Loading...
Resolution No. 2010-177RESOLUTION NO. 2010-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON ESTABLISHING THE RATES FOR THE SALE OF WATER IN THE CITY OF VERNON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VERNON CITY CODE AND ORDINANCE NO. 1029 WHEREAS, on May 16, 1995, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Ordinance No. 1029 which, among other things, established the water rates for the City of Vernon beginning July 1, 1995, with such rates being established by resolution thereafter; and WHEREAS, Vernon City Code Section 25.1 provides that, except as otherwise provided in Chapter 25 of the Vernon City Code, the rates for the sale of water in the City are to be set by resolution; and WHEREAS, by memo dated October 4, 2010, the Director of Community Services and Water, has recommended that the rates established for water services be raised effective January 1, 2011, to reflect the City's increased cost and materials to provide water services; and WHEREAS, no interested party has filed a written request for mailed notice of a meeting on new or increased fees or service charges; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2010, the City Council of the City ,Y Of Vernon held a public meeting to consider water rate increases during which any and all oral or written presentations could be made in accordance with Government Code Section 66016; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of,Vernon wishes to establish new rates for the sale of water in the City of Vernon in accordance with the Vernon City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby establish the rates for the sale of water in the City of Vernon pursuant t.o Vernon City Code Sections 25.1 through 25.9, as set forth in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as though fully set forth at length. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby declares that the applicable rates contained in this resolution shall be effective on the first regular water reading for monthly billing purposes in the month of January 2011. SECTION 4.: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Council of this City. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 2010. Name: Hilario Gonzales Title: Mayor / yor Tem ATTE Wil and G. Y m guc City Clerk 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2010-177, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Monday, December 6, 2010, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon. Executed this 1'*�" day of December, 2010, at Vernon, California. (SEAL) i Willard G. a ag c i, City Clerk - 3 - EXHIBIT Exhibit "A" Water Rates for the City of Vernon Water System . Effective January 1, 2011 1. Monthly Charge For Meters (V.C.C. Sec. 25.2): Meter Size Monthly Minimum Charge 5/8" $ 6.610 3,1" 9.915 In 16.525 1 33.051 2" 52.881 3" 99.152 4" 165.253 6" 330.506 8" 528.809 2. Water Consumption Rates Per 100 Cubic Feet (V.C.C. Sec. 25.3): For water used: $1.28/100 cubic feet 3. Standby Service Meter Charge W.C.C. Sec. 25.3): Meter Minimum Monthly Consumption Size Allowance For Standby Service Monthly Charge 2" 6,000 cubic feet per month $ 122.42 3" 15,000 cubic feet per month 273.00 4" 30,00.0 cubic feet per month 512.95 - 6" 75,000 cubic feet per month 1,199.75 8" 150,000 cubic feet per month 2,267.30 The charge for water in excess of the monthly consumption allowance shall be the rate per cubic foot. A - 1 4. Minimum Rates for Meters for Fire -Related Services (V.C.C. Sec. 25.4) Sprinkler Connection Size Monthly Charge 4" $ 2.00 6" 2.00 811 2.00 10" 2.00 The charge for all water used shall be at the rate shown' in Section 2 of Exhibit A, and shall be payable semiannually. 5. Minimum Rates for Unmetered Service for Fire Protection Purposes (V.C.C. Sec. 25.4): Monthly charge per sprinkler head: $0.25/head 6. Square Footage Charge (V.C.C. Sec. 25.5): Monthly charge for fire -related services based on the square footage of buildings: $0.003102619 per square foot. 7. Minimum Charge for Temporary Installation and Relocation (V.C.C. Sec. 25.6) (each person, firm or corporation): Initial temporary installation: $ 200.00 Relocation of said service: $ 50.00 The water furnished through said temporary connection shall be charged at the rate of one and one-half times the consumption rate set forth in Section 2 of Exhibit A. 8. Bond or Deposit for Temporary Connection to Fire Hydrant (V.C.C. Sec. 25.7) (each person, firm or corporation): Amount of each bond or deposit: $500.00 A - 2 9. Rates for Retail Water Business (V.C.C. Sec. 25.8) (each person, firm or corporation): The rate shall be one and one-half times the meter charge and the.water consumption rate set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of Exhibit A. 10. Water Rates per 100 Cubic Feet'of Reclaimed Water (V.C.C. Seca 25.9) (each person, firm or corporation): Malburg Generating Station $0.488/100 cubic feet until January 1, 2019 Reclaimed water: $1.433/100 cubic feet A - 3 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: December 13, 2010 TO: S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water FROM: Willard Yamaguchi, City Clerk RE: Resolution No. 2010-177 — A Resolu ion of the City Council of the City of Vernon Establishing the Rates for the Sale of Water in the City of Vernon in Accordance with the Vernon City Code and Ordinance No. 1029 Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2010-177, referenced above, which was approved by City Council on December 6, 2010. Thank you. WY:dj Attachment c: Resolution No. 2010-177 City of Vernon NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 (323) 583-8811 The City of Vernon will conduct a Public Hearing, which you may attend. Place: Vernon City Hall City Council Chambers 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Date & Monday, December 6, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Time: The City Council of the City of Vernon will be conducting a Public Hearing regarding Vernon's proposed water rate increase. The purpose of the hearing is to obtain testimony from affected and/or interested persons regarding this subject. The public is also invited to submit written protests regarding the proposed increase. This notice is intended to provide you with information on the water services provided by the City of Vernon, the reasons for the increase in monthly service rates, and the methods by which you can protest this rate increase. The new rate schedule is proposed to take effect on January 1, .2011. The City of Vernon continues its quest to offer among the lowest water rates in the Los Angeles region. However, the City is facing rising operating costs due to increased water supply costs and needed capital improvements to its water facilities. The proposed rate increase is needed to, keep pace with these increases in costs while maintaining a safe and efficient water distribution system. Proposed Changes to Potable Water Charge and Recycled Water Charge The City is proposing to increase the potable water rate per hundred cubic feet (HCF) by 10.93 percent. For a water customer with a 6" meter using 4500/HCF at the current rate your monthly water charge would be $5,546.01 and will increase to $6,104.01 under the proposed water rate increase. For a water customer with a 2" meter using 50/HCF at the current rate your monthly charge would be $110.88 and will increase to $116.88 under the proposed water rate increase. The City is proposing to decrease its monthly square -footage charge assessed on the square -footage of your building or outside storage by 7.93 percent. For a customer who occupies a building with approximately 200,000 square -feet at the current rate your monthly square -footage charge would be $674.00 and would decrease to $620.00 under the proposed rate. For a customer who occupies a building with approximately 50,000 square -feet at the current rate your monthly charge would be $168.50 and would decrease to $155.13 under the proposed rate. There are no other increases in costs to the potable water rate structure. The City is proposing to increase the recycled water rate per hundred cubic feet (HCF) by 1.67 percent for the Malburg Generating Station (MGS) and 69.39 percent for all other customers. There are currently no recycled water customers other than MGS. Change Meter Size Currently Monthly 11 1 1 1Percent -. / V'�'r 1 H„r t (ri'g i' '""'A,.Y4 aaY' J .,. -9:4f1 ,/ Z":,%E ,.�'/,' :F'fiW,rr/f'S'f F.r' 95G .,; /u1' /1. ✓ x . /�.'/` ;^ y ,i.",Y. -. ff..5r/3. ^ "' I / .�; ���/f3 kifG,/ Hir^..3 r ".{y,c4/;, �s'.s4 r!?�'",} r%'I S, l P'v➢ 1,:. ✓r/� W 3 ,f// p//' //dfr✓ ✓'i '✓iE/12� ifs .,,?.$ l'k „yi 21i� ! /I / ,,/'� 5 L : i/ / 1 MiWJ'i' E ,f/kz f ,r f GAG f,'; 5' ";s: ¢-. ' ,® i R // 5. .. ./i ,Tl,{§ yr,4, �€;/ ✓,--.i„fr ��?.,{„n,EY?a C,l'. f,0� xl,urr i/ar.,4d„dr.�1Cv",'A.?h°a�w'9Gldd4f✓rl?Z4�-G[;,e/,u/r�.,.5{i:&v.;i'W:,:,"/'�.ly ,.,1,r,t,rfr e /?. x? :,/l s. k ,+ -T;`. fry.., rt3.r.Er{r/' ..2,�}. i,`--, �«</',,/il ktlf.,/�Nfl✓'„6:,Y,,.6'X k4Lra:✓ t`%f'!/<;FiJ. drYit:YiA�p...^�//�<'/fark.ryfi ,r > r Jb-:,.,:., Current Commodity Commodit '9, %,Y.r:'H /H1 15" Y/�'/ ., . ; �/ <9< ti..d, „Ti3:. /Glv�/,f l,: Y,. �4 c „: f . �l9{ 47: Jt". ;2'4 ,�:. a /tf 3r/••g /'/ >i/:. :.. ..YN'��9/,t -,a?i r,. ,/J. xx. r'fb n,?../y .. t/S.a -., ;rf 4€� y� ;IT�/r '?k �. l�Fl. „ �v y9 ✓ r -:" /'f,'��t „544 #% ✓sir ':/�{ 7�'xf� A'. N, dNt`;x,, it :'a G 'C ...yf 4 ? 't' :.^'F/, r1i� , 5rz`. yrir . ,l/-: ;;/, >tr„M'� "t f� .: ' f N, wF / f'3, ,,,,✓ F .,I ,.. ir.. A(YN 1,//'!. ..Jb +4h 1:,4 :y4.. /9. lok�„4i'° �i r tro ,"�,;.: tkrr'i%,:. Y� /,.4 t,....'N 4/ ti' ,f'•"/ ;A .,.TY/ /'. 5"s i'✓i /,..- �,.a...,17.�..a.,.r/r✓.�f.cv,3,;.ffi�.ri�.��✓l.�rrhr%� / r,,rl . ,:C?,-f% liggr'yy.,%.,t?5: ,'u / 1`, ✓!�/;4./� f.v. s, s'..r.?i,2�,��.d1��a:eZk�'�,t.�d ?..�f�.,4-. /L ///�/� ¢..�j _,r.:-. l ?! ;f/krl7 ,l t :r.-/ ��rJh✓¢.,.9.��.fi„d,.: X,i�:.a�. ,vn:$i»G( :,..fd�.F /,5,?,�r�,f'%r/. �.. Jr4r^//,%afar a&.�s'y.,d 3.. r!,. ,.: / 1 .,��,. t,rr?Gy/:net MonthlyChange Current 1 II _ 1 1 1 1Monthly_Square-Footage Charge Percent xH/y .,. .5., rC'H'" 11.,C Oil �l{:vi'3:.,,r ,iN :y% % /r{/y-,; ,H .., :i /^/,r. Cr�h�k, > / a, /' z';uj r' J/'y'.r 7/r"C„ a 7 //,,;. /4 '�d' r"kk .f.,f .fx/./y/X'r"G/✓/' t. ./ir °xv' Kf/,4 7<. / /Mi J E ;Y./%/,ji{•£�.,7h-/p / „ i. Y 14 ...N ..•!./! O,r, r. `i %,,u ,*f >n ,/ r.., -r'-✓: 4 �,r{'kl��tuu�%../,XN'/J:../,i/.,e.X H,r��✓�i, $0.003102619 AfF.e4: fiY'x-,x/ :, rrr :'n ;. ,„x .,;;rY / ,V., /¢, '7. Li.^r % t!i...:�.weTf�3 4J",- N ";?'.��/ ,SY/ �2'f / {:. //7-. �" { '1 ��''''S4 G' �../;�9�://. !' 'E(//Y ,/ . f�: ,r, a",+Gr4 I 3 6 ,63r✓.f � �.� rio 1� (Decrease) ..r:..e-,n• ,:.4r f f,13 .9/{" /�v., .nzi/�/✓,r?:'�N��� rxvk���0 /.,.F�.✓4,vj�. .F Hi 1YH�/�G.N',,,�,�F7,�r�bGi��,Ha,./��r2/,Y,2��3n�/"u.,f/�{IrX„��4"/.�`iE'/, OF Current Minimum Rates for Meters for1 „�%/// �, /rl;� 2..z,1��.� //,,..ir„h4ixvN'�11ri��wee� 11 1 Minimum Rates for1 n'4,.,�„✓, �,�i 1=1 Related Services for1 1 Services for1 Sizes 19 ,'Y"/'•,r/P J'1///""j�,n� $7 8'... f5/,63ilil/l.; 4f bx.`i'✓'C'rE %I/9//b: �./r4 /%pY✓/. ""{�.: r. 'i r`„:✓./�'. /,. I / ., rf 3 f%./., fib. ,id :G//// ,e �'zG �.r?rf. i` a9' ef,-9 '//r, /4 C,'%/% ,. rEr. .,,"%f/lYt' v'a':.IS,P ft'f '."P3 / %,a,, µ^, :,y3/r,'`//: i., ,; ;fi ,i2,,'/"rY? TS.: l / { r/ P ""aff,u J/ ,/ri,/ // Y'/4/Y/ "9, /a2 y. r„K1 t.,S65 .Ww t", S`" , �F/ rf�Gf ✓gyp ;ey„ �3N'� rf i.J: i, ,.f5r,d EMEN,M{. �( /�H%. 6D' 9m' ;" >' ✓��) -: , N"G,�G,6 r� Yr': /, Fs .✓{4G!i"% y;x i/..��bi�i✓�. : r• '�uf�i�4k!°nvlG`��5,�i.../.,,a`eae�,..� b �f.;Y, rh // jF f .", ,ib ,Y� /✓,5". „we�,..aiMJ Current Minimum Rates 1 1 //', ,, �..F.�{tip Jf ,. ?"y..vt�,:X/t/ri:a.K"�l:,v%°.'3x Proposed Minimum Rates for C' Services for Fire Protection11ses: Services for Fire ProtectionPurposes: Monthly1 Monthly1 ,riY/r .-1, -?vi /. f'. r FY .T%�r .1"6f�vlf Ni/� ,R'„/t ;�,r,,,r �., any..fH t„w ,4�^�Sr'.I^ W � , } ,,,/'y ,. ,. .. v4, - al, z!-., 4e' ,'/,,, ,.'"''"�, c,I -,t'.y i,., w,.k'X' ' t' y'a of5✓.r: - - .e %?",,.�,,,,4:Y�4i�irP i/,¢.%rttx/„�? , „ 9�, "', T! 9E 9 z �i /4! E6 'X,,l� 1,%�nl 4 �.y!P! �i. , r.r r,„4' r ua /-,r di ff 9" "�Y/ °e,.; N ,J:S- ;� /, / .r✓^i1'/, , ag ia?/-�f�ia/ eta'' ,,liC,��./� F`r,r6.. iy .ti . , r/4>-.- /n �iy?, ��l�.s s 1 5, - /�F,��%�yp,'�.,w: <i iy:.:y. .l 1,. �r .le gy,l3, ., ,fr,;r✓, 1€ , j L 2 �5 .� r.f , i :%x�/ ✓�i, '%dY �CYY .'wf./��/rX.f/e G/,��'1l✓✓Lz. 7 StandbyCurrent ,e�„ .,, b,'/.,, ,y(,,. f. �/ H /kYffiuf br, {%r E/vZ/ 1�e�//nL1.i /M1;1: "Y ,h Proposed Standby ,/i4,1: y`€' r.t:1 �✓l/e wi: v1/11..'f nl Meter Size Monthly AllowanceMonthly Allowance ✓ f y':, 'ap, n>q NC '. br r✓ t // ° :!y 3, F," / 9 0, err - ,;;r�f? 1, �11 �. d iY� ,r/r/nf?/ k. f �i, "+' ,n ='{;5✓yei 01, FIN %C rrs,,, r e , ��?�'. �a r" w '/ii rY, ii-? y 11,`/',' &fr7 . N / nF.-. 41/ y+";cY, •• -,, t ,f > , a r, ✓, C fHiyap.,f.,. ✓ ^" . u s P ,r, ,:/''. f r .. z,'. >'c i�f ..rTS / !/5 ,r, �✓r, {� ,/ua�,h3,r>?/,�k✓, .../. ,/1, ,,,,� /„ H�� ,F nrr �,/ ✓a ..?/�f-�„?r/�'t. .,f MINA ���,GG,,,z/,�/���..J��.,:��;J�rF Current Minimum Charge 1Temporary ✓ f/ r rh" "� ty ,i--<u#' � ����ir�. � ./ jr:/.Y�.?,/� .fin r;Y. fr�y� 9F. /,r, 41rr, .,✓ _ 1 1 Relocation Proposed Minimum ChargeTemporary 1Meter Installation1 Relocation TemporaryInitial Installation Relocation of Said Service l''rf ib'J 'V1,11 ,kr a, rs :Y' fl,/ 1,,,;1'� �'. :f'.; "'k f r 'j�Pr ,zg?�f,r,Er„`li, �./ " r` % > /�,' (/ fl : / v,� J W,yrr,Y{/.3 9� p 3A{� 3' y:.. ,,�,i✓. % hhha¢#'(,r r!z r.�OMEN j.q �' „ �c�G,,1 //,rm^f'2f15z�GfihlaLb' fl!Z;46,�r",/%i��4rfj"rrF".1Mf4�,liv?f'es!'a✓G✓t",fS,'fi1`/✓Tti'ui;"6Sy£r�f!f'z/sf,Cft ' 1Proposed rrr r .. ,r /ye .}frr ,d" Recycled Water Rates Pei- (HCF) zk ,.,. .. Malburg StationGenerating \ i� Information About Potable Water Charges A. Basis upon which the charges were calculated —The monthly potable water charge is the sum of three components: a commodity charge, a meter charge, and square footage charge. The commodity charge is based on providing revenue to cover all of the non -labor costs of water service and half of the labor costs of water service. The meter charge is based on providing revenue to cover the other half of the labor costs of providing water service. The square footage charge is based on providing revenue to cover all of the fixed costs for providing ample water and pressure to the fire hydrants and automatic fire protection systems that serve customers' properties. B. Reason for charges — The proposed increase in the commodity charge will be used to cover the increased costs of providing water service, including the increased Replenishment Assessment imposed.by the Water Replenishment District for accessing groundwater supplies and the cost of acquiring water from the Metropolitan Water District for surface water supplies, and to cover the increased fixed costs per hundred cubic feet of water consumed due to a reduction in water consumption by the City's water customers. C. Charge per parcel — The table below provides the proposed potable water charge increase and proposed square -footage decrease. If you need assistance determining the amount of your potable water charge, you may contact Scott B. Rigg by calling 323-583-8811 or by mail or in person at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058. . Change Current Commodity Charge CF Proposed Commodity Charge CF Percent +/- 10.93% $1.16 $1.28 (Increase) Change Current Monthly Square -Footage Charge Proposed Monthly Square -Footage Charge Percent +/- 7.93% $0.00337 $0.003102619 Decrease Information About Recycled Water Charges A...Basis upon which the charges were calculated — The recycled water charge is the sum of six components: water, power, supply, depreciation, administrative costs, and capital credits. B. Reason for charges — The proposed increase in the recycled charge will be used to cover the increased costs associated with recycled water service, power, supplies, depreciation, and administrative costs. C. Charge per parcel — The table below provides the proposed recycled water charge increase. If you need assistance determining the amount of your recycled water charge, you may contact Scott B. Rigg by calling 323-583-8811 or by mail or in person at 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058. Current Recycled Water Rates Per CF Proposed Recycled Water Rates Per CF Malburg Generating Station 1.67% $0.480 $0.488 (Increase) All Other 69.39% Customers $0.846 $1.433 (Increase) Public Hearing At the public hearing, the City will hear and consider all objections or protests to the proposed charges. Written protests regarding the proposed potable water charge increase and/or the proposed recycled water charge increase must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. Written protests may be delivered to the City Clerk at the public hearing or mailed or delivered to the City Clerk at Vernon City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, City of Vernon, California 90058. Protests which are mailed or delivered to Vernon City Hall must arrive at Vernon City Hall by 9:00 a.m. on December 6, 2010 to be counted. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, written protests against the proposed potable water charge increase or recycled water charge increase have been filed (and not withdrawn) by the owners of a majority of the parcels subject to the respective proposed increase; the City Council will not adopt the respective increase. Questions For more information about the proposed water charges you may contact Scott B. Rigg at 323-50- 8811. The documentation supporting the proposed water charges is available in the office of Community Services, Vernon City Hall, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, between the hours of 7:15 a.m. and 5:15 p.m. Monday through Thursday. Dated: fV1/d STAFF REPORT RECEIVED NOV 0 2 2010 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT DATE: October 4, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, irector of Community Services &Water RE: Water Rate Increase Recommendation In 1995 the City of Vernon (City) retained Donald R. Howard ConsultingEngineers, Inc. (Howard Study) to prepare a cost of service and rate design study for the City of Vernon Water Department. The rate design principles established in the Howard Study have been utilized to develop the proposed rate increase. The City last increased its water rates on July 16, 2007. Since that time the cost to produce water has increased significantly. A vast majority of the water the City distributes is extracted from groundwater supplies using production wells to facilitate this process. The City is required to pay the Water Replenishment District (WRD) a Replenishment Assessment (RA) of $205.00 for every acre-foot of water produced. The RA water is purchased by WRD and used to replenish groundwater supplies that are consumed by local water purveyors. Recent environmental courtrulings along with persistent drought conditions have greatly curtailed WRD's ability to secure replenishment water. As a result WRD has been unable to purchase replenishment water from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) since May of 2007. This has forced WRD to secure replenishment water at exceedingly high costs. These costs have been passed on to local purveyors by way of rate increases of 34-percent in just two years. Table No. 1 illustrates the cost escalation: Table No.1 Date of Increase WRD Replenishment Fee Per Acre -Foot Prior to July 1, 2009 $153.00 July 1, 2009 $181.85 July 1, 2010 $205.00 Total Increase: 34-Percent Environmental court rulings coupled with drought conditions have greatly reduced the surface water supplies available from the State Water Project. This has limited MWD's ability to deliver water to its member agencies and has resulted in an escalation of surface water costs. The cost MWD charges for an acre-foot of water have increased by nearly 35-percent in a one and a half year period. Table No. 2 illustrates the cost increases- Table No. 2 Date of Increase -Potable Water Cost Per Acre -Foot Prior to July 1, 2009 $635.00 July 1, 2009 $653.00 September 1, 2009 $781.00 January 1, 2010 $791.00 July 1, 2010 $805.00 January 1, 2011 $855.00 Total Increase: 34.64-Percent Table No. 3 Date of Increase -Recycled Water Units Cost Per Acre -Foot Prior to July 1, 2009-CBMWD Service Area 0-25: $444.00 25-50 $444.00 50-100 $413.00 100+ $413.00 Prior to July 1, 2009-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $337.00 25-50 $313.00 50-100 $290.00 100+ $267.00 July 1, 2009-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 $477.00 25-50 - $477.00 50-100 $434.00 100+ $434.00 July 1, 2009-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $347.00 _ 25-50 $322.00 50-100 $299.00 100+ $275.00 January 1, 2010-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 $487.00 25-50 $487.00 50.100 $444.00 100+ $444.00 January 1, 2010-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $357.00 25-50 $332.00 50-100 $309.00 100-F $285.00 July 1, 2010-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 $506.00 25-50 $506.00 50-100 $460.00 100+ $460.00 July 1, 2010-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $357.00 2 25-50 $332.00 50-100 $308.00 100+ $283.00 Total Increase-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 13.96% 25-50 13.96% 50-100 11.38% 100+ 11.38% Total Increase-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 5.93% 25-50 6.07% 50-100 6.21% 100+ 5.99% It is estimated that the City will purchase approximately 8,200 acre-feet of water for the next fiscal year. Of this, approximately 7,700 acre-feet will be extracted utilizing the City's adjudicated water rights. Moreover, there has been a significant reduction in water sales due to conservation measures enacted by the City in 2009 and a decline in economic activity in the City. Irt fiscal year 2007-2008 the City distributed 10,912 acre-feet of water by way of a combination of pumped and purchasedwater. For fiscal year 2010-2011 it is anticipated that the City will distribute approximately 8,200 acre-feet of water which equates to a 33-percent reduction in water production. Although this reduction in water sales has made the City less reliant on expensive Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) imported water supplies, it requires fixed costs that are not dependent on water sales, such as labor costs to maintain the system, to be absorbed into the commodity rate at a higher rate to cover the costs. It should be noted that the Water Department has had a reduction in staffing that has resulted in a decrease in labor costs. The'staffing reductions will serve to offset some of the cost increases' associated with an increase in water costs. The City's water rates are split into three components: a meter charge; a commodity charge, and; a square footage charge. The Howard Study determined how the Water Department's costs should be split among the three charges to accurately capture costs. Each expense account is split into a fire related cost, a commodity labor cost, and a commodity non -labor cost. The commodity rate is based on providing revenue to cover 100-percent of the commodity non -labor costs and 50-percent of the commodity labor costs. The meter charges are set so that revenues collected will equal the remaining 50-percent of the commodity related labor expenses. Finally, the square footage revenues should cover 100-percent of the fire related expenses. Based on the proposed 2010-2011 fiscal year budget the water rates should be adjusted. This budget includes a projected need of one million in capital improvements during the course of the year. These expenses will be covered by $400,000 in. depreciation costs and $600,000 capital improvements budgeted next year. The Water Department prefers to fund its small capital projects on,a pay as you go formula, as opposed to bonding for the funds and incurring additional interest and administrative costs. The Water Department is estimating that water rates will need to be adjusted based on the proposed budget. The current and proposed rates for potable and recycled water are illustrated in Table Nos.>4 and 5: 3 Table No. 4 Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent Difference Commodity Rate 1.159 1.28 10.93-Percent Increase Meter Rates Varies on meter size Varies 0 Square Footage Rate 0.00337 0.003102619 -7.93-Percent Decrease CBMVVD has constructed a backbone recycled water distribution system in the southeast area of Los Angeles County. This system provides the recycled water to the City. CBMWD has established certain water rates for its retail customers, one for the Malburg Generating Station, and another for all other customers. Similarly, the City's retail rate is also made up of two rates. The rates were established based on a composite of the cost of water, administrative costs, depreciation, and supplies. The City has entered into an agreement with CBMWD for the purchase of recycled water for the Malburg Generating Station. This agreement sets forth the cost of recycled water to the City for this project. As set forth in the agreement, CBMWD is limited to a 3% annual increase in water costs for the Malburg Generating Station. In addition, the City is responsible for all electrical costs for the booster plant serving the Vernon area. The City paid for the construction' of the pipeline extension. The parties agreed that the City will get a capital credit over time to repay the City for its initial expenditure on the pipeline. The capital credit of $200.00 per acre-foot was subtracted from the water cost in order to determine the Malburg Generating Station rate. The proposed recycled water rates are illustrated in Table No. 5: Table No. 5 Current Rate - Proposed Rate -Percent Difference Recycled-CBMWD Service Area $0.846 $1433 69.39 (Increase) Recycled-Malburg Generating Station $0.480 $0.488 1.67% (Increase) The City of Vernon performed a cost comparison study to ascertain how" Vernon's current and proposed potable rate structure compares with that of neighboring cities. Two, manufacturing operations in the City were used in the study. The results of the study, illustrated; in Table No. 6, demonstrate that . Vernon's proposedrate structure remains exceedingly low when compared to neighboring cities: Table No. 6 Agency/Com,pany Business Cost Per HCF Monthly Water Consumption in HCF/Units Average Monthly Cost Average Annual Cost City of Vernon (Current) Business "A" $1.16 37,000 $42,883.00 $514,596.00 City of Vernon (Proposed) Business "A" $1.28 37,000 $47,471.00 $569,652.00 City of Industry -La Puente Business "A" $1.36 37,000 $50',320.00 $603,840.00 City of Vernon (Proposed with SF) Business "A" $1.73 37,000 $64,180.20 $770,162.40 Carson -Cal Water Service Business "A" $2.38 37,1Q0 $88,015.60 $1,056,187.20 Carson -Golden State Business "A" $2.49 37,000 $92,130.00 $1,105,560.00 City of Santa Fe Springs -Golden State Business "A" $2.49 37,000 $92,130.00 $1,105,560.00 City of Industry -Rowland Business "A" $2.60 37,000 $96,200.00 $1,154,400.00 City of Commerce -Cal Water Service Business "A" $2.78 37,000 $102,719.40 $1,232,632.80 City of Santa Fe Springs I Business "A" $3.04 37,000 $112,480.00 $1,349,760.00 rd LADWP Business "A" $3.87 37,000 $143,227.00 $1,718,724.00 City of Vernon (Current) Business `B" $1.16 9,500 $11,010.50 $132,126.00 City of Vernon (Proposed) Business "B" $1.28 9,500 $12,160.00 $145,920.00 City of Industry -La Puente Business "B" $1.36 9,500 $12,920.00 $155,040.00 City of Vernon (Proposed with SF) Business "B" $1.73 9,500 $16,435.00 $197,220.00 Carson -Cal Water Service Business "B" $2.38 9,500 $22,610.00 $271,320.00 City of Industry -Rowland Business `B" $2.60 9,500 $24,700.00 $296,400.00 City of Santa Fe Springs -Golden State Business "B" $2.49 9,500 $23,655.00 $283,860.00 Carson -Golden State Business "B" $2.49 9,500 $23,655.00 $283,860.00 City of Commerce -Cal Water Service Business "B" $2.78 9,500 $26,410.00 $316,920.00 City of Santa Fe Springs I Business `B" $3.04 9,500 $28,880.00 $346,560.00 LADWP I Business "B" 1 $3.87 1 9,500 $36,765.00 $441,180.00 A vast majority of water agencies do not have a square footage charge. For comparison purposes the square footage rate could be converted into a commodity rate by dividing the cost assigned to the square footage charge and dividing it by the units of water sold. By making this calculation the square footage would equate to a commodity rate of $0.4516/HCF. Adding that to the proposed commodity rate of $1.28 equates to a net equivalent rate of $1.7341CF. Table No. 7 illustrates a comparison of this equivalent rate with water purveyors in close proximity to the. City of Vernon: Table No. 7 City of Anaheim $1.72 City of Vernon (Proposed with SF) $1.73 Maywood; Mutual No. 3 $1.95 City of Glendale $2.12 City of Long Beach Tier II Rate $2.43 City of Pasadena Block 2 Rate $2.50 California Water Service -Commerce $2.78 City of Santa Fe Springs $3.04 Table No. 6 and Table No. 7 results demonstrate the City of Vernon proposed rate is among the lowest in the Central Basin region. Therefore, it is my recommendation that the City Council approve the increase in water rates at its December 6, 2010 City Council meeting. Attached herewith are the water commodity, meter, and square footage rate calculations along with the 2010-2011 budget broken into.commodity labor, commodity non -labor, and fire related costs. SKW/sr Enclosures 5 Calculation of City of Vernon Water Rates Service Charge Calculation Meter Size Number of Meters Capacity Factor Number of Meters X (X) Capacity Factor 5/8" 27 1 27 3/4" 37 1.5 55.5 1" 254 2.5 635 1.5" 174 5 870 2.0" 531 8 4248 3.0" 52 15 780 4.0" 58 25 1450 6.0" 24 50 1200 8.0" 1 80 80 Total 1158 9345.5 X = Commodity Related Labor Expense = S = Standby Revenues = R = Hydrant Meter Revenues = B = Adjusted Commodity Related Labor Expense X-(S+R) = B Y = 50% of the Adjusted Commodity Related Labor Expense Monthly Meter Charge Factor = Z Z x 9345.5= Y/12 $1,492,596.300 $8,000.000 $2,000.000 $1,482,596.300 $741,298.150 6.610116723 _ Proposed Meter Charge Meter Size (Z)(X) Factor Proposed Monthly Present Monthly Meter Charge Meter Charge 5/8" 1 x 5.80 $6.610 $6.610 3/4" 1.5 x 5.80 $9.915 $9.910 1" 2.5 x 5.80 $16.525 $16.520 1.5" 5 x 5.80 $33:051 $33.050 2.0" 8 x 5.80 $52.881 $52.880 3.0" 15 x 5.80 $99.152 $99.150 4.0" 25 x 5.80 $165.253 $165.250 6.0" 50 x 5.80 $330.506 $330.500 8.0" 80 x 5.80 $528.809 $528.800 0.00% percent increase Commodity Calculation Charge - - B = Adjusted Commodity Related Costs = $1,482,596.300 50% of Adjusted Commodity Labor Costs = $741,298.150 C = Construction Related Projected Revenues $75,000.000 Note: 63.2% of Construction Related Revenues assigned as a credit against Commodity Charge N = Commodity Non Labor Costs = $3,521,898.600 Projected Water Sales in acre feet = 7,544.00 A = projected water sales in 100 CF 3,286,166.40 Proposed Commodity Charge = (.5 B - .632 C+N) / A $1.283 Current commodity Charge = $1.159 10.69% percent increase Square Footage Charge 36.8 % of Construction Related Revenues Assisgned Credit to Fire Related Cost U = Fire Related Costs = $1,576,883.100 V = Metered Fire Service Revenues = $65,000.000 T = Adjusted Fire Related Costs T = U - V = $1,511,883.100 C = Projected Construction Related Revenues = $75,000.000 Note: 36.8% of Construction Related Revenues assigned as credit towards Square Footage Charge R = Total Square Feet in Service Area = 39,866,402.00 Proposed Square Footage Charge per year = (T - .368C) / R = 0.037231429 Proposed Suare footage charge per month = 0.003102619 Current Square foot charge per month = 0.00337 -7.93% Percent increase Meter Number of 5/8" meters Number of 3/4" meters Number of 1" meters Number of 1.5" meters Number of 2" meters Number of 3" meters Number of 4" meters Number of 6" meters Number of 8" meters Consumption Square foot Total revenue under proposed rates 27 $6.610 $2,141.68 37 $9.915 $4,402.34 254 $16.525 $50,369.09 174 $33.051 $69,009.62 531 $52.881 $336,957.31 52. $99.152 $61,870.69 58 $165.253 $115,016.03 24 $330.506 $95,185.68 1 $528.809 $6,345.71 $741,298.15 Standby Revenues = Hydrant Meter Revenues = Construction Related projected revenues = Metered Fire Service Revenues $1.283 3,286,166.40 $4,215,796.750 0.003102619 39,866,402.00 $1,484,283.100 $8,000.000 $2,000.000 $75,000.000 $65,000.000 Total revenues $6,591,378.00 Total revenue under current rates Meter Number of 5/8" meter 27 $6.610 Number of 3/4" meter 37 $9.910 Number of 1 " meters 254 $16.520 Number of 1.5" meter 174 $33.050 Number of 2" meters 531 $52.880 Number of 3" meters 52 $99.150 Number of 4" meters 58 $165.250 Number of 6" meters 24 $330.500 Number of 8" meters 1 $528.800 Consumption $1.159 3,286,166.40 Square foot 0.00337 39,866,402.00 Standby Revenues = Hydrant Meter Revenues = Construction Related projected revenues = Metered Fire Service Revenues Total revenues $2,141.64 $4,400.04 $50,352.96 $69,008.40 $336,951.36 $61,869.60 $115,014.00 $95,184.00 $6,345.60 $741,267.60 $3,808,666.858 $1,612,197.297 $8,000.000 $2,000.000 $75,000.000 $65,000.000 $6,312,131.75 Variables Commodity Related Labor Expense = $1,492,596.300 Standby Revenues = $8,000.000 Hydrant Meter Revenues = $2,000.000 Construction Related projected revenues = $75,000.000 Commodity Non Labor Costs $3,521,898.600 Projected AF of Water Sales = 7,544.00 Fire Related Costs = $1,576,883.100 Metered Fire Service Revenues $65,000.000 Total square feet of building area in service are 39,866,402.00 Number of 5/8" meters 27 Number of 3/4" meters 37 Number of 1" meters 254 Number of 1.5" meters 174 Number of 2" meters 531 Number of 3" meters 52 Number of 4" meters 58 Number of 6" meters 24 Number of 8" meters 1 Current commodity rate 1.159 Current square footage rate per month 0.00337 u rn c� a Q O 1 0o c, m a o 0 O .O O O - O O O O O' O O d' � 0 06 N O a 44 o o - t N N --. N cly O ro J 00 00 co N M co m ( co le O t$ 0 (O a p LO O N co � N ;! 00 0 ". O O 0 O 00 a O M O co c - fh (n O d' O N 3' d) O O 40 `. V% 0 dj -£ (fl �� co _ � d�j" (f3 6�9' chi 9. o V 0.. ( � N V q V O O o U `�' MLf) 00 O M - - r O M L O — _O O � M O 0 N O O O O 00 W co MEA O M � N � O � � � ,. N � O � N L co di V> � 4F, U> fA d3 M- N 69 a Eli 69 EH K3 (0 EH LL .Z" � E n m O v o 0 0 o o 0 0 o ao o = o 0 00 o 00 00 00 0o O U V O 6j O r. d. O M N O 00 0 7` O O 00 O V M O O M Cfl r— W O 0 � m � { N_ 0 � � 00 O d - O 00 (O C co M N V -: O O co co O a Cr, u, a a @CDc a� a� . o c12 m ( t6 a Q E Y N (D : ro 0 y ar � U N U a> .0 C U a O Q Q i U F C N N H c N N O p ycu N N N E V f O` c 0. o N o 0 o m o 0 0 o m o (n o 0 0 0 Z w O_ O N O O e N O co O (O O f� O Q) O "_ t O E M O r M- V O O - U U O O O O N O N O N O N O N O O M M C. O 0 O O. 0 O O N a N � L L LO LO LO � L L LO LO U) LO O O 61 CD 00 V ER 0 (� a0 N (FT 0 0 N T, 0 Or M M I- 0 00 M (O 4a6 CD O O to co 0 0 O co L _ 0 N- � CV (A -0 O d' O O V3 0 N O _ O 000 O 0 O O 0 0 � r 0 0 O. - - 0 O O g G 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O -O O O O -N I,-i. 00 V O 0 -C Lr EH 0 L 00 N ER 0 LO N (f} O 0 0 0 O W tl�l 0 0 N O fR 0 V ER 0 O O n ca 0 O O 0 0 00 0 N 0 0 N O M (N9 0 O O 0 0 0 V3 00 O O. ER 0 0 O 0 0 co N o 0 0 � 0 0 M EH 0 0 � (O EA 0 0 L N FA O 0 0 M 0 0 o (O (R O 0 o I- UT O 0 LO 4 0 0 o IT69 to O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 63 CD O 0 0 (O � .. 0 00 o N b4 O 0 O Lc)N 0 00 o V3 00 0 0 p O 0 O 61 67 O N D .CL N -a Q N I_ N CD X W 6 u C (6 C f6 "O m CL - � U 0) C o CY1 N N o Ny a C O N _ 6f . o a � Z •Oo 0 n Z _ y o o N �' .0 E 6) C m V O - N F- N H N c N a W E Q 0 O O M LO, C. M O O M LO 0 O O O V LO 0 O O O (O L O O. O O (0 LO o O O O (0 Lr) 0 O O O LO 0 O O O O (O 0 r O O (O 0 O N Cl) O LO 0 O N V O (O 0 O N (O O (O 0 O N (O O (O 0 O (O (O m (O 0 (O (O (O T LO 0 O. (D (O O (O 0 O � (0 W (O 0 O O W O CO 0 U "O 2 N C0C C E 0 U co (D 0) M d s'l'- r '3•s f O fA co oo 0 O 0 o 91, o r t o m 0 a o� °° " rn ao o 0O o oO O o oo o c s Z pp 0oi o0 °' O c O $; E z O tx : :5 O N T 04 r M k.. UY V, g '}' 4; O E g aj fA ff} ,3f fit' #V E9 O 5.53 I' yr S V. l,. .tif j*v+ ER AIR � M O :. pO p O O ij s. O ' t f'� 'p w coo N r O O F1Q O O rai' O cofz ONi oLO y`�f F O LO o �► i t O i0 } Fes; a 00 r t O O 'f"f to O ci 01 r O - �O ' O O O O slr 3 O v O_: 00 r- O O o O o o z si O o O o e I Ol .. m 000 +, - 00 ID to N r N M to M EA as M O d �= lR ft S ah �.. d p O 7 0o p O Ln _. e` o O 00oo O e,j;j p O !1� a co o M o 0 0 o cr o � . 0)0 +. O ER O p e} 00; E r M gi 3•'. p- V3 O p O O g.ww . c s. CD O xs, ss (p ~ r CA 40 w w O .i+ r R f- I- O U a o O o N, 0) O O U rn a �} o a s 3 Z •°` US 0) }i.. t r .� � Q O U) F S cc +' / W Q 7 '� V F c NEE 5 t_ n� O O O O O. Si:U: O O � V co c0 1rE y Q RECYCLED WATER RATES Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) has constructed a backbone recycled water distribution system in the southeast area of Los Angeles County. This system serves the City of Vernon. CBMWD has established certain water rates for its retail customers, one for the Malburg Generating Station (MGS), and another for all other customers. Similarly, the City's retail rate is also made up of two rates. The rates were established based on a composite of the cost of water, administrative costs, depreciation, and supplies. The City of Vernon has entered into an agreement with CBMWD for the purchase of recycled water for the MGS. This agreement sets forth the cost of recycled water to the City for this project. As set forth in the agreement, CBMWD is limited to a 3% annual increase in water costs for the MGS. In addition the City is responsible for all electrical costs for the booster plant serving the Vernon area. The City paid for the construction of the pipeline extension. The parties agreed that the City will get a capital credit over time to repay the City for its initial expenditure on the pipeline. This capital credit of $200.00 per acre foot was subtracted from the water cost in order to determine the Malburg Generating Station rate. - Enclosed herewith is a cost analysis of the recycled water rate structure. Based on the cost analysis, it is recommended that the recycled water rate for the MGS be set at $0.488 per hundred cubic feet and the recycled water rate for all other customers be set at $1.433 per hundred cubic feet. VERNON RECYCLED WATER CONSUMPTION ACRE-FEET POWER May 2009 77.69 $695.32 " June 2009 70.75 $944.76 July 2009 73.90 $1,250.32 August 2009 81.66 $1,587.85 September 2009 78.81 $1,147.20 October 2009 74.20 $842.44 November 2009 68.36 $674.45 December 2009 70.19 $686.74 January 2010 79.60 $593.19 - February 2010 69.48 . $630.00 March 2010 71.70 $808.00 April 2010 73.37 $740.25 TOTAL 889.71 $9792.52 Average Monthly 74.14 Annual Capital Credit ($200) (889.71) = $177,942 Central Basin Rates (2010/2011) VOLUME CBMWD MGS 0 — 25 $506/af $357/af _ 25 — 50 $506/af $332/af " 50 — 100 $460/af $308/af 100+ $460/af $283/af AVERAGE MONTH COMMODITY COST OF RECYCLED WATER FOR MALBURG GENERATING STATION 0 — 25 (25) ($357) _ $8,925 25 — 50 (25) ($332) _ $8,300 50 —100 (24.14) ($308) _ $7,435.12 74.14 $24,660.12 Annual Commodity Cost = ($24,660.12) (12) Annual Capital Credit = ($200) (74.14) (12) _ All Costs for Recycled Water Water $295,921 Power* $10,772 Supplies $500 Depreciation $25,000 City Administrative $35,000 Capital Credit - 177 936 Total Cost $189,257 * Assume 10% increase in power costs Commodity Cost $189,257 / (889.71) (435.60) _ $0.488 per ccf $295,921 $177,936 ALL OTHER RECYCLED WATER CUSTOMERS Assume 25 acre-feet of recycled water consumed per month. Commodity Cost Per Year ($506) (25) (12) _ $151,800 All Costs Water $151,800 Supplies $500 Depreciation $25,000 City Administrative 10 000 Total Cost $187,300 Commodity Cost $187,300 / (300) (435.60) _ $1.433 per ccf RECEIVED O C T 0-5 2010 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT DATE: October 4, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council /0 FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water RE: Water Rate Increase Recommendation In 1995 the City of Vernon (City) retained Donald R. Howard Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Howard Study) to prepare a cost of service and rate design study for the City of Vernon Water Department. The rate design principles established in the Howard Study have been utilized to develop the proposed rate increase. The City last increased its water rates on July 16, 2007. Since that time the cost to produce water has increased significantly. A vast majority of the water the City distributes is extracted from groundwater supplies using production wells to facilitate this process. The City is required to pay the Water Replenishment District (WRD) a Replenishment Assessment (RA) of $205.00 for every acre-foot of water produced. The RA water is purchased by WRD and used to replenish groundwater supplies that are consumed by local water purveyors. Recent environmental court rulings along with persistent drought conditions have greatly curtailed WRD's ability to secure replenishment water. As a result WRD has been unable to purchase replenishment water from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) since May of 2007. This has forced WRD to secure replenishment water at exceedingly high costs. These costs have been passed on to local purveyors by way of rate increases of 34-percent in just two years. Table No. 1 illustrates the cost escalation: Table No- 1 Date of Increase WRD Replenishment Fee Per Acre -Foot Prior to July 1, 2009 $153.00 July 1, 2009 $181.85 July 1, 2010 $205.00 Total Increase: 34-Percent Environmental court rulings coupled with drought conditions have greatly reduced the surface water supplies available from the State Water Project. This has limited MWD's ability to deliver water to its member agencies and has resulted in an escalation of surface water costs. The cost MWD charges for an acre-foot of water have increased by nearly 35-percent in a one and a half year period. Table No. 2 illustrates the cost increases: Table No. 2 Date of Increase -Potable Water Cost Per Acre -Foot Prior to July 1, 2009 $635.00 July 1, 2009 ' $653.00 September 1, 2009 $781.00 January 1, 2010 $791.00 July 1, 2010 $805.00 January 1, 2011 $855.00 Total Increase: 34.64-Percent Table No. 3 Date of Increase -Recycled Water Units Cost Per Acre -Foot Prior to July 1, 2009-CBMWD Service Area 0-25: $444.00 25-50 $444.00 50-100 $413.00 100+ $413.00 Prior to July 1, 2009-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $337.00' 25-50 $313.00 50-100 $290.00 100+ $267.00 July 1, 2009=CBMWD Service Area 0-25 $477.00 25-50 $477.00 50-100 $434.00 100+ $434.00 July 1, 2009-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $347.00 25-50 $322.00 50-100 $299.00 100+ $275.00 January 1, 2010-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 $487.00 25-50 $487.00 50-100 $444.00 100+ $444.00 January 1, 2010-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $357.00 25-50 $332.00 50-100 $309.00 100+ $285.00 July 1, 2010-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 $506.00 25-50 $506.00 50-100 $460.00 100+ $460.00 July 1, 2010-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 $357.00 25-50 $332.00 2 50-100 $308.00 100+ $283.00 Total Increase-CBMWD Service Area 0-25 13.96% 25-50 13.96% 50-100 11.38% 100+ 11.38% Total Increase-Malburg Generating Station 0-25 5.93% 25-50 6.07% 50-100 6.21% 100+ 5.99% It is estimated that the City will purchase approximately 8,200 acre-feet of water for the next fiscal year. Of this, approximately 7,700 acre-feet will be extracted utilizing the City's adjudicated water rights. Moreover, there has been a significant reduction in water sales due to conservation measures enacted by the City in 2009 and a decline in economic activity in the City. In fiscal year 2007-2008 the City distributed 10,912 acre-feet of water by way of a combination of pumped and purchased water. For fiscal year 2010-2011 it is anticipated that the City will distribute approximately 8,200 acre-feet of water which equates to a 33-percent reduction in water production. Although this reduction in water sales has made the City less reliant on expensive Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) imported water supplies, it requires fixed costs that are not dependent on water sales, such as labor costs to maintain the system, to be absorbed into the commodity rate at a higher rate to cover the costs. It should be noted that the Water Department has had a reduction in staffing that has resulted in a decrease in labor costs. The staffing reductions will serve to offset some of the cost increases associated with an increase in water costs: The'City's water rates are split into three components: a meter charge; a commodity charge, and; a square footage charge. The Howard Study determined how the Water Department's costs should be split among the three charges to accurately capture costs. Each expense account is split into a fire related cost, a commodity labor cost, and a commodity non -labor cost. The commodity rate is based on providing revenueto cover 100-percent of the commodity non -labor costs and 50-percent of the commodity labor costs. The meter charges are set so that revenues collected will equal the remaining 50-percent of the commodity related labor expenses. Finally, the square footage revenues should cover 100-percent of the fire related expenses. Based on the proposed 2010-2011 fiscal year budget the water rates should be adjusted. This budget includes a projected need of one million in capital improvements during the course of the year. These expenses will be covered by $400,000 in depreciation costs and $600,000 capital improvements budgeted next year. The Water Department prefers to fund its small capital projects on a pay as you go formula, as opposed to bonding for the funds and incurring additional interest and administrative costs. The Water Department is estimating that water rates will need to be adjusted based on the proposed budget. The current and proposed rates for potable and recycled water are illustrated in Table Nos. 4 and 5: Table No. 4 Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent Difference Commodity Rate 1.59 1.283 10.69-Percent Increase Meter Rates Varies on meter size Varies 0 Square Footage Rate 0.00337 0.00310 -7.93-Precent Decrease 3 i CBMWD has constructed a backbone recycled water distribution system in the southeast area of Los Angeles County. This system provides the recycled water to the City. CBMWD has established certain water rates for its retail customers, one for the Malburg Generating Station, and another for all other customers. Similarly, the City's retail rate is also made up of two rates. The rates were established based on a composite of the cost of water, administrative costs, depreciation, and supplies. The City has entered into an agreement with CBMWD for the purchase of recycled water for the Malburg Generating Station. This agreement sets forth the cost of recycled water to the City for this project. As set forth in the agreement, CBMWD is limited to a 3% annual increase in water costs for the Malburg Generating Station. In addition, the City is responsible for all electrical costs for the booster plant serving the Vernon area. The City paid for the construction of the pipeline extension. The parties agreed that the City will get a capital credit over time to repay the City for its initial expenditure on the pipeline. The capital credit of $200.00 per acre-foot was subtracted from the water cost in order to determine the Malburg Generating Station rate. The proposed recycled water rates are illustrated in Table No. 5: Table No.'S Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent Difference Recycled-CBMWD Service. Area $0.846 $1.433 69.39 (Increase) . Recycled-Malburg Generating Station $0.480 $0.488 1.67% (Increase) The City of Vernon performed a cost comparison study to ascertain how Vernon's current and proposed potable rate structure compares with that of neighboring cities. Two manufacturing operations in the City were used in the -study. The results of the study, illustrated in Table No. 6,demonstrate that Vernon's proposed rate structure remains exceedingly low when compared to neighboring cities: Table No. 6 Agency/Company Business Cost Per HCF Monthly Water Consumption in HCF/Units Average Monthly Cost ' Average Annual Cost City of Vernon (Current) Business "A" $1.16 37,000 $42,883.00 $514,596.00 City of Vernon (Proposed) Business "A" $1.28 37,000 $47,471.00 $569,652.00 City of Industry -La Puente Business "A" $1.36 37,000 $50,320.00 $603,840.00 City of Vernon (Proposed with SF) Business "A" $1.73 379000 $64,180.20 $770,162.40 Carson -Cal Water Service Business "A" $238 37,000 $88,015.60 $1,056,187.20 Carson -Golden State Business "A" $2.49 37,000 $92,130.00 $1,105,560.00 City of Santa Fe Springs -Golden State Business "A" $2.49 37,000 $92,130.00 $1,105,560.00 City of Industry -Rowland Business "A" $2.60 37,000 $96,200.00 $1,154,400.00 City of Commerce -Cal Water Service Business "A" $2.78 37,000 $102,719.40 $1,232,632.80 City of Santa Fe S rin s Business ` A" $3.04 37,000 $112,480.00 $1,349,760.00 LADWP City of Vernon (Current) Business "A" Business "B" $3.87 $1.16 37,000 9,500 $143,227.00 $11,010.50 $1,718,724.00 $132,126.00 City of Vernon (Proposed) Business `B" $1.28 9,500 $12,160.00 7$145,920.00 City of Industry -La Puente Business `B" $1.36 9,500 $12,920.00 $155,040.00 City of Vernon (Proposed with SF) Business `B" $1.73 9,500 $16,435.00 $197,220.00 Carson -Cal Water Service Business `B" $2.38 9,500 $22,610.00 $271,320.00 City of Industry -Rowland Business `B" $2.60 9,500 $24;700.00 $296,400.00 City of Santa Fe Springs -Golden State Business `B" $2.49 9,500 $23,655.00 $283,860.00 Carson -Golden State Business `B" $2.49 9,500 $23,655.00 $283,860.00 City of Commerce -Cal Water Service Business "B" $2.78 9,500 $26,410.00 $316,920.00 City of Santa Fe Springs Business `B" $3.04 91500 $28,880.00 $346,560.00 LADWP Business `B" $3.87 9,500 $36,765.00 $441,180.00 A vast majority of water agencies do not have a square footage charge. For comparison purposes the square footage rate could be converted into a commodity rate by dividing the cost assigned to the square footage charge and dividing it by the units of water sold. By making this calculation the square footage would equate to a commodity rate of $0.45.16/HCF. Adding that to the proposed commodity rate of $1.283 equates to a net equivalent rate of $1.73/HCF. Table No. 7 illustrates a comparison of this equivalent rate with water purveyors in close proximity to the City of Vernon: Table No. 7 City of Anaheim $ l .72 City of Vernon (Proposed with SF) $1.73 Maywood Mutual No. 3 $1.95 City of Glendale $2.12 City of Long Beach Tier II Rate $2.43 City of Pasadena Block 2 Rate $2.50 California Water Service -Commerce $2.78 City of Santa Fe Springs $3.04 Table No. 6 and Table No. 7 results demonstrate the City of Vernon proposed rate is among the lowest in the Central Basin region: Therefore, it is my recommendation that the City Council approve the increase in water rates at its December 6, 2010 City Council meeting. Thank you. SKW/sr Enclosures 5 COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Whitworth, City Administrator FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water DATE: October 4, 2010 SUBJECT: Public Hearing Proposed Water Rate Increase The City of Vernon is proposing to increase its water rates in order to meet rising water costs, needed capital improvements, and reduction in water sales. The Department of Community Services and Water (Department) is respectfully requesting that you schedule a Public Hearing to obtain testimony regarding the subject rate increase on December 6, 2010 at 9:00 A.M. The proposed water rate increase is subject to the provisions of Proposition 218 which requires that public utility providers follow a strictly defined process for increasing rates. Generally speaking, the City must inform affected property owners of the proposed rate increase; clearly demonstrate the amounts of the proposed rate increase, and hold a public hearing no less than 45-days after providing official notice to the property owner, and hear all protests to the proposed rate increase. These rates are subject to "majority protest," meaning they cannot be imposed if a majority of property owners affected by the rate change submit written protests opposing the increase. Enclosed herewith is a Notice of Public Hearing and a Staff Report recommending a potable and recycled water rate increase. Please forward the notice to the City Clerk to be executed. My Department will ensure that the notice is published. Thank you. SKW/sr Enclosures �iaztertt (Groula ixt-Iliratio its, ,ttx- The Only All Hispanic Owned Chain of Bilingual Newspapers 111 S. Avenue 59, Los Angeles, CA 90042-4211 Ph 323.341-7970 • Fax 323.341-7976 • www.egpnews.com PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforementioned; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of EASTERN GROUP PUBLICATIONS' EASTSIDE SUN, MEXICAN AMERICAN SUN, NORTHEAST SUN, BELL GARDENS SUN, VERNON SUN, COMMERCE COMET, CITYTERRACE COMET, MONTEBELLO COMET, MONTEREY PARK COMET, E.L.A. BROOKLYN BELVEDERE COMET AND WYVERNWOOD CHRONICLE, newspapers of general circulation, printed and published THURSDAYS in the County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaperof general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of JUNE 21, 1966. CASE NUMBER 884861; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: OCTOBER 14, all in the year 2010. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at LOS ANGELES, California, this Whh day of OCTOBER, 2010. Wxnrisl__71 Signature This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp CITY OF VERNON Proof of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing: Monday, December 6. 2010 ... regarding Vernon's proposed water rate increase Mill TleCityofVernonwillconductaF'ubhcHearng whichyoiJmay, ,.. ; Place , Vefrton ¢1, Hall City Council Champers 9305 Sanfs Fe Aden4a �Vernoq CA 90b5Br� Date &!(,Time Mo et 9 aloriday:D-616 Cqun Citj%of Vem�}i�will be a Treaty ilQofztle condutCting HV"F4(I the hearing is to#dbtain test�motjy teom a(fected , rteos p# eeoec :rpeek�itoeo p Vfniehttn)f p ioTs regthaa4ridninpgr s�Sy�ue�bs(i�ad� rttnhgis�sUrti�lec;"�tne egrrjghe (opoi 6 iq1§ !teh abntshe'�rh(4 trn,dttyt Yytvdicde= cc)Tirehmsecl as he egsonsi 6r,t5nl by u�ihtch �oti Can protgst,this fates i$e�easg The ne egg,,? p oposed to (akeie egt op Jaffarvy 2d{Y Tlie City ofternon cohttnues its'q es atotoffef q[p¢ng he water rgtq�,i thg os A%�eles, egion, Howbver the i)yts [a�itsi operatirlgicpsts (it�e {o+mcreas�tl water supplykcosts1�nd d reer wate(f)cititles The r�ie ine�esse is imptoVmdntafoits )3roposec) to keep pace�wrti�hese i�icreases i(�coSS. While mlhtami�g a}st e[ficie�t w tejr tlis{rlgutlotl�systQin (VF( rP ry troposed Changes to Pople Watef Charge and Rceled� l The City to inctease the potal;le watef fa,e per ti propgsigg oubic,feet (HC�) by�1093 p�erperi4 for a wate�r6ustomelW�th a 6J usmg'500/H0 atCthe current rate=yogi,montly,Water{Charge' be $5,5d6 01) and wiq increase to $fi 104 01 Uhder the pro45 pose r�te,inerease For a water er3stomer v)ith afi2jt, meter using!50/k currett't'ra(e your--Tont�ily�¢ha�ge would b'e $110 $8'and will inert er $116 88 under the�proposed w$tjk- < Tfie City istiroposing to decrease i�symthl� square' footage`, assessed oi) Yhq square footaY a gfiyout building or p4ts�de, stor 7 93 percent For,a,t:'stgpigrwho bcupies a bia�ng with a�pF§px 200 000 s uar�-feetrat, ithe cuf(ent ;rate yoyr` onthl�sgrf�re.1 charge would bel $674� OOp�aand)v�outd tle�crease toi,�62,0, O�Oi,Ln`l pr9posetl rate For a customer who dct spies Fbwlding,witft approx 50 000'zsgy re'feet at the`burrentt rate riiontitly charge We yo'01 $168 5Q an(� uyoulli decrease to $15513 Undef (he proRosetl rate; are po;other i�icreaees iq costs �o theopotaWe,vfaief rate s4ruct�fret tThe bits is proposing to Iricrdase the recycled watgr.,rat peryf Cubic feet (HCF) bygl 67,,pgrcent fore xMalburg`;Generati€�g (MGS)a'and 69 39 percen(fo'rt�ll t�ieF customerrs Tliere a_,y eurE recycled water customers other t��an MC�S�+ t+'a, , 'r � , t Meter; i Currently t Y �' Proposec�� .Char! Sae ) , t Monthly �MBhthly 4� 7 Perc4 l ,a harge 'CIOU 1 r 1 5' 20, 3 6 0 , -,> ` r;$330 51 80 ? \$5288-1,J, t.,.,,,$528B�1'` Current Comrtrdiiity Proposed Comniodlty Change F Charge (HCF) Charge (HFC) 1 Current Monthly Srjuare Footage Charge Propo§ed Mgnfhly x h_quare Footage Charge C1lange ; $0 Q0337 , $0 Q0,3402619 7;93°/? (De l�= RECYCLED WATER RATES Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) has constructed a backbone recycled water distribution system in the southeast area of Los Angeles County. This system serves the City of Vernon. CBMWD has established certain water rates for its retail customers, one for the Malburg Generating Station (MGS), and another for all other customers. Similarly, the City's retail rate is also made up of two rates. The rates were established based on a composite of the cost of water, administrative costs, depreciation, and supplies. The City of Vernon has entered into an agreement with CBMWD for the purchase of recycled water for the MGS. This agreement sets forth the cost of recycled water to the City for this project. As set forth in the agreement, CBMWD is limited to a 3% annual increase in water costs for the MGS. In addition the City is responsible for all electrical costs for the booster plant serving the Vernon area. The City paid for the construction of the pipeline extension. The parties agreed that the City will get a capital credit over time to repay the City for its, initial expenditure on the pipeline. This capital credit of $200.00 per acre foot was subtracted from the water cost in order to determine the Malburg Generating Station rate. Enclosed herewith is a cost analysis of the recycled water rate structure. Based on the cost analysis, it is recommended that the recycled water rate for the MGS be set at $0.488 per hundred cubic feet and the recycled water rate for all other customers be set at $1.433 per hundred cubic feet. ACRE-FEET May 2009 77.69 June 2009 70.75 July 2009 73.90 August 2009 81.66 September 2009 78.81 October 2009 74.20 November 2009 68.36 December 2009 70.19 January 2010 79.60 February 2010 69.48 March 2010 71.70 April 2010 73.37 TOTAL 889.71 Average Monthly 74.14 Annual Capital Credit ($200) (889.71) = $177,942 Central Basin Rates (1010/2011) VOLUME 0-25 25 — 50 50 — 100 100--k CBMWD $506/af $506/af $460/af $460/af POWER $695.32 $944.76 $1,250.32 $1,587.85 $1,147.20 $ 842.44 $674.45 $686.74 $593.19 $630.00 $808.00 740.25 9792.52 MGS $357/af $332/af $308/af $283/af AVERAGE MONTH COMMODITY COST OF RECYCLED WATER FOR MALBURG GENERATING STATION 0 — 25 (25) ($357) _ $8,925 25 — 50 (25) ($332) _ $8,300 50 — 100 24.14 ($308) = $7,435.12 74.14 $24,660.12 Annual Commodity Cost = ($24,660.12) (12) _ $295,921 Annual Capital Credit = ($200) (74.14) (12) _ $177,936 All Costs for Recycled Water Water $295,921 Power* $105772 Supplies $500 Depreciation $25,000 City Administrative $35,000 Capital Credit - $t77,936 Total Cost $189,257 * Assume 10% increase in power costs Commodity Cost $189,257 / (889.71) (435.60) $0.488 per ccf ALL OTHER RECYCLED WATER CUSTOMERS Assume 25 acre-feet of recycled water consumed per month. Commodity Cost Per Year ($506) (25) (12) All Costs Water Supplies Depreciation City Administrative Total Cost Commodity Cost $187,300 / (300) (435.60) $151,800 $151,800 $500 $25,000 10 000 $187,300 $1.433 per ccf Meter Size 5/8" 3/4" 1" 1.5" 2.0" 3.0" 4.0" 6.0" 8.0" Total Calculation of City of Vernon Water Rates Service Charge Calculation Number of Meters Capacity Factor (X) Number of Meters X Capacity Factor 27 1 37 1.5 254 2.5 174 5 531 8 52 15 58 25 24 50 1 80 1158 27 55.5 635 870 4248 780 1450 1200 80 9345.5 X = Commodity Related Labor Expense = $1,492,596.300 S = Standby Revenues = $8,000.000 R = Hydrant Meter Revenues = $2,000.000 .B = Adjusted Commodity Related Labor Expense X-(S+R) = B = $1,482,596.300 Y = 50% of the Adjusted Commodity Related Labor Expense $741,298.150 Monthly Meter Charge Factor = Z Z x 9345.5= Y/12 6.610116723 Proposed Meter Charge r Meter Size (Z)(X) Factor Proposed Monthly Present Monthly Meter Charge Meter Charge 5/8" 1 x 5.80 $6.610 $6.610 3/4" 1.5 x 5.80 $9.915 $9.910 1" 2.5 x 5.80 $16.525 $16.520 1.511 5 x 5.80 $33.051 $33.050 2.011 8 x 5.80 $52.881 $52.880 3.0" 15 x 5.80 $99.152 $99.150 4.011 25 x 5.80 $165.253 $165.250 6.0" 50 x 5.80 $330.506 $330.500 8.0" 80 x 5.80 $528.809 $528.800 0.00% percent increase Commodity Calculation Charge B = Adjusted Commodity Related Costs = $1,482,596.300 50% of Adjusted Commodity Labor Costs = $741,298.150 C = Construction Related Projected Revenues $75,000.000 Note: 63.2% of Construction Related Revenues assigned as a credit against Commodity Charge N = Commodity Non Labor Costs = $3,521,898.600 Projected Water Sales in acre feet = 7,544.00 A = projected water sales in 100 CF 3,286,166.40 Proposed Commodity Charge = (.5 B - .632 C+N) / A $1.2.83 Current commodity Charge = $1.159 10.69% percent increase Square Footage Charge 36.8 % of Construction Related Revenues Assisgned Credit to Fire Related Cost U = Fire Related Costs = $1,576,883.100 V = Metered Fire Service Revenues = $65,000.000 T = Adjusted Fire Related Costs T = U - V = $1,511,883.100 C = Projected Construction Related Revenues = $75,000.000 Note: 36.8% of Construction Related Revenues assigned as credit towards Square Footage Charge R = Total Square Feet in Service Area = 39,866,402.00 Proposed Square Footage Charge per year = (T - .368C) / R = 0.037231429 Proposed Square footage charge per month = 0.003102619 Current Square foot charge per month = 0.00337 -7.93% Percent increase Total revenue under current rates Meter Number of 5/8' 27 Number of 3/4' 37 Number of 1" r. 254 Number of 1.5" 174 Number of 2" r. 531 Number of 3" r. 52 Number of 4" r 58 Number of 6" r. 24 Number of 8" r. 1 Consumption $1.159 Square foot 0.00337 Standby Revenues = Hydrant Meter Revenues = Construction Related projected revenues = Metered Fire Service Revenues Total revenues $6.610 $2,141.64 $9.910 $4,400.04 $16.520 $50,352.96 $33.050 $6908.40 $52.880 $336,951.36 $99.150 $61,869.60 $165.250 $115,014.00 $330.500 $95,184.00 $528.800 $6,345.60 $741,267.60 3,286,166.40 $3,808,666.858 39,866,402.00 $1,612,197.297 $8,000.000 $2,000.000 $75,000.000 $65,000.000 $6,312,131.75 Variables Commodity Related Labor Expense = $1,492,596.300 Standby Revenues = $8,000.000 Hydrant Meter Revenues = $2,000.000 Construction Related projected revenues = $75,000.000 Commodity Non Labor Costs = $3,521,898.600 Projected AF of Water Sales = 7,544.00 Fire Related Costs $1,576,883.100 Metered Fire.Service Revenues $65,000.000 Total square feet of building area in service are 39,866,402.00 Number of 5/8" meters 27 Number of 3/4" meters 37 Number of 1" meters 254 Number of 1.5" meters 174 Number of 2" meters • 531 Number of 3" meters 52 Number of 4" meters 58 Number of 6". meters 24 Number of 8" meters 1 Current commodity rate 1.159 Current square footage rate per month 0.00337 Total revenue under proposed rates Meter Number of 5/8" meters Number of 3/4" meters Number of 1" meters Number of-1.5" meters Number of 2" meters Number of 3" meters Number of 4" meters Number of 6" meters Number of 8" meters Consumption Square foot Standby Revenues = Hydrant Meter Revenues = Construction Related projected revenues Metered Fire Service Revenues 27 $6.610 $2,141.68 37 $9.915 $4,402.34 254 $16.525 $50,369.09 174 $33.051 $69,009.62 531 $52.881 $336,957.31 52 $99.152 $61,870.69 58 $165.253 $115,016.03 24 $330.506 $95,185.68 1 $528.809 $6,345.71 $741,298.15 $1.283 3,286,166.40 $4,215,796.750 0.003102619 39,866,402.00 $1,484,283.100 $8,000.000 $2,000.000 $75,000.000 $65,000.000 Total revenues $6,591,378.00 Rigg, Scott From: Wilson, Kevin Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:08 PM To: Rigg, Scott Subject: FW: Staff Report Rate Increase Attachments: Comments to notice for water rate increase (Vernon).PDF; Insert to notice for water rate increase (Vernon).DOC Can you incorporate the proposed changes made by the City Attorney's office. From: Trisha Ortiz [mailto:TOrtiz@rwgiaw.com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:51 PM To: Wilson, Kevin Cc: Laurence S. Wiener; Gena Stinnett Subject: RE: Staff Report Rate Increase Kevin, attached please find my suggested revisions to the public hearing notice. I am happy to discuss any questions about the attached. Thank you very much. Trisha Ortiz Attorney at Law Richards I Watson I Gershon 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94104-481 t tel: (415) 421-8484, ext. 320 fax: (415) 421-8486 -----Original Message ----- From: Wilson, Kevin[mailto:KWi[son @ci.vernon.ca.us] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 9:19 AM To: Trisha Ortiz Subject: FW: Staff Report Rate Increase Attached is the most current staff report on the water rate adjustments. We need to add a paragraph on the recycle water rates. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this communication to the intended recipient, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. PROPOSED WATER RATE CHANGES 2011 Donald R. Howard Rate Study 1995 • The rate design • The City's potable water principles established in rates are split into three the Donald R. Howard components: A meter Study have been charge; a commodity utilized to develop the charge, and a square proposed rate changes footage charge to accurately capture costs Justification for Water Rate Changes • Cost of WRD RA Fee has increased 37.58-percent from July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2010 Date of Increase WRD Replenishment Fee Per Acre - Foot July 1, 2007 $149.00 July 1, 2008 $153.00 July 1, 2009 $181.85 July 1, 2010 1 $205.00 Total Increase: 37.58-Percent Justification Continued Cost of MWD surface water supplies has increased 62.24-percent from July 1, 2007 through January 1, 2011 Date of Increase -Potable Water Cost Per Acre -Foot July 1, 2007 $527.00 July 1, 2008 $564.00 July 1, 2009 $653.00 September 1, 2009 $781.00 July 1, 2010 $805.00 January 1, 2011 $855.00 Total Increase: 62.24-Percent Justification Continued • CBMWD Service Area recycled water rates have increased an average of 40.02-percent from July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2010 Total Increase-CBMWD Service Area from July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2010 — Units/AF Percent Increase 0-25 31.09 25-50 40.95 50-100 37.72 100+ 50.33 Average Increase: 40.02-Percent Justification Continued • Malburg Generating Station recycled water rates have increased an average of 9.21 percent from July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2010 Total Increase-Malburg Generating Station from July 1, 2007 through July 1, 2010 — Units/AF Percent Increase 0-25 9.17 25-50 9.21 50-100 9.22 100+ 9.27 Average Increase: 9.21-Percent Justification Continued • Recent environmental court rulings along with persistent drought conditions will result in the continued escalation of surface water costs • The City of Vernon has experienced a 33- percent reduction in water sales since fiscal year 2007-2008. • The City of Vernon last increased water rates on July 16, 2007 PROPOSED RATE CHANGES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2011 Current Commodity Rate Per/HCF Proposed Commodity Rate Per/HCF $1.159 $1.28 10.44-Percent Increase Current Meter Rates Proposed Increase Varies on meter size No Change Current Square Footage Charge Proposed Square Footage Charge $0.00337 $0.003102619 7.93-Percent Decrease PROPOSED RATE CHANGES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2011 CBMWD Service Area Current Recycled Water Rate Per/HCF CBMWD Service Area Proposed Recycled Water Rate Per/HCF $0.846 $1.433 69.39-Percentlncrease Malburg Generating Station Current Recycled Water Rate Per/HCF Malburg Generating Station Proposed Recycled Water Rate Per/HCF $0.480 $0.488 1.67-Percentlncrease RATE COMPARISON STUDY • A majority of water utilities do not have a square footage charge. For comparison purposes, the square footage charge was converted into a commodity rate by dividing the cost assigned to the square footage charge and dividing it by the units of water sold. By making this calculation, the square footage would equate to a commodity rate of $0.4516/HCF. Adding that to the proposed commodity rate of $1.28/HCF equates to a net equivalent rate of $1.73/HCF. RATE COMPARISION STUDY CONTINUED Water Utility Rate Per/HCF City of Anaheim $1.72 City of Vernon $1.73 Maywood Mutual No. 3 $1.95 City of Glendale $2.12 City of Long Beach Tier II Rate $2.43 City of Pasadena Block 2 Rate $2.50 California Water Service -Commerce $2.78 City of Santa Fe Springs $3.04