Resolution No. 2013-073 (3)14.5.5.5 1he Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
'The Southern California Coastal Water Research Proiect (SCCWRP) is a research institute
focusing on the coastal ecosystems of Southern California from watersheds to the ocean. It is
a participant in the SMC. SCCWRP was created by a joint powers agreement. stemming
from a common need among multiple government entities. SCCWRP's diverse member
agencies, including municipalities that discharge treated wastewater to the ocean, storm
water agencies, and water quality regulators, joined together to create a solid foundation for
impartial research. This includes research to dcline best practices for monitoring, data
management and sharing; and technology transfer.
14.5.5.6 Los Angeles County Sediment Management Plans
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, through the Los Angeles County
Flood Control District has developed a 20-year Sediment Management Strategic Plan
(Strategic Plan) for years 2012 to 2032 that pursues new alternatives that can reduce tl►e
environmental and social impacts of sediment management. It evaluates and defines
sediment management methods including removal, transport, placement and use. The
District manages a flood control system ol'dams, debris basins, and other drainage
infrastruct►nN, which reduces risk of floods and debris flows for downstream communities.
Effective sediment management requires the regular removal ol'sediment that deposits within
District facilities. The Strategic Plan represents the results of a continuing dialogue about
sediment management between the District and numerous stakeholders in the region. The.
Strategic flan provides an overview ol'sediment management issues, evaluates various
strategies to help identify optimal solutions.
The GWMA can serve as the conduit for coordination with the District on strategic plan
activities within the Gateway Region and for projects that would benefit its members.
14.5.6 Salt and Nutrient Plan
WRD is working to develop a Salt/Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) for the Central Basin
and West Coast Basin pursuant to the SWRCB Recycled Water Policy. The objective is to
manage salts and nutrients from all sources on a basin -wide or watershed -wide basis in a
manner that ensures attainment of water quality objectives and protection of beneficial uses.
The SNMP will evaluate current and future salt and nutrient loading through 2025 and
calculate the assimilative capacity. It will include a monitoring plan and implementation
plans and projects to manage salt/nutrient loading. Ultimately, the plan will be adopted as a
basin plan amendment. The GWMA will track the plan to identify potential projects and to
evaluate how monitoring activities can be coordinated to reduce costs where possible.
14.6 Relation to Land Use Planning
GWMA serves as the means for exchanging information and integrating the land use and
water plans and planning process. Because GWMA includes municipalities that are
responsible for ►management of both water and land use, local land -use planning decision
makers has been integrally involved in formulation ofthe Gateway IRWMP. The
participation of the land use agencies will ensure constant evaluation of the interactions
Gateway Integrated 14-8 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
between walcr management strategics connsidcrcd in the IRWMP and ongoing hind usc
planning. 'I'hc cities and County also usc their local police lowers to develop local
ordittanccs. rcp,ulalions, and design standards.
14.6.1 City and County General Plans
GWMA members provided the attention to the land use issues that effect or could be
affected bv, the C;ateway IRWMP, thus minimizing the potential for conflicts between the
plans. Calil,0rnia Government Code (§65350-65362) requires that each county and city in
the state develop and adopt a General Plan. The General Plan consists ofa statement of
development policies and setting forth objectives, principles standards, and plan proposals. I
is a comprehensive long term plan for the I)hysical development of the county or city. In this
sense, it is a "blueprint" for development.
The Gateway IRWMP has provided the opportunity liar all the local Itnul use agencies to
coordinate on regional water issues, and the city and county general plans an(] the land use
planning process are mechanisms for local governments to integrate land use and water
supply decisions and use the IRWMP to meet the goals oi'the cities and County as identified
in their respective general plans. For the development ol'the Gateway 110WMP, the city and
county inl6rnuttion were consulted to characterize the historical and existing conditions in
the Gateway Region; to document demand and supply conditions; and to formulate
assumptions for the future without project land use and water supply conditions. The
Gateway IRWMP will be updated as needed in the future. The updates will include
consideration of any major changes to the prevailing land use plans.
The city and coul7ty general plans must contain seven (7) state -mandated elements. They
may also contain any other elements that the legislative body ol'the county or city wishes to
adopt. 'I he seven (7) mandated elements are: Land Use, Open Space, Conservation, I lousing,
Circulation, Noise, and Safety. The breadth of the genera) plans may results in less detailed
or Comprehensive review of' regional water issues. The Gateway Cities and this area of I.os
Angeles County arc generally close to build out. Future development will be mostly
remodel, inlill or urban renewal. General Plan updates will most likely to occur in the 017en
Spacc, Conservation, and Safety sections ol'thc general plans to address hazard/flood
management, groundwater recharge, storm water and non -storm water management and
water quality, water conservation and public service. The Cities and County retain all local
land use authority, but GWMA members will work to coordinate ILltllre updates to their
general plans with the information, projects and programs identified in the Gateway IRWMP.
14.6.2 Local Ordinances, Zoning and Design Standards, and Regulation
The GWMA municipalities adopt local ordinances, zoning and development design standards
and regulations that apply to new project and guide the actions of the igcnciCS. '['Ile Water
Supply Augmentation Study (WAS; See Water Management Section above) recommended
each land use authority review and update the development standards and design guidelines
to include Low Impact Development 0,11)) approaches for infrastructure development and
apply innovative storm water infiltration.
Gateway Integrated 14-9 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
There are currently few standards plans that incorporate infiltration techniques such as
parkways with bio-swales. Standards plans include details on the type of catch basins,
sidewalks, curbs and gutters that can be installed on both private and public projects. The
WAS recommended local governments develop consistent standard plans and guidelines
could reduce development review times. It also advised developing regional and sub -
watershed storm water capture, percolation and retention facilities to provide mitigations for
new development impacts for increased storm water and non -storm water runoff, while also
improving runoff water quality and increasing groundwater recharge resulting from current
land uses.
Since some of the groundwater basins are adjudicated, the WAS report went on to
recommend that governing bodies, including those with land use authority, work together to
support establishment of conjunctive use policies for groundwater basins that will encourage
localized storm water recharge; and to provide credits for recharge from implementation of
storm water BMPs. ']'his also would provide economic incentives to develop decentralized
storm water 13MPs.
Since the Gateway area is mostly built out, this would apply predominantly to any changes to
current land use. This complicates the ability to build regional stone water facilities, assess
impact fees to fund projects and to integrate storm water, water quality and recharge projects
to Meet multiple objectives. The IRWMP is the opportunity to integrate projects, develop
shared design standards and regulation where needed, work through GWMA to fund needed
regional improvement, and apply both the water districts and local land use authorities top
address common problems.
Gateway Integrated 14-10 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
15 Plan Impacts and Benefits
This chapter includes discussion of potential impacts and benefits of IRW1vIP implementation.
including both impacts and benefits within the IRWM Region. between regions, and those
directly affecting DAC and Environmental Justice related concerns. It also includes discussion
of how the effects of individual projects are to be addressed by prois ject proponents. The analys
also serves as a benchmark as the IRWMP],,, implemented and perfonliance is evaluated. The
benefits and impacts identified in this chapter will help the GNVN4A detcmiffle whether the
potential benefits have been realized or if unanticipated impacts have occurred. As the Gateway
IRWMP is implemented and project performance data are gathered, the impacts and benefits can
be reviewed and updated as part of the planned update process.
15.1 General Benefits and Impacts of Regional Planning and
Implementing the IRWMP
Through the Gateway IRWMP, the GWMA hopes to realize the advantages of regional planning
for local communities. The communities are facing increased costs for storm water regulatory
compliance: purchasing imported surface water, meeting drinking water standards: and prevent
flooding in drainage impaired areas. The advantage of the Gateway regional planning approach
and Gateway IIMIMP are related to:
• Identifying regional projects and programs help to create economies of scale.
• Increased f(leuS on the issues and objectives most affecting the local Gateway communities.
• Greater ability to influence legislative process.
• Developing a long -tern] vision for regional water management for water supply and water
quality issues.
• Managing water resources within a recognized hydrologic boundary rather than many
isolated political boUndaries.
• Increasing competitiveness for state and federal funds.
• Reducing costs by co -funding programs for regulatory compliance and monitoring.
• Establishing goals and policies for the most economical and efficient use of available water
resources and tax revenues.
• Providing a forum for DACs in the Gateway Region to pool resources. access funding and
ensure equitable distribution of funding.
• Creating greater opportunity to promote the needs of the sub regional area to the regional
agencies.
Without the Gateway IRWMP, these benefits would be smaller or even lost to the Gateway
Region. In addition. the Gateway region could experience the following impacts of not adopting
and implementing the IRWMP.
Gateway Integrated 15-1 Final
Regional water Managemcnl Man June 2013
• Lack of access to state resources to address identified Gateway issues such as updating aging
inlrastruclurc.
• Increased costs to individually comply with water quality related regulations and TMDLs.
• inability to fairly compete with other areas, support DACs and ensure Environmental .Justice.
• Limitcd economic development opportunities associated with unaddressed water supply and
water quality issues.
• Reduce supply reliability.
• Increased costs related to a need for more imported water.
• Decreased quality of lire due to neglect of regional flood, water supply and environmental
resources.
The Gateway 1RWN41" brings focus to the communities at a grass roots level, allowing greater
participation of local agencies and interest groups for purposes of providing and delivering
benefits at a localized level. Many of these needs have been underfunded and neglected due to
the emphasis on the macro scale regional planning. Planning at a regional scale has been
occurring in the Gateway Region for many years. The scale of the regional planning is such that
the benefits to the smaller local entities and public are not always well understood.
Even though macro scale programs provide economies of scale to address the larger water issues.
the costs for these programs have an impact on local communities because they consume
available public funding, whether local taxes/ water/sewer rates or by consuming the available
state bond funds. The focus on watershed scale regional flood control also dilutes the attention
to local flood and storm water needs. Regional water quality compliance to meet regulatory
requirements places further burdens on the local communities. many of which are disadvantaged
and have limited financial, managerial and regulatory capacity.
15.2 Impacts and Benefits of the IRWMP Program Alternatives
The Gateway IRWMP integration effort defined regional program alternatives. The program
alternatives provide a planning framework to integrate projects and achieve multiple benefits
within the Region. 'Table 15-1 presents that potential regional impacts and benefits of the
proposed Gateway program alternatives. These are qualitative benefits. Quantification of
specific benefits is part of the economic analysis to be prepared to support rate studies or for
purposes of grant application. The GWMA also discussed and identified potential interregional
benefits and impacts that could result from implementation of the program alternatives and Table
l 5-2 presents the potential interregional benefits and impacts.
Gateway Integrated 15-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
u,
=7
S
O
"t7
�
a
a c C
a) _U
a,
(0 u) C �-
C
O
a a) a)
U a)
) C L) U
Q aa) C a) C
CL
C u)
O
O `
m O .-
•C
�) U E
f0
+
O
U C
W (nn V) - X? N
a
E ro
a)
a) E
O
cn uo u
d
CO a'
m .p a a
cNTa
°
IT a)
o(oo (1)�
CL 3 Q) Z a
c
c
c
°) o
-
"c
a) o
3
cc
o
ca)
'o
c
O
m
a
'O
-_
> >
O
O
a))
a)
N�
'>o
f0
Q
O
a
O O
Q
Q.
=
t' �
u
a)
3
n
v
T a
(0
c o n
a)
o
S
a
O
o. (�
x
(D
Q
°
to
a)
>�CL
n "'
= a)
C • to
a
'C
E
m�
-0a)a
°
a
>@
m
v)
��Eo�@ �
m ° 0 n a)
o�L)
c-0
-
o
a)
:-
0
y
c
E
m co
a)
3 > cn � -o _
>
_
° a)
:)Q
o.��
Q)@=rn°)�
�o
��sav)E =•p
°mvi
o
a
a) a)
O
o
m
)j
(0 V
()a
a)C
a)n
Q) d
Q)
a) C
V)
N _
..raoo
.-
C
C Q) Q1 a)
C
U
U C
a.@
a o°��Q.Jo�EY��E.Xo�°'�3
0
�a�vu
cEa o c, a
c
a)
E
m
E
m
m
a
0
o
°
E
m
a
a)
o
O
►-
a
a)
n
E
m
a
T
N
Q
N
Q
C
� G
O
�
.�
° E
a
w
(n
Q a)
a
in
Y
CL
n 0
3 3 n a�
f°
-
�
�. co
c
w
�°
c
oE oN
.o
p� iC
C
g
) co
c>>a
@
�Qmm
Q'�EEtoc�
(am.n
-0
C
O
N N
N N C
o 'C o
a)
ii.
O
a)
i5 C
o0
C (0
3
3o
m
no°to U
c
c>
€°
n�
€ovoa)a-
v'C
M
m 3 o
c
c p E-°
a? n is
0) _0 c,U
� c a>
c
°
o
o a>
5
o
o
L (n
O
O ,V7 0
_
a_ '0 ...-
.n
0 .a U m a
U .0 C 3 'p d d
Z
(n m
.>
C� (d
(� ro
cn (n
C J
a)
f0
y°�
+.'
-6
C
(n
a)
Y
to
to 0
L
l0
U
M
o
X
.n
,�
O
E
U
a Q)
17
Q) C C
n
o (NN n
tD
O
a)
o
C o
o
0 o Z
=0 E 10
c
c
o u v
w
ai 3
:3 o (n
�
(n
Q
co
E
rn
` p
V
E
E c� 3 a)
0
0
d L N O
•C °� "-
U N
C
O
N
m al
N
L
Q
J
m U—
n C
N
7
D Q � n a) a)
N (n N`
Q1
E `
rn
a7 N O C N
n
,N N
v in
U
`
3 o
O
C D
(D
E .� O
c c�
>+
r°
> C N C 7 O .-•
a) a�
m
:�
D c—oaC°
3
co E
(�
U L
m .Cc-0 c
N o
o
'E m non
m o m �o 'v
o v>i n
.o C a)
v m
o- w `
v
v
o
c m
as a`) a� o o
°' M a'
M C io
'` a>
on
°� (n
v o
°�
a ~
x
a� C c °
m m n '�'
> c
f0 `D
o > f6 a� 0 @ � o 0
c E@ C c C 3 0
n
a�
m _(n a
E 3 co 30 c
M
o°
m oo >
C
.0
°' 3
3 n c o
o "-`o
a"i
� w 3° Q'�o
V` U ._� •0 C>
C
N
U U J
E
O -'
U U U
U U>
E n> W .O C@ VOi
E C u N
a,
nm Do •
O N m-0
a> >
>
nn
m a� �'
a)
o > o
�i0
a°iia�'°000-OL 0aEi>
elfs in v, � nN a w `L U v
. . . • • • •
Q
•
°aid
. .
o
•
aoa)i
Ufa
•
o��°cOpO�ana°'i�oa
• • •
EL
• •
_ 0 < t a� n.- .E
• . .
C
0
o
m
m
LL
`
E
C
°
1`C
m
C
U
m
co
3
°
C)E
a
o
o
0
g`g
aD
U
+U C
2 7
_�
C a)
E o5
Q
Q
Q (n
Q C
C
ro
9L
7
71
a
a)
@
f6
C
a)
p
L
V@i cn
a a) a)
>.
n
a)
a)
a
o
a)
a)
_
U
•—
—
@ a)
C)
@ a)
@
°
U C
`'o
U C
�-o
>
E
a)
•> > f0
E �3
f0
O U
U
O
•�
p
cA =3
•U
U
U
V)'�
S .
E
100 =
0
a
c
p
> a
,E
w>
0)a s
o
C
C c
a
E
tC
-C E
@ .D
L
@ .D O N
L7
U) T)
U O
(� o
U N`
Q @
N @
U t0
V) C
CI @o
` = U •- O
@
C
V)
v)
2-0
=
N o@ U
Qom
N
@ O
��>@
c
cco
a
0
c
co
c
4
c
-0 U p
N N
3
yCT
c
@
o
a) o
io a)
a@
O
s
0- a)
O
io
'
r
O @
U
is
)
o
U
a
c)
_
T ' `
`
o
V) U) C
s
Q
@ p
0,_0
to
a)
Ca
m
Q@
Np
O0-0 0-
_NO
a=)3
�Q.
amL
ca
pa)
2
o
a)
L)
IE
T'oYC
`
LQ
O O
_0
Na)
Q7
OO
03QU)V)o
o
(1)
0Q=
v
U
a;u
N Qp 1'
co= o
a
C) 0
o 0
E
E
CY)U �n
o
0 a0o
c
o=
a
co
uma)
0vC.
u n
a
Q
p
Q�
-0)
cscc
E 0) "0
a)
75
@Q
a)o w
cD a
a�)
a)�
-0
E�@"
.mar
m`�ua°
o
m
E
mQooc-�
p '
�°Qj3aa):
-0 Q
o
w�
a°a
o
�
nn
(1)��ac)
` ��
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
. . .
. .
.
. . .
o�u�
.
. .
. . . .
c
rn
@
n
=
a
OU
Q
V
_
o
E
co
Q)
a
d
0)
c
~
N
F-
o io
@
U
a
o
() a)
p 0'
c @
U
C>
a)
Op
@
U
O @
CL
�C
Q
Q O
Q C7
c
cn c
E
cn
> U
o
J 00
rn
ovm) o
o•-
Oa)
Oa�0
m
C
U
a) a`) m C
o—
Q) O
m
u) C O
C
E
=3m a
,
w�`
0 o acmC
m
CL
p
V(UON
'o t CQ
CO
m
Uco
,
°
_C
2 a �.0
o
O 4D
mE
oo.
c
OO m
U)Ua) N
C
a-
tm 0) m 3 °
(D5
aU
—� W o
Q�
Q)
cn
a)a rn
EEo
m
U °
>.
No
In
= E
a)
0
aco)
a
0
�_
a0E n.'c'o
O a)
a�i� N
c
c>iomc
c
C N
C
O
C
E)
Lo V C C
U •Q1 3
-
C
.� N
C
C O O
N j
a m
U, p U O
3 m a U U
O (0
a Z 3
O
z
O
Z Q
m
0
m
C
>In
o
m co
C
C m
N N U
>-(n
(a a,o
v' O
N
0
3
C O
p (o
a)
(D O a
_
C m0 n U
U)
C
f6 V EnN
C
a) 'O
(n
C N
L
U
(D
cn
V!
a O
N O
0, N D m C
C>°
uj
N
n
3
C m
N
a
(r
� Q)
o U (0
0 O N N m O
(n N t
a)
m C U
s O o
N
'C c
n
m
c
c t'
o) E a) 3
m y- X a❑ X
°)
CO ") '0) o
a
n° v
ar
c= 05.
>�
c ooEa, (L)AD
)(n �E
moor
m
O O C
0 -O O`
p CN.-� m
am
d,. C-
.`
O u>
fq
U' °
a) U
Z (n p
V -0 •'=
p) a) a) c C
N E (o O CO p
E(
3 O m C m
C 'C
C
O "O
U
U -O M
a)
.0
c
_U
C:
c mom
c (1);� a)0
O C
"mL
m
oo`a) "a)
m
°3
w
C
C E OU
NTJ C
J(n
O
mh— o
C C
a
o
n.
0 Q)
OU L N
p m U E
U -0 -0 a)
3 :E c (a M
U m Ll
o
C
3 a io U,
U U °
,(o m
a)
a)
(D (o
m v o c
c cn m Co E c
F- m
c E c a� U-
°
c
io o a)
En
E c c
o cm) m o
N@ O `C 0 -o o
0 N-
a) C a 0
cm) u o
oa N`
a� p .o o
�m0)
a r n c
CD- -D
n n n� 5 a�
co a-vm>
a a)
n
'(n> n m>
cm�_�a-0c
> a)
o
a)
omc
> N N 0
(a
. .
7 a) a) C
2 m
. . .
O C� m a) .- >>
U mWOW W(n(nQUa(n=
. . . .
c
.
O O (1) (p N
>ww
. . . .
N p
oa
. .
U
c.E.c
.
_
C
C
O
N
D
O
LL
(D
U
0
3
E
`—°
n
m m
ti
coco
m
E
O
C a)
J
E
(`o
a
o
cm
cu
_o
m
`
C
N
Q.
Z
(o N
_0
C
m
0)
C
o
U
m
Q i)
E
C
; W
U 0)
co
>
a)
>1
42
O m
a)
O (n
Q,
?�
�
nN
Ec
p•(D
Up`
n.�
EC
O
M
ri
i
a)
C)
o
c
O co
v
� o
a ia
c
m c
— a)
o aN
m
a
a)
ro Z a)
> p
C
w
C
a)
C
a) a) m
o v a
-a
v
a)
v
a 0 0
a)
()
a)
a) O C
c
c
c
E n O
T) N
O
Z
O
Z
O
z
O
Cf)
V m N C) V))
O C)in t7) N 0
O 3 O
U O '0 O .c
E N v (N .D
O O C) CL C) N
C)
C -p C N E N
0 a) N a)
C (0 Q) v,
a) If) c o c L) o
o , o
o rna.rnU0.
n
O C -O N C a) .- O
•� a) N ` S�
N O ai ' O@ O 7 C
O
C > N (0 t a) •C (1) :-
O m V) a) O O O 'O m
a CL a) a � a - N
rl
d a) O (EB a Q) V
U)_AL) V) (na(r)a°)
. . . . . . .
�
a
U
C
p
C
C
a
O
cl
a)
C
LL
O
0.
a)
v
(1)
E
2
O
co
Y
C
v
_
(6
J
M
d
(D
w)
4>
c -C
c
0 _
cu
-0
n
�'
a (a
Gf)
v cc
V)
D
a)
—
C C)
O
,C
@ .0
O
c (u
C7
C) p
cn
o
o
v'
Q
Q
Q
QCZ
u c�
15.3 Quantifiable Benefits and Costs of Proposed Projects
The quantitative and qualitative benefits ofeach project were generally identified by project
proponents in the project descriptions submitted for review and evaluation. The projects
were at different stages in the planning process and project information was not provided in
equal level of detail. The project proponents identified the general benefits anticipated.
Table 15-3 shows the overall benefits identified for the projects proposed for inclusion in the
IRWMI'.
Those projects that had preliminary or final designs provided greater level of'detail regarding
qualitative and quantitative benefits or impacts. Each project proponent will be responsible
for further defining qualitative and quantitative benefits and costs to a level of detail required
for a complete grant application consistent with DWR or other grant program requirements.
The evaluation may be in the form of a cost effectiveness analysis or cost/benefit analysis. In
future updates of the Gateway 1RWMP more emphasis will be placed on quantifying
individual project benefits and standardized approaches may be used to capture information
to allow better tracking of project and overall regional performance.
Table 15-3. Summary of Projects Benefits
c
O
C
°'
U
.�
c
N
a�
E
Q
v
U
E
ID#
Project Title
E
a`
a
M
mO
0-
O
O
U
€
a
o
�'
C
a`
o
►�
w
o
a°
w
1
Al
Pico Rivera Emergency Intertie
2
A8
Advance Groundwater Wellhead Treatment
.
_
Facility
Furman Park/Rio Hondo Elementary School
3
A3
Recycled Water Main Extension and
Irrigation System Improvement Project
4
A2
Groundwater Well Supple Reliability Project
5
A2
Hermosillo Park Well - Well No. 9 and water
.
mains
6
A5
Installation of Catch Basin - Screening
.
Devices ARS/CPS
Los Angeles River Estuary Bacteria TMDL -
7
A9
Southeast Area Low Flow Diversion
Los Angeles River Estuary Bacteria TMDL -
8
A9
Southwest Area Low Flow Diversion
9
A9
Los Cerritos Channel Metals TMDL - Low
•
.
_
Flow Diversion
10
Al
MWD West Coast Feeder Connection and
Transmission Main
Gateway Integrated 15-8 Final
Regional \Vater Management Plan ,tune 2013
11 1 A ' 1 New GrOUndwatef Well
---
12
---
-------------
New Water Well
Bellflower Municipal Water Distribution
13
A7
System Reconstruction
14
A2
New Water Well
,
15
A7
Norwalk Park Reservoir and Booster Pump
Station
Norwalk Water Main/Meter Replacements -
—
16
A7
Gridley to Maidstone
17
A4
Outfall Monitoring
,
18
A3
Pilot Plant for Treatment of Los Angeles
River Water
Potable Water Interconnections- Bloomfield
19
Al
x Hayford and Pioneer x Lakeland
20
A7
SCADA and Automation
,
21
Al
Shallow Wells Abandonment
.
0
22
A7
Small System Infrastructure Rehabilitation
Project
.
23
Al
Splash Pad/Spray and Wading Pool Retrofit
0
Bellflower NPDES Permit and TMDL
24
A5
Compliance Storm water Improvements
25
A6
Storm Drain Improvement Project Zone 4
26
A6
Storm Drain Improvement Project Zone 2
27
A6
Storm Drain Improvement Project Zone 3
,
28
A6
Storm Drain Improvement Project Zone 6
29
A6
Storm Drain Improvement Project Zone 7
30
A6
Storm Drain Improvements in the City of La
Mirada
.
31
A2
Well 21 Conversion Project
,
32
A3
West San Gabriel River Parkway Phase 3
Development
33
A5
Catch Basin Trash Inserts and Face Plate
Screens
Al
Cha'wot Open Space Preservation and
34
0
Storm water Runoff Reduction
35
A3
City of Signal Hill Recycled Water System
36
Al
Coyote Creek Irrigation Runoff Reduction
0
Pro ram
.
37
Al
Disadvantaged Communities Schools
0
Retrofit. Program
38
Al
Emergency Water Connection
Improvements
39
A9
Fernwood Water Improvement Park
Gateway Integrated 15-9 Final
Regional Waler Management Plan June 2013
Monitoring of Activities Surrounding the
40
A8
Omega Chemical Corporation Superfund
Site
Addition and/or Expansion of Arsenic
41
A8
Treatment for Ground Water Extracted from
the Pressure Zone of the Central Basin
Addition and/or Expansion of Color
42
A8
Treatment for Ground Water Extracted from
the Pressure Zone of the Central Basin
Addition of 1,4-Dioxane Treatment for
43
A8
Ground Water Extracted from the Central
Basin
Optimization of Strategies to Reduce Storm
44
A9
water Impacts on Surface Water Quality
based on Cost -Effectiveness
45
A6
57th Street Storm Drain Improvement
Project
46
A6
55th Street Storm Drain Improvement
Project
47
A6
District Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement
Project
Vernon Catch Basin Trash Inserts and Face
48
A5
Plate Screen Project
49
A2
Production Well 22
50
A4
Vernon Outfall Monitoring Project
51
A3
Cesar Chavez Park Recycled Water
irri ation Protect
52
A9
Firestone Blvd. Median Project
53
A3
South Gate Park Recycled Water
Conversion project
Tree Well Dry Weather Runoff and First
54
A9
Flow Storm water Capture/TMDL Project
55
A2
Well 25 Replacement
Storm Drain Improvements- The Manor and
56
A6
Salt Lake and Wood Avenues.
'
57
A7
Water SCADA Energy Savings Automation
Project
58
A7
Well 28 Reservoir and Booster Pump
Station
59
Al
Chittick Field
0
Treatment of Low Flow and First Flush
60
A9
Storm water Discharges - Termino Drain
'
61
Al
Pico Rivera 1.5 Million Gallons Reservoir
62
A3
Long Beach Graywater Program
Willow Springs Habitat Enhancement, Trail
63
A9
Improvement and Water Quality
Improvements
64
Al
Citywide Parks Irrigation System Upgrades
0
Gateway Integrated 15-10 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
P,
1 El Dorado Nature Center Lakes Water
6�
Ct
Ouality and Water Conservation
Al
El Dorado Park Duck Pond Water Ouality
66
CF
and Habitat Improvements
'
67
Al
El Dorado Regional Park Water Ouality 8
.
G
Water Conservation
68
Al
El Dorado Nature Center Lake Dredging
,
0
and Leak Repair
69
A9
Long Beach Urban Runoff Recycling Facility
_
(LBURR�
The Los Cerritos, San Gabriel River and
70
A
Alamitos Bay Outfall Trash Collectors
Al
The Los Cerritos, San Gabriel River and
71
0
Alamitos Bay Low Flow Diversion System
'
Al
Construct Bioswales/Landscaping in various
72
0
locations in Long Beach
'
76
Al
Pump Station Vortex Separation System
0
(VDevices
15.4 California Environmental Quality Act and Permitting
15.4.1 Compliance Approach and Responsibilities
Potential environmental impacts of all individual projects listed in the Gateway 11MIMP have
been. or will be evaluated in accordance with CEQA by the project proponents sponsoring
the project and serving as the lead agency and in accordance with their project schedules. 'Fhe
Gateway IR\N'MP does not legally bind participants to carry out projects listed in the plan.
The responsibility fir complying with CEQA and other environmental laws rests with the
public agency or agencies that that is proposing and managing the project. Individual
projects must be certified through either categorical exemption, negative declaration.
mitigated negative declaration or a full Environmental Impact Reporl (EW). During project
planning. the environmental data that was collected was factored into the development and
application of the ranking and screening criteria to the degree that such data was available:
and CEQA clearance was one of the `readiness -to -proceed' criteria used by the GWMA to
set project priorities.
Where multiple agencies are participating in funding for the project. the lead agency will be
determined by the pro.jecl participants. Where agreements between agencies are to be
adopted for projects. which would commit to a course of action to the exclusion of other
courses ofaction. these agencies will need CEQA clearances to commit funding or approve
the final agreements.
The adoption of the Gateway ]RWMP by individual member or submittal of any
implementation grant proposals by the GWMA are exempt from the CEQA since these
actions are related to feasibility, planning studies (§15262) and information collection
Gateway Integrated 15-1 1 Final
Regional \Maier Management Plan ,lure 201
(ti 15300). The Gateway IRWMP consisted of basic data collection and resource evaluation
activities which would not result in the disturbance ofany environmental resource: and
involved planning studies for possible future actions by the participating agencies.
15.4.2 Avoiding, Minimizing, and Mitigating Potential Impacts
]'be purpose and need for projects to be included in the Gateway IRWMP is also to avoid.
minimize or mitigate impacts related to the current management regime and existing
activities. In other words, projects seek to address current negative environmental effects or
impacts to Gateway stakeholders and the Gateway Region that are the result of the baseline
or existing conditions. Environmental, water quality, and other baselines conditions were
documented during the project planning to identify environmental constraints and
opportunities. This was intended to identify environmental impacts and benefits earlier rather
than later in the planning process; and to allow for flexibility in design of the projects and
capital facilities to include measures to avoid impacts, determine mitigation costs and
integrate environmentally friendly elements into Gateway program alternatives were
possible. Gateway projects will therefore avoid, minimize or mitigate any additional
contributions to the negative impacts to groundwater overdraft, storm water runoff; water
quality (TMDI , issues) and the lack of open space and access to parks. The purpose of this
proactive approach was also to ensure that impacts were considered and avoided to the
degree possible long before an EIR or other CEQA documents were prepared for any
Gateway IRWMP projects.
15.5 Impacts and Benefits to DACs
The GWMA has actively sought to engage interested parties and DACs in the IRWMP
development and implementation. Roughly 47 percent of the Gateway Region is considered
DAC areas. DACs are directly represented by Gateway cities on the GWMA. This allows
management IRWMP decisions to be influenced by DAC issue and concerns, resulting in
tangible benefits for DAC's. Some local agencies, organizations and DACs are not full
members of the GWMA but can participate in a meaningful way as interested parties. No
Tribal lands were identified in the Gateway Region. Implementation of the IRWMP is
expected to have the following benefits to DACs and other interested parties:
• Discussion Forum- Provide a forum to discuss water management issues. concerns, and
priorities, especially those important to DACs.
• Information Dissemination- Share information that DACs may not normally have access
to. For instance, DACs and Interested Parties may not have the staff to regularly track
funding opportunities or attend other regional or statewide meetings.
• Overcome Constraints- DACs in the Gateway Region may lack financial, management or
technical capabilities, but through the GWMA, the DACs can come together to reduce
costs. share resources and pursue funding.
• Reduced Costs- The regional programmatic alternatives potentially could reduce costs for
regulatory compliance for TMDL or other storm water management activities, public
outreach or other joint programs.
Gateway Integrated 15-12 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
(_'rc;ilc s: ('OIkctivc Voice. DAG often cannot scnd Who the Iawcr rcv4mal apcnc�
niccliIip, �It tract; activiIiC�; that could dll-eetIV affect their community. T]ic (AN"MIA and
contrniIICCr allrny the communities to ide]It ifv issues early_ establish posiIions and
coIIccIiv( ly represent their interests tip the lamer rc",iona) entities.
Gatnwy Integraial 15-13 Final
Regional Water Nbnagcment Plan We 2013
16
16 Financing Strategies
As part of the IRNVNIP process. research was conducted on alternative funding opportunities
specific to III plcnuntatloll of Gateway 11WMP projects and programs. This section reviews:
Local (',overnmcnt funding available to the Gateway 11MIMP member agencies
Grants and loans that may be available for Gateway 1RVdMP stakeholders
16.1 Local Government Funding
The information presented below identifies the sources of local funding used for capital projects
and management actions to implement the 1RWMP. This includes sources of funding that
GWMA members will use to meet maintenance and operations obligations for projects. 11 also
describes the constraints that local governments face in generating revenues. Each member that
seeks grant funding will need to demonstrate that maintenance and operations funds are to be
committed to the projects. This could include proof through and adopted capital improvements
plan, other engineering feasibility studies and reports, rate studies or approved funding program
adopted pursuant to California requirements.
16.1.1 Integrating Funding Authorities and Sources
Integrating local funding authorities and sources will help the Gateway Region pursue grant
funded projects and seek state and federal funding. Most grant programs require a local match.
]ntegrating available local funding or supporting some approach to sharing costs may be needed
to help meet local match contributions. and for funding projects feasibility studies. design and
environmental review. Planning and pe►7nitting often requires local investment prior to
obtaining state or federal grant funding or loans for construction.
Under their general government authority, local revenue is generated by IR WMP member
agencies (i.e., cities) from a variety of sources including general funds or enterprise funds, water
and sewer rates. developer or impact fees, connection fees, property taxes, and sales taxes. As
applicable, thcre is also the opportunity to generate fees on groundwater pumping or storage.
Gateway IRWMP member agencies are funded through water standby and availability chargcs.
water rates. impact fees and water sales. In addition, GWMA has been formed to coordinate
shared pro,jcct funding.
16.1.2 Benefits Assessments, Benefits Assessment Zone Formation
Funding for large regional projects such as groundwater banking facilities, is often obtained
through benefits assessments. Benefits assessments are special charges levied on property to pay
for public improvements that benefit property in a predetermined district. Regional flood control
and storm water projccts. riparian and habitat development, recycled water and groundwater
Gateway Integrated 16-1 Final
Regional Water Ntanagement Plan .lone 2013
storage are all projects that have been identified as candidates for projects of high priority in the
Gateway Region.
Benefit assessments link the cost ofpublic improvements to those landowners who specifically
benefit from the. improvements. Benefit assessment zones are defined geographically and levies
are put on all properties within a designated benefit assessment zone. The boundaries of a benefit
assessment district may coincide exactly with those of a city, county, or other existing special
district. or they may cover only part of those jurisdictions. A comprehensive engineers report is
needed to form an assessment district. The report must outline the proposed area, key projects,
estimated project costs, annual cost to each property, and the benefit formula used to determine
each property's share of the cost. 1t is the legal basis for an assessment district and must be
formally approved by the governing body that will administer the district. Proposition 218,
which established a strict definition of "special benefits," instituted a common formation and
ratification process for all benefit assessment districts.
16.1.3 Constraints and Certainty of Funding
GWMA defines how monies are collected and decisions are made. One intent of GWMA is to
identify stable sources of funding for shared programs where these programs are determined to
provide benefits to member agencies. GWMA provides the mechanism for ongoing and stable
funding for programs and projects with shared benefits.
Local governments funding is required for multiple purposes and the ability for local
governments in the Gateway Region is constrained by economic and political realities. Like
other regions of the state, the Gateway Region has a limited ability to pay for all necessary
improvement projects or programs. Unemployment has been high across the state and the ability
to raise local revenue is limited by economic conditions. Grants and loans become important in
leveraging the limited local financing capacity.
Proposition 13 created limits on the ability of city and County governments to raise property
taxes. Proposition 218 creates similar constraints for agencies and special districts, including
specific procedural requirements related to generating fees and assessments. Any efforts to
generate new charges and assessments would be subject to voter approval. Planning or
construction of new facilities requires a full evaluation of benefits and costs and an electoral
process, as defined by the proposition and amendments to state law.
For specific projects to be implemented under the IRWMP, it is important to note that one of the
evaluation criteria for project prioritization was the presence of the local funding match, or at the
presence of a solid plan to define stable funding for construction and maintenance of proposed
projects. The process included review of the economic conditions of the proposing sponsor and
DACs were carried Ibi-ward and granted higher priority in the second stage of review for
Proposition 84 monies since there is an opportunity f:or DWR to waive the matching fund
requirements. The DAC sponsors are still required to demonstrate that stable funds are available
for maintenance and operations.
Gateway Integrated 16-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
16.1.4 Grants and Loans — State and Federal
Grants aridior loans,lrc avaiiahlc to help
implement (_,alcvvav IRWMP pro.iccts and
programs. l colcral and state agencies
pl-ovide technical assistance and program
funding for (_Jatewav IRWMP re.latcd
projccts or programs. including
implementation M DWR recommended
\vatcr management strategies. T"hc
Gateway IRMMP mcmber agencies have
prolcct recommendations for groundwater
managemcnt, watcr conscrvation, water
recycling. water quality protection and
improvcmcnt. and support for meeting the
critical water supply and quality needs of
disadvantaged communities. DACs often
qualify'. and many times are prioritized,
101- grant programs to support basic needs
for facility planning. design work, and
envil'011111clatal revic\\.
16.1.4.1 Proposition 84 IRWM and Proposition
1 E Flood/Storm water Grants
Both programs are managed by DWR
under common guidelines. A summary
table of -.rant programs is providcd in
Table 16-1 at the end of the chapter.
Proposition 84 DWR IRWMP Grant Program
Proposition 84. the Safc Drinking Water,
Water Quality and Supply. Flood Control. River and Coastal Protection Act provided bond was
passed by voters in 1996 and allocated $900.000,000 to support IRNNiMP and implementation of
projects. The intent ofthe IRWMP grant program is to promote and practice integrated rcgional
water nruuigement to ensure sustainablc water uses. reliable water supplies, better water quality.
environmental stewardship, efficient urban development. protection of agriculture, and a strong
economy. The program recognizcs the inter-cornaeetivity of water supplies and the environment
and theta pursues projects yielding multiple benefits.
The Gatcway 11:WMP provides a mechanism for setting, priorities to pursue IRWMP
Iill plcmentation Grant funding. It will also help the Region, in the long-tcrm, to coordinate.
rcfinc. and intcgratc existing planning efforts within a comprehensivc. regional context: identify
specific regional priorities for implementation projects: and help to obtain funding support for
the. Gateway Region plans. programs, and projects. A. regional approach is strongly prioritized.
Gateway Integrated 16-3 Final
Regional Waler Management Plan lone 2013
The Gateway IRWMP development was funded with approximately $1M in IRWMP Planning
Grants.
The Gateway Region will be competing with other Regions for the remaining Implementation
Grant funding in Round 2. The Gateway Region is identified in the adjacent figure. There is
roughly $131 M available for implementation grant awards this year. The draft solicitation
package was released in early July 2012. Of the $131 M. roughly $31 M will be made available
for the Los Angeles -Ventura Funding Region. Not less than 10 percent of the available funding
will be used to support projects that address critical water supply or water quality needs for
DACs.
Proposition 1 E, the Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond
Proposition 1 E was passed by California voters in November 2006. It authorized the Legislature
to appropriate $300 million for grants for Storm water and Flood Management (SWFM) projects.
Currently, there are plans to disburse a second round of SWFM Grant funding under the Disaster
Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition i E). Approximately $92M in
SWFM funding is available through this second round of solicitation. A final package was
released in November 2012. Applications were due in December 2012 with awards to be
announced in .July 2013.
In order to apply, projects must be identified within an approved IRWMP. It is also encouraged
that eligible projects help to meet multiple benefits.
Competition is statewide. Proposed projects must be in the Gateway IRWMP.
State and Federal Water Revolving Funds
The purposc of the USEPA Water Revolving Loan Program
is to support projects that will put the clean water and
drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) on a "firmer
foundation."'l1iere are two types of funds, the Clean Water
SRF and the Drinking Water SRF. In California, the State
Water Resources Control Board managed the Clean Water
SRF for wastewater treatments and the Department of
Health Services Manages the Drinking Water SRF.' The
USEPA works with California State and local partners to
develop a sustainability policy including management and
Pricing for future infrastructure funded through SRFs to
encourage conservation and to provide adequate long-term
funding for future capital needs. Portions of these funds
may be applied to regional IRWMP programs that focus on
urban water cons r t'
Resources for Small Water Public Systems
Rural Community Assistance Corporation
(RCAC) <httn:/%N��� �� .rc�ic ora->
California Rural Water Association (CRWA) <
Imp:, N%��.u..cahural�� �tcr oi.,,�>
Self -Help Enterprises (SHE,) <
htl v. \v«.:cl[helnC11ternri�� . ," >
Expense Reimbursement Grant (ERG). CPS
Human Resources Services
California State University Sacramento. Officc of
Water Programs (CSUS)
<htttt:,'/\rXa vN.MvP.ctius cd11'>
American Water Works Association (AWWA).
California -Nevada Section
am\aa.ore/Caen xveh/> —
c �a ►on programs that would benefit the entire Region.
5
�ilerh(71�YlS.Cil."OV/\Water issueSipr0"`ran7S%�7I"3nt5
<httr
Gateway Integrated 16-4 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
Clrinkina 14i01cr SRF
CDPI I ha'� it ranee of Why opprwtu hos for PUhNc walcr svWems 7 "I he (lay{ I Safi Drinkhm,
\Water State l.cvolvin-, Fund Final Intended Use Plan (Au«ust 201 1)" idemines specific set aside
programs IWO help disadvantaged communities.
W"rtcr S�stcm "Technical. Managerial, and Financial (TMF') Capacity Development prop. rani
helps DA(s ivhh systems assessments. operator training_, engineering services and other
support. Preliminary engineering assistance is provided through a contract with University
of California, Davis "Center for Appropriate Technology for Small Water Systems'" (t)CD).
The contract provides engineering services to small systems that lack the finds and expertise
to obtain these services on their own. UCD prepares preliminary, engineering reports for
identified high priority small and disadvantaged systems pr(*cts to move them through the
funding process.
Small \Fate► System (SWS) Technical Assistance. Set -aside. This prograrri is for
communities serving populations of Tess than 10.000 and provides technical assistance
through the Rural Community Assistance Corporation (RCAC). California Rural Water
Assocklkm (CRAMA) and Self Help Enterprises, The CDPS Small Water Systems Technical
Support iWh9 holds quarterly meetings with the technical assistance providers (CalTAP).
These meetings provide the opportunity to identify and implement more effective and
n1caning.ful methods of providing technical assistance to smaller and disadvantaged systems.
Clean Water SRF
The California State Water Resources Control Hoard (SNVRCB) manages the SRF. ']'he SVVRC P
has a Small (Onniunity Wastewater Strategy 10 and has a Small Community Wastewater Grant
(SC1A/6) Program. most recently funded by Propositions 40 and 50, provided grants for the
planning, design, and construction of publicly -owned wastewater treatment and collection
facilities to small communities (ix, with a population of20.000 persons, or less) with financial
hardship. On November 17, 2011. the State Water board executed a contract with California
Rural Water Association (CRWA) to provide up to $500.000 in wastewater -related technical
assistance to small. disadvantaged communities (SDACs) statewide. The types of technical
assistance that will be offered include:
• Preparation of financial assistance applications
• ('ompliaricc audits and troubleshooting to address permit violations or improve operations
0 Review of proposed project alternatives to assist in idcntibby low-cost. sustainable
approachc�,
• Assistance with planning and budgets. hwWdhy capital improvement planning
• Assistance with community outreach, awareness, and education. especially with regard to
rate sett ing and Proposition 218 compliance
The technical assistance provided under- this contract is intended to be targeted and specific, with
each SDAC allotted a maximum of 20 hours of teclinical assistance. CDPH staff may approve
additional time on a case -by -case basis.
USEPA Hardship Grants Program for Rural Communities
USEPA has a Hardship Grants program 11 to help small, disadvantaged rural communities
address their wastewater treatment needs. California identifies eligible projects and may commit
a portion of their grants for technical assistance. Designed to complement the Clean Water SRF
loan program, this program will distribute funds based on the number of rural communities
lacking access to centralized water treatment; and the rural per capita income in California.
State Community Development Block Grant Program
The USDA I lousing and Urban Development (HUD) program offers Community Development
Block Grants (CDBG). They are given directly to California. which then allocates the funds to
srnall cities and nonurban counties. Grants may be used for community and economic
development activities, but are primarily used for housing rehabilitation, public infrastructure
projects including wastewater and drinking water facilities --and economic development.
Seventy percent of grant funds must be used for activities that principally benefit low- and
moderate -income. communities.
Rural Utilities Service Water and Waste Disposal Program
The USDA Rural Utilities Service provides grants and loans through the Water and Waste
Disposal (WWD) program. The program targets rural communities with 10,000 people or fewer
for drinking water, wastewater, solid waste, and storm drainage projects. Rural Utilities Service
also administers the "Water 2000" initiative to bring safe, affordable drinking water to all rural
areas by the year 2000. These programs are administered locally by state and area rural
development offices.
This may be a potential source for DACs in the Gateway Region, depending upon their area
boundaries, which lack local resources to plan and develop water and wastewater facilities, and
may help projects get ready for other funding sources. Money can be used for construction, land
acquisition, legal fees, engineering fees, capitalized interest, equipment, initial operation and
maintenance costs, and related costs to complete a project. Both public agencies and nonprofit
organizations are eligible.
11 <httn:/Avifler.�r,�.gov/t���c/watersheds/w•istewater/en�rev
Gateway Integrated 1 G-0 Final
Regional water Management Plan June 2013
Economic Development Grants for Public Works and Development Facilities
'I'hc (I Dcpartrr►ent of' ('ommcree provides grants through the Economic Deyclopment
Administration (1-11)A) Io cconomically distressed areas for public works projects. includi1111.
\vatcr and wastevvalcr facilities. The projects must promote economic development. create I0170-
term johs. and/or benciit logy -income persons or the long-term unemployed.
Projects must fulfill a pressing need of the area. Recycling to create water for expanding the
renewable cncrpy industry should he a candidate since it would help to establish industrial plants
or facilities. Projects must have an adequate share of local funds evidence firm commitment and
availability of matching funds. be capable of icing started and completed in a timely manner.
State mrn1ey could be used to match the federal money. The State. Gateway Cities. the
Economic Development Commission. or other nonprofit organizations would be eligible.
Federal Water Bank Fund
The Federal Water Bank Fund is designed to deliver funding to priority projects with significant
national or regional economic benefit. The Federal Water Infrastructure Bank would he
authorized to borrow money from the federal 'Treasury at very low rates. In turn. the bank would
make low-intcresi loans for larger projects that typically are too big to access the SRF. if the
Gateway Region \vere to embark on a large regional project. funds from the bank could be
oht, d for projects provida ing regional benefit (i.e.. Recycling or Groundwater Recharge).
16.1.5 Recycled Wafer/ Desalination Funding Programs
The Gateway 1RNVNIP has identified conceptual projects in the area of recycled \yater that would
help to reduce dependence both on groundwater supplies and imported water. Integrating state
and federal landing, is a strategy that could be. applied. There are a number of state and federal
financial assistance programs relating to recycled water projects available to the Gateway
Region. including the SWRCB's grant and low -interest loan programs12 and the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation's 'Vide XV1 Grant Program.
Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act - Title XVI
Title XVI of Public Law 102-575. the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and
Facilities Act. authorizes the federal government to partially fund the capital cost of recycling
projects. Title XV1 program the act directs the Secretary of the Interior to undertake a program
to investigate and identify opportunities for water reclamation and reuse of municipal. industrial.
domestic. and agricultural wastewater, naturally impaired ground and surface Nvaters. and for
design and construction oi'cicmonstration and permanent facilities to reclaim and reuse
\vasteNvater. It authorizes the Secretary to conduct research. including desalting. for the
reclamation of wastcNvater and naturally impaired ground and surface waters. The funds have
<h��..�e���i ���n�ih��,ir�l� ri uu�h�alcr itisu��_t�ru i�un>I�ranls h,;inti:>
Gateway Integrated 16-7 Final
Regional Waler Management Plan .tune 2013
also been used to evaluate water markets, transfers and for creating economic incentives to
conserve water. These finds are managed and distributed by the USBR.
Gateway Region projects for recycling would be candidates for funding.
State Revolving Fund (SRF) / Water Recycling Loan Program (WRLP)/Water Recycling Grants (WRG)
The SRF, WRIT. and WRG provide agencies with low -interest construction loans for water
recycling and groundwater development projects.
Clean 111 ater State Revolving Fund. Mentioned earlier, the SRF can apply to recycling and
desalination. Eligible project types include publicly -owned wastewater treatment facilities. local
sewers, sewer interceptors, and water reclamation facilities, as well as, nonpoint source pollution
control projects.
11'afer Recpcling Funding Program (WRFP). The SWRCB provides funding for the planning.
design, and construction of water recycling projects. Water recycling planning grant funding is
available to assist public agencies with their feasibility study and planning efforts. Construction
projects may be funded with a combination of grants and loans. Privately owned water utilities
that are regulated by the Public Utilities Commission are also eligible to apply for construction
grants.
Water Recpcling Facilities Planning Grant Program (FPGP). The purpose of the FPGP is to
provide grants to public agencies that will assist in the preparation of facilities planning studies
for water recycling using treated municipal wastewater and/or treated groundwater loom sources
contaminated. In addition to encouraging new recycling planning studies, these funds are
intended to supplement local funds and enhance the quality of local planning efforts. The FPGP
Grants are provided liar facilities planning studies to determine the feasibility of using recycled
water to offset the use of fresh/potable water from state and/or local supplies.
Construction Funding Program. The Construction Funding Programs derive funding from the
SRF loan program. The Category I l and V program could support Region projects. Category
111 — Local Supply Water, provides treatment and delivery of municipal wastewater to users that
replace the use of local water supply with recycled water. Category V —Pollution Control.
provide treatment and disposal of municipal wastewater to meet waste discharge requirements
imposed for water pollution control.
Water for America Initiative -USBR is responsible for administering and managing the Water
for America Initiative Program. The Gateway Region IRWMP goals to improve and enhance
local and regional water resources parallel the goals of the Water for America Initiative. Specific
grants available under the Water for America Initiative include the following:
Advanced Water Treatment Grants. The Advanced Water Treatment Grants will provide
funding for pilot or demonstration projects that will test the viability of advanced water treatment
technologies. These grants will help create new water supplies to address water supply
Gateway Integrated 16-8 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
imbalances. J he purposc of Ihcsc projects is to den Ioil stratc the technical and economic viahiIiIv
of using an impaired Nvatc► source within a specific locale.
Haler Alwieting nerd ijjk enCr Grunts. Through the Challenge Grant Program - \Vatcr
Marketing and Ffticiency Grants. Reclamation provides sonic funding to irrigation and water
districts for projects foCUSed on water conservation, efficiency. and water marketing. The focus
is on projects that can be cmnpletcd within 24 months that Nvill help sustainable water supplies in
the western l roiled States. The Water for America Initiative is intended to help communities
meet increasing demands on limited water supplies through collaborative pr(jects. water
conservation technologies. and expanded information sharing.
,Srslem Oi)fimiznlion Review Grants. A System Optimization Re\ ie\N, is a broad look at system-
wide cniciency to improve efficiency and operations of the water delivery, system. The Review
results in a 111,111 ofaction that focuses on improving efficiency and operations on a regional and
basin perspective. Those reconnnended improvements may then be eligible for the \\,,atcr
Marketing and Efficiency Grant funding.
16.1.6 Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Desalinotion Researeh and Innovation Pw-Inership (DRIP). DRIP, manaped by M\VD. is
aimed at developing and demonstrating next -generation desalination and disinfection
technologies that are designed to economically treat large volumes of brackish water fir potable
and nompmahle uses. This partnership includes applied research conducted by California
utilities. universities, and private industry to evaluate imuwativc technologies for treating surface
water municipal wastewater, brackish groundwater, and agricultural drainage water applications.
Communifl' Partnering Program (CPP). MVdD's CPP provides sponsorships to non-profit
community organizations. educational institutions. public agencies and professional associations
for short- and long-term water -related projects. events and activities.
Wafer 1=nrironmoaal Research foundation Partnership ANyam
Water Environmental Research Foundation (% ERF) actively pursues opportunities to leverage
funding and knmvledge through research partnerships with other organizations. Research
partners are typically nonprofit organizations or government entities with research objectives
similar to those of the Foundation. Partnership agreements leverage resources and develop and
disseminate broad-hased knovdcdge. They also provide access to diverse audiences and foster
cooperation. AVER1= All often allocate a set amormt of funding in anticipation of projects to be
identified by the partners. WERF also enters into multi -year partnership programs Nvith
government or quasi -governmental agencies. These partnerships focus in depth on particular
topics and come: together in the joint planning and co -funding of multiple projects. This
opportunity would help Gateway in the identification offuture partnerships for Project
Alternaiives that fall in line with the Partnership Program objectives.
Gateway hmgratcd 1 G-9 Final
Regional Water Manapi:ment Plan .lone 2013
16.1.6.1 Los Angeles County
Water Quality Funding Initiative (WQFI)
Faced wit17 severe TMDL requirements for trash and metals, interested residents. cities. and the
County of Los Angeles are pursuing a parcel tax on properties in the county to pay for storm
water and water quality projects that will help these cities meet State Board TMDL requirements.
The status of this initiative and its revenue is not clear at this writing, but if successful, the
initiative will provide a critical funding stream for the Gateway Region.
Gateway Integrated 16-10 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
I
I
a'
4i
= c
ry
an
a a
-IF
i
C a
O
LW
u
C C)
C
Z E
n
c c
c
c
C
o Z, a
m a)
! Ufj
O
°= a
o
fa
c-o
O
a
a c m z
c
m E
a
a w
?
G
>_
�' r
O
U)
', C
N O
-
•� N
Y
on
a a
+
c
0
„
Q1
O a
6 OJ
O
Q
a
ir
or
---' G
u\
X X
�_
O C
✓�
�1 N
C
O-
or
Q
Q
I a
E E
CD4i
?
c
C
oq
-
Q,
4'
C
-. 41 W
1 V1
C
N
c
0J
fp
> E
C
m
>
C
L
.m O
a N m
C -
ti
R� C
E m
a
N
O V O
E J
c
~
G
r
C V V
C V
V
C 4) A A
1 -0
C N
✓i Ofl
X
m
G
lLl
~ O
to T
m p m
c_ L
ti m
O O
O m
i
OLr)
.--I
a a
a a
s
�
_
r
u
O
o a v
a Q) •�
=
r
v
00
m a
•�'
O
s U,
m
a
� s Ul
u 4! C
N u [!
C
c,
C C
a C
CE
C a <
al
y N
V al
Y
_
V n
C v,
O u O
E
C 0i -G
V
•C �'
C)O
_
Gl
m O
O C
m
a)
_
•O
'v,
[D V
E
1-' a
a,
m
4, O
✓,
o.
c✓ m
^
a
v
a
04 " m
t V 4/
L OQ
V
C
41 C
a1
CIDm
L
4;
a aiJ
a
O
p
m
C ✓i
`
C u
c
0'
-
a, -
CO
m=
a O
O Q/
E
�-
c an
c
?
a,
a, o
o_
u_
o
a
m
c r ti
,
0% C y
u
a�
C a 4)
oil
1J
_
ti DJ
a a/ D.
y
V
C
'� C
_
E
��
rw a C C
,�_
on
=
5 t
'"
a, D
c
V
a a m
a E a`
_ as c m
w m c a
_
w
o_
;,; a,
m .E ✓
Z
CL
c
a!
^ a!
On
ro
`, c
a,
y O
m LL
C Q/
G 0
as
C C
CD
m
O
Ir
v) �n
7J
m
4
V
+
h
a C
c
c a
or
m
C1
V y' LL
in
CO
to
Q1
Ln
N
c
C�
O
p
w
i
ro
L
GL o L
o
I e
u°
M1,I
�� o
��n
l
�
T
N
10
p
c
v
c
o
�
�
o
c
a
c
o
Q
r
d
�
v
Y
n
a n
Q O
N
U
h
U
N
a
Q
�
C
C
OO 'O E
O O
d
N
O O c
cc:,)'a0
O ti
Y
O v
- O .E �� v
O O
O E,
ry -0
O O •7
u
X 0
E E E o
c E
S m o'x°
o A
�- OD
V
M
C
d
C 04
E t
C C
m C �-
p
m, c
> o a 3
3
a E o
a
c o
o
o£
c
o
Q
o `
c
E
s
E o
m
v c 3
n a ro
c
o
o
o
aC
E
a a
u o c
v Y
c oao v
o? 10 -o
TO
a
c o _a c
c 0
E L
3 ti a o
a
'� Y
m c
a
a 4
m •5 m
a a`, co v o
o v
M-
o
ca
v _
Z c
Z
o
a n 0
a
in
a E
nj -o
—
c
r-
vc "
�} Q
a L
C C
n C
5 o
-
u v
c
ry d a
w laJ a
N
�'
'r-
a) o
E o
r 3 c
ono
o w
,0 3
E
a'0 '3
c m�
0 c a a ,
a a
D
`a, c v, a •o_q
d
O
m
a
n h a 0 .�
o
E u o°
'c 2
E v
a
> m a
c o-0
v° v°
c E
a N
c a
o
v c c E
ro > o
E c>
o°
T
ac
E
v Q 'o
o 'm
w
Ea v
°° s a c
N°
o" i s
c
fD v
cu
v a-0
a 'E w -0
3 5
= 0 a o
3
E a a` a o
E E
c
c c
19
c
o
s �° E
v «° a° m
a� °°
c
c a .-
ncn o
° n0 n
h a E
° m- E �
a
n
w
E a
27 oo
c c
c .0 tw
'c o
c a
a
Le
a
ai
•c
a E
`^ oo s E
w
o E
c
;?
0 o c^
a u E (u '
a E
a c E` .c
E '- o "= v
p
w n` =
a .c a v
a
y0
c N
E •E a`
" a o
v a
c"
Ov
y1 N ,°'
>
c 0
E o
:0:, p c o0 o
c
bD
a o
nf0, G' v
c '0
3
--- ..
l7 ° v h°
..
?
v E n 3
voi c� v
a .E a
�` ° c c c
a`,
a
a
a a
a
c
v —o°
.o
m a
m
d
o r
o ELL
,v
u° o
C c y
v, o E
own
cr- u
o•E,r
o
a
a
3
O.. a
o�
a V a
o—
n
a
(6 a
c�
O
C
U LL
a a
a E v
a a
p a To
a E h
a s
W D
d
Y
S a
= v
_
V E
Z U E_
= p
_ o
�m,
C
G
f0
p m
a °' v
"
a
°- vi a
t�
p
v m
V a
V v
2 F- [r
O rmo
V v V) uf0.
ov v
�U v m
voi
ti
%
C'
U
v V
I
r! Q
v� c.
N
=
C
ro
�J
C N
O
O
u
uJ
a O co
U
C
°
C O al O
L1
c
a fV
Q
Q
0
C C
ro ro
V
a D.
�i O
a°-
v
Q O ro
a`J
G 5
a`i
L
F
V E
a
Q
O
Q
°
O
p n
aJ
p
C a Q
O a q
ro p-
C
v
O
v
Y
o o ° 0
O
0 o ro o
° Op
o
Ci Ci NJ
�J a
Ci
V)
VI N QI
Lr) Ln a/
N
'n •�
C) in
E: P1
E_ u m a
Ln
E E
N
u o
E
X
C ro ° v
C Y.
\ N �•
- •Y
C
e1 ro
T '-i Ln
T
T
a
�
_
L C V
c _P aJ
b a
N
a, E E
> c °1 E n
a
_o 0
0 0 r
_
ro C
O O
'.�.� �- O C Q T .x vi d •E C
p
p N O C
C, _
L '>
C N O N
4J al ro E
r`
GA ro ro N O
E Q!
al V
41 �' a) C ii ro
a/ ro .E �o
wc
aJ o 4 o c
aJ a
r c
rU
a c am m °1 c u
pp a- Q
t
01
aJ E uor v
° a
o o
C p
c un u °° c E
N
y
E c aJ r a
u
a
c aJ '- u
PJ u ro
E
0 0
c a; aJ c O
c x ;J c v
r
c i� aJ c N
o
E E
o
y .E
ro - E '° to
v o°°.
° coN
ro a
O [X
on
a 4 m
ro V •_
Y Q C O f9
1p d
Q
m-0 c `J ry
L C al
,�
c �-
c CJ
`
aJ ,n a p aJ L" o
f0 O O 2 al ♦.+ ,C tlD V
° E L o a, r
E o ro a
c -o
a, Y Q o m 3 v E
`1 ti O
C O E
ro
U aJ 4- aJ L Z
n
aJ v d n`J c u
>o
ro c �'
aJ
`,
c 01 ° •� o t E c
a
y O
ra6,
y
Don
aJ a
C
o>
c
na
o_
.
a�
3Pl
p
0a
Ln
aJ rt
O.
p_
0 Ga
m O
U ro
U C
u C
vJ C
to
O V
��
O aJ
Ci °
C C
C
V'1 E
Ln O
CL
00 M
C
p_ ro V
` m E
f° E
Q_ 1V.1
° V
V) .aJ
p >
Q U O
5
D
O
D_
V rD
V lD
U
a�c
a
o
c°,
2
r_
U11
�
o L
C,
f
rt,j
0 'O
- LL
C
Ln
U
ti>
O
S
ry
00
v a
N
v`
o0
C
n C o
C
M
ra
C p
O
C
^
p
D
41
NC
j
Q, u p Q al d
n
u
° m CI-- c: Q-
C d Y
N
o
m C
N
a
> a) m n�
c
ruri
c N
j O Y N>
rp
a"
O
r°
T
Y
p E •� p
u C
C)
u c
— a u g s o a
n v
a C
C.al<L a up o. mQ
o
m-
Q ou
o
c D
N
c
o a
mcmC
r6
v
E
a
rli
m, m
V)
n
o to
`m
C
O
ti
✓ O
C O a`' E
°' Cp C n (a L
Y u -p
a1 C
0-C
n
U
v rp O
'D
a
Y o
N ra N
E •ou o
a
O N r0
a� oo
ra
v
C
a, :,= a
- o
Y
° o
oo
a
E Ewo oD
XO
C
N o 0
Lf)—u,
a o
C °mom
on
c o
ar>
Ln n
m N a o c:) >>
c^ m
o
a >
E -
O
° o
m •
u E m
s
N
- 'N
a
a' fa
,n
o
as
E u o
X
_ a
O O O u ° o
'G
0 N
'o
L n
iA VT J Ii rr a' Vl
U to C
!Z
VT f0
a .n
.2 o
o
° a
E a) @ L
c
N ?Y
a) a` u
O
i° a)
N al % .° r°
a o
Y
E
E p N N
r0 N
m
O -0 .vr
C
ro C
N
4a h 3 > N (O
'0A
@ a, C 'O
>�>
•`-' C C
C ra
° '^
u
u
fa Oa
3 C
Cro ✓N+
f0 O1 3 �0 f°
C C fD
O
Da V L
o 3 c c
'CL 7
m
N
A
c E
O' O
a° a' F-
a
a'
O
v
o
a —^
E v u v m
•�
Z
a`
C N N o
r
tea,
o Q" co
` N
ao
>'o ? E
p
a
N
s- o N N
a X v
o
° 3
0- a `i
w a
AZ'
o o
a v n
o ro
C
v
E E a,
.- m
r�Qo
c
° o°
m
a
c
m .0 .� G) .O` m
E
..+
m€> 5 C- O
o
°
a, E
N E J ° rus c
c
m
r-
a w o
w
o`a
n N
c
m
o° a a
E
5 c '�
o c E
a 5
p O 3
i° °°
3
C° a,
m L
a
E
N
u E E
A
a
v° C u Q/ o f
N= M
o
m .°A c° a)
n.
h O
C
a Q y a
0.
C Y
7
W Q G a '7
Q'
O C N
L E u O
O a' U >
r- 6, E
ra Qa •c
r-
O p
Ti C E a) 6
ar O
vn`
C .R. al
G
C
E a o 0
l7 0 -o
l7 E
o a,
n c u r° o
d
y
— —
r
3
O
'0 n
C
u o ..
Vi a-
To
c
O
a c
)
`° °—u' c °'
o E
i
a�
v, s
v E
p ro
J
n
o m
a
N
a a0
e o
V
a u
_ `,
4)
d 0) non
w a
w
o
a a a
ti a
a �'•� "O
a�
fa
io
o
f0 a,
E-c
a
a v c i E
a o%
3o
rl 07 E
a v C
m a
° E r°
z N E mbn
a`o
rl as a`'
= N 0
d N
o
0 C) O n L O
u h u C E U u
C
3 °23 .Q/_. io
N �-
O
l7
0 0
u r u
O l7 Q
In V)
c
0.
C Cr
d
O
O
Iv
a!
'o
jp
Q N
al
G)
v
N w
al O
.a
V A
N
V p
N
N
n
C Ti
d
c o
c o
N
V C
V C
u N
c
c
E
a.
I
�
O
o
E
c
cD
N
u
in
I
;l
o
1
c
c
c
o.
O
aJ
E
Cq
cO
p
fl
p
u
y
ELn
n
'
N
A
tln
ID Y
C
0
E
pl
al
N
q
i
4
o Ln
o
O
a o
o
O N
a
r
o
aJ
C A
C pJ
� .E
C
O Ci =
E a
al w
o N'
'�_n
Cl♦T+ C
C
ro
17
Ul
N
N
L
a
N
C 4!
O
al
u 0
C C
N'
_aol
C
io C
Q
-O
C
V
>�
'J a)
Q CL
'4l 4 aJ
N 4" t 0
..
O aJ
O
C
A or,
G C
a
4q a
.a
LL
E o N
w al
o al L o `^
jj N
o= °l
U
0
N ro
v
N V
ro al
V a/
ro al ~
abD J C H N
o
a
E
m a
o m
u a Y
al •c o a— -
i o a
o n
a
v
E
o
N
T
°
o N
-cy
ro
o
o f° a
o"'
c
m
a
-o
no p_
c
A
Q E
p O
a) m N ro
Q ro N QJ N a/
o A
C C N
ro v°
c:S
a) =O
o
C N CC
a. ro g
E u
?
°
a =
? a aJ
p
N a Q on
y
z
G°
a w•
v
c
f
u o y
a N c N
al >
X
C
C L aJ
:n C +�
C
N Ti
O O
by :II
al O
f` C
Q
— a/ H C
ro ? N ."
f`0 V a) V ..0
+�.,
v
OA a 6 N
V
N
C C
O. N
OV
Q
Q
N
al Q{-
-
-Q
co
ILn
o
c
o ^
Ln c
ro
m an
E 0
m on E
C
an
o. 'u w
d c
c
0 0
e
0> o o
u
N o
c- a
a '-
a
w
cr
o n-
m, n
3
a) n c E
iv
T
jr of
c
'p N
c
O_ aJ �n
CC
`
N aJ N
N T N bn
N>
LL LJ
VJ K LL U
O
N
Q w 0
V
C
G-
T
0
o
`�
�to
z3�
VI
r
A
.X
�
c
C
s
a
O
ro
•Q
a m
O
O
C
O
Q
T C
o
- O
3
T
y
m io
U L
� O
V_ C
0
•a
C
Y
a c m
n cc
o
n
a nod
Q
z
Ln
u
�
a) o
N
Q
c
bp
)n Q V
L "O
ti
O L
.-1 a O
—
t/) •V
GO O
O
C la
N U
AA N
O
N
G na
ro• a)
c
'
mo
o
W m
O
Q) E ro
Q°
m uD o
Q_
coo
V
o m
= a N
}
N N
If)
C
V "a
Y
o
r W
6b O
�. O
N v
h
o o
c a
X p cD
Ln
U
fV N
•U
CrL
n
Q/ •� y
O
11
CL
m
S
C O fD
C a:C
.n
C
E p
u •D Z
p
U Q)
n
0 L Q
n
o `o
E �
c o Q�
T
oo
p :ooc
cc o
oLn E
m m p
LL Y-
4=- Q) W E
pa h m
-O OD
1/} 1/T
d G W c
to trT U
z:
lei
E o d °
c
o o
o =
m
m EL
m
O E
m U
Q) a Jd
`1 :� E O C
•O O Q/
v t N n
fa L
.fL+ O u
ro Io o
c u Q1 c Q)
vi C
a m v c y
h
o
o c Qco o
c a o c a c
a, v c
Qc c c
C
p o a u
ea n o > •� n
C
> Q) )Q
o O
tU ,�,, �n C h
N C d 0 v
QJQ.
E
o
a
a
m c E° u d¢
Q1
Q) o c -p n
> O }
" m nw
— c
C m
•t'+
C
C p
N
y
C
Y > _
C n n n
Q) C n
E
O Q O Z r O c
7 O C W
•O
v C = O C
E' m
N
W
m
6) •U C
n O
O v
i-+ O V w .C] C
v n C m O C
O C 0`0
v v CO,t0
U 0 p 0 0 0 )Q O
m C
O Qa
Ql O C
O
a) 'o C
u E o oV
-ou0
o nQ a
a, o
v> lJ C
m m o E
H p1 E
E n .E v
o
m m;
a
o n
v v
n o p
c o, (:) 6 aa) '�
r o
.o
w°
w m
v Q o E a
_
a uu o m m n
v
r
c L v
r°_ c° �°
E
v c c
c
o t c n
S
a o
ID c c a "'
m Z
.� a
u >
c a c m c m° -o
m a p E a
a n c
4
v°
o° o `4
v v c -o v
a o v
n v c E v E
° °
_�
s o rn °
cx
o° v = o
°° m c w o o °° o
m o
w
F- U U V to S
V n m o a)
w v u bD .2 r- u w C
D. n
C
v
a E
m
m
m
m ro
v
v
v E o
a
w •?
Y c
c
v v
ct
a o
c
a
c c
o .�
0
`
m
a
o
o o
d
a
N roro
—
u C
dye
C
d f0
co 61
> �)
(u p
5
m
d a)
O
V -c•+
V C
ij7
-p c
C
LL
m m
u m u
u v >
O v
O v) ¢
v) m l7
c
aI
E
v
DU
ro
C
� rocc
r G
ro
R
U
M Q)
C7 ce
I
U L_. r I
C
G v
O u a
C)
D, C)
ry _
Q �.. F E
T rc
Y - u Un UP
4C)
rd p' all
.rt C al G- ° G)
to Ol
it rt' C .b Q 4 H
r_ p — o
l' n m I D 1 t_
M1, v' In-� m L II
UP
O �' fC, u
C. R., G) Q 41 ry A pyl V ` c C
�-
Y p C [ a•i L O n. Q to q, Ln S a, 'O
n. y
v, , u ro .rn ocn o -o "� a, w' c ,�
+, r9 41 Ln , o.
Uo rt; � m � s � - _ is � " to p c c _ c E n E CC),c
aJ m G .m C' f f0 ti O ro m c t�
c o c o E E c
Uo v o_ Ln on m c
O p N c �• io O C n0 O T "k '-
C UP .-i rL m O .-I U vl C S C C C O
to G. CL O. t/i D_ Q
L_
UP ,
aJ m C F_ = m ar 4J a m �I � E)11 z' 4) E O Q c
C: m c ,� m
4, �� V OJ >
E Un �' a °1 aJ E a ° c p
•� C w O O C, p aJ
C O o. O. C ,� ti ' bU p .n ro a� a) O- C O C p O
p c c m p •n - c a aJ E f -c E c c E
O O O a, u v !' m C c E a� ar m O
a V C a' a) O + O y O m
a E G s° o aJ n u
E- a c o c a u a,
ro m m a) � c
ai A L u " C aJ ->
p a o E a o c c _
/ C r°." O n dl C Q ,L- Q- S a, Q Q
m o= u a) Ucn a`J
to
ui di O C D Q, m E W ID
OC1 .0 y i ai U) aJ .4! O Qr (o Un C
m 4r o r ti m _ E E o m D E a z s v a c
w o rt `, •� Z a) u aJ c a' = 01 a f0 c a m ,°�', m �, Cm
v O rho OJ `O MO .y al 'C �. O EO
m all c o
'v ` L� V 'zz V Up, - Cl- D- O u G
C O Q p C C 4), V C a) ti 41 G.
N vi ♦- m Cl �v, R3 u_
G
m
1(1 C
O C C)
c � F
O o_
G_ I CD Q �Q 4 r l7 CO on �' t
O UP
04
E a c c
Z C)o v v a� m L o V)
ZD a ::D L' CC
2
w
<l
5�
>
°
-
0
cz
y-�
(LjO
a M N
ni
C a M N
-O °
r N v'i
C
U
f
ai
J
E my
" o
E m v
AI
?
$
LD@
3
v
\2�
I
N=
r
3> 3
_' c
5
>I ?
3 m 3
3ul °�°
'S m 3
p
c
c
c
c
p
D
o
>
>
>
u
u u
u
-
� u
-
u
> a
> a
> a
> a
a
a
o
O
h a n
D p
o
p
D
= p
<
N
° E E
N
0 E E
N
° E E
N
° E E
d
C T m
C 1a 19
C fa m
C m ly
Y
cc 0 0
0 0 0
m
0 0 0
0 0 0
V a a
V a n
f-
V n a
V a a
>
c
a'
a
N
t0
m
t
•p
N
-o
c
a
o m
a
o
>
N
a
r
C
0
.a-. O
m Z o
Q
cr
cc
r°
a C
O o
z .-
a
Q
c
C
ca
a a
c 0
a
m, x
o
'o
a
o c a
Y
O
'D 111 E
-o
a
a
C a coN
L V
N
O
O O
°cp
E
fu
�O
�
'o
ro
V
OIn
O
M a
o `o
a
E a
a
C.
c)N
a
\ L
Oul
GC
�
C E
O
rtt a
lD w
Ln
V)
.--1
In
N O C
" iv
♦a..
n
O V
E a
o
ccc
ti
o
a O
O
a
CO
E N -p '^
N
3
_
C Q to >
N an a� c
a C a �1 p
v
fD C
`v
°; vi 'n
6 N
a v r c y a
L S
m
Z
E a
f0
•� _p 3 0
N a N N
c x c
oo m
a
3 > L
o CU> a o a
3
a W 0
3
o a E
N@
> 's
u n
m
o o" > c
o
a
E o
a a v
0 0 a=
o o E c
0
0 a
v v
v N
> 3'c
a o
a
v ro
c
c L^ a`
N -o
a
a •N
n— c a
a n- o a
N
E c o
v
v C 60
o
v
r
a` a i a
to '�
— c c
r
A
N .0 -o a
c c
on n 3 L v
E a o
c
o
o v>
a
E ra a c c
a c E m.
w
E a
Z a o
m
D .� m
3
v c
c" m c a
u
Y
°c° °
v o a E ac
..
m o '�
m a o
c
^ a
a
y c
o f
a s
a ro =o
na u m
o
v
s o
n v
a s
a>
a 5 a
m
m c c
a v o
a c a
�a
nE
u _> a
a E
> a-o F M a
ti
s
ra a
a>i
n
C C .�
(a a O
'z
OD O— 'p
N N C p 0�O
bn
C
C C C
OV
O O L a C
�' a 0
=
C a w
QCi @ '6
E ry
++
v' c
N C O fa
a ou
c Q a
a
c
ocn
.c u c
E
°
E
v E
v
o Z E
> Z
° m > w
°> 0°
>
c
n o ao m
O
E v a o a
E
m
n
o
a,
°u -a v a s
a N v
¢ a v v
a
N
u°. E' m
Y 40 a
�°� N 3 N a
s
w
c
X °p v,
io M c ro
�° 3 n° E
m
io
.E
C
E
m
Cu
C
c
>
E
a
6
m
E
a
,a
ro
E
m
s
`o
p m N
u
O
o
a C
N
a l7
oo
a
LL
x
a
o
>
a
4 t7
Q
a`
E
Q
m
a,
re
m
cc
"
c
oc
__
v v °'
Es
aw a a_
vl
m
m
a
'N
cc
10 f0 O
m N >
O O
j
C
m
j
w
v>i
i
r, I
m � �
c I c
a
a to m a
ofc w
m Q
v O O= LL
m G_ ° Y
-� - —
CL n a v o G o ^
.E c u
i o, cn m „ m
F-
I
a a
N
a V1 Q N �
oA
ro
01
v to m m E
u
Cc)p
IV
0
C �'
Y x m ? c
m 'x a on
E � .n .n
C, a a u G G V) E L n QI
r, O ,a-+' N ml mri N a m al bA
If)
b!7
tn
'?• p— E a, u b ti O C C T� D_ bA a C O
m a C a C 'L, ar O 'D p GO, C a O ai
a _ a v-
0� D
c o° 0, C� "_ 04 E a E un a bn u o {_ c bo
o p_ o c on
� o a,
- -
a
-" c a)a c m
ai y a O Y mp a a 4 V u E O C C O C_
DA N 7 Q R; _ u r C 'a O a� a p m
W C C id c)ro ,C O ° tlD _ O ° Q1 bb 'D
D V'z c'+OE E Cai m m
bD a1 fCb bD , C A
cp s_ m ni V co c Z ti bn �' 'no m `° p a, a a a, v o- '�
�a V E o ro o- ;;, a, a o- y m a. c° a a m °' E o ti
a c m E
p�
G ai E m O :, c m p u c O O .n a, m—
nD 2 t C, O_ G_ a a LT a C L bD \ a ,
rt p a 'u G' t a, D. -d G. m Ti a -p' V .O .0 O U
a o E c E o J_ c- o c a, a `, N R, G. E
io = a ti a a u- .- u M bn I- m D Z CL .c m
Id
m C c
E m I c
EE O w E O E pp a) E .
y
c ° n oa E n`o a' 'a by �u
1 m r o m _ v m
C.
p.0
V
c E a Va n c c c o c a, tr' a. o p U bn m o a' ci,
o o pp ! ^ a, ry r✓
16.2 Implementation Strategy
16.2.1 Opportunity
The implementation of projects developed in the IRWMP process is very dependent on
funding opportunities that are present at any particular time. Many projects laid out in the
plan require more capital to implement than is available inthe normal budget of individual
agencies. Thus, implementation of major projects requiring resources beyond the financial
capacity of most agencies is currently opportunistic. Agencies must wait for funding
opportunities to appear for which they are qualified and be prepared to apply and move
quickly to respond. This also means the IRWMP implementation is likewise dependent on
funding opportunity.
These agencies must look for funding opportunities, like State and federal grants and loans,
for completing project planning, design. environmental permitting, and construction. Grants
and loans are usually competitive, so agencies must find sources that they are qualified for
and then spend effort and funds to prepare quality grant and loan applications and contribute
matching funds from local sources to secure these additional resources.
Moreover, these State and federal grants and loans are not steady or consistent. They are
usually dependent on the passage of bonds or legislation, which vary year to year, decade to
decade. They are not available in a sustainable fashion.
16.2.2 IRWMP Advantage
While still opportunistic, the regional stature ofthe Gateway (RWMP allows its member
agencies and participants to collectively prepare for and respond to opportunities. This saves
time and effort for individual agencies, produces stronger and more compelling funding
applications, and, using their modest collective contributions, produces or implement multi -
partner, regional, and multi -benefit projects. While not all projects in the IRWMI' are or
Should be undertaken by the GWMA on behalf of its members, there are many projects that
benefit from the approach.
16.2.3 Proposed Steps to Implementing Projects
The opportunistic nature of resources leads to the following action steps needed to implement
projects for the plan.
• Maintain flexible plan.
• Share information regularly on funding opportunities with IRWMP participants.
• Maintain resources to allow response to funding opportunities.
• Consider having GWMA administer projects that are regional in nature and benefit.
• Updatee priorities and IRWMP project lists regularly.
Gateway Integrated 16-20 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 201
Respomd to fundinp opportunities as thuy appear and implement projects tlrat arc
�c<ldPriority projects should be implemented first. where possible.
I.00l. for additional innovative solutions to meet 1R\\,Nl1' goals.
116.3 Funding Implementation Strategy
Nlatclrinp the type of project to the type olAnding and revenue source is imporlant for
development and implementation of a fundinp stratcg,y for the 1RWNI11. Chapter I3
discussed the Project integration strategy. Section 13.2.2 specifically discussed the GWMA
Prograni Alternatives that provide regional benefit and contribute to meeting regional goals
and objectives. Projects are bundled under the Program Alternatives. The projects nuty fall
into a nurnbcr of categories that influence how they could he funded and from what sources.
The types of projects that need to he funded include:
Regional Project Ahcrnatives that bcnclit all GWMA members and meet common
needs
2. Regional Projects Alternatives that includc multiple GWMA members which meet
the needs of project partners and provide benefit to the participants and region
3. Local projcct that benefit only one member but fit within the regional project
alternative
4. 1_oc d projects that benefit only one member and do not clearly fit into a regional
project alternative
Regardless of the type ol'projcct. each numher agency needs to be responsible for meetinp
any local snatch t'unding requirements of any specific grant pup -am and will need to
demonstrate that maintenance and operations funds are to be committed to the projects from
existing sources of revenue. This could include proof through an adopted capital
improvements plan, other engineering feasibility studies and reports, rate studies, or
approved funding program adopted pursuant to California requirements.
16.3.1 Regional Project Alternative Benefiting all GWMA Members and Meet
Common Needs
Where GWMA stakeholders are all affected by a common problem with a ready solution, the
MOW can provide a shared regional project and there should be shared funding. Proposed
projects could be further developed as GVVMA programs and implemented through the
G\\'MA to share costs and provide benefit throughout the region. Sections 112.3 and 121.4
discussed coordination of activities within the region and between the regions. These could
be regarded as .110 fixed cost items to be funded by the members pursuant to the .IPA
hmclinp agreements and annual budget. These can be regarded as the basic basket of goods
and services to be provided by the GWMA and might include:
Gatcmg Integrated 16-21 Final
Regional Water Management Plan We 2013
• Coordinating with the other regional agencies and between regions.
• Complying with the SB h7-7 reporting requirements and meet 20 x 2020 water
conservation goals.
• Meeting LARWQCB TMDL and MS4 permit requirements.
• Providing a central point for data management
• Identifying sources of state_. local. and federal funding to implement Gateway
1RWMP projects.
Program costs and annual budgets need to be developed. Staff or consultant roles should be
defined to implement the basic basket of goods and services that the GWMA will provide
and sustain. Costs are to be distributed based on the cost distribution approach defined in the
JPA. Local funding would be from available, existing revenue sources of the members or
regional fees. Some specific projects in this category may have start-up costs. The following
Project Alternatives fall into this category.
• Outfall Monitoring (See. 13.2.2.4)
• Improve Catch Basins and/or Install Screening Devices (See 13.2.2.5)
• Integrated Flood Management Program (See 13.2.2.6)
The costs.. timing, and responsibilities need to be further developed for these shared benefit
projects. The JPA funding formula may also need to be revised to apportion costs to the
members from available, existing revenue sources. These projects could be subsidized by
State or federal grants. Projects would respond to specific grant opportunities.
16.3.2 Regional Projects Alternatives that Include Multiple GWMA Members
Which Meet the Needs of Project Partners and Provide Benefit to the
Participants and Region
The projects would include a limited number of GWMA members that would provide local
match or cooperative funding from existing revenue sources based on contracts or other
negotiated agreements. These projects could be subsidized by State or federal grants and
loans. Projects would respond to specific grant opportunities. Projects with defined local
funding matches would be a higher priority. The Regional Program Alternatives (Ch. 13)
subject to this type of funding and financing agreements include:
• Systems lntertie Projects (See 13.2.2.1)
• Well Rehabilitation, Replacement and Repair (See 13.2.2.21)
• Recycling/20 a 2020 Conservation (See- 13.2.2.3)
• Collect and Treat Low Flow Urban Drainage (See 13.2.2.3)
Gateway Integrated 16-22 Final
Regional Water Management Plan ,tune 2013
16.3.9 Local Project that Benefit Only One Member and Fit within a Regional
Project Altemative
'117cse arc pwiccts that have liven identified in Chapter 1 3 as fitting into a Regional Project
Allcrnalivc. but primarily support one member. "1'hcse nu�y not be subject [o as high a
priorily fOr COMA support using any .IPA funding since benefits are more limited and thcsc
projects arc less likely to he competitive for State funds that require multiple benefits and
participants. This does not preclude members from seeking State or federal grant or loan
funding independently and providing any local match requirements from existing revenue
sources. `fhc Program Alternatives (Ch.13) subject to this type of funding and financing
agreements include:
lnfl'aStruClure Replacement. Repair. and Upgrade (See 13.2 2.7)
Groundwater Treatment Projects (See 13.2.2.8)
16.3.4 Local Projects that Benefit Only One Member and Do Not Clearly Fit into
a Regional Project Alternative
These projects would not usually be funded with any regional funding and would not be cost-
sharcd by the GWNIA for State or local grant funding. This does not preclude members from
seeking State or federal grant or loan funding independently and providing any local match
requircrncnts from existing revenue sources.
16.4 Example of the Screening Projects for a Grant Application
This section discusses project prioritization process for a Gateway Proposition 84
lmp]ell cntatloll Grant application to provide an example of how the GWNIA may select
projects for future grant applications.
A rcvicvvand ranking ofthe list ofprgjects that were previously ranked in the II:WMP
development process was undertaken to evaluate whicli projects would best meet the
selection criteria in the. 1'SP and be most competitive for funding. Other grant programs will
have their own selection criteria. The GWMA can more quickh, and efficiently respond to
future opportunities by being prepared to develop and apply an evaluation criterion based on
the specific grant. This Chapter previously identified potential funding programs were the
WAINIA may need to review the grant and develop a selection criteria and process to decide
what prt.iccts to submit. The process may or may not include opening up the projects list and
conduct ol'a "call-lor-projects"' to expand the list. Anticipating how to make explicit
decisions through an open, explicit and transparent process will help avoid conflicts and
increase the probability of success.
The selection criteria in the pSP were used to define which of the Gateway projects would be
competitive for the Proposition 84 Implementation Grant funding. Readiness -to -proceed is a
major factor. A project must be ready to consURuct to be competitive. This means that the
proiect has a completed work plan, schedule and budget: that environmental clearance and
Gateway Integrated 16-23 Final
Regional \4 titer Management Plan .tune 2013
permits have been procured or. at minimum. a plan is in place to obtain environmental
clearance prior to award of a contract: and that the local funding match is identified or the
projects qualities for a DAC waiver of the 25 percent local funding match requirement.
Subject to DWR review, DACs may be able to use Implementation Grant funding to
complete design and/or environmental work leading to construction. but ultimately the
projects must be constructed.
The Consulting Team evaluated projects for their readiness -to —proceed using the
information submitted by project sponsors. The PSP identifies a number of fatal flaws that
eliminated a project from further consideration based on legislatively defined criteria (e.g.:
Approved UWMP or GWMP). This is an example of an exclusion criterion, where a project
is either eligible or not eligible. Once these projects were eliminated, the process described
below was followed.
A first stage screening included eliminating those projects that would be ineligible or not be
competitive. A list was generated that showed those projects screened from further review.
If a project was not included it was not because the project was not worthy or of merit, but
because it would not be a likely candidate for funding based on the DWR PSP. The process
included:
1. Sorting the projects based on where the project was in the planning process.
a. Those projects that were identified as in the Concepts stage and would not start in
under,a year; or were in Project Planning and Feasibility Studies phase, did not have
secure funding, or that did not identify the funding needed, were eliminated from
further consideration. Projects where the sponsored stated that they were not seeking
money at this time were not considered further.
b. Those projects that were identified as Started, Ready to Construct. Final Design,
Preliminary Design or Project Concepts that could commence in less than one year
were carried forward for further review.
c. 11'a project in the Concept stage of planning identified local match funding, it was
retained for further review.
2. Storm water projects that represented single beneficiary or single benefit /purpose
projects were removed from further considerations.
The second stage of screen was to evaluate and identify those projects that would be most
competitive in term of readiness -to -proceed based on sponsor provided information. A
second table was produced that showed the projects that were the most ready -to -proceed.
These projects showed a relatively high readiness to proceed in terns of the CEQA and
permits required: and secured local funding or at least a plan for securing funding. The
availability ofdetailed documentation, including economic feasibility study and/or technical
analysis required further review since the information would be needed to prepare a
competitive grant application.
Gateway Integrated 1 G-24 Final
Regional Water Management Plan .tune 2013
n third i.&Ic showed these projects that Mere ncarly ready to construct. I,trt rrquircd
;uiditiml:d dcsir'n work. Mane of these projects could be competitive if'thcN were further in
the planrrinr and design process. "hhc projects were not competitive heeaUSr they: a) did not
have loc,rl Funding identified. b) required additional design. c) were project concepts or not
ready to start in Ins than one: year. Of We projects that could start within I N,car. many did
not have local funding secured or did not idemi1y a plan to secure local funding. Projects
that require additional design would not he cligihle unless these were for DM's and he would
he able to qualify for if waiver of the 25 percent local match requirement.
The explicit criteria and process Nvas descrihed at if GWMA Stakeholder meeting. The tables
were then presented. which the Stakeholders reviewed. This information was used to support
a dialog rmd negotiation of which projects would be included in the grant application. This
allowed the group to focus on those projects that would be most competitive and supported
decisions on how to fund and prepare the grant application. The project data base used to
store and analyze projects collected in the 1RWNIP developmerrt expedited the sorting
rcquirrd in this grant funding opportunity exercise.
Gateway hwgrated 16-25
Final
Regional Water Management Plan .lone 2W3
17
17 Data Management
"Phis ch,Ipter describes the process ofdata collection, storage. and dissemination to 1RNVM
particip,ints. stakeholders. the public and the State. Two data management systems were
developed to support the IRWMP. The first was developed to support submittal and review
of stakeholder sponsored projects. The second was a GIS web -enabled map viewer linked to
an Oracic database platform. This chapter also presents a User Manual ol'the G1S Map
Viewer. Recommendations for next steps are also presented. Currently GV1IMA. via the
consulting team, is responsible for the 1RWMP project GIS Map Viewer. huturc plans for
data management arc being discussed and are under development by the GWMA to deal witl-
prioritic� associated with water quality issues lacing the Region (MS4 Permit/Order).
17.1 Gateway Project Review and Submittal DMS
This section provides a brief summary ol'tlre project review data management systems and
tools. which was used to track, store. and share stakeholder's project information. The
OWMA needed a system to collect and organize projects for the IRWMP and otherwise
support project sponsors when submitting their project information. The data was submitted
in standard formats to allow for ease application of'the project review and evaluation criteria
adopted by the G VIVIA. Chapter 12 described the project submittal and review data base
tools (Sec 12.1.1).
To file(,[ the needs. the Consulting Team developed the Pro_jeet Submittal Form and the
Project Datahasc Suite. These tools were used to integrate data using a common and
compatible method for collection. storage, and evaluation of stakeholder -provided project
information. The objective was to make the submittal and review process simple. consistent
and ease on both the projects sponsors and reviewers.
The Proicct Submittal Form (Appendix C) provided the common protocol to gather data in a
consistent manner. It is an Adobe form to al low submittal of information via email. The
form allows project sponsors to provide as much detail as necessary during the Project
Solicitation period.
The Project Datahasc pairs Excel and Access files containing all data from the Project
Submittal form. It allows the extraction of data provided by the project sponsor, storage in
the project data hase, and production of reports to support Reviewers and for developing
projects summaries in a Project Workbook was produced to document the submitted project
information. The data base was maintained by the Consulting Team. This DMS is a
deliverable to the GVVMA and thee tools are available for fUtUre `calls -for -projects' and
projects reviews. In the future. the tools could be further integrated with the web enabled
system discussed below to further share collected projects information.
Gateway lntcgrated 17- 1 Final
Regional water 1vtanagcment Plan .tune 2013
17.2 Gateway Map Viewer — IRWMP Database
The GAMMA needed a way to collect and share spatial data describing the baseline
conditions. results of prior monitoring efforts. location of facilities (current/proposed). and
document the problems to be addressed in the IRWMP. Map based visualizations were also
needed 10 show flooding problem areas. storm water problem areas and locations where best
management practices (BMPs) to improve water quality could be prioritized.
A GIS. web enabled tool was envisioned that would allow sharing data; presenting analysis
results to stakeholders and the public in understandable formats; and allowing stakeholders to
produce maps that could be shared with their constituencies. It would make the available
data accessible during the IRWMP development, to support pr( ject formulations, and help
the GWMA make incremental decisions.
The Gateway Map Viewer is a GIS-based tool that allows multiple layers of public domain
and stakeholder provided information to be incorporated into a shared database layers include
raw groundwater information, monitoring locations and results. project locations,
demographic information, city/county/district boundaries. The database can also store
georeferenced reports, teats, plans, and other documents that can be easily retrieved. The
Consulting team developed a web -enabled map viewer and database that could be accessed
by stakeholders and the public through the web from the following link, which is also
available on the GWMA website.
The Consultant Team was responsible for
the development and maintenance of the web site and data management system. 'File tools
are available to the GWMA for ongoing use during IRWMP implementation.
17.2.1 Sources of Data and Use of Gateway Map Viewer to Develop the IRWMP
Stakeholders and the Consultant Tearn contributed data for the Gateway Map Viewer. Data
obtained from stakeholders. such as projects, along with readily available public domain
sources. was collected and uploaded. The original source data was plotted and reviewed for
purposes ofquality control.
17.2.1.1 Groundwater Quality, Levels and Related Data
For the IRWMP, the Gateway Map Viewer was used to compile and store groundwater
quality, and other well infonnation from existing groundwater monitoring programs. This
data was used to assess regional groundwater quality conditions (See Chapter 7, 7.1.1). The
sources of data included are documented in Section 7.2.3.
17.2.1.2 Storm water and Runoff Water Quality
Chapter 8 describes identified storm water and flooding problems in the Region. Figure 8-1
highlights the results of the stakeholder survey on flooding locations with graphics that are
color -coded to identity flooding severity and storm frequency.
Gateway Integrated 17-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
The Managemeni Modeling System ("'MMS) developed by l os Angeles Count
IWO Mind District was used to cvaluatc current water quality conditions within the
Gat "n, IRIVMP Rcybn. 11tc watershed model cornponem ol'the WNINIS' is the I_oadjlw
Simulation (LSPC) provides a comhrchcnsivC data management and modeling
system that is capahle of representing. loading. NO now and water quality. from non -point
and point sources and simulating in -stream processes. ']'he compiled data and modeling
results will help the GWMA ovcr the long run in evaluating which BMP alternatives can
provide the greatest henelits. The maps presented showing the modeling results for various
constitucnis and the prioritized problem areas for flood mitigation measures are also
incorporated into the Gateway Map Viewer.
The (AW"ay Map Viewer can also be used by the GWMA to track where centralized and
decentralized BMPs are being, implemented. current or new monitoring locations and as a
tool to present monitoring results.
17.2.1.3 1 lood Risk
Both the 100-*year and 500-ycar federal Emergency Management Agency, in noodplas within
the Gateway Region have been included as layers in the Gateway Map Viewer. The specific
information was obtained front DV1'R in their Best Available Maps program where they have
identified areas that would potentially be inundated during those rare events. Within the
Gateway Region. most 100-year events are contained within the river levees.
Other Data
Other demographic and base information generally available from government resources
were also provided as layers in the Gateway Map Viewer. This includes boundaries of
districts. cities. and legislative districts. disadvantaged communities, super fund sites,
watersheds, rivers. highways. gaging stations, flood infrastructurn and other p,eorejerenced
ill fo1-111alion.
17.3 Potential Future GIS/DMS Needs and Development
17.3.1 MS4 Permit/Order and TMDL DIMS Needs
The MS4 and TMDL permits will require an individual permittee to develop and Integrated
Monitoring Program ONAP) or to participate with other per-Indlees in a Coordinated Amegrated
Monitoring Program (CIN411). Either approach will have extensive data collection.
management and reporting. MSV Penh/Order Attachment E — Reporting Programi notes
the henelits of the CAMP) approach. noting that "the CIMP provides Permittees opportunities
to increase the cost efficiency and effectiveness ol'the monitoring progmni- and that "the
greatest efficiency play be achieved when a CIMP is designed and implemented on a
Nvatershcd basis". The GWMA is evaluating how to support rnernhcrs and whether to do a
CIMP.
The GWMA could reduce the overall monitoring, and data management program costs to
individual nlenlbers through the CIMP to achieve economies ofscale and management
GatOMY integrated 17-3 Final
Regional Water Manacement Plan .lone 2M 3
cfficiencies. A C1MP will require a shared approach to sampling. laboratory analysis, data
management and compliance reporting. The existing IRWMP G1S/DMS could be expanded
to include: functionalities needed to support the C1MP. including:
Allowing users to submit laboratory testing and monitoring results to a central data base
that supports:
o Quality control and assurance measures
o Management of water quality time series data
o Preparation of required compliance reports
o Submitting of the required data to the State (SWAMP/RWQCB)
Tracking of projects that implement best management practices.
Management of reports and special studies to share and distribute results.
17.3.1.1 Quality Control and Assurance Measures
MS4 permillees are required to develop a Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MRP) and Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Regional Water Board Executive Officer approval. The
GWMA could jointly develop the monitoring plan, establish locations and develop both the
MRP and QAPP for the Gateway Region. The. QAPP will include protocols for sample
collection. standard analytical procedures, and laboratory certification. All samples will be
collected in accordance with applicable Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
(SWAMP) protocols.
17.3.1.2 Management of Water Quality Time Series Data
Large amounts of monitoring data will be generated by an IMP or CIMP and a DMS would
need to effectively manage the sampling, QA/QC, monitoring and reporting program. A GIS
element to the DMS and the monitoring and reporting plan would help document the results
and explain the problem and solutions to the public. The GWMA will need to make decisions
regarding how develop and apply a GIS/DMS to meet the requirements. As described below
in Section 14.5.5, Related Watershed Planning and Monitoring, there are alternatives for
GWMA to consider.
17.3.1.3 Preparation Compliance Report
The MS4 Permit/Order, Attachment E spells out the reporting requirements, including how
the TMDI, reporting could be integrated. The GWMA will need to develop a system to
support reporting to the RWQCB. The functional requirement for any data management
systems should be based on the MS4 Pennit/Order.
17.3.1.4 Submitting of the Required Data to the State
The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) discussed in Chapter 14
serves as the Southern California Regional Data Center (SCRDC) for the Surface Water
Ambient Monitoring Program's (SWAMP's) California Environmental Data Exchange
Network (CEDEN). Any tools developed to support. GWNMA regional monitoring should
Gateway Integrated 17-4 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
include ;� I'unctional requirement to support suhniittal to the state's regional data center as
NN�cll a>, the required reports to thc° RNVQ('13.
17.3.2 Project Submittal System
Foi 1RW NIP update and I'uturc rotmds ol'grant funding. the GWMA could develop additional
furneticm,rlity in the current web enabled G1S/1)MS tool to:
• Allow projects sponsors to submit and update their project information on-line
t Promote transparency and lets other GWMA stakeholders view the project information
• Piov'Ide a map (If' proposed projects. also documenting the status ofthe project
Allow for upload of supporting projects documentation.
6 Manape the IRWMP and projects performance monitoring during implementation
17.4 Gateway Map Viewer User Manual and Documentation
This section provides a brief user manual for the tool and sonic easy -to -follow examples for
how to use the system. The Gateway Map Viewer was developed on ESRI ArcGIS Server
I O.x. It is a GIS-enabled web browser application. The base niap projection is ii-om ERSI
map service and the projection is GCS WCis 1984.
The purpose of the map viewer was to allow stakeholders to access and share regional
information through a readily accessible internet enabled tool: to support decision making
and an open and transparent process: and to allow stakeholders better define regional data
sharinp needs by applying the tool dining development ofthe IRWMP. This later purpose
was intended to help stakeholders define what would be needed to support the GWMA
during IRWN9P implementation and better plan for meeting the long term needs.
17.4.1 Section 1: Interface Introduction
The map interlace is divided into six parts:
Gateway lnigratcd 17-5 Final
Regional W'atcr Management Plan .lunc 2013
Gateway Inlermavon ;;Sele' (�uerr r,�,�phr� loot Easet,la� Lau, 1= { LeJVntl 'PtnL � -Sav L; RN•esh
Tool Bar Title Bar
Gartwav,nronr>rtx�n a„n,:. ,. I ,
Rlghl eO c.k nthc lavhl nenu- , ,,._.I Hlr 1'Ire, '�I•t ... v r
,o have more olrhon�. - 7C�Inor-cl sxeF
C6cP: on tht hl,rt lu set it � E r, t c t war
actrve:•^UO,�t yC�c „nnnatea srte -
GII& the I tvel mm,, hold
r • r
and drag t,, nldr I the layr'rs _ = L�1F.gnn.nvatn, onartF
Main Display Panel L r.,r,t, n:, � r- 5 m1lYaat M.p�
a,
- sl 117,
5 m IYater Vrrltutenl Lnatl�nq Fetter
•,P iW.. 1 rCIO N'.
L., �. t�.l.�l.. 1 :. _ t • J � lu t raven
{'.• IIIL.;. .. - i ll,rlI L Y+elerancd=
- Full r. tt�:n n, I .r
T, I .r II � 1
„_ Layer Display :..i' BeFr�latmna
iHQ- Llt'SGS C�Steti,ins
I -Farb I +�rc.e .rota .
Status Bar
' HnItl lh at•_.,, t t ut. a Irr.h
L-•a;.,, 1,::.., index Map h.nil
lcmi
• Pail 1: The Main Display Panel displays the G1S map.
• Part 2: The Title Bar contains the III -jilt, Save, Refresh, and Share buttons, as well as
Base Map, Layer and Legend display control options.
• Part 3: The Tool Bar contains Information, Select, Query, Graphics, Tools, and
Bookmark tools and subtools.
• Part 4: The Layer Display panel shows which layer folders and layers are visible, and
which layer- is the active layer for the map tools (highlighted).
• Part 5: The Index Map displays the extent shown in the Main Display Panel within the
context of the greater geographic area.
• Part 6: The Status Bar shows the Current Tool in use, the Active Layer, and Lat/Long
coordinates.
Gateway Imegrated 17-0 Final
Regional Water Management Plan .tune 2013
17,4.2 ` cction 2: Map Navigation
17.4.21 Toone IniZoorri Out/Zoom to full/previous Extent/IJcxt Extent
7.or7rnins, in and out can be accomplished in a ncu1llacr of Nvays:
I lic zoom slider located in the left of tlic main display I-►ancl can be moved
upward to zoom in to a larger scale or downward to zoom out to i smaller
scale.
�. Clicking the + -- or buttons under the slider (see picture to the left) will allow
the user to drag an extent box that will rc-center the map display to that
extent. The same can also be accomplished by holding, down the Shift
(zoom in) or Shift + CU-I (zoom out) kc_ys and dragging an extent box.
A mouse scroll forward zooms into the map. while a mouse scroll back zooms
out.
1. The plus (+) key zooms in a level: the minus (-) key zooms out a level.
�. A do►►ble-click anywhere on the map display centers and zooms in on that area.
t
%oon) Mg to the map display's full extent can be accomplished by clicking, the hull
I;xlcnt button (globe) under tyre slider.
Lil�cwisc. ret►n-ning to the previous extent or going to the next exte11t is a matter of
clickitiv the appropriate button (arrows back and lorward, respectively) under the slider.
17.4.2.2 pan
'I o move ►hc nnrp display around. simply click and drap. the map display. Alternatively, you
can use the arrow keys to move the display.
17.4.3 Section 3: Layer Management
17.4.3.1 Display Layer/Select Active Layer
Laycrs shown if) the map display are. controlled using the Laycr Display panel. (If the Lavcr
Display panel isn't visible, click the Laver button in the Data Control Bar.)
To displa, a laver, simple check the box next to the laver. Make sure the folder containing
the laver- is also checked. as every layer is controlled by its root folder. Click the plus (�)
symbol to expand and view the laver contents within .I collapsed folder. To make a layer
invisible, unchcck the boa next to the laver.
To scicct an active layer, click off the name ol'o►ic of the visible (checked) layers so that it is
hi�,�hlightcd. t Inchccked lavers cannot be active lavers.
17A.3.2 Add Layer/Folder
To add a ncvv folder to the Laver Display panel. right -click on the name of the root folder
within which you'd like the new folder to be placed and select Add Nc\v holder. A checked
New holder will tic placed under that root folder that can be renamed.
<�a1e�l:ry InlcLrarr�i 1 %- % Final
Kc" ioI w I \0'atcr �4:�naLemcnt Plan Jung 201
� ayfer
IRS l.I Pn;jed Boundan
jvll?TlSR!F,
F i IneJ
Remove
Rename
rA d New Foldc
Load New LavE
r�'Oro
Transparency'
L1pi'�
FJ
AttributeTabi-
"'°`
Zoom to Laver
IOrange,
. View' Metadata
Gzt;
Download Data
C USO. r,,v' I.lonkunno lief::rrf.
To add a new layer to a folder:
layer
'ViLayer
Lr�J Project Sdes
I..�� IRS/sl! Prcjrct Br,Un,'an
Gateway
177 NP.w FoIdw
r-,
t__: Incorporated C-y
IRia!'
Lj Long Beacl /dater Crstriot
E. Groundv:atcr Basin
❑ Cisa-vantage". Cr, mmun dies i Lc
J Jlatershed
I.. � Cisa-vantage- co—mnt"'
I. Right -click on the name ofthe folder and select Load New Layer.
2. A GIS Layer List will pop up containing several layers grouped into tabs: California
Levee Database, CA Flood ER, SPK Levee and Flood Map. Within each tab are category
subfolders. each containing several data layers. Clicking on these categories will display
the lavers contained therein.
615 Layer 051. ,
CLD Fo:;d EP n:>a� h1a Gateway
Hlahyray;
t.tajor Rivet-s
Geoscience ',",'ate, (IJADSZ SF Zone
RVQ (NA083 SP Zone V'I
Projecte7 (NADE3 SP Zone V
Stoup Water Marrs
3. Checking a I)reviously unchecked layer will add that layer to the Layer Display panel and
to the map display. To return to the map, simply close the GIS Layer List.
G1 Layrt- O. C!
CLD Ft;, :' FF Fk;o; Mal Ga-e:ca,
Flood
_ borrow Site
Closure StructurE:
Cross Section
Encroachment
F1000 Flght
17.4.3.3 Remove/Rename Layer/Folder
Layers
L,
ZID
L; Project Sdea
i_J IRidl.! Froja ct Brun-ar:
f�� Cantantinated Sit,
Regional PYater OualrtV
ICC.`���;�� Storm Watt, Napa
'— L Storm Water Pollutant Loading Factor
''CcLB Bata
To remove a layer or folder, right -click on the name of the layer or folder and click Remove.
If you are removing a folder, a prompt will ask you to click OK to remove the folder and its
subnodcs to preclude accidentally removing layers within that folder.
Gateway Integrated 17-3 final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
Renaming a folder or layer requires right -clicking: the folder or laver name and clicking
IZcnamc. A icat hos will appear around the name that allows the user to change it. Once the
name has heen changed. hit Fntcr to make it final.
17.4.3,E Reorder Layers/Folders-
TO change the order of lavers or folders, click and hold the name of the laver or Older you
wails to move and drag it to its new location. While moving, pay attention to the arrow or
underscorc nurrkcr that indicates its new position ifdropped; dragging the layer Ichward will
place it at the level of root folders, moving it rightward will place it within a root solder.
I,urther. nuwin�t a layer or folder to a new position correspondingly changes the hierarchy of
the map display,
J
I"
..F _ -. ,-,,.-
1>7
Gam=, Integrated 17-9 Final
Regional �Voicr Mawaecmcnt Plan .Turin Nos
Lo.
Ancu:l��s_
r.b III,, El rJi uL. lay"I
1 0 llv
yer
• t._� crnred fles
' �� IR',;9A Frpiect Bnmdery
Gateway
CeIII"JG'
Long Beach V W,r piste
... rlGmundrrater Nasln
r II II'' 1 R, Usadventeced Urnrn—n 'L" -
�' ❑ Urnterehed
❑ BS<0—toped C—IIIIhre
J' Lr... rll.ui IUranae.
❑ Zy Code i..rea
USGS G'k" tdendorina PJw,"k
�JUSGSSwft e`I;.I,, See
f❑�� suoerlund sae
l._J Gaotracker Ed,
1 Geotracker Odell
The layer showing cities included in the IRWM Gateway Region (IRWM) has a higher
placement in the Layer window than the layer showing the disadvantaged communities in
Los Angeles County (Disadvantaged Communities (LA)). As a result, the disadvantaged
communities are not entircly visible. To see the entire extent of the disadvantaged
communities. the Disadvantaged Communities (LA) layer needs to be moved above the
IRWM layer in the Layer window.
Jt. Lay- _ y
R;
�i �u;,,vre;ec. e.r�r•dE-.
1`��IR,11. in �..-i r; �+�rlin(IUiJ f�0111rYi
L_i cB�•;rr
Lena. Neacn a'e• Cs+.
`.) Grouni,: atE. BEa .
�� G�ead:anfag �� iammunecee
Creme.
_
I�' Zip
-Ga�P �rEn
:, t ((L_1 USiS G'r I.ipnitonng Iitt.: pri
l.. 1!$�5 $Ur1a•; P1�eie' 5fle
r❑ Geatracrer Sae
LJ Geatracker area
L_JI Prp7e el Site
Gateway Integrated 17-10 Final
Regional Water Managcmcn► Plan .tune 2013
E
17k3.5 Layer liansparency
On tho"'t, occasions NOICI-C you 111.1v want to view a laver or map fCIILII'C underneath another
ki.vcr without reordering tlicil" positions. the transparency of the top layer can be adjusted:
Right -click on the name of the Nnycr you want to make more transparciii and click
Then move the slide, bat until the desired transparency Is achieved.
Move Ilic Iransparciii slider bar to make the Borehole laver become transparent
17-1 1 Final
RCl!ioll.,Jl Maimocniciii Plan .1011C 201
17,4.4 Title Bar
17.4.4.1 Base Map
Using, the Base Map option, the user can determine the .type of background that serves as the
bascmap for the display.
II C kry Grahn65 ln:ys :- __.
Inlonnation - �, a- --
'_. •• 6L[r t.tap Lavel is LeomA ��IP•n' , eve I _Set,vl °d�2�r
isryl kivrri Rwrlano
b<II Ra- Mar Gallery ,
.ut.il:y (;order:
t Sp, rt19" ..
Downey ...
Norwalk Terrain w0i Labor Linht Gray canvas National Geographk
u.'
F rt lo:lnt L :. \ •.
tuean, vpenS`,rcetMap Ring Maps Aerial
L arrast: o. LdPaond
Haw-- ��
c;mdem eyprea ��.
1 'R Los ., is Part..Of
17.4.4.2 Layer
Toggles the Layer Display box on and off. allowing the user to check. uncheck. add and
remove layers to display on the map.
Inlormall n -UP,
Faso r .y, -:aver F Le�enq ,lFnrr Szs .efie�n cpa
._'R1 trg,..n r� L:Intl�rr HerCla-
6eD
k'rrjr:.. _ son la Fr . _.. _..._ ,.
Spring- Loycr ,.
Downey
�- �_rrolen snag
r- Norwalk [ w.dti pnea„e.
L.
ti �
` i.0 lllrtoll u�„ ' L.CPnMTIrMiBd 6tte
t� Wr.irnrxl t E.,r `� Lr`_,Deobnel W,terOuelDy
51-4Yeler rACP.
,FL" Storm ly,ter eellutpnt Lcudtnq Fectur
t. ; CED Dato
... g
l,P-k L" Welershed
_. Lakew .-I La Palm,
�. •. �: Deee Delr
- Hawaiian r_I Utc E1.1—
n r 4ardrm. cypfe,. �_�1. ,e•Lr. Steleinn
.,- V II,
Lo: ParY
___�!_ ynai
'clt,- 'Hill '.- :!i Ir:f '.rc: .. ... v 1 i,C, _=1 14,1
17.4.4.3 Legend
Displays the legend, which shows the symbology for all checked layers.
Gateway Integrated 17-12 Final
Regional Water Management Plan tune 2013
L,,,
o..�... mom.
.: _.. __--------- ..--_._
17.4.4.4 hint
If you'd like to print the map. click the hi-int button. A new pagc will hop up that show°s the
m.ap displayed with a customizable title bar. The display call be zoomed in and out to cover
anN' prcfcrrcd cztcnl. and can then cithcr be printed directly or saved as a 11DF.
i Lo
flcl �s
i
17.4.4.E Save and Refresh
Savc the current map display with its active layer, visible layers, graphics and selections bN
clicki1W 5,wc. When you refresh or later return to the map. it will display as yogi Ic1t it when
saving.
Cbckiiw lN'cf,csh returns the map to the most recent saved display.
17.4.4.6 Sham
If you,d hkc to share your map display with other users. click Share, which will prompt an
email hoN that includes the link to your saved display.
Gatevvnv lntczretcd 1 7-13 t final
kcrioial wilier Rtalmrcmcnt Plan Junf 201
Intonrow,i, ,•, : :7oe'V G1aphIC 'o'i" F ,c t�.,r,- I. ye, eil"no F•u-d j;. .1 L;-Ret ctb
11..11 .1
- Share slap y
TFr ink to thin mzi' pow �s
You may bookmark f. n1 shirr I.hv mar' by Sendno r, In emaR
11
1 In 1 Frnm_
l.+ Subject:
1. Mes<_agv,
1 "�I
_ 11-
c
- JL
17.4.5 Tool Bar
17.4.5.1 Information
Clicking the Information button on the tool bar provides the user with information about
layers' attributes. By clicking this tool and then clicking on the map display, data for all the
visible features at that point will display in the Results panel, which can then be exported into
various file formats. Also, clicking on the OBJFCTID number will zoom to and highlight
that specific feature.
' Infomlatlon .eie-! QU'7-
'. It
.. G-aphi,S
Tools
6as... tlar
a-'E Legeno
r.,
;;.ern-• `(-, Sp;h' e
Pniject Sit-
The participating cities are subject to
I
numerous INDLs Many of these
TI MS have various monitoring -
requirements. In addition. the new LA
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Gerritos.
MS4 Permit will have new and
Dovmer
extensive monitoring requirement;
Ou"ali
Hawaiian
City of
Dan -
This project will be for the installation of
-- Monitonrig
Gardens.
Downey
Mueller 118 1034t32
33.861974
17 automated composite water qualay
Norwalk,.
Monitoring stations (3 in Cerritos 4 in
Signal Hill.
Downey, 1 in Hawaiian Gardens. 3 in
South Gate
Norwalk 2 in Signal Hill, 4 in South
Gate) at slorm water outfalls in the Los
17.4.5.2 Select
Clicking the Select button on the tool bar opens up several selection options:
:At==nt
Fri F'ol;•gon
Point ot.�1n
Feature
Line Free Line Po1vfin e PoIvoon
`rianole
Circle
Fllirse
Clear Select dv Buffer rlosr
Galewav lntegraled 1 7-14 Final
Regional Water Management Plan .lone 2013
I hcsc .111 he used to sciccl ;Ind find information in scvcral diftcrcr►t ��,►v ,
11410 (luny
C'lickinr: furl the Qucr� tool opcns up the Qucr� Windo\y. Turn on lavcrol interest. (lick ()n
Qhrer� b►Boon. Scleel laver from the Ir_rvcr list,
T he loci can select the laver to query. inhich populates all attribt►tc types within that layer,
l king a cornbination of selected attributes and Boolean operators (note: clicking the Get
Values button shows all the individual teatures within a given attribute column) will display
information about the specified feature. which then can he zoomed to or exported in various
formats. Use CUT or Shift key to do multiple selections to display those columns,.
1 T4.5.4 Graphics
The user can add various graphics to the map display (along with notes that will appear when
the rz,raphic feature is clicked) using the following tools:
Teat: Click the Text button and then click where
on J the map display you would like the text to appear.
'lien type the desired text into the: box that
appe,urs and click Add Text.
Pin Point/Centerlwil►t: Plants a push pin or ccntcrpoint icon at the specified area.
ExIeW: Allows user to create a drag -and -drop extent box.
• Polyro«/Fl-ev Polygmu User can create a polygon bawd on cithcr clicked vertices or
freehand dcsi,.tn.
Gate -vas [ntc�ratc�t 1 %-1 ` final
Kc,irn�al \�'aler Manaz�nu�nt Plan .lone 2U1
• Line/Polyline/Free Line: Allow the user to place a line (click at start, hold. drag to end.
drop). polyline (click at start, movc to nest point. click. continue. double-click at end). or
tree line (click, hold, drag to create line, drop at end) on the map display.
Hutit niat, or, f''arl o Ffv,- a
Lr•'I
L�Jh� tt r c-r ko•.:
HF'
lyifvwooc+
— La 1✓froda t
Compton 1Jonva4:
• Arrow/Triangle/Circle/Ellipse: Displays the corresponding shape.
F u:
<p '• : luttr r
CD i
• Remove Last: Removes only the last graphic drawn.
• Remove All: Removes all graphics from the map display.
• Add Buffer: Opens a buffer distance text box, allowing the user to specify a distance
around the graphic to be included in the display. A dropdown menu gives the user
measurement unit option of feet, Miles, Meters and Kilometers. Once a buffer distance is
entered it will be applied to all graphics until Disable Buffer is clicked.
• Close: Closes the Graphics options toolbar.
• Map Notes: Each graphic contains a map notes that can be shared
L
7hm is a map f lct°l
17.4.5.5 Tools
The following tools are available under the Tools option:
I•!easure L ^,etc y`frV Surface Profile jCapture Extent ck s*
• Measure allows the user to measure the distance between two (or more) points using a
single Line. a Polyline with multiple vertices, or a Freehand Polyline,
Gateway Integrated 17-10 final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
Drm\ a 1111c, to get tile distance of I-iiic/f)oi.,Iillc/1,1-ccl)aiicI Polylinc
"'d yl
Goto NY allows the user to navlatc to a pan Ou lar area Ong a spevifccl latitude and
lom-litudc.
Click to zoom to 1 1 ,
and re -center Or' that location. icon will fade away , 'I fici i 1c\
�
sec(qW.".
Click -Add Point to Mar' to zoom to and display the specific Wong point.
GaIrmp IMUMm! 17-17 F&I
Regional \Water Nbnai!(mcnj 111a1) Jmw 2M 3
Surface Profile gives the user the ability to view an altitude profile based on a drawn
polyline.
Capture: Extent grabs a screenshot of the specified extent and stores it as a PNG image
file.
Close closes the Tools options toolbar.
17.4.5.6 Bookmark
Clicking the Bookmark button allows the user to save the extent of the current map display.
which can be recalled later using the dropdown.
Add a new bookmark X
Bookmark Name: My Location
Save Cancel
Example I : bind what cities are located in high priority water quality problem areas using
the Free Polygon select tool.
Turn on the layers that are being analyzed. In this example, these layers are "IRWM" for
the cities in the IRWMP and "WQ Problem Areas" for the water quality problem areas.
Since we need to find out which cities are located in the water quality problem areas, the
"WQ Problem Areas" layer should be the topmost layer. Move the "WQ Problem Areas"
layer above the ` IRWM" layer if needed.
Click on the Free Polygon tool and trace the area designated as "High Priority Water
Quality Problem Area". The Legend may be opened to see the differentiation in water
quality problem areas.
When you are finished tracing the shape. an Information table will open with the cities
and the water quality problem areas inside the shape.
Gatmay Imcgraied 17-18 final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
el
"room= "N TIM
pigtx
f.
W-i
Gam, Wymcd 17-19 Fill"ll
Rcpioll.'il \\ alcl "Mallapcillcill flan June- 2W �',
L,,Map Law "C'j.
N111 in.: 4;1
Rosemead West Covina
Monterey Park
A"x, IRWM
WHITTIER
DOWNEY
LAKEWOOD
BELLFLOWER
PARAMOUNT
SOUTH GATE
VERNON
LONG BEACH
BELL GARDENS
COMMERCE
71
L9!1L,1110 3?
Example 2: Find what projects are located within a disadvantaged C0111111LInitV Using the In
Feature tool.
I - Turn on the layers that are being analyzed. In this example. these layers are "Project
Sites" for and "Disadvantaged Communities (1,A)" for disadvantaged communities in
Los Angeles County. For this tool, it does not matter which is the topmost laver.
2. Click on the Disadvantage Communities (LA) layer to activate it. When a layer is actINT,
it will be highlighted in yellow.
3. Click on the In Feature tool. An information table will open with the Project Sites and
Disadvantage Communities in Los Angeles County that are coincidentally located.
Gateway Integrated 17-20 Final
Regional Water Managcnictil Plan June 2013
7, "M 4r �4 f11`1tyr;,71Ti%4r 'WX", - ; wl�
,
Ploj.Cl
Si—
Aiciwna,,j,
a, 1.
1,1 6,,,rx
tl P—,sjf,
G-1 " ha';,
081�1
the
anti C', I! G, 1—T,
nf th, C-1-
I
%
i
ILA
Exampic 3: Determine how many Flood SLIJWCy Responses returned I Severe Flood LISiJIV
the Query tool.
1. EIISLIVC that the V100d SLIl-VCY Response layer is turned on.
2. Clicl, on the Query too]. The Advanced QLICI')' window will open.
Gjatv\v.i.\ hilegratcd 17-21 Final
Rci-,iomd Water NLmaocnicnt Man June 201
3. In the Advanced Query window, select the Flood Survey Response layer from the
"Lave:r"' drop -down. Type "severe'" as the value. The search will be conducted on all
fields. but the user is able to select which fields are shown for the results. Select the
desired return field under "Field Name".
4. Click on the "Query' button.
S. The results will be shown on the `Results" tab. Also in the "Results" tab, the user can
select a result to zoom to on the map and export all the results to CSV, XML. or K.ML.
In'ormahnn •;; Selr <' Ouen Graphics ToDI ease Map Y t—= Laye, Print ave
.� Legi,"d _ L- Fenesh
Layer
Cl vrc�eu saes
arn.r aopa Dounelary
Elicetew,y
�ennmmin.teo sne
Z� ^��Negbnel Wne. Queley
u Storm Water Mop,
777777777-1
L_ 1 FbaE Survey RaapCnaa
�- I_JFhc^L^ntrol proton. l.reo�
gtorm W.teF Pollutant Loe Ainy Fectoi
�' L�Weterenea
D.ta
❑ CDEC SIeU��:
L_IU56' C, _te vn,
Gateway Integrated 17-22 Final
Regional water Management Plan June 2013
MI
{
Al
Galova� Integrated 17-23 Final
►Zegio�nal W,11cr Nianacemcnt Plan June 2013
1 4
ub
18 Plan Performance and Monitoring
This Chapter defines the Plan Pe►'fo1'►llarlee and Monitoring Strategy. The IRWNIII
lev,islation and DWR standards require that IRNVNII s include performance measures and
monitoring to document progress toNvard meeting plan objectives. The purpose of the Plan
Performance and Monitoring strategy is to document how the IRWMP objectives are to be
measured. how the program alternatives are being implemented to meet the objectives and
that the anticipated IRWMP benefits arc being delivered.
Perlormance is tracked at two levels. First, at the IRWMP level, performance measures and
criteria are developed and used to evaluate the overall progress in meeting the plan objective.
Second. at the project level. each projects sponsor or sponsoring group will track
perlormancc against the project specific objectives and performance plan. The results of the
perlormancc and monitoring effort will be used to measure and track success, prepare regular
progress reports to the GWMA and present IRWMP results to public and stakeholders to
maintain and gain further support for the IRWMP.
']'lie GWMA is responsible for:
• IRWN11' implementation. evaluation, and monitoring the overall performance in meeting
the goals and objectives.
• Annually evaluating the perlormancc for implementing projects that contribute to
meeting the overall goals and objectives.
• Tracking all projects sponsors, including aggregating reports of specific- projects
performance and monitoring.
The annual review by the GWMA is part of the adaptive management strateg>; that will help
guide changes to the IRWMP in the future. It will be used to facilitate discussion of"lessons
learned" from project -specific monitoring efforts.
The IRWMP objectives were established by GWMA (Chapter 6). GWMA broadly define
the objectives so that they were easy to communicate and gain consensus. GWMA deferred
creation of the methods to measure the objective until such timee as an integration strategy
was developed and projects were identified. Chapter 13 explained how the plan
development integrated strategies and configured program alternatives. Performance
measures were defined for the IRWMP objectives that include:
• Attain rcquircd TMDL levels in accordance with individual schedules.
• FlIectivcly reduce sources of pollutants and environmental stressors.
• Continue and enhance water use efficiency measures to meet 20 x 2020 per capita water
use targets.
• Fxpand Regional Water Recycling facilities and recycled water distribution to help
provide reliable sources.
Gateway lnicgrated 1 R-1 Final
Regional \Water Management Plan June 201 3
Systcmatically upgrade aging water infrastructure.
Create habitat, open space and water based recreational opportunities.
Install and optimize water monitoring to effectively manage storm water in the Region.
Obtain. manage and assess water resources data and information.
18.1 Water Quality
Objectives 1, 2. and 7 are to meet the water quality goal of the IRWMP. The primary driver
behind the IRWMP water quality objectives is the need to comply with Los Angeles
RWQC13 requirements and meet Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) Objectives. Los
Angeles RWQCB approved municipal storm water runoff regulations to prevent trash,
metals, bacteria, chemicals and pesticides from being washed into storm drains and into
creeks, rivets and the ocean. The Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit
and 'T'MDL Monitoring requirements,13 referred to here as the MS4 Pen-nit/Order, cover
municipalities in Los Angeles County, except for Long Beach which has its own storm water
permit. The MS4 Pennit requires cities in the Gateway Region to develop plans to reduce
the pollutants in storn water, and to monitor the results and take corrective action when goals
are not met. Many of the GWMA stakeholders are storm water discharge permit holders.
The stakeholders have a wide range of strategies available under the new permit to reduce
pollution. GWMA, through the IRWMP, has identified program alternatives to meet
IRWMP water quality objectives, and also may serve as corrective actions that would meet
RWQCB requirements. Both qualitative and quantitative performance measures have been
identified along with metrics to be used to track progress.
18.1.1 Monitoring
MS4 Permit contains standards provisions for monitorin , record keeping and reporting 14
.
and for the specific Monitoring and Reporting Program 1 within the various watershed areas
in the Gateway Region. The GWMA is investigating cost effective approaches to execute an
integrated regional monitoring program and assessment program. The intentions for the
IRWMP are to:
• Integrate RWQCB requirements
• Avoid duplicative efforts
• Achieve cost effectiveness
• Be consistent with the Basin Plan
The GWMA has discussed development of an integrated watershed monitoring program
designed to include:
• Receiving Water Monitoring
" See Final Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharges
within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, Except Those Discharges Originating from the City of
Long Beach MS4. ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175, NPDES No. CAS004001. (December 5, 2012).
14 Permit Attachment C
15 Permit Attachment D
Gateway lntegraled 18-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
Slow) w;,tcr Oulfall Monilorin"
ivc.n `;torn �valcr Oull III Monitoring,
• 1��r�r DevclopmentiRc-DevcIopmeIll Eflictivcness Tracking
• Spimud Studies
(alewar member agencies responsible lot- MS4 monitoring and reporting were still
developing the approach to meting the rcqukemcros of Be MS41"ermil/Order and deciding
h0vy to conlig.ure a regionalized program. Baseline. existing conditions have been
estahlkhed through the monitoring program discussed in Section 14.5.5 (SGRRMP.
l.AllVA/'MP) and the related monitoring reports and in Section 8.2. Storm water and Walcr
Quality Problem Areas. The current beneficial uses and list of impaired water bodies are also
part of the 1R"IN4P baseline. The future ambient. special studies and compliance monitoring
will implemented by the GWMA members pursuant to the MS4 Permit/Order, will rc:IN, on
these sources for purposes of comparing future monitoring results.
18.1.2 Reporting
All ofihc NIS4 permittees. whether operating separately or as a member ofa watershed
group. will prepare and submit by December 15 annual reports to the RWQCB. These
reports will be used by GWMA to discuss the effectiveness of its past and ongoing control
measures. 1R\VNIP projects and further develop plans for future control measures. The
required content is spelled out in the Iv1S4 Permit/Order for the watershed management areas
in the (iatcwmy Region. Annual Reports will clearly identify all data collected and strategics.
control measures, and assessments implemented by each permittee within their jurisdiction.
18.1.3 Performance Measures
The table hclow presents IRVJMP performance measures to help the GWMA measure and
track progress in meeting the IRVVMP objectivcs. To meet the TRWMP water quality
objectivcs, wvalershed control measures are defined as those structural or non-structural
control. operations and maintenance procedures that arc designed to achieve applicable water
quality -based effluent limitations or receiving water limitations. "'
1O See MS4. Scclior C'. "Aemlwd Management Programs
Ga C.q Integrated Ib- Fhal
Regional W,11cr Manapemcnt Plan We 201 ti
Performance Measure
Metric
Implement Watershed Control Measures under
• Number and type of project
MS4 Permits.
implemented
• Amount of investment in dollars''
Reduction in the number of exceedence days for
0 Days exceeding standard
non-compliance with water quality based effluent
0 Number of violations
limitations and/or receiving water limitations
Develop watershed management plan (WMP) or
Number of agencies with
enhanced watershed management plans (EWMP)
0 RWQCB approved WMP or EWMP
pursuant to the MS4 Permit
• Adopting and implementing Low
Impact Development ordinances
• Number of agencies implementing
green street policies
Reduction in trash reaching local river and the
• Number of trash racks, catch basins
ocean
and/or devices installed
• Pounds of trash collected
• Number of violations of standard
Improved monitoring of water quality
• Number of outfall monitoring stations
installed
• Reduced cost of regional program
versus individual monitoring
Reduction of flow and/or treatment of non -storm
. Amount of low -flow urban run-off
water discharges identified as contribution to
(AF/yr) diverted to:
noncompliance with MS4
o sanitary sewer
o Alternative treatment (e.g.;
biofiltration), restoration or other
remedial measures
o Beneficial reuse, including
groundwater replenishment
Progress in implementing storm water
• Agencies, number and type of
management minimum control measures
minimum control measures and
projects implemented
• Amount of investment ($)
• Number of updated, revised storm
water control manuals
• Adopted policies and standards
GWMA implementing BMPs for public agency
• Number, type and investment in
facilities and activities18
r
eneral and activity specific BMPs
,�pecnftc ana►ys►s toots may also be used to evaluate feasible alternatives to controlling storm
water, non -storm water and developing more detailed watershed management plans pursuant
to the RWQCB Permit/Order. The RWQCB Permit/Order requires a quantitative Reasonable
Assurance Analysis using a peer- reviewed public domain model such as the Watershed
" Each MS4 Pennittee is required to conduct a fiscal analysis of'the annual capital, operations and maintenance
costs to implement the requirements of the RWQCB order; and to describe the actions and expenditures in an
Annual Report.
18 See Order/Permit 'fable 18, BMPS for Public Agency Facilities and Activities
Gateway Integrated 18-4 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
ManarTtttcnl Modcling System hydrologic Simulation Propram-FORTRAN
(I�SPl L ,uulior tltc SllJucturd BMP PPlor'111Zatlon;md Analysis Tool (S13PAT).
"There arc a number of, erformance measures and management practices that meet both the
wider qutility ()hjcctive and the 20 x 2020 conservation objectives. The next section includes
discussion of the programs that would reduce urban runoff and may also help meet I1y
water qualify ohjcctives.
18.2 Enhance Water Use Efficiency to Meet 20 x 2020 per Capita
Water Use Targets
IRWN11) objectives 3, 4. and 5 are to achieve the goal for optimizing and ensuring water
supply reliability included. All of the GWMA stakeholders that are retail water agencies
with greater than 3.000 connections must have m Urban Water Management Plan (t1WMP)
prepared rind adopted by July 1. 201 1. "I'hc monitoring and reporting requirements are
defined in state law and 2010 UWMP Guidebook published by D1rhR.
18.2.1 Monitoring
The (;A\AMA will integrate performance measures and monitoring included in the UWMP to
track 1111l7lement;ttion of Bcst Management Practices (13MPs/Demand Management Measures
(DMMs) and progress in meeting the 20 a 2020 conservation goal., The UWMPs are to
contain schedules for implementing the BMPS/DMMs being implemented by stakeholders.
Signatories to the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Urban Water Conservation in
California submit annual reports to the Calilorm i Urban Water Conservation Council
These same reports will be used to inform GWMA.
18.2.2 Performance Measures
The U\VNIP annual reports are the source of monitoring, the performance measures described
below.
The DhM9s are as documented in the DWR guidelines and/or as defined by the CalifOrma Urban Watcr
Conservation Council.
20 California Aeater Code 106351(c)
Gatcwav Integrated 18 5 Final
Regional Water Management Plan .tune 2013
Performance Measure
Metric
Adopted and DWR approved UWMP
Number of agencies with adopted UWMP
approved by DWR as to meeting standards
Implementation of Best Management Practices
Annual report and listing of BMPs/DMMs
/Demand Management Measures
implementation activities and investments
(BMPs/DMMs) and other strategies defined in
the applicable UWMP.
Individual stakeholders track and measure
• Volume of water conserved (AF/yr)
volume of conserved water
• Volume of imported water use avoided (AF/yr)
• Reduction in per capita water use (gpcd)
• Avoided cost of imported water ($)
18.3 Expand Regional Water Recycling Facilities
Objective 4 is to expand recycling is pant of the goal to increase water supply reliability.
Individual GWMA stakeholders are pursuing a range of recycling projects and continuing to
participate in regional recycling. This includes increasing treatment levels and improving
purple pipe distribution systems.
18.3.1 Monitoring
GWMA members will monitor and report on the projects that expand the use of recycled
water.
18.3.2 Performance Measures
Performance Measure Metric
Individual GWMA stakeholders track and
measure increased use of recycled water
• Feasibility studies and CIP improvement plans
adopted and funded.
• Number of new connections to recycled system
• Volume of water treated for recycling/reuse
(AF/yr)
• Volume of imported water use avoided (AF/yr)
• Areas receiving recycled water for irrigation or
habitat creation (acres)
• Amount of distribution system improvements
(linear feet of purple pipe)
• Avoided cost of imported water ($)
Reduced groundwater pumping • Provide an alternative supply in lieu of
groundwater (AF/yr)
Gateway Intcgrated 18-6 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
18.4 Systematically Upgrade Aging Water Infrastructure
t)hjectivc 5 iR to sv'stematicallV upgrade \Natcr inirastruclure IS also part oi'the foal jo
optinIizc and ensure water supple reliability. This includes projccts to help DACS meet
\N�ater Supply and quality needs.
18.4.1 Monitoring
GWNIA members vv,ill monitor and report on the projects that upgrade infi-asiructure as
projects arc funded and implemented. Any updates to CIPs will be included in future
IRWMP updates.
18.4.2 Performance Measures
Performance Measure
Metric
Individual GWMA stakeholders update CIPs
. Feasibility studies and CIP improvement
plans adopted and funded
Wastewater collection systems improvements
• Pipeline replacements (linear feet)
• Population served
• Reduction in number of breaks
• Reduction in systems loss (cis)
Well replacements or repair to preserve pumping
. Number of wells repaired, replaced
capacity
• Preserved groundwater pumping/yield
(AF/yr; cfs of pumping capacity)
• Volume of imported water avoided (AF/yr)
• Avoided cost of imported water ($)
Groundwater treatment facility improvements to
. Groundwater pumping/yield (AF/yr; gpm of
treat and reuse contaminated water
pumping capacity)
• Volume of imported water avoided (AF/yr)
• Avoided cost of imported water ($)
Systems Interties
• Population served
• Supply interruptions avoided (number of
events)
Upgrade drinking water treatment plants
• Volume treated (gpm)
• Customer complaints (events)
• Number of exceedence events (events)
Upgrade wastewater treatment facilities
• Volume treated (gpm)
• Number of exceedence events (events)
Gatcway Integrated IN-7 Final
Regional Nk;ilcr Managemcnl Plan Junc 2013
18.5 Create Habitat, Open Space, and Water Based Recreational
Opportunities
Objective 6 is to create habitat, open space and water based recreational opportunities. it is
part of the goal to provide stewardship of the regions natural resources and enhancement of
amenities and open space. Integrated performance measures include reduced erosion
potential through habitat preservation and creation.
18.5.1 Monitoring
GWMA members will monitor and report on the projects that create, enhance or preserve
habitat and open space.
18.5.2 Performance Measures
Performance Measure
Metric
Create or preserve habitat and open space
List of species and habitat supported
• Areas created, enhanced or preserved
by habitat type (acres)
• Easements procured (acres)
Increased wildlife and botanical diversity
Species counts and observations
(number of sitings; number of
observation/survey events)
Improve recreational opportunities for urban
People served
populations
• Visitor days
• Number of interpretive events held
Reduced erosion and runoff, avoided water quality
Runoff reduced through preservation and
degradation
avoidance of development (cfs)
• Reduced sedimentation (tons)
• Reduced storm water runoff and
pollution loads (mg/1)
18.6 Project Performance and Monitoring Plan
Projects are included in the IRWMP because they contribute to meeting the overall regional
IRWMP goals and objectives. Each of the Projects Sponsors will develop project
performance and monitoring plans. If the GWMA is lead it will develop the projects
performance and monitoring plan. The projects specific plans are to be developed during the
planning phase and are intended to set the stage for tracking a prcjecVs contribution to
Gateway Integrated 18-8 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
and metrics ah«ve provi�ic a
mecum-, 111c Il:\ N411 ohjcclivcs. "I'hc pCI-1,6rmancc measures
hw-js for ilr-thcr developing a detailed project performance table which will identil� :
• Project goals
• Desircd outcomes
• Output indicators — measures to effectively track output
• Outcome indicators — measures to evaluate change that is a direct result of the work
• Measurement tools and methods
• Measurable targets that are feasible to meet during the life of the Proposal
Output indicators measure on -the -ground implementation of management actions, such as
acres ol'habitat restored, miles of levees strengthened. ctc. Output indicators describe the
Icvel of activity that will be provided over a period of time, including a description of the
Characteristics (c.g.. timeliness) established as standards for the activity. Outputs refer to the
internal activities ofa program — the products and services delivered
Outcome indicators measures "response" or "results" and describe the ultimate outcome oi-
the project or management action upon the `system' that is being managed (For example.
improved water quality in a specific Nvater body). The outcome measures should be tied to
the goals and objectives ofthc program. "These could also be specific numerical targets.
These usually compare systems wide with and without (baseline) projects conditions for
large systems variables. The relationship ofthc projects monitoring to existing or proposed
regional programs and the ability to integrate monitoring efforts should also be evaluated.
Pnor to project implementation. each projects specific monitoring plan will provide an
explanation of the following:
• Describe what is being monitored (e.g.: water quality. water depth. flood frequency, and
effects the project may have or habitat or particular species (before and after
Construction) .
• Measures to remedy or react to problems encountered during monitoring..
• Location and frequency of monitoring. also documenting any quality assurance projects
plan (OAPP).
• Monitoring protocols/methodologies. including who will perform the monitoring.
In addition. project sponsors will provide data to the state in forms and formats needed to
include in the state's data bases where this is a condition of any grant funding. The GWNIA
members are already participating in a number of regional monitoring efforts. One of the
potential projects is to develop further regional monitoring for purposes of the ensuring and
demonstrating compliance with the TNID1_. requirements. Projects Sponsors will ensure the
monitoring schedule is maintained and that adequate resources (funding) are available in
maintenance and operations budgets in order to maintain monitoring of the project
throughout the scheduled monitoring timefi-ame.
Gateway Integrated 18-9
Final
Regional Water Management Plan Junc 2013
19
9 Plan Amendments
Integrated Regional Water Management Plans arc not static. They are living documents that
must chr►nge over time to meet the changing needs of water management Nvithin the region or
to adapt to changing forces or opportunities from outside the region. One might even
consider that successful plans surely require attention and updating because they have
accomplish parts oftheir goals and must be adjusted for new goals on the horizon.
The Gateway JIM/MP process has considered the need to adapt the plan to change.
Stakeholders reviewed how they might update the plan or parts of the plan during their
meeting on December 13. 2012 and agreed by consensus on a procedure for amendments. as
detailed beloNy.
Thcre are two levels of plan amendments that need to be considered: 1) changing the basic
elements and assumptions for the plan or 2) changing or maintaining a current project Or
actions list for the plan.
19.1 Basic Plan Changes
Wllcrc major elements or formal parts of the IRWMP must be changed or updated, the
procedure would need to be more involved. Changes to the Goals and Objectives ofthe plan.
I'()'- example. or the governance structure or the underlying funding and representation of the.
IRWMP or the Regional Water Management Group are all large changes in the base
document. Since the plan was originally adopted by resolution of the various bodies.
including. in Gateways case, the GWMA itself; any changes should require these bodies to
re -adopt the updated plan.
The 1RWAII' Guidelines require the IRWNIP to be reviewed every five years for adequacy.
Legislative changes to IRWMP requirements or administrative changes by DWR in
Guidelines for 1RVVMPs have required existing plans be updated in the past. Water
management needs or priorities within the Region may also change over time and require
plan updates to be current. Regions should anticipate plan updates in some form every live
years.
Like the original IRWMP adoption process. major plan updates should be governed and led
by a careful. open, stakeholder -driven process. Like the original IRWMP, the process must
revisit issues, got►Is. strategies. projects. integration. impacts, benefits and implementation
pathways.
7'hercl'Ore. updates to the plan must be considered and authorized by the region's governing
body and its membership. Plan updates must be authorized and directed by majority
vote of the Gateway Water Management Authority.
Gateway hrtcgrated 19-1 Final
Regional W;itei Management Plan Junc 2013
19.2 Project List Changes
l_lpdatin,g the project list within the IRWMP is generally considered a minor adjustment to
the plan, and almost a maintenance procedure. considering the plan should be flexible
enough to endure at least five years between formal updates.
New funding opportunities may arise or water management conditions change that would
affect various projects on the project list. In addition, new project ideas or funding
opportunities may arise for the region. Funding criteria for grants and loans may change,
making a project more competitive for funding. For projects to receive state funding, they
must be included on the IRWMP project list. To allow flexibility for new ideas or better
integrated programs, the list should have the ability to be modified in a quick and easy way.
The IRWMP is not being changed, the procedure is just adding projects to the list.
Updating the project list should be initiated as needed using a "call for projects"
procedure and that update should be at the pleasure of the GWMA Board. The
following procedure was endorsed by the Stakeholders in December_ 2012:
Project List Maintenance Process:
l . Request(s) to GWMA Board from Member or Stakeholder
2. GWMA authorizes Project List Amendment by vote and sets solicitation period (-30
day)
3. Members/stakeholders submit projects through submittal form
I. GWMA selects Technical Review Committee
5. Technical Review Committee reviews submittals and screens and ranks projects using
previously developed ranking criteria (Approximately 30 days)
i. Technical Review Committee presents to Stakeholders
7. Stakeholders recommend Amended List to GWMA for adoption
3. GWMA adopts list
Figure 19-1 outlines the procedure. Any additional decisions that may be required should be
addressed to the GWMA Board.
Gateway Integrated 19-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
,, C)!-� I i-, C
Figure 19-1. Project List Maintenance Process
Gyalcw;n 1111curolc(l 19-3 Final
Regional Water 1v4,11111VOIR'llt P1,111 J1111C 2013
20
20 Conclusions and Recommendations
20.1 Conclusions
• G\VNIA has led an open. participatory, collaborative: public process for the development
of an IRWMP for the Gateway Region. A stakeholder group was formed to make
recommendations to the GWMA and guide the process.
• Stakeholders formulated a list of Goals and Objectives that was adopted by the GWMA
that address the major water management issues in the Region, including water quality
protection and enhancement. water supply reliability, flooding, and storm water
management and environmental stewardship.
• The IRWMP process includes studies on groundwater and groundwater quality and
monitoring, storm water and flooding. and water supply and demand. The effect of
climate change on the plan was also analyzed.
• A wide range of prq.jects were suggested and incorporated in the plan to carry out water
management strategies addressing IRWMP Goals and Objectives. Project Alternatives
provide regional solutions for regional problems.
Coordination with other planning efforts. effective communications, and plan performance
monitoring are important continuing steps for GWMA in the continued effective
management of -the Gateway Region's water resources.
20.2 Recommendations
20.2.1 IRWMP Maintenance- Communications, Coordination, and Reporting
GWMA should:
1.1 C0111i►71,1c to coordinate regional ivoter managcnrenl elforts and be oclive in
irupleruenting solutions to ivaler management issrres.
1.2 C'oordinote amoral meeling in Ja»uar'v to reviciv the pi-ess in meeting goals and
objectives: revicu, the annual reports for grant funded projects; and reviciv and discuss the
annual reports r-equired in December under- the RAW Perrnit/Or•der.
Under the flan Perforniance and Monitoring Program (PPM; Ch 15), grant funded project
sponsors will be required to submit annual reports to the GWMA for consolidation and
review. Each member ofthe GWMA is encouraged to use the PPM program to track
individual efforts in the IRWMP program alternatives so that the GWMA and public know
what has been accomplished and so the GWMA can demonstrate success. This includes
activity in each ofthe program alteniatives including tracking and reporting on etlorts to:
• Enhance Water Use Efficiency to Meet 20 x 2020 per Capita Water Use Targets
• Expand Regional Water Recycling Facilities
Gateway ]ntegrated 20-1 Final
Regional Water Management Plan .lime 2013
• Systematically Upgrade Aging Water Infrastructure
• Create Habitat, Open Space and Water Based Recreational Opportunities
Under the MS4 Permit/Order, annual reports are required21 which identify all data collected
and strategies. control measures, and assessments implemented by each permittee within
their jurisdiction.
1.3 Coordinate Interactions with Other Intra-Regional Efforts and with Neighboring
IR IVAI Regions
Liaisons or representatives should provide regular updates regarding the activity of key
groups or planning initiatives to GWMA. For example, GWMA should continue to
coordinate with watershed TMDL committees.
1.4 Maintain a stakeholder contact list of liaisons, key points of contact and
representatives to other agencies and regional planning efforts.
1.5 Maintain the GiVAIM website to track calendars, distribute documents, and share
data.
1.6 Develop Contracts benveen the Gi IMA and Proposition 84 Grant Recipients
GWMA Nvill be the contract manager and fiscal agent for any grant awards under contract
with DWR. GWMA will need to sign contracts with the entities to implement projects. This
includes designating contract managers, binding recipients to DWR contract requirements,
establishing administrative costs and overhead, and other required provisions.
1.7 Update Projects list as necessary and as grans opportunities are identified.
1.8 Track legislation, inform elected leader and develop lobbying efforts to direct
resources to the area to implement the IR iVAIP and related projects and programs.
19 Develop Gate)vay specific public outreach and education materials and campaigns.
20.2.2 Further Develop GWMA Projects
Two specific GWMA projects were conceptually identified that require further development
of scope, schedules, budgets, roles and responsibilities and funding. Both are related to how
the region will reduce the overall individual agency costs through shared program
implementation and development. The concepts for shared program require further
development including definition of scope, schedule, budget, roles, and responsibilities and
funding/cast sharing agreements. Efforts would require a program to manage and share data
See Attachment C, Final Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)
Discharges within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, Except Those Discharges Originating from
the City of Long Beach MS4. ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175, NPDES No. CAS004001. (December 5, 2012)
Gateway Integrated 20-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
and to gcneratc local revenue to share costs to comply with requirements. The t)N°o pi-111cipal
in itiativc,: include:
Address hIS4 Permit/(h-dcr 11'alershe(I Monitoring and Reporting Program"
The M',4 Permit/Order requires watershed scale monitoring. A cooperative program should
be developed to improve overall cost effectiveness ofcompliance and assessment monitoring
efforts in the l_.A and San Gabriel River watershed that are within the Gateway Region. A
cooperative plan and program would reduce redundancies, target monitoring efforts on
contaminants of concern and to adjust monitoring locations and sampling frequencies to
better respond to detections and problems. The results would be used to establish
management priorities in both watersheds. The results could be used by GWMA to integrate
ongoing and planned special studies and prioritize corrective measures.
2.2 .S'uiy)ort Watershed C'oivective Action Plans
The GAMMA needs a program to implement cost effective corrective actions and best
management practices (BMP) to meet water quality standards and objectives for both storm
water and non -storm water runoff. The BMPs could include both centralized and
decentralized actions to improve water quality and comply with the MS4 Permit/Order.
Additional work is needed to define the most cost effective BMPs and programmatic actions.
GWMA programmatic efforts should be implemented based on the results of prior research
and demonstration projects. the contemporary monitoring results that identify problem areas.
available models to establish initial priorities for impacted areas. and establish an actionable
engineering plan that defines benefits. roles and responsibilities, funding requirements and a
financial model. Benefits should factor in integrated program objectives for groundwater
recharge. water quality improvements and storm water management.
2.3 G1f'1114 should install, maintain, and.fiu•ther del,elop the web enabled GIS dales base
rrsed to support IR N'AIP implementation cord, further develolnuew of monitoring program /or
the AISa permit 'This data management sYsteni fiwilitates data sharing, production of
required re1wrls, document crater glla tl, improvements. and tracks projects.
2. l Dc, jinc, Funding and a Finance plan to cast effectiveh, implement actions and bast
111(mogemc171 practices to comply with orders and requh,ements.
As with monitoring. a shared GWMA program should be developed to identify how to fund
the actions identified under Recommendation 20.4. GWMA provides the governance and
Funding mechanism to take advantage of the finding authorities available to special districts
or the cities under Proposition 218 and 13, respectively.
"Permit Attachment 1)
Gatewa'N, Integnated 20-3
Final
Regional Water Management Plan .tune 2013
20.2.3 Provide Regional Leadership
3.1 The G41'A1A should continue, to provide leadership to influence local ti,ater planning
and de>>elop unified positions to other regional w�atcr management entities to ensure
economic justice and the fair distribution of',rraws, progn,am funding and projects.
The GW MA now provides the opportunity to engage elected leaders and improve the
representation to the other regional agencies that are undertaking programs and project, or
subsidizing local programs for activities like water conservation and recycling. Through the
GWMA, the Gateway Region has the opportunity to create greater awareness of the
communities needs and will work to provide more cohesive input to regional agencies.
Gateway Integrated 20-4 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
21
21 References
Albritton. 1). L. Allen. M. R.. Baede. A. P. M.. Church, .I. A.. Cubasch. U.. aiaosu. D..
Mearns, L. O. (2001). of Book: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis.
Contributions of Working GI-oup 1 to the'hlhird Assessment Repoli of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1PCC). Cambridge and New York.
California Climate Change Center (CCCC). 2009. Using Futul'e Climate Projections to
Support Water Resources Decision Making in California. CEC-500-2009-052-F.
Prepared by- California Department of Water Resources.
California Department of Public Health, 2012. California Water Quality Database.
http://������.cdph.ca.gov/ccrtlic/drinkingwater/Pages/F�DTlitirary.asps. Accessed:
February 2012.
California Department of Water Resources. 2012. The State Water Project Final Delivery
Reliability Report 201 l . Prepared by AICOM.
California Department of Water Resourccs. 2011. Climate Change Handbook for Regional
Water Planning. Prepared for USEPA and CDWR.
California Department of Water Resources. 2004. Coastal Plain of Los Angeles
Groundwater Basin. Central Sub -basin. California's Groundwater Bulletin 1 18.
February 2004.
California Department of Water Resources, 2004. Coastal Plain of Los Angeles
Groundwater Basin. West Coast Sub -basin. California's Groundwater Bulletin 1 18.
February 2004.
California Department of Water Resources, Southern District, 1961. Bulletin 104 — Planned
Utilization of the Groundwater Basins of the Coastal Plain of Los Angeles County. June.
1961.
California Department of Water Resources, Southern District, 2012. Watermaster Service in
the West Coast Basin. Los Angeles County, July 1, 201 1 — June 30. 2012. September,
2012.
California Ynergy Commission (CEC), 2005. California's Water Energy Relationship. CLC-
700-2005-01 I -SF.
California Energy Commission. 2006, Refining Estimates of Watcr-Rclated Energy Use in
California. CEC-500-2006-1 18.
Church..1. A.. and White, N..1., 2011. Sea -Level Rise from the Late 19"' to the Early 21''
Century. Sury Gcophys. 32,58.5-602. DO1: 10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1.
Gatewa} Integnated 21-1 Final
Regional Waters Rlanapement Plan June 2013
CM1113. Bias Corrected and Downscaled WRCP CMIP3 Climate Projections — Archive at
I�tt :1' d�-dclucllnl or �d����nsc led crnip projections,'.
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2010. Embedded Energy in Water Studies.
Prepared by- GEl Consultants Inc.
Ccntra) Basin Judgment, 1991. Central and West Basin Water Replenishment District. etc.. s.
Charles E. Adams, et al. case no. 786,656 Second Amended Judgment, May 6, 1991.
h��_�v,��� �tater ca Gov'���ter�7�aster�centrtalbasin iud�rnentiindes.cfii».
Department of Water Resources, 2012. The State Water Project. Final Delivery Reliability
Report 2011. State of California Natural Resources Agency, Department of Water
Resources. June 2012.
Department of Water Resources, 2012a. Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand
Study. Technical Report G — System Reliability Analysis and Evaluation of Options and
Strategies.
GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc., 2013. Gcohydrologic Review of Existing
Groundwater Monitoring Programs in the Los Angeles Gateway Region. January 11,
2013.
Hayhoe. K.. Cayan, D., Field C. B., Frumhoff, P.C., Maurer, E. P., Miller. N. L., Moser.
S.C.. Schneider. S.H.. Cahill, K. N.. Cleland E. E.. Dale.. L.. Drapek. R.. Hanemann. R.
M., Kalkstein, L.S., Lenihan, l.. Lunch, C. K., Neilson, R. P., Sheridan, S. C., Verville, J.
H_ 2004, Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA (PNAS). 101(34):12422-7.
Houston. J. R., and Dean, R. G.. 2011, Sea -Level Acceleration Based on U.S. Tide Gauges
and Extensions of Previous Global -Gauge Analyses. Journal of Coastal Research:
Volume 27. Issue 3: pp. 409-417. DOI: 0.21 12/.1COASTRLS-1)-I'1
Oni; I.
Los Angeles County Sediment Management Strategic Plan 2012 — 2032. 2012. County of
Los Angeles Department of Public Works and the Los Angeles County Flood Control
District. Dta1t April 23, 2012. http://J���,.lacountv.„o�!lacfed/sediment/stplan.asp�;.
Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council (LASGRWC). 2002. Water Supply
Augmentation Study, Pilot Program Report.
Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council (LASGRWC). 2005. Los Angeles
Basin Water Augmentation Study Phase 11 Final Report. Geomatrix.
httt,:,'������ u�br �,o�ilc�st�calh-efforts/LAS���trttti�zmentationiAppA.pdf.
Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council (LASGRWC). 2010. Water
Augmentation Study, Research, Strategy, and Implementation Report.
httj):` WAS Strateev Document Aehj)d1.
Gateway Inlegrated 21-2 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
Los An(-,cics Rcgional \\pater Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). 2001). SlatT Report. Los
AnVcic. Revion Integrated Report Clean W iter Act Section 305(b) Report and SCCtlon
303(d) List ol' Impaired Waters 2008 1-1pdate. July 2009.
MacDonald. G.. Rian. S.. and Hidalgo. If.. 2005. Colorado River Basin Climate. Special
Puhlication for Association of California \\pater Agencies (ACWA) and Colorado River
Water Uscrs Association Conlerences.
Maurer. I.:. P.. Hidalgo, H. G., Das, T.. Hettinger, M. D.. and Cavan. D.R.. 2010. The utility
of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily
strcamflow in California. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14. 1 125-1 138, do]:
10.5194/hess-14-1 125-2010.
Maurer. F.Y., Brekke. L.. T. Pruitt. and P. B. Duffy. 2007. Fine -resolution climate projections
enhance regional climate change impact studies. Eos Trans. AGU, 88(47). 504.
Metropolitan Water District. The Regional Urban Water Management Plan. 2010.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
National Academy of' Sciences, 2012, Sea -Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon
and Washington: Past, Present and IUtUrC. Board on Farth Sciences and Resources:
Ocean Studies Board: Division on Earth and Life Studies: National Research Council.
The National Academies Press, ISBN 978-0-309-25594-3.
Pierce. D. W.. Ed.. 2012. California climate exacnics workshop report. Scripps Institution of
Oceanography. 32 pp.
Rahmstorf. S. 2007. A semi -empirical approach to projecting future seal -level rise. Science,
315. 368-370. http://www.pik-I)otsdam.de/—,stefan%Publications/Nature/rahmstot-l_science
2007.pdf.
Rahmstorf. S. 2012. Modeling sea level rise. Nature Education Knowledge 3(3):4.
Solomon. S., Qin. D.. Manning, M., Chen. Z., Marquis, M. C.. Averyt, T.. Tignor. M.. and
Miller. H. 1— 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the. Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).. C:ambridgc and
New York.
State Water Resources Control Board, GcoTracker Data Management System, 2012.
Locations of Sites of Environmental Concern. http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.g,ov. Site
Accessed: March 2012.
Tetra Tech. 2010a. Los Angeles County Watershed Model Configuration and Calibration —
Part 1: Hydrology. Prepared for County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works..
Watershed Management Division, Los Angeles County. CA, by Tetra Tech, Pasadena.
CA.
Gateway Integrated 21-3 Final
Regional water Management Plan June 2013
Tetra Tech. 2010b. Los Angeles County if'alershed Model Confrguralion and Calibralion—
Part H. 11'wcr Qualify. Prepared for County of Los Angeles Department of Public
Works. Watershed Management Division. Los Angeles County, CA, by Tetra Tech.
Pasadena, CA
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). 2004. Southern California Water Recycling Projects
Initiative. White Paper on the Southern California Water Recycling Regional Partnership.
Prepared by CHMHill.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR). 2007. Los Angeles Basin Groundwater Augmentation
Model: User's Manual and Technical Documentation (Vol. 4.1.4). Denver, CO. U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Water Resources Division.
U. S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), 2011. West -Wide Climate Risk Assessments: Bias -
Corrected and Spatially Downscaled Surface Water Projections, Technical Memorandum
No. 88-68210-201 l -01. Prepared by - The U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of
Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Denver, Colorado. 138pp.
U. S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), 2012. Colorado River Basin Water Supply and
Demand Study Final Study Reports. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. December 2012.
United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), 2012. Colorado River Basin Water Supply
and Demand Study. Prepared by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Reclamation. Technical Services Center, Denver, Colorado.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012. Locations of Sites of Environmental Concern
Including Superfund Sites. http://ofmpub.cpa.gov/apex/cimc/f?p=25.5:63:0.
http://clpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/srclisites.cfm. Sites Accessed: June 2012.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Region 9, 2012. Groundwater Monitoring Report for
2008 and 2009 Omega Chemical Corporation Superfund Site. Prepared by C112M Hill.
May 2012.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, San Francisco, California, 2010. First
Five -Year Review Report for Pemaco Superfund Site Maywood, California. Pemaco
Maywood Superfund Site Plume Delineation. September 2010.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Reports Omega Chemical Corporation Superfund Site, Operable Unit 2, Los Angeles
County, California, Volume 1. Omega Chemical Corporation Superfund Site Plume
Delineation. Prepared: by CH2M Hill. August 2010.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Cooper Drum Company Superfund Site
Remedial Design Technical Memorandum for Field Sampling Results - Addendum No.
4, Wcil Installations, Pumping Test, and Groundwater Sampling Results April/May 2009.
Cooper Drum Company, Jervis B. Webb, and Seam Master Industries Superfund Site
Plume Delineations. Prepared by: Innovative Technical Solutions, Inc. February 2010.
Gateway Integrated 21-4 Final
Regional Water Management Plan June 2013
L1.1'. I nv ironmental Protection Agency. 2009. IT, Five -Year Review Report IN Waste
Disposal Inc. Superfund Site. Santa Fe Springs. Los Angeles County, California. AV'rite
Disposal Inc. Superfund Site flume Location. Prepared by: U.S. Army Corps of
1-nhinccrs. Aupust 2009.
Water Replenishment District of Southern California. 2012. Water Quality Data and Well
Completion Details Received from WRD. .lone 2012.
Water Replenishment District of Southern California. 2012. Regional Groundwater
Monitoring Report Water Year 2010-201 1. March 2012.
Gateway Integrated 21-5 Foal
Regional Water Management Plan .lone 2013
22
Appendix A Resolutions
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-X
A RESOLUTION 017 THE: BOARD OT DIRECTORS OF THE
LOS ANGELES GATEWAY REGION INTEGRATED REGIONAL
NVATER MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AtJTHROITY AUTHORIZING TFI
ADOPTION OP THE GATEWAY INTEGRATED REGIONAL,
WATER MANATEMENT PLAN
IA�HE1tL:AS. the Los Angeles Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water Management Joint
Powers Authority (GWMA) is comprised of cities and other government agencies interested
in maximizing opportunities to integrate water management activities such as water supply
reliability. water quality, environmental stewardship, and flood management: and
WHEREAS, the GWMA is a Regional Water Management Group recognized by the State of
California Department of Water Resources: and
W1JEREAS, Proposition 84 provided funding for the IRWN1P grant used to develop the
Gateway Integrated Regional Water Management Plan pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water.
Water (Quality and Supply, Flood Control. River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006
(Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 75001 et seq.). and
WFIF"I'U'AS. (ANIMA has continued to engage potential GWMA members and various
stakeholders throughout the Region into the IRWMP development process: and
WHERL:AS. the GWMA has developed the Gateway Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan through an open, participatory. collaborative, public process:
NOW. THEREFORE. THE GWMA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, ORDER, AND
DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Los Angeles Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water Management Joint
Powers Authority adopts the IRWMP dated June 2013,
Section 2. The Board Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED. APPROVED. AND ADOPTED this day of_ .2013.
Christopher Cash. Board Chair
ATTEST:
Charlie Iloneycutt, Board Secretary
Gatcway Integrated A- I Final
Regional Neater Managcmenl Plan ,tune 2013
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-N
A RESOLUTION OF TI IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUTFIORIL1NG THE ADOPTION OF THE GATEWAY INTEGRATED REGIONAL
WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DATED .TUNE 2013
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Gateway Region Integrated Regional Water Management
Joint Powers Authority (GWMA) is comprised of cities and other government agencies
interested in maximizing opportunities to integrate water management activities such as
water supply reliability, water quality, environmental stewardship, and flood management;
and
WHEREAS, Proposition 84 provided funding for the IRWMP grant used to develop the
Gateway Integrated Regional Water Management Plan pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water,
Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006
(Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 75001 et seq.); and
WHEREAS, the GWMA is a Regional Water Management Group recognized by the State of
California Department of Water Resources; and
WHEREAS, the GWMA has developed the Gateway Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan through an open, participatory, collaborative, public process; and
WHEREAS. the City of actively supports and is a member the GWMA; and
WHEREAS. the City of has been an active Stakeholder, contributor, and
participant in the development of the Gateway Integrated Regional Water Management Plan:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
that it does hereby adopt the Gateway Integrated Regional Water
Management Plan dated June 2013.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
City Clerk
, 2013.
,Mayor
Gateway Integrated A-2 Final
Regional Watcr Management Plan June 2013
23
Appendix B Outreach Plan
Galmay Integrated 13-1 Final
Regirnial Walcr Management Plan Junc 2013
4
F •ry
� � t �': k r
T^ k
� s. �' i
y �� � :" ,r .cam �",y^'�',,
r Y wsi' sIR�,�. �•
f °Y "�
t� y4. ��
f' . '�'
Outreach Pion for Gateway IRWMP
February 22, 2012
Outreach Plan for the
Gateway Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Plan
Following is an outreach plan that outlines the strategies, tactics and materials necessary to
reach the stakeholders and general public, with an emphasis on Disadvantaged Communities,
or DACs, to enlist their participation in Gateway IRWMP's development process.
Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) is a collaborative effort to identify and
integrate projects, programs and policies for demand, water supply, water quality and flood
management for the Gateway IRWM Region (Region). IRWM crosses jurisdictional, watershed,
and political boundaries; involves multiple agencies, stakeholders, individuals, and groups;
and attempts to address the issues and differing perspectives of all the entities involved
through mutually beneficial solutions.
ASSUMPTIONS
• All parts of the plan are open to review and comment. As part of the IRWMP process,
the Gateway IRMWP group will be accepting initial comments at the public meeting
(both the stakeholder and Gateway Water Management Authority "GWMA" meetings
are public). There is a public draft document and a public meeting halfway through a
public review and comment period. The public can appear at the JPA meeting when
the plan is adopted.
• As the governing board of a joint powers authority, the GWMA will evaluate and
respond to public comment.
• The public review draft of the plan will be submitted in about 14 months from now.
• The final IRWMP is adopted by the GWMA and copies are submitted to Department of
Water Resources.
• We cannot call the plan anything else as the State has a particular definition and
standards for an IRWMP.
• Any member of the public is eligible to participate in meetings and provide input
regardless of whether they are owners or tenants of where they live.
• We have based our recommendations on census data of select cities with the highest
density of DACs as well as conversations with a few stakeholders and residents in
select cities.
• A component of the IRWMP process is community outreach to stakeholders within the
Region. Initial outreach will be conducted to non-GWMA members, interest ie!
and disadvantaged communities.
• Stakeholders are defined as people who are speaking on Denau of a group or peop
and are usually but not always part of an organization, whether public, private or
nonprofit
_4sga
Outreach Plan Jor Gotewoy IRWMP
Februory 22,2012
THE PLAN
Goal of the project. (the "why?"): Demonstrate a concerted effort was made to reach out to
underscrved communities (stakeholders and general public) in the Gateway Cities to provide
input into the IRWMP.
Goal of the plan: Ensure community is fully engaged or has an opportunity to be engaged in
the process of developing the plan. The general goal, which is being finalized in the first steps
of the planning process, is to ensure the water supply and water quality of these communities
are protected and enhanced.
THE OUTREACH
GOALS
• Demonstrate that a concerted effort was made to appropriately inform stakeholders in
the gateway communities of the upcoming plan and their right to contribute to it
• Demonstrate that a concerted effort was made to reach stakeholders that represent
residents in the DACs
• Make initial contact with at least 5 DAC reps to be added to the existing Stakeholders
Group
MESSAGING
1. Keep Your Water Clean For Your Children: This is about keeping your community's
water clean and reliable for your children and future generations
2. Call to Action: Come to the public meeting for information + logistics
"all translated into Spanish
AUDIENCES:
(1) City Representatives
1. Action items
• Join the stakeholders' group and come to subsequent meetings
• Spread the word on the plan and how to participate
• Provide referrals of who else we should outreach to
• Review the plan and provide feedback
(2) General Stakeholders
1. What is the action we want them to take?
• Join the stakeholders group and come to subsequent meetings
• Spread the word on the plan and how to participate
• Provide referrals of who else we should outreach to
• Review the plan and provide feedback as representatives of their community
2. What are the barriers and motivators?
• Motivator -- having a say or an impact in the future water quality of their area
Aga
Outreach Plan for Gateway IRWMP
February 22,2012
• Motivator - water quality and quantity issues are a good fit with nonprofit's
mission or main line of services
• Barrier -- time if they are nonprofits because they're usually short of resources
3. What type of stakeholders are they?
• Government
• Businesses
• Chambers of Commerce
• HOA's
• Nonprofits
• Community leaders: not affiliated with an organization but influential in the
community
• Faith -based groups: churches or religious groups are huge gathering centers for
many communities. We could tap into these leaders to publicize the meetings
for us.
4. What are potential methods of communication (e.g., do they have Internet access,
available media outlets)
• Most have Internet access, either at home, work or through smart phones
• Some nonprofits and/or businesses have social media presence we could tap
into
Utilize existing access to local cable and stakeholder websites, including GWMA
website
(2.1) DAC Stakeholders
1. What is the action we want them to take?
• Join the stakeholders group and come to subsequent meetings
• Spread the word on the plan and how to participate
• Provide referrals of who else we should outreach to
• Review the plan and provide feedback as a representative of their community
2. What are the barriers and motivators?
• Motivator -- protect the water quality in their area for the community; make an
impact on the future; contribute to caring about and making water quality
protection a social norm (if other people are participating or telling you about
it)
• Motivator -- precedent of nonprofit coalitions (e.g., Environmental Justice
Coalition for Water) and civic groups (e.g., Padres Unidos, a parent advocacy
group) having mobilized around water and Bell accountability issues and made
a difference
• Motivator - giving underserved communities a voice in protecting the water
quality, and, by extension, quality of life in their communities
• Motivator - water quality issue is a good fit with nonprofit's mission or main
line of services
• Barrier -- time if they are nonprofits because they're usually short of resources
• Barrier - distrust in government, especially around water issues (e.g.,
Maywood)
• Barrier - long timeline of plan's development process and a lack of immediate
tangible benefits/changes that directly impact their lives
3. What type of stakeholders are they?
• Businesses
4 .ksga
Outreach Plon for Gotcwoy IRWMP
rcbruory 22,2072
Nonprof its
Community leaders: not affiliated with an organization but influential in the
community
Faith -based groups: churches or religious groups are huge gathering centers for
many communities. We could tap into these leaders to publicize the meetings
for us.
4. What are potential methods of communication (e.g., do they have Internet access,
available media outlets)
• Nonprofits usually have Internet access
Some nonprofits and/or businesses have social media presence we could tap
into
5. Any special "messaging" considerations for this group?
• Some may be monolingual Spanish -speakers and we need to consider this when
conducting outreach
(3) General Public
1. What is the action we want them to take?
• Primary:
c Learn about the Gateway IRWMP and how it affects their community
(either through attending a public meeting, reading about it online, etc)
• Secondary:
o Attend the 2/29 public meeting
o Provide feedback based on highlights and questions we will provide
What are the barriers and motivators?
• Motivator -- protect the water quality in your area for your family and future
generations; contribute to caring about and making water quality protection a
social norm (if other people are participating or tetling you about it).
• Barrier - doesn't seem important to their everyday lives; low on their priority
list; unclear call to action (it's too complicated to read the information or
submit a comment)
• Barrier - long timeline of plan's development process and a lack of immediate
tangible benefits/changes that directly impact their lives
• Barrier: fear they will be solicited for money in any way
What's the basic demographic info (e.g., ethnicity, age, language, immigrants?)
• Majority Latino, except for Compton, which is still majority Latino but has
African American population
• A majority (over 50% for many cities) of the households have children under
18 living with them, which could potentially mean that keeping the water
clean for children and their families is highly important
• Average family size is about 3-4 people and age range runs the gamut, with the
bulk of the population being younger than 18 and in the 25-44 range.
• First generation residents are more comfortable speaking Spanish; younger
generation is bilingual
4. What are potential methods of communication (e.g., do they have Internet access,
available media outlets)
• Older generation reads or listens to Spanish -language media; younger
generation have local media, mainstream media and social media
sp
Outreach Plan for Gateway IRWMP
February 22, 2012
(3.1) DAC Public
1. What is the action we want them to take?
a. Primary:
o Learn about the Gateway IRWMP and how it affects their community
(either through attending a public meeting, reading about it online, etc)
b. Secondary:
o Attend the 2/29 public meeting
o Provide feedback based on highlights and questions we will provide
2. What are the barriers and motivators?
• Motivator -- water quality has been a hot button issue in some cities like
Maywood (i.e., they had brown running water) so residents may be motivated
to participate and spread the word. A recent meeting in Maywood about water
quality where volunteers went door-to-door distributing flyers garnered a
turnout of about 100-120.
• Motivator -- protect the water quality in your area for your family and future
generations; make an impact on the future, norms (if other people are
participating or telling you about it).
• Barrier - doesn't seem important to their everyday lives; low on their priority
list; unclear call to action (it's too complicated to read the information or
submit a comment)
• Barrier - high tenant rate compared with owners. Communities with high
tenant rates are usually more transient and its residents less engaged
compared with owner -occupied communities
• Barrier -- transportation and child care (or child -friendly tools/activities to
keep them preoccupied during meeting): since all meetings will be held in
Paramount and there are significant numbers of single parents; consider
meetings in other communities
• Barrier -- time: many of them work in the evening and meetings are held at
7pm
3. What's the basic demographic info (e.g., ethnicity, age, language, immigrants?)
• Majority Latino, except for Compton, which is still majority Latino but has '/3
African American population
• Most of the high -density DAC cities were low on home -ownership (30%) vs.
rentals (70%) except for Compton, where 55% of the homes were owner
occupied, and Paramount, where about 40% of the homes were owner occupied
• A majority (over 50% for many cities) of the households have children under
18 living with them, which could potentially mean that keeping the water
clean for children and their families would be highly important
4. What are potential methods of communication (e.g., do they have Internet access,
available media outlets)
• Limited Internet access at home but younger generation has access through
schools and libraries
• Older generation consumes Spanish -language press like La Opinion and
Univision; bilingual younger generation may be best reached through the school
system
• Consider bilingual outreach flyers at libraries
5. Any special "messaging" considerations for this group?
Jksga
OLJtreOCh Plon for Gateway IRWMP
Februory 22, 2012
• Direct link to water quality and importance of protecting family's health would
be critical
• While the experience of some cities mobilizing around water quality issues is an
opportunity to engage them further, it could also potentially be a challenge if
we are lumped with any other water quality cases associated with government.
Distrust in governments responding to communities' needs around this issue
runs high.
• It may be beneficial to provide maps in any flyer or invitation to the meetings
to make it easier for residents to participate.
• Describe Gateway IRWMP process, timeline, and how projects get funded and
built.
TACTICS:
PHASE I: PLANNING
A. Create Materials
1. Finalize the messaging li the action: Before reaching out to the public, it is critical
that the stakeholders group reach a consensus on what the key messaging points are
and that the call to action (i.e., what exactly we want people to do and how they can
provide input) has been clearly articulated.
a. Finalize the key messaging points for the public dissemination of the IRWMP
b. Decide on which sections/components of the plan will be widely publicized for
public comment and the logistics of the way people will submit their
comments. The final result should be a simple, easy to understand prompt and
a clear cut way to respond to it.
c. Create the available avenues for public comment (e.g., offline stations, online
form, etc)
d. Formulate how we will address or respond to feedback and through what
channels
2. Develop a flyer: Create a basic flyer, in Spanish and English, that provides an "at a
glance" of the project and then a clear call to action (e.g., come to the meeting, visit
the website or call for more info). Use the design to set the tone for other program
pieces.
Audiences: General and DAC Public (for consumption), General and DAC stakeholders
(for distribution)
3. Create an editable design piece: Create a Word document with a designed header and
Tooter that can be repurposed by anyone on the project to create program flyers or
announcements. This way, the look and feel of the template will be immediately
recognizable and associated with the project.
Audiences: City representatives and GEI
7 A's()a
Outreach Plan for Gateway IRWMP
February 22, 2012
4. Create an E-newsletter: Collect email signups through the GWMA website or events
whenever possible and send people periodic (e.g., quarterly) updates about the status
of the plan should they be interested. E-newsletters would be bilingual and brief.
a. Create a sign-up sheet to take to events. Sheet would allow people with emails
to sign up to receive the newsletter.
b. Create an E-newsletter template and subsequent updates with information that
is relevant to a broad audience and send it out approximately once a quarter.
c. Make the E-newsletter available on the website and have an online signup form
prominently visible
Audience: Any
Update the program website: Make the website accessible to the general public by
making it more visually compelling as well as more user-friendly navigation and
content -wise -- focusing on a clear call to action and specifics about how this plan will
have a direct impact on people living in Gateway cities.
a. Re-create the website homepage including the structure, content and design
b. Add in a "get involved" page that provides visitors with an easy way to see
what the opportunities are for involvement in the plan
c. Create a form that allows people to submit comments and thoughts about the
plan online
d. Make sure that someone is collecting, tracking and addressing these comments
on the back end - if people sense that comments and emails aren't being
promptly responded to, they may disengage
e. Make the site bilingual - add a plug-in tool to translate site into Spanish
B. Build Partnerships
1. Expand the existing list of stakeholders with an emphasis on DACs: There are several
existing groups and coalitions of stakeholders covering the Gateway Cities that we
could leverage. Because there is an extensive list of stakeholders that already exists,
we will focus our efforts on expanding the list further with an emphasis on including
more DAC stakeholders in the Gateway Cities. This list will go off of the existing list
and should be a collaborative document (shared between GEI, SGA and the City reps)
so that outreach to various organizations and people becomes a team effort.
a. Create a collaborative online document for information sharing
b. Ask each of the stakeholders to contribute at least two (2) possible stakeholder
candidates (either in the General or DAC group)
c. We will focus on identifying and recruiting DAC stakeholders
d. Each stakeholder could commit to helping us distribute materials and resources
to their networks
Audiences: General stakeholders, DAC stakeholders
_asp
OuUeoch Plan Jor Gateway IRWMP
February 22, 2012
PHASE II: IlsPLENT14 f AT ION
A. Set Lip Public Comment Opportunities (especially for those with no Internet access)
1. Set ul) response mechanisms:
a. Online (see Website section under A.5 on page 8)
b. Off line stations at community centers or, other strategic locations in the region:
partner with a few key community centers and libraries that will contain
information about the Gateway IRWMP and the opportunity for the public to
submit a comment based on plan highlights and questions to be developed
(e.g., self-addressed postcards, feedback email address, etc)
B. Public Meetings
1. Decide on logistics
a. Book a meeting venue, select a time and date
Define purpose and expected outcomes of the meeting
i. Agree on what the key message points will be
ii. Decide on what action we're asking the public to take at the meeting
Decide how the meeting will be organized
i. Presentation? Open forum? Small breakout sessions?
ii. Line up the speaker(s), key messages for each and assess if a facilitator
is needed
iii. Develop presentation, key messages, length and format (e.g.,
powerpoint, images, poster boards, etc)
iv. As needed, hire a simultaneous interpreter or use bilingual staff to
interpret the proceedings of the meeting for non-English speakers
v. Create the necessary meeting materials (e.g., sign in sheet, comment
cards, FAQ or f(yer, etc)
Publicize the meeting
a. Create an event flyer (i.e. who, what, where, etc)
i. Send it out to local media outlets (e.g. chamber of commerce
newsletters and respective City publications)
ii. Reach out to online community calendars including those on City
websites and media websites
iii. Send it out to the City reps and ask that they post the announcement on
the City website, cable channels, newsletters and online calendars
iv. Create an email invitation and send it out to city representatives,
stakeholders, existing coalitions and task forces covering the region Et
local clubs (e.g. Rotary Clubs) to help spread the word
Conduct and/or facilitate the meeting
a. Conduct a dress rehearsal, if possible, to ensure everyone understands their
role during the meeting, when and how the public will have an opportunity to
weigh in and ensure the meeting proceeds smoothly
Synthesize comments and report back to community
a. Create a summary of the comments received during the meeting and your -
responses
b. Translate the summary and responses into Spanish
,tsga
Outreoch Plon for Gotewoy IRWMP
February 22, 2012
c. Post the summary and responses to the IRWMP website
d. Make the summary and responses available in libraries and community centers
for those without Internet access
C. Media
1. Use existing outlets
a. Tap into existing community resources such as:
i. School districts' newsletter and websites (e.g., school districts
sometimes have an extensive mailing list and networks we could tap
into to promote meetings and distribute information)
ii. City governments' newsletters, websites and local cable access
television stations (e.g., individual cities and Gateway Cities' Council of
Governments)
iii. Local nonprofits' newsletter and websites
iv. Coalitions and task forces within Gateway Region
v. Churches' bulletins and newsletter (e.g., Santa Rosa de Lima is a large
church that spans several Gateway cities and could potentially help
publicize meetings and promote the plan)
2. Identify key spokespeople within General Et DAC Stakeholder Groups as well as General
Ei DAC Public Groups (1-2 spokespeople total)
a. Debrief identified spokespeople on media outreach using talking points
3. Develop and distribute talking points for media outreach in English and Spanish
a. Limited to three (3) talking points (similar to the messaging points on page 2)
that can be tailored depending on the type of outlet (mainstream vs. local,
print or TV vs. radio, etc)
4. Mainstream Spanish -language media outreach
a. Some households consume more mainstream Spanish media such as La Opinion
or Univision TV
5. Hyper local media outreach
a. There are a few smaller local papers that we could tap into to reach these
communities, such as Eastern Group Publications, which is one of the largest
chains of local bilingual papers with the following publications, many of which
are based in the Gateway Cities:
i. Eastside Sun / Northeast Sun / Mexican American Sun / Bell Gardens Sun
/ City Terrace Comet / Commerce Comet / Montebello Comet / ELA
Brookyln Belvedere Comet / Wyvernwood Chronicle / Vernon Sun
b. Outreach to local Compton media for non -Spanish speakers: Compton Bulletin
(http: //www.thecomptonbuttetin.com/)
c. The Wave for Maywood/South Gate area
d. El Aviso Magazine
10 _4sga
Outreach Plon jar Gateway IRW'MP
February 22, 2012
D. Onlinc Pi omotion
1. Crass linking: ask stakeholders that have websites and/or social media outlets to
include a link to the Gateway IRWMP site or a direct link to the meeting information or
public comment page within the website.
2. Geo targeted Google ads: when people within the boundaries of the Gateway do a
water related search, they will be directed to the GWMA website
11 �� Z,.7, it
Appendix C Project Submittal Review and Process
Gateway lnlegrate.d C I Final
Regional NValer Management Plan June 2013
PURPOSE
Thr Project Iif n is to hC used by I-) lojec t sponsors to submit proposed projects to the Lc,Angeles gate vvav
R`eaion Integfatt_divanagemcnI Joint Powers Authority (GVVIViA) to Jae considered for inclusion in the gateway
region lnteai a!(-(' k(gio! 'VVater JAanaaenient Plan (IRVVIVtF). 5ubrnitted Projects should help the Rea ion meet the IRVVf+rP
goals and abie ( YI iv,_, Itoj< its that may seek funding from Proposition V,4, Proposition IF, or other State ,our(:(-< mast he
induded in the Gate�w'ay Reoion iRVUMP to qualify for giant funding.
iNTRODUCTIOf
To submit a project for inclusion into the Gateway IP,VIMP, please complete this form and submit (button on top of this
page) or send it as an e mail attachment to . �_,.; r _ .__ ,i :. It is recommended that you print a copy
of this form for referen(e as you complete the document. Project sponsors n lay find it helpful to first prepare the response,
using vford processing sofi�n�arc, thetas cut and paste final responses into this form. Please note, anyone with the free Adobe
Reader !located at: ) or Adobe Acrobat: Version 8.1 or later can fill out, save, and stibmit this
to rn t.
I. Lac Ii prol:�osed v�roject requires a separate form.
2. If the fields of tilt fey! it are not highlighted., please edit( on the "Highlight Fields° button on the upper right hand
cornerr of the ioi m. TIiii, will highlight: all fields to be filled out. !'lease none, fields outlined in red must he conipleled to
submit the Patti; VUt, can either click on the field to enter data or use the Tab button to tab through the form.
a. To fill out a text field (i.c., a paragraph descriptor or address information), click the cursor in the field and type the
necessary info(mation. Some text. is highlighted in it these indicate questions that have further instruction. Place
the cursor a r--r ', he question and a box will pop up with that instruction. Help information is also listed at the back.
of this form.
4. To select item: it the drol_r dov(n menus, click on the arrow to the right of the field and select an item.
T o select a box of circle item, click on the box or circle.
6. Please verity,, all information is correct and the form is as complete as possible prior to submitting or sending.
7. To save the form qn to File Save As and save the document: to your working directory. Please note you must have
Version 8.1 or Pater of Adobe Acrobat or the latest version of Adobe Reader to save the input data on it. To
dov'✓IToad Adobe Reader for free, please visit I i t %cC 1 o (jol
Once you have completed the form, please click on the "SubMit" button in the upper right hand corner of the form.
Adobe vvill attempt to send the file immediately using the default e-mail systern on your computer. If one is not: set
up to send e -mails automatically, please send the saved form as an attachment. If Adobe has used your default e
mail successfully, the sent submittal vvJ11 be in your "Outbox" or "Sent" folder. You will receive a Notice of Receipt
from the Gate�nr<=y IRVVII/P e-mail. Please note this may take a fern- days to process.
9. YOrJ may also attacfj other project documentation to the e-mail if desired.
you hatre rnv ?roblen,)s fillino out or scndinr? this fon'77, please e-maif
VR Documentjtion ✓
http;/iyaww. tewairvvn'- otrcj/
Today s DateL_ __ I
Part I -Basic Project Information. Relation to Gateway IRWMP's Goals and Benefits
1. Project Title (Required)
P riicipatiru: ACI( 1 ie
3. Agency/Organization (Required)
4. Person to Contact (Required) 5. Title
6. E-Mail Address (Required) �-
7. Mailing Address (Required)
8. Phone Numbe+ (Required)
9. Project Location (Required) Longitude: Latitude: �-
10. Summary of Project Uescriptiar�
11. Primary Project Type
( Water Supply Reliability (' Environmental Protection and Enhancement C Other Regional Policy Goals
i Water Quality t" Flood Protection & Stormwater Management Other
12. Are you seeking co-sponsors within the Gateway Region for the project or would you be willing to partner with others on a project?
C' Yes C No
Page 1
iae('IitIc 51J(='Cifl( 60t(-1NaV '1kV'li1A[A �)I9
-
"e(_
13o. It ves, plcose' oplwn ww 01'' 1
the sjw(iflc pool or wo / hol" to
jwycc; onhihutes.
Local Planning Document Consistency
Is the project consr-tIent with the City or County General
i-ian, State or federal land use plan, City UWMP, Water Quality
Control Plan, Watct Mana f-,,eaten'.. or Flood Plan, or an existing
capital facility plan:'
Y No ". Not SUre
If yes, please expiain and list. Please provide a specific title and
citation of the related plan, describing how the project would
support plan implementatimi.
Yes
����0)�Cf Re17�,i1 ,� Plco,ledescribethe anticipotedbenefitsoftheproieciwspecificollyospossible,providinc?quc,r,iitativeor
quohlotive informotion whenever possiblc.
16. Does the project have rat iy ea;pected
measurable water supply yieirf benefits,?
Yes No
i
I
17. Does the proje� i have ariy expected
flood protection or stoats r
management benefits,
Yes NO
Page 2
18. Does the project have any expected If vc—, explair,
demand management benefits?
(" Yes f' No
19. Does the project have any expected
ecosystem restoration and If Yes, explair;
management benefits?
r Yes (` No
20. Does the project have anyexpected If yes, explain
recreation and public access benefits?
C Yes (- No
21. Does the project have any expected
Power cost savings and production
benefits?
C" Yes (- No
22. Is the project cost effective and If ye'>, explain
economically feasible?
C' Yes (- No
23. Does the project have any expected If ves, explain
water quality improvement benefits?
C Yes C No
24. Describe what you believe are
any other benefits of the project.
Page 3
I'M 2- Pnijeci SIALIV. Needs. arid Readincs4 to Piviceed
Regardles,, of the PrO(CO readiness to proceed, the process M hOp: of document stakeholder needs and Prepare
for subsequer: i oupd! of fundwil; or future state funding oppoNunkien h) identify potential partners and project
Avelyabon oppowrKWA; anQ match proposed projects \vdh kmdhg somwes for design and Amplemenshn-,
money.
Project Schedule Inforination
21 P"ect Now inyjI� Y, I a Mv A le pmjcnl is in the rAdviningand project development i)roce�s.
26. Project SchechOw K ho A A w, NWMoqI MM ,Oje,)
Commencement:
Completion:
Already Tan& (oulc' be
Expected to vvll` f1 I Y(61 Could oe connp(eted I lo _3 years froth i-,nv,,
Expected I o auto Ise bf, to 6 years: Frnly, na\/"
Expected !v compwm y w G poo cam no\, Could be (0111!-,Ieted greater Ihan 6 ycay.� hc�'r, nvv,�
Expected W commo we 9H A" than 6 yens from now
Project Funding
27. Funding Needy Mato ESTy dev Me \where YOU PeUCI
funding to further ph, dayn vqNowyou ymm pi-oln,
(Please select Yes or [VO) -i
J
b. Total of plai ii i(-(, 10(al kflldlhz-? match).
c. Total 01 01 or federal ondinq,
d- halal PI-0jeCi costs unfunded.
29. Do you plan on %eukhlq funding for YORTY PITIas too PimpmMon 84 for water resources pleow m huri-i Proposit
ion q for f IOm-,'
and If no, you Play skip to question 311. Yes No
30, Has local project f"dkr and financing; been secured? ! Yes I- No
- s there a plan and wheM to Sake the project funding and firiancop? Yes No
Pam,
Project Technical Information
Please note that project sponsors may be asked to provide copies of technical documents. This could include feasibility and
planning studies, design documents, economic analysis, rage studies or other supporting reports. Lack of technical information
should not preclude submittal of a project, and may identify needs and define future actions.
32. Do you have project: technical
reports and documentation? If yes, please list. If no, please
C Yes r No describe planned work
Project Environmental Information
Please note that project sponsors may be asked to provide copies of the environmental documents, or permit and compliance
information. Lack of environmental clearance should not preclude submittal of a project, and may identify needs and define
future actions.
33, Is the environmental
documentation for the project
complete? If yes, please Liss:
(._ Yet (.. No
34. Do you have a plan and schedule to
complete the environmental review,
If yes, please list
C Yes C No
35. Does the project have the
necessary permits and regulatory
agency approvals?
If yes, please list
C Yes C No
36. Do you have a plan and schedule
to complete the permitting process?
C Yes r_ No If yes, please list
Page 5
CDWh Pe ouit cc Ptanagemen Strategies Applied
Alt <c _NOI till r, �c � � ,r sr,,=�� �l 1 J � � 1 ll I I
'r�,lt �,�• ('I'��0�' � 'I� I;i/'C.'L';t rtn
f'lgpt-,ibl I,,i4( 1ii
Increase 1rvater cup�;:,ft,, Celial)ility
j DFsMaGn
Mormc
[I ConjunUivE� Usc
Imported VVM(
[1 VI Ms RFrvc%
[� 1Nntei Supi;�ly Rt�li,i!,ili�
L—j vuater C�ntirn�aiio��
h,dl:;tiial I'n,rl � I ftnc��
Improve Water Quality
�� Treatment f✓,�ih:-�,�,1;�;ic�
❑ by ;tei and UVa�.'ie� I ��� ��li,_�Fn'-
lhlaiei Qu,ility i,iwt i tin!i <:I;r1 In'�(irc��fFmFlli
38- State Progrom Prefer-ences
Practice Resources stewardship
Lod Uw Planning M w,Wnwnt
_ Erns MMU Re51-oiaiion
Recharge Area Piotection
Re(l(c-101" and Public Acce.r,
h1�atPrS11 °C,' PI, nnino
_� Er nr�nr-�t�it��l and t abii..r p��trr�ii, ,rd l;�i �rr�Frnt;i±
Improve Flood Management
[— 1 Hood IVian
Ston7�l/U<il�ilapuic n; W1 gcn�er�1
Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers
L Conveyance aP,ci f=e-
[%y,,,em Re -operation
1/�rate� i1olsiers
� Economic Ircentiver lLc, n_, r,r,ritr, ant' Vvr,3ier I n� no`
Mau check !q%1"rh of ih( ,i('i(- f'vr `c,c n(f < the pin/co IAA fl/ Stl,7j�Or(. PhC %50?E.(%71 p "t:i �i�✓(_ : iQ.54.G ti(7i(' l�fi,�� jil C'iE'!Cr?i k' i4flli (�('
(7lVEl1 1U �7TrJfE�l l�fCi�:>C'c : �%�7i:
�� Induderegionalt_r,r�irr(• �� p�r<,,:,,,1�.{GVVC�10544j.
[] Eaeakw"Mquic W.•`, I nwhagumst pI"oC31cwnd prjeos wilthinthe Req&j)
f Effeciively i< <<,-1��e tiu it�c_<.ir; vv:,tc�� re�ated conflicts Within of behn+er�n rHr,inn�,
�� %�ddlCcS � 1"lily ��'dJr!l� ' I: i;Civ Cif '�N�'iei Gudil`lV nPFY�S of d!S ,dV/ci.lii;�ged COrTlnlf_lntllE'S V✓It i;il l ii?l reC11011.
CD support the f'fiPCtw 1(1Segfi tW A watewwvgemem With And usu phnAng.
Fol eligible t WH),
IJUI t anaeniPnundKj XOect' 1 i(l) pl �Vidc nad 1ph 1xnefr,,
not finitd tU, v', 1- irgeenemn lem
benedi redueticr: of in swam eroSU n and
sedimcntatot , anti gim ndwirwr techaige.
Nup (,
It�,:��UJWV�J�catPWavit rrir�n�U/
39. Address Statewide Priorities
Please mark which of thr Tecific Statewide Priorities for the 1RMIMP Grant Program the project would help meet.
[] Drought Preparedness.
Use and Reuse Water More Efficiently.
Climate Change Response Action, including support adaptation to climate change, reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, reduce energy consumption, use clean energy sources to move and treat water.
Projects that practice, promote, improve, and expand environmental stewardship to protect and enhance the
environment.
❑ Protect Surface Water and Groundwater Quality.
Ensure equitable distribution of benefits, increase participation, develop multi -benefit projects, and/or address
the safe drinking water and wastewater needs of small and disadvantaged communities.
40. Additional Information:
Page 7
Expknahow
: !("j, , I`.I �l r)�,: 1 11( 1 , , : , " l. - MY Puna 111 i hz 1 or u ir ( uwonyA or po I Qaty in I Q
0. p4nu pi -co" " ( nt h"hih KEYITc04 MW prowc!
1tiPlcc,v( ptrwior o Cr I CCU c ic'10W)n of OE Pul-Imsc and,; nFEc Or the p
It: 1 �`/i It (Mlw If the prow u Is net in-i p, Ic.-nen-wd'. -I his section ShOLI I d describe the purpose ni� neeo fc, thea,-)d cl the (--I '�WrDl 'OWN "ickdo d"C"vs"` of the PI oj('W� Foal,, �,n'! �'bi( ov�,
rl-oposcoProj( , t, iI-;( I iJu prot-'Icrns or Cor-illicls that OT IQ PdOwssed aid Ux potential consequence, or negative impart; C1
in,Clion. Plr-, i( cc(n do K 00 PWYO i� intended to sul--poN crmphay, OKI, a specific regulwory requirivii-iFnt.
IE I" Pos"I", Pk " H- rWw nupply benefin In quairthaDve lernn. For example, the project yield pow We, v0W,, C
ti-eat od PAGM, PcTuk" wv- K ones of hnd Wrtated, etc. Include qualitative de scrip as needed. For examr0e, the project Awdi
Imovicip an ahenw,�vc ( I W: lei to to used in place of E cmic nt water source, lhl-1 eWyAing the aVajQbW SUppl&V e, p,
K di put poor qudit) Vnnc 1 le U re 06A use and create econe irmc bend un without Tuquh mg addilian< ! water supplies.
Q. Where posobic PUPr (1— 0- flood control and stern) wak; benefits in quanthadve terms. For , rhe j)nCj(-'N will he 1;
re?xc fhodmp or 100 n - 01 n" KenAM devOcipment, prevent ficody and oe oim�ds jjcotdut-jif 5C, year evcrv, . n,.�
pwp,ty dxwTv, hwWde WMIn d"aQAom worc aRyWhalq fm uunTY the piper wiT vni,
&0o;VQutFMhn bank 11ka Py Q the UAY ,"Port residents d and commucial dnTIcitoperit by reduc0p the loss of dawkylblo su,:
thai v,roulc, othcriiviSc he (Grid-nito (� tc on -vile storm-ayer ntior, ponds.
ATen possIr. in pk t d"nilp demand rranagemw or 0011 COnYV"DOn bElWilt', in 0,Llanlitativu for ()'anlpiic' !I,( pnojrr-
KIII P-owde a SUNAUlAr to, oon( III Water source use by prow inE,, 2500 acre feet of wrVded waqeway! Ann other use ochjd(-
-walitative deschplJoy wo - op wri-Vin For examoc, the projeo wN Savewater Unmigh bstAktion of watei awasuren-wo rkocc
d %plemem a ww"TTI Wk cl-tcsicr, aid pipeline rc,-air pi-orj amn in the Cirt,.
33. Vl1h( re poss;h1c, POP f 14 aiho ecantenis rEns-ation knefas hi quantitative terms, For example, the p! elect O!jIl pIo\/jc:,, - p
inash habitat and nuplAxi n a, oc
1 n H, fowl &Tlude qua RaVre d"ci ption where -3pprepr io,,te For (xanjp1,, h(
P"010 will create open wwH I Ww i And irvicenul rycreational benefits for bird waiddrig.
2a TQCW Mhk A— C—A, mcmatJon and public Pccc5s We% In quantKative terms. Fy c x&mpk, We project will ,,pe
accussiblde open q)W" h"P WT 5dr of "tveljr(-"'chat Adudc a 2C ear pcl ling let and handicap 6ccy5ml-4 viciwnt, alc,--<. lnrluG(
qwARWe d"Qv&w OK Onkle. For examoc, the lopect wdl h6p the County by Con-ilaked unmine ater rewmidn pwd, WI -
sous fields.
2Y "there pusible, pop, CmKumc IN power savhg benewts W quandtative IeHPQ For example, the project iIilj increase the
r�,irienry of
thic current plant op( -i1c,i , \,r of the power required by the Current phra to treat We same volume of water. inch de
qualitAke decal iphow vdq " pPropel te. For example. We PoJect will include No Panelk, to meet some el the demorids, thus
22, Dan the pm Ire-; pin, rye PnY qu aim a bW econcink WOO to We Gmemy Region in AT= of net et onoluk activity, or Wh C I L I ko-,
and revenue Feneroluoi,-,
21 Alew possibl" pk,4 J"n Or Me r qually benefits in quanti-tativc terms, For example, the projew will cluxan TIVIDUawls Q
50%. ITYWde quWan we A Y ripluiv %Yh"E app opnon f-01 the pyco will SO the County by Anp-oving water quajoy is the,
LA Five.
2,'i. The Total Estin-,med cc, 1 (TEW I9 the total cost of the project Total planned local funding is Hie planned local londing
dwert expendlurev This CJ!l nrlLyy
Q�; how! arquvdhon, design or unvOonmenlal review services) or other in -Kind exPel-ses (Cr ; staff th-tic), fetal
federal or other fur Nisi inchudeq all other planned SIDUI-ces of funding (e, private sector partners), which could be um---d is
-et local match fundinr I( eldrerocolts. Total unfunded caq, we Move which would be candid to for grand fundinE or repress nt the
ount needed to plan, A �urn MYrOnn"t the powo.
PPOE t'
N0c a � C •Q � Q O ui u� d rL rr0 C Cu .� O
o
N 41 fu
a E O C °~ w 3 Q= v i oA x 0` CJ v 'n v`°
a _o E EL T v c c a, �n fD a, u O - a,
m _ O v i3 % "a +' c v- > O C "' v a: s O CL a1
C v C O N = C, '� 'n ° C, • In _ = O Cam... ro u U V u
- v a, -0 o ro m T c uo a v L, _ +T 3 in 3 O u o 3 c r- to ,_
o a ` °c° u s m = a, c " > v o� ° '= na', aa,
a _ -
�, 'n o 'a 3 m c E> v o a, 0 — c- o c l7 ro r `
E ro ro o O- c a« y ro 3 v rro yo 'a ` C) .a
N C.-r . O o L) O4 C. °° ° a o OE >- O 'a oWvL°
CC ro�°'
O to
`CC, O '^ ° ^ uM 'n
=C V
_
N
Y
a
E a +� Z '* - ro r "' O E c c E
T 3 o t7 v a v ro a E Q a, 'n ro c ro c v y u p a,
r ro C, 3 O r- G: C N C, c O i ro -p ro O i
C: t Co �o aA a, o ro r on v c .n *. a, v 'n c= W 3 u
= >• O N ro ro w _ T C C O v .0 ` On _ O ro
ro N n u o a, a, oa O_ M a, " 0fD h O v 3 v 'cs = L a,
U r = C, +�+ E w O �:, ;� o O = C �O 'n O m m '_ � C 3 w +v. O pp
] + ` O C N H V O OC o vi O C, _Ln � C, - C C v- .M C r
c v` O '' .x r N ro 3 T ro 'n m 0 E
to - •i QL CON "ro=T ro rTa .C- 3 rv. rO a T ro C ..3`rOA ✓r E O fu 'O F0C > CL r-
IVro 0 M D N =�C V 'O rC, ro tw v
OA > a) Cro O c m C, n
NO O C _u O Cp C `ro .0 S ao
0O v '�
o" -0z oga t a E a) m a
� Oro4-0 0
n ro 3 �= .:° a3 a`o°u c -c c a•o oa o Iv E
_ u
�- �-- ro a a v ro v 3 �•- 3 u. n Y
o 70-
o. c
� O41 T
o > V) = O a
u ,T, V 0
U
a
>
u
O c
O
c
_c
CL,
QO
O
C �•+
O ro c
a
=
a,
E
p o c E
E
E
W
=
O
o
K = w >
Y Q
Dill
cz
ro
0
C
ro c E
+- a
cu
-
o cri
u a, >
c O
E
ro IV°; = IV
a
v
Q�: Li
O a x ->
LL W Q' W V)
CZ C
'
N
e
v 'ar,
m
ro v
C7 cc
C-
fL
C G
t
G)
y
co �
O
`
p
Cl
C
a
✓,
C'
Ll In v,
O C
C
E
L,
V
"
y
O a
?
c.
—
C)
in
�. a
O
C)'C
"Cz
a
c':
$
c
�L
ti
ry>
U1 L
T
G
Q
c)'
t
rt
T
a a
O.�
?
S
V,
c S
Q
C
a
E
C
L
z-
cc >
u
a c$
Q.
V
•G
a
Y
O
L
Q
p bn
�'
a
��
✓'
n
v
}
Q
p
C.
in
,>
Q
a
o a
v
a
o
CE
a
c
u
InIn
CaC
>
.�
.N
G
o
3-
a
a
" v
ti
CL
L'
i' ?
L
oTA
a
Q N
a
a ti v
'u
0
G
bA
.�,
VJ Y
Y
CL a
a
C
')
Y
V1
O
a
v
u
s
t•
bA
a
✓) C
J ~'
v
S
N
a
S
C
S
LY
E
c
.
s a
u s
L
o
) 0
Y
r-
a
s
c
L
u
Y
Y
—
a
.a
p
L
a
w
o
ry bA c�
5
o
✓' GIn
Z
a
r
a
n
ti
a
c .�
aA c
a
In
a
I
L
In
C- T
--
bA .0 ._
_..
4�--
s
C
G
4
�O
L vn
E
<
3
N a
>
p C
Q
_a
Q
Gi
4�
Y Ti
In
r4
.- p
.0
~ L
G
N
E
Y
>
a
QIn
`
ri+
VI
Y
o
v
a a
a 3ru
a
s
a
In
m
a
Q o—
v
a
InL
o
In
G
In
In
c
ti
C
aY
m a
✓,
q
a
=
aA
a
,o
a
v
G
a
Q 3.
- a
In
Gp_
a
4
c
p s
5
,c-- `
ti
T'
bA
+ a
V
a
c
a 4-
s In
r
In
3 `^
Q rm
a
v cr
r�
rc 3
C a!
L
> L
C>:
L
"G
i-
rD a
tU
4
S
o
a
s GlJ
a-1
O
S
a
SJ a
M a
G.
a
E
v)
C
s
v`
v T—
'
a
Y
c
✓�
bA
c
G
E Ib
c
s
>
O?
0^
Q
P
O c
Q
G
U S
Y
Y
G•
t'
ML•
Y
ti
ti
C
bA
=
Q ti
Q rU
u
L
x
.ae
m
ti
S
S
Q
Q
z
L
G
Q
T
T
a
C
ZT)rr
�
CL
ti
O
F.
v
a,Co
w
j
v
>>
v
a
u >
>
ti
r
~
In O
* c a
oaA rt
rc
p
cr,
Z
c 1]
J rG
InIn
E C
rb V1
G
r'
aJ
rC- r
G _
L a
=
as is
Q1
u Q
C (1') Q
In> V
Q rG
G
_
C7
i E
.J CrJ
Vt
CG
00
Ln
lCa
I�
v
U �
r-
E
a
V)
O
Ln
O
N
�O O C
J
^ v>
T O
t] +
G c
C J O
>
O
o
3
-
O
3
a
v N
In v
v
E
_ a _o
a v
2
�
Y 3
L
.-
G
X� afOi >= c
'x Co
c 3 o
c
a p •• a= w
p a'n
C
p
u
a= E c
- a-
w
o o c
- o
c
f0 r O j
t f0 �T.
Q d h m
U U
f9
v v 3
> a V
c '_^ t V
r v
c
o01c
in 0
o
C
4
a 3 0n
3
o v
°i o
v
.c = o C o
4A_ 'n
3
E
o
a •� 3 3
S
3
o JZ;-- o o
o o
Ln
10 o
o
c o
c
C41
f4 'O N
C C
CC
C CO
QO
"a v CO �•= 0 0
V ZS h
N V)f: to
v
v
tEo
Q c
c o r0
a cv
v ca
+- =
o 3
E
N
Y°
o
on m e V) 3 0, Q
o oo
3 N o Y E
- c
c
0o a� n
Ln a
Oa
C
X'
C
CL " Q
E
U
`co
V) Q "
�ttC
vCo
aV
'oCav30
ma@ v
°vomco
E
M=n
E EEc
�>E
o
E
Q Q okn a
oo
U
= C=
Q
Hc
oQ
E
._
i%n
0
O
i—n c
) =
T
E
o =
o =
u
m
V
V
d
o
F
o
- L.L.
°'
v
c
w o
c 3
c
E
a` -'
ti
'n
� fO
oi,
a
L)
c
U m c
ti
-� c�c
of Q
4n D
C O
y J
In
cOCZ
v O v
cc
`
a
c n`,
Q
V
*- + cu
,n : >
+- a
'n N >
> c c
> O
CO V) O
V H
o
m
0o
m
v
-
�'
a
ro
4'
cInCL
E
v
'a
O
Y t
C_
S
O
O?
Q
CwiA
G
C;
G.
(G
E 'D
n C
,C
M
G
N
ru
a� 4
a
v rc, ara
E
v
o
v
�-
w
u
ro
rc -p L
w .J
ro -p
Q
a
o
3
C
>o
c o V,
v
In
V?
v, In
ocr,v
v
ra
o w °
r� C
In
oLd
ra C
v c
Q a v
o m
a o v
v c
In
C >
a
w E
p 5
u f 6
O 3
l
}
C
v
In
�;
If)
w .w ,
In
M u
Ln
C,
c
a
a
°'
V°
:°
ro
� Cl v
: y
u C
c
v
c
x
E E
v
w
a
v
v
3 H
°
3
°
rt
a..
�',
«
v
�.-
w p
X `
@
la
"`
� .G
Q C c
Q p
"G In
+
•c
CL
-C
:v,
.O
cl
uo •a
.E
G m 3
=-0 ,
c m
ncj
(1)
G
G
ao
I" CL
E
_0
c .� °
C v
u c
c v
Q
I,'
a
C
u v
E
r�
Inw
L
v ra v
v w
Q
'v
c
c
�w
c
In c
C,
F-
C;
v �
o
a
Q
ry
V I.) In
In
F-
_ >,
° C
c
° °
_ v ro
° 3 .a
p p
° >
E
,w w
rn
E
U
1
*
is
G rcc
V)
In
°
O
.c
E
�_ E
Z
� >
a
.>
V
V
��
p V O
w
ti
LL
O
V
�
G
C
O
� y
c
rl)
GI
n c u
ry
a) n
E
—.
u .�
In
w E
u
ti
s
a
?
c
C21 c
a
3
C
4 a
b1
c
CD
2
O
�
G r�
a p
x C)
O
Gn �
L7
p
ti °
✓ r
a w
m
Z
Z
to 5 v
Z
Z re
c
G
OU
ri
e-1
r'!1
�-1
rl
V-)
rr
(6 C,
R'
a
s
p po
v
?�
C C
a
�p •` i c
a GO 3 C
asp-
y
f
a noo
a� D,..,u
_
>_
_ro
ms
O O
o="
°
V
o
v�
F
,r +
^_ a u
t
r 3 c
m
0 c v a
c= a
m
� o -o = 3
a
z
C x=
v
-^
C
`
a Y
c
o S
a m— C
n. C o a
l7 m E •>
_
�n a
a C
a O;
Q
C m
p
CoL' L
O
�Cp
aCc
°
_°
c
w .0 >Lm
a
ocE
a o
sraa
o
z p
o
s
a=
m
s N= v
R o m
c m
c y
.O o -
„
J 'O =
C)
= OD 1- =
a 7 m
: s
U C
U
a c
3
c N a 3
�n
O
C
L C +'
F- C �=
*' O -?� OC a
° .fl E a 0
r -a
0
n,
�- p a
L
a c 3 a=
E
L ro
U ao
Y
a n a
c d
a
O c O LO y +a
°. E
a 3 0 f V
*' -x
bA v
m
a L
a �'
Z C
C r p
m m
L
a
C
H ,n
E
c° >> a r
a
E ,,;
Ln Y ..Q
� -p
m tr1 O m
0
m ram-- > C�
s1 a
°1 v
41 Q C
Oa
O3 L
J Cr 0
a 0E
�;L
►. s .aQn.
m r�n
.
CC
LL
vo
C *a' = O°
O. O
OA
)m
o
as°L
o
Ea- a
otL
m
r
-C>v
+a„
m O Q
p c
'= o
" a — °
O '= w *'
C
m b= to a +,
O n H
w-Ln
o=
m
w
E (u E
v
m C u
tco
� •- *'
w
o
v
u c t
o°
3
L p c
oo E m L m
`-
' s Ln
00 v y
u vai
c
O O
u
m a
oA ° C1
0 c 3 u
ti
° a
L y
v°
u o
cu
E
>
Oc
�e
wp
'Om
dE
V°
� W
a
Ca QcO
OO
°'
mE
L r
Q °Ofl
E na
N C
O
c^ J
°
a a
-
> ' a
Cu vc
cc
a
.
CC ;
o to a a
>
s
o
uyv
u E
CO x
o CT
Q
o .�
�c
>,
s *'
c
u a
�c
o m
o
ami a`� E
°
�Z
vo°
c'S a
uZ
o a
J Q
�
m
c '"'
L '•'
2m
O
C�r
N
L
rp
m C
Z
o
V
l7 0= C
J
p
>
y
JO
v
z=•�
O
'•'
C
C
m
C.
a
cCa
`
M
m (U
p
O
E
0
=
L
'n
=
a
c
a V)
� �• c
c
L
° �'
y
v x
m
°
s
°
a
3
°/ -0
- J
E o
—
_
Q
°'
= v
O "=
v'
e t6 -Q
c _
'.-°
L
r o
E
o
a
a
c
c >
m
Z 2� �L
c
O
a o
d
r O
m
O
a
i. cc
G
°J • ai
00
a
a
>CO
G
rt
i�
o ti
Q.1
O
LL
CU
L Q)
V
c
u)
v,
of) E rr
G
�'
C:.
O
S
C O u
L
C..
a
C)
L
-O
C C-)ro
+. C
cc
u
v,
O
G
rc
vI
_—
ti
E
O Z
L m
E L
o
ro 3
U
C
o
O
'L
E
-ar`
tip C
'E
V 4- Y C
C. '�
L
tG
"'
G
v
LW
p
QJ ro a,
v
ti>
C
4
O ro
—+
0 C U E
L C a
C O
L
u
ru
-
cc
O
a)
o o CL
ti on
v
>
-Cl
-Ca
"'
O..
C
o
vl u
a w
i •U C. Q
O
�
E
G
E
au
ti
v,
m
m
rt� l.?
=
_-
'Lr vi
C CU
O -O
G
'L
ut
C
E CL
L
a
o o
rt
oA ti
>
VI
C')
L
v
m, >
ti
CT
? C.
O
v
C
+-'
-O
w
f�1
a
O
O C
O
0 v rc
E'
O
C
O
:E
O
z-
rc
r'~c
ar
v);
T
V
n p
O u
A
.s
WJ
x
L
a
v
a
n>
c CD > '0
ro to
C
L
rc a
C v >
CL •DA
> G
O
O
G
a
V o
V 1
1
.ti
L
E
O 3
a
p L
coCD
ob
a`
l)
Q
C
✓1
Q
LO
vl =
O
f2
a v
v
vl
r
QJ
CJ
G ✓�
f
r"
T w
tC
.C.
�--
.
O C--
cc
1— �-'•
N
M
cf
C
L
u
>
c, ry
o a
ro
QI
C
ry :
>, 2
> O
>[
V G
p
V Z
v
V
V
C,
C Q
C
N
ry a
o
C
L
a
L,
o
ru
E
C) 3
G>
> E�
u .- ro
CL
co C,.tea.,
M c
C�
Cc
L)
O
aJ
�
ti
t
E
c
m
a
O
ti
m p
E.
E
G
ry
a
LU
®
EGj
u,
c
}
v
E p
` —C)
a
+
a
E
a
o
L
J
O
ti
N
OLO
arc
CL
2
w
°
r
� GU
O
N
N
N
rV
J
CL
v
v
v
v
a
L
Y
C
Y
L
Y
L
Y
L
Y
(C
C
C
y'V
O O
N p O v
vCi O O v
.N 0 0�
0 0�
�"
Y
f6
to Y C
v u v p
Y C
v v u 0
Y
@ C
v u u-
Y
f4
v u Cl)u
Y C
E u u
v
c
v
f0 O
-0
:0
E
on
- oo
�
- OD
= �'
on
D v fO
- -fl on
U
E �'
c
c
o
c
'f'o
m
c
'�
:� M
c
'ti
4n
>
o
o
> fL °
> °
> w °
w °
fL
_
C
0
v �
v � �
v
`n fn C �
a
' � C �
�n
fS3
u O
m 'fp 'O
C '(� 'O
C
C'. 't6 •O
C trD 't0 'O
C f0 "O
O
—.
C
O
a)
to L L- IV
N
fD L N
fp L •- N
C
D1
f0
C
ra
n
fv m E'
n N V
v fo E'
0. N Hn�
w m E'
v m E
Di tv E'VI
Y
u
.2 L
On N i .O
OD CV-0
to0 " .n
OA N 0
L
O
Y
f9 O ��
fU O ��
f0 0
v�
>
V-
ti-
N 4-
N V-
4J V-
v
>
w
r0
N V-
N N p
CU y...
a) ++ p
'�
W
N v +_ p
-° "O
V.-
H W +• p
.o
y_
Q) ;� p
•O 'O
O
tD
Y Ln
f6 N
m
W
tO f,
a
v �fu
w
y
2 v
v
W
E
c
o�
OD m c
o°Jn m
c'
tw
cnc°'
on
w
E
.�
Y w
n cw
fV
IV
cv
o
c
^ c o
a
OD
�C
N
C
L' N C
9
O L V1 C
0LN
u V7 C
6
3 Ln
�
>
p 'O G/ —
p "O _
p O fL _
p O v _
p—
n
J
E a
E o
E 5
E
LA
E v
rfl
.v
a w
rLa M�a
f`a
p
o
'a
aci
a v v
a a c a
�'
a = v
E
�a4-
o :�=
o
:a)
Y
a.
u
>, N
T N
>, a1 )
c a�
>. � fL
c a
G! q1
Vl
V-
v- �
•f+ '(i O 'a
Y -a O 'O
0
Y •O O "a
+. -p O T3
O
o E
ZJ a
v n.a)
u aw
c
u av
c
u nw
c
fC
C
C L
c kn
41 0 W
c v,
G/ a! v_i w
v 41 !_n N
kn
N y ,✓n W
In
d/ O 0 N
i
O
O QN
-C W .0 L
-C Q) L L
L w L -C
L v L L
L w L L
Z
--- O_
On
Y L i- r
�'' .p ►-- ."'
�-' L F_ Y
•'' L 1- �"'
"' .O
tB
fO W
._
w OD ��,,
O D1 Op
Gl r
O N OA .IV
O w „w
J
'p
'O
O
r
vi
vi a,
C:
fL L
t6 L
fU L •
@ L
fo L
n>
c
c Z
n> p E
°> o E
o> o E
a> O E
o E
>
U
in
�n r�
E
Q u .� a
Q u fv
<t u w v
Q w
Q u w
u
c
c
c
C
c
ti
O O
O O
O O
O O
O p
E
E
E
> E
E
O
U i
r
V
Y
lJ
V@
u
>
fL
fG
fO
f0
fD
V
a
a
a
n
a
c
c
c
c
c
O O
O p
O p
O p
O p
w E
E
E
E
Y E
u
v-
m
u m
u m
fa
fa
ra
fa
to
a
a
a
a
a
c
c
c
c
c
>
w
E
a
E
a
E
E
E
V
>
>
>
>
>
L
0
0
0
0
Y
a
n
a
n
a
S
°J
E
Efv
Em
Ea
Er\
c
ai
C
C C
C C
C
C
-p
` O
N
O
N
m O
N
O
N
O
N
fO E
GI
Q ?•+
Q Y
O •!�
Q i�
O +
Q
>
w]
y
E a
E au,
E uw
E a
E v
E
O 0
O O
O O
p O
p
5') a
vi a
vi a
) a`
in a`
V)
fV
fV
fV
(14 N
N
mm
C7
I IG, V,
W) C)
E <
WC,
cp C C C)
rr ru 0 CL CC 4- c C)
N.-r c v
C)
rr,
CD
ruti o G) 4T- uo
0 C)
CL C W Qm
E
C W L R C) 7-- < Ln M
L) G-) ro
G) w ti > rr, _0
Q) E
CL <
M L.
C) (D I— m
0
L) .— _0 < a) rc 0 L)
r- ;,:'
2!- c CO ;.& v - -0 E
Q. 0 ru >
0 ro Lrl Q.)
C, C)
ro
Qj C,)v.
m CLI rz
cy! C (IJ >
Cl ut C m >
rl — .— uv, V,
w E
ur)
L)
, a) -0 (1) CO
17 ro
— = L)
_r_ a) 'r,
ro M, C to M
-0 CI- c CL -0 C) >, m c rCO S
-
'57, L) V� C) V) a) 0 < 4)
ru M Z rG C) Cl, CL Ln ru ru —ro tV) w
CL CJ m
C vi C) Cl) > -.j , -0 = m "
E a) Q, C) un
—1 w UD Ln
> 'n Z> -C C
UO G) o C)
PL
CL u
u > c -C
(v E
V, a) cj 0 CL
rr,
E 0
L)
r- [a
m c
CL re c C CL C
C)
C) C,4) 5 >
rr m •
c ro
-C ru u �E c C) =
L)
C) L) ur) v) V)
0 C) a C)
FA L
03
rr vl
Q-1 L) c
C) 0 ru
V) (_J
LL.)
ci
rl)
P ro
ru C rr,
-C w
t'l
CO
Q) L.L
a) C)
C, >
ci
:; I -
C�;
L aL) rz
P
ry M
M rf) rf) C CC
c
Q a — o o L
a O C D O
° jp 0 ro O T Y .� .0 ro C Q1
C C ++ O a
Ql +.+ C Q) ro ro O
r�O Q, rL OO W C Q) f�D O .� O N •D
o O in v v pp a�
> z3 E ,� E N o a E n w
ro x O v ro ° ro o c r- •- v. ro !9 ro != ro
v a Co > m W s ° o m °' E> �'3 u
0 -2
Q) L Q> tw Q1 v ro 3 .w C O C C' H
i Q) v C .0 O >. 'O +' L N .r Q1
v an O .0 +� J v Ql C In i T O
ro C C C CL p ro H c C aJ O
M i1 C O 'O O m c ` C O to
_ O Op Q) E :I-
0 ui .Ll C _' Q! .� Ql ►: `� ++ C .�N
° Mm 'C T V +% O N ro p ro u ro In v
_ �n ip O O 3 Q7 Op O '0 C
o= 0) E, `^ a v o C T > c
'r = �, V)= W v n °a v ro a, = v E
a 3 cu
o~ O N -aTi 3 g w 3 L 3
v, ro v 3 ro a`, t ro a 'n
T x 3 o
ro a Y a j O O .a n ro c u w O
i 'N00 O
O QI on NVO O Z_ fl Oo�Ero E ro
Q1 TS O �+ ip
s ro 3 ro c> a »r rp is c„ 1
Q, v o a IV4n x -° 3 c o w ro ', E °
> Q� u L QJ
u L ' O
O O - O N 6>- y6 +v- '- t O L v
G. C O.. 06 u N 3 3 ~O d 'Cr �= O- v w C
u L w Q> >@ u O C vi rp ip 3 c Q)
O,C =_ _ - j 0 vl +• - O ro t :._- QI ro a '0 ° N
CL Q, � ai ro C. ro c Q •p v p .«. i� u u v
Q� Y c c .,
ro u C
F-- rc0 c n fD H u Lf
0
C C Y
Ln
O
0 = O = V O
y Z
u iu
O
Ln
v
W
ro
v
ro
3
c
U
�
c
Ql
u
c
C
O
Q)° u
T
O
J
ro V C
Quj
a
@
pp C
E
V)
ce
S
r
C ro
Y V
C
Cl p 0
C
v aco
ro
N
3 v v
o n`,
o o
s v tyo
ro
p M
ccm
>
ro
r n
M
v a
C,
C, Cl)
C)
Lr,
L)
rl)
cc
C: In
rI,
rl)
Lr,
Cc 0
>
LL' :5
C� > c
:t
L
Uf) —C,
uo
E
ru G) ur, (1)
In
L-I
C)
L)
C,
In
7�
>
In
CL
0)
a
E
>
O.
4-) C) c
M OmjM
n
Cc
0
<
E
cc)
E
Cl)
In
M
> a) 0 CL
In
L.L L�) rr,
>
0 V)
V,
Cc
C)
> Q)
U W M 0 (v
*E
;�-
,n
ro
— --j I,
4�
CO
C
V,
1-n
In
-0
V, E z, >
u
=�
— u c
C:
L) c 0)
0
>
C) ro
0
-C
— M
- -0 E
L)
E
U
n
.
C, r.) (1)
0 —a)
C
a
r4)
fV 4
C)
a)
>
C) >
Ln
C,
E
E
ro
rt-)
In
Q)
C)
CL)
C�
0
cl)
0
w
C:
E
C) m a)
m
Ln
V,
a
to
In 0 E
In
C) ;-->
C)
-0
C
R.
>'
—
—
m
ru c In
0 Q)
c
> 0)
Z >
>
In
-0
C)
U'D
0 CL L) Qj -0 m
0
C)
Ln
a)
>
L) 0)
w E
w
In
E
C)
E
>
E
E
—
0
C)
t,n o
C-
C)
0
-0
-0
-
C,
-0 kn 0 —
V)
C
C,
L)
-o
E _0
C) Cl)
V� 0 V)
Q- — -0
'0
CL
L)
V)
?:
G)
a)
w >
c
rr,
>
C,
—
0 0 , W a)
0 — . w —
fz -r-
w
m
r, <
-c 0
ro
Dr
>
—
Z
C) ro c
m
'E
o
w .0 0
C)
cm
m 0
J--
Qv))
o E
tw
0
E — CS a-)
0',
.�2 0 Cu
a)
0
a Q)
>
>
7 CL
< >
-0
C
ro
ry M
,
--i
C,
m C:L T E
F > m L)
C
m
m
>
co
>
LL
L,) as
s ru L.,-
ry
C) C)
0 0
L)
U >
L)
0
ro c: C)
C
C
ire
C M In
ru
'n
E
L)
C)
>
rQ >
L)
0
E
r
4)
en
In
In
co
E
Q)
>
>
> E O
W) W
C)
c)
CL
u cc
41
Di
ff)
cr)
(Y)
c a
L C
'o a
L
} n
C
c ti
v •% m p
c
4 rl
wn
L-0c
O
`
0 on c
o=
-
c 0c
cv>i6
_
a
O
TV
O
p'a
n C a
u m ,O
Oa
_
On
(D
rm a
m
O In
faL,
a a
c
¢
aai
+o-
-C"
`ob
°�-
a
VYv
LL
'v
'
�n
C° 3=
L
Ea
D
L
OO °
v m
a
m l7 'o
L
° c r T
c r io
m v U O
u
c
r14
a p
V
L
°
c
a)
a
-
a
Laa
-
a
0 0a a
tw xC
U
0
v)
O
O
N .L -
O C a 2i
O T U a
Z3
c
: cn
C = a kn
L C
u
L
a L u m
C d ?:
�'' N =
"
u m
4- L r
CL)
Z
Ca
a>°-
OO
•�wc a v
eo
0
u o a
a
lo oc_
c
0
vV
c u
o cCo°
a c z,O
oO
op
Q
+f,
mC W
L
a
O
a
M a '0
=
o
u
�a a
C
>
0
C •� C
a=
fCO y C
r- 4- a
C Y a a L Q
O C L r
3
L
O
O v a
L p C
0
L m m L
Ua
p p
.Y
k3nL.°
Ln
mati
n
am coLL
V)
o C m
Yaf6
n
v W
o L
t- o
ga,
0
o c
r_
i a o
m-0` O
'a
oM c
u O• f0 a
a = p
�' X O p Z
v
u
a
O
�OD W«
on m D- -O
a s a
a=
Q
3 'a =
C:
L
t o
a°A,
p c
o
a c m
a
3
0
ra O a
Lt
N"U
O
a
w_
cC
*'
'
O
m
u ro 3
O ai
Z Q
= C m C�
Go
a
n
w v
c
w L;
c
w
c
w
w 0 v
uw O y
uw 0
0 v
V n a
V) II v
V =• a
N a v
V a a
Vt a Ld
U a a
In a u
0 V)
C) V)
0 V)
LD V)
'n
v a o
u c
a
c
a
_
X c 0
c
o
y
°°
v
E
O o
Q p
ac,
NL
'
o O
L
'
L '
cri
'J
U
p L '=
v- _O v
C C
-p
O u
C C
ti O u C
ti
.` C@ C
C p y w
a m
C
O `X
a co
C �X co
ai
O C Vco
L
m
0
C)
G L
m
C�
0 C L m
N
C L C aQj
p La a
m m r
a
-0 xv m
Ln —
y
'0
@ m r
a v m
0 '''
v
m r Y
v m ac,
I
V) U VOi
Q uw }- >
a. U
Q
w ►-S
a U
Q f- U
G
'an
o
c
.-+
�
r.i
c
m
c
c,
C7 ck