The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution No. 2013-031 (6)Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update - Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection III Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.891 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx ,Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II------------ II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit - Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include .Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module.: Base Vol: 89 798 25 44 509 184 85 140 23 28 235 74 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1189 - 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.47 0.53 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3103 97 1600 2350 850 1600 1374 226 1600 1217 383 ------------I--------------- II-------------- =11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:51 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour - ---------------'---------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection III Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - III Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.973 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E Street Name: _ Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L- T R L - T R L- T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II----------`----I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 544 36 86 862 93 169 335 49 25 169 52 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.99 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252. 77 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRY Volume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I' Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 0.67 0.13 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3001 199 1600 2888 312 1600 1396 204 1600 1224 376 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.21 0.21 .Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to AUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 _ Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as .Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 112 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - J12 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.199 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec)- Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: - Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 280 909 235. 19 162 22 59 688 129 181 859 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHt Volume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600-1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Ad5ustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 2.76 0.24 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2543 657 1600 2817 383 1600 2695 505 1600 3041 159 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.53 0.53 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.170.42 0.42 Crit Moves: -Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 13-1 Vernon GeneralPlanCirculation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 _ Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 412 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - 912 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(x): 1.335 Loss Time (sec):. 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T- R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 224 122 55 771 42 30 860 219 248 855 23 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 197 -334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 i MLF Adj: 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 ---------------------------II---------------II-------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: .Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 -1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 1600 2072 1128 1606 3035 165 1600 2551 649 1600 3116 84 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II-----------`---I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.23 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: **** ***# #**# ##*# Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc.. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Moo Dec 10, 2022 10:48:45 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update - Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------_------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 6) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.960 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E 'Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R - L - T - R L T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. .Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: ,Base Vol: 199 960 36 35 656 208 131 108 133 79 531 87 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49. 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 118 791 130 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 297 1430. 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 118 .791 130 User Adj: -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 118 791 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 118 791 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 218 791 130 Ov1AdjVol: 0 ------------ I--------------- II---------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16001600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.45 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.19 0.12 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.25 0.08 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.00 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario '-------------------------------------------------------' Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 14-1 ------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - N13 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.019 Loss Time (sac): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 - Level Of Service:. F Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound :Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T R ------------ I ------`-------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------- I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0. 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 838 73 109 964 188 172 688 290 29 240 30 Growth Adj:- 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 "Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial rut: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 PHF Volume: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 "Ov1Adj Vol: 235 ------------I--------------- II---------------II-------------=-II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 16003200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II'--------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.39 0.07 0.10 0.45 0.18 0.16 0.32 0.27 0.03 0.11 0.03 Ov1AdjV/S: - - 0.15 Crit Moves• +++# +++* ++*+ +*+* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan. Circulation Element.Update Current General Plan Year 2035 - Morning Peak Hour - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 414 Downey -Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - f14. Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X):_ 0.998- Loss Time (sec):. 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 - Level Of Service: E Street Name: Downey Road - Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound - Movement: L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11______________-I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 .1 -2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 846 109 51 481 173 50 258 45 167 740 141 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49. 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 Added Vol: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210. Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1261 162 76 717 -258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------h Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 .1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 .Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.68 0.32 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2688 512 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.22 0.16 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.09 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario. Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:46:57 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 EveningPeakHour -------------------------------------------------------------------------`----- Level Of Service Computation Report. ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 114 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - k14 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.043 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound . Movement: L - T R L - T - R L.- T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------- ----- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0- 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 043 204 199 1022 81 150 611 205 156 291 82 'Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1256 304 297 1523 122 224 910 305 232 434 122 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o l.00 1.o0 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2497 703 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.19 0.19 0.46 0.08 0.14 0.28 0.19 0.08 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: *#*# **+• **** **** Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to XUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario - Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 6) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection M15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - 415 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.079 Loss Time (sec): 30 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Downey Road - - Slauson. Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T -- R L - T - R L- T - R L- T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1, 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module:. Base Vol: 8 20 8 131 42 93 101 703 20 1 1134 455 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 Reduced Vol: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLP Adj:" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 676 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.94 0.06 0.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 498. 1102 1600 3113. 69 2 2282 916 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.090.34 0.34 0.00 0.74 0.74 Crit Moves: Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012. 10:48:57 Page-16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 815 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 - Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.075 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle:. 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 29 95 398 25 158 112 1069 9 1 829 153 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bee: 27 93 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 93 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27. 93 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 Reduct-Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 93 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 93 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.86 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.69 0.31 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 219 1381 1600 3188 12 3 2699 498 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- r11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.46 0.46 Crit Moves: *#** +*** *******# T=affix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46. Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length B) Method (Future- Volume. Alternative) Intersection 116 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.717 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): - xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: - 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R L- T - R L- T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------`II---------------II-_-------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 93 661 1149 22 622 717 178 519 139 200 236 170 Growth-Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bee: 139 995 1712- 33 '927 1068 265 773 207 298 352 253 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 139 9B5 1712 33 927 1068 265 773 207 298 352 253 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 139 985 1712 33 927 0 265 773 207 ,298 352 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 139 985 1712 33 927 0 265 773 207 298 352 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 rinalVolume: 139 985 1712 33 927 0 265 773 207 29B 352 0 ------------ I--------------- II --------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I .Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 1600 4124 676 1600 1600 3200 ------------I------------ ---II-------------- -II--------------- II-------- -.------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.15 2.07 0..02 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.19 0.31 0.19 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to XUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 816 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - 016 Cycle (sec):- 100, Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.594 -Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L.- T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11=--------------I' Control: Protected Protected - Split Phase, Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 9 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 710 798 39 1025 260 999 582 404 279 152 476 Growth Adj; 1.49 2.49 1.49 .1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 387 669 867 -602 416 226 -709 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 387 669 867 602 416 226 709 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 0.00 PHF Volume: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 0 669 867 602 416 226 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 0 669 867 602 416 226 0 PCE Ad5: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 0..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 .FinalVolume: 79. 1058 1189 51 1527 0 669 867 602 416 226 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.31 1.87 0.82 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 2090 2996 1311 2600 1600 3200 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.74 0.03 0.24 0.00 0.32 0.29 0.46 0.26 0.14 0.00 Crit Moves: **** +*** **** #k** Trafflx 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGECA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 18-1 ---------------------------------- ------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ----------------------------- Level Of Service computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.949 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 - Level Of Service: E Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 -0 1 1 0 1 ------------ 1--------------- II --------------- II------------- --11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 279 1132 4 122 670 934 510 62 32 3 249. 94 Growth Adj: .1.49 1.49 1-.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Has: 416 1687 6 182 998 1392 760 92 48 4 371 140 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 416 1697 6 182 998 1392 760 92 48 4 371 140 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 416 16B7 6 182 998 0 760 92 48 4 371 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0. Reduced Vol: 416 1687 6 182 998 0 760 92 48 4 371 0 PCE Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 416 1687 6 182 998 0 760 92 48 4 371 0 ------------ --------------- II------------- --11--------- ------II-=-------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 -1.00 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4783 17 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 38 3162 1600 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.21 0.00 0.26 0.06 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **F* **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA- Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ---------`--------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.081 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx _Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: _ North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 717 4 84 1158 351 1025 259 218 4 49 90 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 106 1068 6 125 1725 523 1527 386 325 6 73 134 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 106 1068 6 125 1725 523 1527 386 325 6 73 134 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 106 106E 6 125 1725 0 1527 3B6 325 6 73 0 Reduct Vol-: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1068 6 125 1725 0 1527 386 325 6 73 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 106 1068 6 125 1725 0 1527 386 325 6 73 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes:. 1.00 2.98 0.02 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4773 27 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 242 2958 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.36 0.00 0.53 0.24 -0.20 0.02 0.02 0.00 Crit Moves: Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to 1(UNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Default scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 2-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 4) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW).- #la Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.617 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+P-0.0 sec)Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound- East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 1279 42 100 984 52 119 640 47 85 605 241 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77- 177 954 70 127 901 359 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 10 127 901 359 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1..00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.30 1.59 0.12 0.18 1.30 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 309E 102 1600 3040 160 472 2541 187 292 2079 828 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II------------- �-II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.09 0.48 0.4B 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.43 Crit Moves: **** **h* **#+ ***# Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN.ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 2-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 01 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #Is Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.671 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Services F Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II-------- - ------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: - 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: .Base Vol: 50 1063 59 119 1008 79 201 639 93 128 718 235 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1584 88 177 1502 .110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 Added Vol: 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 2583 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1563 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1583 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 YCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1583 88 177 1503 11D 299 952 139 191 1070 350 ------------I--------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: - 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 �1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.43 1.37 0.20 0.24 1.33 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3032 168 1600 2981 219 6B9 2192 319 379 2125 696 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.52. 0.52 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.50 0.50. 0.50 Crit Moves:***#- **#**T Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year-2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %)Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 9101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - qlb Cycle (sec):100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.217 -Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T- R ------------ I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------- I .Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights:- Include. Include Include . Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1!. 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0. 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ ----- - --------- II --------------- Volume Module:. Base Vol: 28 202 60 6B 141 11 44 630 108 9 892 79 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13, 1329 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLFAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 131329 -118 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.70 0.21 0.31 0.64 0.05 0.11 1.61 0.28 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 154 1114 331 495 1025 80 180 2578 442 32 3168 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.07 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year2035 Evening Peak Hour .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report. ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) .Intersection 1101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - 41b Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.317 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 - Level Of Service: F Street Name: Alameda Street (East) - Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ 1--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted, Permitted Split Phase Split Phase 'Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ------`----- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 244 46 65 161 10 30 762 25 1 1056 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bsei 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 2135 37 1 1573 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 POE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: -22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II--------- ------ Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.28 0.68 0.04 0.07 1.67 0.06 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 79 1280 241 441 1092 68 118 2985 98 3 3197 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II------------=--II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 0.04 Crit Moves: *#*# ##** ##*# #*#* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE 'CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ---------------------`---------------------------------------_------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 12 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - West (EW) - N2a Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.482 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx. Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II -----------_--- II --------------- II_ --------------I Control: _ Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 o ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 36 1315 38 80 660 90 119 362 27 11 -171 65 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.99 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 59 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 90 16 255 97 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 90 16 255 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 59 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 90 16 255 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 54 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 90 16 255 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 59 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 90 16 255 97 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.76 0.24 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.04 0.69 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3110 90 1600 2817 383 396 1204 1600 71 1108 421 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: - 0.03 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.95.0.95 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: ***# #x*# **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ______________________________________________________________________ -.Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 12 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street West (EW) - Ala Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.692 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F •*xK#*K*#fi**#*KKK*a#***##**xx##fixx*Krt*##w##**a#a#iw#*#x#i**#i**+#**k**AK*#***a#* .Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T- R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11_______________I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include - Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 - U 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------IJ---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 957 16 82 1066 139 102 246 42 48 533 146 'Growth Adj:-1.491.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 Added Vol: 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 210 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 Reduced Vol: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.-97 0.03 1.00 1.77 0.23 0.29 0.71 1.00 0.07 0.73 0.20 Final Sat.0 1600`3147 53 1600. 2831 369 469 1131 1600 106 1173 321 - -----------I---------------If---------------II---------------II--------------I Capacity Analysis Module:. Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.45 0.45. 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32 0.04 0:68 0.68 0.68 Crit Moves: **** #*** ***x *#*# Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario TUe Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 . Page 20-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length %)-Method (FutureVolumeAlternative) Intersection 1102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b .Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(%): - - 0.811 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh).: xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L -- T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II------- :------- II --------------- II____. ----------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include - Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II-------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 54 -14 5 13 38 199 257 24 2 201 13 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 12 SO 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 60 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I 'Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.71 0.18 0.09 0.23 .0.68 0.41 0.54 0.05 0.01 0.99 1.00 Final Sat.: ' 168 1137 295 143 371 1086 663 857 .80 16 1584 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: _ Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.00,0.05 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.19 0.19 0.01 Crit Moves: }••+ +**+ **#* **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed.General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Level. Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 9102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - 82b Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol../Cap.(X): 1.153 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay(sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 LevelOf Service: F Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound- West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T- R L T- A ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split .Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include - Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 l! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I volume Module: Base Vol: 6 41 9 24 35 206 44 288 12 1 515 8 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj:- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .Lanes: 0.11 0.73 0.16 0.09 0.13 0.78 0.13 0.84 0.03 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 171 1171 257 145 211 1244 205 1340 56 3 1597 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.48 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traifix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------.-__ __-_----__--- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 13 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - 03 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.988 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ------- -------- II --------------- I1--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: -0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 .2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 1177 113 77 1016 45 23 71 70. 142 160 103 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1..49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 115 1754 168 115 1514 67 34 106 164 212 238 153 Added Vol: -14 6 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut-.' 101 1760 171 115 1515 67 34 108 104 212 238 153 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 101 1760 0 115 151.5 0 34 108 104 212 238 153 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 Reduced Vol: 101 1760 -0 115 1515 0 34 108 104 212 238 153 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 101 1760 0 115 1515 -0 34 108 104 212 238 153 ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 973 627 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vo2/Sat: 0.06 0.55 0.00 0.07 0.47 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.07 •0.13 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **F# F+** Fwww ###} Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report - ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.125 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: - L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II- -------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0- 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 -1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: - Base Vol:- 80 1072 133 105 1108 21 253 244 93 117 136 68 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.491.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 119 1597 198 156 1651 31 377 364 139 174 206 101 Added Vol: -8 4 2 - 0 -4 0 0 1 -7 -2 -1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 111 1601 200 156 1647 31 377 365 132 172 205 101 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 1601 0 156 1647 0 377 365 132 172 205 101 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 1601 0 156. 1647 0 377 365 132 172 205 101 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: Ill 1601 0 156 1647 0 377 365 132 172 205 101 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1606 1600 1070 530 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.50 0.00. 0.10 0.51 0.00 0.24 0.23 0.08 0.11 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ---------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 94 Santa Fe Avenue.(NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.055 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay.(sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 36th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II ------------ II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 1304 178 94 967 151 28 167 61 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.491.49 1:49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42. 249 91 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 -14 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. PHF Volume: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.73 0.27 0.14 0.86 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2813 387 1600 2768 4.32 230 1370 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.69 0.69 0.09 0.52 0.52 0.03 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **•* **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 5-1 Vernon General Plan. Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 6) Method (Future Volume Alternative)- tfi****##+x*%***+*fi**#**i#xx+*%%%###**fi**x*#w###x**#*i****##x*##**#%**k#w******** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - 44 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.119 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: - Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: .Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 978 219 151 1346 122 20 247- 80. 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 -9 0 0 -5 0 0 0 0 0 0. -0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 142. 1448 326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lA0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 142 1449 326 225 2001 162 30 368 119 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 142 1448 '326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 - 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 142 1440 326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- I:I--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 .1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.001.63 0.37 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.07 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600.2612 588 1600 2933 267 120 1480 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I 'Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.55 0.55 0.14 0.68 0.68 0.02 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (p) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to. RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA . Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 201208:33:49 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report - ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length B) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 95 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): _ 1.076 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle:- 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - A ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include - Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1517 109 79 962 4 2 10 3 142 4 238 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 -14 0 0 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 -11 15 4 214 6 206 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 0 15 4 214 6 206 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 0 15 4 214 6 206 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 0 15 4 214 6 206 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.03 0.97 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 3187 13 0 1231 369 1600 52 1548 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity. Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.07 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 6-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 95 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - 15 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(%): 1.018 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement:- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 1199 108 122 1245 1 24 20 6 165 7 117 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 -1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 Added Vol: 0 -1 -1 0 2 -7 -8 0 -0 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 1786 160 182 1857 -5 28 30 9 248 10 174 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 1786 160 162 1857 0 28 30 9 248 10 174 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 4 1786 160 182 1857 0 28 30 9 248 10 174 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 4 1786 160 182 1857 0 28 30 .9 248 10 174 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.42 0.45 0.13 1.00 0.19 0.81 Final Sat.: 1600 2937 263 1600 3200 0 668 717 215 1600 310 1290 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.11 0.58 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.03 0.14 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default, Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) #}}####*####**#W*WW*#W###W*W**W****f*W*W****#**#W**WW*##a**#**#**#**#**W**}*}*WW Intersection #6 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - II Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.017 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: - F Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound I East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+permit Protected Protected Prot+permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 997 - 19 94 770 240 142 235 90 26 384 482 Growth Adj: 1.49 1-.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse:. 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 1331486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1486 26 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: .1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.06 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.53 0.47 1.00.2.17 0.83 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3140 60 1600 2442 758 1600 3471 1329 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.02.0.18 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traf fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 16 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) --A Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.062 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay -(sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: -L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Protected Protected ProtiPermit Rights: Include Include Include Include. Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 100 863 26 170 1063 155 170 358 64 30 285 267 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 Added Vol: 0 -2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 ---------------------------II-------`-------II---------------II---------------I .Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 -1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 2.55 0.46 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat. 1600 3106 94 1600 2800 400 1600 4072 726 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.41. 0.41 0.16 0.58 0.58 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.12 Crit. Moves: **** **** **** **#* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 117 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - 97 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): - 1.127 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R ------- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11____________---I Control: Prot+permit Prot+permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 '--------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 121 1203 56 117 1069 104 39 92 43 27 240 96 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 180 1792 83 174 1593 155 56 137 64 40 358 143 Added Vol: 0 14 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 180 1806 83 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 180 1806 0 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 180 1806 0 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 180 1806 0 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.32 1.00 0.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1093 507 1600 1136 464 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------=------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.56 0.00 0.11 0.50 0.10 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **#* ##** ***# Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario - Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour --------------------------------------------•----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle .Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - $7 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical-Vol./Cap.(X): 1.314 Loss Time (sec): 10-(Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T- R L T - R L- T - R _----------- I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II--------------- I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Include Include - Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0. 1 0 - `---=------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 1178 46 225 1407 51 97 385 65 36 112 149 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 88 1755 69 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0. -7 -3 3 1 0 0 -1 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 1764 69 335 2009 73 148 575 97 54 166 225 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 1769 0 335 2089 73 148 .575 -97 54 166 225 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 2764 0 335 2089 '73 148 575 97 54 166 225 ,PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: - 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 86 1764 0 335 2089 73 148 575 97 54 166 225 ---------------------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1369 231 1600 679 921 - ----------- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: 'Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.21 0.65 0.05 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: xx** *#** wwWw **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 9-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) --#8 Cycle (sec): - 200 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.060. Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay(sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level 0£ Service: F Street Name: - Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: .Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 '1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 69 1166 84. 56 966 127 102 303 .59 165 619 103 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 Added Vol• 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 9 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 103 1740. 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Reduced Vol: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 -----------=I----- ---------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600. 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.67 0.13 1.00 1.77 0.23 1.00 2.51 0.49 1,00 2.55 0.45 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 2828 372 1600 4019 181 1600 4081 719 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.06 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215(c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to EUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 06:34:00- Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ---------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU .I(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 98 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - 98 cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.111 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: - Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R ------------I--------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0. 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 39 1033 130 116 1348 75 170 574 60 124 377 62 .Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 2.49 Initial Bse: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112- 253 855 89 185 562 92 ! - Added Vol: 0 1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Initial Fut:. 58 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 186 562 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 58.1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 166 .562 95 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 186 562 95 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 MLF Adj: 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 58 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 -855 89 186 562 95 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 16D0 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.72 0.2B 1.00 2.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 2844 356 1600 3031 169 1600 4346 454 1600 4103 697 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: 0.04.0.54 0.54 0.11 0.66 0.66 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.14 0.14 'Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year.2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 0 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - R9 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(H): 0.953 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/v.eh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E •Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie- Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit - Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include. Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 62 102B 20 63 899 112 53 83 39 9 168 241 'Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1..49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Flit: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 User Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 Reduct'Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359- .PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -FinalVolume: . 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.78 0.22 0.63 0.95 0.45 0.04 0.96 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3139 61 1600 2641 359 969 1518 713 69. 1531 1600 --------=--- I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module-: 'Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.19 0.16 0.22 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 49 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon. Avenue (EW) -.49 Cycle (sec): 100 - Critical Vol./Cap..(X): 1.050 - Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F w#ww#w#####xrtw*+#w+w###++++ww++w+###*##+**##++###+wx+*#ww#www+ww+++##+#+#+#####+ Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: 'L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights:. Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 872 14 141 1268 48 106 204 76 22 98 121 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 2.49 Initial Bse: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 159 304 113 33 146 180 Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 -1 2 -1 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 1300 21 210 1888 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 1300 21 210 1886 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 -Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1300 21 210 1808 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 1300 21 210 1880 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 2.00 1.93 0.08 0.55 1.06 0.39 0.18 0.82 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600.3149 51 1600 3080 120 875 1694 631 292 130E 1600 ------------ I------`--------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.61 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves: +#+ww+w+w+w+###*w+#++++w++wrt+#ww####+#+#+x##+#++#############+###w*ww+wkw++w###w Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 11-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 .. Morning Peak Hour ----------------------------------------------------------- _____________________ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length B) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 110 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - N10 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.969 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R ---------- +-1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit .Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit .Rights: - Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I ------ --------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II_ -_____________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 880 46 81 635 62 76 212 21 88 494. 132 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 Added Vol: 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 'User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 -31 132 736 200 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module:- Sat/Lane: 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes-: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3041 159 1600 2915 2B5 1600 2912 2B8 1600 2517- 683 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to XUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection M10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - 110 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.899 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include -Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II------------- `-II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol,• 19 674 93 124 1069 59 84 384 43 62 281 98 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Has: 28 1004 139 185 1593 BB 125 572 64 92 419 146 Added Vol: 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147. Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 5.72 64 92 419 147 'PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 28 1004 139 1B4 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147 --------------------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2812 388 1600 3033 167 1600 2878 322 1600 2368 832 ------------ 1--=------------ II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------I .Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.11 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 _ Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) - Intersection H11-Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.891 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: - 100 -Level-Of-Service: D Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L- T - R L- T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Penait Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II-------------- =11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 798 25 44 509 184 85 140 23 28 235 74 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127. 209 34 42 350 110 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVolo 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 CinalVolume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 ------------I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 2.00 1.47 0.53 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3103 97. 1600 2350 850 1600 1374- 226 1600 121.7 383 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- If--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 201208:34:00 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) •«x+xx+xx«+««+++++rtx«xxx++«+rt+rt+rt++rtx«++«+xx++«+xrt+«+++++++«+++«+«+++xx++x+*+*«+ Intersection III Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - III +«x«+«+rt««++xxx+x«rtx++xrt+«++xxxxxxxxxx«xxxxrtx««++««+++««xx«««x++«+++x++++«««xx+« Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(%): 0.973 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: - L - T - R- L - T - R L - T - R L T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min.. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 544 36 86 862 93 169 335 49 25 169 52 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.99 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 76 811 ' 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.61 0.19 2.00 0.87 0.13 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3001 195 1600 2888 312 1600 1396 204 1600 1224 376 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed toRUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 112 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - 112 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.199 Loss Time .(sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue - Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T R ---------------------------II--_------------ II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Rights: Include- Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3. 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 280 909 235 19 162 22 59 688 129 181 659 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse.: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2543 657 1600 2817 383 1600 2695 505 1600 3041 159 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis.Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.53 0.53 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.38 0.38 -0.17 0.42 0.42 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - J12 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(K): 1.334 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound I West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - . R - L . - -T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: - 132 224 122 55 771 92 30 860 219 248 855 23 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 339 182 82 1149 63 95 1281 326 370 1274 39 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 2 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial rut: 197 339 182 82 1149 63 95 1279 326 370 1276 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 197 339 182 82 1149 63 95 1279 326 370 1276 39 Aeduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 197 339 182 82 1149 63 95 1279 326 370 1276 39 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 197 339 182 82 1149 63 95 1279 326 370 1276 39 ---------------------------II---------------II--------------- II - --------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1,95 0.05 Final Sat.: 1600 2072 1128 1600 3035 165 1600 2550 650 1600 3116 89 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.23 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: **** *#*# ***# *w** *w**rt***W*rt**rt**rtR**w*****xrt**wrt*xWwW*w***tR****W*******t***x**w*****t*w****W*#* Tra£fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC,. ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 21, 2012 08:33:50 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 9) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - 413 .Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.963 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - A -_----------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0. 0 0 "Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 199 960 36 35 656 208 131 108 133 79 531 87 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 118 791 130 Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 1 3 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.O0 1.00 PHF Volume: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131- Ov1AdjVol: 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 "Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.45 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.19 0.12 0.05 0.13 0.07 0.25 0.08 OvlAdj V/S: 0.00 Crit Moves; **+* ##}* *«** ***+ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection. W Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - 913 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.019 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal ,Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: -F Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: - L - T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T- R _----------- I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include OV1 Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 838 73 109 964 188 172 688 290 29 240 30 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Has: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 Added Vol: -1 4 -1. -1 -3 -1 2 2 2 1 -1 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 196 1253 100 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 Ov1AdjVol: 238 - ----------- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: - 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: 0..12 0.39 0.07 0.10 0.45 0.17 0.16 0.32 0.27 0.03 0.11 0.03 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** •*** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to HUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update _ Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 114 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - )I19 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.002 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Hound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R ---___-_-___I---------- ----- II_ --_-__________II ----------- _.___11_______________I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 846 109 51 481 173 50 258 95 167 740 141 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 751261 162 76 717 258 75 389 67 299 1103 210 .Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 3 0 9 29 0 0 3 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 2262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 299 1106 210 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 -67 299 1106 210 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 299 1106 210 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 299 1106 210 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment:- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.68 0.32 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2689 511 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.22 0.16 0.05 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: **** *#** *+** **** Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 00:34:00 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 ,Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU Moss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) - Intersection 014 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - 814 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.048 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach:. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ------- - ------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ 1--------------- II --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 843 204 199 1022 81 150 611 205 156. 291 82 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49. 1.49 1.49. 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Has: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 Added Vol: 0 -1 0 0 2 -2 3 18 0 0 -11 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.55 0.45 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2482 718 - ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.050.39 0.19 0.19 0.48 0.07 0.14 0.29 0.19 0.08 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: #### *### ##** F**# Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection ill Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.081 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: - Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -. T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ 1--------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 20 8 131 42 93 101 703 20 1 1134 455 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1..49 Initial Bse: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 30 12 195 63 243 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 User .Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 30 12 195 63 3.43 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 30 12 195 63 143 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 .30 12 195 63 143 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.94 0.06 0.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 488 1112 1600 3111 89 2 2292 916 ------------ I---------------II--------_------II---------------II---------------I capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.74 0.74 Crit Moves: ++*" •+*K K**• +*+# Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC,-ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ----------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of. Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 815 -Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.073 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted - Permitted Rights:- Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------li---------------LI---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 29 45 396 25 158 112 1068 4 1 829 153 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 . 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 2591 6 1 1235 228 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 43 67 593. 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 .6 1 1235 228 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.86 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.69 0.31 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 217 1383 1600 3186 12 3 2699 498 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.46 0.46 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012. 0B:33:50 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report - ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection N16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - 416 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.725 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: - Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound - South Bound- East Bound .West Bound Movement: L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I_____---------- II--------------- II--------------- II ----_-____-____I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights:. Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1. 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 o 1 0 2 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 93 661 1149 22 622 717 178 519 139 200 236 170 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bee: 139 985 1712 33 927 1068 265 773 207 298 352 253 Added Vol: 1 19 3 0 -1 0 6 3 15 - 1 1 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 140 1004 1715 33 926 1068 271 776 -222 299 353 255 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 140 1004 1715 33 926 0 271 776 222 299 353 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 140 1004 1715 33 926 0 271 776 222 299 353 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 140 1004 1715 33 926 0 271 77.6 222 299 353 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.56 0.44 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 1600 4088 712 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.16 2.07 0.02 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.19 0.31 0.19 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012. 08:34:01 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical.vol./Cap.(X): - 1-.598 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0. sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxK "Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T - R L T - R L - T- R L- T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------- -----I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include .Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0. 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 r--------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 710 798 34 1025 260 449 582 404 219 152 476. Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49. 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bee: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 387 669 867 602 416 226 709 Added Vol: -7 5 0 0 0 -1 5 0 12 1 -1 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 386 674 B67 614 417 225 711 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 72 1063 2189 51 1527 0 674 867 614 417 225 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 0 674 867 614 417 225 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 0, 674 867 614. 417 225 0 ----------=-I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 .1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.31 1.86 0.83 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 2099 2974 1326 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.17 0.74 0.03 0.24 0.00 0.32 0.29 0.46 0.26 0.14 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** *#** *•** Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to RUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss asCycleLength %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection 417 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.952 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 Lanes: 1. 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 279 1132 4 122 670 934 510 62 32 3 249 94 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 416 1687 6 182 998 1392 760 92 48 4 371 140 Added Vol: 0 0 -1 -13 3 -1 4 -2 '0 1 2 14 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial. Fut.: 416 1687 5 169 1001 1393 764 90 48 5 373 154 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF. Volume: 416 1687 5 169 1001 0 764 90 48 5 373 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 416 1687 5 169 1001 0 764 90 48 5 373 0 PCE Adj: - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 "FinalVolume: 416 1687 5 169 1002 0 764 90 48 5 -373 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600. 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.97 1.00 Final Sat.:" 1600 4786 - 14 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 46 3154 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: - Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.21 0.00 0.27 0.06 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.00 .Grit Moves: ##*# x*#x #*** *#*# Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Toe Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01_ Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 6) Method (Future Volume Alternative) - .Intersection 417 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - k17 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.080 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R-0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T R L - T - R L- T - R --------------------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 717 9 89 1158 351 1025 259 218 9 99 90 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 106 1068 6 125 1725 523 1527 386 325 6 73 134 Added Vol: 0 -2 0 9 3 9 -2 1 0 0 0 -1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 106 2066 6 129 1728 527 1525 387 325 6 73 133 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 106 1066 6 129 1728 0 1525 387 325 6 73 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1066 6 129 1728 0 1525 387 325 6 73 0. PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 106 1066 6 129 1728 0 1525 387 325 6 73 0 --------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: .Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4773 27 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 242 2958 1600 -------^---- I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.36 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.00 - Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to EUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA 11 @JK 1'*',IUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OV'LR 35 YLARS Of LXCLI_IIN] SLRV'ICL 0 EXHIBIT B .r c v a 0 v 0 W M tw O L a WO c O CL w Dc OD c CO G c aD El C N ' w N L L Y r F c Y U 0 O -o nv° !co N L U = v w w n w O vi c Y w U E ° o c N E ; O m O C w " w o ac a o C N d O L .L C �L>�_ C rn O 9 N N H 0O O w E C c E -o 6 w C C Oq o 0 EN � L ofl 'N c r E x° > ni m Y kk Ul v 3 Y a w N C N � b0 � E N 7 C C o'p 0 wCL o bD m y w c y w E a C Y bo o C O m ems-°. c -O > C CL Y > c w Y 0 O w w + C CO pry D 'C aL.+ w cu m c O U u 3 w c Y b9 > !p m d O w CL L 7 C p N le�l u V d�y t0 n r. l K,+ 0 v a - t8�J Fw r.... `o E O i ti fvvu St[ C N U y O E .0 f0 U O L C w 0 O U C pt > N >, r\i;vlra;E >. E .0 �as C m u r Q o L Y +' c`- >> m O `o o i° § 1[ P, N (` E O m N 2 O O m 00 2 N 'O N.fs3?G1j -,xya'. m. 0 j c r v 0 N o w w E v v m Y c v m eo c a w a a w w .o _ c E O Y .a O +—w' o= m m a � Y m Y w c L ° N O= VI •—' U a N N Y L �_' v ,__ G a w N I E w ai uc c v m a z o12 ` N '-^ t w v o c t x g"k Y .N YO N h0 fit` {WR�N' ` L O W o0 N O d N b0 V` .O C .Y}fS� O N O W C Y O N C L N O N LVd N ec_n a c C 'co c E t o E E v PION e $ E e a o N a m e w eo - y > E E n w > ° a>i v N .O -E o v v w � h u, E v ,{ w N ,;, a ., w c cc L w w w w e 'N m w c> s ¢L.. o� r.n E.L. E Q kfi �r e:',kTin� 7Cf Cl a H bid t y�f e } SVWY ✓ S A 1pklvt� (Y: O O J N v E O J N« E O J N w E S VI E U fO l '> Y N E V m l •O N E w m r N N Y E u m tomJ o E 2 3 o '- E 2 3 Q _ >- E' 3 a mJ N 0 V O Sf�r��k ftii'i m ho w O O C C O i tr .O N C m N 0 w O O C m Y UI Co 'H tf ° m v > u o ao c o n^ >_ m o ° m J N E �u m > Ol C - Ol C ah 0 Ol m m a+ ° O m ° Y ,FI c,g '-. 2 o c ;o E o c Cm E aN+ o c w a E w c v E rf C♦� o u w' N m i a` �� pJp a a` h m m a a m a y vJi 4'�'at j+l w C C C O u iziA`� C _ O N a O O w N .� L Y ' Nt5vt > m 41 5 E3 L10 > m �.`• n N a'o c o ,o ; O 00 'O J 'O v V m H : i a E w u _c m o a ij ° m -° ._ 'o w 3 N E c J ,N�., C w i� N Ol N 40 O u O m pmj > O 3t— w to a •3 N C V- o uw w yIJ4t iQ, L Q d H m a C N= J N O C ,,` aLw+ w— vi UO u n c a x ° w 3 Y> v o w o w +• w fn no ) e41 a';'6 m Y 3_ c O m M W O m m J `O N u O m v a w tr°y�i E aci cE m° 2 � o` V• L y N N ti+ 1 R k�a , ... �F� Y ; s ,� ,, - v vOi 0 V h x �zi�1��))✓t yr Y N _ x a E v w a .cc c aQm v ou0 v o •.xzL%SR: Ny 'pop t4- '��GY to N O C l 41 �L .GI�F 1 yr Q w ti, kS ITIv ` te�; "' 3 '^ v oIt = n m 3 ° •v E N ° v PTP u c ° N c v Y o E c c v 9 CL O t �Av.h I•� i u .SZn 's..r5 M irt CITY CLERK'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: February 26, 2013 TO: S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water FROM: Deborah Juarez, Records Management Assistant 14 RE: Resolution No. 2013-31 — A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Proposed Affordable Housing Development at 4675 52"d Drive, Associated Development Agreement, Disposition and Development Agreement, General Plan Amendments, and Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments; and Adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2013-31 referenced above, which was approved by City Council on February 19, 2013. Thank you. Attachment c: Resolution No. 2013-31 RECEIVED RECEIVES y` JAN 3 1 2013 JAN 31 2013 ��» e �� CITY ADMINISTRATION CITY CLERK'S,OFFICE STAFF REPORT Community Services and Water DATE: February 5, 2013 TO; Honorable Mayor and City Council 4elj FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson; Director of Community Services and Water RE; Approval of Resolutions rind Ordinances Updating the General Plan Land Use and Housing Elements, amending the Zoning Code, Approving a Development Agreement with Meta Housing Corporation, and. approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration Recommendation The Projecteo'llect'ively includes: the proposed,45 Unit Affordable Housing Development at•4675 52"d Drive, the Associated Development Agreement and Disposition And Development Agreement, Proposed General Plan Amendments and Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments, It is recommended that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, contained in Public Resources Code commencing at Section;21000 and the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to the mitigation measurescontainedin the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the project. It is also recommended that the .mitigation monitoring Reporting Program contained in Attachment 1 be approved. It is further recommended that the City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall be designated as the custodian of all documents or other materials which constitute this record of proceedings upon which this decision is made. It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution amending the Land Use Element and the Housing Element of the General Plan to allow the construction of residential housing units and an emergency shelter within specified zones of the City. Adopt an ordinance amending the Citys' Zoning Ordinance and Map setting forth the overlay zones where residential housing and an emergency shelter would be permitted and establishingcriteria for the construction of the housing units and emergency shelter. Lastly, it is also recommended that the City Council approve a Development. Agreement with Meta Housing Corporation for the construction of residential housing units to be located at4675 52"d Drive in the City of Vernon. A Disposition and Development Agreement will also be presented to the City Council at the February 19, 2013 City Council meeting. Backaround To institute improved governance practices that include expanding the voting population in Vernon the City intends to amend its General Plan and Zoning Ordinance to permit the construction of additional housing within the City of Vernon. Additionally City Staff is recommending that the City enter into a Development Agreement ("DA") and Disposition and Development Agreement ("DDA") to permit Meta Housing Corporation to construct a 45 unit apartment complex on the City owned property located at 4675 52"d Drive in the City of Vernon. Update to General Plan Elements To allow the housing development project to move forward, amendments to the General. Plan Land Use and Housing Elements will be required. In addition, amendments to the General Plan will be made to reflect current State law as described below. Amendment to the Land Use Element Two new overlay districts are proposed to be added to the Land Use Element: the Housing Overlay and the Emergency Shelter Overlay. Each of these overlay districts apply to specific sites in the City that have been identified as most suitable for these uses (see Exhibit 1). Pursuant to proposed revised land use policy, the Housing Overlay would permit up to an additional 60 units in the City of Vernon. Housing Overlay District As part of the project, thej proposed amendment to the Land Use Element states that the Housing Overlay District may be applicable only to sites that have been specifically identified by the City and determined to be the best locations for housing, given surrounding uses, proximity to services and amenities, and distance from safety hazards. Residential uses are permitted in this district only pursuant to the terms of a Development Agreement, given the unique safety constraints in Vernon. Emergency Shelter Overlay District Pursuant to S132, codified in Government Code Sections 65582, 65583, and 65589.5e, the City is required to accommodate emergency shelters by right in at least one zone. To implement this law, the City proposes to establish the Emergency Shelter Overlay District, which will apply only to sites that have been specifically identified by the City and determined to be appropriate locations for emergency shelters. Housing Element State law requires that the Housing Element be updated at least every eight years, on a timeline consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, unless extended by the legislature. Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.8, Chapter 3 of Division I of Title 7 of the Government Code sets forth the legal requirements for a housing element, and. encourages the provision of affordable and decent housing in suitable living environments for all communities to meet statewide goals. The 2014-2021 Housing Element update is a policy document that outlines the City's current and projected future housing needs (as identified by the State Housing and Community Development Department, or HCD) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the City's goals, policies, and programs to address those identified needs. Specifically, the element details: 0 Population characteristics and trends • Employment characteristics • The types of households in Vernon • Special needs populations • Housing characteristics and trends • Constraints on the development of new housing • Housing resources (available vacant and underutilized sites, financial resources) • How the City will work to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation assigned by SCAG and otherwise achieve housing goals Given Vernon's status as an industrial city, the Housing Element has, in the past, promulgated the policy that no new housing will be constructed in Vernon due to the safety risks posed by the multitude of industries operating there, including many that involve the use, transport, and production of hazardous materials. The proposed 2014-2021 Housing Element revises that policy and identifies two potential sites for housing development that have been deemed most suitable. One of these sites (4675 52nd Drive) is also designated with a Housing Overlay in the Land Use Element. The Housing Element also addresses new State laws, including SB 2 (codified as Government Code Section 65583[a][4]), which requires jurisdictions to identify a zone in which to permit emergency (homeless) shelters by right. The Housing Element identifies an area designated with an Emergency Shelter Overlay in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has reviewed the draft element to determine whether it meets the requirements of State law, and has determined that the Element is compliant. Update to Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map The City has drafted revisions to the Zoning Ordinance to achieve consistency with proposed Land Use Element Overlay Districts and the goals, policies, and implementation measures specified in the General Plan. These revisions include a new Housing Overlay District and Emergency Shelter Overlay District and related use and development standards, as well as required findings for these new overlays. Additionally, a new Procedures section has been created to establish the Development Agreement process as the method for allowing new housing development. Further, the Amendment incorporates multiple new definitions related to these amendments. The Zoning Map is proposed to be amended to identify locations for the Housing and Emergency Shelter Overlay districts. The Housing Overlay District is proposed to apply to one vacant parcel located on the east side of the City (4675 52"d Drive). The Emergency Shelter Overlay District is proposed to apply to a single vacant parcel located in the northwest comer of the City (see Figure 1). Proposed Residential Project at 4675 52nd Drive To institute improved governance practices that include expanding the voting population in Vernon, the City has identified a site at 4675 52"d Drive as appropriate for a new housing development. The parcel is owned by the City of Vernon. To meet agreed -upon deadlines (with the State legislature) for achieving new housing development in Vernon, the City issued a Request for Proposals on April 19, 2012 for housing development on this 2.06-acre site. Proposals were received in July 2012, all of which proposed exclusively residential use yielding between 31 and 61 units. All development proposals were considered. The proposal from Meta Housing Corporation was selected as most appropriate. The proposal would provide for 45 units. This component of the project would include project entitlements consisting of a Development Agreement, as required pursuant to proposed Zoning Ordinance regulations for the new Housing Overlay Zone. The proposed rental housing development would include nine one -bedroom units, 22 two - bedroom units, and 14 three -bedroom units. At least 22 units would be affordable to lower - income households. Additional improvements onsite would include a community building, an office for property managers and social service providers, laundry room, computer lab, tot lot, and 74 onsite parking for residents. New driveways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street trees, and street lights and associated landscaping would also be provided. The project would be gated. The project design utilizes a traditional housing form with pitched roofs, stone veneer, and stucco. The buildings would be combined into small groups to fit into the adjacent residential neighborhood (in the City of Maywood). A paseo would connect the individual units and buildings with parking areas and common areas. The buildings are proposed to be arranged around a central courtyard common open space. Buildings would be two stories in height. Parking would be located along the east and west property lines. The parking areas would provide buffers from the adjacent industrial uses. Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5 provide graphic representations of site plans, floor plans for units, and example architectural features. The .project is expected to obtain LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification, at least at the Silver level. Upon project construction completion, onsite services to residents are planned 'with the intention of helping tenants maintain stability and prevent eviction, build life skills, increase income and assets, increase health and well-being, and improve the educational success of their children. The proposed project includes up to 4,500 square feet of physical space for service amenities. All services would be provided on site. All previous building on the site have been demolished and removed; the site is currently vacant. The grounds are predominantly paved with a crushed rock base. The northeasterly 17 feet of the property are subject to an easement for a rail spur track and utility purposes. In the past, the property has been used for a number of industrial uses, with the most recent being an appliance manufacturing facility. Project construction is anticipated to begin in December 2013, with completion in May of 2015. Construction will require the import of new clean fill dirt to replace contaminated soils that have been removed. Additional construction activities include installation of a vapor barrier below each structure, installation of a venting system, building construction, landscaping, paving, and infrastructure improvements in the form of curb and gutter, sidewalks, and street trees. Development Agreement The City of Vernon and Meta Housing Corporation intend to enter into a Development Agreement for the construction of a 45 unit housing development in the City of Vernon in accordance with the proposed zoning ordinance requirements. The Development Agreement sets forth the permitted uses of the Site, the density and intensity of use thereon, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings on the Site, and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes. The Agreement will commence upon the Effective Date and shall continue 4 in force for a period of five (5) years unless extended or terminated as provided herein. This Agreement terminates upon the expiration of the term or when the Site has been fully developed and all of Developer's obligations in connection therewith are satisfied as determined by the City, whichever occurs fast. During the term of this Agreement, Developer shall have a vested right to develop the Housing Development in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, rules, minute orders, regulations, and official policies of the City applicable to development and occupancy of the Site in effect on the Effective Date. The Agreement will be annually reviewed to determine if Meta Housing Corporation has demonstrated good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If the City Council finds and determines that the Developer has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the period under review, the review for that period shall be concluded. If the City Council finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that the Developer has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the period under review, and Developer has been notified and given an opportunity to cure in accordance with the provisions of Section 6 below,.the City Council may modify or terminate this Agreement in accordance with State law. Disposition and Development Agreement To facilitate the cooperation between the City and the developer of the proposed 45-unit affordable housing project, a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) has been proposed by and between the City of Vernon and the developer. The DDA will be presented to the City Council at the next regularly scheduled meeting on February 19, 2013. This DDA is currently being negotiated but, will incorporate the following or similar provisions: 1. Conveyance of Land. City will agree to ground lease the Site, for an annual rent equal to the residual rental value of the Site, to a development entity formed by Meta for the development and operation of an affordable housing project on the Site (the "Project"). The City has retained the services of Keyser Marston to review the proforma study prepared by Meta Housing Corporation and perform its own independent economic analysis to determine the rental value of the property. Through their analysis it has been determined that the residual rental value would be one dollar ($1.00) per year. The term of the ground lease would be 65 years. The City will retain the non-commercial naming rights of the development. a. The Ground Lease, among other things, includes each of the following terms: (i) The Ground Lease provides that City will not obtain any loans secured by the Site unless such loans have been previously approved, in writing, by the Project Developer. (ii).The Ground Lease provides that City will own fee title to the land comprising the Site, and the Project Developer will own fee title to all improvements constructed or otherwise located on the Site. (iii)The Ground Lease includes reasonable mortgagee protection provisions as required by the Project Developer's lenders. (iv)Pursuant to the terms of the Ground Lease, City, as landlord, will agree to provide notice of any defaults by the Project Developer under the Ground Lease to the Project Developer's limited partners and lenders (if required), and allow any such parties the right to cure a default by the Project Developer under the Ground Lease. (v) The Ground Lease permits the Project Developer to encumber its leasehold interest in the Site to secure loans deemed necessary or desirable by the Project Developer which are reasonably acceptable to City. The City will not be required to subordinate its fee title in the Site to any construction or permanent loans obtained by Project Developer. (vi)The Ground Lease is in accordance with the requirements of Government Code Section 37380(b)(1), which provides that "a city may lease property owned or held or controlled by it, or any of its departments or boards for a period exceeding 55 years but not exceeding 99 years, if all of the following conditions are met: (1) The lease shall be subject to periodic review by the city and shall take into consideration the then current market conditions. The local legislative body may, prior to final execution of the lease, establish the lease provisions which will periodically be reviewed, and determine when those provisions are to be reviewed." b. Meta or its affiliate will form a limited partnership or other entity for the Project (the "Project Developer"). The Project Developer entity will include, as the managing general partner, Western Community Housing, Inc. (or a limited liability company wholly owned by Western Community Housing, Inc. or another nonprofit corporation highly experienced in the development and operation of affordable housing which is acceptable to the City) ("Development Partner"). c. City will be responsible for creation of a legal parcel for the Site. d. City will provide Meta with copies of all environmental reports and other information regarding the physical condition of the Site which is in City's possession. Meta will have access to the Site prior to closing to conduct environmental inspections and other due diligence. Upon commencement of the ground lease of the Site to the Project Developer, the Project Developer will be responsible for all environmental remediation of the Site at its expense. e. Closing for the commencement of the ground lease of the Site will occur when the following conditions have been satisfied: Meta approval of Site condition, closing of construction financing, receipt of commitments for required permanent financing, receipt of all required land use entitlements, approval of construction plans by the City, building and grading permits for the Project are ready for issuance, execution and deposit of all closing documents, required insurance policies have been obtained, title insurance has been obtained, required bonds have been secured, and other reasonable and customary conditions of closing have been satisfied. 2. Project Schedule. The Agreement contains a detailed schedule of milestones for due diligence activities and approvals; application for and obtaining entitlements; preparation, submission and City approval of plans; application for and obtaining financing; satisfaction of conditions to closing; closing; commencement of construction; and completion of construction. 3. Construction. The Agreement will require that the Project be constructed in accordance with the development standards set forth in a Development Agreement between the City and Meta or the Project Developer adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65864. The Project will include approximately 9 one bedroom apartment units, 22 two bedroom apartment units, and 14 three bedroom apartment units, a community building, an office for Site managers and social service providers, laundry room, computer lab, tot lot, not less than 74 onsite parking spaces, driveways, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street trees, street lights and associated landscaping. The Project will be gated. Three of the apartment units (one one -bedroom unit, one two -bedroom unit and one three -bedroom unit) will be accessible in accordance with ADA standards, and all of the ground floor level apartment units will be adaptable to ADA accessibility standards. The Project will obtain LEED Silver certification. Developer will be responsible for importing new clean fill dirt, installation of a vapor barrier below each structure, and installation of a venting system. The Project Developer will comply with state prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements in the construction of the Project. 4. Financing. The parties acknowledge that Low Income Housing Tax Credits and other sources of financial assistance will be necessary to make the Project economically feasible. The Project Developer will be required to seek reasonably available funding sources for the construction of the Project. a. The Agreement will include a financing plan for the Project. The Project Developer will apply for and seek to obtain the financing sources contained in the financing plan. b. 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits are contemplated for the Project. Meta will apply for an allocation of 9% tax credits in the first California Tax Credit Allocation Committee ("CTCAC") allocation round of 2013. If unsuccessful, Meta will apply for an allocation of 9% tax credits in the second allocation round of 2013. If unsuccessful in the first and second allocation rounds of 2013, City will have the right to terminate the Agreement in its sole discretion; provided that the City may elect in its sole discretion to authorize Developer to make one or two applications for 9% tax credits in 2014. c. As appropriate, the financing plan may provide for the Project Developer to seek and apply for conventional construction and permanent loans, AHP loans, loans or other financial assistance from the County of Los Angeles Community Development Commission, and/or other state and federal sources of affordable housing assistance. d. The parties do not contemplate that City will make any loans or grants to the Project. e. Meta will retain any developer fee payable in accordance with the terms of the tax credit financing. To the extent necessary to make the Project financially feasible, Meta may be required to defer a portion of the developer fee for the Project. 5. Income and Affordability Requirements. The Project will be subject to affordability requirements restricting apartment units to income limits and affordable rents. a. 2 apartment units will be restricted to extremely low income households, 14 apartment units will be restricted to very low income households; and 6 apartment units will be restricted to lower income households, for a total of 22 "Affordable Units." Rents for the Affordable Units will be restricted to the maximum rents permitted by Low Income Housing Tax Credit requirements and/or applicable funding sources. b. The Project will be subject to other regulatory requirements related to financing which is actually obtained for the Project, which may include a CTCAC regulatory agreement and regulatory agreements related to other public financing obtained for the Project. c. Affordability and other ongoing requirements will be set forth in a Regulatory Agreement to be recorded as an encumbrance to the Site. The City will reasonably consider subordination of the Regulatory Agreement to the liens recorded for the benefit of Project Developer's conventional lenders. 6. Site Management. The Project Developer will be required to retain a Site management firm to manage the Project. a. City will have approval rights over the identity of the Site manager, and any changes to the identity of the Site manager. The Site manager and Project manager will be required to refrain from engaging in any political activity among tenants and tenant groups. b. The Agreement will contain a detailed Site management plan which will set forth procedures for operation of the Project, including procedures for tenant selection, an eviction policy, staffing schedules, house rules, security plan, and a social service plan. The Site management plan will include a tenant selection process, which will provide a method of soliciting tenant applications, initial screening of tenant applicants, and random selection of pre-screened applicants for initial tenant selection and ongoing vacancies. The tenant selection shall be through a lottery system which will be open to the public. The applicants and City will be notified in advance of the time and location of the lottery. c. If the Site manager is not properly managing the Project in accordance with the Site management plan, City will have the right to require the Project Developer to replace the Site management company or to require the Site management company to change the employees managing the Project. 7. Maintenance Requirements. The Project will be subject to maintenance requirements for exterior improvements and landscaping. The Project will maintain a capital replacement reserve account in a monthly amount to be determined [plus CPI or other inflationary index] which may be satisfied by capital reserve requirements of financing which has been obtained for the Project. S. Remedies. a. City will have the right to terminate the Agreement prior to completion of the Project in the event Meta and/or Project Developer fails to perform any obligation of the Agreement, subject to notice and cure rights, including the failure to meet certain milestones in the schedule, or Meta and/or Project Developer becomes insolvent or bankrupt, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, is subject to receivership, or similar circumstances. b. City, subject to a reasonable notice and cure period, will have the right to terminate the ground lease and reacquire possession of the Site for reconveyance to another developer if construction of the Project has not commenced in accordance with the Agreement schedule, or if construction is suspended after commencement. c. City will require Project Developer to obtain payment and performance bonds, provide a letter of credit, or other security for the construction of the Project reasonably acceptable to the City. Findings The City of Vernon Police, Fire and Community Services and Water Departments have reviewed the proposed residential site development plans for the project and determined that the project conform with the City adopted codes and polices. In accordance with section 26.4-5 of the City's new zoning provisions for residential developments certain finding must be made prior to the approval of a development agreement. It is therefore recommended that the City Council make the following findings regarding for the proposed 45 unit housing development located at 4675 52nd Drive in the City of Vernon: a) The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the 45 unit housing development is compatible with the existing land uses in the vicinity; b) The proposed density is consistent with density standards and all applicable policies contained in the General Plan; c) The site and site plan are physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle access, and public services and utilities, including but not limited to fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, sewerage, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, and wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal; d) On -site traffic circulation for pedestrians and vehicles is designed into the development to allow residents to move easily through the development and to avoid pedestrian/vehicular conflicts and further and provides appropriate access for fire and police response and surveillance. e) The proposed project provides suitable, usable common and/or private open space that will meet the passive and/or active recreation needs of the resident. Common open space areas and setbacks are provided with landscaping and other improvements suitable for the development proposed; f) The proposed project provides adequate parking to meet the residents' needs, to avoid parking impacts on surrounding properties, and to comply with state and federal law; g) Refuse/recycling collection areas are located to provide easy access to for all residents and collection vehicles, and to minimize noise impacts on residents; CEOA An initial study for the project was performed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as established in Section 21000 et. seq. of the California Public Resources Code. The Project collectively includes the proposed 45 Unit Affordable Housing Development at 4675 52nd Drive, the associated Development Agreement and Disposition And Development Agreement, Proposed General Plan Amendments and Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments. It was determined that all potential environmental impacts would be less than significant if appropriately mitigated. Subsequent to publication of the initial study and proposed mitigated negative declaration, the City met with the applicant for the housing development at 4675 52"d Drive to review the mitigation measures, as they would be included as conditions of development. Specific revisions to mitigation measures 4.3-1 and 4.11-2 were made to reflect to practical construction measures and filtration system maintenance requirements that could still achieve the desired mitigation regarding air filtration and outdoor noise. The mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program hereby revise the measures contained in the initial study and proposed mitigated negative declaration. It is recommended that the City Council find that the revised mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program will achieve the mitigation objectives set forth in the initial study and proposed mitigated negative declaration, and will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Therefore, it is recommended that a mitigated negative declaration be adopted for the project subject to the mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program. It is further recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program. Fiscal Impact The City of Vernon currently owns the property located at 4675 52nd Drive in the City of Vernon that the proposed housing development will be constructed upon. This 2.06 acre property has a current market value of approximately $2.25 million. The City of Vernon retained the services of Keyser Marston to perform an independent market analysis to determine the residual rental value if the property were to be utilized for a 45 unit low income housing development. After reviewing the pro forma prepared by Meta Housing Corporation and performing its analysis it was determined that the housing project would only be viable if there was financial participation from the City in the form of reduced rental rate. Keyser Marston determination is that the residual rental rate of the property would have to be at $1.00 per year in order to make the project feasible. The rental rate will be reviewed from time to time during the term of the lease to confirm that the City's rental rate is appropriate. 10 Exhibit 2: Site Plan - Proposed Affordable Housing Project at 4675 52nd Drive 1,9, IPA Exhibit 3: Floor Plans - Proposed Affordable Housing Project at 4675 52nd Drive r f J 13 Exhibit 4: Rendering - Proposed Affordable Housing Project at 4675 52"a Drive 14 R � £2\� \� (§ 90 RECEIVED FEB 14 2013 CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY SERVICES & WATER DEPARTMENT OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Whitworth, City Administrator FROM: Samuel Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water DATE: February 14, 2013 SUBJECT: Response to comments from South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) and the City of Maywood regarding the proposed 45-Unit Affordable Housing Development Project We have received a letter from South Coast Air Quality Management District ("AQMD") dated January 25, 2013 and a letter from the City of Maywood dated January 24,2013 regarding the above -mentioned project. AQMD has submitted written comments (copy of letter attached) regarding the proposed project site being exposed to significant levels of air pollution from nearby industrial sources. In response to AQMD's letter the staff has prepared written responses (see attachment). It is staff's opinion that the concerns that AQMD has raised have been adequately addressed in the proposed mitigation measures. Therefore, the staff believes we have satisfied any issues or concerns pertaining to this project. The letter received from the City of Maywood is regarding the potential impacts from construction and operations from the proposed project site. In response to their letter the staff has prepared written responses. It is staff s opinion that the concerns that the City of Maywood has raised have been adequately addressed in the response letter (see attachment). Therefore, the staff believes we have satisfied any issues or concerns pertaining to this project. SKW/sc Auach=nts r lit ,f 4,305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058 Telephone (323) 583-8811 February 14,2013 G-4 Ian MacMillan South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 Dear Mr. MacMillan: The City thanks the SCAQMD for the continents regarding the air quality impact assessment performed in support of the proposed low income housing development. The City feels, as the Lead Agency, that the appropriate significance criteria have been used to assess potential health impacts to the future residents, and that the development of the proposed site for residential uses results in less than significant impacts. The City also notes that it has been conservative in conducting the health risk assessment (HRA) for CEQA purposes, as the CEQA statute and case law indicate that the focus of the analysis is project impacts on the environment, "hot the impact of the environment on the project. The City concurs with the SCAQMD that HRAs for the siting of sensitive land uses within an existing built environment typically include sources of toxics air contaminants (TACs) located within one -quarter mile of the project site. It should be noted, the health risk analyses were originally prepared to aid the City in assessing the suitability of multiple non-specific potential housing locations within the City of Vernon. To ensure flexibility and maximum applicability, the health risk analyses included TAC sources within a larger radius of the candidate sites. Based on the maximum individual cancer risks, the City concluded a number of health protective design features should be integrated into future development plans, as appropriate. In addition, the burden threshold was used to assess the relative risks by accounting for the different future populations each potential housing site could accommodate. For the reasons stated in the HRA, the City does not believe the incremental cancer risk is an appropriate threshold for this project. Nonetheless, in response to the SCAQMD's letter, the City has reviewed the HRA and verified that the individual cancer risks reported in the MND are highly conservative for the specific project site currently under consideration, as it includes sources farther than one -quarter mile of the proposed project site. Applying the control efficiency of an air intake filtration system rated at MERV 8 to the unmitigated screening HRA risks results in a maximum predicted cancer risk of approximately 12 in one million in the vicinity of the proposed project site. (This value also accounts for the corrected breathing rate, as notedbelow.) This cancer risk value included approximately 3,500 feet distance from the 1-710 EE.,chusive y Industriaf February 14, 2013 Page 2 freeway and the Atlantic Boulevard off -ramp, which is outside of the quarter -mile radius of the identified project boundaries. Per SCAQMD's suggestion, the City has refined the HRA modeling to more specifically only include sources within one -quarter mile of the site. Based on review of site plans and aerial photo measurements; the City notes that a segment of the 1-710 freeway lies within one -quarter mile of the nearest (northeastern) boundary of the proposed residential development. The majority of the dwelling units will be built more than one -quarter mile from the freeway. The site -specific dispersion modeling and risk calculations show that future residents will be exposed to a cancer risk of 6 in one million, which is less than the threshold of 10 in one million recommended by the SCAQMD. The cancer risk value of one in six million also takes into account MERV 8 filtration systems which will be installed in the units as required by mitigation measure 4.3-1, as outlined in the mitigation monitoring reporting .program for the project. Detailed dispersion modeling and health risk calculation files were sent to the SCAQMD for review on or around February 4, 2013. AQMD RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES Review of the HRA has not revealed any significant air quality impacts. The proposed mitigation continues to be adequate. Mitigation measure 4.3-1 requires installation of MERV 8 filtration systems in each unit and further, that the project manager provide long-term maintenance of the filters. The mitigation measure does not require positive pressure with the building's filtered ventilation system in living spaces since provision of the MERV 8 filtration systems alone is deemed adequate. . MODELING FILE AVAILABILITY Comment noted. Detailed dispersion modeling and health risk calculation files were sent to the SCAQMD for review on or around February 4, 2013. Health Risk Modeling Parameters Comment noted. The breathing rate used for future residents should be 21.1 m3/day. The City notes that the correct breathing rate was used in the HRA to calculate impacts from stationary sources. The breathing rate was corrected and applied to the refined mobile source analysis discussed above. Results of the analysis indicated that cancer risk would be below the 10 in one million. threshold recommended by the SCAQMD. Therefore the results discussed above for the proposed site are consistent with the analysis contained in the MND. Health risk impacts will remain less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. The diesel particulate matter emission rate used in the HRA was based on the current fleet mix.1 Although future fleet mix will result in reduced DPM emissions, the analysis takes a conservative approach. Therefore, the City feels that no corrections are necessary. California Air Resources Board EMFAC 2011 database. httg:JZwww.arb.ca.gov/emfac (Accessed October 2012) City of Vernon, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058 — Telephone (323) 583-8811 February 14,2013 Page 3 Sincerel am el Kevin Wilson, P.E. Director of Community Services & Water SKW City of Vernon, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058 — Telephone (323) 583-8811 C m E 47 - E' 'a'a S C C e CE CC as 0 10 CL _) -0 m m M C U 47 of v C a EaCI >.vmo .ot M Et 3r CEu 3m� � imp. o22uQ vC. v VI p U p U N p 4+_ ale O C CSa caE; 1Oa" o ° rnmcc o c� OC a?O9oEmC N >�=`v=ommcvvgoej O mctnE 013 U M 0 u O > w U) �a G7 0 cc, 3 C 'CI C ov�y >vcoorn.n oomrnm oc - d 0 OCm emu'- m. '°'"uc±+ "v. c" o°�mc= •- O c a E o u rn- :- u a+C eE� °�'9v c'ac.omoE o�cvE ogcvE j f0 .0 O F 0 a 10 a= 3 0 a` E v c v� v E LL H jOa 0 ��ma ay.vma L C0 0 G1 G Q.Q (A Ecv�rmot, caai UMco int vo N O1 a,�°m ace "o'a roa`o v h M O W V W T a i'CLn L++ v�.�'rv-°E o 10 or%> >c_Ea mcE� 01C ^CVV rnL um vuv y =oc vioau L i m o c `o O o? m n i E t v L a O.fO Nc�cac iCM E`Su ^�c,o..a�i O10 L m..ov-m a�'-v x ao G7. cmvV Sv t3E voav uvL C C o>x.�v TE u, tout H aoc Wm �p > G7 mS0�caaE �Mo ` �voa a`mE O OLi -r xEcME ac00 O vm�> apvm O O� E=nwamyom w`O� M n'E E aka. y d �C a me o �.E9 oy E'-E m�E 01 lk C y m -0 i' , a ace m. `" v� a m S N v. n v v C d occv_Evm a magi w oE.v`�N mvac Ol.y F u v m c- n c C 7 C u._'rnt Oi a) "Wv m s u=v va-ou O o CE_w�'^u ctw of mEva vi 4 i O wt pw Eww vaJ E> i N tg> rnam'0 N O i L. m � m E Q c E n w � 3 f rn� u 6. c- C4 4.8 Ol a v. mrn 3 wo u o'3ay.> 47 0 0Ey00 avi'.EE CV, r,CTmm - wcc�'G G aa.+ i d 'Gc �'w n Ernw m cXw Ev maE°rn - LC i aFacrnmj10v au'nT' Omvvvm E..v>c O o c4T v.c ov d 0 a mcme O C 'v maU9 Ca'^E va¢U L _L°_trn mEcc?. C O° E m o>> me wEE 0 m,°m3 of a O N C. OI rL,aU_.OL L u W E TN i � O'O h 2 p �ii 0— O E E. N> C L .- Y 'C I Y a.._mvao�E ¢u 3 m a`mtmnw0 aZv)Za' a�0 °f N > i�C m ; o, r O N & § ! ■ � . $ c . §c z. k}0 0, -ano 0 ga £| ® f5 ` . ;{®»] ) o cjgEl�0 //t«L—.0 .E E&J!7 r•■i=$;E30: _)(( -� \ f<# t c ce \i � ��E \k�\ -U:a - ■ « .£tl;' .E 0 Z § �§ �023 ";E t«r \(i - 2 0 {kk�\ \ .\E . au ,.t f�f« § EcEul r°�k E ! - | ]!/ \\\\^ k «�° 3 ( - 'o t)§ cO3: _ )49z, .®' _ �)ia :}) �� $�\0 I.E\/7 - �- B:6mt ,u.2 a-_ !\e!§ .. ;#E!a &kk) k»]0 ■ ~ ® ° \ a § m. South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (909) 396-2000 • www.aamd.gov E-Mailed: January 25, 2013 January 25, 2013 KWilson@ci.vemon.ca.us Mr. Kevin Wilson City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 The South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above -mentioned document. The following comments are intended to provide guidance to the lead agency and should be incorporated into the final environmental document as appropriate. The MND demonstrates that the residents living on the project site will be exposed to significant levels of air pollution from nearby industrial sources. Specifically, the MND states that residents at the preferred project site will be exposed to an incremental cancer risk of 26 in one million, however, the lead agency concludes that the project will result in less than significant air quality impacts. Further, the Health Risk Assessment (HRA) contained in the MND appropriately compares the project's cancer risk levels to AQMD's cancer burden threshold of 0.5 and the AQMD's Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk (MICR) threshold of 10 in one million. However, it appears that the lead agency based its significance determination solely on the cancer burden threshold. The AQMD CEQA significance thresholds are not intended to be individually selected and applied to projects; therefore, the AQMD staff recommends that the lead agency revise the MND to ensure that the air quality significance determination is based on all AQMD CEQA significance thresholds including the MICR value of 10 in one million. If upon revision of the MND the lead agency determines that the project will have significant air quality impacts based on the HRA the AQMD staff recommends that the lead agency include the following mitigation measures in the final CEQA document. a. Specify conditions to ensure that high efficiency filters will continue to be maintained and replaced for the life of the project (e.g., through a provision in the covenants, conditions and restrictions, CC&Rs), and b. Consider maintaining positive pressure with the building's filtered ventilation -- - - system in living spaces to reduce infiltration of unfiltered outdoor air. Mr, Kevin Wilson January 25, 2013 AQMD staff requests that the lead agency provide the electronic modeling files so that we can review them more thoroughly. Without these files, we can only offer partial comments as many details are not available to us. The lead agency may want to revise the HRA prior to finalizing the CEQA process for this project as there are several calculation procedures that may have led to spurious results in the HRA. These include the items identified below. The breathing rate of 16.2 m3/day in the HRA is lower than the District recommended rate of 21.14 m3/day (302 L/kg-day). This error results in reported risks that are too low. The HRA did not take into account the expected lower Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) emissions in future vehicle fleets. This discrepancy results in reported risks that are too high. The results from modeling the I-710 freeway are unexpected as DPM accounts for only —40% of the freeway risk. Typically DPM account for —90% of the risk. Without access to the modeling files, AQMD staff is not able to verify the validity of the reported result. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the final CEQA document. Further, staff is available to work with the lead agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact Dan Garcia, Air Quality Specialist CEQA Section, at (909) 396-3304, if you have any questions regarding the enclosed comments. Sincerely, 'W v. 11A44 Ian MacMillan Program Supervisor, CEQA Inter -Governmental Review Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources IM:DG LAC 130109-04 Control Number 4305 Santa Fe A Telephone' (323) 583-8811 February 11, 2013 Rocio Lopez City of Maywood 4319 East Slauson Avenue Maywood, CA 90270 Dear Mr. Lopez: G-4 Thank you for providing your comments to the proposed 45 unit affordable housing development project to be located at 4675 52"d Drive in the City of Vernon. The City of Vernon hereby responds to the comments and questions you have raised. C-1: The Site plan does not show the depth of the property, A: The depth of the property that will be developed is 199.4 feet; please see the attached site plan. C-2: The site plan shows a fence located right along the front property line. As the City of Maywood has residential units immediately to the south of this property; we are _recommending that any fencing be located behind a front landscaped setback area. Fencing material and.height should also be called out in the site plan. A: The City of Vernon has no setback requirements on fencing. However, the City will work with the developer to see if the fence, can be slightly set back from the street right-of=way. The attached site plan currently shows the fence will beset back two feet from the back of sidewalk. Additionally, the Developer will be landscaping the parkway strip in the sidewalk area while maintaining a pedestrian walkway in compliance with ADA. This will also aid in softening the look of the fence. The fence and gate material along the street riht o `-six foot in height and be of wrought iron materials. gf way will be C-3: The assessor parcel map shows 52"d Drive as a 50 foot wide street. The site plan indicates that the property line starts 25 feet from the centerline to the subject site property line. If landscaping is proposed in front of the proposed fence, that would be within the City right of way. Who will maintain this landscaped setback area? A: The landscape area in the parkway strip is required to be maintained by the adjoining property owner in accordance with Sections 22.62 and 22.63 of the City Code. rE,Xcfusivefy Industrial February 13, 2013 Page 2 C-4: Please provide us with an actual full scale site planwhich shows fencing materials, including driveway gates, location of King Avenue'(will the proposed driveway line up with this street?), proposed front i 4ttdscape setback. (front landscape plan) and public improvements i.e. existing telephone poles, along 52A Drive. A: Attached herewith you find a copy of tle plan you have requested. It should be noted that the City is not requiring the developer to underground the aboveground utilities. Two additional fire hydrants will be added in and around the frontage of the property. The exact location of the fire hydrants will be determined by the Vernon Fire Department. The site plan attached shows the relationship of the site with King and Mayflower Street and the existing improvements in the sidewalk area. C-5: Please provide us with a southern elevation of the. proposed project (street view from 52"d Drive). A: Attached herewith you will find a plan reflecting the southern elevation of the proposed project. Also attached is a rendering from the 52"d Drive perspective. C-6: Under Section 4.15 Transportation and Traffic, the Mitigated Negative Declaration states, under sections a-d that there are No Impacts. The City of Vernon's acceptable level of service is D, while the City of Maywood's acceptable level of service for local streets is. C. 52"a Drive in Maywood is a local street. According to the City of Maywood's'Final EIR Land Use Element, in accordance with the City's LOS standard, which is LOS D for arterial and collector streets, study intersections that deteriorate to LOS E. or worse are significantly impacted and mitigation is required. A: Please note that the analysis in the traffic study was prepared to address several General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments being contemplated by the. City, including establishment of a Housing Overlay District/Zone that would facilitate development of the proposed housing project analyzed in the Initial Study. At this time, only proposed amendments relating to housing are moving forward. Regarding the acceptable level of services (LOS) used in the analysis, for those streets located in the City of Vernon the City has used its adopted standard of LOS D. In recent . discussions with the City of Maywood contract traffic engineer, we learned that the Maywood also uses the LOS D standard. The analysis focused on major and collector streets and not local streets such as E. 52"d Drive. Also, the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard/E. 52"d Drive was not analyzed specifically for the housing development because in Los Angeles County, the minimum project -added traffic that is needed before an intersection has to be studied is 50 two-way trips in either the morning or evening weekday peak hour. As the attached supplementary material (Kunzman Associates, Inc. letter dated February 4, 2013) indicates, the proposed housing developmentis estimated to generate 23 morning and 28 evening peak hour trips, below the threshold. Thus, no analysis of this intersection was warranted. The projected future conditions of LOS E and F are associated with regional growth and build -out in Vernon consistent with land use policy. The theoretical intersection impacts are based on the intersection capacity compared to the number of project trips that are projected at each intersection. Based on the Los Angeles Department of Transportation Policies and Procedures, an impact.is considered significant if the project -related increase in the volume -to - capacity ratio equals or exceeds the thresholds shown below: City of Vernon, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058.- Telephone (323) 583-8811 February 13, 2013 Page 3 Level of Service Volume/Ca' aci Incremental Inci C 0.70-0.79 0.04 or more D 0.90-0.89 0.02 or more E/F 0.90 - more . 0.01 or more In order for the housing development to impact an intersection by one percent, the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard at District Boulevard would have.to receive 48 project vehicle trips during the morning or evening peak hour (4,828 X 0.1 = 48.28), and.the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard at E. 52nd Drive would have to receive 80 project vehicle trips during the morning or evening peak hour (8,063 X 0.1 = 80.63). Table 3 in the attached Kurtzman Associates, Inc. letter shows that that the trips associated with the housing development fall well below the one percent threshold for LOS F. The study area intersections are not projected to be impacted. The housing development itself will not create significant traffic impacts, nor will it contribute cumulatively significant impacts. The comment letter, states that anything over an unacceptable level of service needs to be mitigated. However, the criteria used are twofold: over an acceptable LOS :and over the significance threshold. This project does not meet or exceed the significance threshold. C-7: The Traffic Study does not clearly address the future level of service at the intersection of 52nd Drive and Atlantic Blvd. It does, however, address the intersection of District Blvd, and Atlantic Blvd. with a projected level of service between E and F. A: See response to C-6. C-8: The MND should therefore address mitigation measures for the proposed intersection of 52 nd Drive and Atlantic Blvd., particularly for those vehicles turning southbound and north bound from 52 nd Drive onto Atlantic Blvd. A: The criteria used are twofold to determine if an intersection is significantly impacted: over an acceptable LOS and over the significance threshold. This project does not meet or exceed the significance threshold, therefore no mitigation is required. C-9: Under section e. Inadequate Emergency Access, it does not address the fact that there is no emergency access circulation to the rear of the property as parking spaces are blocking the access. Site pan should show adequate on site emergency access. A: The Vernon fire Department has reviewed and approved the site plan for the project. It is their opinion that sufficient emergency access is being provided to the site. In accordance with section 503.1 of the California Fire Code a fire access road shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured along an approve route. The fire code permits this distance to be increased if the building is equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. The apartments will.be served with an automatic fire sprinkler system and therefore the fire department has approved the 150 foot distance to be increased. Dead end fire roads will lead into each side of the apartment complex within the parking lots and in compliance with the fire code. The fire department will either be provided with the keys to access the gates or Knox boxes will be provided to permit access to the parking City of Vernon, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058 — Telephone (323) 583-8811 February 13, 2013 Page 4 areas. The maximum distance from the fire road or to; the street right of way to the exterior portion of any of the buildings is proposed to be 160 feet. C-10: According to the most updated Assessor Parcel Map, 52nd Drive is 50 feet in width. The street however appears to be very narrow and there are signs stating "No Parking At Any Time" along the north side of 52"d Drive in the City of Vernon public right-of-way. We are concerned that residents and visitors associated with this project may park along the south side within the City of Maywood, creating a burden to this already narrow street. A: The site is proposed to have 76 parking stalls. This apartment complex will be for low and moderate income families. Therefore, it is assumed based on historical data that many of the residents will be one car families. As such the City is of the opinion that sufficient parking is being provided onsite for the residents and their visitors and no offsite parking will be required for the housing development. Attached herewith please find a white paper prepared by the. Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing which concludes that it is not necessary to provide the same parking ratios for market rate apartments compared to. affordable housing units and concludes, that 1 stall per unit is sufficient. The City of Los Angles only requires 1 parking stall for units containing 2 or less habitable rooms and 1.5.parking stall per unit containing 3 or more habitable rooms for restricted affordable housing units. The Vernon project will provide 1.69 stalls per unit. In addition, Applied Planning, Inc. recently prepared a study for the Salem Apartments in Glendale. There study concluded that if the proposed low income housing project was outside of the central business district the following parking ratios were appropriate: • One -bedroom 1.25 resident spaces plus 0.17 guest space • One -bedroom 1.50 resident spaces plus 0.17 guest space • One -bedroom 1.75 resident spaces plus 0.17 guest space Based on these ratios and given the mix of Vernon's housing units, the Vernon project would require 76 parking stalls, exactly what is being provided. Lastly, the City discussed the proposed parking ratios with Solari Enterprises Inc., who manages over 75 low and moderate income family housing projects in the Southern California area. This firm routinely performs parking surveys of th€units they manage. They have found all of the developments that they manage have excess parking spaces during all periods of the day, with the exception of one development in San Diego, which is parked at 0.5 spaces per unit. This includes an 80 unit complex with 83 parking stalls, a 78 unit complex with 84 parking stalls and an 85 unit complex with 134 parking stalls all located in the City of Los Angeles. The City of Vernon appreciates your concerns and believes that all of the issues that you have raised have been adequately addressed. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. SKW Sincerely vin Wilson, P.E. irector of Community Services & Water City of Vernon, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058 —Telephone (323) 583-8811 KIINZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Q OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE February 4, 2013 Ms. Laura Stetson MIG I HOGLE-IRELAND 630 North Rosemead Boulevard, Suite 150 Pasadena, CA 91107 Dear Ms. Stetson: INTRODUCTION The firm of Kunzman Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide this project analysis for the 52nd Drive Apartments project. The proposed project site is located on the north side.of East 52nd Drive and east of Atlantic Boulevard in the City of Vernon (see Figure 1). Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, .a glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is proposed to be developed with 45 apartments. Figure 2 depicts the proposed project site plan. The site is currently vacant and not generating any vehicular trips. Apartment land use peak traffic volumes occur in the morning and evening when inhabitants are going to and from work. Mid -day volumes are often shopping oriented or child related, such as home -to - school and home -to -Little League. The vehicle mix is virtually all passenger vehicles. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE The project site is currently projected to be developed with manufacturing land use. Manufacturing land use will characteristically have fewer employees per acre than most other business or commercial uses, and fewer non -employee visits. There are pronounced traffic peaks as employees arrive in the morning and depart in the evening. The vehicle mix is split between passenger vehicles and heavy trucks. 1111 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 34 ORANGE CALIFORNIA 92868 . (7141973-93a3 w W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.00Nt Ms. Laura Stetson MIG I HOGLE-IRELAND February 4, 2013 EXISTING TRAVEL LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS Figure 3 identifies the existing roadway conditions within the study area. The existing number of through travel lanes, intersection controls, and the intersection geometries are identified. REQUIREMENT OF A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS In Los Angeles County, the minimum project added traffic that is needed before an intersection has to be studied is So two way trips in either the morning or evening weekday peak hour. If a project adds more traffic than the minimum threshold amount to an intersection, then that intersection has to be analyzed for deficiencies. DEFINITION OF DEFICIENCY AND SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS The City of Vernon has an established acceptable Level of Service of D. Level of Service E and F are unacceptable. Based on the Los Angeles Department of Transportation Policies and Procedures, an impact is considered significant if the project -related increase in the volume -to -capacity ratio equals or exceeds the thresholds shown below: Significant Impact Threshold for Intersections Level of Service Volume/Capacity Incremental Increase C 0.70-0.79 0.04 or more D 0.80-0.89 0.02 or more E/F 0.90--more 0.01ormore DETERMINATION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY In Los Angeles County, the technique used to calculate Intersection Capacity Utilization is as follows. Lane capacity is 1600 vehicles per lane per hour of green time for through and turn lanes, except that a capacity of 2880 vehicles per lane per hour of green time is used for dual turn lanes. A total yellow clearance time of 10 percent is added. . To determine the potential capacity of an intersection the appropriate percentage of green time has been allocated to each turning movement and then multiplied by the lane capacities. The theoretical capacity of Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) is 4,828 vehicles per hour and the Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at East 52nd Drive (EW) is 8,063 vehicles per hour (see Table 1). W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM 2 Ms. Laura Stetson MIG I HOGLE-IRELAND February 4, 2013' PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION The trips generated by the proposed project are determined by multiplying an appropriate trip generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major change in these variables may affect trip generation rates. Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic, morning peak hour inbound and outbound traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed land use. By multiplying the trip generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic volumes are determined. Table 2 shows the proposed project trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trio Generation 9th Edition, 2012. The proposed project is proje fed to generate approximately 299 daily vehicle trips, 23 of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 28 of which will occur during the evening peak hour. PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION To'determine the trip distribution for the potential project, peak hour traffic counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of the site, and other additional .information on future development and traffic impacts in the area were reviewed. The trip distribution for the potential project is provided on Figure 4, THEORETICAL INTERSECTION IMPACTS The theoretical intersection impacts are based on the intersection capacity compared to the number of project trips that are projected at each intersection. In order for the project to impact the intersection by one (1) percent, the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) would have to receive 48 project vehicle trips during the morning or evening peak hour (4,828 X 0.1 = 48,28), and the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at East 52nd Drive (EW) it would have to receive 80 project vehicle trips during the morning or evening peak hour (8,063 X 0.1= 80.63), . Table 3 shows that that the projects trips are well below the one (1) percent threshold for Level of Service F. The study area intersections are not projected to be impacted. CONCLUSION The project does not contribute traffic to the study area greater than or equal to the fifty (50) peak hour vehicle trip threshold during the morning or evening peak hours. W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM 3 Ms. Laura Stetson MIG I HOGLE-IRELAND February 4, 2013 If the intersections of Atlantic Boulevard INS) at District Boulevard (EW) or Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at East 52nd Drive (EW) were analyzed, the project does not generate enough vehicle trips to significantly impact the intersections. It should be noted that intersection deficiencies in shown in the City of Vernon General Plan Update Traffic Impact Analysis, dated December 11, 2012, are from the existing land uses and areawide growth but not the proposed project and the vacant parcels within the City. It should be noted that the 52nd Drive Apartment project will decrease the potential for heavy truck traffic along East 52nd Street adjacent to the existing homes of the residents to the City of Maywood. It has been a pleasure to serve your needs on this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 973-8383. Sincerely, KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Carl Ballard, LEED GA Principal Associate #5031b //PpF E5S/pv\ �vQ�O �P�lt` A• KU,(,2 �FZ pG? z 3 No. TROD Z b d * FV% fS>\I KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. William Kunzman, P.E. Principal W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COAI .�} M .y A a A V C O u N N a` c `o c 0 '« n c �E v m 0 a 0 0 e" 0 e E e u 0 Q 9 Table 2 Trip generation' Land Use Quantity Unit' Morning Evening Daily Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Trio Generation Rates DU 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62 6.65 Apartments Trios Generated Apartments 45 DU 5 18 23 18 10 28 299 r5ource: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trlo Generation. 9th Edition, 2012, Land Use Category 220. 2 DU = Dwelling Unit O. O = O 2 ae E � � m m v a 0 B L aJ U a O Z O Z a E �`c N - n ti E > v a o a Z O Z E a — ti m T 00 O = C C V a w _o O C O C m N a E or O b O m o N x W N d m N C = y� 1 W 2 N 1v1 ♦+ C O � 01 °rye HT I Figure 1 Project location Map Atlantic Boulevard East 52nd Street District Boulevard S2' aol� P Site King Avenue/ Mayflower Avenue NTS 5031/1- KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OVFR 35 VEnRS OF E%Ln TENT SERVICE 0 Figure 2 Site Plan 1" L D FE -'s, �s' A— IC ri 2. '11W .13 -A NTS KLINZMANAssoc[ATES, INC. 5031/2 OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE 9 Figure 3 Existing Intersection Controls and Through Travel Lanes East S2nd Street w NTS KUNZMAN VIdyuvwci MVZIIUc dAbsos ddb�os s-0°lYP o�9Y,P Legend Q =Traffic Signal vov = Stop Sign 4 =Through Travel Lanes D = Divided U = Undivided >> = Free Right Turn 5031/3 IATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER J$ YEARS OF tACELLEKT SERVICE 10 NTS East 52nd t��w�MAN ASSOCIATES, I OVER 3$VFAQS OF -, IF MT SERVICE Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/4, 11 APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street for turning around. open at one end only, and with special provisions DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the' peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic -actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway; such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak. direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: S allest ti a headway between successive vehicles in a traffic strea into which another vehicle is willin and able to cross or er e. MULTI -MODAL: More than one ode; such as auto obile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation odes. OFFSET: The ti a interval in seconds between the be innin of reen at one'. intersection and the be innin of reen at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely rouped cc ponent of traffic that is co posed of several vehicles ovin , or standin ready to ove, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN -DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to deter ine the point of on in and the point of destination for a iven vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE):- One car is one Passen er Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or Passen er Car Equivalents in that a truck requires Ion er to start, oes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a hi her Passen er Car Equivalent than a pty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive inutes with the hi hest nu ber of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic si nal that directs traffic to stop and o on a predeter ined ti a schedule without re and to traffic conditions. Also, fixed ti e si nal. PROGRESSION: A ter used to describe the pro ressive ove ent of traffic throu h several si nalized intersections. SCREEN -LINE: An i a inary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, nor ally to verify the validity of athe atical traffic odels. SIGNAL CYCLE: The ti a period in seconds required for one co plete sequence of si nal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the si nal cycle allocated to one or ore traffic ove ents. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiatin the ove ent of queued traffic fro a stop to an avera a runnin speed throu h a si nalized intersection. TRAFFIC -ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic si nal that directs traffic to stop and o in accordance with the de ands of traffic, as re istered by the actuation of detectors. e TRIP'. The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP!END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip -ends. A trip -end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quality of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. i Parking Requirements Guide For Affordable Housing Developers Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005 Los Angeles, CA 90010 www.scanph.org 02.17.04 Table of Contents Parking Requirements Fact Sheet List of Relevant Resources Best Practices Policies Example Best Practices Policy - Los Angeles Sample Southern. California Minimum Parking Requirements Related Newspaper Articles page. 3 4 6 7 8 11 {°Rethinking Residential Parking: Myth & Facts" Appendix A Report by the Non -Profit Housing Association of Northern California Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH:213-480-1249 www.scanoh.ora -2- Parking Requirements and the Cost to Affordable Housing Fear of traffic congestion and overcrowded street parking has led many cities to establish minimum parking requirements calling for developments to provide often excessive amounts of off-street parking. Aside from creating excess parking and adding to congestion by encouraging automobile usage, parking requirements have a tremendous negative impact on development of all kinds, especially affordable housing. Problems for Affordable Housing Developers Increases Development Costs - Parking requirements drive up the cost of development, resulting in less units of housing. Needing to spend more on parking means less funds available to provide housing. Some developments end up having more space for cars than for people. Reduces the Potential for Other Amenities and Uses Wastes Land - Parking requirements also mean that less money and land is available for other purposes. Childcare facilities, community rooms, and play areas may all be sacrificed in order to accommodate parking. The possibility for mixed -use, such as ground - floor retail, are also reduced, leaving other community needs unmet in the name of parking. • Less Attractive Desians - Meeting parking requirements becomes a focal point in the design process and eliminates opportunities to incorporate open space. With less parking to consider, a building can be designed that more reflects a neighborhood's context and needs. Is All This Parking Needed? No. Parking requirements have largely been arbitrarily determined and do not usually reflect the verifiable parking needs of the people who will make use of a development. • Parking requirements have often been set using a "one -size fits all" approach using information gathered during peak periods at developments with ample parking in areas with few public transit options. The likely residents of affordable housing do not require a great deal of parking. Studies show that the correlation between income and vehicle ownership is strong, with the likelihood of owning more than one vehicle increasing with Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH: 213-480-1249 www sconnh ora 3- income. Low-income families, seniors, and special needs populations are less likely to require the useof more than one parking space, if that, at all. The need for parking also decreases for residents in dense areas near transit. Southern California. Association of Non•Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH: 213-480-1249 www scanah.oto -4- Resources Planning for Residential Parking: A Guide for Housing Developers and Planners. Website created by NPH to help developers be more effective in arguing for reduced parking. Contains data, recommendations, and a model for determining the amount of. parking needed by a specific site. htip://dcrp ced berkelev edu/studentsZrrusso/parking/Developer%20Manual/in dex.htm Donald Shoup Professor, Urban Planning. UCLA. Has written numerous reports regarding parking requirements'. Argues for reduced parking requirements for numerous developments, including affordable housing. shoup@ucla.edu Reports Parking Requirement Impacts on Housing Affordability Todd Litman, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Victoria, B.C„ Canada, 1999. www.vfpi.org/r)ark-hou.pdf Pavement Busters Guide: Why and How to Reduce the Amount of Land Paved for Roads and Parking Facilities Todd Litman, Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Victoria, B.C., Canada, 2000. www vtpi ora/pav-bust bdf Smart Growth Zoning Codes: A'Resource Guide Local Government Commission. Sacramento, 2003. To order a copy, visit www.lac.ora Travel Characteristics of Transit -Oriented Development in California Hollie Lund (CSU Poly, Pomona), Robert Cervero (UC Berkeley), Richard Wilson (CSU Poly, Pomona). California, 2004. Please contact SCANPH for a copy. Rethinking Residential Parking: Myth & Facts Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing - 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH: 213-480-1249 wwvv sconoh org 5- Non -Profit Housing Association of Northern California (NPH). San Francisco, 2001. www non prof ithousing ora/actioncenter/toolbox/parking/mythsand facts.p'df Reducing Housing Costs by Rethinking Parking Requirements San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR). San Francisco, 1998. www.sipur.org/documents/sipurhsqr)ka.odf Reports. cont. Buying Time at the Curb Donald Shoup, UCLA Department of Urban Planning. Los Angeles, 2003. www.spipsr.ucla.edu/up/webfiles/buyinatime.ipdf The High Cost of Free Parking Donald Shoup, UCLA Department of Urban Planning. Los Angeles, 1997. www sppsr ucla.edu//dup/people/faculty/Shoup%20Pub%204.pdf In Lieu of Required Parking Donald Shoup, UCLA Department of Urban Planning. Los Angeles, 1999. www sppsr ucla.edu//dup/people/faculty/ShouD7.2OPub%202.pdf The Trouble With Minimum Parking Requirements Donald Shoup, UCLA Department of Urban Planning. Los Angeles, 1999. Housing Shortage/Parking Surplus: Silicon Valley's Opportunity to Address Housing Needs and Transportation Problems with Innovative Parking Policies Transportation and Land Use Coalition. San Jose, 2002. www.transcoolition.ora/reports/housing s/housina shortage home.html Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH:213-480-1249 www.scanoh.ora Best Practice Policies Here is a quick list of jurisdictions and practices that can be used as examples: Combined Reductions in Parking Requirements for Affordable Housing and Proximity to Transit Parking •kequiremerit Reductions for ' A ftol d iTpla; H otA,�i h g Using Square Feet Rather Than Bedrooms for Parking Requirements City of Los Angeles City of San Diego Santa Monica City of Berkeley See Next Page Parking requirements reduced by .25 spaces Per dwelling unit for Transit Area or Very Low Income housing (Municipal Code 14205) R tluCes parking for two 6edroarn affaFc 4b1e ;` hou_6 unlfs'from 2 paces 0f&. rt fo 1 spayasp�rUnit;,(&eaf,ah�'Os_1ptJgrpppi , In R-4 district, parking requirements are 1 per 1,000 ft of gross floor area. This reduces the penalty that minimum parking requirements typically have on smaller units. (Section 23D.40 0801 In RE-4, R$D and C 3 D>strinfS Ness Specldl use Dlsfpdtj, parking rqulrem�nl" is reduced to I space ner 4 ,.,h,+e Lower Parking For 1 bedrooms and studios only, San Jose has San Jose a 0.5 spaces per unit reduction Requirements for in MPRs when a facility is "All Open Parking" vs. "One -Car' or Unassigned Parking Lots 'Two -Car Garage" (Municipal Code 20 12.215) versus Assigned Parking Spaces If open lot, parking requirements are 0.3 to 0.4 spaces per p Sunnyvale- P unit lower than developments using one -fully enclosed garage. (Municipal Code 19 46 050) Allowing Re identldl )MA�tp Glofd q, V ty;- PQss 1r;fvy��n 20,tilld 4Sf� r,� �1 Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 _ PH: M-480-1249 www scanah ora -7- E1tiYAff4NRr,$` �� to Pw aY�ti� (+nf1 �dr ' ,��twsJ�11y Tray§lt Na Re'sidentsdha:Discourit: ..,, One -fifth the regular parking requirement for housing specifically designed for and San Francisco occupied by senior citizens or physically "By -right" reductions in handicapped persons. (Article 1.5. Section parking requirements for 151) Senior and disabled housing 25% reduction of parking requirement for housing exclusively for persons over the age of Berkeley sixty-two (62). One space per 5 residents for nursing homes. (Section 23D.40.080) Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH:213-480-1249 www.scanoh.ora IM. City of Los Angeles Municipal Code Chapter 1, General Provisions & Zoning Section 12.22 A 25 (d) 25. Affordable Housing Incentives/Density Bonuses. (d) Affordable Housing Production Incentives. Notwithstanding any provisions of this article to the contrary, density bonus Projects, and other development projects with any restricted affordable units or any affordable accessible units, shall be granted the following incentives: (1) In calculating dwelling units or guest rooms, density shall be rounded upwards from fractions of one-half (1/2) and more from that permitted by the applicable zone to allow one additional dwelling unit or guest room. (2) Parking requirements for each restricted affordable unit only shall be as follows: For a project located within 1,500 feet of a mass transit station or major bus route For a project containing 1 or 2 habitable rooms and not to-cated within 1,500 feet of a transit station or major bus route For a project containing 3 or more habitable rooms and not located within 1,500 feet of a transit station or major bus route For any project containing units designed for senior citizens and/or disabled persons For a single -room occupancy hotel 1.00 parking space per dwell-ing unit, regardless of the number of habitable rooms 1.00 parking space per dwell-ing unit 1.50 parking spaces per dwelling unit I0.50 parking space per dwell-ing unit "or guest room 0.25 parking space per dwell-ing unit or guest room, with a minimum of 5 parking stalls per facility Southern California Association of Non -Profit Housing 3345 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1005, Los Angeles, CA 90010 PH: 213-480-1249 www_ scan�4h oro M b n 0 a y O SOUR HOUR Him `z 4 zz3z �� Y 8T n m Dap 8 o y g a gFg I H A e r M W02 3 Z y �^2 \ ..�. � K\< 2 «.� \ »� RE: W Of binmente on Proposed 46 tlnR-Affordabie Housing Development L ii.dt 46fi6 52nd Dt(ve—,Vembn,.CA 90068 DearM�:Wllson: , We heVe reviewed the City of Vemon'B Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed abdVementfoned'project. While we do not oppose th comments conoems: e project, we do have the fallowing -JeRVI ar Sf1e.:suoJect property. Th • e, site plan 8howe a fence lot :Ated, right _along the front property line. As the City of Maywood has residential unity immediately to the south of this property, we are recommending that any fencing be located behind a front landscaped setback area. Fent ing material and height should elk be called out on the site plan. • Theassessor;:paroal map shoWe 62nd.DriJe.ae a 60 foot wide street. The site plan indieatee that the Property -line starts 25 0 i from the street centerline to the subject site property line, if landsoapin le proposed in -front of the propoeetl fence, that would be wRhin.the City of Vernon �Igftt=oRvvay, Wh'o;will maintain this landscaped setback area? • PleBee provitla us with an' actual full .scale. site plan which shows fencing materials, inclutling .driveway gates, locatlon of Igng Avenue (will the proposed driveway line up I.nrith`thie street?), proposed front landscaped setback (front landscape plan) and public improvements, I.e. existing telephone poles, along 52nd Drive. • Please provide us with a saitham elevation of the proposed project (street view from 52n4`Drive). • Under Section 4.15 Transportation and Traffic, the Mitigated Negative Declaration states, under Sections ad, that there are No Impacts. The CRY of Vemon's acceptable level of service Is D, while the City of Maywood's acceptable level of service for local streets is C. 52nd Drive In Maywood is a local street. According to the City of Maywood's Rnal EIR Land Use and Circulation Elements, In accordance with the CRy's LOS standard, which Is LOS D for arterial and collector streets, study intersections that deteriorate to LOS E or worse are signRicantly impacted and mitigation is required. • The Traffic Study does not clearly address the future level of service at the intersection of 52nd Drive and Atlantic Blind. It does, however, address the intersection of District Blvd.. and Atlantic Blvd. with a projected level of service between E and F. City of Vernon' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 4305 Santa Pe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 (323) 583-8811 ADOPTION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATON MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO:THE CITY OF VERNON GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE, AND APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR A PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 4675 52aDbRIVE IN THE CITY OF VERNON, CALIFORNIA (THE "PROJECT") NOTICE ISHERUBY GiVEN that the City of Vernon City Council will hold a Public Frearing at 9:00 A.M. on Tuesday, February 5, 2013, at City Hall in the City Council Chambers, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, Callfornia.. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the following matters: Adoption of R Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 2100D et seq, and Government Code Section 15000 et seq., the City of Vernon prepared an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project, and die City has determined that withmitigatiou measures incorporated, project impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level. A Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program has been prepared identifying the monitoring requirements and documentation. Focused Amendments to theLand Use Element of the General Plan. Consider and approve proposed Amendments to establish a Housing Overlay and an Emergency Shelter Overlay. Update of the Housing Element for the2014-2021 Planning Cycle. Consider and approve Amendments to the Housing Element of the General. Plan to address the requirements` for the 2014-2021 1-lousing Element cycle of the Southern California Association of Governments region, and to identify sites for potential housing consistent with'the Land Use Element. Focused Amendments to Chapier 26 (Zoning) of the Code of the City of Vernon and the Zoning Map. Consider and approve an Ordinance amending sectionsofCliapter26taachieve consistency with the General Plan and in particular, to establish a Housing Overlay zone and an Emergency Shelter Overlay zone, and to amend the Zoning Map to apply the two overlay ?Apes: Development Agreement. Consider and approve an Ordinance establishing u Development Agreement between the City of Vernon and Meta Housing Corporation for development of a housing project at 4675 52ne Drive in the City of Vernon, California. ALL INTERESTED AND/OR AFFECTED PARTIES are invited to submit written comments in favor of, or in opposition to, this matter prior to the time of the hea or be heard in support of, or opposition to, the proposed project at the time of the .hearing. For iota nalior, please conlact Kevi Wilson, Community Services and Water Director at (323) 583-8811. � J Date: