 x 1.0086 = 1.1278
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit $251,277,617 x 1.1278 = $283.390.896
EXHIBIT "A"
A-9
CITY OF VERNON
PUBLIC NOTICE
ESTABLISHMENT OF APPROPRIATION LIMITATION
THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR 2009-2010 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
7910, SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT $ 304,135,110 FOR THE CITY OF VERNON, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF PROPOSITION 111 ADOPTED BY THE
VOTERS ON JUNE 5, 1990, AND EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1990.
THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THIS APPROPRIATION LIMIT WILL BE CONSIDERED
BY CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 29, 2009.
DOCUMENTATION USED IN DETERMINATION OF THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT IS
AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION BY THE PUBLIC AT THE VERNON CITY HALL,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA 90058,
MONDAY THRU THURSDAY, 7:00 A.M. TO 5:30 P.M.
MANUELA GIRON
CITY' CLERK
DATED: MAY 13, 2009
PUBLIC NOTICE
ESTABLISHMENT OF APPROPRIATION LIMITATION
THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR 2009-2010 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
7910, SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT $ 304,135,110 FOR THE CITY OF VERNON, IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF PROPOSITION I I I ADOPTED BY THE
VOTERS ON JUNE 5, 1990, AND EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1990.
THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THIS APPROPRIATION LIMIT WILL BE CONSIDERED
BY CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 29, 2009.
DOCUMENTATION USED INDETERMINATION OF THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT IS
AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION BY THE PUBLIC AT THE VERNON CITY HALL,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT, 4305 SANTA FE AVENUE, VERNON, CALIFORNIA 90058,
MONDAY THRU THURSDAY, 7:00 A.M. TO 5:30 P.M.
MANUELA GIR
CITYCLERK
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit Calculation 5/12/09
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit $283,390,896
Increase in Non-residential construction 6.36%
Los Angeles County population change .90%
1.0636 x 1.0090 = 1.0732
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit $283,390,896 x 1.0732 = $304,135,110
Calculation prepared by Sharon L. Duckworth -� -
Calculation verified by Rory Burnett
ENT 0A,
T
Z
W IIII n
o n,
* DEPARTMENT OF
C'11 IFCRN%P F I N A N C E
May 2009
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price and Population Information
ARNOLD 5CHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR
91 5 L STREET ■ SACRAMENTC CA ■ 9581 4-3706 ■ WWW.DOF.CA.GDV
Appropriations Limit
The California Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 2227, mandates the Department of Finance
(Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each
local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2009, in conjunction
with a change in the, cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year
2009-2010. Enclosure I provides the change in California's per capita personal income and an example
for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2009-2010
appropriations limit. Enclosure 11 provides city and unincorporated county population percentage
changes, and Enclosure IIA provides county and incorporated areas summed population percentage
changes. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations
and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and Taxation
Code, Section 2228, for further information regarding the appropriation limit. You can access the Code
from the following website:"http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.htmI" check box: "Revenue and Taxation
Code" and enter 2228 for the search term to learn more about the various population change factors
available to special districts to calculate their appropriations limit. Article XIII B, Section 9(C), of the
State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate.
Consult the following website: "http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13B" for additional information.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part
of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this issue should be referred to their
respective county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself. No state agency
reviews the local appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation Code
Section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the
current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to
the State Controller by June 1, 2009.
Please Note: Prior year's city population estimates may be revised.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit
at (916) 323-4086.
MICHAEL C. GENEST
Director
By:
ANA J. MATOSANTOS
Chief Deputy Director
Enclosure
Fiscal Year 2009-2010
May 2009
Enclosure I
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their
cost -of -living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing
body. The cost -of -living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the
percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage
change to be used in setting the 2009-2010 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2009-2010 0.62
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2009-2010
appropriation limit.
2009-2010:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 0.62 percent
Population Change = 1.11 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio
Population converted to a ratio:
Calculation of factor for FY 2009-2010:
0.62 + 100 = 1.0062
100
1.11 + 100 = 1.0111
100
1.0062 x 1.0111 = 1.0174
2
Fiscal Year 2009-2010
Enclosure II
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions
January 1, 2008 to January 1, 2009 and Total Population, January 1, 2009
Total
County Percent Change -- Population Minus Exclusions -- Population
C ity 2008-2009 1-1-08 1-1-09 1-1-2009
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills
0.58
23,203
23,337
23,337
Alhambra
0.47
88,754
89,171
89,171
Arcadia
0.67
56,169
56,547
56,547
Artesia
0.55
17,455
17,551
17,551
Avalon
0.80
3,512
3,540
3,540
Azusa
0.94
48,475
48,932
48,932
Baldwin Park
0.40
81,122
81,445
81,445
Bell
0.56
38,543
38,759
38,759
Bellflower
0.63
76,713
77,194
77,194
Bell Gardens
0.62
46,499
46,786
46,786
Beverly Hills
0.88
35,774
36,090
36,090
Bradbury
1.17
942
953
953
Burbank
0.62
107,412
108,082
108,082
Calabasas
0.61
23,590
23,735
23,735
Carson
0.35
97,818
98,159
98,159
Cerritos
0.38
54,649
54,855
54,855
Claremont
1.95
37,057
37,780
37,780
Commerce
0.67
13,460
13,550
13,550
Compton
0.77
98,674
99,431
99,431
Covina
0.55
49,271
49,541
49,541
Cudahy
0.59
25,728
25,880
25,880
Culver City
0.48
40,464
40,657
40,657
Diamond Bar
0.65
60,015
60,407
60,407
Downey
0.65
112,735
113,469
113,469
Duarte
1.16
22,826
23,090
23,090
El Monte
0.78
125,336
126,308
126,308
ElSegundo
0.57
16,903
16,999
16,999
Gardena
0.62
61,430
61,810
61,810
Glendale
0.64
205,980
207,303
207,303
Glendora
0.78
52,067
52,474
52,474
Hawaiian Gardens
0.47
15,810
15,885
15,885
Hawthorne
0.54
89,498
89,979
89,979
Hermosa Beach
0.33
19,426
19,491
19,491
Hidden Hills
0.50
2,003
2,013
2,013
Huntington Park
0.38
64,374
64,617
64,617
Industry
0.38
794
797
797
Inglewood
0.56
118,201
118,868
118,868
Irwindale
0.76
1,714
1,727
1,727
La Canada Flintridge
0.30
21,155
21,218
21,218
(') Exclusions include residents on federal military Installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal
correctional institutions and veteran homes.
3
Fiscal Year 2009-2010
Enclosure II
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions
January
1, 2008 to January 1, 2009 and Total Population, January 1, 2009
Total
County
Percent Change
-- Population Minus Exclusions --
Population
City
2008-2009
1-1-08
1-1-09
1-1-2009
La Habra Heights
0.75
6,105
6,151
6,151
Lakewood
0.61
83,005
83,508
83,508
La Mirada
0.24
49,818
49,939
49,939
Lancaster
1.19
138,488
140,136
145,074
La Puente
0.60
43,009
43,269
43,269
La Verne
0.36
33,858
33,981
33,981
Lawndale
0.74
33,346
33,593
33,593
Lomita
0.25
20,936
20,989
20,989
Long Beach
0.58
489,800
492,625
492,682
Los Angeles
1.09
4,017,760
4,061,730
4,065,585
Lynwood
0.60
72,740
73,174
73,174
Malibu
0.65
13,624
13,712
13,712
Manhattan Beach
1.11
36,315
36,718
36,718
Maywood
0.62
29,800
29,984
29,984
Monrovia
1.09
39,103
39,531
39,531
Montebello
0.58
65,291
65,667
65,667
Monterey Park
1.09
64,176
64,874
64,874
Norwalk
0.48
108,250
108,768
109,567
Palmdale
3.51
146,209
151,346
151,346
Palos Verdes Estates
0.57
13,967
14,046
14,046
Paramount
0.41
57,638
57,874
57,874
Pasadena
1.96
147,293
150,185
150,185
Pico Rivera
0.39
66,640
66,899
66,899
Pomona
0.47
162,201
162,961
163,408
Rancho Palos Verdes
0.19
42,720
42,800
42,800
Redondo Beach
0.82
67,099
67,646
' 67,646
Rolling Hills
0.66
1,956
1,969
1,969
Rolling Hills Estates
0.14
8,138
8,149
8,149
Rosemead
0.87
57,095
57,594
57,594
San Dimas
0.57
36,669
36,878
36,878
San Fernando
0.83
25,083
25,292
25,292
San Gabriel
0.72
42,521
42,829
42,829
San Marino
0.11
13,378
13,393
13,393
Santa Clarita
0.64
176,030
177,150
177,150
Santa Fe Springs
0.54
17,689
17,784
17,784
Santa Monica
1.72
90,926
92,494
92,494
Sierra Madre
0.29
11,051
11,083
11,083
Signal Hill
0.82
11,337
11,430
11,430
South El Monte
1.58
22,264
22,615
22,615
South Gate
0.53
102,225
102,770
102,770
South Pasadena
0.73
25,644
25,832
25,832
(*) Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal
correctional institutions and veteran homes.
12
Fiscal Year 2009-2010
Enclosure II
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions
January 1, 2008 to January 1, 2009 and Total Population, January 1, 2009
Total
County Percent Change -- Population Minus Exclusions -- Population
City 2008-2009 1-1-08 1-1-09 1-1-2009
Temple City
0.75
35,480
35,747
35,747
Torrance
0.67
148,115
149,111
149,111
Vernon
0.00
95
95
95
Walnut
1.16
32,112
32,486
32,486
West Covina
0.56
112,022
112,648
112,648
West Hollywood
0.62
37,348
37,580
37,580
Westlake Village
0.50
8,814
8,858
8,858
Whittier
0.39
86,452
86,788
86,788
Unincorporated
0.79
1,082,750
1,091,340
1,091,978
County Total
0.90
10,289,936
10,382,451
10,393,185
(*) Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal
correctional institutions and veteran homes.
5
A�
o-�
Q � y DEPARTMENT OF � .. �_;:_. .. _. ��
W FINANCE F
O 915 L STREET 10 A
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-3706 2 'e
Z
°4cavRN`P � � WdNES' Bt356TE5
02 IM $ 00-420
0004253606 MAY 06 2009
MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 95814
Rory Burnett
Finance Director
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
.W _ _ .7i. i. ��: .I� =I:1.�.. iS.i.:.?�:!.:i 13 si�?fi..i•,i�s i{�:. �:{15s'rG1
Page 9 of 9
BB. 2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118 = 1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit $164,119,503 x 1.0650 = $174,787 271
CC. 2006-2007 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
200572006 Appropriation Limit $174,787,271
Increase in Non-residential construction 29.41%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
.1.2941 x 1.0078 = 1.3042
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit $174,787,271 x 1.3042 = $ 227, 557.559
DD. 2007-2008 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit $227,957,559
Increase in Non-residential construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change .72%
1.0944 x 1.0072 = 1.1023
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit $227,957,559 x 1.1023 = $251 277.617
EE, 2008•-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit $251,277,617
Increase in Non-residential construction 11.82%
Los Angeles County population change .86%
1.1182 x 1.0086 = 1.1278
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit $251,277,617 x 1.1278 = $283,390,896
EXHIBIT "A".
zct
1, 0 b 3
05-Mav�2008 01:26pm From -ASSESSOR EXC E
320
T-718 P.002/003 F-063
,/or wa
+ f
xeq —u t��*
RICK AUERBACH
ASSESSOR
Ms. Sharon Duckworth
City Treasurer
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, California 90055
Dear Ms. Duckworth:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR
500 W. TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-,2770
h ttp://essessor, co la. cs. us/
May 5, 2009
Your agency, the City of Vernon, in order to effect an adjustn:�.ent of its Gann Limit,
has requested that the Assessor's Office supply the perco-ritage change in total
assessed valuation for the city over that of the preceding year, due to nonresidential
new construction.
For the City of Vernon, the 2008-2009 net a in, nonresidential new
construction, applicable to the 2009,2010 budget, i 6.36° o.
If we, can be of further service, please call Ventura Cuenca at (' 13) 974-9221.
Very truly yours,
Dan Kinoshita
Senior Information Systems Analyst
Research and Developrruent
DK:mf
05-May-2009 01:26pm From -ASSESSOR EXC E
'�/x
,•fir
Ul
�+J
W
LL
C)
w
rz �-
0
r
CO
w .2
W
C7 O
CL
< O
U) M
0
U
O
z
O
0
0 9.0 cq
10 co
in O
........���aaaaa CD w
w
� r�
40 la
320
T-i16
P.003/003
F-063
s
Q
V-
q
Q
4 Qi
ct
6
Air
40
P
CD
G
C4
03-
•
w
N
R
h.
,
Ca Ca
%_
cp
�
C
vl
C
V*
im
Of
ci
Q
cc
n
CD ca
Lo C'
to
CR
c`m M
T
m
C-4 o
a
.c
4.
r
CD
a
o
L
4
W
sic
Q
a�
�
3
Q
C
❑
'
O
a
0R
i3
r..
x
a
L)
o
n.
c•)
cri
�.ci
td
O
L
L
CL
aL
=
a
W
dp
as
in
�
<
W
_
M
a
4
C2
4
a
o
m
b
a�
o
04
3
C1
C
U
Lo-
0)
a,
05--May12009 01:26pm From -ASSESSOR EXC
ASSMSOB NICKAUMBAC11
EXECOrIVIR OFFICC
500 WEST TEWLE #920
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
E
320 T-718 P•001/003 F-063
f nffe tr';1 3r,11�
�..., l,..•. a... .... P,......... %
FAX lVUMEIER
213.617.14 3 s"
:'Iffl Date;
• ill �!ld�° • � t1%�ih,.ii ++v.l. * � ■ • i �
I i :�4Ail �i
l...c rv�
n Pages:
9 _
For Rm iew 0 Please Comment 13 Rowe Reply 0 Please RftWle
Nate: