Resolution No. 2014-031RESOLUTION NO. 2014-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VERNON ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE
2014-2015 FISCAL YEAR, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 7910
WHEREAS, Section 7910, of the Government Code requires the
governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution,
an appropriation limit for each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the appropriation limit for fiscal year 2013-2014,
was $962,096,932; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California passed
Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990; and
WHEREAS, under Proposition 111, a City is allowed to use
either, (a) the change in California per capita income from the
preceding year, or (b) the percentage change in the local assessment
roll from the preceding year due to increases in nonresidential
construction; and
WHEREAS, the documentation used in the determination of the
appropriation limit provided for herein has been made available for
inspection by the public fifteen (15), days prior to this meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
intends to establish the appropriation.limit for fiscal year
2014-2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon finds
that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule
that CEQA only applies to projects that may have an effect on the
environment.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
establishes $988,993,313 as the amount of the appropriation limit for
fiscal year 2014-2015, in accordance with the provisions of,
Proposition 111. The computation is attached hereto as Exhibit A,
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Vernon has
approved a budget by adopting a Resolution, which did not exceed the
appropriation limit for fiscal year 2014-2015.
SECTION 5: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
declares that the budget established by Resolution complies with the
re.quirements:of Government Code, Sections 7900, et seg.
- 2 -
SECTION 6: The City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the
City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of
this resolution, and the City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the City
of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's, or Deputy
City Clerk's, certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of
the Council of this City.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 2014.
ATTEST:
Ana rci.a
City Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
06
Name: W. Michael McCormick
Title: Mayor /
Scott E. Porter, Deputy City Attorney
- 3 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
kna Barcia
I, -�y' Deputy City Clerk of the City
of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being
Resolution No. 2014-31, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of ;the City
Council duly held on Tuesday, June 17, 2014, and thereafter was duly
signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon.
Executed this 11 day of June, 2014, at Vernon, California.
(SEAL)
ki
A Bar '
�C-"y ` ' � Deputy City Clerk
4 -
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
A. CALCULATION OF BASE YEAR 1978-79
STEP 1.
1. Proceeds from Taxes
Property taxes
Othertaxes
Investment earnings
Revenue for Other -Agencies
Less: Railroad Crossing Grant
SUB -TOTAL
Contribution from Enterprise Fund
Miscellaneous
TOTAL PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
2. Non -Proceeds from Taxes
A. User Fees by Function
Public Works
Construction Permits
Streets & Curbs
Engineering Services
SUB -TOTAL
Health
Food Vehicle Permits
Public Health Permits
SUB -TOTAL
Police
Police Services
SUB -TOTAL
TOTAL USER FEES
B. Interfund Service Charges
C. Cost -Reimbursement Items
D. Donations and Grants (non -State) Railroad Crossing Grant
E. Exempt Revenues -(Mandated Cost Reimbursement, Fines,
Proceeds from Bond Issues) Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties
TOTAL NON PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
GRAND TOTAL
STEP 2.
1. Match Cost to User Fees
2. Revenues less than Costs
3. No portion of User Fees considered "Proceeds of Taxes"
STEP 3.
1. All Revenues of the City
2. Non Proceed of Taxes
3. User Fees in excess of Costs
4. Less Debt Service Appropriations
TOTAL
STEP 4.
1. Total all actual Appropriations, as amended for 1978.79
Transfers to Reserves
2. Subtract Non Proceeds of Taxes
BASE YEAR LIMIT (1978-79)
EXHIBIT "A"
A-1
Page 1 of 7
1,061,619
4,890,969
302,913
831,739
9,277
822,462
7,077,963
1,549,490
5,306
8,632,759
121,551
1,604
82,706
205,862
15,516
47,578
63,094
5,944
5,944
274,899
0
0
9,277
67,303
351,479
8,984,238
8,984,238
(351,479)
0
0
8,632,759
8,586,750
3,988,675
12,575,425
(351,479)
12,223,946
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
B. 1979-80 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1978-79 Appropriation Limit
CPI change 10.17%
Vernon population change 1.15%
1.1027 X 1.0115=1.11437
1979-80 Appropriation Limit
C. 1980-81 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1979-80 Appropriation Limit
CPl change 12.11%
Vernon population change -1.14%
1.1211 X .9886=1.1683
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
D. 1981-82 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita income change 9.12%
Vernon population change 4.60%
1.0912 X 1.0460=1.1414
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
E. 1982-83 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
Per Capital Income change 6.79%
Vernon population change-4.35%'
1.0679 X .9565=1.02144635
1982-83 Appropriation Limit
F. 1983-84 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1982-83 Appropriation Umit
Per Capita income change 2.35%
Vernon population change 2.30%
1.0235 X 1.0230=1.0470
1983-84 Appropriation Limit
G. 1984-85 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1983-84 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 4.74%
Vernon population change -5,37%
1.0475 X .9463 = .9912
1984-85 Appropriation Limit
H. 1985-86 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1984-85 Appropriation Limit
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.74%
Vernon population change -3.46%
1.0374 X .9654=1.0017
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
EXHIBIT "A"
A-2
Page 2 of 7
12,223,946
X 1.11437
13,621,999
13,621,999
X 1.1083
15,097,261
15,097,261
X 1.1414
17,232,014
17,232,014
X 1.02144635
17,601,578
17,601,578
X 1.0470
18,428,852
18,428,852
X 0.9912
18,266,678
18,266,678
X 1.0017
18,297,731
CITY OF VERNON Page 3 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
I. 1986-87 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1985-86 Appropriation Limit 18,297,731
U.S. Consumer price index change 2.30%
Vernon population change 6.17%
1.0230 X 1.0617=1.0861 X 1.0861
1986-37 Appropriation Limit 19,873,166
J. 1987-89 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1986-87 Appropriation Limit 19,873,166
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.04%
Los Angeles County population change 1.91%
1.0304 X 1.0191 = 1.0501 X 1.0501
1987-88 Appropriation Limit 20,868,812
K. 1988-89 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1997-88 Appropriation Limit 20,868,812
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.93%
Los Angeles County population change 1.62%
1.0393 X 1.0162=1.0562 X 1.0562
1988-89 Appropriation Limit 22,041,639
L. 1989-90 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1988-89 Appropriation Umlt 22,041,639
U.S. Consumer price index change 4.98%
Los Angeles County population change 1.141/
1.0498 X 1.0114 = 1.0618 X 1.0618
1989.90 Appropriation Limit 23,403,812
M. 1990-91 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1989-90 Appropriation Limit 23,403,812
Per Capita Income change 4.21%
Los Angeles County population change 1.36%
1.0421 X 1.0136=1.0563 X 1,0563
1990-91 Appropriation Limit 24,721,447
N. 1991-92 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1990-91 Appropriation Limit 24,721,447
Per Capita income change 4.14%
Los Angeles County population change 1.73%
1.0414 X 1.0173=1,0595 X 1.0595
1991-92 Appropriation Limit 26,192,373
O. 1992-93 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1991-92 Appropriation Limit 26,192,373
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 32.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.49%
1.3224 X 1.0149=1.3421 X 1.3421
1992-93 Appropriation Limit - 35,152,784
EXHIBIT "A"
A-3
CITY OF VERNON Page 4 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
P. 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1992-93 Appropriation Limit 35,152,784
Per Capita income change 2.72%
Las Angeles County population change.96%
1.0272 X 1.0096 = 2,0371 X 1.0371
1993-94 Appropriation Limit 36,456,952
Q. 1994-95 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1993-94 Appropriation Umit 36,456,952
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 4.84%
Los Angeles County population change .75%
1.0484 X 1.0075=1.05627 X 1.05627
1994-95 Appropriation Limit 38,508,385
R. 1995-96 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1994-95 Appropriation Limit - 38,508,385
Per Capita income change 4.72%
Los Angeles County population change .33%
1.0472 X 1.0033=1.0507 X 1.0507
1995-96 Appropriation Limit 40,460,760
S. 1996.97 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1995-96 Appropriation Limit 40,460,760
Per Capita income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change .48%
1.0467 X 1.0048 = 1.0517 X 1.0517
1996-97 Appropriation Limit 42,552,581
T. 1997-98 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1996-97 Appropriation Limit 42,552,581
Per Capita Income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change 1.24%
1.0467 X 1.0124=1.0597 X 1.0597
1997-98 Appropriation Limit 45,092,970
U. 1999-99 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1997-98 Appropriation Limit - 45,092,970
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 9.91%
Los Angeles County population change 1.39%
1.0991 X 1.0139 = 1.11 X 1.11
1998-99 Appropriation Limit 50,053,197
V. 1999-2000 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1998-99 Appropriation Limit 50,053,197
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 15.35%
Los Angeles County population change 1.78%
1.1535 X 1.0178=1.17 X 1.17
1999-2000 Appropriation Umlt 58,562,240
EXHIBIT "A"
A-4
CITY OF VERNON Page 5of7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
W. 2000.2001 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1999-2000 Appropriation Limit 56,562,240
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 10.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.75%
1.1024X 1.0175 = 1.1217 x 1.1217
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit 65,689,265
X. 2001-2002 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit - 65,689,265
Increase In Nonresidential Construction 25.96%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.2596 X 1.0166=1.2805 x 1.2805
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit 84,115,104
Y. 2002-2003 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit 84,115,104
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 27.25%
Los Angeles County population change 1.77%
1.2725 X 1.0177=1.2950 x 1.2950
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit 108,929,060
Z. 2003-2004 APPROPRIATION UNIT CALCULATION
2002.2003 Appropriation Limit 108,929,060
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 19.80%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.1980 X 1.0166=1.2179 x 1.2179
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit 132,664,702
AA. 2004.2005 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit 132,664,702
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 22.03%
Los Angeles County population change 1.38%
1.2203 X 1.0138=1.2371 x 1.2371
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit 164,119,503
BB. 2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit 164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118=1.0650 x 1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit 174,787,271
CC. 2006-2007 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit 174,787,271
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 29.41%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.2941 X 1.0078-1.3042 X 1.3042
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit 227,957,559
EXHIBIT "A"
A-5
CITY OF VERNON Page 6 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
DD. 2007-2008 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit 227,957,559
Increase In Nonresidential Construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change .72%
1.0944 X 1.0072 = 1.1023 X 1.1023
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit 251,277,617
EE. 2008-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit 251,277,617 .
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 11.82%
Los Angeles County population change.86%
1.1182 X 1.0086=1.1278 X 1.1278
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit 283,390,896
FF. 2009.2010 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit 283,390,896
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 6.36%
Los Angeles County population change .90% '
1.0636 X 1.0090=1.0732 X 1.0732
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit 304,135,110
GG. 2010-2011 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit 304,135,110
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 21.45%
Los Angeles County population change .83% -
1.2145 X 1.0083=1.22458 X 1.22458
2010-2011 Appropriation Limit 372,437,773
HH. 2011-2012 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION -
2010-2011 Appropriation Limit 372,437,773
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 67.70%
Los Angeles County population change.38%
1.6770 X 1.0038=1.683373 X 1.683373
2011-2012 Appropriation Limit 626,951,691
H. 2012-2013 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2011-2012 Appropriation Limit 626,951,691
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 62.40%
Los Angeles County population change .38%
1.6240 X 1.0038=1.630171 X 1.630171
2012-2013 Appropriation Umit 1,022,038,465
JJ. 2013-2014 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2012.2013 Appropriation Limit 1,022,039,465
Increase In Nonresidential Construction -6.51%
Los Angeles County population change .69%
0.9349 X 1.0069 = 0.941351 X 0.941351
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit 962,096,932
EXHIBIT "A"
A-6
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
KK. 2014-2015 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 2.00%
Las Angeles County population change.78%
1.0200 X 1-0078 = 1.027956
2014-2015 Appropriation Limit
EXHIBIT "A"
A-7
Page 7 of 7
962,096,932
1.027956
988,993,313
TRANSMITTAL COMMUNICATION
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 25, 2014
TO: William Fox, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Masami Higa, Assistant Finance Director
Joaquin Leon, Deputy City Treasurer
FROM: Deborah Juarez, Records Management Assistant (/
RE: Resolution No. 2014-31 — A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Adopting
an Appropriation Limit for the 2014 — 2015 Fiscal Year, Pursuant to Government Code
Section 7910
Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2014-31 referenced above, which was approved by the
City Council on June 17, 2014.
Thank you.
Attachment
c: Resolution No. 2014-31
STAFF REPORT
RECEIVED
JUN 11 2014
CITY ADMINISTRATION
JUN 112014 STAFF REPORT
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Finance Department
DATE: June 17, 2014
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William Fox, Finance Director
RE: Recommendation for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Appropriation Limit
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:
Find that adoption of the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Appropriation Limit proposed in this
staff report is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in
accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects
that may have an effect on the environment.
2. Establish the City's Appropriation Limit for the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 in the amount of
$988,993,313 based on the percentage growth in the State Per Capita Personal Income
and County Population.
Background
California voters approved an initiative on November 6, 1979 that added Article XIIIB to the
State Constitution. The provisions of this article place limits on the amount of revenue that can
be appropriated by all entities of government. This State Appropriation Limit is often referred to
as the Gann Limit, after Paul Gann, the author of the measure placing the limit in the State
constitution. The Appropriation Limit is based on actual appropriations during the 1978-1979
fiscal years, as increased each year using specified population and inflationary growth factors.
The original legislation implementing the provisions of Article XIIIB became effective January
1, 1981. In accordance with that legislation, the governing body of each government jurisdiction
must, by resolution, establish its annual Appropriation Limit for the coming year at a regularly
scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting.
The original Article XIIIB (Proposition 4) and its implementing legislation, Chapter 1205/80,
was modified in June 1990 by Proposition 1 I 1 and SB 88 (Chapter 60/90). Significant changes
imposed by Proposition 111 include the following:
• The provision of a choice in methodologies for determining the annual inflation factor
between (1) growth in California per capita income, or (2) growth in non-residential
assessed valuation due to new construction within the City.
• The provision of a choice in methodologies for determining the annual population growth
factor between (1) City population growth, or (2) County population growth.
• Regulations allowing the exclusion of "qualified capital outlay" expenditures from
calculation of the Limit.
• Provision of a process for avoiding tax refunds if a city falls sufficiently below the Limit
in the next fiscal year. The revised language provides two years, beyond the second year,
to refund any remaining excess during which jurisdictions can seek to obtain a successful
override vote.
As a result of Proposition 111, the City is required to choose between two annual inflation
factors and two population factors.
The choice offered for the annual inflation factor is (1) the growth in California per capita
income or (2) the growth in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction
within the City.
The choice offered for the annual population growth factor is (1) the growth in City or (2)
County population.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the non-residential assessed valuation due to
new construction as its annual inflation factor and the County's population growth as its annual
population growth factors for the past eight (8) years.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the State per capita personal income as its
annual inflation factor and the County's population growth as its annual population growth
factors for Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
When the City prepares its annual budget each year, the appropriations subject to the
Appropriation Limit is typically well below the Appropriation Limit as shown below:
Fiscal Year
Appropriation Limit
Appropriation Subject to
the Limit
Amount Under Limit
2006-2007
$228 million
$44 million
$184 million
2007-2008
$251 million
$50 million
$201 million
2008-2009
$283 million
$77 million
$206 million
2009-2010
$304 million
$48 million
$256 million
2010-2011
$372 million
$41 million
$331 million
2011-2012
$627 million
$62 million
$565 million
2012-2013
$1,022 million
$47 million
$975 million
2013-2014
$962 million
$55 million
$907 million
2014-2015
$989 million
$52 million
$937 million
Over the last nine (9) years, and including 2014-2015, the City's appropriations subject to the
Appropriation Limit have remained well below the Appropriation Limit. Given the size of this
gap, it is unlikely that the City will exceed the Appropriation Limit in the upcoming years
without significant changes to the City's tax structure.
The notice indicating the documentation used in the determination of the appropriation limit
provided herewith was posted on the City's website on June 5, 2014 and is available for public
inspection.
Fiscal Imaact
There is no fiscal impact since the City continues to remain below the Appropriation Limit.
Attachment 1: Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Appropriation Limit Calculation
Attachment 2: Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Alternative Adjustment Factors
Attachment 1
City of Vernon
Fiscal Year 2014-2015
Appropriation Limit Calculation
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
2014-2015 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 2.00%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.0200 X 1.0078 = 1.027956
2014.2015 Appropriation Limit
Page 1 of 1
962,096,932
X 1.027956
988,993,313
Attachment 2
City of Vernon
Fiscal Year 2014-2015
Alternative Adjustment Factors
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Under Proposition 111, there are two options available for each of the major adjustment factors.
The values of these factors for the purpose of calculating the Gann Limit are as follows:
Price Factors:
(A) Percent growth in State per Capita Personal Income:
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Price Factor A
(B) Percent change in Assessed Valuation in new
non-residential construction
(Source: Los Angeles County Assessor's office)
Price Factor B
Population Factors:
(C) Percentage growth in County Population
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Population Factor C
(D) Percent growth in City Population
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Population Factor D
Annual Adiustment Factors
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
5.6%
4.1%
2.0%
1.0210
1.0420
1.0420
62.40
-6.51
-56.74
1.6240
0.9349
0.4326
6.38
0.69
0.78
1.0038
1.0069
1.0078
0.00
0.83
0.83
1.0000
1.0083
1.0083
Based upon the actual data, the four alternative adjustment factors are as follows:
A x C 1.024880 1.049190 1.050128
A x D 1.021000 1.050649 1.050649
B x C 1.630172 0.941351 0.435974
B x D 1.624000 0.942660 0.436192
PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME a/
United
California
California
% Change
States
% Change
% of U.S.
1929
$
992
--
$
697
142.3%
1930.
$
887
-10.6%
$
618
-11.3%
143.5%
1931
$
750
-15.4%
$
525
-15.0%
142.9%
1932
$
581
-22.5%
$
398
-24.2%
146.0%
1933
$
546
-6.0%
$
372
-6.5%
146.8%
1934
$
602
10.3%
$
424
14.0%
142.0%
1935
$
661
9.8%
$
473
11.6%
139.7%
1936
$
771
16.6%
$
535
13.1%
144.1%
1937
$
796
3.2%
$
574
7.3%
138.7%
1938
$
772
-3.0%
$
526
-8.4%
146.8%
1939
$
782
1.3%
$
556
5.7%
140.6%
1940
$
845
8.1 %
$
593
6.7%
142.5%
1941
$
1,013
19.9%
$
717
20.9%
141.3%
1942
$
1.284
26.8%
$
908
26.6%
141.4%
1943
$
1,548
20.6%
$
1,106
21.8%
140.0%
1944
$
1,582
2.2%
$
1,194
8.0%
132.5%
1945
$
1,582
0.0%
$
1,235
3.4%
128.1%
1946
$
1,663
5.1%
$
1,254
1.5%
132.6%
1947
$
1,682
1.1%
$
1,317
5.0%
127.7%
1948
$
1,753
4.2%
$
1,425
8.2%
123.0%
1949
$
1,736
-1.0%
$
1,382
-3.0%
125.6%
1950
$
1,871
7.8%
$
1,503
8.8%
124.5%
1951
$
2,078
11.1%
$
1,667
10.9%
124.7%
1952
$
2,206
6.2%
$
1,751
5.0%
126.0%
1953
$
2,248
1.9%
$
1,826
4.3%
123.1%
1954
$
2,227
-0.9%
$
1,810
-0.9%
123.0%
1955
$
2,380
6.9%
$
1,906
5.3%
124.9%
1956
$
2.497
4.9%
$
2,013
5.6%
124.0%
1957
$
2,579
3.3%
$
2,087
3.7%
123.6%
1958
$
2.597
0.7%
$
2.108
1.0%
123.2%
1959
$
2,739
5.5%
$
2,206
4.6%
124.2%
1960
$
2,822
3.0%
$
2,268
2.8%
124.4%
1961
$
2,878
2.0%
$
2,326
2.6%
123.7%
1962
$
3,002
4.3%
$
2,439
4.9%
123.1%
1963
$
3.100
3.3%
$
2,526
3.6%
122.7%
1964
$
3,273
5.6%
$
2,671
5.7%
122.5%
1965
$
3,410
4.2%
$
2,849
6.7%
119.7%
1966
$
3,653
7.1%
$
3,061
7.4%
119.3%
1967
$
3,870
5.9%
$
3,253
6.3%
119.0%
1968
$
4,196
8.4%
$
3,536
8.7%
118.7%
1969
$
4,532
8.0%
$
3,836
8.5%
118.1%
1970
$
4,801
5.9%
$
4,084
6.5%
117.6%
1971
$
5,027
4.7%
$
4,340
6.3%
115.8%
1972
$
5,451
8.4%
$
4,717
8.7%
115.6%
1973
$
5,944
9.0%
$
5,230
10.9%
113.7%
1974
$
6,557
10.3%
$
5,708
9.1%
114.9%
1975
$
7,136
8.8%
$
6,172
8.1%
115.6%
1976
$
7,835
9.8%
$
6,754
9.4%
116.0%
1977
$
8,572
9.4%
$
7,402
9.6%
115.8%
1978
$
9,572
11.7%
$
8,243
11.4%
116.1%
1oft
PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME a/
United
California
California
% Chance
States
% Chance
% of U.S.
1979
$
10,719
12.0%
$
9,138
10.9%
117.3%
1980
$
11,928
11.3%
$
10,091
10.4%
118.2%
1981
$
13,144
10.2%
$
11,209
11.1%
117.3%
1982
$
13,742
4.5%
$
11,901
6.2%
115.5%
1983
$
14,517
5.6%
$
12,583
5.7%
115.4%
1984
$
15,913
9.6%
$
13,807
9.7%
115.3%
1985
$
16,777
5.4%
$
14,637
6.0%
114.6%
1986
$
17,526
4.5%
$
15,338
4.8%
114.3%
1987
$
18,447
5.3%
$
16,137
5.2%
114.3%
1988
$
19,515
5.8%
$
17,244
6.9%
113.2%
1989
b/ $
20,448
4.8%
$
18,402
6.7%
111.1%
1990
$
21,380
4.6%
$
19,354
5.2%
110.5%
1991
$
21,734
1.7%
$
19,818
2.4%
109.7%
1992
$
22,439
3.2%
$
20,799
5.0%
107.9%
1993
$
22,744
1.4%
$
21,385
2.8%
106.4%
1994
c/ $
23,448
3.1%
$
22,297
4.3%
105.2%
1995
$
24,498
4.5%
$
23,262
4.3%
105.3%
1996
$
25,788
5.3%
$
24,442
5.1%
105.5%
1997
$
27,063
4.9%
$
25,654
5.0%
105.5%
1998
$
29,195
7.9%
$
27,258
6.3%
107.1 %
1999
$
30,679
5.1%
$
28,333
3.9%
108.3%
2000
$
33,404
8.9%
$
30,319
7.0%
110.2%
2001
$
34,063
2.0%
$
31,524
4.0%
108.1%
2002
$
34,222
0.5%
$
31,798
0.9%
107.6%
2003
$
35,298
3.1%
$
32,676
2.8%
108.0%
2004
$
37,150
5.2%
$
34,300
5.0%
108.3%
2005
$
38,969
4.9%
$
35,888
4.6%
108.6%
2006
$
41,627
6.8%
$
38,127
6.2%
109.2%
2007
$
43,157
3.7%
$
39.804
4.4%
108.4%
2008
$
43,609
1.0%
$
40,873
2.7%
106.7%
2009
$
41,569
-4.7%
$
39,357
-3.7%
105.6%
2010
$
42,297
1.8%
$
40,163
2.0%
105.3%
2011
$
44,666
5.6%
$
42,298
5.3%
105.6%
2012
$
46,477
4.1%
$
43,735
3.4%
106.3%
2013
$
47,401
2.0%
$
44,543
1.8%
106.4%
a/ Estimates for 2001 forward reflect the results of the comprehensive revision to the national
income and product accounts (NIPAs) released in July 2013. This will create a temporary break
in the time series for earlier years. Revised annual estimates back to 1929 will be released in the
b/ Reflects Loma Prieta earthquake.
c/ Reflects Northridge earthquake.
Note: Omits income of government employees overseas.
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, http://www.bea.gov/
Last updated: March 25, 2014; new estimates for 2013.
Filename: bbpcpi
2of2
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR
;F
500VVEST TEMPLE STREET
A.S_.$ESSO[t
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 00012-2770
y.(JOV
8S.S1.888,
uk5o elp5
1.080.SOZ211'I
07.21
SANTOS H. KREIMANN
C14000PUiYA$SESSOR
GEORGE RENKEI
P851$I?,IiA$$E60pR
SHARON HOLLER
AMSIAWASSESOOR
May 12, 2014
Ms. Masami Higa
Assistant Finance Director
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Ave.
Vernon, CA 90058
Dear Ms. Higa:
Your agency, the City of Vernon, in order to effect an adjustment of its Gann Limit,
has requested that the Assessor's Office supply the percentage change in total
assessed valuation for the city over that of the preceding year, due to nonresidential
new construction.
For the City of Vernon, the 2013-2014 net change in nonresidential new
construction, applicable to the 2014-2015 budget, is-56.74%.
If we can be of further service, please call Kevin Quon at (213) 974-5154.
Sincerely,
4I M/
Kevin Quon
Appraiser
Business Solutions
Enclosures
x
O
W
(n
(n
a
W
2
LL
W
U
LL
O
(n
W
J
W
Z
a
(n
O
LL
O
}
z
D
Q
• M
OI
NV
0
NN ' of
N N
o
00'1
w
N
O
0
np
N
O tD
V
N
e
OD
O
O
tff
0
0 �
• N
• W
N
O
N
t�l
N
t+yy1 ggo
N
• •j
W
y�
6/i
w
•
W
M
N
a
qq
A
�
M
• N
O
'Nd'
O
• w
M
O
w
O
w
ai
t0
ao
M
N
00
v
a0
b
w
N
w
yPa
w
Yr
II
N
t0
Gp
co
'
act
Nm
vIl
60N
N
/A
G
a
C
w
w
rx�
3
w
co
O
w
w
44
r ONi
m o
W
m
~
w
0
�.
c
a.
y
o
c
L
IL
C7 w
w
E
c
O
U.
0 ii
Z
ea7
_?
—
O
3, t
O
•
O
'7
C
y
GO
w
ar
o M.
Z
O
m
II
Q
U
Q
U
o
o
•
•+
c
to
Q
o 0
�
�
d'
EO
Z M
Q Q
t0
>
N
O
to
«
y
>
y
>
2
n
r
: u
•
c
O
y
Q
C
i�
c
O V
i0
• :
U
N
:
y • d
'
^
0
N 0
u
?
y�
1�
{y�
�Lp
m
of w
E
,,
Z
LL
iL
C e
u
C C
vyJ
d
L
e
m d
, n1
4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vemon, CaRfornfa 90058
Telephone (323) 583-8811
May 12, 2014
Tia Nguyen
Appraiser Specialist
Statistical Support
Los Angeles County Assessor
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California 90012-2770
Dear Ms. Nguyen,
The City of Vernon, in order to effect an adjustment of its Gann Limit, request that the Assassoes
Office supply the percentage change in total assessed valuation for the city over the preceding year,
due to nonresidential new construction (2013-2014 net change applicable to the 2014-2015 budget).
If you have any questions, please call Masami Higa at (323) 583.8811 Ext. 254.
Sincerely,
Masamt Higa
Assistant Finance Directo
EVillisiveo IndustAdt
ENT Op
�aA A
Q ti
w 111 n
o �
{�. DEPARTMENT OF EDMUNO 0. 9ROWN JR. • GOVERNOR
��,,�---FINANCE 9T4TE CAPITOL \ ROOM 1149 R BACRAMGNTD CA Z 95B 14-499a IIIWWW.00f.C4.ROV
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
May 2014
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
The California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 2227, mandates the Department of Finance
(Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments.
Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2014,
in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations
limit for fiscal year 2014-15. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal
income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to
calculate the 2014-15 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides city and unincorporated county
population percentage change. Attachment C provides population percentage change for
counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes
federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and
Taxation Code section 2228 for further information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XIII
B, section 9(C), of the State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations
limit calculation mandate. The Code and the California Constitution can be accessed at the
following website: htto://leainfo.legislature.ca.ciov/facesicodes.xhtmi.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation
as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this issue should be referred
to their respective county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself. No
state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation
Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that
exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify
the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2014.
Please Note: Prior year's city population estimates may be revised.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at
(916) 323-4086,
MICHAEL COHEN
Director
By:
KEELY M. BOSLER
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
May 2014
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living
factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost
of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage
change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used
in setting the fiscal year 2014-15 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2014-15 -0.23
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2014-15
appropriation limit.
2014-15:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = -0.23 percent
Population Change = 0.95 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio:
Population converted to a ratio:
Calculation of factor for FY 2014-15:
-0.23 + 100 = 0.9977
100
0.95 + 100 = 1.0095
100
0.9977 x 1.0095 = 1.0072
Fiscal Year 2014-15
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions`
January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014 and Total Population, January 1, 2014
Total
County Percent Change - Population Minus Exclusions Population
City 2013-2014 1-1.13 1-1-14 1-1-2014
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills
0.47
20,528
20,625
20,625
Alhambra
0.48
84.290
84,697
84,897
Arcadia
1.05
56,901
57,500
57,500
Artesia
0.51
16,606
10,690
16,776
Avalon
0.55
3,799
3,820
3,820
Azusa
1.62
47,614
48,385
46,385
Baldwin Park
0.46
76.362
76,715
76,715
Bell
0.47
35,804
35,972
35,972
BeliBower
0.53
77,330
77,741
77,741
Bell Gardens
0.48
42,463
42,667
42.667
Beverly Hills
0.47
34,515
34.677
34,677
Bradbury
0.74
1,074
1,082
1,082
Burbank
0.47
105,045
105,543
105,543
Calabasas
0.53
23.816
23,943
23,943
Carson
0.42
92,251
92,636
92,636
Cerritos
0.47
49,506
49,741
49,741
Claremont
0.42
35,768
35,920
35,920
Commerce
0.47
12,942
13,003
13,003
Compton
0.49
97,608
98,082
98,082
Covina
0.48
48.387
48.619
48.619
Cudahy
0.47
24,028
24,142
24.142
Culver City
0.88
39.233
39,579
39,579
Diamond Bar
0.48
56,133
56,400
56,400
Downey
0.47
112,829
113,363
113,363
Duarte
0.47
21,587
21,668
21,668
El Monte
0.49
114,503
115,064
115,064
ElSegundo
0.49
16,815
16.897
16,897
Gardena
0.81
59.602
60,082
60,082
Glendale
1.05
193,769
195,799
196,799
Glendora
1.17
50,697
51,290
51,290
Hawaiian Gardens
0.50
14,384
14,456
14,456
Hawthorne
1.31
85,526
86,644
86,644
Hermosa Beach
0.43
19,666
19,750
19,750
Hidden Hills
0.64
1,889
1,901
1,901
Huntington Park
0.63
58,661
59,033
59,033
Industry
0.23
437
438
438
Inglewood
0.50
1.11,238
111.795
111,795
Irwindale
0.76
1,455
1,466
1,466
La Canada Flinbidge
0.41
20,452
20,535
20,535
`Exclusions Include residents on federal military Installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2014-15
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions"
January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014 and Total Population, January 1, 2014
Total
County Percent Change - Population Minus Exclusions - Population
City 2013-2014 1.1-13 1-1-14 1-0d014
Los Angeles (Continued)
La Habra Heights
0.69
5,383
5,420
5,420
Lakewood
0.49
80,830
81,224
81,224
La Mirada
0.45
48,958
49,178
49.178
Lancaster
0.78
153.809
155,012
159,878
La Puente
0.58
40,245
40,478
40,478
La Verne
0.53
32,059
32,228
32,228
Lawndale
0.46
33,077
33,228
33,228
Lomita
0.50
20,528
20.630
20,630
Long Beach
0.51
467,817
470,184
470,292
Los Angeles
1.00
3,863,013
3,901,605
3,904,657
Lynwood
0.42
70.685
70,980
70,980
Malibu
0,71
12,774
12,865
12,865
Manhattan Beach
0.49
35.445
35,619
35,619
Maywood
0.47
27,627
27,758
27,758
Monrovia
0.53
36,966
37,162
37,162
Montebello
0.48
03.222
63,527
63,527
Monterey Park
0.48
61,482
61,777
- 61,777
Norwalk
0.42
105,501
105,948
106.630
Palmdale
0.66
154,629
155,657
155,657
Palos Verdes Estates
0.50
13,597
13,665
13,665
Paramount
0.72
54,657
65.051
55,051
Pasadena
0.55
140,102
140,879
140,879
Pico Rivera
0.47
63,572
63,873
63,873
Pomona
0.53
150,814
151,611
161,713
Rancho Palos Verdes
0.52
42,121
42,341
42.358
Redondo Beach
0.42
67,437
67,717
67,717
Rolling Hills
0.48
1,866
1,895
1,895
Rolling Hills Estates
0.48
8,145
8,184
8,184
Rosemead
0.49
54,497
54,762
54,762
San Dimas
1.09
33.706
34,072
34,072
San Fernando
0.54
24.093
24,222
24,222
San Gabriel
0.34
40,178
40,313
40,313
San Marino
0.66
13,254
13,341
13,341
Santa Clarita
1.98
205.075
209,130
209.130
Santa Fe Springs
3.12
16,781
17.304
17,349
Santa Monica
1.20
91,094
92,186
92,185
Sierra Madre
0.58
11,030
11,094
11.094
Signal Hill
1.65
11,226
11,411
11,411
South El Monte
0.50
20,325
20,426
20,428
South Gale
0.93
95,173
96,057
96,057
South Pasadena
0.53
25,874
26,011
26,011
-Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, stale and
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2014-15
Attachment 6
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions"
January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014 and Total Population, January 1, 2014
Total
County
Percent Change
- Population Minus
Exclusions -
Population
City
2013.2014
14.13
1.1-14
1-1-2014
Los Angeles (Continued)
Temple City
0.44
35,974
36,134
36,134
Torrance
0.52
146,949
147.706
147.706
Vernon
0.83
121
122
122
Walnut
0.49
29,966
30,112
30,112
West Covina
0.48
107,313
107.828
107,828
West Hollywood
0.56
34,875
35,072
35,072
Westlake village
0.47
8,347
8,386
8,386
Whittier
0.46
86,144
86.538
86.538
Unincorporated
0.54
1,039,757
1,045,382
1,046,557
County Total
0.78
9,953,626
10,031,664
10.041,797
"Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
c/�(_, �eIi7-/l
City of Vernon
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
(323) 583-8811
The City Council of the City of Vernon will conduct four (4) public hearings, which you may
attend.
PLACE: Vernon City Hall
City Council Chambers
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
DATE & Tuesday, June 17, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
TIME: (or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard)
SUBJECTS: Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2014-2015:
1) Proposed City -Wide Budget
2) Gann Governmental Appropriation Limit
3) General Fee Schedule for Services Provided by City
4) Adjustments to Retail Electric Rates
REQUEST: All parties are invited to be present and to submit statements orally or in
writing before or during the applicable public hearing(s).
REVIEW OF Subject documents are available for inspection by the public at
THE FILE: Vernon City Hall, City Clerk Department, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon,
California 90058, Monday thru Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and on
the City's website at: http•//www cityofvemon.org/govemmg t/public-
meetings/city-council.
PROPOSED Staff plans to recommend that the Vernon City Council determine that
CEQA the proposals will not have a significant effect on the environment and are
FINDING: exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
If you desire to challenge the actions taken by the City Council or any portion thereof in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
applicable hearings described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of
Vernon during, or before, the hearing.
Each of the hearings may be continued or adjourned or cancelled and rescheduled to a
stated time and place without further official public notice of thSAublic hearings.
Dated: O3zli
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
,x!atrrat (f)-rou t
The Only All Hispanic Owned Chain of Bilingual Newspapers
111 S. Avenue 59, Los Angeles, CA 90042-4211
Ph 323.341-7970 • Fax 323.341-7976 • www.egpnews.com
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the County aforementioned; I am over the age
of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested
in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk of the printer of
EASTERN GROUP PUBLICATIONS'
EASTSIDE SUN, MEXICAN AMERICAN SUN,
NORTHEAST SUN, BELL GARDENS SUN,
VERNON SUN, COMMERCE COMET,
CITY TERRACE COMET, MONTEBELLO COMET,
MONTEREY PARK COMET,
E.L.A. BROOKLYN BELVEDERE COMET
AND WYVERNWOOD CHRONICLE,
newspapers of general circulation, printed
and published THURSDAYS in the County of
Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been
adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by
the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles,
State of California, under the
date of JUNE 21. 1966.
CASE NUMBER 884861;
that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has
been published in each regular and entire issue
of said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to -wit:
JUNE 05 & 12,
all in the year 2014.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at LOS ANGELES, California,
this 12thday of JUNE, 2014.
CITY OF VERNON
Proof of Publication of
City of Vernon
Notice of Public Hearings
Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2014-
2015 — 1) Proposed City -Wide Budget: 2) Gann
Governmental Appropriation Limit: 3) General
Fee Schedule for Services Provided by City:
and 4) Adjustments to Retail Electric Rates
Signature