Loading...
Resolution No. 2012-026RESOLUTION NO. 2012-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON APPROVING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, by Resolution No. BDC-2, adopted January 25, 2012, the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development ("BDC") approved and adopted a Conflict of Interest Code (the "Code") and submitted the Code to the City Council of the City of Vernon pursuant to Sections 81000 et seq. of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Code submitted meets the criteria of California Government Code Section 81000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Conflict of Interest Code submitted by the BDC and provided for in Resolution No. BDC-2 is hereby approved. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Council of this City. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2012. Name: William J- Davis Title: / Mayor Pro-Tem -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2012-26, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Tuesday, February 7, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pr Tem of the City of Vernon. Executed this day of February 2012, at Vernon, California. W llard G. Y uc i, ty Clerk (SEAL) -3- CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2012 TO: Kristen Enomoto, Council Department Manager Alex Kung, Senior Accounting Manager Mark Whitworth, City Administrator/Fire hief FROM: Willard Yamaguchi, City Clerk RE: Resolution No. 2012-26 — A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving a Conflict of Interest Code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2012-26 referenced above, which was approved by the City Council of the City of Vernon on February 7, 2012. Thank you. WY:dj Attachment c: Resolution Nos. 2012-26, BDC-2 { ov vERM RECEIVED JAN 3 1 2012 a�G��tECEIVED JAN 2 6 2012 CITY ADMINISTRATION CITY CLERICS OFFICE STAFF REPORT City Clerk's Office 9 DATE: January 25, 2012 TO: Honorable Mayor Pro-Tem and City Council FROM: Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk Ot RE: Business Development Committee Conflict of Interest Code On April 19, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69 which established the Ad Ijoc Advisory Committee for Business Development: As with other committees established within the same resolution, it is recommended that the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government code Section 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies. On January 25, 2012, the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development adopted the Conflict of Interest Code, Resolution No. BDC-2, attached hereto. It is recommended that the City Council approve said Conflict of Interest Code at the City Council meeting of February 7, 2012. `WGY/ab RESOLUTION NO. BDC-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE THAT INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND SUBMITTING SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON FOR APPROVAL WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, the Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69, which establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon (the "Committee"); and WHEREAS, the Committee has elected to adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730) which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference, including any amendments to said regulation duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission; and WHEREAS, Section 4.5 of the Charter of the City of Vernon provides that regulations pertaining to any subject or model codes may be adopted by reference in their original form or with amendments; and WHEREAS, the Committee desires to adopt by reference the provisions of 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, as currently written and as amended from time to time by the Fair Political Practices Commission, as its Conflict of Interest Code; and WHEREAS, the Committee desires to designate which Committee positions are required to file Statements of Economic Interests and further desires to create disclosure categories for these positions. NOW, -THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby adopts the attached Conflict of Interest Code which. incorporates by reference the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments thereto duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, along with attached Appendix A which designates positions held by Committee officials required to file Statements of Economic Interests and attached Appendix B which establishes disclosure categories. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon, in his capacity as staff of for the Committee, is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution, the Conflict of Interest Code, including Appendix A and Appendix B, to the City Council of the City of Vernon for approval. SECTION 4: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby designates the Vernon City Clerk to serve as the filing officer for matters relating to the Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with the provisions of the Political Reform Act. -2- SECTION 5: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this.resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Committee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 2012. ATTEST: Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon -3- Name: Title: Chairman / Vice Chairman STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY'OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. BDC-2, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the.Committee duly held on Wednesday, January 25, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Committee. Executed this _ day of January, 2012, at Vernon, California. Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon (SEAL) VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE The Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69 which. establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon. The Committee has elected to adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et sea.), for state and local government agencies. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference and which may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public notice and hearing to conform to amendments of the Political Reform Act. The terms of the standard conflict of interest code in 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments thereto, along with Appendix A and. Appendix B in which officials are designated and disclosure categories are established, are hereby incorporated by reference and shall constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Vernon Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. APPENDIX A VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Designated Positions Committee members CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE DESIGNATED POSITIONS Disclosure Categories VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES There shall be one disclosure category, Disclosure Category L Each person in a designated position listed in Appendix A must disclose the following interests on his or her Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700). Disclosure Category 1 (a) Interests in real property located within the City of Vernon or within a two mile radius of the City. (b) Investments or business positions in entities doing business within the City of Vernon. (c) Investments or business positions in any entity that does business with or is soliciting business from the City of Vernon. (d) Income, including loans, gifts and travel payments, from any entity described in (a), (b), or (c). RESOLUTION NO. BDC-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE THAT INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND SUBMITTING SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON FOR APPROVAL WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, the Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69, which establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon (the "Committee"); and WHEREAS, the Committee has elected to adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730) which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference, including any amendments to said regulation duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission; and WHEREAS, Section 4.5 of the Charter of the City of Vernon provides that regulations pertaining to any subject or model codes may be adopted by reference in their original form or with amendments; and WHEREAS, the Committee desires to adopt by reference the provisions of 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, as currently written and as amended from time to time by the Fair Political Practices Commission, as its Conflict of Interest Code; and WHEREAS, the Committee desires to designate which Committee positions are required to file Statements of Economic Interests and further desires to create disclosure categories for these positions. NOW, -THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby adopts the attached Conflict of Interest Code which incorporates by reference the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments thereto duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, along with attached Appendix A which designates positions held by Committee officials required to file Statements of Economic Interests and attached Appendix B which establishes disclosure categories. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon, in his capacity as staff of for the Committee, is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution, the Conflict of Interest Code, including Appendix A and Appendix B, to the City Council of the City of Vernon for approval. SECTION 4: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby designates the Vernon City Clerk to serve as the filing officer for matters relating to the Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with the provisions of the Political Reform Act. 2_ SECTION 5: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Committee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 2012. Name: W. Michael McCormick Title: / Vice Chairman City Clerk of the CAL/y of Vernon -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. BDC-2, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the Committee duly held on Wednesday, January 25, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Committee. Executed this *— day of January, 2012, at Vernon, California. Willard G: City Clerk (SEAL) ty of Vernon VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE The Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69 which establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon. The Committee has elected to adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et seg.), for state and local government agencies. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference and which may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public notice and hearing to conform to amendments of the Political Reform Act. The terms of the standard conflict of interest code in 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments thereto, along with Appendix A and Appendix B in which officials are designated and disclosure categories are established, are hereby incorporated by reference and shall constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Vernon Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. APPENDIX A VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Designated Positions Committee members 1614 ►]01wel-9i]iT►YiI�I:� RSl[K6J-pam DESIGNATED POSITIONS Disclosure Categories APPENDIX B VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES There shall be one disclosure category, Disclosure Category 1. Each person in a designated position listed in Appendix A must disclose the following interests on his or her Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700). Disclosure Category 1 (a) Interests in real property located within the City of Vernon or within a two mile radius of the City. (b) Investments or business positions in entities doing business within the City of Vernon. (c) Investments or business positions in any entity that does business with or is soliciting business from the City of Vernon. (d) Income, including loans, gifts and travel payments, from any entity described in (a), (b), or (c). CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 2012 TO: Business Development Committee Q�/� FROM: Willard Yamaguchi, City Clerk (/ RE: Resolution No. BDC-2 — A Resolution of the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon Adopting a Conflict of Interest Code that Incorporates by Reference the Standard Conflict of Interest Code of the Fair Political Practices Commission and Submitting Said Conflict of Interest Code to the City Council of the City of Vernon for Approval Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. BDC-2 referenced above, which was approved by the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon on January 25, 2012. Thank you. WY:dj I:r, M,1"� c: Resolution No. BDC-2 { CF vER� nECEIVED JAN 19 2012 CITYCLERK'SO12 STAFF REPORT City Clerk's Office DATE: January 17, 2012 TO: Business Development Commission FROM: Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk A RECEIVED JAN 19 2012 CITY ADMINISTRATION RE: Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development — Conflict of Interest Code Background On April 19, 2011, the Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69 which established the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. As with other committees established within the same resolution, it is recommended that the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government code Section 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies. Once adopted by the Committee, the conflict of interest code will then be submitted to the City Council for approval. It may be returned for revisions for resubmission. The Committee's conflict of interest code becomes effective only after approval by the City Council. The Fair Political Practices Commission ("FPPC"), the state agency which administers the provisions of the Political Reform Act, has adopted a regulation (2 California Administrative Code Sections18730, copy attached) containing the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference into a local agency's conflict of interest code. The FPPC recommends that local agencies incorporate this model code by reference due to the complexity of the information and to provide for legislative or regulatory changes. When the FPPC's model code is revised, these changes would automatically be included in the Committee's conflict of interest code. Most local jurisdictions in California have incorporated the provisions of the FPPC model code into their local conflict of interest codes. The Vernon City Charter (Section 4.5) specifically permits model codes to be adopted by reference. Recommendation It is recommended that the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development adopt the proposed Conflict of Interest Code. WGY/ab (Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, Title 2, Division 6, California Code of Regulations.) § 18730. Provisions of Conflict -of -Interest Codes. (a) Incorporation by reference of the terms of this regulation along with the designation of employees and the formulation of disclosure categories in the Appendix referred to below constitute the adoption and promulgation of a conflict -of -interest code within the meaning of Section 87300 or the amendment of a conflict -of -interest code within the meaning of Section 87306 if the terms of this regulation are substituted for terms of a conflict -of -interest code already in effect. A code so amended or adopted and promulgated requires the reporting of reportable items in a manner substantially equivalent to the requirements of article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Sections 81000, et seq. The requirements of a conflict -of -interest code are in addition to other requirements of the Political Reform Act, such as the general prohibition against conflicts of interest contained in Section 87100, and to other state or local laws pertaining to conflicts of interest. (b) The terms of a conflict -of -interest code amended or adopted and promulgated pursuant to this regulation are as follows: (1) Section 1. Definitions. The definitions contained in the Political Reform Act of 1974, regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission (Regulations 18110, et seq.), and any amendments to the Act or regulations, are incorporated by reference into this conflict -of -interest code. (2) Section 2. Designated Employees. The persons holding positions listed in the Appendix are designated employees. It has been determined that these persons make or participate in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on economic interests. (3) Section 3. Disclosure Categories. This code does not establish any disclosure obligation for those designated employees who are also specified in Section 87200 if they are designated in this code in that same capacity or if the geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction in which those persons must report their economic interests pursuant to article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Sections 87200, et seq. In addition, this code does not establish any disclosure obligation for any designated employees who are designated in a conflict -of -interest code for another agency, if all of the following apply: (A) The geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction of the other agency; (B) The disclosure assigned in the code of the other agency is the same as that required under article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Section 87200; and (C).The filing officer is the same for both agencies.V Such persons are covered by this code for disqualification purposes only. With respect to all other designated employees, the disclosure categories set forth in the Appendix specify which kinds of economic interests are reportable. Such a designated employee shall disclose in his or her statement of economic interests those economic interests he or she has which are of the kind described in the disclosure categories to which he or she is assigned in the Appendix. It has been determined that the economic interests set forth in a designated employee's disclosure categories are the kinds of economic interests which he or she foreseeably can affect materially through the conduct of his or her office. (4) Section 4. Statements of Economic Interests: Place of Filing. The code reviewing body shall instruct all designated employees within its code to file statements of economic interests with the agency or with the code reviewing body, as provided by the code reviewing body in the agency's conflict -of -interest code. (5) Section 5. Statements of Economic Interests: Time of Filing. (A) Initial Statements. All designated employees employed by the agency on the effective date of this code, as originally adopted, promulgated and approved by the code reviewing body, shall file statements within 30 days after the effective date of this code. Thereafter, each person already in a position when it is designated by an amendment to this code shall file an initial statement within 30 days after the effective date of the amendment. (B) Assuming Office Statements. All persons assuming designated positions after the effective date of this code shall file statements within 30 days after assuming the designated positions, or if subject to State Senate confirmation, 30 days after being nominated or appointed. (C) Annual Statements. All designated employees shall file statements no later than April (D) Leaving Office Statements. All persons who leave designated positions shall file statements within'30 days after leaving office. (5.5) Section 5.5. Statements for Persons Who Resign Prior to Assuming Office. Any person who resigns within 12 months of initial appointment, or within 30 days of the date of notice provided by the filing officer to file an assuming office statement, is not deemed to have assumed office or left office, provided he or she did not make or participate in the making of, or use his or her position to influence any decision and did not receive or become entitled to receive any form of payment as a result of his or her appointment. Such persons shall not file either an assuming or leaving office statement. (A) Any person who resigns a position within 30 days of the date of a notice from the filing officer shall do both of the following: (1) File a written resignation with the appointing power; and (2) File a written statement with the filing officer declaring under penalty of perjury that during the period between appointment and resignation he or she did not make, participate in the making, or use the position to influence any decision of the agency or receive, or become entitled to receive, any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. (6) Section 6. Contents of and Period Covered by Statements of Economic Interests. (A) Contents of Initial Statements. Initial statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the effective date of the code and income received during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the code. (B) Contents of Assuming Office Statements. Assuming office statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the date of assuming office or, if subject to State Senate confirmation or appointment, on the date of nomination, and income received during the 12 months prior to the date of assuming office or the date of being appointed or nominated, respectively. (C) Contents of Annual Statements. Annual statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the previous calendar year provided, however, that the period covered by an employee's first annual statement shall begin on the effective date of the code or the date of assuming office whichever is later, or for a board or commission member subject to Section 87302.6, the day after the closing date of the most recent statement filed by the member pursuant to Regulation 18754. (D) Contents of Leaving Office Statements. Leaving office statements shall disclose reportable investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the period between the closing date of the last statement filed and the date of leaving office. (7) Section 7. Manner of Reporting. Statements of economic interests shall be made on forms prescribed by the Fair Political Practices Commission and supplied by the agency, and shall contain the following information: (A) Investment and Real Property Disclosure. When an investment or an interest in real property is required to be reported the statement shall contain the following: 1. A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; 2. The name of the business entity in which each investment is held, and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; 3. The address or other precise location of the real property; 4. A statement whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property equals or exceeds $2,000, exceeds $10,000, exceeds $100,000, or exceeds $1,000,000. (B) Personal Income Disclosure. When personal income is required to be reported,5 the statement shall contain: 1. The name and address of each source of income aggregating $500 or more in value, or $50 or more in value if the income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; 2. A statement whether the aggregate value of income from each source, or in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source, was $1,000 or less, greater than $1,000, greater than $10,000, or greater than $100,000; 3. A description of the consideration, if any, for which the income was received; 4. In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value of the gift; and the date on which the gift was received; 5. In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security, if any, given for the loan and the term of the loan. (C) Business Entity Income Disclosure. When income of a business entity, including income of a sole proprietorship, is required to be reported,6 the statement shall contain: entity; 1. The name, address, and a general description of the business activity of the business 2. The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the filer's pro rata share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than $10,000. (D) Business Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, a designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or in which he or she holds any position of management, a description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. (E) Acquisition or Disposal During Reporting Period. In the case of an annual or leaving office statement, if an investment or an interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. (8) Section 8. Prohibition on Receipt of Honoraria. (A) No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept any honorarium from any source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests. This section shall not apply to any part-time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) of Section 89501 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. This section shall not limit or prohibit payments, advances, or reimbursements for travel and related lodging and subsistence authorized by Section 89506. (8.1) Section 8.1. Prohibition on Receipt of Gifts in Excess of $420. (A) No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept gifts with a total value of more than $420 in a calendar year from any single source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests. This section shall not apply to'any part-time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (e), (f), and (g) of Section 89503 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. (8.2) Section 8.2. Loans to Public Officials. (A) No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the elected officer holds office or over which the elected officer's agency has direction and control. (B) No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the public official holds office or over which the public official's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (C) No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. (D) No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (E) This section shall not apply to the following: 1. Loans made to the campaign committee of an elected officer or candidate for elective office. 2. Loans made by a public official's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent -in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such persons, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans from a person which, in the aggregate, do not exceed five hundred dollars ($500) at any given time. 4. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (8.3) Section 8.3. Loan Terms. (A) Except as set forth in subdivision (B), no elected officer of a state or local government agency shall, from the date of his or her election to office through the date he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan of $500 or more, except when the loan is in writing and clearly states the terms of the loan, including the parties to the loan agreement, date of the loan, amount of the loan, term of the loan, date or dates when payments shall be due on the loan and the amount of the payments, and the rate of interest paid on the loan. (B) This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1. Loans made to the campaign committee of the elected officer. 2. Loans made to the elected officer by his or her spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent -in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (C) Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provision of Title 9 of the Government Code. (8.4) Section 8.4. Personal Loans. (A) Except as set forth in subdivision (B), a personal loan received by any designated employee shall become a gift to the designated employee for the purposes of this section in the following circumstances: 1. If the loan has a defined date or dates for repayment, when the statute of limitations for filing an action for default has expired. 2. If the loan has no defined date or dates for repayment, when one year has elapsed from the later of the following: a. The date the loan was made. b. The date the last payment of $100 or more was made on the loan. c. The date upon which the debtor has made payments on the loan aggregating to less than $250 during the previous 12 months. (B) This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1. A loan made to the campaign committee of an elected officer or a candidate for elective office. 2. A loan that would otherwise not be a gift as defined in this title. 3. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor has taken reasonable action to collect the balance due. 4. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor, based on reasonable business considerations, has not undertaken collection action. Except in a criminal action, a creditor who claims that a loan is not a gift on the basis of this paragraph has the burden of proving that the decision for not taking collection action was based on reasonable business considerations. 5. A loan trade to a debtor who has filed for bankruptcy and the loan is ultimately discharged in bankruptcy. (C) Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provisions of Title 9 of the Government Code. (9) Sectiop 9. Disqualification. No designated employee shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the making of any governmental decision which he or she knows or has reason to know will have a reasonably foreseeable material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the official or a member of his or her immediate family or on: (A) Any business entity in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth $2,000 or more; (B) Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth $2,000 or more; (C) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating $500 or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made; (D) Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or (E) Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating $420 or more provided to, received by, or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. (9.3) Section 9.3. Legally Required Participation. No designated employee shall be prevented from making or participating in the making of any decision to the extent his or her participation is legally required for the decision to be made. The fact that the vote of a designated employee who is on a voting body is needed to break a tie does not make his or her participation legally required for purposes of this section. (9.5) Section 9.5. Disqualification of State Officers and Employees. In addition to the general disqualification provisions of section 9, no state administrative official shall make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence any governmental decision directly relating to any contract where the state administrative official knows or has reason to know that any party to the contract is a person with whom the state administrative official, or any member of his or her immediate family has, within 12 months prior to the time when the official action is to be taken: (A) Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public, regarding any investment or interest in real property; or (B) Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public regarding the rendering of goods or services totaling in value $1,000 or more. (10) Section 10. Disclosure of Disqualifying Interest. When a designated employee determines that he or she should not make a governmental decision because he or she has a disqualifying interest in it, the determination not to act may be accompanied by disclosure of the disqualifying interest. (11) Section 11. Assistance of the Commission and Counsel. Any designated employee who is unsure of his or her duties under this code may request assistance from the Fair Political Practices Commission pursuant to Section 83114 and Regulations 18329 and 18329.5 or from the attorney for his or her agency, provided that nothing in this section requires the attorney for the agency to issue any formal or informal opinion. (12) Section 12. Violations. This code has the force and effect of law. Designated employees violating any provision of this code are subject to the administrative, criminal and civil sanctions provided in the Political Reform Act, Sections 81000-91014. In addition, a decision in relation to which a violation of the disqualification provisions of this code or of Section 87100 or 87450 has occurred may be aside as void pursuant to Section 91003. 'Designated employees who are required to file statements of economic interests under any other agency's conflict -of -interest code, or under article 2 for a different jurisdiction, may expand their statement of economic interests to cover reportable interests in both jurisdictions, and file copies of this expanded statement with both entities in lieu of filing separate and distinct statements, provided that each copy of such expanded statement filed in place of an original is signed and verified by the designated employee as if it were an original. See Section 81004. 2See Section 81010 and Regulation 18115 for the duties of filing officers and persons in agencies who make and retain copies of statements and forward the originals to the filing officer. 3For the purpose of disclosure only (not disqualification), an interest in real property does not include the principal residence of the filer. 4Investments.and interests in real property which have a fair market value of less than $2,000 are not investments and interests in real property within the meaning of the Political Reform Act. However, investments or interests in real property of an individual include those held by the individual's spouse and dependent children as well as a pro rata share of any investment or interest in real property of any business entity or trust in which the individual, spouse and dependent children own, in the aggregate, a direct, indirect or beneficial interest of 10 percent or greater. 5A designated employee's income includes his or her community property interest in the income of his or her spouse but does not include salary or reimbursement for expenses received from a state, local or federal government agency. 6Income of a business entity is reportable if the direct, indirect or beneficial interest of the filer and the filer's spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest. In addition, the disclosure of persons who are clients or customers of a business entity is required only if the clients or customers are within one of the disclosure categories of the filer. Note: Authority cited: Section 83112, Government Code. Reference: Sections 87103(e), 87300- 87302, 89501, 89502 and 89503, Government Code. HISTORY I. New section filed 4-2-80 as an emergency; effective upon filing (Register 80, No. 14). Certificate of Compliance included. 2. Editorial correction (Register 80, No. 29). 3. Amendment of subsection (b) filed 1-9-81; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 81, No. 2). 4. Amendment of subsection (b)(7)(B)1. filed 1-26-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83, No. 5). 5. Amendment of subsection (b)(7)(A) filed 11-10-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83, No. 46). 6. Amendment filed 4-13-87; operative 5-13-87 (Register 87, No. 16). 7. Amendment of subsection (b) filed 10-21-88; operative 11-20-88 (Register 88, No. 46). 8. Amendment of subsections (b)(8)(A) and (b)(8)(B) and numerous editorial changes filed 8-28-90; operative 9-27-90 (Reg. 90, No. 42). 9. Amendment of subsections (b)(3), (b)(8) and renumbering of following subsections and amendment of Note filed 8-7-92; operative 9-7-92 (Register 92, No. 32). 10. Amendment of subsection (b)(5.5) and new subsections (b)(5.5)(A)-(A)(2) filed 2-4-93; operative 2-4-93 (Register 93, No. 6). 11. Change without regulatory effect adopting Conflict of Interest Code for California Mental Health Planning Council filed 11-22-93 pursuant to title 1, section 100, California Code of Regulations (Register 93, No. 48). Approved by Fair Political Practices Commission 9-21-93. 12. Change without regulatory effect redesignating Conflict of Interest Code for California Mental Health Planning Council as chapter 62, section 55100 filed 1-4-94 pursuant to title 1, section 100, California Code of Regulations (Register 94, No. 1). 13. Editorial correction adding History 11 and 12 and deleting duplicate section number (Register 94, No. 17). 14. Amendment of subsection (b)(8), designation of subsection (b)(8)(A), new subsection (b)(8)(B), and amendment of subsections (b)(8.1)-(b)(8.1)(B), (b)(9)(E) and Note filed 3-14-95; operative 3-14-95 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 95, No. 11). 15. Editorial correction inserting inadvertently omitted language in footnote 4 (Register 96, No. 13). 16. Amendment of subsections (b)(8)(A)-(B) and (b)(8.1)(A), repealer of subsection (b)(8.1)(B), and amendment of subsection (b)(12) filed 10-23-96; operative 10-23-96 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 96, No. 43). 17. Amendment of subsections (b)(8.1) and (9)(E) filed 4-9-97; operative 4-9-97 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 97, No. 15). 18. Amendment of subsections (b)(7)(B)5., new subsections (b)(8.2)-(b)(8.4)(C) and amendment of Note filed 8-24-98; operative 8-24-98 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 98, No. 35). 19. Editorial.correction of subsection (a) (Register 98, No. 47). 20. Amendment of subsections (b)(8.1), (b)(8.1)(A) and (b)(9)(E) filed 5-11-99; operative 5-11-99 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 99, No. 20). 21. Amendment of subsections (b)(8.1)-(b)(8.1)(A) and (b)(9)(E) filed 12-6-2000; operative 1-1- 2001 pursuant to the 1974 version of Government Code section 11380.2 and Title 2, California Code of Regulations, section 18312(d) and (e) (Register 2000, No. 49). 22. Amendment of subsections (b)(3) and (b)(10) filed 1-10-2001; operative 2-1-2001. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements) (Register 2001, No. 2). 23. Amendment of subsections (b)(7)(A)4., (b)(7)(B)L-2., (b)(8.2)(E)3., (b)(9)(A)-(C) and footnote 4. filed 2-13-2001. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements) (Register 2001, No. 7). 24. Amendment of subsections (b)(8.1)-(b)(8.1)(A) filed 1-16-2003; operative 1-1-2003. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements) (Register 2003, No. 3). 25. Editorial correction of History 24 (Register 2003, No. 12). 26. Editorial correction removing extraneous phrase in subsection (b)(9.5)(B) (Register 2004, No. 33). 27. Amendment of subsections (b)(2)-(3), (b)(3)(C), (b)(6)(C), (b)(8.1)-(b)(8.1)(A), (b)(9)(E) and (b)(I1)-(12) filed 1-4-2005; operative 1-1-2005 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4 (Register 2005, No. 1). 28. Amendment of subsection (b)(7)(A)4. filed 10-11-2005; operative 11-10-2005 (Register 2005, No. 41). 29. Amendment of subsections (a), (b)(1), (b)(3), (b)(8.1), (b)(8.1)(A) and (b)(9)(E) filed 12-18-2006; operative 1-1-2007. Submitted to OAL pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office ofAdministrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements) (Register 2006, No. 51). 30. Amendment of subsections (b)(8.1)-(b)(8.1)(A) and (b)(9)(E) filed 10-31-2008; operative 11- 30-2008. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office ofAdministrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2008, No. 44). 31. Amendment of section heading and section filed 11-15-2010; operative 12-15-2010. Submitted to OAL for filing pursuant to Fair Political Practices Commission v. Office of' Administrative Law, 3 Civil C010924, California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, nonpublished decision, April 27, 1992 (FPPC regulations only subject to 1974 Administrative Procedure Act rulemaking requirements and not subject to procedural or substantive review by OAL) (Register 2010, No. 47). RESOLUTION NO. 2012-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON APPROVING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, by Resolution No. BDC-2, adopted January 25, 2012, the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development ("BDC") approved and adopted a Conflict of Interest Code (the "Code") and submitted the Code to the City Council of the City of Vernon pursuant to Sections 81000 et seq. of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Code submitted meets the criteria of California Government Code Section 81000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Conflict of Interest Code submitted by the BDC and provided for in Resolution No. BDC-2 is hereby approved. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Council of this City. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of February, 2012. Name: William J- Davis Title: / Mayor Pro-Tem -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2012-26, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Tuesday, February 7, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pr Tem of the City of Vernon. Executed this day of February 2012, at Vernon, California. W llard G. Y uc i, ty Clerk (SEAL) -3- CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 2012 TO: Kristen Enomoto, Council Department Manager Alex Kung, Senior Accounting Manager Mark Whitworth, City Administrator/Fire hief FROM: Willard Yamaguchi, City Clerk RE: Resolution No. 2012-26 — A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Approving a Conflict of Interest Code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2012-26 referenced above, which was approved by the City Council of the City of Vernon on February 7, 2012. Thank you. WY:dj Attachment c: Resolution Nos. 2012-26, BDC-2 { ov vERM RECEIVED JAN 3 1 2012 a�G��tECEIVED JAN 2 6 2012 CITY ADMINISTRATION CITY CLERICS OFFICE STAFF REPORT City Clerk's Office 9 DATE: January 25, 2012 TO: Honorable Mayor Pro-Tem and City Council FROM: Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk Ot RE: Business Development Committee Conflict of Interest Code On April 19, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69 which established the Ad Ijoc Advisory Committee for Business Development: As with other committees established within the same resolution, it is recommended that the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government code Section 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies. On January 25, 2012, the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development adopted the Conflict of Interest Code, Resolution No. BDC-2, attached hereto. It is recommended that the City Council approve said Conflict of Interest Code at the City Council meeting of February 7, 2012. `WGY/ab RESOLUTION NO. BDC-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE THAT INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND SUBMITTING SAID CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON FOR APPROVAL WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, the Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69, which establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon (the "Committee"); and WHEREAS, the Committee has elected to adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation (2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730) which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference, including any amendments to said regulation duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission; and WHEREAS, Section 4.5 of the Charter of the City of Vernon provides that regulations pertaining to any subject or model codes may be adopted by reference in their original form or with amendments; and WHEREAS, the Committee desires to adopt by reference the provisions of 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, as currently written and as amended from time to time by the Fair Political Practices Commission, as its Conflict of Interest Code; and WHEREAS, the Committee desires to designate which Committee positions are required to file Statements of Economic Interests and further desires to create disclosure categories for these positions. NOW, -THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby adopts the attached Conflict of Interest Code which. incorporates by reference the terms of 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments thereto duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, along with attached Appendix A which designates positions held by Committee officials required to file Statements of Economic Interests and attached Appendix B which establishes disclosure categories. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon, in his capacity as staff of for the Committee, is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution, the Conflict of Interest Code, including Appendix A and Appendix B, to the City Council of the City of Vernon for approval. SECTION 4: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby designates the Vernon City Clerk to serve as the filing officer for matters relating to the Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with the provisions of the Political Reform Act. -2- SECTION 5: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this.resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Committee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 2012. ATTEST: Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon -3- Name: Title: Chairman / Vice Chairman STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY'OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. BDC-2, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the.Committee duly held on Wednesday, January 25, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Committee. Executed this _ day of January, 2012, at Vernon, California. Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon (SEAL) VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE The Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69 which. establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon. The Committee has elected to adopt a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et sea.), for state and local government agencies. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which may be incorporated by reference and which may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public notice and hearing to conform to amendments of the Political Reform Act. The terms of the standard conflict of interest code in 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730 and any amendments thereto, along with Appendix A and. Appendix B in which officials are designated and disclosure categories are established, are hereby incorporated by reference and shall constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Vernon Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. APPENDIX A VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Designated Positions Committee members CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE DESIGNATED POSITIONS Disclosure Categories VERNON AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES There shall be one disclosure category, Disclosure Category L Each person in a designated position listed in Appendix A must disclose the following interests on his or her Statements of Economic Interests (Form 700). Disclosure Category 1 (a) Interests in real property located within the City of Vernon or within a two mile radius of the City. (b) Investments or business positions in entities doing business within the City of Vernon. (c) Investments or business positions in any entity that does business with or is soliciting business from the City of Vernon. (d) Income, including loans, gifts and travel payments, from any entity described in (a), (b), or (c). RESOLUTION NO. BDC-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. BDC-2 REGARDING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, on April 19, 2011, the Vernon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-69, which establishes an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development in the City of Vernon (the "Committee"); and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2012, the Committee adopted Resolution No. BDC-2 adopting a conflict of interest code similar to those required by the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended (Government.Code Sections 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the Committee does not make decisions that affect economic interests, and thus, should not be required to file a conflicts of interests codes and economic interest statements; and WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc.Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon desires to repeal Resolution No. BDC-2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained above are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development hereby repeals Resolution No. BDC-2. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon, in his capacity as staff of for the Committee, is hereby authorized and directed to send a copy of this Resolution to the City Council of the City of Vernon for approval SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Committee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13`h day of June, 2012. T Name: W. Michael McCormick Title:- lia / Vice Chairman - 2 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. BDC-3, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the Committee duly held on Wednesday, June 13, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Committee. Executed this day of June, 12, at Vernon, California. llar G. li. aa c i, City Clerk of e ity Vernon (SEAL) - 3 - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: June 14, 2012 TO: Business Development Committee FROM: Willard Yamaguchi, City Clerk / t RE: Resolution No. BDC-3 — A Resolution of the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon Repealing Resolution No. BDC-2 Regarding the Conflict of Interest Code Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. BDC-3 referenced above, which was approved by the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development of the City of Vernon on June 13, 2012. Thank you. WY:dj Attachment c: Resolution No. BDC-3 R'F ` `IVED JUN 0 7 20iE'' CITY .GItua'S OFFICE,. is STAFF REPORT Business Development Committee DATE: May 29, 2012 TO; 1lottorable.ChairandCommittee Members e v FROM: Samoal KLvin Wilson, DirectorofCommunity, Services St Water RE: Conflict of Interest Code RECEIVED JUN 0 6 20,1Z CITY AWINITRATION' The City ot'Vemon's independent ethics advisor was requested to give his opinion on whether the Ciy's Business Development Committee was required to adopt a contlictof lntei st code. 'fhe Business' Development Committee adopted Resolution No. BDC-2 atits January 25i 2012 meeting, establishing a conflict of intanst code for its committee members. Cityslall'bad found it increasingly difficult to bring relevant subject matter to the conttnitice that was not in. violation with this conflict of interest code. 'Therefore, the independent ethics advisor was requested to give rat opinion on whether a coil hicl of interest code was necessary for an Ad floc committee. John Van De Kanp and Robert NL Stern have provided ail opinion on the subject matter, a copy of which is attached. to brief it is their opinion that the Ad aloe Committee for Economic Development ("Business Development Committee") does not make decisions [lint affect economic interests and thus should not be required to rife Conlliels of Inici,est Codes and economic interest statements. li' it is Itno• idetemlincd lhat the coninittecs are making decisions that are regularly accepted by the City Council, then the committee should be subject to the conflicts provisions of the Political Itef'onn Act of 1974. If motribers ol'the committee want to submit economic interest statements on a voluntary basis, they are permitted to do so. It is therefore recommended that since the Business Development Committee serves only as an advisory board, that the Conflict of interest code be repeated. S W Attachment re -sellers, buyers, traders, brokers, marketers, consultants, and other businesses that purchase, sell, and/or transfer electrical energy or fuel for the generation of electrical energy and do business with the City of Vernon Light & Power Department,and income, loans, travel payments and gifts from anyone who is in the service area of the Department. The initial question that must be addressed: do these committees make decisions or participate in making decisions for the city? If they do, then the conflicts codes are required. If not, the codes are not mandated by state law. The conflicts of interest portions of the Political Reform Act of 1974 were designed to identify persons who were making or participating in making decisions affecting economic interests. The 1974 Act was carefully crafted to take into account a 1970 California Supreme Court decision which ruled that the state could not require persons to disclose assets that could not be affected by their governmental decisions. [See City of Carmel by the Sea v. Young, (1970) 2 Cal.3d 259.] Thus, it must be determined if these commissions make governmental decisions. The California Fair Political Practices Commission has issued regulations that provided guidance on this question. The regulations say that members of commissions (even those that are non -salaried or advisory) possess decisionmaking authority: 1, if they make a final governmental decision; 2. if they may compel a governmental decision (or prevent a decision through veto power or the exclusive power to initiate a decision); or 3. if they make substantive recommendations that are and over an extended period of time have been regularly approved without significant amendment or modification by the another public official or governmental agency (namely, the Vernon City Council). See FPPC Reg. 18701. It appears that the the two Vernon committees do not meet the first two parts of the regulation and that it maybe too early to determine if they meet the third part (over a period of time their recommendations have been approved without significant amendment or modification). The Fair Political Practices Commission has issued opinions addressing situations similar to this. For example, in the Wilson opinion issued in 1994, it said: Where a board or commission charged with making substantive recommendations has been newly formed and has no history of its recommendations being regularly approved over an extended period of time, this agency has advised that such a board or commission is not yet a decisionmaking entity under the Act. [Wilson Advice Letter 1-94-307 and confirmed by several other similar advice letters.] Because the two Vernon committees are brand new and have no track record where the city council has regularly approved their recommendations, it appears that the city should not continue to require conflicts of interest statements and disclosures by the members of the committees until it is clear that the committees come within this requirement. We would suggest that the city keep careful track of the committees' recommendations forwarded to the city council and how the council responds to the recommendations. If after a period of time (no more than two years), the council is accepting all or most of the recommendations without significant changes, then the committees should be required to adopt the appropriate conflicts codes. If the members of the committees want to voluntarily submit disclosure statements in the future, they may do so, but it should be made clear that this is not a requirement since most are not considered public officials within the terms of the Political Reform Act. (Any member of the committees who are already public officials, such as city councilmembers and other city officials, must continue to file their statements.) Members of the committee who wish to withdraw their disclosure statements from the public record should ask the city clerk to return their statements to them. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2012-26 REGARDING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, on February 7, 2012, the City Council of the City of Vernon adopted Resolution No. 2012-26 approving a conflict of interest code for the Advisory Committee For Business Development (the "Committee"); and WHEREAS, the Committee does not make decisions that affect economic interests, and thus, should not be required to file a Conflicts of Interests code and economic interest statements; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2012, by Resolution No. BDC-3, the Committee repealed Resolution No. BDC-2 which adopted a conflict of interest code similar to one required by the Political Reform Act of. 1974, as amended (Government Code Sections 81000, et seq.), for state and local government agencies; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon desires to repeal Resolution No. 2012-26. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the recitals contained hereinabove are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby repeals Resolution No. 2012-26. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution, and the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of the Council of this City. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June, 2012. Wi iam J. Davis Name: Title: Igayo6P/ Mayor Pro-Tem STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, Willard G. Yamaguchi, City Clerk of the City of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2012-105, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly held on Tuesday, June 19, 2012, and thereafter was duly signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro -Teem/ of the City of Vernon. Executed this �/ day of June, 2012, at Vernon, California. (SEAL) - 3 - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 2012 TO: Kristen Enomoto, Assistant to the City Administrator Alex Kung, Assistant to the City Administrator Mark Whitworth, City Administrator/Fire Chief S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water FROM: Willard Yamaguchi, City Clerk RE: Resolution No. 2012-105 — A Resol ion of the City Council of the City of Vernon Repealing Resolution No. 2012-26 Regarding the Conflict of Interest Code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2012-105 referenced above, which was approved by the City Council of the City of Vernon on June 19, 2012. Thank you. WY:dj Attachment c: Resolution Nos. 2012-26, 2012-105 RECEINI1ED RECEIVED JUN 12 2012 CITY ADMINISTRATION ,JUN 14 CITY CLERK'S uri i�E STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMEN DATE: June 13, 2012 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water RE: Repeal of the Conflict of Interest Code for the Business Development Committee The City of Vernon's independent ethics advisor was requested to give his opinion on whether the City's Business Development Committee was required to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-26 at its February, 2012 meeting, establishing a conflict of interest code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. City staff had found it increasingly difficult to bring relevant subject matter to the committee that was not in violation with this conflict of interest code. Therefore, the independent ethics advisor was requested to give an opinion on whether a Conflict of Interest Code was necessary for an Ad Hoc committee. John Van De Kamp and Robert M. Stern have provided an opinion on the subject matter, a copy of which is attached. In brief, it is their opinion that the Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development ("Business Development Committee") does not make decisions that affect economic interests and thus should not be required to file Conflicts of Interest Codes and economic interest statements. If it is later determined that the committees are making decisions that are regularly accepted by the City Council, then the committee should be subject to the conflicts provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974. If members of the committee want to submit economic interest statements on a voluntary basis, they are permitted to do so. It is therefore recommended that since the Business Development Committee serves only as an advisory board, that the City Council repeal the Conflict of Interest Code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. SKW Enclosure RECEIVED OF Vg JUN 1''4 2012 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE �6jreer moa COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mark C. Whitworth, City Administrator FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson,Direetor of Community Services & Water DATE: June 13, 2012 SUBJECT: Repeal of the Conflict of Interest Code for the Business Development Committee The City of Vernon's independent ethics advisor was requested to give his opinion on whether the City's Business Development Committee was required to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-26 at its February, 2012 meeting, establishing a conflict of interest code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. City staff had found it increasingly difficult to bring relevant subject matter to the committee that was not in violation with this conflict of interest code. Therefore, the independent ethics advisor was requested to give an opinion on whether a Conflict of Interest Code was necessary for an Ad Hoc committee. John Van De Kamp and Robert M. Stern have provided an opinion on the subject matter, a copy of which is attached. In brief, it is their opinion that the Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development ("Business Development Committee") does not make decisions that affect economic interests and thus should not be required to file Conflicts of Interest Codes and economic interest statements. If it is later determined that the committees are making decisions that are regularly accepted by the City Council, then the committee should be subject to the conflicts provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974. If members of the committee want to submit economic interest statements on a voluntary basis, they are permitted to do so. It is therefore recommended that since the Business Development Committee serves only as an advisory board, that the City Council repeal the Conflict of Interest Code for the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for Business Development. y;, May 21, 2012 To: Jerry Simmons From: John Van de Kamp and Robert M. Stern Re: Vernon Committees You have asked us to review the Conflicts of Interest Codes for two committees in the City of Vernon to see if they should be modified: the Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development and the Ad Hoc Committee on Electric Rates. The Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development adopted its conflict of interest code on January 25, 2012, and the Ad Hoc Committee on Electric Rates adopted its conflicts of interest code on October 5. 2011. Executive Summary The two committees, the Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development and the Ad Hoc Committee on Electric Rates, do not make decisions that affect economic interests and thus should not be required to file Conflicts of Interest Codes and economic interest statements. If it is later determined that the committees are making decisions that are regularly accepted by the City Council, then the committees should be subject to the conflicts provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974. If members of the committees want to submit economic interest statements on a voluntary basis, they should be permitted to do so. Memorandum The codes adopted for the two Ad Hoc Committees were quite extensive. For the Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development, members must disclose all interests in real property located in Vernon or within a two mile radius of the city; all investments in entities doing business in the city; all investments or business positions in interests doing business with or soliciting business from the city; and income, loans, travel payments and gifts from anyone who has real property or does business in or with the city. For the Ad Hoc Committee on Electric Rates, the disclosures are not as broad. Members must disclose interests in real property within the service area of the City of Vernon Light and Power Department; business positions with entities within the service area of the Department, investments of 10% or greater in entities within the service area of the Department; investments and business positions with electric utilities, power exchanges, power plants, fuel supply/transportation entities, suppliers, vendors, sellers, re -sellers, buyers, traders, brokers, marketers, consultants, and other businesses that purchase, sell, and/or transfer electrical energy or fuel for the generation of electrical energy and do business with the City of Vernon Light & Power Department,and income, loans, travel payments and gifts from anyone who is in the service area of the Department. The initial question that must be addressed: do these committees make decisions or participate in making decisions for the city? If they do, then the conflicts codes are required. If not, the codes are not mandated by state law. The conflicts of interest portions of the Political Reform Act of 1974 were designed to identify persons who were making or participating in making decisions affecting economic interests. The 1974 Act was carefully crafted to take into account a 1970 California Supreme Court decision which ruled that the state could not require persons to disclose assets that could not be affected by their governmental decisions. [See City of Carmel by the Sea v. Young, (1970) 2 Cal.3d 259.1 Thus, it must be determined if these commissions make governmental decisions. The California Fair Political Practices Commission has issued regulations that provided guidance on this question. The regulations say that members of commissions (even those that are non -salaried or advisory) possess decisionmaking authority: 1. if they make a final governmental decision; 2. if they may compel a governmental decision (or prevent a decision through veto power or the exclusive power to initiate a decision); or 3. if they make substantive recommendations that are and over an extended period of time have been regularly approved without significant amendment or modification by the another public official or governmental agency (namely, the Vernon City Council). See FPPC Reg. 18701. It appears that the the two Vernon committees do not meet the first two parts of the regulation and that it maybe too early to determine if they meet the third part (over a period of time their recommendations have been approved without significant amendment or modification). The Fair Political Practices Commission has issued opinions addressing situations similar to this. For example, in the Wilson opinion issued in 1994, it said: Where a board or commission charged with making substantive recommendations has been newly formed and has no history of its recommendations being regularly approved over an extended period of time, this agency has advised that such a board or commission is not yet a decisionmaking entity under the Act. [Wilson Advice Letter 1-94-307 and confirmed by several other similar advice letters.] Because the two Vernon committees are brand new and have no track record where the city council has regularly approved their recommendations, it appears that the city should not continue to require conflicts of interest statements and disclosures by the members of the committees until it is clear that the committees come within this requirement. We would suggest that the city keep careful track of the committees' recommendations forwarded to the city council and how the council responds to the recommendations. If after a period of time (no more than two years), the council is accepting all or most of the recommendations without significant changes, then the committees should be required to adopt the appropriate conflicts codes. If the members of the committees want to voluntarily submit disclosure statements in the future, they may do so, but it should be made clear that this is not a requirement since most are not considered public officials within the terms of the Political Reform Act. (Any member of the committees who are already public officials, such as city councilmembers and other city officials, must continue to file their statements.) Members of the committee who wish to withdraw their disclosure statements from the public record should ask the city clerk to return their statements to them.