Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Resolution No. 2015-015 (2)
Volume 2 Sup ental E ronmer (S Clearinghouse No. 20 fy of Vernon cused General Pla December 2014 tal Impa JJ61031) nd Zoni I. IIII �1 _ r_ m .. Report nce Update Lead Agency: City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Appendix A Notice of Preparation/Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank DRAFT INITIAL STUDY City of Vernon Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update September 12, 2012 Lead Agency: City of Vernon Department of Community Services & Water 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Consultant to the Lead Agency: Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 630 North Rosemead Boulevard, Suite 150 Pasadena, CA 91107 Hogle-Ireland Planning & Development Consulting - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - Table of Contents 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................1 2 Project Description...............................................................................................3 2.1 - Project Title..............................................................................................3 2.2 - Lead Agency Name and Address..................................................................3 2.3 - Contact Person and Phone Number..............................................................3 2.4 - Project Location.........................................................................................3 2.5 - Project Sponsor's Name and Address...........................................................3 2.6 - General Plan Land Use Designation..............................................................3 2.7 - Zoning District..........................................................................................3 2.8 - Project Description.....................................................................................3 2.9 - Project Objectives......................................................................................8 2.10 - Surrounding Land Uses..............................................................................8 2.11 - Environmental Setting................................................................................9 2.12 - Required Approvals....................................................................................9 2.13 - Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required ...................................... 10 Assumptions...................................................................................................... 10 3 Determination ....................................................................................................19 3.1 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .................................................. 19 3.2 - Determination......................................................................................... 19 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts.................................................................21 4.1 - Aesthetics............................................................................................... 21 4.2 - Agriculture and Forest Resources.............................................................. 23 4.3 - Air Quality.............................................................................................. 25 4.4 - Biological Resources................................................................................ 27 4.5 - Cultural Resources................................................................................... 29 4.6 - Geology and Soils.................................................................................... 31 4.7 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions....................................................................... 35 4.8 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................. 36 4.9 - Hydrology and Water Quality.................................................................... 38 4.10 - Land Use and Planning............................................................................. 42 4.11 - Mineral Resources....................................................................................44 4.12 - Noise..................................................................................................... 45 4.13 - Population and Housing............................................................................ 47 4.14 - Public Services........................................................................................ 49 4.15 - Recreation.............................................................................................. 51 4.16 - Transportation and Traffic......................................................................... 52 4.17 - Utilities and Service Systems.................................................................... 55 4.18 - Mandatory Findings of Significance............................................................ 58 5 References........................................................................................................61 5.1 - List of Preparers...................................................................................... 61 Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update Table of Contents List of Exhibits Exhibit 1: Regional Context and Vicinity Map ......................................................... 11 Exhibit 2: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map ..................................................... 13 Exhibit 3: Proposed Zoning Map........................................................................... 15 Exhibit 4: Proposed Housing Sites........................................................................ 17 Initial Study 1 Introduction The City of Vernon (Lead Agency) adopted comprehensive updates to the City of Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance on December 3, 2007. The General Plan is a comprehensive, long- range plan that guides decisions relating to land use, transportation, housing, public safety, use of open space and natural resources, parks and recreation, and noise in the community. The Zoning Ordinance implements the land use policies contained in the General Plan. In conjunction with approval of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance in 2007, the Vernon City Council certified a Final Program Environmental Impact Report (General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. [SCH] 2007061031), which evaluated, at a program level of analysis, the environmental consequences of long-term implementation General Plan. The Program EIR also examined alternatives to the project and recommended mitigation measures that would reduce or avoid the project's significant impacts. The General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR found that the project would result in the following significant impacts that could not be fully mitigated: traffic on local surface streets and freeways (at both the project level and on a cumulative basis), cumulative air quality impacts cumulative utilities impacts The City of Vernon has prepared this Initial Study for use in determining whether the impacts associated with the currently proposed General Plan Amendments, Zoning Ordinance Amendments, and Zoning Map changes (collectively referred to as the "project" or "Proposed Focused Update") were addressed in the 2007 General Plan EIR. Based on the analysis contained in this Initial Study, the City will determine whether a subsequent or supplemental EIR - or no further review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (Government Code § 15000 et seq.) — is required. Under CEQA, a subsequent or supplemental EIR to a previously certified EIR is required if one or more of the following circumstances arises: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions in the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects (CEQA Guidelines, § 15162, subd. (a)(1)); (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects (CEQA Guidelines, § 15162, subd. [a][2]); or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: (a) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; (b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 2 Introduction (d) Mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative (CEQA Guidelines, §15162, subd. (3)(a)-(d), see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21166). The lead agency may choose to prepare a supplement to an EIR rather than a subsequent EIR if: (1) Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and (2) Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation (CEQA Guidelines, § 15163). The 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR is available for review at the City of Vernon Community Services and Water Department, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058. This Initial Study concludes that a Supplemental EIR to the Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR is required for the Proposed Focused Update. Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the proposed project in the changed situation, as only very limited land use changes are proposed. 2 Initial Study 2 Proiect Description 2.1 - Project Title City of Vernon Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 2.2 - Lead Agency Name and Address City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 2.3 - Contact Person and Phone Number S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services and Water (323)583-8811 2.4 - Project Location The project applies to all parcels within the City of Vernon and the City's sphere of influence. Vernon is located in the central portion of Los Angeles County, directly south of downtown Los Angeles. Vernon is adjacent to the cities of Los Angeles, Huntington Park, Maywood, and Commerce. The City's planning area encompasses approximately 5.2 square miles. Exhibit 1 (Regional Location and Vicinity Map) illustrates the Vernon's location within Los Angeles County and its local context. 2.5 - Project Sponsor's Name and Address City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 2.6 - General Plan Land Use Designation Industrial with various overlays (see Exhibit 2) 2.7 - Zoning District Industrial with various overlays (see Exhibit 3) 2.8 - Project Description The City of Vernon adopted a comprehensive update to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance in 2007. A Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) was prepared at the time and certified by the Vernon City Council. In the past, the City has adopted and implemented land use policy that allowed for very limited housing in Vernon (restricted to existing residences) due to the unique and ubiquitous industrial nature of the City. However, in 2011 the City Council committed to implementing new good governance practices that included adopting land use policies aimed at increasing the voting populous. Specifically, the City has determined that additional properties Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 3 2 Project Description could be designated for residential use and has identified specific locations where new housing development would be permitted to occur. The City has drafted land use policies and zoning regulations that would allow such development to occur. The proposed project consists of several components: • Housing Element Update (2014-2021) to comply with State Housing Element law regarding timely updates and to include information on potential housing sites in the City by revising existing land -use policy which prohibited new housing. The Housing Element identifies two sites where residential housing could be permitted and one site where an emergency shelter could be permitted. • Update to the Land Use Element to introduce new Overlays: Housing and Emergency Shelter. • Update to the Land Use Element to expand commercial and trucking uses: Land Use Element policies regarding commercial and trucking and freight uses have been revised to expand where these uses can be established in the City. • Update the Resources, Safety, and Noise Elements to comply with recently passed State laws and update pertinent information. • Update the Implementation Plan (Appendix A) with new applicable policies related to the above revised policy changes. • Revise the Zoning Ordinance to create implementing zoning overlays for new General Plan land use designation overlays and/or policies —Housing, Emergency Shelter, Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay —and to expand the area to which the Commercial Overlay applies. Additional clean-up items which do not affect the policy direction of the Zoning Ordinance are also included in this project. • Potential housing project at 4675 52nd Drive. The City has received multiple proposals for a residential development at this location. The potential of locating new housing at this location is reviewed in this Initial Study. Each of these components is discussed in more detail below. For the purposes of this Initial Study, the focused update to the Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, including the potential housing project at 4675 52nd Drive, is collectively referred to as "the project" and "the Proposed Focused Update." The "planning area" is the area to which the project applies; this includes all parcels within the City of Vernon and its sphere of influence. Update to General Plan Elements Housing Element The Vernon 2014-2021 Housing Element meets the very specific requirements of state law regarding the content of housing elements (Government Code, Section 65580 et seq.). State law requires that the Housing Element be updated at least every eight years, on a timeline consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan, unless extended by the legislature. Article 10.6, Section 65580-65589.8, Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code sets forth the legal requirements for a housing element and encourages the provision of affordable and decent housing in suitable living environments for all communities to meet statewide goals. The 2014- 2021 Housing Element update is a policy document by the City of Vernon regarding its current 4 Initial Study 2 Project Description and projected future housing needs (as identified by the State Housing and Community Development Department, or HCD) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the City's goals, policies, and programs to address those identified needs. Specifically, the element details: ■ Population characteristics and trends ■ Employment characteristics ■ The types of households in Vernon ■ Special needs populations ■ Housing characteristics and trends • Constraints on the development of new housing ■ Housing resources (available vacant and underutilized sites, financial resources) ■ How the City will work to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation assigned by SCAG and otherwise achieve housing goals Given Vernon's status as an industrial city, the Housing Element has, in the past, promulgated the policy that no new housing will be constructed in Vernon due to the safety risks posed by the multitude of industries operating there, including many that involve the use, transport, and production of hazardous wastes. This 2014-20214 Housing Element revises that policy and identifies two potential sites for housing development that have been deemed most suitable. One of these sites is designated with a Housing Overlay in the Land Use Element. The Housing Element also addresses new State laws, including SB 2 (codified as Government Code Section 65583[a][4]), which requires jurisdictions to identify a zone in which to permit emergency (homeless) shelters by right. The Housing Element identifies an area designated with an Emergency Shelter Overlay in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. See Exhibit 4 for locations of both potential housing and emergency shelter sites. Additional updates include new U.S. Census information and information to comply with SB 812 related to persons with developmental disabilities. The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) will review the draft element to determine whether it meets the requirements of state law. Land Use Element The Land Use Element identifies the physical form of Vernon and how land will be used over the long term. This element sets forth the location, type, and intensity uses, and also establishes the desired mix and relationship between uses. Land use designations identify the types and nature of development permitted throughout the planning area. The goals and policies contained in this element provide the foundation for maintaining Vernon as a regional manufacturing and industrial center, while allowing for some commercial uses and public facilities. These policies were retained in this Proposed Focused Update. In recognition of Vernon's unique status as an exclusively industrial city, the 2007 General Plan established a single land use category (Industrial) and three overlay districts: Commercial, Rendering, and Slaughtering. The Focused Update proposes to expand the area to which the Commercial Overlay applies. Also, regulations will permit ancillary commercial uses throughout the City on weekends, to be implemented by the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, two new overlay districts are proposed to be added: the Housing Overlay and the Emergency Shelter Overlay. Each of these overlay districts apply to one specific site within the City, respectively, that has been identified as most suitable for these uses. The Housing Overlay would permit up to an additional 60 units in the City of Vernon. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 5 2 Project Description Housing Overlay District The Housing Overlay District is proposed to apply to one vacant parcel located on the east side of the City. The Housing Overlay District is applicable only to sites that have been specifically identified by the City and determined to be the best locations for housing, given surrounding uses, proximity to services and amenities, and distance from safety hazards. Residential uses are permitted in this district with a Conditional Use Permit or other discretionary review, such as a Development Agreement, given the unique safety constraints in Vernon. Emergency Shelter Overlay District The Emergency Shelter Overlay District is proposed to apply to a single vacant parcel located in the northwest corner of the City. The Emergency Shelter Overlay District is applicable only to sites that have been specifically identified by the City and determined to be appropriate locations for emergency shelters. This District is intended to comply with requirements of Government Code Section 65583(a)(4), as discussed in the Housing Element. Safety Element The Safety Element establishes policies to protect the community from natural and human -caused hazards. The element includes a discussion of those features within or near the planning area that represent a potential danger to buildings/structures, public facilities, and infrastructure. The element establishes goals, policies, and plans to minimize dangers to residents, workers, and visitors associated with seismic hazards, flooding, and hazardous materials. The Safety Element was updated to achieve consistency with new land use and housing policies, and to comply with AB 162, enacted in 2007 and effective in 2009. AB 162 revised multiple sections of the Government Code and requires flood risk management information to be included in the Safety Element. As part of this update, new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood maps were added to the Safety Element. Policies were slightly revised to reflect updated housing policy. The underlying preexisting Safety Element goals remain the same. Resources Element The Resources Element contains goals and policies that encourage conservation and management of both cultural and natural resources, including water resources, open space, energy resources, air quality, historic buildings and sites. The project proposes limited changes associated with the Focused General Plan update for the Resources Element. Specifically, the information related to the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) applicable to the City was updated to reflect information in the most recently adopted UWMP (2010). Additionally, a policy was added related to AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and SB 375 (2008), to consult with regional governmental groups to coordinate land use, circulation, and infrastructure planning. Additional changes were made to achieve consistency regarding the City's housing policy, specifically the policy change to permit housing in very limited locations in the City rather than prohibiting new housing. The underlying preexisting Resources Element goals remain the same. Noise Element The Noise Element focuses on minimizing community noise by identifying its sources and assessing alternative methods to reduce impacts. The element establishes policies to abate noise and reduce the detrimental health effects associated with excessive noise levels. The element identifies noise standards and land use compatibility guidelines to be used in the assessment of development proposals to protect noise -sensitive land uses from excessive noise. 6 Initial Study 2 Project Description The project proposes limited changes to the Noise Element to reflect revised housing policy. The underlying preexisting Noise Element goals remain the same. Implementation Plan The General Plan includes a comprehensive Implementation Plan that provides direction for translating goals and policies to specific actions. The Implementation Plan serves as a basis for making future programming decisions related to the assignment of staff and the expenditure of City funds. The Implementation Plan identifies individual program responsibility, funding sources, and a timeframe for completion. A limited number of new actions were added to the Implementation Plan to correlate with new policies in the General Plan. Update to Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map Updates to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map (Exhibit 3) are largely intended to achieve consistency between the revisions proposed in the Focused General Plan update and the Zoning Ordinance. Additional policy changes include: 1) expanding the Commercial Overlay zone and permitting ancillary commercial on weekends throughout the City, 2) establishing a new Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay District to certain areas of the City, and providing related development standards, and 3) completing minor clean up of language in the Ordinance to facilitate its interpretation. General Plan Consistency and Commercial Overlay Expansion The City prepared revisions to the Zoning Ordinance to achieve consistency with Land Use Element Overlay Districts, goals, policies, and implementation measures specified in the General Plan. These revisions include a new Housing Overlay District and Emergency Shelter Overlay District in both the Zoning Ordinance and the Zoning Map, and related use, development, and site planning standards for these new overlays. Additional changes include revisions to commercial uses policy, as indicated in the General Plan Land Use Element. These changes are reflected in the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance with the revisions to regulations for ancillary commercial uses (permitted on weekends) and expansion of the Commercial Overlay on the Zoning Map. Additional regulations are included for parking and loading standards for different types of commercial uses. Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay Zoning District The City proposes to establish a new Zoning Overlay District. This overlay would correlate to the new Truck and Freight Overlay in the General Plan. The Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay District as proposed is represented in Exhibit 3. Development standards, including site planning standards and allowable uses, are included in the Zoning Ordinance amendments. Whereas truck and freight terminals would not be allowed elsewhere in the City, this amendment proposes to allow these uses, subject to development standards and a Conditional Use Permit, within the new Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay District. Clean Up Items Section 26.2.3, Definitions, of the Zoning Ordinance is proposed to be updated to increase clarity in interpretation and implement the above policy changes. The definitions of community facilities, floor -area ratio, freight terminal, incidental use, retail use, slaughtering, truck terminal, and warehouse use will be updated, and definitions will be added for hazardous waste facility, indoor recycling facility, outdoor recycling facility, solid waste facility, and trade school. Section 26.4.1 - Zones, Permitted Uses, Development Standards, and Site Planning Standards is proposed to be updated with the following changes: 1) additional uses permitted by right were added Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 7 2 Project Description 2) uses permitted with a conditional use permit were added or revised 3) buffer requirements for acutely hazardous materials within 500 feet of a school are added 4) screening of outdoor storage activities modified; clarifications on water usage requirements for conditional use permits 5) interpretations by the Community Services Director regarding measurements and exceptions to standards 6) clarifications on parking access, parking space size, vehicle maneuvering, and street dedication 7) extension of amortization of nonconforming outdoor activities and storage to 2020 8) other minor clarification and typographical changes Proposed Residential Project at 4675 52"d Drive To institute good governance practices, including expansion of the voting population in Vernon, the City has identified a site at 4675 52"d Drive as possibly appropriate for new housing development. This is the only location in the City that is proposed to be designated with the Housing Overlay District as part of the Focused General Plan update. The parcel is owned by the City of Vernon and would be developed by a yet -to -be determined developer, if this project, including General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments, is approved. To meet good governance agreed -upon deadlines for achieving new housing development in Vernon, the City issued a Request for Proposals on April 19, 2012 for development proposals for new housing on this 2.06-acre site. Project proposals were received in July 2012, all proposing exclusively residential use and yielding between 31 and 61 total units. Three development proposals will be considered; these three proposals will provide the framework for environmental analysis in this Initial Study. However, potential unit yield of the three proposed projects to be considered is 35 to 45 units, consistent with the City policy direction for this site. All development proposals include provisions for on -site open space/amenities, buffering (through setbacks) from the adjacent railroad spur, and on -site parking. No permitted activities or approved actions will occur related to any potential residential development on this site until and if General Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments are completed and this CEQA review process has been completed. 2.9 - Project Objectives This update is being pursued so that the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent with State law and consistent with each other, and to provide policy direction for additional housing sites within the City to forward City policy to expand the voting population in Vernon. Other objectives of the General Plan remain unchanged. Specifically, the City's intent is to continue to support the ongoing industrial character of the City, while recognizing the changing industrial environment throughout the United States and globally, and to respond appropriately. 2.10 - Surrounding Land Uses The project applies to all parcels within the City of Vernon and its sphere of influence. Vernon is adjacent to the cities of Los Angeles, Huntington Park, Maywood, and Commerce. Surrounding uses in these cities include residential, commercial, and industrial uses. With regard to proposed General Plan land use changes and related consistency Zoning Map changes, the two new General Plan Overlay Districts are applied to one parcel each. The proposed Housing Overlay site is at the southeast edge of the City, on vacant site. To the south, in the City 8 Initial Study 2 Project Description of Maywood, are residential uses in the form of single-family and multi -family housing. To the west and north are vacant parcels; the Los Angeles River lies farther north. To the east are industrial uses. The Emergency Shelter Overlay District is located near the intersection of Alameda Street and E. 25t" Street, near the Alameda Corridor freight rail line. The site is currently vacant. Surrounding uses include residential, public utility (Alameda Corridor), and wholesale commercial uses. The Commercial Overlay District is proposed to be expanded to include additional parcels along Soto Street, as well as properties on Slauson Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard. Surrounding uses are generally industrial in nature, with a limited number of commercial uses. Additionally, the potential expansion of the Commercial Overlay District would be adjacent to the Maywood Elementary School, located in the adjacent City of Maywood. The Zoning Map has an additional proposed amendment: the Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay District. This overlay would apply to a northern portion of the City, as indicated in Exhibit 3. Surrounding uses are general industrial in nature, as well as rail yards and rail lines. The Los Angeles River borders much of this proposed Overlay District. 2.11 - Environmental Setting The City of Vernon is located in the central portion of Los Angeles County, directly southeast of downtown Los Angeles. V ernon is adjacent to the cities of Los Angeles, Huntington Park, Maywood, and Commerce. Vernon is connected to the regional rail lines via the Alameda Corridor, which is the primary connection between the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach and the rail yards located in Vernon, Commerce, and downtown Los Angeles. A portion of the Hobart Yard, an intermodal facility where large shipping containers are transferred from railroad cars to trucks and vice versa, is also located in Vernon. The corporate limits of the City of Vernon encompass approximately 5.2 square miles, extending generally from Alameda Street and the Alameda Corridor on the west to the I-710 freeway to the east, and the cities of Maywood and Huntington Park on the south and the cities of Los Angeles and Commerce to the north. A portion of unincorporated Los Angeles County is located in the planning area that includes primarily industrial uses and portions of the Los Angeles River. Lands within Vernon largely have been developed with industrial uses since incorporation in 1905. Close to 50,000 employees commute into Vernon daily to work in the 1,200 manufacturing, warehousing, industrial, and transportation -related businesses. As of 2010, Vernon had only 31 residences and a population of 112 persons. 2.12 - Required Approvals • The City Council must approve a General Plan Amendment that incorporates the focused updates into the current General Plan. • The City Council must approve a Zone Text Amendment to create and implement the Housing Overlay, Emergency Shelter Overlay, Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay, and expansion of the Commercial Overlay, as well as other focused amendments to facilitate implementation and ease interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance. • The City Council must approve a Zoning Map Amendment to apply the Housing Overlay, Emergency Shelter Overlay, Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay, and expansion of the Commercial Overlay to the Zoning Map. • The City Council must approve a Development Agreement related to 4675 52nd Drive prior to approval of building permits for a proposed project on this site. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 9 2 Project Description 2.13 - Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required The State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development will review the Housing Element for compliance with State law and indicate whether the adopted Element is consistent with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Government Code). Assumptions The environmental analysis contained in this Initial Study is based on the following assumptions: Project Specific Environmental Review: In the City of Vernon, all development proposals that are considered "projects" under CEQA are subject to an environmental review process to determine the level of impact and to impose appropriate mitigation measures, if needed, to avoid significant impacts. The only potential housing development project which this Initial Study will review is applicable to development at 4675 52"d Drive, where housing is anticipated in the near future. 2. Purpose and Focus of this Initial Study for the Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Environmental Review: Other than providing environmental review for a potential housing development at 4675 52"d Drive, this project would not authorize any plans for construction of new uses, or redevelopment of any properties to produce new uses. The proposed project is an update to existing policy documents. No other direct environmental impacts, besides those discussed for 4675 52"d Drive, therefore, would occur. In addition to assessing impacts related to a potential housing development at 4675 52"d Drive, then, the purpose of the environmental assessment is to determine whether there are any peculiar types of impacts that could occur as an indirect result of the Housing Element strategies and other amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Because the City certified a Program EIR in 2007 for a comprehensive update of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, the analysis in this Initial Study tiers upon this prior Program EIR for the purpose of determining whether a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is required, or an Addendum to the prior Program EIR. 10 Initial Study 2 Project Description Exhibit 1: Regional Context and Vicinity Map 1� 101 Burbank Pasadena Glendale Monrovia Arcadia VI �,ITempleCml !� iwest 101 "1 If Alhambra ; ElMome Holiywaod 1,+ - - - 11 Beverly P i fU ' Hi vliserl -- 'rr Rosemead - - Los Angeles �> I South 1 fell Park : El Monte` Downtown ` Los Angeles Culver -7 -� Montebello, CHy J'Lf,r" Vernon Cont erce 1' Pico -`s•, `• , - APO; Huntington P rk ' Rivera Pa / n- Bill ' r~ 0e11 --- v Gardens.' J wblurer _ Inglewoodh'`� _ Santa Fe 0 �--- South Gate " - -- _ Downey Springs �- Lynwood ' EISegundo awthome -I _ �^ ---- - _ La Mirada _ Gardena Compton lN Norwa L-' - �CarsoB"rl ------ (� — Cerritos Miles " 0 2.5 5 Vernon City Sphere Miles 00 0.5 1 Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 11 2 Project Description - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 12 Initial Study 2 Project Description �' MaNn Lumnr Wrt 'tRiv ��— _ ++ s� Exhibit 2: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map .U. L1L1LJLJLJL1L1L1E1L -ILA LLILIUUI,,�L FE LLD -R!! -I` ala6 � 7-0 r INI BL 1_ EVE N N AVF+n n F a5yl S! 51n A 15q\\ `\ r�- \ \ \ \ y y ' ti\4\�ti`\ •\� _ \1ll u4Fi1 -� .I -J� \t�. N F4Bm`I— ;. z e sEno sr - FRUYtAND , \�\. \ � _ S ® E. t\ San gi �`�J ������ I''li - \ \\ \\ •` t ® J � \\ ,� 4\� \ t bJtM1 St 371hg1 At —^'SI -n �® �ESLAUSONFV ��\ `��ti • 4 • \\ 1\i\\- I \ LAI � � � Ll I �� _ � l q{J5 AV CQ��St `~- wovpa� LA" J uY u la. H Irelan6 Sa smear 11, 20I2. � � � ®Lf�9�7 L[ � ^�- �J fff(((jjj Sake: CAy d Venen and Los Angeles CauNw 201 i RI �w F90t fjr+` N n Son —�; —�� LEGEND Land Us Designation Overlay Districts Base Map Industrial ® Commercial ---- Vemon City Boundary Rendering — — — — — — Vernon Sphere of lnkuence ® Slaughtering Freeway Housing Railroad ® Emergency Shaker F— Las Angeles River Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update lb DRAFT LAND USE POLICY MAP 13 2 Project Description - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 14 Initial Study 2 Project Description Mam 1 m., Pang Jr R W E M1!lO. St�a ' �� aaaw s� 1y11,� m aew. � 11 I 761 9t e w1e a: r�I _JLJ I t aum NI FLL ewu+:n e ,sa15Y Jt 51�d j 1 [res 1 esi [IT .�j11NI 1�jI I,igu zir- �' I � 1 Exhibit 3: Proposed Zoning Map L -1 6� R �? wo. M OR— �I���'J�►!�./�����l����/ F� _ate f � I ray �■ Rlr k LL_ rrnasr I� _ TTI V I L ;;Sl. �\ \ .,t 6zal L =I� E SL L`I Ih L f 1 1 - .0 1f .0-0 - PAN ti �r I Lail Up'"[. Hogly Irv4nq Sepnn6u 11, 2012. Apuwa' Cily n1 Vernnn and L-Anfl km C. nuMx 2011 AH N o ^son 1,000 i,Fno 7,nm LEGEND Zone Overlay Districts Base Map Industrial ® Commercial ---- Vemon City Boundary Rendering — — — — — — Vernon Sphere of Influence ® Slaughtering Freeway ® Trucking and Freight Terminal Railroad Housing Los Angeles River ® Emergency Sheffer Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update -� zN � I Dunham9 ?q��cwra xa m 1 Asta+AV CI IL ILjF ���=r%. 0lyl JL AOLI5Q jjj�' �1-F _ � �C 1 1 j1 } rJ JL _ � 77_jjjj Rill yy y fj t� JFA5 H 17/nl7ri DRAFT ZONING MAP is 2 Project Description - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 16 Initial Study 2 Project Description - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 18 Initial Study 3 Determination 3.1 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a Potentially Significant Impact' as defined by the checklist on the following pages. (Note: If any box is checked, an Environmental Impact Report must be prepared). El ❑ Agriculture Resources ®, Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology /Soils Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous Hydrology / Water 0' Emissions Materials ❑ Quality ❑ Land Use / Planning ❑ Mineral Resources Noise ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation Transportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities / Service Mandatory Findings Systems of Significance 3.2 - Determination I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the ❑ environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the ❑ environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and ❑ an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the ❑ environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATIO,N;'including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed p c j�, nothing further is required. S. Kevin Wilson, c or Community Services and Water :?-r(-IZ Date Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 17 3 Determination - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 20 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.1 - Aesthetics Would the project: Potentially Less Than Significant with Less Than No Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Impact Incorporation Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic ❑ ❑ ❑ buildings within view from a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its ❑ ❑ ❑ surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or ❑ ❑ ❑ nighttime views in the area? a-d) No Impact. Potential impacts to scenic vistas within the City of Vernon were previously analyzed in the Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR. The analysis concluded that no impact would result since no scenic vistas, scenic resources, or state scenic highways are located in the City. In addition to land use changes proposed in the General Plan, the Proposed Focused Update includes revisions to the Zoning Ordinance to introduce development standards concerning lots sizes, building intensity, setbacks, building height limitations for the proposed new zoning district overlays. These standards are intended to provide for quality design of proposed development, as well as ensure compatibility with existing surrounding development. The Proposed Focused Update does not propose any changes to the Zoning Ordinance which would remove or revise existing development standards to reduce light and glare impacts. Impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the General Plan EIR, and no new impact would occur. With regard to the proposed development at 4675 52"d Drive, surrounding land uses to the west, east, and north consist of industrial businesses. Residential uses (single- and multi -family) are located across the street to the south in the City of Maywood. Proposed development at this site would be two to three stories in height; a proposal for a three-story development has a graduating height which increases from the street edge towards the back of the property. Two proposals would be limited to two stories in height. Given the industrial natural of other existing land uses in the area, a proposed housing development on this site, of relatively consistent scale Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 21 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts with nearby residential uses, would be consistent with the aesthetic condition at nearby residential uses relative to scale. The development proposals all aim to provide clear pedestrian -orientation toward the 52nd Drive boundary, with ground floor entrances and limited parking and driveway interruptions. The development projects as proposed would be compatible with existing conditions relative to adjacent residential uses, and no scenic vistas would be impacted. All development proposals include landscaping, building articulation, and varied architectural materials. The proposed designs would complement buildings on surrounding properties and provide open space amenities in the form of courtyards and child play areas. The project site is in a developed urban area that is currently well illuminated. Sources of illumination include freestanding streetlights, light fixtures on buildings, pole -mounted lights, traffic signals, and vehicle headlights. The project will be required to adhere to existing development standards to regulate light and glare, which would also be reviewed during the discretionary review process for the development project. The proposed development projects would have no adverse aesthetic impacts. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. 22 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.2 - Agriculture and Forest Resources Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act ❑ ❑ ❑ contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code ❑ ❑ ❑ section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest ❑ ❑ ❑ use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- ❑ ❑ ❑ agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? a-b) No Impact. The City of Vernon is an urbanized city, fully built out, and comprised of virtually all industrial uses, with a few commercial and residential uses scattered throughout the city. Based upon a review of maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) of the California Resources Agency, the project study area does not contain any land designated as "Prime Farmland," "Unique Farmland," or "Farmland of Statewide Importance."1 As such, no impact would occur. No Williamson Act contracts are active for any 1 California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, 2008. The City of Vernon is indicated within "Area Not Mapped" in 2010 maps of Los Angeles County. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 23 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts property within Vernon.` All properties within Vernon are zoned Industrial; certain properties have additional overlay districts applied. Neither the Industrial zone nor any overlays are intended for agricultural uses. N o new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Update than as identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. No impact would occur. c-d) No Impact. No timberland exists within the planning area. This condition precludes the possibility of conflicts with forest land zoning or loss of forest land as a result of implementation. Therefore, no impacts would result from the Proposed Focused Update. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update than as identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. e) No Impact. Given the existing industrial and built -out nature of Vernon, the project would not result in any conversion of farmland or forestland to another use. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update than as identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. Z California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Program, 2007. 24 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.3 - Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicab air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of an criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainmer under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality stand< (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursor d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number people? a) Less than Significant Impact. c-d) Potential Significant Impact. As identified in the Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR, over the long term, implementation of General Plan policies could result in an increase in criteria pollutant emissions primarily due to related motor vehicle trips. Stationary sources and area sources —including emissions from natural gas combustion, landscape equipment, and solvents from surface coatings —would result in lesser quantities of criteria pollutant emissions. Stationary sources and diesel -fueled mobile sources would also generate emissions of toxic air contaminants JACs) including diesel particulate matter that could pose a health risk. While implementation of the Proposed Focused Update would likely have less than significant air quality impacts, the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment propose changes in the land use designation of specific parcels (with introduction of two new General Plan overlay districts and three new Zoning Districts, and revisions to another existing overlay district, as applied in Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 25 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Exhibits 2 and 3), and allowance of new uses that could result in an increase in development intensity, and a corresponding increase in vehicle trips and traffic that could trigger potentially significant air quality impacts. As such, implementation of the Proposed Update could result in a new significant air quality impact or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified air quality impact. Furthermore, the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, while finding project -related impacts regarding air quality less than significant, found cumulative air quality impacts significant and unavoidable. Therefore, potential air quality impacts will be fully analyzed within a Supplemental EIR to the Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR to be prepared for the proposed Focused Update. e) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the Initial Study completed for the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, the majority of development anticipated to occur in Vernon would be predominantly industrial. New development associated with the Proposed Focused Amendments may be industrial, commercial, or residential in nature. Each new development will be required to comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's guidelines regarding odor control. In addition, the proposed Zoning Ordinance includes additional requirements to prohibit the emission of noxious odors into the outside air. Any impact associated with the Proposed Focused Update, would, as such, be beneficial, given the City's proposed measures to constrain odors from businesses. The proposed residential development project at 4675 52nd Drive, given its residential nature, would not involve any uses associated with odor complaints, as indicated in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (such as agricultural operations, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and some industrial operations). Compliance with existing regulations will ensure that impact will be less than significant. The proposed Emergency Shelter Overlay would likewise have no odor -producing uses. With regard to the proposed Trucking and Freight Overlay District, odors may be associated with diesel trucking activities; however, existing uses already generate/attract significant diesel truck traffic. Odors associated with new trucking or freight terminals constructed pursuant to revised zoning policy are not anticipated to be noticeable or significant relative to existing conditions. Expanded areas of the Commercial Overlay District are not anticipated to have more significant odor impacts than existing industrial uses have; odor impacts are likely to be less with commercial uses than industrial. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Update than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. 26 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.4 - Biological Resources Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Have a substantial adverse effect either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status specie in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Californi Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands a defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 27 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other ❑ ❑ ❑ ie approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? a-f) No Impact. As indicated in the Initial Study completed for the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, Vernon is a fully built -out community, and no native habitat remains. Given the industrial nature of the majority of the city, no unique biological resources or habitat conservation areas are located within the planning area. No species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are known to exist within the Planning Area. According to the federal National Wetlands Inventory, the project site does not contain any wetlands and the proposed project would not disturb any offsite wetlands.3 The Los Angeles River, where it runs through Vernon, is concrete lined and does not function as riparian habitat. The City of Vernon does not have any adopted tree preservation ordinance or other policies protecting biological resources. Vernon does not contain any Habitat Conservation Plano, Natural Community Conservation Plans, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan. No impact will occur. No new or substantially more severe impact would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. 3 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. <http://107.20.228.18/Wetlands/WetlandsMapper.html#> [Accessed August 16, 2012] 4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Conservation Plans and Agreements Database. <http://ecos.fws.gov/conserv_plans/public.jsp> [Accessed August 16, 2012] 5 California Department of Fish and Game. California Natural Community Conservation Planning. <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/habcon/nccp/> [Accessed August 16, 2012] 28 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.5 - Cultural Resources Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical ❑ ❑ ❑ resource as defined in 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to ❑ ❑ ❑ 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or ❑ ❑ ❑ site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of ❑ ❑ ❑ formal cemeteries? a-b) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the Initial Study associated with the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, Vernon is largely built out and does not contain any known archaeological resources. Industrial uses have been the predominant land use in the City since the early 1900s. Vernon contains many industrial buildings that house diverse industries, some of which also display architecture of distinct periods and styles, as indicated in the General Plan Resources Element. Adoption of the Proposed Focused Update will not result in any action that will directly cause the elimination or alteration of any building that may have historic significance. The General Plan Resources Element contains policies that work to protect potentially historic buildings and sites; the focused update would not revise or remove any of these policies. No buildings are located at 4675 52nd Drive housing site. Given that the site was previously developed and graded for past developments, any buried archaeological resources would have already been uncovered or destroyed at the time of initial development of the site. Impacts related to historical and archaeological resources for the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR; impacts would be less than significant. c-d) No Impact. Given the highly built out and industrial character of Vernon, no buried paleontological resources or human remains or cemeteries are anticipated to be disturbed by the proposed project. Existing law (Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Sections 5097.94 and 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code) requires the protection and proper treatment of any prehistoric or historic artifacts or human remains encountered during excavation activities. Implementation of General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policy and standards and application of existing law on an individual project basis will allow any potential paleontological resources or human remains uncovered to be properly treated. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 29 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts With regard to the potential housing development at 4675 52nd Drive, since the project site was developed in the past (although it is vacant now as all buildings have been demolished), no paleontological resources or human remains or cemeteries are anticipated to be disturbed by the proposed project. Any buried paleontological resources or human remains likely would have been uncovered or destroyed at that time of initial development of the site. In the unlikely event that paleontological resources or human remains are uncovered, existing regulatory procedures pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Sections 5097.94 and 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code would be required, and impacts to resources and/or human remains would be avoided. No impact will occur with application of these existing regulations. Impacts of the Proposed Update would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR; no impact would occur. 30 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.6 - Geology and Soils Would the project: a) Expose people or structurE potential substantial adver effects, including the risk c injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthc fault, as delineated on the recent Alquist-Priolo Earth Fault Zoning Map issued b, State Geologist for the are based on other substantial of a known fault? Refer to of Mines and Geology Spec Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground sha iii) Seismic -related ground fail including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil ei the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic u that is unstable, or that we become unstable as a resL project, and potentially re! or off -site landslide, latera spreading, subsidence, ligt or collapse? d) Be located on expansive sc defined in Table 18-1-B of Uniform Building Code (19 creating substantial risks t property? Potentially Less Than Significant Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than No Significant Impact Impact s to se if loss, uake most quake r the a or ❑ ❑ ❑ evidence Division ;ial king? El El El u re, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ V ❑ ❑ El El •osion or El iit or soil )uld It of the �ult in on- ❑ ❑ ❑ iefaction ►il, as the 37), ❑ ❑ ❑ :) life or Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 31 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not ❑ ❑ ❑ Se available for the disposal of waste water? a.i) Less than Significant Impact. No portion of Vernon is traversed by a known fault, as delineated on the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map.6 As concluded in the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, the potential for surface fault rupture is considered to be low. Impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the prior Program EIR and would be less than significant. a.ii) Less than Significant Impact. As noted above in a.i), the California Department of Conservation reports no known faults in Vernon. However, the proposed project and all future development proposed pursuant to General Plan land use policy and Zoning Ordinance standards will be subject to ground shaking impacts should a major earthquake occur in the future in the surrounding seismically active Southern California region. The Safety Element of the General Plan indicates that the Las Ciengas Fault runs along the northeast boundary of the City. Furthermore, blind thrust faults may be located in the vicinity. Blind thrust faults lack superficial ground features normally associated with thrust faults that have recently experienced seismic activity. Potential impacts include injury or loss of life and property damage. Buildings and structures proposed pursuant to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance will be subject to the seismic design criteria of the California Building Code (CBC) and any project - specific design requirements. Adherence to these requirements will reduce the potential of the building from collapsing during an earthquake, thereby minimizing injury and loss of life. Although structures may be damaged during earthquakes, adherence to seismic design requirements will minimize damage to property and structures because the structure would be designed not to collapse. The CBC is intended to provide minimum requirements to prevent major structural failure and loss of life. Adherence to existing regulations will reduce the risk of loss, injury, and death; impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would be less than significant. a.iii) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, portions of the south and eastern sectors of the City are susceptible to liquefaction .'$ However, all development occurring pursuant to the updated General Plan and Zoning Ordinance will be constructed in compliance with the CBC, and will incorporate all seismic safety features as required. New development will consist primarily of new industrial buildings that replace existing, older structures; the new structures will incorporate improved seismic safety features and thus, a beneficial effect of improving seismic safety may result. The City enforces stringent safety criteria for new construction, including site -specific soils investigation and the use of engineering techniques specific to each site that overcomes any potential 6 California State Department of Conservation. California Geological Survey, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps. Los Angeles Quadrangle, January 1, 1977. Other portions of the city not mapped. 7 California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, South Gate Quadrangle. March 25, 1999. 8 California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, Los Angeles Quadrangle. March 25, 1999. 32 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts geotechnical constraints. The proposed project would not modify any of these existing standards and regulations, and impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the General Plan EIR and would be less than significant. a.iv) No Impact. The City of Vernon is virtually flat. No portion of the planning area is indicated to be within a State of California Seismic Hazard Zone landslide zone of required investigation.'," The proposed residential project at 4675 52nd Drive would be constructed on a flat site with no potential for landslides. Impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR; no impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Initial Study for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR indicated that proposed new construction pursuant to General Plan land use policy could result in grading and earthwork that would expose soils, increasing the chance for soil erosion. Implementation of the Proposed Focused Update would not change any of these conditions or result in more significant impacts, as no new areas that were previously undeveloped would have new potential for development. Only the allowed uses on these sites and other procedural requirements have been revised by the Proposed Focused Update. With regard to 4675 52nd Drive, future housing construction on this site is subject to SCAQMD Rule 403 and the erosion control requirements of the CBC to prevent wind-blown and stormwater- related erosion. Rule 403 will minimize wind-blown erosion by requiring stabilization of disturbed soils during construction activities through measures as such daily watering. Required erosion control plans will ensure that measures are implemented at project sites to prevent or minimize erosion due to rain, ensuring that downstream water bodies are protected from sedimentation. Projects will continue to be subject to standard erosion control and engineering techniques set forth in the Municipal Code, including National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. Impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. c-d) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated above in a.i - a.iv), the Proposed Focused Update would result in less than significant impacts. The Initial Study for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR noted that the City requires geotechnical investigations for all new development in seismic and geologic hazard areas. Where development would be proposed on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or located on expansive soil, the applicant will be required to use specific engineering and construction standards and must comply with the City and state building codes. With regard to development at 4675 52nd Drive, a project -specific geotechnical investigation would be required, consistent with standard City procedures. The recommendations of the geotechnical report will be implemented during site preparation and grading. The CBC requires special design considerations for foundations of structures built on soils with expansion indices greater than 20. The CBC also includes a requirement that any City - approved recommendations contained in the soil report be made conditions of the building permit. Compliance with existing CBC regulations would limit hazard impacts arising from unstable soils to less than significant. Impacts related to on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, collapse, or expansive soils would be less than significant with implementation of the proposed geotechnical recommendations. Impacts of the Proposed Focused Update would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. 9 California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, South Gate Quadrangle. March 25, 1999. io California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, Los Angeles Quadrangle. March 25, 1999. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 33 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts e) No Impact. New development would be required to connect to public sewer service pursuant to City policies. No impact would occur. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. 34 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.7 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions Potentially Significant Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a ie significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions ie of greenhouse gases? Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a-b) Potentially Significant Impact. While implementation of the Proposed Focused Update would likely have less than significant greenhouse gas emission impacts, the General Plan and Zoning Amendments propose changes in the land use designation/zoning of specific parcels (as indicated in Exhibits 2 and 3) that would result in a potential increase in development intensity and a corresponding increase in vehicle trips and traffic, which could have potentially significant greenhouse gas emission impacts. As such, implementation of the Proposed Focused Update could result in a new significant impact. Therefore, potential greenhouse gas emission impacts will be fully addressed within a Supplemental EIR to the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 35 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.8 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or if ❑ ❑ ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the ❑ ❑ ❑ release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an ❑ ❑ ❑ existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it ❑ ❑ ❑ create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project ❑ ❑ ❑ area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ emergency evacuation plan? 36 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ ie a-c) Potentially Significant Impact. Hazardous materials are routinely used and transported throughout Vernon on the local streets and via rail. Current and future uses will continue to be exposed to hazards from the routine use, disposal, and transport of hazardous materials. In addition, future development could produce hazardous materials and waste. Because of the new potentially significant impact associated with these issues, hazardous materials will be fully addressed within a Supplemental EIR to the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. d) Potentially Significant Impact. Several sites within Vernon are included on the Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substance List (Cortese List of hazardous materials sites). Redevelopment of industrial sites has the potential to result in discovery of contaminated soils and other hazardous materials. Because of the new potentially significant impact associated with these issues, hazardous waste sites will be fully addressed within a Supplemental EIR to the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. e-f) No Impact. No airport land use plan applies within the planning area. The nearest airport is Compton Airport, located approximately eight miles to the south. No changes associated with the Proposed Focused Update would impact air traffic. No adverse impacts associated with airport operations would result. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Update than as identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. g) Less than Significant Impact. The project proposes no changes to the City's Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) Multi -Hazard Functional Plan (MHFP), and thus would not impair implementation of the SEMS or MHFP. Proposed development under the Proposed Focused Update would be subject to review by the City of Vernon Police and Fire Departments for compliance with emergency response standards and adopted emergency response plans. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. h) No Impact. The City of Vernon is a fully built -out community and does not contain nor is adjacent to any wildlands. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR; no impact would occur. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 37 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.9 - Hydrology and Water Quality a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) c) d) e) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation 38 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would ❑ ❑ ie ❑ impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including ❑ ❑ ie ❑ flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ie a) Less than Significant. As analyzed in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, implementation of existing regulations and General Plan policies would ensure that water quality standards and waste discharge requirements are not violated. As a co-permittee under Los Angeles County's MS4 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, the City is required to implement all pertinent regulations of the program to control pollution discharges from new development. These regulations reduce pollutant loading through the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other control measures that minimize or eliminate pollutants from urban runoff, thereby protecting downstream water resources. BMPs implemented to address commercial pollutant sources generally involve maintenance of storm drain facilities, parking lots, vegetated areas, and educational programs. Violations of water quality standards due to urban runoff can be prevented through the continued implementation of existing regional water quality regulations. The proposed project, including revisions to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, would not interfere with the implementation of NPDES water quality regulations and standards. The proposed residential development project at 4675 52"d Drive would disturb approximately 2.06 acres of land and therefore will be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements during construction activities, in addition to standard NPDES operational requirements. The proposed project will require submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which will include BMPs to protect water quality during construction activities. The City will require BMPs as listed in the California Stormwater Quality Association's California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks. These measures, which include resident/owner education, activity restrictions, parking lot sweeping, basin inspection, landscaping, roof runoff controls, efficient irrigation, slope and channel protection, storm drain signage, trash racks, and trash storage areas, will reduce pollutants in storm water runoff and reduce non -storm water discharges to the City's stormwater drainage through controlling the discharge of pollutants. Operational BMPs will be identified in a Stormwater Runoff Management Plan that will be submitted to the City for review and approval. Impacts related to violation of water quality standards will be less than significant with implementation of these existing regulations. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 39 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts b) Less than Significant Impact. Water service for Vernon is provided by three service providers: City of Vernon Water Department, California Water Service Company (Cal Water) - East Los Angeles District, and Maywood Mutual Water Company Number 3. Some of the water supplied within the planning area comes from groundwater wells. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map propose changes in the land use designation of specific parcels (with introduction of two new General Plan overlay districts, expansion of another overlay district, and three new Zoning Overlay Districts as illustrated in Exhibits 2 and 3); allowance of new uses could result in an increase in development intensity. However, the proposed allowed new uses would likely use substantially less water than industrial uses, which are, in general, considered to be high -intensity water users. Based on water demand factors provided in the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan for Cal Water's East Los Angeles District, the year 2015 projected water demand at a metered service of a multifamily residential development is 2.8 acre-feet/year. The projected demand for the average metered industrial user is 20.9 acre-feet/year.11 Given that proposed residential uses and commercial uses will in general consume far less water annually that the average industrial use (approximately 2.9 acre- feet/year and 1.0 acre-feet per/year, respectively), impact of the land use changes will be less than significant. The project site at 4675 52"d Drive is served by Maywood Mutual Water Company Number 3. As of August 2012, Maywood Mutual Water Company Number 3 had an adjudicated supply of 1,400 acre-feet and a demand of approximately 1,350 acre-feet, with a residual supply of at least 50 acre-feet of water.12 This would be more than ample to accommodate the proposed development at 4675 52"d Drive. Impacts would be similar and less severe than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would continue to be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project substantially altered the drainage pattern of an existing stream or river so that erosion or siltation would result. No natural, non -concrete lined rivers traverse the City of Vernon. The Los Angeles River is a significant water feature; however, it is fully concrete lined and its course would not be altered in any way via the project. The project involves no changes to this flood control channel. With regard to future development project proposed pursuant to Land Use and Housing Element policy, site drainage plans are required by the City of Vernon and would be reviewed by the City. Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be required during construction consistent with an approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to demonstrate compliance with the City's NPDES permit. With regard to 4675 52"d Drive in particular, no substantial grading is proposed to the relatively flat site; thus, drainage patterns would not be disrupted. Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be required. At the completion of construction, the project would consist of impervious surfaces and landscaped areas, and would therefore not be prone to substantial erosion. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. d-e) Less than Significant Impact. As was previously discussed in Section 4.9.c above, the proposed project would not result in an alteration of the drainage pattern or increase in flows that would result in flooding on or off site because the City of Vernon is fully developed with buildings, pavement, and other impervious surfaces. Any new development would be required to comply 11 California Water Service Company. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan - East Los Angeles District. Table 3.3-3: Projected 2015 Water Deliveries. 12 Telephone communication with Bob Roth, City of Maywood Municipal Water District 3 engineer, August 30, 2012. 40 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts with NPDES regulations. The existing storm drain system is adequate to accommodate stormwater runoff. Impacts would be similar to or less than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. f) Less than Significant Impact. All future development projects pursuant to General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policy will be required to comply with water quality requirements of the U.S. EPA, Los Angeles RWQC6, and the City of Vernon. Compliance with existing requirements would reduce water quality impacts to a less -than -significant level. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR and would be less than significant. g-h) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the General Plan Safety Element, no portion of the planning area lies within a 100-year flood zone. A very small portion of the City in the southeastern corner is identified by FEMA to be within a 500-year flood zone; this area does include the Housing Overlay and proposed development at 4675 52"d Drive. Since no areas of the City are located within a 100-year flood zone, impacts associated with the project related to housing or flood hazard area structures would be less than significant. No new or more severe impacts than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR would occu r. i) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the General Plan Safety Element, nearly all of Vernon lies within the potential inundation areas for Hansen Dam and/or Sepulveda Dam, which are located more than 20 miles northwest of the City. In the unlikely event that a catastrophic earthquake causes the collapse of either of these dams, water and debris would flow to and then generally along the Los Angeles River in a fairly narrow stream before spreading out over a swath of the coastal plain several miles wide, including Vernon. In this case, the flow would take 8 to 19 hours to reach the City. As such, risk to human life is minimal as the long delay should give ample time for emergency responders to respond. Procedures are outlined in the City's SEMS Multi -Hazard Functional Plan (MHFP). Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. j) No Impact. The City of Vernon lies approximately 12 miles from the Pacific Ocean and therefore is not subject to tsunamis. No large water bodies exist in the City that would present seiche hazards. Topography in the City is virtually flat. No natural features exist that would create mudflows. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 41 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.10 - Land Use and Planning Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ ie b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural ❑ ❑ ❑ community conservation plan? a) No Impact. The proposed project would not physically divide an established community. Citywide, the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance updates will continue to allow the recycling of established industrial uses to new industrial uses and commercial uses. The Housing Element also identifies two sites where housing could be considered, and one site which could accommodate a potential emergency shelter. At a single site at 4975 52"d Drive, residential uses will be permitted via the proposed Housing Overlay, pursuant to the proposed General Plan and Zoning maps. At the northwest corner of the City, the Emergency Shelter Overlay will apply to a single property. The site at 4975 52"d Drive is surrounded by residential uses to the south (in the City of Maywood) and industrial uses to the north. Given that the site is located at Vernon's south border, the proposed project will not divide an established industrial community. The project does not propose construction of any roadway, flood control channel, or other structure that would physically divide any portion of the community. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR; no impact will occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves focused updates of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, with these objectives: 1) allow for a limited number of new housing units pursuant to the City's good governance initiative, 2) expand allowed uses in the north part of Vernon by creating a new Trucking and Freight Overlay, 3) extend the Commercial Overlay District to allow additional commercial development to support industrial users and permit ancillary commercial uses on weekends, and 4) provide clarifications in the Zoning Ordinance text. The intent of the simultaneous General Plan and Zoning Ordinance updates is to provide for consistency between the two documents. No other agency has jurisdiction over land use issues in Vernon. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. 42 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts c) No Impact. As discussed in Checklist Response 4.4.f above, the planning area is not part of any habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. As such, no impact will occur. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 43 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.11 - Mineral Resources Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ ❑ ie residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ ie general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a-b) No Impact. The City is a fully urbanized area with predominantly industrial uses. As indicated in the Initial Study for the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR, no mineral resource areas exist in Vernon. The City's General Plan does not identify any locally important mineral resources, and there are no known mining operations within the city or its immediate vicinity. Development pursuant to the proposed project will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource. No impact will result. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. 44 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.12 - Noise Would the project result in: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or + ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing ❑ ❑ ❑ without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels ❑ ❑ ❑ existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working ❑ ❑ ❑ in the project area to excessive noise levels? a-d) Potentially Significant Impact. The 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR analyzed potential noise impacts related to new development permitted under the General Plan and found potential impacts to be less than significant with implementation of General Plan policies and EIR mitigation measures. The proposed project includes changes to land use designations of specific parcels (shown in Exhibits 2 and 3) that could result in an increase in development intensity and new sensitive receptors. The potential development projects resulting from these proposed land use designation changes, including proposed residential development at 4675 52nd Drive and an emergency shelter, could trigger potentially significant noise impacts not Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 45 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts previously analyzed in the 2007 Program EIR. Therefore, noise impacts, both short-term and long-term, will be further analyzed in the Supplemental EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. e-f) No Impact. As indicated in the Initial Study completed for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, no part of Vernon is located within an area covered by an airport land use plan, and no part of the City is located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The nearest airport is in Compton, approximately eight miles to the south. Thus, adoption and implementation of the Proposed Focused Update will not result in airport noise impacts on people residing or working within the Planning Area. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. 46 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.13 - Population and Housing Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ❑ ❑ ie ❑ (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ ie housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ ❑ ie housing elsewhere? a) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment includes goals, policies, and implementation programs that will allow for very limited housing development at specific locations. While the City has had a long-standing policy to prohibit any new residential uses due to extensive industrial operations throughout Vernon, the City's good governance initiative and the Regional Housing Needs Allocation of two units have led the City to propose two overlay zones that will allow limited housing. Between 20 and 61 new units could be accommodated, as well as an emergency shelter. The emergency (homeless) shelter would not house permanent residents. With implementation of this policy, the Vernon Planning Area has the potential to accommodate a population of approximately 328 residents13 at build out; this represents more almost a tripling of the current estimated population of 112 (2010 Census). This level of growth has not yet been accounted for in regional planning documents, as the City's good governance initiative and efforts to increase the voting populace in Vernon are recent changes. These changes will be reflected in future regional planning documents. Thus, while the potential tripling of the local population may seem significant in percentage terms, the actual population increase in real numbers is small. The potential increase is directly responsive to the City's good governance policy to increase the local populace and foster fair voting procedures. Also, in terms of secondary impacts associated with the anticipated population increase, the analysis in this Initial Study indicates that the new housing and residents will not create significant environmental impacts. 13 This population projection assumes 60 units, pursuant to proposed land use policy, and extrapolates based on existing (2010) household size, which is estimated at 3.6 persons per household. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 47 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts b-c) No Impact. The recycling of uses permitted by land use policy would not remove any existing housing. The City owns virtually all of the existing housing in Vernon and has indicated its intention to retain the units. The Housing Element includes policies that provide for the retention of the existing 31 housing units in the City that are economically and physically sound. Proposed development at 2675 52"d Drive would take place on an existing vacant parcel and would not displace housing or people. Implementation of the Proposed Focused Update would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people. Impacts would be similar to or less than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. 48 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.14 - Public Services Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Fire protection?El El ie El b) Police protection?El El ie El c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? a-b) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the Initial Study completed for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, development pursuant to proposed General Plan policy and zoning regulations will not substantially increase the business population in Vernon since limited vacant land exists. New development will consist of the recycling of development on existing properties. This condition continues to be true for the Proposed Focused Update. As a general practice, City staff examines each development application to determine site -specific fire protection and other safety needs. City staff will review the site plan for any potential development at 4675 52"d Drive and ensure it meets emergency access requirements. Vernon maintains its own fire and police departments, and as part of the budgeting process each year provides funding to ensure that services adequately meet any changing needs in the City. Therefore, the potential impact on fire and police services will continue to reviewed with each development proposal and annually. Through existing practices and procedures, the City will be able to meet and maintain acceptable service ratios. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. The only school located in Vernon is Vernon City Elementary School. Maywood Elementary School is located close by in the City of Maywood. Both schools are located within the Los Angeles Unified School District. Proposed residential development completed pursuant to General Plan and Zoning Ordinance policy would be limited to the Housing Overlay (limited to potential housing sites identified in the Housing Element and consistent with Land Use policy). The proposed residential project will result in incremental population growth and potential associated growth in students within the Los Angeles Unified School District. I n accordance with the California Government Code, standard school facility impact fees will be paid to offset any incremental impacts of the proposed project. With the payment of the fee, impacts to school facilities would be less than significant. Given the limited scale of the proposed Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 49 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts residential land use changes, impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR and would be less than significant. d-e) Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would introduce a new Housing Overlay in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The overlay would allow for a limited number of new housing units (maximum of 60 potential units total). The proposed residential project at 4675 52"d Drive will result in population growth that would incrementally impact recreation facilities, given the potential 35 to 45 new housing units that could be supported on the site. Each of the proposed development schemes the City has received provides for on -site open space areas for use by future residents. The City has no other existing recreation facilities. As such, it can be assumed that other existing recreation facilities in neighboring jurisdictions would potentially be utilized by the proposed project's residents. As part of the good governance reform measures, the Vernon City Council adopted a Resolution (2011-149) on August 25, 2011 which established a fund for Regional Community Recreational Facilities and Environmental and Community Benefit Fund. A total of $3.2 million has been set aside in the 2012-2013 City budget for the fund and for funding regional recreational facilities. Negotiations have been ongoing between Vernon officials and representatives from the City of Huntington Park and Los Angeles County (relative to the unincorporated community of Boyle Heights). While the City does not have a process to assess parks fees due to the limited potential for new housing in the City, any potential impact on recreational facilities in neighboring jurisdictions resulting from increasing the residential population of Vernon by up to 60 new housing units would be addressed through this existing fund, and would be less than significant. Impacts to any other public facilities, such as libraries, would similarly be less than significant since the limited increase in population is not of a size that would required the expansion of existing or construction of new public facilities. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. 50 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.15 - Recreation Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial ❑ ❑ Pf ❑ physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might ❑ ❑ i-e ❑ have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Less than Significant Impact. Refer to the discussion in Section 4.14d) above. Impacts to recreation would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would be less than significant. b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project, through new land use policies and the potential development at 4675 52nd Drive, would incrementally increase the local population and therefore potentially impact surrounding and regional parks. However, given the project scale and limited allowance for new residential units in the City, and further provided that the City will require on - site open space for any new housing projects, the project does not necessitate the construction of new parks. Any expansion or new construction of recreation facilities would be subject to its own environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Impacts would be less than significant. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 51 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.16 - Transportation and Traffic Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized ❑ ❑ ❑ travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other ie ❑ ❑ ❑ standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change ❑ ❑ ❑ ie in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) ❑ ❑ ❑ ie or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ie ❑ 52 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the ❑ ❑ ❑ performance or safety of such facilities? a-b) Potentially Significant Impact. The 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR identified impacts on traffic on local surface streets and freeways as significant and unavoidable at the program and cumulative levels. Mitigation was included to reduce impacts, including: 1) conducting a study to determine if an Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control System (ATSAC) would be a beneficial and cost-effective method for the City to operate and maintain; 2) coordination with local jurisdictions, rail companies, and Metropolitan Transportation Authority regarding transportation improvements; 3) coordination with Caltrans and other local government associations regarding I-710 freeway improvements; 4) Soto Street widening and right-of-way dedications to meet Circulation and Infrastructure Element goals; and 5) capacity enhancements at Santa Fe Avenue and 38t" Street. However, full implementation of these measures would be contingent upon actions by outside agencies or funding that has not yet been secured; as such, impacts were found to be significant and unavoidable. The proposed project includes General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to establish a Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay district, expand the boundaries of the Commercial Overlay district, permit housing at 4675 52nd Drive, accommodate emergency housing within the Emergency Housing Overlay, and permit housing at identified sites in the Housing Element (as shown in Exhibits 2, 3, and 4). Over the long term, development pursuant to land use policy and zoning regulations could result in an increase in development intensity and a corresponding increase in vehicle trips and traffic in certain areas of Vernon. Accordingly, potentially new or substantially more severe significant transportation impacts could occur with the adoption of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance/Map Amendments that will need to be further analyzed in a Supplemental EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. c) No Impact. No airport land use plan applies to any area of Vernon. The nearest airport is Compton Airport, which is located approximately eight miles to the south. Implementation of the Proposed Update would have no effect on air traffic patterns at Compton Airport. No impact would occur. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur. d) No Impact. The Proposed Focused Update does not propose any changes to the General Plan Circulation and Infrastructure Element. The existing Zoning Ordinance includes planning and project design standards intended to address such issues as traffic hazards for individual development proposals. The Proposed Focused Update includes additional language to ensure truck maneuvering does not occur near driveways to limit potential traffic hazards. No changes are proposed to roadways beyond those considered in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR. Minor edits to the Zoning Ordinance would increase traffic safety in the vicinity of development sites. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur as a result of project adoption and implementation. e) Less Than Significant Impact. As indicated in d) above, no changes are proposed to the Circulation and Infrastructure Elements, and revisions to the Zoning Ordinance regarding parking and loading are intended to enhance traffic safety and emergency access. With regard to the proposed residential development project at 4675 52nd Drive, project access will be via 52nd Drive. Through review of the project site plan, the City will confirm that turning radii for emergency vehicles accessing the site and are adequate serve the use. Therefore, the project Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 53 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts would have less than significant impacts on the provision of adequate emergency access. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. f) Less than Significant Impact. The Proposed Focused Update does not include any proposed revisions to the Circulation and Infrastructure Elements. As noted in the Initial Study for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, the General Plan includes policies to coordinate transportation access and public transit. No changes are proposed to these policies. Thus, the Proposed Focused Update would not conflict with such policies, and no impact would occur. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the Proposed Focused Update. 54 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.17 - Utilities and Service Systems Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control ❑ ❑ ❑ Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction ❑ ❑ ❑ of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which ❑ ❑ ❑ could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded ❑ ❑ ❑ entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's ❑ ❑ ❑ projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid ❑ ❑ ❑ waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ❑ ❑ ❑ Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 55 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts a) Less than Significant Impact. All new development will be required to comply with wastewater treatment requirements set forth by Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region and Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. As indicated in the Initial Study completed for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, impacts would be less than significant. With regard to proposed development at 4675 52nd Drive, the project would involve replacing a vacant lot (formerly occupied by an industrial user) with residential dwelling units. The proposed residential units will discharge common wastewater from lavatory and kitchen activities. Such discharges will not require upgrades or new technology to be installed at the wastewater treatment facility to ensure continued compliance with wastewater discharge requirements. Impacts will be similar and no more severe than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would continue to be less than significant. b,c,e) Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the Initial Study completed for the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, new development pursuant to General Plan land use policy could intensify some uses on properties. However, the City will require that each individual project be adequately served by water, sewer, and drainage improvements, and connection fees for regional facilities would be paid. Connection fees contribute to construction of new regional systems and facilities as need to accommodate growth. Impact would continue to be less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. Three water agencies supply water to properties in Vernon: the City of Vernon Water Department, California Water Service Company (Cal Water) - East Los Angeles District, and Maywood Mutual Water Company Number 3. Industrial businesses will continue to be the preponderant water users in Vernon, consistent with current land use policy. However, proposed General Plan land use policy changes would allow for some conversion of industrial to commercial and residential uses, including the proposed multifamily residential development at 4675 52nd Drive. Based on water demand factors provided in the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan for Cal Water's East Los Angeles District, the year 2015 projected water demand at a metered service of a multifamily residential development is 2.8 acre-feet/year. The projected demand for the average metered industrial user is 20.9 acre-feet/year.14 As indicated in 4.9b) above, given that a commercial or residential use will consume far less water annually that the average industrial use, impact of the land use changes will be less than significant. Furthermore, the project site at 4675 52nd Drive is served by Maywood Mutual Water Company Number 3. As of August 2012, Maywood Mutual Water Company Number 3 had an adjudicated supply of 1,400 acre-feet, and a demand of approximately 1,350 acre-feet, with a residual supply of at least 50 acre-feet of water.15 This would be more than ample to accommodate the proposed development at 4675 52nd Drive, given water usage estimates. Impacts would be similar and less severe than those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would continue to be less than significant. f-g) Less than Significant Impact. All development pursuant to General Plan policy and the Zoning Ordinance will be required to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to the disposal of solid waste. With regard to waste volume, the very limited allowance for residential use at 4675 52nd Drive (as opposed to industrial) under the proposed General Plan Amendment is not anticipated to generate significant additional solid waste; in fact, the residential use would generate less waste. As concluded in the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, long-term implementation of land use policy less than significant 14 California Water Service Company. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan - East Los Angeles District. Table 3.3-3: Projected 2015 Water Deliveries. 15 Telephone communication with Bob Roth, City of Maywood Municipal Water District 3 engineer, August 30, 2012. 56 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts impacts relative to solid waste. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 Program EIR, and would be less than significant. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 57 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.18 - Mandatory Findings of Significance Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporation a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ❑ ❑ ❑ community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but ❑ ❑ ❑ cumulatively considerable? ie c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects ❑ ❑ ❑ on human beings, either directly or ie indirectly? a) Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 4.4, Biological Resources and Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, the Proposed Update does not have the potential to substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 2007 General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Program EIR, and would be less than significant. b) Potentially Significant Impact. While significant cumulative growth impacts relative to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation are not anticipated due to implementation of the General Plan Amendments, Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance revisions, or the proposed project at 4675 52"d Drive, new significant or substantially more severe cumulative impacts in these areas could occur as a result of the Proposed Focused Update, which propose changes in the land use designation of specific parcels. These changes could result in an increase in development intensity and resulting increase in air quality impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, the exposure of persons to hazards and hazardous materials, the exposure of persons to noise, and transportation system impacts. Accordingly, such impacts could be potentially new or 58 Initial Study 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts substantially more severe significant impacts and will be analyzed in a Supplemental EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. c) Potentially Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 4.3 Air Quality, Section 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Section 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Section 4.12 Noise, and Section 4.16 Transportation/Traffic, potential impacts in these areas could create new or substantially more severe environmental effects that would adversely affect human beings. Such effects will be analyzed in a Supplemental EIR to be prepared for the Proposed Focused Update. Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 59 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 60 Initial Study 5 References 5.1 - List of Preparers City of Vernon (Lead Agency) Dept. of Community Services & Water 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Contact: S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services and Water Hogle-Ireland (Environmental Analysis) 630 N. Rosemead Blvd., Suite 150 Pasadena, CA 91107 ■ Laura Stetson, AICP, Senior Vice President ■ Genevieve Sharrow, Associate Project Manager II Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update 61 5 References - This Page Intentionally Left Blank - 62 Initial Study y n` ANUELES, CUUN'1 Y LLE notice of Preparati®n To: From: City of Vernon Dept. of Community Services & Water 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft SuppIgmenta) Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) The City of Vernon will be the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed project identified below. The City of Vernon is requesting input from government agencies, other organizations, and others regarding the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the SEIR. Responsible and trustee agencies are requested to indicate -their statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Public agencies receiving this Notice of Preparation may need to consider the SEIR prepared by the City of Vernon if they need to issue permits or other approvals for the proposed project. A copy of the Initial Study —including detailed project description, location, and potential environmental effects —is attached and also can be found on the City's website: http://www.cityofvernon.org/. Project Location: The City of Vernon is located in the central portion of Los Angeles County, directly south of downtown Los Angeles. Vernon is adjacent to the cities of Los Angeles, Huntington Park, Maywood, and Commerce. Refer to Exhibit 1 in the attached Initial Study. Project Description: The proposed project consists of: 1) a comprehensive update to the Vernon General Plan Housing Element; 2) a related revision to the Land Use Element to introduce a new Housing Overlay and Emergency Shelter Overlay, and to expand the Commercial Overlay; 3) revisions to the Land Use, Noise, Safety, and Natural Resources Elements to be respond to newly adopted State law; and 4) focused revisions to the Vernon Zoning Ordinance (Title 26 of the Municipal Code) and Zoning Map, including introduction of a Housing Overlay, Emergency Shelter Overlay, and Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay; expansion of the Commercial Overlay and revisions to allowable commercial uses; and minor edits to clarify other provisions. Refer to the project description in the Initial Study for further information. Please provide your written comments, including specific statutory responsibilities of your agency, as applicable. If you are not a public agency with any statutory responsibility concerning this project, please identify your environmental concerns and any suggested ways to avoid or reduce the impacts that may pertain to this project. Written comments most be received at the earliest possible date, but no later than 30 days after the receipt of this notice. The NOP comment period runs from September 13, 2012 through October 15, 2012. A scoping meeting for agency representatives and the public will be held on September 26, 2012 at 9:00 A.M. at City Hall Council Chamber, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058. Please send your responses and the name of the contact person to: S. Kevin Wilson, Director of Community Services & Water 4305 Santa Fe Ave. Vernon, CA 90058 Email: kwilsonAci.vernon.ca.us Telephone: (323) 583-8811 Project Title: City of Vernon Focused General Plan and Zoning Ord Date: ` —�l l Z Signature _ Title: D ate munity Services & Water Print Form Appendix C Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 For Hand Delivery/Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Project Title: City of Vernon Focused General Plan and Lead Agency: City of Vernon Mailing Address: 4305 Santa Fe Ave. City: Vernon Ordinance Update Contact Person: S. Kevin Wilson Phone:323-583-8811 Zip: 90058 County: Los Angeles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Project Location: County:All parcels in Vernon City/Nearest Community: City of Vernon Cross Streets: N/A; entire City Zip Code: 90058 Longitude/Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): Assessor's Parcel No.: N/A; entire City Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 1-710, 1-5, 1-10 Airports: none Document Type: " N / " W Total Acres: Section: Twp.: Range: Base: Waterways: Los Angeles River Railways: UP, BNSF Schools: LA USD CEQA: ❑x NOP ❑ Draft EIR NEPA: ❑ NOI Other: ❑ Joint Document ❑ Early Cons ❑ SupplemenUSubsequent EIR ❑ EA ❑ Final Document ❑ Neg Dec (Prior SCH No.) ❑ Draft EIS ❑ Other: ❑ Mit Neg Dec Other: ❑ FONSI Local Action Type: ❑X General Plan Update ❑ Specific Plan ❑x Rezone ❑ Annexation x❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Master Plan ❑ Prezone ❑ Redevelopment X❑ General Plan Element x❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Use Permit ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Community Plan ❑ Site Plan ❑ Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) ❑ Other: Development Type: ❑X Residential: Units 35-45 Acres 2.06 ❑ Office: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ❑ Transportation: Type ❑ Commercial: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ❑ Mining: Mineral ❑ Industrial: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ❑ Power: Type MW ❑ Educational: ❑ Waste Treatment: Type MGD ❑ Recreational: ❑ Hazardous Waste:Type ❑ Water Facilities:Type MGD ❑ Other: Project Issues Discussed in Document: ❑ AestheticNisual ❑ Fiscal ❑ Recreation/Parks ❑ Vegetation ❑ Agricultural Land ❑ Flood Plain/Flooding ❑ Schools/Universities ❑ Water Quality X❑ Air Quality ❑ Forest Land/Fire Hazard ❑ Septic Systems ❑ Water Supply/Groundwater ❑ Archeological/Historical ❑ Geologic/Seismic ❑ Sewer Capacity ❑ Wetland/Riparian ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Minerals ❑ Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading ❑ Growth Inducement ❑ Coastal Zone ❑X Noise ❑ Solid Waste ❑ Land Use ❑ Drainage/Absorption ❑ Population/Housing Balance ❑X Toxic/Hazardous ❑x Cumulative Effects ❑ Economic/Jobs ❑ Public Services/Facilities X❑ Traffic/Circulation x❑ Other: Greenhouse gases - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation: Industrial land use; largely industrial zoning - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pro—ject Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) The proposed project consists of: 1) a comprehensive update to the Vernon General Plan Housing Element; 2) a related revision to the Land Use Element to introduce a new Housing Overlay and Emergency Shelter Overlay, and to expand the Commercial Overlay; 3) revisions to the Land Use, Noise, Safety, and Resources Elements to respond to newly adopted State Law; and 4) focused revisions to the Vernon Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, including introduction of a Housing Overlay, Emergency Shelter Overlay, and Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay; expansion of the Commercial Overlay and revisions to allowable commercial uses; and minor edits to clarify other provisions. Note: The State Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. tf a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill in. Revised 2010 Reviewing Agencies Checklist Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "X". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S". X Air Resources Board Office of Historic Preservation Boating & Waterways, Department of Office of Public School Construction California Emergency Management Agency Parks & Recreation, Department of California Highway Patrol Pesticide Regulation, Department of X Caltrans District #7 Public Utilities Commission Caltrans Division of Aeronautics X Regional WQCB #4 Caltrans Planning Resources Agency Central Valley Flood Protection Board Resources Recycling and Recovery, Department of Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm. Coastal Commission San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mms. Conservancy Colorado River Board San Joaquin River Conservancy Conservation, Department of Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy Corrections, Department of State Lands Commission Delta Protection Commission SWRCB: Clean Water Grants Education, Department of SWRCB: Water Quality Energy Commission SWRCB: Water Rights X Fish & Game Region #5 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Food & Agriculture, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of Water Resources, Department of General Services, Department of X Health Services, Department of Other: X Housing & Community Development Other: Native American Heritage Commission - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Local Public Review Period (to be -filled in by lead agency) Starting Date September 13, 2012 Ending Date October 15, 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lead Agency (Complete if applicable): Consulting Firm: Applicant: Address: Address: City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip: Contact: Phone: Phone: Signature of Lead Agency Representative: - — — — — — — — — — — — — Date _! — /I- fZ Authority cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 21161, Public Resources Code Revised 2010 Print Form Summary Form for Electronic Document Submittal Form F Lead agencies may include 15 hardcopies of this document when submitting electronic copies of Environmental Impact Reports, Negative Declarations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, or Notices of Preparation to the State Clearinghouse (SCH). The SCH also accepts other summaries, such as EIR Executive Summaries prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15123. Please include one copy of the Notice of Completion Form (NOC) with your submission and attach the summary to each electronic copy of the document. SCH #: Project Title: City of Vernon Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update Lead Agency: City of Vernon Contact Name: S. Kevin Wilson Email: KWilson@ci.vernon.ca.us Phone Number:323-583-8811 Project Location:City of Vernon , Los Angeles County City County Project Decription (Proposed actions, location, and/or consequences). The proposed project consists of: 1) a comprehensive update to the Vernon General Plan Housing Element; 2) a related revision to the Land Use Element to introduce a new Housing Overlay (and permit a potential housing development at 4675 52nd St.) and an Emergency Shelter Overlay; 3) revisions to the Land Use, Noise, Safety, and Resources Elements to respond to newly adopted State Law; and 4) focused revisions to the Vernon Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, including introduction of a Housing Overlay, an Emergency Shelter Overlay, and a Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay; expansion of the Commercial Overlay and revisions to allowable commercial uses; and minor edits to clarify other provisions. Identify the project's significant or potentially significant effects and briefly describe any proposed mitigation measures that would reduce or avoid that effect. Based on the findings of the Initial Study, the City has identified topics for further analysis in a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Supplemental EIR to the 2007 Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR, State Clearinghouse No. 2007061031). Other impact issues were found to have no effects or would result in less than significant impacts. No mitigation measures were proposed in the Initial Study. Potentially significant effects identified that will be further analyzed in the SEIR are: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Transportation/Traffic. Revised September 2011 continued If applicable, describe any of the project's areas of controversy known to the Lead Agency, including issues raised by agencies and the public. Provide a list of the responsible or trustee agencies for the project. City of Vernon �ry Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance [1t .' rain°[o.� � �`g' U p d ate Purpose of the Scoping Meeting To determine the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Supplemenl'- EIR • General Plan and Zoning Ordinance EIR certified in 2007 • Supplemental EIR (SEIR) CEQA Guidelines 15162 — Minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the proposed project in the changed situation K roject Description _W MW General Plan Amendments • Housing Element amendment — 2014-2021 State -required update — Good governance: Allow up to 60 more units in the City • Land Use Element amendments — new Housing Overlay — new Emergency Shelter Overlay — expanded Commercial Overlay • Noise, Safety, & Resources Element amendments — AB 162, SB 244, SB 375, and updates relevant information Droject Description Other Components • Zoning Ordinance and Map Amendments • Achieve consistency with General Plan amendments — new Housing Overlay, new Emergency Shelter Overlay, expanded Commercial Overlay • new Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay District • Allow ancillary commercial uses on weekends Droject Description Other Components • 4675 52nd Street proposed housing development • 2.06-acre City -owned site • Anticipated 35-45 units � J r _ - ,W �E UWE RM�ugo Sty,, E 14tt;St _ union Pacifil �rae"00 rr■ Vernon di I lam`Qfh'A �1, • S - E4t3ath.S# m o.. i ��I �: _r �q� ^+ • Rr r E 51st S2ndSt rei r p� a E'55th'St _ _ N aV. 53rd $t' " ~` `+ram` • h, S 1 , E 57th St 56th St 55th St • 1 �t _ a 1 �stti St $%ttl Rando • _ � � filst St Q E 60th Stdon fir f V r p G� , rL 4• Li i — Triggs St TQ7e9r aibh • 'Qa Noakes St �'i♦ Astor AV Land Use Designation 0 Industrial Draft Land Use Map i Overlay Districts ® Commercial Rendering Slaughtering Housing Emergency Shelter Base Map --- Vernon City Boundary — — — — — — Vernon Sphere of Influence Freeway Railroad 0 Los Angeles Rivet 1■. - ■■■■■■■■■�I■■■■■ ■■■■ �, � ■1- ���� � �, �a��_u � _:.�. .. ill _ �1 �1, `' r 1■�I Alm �� �■* ��,��,, ' '� _ � III ■ ma's �I Inn ■o�,€•'�r 4 .1 t�•�?E� Rtl�l ■II� '74 N WA IC MI ® �'_win MENEM car.. � € _ _ ■�. � � s� i' �111■[! I arr� f����� .- 1 III �� � �>� �d � �' ,%iR"�f: � � � �1 � ■ � � III �� �t��� � �° WIJ■III-■«� 1_� _ _ , �_ 1_ - si IL LIIIIIIIYYIIIIIrr�r�, � �__��.� -__l� 1 ■■■■ ..._ n Zane 0 Industrial Draft ZoningMap Overlay Districts Base Map Commercial ---- Vernon City Boundary ti Rendering — — — — — — Vernon Sphere of Influence ® Slaughtering Freeway ® Trucking and Freight Terminal Railroad ® Housing F— Los Angeles River ® Emergency Shelter 'PAP r -.ram T'il%J/j►ar�I!➢G Qi' �jr I' �° /I .��/ ■ ® r I ++ I I �I f�/// ////{;!%% /�i•1 �, ,��<�3� �v® INA iii/iiiiii/r►�•,�yrn� / '�% ;,��.� p►'a/I./ �i'��///%/r� ':F�'a`�cl :�/ ��`ra� ►"P W4. MR. I p it' a �. S`♦ems`. � I �/ �s'i � a� ;�vr� ; "' - / E ■ i �lf�/�I J�I��ii�r�I,�l,//�i�=7�'�•fJ`,ir�o ,.��� /{/%'�,lf;! �//� ��;��'F����� ����/,� , 4 � IE nn�y�� � ��J� � .III/�_/i/�I.III� �. 'Ic��..-r�Yt��'.fy,��a^�3�<• � �" F- ., I`I� II �■ �f's���rr':J:rl'/.%%���/.%//I'P/+%/. '�:rg�'��`�c� � .ir' �'�`'�r�a� .. s�� �_ _�- y�i►e�.������I.�.����� �//�//�Ih '°o�,�s,�ca¢`:` gj r�`i.� `♦I ri'y-BSc* 1:1 ElmMEN NMI NOW + `: W■ ��+.s N MIDI■ POP �/ 't III ��� �� � 1� ■ ��� C 1 I �'"r' `�� �,#�' IN roject Description General Plan (Proposed) Land Use Capacity • No net increase in industrial building square footage or employment projections • Potential modest increase in commercial development • Permit an additional 60 units of housing (Estimated 216 additional residents) Purpose of the EIR • Public disclosure of the environmental consequences of a proposed project or plan • Identify mitigation measures and examine alternatives to reduce or avoid potentially significant impacts • Planning tool to assist decision -makers in evaluating benefits/disadvantages of the proposed General Plan and Zoning Code amendments 11 SEIR Process and Scoping Process Draft EIR Distributed for Public Review &Comment (45 days) End of Draft EIR Public Review Period Prepare Responses to Comments on DEIR Prepare Final EIR Certification Documents Public Hearings/Final Certification chedul &I* September 26, 2012 Late November 2012 January 2013 January 2013 January 2013 February 2013 12 Topics Included in the SEIR • Air Quality • Greenhouse Gases • Hazards/Hazardous Materials • Noise • Transportation/Traffic • Cumulative and Growth Inducing Impacts • Alternatives • Irreversible Environmental Changes 13 Focus of Requested Comments onScope of the EIR • Specific kinds of impacts of concern—e.g. traffic congestion at particular locations, local greenhouse gas emissions, noise or hazardous conditions from specific sources, etc. 14 Focus of Requested Comments onScope of the EIR _ • Soecific concerns about effectiveness of existing City policies and planning and engineering programs that deal with environmental protection and protection from hazards 15 Focus of Requested Comments onScope of the EIR Suggestions about ways to improve or change City policies and programs to better address specific environmental concerns 16 Focus of Requested Comments onScope of the EIR • Air Quality/GHG: Industrial uses and transportation sources • Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Industrial uses; active earthquake faults • Noise: Business/industrial noise; traffic and train noise • Transportation /Traffic: Automobile and truck traffic; train impacts 17 �ry Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance [1t .' rain°[o.� � �`g' U p d ate STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY EDMIJND G. BROWN JR. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7, OFFICE OF REGIONAL PLANNING 4 Ct a IGR/CEQA BRANCH r 100 MAIN STREET, MS # 16 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-3606 Flex your power! PHONE: 3) 89 -1337 19 �ill�l urn It rVl 0 Be energy efficient! FAX: (213) 897-1337 September 20, 2012 Mr. Kevin Wilson City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Ave Vernon, CA 90058 Re: IGR/CEQA No. 120916ZJ-NOP/IS City of Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update Vic. LA-5/710-VAR, SCH#2007061031 Dear Mr. Wilson: Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the City of Vernon General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update. Based on the information received, we have the following comments: To fully evaluate the potential impacts to the State Highway System at the General Plan build - out, a traffic study is necessary and should be prepared prior to preparing the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The traffic study should include the following information: 1. Analysis of Interstate 5 (I-5) and Interstate 710 (I-710) freeways, including all affected on/off ramps. 2. Trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and trip assignment. 3. Traffic volumes and level -of -service calculations for major, Including existing, project, cumulative, and project plus cumulative traffic analysis. 4. An analysis of future transportation infrastructure improvements, including improvement to the mainline freeway and freeway on/off-ramps. 5. The General Plan should include an analysis of goods movement activities within the City, such as trucking operations and rail freight operations. It should also include intermodal rail freight/trucking operations, retail and manufacturing warehouse distribution facilities, and a summary of origin and destination. The Goods Movement activities should also include current level of operation and future system capacity. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Kevin Wilson September 20, 2012 Page 2 of 2 6. Transportation Corridor Studies that may involve implementing congestion pricing for trucks using new local highway facilities such as along the I-710 Freeway corridor should be included in the Vernon General Plan. For additional information on Caltrans criteria for the preparation of traffic impact analysis, please refer the traffic consultant to the Department's traffic study guide Website: http://www.dot ca og v/hq/tpp/offices/ocp/igr cee a files/tis ug_ ide pdf If you have any questions regarding our comments, please call project coordinator Zeron Jefferson at (213) 897-0219. Please refer to record number 120916/ZJ. Sincerely, DiAnna Watson IGR/CEQA Branch Chief cc: Scott Morgan, State Clearinghouse "Caltrans improves mobility across California" SYA—TE OFrALIFORNIA €amunu G- 9rown. Jr., Go verger NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 915 CAFrrOL MALL. ROOM 364 $ACAAMENTO, CA 9014 (416)553-6251 rft (816) 657.53W Wet) $11e ..W,% i;aht ' ,3e.t d6 natiefpacberi.nat September 26, 2012 Mr. S. Kevin Wilson Planner City of Vemon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vemon, CA 90058 J,A ;ornmunity SeMces Re-. SCH#200706101_CEQ&Npfice of Preparation {IVQP)- draft Environmental Impact Report LD£IR�for the "Focused General Plan and Zoning Prdinance Update. Project;' located in_the C ity of Varnoni Las Angeles County, California Dear Mr. Wilson: The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) is the State of Califomia 'Trustee Agency' for the protection and pre servatian of Native American cultural resources pursuant to California Public Resources Cade §21070 and affirmed by the Third Appellate Court in the case of EPIC v. Johnson (1985: 170 Ca[ App. 3fd 604). Tins letter includes state and federal statutes relating to Native American historic properties or resources of religious and cuitutal significance to American Indian tribes and interested Native American individuals as 'consulting parties' under both state and federal law- State law also addresses the freedom of Native American Religious Expression in Public Resources Code §5097.9. This project is also subject to California Government Code Section 65352.3 et seq. The California Environmental Quality Act (QEGA — CA Pubic Resources Code 21060-21177- amendments effective 3/1812010) requires that any project that causes a substantial adverse charge in the significance of an historical resource- that includes archaeolog icaJ resources, is a 'significant effect' requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Deport (FIR) per the CEQA Guidelines defines a significant impact on the environment as 'a substantial, or potentially substantial. adverse change in any of physical conditions within an area affected by the proposed project, including ...objects of historic or aesthetic sign ficance." In order to comply with this provision. the lend agency is required to assess whether the {project will (rave an adverse impact on these resources within the "area of potential effect (APE), and if so. to mitrgate that effect. The NAHC recommends that the [ead agency request that the NAHC do a Sacred Lands File search as part of the careful planning for the proposed project. The NAHC "Sacred Sites.' as defined by the Native American Heritage Commission and the California Legislature in California Public Resources Code §5097_94(a) and 5097.96 Items in the NAHC Sacred Lands Jnventory are confidential and exempt from the Public Records Act pursuant to Califorriia Government Code §6254 (r ). Early consultation with Native American tribes in your area is the best way to avoid unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources or burial sites once a project is underway. Culturally affiliated tubes and individuals may have knowledge of the religious and cultural significance of the historic properties in the project area (e,g. APB). We strongly urge th, t you make contact with the list of Native American Contacts on the attached fist of Native American contacts, to see if your proposed project might impact Native American cultural resources and to obtain their recommendations concerning the proposed project- Pursuant to CA Public Resources Code § 5097-95, the NAFIC requests cooperation from other public agencies in order that the Native American consulting parties be provided pertinent project information. Consultation with Native American communities is also a matter of environmental justice as defined by California Government Code §65040,1 (e). Pursuant to CA Public Resources Code §5097.9 . the NAHC. requests that pertinent project information be provided consulting tribal parties, including archaeological studies. The NAHC recommends avoidance as defined by CEQA Guidelines §15370(a) to pursuing a project that wvould damage of destroy Native American cultural resources and California Public Resources Code Section 2108 - (Archaeological Resources) that requires docurnentation, data recovery of cultural resources, construction to avoid sites and the possible use of covenant easements to protect sites. Furthermore the NAHC if the proposed project is under the jurisdiction of the statutes and regulations of the National Environmental policy Act (e-g. NEPA; 42 U.S-C. 4321-43351). onsaltation with tribes and interested Native American consulting parties, on the NAHC list, should be coriducted in compliance with the requirements of federal NEPA and Section 106 and 4(q of federal NHPA (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq), 36 C F R Part 800.3 (f) (2) & -5, the President's Council on Environmental Quality (C 4, 42 U. .0 4371 et seq. and NAGPRA ( 5 U.&C, 3001- 01 ) as appropriate- The 1992 ,Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties were revised so that they could be applied to alb historic resource types included in the NaticnaI Register of Historic Places and including cukturaI landscapes. Also, federal Executive Orders Nos. 11593 (preservation of cultural environment), 13175 (coordination & consultation) and 13007 (Sacred Sites) are helpful, supportive guides for Section 106 consultation. The aforementioned Secretary of the Interior's Sfandards include recommendations for all -lead agencies' to consider the historic context_ of proposed projects and to "research" the cultural landscape that might include the `area of potential effect. Confidentiality of "historic properties of religious and cultural significance" should also be considered as protected by California Government Code §6254( r) and may also be protected under Section 304 of he NHPA or at the Secretary of the Interier discretion if not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Secretary may also be advised by the federal Indian Religious Ffeedom Act (cf. 42 US C.. 1996) in issuing a decision on whether or not to disclose items of religious and/or cultural significance identified in or near the APES and possitifity threatened by proposed project activity - Furthermore, Public Resources Code Section 5097-98, Califomia Government Code §27491 and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5 provide for provisions for inadvertent discovery of human remains mandate the processes to be followed in the event of a discovery of human remains in a project location other than a 'dedicated cemetery' To be effective, consultation on specific projects must be the result of an ongoing relationship between Native American tribes and lead agencies, project proponents and their contractors, in the opinion of the NAHC. Regarding tribal consultation, a relationship built afound regular meetings and infwmal involvement +with local tribes will lead to more qualitative consultation tribal input on specific projects- Finally+, where Native American cultural sites artdfof Native American burial site$ are prevalent w ithin the project site, the INAH 0 recornmends 'avoidance' of the site as referenced by EQA Guidelines Section 15370(a). It you have any clue ns about this response to your request. please do not hesitate to me at (916) 6 3- _ 8-ngleton Program Analyst cc: State =hcan useAttachment. Contact List Native American Contacts Los Angeles County September 26, 2012 LA City/County Native American Indian Comm Ran Andrade, Director 3175 West 6th St, Rm, 403 Los Angeles . CA 9000 rail drade css.#acaunty.gov (213) 351-524 (13) 386-3995 FAX Ti'At Bocietylinter-Tribal Council of Pimu Cindi M. Alvitre, Chairwoman -Mani ar 3094 Mace Avenue, Apt. B Gabrielino Costae Mesa, r CA 92626 calvitreC yahaa.cem (714) 504-2468 Cell abrlelino longva Nation Barn Dunlap, C uttural Resources Director P 0. Box 869O8 Gabrielina Tangva Los Angeles . CA so086 S a md u 0 a p C§ earth Iink.net (909) 262-9351 - cell Cabrielino Tongva Indians of Cal ilornia Tribal Council Robert F_ Dorame, Tribal Chair/Cultural Resources P 0. Box 490 Gabrielino Tongva Bellflower CA 90707 gtongve verizon.net 562-761-6417 - voice 582-761-6417- fax 7angva Ancestral Territorial Tribal Nation abrielino-TiDn9va Tribe John Tommy Rosas, Tribal Admin. Bernie Acuna Private Address Gabrielino Tongva 1875 Century Pk East #1500 Cabrielino Los Angeles , CAA 9067 tettniaw@gmail.com (619) 294-561 -work 310-570-6567 (310) 428-5690 - cell (310) 587-0170 - FAX bacunat @5gabrieinotriibe.org GabrielenolTonova San Gabriel Band of Mission Anthony Morales, Chairperson PO Box 693 Gabrielino Tongva Sari Gabriel , CA 91 778 TTribalcounciI L& aol.corn (626) 286-1632 (6 ) 86-175B - Flame (626) 286-1262 -FAX This I lst is c u rrant wily " of the date of th i9 docum int. Gabrielino-Ton9va Tribe Linda Crandefaria, Chairwoman 1875 Century Pk East #1500 fiabrieiino Los Angeles . CA 90067 Icandelarial C?gabrielino7ribe.org 626-678-1 184- cell (310) 587-0170 - FAX Distribution of this list does nol mltewe any parson of the statutoty rosponsIbiliq as defined In Section 71350.5 of the Neahh gild $imfety Code. Section $097-94 of the Public Resourr-e5 Cotig i3nd 5"Hon 541$7.96 or the PuWk F�O60urr_" Code. This Iist ,s applicable for contactJng local Natwo Arnericans vAth regard to cultural resources for the proposed SCHQ007051031. Cr=QA "ice of Preparation (NQP), draft Environmental JmparI Repoft (DEIR) kw the For.uaed General Elan and Zoning Ordinance Update-, located in the City of Vernon, Loa Angeles County, California. Native American Contacts Los Angeles County September 26. 2012 Gabrielenv Band of Mission Indians Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Gabrieline Covina , GA 91723 (626) -41 1 gabrielenoindians yahoo. om This list is current only as of the date of this document, Dlstrihotion of this list does nok rslieve any person of tho Statt tOry FesP4n91WRY as def4ne•d in SeGtI*ra 7050.5 of the Health Snd Safety Cade. Section 5091." of the Public- Resources Code and Section W$7_98 of the Publi4 Resources Code. This tkst is applicable for contacting local Natkva Americans with regard to cultural re5oumes for the proposed *CHOM70G10]4; CEOA Netite of Preparation (140P): draft EnvlFonmQnt31 lmpactReport (driR) for the Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinanore Update; located in ttae City of Varnon; Los Angeles County, ralifomia. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 320 WEST 4"' STREET, SUITE 500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 September 21, 2012 S. Kevin Wilson City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 Dear Mr. Wilson: Re: SCH# 2007061031 Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update The California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) has jurisdiction over the safety of highway - rail crossings (crossings) in California. The California Public Utilities Code requires Commission approval for the construction or alteration of crossings and grants the Commission exclusive power on the design, alteration, and closure of crossings in California. The Commission Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES) is in receipt of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) from the State Clearinghouse for the proposed City of Vernon (City) Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update project. Previously on June 26 and October 5, 2007, RCES issued two (2) comment letters on the matter. RCES recommends that the City add language to the General Plan so that any future development adjacent to or near the shared railroad/light rail right-of-way is planned with the safety of the rail corridor in mind. New developments may increase traffic volumes not only on streets and at intersections, but also at at -grade highway -rail crossings. This includes considering pedestrian circulation patterns/destinations with respect to railroad right-of-way and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Mitigation measures to consider include, but are not limited to, the planning for grade separations for major thoroughfares, improvements to existing at -grade highway -rail crossings due to increase in traffic volumes and continuous vandal resistant fencing or other appropriate barriers to limit the access of trespassers onto the railroad right-of-way. If you have any questions, please contact Ken Chiang at 213-576-7076, email at ykcgcpuc.ca.gov. Sincerely, 1 Ken Chiang, PE Utilities Engineer Rail Crossings Engineering Section Consumer Protection & Safety Division C: State Clearinghouse South Coast Air Quality Management 1 tri" t 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar. CA 917 5-418 (909) 396-2000 a www.aqmd.gov S_ Kevin Wilson Director ofCommunity Servies & Water City of Vornoir 4305 Santa Fe Avenue Vernon, CA 90058 .ti October 3, 2012 Notice of Preparation of a CE A Document for the Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update The South Coast Air (Quality Management District (SC:AQMD) appreciates the oppartunity to comment on the above- mcntianW document_ Tie SCA QMD-S conkmet 0 are reconrttrcndations regarding the analysis of pertential air quality impacts from the proposed project that should be included in the draft C EA document_ Please send the Sc. AQMD a copy oI" the Draft EIR upon its completion. plate brat copies of the Draft E I R Ihat area submitted to the State Clearinghouse are not forwarded to the SC:AQMD. Please forward a copy of the Draft E IFS directly to SC AQ M D at the address in our letterhead, [n addition, pleaste send with the drag EIR sill appendices or technical documents related to the air quality and greenhouse gas analyses and electronic versions of all air quality modeling and health risk assessment files. These include original emission calculation spreadsheets and modeling files nut Adobe PDF Liles). Without all files and supporting air finality docurnenution, the SCAQMD will he unable to complete its review of the air quality analysis in a timely manner. A rty deIays is providing all supporting air quality documentsrtion will rea uire additional time for review beyond the end of the comment period, Air (finality Analysis The SCA M D adopted its Cal ifornia Environmental Quality Act (CF.QA) Air Quality Handbook in 1993 to assist other pEiblic agencies with the preparation ofair quality analyses. The SCAQMD recommends thsr the lead Agency use this Hand book as guidance when preparing its air quality analysis_ Copics o1'the Handbook are available From the SCA MD"s Subscription Services Department by calling (909) 396-3720. The lead agency may wish to consider using Sand use emissions estimating soflware much a�i the recently released CalEEMod. ` his model is aivaiIable on the CA VID Webske at, hLtp,//www.ggrnd.LovicNa/i-nodels.htirn]. The Lead Agency should identify any potential adverse air gLial ity impacts that could occur from a I I phases of the project and all air pollutant sources related to the project. Air quality impacts from both construction (including demolition, if any) and operations should be calculated. Construction -related air quality impacts typically include, but are riot limited to, emissions fronr the use of heavy-duty equipment front grading. earth -load inglunload ing, paving. architectural coatings, off road mobile sources (e.g., heavy-duty construction equipment) and on -road mobile sources (e.g., construction worker vehicle trips. material transport trips). Operation -related air quality impacts may irncIWe, but are not limited to, emissions from stationary sources (e.g., boilers), area sources (e.g., solvents and coatings), and vehicular trips (e.g., on- and off -road tailpipe omissions and entrained dust). Air quality impacts front indirect sources, that is, sources that generate or attract vehicular trips should he included in the analysis. The SCAMD has developed a methodology for calculatioa P,5 emissions from construction and operational activities and processes. In connection with developing PM2.5 calculation methodologies; the SCAMD has also developed both regional and localized significance thresholds. The SCAQM requests chat the lead agency quantify PM? _5 emissions and compare the resultas to the recommended PM .5 significance thresholds. Guidance for caleuWing PM 2.5 emissions and P M2.5 significance thresholds can be found at the following internet address: http;l/w�%, -agrod, oa vtcegaAiandbonk/PM2 51P 2_S.html, & Levin Wilsrrrt October 3. 21Il12 In addition to autalyzing regional air quality impacts the SCAQMD recommends calculating localized air quality impacts and comparing the resuits to localized significance thresholds (LS1-s). LST's can be used in addition to Ole recommended regiunaI significance thresholds as a second indicalion uI' air qunlily impacts when Preparing a C'FQA document. Therelnre. when }preparing the air qual ity analysis l`or the proposed project. il is rcconimcnded that the lead agency pxrlonrt a IocaIized significance analysis ley either using the LST� developed by the SC'AQMD or rertorming dispersion mode Iing as necessary. Guidance feu performing a localized air quaIIt%- analysis can be found at http-/!%&r%v-tv.agtnd- n� v/cegAapdbook/1-STiL-ST.html- In the event thal the proposed project generates, or attracts vehicular Irips, especially heavy-duty diesel -Fueled vehicles, it is recummendud that the lead agency pertor n a mobile source health risk assessment, Guidance Ibr peiforming a inobile source healtlt risk assessment ("health Risk Aswss=nt (iuidanze for Analyzing Cancer Risk from Mobile Source DieseI Ed I ing Emissions tar C LQA Air Qua I1V Analysis') can be found «n ilie SCAQMIYN CE(}A web pages a the fallowing intemet add ress= hap'. viccgsfhandbgol riobile_toxic/mohiIc_roxic.htm1. An analysis ❑f a I I toxic air contaminant impacts due iG the decommissioning Or use of equipment potentially generating such air pollutants should also be inc Iu&d. Mitiga inn Measures In the event that the project generates sign ificam adverse air qua4lhy impacts. CEQA require;s that all fen,�ibie mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized during project construction and operation to minimize or eliminate significant adverse air quality impacts. To assist the Lead Agenc} with identif�-ing possible iniIigat ic+n Measures ror Ilse prulee 1, please rcrer In Chapter I I ortht SC'AQMD C FQA Air Quality IIandbook IOF Satmple air qu$Iity mitigation nicastires. Additional mitigation measures can he found on the SC'AQN1D's C i"QA web pages at the following interne[ address: www.aymd.goy/cegalhandbook/mitigation/MM intro.htnil Additionally, SCAQMD'.s R the 403 - Fugitive Dust, and the I'm plemct iitat-ton Handbook contait4 numerous measures for controlling construction -related emissions that should be considered for use as CEQA mitigation if not otherwise required. Othar measure; I reduce air quality impacts From Iand nse projects can be found in the SCAQMD's Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality issues in General I'lans and IrocaI Planning. This documen I can be round at the Following intomw address; http;Ww,agmd.goviprda_s/agggidOayguide-himI- In addition. g4idance on siting incompatible land uses can be Found in the California Air Resources Board's Air Qijality and Land Use i Ianftook-. A Coin munity Perspective, which can be round at the Following intermut address. http.,?/ww%Y_arb.ca.govkhAandbeoL.ydf. C'ARB's l.Find LJse IIandbook is a general reference guide for evaluating. and reducing air pollution impacts associated %vilh tx'w projects that go through the Ian use decision -making process. Pursuant to slate C'EQA {guidelines § 15 1: 6.4 (a)( I A1)), arty impacts nesi liing from initigatii= measures musl also be di_wusscd. Dahk 1.6%1turrrc SCAQMD odes and relevant air quality reports and data are available by cal Iing the SCA M D? s Public Information Center at (909) 396-2039. Mtic h of the inform ition availahle through the Pub1 is Ii)Ib mation Center is also available via the SCA MD's World Wide Web Homepage (http:lfwww.agmd.gov). The SCAQMD staff` is available to work with the Lead Agency to ensure that project -related emissions are ace urawlV identified, categorized, and evaluated. If you have any questions regarding this ieiter- please call tan MacMillan. Program Supervi k)r. CHQA Section. at (909) 396-1244. Sincerely. I/ A Aloe Ian Macmiliatn Program Supervisor. CEQA letter-Govemmentai review Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources LM LAC1 20913-04 Control dumber STATE OF CALIFORNIA OVEF�NOR'S OFFICE oj-PLA-N1NING ' STD RESTARCH r9LrFnPN,F i DDMUND G. BROW? E', GOVERNOR September 13, 2012 To: Reviewing Agencies STATE CIEAiiNGHOUSL AND PL NNING UNIT Notice of Preparation Re: Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update SCH# 2007061031 W S CAl'ele, KEN ALE)., DIRECrOI: SEP 17 2912 Community Services Attached for your review and comment is the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Responsible agencies must transmit their comments on the scope and content of the NOP, focusing on specific information related to their own statutory responsibility, within 30 days of receipt of the NOP from the Lead Agency. This is a courtesy notice provided by the State Clearinghouse with a reminder for you to comment in a timely manner. We encourage other agencies to also respond to this notice and express their concerns early in the environmental review process. Please direct your comments to: S. Kevin Wilson City of Vernon 4305 Santa Fe Ave Vernon, CA 90058 with a copy to the State Clearinghouse in the Office of Planning and Research. Please refer to the SCH number noted above in all correspondence concerning this project. If you have any questions about the environmental document review process, please call the State Clearinghouse at (916)445-0613. Sincere, Scott Morgan Director, State Clearinghouse Attachments cc: Lead Agency 1400 !OIh S,,-eet 1.0, Boz 3044 Sacramento, Califo-n a 95812-30A4 �t 1 aa�,-0613 FAl (916j 323-301S vwJ)A'.00-.ca.c7ov Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2007061031 Project Title Focused General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Update Lead Agency Vernon, City of Type NOP Notice of Preparation Description The proposed project consists of: 1) a comprehensive update to the Vernon General Plan Housing element; 2) a related vision to the Land Use Element to introduce a new Housing Overlay and Emergency Shelter Overlay, and to expand the Commercial Overlay; 3) revisions to the Land Use, Noise, Safety, and Resources Elements to respond to newly adopted State Law; and 4) focused revisions to the Vernon Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map, including introduction of a Housing Overlay, Emergency Shelter Overlay, and Truck and Freight Terminal Overlay; expansion of the Commercial Overlay and revisions to allowable commercial uses; and minor edits to clarify other provisions. Lead Agency Contact Name S. Kevin Wilson Agency City of Vernon Phone 323 583-8811 x245 Fax email Address 4305 Santa Fe Ave City Vernon State CA Zip 90058 Project Location County Los Angeles City Vernon Region Cross Streets Entire City Lat / Long Parcel No. Entire City Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways 1-5, 1-10, 1-710 Airports No Railways UPRR, BNSF Waterways Los Angeles River Schools LA USD Land Use Industrial Land Use; largely Industrial Zoning Project Issues Noise; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Cumulative Effects; Other Issues; Air Quality Reviewing Resources Agency; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; Agencies Department of Fish and Game, Region 5; Office of Emergency Management Agency, California; Native American Heritage Commission; Public Utilities Commission; California Highway Patrol; Department of Housing and Community Development; Caltrans, District 7; Department of Toxic Substances Control; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 4 Date Received 09/13/2012 Start of Review 09/13/2012 End of Review 10/12/2012 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. o v I • 0 O U c O o 2 a o U U O m _ O C OJ m N ��CXy V O U >' Q1 O- m a) O O LL (C9 r m E a' m m O O .a 'E) U r V) a) N M O' m -o cr m v m n ` � Q) V) m m to a7 m> m lf) a] p] m> m (D O m a (D h CO an co m� m> m m Z U n U C to U N U U O U� o U= U a O U a ,C a U� CS L0 La) U c� U '- U U CJ O O ap � C7 C O E m U a) U 'S r c `m C N C 'p C C Cl) = -0Q ?s C O Q' a) r O -� � E NQ a' BULL �Ua' a' O .a) � J> a' c0 � n1 mo O U O i ®UZ ❑ WUW ❑U -J ❑U ❑ ❑ ❑J ❑ ❑U ❑V) ❑(n ❑ ❑ N O � CO 6 75 p m U) N .:� U O N U O V) U N - O is O U) O a) - U U U U U E U)O u) a) N c Q �n > = ai a) a a U) _N Mn (n 'p •� O_ x 75V) V) ,U O (,f a' X O O O U F 0� a O a N a) C N d � a1 N O C C 6 C V) T C Y fn V) Vl E uJ N C C C ul C C p C N ° m 01 C_ E a C a7 f0 (6 ,0 a) O O _2 E c0 "O ID- y o @ i C a) C J O) V) ~ c c c o W "O Q7 D `a— a ° y C •O :) D Q) ` M- O° nz—= ° a o cc aw° f9 p®= U -0 fa 7 m¢ m U a) U O U U o U E = F- O O :Y s 2 i O N m C o +�+ O N C « O m �- a) O m 0 U U) m aa) tq m p CT Q m Q o ¢ O m ❑o®C7❑�❑�®2i W 0� V7 ❑ ❑ ❑ .4 a) .- :w-• .o �j ,o a) .- L .- W W ❑ V) C❑ L ¢ �� aoLq C O O 07 O C tm 0 C C O U) C m a >` .� C C r N M "I- to CO Q) V) c o y 3 aoi E o p u u u u u u u N C 1C E d E > o R1 a •� a x U C p` .> (II V) 0 a) fn V) (n C Vl N U (II o o y m D7 O C N Q R'S _ 1D n1 d od E ❑ 0 0� 0 0 0 O N 0 0 O` C -p m N U c0 U a) O a 'C •O) C (/•) 7 r m C E W 'U 'r U U a1 O_ •- C U N C O N .N- y T a7 O �_ ° A _ �- .V E 7j 'o a) � U `�] E ° 7 Q) @ m �• i O .E t0 O .� C O N °- w Y (n O° > O C fC9 A C� ccu � fC ` a .0 .�+ O - i .�.+ O M N M is +�+ Z " 3 Q E� C 7 O O cL >, J >+ a U ?� m m .c 0 Z (0 a) () cn U Q IC a) U a ca C O U 0 O a) U 2 m Q _� p1 fII ° fC .0 (C m E @ .N U U U¢ U Q U m — m U m U c R O N o m7 .�0, f0 m L o C ® L ® a) 7 `� o O O ® a) ® a) ❑ (a ® Y ® aS ® U N ZUO J rn0 (n� h-QU a U) U= � O W O O r v uO E m c C O E ( w o V) C a) O u v O m C C C O O p O m C Z p O_ N d E a) O N a) ? 0 T •� N M 07 Ol a m a CM C = ,U ea .0 a) m .0' C C a) a) C O O 2 a c a) 0> r a U 06 °) � U � N No � � cm O � Q E o m N .2 m m m E m E 0 a) y @ E L N . V p) C c n � C C a) N C7 o m U) O ° E U C O E r o o W a7 N -n C a' as (9 Z m a) N a) O 0 U N U c. fQ O 9 0� 2 c I.L w U CO N a) fa Q _° 0 """ U O d 3 O O O �@ "- +•' — m 'N N O � V) Q of E o E E o+� a) a8 c o3 0 a7 c a3 a) ° cam E 7 xs r. o Q) O L— c) o ° a) c ° -C m •� _ _ cn U Q) a •F ^u m N r c0 w= (j Q1 C`@J ¢ r c = U LOU L� 0.�� cu o0LL CL U c- E Q�= �° j > C CO `.«° EZ W CU LL a) o N_ m n Z (n �' Q 0.S LL> LLLL O 0 LL n) N a o f .0 M = E a� m U LL f9 O a) m a) c a) m o o N. ❑ (%7 U U 0 C O U `L -O Lo m o- a m U U .N p�LL ° Mn O V) L ❑ O go a) (6 (0 a3 p O ® a) (0 Cl C: a) p�U [ C W O a rn ff �❑q n � a U J J L�� LL -) LL U J 1 L..9 C 0 = fA a U� � U7 � LJ Lg a Q -� O U C L_V � U ❑ ® �U O o 06 a o _n oo a o U) E _ pa O O O O 'D c) ca N E c9 d7 Z o U' O O aS a) 7] c >o a'i c LL °N C � � w Z C O0U Wq CD ° oU ° oN f ° a) E e C Q1 •EU) (U p V 'cN J O O . IL)m , - N C mv U n Q ¢O NNaN u o EU u i o� uC0 °°o E co)� uU �° U° a� 0. u nai ca) O U)O c0 ' U O a. a) O O) o 0 ) 0Q o if V)2 o L Z � ,�U �❑❑ C O )v p p O_a) Z5 71 O Z W (n p l.L City of Huntington Park Planning Department 6550 Miles Avenue Huntington Park, CA 90255 L.A. County Board of Supervisors Director of Planning James Hertl — Room 1390 320 W. Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt District (AQMD) 21865 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Brian Scanlon L.A. County Public Works Mapping & Property Mgmt. 900 S. Fremont Avenue, 10th Floor Alhambra, CA 91803 City of Commerce Planning Department 2535 Commerce Way Commerce, CA 90040 City of Bell Planning Department 6330 Pine Street Bell, CA 90201 City of Cudahy Planning Department 5220 Santa Ana Street Cudahy, CA 90201 L.A. County Sanitation District P.O. Box 4998 Whittier, CA 90607 City of Maywood Planning Department 4319 Slauson Avenue Maywood, CA 90270 City of Los Angeles Planning Department 200 North Spring St. Los Angeles, CA 90012 Lucille Roybal-Allard John Kinas Congresswoman United States Aluminum 255 E. Temple St., Ste 1860 3663 Bandini Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90012 Vernon, CA 90023 Gloria Molina Ms. Gutierrez Board of Supervisors 924 S. Mott Street 500 W. Temple St., Ste 856 Los Angeles, CA 90023 Los Angeles, CA 90012 City of Long Beach James H. Hillands Office of the City Manager Heger Realty Corp. 333 W. Ocean Blvd., 13th floor 5657 E. Washington Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90802 Los Angeles, CA 90040 E.J. Contreras Joseph R. Garruba Owens -Brockway California Portland Cement Co. 2901 Fruitland Avenue 2025 E. Financial Way Vernon, CA 90058 Glendora, CA 91740 California Water Service Comp. J.J. Little 3316 West Beverly Boulevard J.J. Little Company, Inc. Montebello, CA 90640 9945 Malgar Drive Whittier, CA 90603 Marisa Olguin L.R. Luppen Chamber of Commerce Metal Products Engineering 3801 Santa Fe Avenue 3050 Leonis Boulevard Vernon, CA 90058 Vernon, CA 90058 State Clearinghouse Ellen Orlando P.O. Box 3044 Karen Lehrer Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 2300 E. 11th Street Los Angeles, CA 90021 L.A. County Flood Control District Maywood Mutual Water Co. 3 900 S. Fremont Avenue, 8th Floor 6151 Heliotrope Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 Maywood, CA 90270 L.A. Unified School District So. Cal Edison Office of Environmental Health & Safety 1924 Cashdan Street 333 South Beaudry Ave., 20th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Compton, CA 90220 Attention: Glenn Striegler Attn: Mike Frazier SukChon County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Land Development Division P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 Dave Karrker California Water Service 5243 E. Sheila Street Commerce, CA 90022 AT&T Reynan L. Ledesma 100 W. Alondra Blvd., Rm 202A Department of Water & Power L.A. Gardena, CA 90248 The Gas Company (So. Cal Gas Co.) 3150 111 N. Hope Street Attn: Leslie Donaldson P.O. Box San Dimas, C, CA 91773 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad L.A. Junction Railroad 3770 E. Washington Blvd. 4433 Exchange Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90023 Vernon, CA 90058 Attn: Dick Ebel Attn: Marion Alexander SukChon L.A. County Sanitation District County of Los AngelesDepartment of Public Works The Gas Company (So. Cal Gas Co.) P.O. Box 4998 P.O. Box 3150 Whittier, CA 90607 Land Development Division San Dimas, CA 91773 P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 L.A. County Sanitation District P.O. Box 4998 Whittier, CA 90607 SukChon County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Land Development Division P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 The Gas Company (So. Cal Gas Co.) P.O. Box 3150 San Dimas, CA 91773 SukChon L.A. County Sanitation District County of Los AngelesDepartment of Public Works The Gas Company (So. Cal Gas Co.) P.O. Box 4998 P.O. Box 3150 Whittier, CA 90607 Land Development Division San Dimas, CA 91773 P.O. Box 1460 Alhambra, CA 91802-1460 Appendix B Air Quality Data This Page Intentionally Left Blank X4F-I I WL[ciroillIall I This Page Intentionally Left Blank CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 1 City of Vernon Supplemental EIR Existing South Coast Air Basin, Summer Date: 12/16/2013 2:55 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 113,822.28 1000sgft 2,613.00 113,822,280.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 12 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - acreage Construction Phase - No construction proposed. 2.2 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) Operational Year N20 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 31 2014 0.006 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 0.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 113,822,000.00 113,822,280.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2,612.99 2,613.00 2.0 Emissions Summary ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day Area 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Energy 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.6 690,087.69 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 992 92 79 Mobile 3,992.5407 13,111.849 53,171.58 109.6362 7,444.616 212.9344 7,657.551 1,988.6281 195.5229 2,184.1510 10,160,88 10,160,886 444.4319 10,170,21 1 50 1 1 7 1 1 6.7357 .7357 1 1 1 .8064 Total 7,033.3991 13,687.040 53,666.79 113.0875 7,444.616 256.6843 7,701.300 1,988.6281 239.2728 2,227.9008 10,850,99 10,850,999 457.7331 12.6516 6 66 7 9 1 1 9.3452 1 .3452 1 110,864,531 .7393 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Area 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Energy 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.6 690,087.69 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 992 92 79 Mobile 3,992.5407 13,111.849 53,171.58 109.6362 7,444.616 212.9344 7,657.551 1,988.6281 195.5229 2,184.1510 10,160,88 10,160,886 444.4319 10,170,21 1 50 7 1 6.7357 .7357 1 1 1 .8064 Total 7,033.3991 13,687.040 53,666.79 113.0875 7,444.616 256.6843 7,701.300 1,988.6281 239.2728 2,227.9008 10,850,99 10,850,999 457.7331 12.6516 6 66 7 1 1 9 1 1 9.3452 1 .3452 1 110,864,531 .7393 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 12/31/2013 5 0 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating - sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle ClasE Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day 13,992.5407 Unmitigated 13,111.849 53,171.58 109.6362 7,444.616 212.9344 7,657.551 1,988.6281 195.5229 2,184.1510 10,160,88 10,160,886 444.4319 10,170,21 1 50 7 1 6.7357 .7357 .8064 Mitigated 3,992.5407 13,111.849 53,171.58 109.6362 7,444.616 212.9344 7,657.551 1,988.6281 195.5229 2,184.1510 10,160,88 10,160,886 444.4319 10,170,21 1 50 7 1 6.7357 .7357 .8064 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry 793,341.29 150,245.41 77397.15 2,653,392,885 2,653,392,885 Total 793,341.29 150,245.41 77,399.15 2,653,392,885 2,653,392,885 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 LDA LDT1 I LDT2 MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587 0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- 7 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.6 690,087.69 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 Mitigated 992 92 79 NaturalGas 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.6 690,087.69 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 Unmitigated 992 92 79 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 5.86575e+ 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 Industry 006 92 992 79 Total 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 92 992 79 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 5865.75 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 Industry 92 992 79 Total 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 92 992 79 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Mitigated 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 722.6917 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,253.6811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.2275 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Total 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 1 004 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 722.6917 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,253.6811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.2275 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Total 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 1 004 1 1 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 1 City of Vernon Supplemental EIR Existing South Coast Air Basin, Winter Date: 12/16/2013 2:57 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 113,822.28 1000sgft 2,613.00 113,822,280.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 12 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - acreage Construction Phase - No construction proposed. 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2014 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 0.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 113,822,000.00 113,822,280.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2,612.99 2,613.00 2.0 Emissions Summary ROG NO c0 S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 1 Energy 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.6 690,087.69 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 992 92 79 Mobile 4,116.6429 13,828.834 51,193.08 104.0720 7,444.616 213.9547 7,658.571 1,988.6281 196.4615 2,185.0896 9,657,831. 9,657,831. 444.6368 9,667,169. 0 05 7 4 6624 6624 0355 Total 7,157.5012 14,404.025 51,688.29 107.5233 7,444.616 257.7046 7,702.321 1,988.6281 240.2114 2,228.8395 10,347,94 10,347,944 457.9380 12.6516 5 21 7 1 3 1 4.2719 .2719 110,361,48 .9684 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 7TO CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Energy 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.6 690,087.69 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 992 92 79 Mobile 4,116.6429 13,828.834 51,193.08 104.0720 7,444.616 213.9547 7,658.571 1,988.6281 196.4615 2,185.0896 9,657,831. 9,657,831. 444.6368 9,667,169. 0 05 7 4 6624 6624 0355 Total 7,157.5012 14,404.025 51,688.29 107.5233 7,444.616 257.7046 7,702.321 1,988.6281 240.2114 2,228.8395 457.9380 12.6516 5 21 7 3 110,347,94110,347,9441 4.2719 .2719 1 110,361,481 .9684 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 12/31/2013 5 0 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating - sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Clas: Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 CH4 770 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 11\113777021 1 1 Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 4,116.6429 13,828.834 51,193.08 104.0720 7,444.616 213.9547 7,658.571 1,988.6281 196.4615 2,185.0896 9,657,831. 9,657,831. 444.6368 9,667,169. 0 05 7 4 6624 6624 0355 Mitigated 4,116.6429 13,828.834 51,193.08 104.0720 7,444.616 213.9547 7,658.571 1,988.6281 196.4615 2,185.0896 9,657,831. 9,657,831. 444.6368 9,667,169. 0 05 7 4 6624 6624 0355 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry 793,341.29 150,245.41 77399.15 2,653,392,885 2,653,392,885 Total 793,341.29 150,245.41 77,399.15 2,653,392,885 2,653,392,885 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 5.86575e+ 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 Industry 006 92 992 79 Total 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 92 992 79 Mitigated NaturalGa I ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 5865.75 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 Industry 92 992 79 Total 63.2580 575.0731 483.0614 3.4504 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 43.7056 690,087.69 690,087.6 13.2267 12.6516 694,287.4 92 992 79 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Mitigated 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 770 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 1 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 722.6917 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,253.6811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.2275 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Total 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 1 004 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 770 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 1 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 722.6917 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,253.6811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.2275 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 004 Total 2,977.6003 0.1184 12.1503 8.7000e- 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 0.0443 24.9103 24.9103 0.0745 26.4750 1 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 12/16/2013 2:52 PM City of Vernon Supplemental EIR Existing South Coast Air Basin, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 113,822.28 1000sgft 2,613.00 113,822,280.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Climate Zone 12 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - acreage Construction Phase - No construction proposed. Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2014 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstruction Phase NumDays 10,000.00 0.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 113,822,000.00 113,822,280.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 2,612.99 2,613.00 2.0 Emissions Summary ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 543.3415 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.54OOe- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.45OOe- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 Energy 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 506,746.3 506,746.38 20.2316 5.8274 508,977.7 814 14 37 Mobile 541.2811 1,939.3142 7,136.559 14.4714 1,004.719 29.2941 1,034.013 268.7871 26.8988 295.6860 0.0000 1,217,929. 1,217,929. 55.3664 0.0000 1,219,092. 1 4 5 8852 8852 5793 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28,649.99 0.0000 28,649.998 1,693.166 0.0000 64,206.49 83 3 4 7 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8,350.546 98,078.01 106,428.56 862.1895 21.1845 131,101.7 1 71 32 81 Total 1,096.1672 2,044.2798 7,226.236 15.1012 1,004.719 37.2759 1,041.995 268.7871 34.8806 303.6678 37,000.54 1,822,757. 1,859,757. 2,630.962 27.0119 1,923,381. 5 4 3 44 1085 6529 3 5360 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 543.3415 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 Energy 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 506,746.3 506,746.38 20.2316 5.8274 508,977.7 814 14 37 Mobile 541.2811 1,939.3142 7,136.559 14.4714 1,004.719 29.2941 1,034.013 268.7871 26.8988 295.6860 0.0000 1,217,929. 1,217,929. 55.3664 0.0000 1,219,092. 1 4 5 8852 8852 5793 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28,649.99 0.0000 28,649.998 1,693.166 0.0000 64,206.49 83 3 4 1 7 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8,350.546 98,078.01 106,428.56 862.0330 21.1521 131,088.4 1 71 32 60 t 1,096.1672 2,044.2798 7,226.236 15.1012 1,004.719 37.2759 1,041.995 268.7871 34.8806 303.6678 37,000.54 1,859,757. 2,630.805 26.9795 1,923,368. 5 4 3 44 11,822,757. 1085 6529 8 2139 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBlo-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 1 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 12/31/2013 5 0 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating - sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Clas! )emolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 541.2811 1,939.3142 7,136.559 14.4714 1,004.719 29.2941 1,034.013 268.7871 26.8988 295.6860 0.0000 1,217,929. 1,217,929. 55.3664 0.0000 1,219,092. 1 4 5 8852 8852 5793 Unmitigated 541.2811 1,939.3142 7,136.559 14.4714 1,004.719 29.2941 1,034.013 268.7871 26.8988 295.6860 0.0000 1,217,929. 1,217,929. 55.3664 0.0000 1,219,092. 1 4 5 8852 8852 5793 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry 793,341.29 150,245.41 77397.15 2,653,392,885 2,653,392,885 Total 793,341.29 150,245.41 77,399.15 2,653,392,885 2,653,392,885 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH 0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587 0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total 02 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr NaturalGas 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 114,251.7 114,251.75 2.1898 2.0946 114,947.0 Mitigated 580 80 51 NaturalGas 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 114,251.7 114,251.75 2.1898 2.0946 114,947.0 Unmitigated 580 80 51 Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 392,494.6 392,494.62 18.0417 3.7328 394,030.E 234 34 86 Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.0417 3.7328 394,030.6 Unmitigated �392,494.61392,494.62� 234 34 1 86 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr 2.141e+00 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 114,251.75 114,251.7 2.1898 2.0946 114,947.0 9 80 580 51 ffi 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 114,251.75 114,251.7 2.1898 2.0946 114,947.0 80 580 51 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Light 2.141e+00 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 114,251.75 114,251.7 2.1898 2.0946 114,947.0 Industry 9 80 580 51 Total 11.5446 104.9508 88.1587 0.6297 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 7.9763 0.0000 114,251.75 114,251.7 2.1898 2.0946 114,947.0 80 580 51 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Light 1.37156e+ 392,494.62 18.0417 3.7328 394,030.6 Industry 009 34 586 Total 392,494.62 18.0417 3.7328 394,030.6 34 586 Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Light 1.37156e+ 392,494.62 18.0417 3.7328 394,030.6 Industry 009 34 586 Total 392,494.62 18.0417 3.7328 394,030.6 34 586 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 543.3415 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated 543.3415 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 131.8912 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 411.2968 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 0.1534 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 543.3415 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 131.8912 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 411.2968 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 0.1534 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 Total 543.3415 0.0148 1.5188 1.1000e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 5.5400e- 0.0000 2.8248 2.8248 8.4500e- 0.0000 3.0022 004 003 003 003 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 I CH4 N2O I CO2e Category MT/yr Unmitigated 106,428.56 32 862.1895 21.1845 131,101.7 81 Mitigated 106,428.56 32 862.0330 21.1521 131,088.4 60 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Light 26321.3 / 0 106,428.56 862.1895 21.1845 131,101.7 Industry 32 281 Total 106,428.56 862.1895 21.1845 131,101.7 32 281 Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Light 26321.3 / 0 106,428.56 862.0330 21.1521 131,088.4 Industry 32 060 Total 106,428.56 862.0330 21.1521 131,088.4 7 7 32 060 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year TCO2 CH4 N2Ootal CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 28,649.998 3 1,693.1664 0.0000 64,206.49 7 Unmitigated 28,649.998 3 1,693.1664 0.0000 64,206.49 7 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I Land Use tons MT/yr General Light 141139 28,649.998 1,693.166 0.0000 64,206.49 Industry 3 4 27 Total 28,649.998 1,693.166 0.0000 64,206.49 3 4 27 Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I Land Use tons MT/yr General Light 141139 28,649.998 1,693.166 0.0000 64,206.49 Industry 3 4 27 Total 28,649.998 1,693.166 0.0000 64,206.49 3 4 17 27 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 730]OOMOX0111Iall I This Page Intentionally Left Blank CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 12/16/2013 3:03 PM City of Vernon Supplemental EIR Proposed South Coast Air Basin, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 120,879.00 1000sgft 2,775.00 120,879,000.00 1 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 12 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - acreage Construction Phase - No construction proposed. 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2035 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2035 2.0 Emissions Summary ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 I 1 Category lb/day lb/day Area 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Energy 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 520 20 861 Mobile 1,857.1778 5,226.4884 23,937.84 122.4193 7,930.090 159.8782 8,089.969 2,120.430 147.5124 2,267.9427 8,727,552. 8,727,552. 217.2612 8,732,115. 16 9 1 1 2 1 8005 8005 2860 Total 5,086.3831 126.0846 7,930.090 206.3369 8,136.427 2,120.430 193.9711 9,460,450. 231.3761 13.4360 9,469,474. 15,837.3249124,463.121 31 9 8 2 12,314.40141 19,460,450.1 8071 8071 8580 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category lb/day lb/day Area 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Energy 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 520 20 861 Mobile 1,857.1778 5,226.4884 23,937.84 122.4193 7,930.090 159.8782 8,089.969 2,120.430 147.5124 2,267.9427 8,727,552. 8,727,552. 217.2612 8,732,115. 16 1 9 1 1 2 1 8005 8005 1 2860 Total 5,086.3831 5,837.3249 24,463.12 126.0846 7,930.090 206.3369 8,136.427 2,120.430 193.9711 231.3761 13.4360 9,469,474. 31 9 1 1 8 1 2 1 1 12,314.40141 19,460,450.19,460,450.1 8071 8071 1 8580 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 12/31/2013 5 0 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total CO2 jTotalCO21 1 1 Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 1,857.1778 5,226.4884 23,937.84 122.4193 7,930.090 159.8782 8,089.969 2,120.430 147.5124 2,267.9427 8,727,552. 8,727,552. 217.2612 8,732,115. 16 9 1 2 8005 8005 2860 Mitigated 1,857.1778 5,226.4884 23,937.84 122.4193 7,930.090 159.8782 8,089.969 2,120.430 147.5124 2,267.9427 8,727,552. 8,727,552. 217.2612 8,732,115. 16 9 1 2 8005 8005 2860 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use L; Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry 842,526.63 159,560.28 82197.72 2,817,897,152 2,817,897,152 Total 842,526.63 159,560.28 82,197.72 2,817,897,152 2,817,897,152 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total CO2 I I 1 1 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Mitigated 520 20 861 NaturalGas 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Unmitigated 520 20 861 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 6.22941e+ 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Industry 006 20 520 861 Total 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 20 520 861 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 6229.41 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Industry 20 520 861 Total 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 20 520 861 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N2O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Mitigated 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 I I SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 767.4989 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,393.4042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.1224 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Total 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 ITotalCO21 I I SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 767.4989 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,393.4042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.1224 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Total 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 1 004 1 1 1 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 12/16/2013 3:05 PM City of Vernon Supplemental EIR Proposed South Coast Air Basin, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 120,879.00 1000sgft 2,775.00 120,879,000.00 1 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 12 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - acreage Construction Phase - No construction proposed. 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2035 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2035 2.0 Emissions Summary ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 1 Category lb/day lb/day Area 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Energy 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 520 20 861 Mobile 1,897.9578 5,470.3576 23,399.85 116.3224 7,930.090 160.2526 8,090.343 2,120.430 147.8568 2,268.2871 8,333,233. 8,333,233. 217.6240 8,337,803. 87 9 6 1 2 1 0295 0295 1 1 1 1325 Total 5,127.1632 6,081.1942 23,925.14 119.9877 194.3156 231.7388 13.4360 02 17,930.0901206.7113JE;,136.80212,120.4301 9 3 2 12,314.74581 19,066,131.19,066,131.1 0361 0361 1 19,075,162.1 7045 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I Category lb/day lb/day Area 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Energy 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 520 20 861 Mobile 1,897.9578 5,470.3576 23,399.85 116.3224 7,930.090 160.2526 8,090.343 2,120.430 147.8568 2,268.2871 8,333,233. 8,333,233. 217.6240 8,337,803. 87 1 9 6 1 2 1 0295 0295 1 1325 Total 5,127.1632 6,081.1942 23,925.14 119.9877 7,930.090 206.7113 8,136.802 2,120.430 194.3156 231.7388 13.4360 9,075,162. 02 9 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 12,314.74581 19,066,131.19,066,131.1 0361 0361 1 7045 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 12/31/2013 5 0 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 720 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 ITotalCO21 1 1 Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 1,897.9578 5,470.3576 23,399.85 116.3224 7,930.090 160.2526 8,090.343 2,120.430 147.8568 2,268.2871 8,333,233. 8,333,233. 217.6240 8,337,803. 87 9 6 2 0295 0295 1325 Mitigated 1,897.9578 5,470.3576 23,399.85 116.3224 7,930.090 160.2526 8,090.343 2,120.430 147.8568 2,268.2871 8,333,233. 8,333,233. 217.6240 8,337,803. 87 9 6 2 0295 0295 1325 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry 842,526.63 159,560.28 82197.72 2,817,897,152 2,817,897,152 Total 842,526.63 159,560.28 82,197.72 2,817,897,152 2,817,897,152 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total CO2 I I I I Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Mitigated 520 20 861 NaturalGas 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.5 732,871.55 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Unmitigated 520 20 861 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total 77702e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 6.22941e+ 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Industry 006 20 520 861 Total 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 20 520 861 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day General Light 6229.41 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 Industry 20 520 861 Total 67.1799 610.7263 513.0101 3.6644 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 46.4152 732,871.55 732,871.5 14.0467 13.4360 737,331.6 20 520 861 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio- TotaICO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 To CO2 I I Category lb/day lb/day Unmitigated 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Mitigated 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 To CO2 I SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 767.4989 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,393.4042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.1224 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Total 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 1 004 1 1 1 Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CO2 ITotalCO21 I I SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 767.4989 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 2,393.4042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 1.1224 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 004 Total 3,162.0255 0.1103 12.2715 9.2000e- 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 0.0435 26.4547 26.4547 0.0682 27.8859 1 004 1 1 1 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 12/16/2013 3:06 PM City of Vernon Supplemental EIR Proposed South Coast Air Basin, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Light Industry 120,879.00 1000sgft 2,775.00 120,879,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone 12 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - acreage Construction Phase - No construction proposed. 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Operational Year 2035 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10,000.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2035 2.0 Emissions Summary ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 577.0051 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 003 003 003 Energy 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 538,163.4 538,163.49 21.4859 6.1887 540,533.1 934 34 44 Mobile 249.7553 767.3518 3,249.342 16.1673 1,070.298 21.9724 1,092.270 286.6214 20.2729 306.8942 0.0000 1,049,535. 1,049,535. 27.0797 0.0000 1,050,104. 8 5 8 6753 6753 3485 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 30,426.30 0.0000 30,426.307 1,798.143 0.0000 68,187.31 73 3 3 5 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8,868.282 104,158.8 113,027.16 915.6455 22.4979 139,230.0 6 852 78 67 Total 839.0207 878.8231 3,344.501 16.8361 1,070.298 30.4486 1,100.747 286.6214 28.7491 315.3704 1,691,861. 1,731,155. 2,762.362 28.6866 1,798,058. 1 1 5 1 139,294.58 99 0538 6436 0 0873 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 577.0051 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 003 003 003 Energy 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 538,163.4 538,163.49 21.4859 6.1887 540,533.1 934 34 44 Mobile 249.7553 767.3518 3,249.342 16.1673 1,070.298 21.9724 1,092.270 286.6214 20.2729 306.8942 0.0000 1,049,535. 1,049,535. 27.0797 0.0000 1,050,104. 8 5 8 6753 6753 3485 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 30,426.30 0.0000 30,426.307 1,798.143 0.0000 68,187.31 73 3 3 5 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8,868.282 104,158.8 113,027.16 915.4793 22.4635 139,215.9 6 852 78 86 Total 839.0207 878.8231 3,344.501 16.8361 1,070.298 30.4486 1,100.747 286.6214 28.7491 315.3704 1,691,861. 1,731,155. 2,762.195 28.6522 1,798,043. 1 5 1 139,294.58 99 0538 6436 8 9392 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 12/31/2013 5 0 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating - sgft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 162 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD Mix HDT Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 249.7553 767.3518 3,249.342 16.1673 1,070.298 21.9724 1,092.270 286.6214 20.2729 306.8942 0.0000 1,049,535. 1,049,535. 27.0797 0.0000 1,050,104. 8 5 8 6753 6753 3485 Unmitigated 249.7553 767.3518 3,249.342 16.1673 1,070.298 21.9724 1,092.270 286.6214 20.2729 306.8942 0.0000 1,049,535. 1,049,535. 27.0797 0.0000 1,050,104. 8 5 8 6753 6753 3485 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry 842,526.63 159,560.28 82197.72 2,817,897,152 2,817,897,152 Total 842,526.63 159,560.28 82,197.72 2,817,897,152 2,817,897,152 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by General Light Industry 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 5.0 Energy Detail 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Categod-tons/yr MT/yr NaturalGas 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 121,335.1 121,335.10 2.3256 2.2245 122,073.5 Mitigated 046 46 98 NaturalGas 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 121,335.1 121,335.10 2.3256 2.2245 122,073.5 Unmitigated 046 46 98 Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 416,828.3 416,828.38 19.1603 3.9642 418,459.E 888 88 46 Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 416,828.3 416,828.38 19.1603 3.9642 418,459.E Unmitigated 888 1 88 1 46 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Light 2.27373e+ 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 121,335.10 121,335.1 2.3256 2.2245 122,073.5 Industry 009 46 046 98 Total 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 121,335.10 121,335.1 2.3256 2.2245 122,073.5 46 046 98 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e s Use I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Light 2.27373e+ 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 121,335.10 121,335.1 2.3256 2.2245 122,073.5 Industry 009 46 046 98 Total 12.2603 111.4576 93.6243 0.6688 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 8.4708 0.0000 121,335.10 121,335.1 2.3256 2.2245 122,073.5 46 046 98 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Light 1.45659e+ 416,828.38 19.1603 3.9642 418,459.6 Industry 009 88 546 Total 416,828.38 19.1603 3.9642 418,459.6 88 546 Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Use I I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Light 1.45659e+ 416,828.38 19.1603 3.9642 418,459.6 Industry 009 88 546 Total 416,828.38 19.1603 3.9642 418,459.6 88 546 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 02O CO2e PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 577.0051 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 003 003 003 Unmitigated 577.0051 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 003 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 140.0685 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 g er 436.7963 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ts kLandscaping 0.1403 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 003 003 003 577.0051 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 1 003 003 1 003 1 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 72O CO2e I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total 1 1 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 140.0685 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer 436.7963 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping 0.1403 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 004 003 003 003 1 003 003 Total 577.0051 0.0138 1.5339 1.2000e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 5.4400e- 0.0000 2.9999 2.9999 7.7300e- 0.0000 3.1622 1 004 1 003 003 003 003 1 003 1 1 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N2O I CO2e Category MT/yr Unmitigated 113,027.16 78 915.6455 22.4979 139,230.0 67 Mitigated 113,027.16 78 915.4793 22.4635 139,215.9 86 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Light 27953.3 / 0 113,027.16 915.6455 22.4979 139,230.0 Industry 78 767 Total 113,027.16 915.6455 22.4979 139,230.0 78 767 Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e door Use I I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Light 27953.3 / 0 113,027.16 915.4793 22.4635 139,215.9 Industry 78 286 Total 113,027.16 915.4793 22.4635 139,215.9 78 286 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 30,426.307 3 1,798.1433 0.0000 68,187.31 5 Unmitigated 30,426.307 3 1,798.1433 0.0000 68,187.31 5 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I Land Use tons MT/yr General Light 149890 30,426.307 1,798.143 0.0000 68,187.31 Industry 3 3 55 Total 30,426.307 1,798.143 0.0000 68,187.31 3 3 7 55 Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I Land Use tons MT/yr General Light 149890 30,426.307 1,798.143 0.0000 68,187.31 Industry 3 3 55 Total 30,426.307 1,798.143 0.0000 68,187.31 3 3 55 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CITY OF VERNON GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS December 11, 2012 Traffic Engineering I Transportation Planning I Parking I Noise/Vibration I Expert Witness Air Quality I Global Climate Change I Health Risk Assessment I K I KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF VERNON GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS December 11, 2012 Prepared by: Amy L. Kim, EIT, Robert Kunzman, Carl Ballard, LEED GA, and William Kunzman, P.E. �ppF ES51pv KCI,�� A.^^. L No. TROO56 n d * TRAFV\G�Q. OF GAU� 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 Orange, California 92868 (714) 973-8383 www.traffic-engineer.com 5031 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Summary................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives..................................................................1 B. Study Area..............................................................................................................1 C. Definition of Deficiency and Significant Impact........................................................2 D. Principal Findings....................................................................................................2 II. Existing Traffic Conditions.................................................................................................5 A. Existing Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls.......................................................5 B. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes....................................................................5 C. Truck Passenger Car Equivalents.............................................................................5 D. Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service.................................5 E. Planned Transportation Improvements and Relationship to General Plan ...............6 III. Current General Plan Year 2035 Traffic Conditions...........................................................15 A. Method of Projection............................................................................................15 B. Current General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes .............................15 C. Current General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service..................................................................................................................15 IV. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Traffic Conditions....................................................... 20 A. Method of Projection............................................................................................ 20 B. Potential Development......................................................................................... 20 1. Potential Development Locations......................................................................20 2. Trip Generation..................................................................................................20 3. Trip Distribution..................................................................................................20 4. Trip Assignment..................................................................................................21 C. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes ......................... 21 D. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service.................................................................................................................. 21 E. Significant Impact..................................................................................................21 V. Conclusions.....................................................................................................................45 APPENDICES Appendix A — Glossary of Transportation Terms Appendix B —Traffic Count Worksheets Appendix C — Truck Percentage Calculations Appendix D — Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Capacity Utilization List of Tables Table 1. Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service ....................................... 7 Table 2. Current General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service........................................................................................................................... 16 Table 3. Potential Proposed Development Trip Generation.......................................................22 Table 4. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service........................................................................................................................... 23 Table 5. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service........................................................................................................................... 24 List of Figures Figure1. Location Map...................................................................................................................4 Figure 2. Existing Through Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls...............................................8 Figure 3. Existing Intersection Geometrics....................................................................................9 Figure 4. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes.........................................................................10 Figure 5. Existing Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ......................11 Figure 6. Existing Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ........................12 Figure 7. City of Vernon General Plan Circulation Element.........................................................13 Figure 8. City of Vernon General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections..................................................14 Figure 9. Current General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes..................................17 Figure 10. Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning MovementVolumes...................................................................................................... 18 Figure 11. Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning MovementVolumes...................................................................................................... 19 Figure 12. Potential Development Site Location Map...................................................................25 Figure 13. Potential Development Number 1 Trip Distribution..................................................... 26 Figure 14. Potential Development Number 2 Trip Distribution..................................................... 27 Figure 15. Potential Development Number 3 Trip Distribution..................................................... 28 Figure 16. Potential Development Number 4 Trip Distribution..................................................... 29 Figure 17. Potential Development Number 5 Trip Distribution.....................................................30 Figure 18. Potential Development Number 6 Trip Distribution.....................................................31 Figure 19. Potential Development Number 7 Trip Distribution.....................................................32 Figure 20. Potential Development Number 8 Trip Distribution.....................................................33 Figure 21. Potential Development Number 9 Trip Distribution.....................................................34 Figure 22. Potential Development Number 10 Trip Distribution...................................................35 Figure 23. Potential Development Number 11 Trip Distribution................................................... 36 Figure 24. Potential Development Number 12 Trip Distribution................................................... 37 Figure 25. Potential Development Number 13 Trip Distribution...................................................38 Figure 26. Potential Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes................................................39 Figure 27. Potential Development Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes........................................................................................................................ 40 Figure 28. Potential Development Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes........................................................................................................................ 41 Figure 29. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes...............................42 Figure 30. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning MovementVolumes......................................................................................................43 Figure 31. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning MovementVolumes......................................................................................................44 Introduction and Summary A. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the traffic impacts resulting from proposed residential and trucking overlay districts in the City of Vernon, and to identify the traffic mitigation measures necessary to maintain the established Level of Service standard for the elements of the impacted roadway system. The traffic issues related to the proposed land uses and development have been evaluated in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act. The City of Vernon is the lead agency responsible for preparation of the traffic impact analysis, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act authorizing legislation. This report analyzes traffic impacts for the Existing and Year 2035 traffic conditions. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided in Appendix A. B. Study Area The study area intersections were determined by selecting the intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service in the 2007 Circulation Plan Update for the City of Vernon (see Figure 1): Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue (EW) - #1 55th Street (EW) - #2 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 38th Street (EW) - #4 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 Downey Road (NS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 District Boulevard (EW) - #17 C. Definition of Deficiency and Significant Impact The City of Vernon has an established acceptable Level of Service of D. Level of Service E and F are unacceptable. Based on the Los Angeles Department of Transportation Policies and Procedures, an impact is considered significant if the project -related increase in the volume -to -capacity ratio equals or exceeds the thresholds shown below: Significant Impact Threshold for Intersections Level of Service Volume/Capacity Incremental Increase C 0.70-0.79 0.04 or more D 0.80-0.89 0.02 or more E/F 0.90 - more 0.01 or more D. Principal Findings Existing Level of Service: For Existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersections that operate at Levels of Service E to F during the peak hours (see Table 1): Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue (EW) - #1 55th Street (EW) - #2 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 38th Street (EW) - #4 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 Downey Road (NS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Current General Plan Year 2035 Level of Service: For the Current General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E to F during the peak hours, without improvements (see Table 2). All potential developments within the proposed housing and trucking overlay districts have been individually accounted for by an appropriate trip generation and trip distribution. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Level of Service: For the Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E to F during the peak hours, without improvements (see Table 4). Table 5 depicts the Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions at the study area intersections. The study area intersections are not significantly impacted by the proposed housing and trucking overlay districts. 3 II 27th Street 37th Street 26th Street v 28th v Street I o a v0i � > 41st 38th Street Street 1 1 Vernon Avenue a, Figure 1 Location Map Bandini °1 Boulevard Vernon Avenue `^ a 46th Street 1 > 48th Street a Leonis �� Boulevard v ml 49th Street m° > EI m° Fruitland a al Avenue 1 54th Street 55th Street Slauson Avenue I i NTS KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Washington g _ oulevard Idnge Avenue a o a a roo > > N � QwQ ro r—••_.. _0 =5 ro I > c o r a' I C ru �. Q of �I Rando— ph Street OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE 4 Legend 0 = Intersection Reference Number = City Boundary 5031/1 II. Existing Traffic Conditions The traffic conditions as they exist today are discussed below and illustrated on Figures 2 to 8. A. Existing Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls Figures 2 and 3 identify the existing roadway conditions within the City of Vernon. The number of through travel lanes and intersection controls for existing roadways are illustrated on Figure 2 and the existing intersection geometries are identified on Figure 3. B. Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 4 depict the existing average daily traffic volumes in the study area. Existing manual morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement counts have been obtained by Kunzman Associates, Inc. in February and October 2012 (see Appendix B). The existing average daily traffic volumes have been obtained from peak hour counts using the following formula for each intersection leg: PM Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 11.0 = Leg Volume. C. Truck Passenger Car Equivalents To account for the number of trucks that are included in the traffic counts, a truck factor has been developed. Four vehicle classification spot counts have been conducted to calculate the percentage of the vehicle mix that are trucks. The truck percentage calculation shows that there are currently 22 percent trucks on the City of Vernon Streets (see Appendix C). Per the City of Vernon, a Passenger Car Equivalent of 2.5 has been used on the 22 percent trucks (see Appendix Q. A truck factor of 1.33 has been applied to account for the calculated 22 percent trucks on the study area roadways ((1.00 — 0.22) + (0.22 X 2.5) = 1.33). D. Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service The technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (see Appendix D). To calculate Intersection Capacity Utilization, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. The existing Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service for the study area intersections are shown in Table 1. Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization is based upon manual morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement counts obtained by Kunzman Associates, Inc. in February and October 2012. The factored traffic counts are presented on Figures 5 and 6. There are two peak hours in a weekday. The morning peak hour is between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM, and the evening peak hour is between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The actual peak hour within the two hour interval is the four consecutive 15 minute periods with the highest 5 total volume when all movements are added together. Thus, the evening peak hour at one intersection may be 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM if those four consecutive 15 minute periods have the highest combined volume. For Existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersections that operate at Levels of Service E to F during the peak hours (see Table 1): Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue (EW) - #1 55th Street (EW) - #2 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 38th Street (EW) - #4 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 Downey Road (NS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Existing delay worksheets are provided in Appendix D. E. Planned Transportation Improvements and Relationship to General Plan The City of Vernon General Plan Circulation Element is shown on Figure 7. Existing and future roadways are included in the Circulation Element of the General Plan and are graphically depicted on Figure 7. This figure shows the nature and extent of arterial highways that are needed to adequately serve the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The City of Vernon General Plan roadway cross - sections is shown on Figure 8. Table 1 Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service Intersection Approach Lanes 1 Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic ICU-LOS Z L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Intersection Control3 Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.454-F 1.502-F Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #1b TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.5 1 1.334-F 1.097-F 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 d 0 1 0 1.186-F 1.521-F 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 d 0.891-D 0.735-C Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 1 1 d 1 0.5 0.5 1.040-F 1.014-F 38th Street (EW) -#4 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 d 0 0 0 0.956-E 1.011-F Vernon Avenue (EW) -#5 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.972-E 0.923-E Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1 2 2 0.919-E 0.957-E Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) -#7 TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.009-F 1.181-F Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 0.951-E 1.003-F Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.861-D 0.948-E Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.876-D 0.814-D Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.806-D 0.879-D Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1.081-F 1.202-F Downey Road (NS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) -#13 TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1> 1 2 d 0.868-D 0.920-E Bandini Boulevard (EW) -#14 TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 0.5 0.902-E .942-E Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 TS 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.974-E 0.970-E Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 TS 1 4 1 1 3.5 1.5>> 1.5 2 0.5 1 1 2>> 1.543-F 1.433-F District Boulevard (EW) - #17 TS 1 2.5 0.5 1 3 1>> 2 1 1 0.5 1.5 1>> 0.858-D 0.975-E ' When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto Turn Lane; > = Right Turn Overlap; » = Free Right Turn ICU-LOS = Intersection Capacity Utilization -Level of Service 3 TS=Traffic Signal Figure 2 Existing Through Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls 4D 4D 25th Street _ 04D 4D 27th Street 4D 26th Street _ v �J 4D 28th? 2D v 4D Washin gton Bouleva _ S t �' 4D S ai rd I vard 37th Street tree 4D o N a ° Bandini �' Q 4D 2U 4D Boulevard 4D SD 41st 38th Street 2U 0 4D 4D 4D 4D Street I 4U� 2U � Vernon Avenue 4D 4U v 6D v > v, �4U a) 0� Vernon Avenue 4U 4 D Exchange 4U 4U 4D @� 4U 2U c Q' 46th Street Avenue W i48th Street v, a 4D Leonis �• 4D 6 B I -0 ml 49th Street w 4U o 4U 4D a a 3 c� v �. @� 2U Fruitland m° > a >> v Qw Q QI m° 2U Avenue r.._.._.., 4D a, a : V 4Ui 2U 55th Street : 54th Street I c > o � E 2U 2U I 4U ° a � o 4U �� 4UI 2U a o Slauson Avenue L • • 4D 4D � 4D 4plRando/E reet NTS KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OvER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE 8 4D 6 Legend = Traffic Signal 4 = Through Travel Lanes D = Divided U = Undivided 5 N 5031/2 Figure 3 Existing Intersection Geometrics 1 '�-'0.5 1 `�-1 2 �0 2 `�-d 3 '�-'0.5 4 �0 5 `?-'0.5.5 o-- 4-11 0-o C-1.5 u 4 1 - -- 4-0.50.5 C-0.5 c, , 4-0�-- 4-1 4l � b-0.5 al � b�0.5 � � b�0 al � b�0.5 � � b -1 � � b -o 4l -0.5 0.5 0.5 --9' 1 T � 0.5 i (° 0 --61 (° 1 0.5 --4 '1 o al l 1 1 - -- 0.5 1 0.5� 0.5 0.5 d 0 d d c 0� ^ c 6 2 7 4-0.5 8 4-0.5 9 4-0.5 10 +--0.5 11 0.5 12 '�-'0.5 cr� �2 0.5 2.5 1 5 +--0.5 4-1.5 �bba�1Q ��ba�14 ��ba�1Q �bba� 11 1� p 1� a�14 p 1� a�14 p 0.5� a�00..5p 1� p 1� p I I I 1-4, p I I I 2.5 --i> 0.5 - - N n 2.5 1 1.5 ^ 0.5 1.5 --i> 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5� 0 0.5 0.5� ^ o 13 le?--d 14 'e�-0.5 15 `�-0.5 18 , �2> 17 4-1> b�1 4--2- �1.5 4-1 �0.5 M �1 4-1.5 1 (° 1-61 1 1.5 �' i (° 2 2 2 --- 1.5 2 1���� 1 1 0.5 0.5--+ 1� c Legend > = Right Turn Overlap NTS 5031/3 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE Figure 4 Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 26.7 o 34.2 25.3 25th Street 8.9 A k 18.8 6'9 28.6 26th Street 10.5 27th Street v 25.6 12.9 28th Washington as n 30.8 v a hin t on Boulevard Street o C o �° W' 26.1 37th Street 6.8 �' 15.2 , Q Bandini - 6.j 28.8 14.2 Boulevard 15.3 41st 38th Street 30.1 27.3 17.0 Street 29.9 6.4 Vernon Avenue 32 9 Vernon Avenue 6.6 30.0 5.9 12.5 v > a, 25.3 23.5 22.3 30.1 v23.8 Q 46th Street Excha 48th Street V) > a 23.2L11..s 9.6 Boulevard o° m 49th Street > a 21.6 7.7 > 3 CO a ro @ Co° Fruitland a 9.3 9.5 Avenue 18.3 a, -0 54th Street 55th Street > 9.6 14.2 9.9 M � 124.2 12.6 ° 3 o a Slauson Avenue 23.5 23.8 24.1 27 18.9 >.1.3 RandolPh Street NTS KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 10 nge Avenue >Q c <LUQ 0 G Legend 23.9 = Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) 5031/4 Figure 5 Existing Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 1511 0 293 0 1104 0 75 0 1513 0 1612 0 1389 0 1 9�321 1 �105 0 2 ,o O �86 ?� 2 �17 3 �137 4 �0 0 5 O �184 °2 0 Y2 4- 805 N 93 O 4-1186 M 1 O - 4-227 M ^ - N 4-267 O M O - - 4-213 � O N N 4-0 O = - "J 4-5 b �113 4 b �12 4 b �15 4 b �3 4 b -189 4 0 4 b -189 4 D 158 D 59 — 1 T D 158 — D 265 — �TD 37 — 41T�D 3 851--i> N o 838 MN&3 � 481-man M 342��,��0�� F�31 � 222�MM� 0 N 13�Mot 63� 144� 36� 32� r - 81� ^ 41827 0 386 0 1848 1020 1817 1 2107 L 0 2166 1468 0 1716 v 1528 0 1429 0 1035 0 981 0 269 0 6 ';--641 7 - ';--128 2 8 n 4 137 9 �321 10 �176 S 11 98 �`* 12 �60 4-511 = = .1 =2 4-319 4-823 = 4-223 " *-657 - - 93 4-313 < 4-1142 4Ib7-35 4 al 6 7-36 4 4��b -219 4 12 4 7-117 4 alb -37 4 b7-241 4 D 189 --4' � t D 52 --4' � t � D 136 � T ( D 70 — 101 — 1 T � D 78 --4' 1 T � 313--i> �Q M 122��gp 403 S4�� Pi 110���� 282 �,� P, 186��or, -- 915�NSM 120� =N N 57� � 78� � - 52 " 28 - 31-4�1 f ;:::: 172--R, - 1469 1 1835 1 1- 1755 1 1476 0 1286 1 1- 1212 1 1- 1894 1196 0 938 0 354 0 1810 0 2295 0 13 116 1400 188 15_ �605 � 16�^ �226 8 - 17!�N �125 4-706 - - - 4-984 M - t = 4-1508 7- K 4-314 = 4-331 b -105 4 b 6--222 4 b - 4 b 6--266 4 4 D 174-1T D 67-1TT D 134— 237— 678� 144--I> tS pz% 0 343 g V 935-- N 690 N N o 82 177 N �-! 60 27 185 ^ 0D r 43 0 1590 0 1337 0 49 1 2531 0 1882 NTS 5031/5 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 11 Figure 6 Existing Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 1597 0 313 0 1712 0 353 0 1642 0 2153 0 1819 0 1 313 N 1 '�—'60 tg 2 `�-194 2 —,11 3 Q—,90 M 4 m N 0 0 5 �156 4-1404 °= 0 4-709 N n 4-685 aO = = 4-184 4-0 — 49 b �95 4 4i b �1 4 b -64 4 b �1 4 b �156 4 b -0 4 b ,--219 4 D 267 T� D 40 D 136 � T � D 59 D 336 T� '1T[D D 32� �T� N 850 -4, ��^ � 1013 � R n 327 � � N N 2 383 � � t2 t2 325 � 0 Q N c o27 � � g124� 33� 56� 16� — 124� —=- L329 ^— 81559 406 1337 75 17091718 1 1743 1872 0 2238 0 2047 0 1938 0 1665 0 1384 0 1154 0 6 g �355 7 �198 8 M 4 82 � 9 W �161 0 10 �130 11 a �69 12 N �31 O N a0 W Obi M O_ m N < ib M a' O < M c0 O^ < 4-1137 b b -409 4 4� b -489 4 4� b -165 4 4� b -29 4 4� b -824 4 4� b -335 4 I b b �330 4 26 129� 226� 112 225 D 40 � jp�247 51 3 � - 1 � M 446 ZSW -- 1144 - 85 80�� 101 � 65 291�1599 1706 12431316 1045 840 636 1677 0 1732 0 772 0 1754 0 2119 0 13 O `?-40 9° 14 �109 0 15 o �203 0 16 - �633 0 17 g �120 9 = 4-319 o "2 N 4-387 n 4-1103 r2 M =' a 4-202 = = 4-65 b �39 4 b -207 4 b -i 4 T 371 4 b -5 4 D 229 T D 200 149 T� D 597� ��� D1363� n 915 813 1420 M S 0 774 o^ 344 r 386 3 = 273 3 — 5 � 537 o 290 0 1388 0 1459 0 123 20 55 1053 NTS 5031/6 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 12 Figure 7 City of Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Legend --- City Boundary ■■■■I Freeway Freeway 00001 Arterial Railroad I Collector Local NTS Source: City of Vernon KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE 13 5031/7 Figure 8 City of Vernon General Plan Roadway Cross -Sections 80' to 120' 64' to 104' 32'- 52' 1 32'- 52' i i Arterial 80' Minimum 64' 32' 32' I i Collector Streets 60' to 65' 42' to 49' 20.5' - 24.5'20.5' - 24.5' I i Local Streets KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES Source: City of Vernon 5031/8 OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE 14 III. Current General Plan Year 2035 Traffic Conditions In this section, Current General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions are discussed. Figures 9 and 11 illustrate the Current General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions. A. Method of Projection Based upon the 2007 City of Vernon General Plan Updated, an ambient annual growth rate of 0.5 percent is used in this analysis. This produces a growth factor of 1.12 for Year 2035 conditions. B. Current General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes Current General Plan Year 2035 average daily traffic volumes are depicted on Figure 9. C. Current General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service The technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (see Appendix D). To calculate Intersection Capacity Utilization, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. The Current General Plan Year 2035 morning and evening peak hour turning movement volumes are provided on Figures 10 and 11, respectively. For the Current General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E to F during the peak hours, without improvements (see Table 2). Current General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets are provided in Appendix D. 15 Table 2 Current General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service Intersection Approach Lanes 1 Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic ICU-LOS Z L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Intersection Control 3 Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #1a TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.617-F 1.671-F Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.5 1 1.217-F 1.317-F 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 d 0 1 0 1.482-F 1.692-F 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 d 0.811-D 1.153-F Santa Fe Avenue INS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 1 1 d 1 0.5 0.5 0.986-E 1.124-F 38th Street (EW) - #4 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 d 0 0 0 1.059-F 1.121-F Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 1.077-F 1.022-F Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1 2 2 1.017-F 1.061-F Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.118-F 1.311-F Bandini Boulevard (EW)-#8 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1.053-F 1.111-F Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.953-E 1.050-F Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.960-E 0.899-D Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.891-D 0.973-E Boyle Avenue INS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1.199-F 1.353-F Downey Road INS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1> 1 2 d 0.960-E 1.019-F Bandini Boulevard (EW)-#14 TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 0.5 0.998-E 1.043-F Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 TS 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.079-F 1.075-F Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW)-#16 TS 1 4 1 1 3.5 1.5>> 1.5 2 0.5 1 1 2>> 1.717-F 1.594-F District Boulevard (EW) - #17 TS 1 2.5 0.5 1 3 1>> 2 1 1 0.5 1.5 1>> I 0.949-E I 1.081-F ' When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto Turn Lane; > = Right Turn Overlap; » = Free Right Turn z ICU-LOS = Intersection Capacity Utilization -Level of Service ' TS = Traffic Signal 16 Figure 9 Current General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 25th Street 10.0 7.7 32.1 26th Street 11.8 27th Street Y v F28th v Street o 34.6 a 0 c 37th Street 7.6 �' 17.1 Bandini � v Q - Boulevard 17.2 7. 32.3 15.9 41st 38th Street 33.8 Street 33.5 7.2 Vernon Avenue 36.9 7 4 Vernon Avenue 33.7 6.6 26.4 25.0 > 28.4 33.8 1 3 '26.7 �' > Q 46th Street 26.0L12..s > 48th Street in a Boulevard v m 49th Street a I(OT. 24.2 W 8.6 COo > a @ Fruitland m° a 32 9 Avenue 7 Washin 14.5 ` gton Boulevard 19.1 nge Avenue Q w c Q 20.5 a, -0 iQ 54th Street c o 55th Street > 15.9 11.1 a v 10.8 0 27.2 ;126Z.7 ° 3 oSlauson Avenue 26.4 27.0 30. 21.2 � > 1.5 RandoIPh Street NTS KUNZMAN AssocIATEs, INC. ivER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 17 23. P-N6. 6.8 Legend 26.8 = Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) 5031/9 Figure 10 Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 1692 0 327 0 1236 0 83 0 1696 0 1806 0 1557 0 1 ts 359 1 O �118 0 2 �97 ZS 2 �19 M 3 �153 0 4 �0 0 5 M �206 n M O < M a 0 O M - m n� -212 N L o-�bb�9v 4 al�b�i3294 a��b -16 4 a��b�399 4 o-��b 4 a��b�o 4 o-�bb -2 �212 a D 177— 66— 77 297 34— 42— 3—��� 0 954 --f> p!,, 82 939 2 539 2 L'�; �R 383 106 � � ^ � 249 tg 15 --f> M o 70 161 40 36 104 91 4� 2048 432 2070 0 113 2037 0 2360 2425 1645 0 1922 0 1711 0 1601 0 1159 0 1098 0 302 0 6 co 4--718 7 m a �143 ;t: 8 m M �153 M 9 g 4-359 10 < �197 0 11 �110 0 12 �67 u"J M = 4-572 �_ I� 4-358 OO � M 4-922 M < 4-250 N = *-736 — N �D r o 4-350 W M N N -39 4 7-40 4 7-246 4 4 7-131 4 7-42 4 1b�270 4 58 152— 79—��� �°��� D 127�°��� D 88—��� m 350�M22 137� S42 451 0^g N 124 S4MM ��Mg E31 209 �,22p; 21025���B n 134 � � 1 64 � � � 88 � — — 58 � r' � 34 � � � r' 192 -,R1 1647 1 2055 1 1- 1965 0 1654 1441 0 1359 2121 1339 0 1051 0 397 0 2028 0 2572 0 13 `?-130 W3 14 `�-210 N 15 �678 0 16 'e�-253 0 17 N '�-140 M — 4791 4-1103 r = — 41690 N M — 4352 - b �118 4 b -249 4 b - 4 4 C� b 6--4 4 D 195� ��� D 75�'��� D 150� ��� D 265� ��� D 760� 161� M 384 ^ 1047 N 773 M 0 92 198� ' 67 30 207 48 � 0 1781 0 1498 0 54 0 2836 0 2109 NTS 5031/10 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 18 Figure 11 Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 1789 0 352 0 1917 0 395 0 1838 0 2413 0 2038 0 1 �350 1 �67 2 o-N �218 0 2 oN� �12 3 �101 4 �0 5 �174 -^ �oN 1910 4 ���D�1573 4 ���D -724 4 ��b�167 4 ��b -174 4 ��b�0 4 ��b4-2 �246 4 D 299 T� D 45 152— 66— 377 D 30 36� 0 952 --i> � 1135 --- � 367 -- �2 429 � � 364 368 30 - 139� - = 37� " 63 18� 139� ��� 119 9� 1747 455 1498 1 L83 1914 10 1925 1952 2098 0 2507 0 2294 0 2171 0 1866 0 1551 0 1294 0 6 �398 T 7 �222 8 �92 W3 9 �180 M 10��� �146 11 �77 M 12M�N �34 NON �oM moo- ^-o MNN 4-3774 b b -455 4 D -547 4 D -185 4 �� b �336 4 � b �92 4 �� b �372 4 b b �370 4 145 � t � D 253 —° TT D 158 — T —' TT D 252— 1 T D 45—m533� 574 �2 ^ g � 855 � 2 w3 � � 304 � ^ & � � E64 K 2 � 499 � ; e � � �, 1281 �95 = 97 = 89 %2^ 113 = 73 326 1474 1 1- 1912 0 1791 0 1392 1171 0 941 I 1- 713 1878 0 1941 0 865 0 1965 0 2373 0 13 0 N aO = = �45 �9 14 - - K `�-122 28 15 n M 93 `�-228 16 - ';-709 M ^ 17 = = '�-134 V b 4-358 �43 4 b 4-434 6--232 4 4-1235 - 4 b 4-226 -416 4 4-73 6 4 D 256 224--6'1T� D 167— 669 T� 11527 � T � � 1025 0 910 ^ N M 1591-- 867 � � 2 2 N 386 � 0 2 432 3= = 305 N - 6 3 602 o 7:: 325 3 o 0 1555 0 1635 1 1 0 137 1 2326 0 1180 NTS 5031/11 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 19 IV. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Traffic Conditions In this section, Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions are discussed. Figures 12 and 31 illustrate the Current General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions. A. Method of Projection Based upon the 2007 City of Vernon General Plan Update, an ambient annual growth rate of 0.5 percent is used in this analysis. This produces a growth factor of 1.12 for Year 2035 conditions. The potential development trip generation and trip distribution are then applied to analyze the Proposed General Plan. B. Potential Development 1. Potential Development Locations The City of Vernon has provided the potential locations for residential developments, industrial developments, and an emergency shelter within the residential and trucking overlay districts. Figure 12 provides the location of each potential development site. 2. Trip Generation The trips generated by the potential development is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major change in these variables may affect trip generation rates. Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic and morning peak hour inbound and outbound traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed land uses. By multiplying the trip generation rates by the land use quantities, the traffic volumes are determined. The difference in vehicle trips between the previously proposed land uses and the proposed land uses are used as the trip generation for each potential development site. Table 3 shows the trip generation based upon rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 9th Edition, 2012. 3. Trip Distribution To determine the trip distribution for the potential developments, peak hour traffic counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of the site, and other additional information on future development 20 and traffic impacts in the area were reviewed. The trip distributions for the potential developments are provided on Figures 13 to 25. 4. Trip Assignment Based on the identified trip generation and distributions, potential development average daily traffic volumes have been calculated and shown on Figure 26. Morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes expected from the potential developments are shown on Figures 27 and 28, respectively. C. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Averaee Dailv Traffic Volumes Proposed General Plan Year 2035 average daily traffic volumes are depicted on Figure 29. D. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service The technique used to assess the capacity needs of an intersection is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (see Appendix D). To calculate Intersection Capacity Utilization, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the intersection. The Proposed General Plan Year 2035 morning and evening peak hour turning movement volumes are provided in Figures 30 and 31, respectively. For the Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E to F during the peak hours, without improvements (see Table 4). Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets are provided in Appendix D. E. Significant Impact Based on the Los Angeles Department of Transportation Policies and Procedures, an impact is considered significant if the project -related increase in the volume -to -capacity ratio equals or exceeds the thresholds shown below: Significant Impact Threshold for Intersections Level of Service Volume/Capacity Incremental Increase C 0.70-0.79 0.04 or more D 0.80-0.89 0.02 or more Table 5 depicts the Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions at the study area intersections. The study area intersections are not significantly impacted by the proposed housing and trucking overlay districts. 21 Table 3 Potential Proposed Development Trip Generation' Morning Evening Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Site Land Use QuantityUnit' Dail Trip Generation Rates Warehousing AC 7.22 2.81 10.03 3.04 5.65 8.69 57.23 Manufacturing AC 6.92 0.52 7.44 4.43 3.92 8.35 38.80 Emergency Shelter3 Site 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 10.00 Apartments DU 0.1 0.41 0.511 0.4 0.22 0.62 6.65 Trips Generated Warehousing 2.7 AC 19 8 27 8 15 23 155 Manufacturing 2.7 AC -19 -1 -20 -12 -11 -23 -105 1 Subtotal 0 7 7 -4 4 0 50 Emergency Shelter 1 Site 1 1 2 1 1 2 10 Manufacturing 2.1 AC -15 -1 -16 -9 -8 -17 -81 2 Subtotal -14 0 -14 -8 -7 -15 -71 Warehousing 5.0 AC 36 14 50 15 28 43 286 Manufacturing S AC -35 -3 -38 -22 -20 -42 -194 3 JSubtotal 1 11 12 -7 81 1 92 Warehousing 3.6 AC 26 10 36 11 20 31 206 Manufacturing 3.6 AC -25 -2 -27 -16 -14 -30 -140 4 Subtotal 1 8 9 -5 6 1 66 Warehousing 3.1 AC 22 9 31 9 18 27 177 Manufacturing 3.1 AC -21 -2 -23 -14 -12 -26 -120 5 Subtotal 1 1 7 8 -5 6 1 57 Warehousing 2.9 AC 21 8 29 9 16 25 166 Manufacturing 2.9 AC -20 -2 -22 -13 -11 -24 -113 6 Subtotal 1 6 7 -4 5 1 53 Warehousing 10.5 AC 76 30 106 32 59 91 601 Manufacturing 10.5 AC -73 -5 -78 -47 -41 -88 -407 7 Subtotal 1 3 25 28 -15 18 3 194 Warehousing 2.0 AC 14 6 20 6 11 17 114 Manufacturing 2 AC -14 -1 -15 -9 -8 -17 -78 8 Subtotal 0 5 5 -3 3 0 36 Warehousing 2.7 AC 19 8 27 8 15 23 155 Manufacturing 2.7 AC -19 -1 -20 -12 -11 -23 -105 9 Subtotal 1 0 7 7 -4 4 0 50 Apartments 10 DU 1 4 5 4 2 6 67 Manufacturing 0.5 AC -3 0 -3 -2 -2 -4 -19 10 Subtotal -2 4 2 2 0 2 48 Warehousing 8.6 AC 62 24 86 26 49 75 492 Manufacturing 8.6 AC -60 -4 -64 -38 -34 -72 -334 11 Subtotal 1 2 20 22 -12 15 3 158 Apartments 45 DU 5 18 23 18 10 28 299 Manufacturing 2.9 AC -20 -2 -22 -13 -11 -24 -113 12 Subtotal -15 16 1 5 -1 41 186 Warehousing 3.0 AC 22 8 30 9 17 26 172 Manufacturing 3.0 AC -21 -2 -23 -13 -12 -25 116 13 Subtotal 1 1 6 7 -4 5 1 56 ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trio Generation. 9th Edition, 2012, Land Use Categories 140, 150, and 220. z AC = Acres; Site = Site; DU = Dwelling Unit ' The emergency shelter is projected to generate little to know traffic. Ana ssumption of 1 inbound and 1 outbound vehicle has been made for the morning and even total of 30 vehicle trips per day. 22 Table 4 Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service Intersection Approach Lanes 1 Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic ICU-LOS Z L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Intersection Control 3 Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #1a TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.617-F 1.671-F Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.5 1 1.217-F 1.317-F 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 d 0 1 0 1.482-F 1.692-F 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b TS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0.5 0.5 d 0.811-D 1.153-F Santa Fe Avenue INS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 1 1 d 1 0.5 0.5 0.988-E 1.125-F 38th Street (EW) - #4 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 d 0 0 0 1.055-F 1.119-F Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0 1 0 0.5 1 0.5 1.076-F 1.018-F Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1 2 2 1.017-F 1.062-F Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1.127-F 1.314-F Bandini Boulevard (EW)-#8 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1 2.5 0.5 1.060-F 1.111-F Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.953-E 1.050-F Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.969-E 0.899-D Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.891-D 0.973-E Boyle Avenue INS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 TS 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1.199-F 1.334-F Downey Road INS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1> 1 2 d 0.963-E 1.019-F Bandini Boulevard (EW)-#14 TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 0.5 1.002-F 1.048-F Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 TS 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.081-F 1.073-F Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW)-#16 TS 1 4 1 1 3.5 1.5>> 1.5 2 0.5 1 1 2>> 1.725-F 1.598-F District Boulevard (EW) - #17 TS 1 2.5 0.5 1 3 1>> 2 1 1 0.5 1.5 1>> I 0.952-E I 1.080-F ' When a right turn lane is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto Turn Lane; > = Right Turn Overlap; » = Free Right Turn z ICU-LOS = Intersection Capacity Utilization -Level of Service ' TS = Traffic Signal 23 Table 5 Project Traffic Contribution Year2035 Proposed General Plan Without Mitigation With Mitigation Current General Plan Volume to Levelof Volume to Level of Project Significant Volumeto Levelof Project Significant Peak Intersection Hour Capacity Service Capacity Service Impact Impact' Capacity Service Impact Impact Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la Morning 1.617 F 1.617 F 0.000 No Evening 1.671 F 1.671 F 0.000 No Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb Morning 1.217 F 1.217 F 0.000 No Evening 1.317 F 1.317 F 0.000 No 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a Morning 1.482 F 1.482 F 0.000 No Evening 1.692 F 1.692 F 0.000 No 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b Morning 0.811 D 0.811 D 0.000 No Evening 1.153 D 1.153 D 0.000 No Santa Fe Avenue INS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 Morning 0.986 E 0.988 E 0.002 No Evening 1.124 F 1.125 F 0.001 No 38th Street (EW) - #4 Morning 1.059 F 1.055 F -0.004 No Evening 1.121 F 1.119 F -0.002 No Vernon Avenue (EW) -#5 Morning 1.077 F 1.076 F -0.001 No Evening 1.022 F 1.018 F -0.004 No Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 Morning 1.017 F 1.017 F 0.000 No Evening 1.061 F 1.062 F 0.001 No Soto Street INS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 Morning 1.118 F 1.127 F 0.009 No Evening 1.311 F 1.134 F -0.177 No BandiniBoulevard (EW)-#8 Morning 1.053 F 1.060 F 0.007 No Evening 1.111 F 1.111 F 0.000 No Vernon Avenue (EW) -#9 Morning 0.953 E 0.953 F 0.000 No Evening 1.050 F 1.050 F 0.000 No Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 Morning 0.969 E 0.969 E 0.000 No Evening 0.899 D 0.899 D 0.000 No Fruitland Avenue (EW) -#11 Morning 0.891 D 0.891 D 0.000 No Evening 0.973 E 0.973 E 0.000 No Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) -#12 Morning 1.199 F 1.199 F 0.000 No Evening 1.335 F 1.334 F -0.001 No Downey Road INS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Morning 0.960 E 0.963 E 0.003 No Evening 1.019 F 1.019 F 0.000 No BandiniBoulevard (EW)-#14 Morning 0.998 E 1.002 F 0.004 No Evening 1.043 F 1.048 F 0.005 No Slauson Avenue (EW) -#15 Morning 1.079 F 1.081 F 0.002 No Evening 1.075 F 1.073 F 0.002 No Atlantic Boulevard INS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) -#16 Morning 1.717 F 1.725 F 0.008 No Evening 1.594 F 1.598 F 0.004 No District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Morning 0.949 E 0.952 E 0.003 No Evening 1.081 F 1.080 F -0.001 No 'Based on the Los Angeles Department of Transportation Policies and Procedure, impact is considered significant if the project related increase in the volume to capacity ratio equals or exceeds the thresholds shown below: Significant Impact Threshold for Intersections Level of Service Volume/Capacity Incremental Increase C 0.70 - 0.79 equal to or greater than 0.040 or more D 0.80 - 0.89 equal to or greater than 0.020 or more E/F 0.90 - more equal to or greater than 0.010 or more 24 Figure 12 Potential Development Location Map 25th Street 1 0 26th Street 27th Street 0 v Washington 28th v O Boulevard Street o 4 a o O7 NF& > 37th Street Bandini i, IF Boulevard 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue v T Q Vernon Avenue a, a) > (U `^ Exchangegvenue g• < 46thStreet c > 48th Street Vm) a Leonis Boulevard v o (U- 49th Street ? 3 v m > ro >> > v o E Fruitland a Qw Q o` > a m° Avenue " Q v _0 � v r 55th Street 54th Street c > o ra v > a v0 Q o a Q o It Slauson Avenue 3 > (6 Randolph Street NTS KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE 25 Legend 1O = Potential Development Site 5031/12 25th Street 35% 27th Street 37th Street 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue LL•� ra c c > 48th Street n a 3 5 % Y 0 49th Street 55th Street Figure 13 Potential Development Number 1 Trip Distribution 20°% v a, (n S ai 0 a 0 c V) i > v Q Bandini — Boulevard Vernon Avenue a, v > Q' 46th Street Leonis Boulevard a w > v 3 v 0 v Co > 0 Fruitland m Avenue 54th Street 25% II 1 Slauson Avenue 10% NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. ar -0 7 0 a v M C: 0 3 U Q a o Washington g oulevard 3 T Randol, OvER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 26 Avenue QJ Q � 3 QW Q � � U 15% I Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/13 Figure 14 Potential Development Number 2 Trip Distribution 25th Street 26th Street 27th Street Y v Washin 28th N gton Boulevard Street ° a 0 c > 37th Street N Bandini iv Boulevard 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue It 100% Vernon Avenue �v a, > v Exchange c g v ^ < 46th Street Avenue m m as c > 48th Street un. a Leonis ° a c Boulevard v o v v m 49th Street a 3 c v -6 W c, M a a) 7 ° m UJ > a >. 4J W N N >> > A Qw C 3 ° �C1i B 04/�,` @ m Fruitland Q o " a Avenue Q drd v -a � v 55th Street 54th Street c > o = > < � o Q ° 3 Slauson Avenue NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE a T Legend 3 Randol 10%= Percent To/From Project ph Street 5031/14 27 50% 25th Street 7 27th Street 25% 37th Street 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue c v ,, 48th Street Ua Ln 49th Street E Q 55th Street Figure 15 Potential Development Number 3 Trip Distribution 25% Y O aic 0% 00V) Vernon Avenue v v > Q' 46th Street Leonis Boulevard v w > v 3 v 0 v Co > 0 Fruitland m Avenue 54th Street 20% Slauson Avenue NTS KUNZMAN AssocIATEs, INC. v -0 7 0 a v M C: 0 3 U Q a o OvER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 28 Washington g oulevard Avenue N Q � 3 QW Q � � U 5% I Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/15 Figure 16 Potential Development Number 4 Trip Distribution 30% , n°. 25th Street 26th Street 27th Street v Washin 28th N gton Boulevard Street a 70% 37th Street VA Bandini T Q 41st 38th Street ou r 65% Street Vernon Avenue \ac 10% Vernon Avenue a, v • ^ Exchange o 5% Q 46th Street gvenue 55% m Q 48th Street Q ° �a��\G P� Leonis c y Boulevard v o v. 4/S�r�c 49th Street o �� C m v 15% a m Q CU Qw Q @ m Fruitland o v " a Avenue Q drd ai -p a 5% 55th Street 54th Street c > o c ) 10 Q (U O Q Cr 3 PPS 5� Slauson Avenue 5% 30% ° on 3 T Legend Randol ph Street 10%= Percent To/From Project NTS 5031/16 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. )vER 35 Y[ARS of EXCELLENT SrRvicE 29 25th Street 27th Street 37th Street 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue LL•� @ c c � 48th Street in a Ln 49th Street E m Q 55th Street Figure 17 Potential Development Number 5 Trip Distribution Street v v I 0 0 0 N 15% AA2 41 BandiQ Boulevard Vernon Avenue vv > Q' 46th Street Leonis :IF ouevard >v0> mQO ruitland m Avenue 54th Street 15% c NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. — 30% m m � ` o & nge Avenue Q CU Z OC 4/S Qw QCU ° O� 4 P`dr _ U Q v -if c � o Q 0 U a OvER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SrRvicE 30 Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/17 25th Street 27th Street 37th Street 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue LL•� @ c c � 48th Street in a Ln 49th Street E m Q 55th Street Figure 18 Potential Development Number 6 Trip Distribution Street v v I 0 0 0 N 15% AA2 41 BandiQ Boulevard Vernon Avenue vv > Q' 46th Street Leonis Boulevard v w > v v 0 v O Fruitland Co Avenue 54th Street 15% c NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. — 30% m m � ` o & nge Avenue Q CU Z OC 4/S Qw QCU ° O� 4 P`dr _ U Q v -if c � o Q 0 U a OvER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SrRvicE 31 Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/18 Figure 19 Potential Development Number 7 Trip Distribution 30% 25th Street 26th Street 27th Street Y v Washin 28th N gton Boulevard Street 0 CU a CU 37th Street ^ 35% T Q 7 Boulevard 65% 41st 38th Street li'd Street Vernon Avenue Vernon Avenue a, v ai Exchange Q 46th Street gvenue > 48th Street a Leoms Boulevard v o v. m 49th Street > a CU 3 v m a QJ CU Qw Q @ m° Fruitland a Avenue v � � v 55th Street 54th Street c > 0 Q (U o Q 0 3 U a 0 o 5� Slauson Avenue on 3 T RandolPh Street NTS KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. )vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 32 01 VI 10% 30% 5%1 5% 1 Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/19 Figure 20 Potential Development Number 8 Trip Distribution 30% 25th Street 26th Street 27th Street Y v Washin 28th N gton Boulevard Street 0 0 a 0 c L 37th Street v' v 35% Boulevard 65% 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue Vernon Avenue a, v ai Exchange Q 46th Street gvenue W 48th Street a Leonis Boulevard v o QJ- m 49th Street > a 3 vCU coa L CU Qw Q @ m° Fruitland a Avenue M v -0 I v 55th Street 54th Street c > 0 � Q (Uo Q 0 3 U a 0 o 5� Slauson Avenue on 3 T RandolPh Street NTS KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. )vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 33 01 VI 10% 30% 5%1 5% 1 Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/20 25th Street 27th Street 37th Street 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue LL•� @ c c � 48th Street in a Ln 49th Street E m Q 55th Street Figure 21 Potential Development Number 9 Trip Distribution Street v v I 0 0 0 N 15% AA2 41 BandiQ Boulevard Vernon Avenue vv > Q' 46th Street Leonis :IF ouevard >v0> mQO ruitland m Avenue 54th Street 15% c NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. — 30% m m � ` o & nge Avenue Q CU Z OC 4/S Qw QCU ° O� 4 P`dr _ U Q v -if c � o Q 0 U a OvER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SrRvicE 34 Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/21 25th Street 27th Street P48thStree 41st Street LL•�@ cc an aLn 55th Street U w a Figure 22 Potential Development Number 10 Trip Distribution Street v v v S v 0 a 0 c V) i > a, Q :Bandini — Boulevard Vernon Avenue v v > Q' 46th Street tAven d v (6 41 7 > > c O > 0 CD Q O m ue v -a 54th Street a v M 0 3 U Q a o 5% NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. :)vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 35 Washington g oulevard nge Avenue Cy Qw Q O � O C J > Q 10% SO% 5%1 5% 1 25% Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/22 Figure 23 Potential Development Number 11 Trip Distribution 10% 5% 25th Street 26th Street 27th Street Y v Washin 28th N gton Boulevard Street o a 0 c 37th Street V) i > Bandini v Q Boulevard 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue a� 35% Vernon Avenue a, > c • v > v ^ Q' 46th Street xchange Avenue c c c 1, m m g c > as 48th Street v QI o y Anne, Boulevard v o v. 15 % m 49th Street > a 3 vCU Q N Qw C 3 C @ Co° Fruitland Q o 40% a Avenue Q 0 20% 00 54th Street v c -a o = a = 0 11 100% 55th Street > 10 O ~PP�dG : Q I - Slauson Avenue 5% 30% on 3 T Legend Randol 10%= Percent To/From Project ph Street NTS 5031/23 KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. )vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 36 25th Street 27th Street P48thStree 41st Street LL•�@ cc an aLn 55th Street Figure 24 Potential Development Number 12 Trip Distribution Street v v v S v o a a) V) i > a, Q :Bandini - Boulevard Vernon Avenue v v > Q' 46th Street � tFruitland ulevard v5.o > o Co Avenue v 54th Street a O U 5% NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. a :)vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 37 Washington Bouievar a m m � 50% v Exchange Avenue L 5% P 10% �Q 0 a v o ro > > o c 55% U Q> 60% J 85 % 5% C oQ 100% 10 PP 12 �dG 25% S% 25% Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/24 Figure 25 Potential Development Number 13 Trip Distribution 10% 5% 25th Street 26th Street 27th Street Y v Washington 28th N gton Boulevard Street ° ° a CU 0 0 c L a, 37th Street N Q Boulevard 41st 38th Street Street Vernon Avenue a, v > v ^ Vernon Avenue Exchange g < 46th Street gvenue c > 48th Street a Leonis Boulevard v o v. m 49th Street > a CU 3 v m a L Qu, Q @ m° Fruitland a Avenue v -° v 55th Street 54th Street c > o = > < � o Q 0 0 a o Slauson Avenue on 3 T RandolPh Street NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. :)vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 38 15% VI 35% 30% Legend 10%= Percent To/From Project 5031/25 Figure 26 Potential Development Average Daily Traffic Volumes 0.1 0.2 0.1 25th Street 0.1 NOM NOM 27th Street NOM 26th Street 0.1 Street o 1 aCU o '�° L 37th Street NOM N Baandini Boulevard NO NO 41st 38th Street 0.1 Street NOM NO Vernon Avenue NOM Vernon Avenue NOM NOM a, • Q/ v NOM LL vNOM N " Q 46th Street NOKeNOM > reet n a W VN eonis Boulevardreet a LLm°Fruitland 3 NOMNOM m° w Avenue Washin 0.1 gton Boulevard CU -0 54th Street 55th Street > a v NOM NOM NOM ° 3 a o Slauson Avenue NOM NOM NOM on 3 >T co Randolph Street NTS KUNZMAN AssoclATEs, INC. OvER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SrRvicE 39 0.2 m Avenue o & m m a 03 --- L-:-F c 3 o v U Q a 0.1 0.3 v o > 0.2 —f ONOM Legend 0.2 = Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) NOM = Nominal, Less Than 50 Vehicles Per Day 5031/26 Figure 27 Potential Development Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 2 v 0 v 2 v 0 v 1 v 3 v 2 v 1 �0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 o-�bb�o o-�-b�o a�b�o I o-��b �o �o a �o a �bb�o �2 a D 0 1 T D 0-6' D 0 D 0-1' D 0-1' � T D 0-4' D -14 41 0 0--J>--- o O O O 2 ^2 o O 0--J>--- 0� 0 0 0 0 -4 0 -14 0 40 10 60 1v -10 0 Ov 6 0 0 7 3 M 8 9 9 4-,-0 0 10 1-3 11 4L-0 0 12 4L-0 ebb -0 -0 - 2 � �b�o b� ��o �170 olIb�4 �o a D 0-!�, � t� D 4 D 0 0— D 0— D 0— D 0� 1 T r 0 0-0000 - 1--t> 1�0�0 o O�o�o o 0 --- o O�000 o O�--- 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0 0 14 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 L 0 0 lv 3v 4v Ov -8v 13 1 14 `L-0 M 15 `L-0 0 16 '1--2 17 '�-14 4--3 a o-�bb4-3 a a�-b4—o a a�-b�i �1 a D 2 4 0 6 4� 4�0�0 24�� o o O�000 3��� -1�000 2 0� 0� 15� 0 6 � 1 0 0 � 23 � 0 NTS 5031/27 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 40 Figure 28 Potential Development Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes lv Ov 1v Ov —4v —5v —5v 1 �0 0 1 le�-0 0 2 �-0 0 2 0 0 3 Q—, 0 4 0 0 5 �0 o_o 4-0 --- 4-0 0_0 4-0 �o a --- o-��b�o �0 a o�i o ��b -1 --2 a o o 4-0 cio 4--0N D 0-S' D 0-9' D 0 D 0--s D 0 D 0— � D -8 0 0-0 o O�000 0 0 -7� 3v -9v -2v 1v -lv Ov Ov 6 0 0 7 3 8 9 4-,-0 0 10 11 4L-0 0 12 4L-0 ebb -0 -0 �0 -0 - -�o b -1b�o olbb�2 �o a D 0� � t D 3�' � t D 0�' D -1— D 0�° D 0— D 0� 0 0�o o 1�--- 0 0��� i O�o�o 0 0�--- o O�000 -2--i> 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0� 0 -2 9 0 1 0 0 0 -Sv Ov 2v Ov 11- 13 14 0 0 15 0 0 16 `�-2 N 17 4--1 4-0 a ��b -1 a o-��b�o �o a D 2 (° D 3 -2— (° -2�2� i 18�00o 0-- o L�5 � �o 12� 0� 0� 0� NTS 5031/28 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 41 Figure 29 Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 30.1 o 38.6 28.5 25th Street 21.2 10.0 7.7 32.1 26th Street 11.9 27th Street Y 14.6 28.8 was h� 28th v n t g on Bouleva n 34.7 a r d Street 0 a 0 �° a� 29.4 37th Street 7.6 " 17.2 Bandini v Q - 7..Q 32.3 V5 9 Boulevard 17.5 41st 38th Street 33.9 30.6 19.3 Street 33.5 7.2 Vernon Avenue a � 36.9 Vernon Avenue 33.7 6.6 g Ti 26.4 25.0 > 28.4 33.8 1 3 �26.7 Q 46thStreet Exchange gVenue 48th Street c > in a 26.0L12..s E 10.8 Boulevard v o v. CU m 49th Street 24.2 a, 0 �v 8.6 m° > a v >> > Qw c 3 o @ Co° Fruitland Q o > a 32.9 10.7 Avenue " Q 20.5 a, -0 54th Street I c o 55th Str 15.9 11.1 127.2 SlausonAvenue 26.4 KUNZMAN AssocIATEs, INC. v � a v 010.8 0 3 U 0 a in 7 27.0 30. on 1.5 RandoIPh Street 1vER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 42 of 23. P-N6. 6.8 Legend 26.8 = Vehicles Per Day (1,000's) 5031/29 Figure 30 Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 1694 0 327 0 1238 0 83 0 1697 0 1809 0 1559 0 1 1 0 �-,118 0 2 �97 ZS 2 �19 3 �153 0 4 M �0 0 5 M �206 `0 n1 M O < M a0 O M I� m M ^� -212 N� o-�bb�9v 4 al�b�i3294 a��b�is5 4 a��b�399 4 o-��b 4 a��b�0 4 o-�bb -2 �214 4 D 177-1TT D 66— 77 D 297 D 34 42 D -9--5'�T� 0 954--f> p!,,0 2 939 2 539 -u;L'�; f 383 4 108 249�;��tg 15--f>Mo 70--1, - 161 40 36 104 91 4� 2048 432 0 2070 113 2032 2346 2425 1649 0 1923 0 1717 0 1602 0 1158 0 1098 0 302 0 6 ,o �718 7 m a �146 8 0 4 162 M 9 03 M "-'-359 10 4-200 11 110 0 12 �67 2 -39 4 ��b -408 4 ��b -248 4 ��b -130 4 17-1311 4 -42 4 1b4-1284� �270 4 D 212 D 62 52 79 D 113 — D 127 D 88 m 350�M22 N 138�&302 94 452�0^g N 124 S4MM o 316��Mg 209 �,22p; 21025�^nS n 134� � � 64� � � 0 88� � � 58� r' 31� 34� � 7 r 192� � �2 1647 1 1- 2069 0 1968 0 1657 1441 1 0 1359 2121 1340 0 1054 0 401 0 2027 0 2563 0 13 ,o �131 14 o `�-210 tg 15 `�-678 0 16 - `�-255 0 17 '�-154 M M 4-794 - 4-1106 = 4-1690 N �^ M 4-353 2 o �2 4-373 b -119 4 b -249 4 b - 4 b -299 4 � b 6--5 4 D 197— 79-'a 150 271 764� 165 o^ 408 Z 1047 7 776 R o F 0 90 " 200 3 = 67 3 30 = 222 - - 48 0 1787 0 1499 0 54 0 2859 0 2108 NTS 5031/30 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 43 Figure 31 Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes 1790 0 352 0 1918 0 395 0 1834 0 2408 0 2033 0 1 M �350 1 0 �67 � 2 �� 218 0 2 �12 B 3 �101 p2 4 s v �0 0 5 �174 4-1070 - 4-1573 o 4-794 - n 4-767 M = = 4-205 °= o 4-0 2 `= 4-10 4� b �191 4 4� b �1 4 -72 4 -172 4 -0 ,--248 4 D 299 � D 45 152— TT D 66— 377 30 28 � T � 0 952 --i> � 1135 --- � 367 -- n � 429 � � � � 365 � � � g ^ 368 � � � 30 � - 2 s 139� r = 37� " 63� < 18� 132� 119� 9� 1746 455 1497 83 1912 1916 1950 2101 0 2497 0 2292 0 2172 0 1865 0 1551 0 1294 0 6 �, �398 7 2- �225 8 0 �95 9 - o �180 2 10 M �147 2 11 � �77 S 12 �34 B 5 4- !2 b b1276 -45 4 4� b -54 4 4� b -186 4 a� b '336 4 4� b '92 4 4� b �372 4 b b �70 4 370 148 t � D 253 � T � D 157 — T D 125 —' TT D 252 — 1 TT D 45 — m 533 � N 0 575 - o; ^ g 855 2 � � 304 � � g N � 572 � K o 2 � 499 � ; e � � �, 1279 � 95 � - aD 97 -;�, = 89 r 113 r 64 73 326 1472 1 1 0 1921 1791 0 1393 1171 941 713 1873 0 1941 0 867 0 1964 0 2384 0 13 e - ZE �46 14 - ^ K `�-122 PZ - 15 .-, n M 93 `�-228 16 - °8 = `�-711 2 r2 17 C = '�-133 V b 4-357 �44 4 b - 4423 6--232 4 b 4-1235 - 4 T b 4-225 -417 4 b 4-73 -6 4 D 258 1T D 227--6'1T� D 165— �T� D15251027 � � N o 0 928 � ^ N 1591-- � ^ M ,^, 387434 3 305 3 63 L674 3251557 0 1634 0 1370 23 44 1178 NTS 5031/31 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. OVER 35 YEARS of EXCELLENT SERVICE 44 V. Conclusions The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the traffic impacts resulting from proposed residential and trucking overlay districts in the City of Vernon, and to identify the traffic mitigation measures necessary to maintain the established Level of Service standard for the elements of the impacted roadway system. The study area intersections were determined by selecting the intersections that were projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service in the 2007 Circulation Plan Update for the City of Vernon. Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue (EW) - #1 55th Street (EW) - #2 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 38th Street (EW) - #4 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 Downey Road (NS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Existing Level of Service: For Existing traffic conditions, the study area intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersections that operate at Levels of Service E to F during the peak hours (see Table 1): 45 Alameda Street (NS) at: Vernon Avenue (EW) - #1 55th Street (EW) - #2 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at: 25th/26th Street (EW) - #3 38th Street (EW) - #4 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - #6 Soto Street (NS) at: 26th Street (EW) - #7 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 Boyle Avenue (NS) at: Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 Downey Road (NS) at: Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at: Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 District Boulevard (EW) - #17 Current General Plan Year 2035 Level of Service: For the Current General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E to F during the peak hours, without improvements (see Table 2). All potential developments within the proposed housing and trucking overlay districts have been individually accounted for by an appropriate trip generation and trip distribution. Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Level of Service: For the Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service E to F during the peak hours, without improvements (see Table 4). Table 5 depicts the Proposed General Plan Year 2035 traffic conditions at the study area intersections. The study area intersections are not significantly impacted by the proposed housing and trucking overlay districts. The 1-710 widening project is projected to add an additional two northbound and two southbound travel lanes. These travel lanes proposed to be dedicated to trucks. The additional lane modifications are not projected to alter the traffic patterns within the City of Vernon. There is also a potential for additional interchanges and modification the existing interchanges along the I- 710 Freeway. These potential improvements will potentially significantly improve the function of Atlantic Boulevard/Bandini Boulevard. 46 The Orange Rail Line might align through the City of Vernon and provide access to the City of Vernon. At this point there is no preferred alignment and no proposed stations. Traffic patterns within the City of Vernon are not anticipated to significantly change if and when this Orange Rail Line is completed. It should be noted that the City of Vernon is virtually built out and that physical lane addition as a means of traffic mitigation provides limited opportunities. It is recommended that the City of Vernon implement an Intelligent Transportation System. The City of Los Angeles has implemented a number of Los Angeles County Automated Traffic Surveillance and Control systems and these systems provide an approximate 10 percent increase in capacity. 47 Appendices Appendix A — Glossary of Transportation Terms Appendix B —Traffic Count Worksheets Appendix C — Truck Percentage Calculations Appendix D — Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Capacity Utilization APPENDIX A Glossary of Transportation Terms GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out). CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic -actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper. HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI -MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN -DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS: One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles. PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. SCREEN -LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC -ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP -END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip -ends. A trip -end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quality of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles. UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles. APPENDIX B Traffic Count Worksheets Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_001 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 7:00 AM 9 151 2 12 117 5 10 76 3 6 85 30 506 7:15 AM 2 155 10 12 124 7 12 82 1 10 81 26 522 7:30 AM 5 172 8 12 130 4 19 89 5 9 93 39 585 7:45 AM 4 149 9 16 152 4 15 83 3 17 77 49 578 8:00 AM 7 156 7 12 130 11 15 88 6 15 76 31 554 8:15 AM 7 163 1 9 113 6 24 77 11 10 68 30 519 8:30 AM 9 169 3 17 100 8 10 58 6 10 65 20 475 8:45 AM 10 164 2 10 118 7 14 87 12 8 60 16 508 NL NT NR TOTAL VOLUMES : 53 1279 42 APPROACH Ws : 3.86% 93.09% 3.06% CONTROL : Signalized SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL 100 984 52 119 640 47 85 605 241 4247 8.80% 86.62% 4.58% 14.76% 79.40% 5.83% 9.13% 64.98% 25.89% Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_001 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: ND PM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 4:00 PM 7 129 9 16 92 4 33 56 15 16 63 43 483 4:15 PM 7 145 6 16 112 5 48 76 16 20 97 26 574 4:30 PM 12 126 9 13 123 6 43 91 2 15 86 27 553 4:45 PM 3 134 7 18 138 6 17 75 16 8 99 32 553 5:00 PM 4 116 6 11 109 7 19 79 15 17 104 42 529 5:15 PM 5 126 3 13 138 17 11 88 5 16 104 21 547 5:30 PM 4 150 14 24 148 16 20 87 14 21 97 21 616 5:45 PM 8 137 5 8 148 13 10 87 10 15 68 23 532 NL NT NR SL ST TOTAL VOLUMES : 50 1063 59 119 1008 APPROACH %'s : 4.27% 90.70% 5.03% 9.91% 83.93% CONTROL : Signalized SR EL ET ER I WL WT WR TOTAL 74 1 201 639 93 128 718 235 4387 i.16% 21.54% 68.49% 9.97% 11.84% 66.42% 21.74% Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_001 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: U AM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 7:00 AM 5 24 5 10 13 0 5 16 0 14 92 7:15 AM 7 22 8 9 24 2 10 32 1 8 123 7:30 AM 4 26 11 7 14 1 7 6 5 12 93 7:45 AM 5 38 5 8 22 0 9 10 0 9 106 8:00 AM 3 26 10 5 19 3 5 13 0 2 86 8:15 AM 0 28 5 7 18 2 4 14 2 16 96 8:30 AM 1 23 11 10 17 2 1 6 1 11 83 8:45 AM 3 15 5 12 14 1 3 it 0 7 71 NL NT NR I SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 28 202 60 68 141 11 44 0 108 9 0 79 750 APPROACH Ws : 9.66% 69.66% 20.69% 30.91% 64.09% 5.00% 28.95% 0.00% 71.05% 10.23% 0.00% 89.77% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_001 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 4:00 PM 3 35 10 10 17 2 3 5 0 10 95 4:15 PM 1 32 9 8 24 1 5 6 0 3 89 4:30 PM 0 33 8 11 20 0 3 1 0 6 82 4:45 PM 1 28 4 3 17 1 3 1 0 4 62 5:00 PM 0 32 6 6 20 2 4 5 0 5 80 5:15 PM 4 28 2 9 19 1 6 3 0 2 74 5:30 PM 1 37 5 10 25 2 4 1 0 8 93 5:45 PM 5 19 2 8 19 1 2 3 1 7 67 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 15 244 46 65 161 10 30 0 25 1 0 45 642 APPROACH Ws : 4.92% 80.00% 15.08% 27.54% 68.22% 4.24% 54.55% 0.00% 45.45% 2.17% 0.00% 97.83% CONTROL : Signalized El e / r- = 2 no punogEaM $ / b 2 2 o OD e ? 2 2 = M \ / 3 / \ f e / o e m . z of ICC) Eastbound f / � p / 7 / / o � \ / @ M m m punogaa? / f 7 \ / _ © @ 7 / 2 2 « 3 q / 0 % / m 2 » � @ e f # e e uo _ tln / k [punoqlsam f f -j 2 ? tic _ \ \ / e / o e m z � f \ % @ Eastbound % T �= R $ \ r- \ % \ m � e punogEaM $ e 7 � « e / / 0 bD % ? 7 o B = / o / e / 0 / o m z � � \ Eastbound 2 / Eastbound { \ 7 \ \ / 9 o ? 8 » I . B \ \ \ L / f \ o c a) I " LU \ § q \ \ / $ / > 3 2 3 = Q Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_002 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOU AM Day:TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 ND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7:00 AM 4 141 4 12 75 13 10 46 4 3 16 6 334 7:15 AM 4 165 8 14 81 15 17 77 0 5 22 9 417 7:30 AM 4 198 8 6 83 13 16 54 2 0 31 8 423 7:45 AM 4 176 4 11 83 18 15 57 3 1 31 7 410 8:00 AM 5 173 4 12 75 10 13 46 4 1 25 11 379 8:15 AM 5 155 2 12 91 8 16 25 1 0 15 3 333 8:30 AM 5 160 5 3 76 4 16 32 3 0 16 9 329 8:45 AM 5 147 3 10 96 9 16 25 10 1 15 12 349 NL NT NR TOTAL VOLUMES : 36 1315 38 APPROACH Ws : 2.59% 94.67% 2.7� CONTROL : Signalized SL ST SR EL ET ER I WL WT WR I TOTAL 80 660 90 119 362 27 11 171 65 2974 9.64% 79.52% 10.84% 23.43% 71.26% 5.31% 4.45% 69.23% 26.32% Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_002 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets: WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4:00 PM 5 116 4 9 112 24 15 26 8 8 90 29 446 4:15 PM 5 122 1 9 118 21 12 34 6 7 62 11 408 4:30 PM 4 130 1 9 144 17 8 32 5 4 72 13 439 4:45 PM 3 118 1 4 125 14 12 33 4 2 50 15 381 5:00 PM 3 105 1 14 146 13 11 31 8 9 69 27 437 5:15 PM 6 130 3 16 132 12 13 26 4 4 56 23 425 5:30 PM 3 120 1 10 147 15 15 37 3 9 69 16 445 5:45 PM 3 116 4 11 142 23 16 27 4 5 65 12 428 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 32 957 16J 82 1066 139J 102 246 42 48 533 146 3409 APPROACH Ws : 3.18% 95.22% 1.59% 6.37% 82.83% 10.80% 26.15% 63.08% 10.77% 6.60% 73.31% 20.080/0 00NTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_002 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets:' NORTHBOUND AM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7:00 AM 2 4 1 0 1 9 31 2 0 1 51 7:15 AM 2 7 4 1 0 4 39 3 0 0 60 7:30 AM 0 10 0 0 2 3 27 2 1 0 45 7:45 AM 0 4 1 1 3 2 39 3 0 3 56 8:00 AM 0 9 4 2 3 7 24 6 0 0 55 8:15AM 0 8 0 1 2 4 9 5 0 5 34 8:30 AM 1 9 2 0 1 4 18 1 1 3 40 8:45 AM 3 3 2 0 1 5 12 2 0 1 29 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 8 54 14 5 13 38 199 0 24 2 0 13 370 APPROACH %'s : 10.53% 71.05% 18.42% 8.93% 23.21% 67.86% 89.24% 0.00% 10.76% 13.33% 0.00% 86.67% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_002 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets: ,'°� ��—t'`F 4, ''�#.� Irk -� "�Nrv>., �'.�F'� r .:�. �� NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4:00 PM 1 8 0 2 2 33 6 0 4 56 4:15 PM 0 7 2 3 6 25 8 2 2 55 4:30 PM 1 4 1 5 4 31 7 1 0 54 4:45 PM 1 6 0 4 5 27 5 5 0 53 5:00 PM 2 5 1 1 2 34 3 2 0 50 5:15 PM 0 3 2 1 1 23 7 0 0 37 5:30 PM 0 3 3 7 3 18 5 0 0 39 5:45 PM 1 5 0 1 12 15 3 2 2 41 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 6 41 9 24 35 206 44 0 12 0 0 8 385 APPROACH Ws : 10.71% 73.21% 16.07% 9.06% 13.21% 77.74% 78.57% 0.00% 21.43% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% CONTROL : Signalized / 4 � $ E y _ G m # -5�' z % E / 2 E m e \ % A tko � k / punogaaM L % __j / / / 7 q ( _ / m - / o Eastbound p / m \ / e m e f \ % m punogaaM 2 aj \ 7 bn » _ ® = ® @ 2 / 2 / 0 \ e / o / m z m m q o 41 _ � k � punog9AA N % � 7 7 41 2 @ = m / 2 R \ e m E / # / / 0 % m z 41 LIrcolD % 2 » -------- Eastbound 9 2 cc / 7 \ % $ m m w.m # w 41 _ � k -ail punogaaM Iq % � o y $ _ \ e © 0 _ _ Ln / B / 2 B / / k o / m. z » � / $ Eastbound } / Eastbound \ \ 7 . / / ƒ W % 0 Q:� ƒ 0 \ v c e m R $� •[ o c „ L c LU \ § $ / \ / $ / I w m 2 w A = e Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_003 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 AM NS/EW Streets: J NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1.5 .5 1 1.5 .5 1 1 0 1 1 0 7:00 AM 16 262 16 7 250 4 8 26 24 23 31 27 694 7:15 AM 25 242 21 15 222 10 4 10 21 28 34 23 655 7:30 AM 19 329 24 15 234 12 4 17 21 36 45 22 778 7:45 AM 27 305 36 22 236 8 9 24 22 36 42 22 789 8:00 AM 16 269 30 22 301 10 6 21 15 34 37 28 789 8:15 AM 15 274 23 18 245 15 4 9 12 36 36 31 718 8:30 AM 17 273 16 20 247 12 13 16 14 35 30 26 719 8:45 AM 15 205 20 26 216 10 9 20 15 34 28 28 626 NL NT NR TOTAL VOLUMES : 150 2159 186 APPROACH Ws : 6.01% 86.53% 7.45 CONTROL : Signalized SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTA 145 1951 81 57 143 144 262 283 207 5768 6.66% 89.62% 3.72% 16.57% 41.57% 41.86% 34.84% 37.63% 27.53% Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_003 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND PM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1.5 .5 1 1.5 .5 1 1 0 1 1 0 4:00 PM 20 275 32 28 257 5 26 49 42 24 35 19 812 4:15 PM 26 267 30 18 241 6 12 54 26 20 27 12 739 4:30 PM 26 312 40 24 182 13 19 48 33 33 24 11 765 4:45 PM 21 270 32 28 242 9 11 33 34 19 34 22 755 5:00 PM 15 255 48 23 261 9 16 69 30 25 30 17 798 5:15 PM 16 325 29 17 290 5 12 51 18 32 44 21 860 5:30 PM 17 262 25 31 292 5 14 51 20 38 33 17 805 5:45 PM 32 230 31 34 265 2 11 73 25 22 31 13 769 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 173 2196 267 203 2030 54 121 428 228 213 258 132 6303 APPROACH WS : 6.56% 83.31% 10.13% 8.88% 88.76% 2.36% 15.57% 55.08% 29.34% 35.32% 42.79% 21.89% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_004 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND AM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 7:00 AM 22 279 35 16 266 34 14 27 21 714 7:15 AM 27 290 42 20 249 41 1 33 20 723 7:30 AM 25 364 42 19 212 40 6 44 15 767 7:45 AM 34 336 48 27 242 39 14 53 10 803 8:00 AM 16 314 46 28 264 31 7 37 16 759 8:15 AM 14 255 34 26 255 26 7 32 8 657 8:30 AM 21 278 24 24 255 25 5 23 20 675 8:45 AM 13 212 39 21 243 32 7 30 17 614 NL NT NR I SL ST SR I EL ET ER I WL WT WR I TOTA TOTAL VOLUMES : 172 2328 310 181 1986 268 61 279 127 1 0 0 0 5712 APPROACH Ws : 6.12% 82.85% 11.03% 7.43% 81.56% 11.01% 13.06% 59.74% 27.19% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_004 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4:00 PM 35 268 67 41 295 22 7 59 18 812 4:15 PM 30 265 46 39 290 17 8 55 17 767 4:30 PM 27 263 53 40 286 30 10 47 22 778 4:45 PM 20 231 65 33 296 29 1 62 19 756 5:00 PM 22 297 54 45 349 43 7 69 27 913 5:15 PM 34 222 51 36 329 31 8 57 20 788 5:30 PM 19 228 49 37 372 19 4 59 14 801 5:45 PM 15 196 42 44 300 20 7 52 18 694 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 202 1970 427 315 2517 211 52 460 155 0 0 0 6309 APPROACH Ws : 7.77% 75.80% 16.43% 10.35% 82.71% 6.93% 7.80% 68.97% 23.24% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/01 CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_005 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOU AM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 N NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 .5 1 .5 7:00 AM 2 344 21 14 281 2 0 2 0 37 1 23 727 7:15 AM 0 358 41 25 241 2 0 4 2 34 0 37 744 7:30 AM 0 408 20 16 215 0 2 1 1 41 2 36 742 7:45 AM 0 407 27 24 225 0 0 3 0 30 1 42 759 8:00 AM 1 353 22 20 257 0 0 2 1 37 1 26 720 8:15 AM 1 295 20 23 218 1 0 2 0 36 3 27 626 8:30 AM 0 293 15 17 271 2 0 3 0 16 1 28 646 8:45 AM 6 265 16 21 207 1 1 1 2 35 2 20 577 NL NT IN SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 10 2723 182 160 1915 8 3 18 6 266 11 239 5541 APPROACH %'s : 0.34% 93.41% 6.24% 7.68% 91.93% 0.38% 11.11% 66.67% 22.22% 51.55% 2.13% 46.32% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_005 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 .5 1 .5 4:00 PM 0 310 25 22 286 6 1 3 1 49 2 31 736 4:15 PM 3 320 29 36 310 1 1 3 3 35 2 18 761 4:30 PM 0 296 25 27 316 0 2 4 1 37 0 32 740 4:45 PM 0 262 25 25 291 0 12 6 1 44 2 29 697 5:00 PM 0 321 29 34 328 0 9 7 1 49 3 38 819 5:15 PM 0 252 17 27 365 0 3 10 1 25 0 30 730 5:30 PM 2 266 18 22 344 0 10 19 4 26 1 33 745 5:45 PM 1 245 17 22 313 0 1 5 1 30 2 8 645 NL NT NR SL ST SR TOTAL VOLUMES : 6 2272 185 215 2553 7 APPROACH %'s : 0.24% 92.25% 7.51% 7.75% 92.00% 02 CONTROL : Signalized EL ET ER WL WT WR 39 57 13 295 12 219 35.78% 52.29% 11.93%1 56.08% 2.28% 41.63% TOTAL 5873 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_006 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 AM NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 7:00 AM 27 236 3 23 219 79 24 66 24 5 89 111 906 7:15 AM 21 248 4 16 195 60 45 57 20 5 94 105 870 7:30 AM 24 243 7 28 179 52 40 62 31 9 106 160 941 7:45 AM 17 270 5 27 177 49 33 50 15 7 95 106 851 8:00 AM 16 258 1 28 212 61 44 60 12 2 80 94 868 8:15 AM 22 191 3 28 178 47 28 60 9 1 82 76 725 8:30 AM 20 209 5 29 201 57 29 52 11 3 69 81 766 8:45 AM 15 183 8 29 169 43 28 54 13 6 58 66 672 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 162 1838 36 208 1530 448 271 461 135 38 673 799 6599 APPROACH %'s : 7.96% 90.28% 1.77% 9.52% 69.99% 20.49% 31.26% 53.17% 15.57% 2.52% 44.57% 52.91% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_006 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND PM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 4:00 PM 27 224 6 35 251 47 53 98 19 7 82 58 907 4:15 PM 27 237 8 46 271 29 57 89 8 8 66 57 903 4:30 PM 14 208 7 38 281 37 37 110 24 15 80 74 925 4:45 PM 27 183 3 50 234 44 32 67 16 1 56 62 775 5:00 PM 32 235 8 36 297 45 44 92 16 6 83 74 968 5:15 PM 18 163 3 31 328 30 36 76 16 2 72 79 854 5:30 PM 31 166 3 43 299 37 50 87 18 4 55 58 851 5:45 PM 7 164 1 36 286 21 35 98 21 4 58 63 794 NL NT TOTAL VOLUMES I83 1580 APPROACH %'s : 10.16% 87.68% CONTROL : Signalized NR I SL ST SR I EL ET ER I WL WT WR ( TOTAL 39 315 2247 290 344 717 138 47 552 525 6977 2.16% 11.04% 78.79% 10.17% 28.69% 59.80% 11.51% 4.18% 49.11% 46.71% North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: 26th Street Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Morning Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 AM Cars 19 258 3 20 258 12 5 10 8 3 29 27 2-Axle Truck 2 13 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 5 2 3-Axle Truck 1 15 1 2 6 1 1 2 1 0 3 2 4-Axle Truck 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7:15 AM Cars 20 288 3 18 231 17 9 12 9 6 43 14 2-Axle Truck 1 10 1 0 9 0 0 1 2 2 3 1 3-Axle Truck 1 4 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 4-A-le Truck 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 7:30 AM Cars 25 297 8 27 250 28 6 18 8 7 49 12 2-Axle Truck 4 17 2 1 12 1 0 6 0 3 1 2 3-Axle Truck 1 6 1 1 6 0 2 3 0 1 4 4 4-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 7:45 AM Cars 34 269 19 31 252 18 5 14 3 3 56 24 2-Axle Truck 2 18 3 0 13 1 4 4 4 0 7 5 3-Axle Truck 1 8 0 1 6 1 0 5 0 1 4 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 8:00 AM Cars 24 256 8 23 259 28 10 17 11 7 42 17 2-Axle Truck 1 15 2 1 13 1 2 0 3 1 12 3 3-Axle Truck 0 6 0 0 6 0 3 3 0 0 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 8:15 AM Cars 21 271 8 26 221 22 5 13 13 3 48 18 2-Axle Truck 2 17 3 1 14 2 1 1 0 0 8 4 3-Axle Truck 2 13 0 1 7 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM Cars 17 207 4 22 253 32 5 17 9 4 45 15 2-Axle Truck 5 26 1 1 17 0 1 4 1 1 1 6 3 3-Axle Truck 0 10 2 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 8:45 AM Cars 12 226 3 12 233 28 7 9 2 6 41 13 2-Axle Truck 0 16 1 1 3 9 1 1 2 5 4 2 10 2 3-Axle Truck 0 4 0 1 9 2 2 3 1 0 4 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 Total Cars 172 2,072 56 179 1,957 185 52 110 63 39 353 140 2-Axle Truck 17 132 1 13 8 1 96 6 10 22 14 9 1 52 22 3-Axle Truck 6 66 4 6 54 10 8 19 3 2 22 14 4-Axle Truck 1 5 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5-Axle Truck+ 9 16 2 5 16 1 1 10 0 2 14 6 Total 205 2291 76 200 2125 202 71 161 80 52 442 184 Peak Hour Volumes 121 1 1203 1 56 117 1 1069 1 104 39 1 92 1 43 27 1 240 1 96 Peak Hour Factor 0.943 0.954 0.888 0.864 North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: 26th Street Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 11 250 12 32 249 11 24 46 11 8 26 22 2-Axle Truck 1 7 2 3 11 3 1 4 1 4 2 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 2 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 4 0 2 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4:15 PM Cars 8 274 8 32 247 12 17 47 14 6 22 13 2-Axle Truck 1 13 1 7 14 3 2 6 1 0 4 2 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 4 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 7 1 0 5 1 0 4 1 0 2 3 4:30 PM Cars 12 292 7 39 279 7 13 56 10 24 23 38 2-Axle Truck 3 5 0 3 1 14 5 1 5 1 1 2 2 2 3-Axle Truck 0 3 1 1 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 5 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4:45 PM Cars 8 249 10 57 306 5 7 65 14 12 18 40 2-Axle Truck 1 7 2 6 12 1 1 5 0 2 1 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 5-Axle Truck + 1 10 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 2 2 5:00 PM Cars 10 304 11 42 333 9 28 73 13 9 20 37 2-Axle Truck 1 7 1 4 7 1 0 7 1 0 4 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 0 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 5:15 PM Cars 15 292 7 44 310 9 20 92 16 10 32 32 2-Axle Truck 3 8 1 2 9 0 1 5 1 2 0 0 3-Axle Truck 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 3 0 4 6 2 0 1 0 1 4 1 5:30 PM Cars 14 296 10 51 357 12 29 95 21 7 15 37 2-Axle Truck 1 4 1 9 12 3 1 4 0 0 3 0 3-Axle Truck 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 8 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 5:45 PM Cars 9 236 12 53 348 6 17 91 12 7 19 37 2-Axle Truck 2 7 2 4 8 3 0 5 0 0 0 1 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 5 0 3 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 Total Cars 87 2,193 77 3S0 2,429 71 155 565 1 111 83 175 256 2-Axle Truck 13 58 10 38 87 19 7 41 5 10 16 9 3-Axle Truck 3 10 3 13 14 4 1 14 1 1 7 0 4-Axle Truck 0 3 2 1 3 1 0 7 0 1 9 1 5-Axle Truck + 4 47 1 14 42 6 2 12 2 1 19 10 Total 107 2311 93 416 1 2575 101 1 165 639 119 96 226 276 Peak Hour Volumes 59 1 1178 1 46 225 1 1407 1 51 97 1 385 1 65 36 1 112 1 149 Peak Hour Factor 0.946 0.931 0.866 0.884 North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Morning Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southboun.d Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 AM Cars 14 253 12 10 202 41 16 66 2 39 134 14 2-Axle Truck 1 12 1 0 9 0 0 2 2 1 3 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 2 1 6 2 4-Axle Truck 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 10 3 1 5 2 2 7 2 2 3 2 7:15 AM Cars 20 291 14 4 234 30 14 54 17 35 123 16 2-Axle Truck 2 8 1 2 12 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 2 1 1 4-Axle Truck 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 4 5 1 4 0 2 9 2 3 3 0 7:30 AM Cars 18 277 22 9 194 29 20 74 8 34 146 30 2-Axle Truck 2 13 1 0 2 12 1 7 6 1 1 1 5 1 3-Axle Truck 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 4 2 1 6 2 1 3 0 1 10 2 7:45 AM Cars 12 286 25 10 221 31 29 54 11 41 151 17 2-Axle Truck 1 19 0 1 15 1 3 6 2 1 6 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 6 1 2 4 1 1 10 2 2 6 3 8:00 AM Cars 7 231 11 19 236 28 18 56 11 42 132 28 2-Axle Truck 2 17 2 0 17 0 1 9 3 1 12 0 3-Axle Truck 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 1 4 3 2 1 7 1 0 11 1 8:15 AM Cars 16 270 20 8 204 28 29 51 10 35 111 25 2-Axle Truck 4 16 1 0 12 2 5 3 0 2 5 3 3-Axle Truck 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 3 9 3 1 6 3 3 3 2 1 9 4 8:30 AM Cars 5 195 13 6 233 25 13 42 7 35 108 22 2-Axle Truck 1 22 2 3 13 1 4 10 3 2 6 5 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 4 4 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 8 0 2 2 2 0 5 0 2 6 1 8:45 AM Cars 12 208 13 7 194 19 17 42 8 33 88 18 2-Axle Truck 2 12 2 2 8 4 1 4 4 2 8 5 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 3 2 1 5 4 0 5 1 3 13 1 Total Cars 104 2,011 130 73 1,718 231 156 439 74 294 993 170 2-Axle Truck 15 119 9 10 98 9 23 42 15 10 49 17 3-Axle Truck 4 13 2 1 11 3 5 23 3 6 18 10 4-Axle Truck 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 5-Axle Truck 7 47 17 13 35 16 10 49 10 14 61 14 Total 132 2192 158 97 1863 259 194 555 103 1 325 1 1126 211 Peak Hour Volumes 69 1 1166 1 84 56 1 966 1 127 102 1 303 1 59 165 1 619 1 103 (Peak Hour Factor T 0.937 0.918 0.943 0.940 North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 5 239 17 28 261 8 44 123 17 23 43 15 2-Axle Truck 1 7 4 3 13 1 5 5 1 2 11 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 4 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 1 2 3 4 2 1 8 3 3 5 1 4:15 PM Cars 16 251 19 31 280 18 26 108 20 22 47 12 2-Axle Truck 1 12 1 2 14 1 3 8 1 2 12 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 3 6 2 0 6 2 3 7 2 1 12 1 4:30 PM Cars 13 240 15 22 241 15 39 131 16 33 57 20 2-Axle Truck 1 9 1 5 12 1 2 4 4 3 6 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 2 2 6 0 2 5 1 3 13 1 4:45 PM Cars 5 218 27 28 1 316 19 1 38 118 13 39 92 18 2-Axle Truck 0 7 1 0 14 1 1 2 3 0 9 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 8 1 0 2 2 1 9 1 0 7 2 5:00 PM Cars 11 245 23 20 306 18 53 161 16 32 80 12 2-Axle Truck 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 3 1 2 0 3 1 0 4 3 2 5 2 5:15 PM Cars 7 270 36 32 320 11 34 126 11 19 72 10 2-Axle Truck 0 5 0 0 13 2 1 3 0 1 2 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 1 2 4 1 0 3 2 3 5 0 5:30 PM Cars 10 252 28 31 351 13 35 138 8 27 80 13 2-Axle Truck 1 3 3 2 8 1 3 1 0 0 4 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 7 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 8 1 5:45 PM Cars 11 214 27 37 332 19 19 122 14 23 85 19 2-Axle Truck 1 6 0 2 3 1 2 4 0 0 3 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 3 1 1 2 3 Total Cars 78 1,929 192 229 2,407 121 288 1,027 115 218 556 119 2-Axle Truck 6 56 12 15 1 81 10 1 18 28 11 8 49 5 3-Axle Truck 0 8 7 2 11 2 1 4 8 0 0 12 1 4-Axle Truck 0 2 1 0 1 1 3 7 1 0 4 1 5-Axle Truck+ 11 35 14 9 27 10 7 1 41 13 14 57 11 Total 95 1 2030 1 226 255 2527 144 320 1111 140 240 1 678 137 Peak Hour Volumes 39 1 1033 1 130 116 1 1348 1 75 170 1 574 1 60 124 1 377 62 Peak Hour Factor 1 0.922 0.936 0.820 0.823 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_007 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 AM NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 7:00 AM 10 252 0 19 195 25 14 11 9 6 38 47 626 7:15 AM 15 241 1 16 243 26 13 33 11 2 34 55 690 7:30 AM 16 296 10 14 207 32 17 11 9 4 55 54 725 7:45 AM 17 246 4 17 215 27 15 23 10 1 45 67 687 8:00 AM 14 245 5 16 234 27 8 16 9 2 34 65 675 8:15 AM 15 193 1 23 241 25 11 18 11 1 33 60 632 8:30 AM 10 237 1 20 260 29 11 16 9 4 31 42 670 8:45 AM 17 182 1 20 217 16 12 26 14 1 27 34 567 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 114 1892 23 145 1812 207 101 154 82 21 297 424 5272 APPROACH %'s : 5.62% 93.25% 1.13%1 6.70% 83.73% 9.57% 29.97% 45.70% 24.33% 2.83% 40.03% 57.14% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_007 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets:! SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4:00 PM 21 228 4 29 247 15 23 46 18 4 23 55 713 4:15 PM 14 169 10 36 289 18 20 37 27 5 24 41 690 4:30 PM 14 203 2 25 247 14 24 39 25 8 33 29 663 4:45 PM 8 215 2 36 337 15 18 34 23 6 35 33 762 5:00 PM 12 246 0 28 312 20 40 68 18 6 31 31 812 5:15 PM 20 219 7 43 333 2 20 34 18 6 13 32 747 5:30 PM 8 192 5 34 286 11 28 68 17 4 19 25 697 5:45 PM 5 168 2 45 305 8 17 32 20 0 14 24 640 NL NT NR I SL ST SR LL t I Z wL VV i VVrc i v i Mi TOTAL VOLUMES : 102 1640 32 276 2356 103 190 358 166 39 192 270 5724 APPROACH Ws : 5.75% 92.45% 1.80% 10.09% 86.14% 3.77% 26.61% 50.14% 23.25% 7.78% 38.32% 53.89% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_008 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 NS/EW Streets: SOUTHBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 7:00 AM 4 209 8 16 156 18 10 51 10 21 105 32 640 7:15 AM 3 205 13 21 174 10 29 55 4 27 134 30 705 7:30 AM 17 239 13 22 172 9 20 58 1 16 120 37 724 7:45 AM 17 227 12 22 133 25 17 48 6 24 135 33 699 8:00 AM 5 230 3 20 159 18 11 44 1 11 50 12 564 8:15 AM 9 167 5 31 195 30 10 39 4 28 102 29 649 8:30 AM 6 196 6 23 175 19 19 47 2 29 97 33 652 8:45 AM 6 152 6 23 183 29 5 30 2 25 106 25 592 TOTAL VOLUMES :1 67 1625 66 I 178 1347 158 I 121 372 30 I 181 849 231 I 5225 APPROACH %'s : 3.81% 92.43% 3.75% 10.58% 80.04% 9.39% 23.14% 71.13% 5.74% 14.35% 67.33% 18.32% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_008 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets ids 1 d .;,� ol,� ` _ .�I i; �4�t'I��a�lj` : 'e "Tmi���el� tl,.I! �;4 �. �'im .,�mua,«ytmi�. o-s,'� NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 4:00 PM 10 158 12 28 242 12 18 99 12 21 90 22 724 4:15 PM 6 137 12 32 245 8 16 66 6 24 50 15 617 4:30 PM 6 182 29 31 245 16 15 109 8 18 59 24 742 4:45 PM 2 153 17 29 289 10 14 79 9 15 64 18 699 5:00 PM 5 174 22 31 266 16 34 115 11 16 79 34 803 5:15 PM 6 165 25 33 269 17 21 81 15 13 79 22 746 5:30 PM 3 142 21 33 254 14 17 114 8 8 62 29 705 5:45 PM 3 129 25 31 282 12 9 72 3 13 52 12 643 NL NIT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 41 1240 163 248 2092 105 144 735 72 128 535 176 5679 APPROACH %'s : 2.84% 85.87% 11.29% 10.14% 85.56% 4.29% 15.14% 77.29% 7.570% 15.26% 63.77% 20.980/o CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_009 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 7:00 AM 20 171 6 11 122 28 30 34 10 4 67 22 525 7:15 AM 24 186 8 9 156 47 22 29 10 6 51 17 565 7:30 AM 26 238 4 9 132 41 20 43 2 5 70 24 614 7:45 AM 23 185 10 12 101 41 26 32 5 6 55 16 512 8:00 AM 16 189 3 14 120 55 17 36 6 11 59 17 543 8:15 AM 26 140 4 17 126 69 18 36 5 12 65 11 529 8:30 AM 15 187 1 20 129 75 18 30 22 4 44 21 566 8:45 AM 21 131 3 14 125 63 16 33 11 7 52 11 487 TOTAL VOLUMES :1 171 1427 39 APPROACH °/a's 10.45% 87.17% 2.31 CONTROL : Signalized SL SF SR tL tl tK 106 1011 419 167 273 71 6.90% 65.82% 27.280/0 32.68% 53.42% 13.81. WL WT WR TOTAI 55 463 139 4341 8.37% 70.47% 21.16% Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_009 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets- RTHBOUND PM EASTBOUND Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 r!f7 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4:00 PM 14 124 1 17 239 30 32 60 14 11 55 14 611 4:15 PM 7 125 2 22 226 19 26 54 6 5 44 11 547 4:30 PM 13 141 8 22 207 21 50 96 18 8 55 9 648 4:45 PM 7 120 8 21 258 27 37 73 8 4 40 13 616 5:00 PM 16 148 12 19 248 21 47 109 14 11 42 18 705 5:15 PM 15 135 8 24 249 24 35 57 9 2 32 12 602 5:30 PM 3 116 10 30 229 24 41 81 10 5 30 6 585 5:45 PM 5 105 6 20 223 22 41 59 12 4 34 10 541 NL NT TOTAL VOLUMES : 80 1014 APPROACH %'s : 6.96% 88.25% CONTROL : Signalized NR I SL ST SR 55 175 1879 188 1.79% 7.81% 83.81% 8.35 EL ET ER I WL WT WR 309 589 91 50 332 93 31.24% 59.56% 9.200/0 10.53% 69.89% 19.58% TOTAL 4855 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_010 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 AM NS/EW Streets: RTHBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 7:00 AM 50 197 35 5 60 4 5 145 26 47 216 15 805 7:15 AM 68 239 51 4 58 5 13 172 24 35 224 11 904 7:30 AM 66 239 61 8 43 5 15 182 38 47 217 11 932 7:45 AM 86 218 71 4 31 6 17 183 38 45 207 11 917 8:00 AM 60 213 52 3 30 6 14 151 29 54 211 12 835 8:15 AM 61 212 52 4 32 2 20 137 23 40 195 6 784 8:30 AM 49 130 49 3 24 3 12 140 19 39 171 13 652 8:45 AM 34 89 36 6 32 4 20 169 16 38 210 9 663 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 474 1537 407 37 310 35 116 1279 213 345 1651 88 6492 APPROACH %'s : 19.60% 63.56% 16.83% 9.69% 81.15% 9.16% 7.21% 79.54% 13.25% 16.55% 79.22% 4.22% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_010 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 4:00 PM 28 63 25 16 167 16 9 228 43 68 207 4 874 4:15 PM 32 44 36 13 141 6 7 225 55 59 185 7 810 4:30 PM 31 62 41 18 164 16 9 233 43 56 199 6 878 4:45 PM 35 55 31 8 182 8 8 209 64 48 210 6 864 5:00 PM 39 54 27 10 196 5 8 214 46 76 227 3 905 5:15 PM 27 53 23 19 229 13 5 204 66 68 219 8 934 5:30 PM 45 55 39 16 217 9 8 191 51 63 170 6 870 5:45 PM 25 50 31 8 171 6 5 223 68 65 168 9 829 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 262 436 253 108 1467 79 59 1727 436 503 1585 49 6964 APPROACH a/o'S : 27.55% 45.85% 26.60% 6.53% 88.69% 4.78% 2.66% 77.72% 19.62% 23.54% 74.17% 2.29% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_011 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 AM NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1.5 .5 1 1.5 .5 1 2 1 1 2 0 7:00 AM 56 212 7 10 127 36 20 24 33 12 128 14 679 7:15 AM 57 231 7 8 130 69 38 20 25 20 146 15 766 7:30 AM 63 236 8 7 153 64 32 26 30 18 158 23 818 7:45 AM 34 231 7 9 199 39 32 37 49 21 133 31 822 8:00 AM 45 262 14 11 174 36 29 25 29 20 94 18 757 8:15 AM 47 192 9 12 162 50 30 32 28 16 112 21 711 8:30 AM 51 171 9 6 129 40 31 35 29 10 114 22 647 8:45 AM 52 141 6 8 164 46 32 27 29 24 115 27 671 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 405 1676 67 71 1238 380 244 226 252 141 1000 171 5871 APPROACH %'s : 18.85% 78.03% 3.12% 4.20% 73.30% 22.50% 33.80% 31.30% 34.90% 10.75% 76.22% 13.03% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_011 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 1.5 .5 1 1.5 .5 1 2 1 1 2 0 4:00 PM 42 204 18 17 205 49 48 143 62 21 56 12 877 4:15 PM 27 177 5 25 176 44 55 160 58 16 49 17 809 4:30 PM 28 199 23 21 205 67 57 154 58 10 43 5 870 4:45 PM 40 225 16 14 173 29 44 134 59 14 49 13 810 5:00 PM 35 270 16 29 226 58 48 151 73 8 57 5 976 5:15 PM 29 195 18 32 267 51 36 159 69 7 58 5 926 5:30 PM 33 171 17 23 259 51 42 199 84 4 42 8 933 5:45 PM 35 202 22 25 212 28 46 179 64 10 83 12 918 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLU MES : 269 1643 135J 186 1723 377 376 1279 527 90 437 77 7119 APPROACH Ws : 13.14% 80.26% 6.60% 8.14% 75.37% 16.49% 17.23% 58.62% 24.15% 14.90% 72.35% 12.75% CONTROL : Signalized North/South Street: East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Mornine Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Scuthbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Throughl Right 7:00 AM Cars 13 193 16 10 116 27 11 46 8 42 150 19 2-Axle Truck 0 9 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 4 5 2 3-Axle Truck 0 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 0 4-Axle Truck 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 1 5 1 5 0 0 1 11 0 4 9 2 7:15 AM Cars 6 209 14 6 119 38 9 40 5 37 153 22 2-Axle Truck 1 11 5 1 5 2 1 4 2 3 3 4 3-Axle Truck 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 4 2 1 1 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 1 7 0 3 2 1 10 1 2 4 1 7:30 AM Cars 11 210 1 28 12 112 40 1 15 49 13 31 149 39 2-Axle Truck 0 10 2 1 11 0 0 4 4 4 5 2 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 2 0 0 1 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 2 3 5 0 3 2 0 10 0 7 12 0 7:45 AM Cars 14 195 20 18 98 48 5 49 5 23 199 34 2-Axle Truck 0 18 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 7 0 5 11 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 4 3 4 1 4 2 0 10 3 2 12 0 8:00 AM Cars 8 167 13 4 114 27 8 50 4 46 172 24 2-Axle Truck 2 12 0 4 4 3 2 1 6 3 2 5 6 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 5 0 2 2 1 8 2 1 10 1 8:15 AM Cars 14 167 10 11 1 122 33 5 26 7 30 135 34 2-Axle Truck 0 14 2 2 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 5 5 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 3 2 6 1 3 4 1 3 12 3 8:30 AM Cars 14 152 1 8 11 101 32 7 43 9 41 140 42 2-Axle Truck 5 13 2 2 8 1 0 9 2 3 5 2 3-Axle Truck 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 4 0 3 3 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 2 0 4 1 0 7 4 4 10 1 8:45 AM Cars 8 132 5 13 102 24 7 31 13 36 125 34 2 17 2 2 10 3 2 10 2 3 11 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 + dk 4 2 6 0 6 3 2 13 3 3 13 1 Total 88 1,425 114 85 884 269 67 334 64 286 1,223 248 k 10 104 15 15 44 13 7 43 16 27 50 26 3-Axle Truck 1 10 8 4 8 5 6 19 5 8 12 9 4-Axle Truck 0 2 1 5 1 6 4 4 0 1 2 0 5-Axle Truck+ 14 20 37 4 33 13 7 73 14 26 82 9 Total 113 1561 175 113 970 1 306 91 473 99 348 1369 292 Peak Hour Volumes 50 1 846 1 109 51 481 1 173 50 1 258 1 45 167 1 740 1 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.924 0.958 0.883 0.897 North/South Street: Downey Road East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 10 204 37 32 175 15 38 124 20 30 54 21 2-Axle Truck 2 8 3 5 13 2 5 8 1 6 10 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 3 0 1 4 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 4 1 1 4 1 2 10 1 0 9 1 4:15 PM Cars 3 171 50 43 223 13 29 116 20 19 47 20 2-Axle Truck 0 9 6 3 12 1 3 9 4 3 11 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 3 7 4 2 2 2 0 10 1 1 10 0 4:30 PM Cars 10 206 1 61 30 189 23 19 142 24 31 48 21 2-Axle Truck 3 5 2 3 1 14 5 1 3 6 4 0 6 2 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 4-Axle Truck 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 6 1 3 15 1 4:45 PM Cars 5 187 40 43 234 21 26 131 17 20 85 16 2-Axle Truck 0 4 4 5 5 1 1 5 1 2 6 1 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 2 0 4 2 1 9 3 2 5 0 5:00 PM Cars 7 208 48 50 245 17 31 136 42 29 64 25 2-Axle Truck 0 4 2 4 4 0 1 4 1 1 3 1 3-Axle Truck 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 3 3 0 3 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 5:15 PM Cars 8 212 50 38 250 19 39 154 50 38 61 18 2-Axle Truck 1 5 3 2 3 0 2 3 2 0 3 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 1 1 0 1 1 2 7 1 0 7 0 5:30 PM Cars 13 177 46 51 251 1 19 40 143 39 50 51 19 2-Axle Truck 2 5 2 1 7 1 0 4 0 2 1 1 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 6 1 5:45 PM Cars 14 223 44 46 251 19 33 141 70 32 74 16 2-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0L249484 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 Total Cars 70 1,588 376 333 1,818 146 255 1,087 282 156 2-Axle Truck 8 40 22 23 58 10 15 39 13 7 3-Axle Truck 0 5 3 8 7 6 4 8 1 4 4-Axle Truck 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 6 5 0 5-Axle Truck+ 10 22 13 5 20 8 6 58 7 3 Total 89 1657 414 369 1903 173 280 1198 308 170 Peak Hour Volumes 50 1 843 1 204 199 1 1022 1 81 150 1 611 1 205 156 1 291 82 Peak Hour Factor 0.959 0.969 0.925 0.958 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_012 City: City of Vernon NS/EW Streets:) NORTHBOUND AM Day: TUESDAY Date: 10/16/2012 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 .5 .5 1 .5 .5 1 2 0 0 2 0 7:00 AM 0 3 3 47 6 39 12 148 0 1 240 109 608 7:15 AM 2 5 2 35 9 25 24 165 4 0 280 126 677 7:30 AM 2 3 3 35 13 27 26 195 4 0 300 118 726 7:45 AM 0 7 1 25 10 21 25 183 8 0 279 109 668 8:00 AM 4 5 2 36 10 20 26 160 4 0 275 102 644 8:15 AM 0 2 4 31 6 28 27 150 4 0 211 83 546 8:30 AM 0 4 2 39 10 24 20 132 2 0 248 87 568 8:45 AM 1 6 1 33 8 34 33 162 4 0 257 70 609 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL TOTAL VOLUMES : 9 35 18 281 72 218 193 1295 30 1 2090 804 1 5046 APPROACH %'s : 14.52% 56.45% 29.03% 49.21% 12.61% 38.18% 12.71% 85.31% 1.98% 0.03% 72.19% 27.77% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_012 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 .5 .5 1 .5 .5 1 2 0 0 2 0 4:00 PM 7 15 21 100 5 46 29 267 3 0 191 33 717 4:15 PM 2 9 11 103 4 44 34 241 1 0 173 41 663 4:30 PM 4 8 10 89 3 32 32 311 1 0 189 43 722 4:45 PM 3 8 8 98 4 44 29 256 1 0 214 28 693 5:00 PM 8 8 16 112 6 47 18 263 2 0 211 43 734 5:15 PM 3 5 11 99 12 35 33 238 0 0 215 39 690 5:30 PM 5 7 8 118 1 41 33 271 1 1 196 33 715 5:45 PM 3 7 3 126 2 40 23 243 1 1 174 35 658 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WI WK TOTAL VOLUMES : 35 67 88 845 37 329 231 2090 10 2 1563 295 APPROACH %'s : 18.42% 35.26% 46.32% 69.78% 3.06% 27.17% 9.91% 89.66% 0.43% 0.11% 84.03% 15.8E CONTROL : Signalized TOTAL 5592 North/South Street: Atlantic Boulevard East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Morning Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 AM Cars 34 178 234 2 151 135 26 85 23 29 47 36 2-Axle Truck 0 6 6 0 7 5 0 5 4 6 0 6 3-Axle Truck 1 1 4 0 6 4 4 0 0 4 1 4 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 5-Axle Truck+ 1 5 13 1 4 4 19 6 9 15 4 13 7:15 AM Cars 15 169 246 4 132 180 45 127 25 32 53 29 2-Axle Truck 2 6 7 2 11 4 2 5 4 0 5 7 3-Axle Truck 0 2 7 0 1 5 1 5 2 2 0 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 0 6 7 0 4 6 10 8 9 11 2 9 7:30 AM Cars 21 145 276 1 148 184 21 99 22 28 53 21 2-Axle Truck 1 6 12 1 9 5 3 5 1 2 6 5 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 10 0 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 0 8 15 0 6 9 10 10 8 15 3 7 7:45 AM Cars 18 119 282 7 117 147 23 143 7 25 49 15 2-Axle Truck 0 5 7 0 10 7 1 3 6 7 5 5 2 3-Axle Truck 0 3 8 0 6 5 1 2 2 5 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 5-Axle Truck + 0 1 9 0 7 15 7 9 12 9 4 10 8:00 AM Cars 14 101 217 8 160 193 20 81 14 34 57 25 2-Axle Truck 2 5 11 0 14 8 5 8 3 2 4 5 3-Axle Truck 0 2 12 0 4 3 0 1 1 3 1 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 8 15 0 9 7 13 12 7 12 4 9 8:15 AM Cars 13 121 226 7 138 164 26 104 28 16 61 29 2-Axle Truck 0 2 11 0 8 10 10 6 0 8 2 3 3-Axle Truck 0 0 17 0 8 8 0 3 0 4 4 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 22 0 11 7 9 6 8 15 3 9 8:30 AM Cars 20 114 210 4 1 154 142 20 57 21 18 73 28 2-Axle Truck 1 5 10 0 8 6 4 13 3 3 2 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 12 1 2 7 1 3 1 5 0 3 4-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 8 22 1 5 8 15 7 6 10 3 7 8:45 AM Cars 22 96 157 4 121 124 1 19 91 15 30 52 32 2-Axle Truck 1 4 12 1 12 9 4 10 3 7 5 4 3-Axle Truck 0 1 7 0 1 6 1 5 0 2 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 0 6 20 0 6 13 12 12 10 14 1 4 Total Cars 157 1,043 1,848 37 1,121 1,269 200 787 155 212 445 215 2-Axle Truck 7 39 76 4 79 54 31 58 26 37 28 28 3-Axle Truck 1 11 77 1 29 40 9 22 8 29 12 17 4-Axle Truck 1 0 1 1 1 13 1 5 3 1 0 1 3 4 2 10 3 7 5-Axle Truck + 2 45 123 2 52 69 95 70 69 101 24 68 Total 167 1139 2137 49 1 1284 1 1432 338 1 941 260 389 512 335 Peak Hour Volumes 93 1 661 1 1149 22 1 622 1 717 178 1 519 1 139 200 1 236 1 170 Peak Hour Factor 0.957 0.930 0.857 0.902 North/South Street: Atlantic Boulevard East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Courts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Throughl Right Left Through Right 4:OO PM Cars 7 186 167 6 220 30 85 130 58 74 44 122 2-Axle Truck 0 4 11 0 16 4 2 14 2 1 3 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 3 0 1 7 1 0 0 6 3 1 4-Axle Truck 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 34 0 1 5 12 2 11 10 10 1 4 4:15 PM Cars 8 162 174 4 172 32 75 141 76 49 26 87 2-Axle Truck 0 2 15 0 11 9 5 10 3 2 2 1 3-Axle Truck 2 1 1 1 4 8 2 0 0 3 0 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 3 0 0 f 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 1 2 3 30 0 7 11 8 9 19 6 2 9 4:30 PM Cars 13 173 157 4 226 50 124 124 76 51 32 125 2-Axle Truck 0 4 7 3 12 5 2 15 1 4 5 4 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 5 3 0 4 3 0 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 3 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 3 26 0 2 10 9 6 9 10 2 4 4:45 PM Cars 15 184 195 10 222 38 72 124 69 74 30 118 2-Axle Truck 0 3 9 0 8 4 5 8 2 3 0 0 3-Axle Truck 0 0 4 2 2 4 0 1 1 1 1 3 4-Axle Truck 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 26 0 9 5 3 7 5 6 1 3 5:00 PM Cars 10 193 167 3 249 46 96 114 111 67 38 110 2-Axle Truck 0 6 3 0 13 4 2 10 2 6 1 2 3-Axle Truck 1 0 0 5 0 2 6 0 0 1 1 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 26 1 7 3 6 8 15 3 2 6 5:15 PM Cars 13 128 144 11 256 57 117 152 93 40 32 90 2-Axle Truck 0 2 3 0 7 4 3 6 1 2 2 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 5 7 1 0 1 4 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 19 0 3 4 5 7 6 4 1 8 5:30 PM Cars 14 164 161 3 270 71 123 135 109 51 34 80 2-Axle Truck 0 8 24 0 3 3 2 4 2 2 3 4 3-Axle Truck 2 0 3 0 0 12 2 0 1 1 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 0 0 1 2 7 0 0 8 0 0 0 5:45 PM Cars 12 132 180 6 214 44 74 131 80 42 40 73 2-Axle Truck 0 1 20 0 3 2 1 5 3 5 2 4 3-Axle Truck 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 Total Cars 92 1,322 1,345 47 1,829 368 766 1,051 672 448 276 805 2-Axle Truck 0 30 92 3 73 35 22 72 16 25 18 17 3-Axle Truck 5 2 24 3 16 49 9 2 9 20 7 9 4-Axle Truck 1 0 10 1 2 17 2 0 10 1 7 1 5-Axle Truck+ 3 23 161 2 40 56 33 48 78 39 9 34 Total 101 1377 1632 56 1960 525 832 1173 785 533 317 866 Peak Hour Volumes 53 710 798 34 1025 260 449 582 404 279 152 476 Peak Hour Factor 0.881 0.921 0.915 0337 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_013 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 AM NS/EW Streets: EASTBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 1 1 .5 1 .5 7:00 AM 68 273 2 27 160 222 113 9 6 0 60 26 966 7:15 AM 74 280 1 33 149 214 116 12 8 0 63 25 975 7:30 AM 70 292 0 39 144 213 159 16 9 1 57 21 1021 7:45 AM 67 287 1 23 217 285 122 25 9 2 69 22 1129 8:00 AM 48 241 0 29 172 266 108 12 18 0 54 14 962 8:15 AM 50 206 1 18 151 274 112 15 10 0 34 24 895 8:30 AM 35 273 0 25 159 245 86 10 11 2 40 13 899 8:45 AM 38 185 3 12 193 246 107 17 10 1 24 7 843 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL tl tK wL wl wK IUTAI TOTAL VOLUMES : 450 2037 8 206 1345 1965 923 116 81J 6 401 152 7690 APPROACH %'s : 18.04% 81.64% 0.32% 5.86% 38.25% 55.89% 82.41% 10.36% 7.23% 1.07% 71.74% 27.19% CONTROL : Signalized Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Project ID: CA12_5403_013 Day: TUESDAY City: City of Vernon Date: 10/16/2012 PM NS/EW Streets: BOUND SOUTHBOUND NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 3 0 1 3 1 2 1 1 .5 1 .5 4:00 PM 18 211 0 17 278 107 207 41 53 0 12 32 976 4:15 PM 17 180 1 18 296 79 195 41 48 2 17 20 914 4:30 PM 13 157 2 20 266 92 267 64 51 0 14 18 964 4:45 PM 21 188 0 19 274 84 243 60 51 1 11 15 967 5:00 PM 14 171 1 24 316 81 257 69 56 1 11 29 1030 5:15 PM 23 201 1 21 302 94 258 66 60 2 13 28 1069 5:30 PM 17 173 2 20 240 87 190 60 82 0 17 20 908 5:45 PM 20 165 1 28 306 80 233 48 64 1 13 29 988 NL NT NR I SL ST SR TOTAL VOLUMES 143 1446 8 167 2278 704 APPROACH Ws : 8.95% 90.54% 0.50% 5.30% 72.34% 22.36% CONTROL : Signalized EL ET ER I WL WI WK IUTA 1850 449 465 7 108 191 7816 66.93% 16.24% 16.82% 2.29% 35.29% 62.42% APPENDIX C Truck Percentage Calculations Truck Percentage Calculations Intersection Car Truck Morning Evening Morning Evening Soto Street INS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 4,718 5,827 1,361 1,303 Soto Street INS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 5,584 6,465 1,642 1,486 Downey Road (INS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 4,469 6,128 1,484 1,409 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 6,5331 8,110 2,490 2,299 Total Cars - AM 21,304 Total Cars - PM 26,530 Total Cars 47,834 Total Trucks - AM 6,977 Total Trucks - PM 6,497 Total Trucks 13,474 Percent Cars - AM 75.3% Percent Trucks - AM 24.7% Percent Cars - PM 80.3% Percent Trucks - PM 19.7% Percent Cars 78.0% Percent Trucks 22.0% North/South Street: Sato Street East/West Street: 26th Street Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Morning Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left IThrough Right 7:00 AM Cars 19 258 3 20 258 12 5 10 8 3 29 27 2-Axle Truck 2 13 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 5 2 3-Axle Truck 1 15 1 2 6 1 1 2 1 0 3 2 4-Axle Truck 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7:15 AM Cars 20 288 3 18 231 17 9 12 9 6 43 14 2-Axle Truck 1 10 1 0 9 0 0 1 2 2 3 1 3-Axle Truck 1 4 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 4-Axle Truck 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5-Axle Truck + 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 7:30 AM Cars 25 297 8 27 250 28 6 18 8 7 1 49 12 2-Axle Truck 4 17 2 1 12 1 0 6 0 3 1 2 3-Axle Truck 1 6 1 1 6 0 2 3 0 1 4 4 4-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 7:45 AM Cars 34 269 1 19 31 252 1 18 5 1 14 3 3 56 24 2-Axle Truck 2 18 3 0 13 1 4 4 4 0 7 5 3-Axle Truck 1 8 0 1 6 1 0 S 0 1 4 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-AxleTruck + 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 8:00 AM Cars 24 256 8 23 259 28 10 17 11 7 42 17 2-Axle Truck 1 15 2 1 13 1 2 0 3 1 12 3 3-Axle Truck 0 6 0 0 6 0 3 3 0 0 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5-Axle Truck + 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 8:15 AM Cars 21 271 8 26 221 22 S 13 13 3 48 18 2-Axle Truck 2 17 3 1 14 2 1 1 0 0 8 4 3-Axle Truck 2 13 0 1 7 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM Cars 17 207 4 22 253 32 5 17 9 4 45 15 2-Axle Truck 5 26 1 1 17 0 1 4 1 1 6 3 3-Axle Truck 0 10 2 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 8:45 AM Cars 12 226 3 12 233 28 7 9 2 6 41 13 2-Axle Truck 0 16 1 3 9 1 2 5 4 2 10 2 3-Axle Truck 0 4 0 1 9 2 2 3 1 0 4 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 Total Cars 172 2,072 56 179 1,957 185 52 110 63 39 353 140 2-Axle Truck 17 132 13 8 96 6 10 22 1 14 9 52 22 3-Axle Truck 6 66 4 6 54 1 10 1 8 19 3 2 1 22 14 4-Axle Truck 1 5 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 5-Axle Truck+ 9 16 2 5 16 1 1 10 0 2 14 6 Total 205 2291 76 200 2125 1 202 71 161 80 52 442 184 Peak Hour Volumes 121 1 1203 1 56 117 1 1069 1 104 39 1 92 1 43 27 1 240 1 96 Peak Hour Factor 0.943 0.954 0.888 0.864 North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: 26th Street Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Fvenine Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 11 250 12 32 249 it 24 46 11 8 26 22 2-Axle Truck 1 7 2 3 11 3 1 4 1 4 2 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 2 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 4 1 0 2 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4:15 PM Cars 8 274 8 32 247 12 17 47 14 6 22 13 2-Axle Truck 1 13 1 7 14 3 2 6 1 0 4 2 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 4 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 7 1 0 5 1 0 4 1 0 2 3 4:30 PM Cars 12 292 7 39 279 7 13 56 10 24 23 38 2-Axle Truck 3 5 0 3 14 5 1 5 1 2 2 2 3-Axle Truck 0 3 1 1 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 5 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4:45 PM Cars 8 249 10 57 306 5 7 65 14 12 18 40 2-Axle Truck 1 7 2 6 12 1 1 5 0 2 1 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 5-Axle Truck+ 1 10 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 0 2 2 5:00 PM Cars 10 304 11 42 333 9 28 73 13 9 20 37 2-Axle Truck 1 7 1 4 7 1 0 7 1 0 4 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 0 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 5:15 PM Cars 15 292 7 44 310 9 20 92 16 10 32 32 2-Axle Truck 3 8 1 2 9 0 1 5 1 2 0 0 3-Axle Truck 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 0 4 6 2 0 1 0 1 4 1 5:30 PM Cars 14 296 10 51 357 12 29 95 21 7 15 37 2-Axle Truck 1 4 1 9 12 3 1 4 0 0 3 0 3-Axle Truck 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 1 8 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 5:45 PM Cars 9 236 12 53 348 6 17 91 12 7 19 37 2-Axle Truck 2 7 2 4 8 3 0 5 0 0 0 1 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 Total Cars 87 1 2,193 77 350 2,429 71 155 565 111 83 175 256 2-Axle Truck 13 58 10 38 87 19 7 41 5 10 16 9 3-Axle Truck 3 10 3 13 14 4 1 14 1 1 7 0 4-Axle Truck 0 3 2 1 3 1 0 7 0 1 9 1 5-Axle Truck + 4 47 1 14 42 6 2 12 2 1 19 10 Total 107 2311 93 416 2575 S01 165 639 119 96 226 276 Peak Hour Volumes 59 1 1178 1 46 225 1 1407 1 51 97 3851 65 36 1 112 1 149 Peak Hour Factor 0.946 0.931 0.866 0.884 North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Morning Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 AM Cars 14 253 12 10 202 41 16 66 2 39 134 14 2-Axle Truck 1 12 1 0 9 0 0 2 2 1 3 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 2 1 6 2 4-Axle Truck 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 10 3 1 5 2 2 7 2 2 3 2 7:15 AM Cars 20 291 14 4 234 30 14 54 17 35 123 16 2-Axle Truck 2 8 1 2 12 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 2 1 1 4-Axle Truck 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 5 1 4 0 2 9 2 3 3 0 7:30 AM Cars 18 277 22 9 194 29 20 74 8 34 146 30 2-Axle Truck 2 13 0 2 12 1 7 6 1 1 5 1 3-Axle Truck 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 4 2 1 6 2 1 3. 0 1 10 2 7:45 AM Cars 12 286 25 10 221 31 29 54 11 41 151 17 2-Axle Truck 1 19 0 1 15 1 3 6 2 1 6 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 6 1 2 4 1 1 10 2 2 6 3 8:00 AM Cars 7 231 11 19 236 28 18 56 11 1 42 132 1 28 2-Axle Truck 2 17 2 0 17 0 1 9 3 1 12 0 3-Axle Truck 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 1 1 4 3 2 1 7 1 0 11 1 8:15 AM Cars 16 270 20 8 204 28 29 51 1 10 35 1 111 25 2-Axle Truck 4 16 1 0 12 2 5 3 0 2 5 3 3-Axle Truck 1 5 0 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 3 9 3 1 6 3 3 3 2 1 9 4 8:30 AM Cars 5 195 13 6 233 25 13 42 7 35 108 22 2-Axle Truck 1 22 2 3 13 1 4 10 3 2 6 5 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 4 4 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 8 0 2 2 2 0 5 0 2 6 1 8:45 AM Cars 12 208 13 7 194 19 17 42 8 33 88 18 2-Axle Truck 2 12 2 2 8 4 1 4 4 2 8 5 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 2 1 S 4 0 5 1 3 13 1 Total Cars 2,011 130 73 1,718 231 156 439 74 294 993 170 2-Axle Truck 119 9 10 98 9 23 42 15 10 49 17 3-Axle Truck 13 2 1 11 3 5 23 3 6 18 10 4-Axle Truck N132 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 0 5-Axle Truck+47 17 13 35 16 10 49 10 14 61 14 Total 2192 1 158 1 97 1 1863 j 259 1 194 1 555 103 325 1126 211 Peak Hour Volumes 69 1 1166 1 84 56 1 966 1 127 102 1 303 1 59 165 1 619 1 103 Peak Hour Factor 0.937 0.918 0.943 0.940 North/South Street: Soto Street East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 5 239 17 28 261 8 44 123 17 23 43 15 2-Axle Truck 1 7 4 3 13 1 5 5 1 2 11 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 4 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck +. 1 1 2 3 4 2 1 8 3 3 5 1 4:15 PM Cars 16 251 19 31 280 18 26 108 20 22R57 12 2-Axle Truck 1 12 1 2 14 1 3 8 1 2 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 3 6 2 0 6 2 3 7 2 1 1 4:30 PM Cars 13 240 15 22 241 15 39 131 16 33 20 2-AxleTruck 1 9 1 5 12 1 2 4 4 3 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 2 2 6 0 2 5 1 3 13 1 4:45 PM Cars 5 218 27 28 316 19 1 38 118 13 39 92 18 2-Axle Truck 0 7 1 0 14 1 1 2 3 0 9 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 11 1 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 8 1 0 2 2 1 9 1 0 7 2 5:00 PM Cars 11 245 23 20 306 18 53 161 16 32 80 12 2-Axle Truck 1 7 2 1 4 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 3 3 2 0 3 1 0 4 3 2 5 2 5:15 PM Cars 7 270 36 32 320 11 34 126 11 19 72 10 2-Axle Truck 0 5 0 0 13 2 1 3 0 1 2 1 3-Axle Truck 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 1 2 4 1 0 3 2 3 5 0 5:30 PM Cars 10 252 28 31 351 13 35 138 8 27 80 13 2-Axle Truck 1 3 3 2 8 1 3 1 0 0 4 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 7 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 8 1 5:45 PM Cars 11 214 27 37 332 19 19 122 14 23 85 19 2-Axle Truck 1 6 0 2 3 1 2 4 0 0 3 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 3 1 1 2 3 Total Cars 78 1,929 192 229 2,407 121 288 1,027 115 218 556 119 2-Axle Truck 6 56 12 15 81 10 18 28 11 8 49 5 3-Axle Truck 0 8 7 2 11 2 4 8 0 0 12 1 4-Axle Truck 0 2 1 0 1 1 3 7 1 0 4 1 5-Axle Truck+ 11 35 14 9 27 10 7 41 13 14 57 11 Total 95 2030 226 255 2527 144 320 1111 140 240 678 137 Peak Hour Volumes 39 1 1033 1 130 116 1 1348 1 75 170 1 574 60 124 1 377 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.922 0.936 0.820 0.823 North/South Street: Downey Road East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Mornine Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left J Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 AM Cars 13 193 16 10 116 27 11 46 8 42 150 19 2-Axle Truck 0 9 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 4 5 2 3-Axle Truck 0 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 1 5 1 5 0 0 11 1 0 4 9 2 7:15 AM Cars 6 209 14 6 119 38 9 40 5 37 153 22 2-Axle Truck 1 11 5 1 5 2 1 4 2 3 3 4 3-Axle Truck 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 4 2 1 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 1 7 0 3 2 1 10 1 2 4 1 7:30 AM Cars 11 210 28 12 112 40 15 49 13 31 149 39 2-Axle Truck 0 10 2 1 11 0 0 4 4 4 5 2 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 2 0 0 1 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 2 3 5 0 3 2 0 10 0 7 12 0 7:45 AM Cars 14 195 20 18 98 48 5 49 5 23 199 34 2-Axle Truck 0 18 1 1 3 1 1 7 0 5 11 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 4 3 4 1 4 2 0 10 3 2 12 0 8:00 AM Cars 8 167 13 4 114 27 8 50 4 46 172 24 2-Axle Truck 2 12 0 4 4 3 2 6 3 2 5 6 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck + 1 3 5 0 2 2 1 8 2 1 10 1 8:15 AM Cars 14 167 10 11 122 33 5 26 7 30 13S 34 2-Axle Truck 0 14 2 2 1 3 1 3 2 3 5 5 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 3 2 6 1 3 4 1 3 12 3 8:30 AM Cars 14 152 8 11 101 32 7 43 9 41 140 42 2-Axle Truck 5 13 2 2 8 1 0 9 2 3 5 2 3-Axle Truck 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 4 0 3 3 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 2 0 4 1 0 7 4 4 10 1 8:45 AM Cars 8 132 5 13 102 24 7 31 13 36 125 34 2-Axle Truck 2 17 2 2 10 3 2 10 2 3 11 3 3-Axle Truck 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 4 2 6 0 6 3 2 13 3 3 13 1 Total Cars 88 1,425 114 85 884 269 67 334 64 286 1,223 248 2-Axle Truck 10 104 15 15 44 13 7 43 16 27 50 26 3-Axle Truck 1 10 8 4 8 5 6 19 S 8 12 9 4-Axle Truck 0 2 1 5 1 6 4 4 0 1 2 0 5-Axle Truck + 14 20 37 4 33 13 7 73 14 26 82 9 Total 113 1561 175 113 970 306 91 473 99 348 1369 292 Peak Hour Volumes SO 846 1 109 51 1 481 1 173 1 50 1 258 1 45 167 740 1 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.924 0.958 0.883 0.897 North/South Street: Downey Road East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 10 204 37 32 175 15 38 124 20 30 54 21 2-Axle Truck 2 8 3 5 13 2 5 8 1 6 10 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 3 0 1 4 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 4 1 1 4 1 1 2 10 1 0 9 1 4:15 PM Cars 3 171 50 43 223 13 29 116 20 19 47 20 2-Axle Truck 0 9 6 3 12 1 3 9 4 3 it 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 3 7 4 2 2 2 0 10 1 1 10 0 4:30 PM Cars 10 206 61 30 189 23 19 142 24 31 48 21 2-Axle Truck 3 5 2 3 14 5 3 6 4 0 6 2 3-Axle Truck 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 4-Axle Truck 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 6 1 3 15 1 4:45 PM Cars S 187 40 43 234 21 26 131 17 20 85 16 2-Axle Truck 0 4 1 4 5 1 5 1 1 5 1 2 6 1 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 2 0 4 2 1 9 3 2 5 0 5:00 PM Cars 7 208 48 50 245 17 31 136 42 29 64 25 2-Axle Truck 0 4 2 4 4 0 1 4 1 1 3 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 3 3 0 3 0 1 6 0 3 8 0 5:15 PM Cars 8 212 SO 38 2S0 19 39 154 50 38 61 18 2-Axle Truck 1 5 3 2 3 0 2 3 2 0 3 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 2 1 1 0 1 1 2 7 1 0 7 0 5:30 PM Cars 13 177 46 51 251 19 40 143 39 50 51 19 2-Axle Truck 2 5 2 1 7 1 0 4 0 2 1 1 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 2 0 0 6 1 5:45 PM Cars 14 223 44 46 33 141 70 32 74 16 2-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 Total Cars 70 1,588 376 333 J1,818146 255 1,087 282 249 484 156 2-Axle Truck 8 40 22 23 15 39 13 14 40 7 3-Axle Truck 0 S 3 8 4 8 1 2 15 4 4-Axle Truck 1 2 0 0 0 6 5 0 5 0 5-Axle Truck+ 10 22 13 57 9 66 3Ttal 89 1657 414 369 280 1198 308 274 610 170 Peak Hour Volumes 50 1 843 1 204 199 1 1022 1 81 150 1 611 1 205 156 1 291 82 Peak Hour Factor 0.959 0.969 0.925 0.958 North/South Street: Atlantic Boulevard East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Morning Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 7:00 AM Cars 34 178 234 2 151 135 26 85 23 29 47 36 2-Axle Truck 0 6 6 0 7 5 0 5 4 6 0 6 3-Axle Truck 1 1 4 0 6 4 4 0 0 4 1 4 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 5-Axle Truck+ 1 5 13 1 4 4 19 6 9 15 4 13 7:15 AM Cars 15 169 246 4 132 180 45 127 25 32 53 29 2-Axle Truck 2 6 7 2 11 4 2 5 4 0 5 7 3-Axle Truck 0 2 7 0 1 5 1 5 2 2 0 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 0 6 7 0 4 6 10 8 9 11 2 9 7:30 AM Cars 21 145 276 1 148 184 21 99 22 28 53 21 2-Axle Truck 1 6 12 1 9 5 3 5 2 6 5 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 10 0 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 5-Axle Truck + 0 8 15 0 6 9 10 10 8 15 3 7 7:45 AM Cars 18 119 282 7 117 147 23 143 7 25 49 15 2-Axle Truck 0 5 7 0 10 7 3 6 7 5 5 2 3-Axle Truck 0 3 8 0 6 5 1 2 2 5 2 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 5-Axle Truck + 0 1 9 0 7 15 7 9 12 9 4 10 8:00 AM Cars 14 101 217 8 160 193 20 81 14 34 57 25 2-Axle Truck 2 5 11 0 14 8 5 8 3 2 4 5 3-Axle Truck 0 2 12 0 4 3 0 1 1 3 1 3 4-Axle Truck 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 8 15 0 9 7 13 12 7 12 4 9 8:15 AM Cars 13 121 226 7 138 164 26 104 28 16 61 29 2-Axle Truck 0 2 11 0 8 10 10 6 0 8 2 3 3-Axle Truck 0 0 17 0 8 8 0 3 0 4 4 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 1 3 22 0 11 7 9 6 8 15 3 9 8:30 AM Cars 20 114 210 4 154 142 20 57 21 18 73 28 2-Axle Truck 1 5 10 0 8 6 4 13 1 3 3 2 1 3-Axle Truck 0 1 12 1 2 7 1 3 1 5 0 3 4-Axle Truck 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 8 22 1 5 8 15 7 6 10 3 7 8:45 AM Cars 22 96 157 4 121 124 19 91 15 30 52 32 2-Axle Truck 1 4 12 1 12 9 4 10 3 7 5 4 3-Axle Truck 0 1 7 0 1 6 1 5 0 2 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 0 6 20 0 6 13 12 12 10 14 1 4 Total Cars 157 1,043 1,848 37 1,121 1,269 200 787 155 212 445 215 2-Axle Truck 7 39 76 4 79 54 31 58 26 37 1 28 28 3-Axle Truck 1 11 77 1 29 40 9 22 8 29 12 17 4-Axle Truck 1 0 1 13 5 3 0 3 4 2 10 3 7 5-Axle Truck+ 1 2 45 1 123 2 52 69 95 70 69 101 24 68 Total 167 1 1139 1 2137 1 49 f 1284 1432 338 941 260 389 512 335 Peak Hour Volumes 93 1 661 1 1149 22 622 1 717 178 1 519 1 139 200 1 236 1 170 Peak Hour Factor 1 0.957 0.930 0.857 0302 North/South Street: Atlantic Boulevard East/West Street: Bandini Boulevard Counter: Counts Unlimited Date: 02/22/12 KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC COUNT Evening Peak Hour Time Classification Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right Left Through Right 4:00 PM Cars 7 186 167 6 220 30 85 130 58 74 44 122 2-Axle Truck 0 4 11 0 16 4 2 14 2 1 3 0 3-Axle Truck 0 1 3 0 1 7 1 0 0 6 3 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 1 3 34 0 5 1 12 2 11 10 10 1 1 4 4:1S PM Cars 8 162 174 4 172 32 75 141 76 49 26 87 2-Axle Truck 0 2 15 0 11 9 5 10 3 2 2 1 3-Axle Truck 2 1 1 1 4 8 2 0 0 3 0 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 5-Axle Truck+ 2 3 30 0 7 11 8 9 19 6 2 9 4:30 PM Cars 13 173 157 4 226 50 124 124 76 51 32 125 2-Axle Truck 0 4 7 3 12 5 2 15 1 4 5 4 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 5 3 0 4 3 0 1 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 3 26 0 2 10 9 6 9 10 2 4 4:45 PM Cars 15 194 195 10 1 222 38 72 124 69 74 30 118 2-Axle Truck 0 3 9 0 8 4 5 8 2 3 0 0 3-Axle Truck 0 0 4 2 2 4 0 1 1 1 1 3 4-Axle Truck 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 1 4 26 0 9 5 3 7 5 6 1 3 5:00 PM Cars 10 193 167 3 249 46 96 114 111 67 38 110 2-Axle Truck 0 6 3 0 13 4 2 10 2 6 1 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 5 0 2 6 0 0 1 1 2 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 26 1 7 3 6 8 15 3 2 6 5:15 PM Cars 13 128 144 11 256 57 117 152 93 40 32 90 2-Axle Truck 0 2 3 0 7 4 3 6 1 2 2 2 3-Axle Truck 0 0 1 0 5 7 1 0 1 4 1 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 5 19 0 3 4 5 7 6 4 1 8 5:30 PM Cars 14 164 161 3 270 71 123 135 109 51 34 80 2-Axle Truck 0 8 24 0 3 3 2 4 2 2 3 4 3-Axle Truck 2 0 3 0 0 12 2 0 1 1 0 0 4-Axle Truck 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 5-Axle Truck+ 0 0 0 1 2 7 0 0 8 0 0 0 5:45 PM Cars 12 132 180 6 214 44 74 131 80 42 40 73 2-Axle Truck 0 1 20 0 3 2 1 5 3 5 2 4 3-Axle Truck 1 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 4-Axle Truck 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 5-Axle Truck + 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 Total Cars 92 1,322 1,345 47 1,829 368 766 1,051 672 448 276 805 2-Axle Truck 0 30 1 92 3 1 73 35 1 22 72 16 25 18 17 3-Axle Truck 5 2 24 3 16 49 9 2 9 20 7 9 4-Axle Truck 1 0 10 1 2 17 2 0 10 1 7 1 5-Axle Truck + 3 23 161 2 40 56 33 48 78 39 9 34 Total 101 1377 1632 56 1960 525 832 1173 785 1 533 1 317 866 Peak Hour Volumes 53 1 710 1 798 34 1 1025 1 260 449 1 582 1 404 279 1 152 1 476 Peak Hour Factor 0.881 0.921 0.915 0.937 APPENDIX D Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Capacity Utilization EXPLANATION AND CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (lva ry i a\A/ The ability of a roadway to carry traffic is referred to as capacity. The capacity is usually greater between intersections and less at intersections because traffic flows continuously between them and only during the green phase at them. Capacity at intersections is best defined in terms of vehicles per lane per hour of green. If capacity is 1600 vehicles per lane per hour of green, and if the green phase is 50 percent of the cycle and there are three lanes, then the capacity is 1600 times 50 percent times 3 lanes, or 2400 vehicles per hour for that approach. The technique used to compare the volume and capacity at an intersection is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization. Intersection Capacity Utilization, usually expressed as a percent, is the proportion of an hour required to provide sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity. If an intersection is operating at 80 percent of capacity (i.e., an Intersection Capacity Utilization of 80 percent), then 20 percent of the signal cycle is not used. The signal could show red on all indications 20 percent of the time and the signal would just accommodate approaching traffic. Intersection Capacity Utilization analysis consists of (a) determining the proportion of signal time needed to serve each conflicting movement of traffic, (b) summing the times for the movements, and (c) comparing the total time required to the total time available. For example, if for north -south traffic the northbound traffic is 1600 vehicles per hour, the southbound traffic is 1200 vehicles per hour, and the capacity of either direction is 3200 vehicles per hour, then the northbound traffic is critical and requires 1600/3200 or 50 percent of the signal time. If for east -west traffic, 30 percent of the signal time is required, then it can be seen that the Intersection Capacity Utilization is 50 plus 30, or 80 percent. When left turn arrows (left turn phasing) exist, they are incorporated into the analysis. The critical movements are usually the heavy left turn movements and the opposing through movements. The Intersection Capacity Utilization technique is an ideal tool to quantify existing as well as future intersection operation. The impact of adding a lane can be quickly determined by examining the effect the lane has on the Intersection Capacity Utilization. Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheets That Follow This Discussion The Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheet table contains the following information: 1. Peak hour turning movement volumes. 2. Number of lanes that serve each movement. 3. For right turn lanes, whether the lane is a free right turn lane, whether it has a right turn arrow, and the percent of right turns on red that are assumed. 4. Capacity assumed per lane. 5. Capacity available to serve each movement (number of lanes times capacity per lane). 6. Volume to capacity ratio for each movement. 7. Whether the movement's volume to capacity ratio is critical and adds to the Intersection Capacity Utilization value. 8. The yellow time or clearance interval assumed. 9. Adjustments for right turn movements. 10. The Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service. The Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheet also has two graphics on the same page. These two graphics show the following: 1. Peak hour turning movement volumes. 2. Number of lanes that serve each movement. 3. The approach and exit leg volumes. 4. The two-way leg volumes. 5. An estimate of daily traffic volumes that is fairly close to actual counts and is based strictly on the peak hour leg volumes multiplied by a factor. 6. Percent of daily traffic in peak hours. 7. Percent of peak hour leg volume that is inbound versus outbound. A more detailed discussion of Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service follows. I axial of Cnrvira Level of Service is used to describe the quality of traffic flow. Levels of Service A to C operate quite well. Level of Service C is typically the standard to which rural roadways are designed. Level of Service D is characterized by fairly restricted traffic flow. Level of Service D is the standard to which urban roadways are typically designed. Level of Service E is the maximum volume a facility can accommodate and will result in possible stoppages of momentary duration. Level of Service F occurs when a facility is overloaded and is characterized by stop -and -go traffic with stoppages of long duration. A description of the various Levels of Service appears at the end of the Intersection Capacity Utilization description, along with the relationship between Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service. Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections Although calculating an Intersection Capacity Utilization value for an unsignalized intersection is invalid, the presumption is that a signal can be installed and the calculation shows whether the geometrics are capable of accommodating the expected volumes with a signal. A traffic signal becomes warranted before Level of Service D is reached for a signalized intersection. Signal Timing The Intersection Capacity Utilization calculation assumes that a signal is properly timed. It is possible to have an Intersection Capacity Utilization well below 100 percent, yet have severe traffic congestion. This would occur if one or more movements is not getting sufficient green time to satisfy its demand, and excess green time exists on other movements. This is an operational problem that should be remedied. Lane Capacity Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width; however, standard lanes have approximately the same capacity whether they are 11 or 14 feet wide. Our data indicates a typical lane, whether a through lane or a left turn lane, has a capacity of approximately 1750 vehicles per hour of green time, with nearly all locations showing a capacity greater than 1600 vehicles per hour of green per lane. Right turn lanes have a slightly lower capacity; however 1600 vehicles per hour is a valid capacity assumption for right turn lanes. This finding is published in the August, 1978 issue of ITE Journal in the article entitled, "Another Look at Signalized Intersection Capacity" by William Kunzman. A capacity of 1600 vehicles per hour per lane with no yellow time penalty, or 1700 vehicles per hour with a 3 or 5 percent yellow time penalty is reasonable. Vplimm Time The yellow time can either be assumed to be completely used and no penalty applied, or it can be assumed to be only partially usable. Total yellow time accounts for approximately 10 percent of a signal cycle, and a penalty of 3 to 5 percent is reasonable. During peak hour traffic operation the yellow times are nearly completely used. If there is no left turn phasing, the left turn vehicles completely use the yellow time. Even if there is left turn phasing, the through traffic continues to enter the intersection on the yellow until just a split second before the red. Chararl I nnpc Shared lanes occur in many locations. A shared lane is often found at the end of an off ramp where the ramp forms an intersection with the cross street. Often at a diamond interchange off ramp, there are three lanes. In the case of a diamond interchange, the middle lane is sometimes shared, and the driver can turn left, go through, or turn right from that lane. If one assumes a three lane off ramp as described above, and if one assumes that each lane has 1600 capacity, and if one assumes that there are 1000 left turns per hour, 500 right turns per hour, and 100 through vehicles per hour, then how should one assume that the three lanes operate. There are three ways that it is done. One way is to just assume that all 1600 vehicles (1000 plus 500 plus 100) are served simultaneously by three lanes. When this is done, the capacity is 3 times 1600 or 4800, and the amount of green time needed to serve the ramp is 1600 vehicles divided by 4800 capacity or 33.3 percent. This assumption effectively assumes perfect lane distribution between the three lanes that is not realistic. It also means a left turn can be made from the right lane. Another way is to equally split the capacity of a shared lane and in this case to assume there are 1.33 left turn lanes, 1.33 right turn lanes, and 0.33 through lanes. With this assumption, the critical movement is the left turns and the 1000 left turns are served by a capacity of 1.33 times 1600, or 2133. The volume to capacity ratio of the critical move is 1000 divided by 2133 or 46.9 percent. The first method results in a critical move of 33.3 percent and the second method results in a critical move of 46.9 percent. Neither is very accurate, and the difference in the calculated Level of Service will be approximately 1.5 Levels of Service (one Level of Service is 10 percent). The way Kunzman Associates does it is to assign fractional lanes in a reasonable way. In this example, it would be assumed that there is 1.1 right turn lanes, 0.2 through lanes, and 1.7 left turn lanes. The volume to capacity ratios for each movement would be 31.3 percent for the through traffic, 28.4 percent for the right turn movement, and 36.8 percent for the left turn movement. The critical movement would be the 36.8 percent for the left turns. Right Turn on Red Kunzman Associates' software treats right turn lanes in one of five different ways. Each right turn lane is classified into one of five cases. The five cases are (1) free right turn lane, (2) right turn lane with separate right turn arrow, (3) standard right turn lane with no right turns on red allowed, (4) standard right turn lane with a certain percentage of right turns on red allowed, and (5) separate right turn arrow and a certain percentage of right turns on red allowed. Free Right Turn Lane If it is a free right turn lane, then it is given a capacity of one full lane with continuous or 100 percent green time. A Free right turn lane occurs when there is a separate approach lane for right turning vehicles, there is a separate departure lane for the right turning vehicles after they turn and are exiting the intersection, and the through cross street traffic does not interfere with the vehicles after they turn right. Separate Right Turn Arrow If there is a separate right turn arrow, then it is assumed that vehicles are given a green indication and can proceed on what is known as the left turn overlap. The left turn overlap for a northbound right turn is the westbound left turn. When the left turn overlap has a green indication, the right turn lane is also given a green arrow indication. Thus, if there is a northbound right turn arrow, then it can be turned green for the period of time that the westbound left turns are proceeding. If there are more right turns than can be accommodated during the northbound through green and the time that the northbound right turn arrow is on, then an adjustment is made to the Intersection Capacity Utilization to account for the green time that needs to be added to the northbound through green to accommodate the northbound right turns. Standard Right Turn Lane, No Right Turns on Red A standard right turn lane, with no right turn on red assumed, proceeds only when there is a green indication displayed for the adjacent through movement. If additional green time is needed above that amount of time, then in the Intersection Capacity Utilization calculation a right turn adjustment green time is added above the green time that is needed to serve the adjacent through movement. Standard Right Turn Lane, With Right Turns on Red A standard right turn lane with say 20 percent of the right turns allowed to turn right on a red indication is calculated the same as the standard right turn case where there is no right turn on red allowed, except that the right turn adjustment is reduced to account for the 20 percent of the right turning vehicles that can logically turn right on a red light. The right turns on red are never allowed to exceed the time the overlap left turns take plus the unused part of the green cycle that the cross street traffic moving from left to right has. As an example of how 20 percent of the cars are allowed to turn right on a red indication, assume that the northbound right turn volume needs 40 percent of the signal cycle to be satisfied. To allow 20 percent of the northbound right turns to turn right on red, then during 8 percent of the signal cycle (40 percent of signal cycle times 20 percent that can turn right on red) right turns on red will be allowed if it is feasible. For this example, assume that 15 percent of the signal cycle is green for the northbound through traffic, and that means that 15 percent of the signal cycle is available to satisfy northbound right turns. After the northbound through traffic has received its green, 25 percent of the signal cycle is still needed to satisfy the northbound right turns (40 percent of the signal cycle minus the 15 percent of the signal cycle that the northbound through used). Assume that the westbound left turns require a green time of 6 percent of the signal cycle. This 6 percent of the signal cycle is used by northbound right turns on red. After accounting for the northbound right turns that occur on the westbound overlap left turn, 19 percent of the signal cycle is still needed for the northbound right turns (25 percent of the cycle was needed after the northbound through green time was accounted for [see above paragraph], and 6 percent was served during the westbound left turn overlap). Also, at this point 6 percent of the signal cycle has been used for northbound right turns on red, and still 2 percent more of the right turns will be allowed to occur on the red if there is unused eastbound through green time. For purpose of this example, assume that the westbound through green is critical, and that 15 percent of the signal cycle is unused by eastbound through traffic. Thus, 2 percent more of the signal cycle can be used by the northbound right turns on red since there is 15 seconds of unused green time being given to the eastbound through traffic. At this point, 8 percent of the signal cycle was available to serve northbound right turning vehicles on red, and 15 percent of the signal cycle was available to serve right turning vehicles on the northbound through green. So 23 percent of the signal cycle has been available for northbound right turns. Because 40 percent of the signal cycle is needed to serve northbound right turns, there is still a need for 17 percent more of the signal cycle to be available for northbound right turns. What this means is the northbound through traffic green time is increased by 17 percent of the cycle length to serve the unserved right turn volume, and a 17 percent adjustment is added to the Intersection Capacity Utilization to account for the northbound right turns that were not served on the northbound through green time or when right turns on red were assumed. Separate Right Turn Arrow, With Right Turns on Red A right turn lane with a separate right turn arrow, plus a certain percentage of right turns allowed on red is calculated the same way as a standard right turn lane with a certain percentage of right turns allowed on red, except the turns which occur on the right turn arrow are not counted as part of the percentage of right turns that occur on red. Critical Lane Method Intersection Capacity Utilization parallels another calculation procedure known as the Critical Lane Method with one exception. Critical Lane Method dimensions capacity in terms of standardized vehicles per hour per lane. A Critical Lane Method result of 800 vehicles per hour means that the intersection operates as though 800 vehicles were using a single lane continuously. If one assumes a lane capacity of 1600 vehicles per hour, then a Critical Lane Method calculation resulting in 800 vehicles per hour is the same as an Intersection Capacity Utilization calculation of 50 percent since 800/1600 is 50 percent. It is our opinion that the Critical Lane Method is inferior to the Intersection Capacity Utilization method simply because a statement such as "The Critical Lane Method value is 800 vehicles per hour" means little to most persons, whereas a statement such as "The Intersection Capacity Utilization is 50 percent" communicates clearly. Critical Lane Method results directly correspond to Intersection Capacity Utilization results. The correspondence is as follows, assuming a lane capacity of 1600 vehicles per hour and no clearance interval. Critical Lane Method Result 800 vehicles per hour 960 vehicles per hour 1120 vehicles per hour 1280 vehicles per hour 1440 vehicles per hour 1600 vehicles per hour 1760 vehicles per hour Intersection Capacity Utilization Result 50 percent 60 percent 70 percent 80 percent 90 percent 100 percent 110 percent INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION Level of Service Description Volume to Capacity Ratio A Level of Service A occurs when progression is extremely 0.600 and below favorable and vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Level of Service B generally occurs with good progression 0.601 to 0.700 and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for Level of Service A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Level of Service C generally results when there is fair 0.701 to 0.800 progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Level of Service D generally results in noticeable congestion. 0.801 to 0.900 Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume to capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Level of Service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable 0.901 to 1.000 delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume to capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F Level of Service F is considered to be unacceptable to most 1.001 and up drivers. This condition often occurs when oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high volume to capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. 1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council Washington D.C., 2000. Existing Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 2-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.454 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 1279 42 100 984 52 119 640 47 85 605 241 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 70 1701 56 133 1309 69 158 851 63 113 805 321 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 70 1701 56 133 1309 69 158 851 63 113 805 321 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 70 1701 56 133 1309 69 158 851 63 113 805 321 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 70 1701 56 133 1309 69 158 851 63 113 805 321 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 70 1701 56 133 1309 69 158 851 63 113 805 321 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.30 1.59 0.12 0.18 1.30 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 3098 102 1600 3039 161 472 2541 187 292 2079 828 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.55 0.55 0.08 0.43 0.43 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.39 0.39 0.39 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 2-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.502 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 1063 59 119 1008 74 201 639 93 128 718 235 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 67 1414 78 158 1341 98 267 850 124 170 955 313 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 67 1414 78 158 1341 98 267 850 124 170 955 313 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 67 1414 78 158 1341 98 267 850 124 170 955 313 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 67 1414 78 158 1341 98 267 850 124 170 955 313 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 1414 78 158 1341 98 267 850 124 170 955 313 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.43 1.37 0.20 0.24 1.33 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3032 168 1600 2981 219 689 2192 319 379 2125 696 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.45 0.45 0.45 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.334 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 36 1315 38 80 660 90 119 362 27 11 171 65 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 48 1749 51 106 878 120 158 481 36 15 227 86 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 1749 51 106 878 120 158 481 36 15 227 86 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 1749 51 106 878 120 158 481 36 15 227 86 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 1749 51 106 878 120 158 481 36 15 227 86 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 1749 51 106 878 120 158 481 36 15 227 86 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.76 0.24 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.04 0.69 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3110 90 1600 2816 384 396 1204 1600 71 1108 421 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.56 0.56 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.40 0.40 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.097 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------- I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 202 60 68 141 11 44 630 108 9 892 79 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 37 269 80 90 188 15 59 838 144 12 1186 105 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 37 269 80 90 188 15 59 838 144 12 1186 105 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 37 269 80 90 188 15 59 838 144 12 1186 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 37 269 80 90 188 15 59 838 144 12 1186 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 37 269 80 90 188 15 59 838 144 12 1186 105 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.70 0.21 0.31 0.64 0.05 0.11 1.61 0.28 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 154 1114 331 495 1025 80 180 2578 442 32 3168 1600 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.18 0.18 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.07 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.186 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 244 46 65 161 10 30 762 25 1 1056 45 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 20 325 61 86 214 13 40 1013 33 1 1404 60 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 20 325 61 86 214 13 40 1013 33 1 1404 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 20 325 61 86 214 13 40 1013 33 1 1404 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 20 325 61 86 214 13 40 1013 33 1 1404 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 20 325 61 86 214 13 40 1013 33 1 1404 60 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.28 0.68 0.04 0.07 1.87 0.06 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 79 1280 241 441 1092 68 118 2985 98 3 3197 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.44 0.44 0.04 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.521 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 957 16 82 1066 139 102 246 42 48 533 146 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 43 1273 21 109 1418 185 136 327 56 64 709 194 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 1273 21 109 1418 185 136 327 56 64 709 194 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 1273 21 109 1418 185 136 327 56 64 709 194 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 1273 21 109 1418 185 136 327 56 64 709 194 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 1273 21 109 1418 185 136 327 56 64 709 194 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.77 0.23 0.29 0.71 1.00 0.07 0.73 0.20 Final Sat.: 1600 3147 53 1600 2831 369 469 1131 1600 106 1173 321 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.50 0.50 0.29 0.29 0.03 0.60 0.60 0.60 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.891 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 1177 113 77 1016 45 23 71 70 142 160 103 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 102 1565 150 102 1351 60 31 94 93 189 213 137 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 102 1565 150 102 1351 60 31 94 93 189 213 137 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 102 1565 0 102 1351 0 31 94 93 189 213 137 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 102 1565 0 102 1351 0 31 94 93 189 213 137 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 102 1565 0 102 1351 0 31 94 93 189 213 137 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 973 627 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.49 0.00 0.06 0.42 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.735 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II --------------- II -------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 54 14 5 13 38 199 257 24 2 201 13 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 11 72 19 7 17 51 265 342 32 3 267 17 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 72 19 7 17 51 265 342 32 3 267 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 11 72 19 7 17 51 265 342 32 3 267 17 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 11 72 19 7 17 51 265 342 32 3 267 17 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 11 72 19 7 17 51 265 342 32 3 267 17 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.71 0.18 0.09 0.23 0.68 0.41 0.54 0.05 0.01 0.99 1.00 Final Sat.: 168 1137 295 143 371 1086 663 857 80 16 1584 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ---------------II---------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.17 0.01 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.040 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 41 9 24 35 206 44 288 12 1 515 8 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 8 55 12 32 47 274 59 383 16 1 685 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 55 12 32 47 274 59 383 16 1 685 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 8 55 12 32 47 274 59 383 16 1 685 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 8 55 12 32 47 274 59 383 16 1 685 11 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 8 55 12 32 47 274 59 383 16 1 685 11 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ----------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.73 0.16 0.09 0.13 0.78 0.13 0.84 0.03 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 171 1171 257 145 211 1244 205 1340 56 3 1597 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.43 0.01 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.014 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 1072 133 105 1108 21 253 244 93 117 138 68 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 106 1426 177 140 1474 28 336 325 124 156 184 90 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 106 1426 177 140 1474 28 336 325 124 156 184 90 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 1426 0 140 1474 0 336 325 124 156 184 90 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1426 0 140 1474 0 336 325 124 156 184 90 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 1426 0 140 1474 0 336 325 124 156 184 90 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1072 528 ------------ I ---------------II---------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.45 0.00 0.09 0.46 0.00 0.21 0.20 0.08 0.10 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 5-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.956 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 1304 178 94 967 151 28 167 61 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 136 1734 237 125 1286 201 37 222 81 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 136 1734 237 125 1286 201 37 222 81 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 136 1734 237 125 1286 201 37 222 81 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 136 1734 237 125 1286 201 37 222 81 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1,.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 136 1734 237 125 1286 201 37 222 81 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.73 0.27 0.14 0.86 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2816 384 1600 2768 432 230 1370 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.62 0.62 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.02 0.16 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 5-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.011 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 978 219 151 1346 122 20 247 80 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 126 1301 291 201 1790 162 27 329 106 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 126 1301 291 201 1790 162 27 329 106 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 126 1301 291 201 1790 162 27 329 106 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 126 1301 291 201 1790 162 27 329 106 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 126 1301 291 201 1790 162 27 329 106 0 0 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.07 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2615 585 1600 2934 266 120 1480 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.50 0.50 0.13 0.61 0.61 0.02 0.22 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.972 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1517 109 79 962 4 2 10 3 142 4 138 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 3 2018 145 105 1279 5 3 13 4 189 5 184 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2018 145 105 1279 5 3 13 4 189 5 184 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 2018 145 105 1279 5 3 13 4 189 5 184 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 2018 145 105 1279 5 3 13 4 189 5 184 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 2018 145 105 1279 5 3 13 4 189 5 184 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.13 0.67 0.20 1.00 0.03 0.97 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 3187 13 213 1067 320 1600 45 1555 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.923 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 l! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 1199 108 122 1245 1 24 20 6 165 7 117 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 4 1595 144 162 1656 1 32 27 8 219 9 156 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 1595 144 162 1656 1 32 27 8 219 9 156 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 1595 144 162 1656 1 32 27 8 219 9 156 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 4 1595 144 162 1656 1 32 27 8 219 9 156 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 4 1595 144 162 1656 1 32 27 8 219 9 156 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.83 0.17 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.48 0.40 0.12 1.00 0.19 0.81 Final Sat.: 1600 2936 264 1600 3197 3 768 640 192 1600 304 1296 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.10 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.14 0.03 0.12 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - # ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.919 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Protected Protected Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 997 19 94 770 240 142 235 90 26 384 482 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 118 1326 25 125 1024 319 189 313 120 35 511 641 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 118 1326 25 125 1024 319 189 313 120 35 511 641 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 118 1326 25 125 1024 319 189 313 120 35 511 641 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 118 1326 25 125 1024 319 189 313 120 35 511 641 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 118 1326 25 125 1024 319 189 313 120 35 511 641 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3140 60 1600 2440 760 1600 3471 1329 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.42 0.42 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.16 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - # ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.957 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Protected Protected Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 100 863 26 170 1083 155 170 358 64 30 285 267 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 133 1148 35 226 1440 206 226 476 85 40 379 355 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1148 35 226 1440 206 226 476 85 40 379 355 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1148 35 226 1440 206 226 476 85 40 379 355 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1148 35 226 1440 206 226 476 85 40 379 355 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1148 35 226 1440 206 226 476 85 40 379 355 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 2.55 0.46 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3106 94 1600 2799 401 1600 4072 728 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.12 0.11 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.009 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II --------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 121 1203 56 117 1069 104 39 92 43 27 240 96 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 161 1600 74 156 1422 138 52 122 57 36 319 128 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 161 1600 74 156 1422 138 52 122 57 36 319 128 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 161 1600 0 156 1422 138 52 122 57 36 319 128 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 161 1600 0 156 1422 138 52 122 57 36 319 128 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 161 1600 0 156 1422 138 52 122 57 36 319 128 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.32 1.00 0.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1090 510 1600 1143 457 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.50 0.00 0.10 0.44 0.09 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.02 0.28 0.28 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.181 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II-------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 1178 46 225 1407 51 97 385 65 36 112 149 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 78 1567 61 299 1871 68 129 512 86 48 149 198 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 78 1567 61 299 1871 68 129 512 86 48 149 198 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 78 1567 0 299 1871 68 129 512 86 48 149 198 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 78 1567 0 299 1871 68 129 512 86 48 149 198 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 78 1567 0 299 1871 68 129 512 86 48 149 198 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1369 231 1600 687 913 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.49 0.00 0.19 0.58 0.04 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.03 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.951 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 69 1166 84 56 966 127 102 303 59 165 619 103 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 92 1551 112 74 1285 169 136 403 78 219 823 137 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 92 1551 112 74 1285 169 136 403 78 219 823 137 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 1551 112 74 1285 169 136 403 78 219 823 137 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 1551 112 74 1285 169 136 403 78 219 823 137 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 1551 112 74 1285 169 136 403 78 219 823 137 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.77 0.23 1.00 2.51 0.49 1.00 2.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 2828 372 1600 4018 782 1600 4115 685 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.14 0.20 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.003 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 39 1033 130 116 1348 75 170 574 60 124 377 62 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 52 1374 173 154 1793 100 226 763 80 165 501 82 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 52 1374 173 154 1793 100 226 763 80 165 501 82 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 52 1374 173 154 1793 100 226 763 80 165 501 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 1374 173 154 1793 100 226 763 80 165 501 82 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 52 1374 173 154 1793 100 226 763 80 165 501 82 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.72 0.28 1.00 2.58 0.42 Final Sat.: 1600 2842 358 1600 3031 169 1600 4346 454 1600 4122 678 ------------ I---------------II---------------II----------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.48 0.48 0.10 0.59 0.59 0.14 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.12 0.12 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 10-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.861 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ 1--------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 62 1028 20 63 899 112 53 83 39 9 168 241 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 82 1367 27 84 1196 149 70 110 52 12 223 321 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 82 1367 27 84 1196 149 70 110 52 12 223 321 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 82 1367 27 84 1196 149 70 110 52 12 223 321 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 82 1367 27 84 1196 149 70 110 52 12 223 321 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 82 1367 27 84 11�6 149 70 110 52 12 223 321 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.78 0.22 0.61 0.95 0.45 0.04 0.96 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3139 61 1600 2845 355 969 1518 713 69 1531 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------LI---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.17 0.15 0.20 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.948 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 872 14 141 1268 48 106 204 76 22 98 121 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 64 1160 19 188 1686 64 141 271 101 29 130 161 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 64 1160 19 188 1686 64 141 271 101 29 130 161 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 64 1160 19 188 1686 64 141 271 101 29 130 161 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 64 1160 19 188 1686 64 141 271 101 29 130 161 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 64 1160 19 188 1686 64 141 271 101 29 130 161 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.93 0.07 0.55 1.06 0.39 0.18 0.82 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3149 51 1600 3083 117 879 1691 630 292 1308 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.37 0.37 0.12 0.55 0.55 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.10 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.876 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 880 46 81 635 62 76 212 21 88 494 132 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 55 1170 61 108 845 82 101 282 28 117 657 176 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 55 1170 61 108 845 82 101 282 28 117 657 176 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 55 1170 61 108 845 82 101 282 28 117 657 176 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 55 1170 61 108 845 82 101 282 28 117 657 176 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 55 1170 61 108 845 82 101 282 28 117 657 176 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.58 0.42 Final Sat.: 1600 3041 159 1600 2915 285 1600 2912 288 1600 2525 675 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ---------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.814 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 674 93 124 1069 59 84 384 43 62 281 98 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 25 896 124 165 1422 78 112 511 57 82 374 130 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 25 896 124 165 1422 78 112 511 57 82 374 130 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 25 896 124 165 1422 78 112 511 57 82 374 130 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 25 896 124 165 1422 78 112 511 57 82 374 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 25 896 124 165 1422 78 112 511 57 82 374 130 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2812 388 1600 3033 167 1600 2878 322 1600 2373 827 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.806 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I ---------------II-------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 798 25 44 509 184 85 140 23 28 235 74 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 118 1061 33 59 677 245 113 186 31 37 313 98 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 118 1061 33 59 677 245 113 186 31 37 313 98 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 118 1061 33 59 677 245 113 186 31 37 313 98 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 118 1061 33 59 677 245 113 186 31 37 313 98 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 118 1061 33 59 677 245 113 186 31 37 313 98 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.47 0.53 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3103 97 1600 2350 850 1600 1374 226 1600 1217 383 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.0'7 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.879 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 544 36 86 862 93 169 335 49 25 169 52 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 68 724 48 114 1146 124 225 446 65 33 225 69 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 68 724 48 114 1146 124 225 446 65 33 225 69 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 68 724 48 114 1146 124 225 446 65 33 225 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 68 724 48 114 1146 124 225 446 65 33 225 69 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 68 724 48 114 1146 124 225 446 65 33 225 69 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 0.87 0.13 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3001 199 1600 2888 312 1600 1396 204 1600 1224 376 ---------- I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.14 0.32 0.32 0.02 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.081 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 280 909 235 19 162 22 59 688 129 181 859 45 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 372 1209 313 25 215 29 78 915 172 241 1142 60 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 372 1209 313 25 215 29 78 915 172 241 1142 60 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 372 1209 313 25 215 29 78 915 172 241 1142 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 372 1209 313 25 215 29 78 915 172 241 1142 60 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 372 1209 313 25 215 29 78 915 172 241 1142 60 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2543 657 1600 2817 383 1600 2695 505 1600 3041 159 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.48 0.48 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.34 0.34 0.15 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.202 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 224 122 55 771 42 30 860 219 248 855 23 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 176 298 162 73 1025 56 40 1144 291 330 1137 31 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 176 298 162 73 1025 56 40 1144 291 330 1137 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 176 298 162 73 1025 56 40 1144 291 330 1137 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 176 298 162 73 1025 56 40 1144 291 330 1137 31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 176 298 162 73 1025 56 40 1144 291 330 1137 31 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 1600 2072 1128 1600 3035 165 1600 2551 649 1600 3116 84 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.45 0.45 0.21 0.36 0.36 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection *13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.868 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 199 960 36 35 656 208 131 108 133 79 531 87 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 265 1277 48 47 872 277 174 144 177 105 706 116 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 265 1277 48 47 872 277 174 144 177 105 706 116 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 265 1277 48 47 872 277 174 144 177 105 706 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 265 1277 48 47 872 277 174 144 177 105 706 116 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 265 1277 48 47 872 277 174 144 177 105 706 116 Ov1AdjVol: 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.40 0.03 0.03 0.27 0.17 0.11 0.04 0.11 0.07 0.22 0.07 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.920 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 838 73 109 964 188 172 688 290 29 240 30 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 176 1115 97 145 1282 250 229 915 386 39 319 40 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 176 1115 97 145 1282 250 229 915 386 39 319 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 176 1115 97 145 1282 250 229 915 386 39 319 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 176 1115 97 145 1282 250 229 915 386 39 319 40 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 176 1115 97 145 1282 250 229 915 386 39 319 40 Ov1AdjVol: 210 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.35 0.06 0.09 0.40 0.16 0.14 0.29 0.24 0.02 0.10 0.02 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.13 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.902 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 846 109 51 481 173 50 258 45 167 740 141 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 67 1125 145 68 640 230 67 343 60 222 984 188 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 67 1125 145 68 640 230 67 343 60 222 984 188 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 67 1125 145 68 640 230 67 343 60 222 984 188 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 67 1125 145 68 640 230 67 343 60 222 984 188 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 1125 145 68 640 230 67 343 60 222 984 188 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.68 0.32 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2688 512 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.35 0.09 0.04 0.20 0.14 0.04 0.11 0.04 0.08 0.37 0.37 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.942 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 843 204 199 1022 81 150 611 205 156 291 82 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 67 1121 271 265 1359 108 200 813 273 207 387 109 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 67 1121 271 265 1359 108 200 813 273 207 387 109 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 67 1121 271 265 1359 108 200 813 273 207 387 109 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 67 1121 271 265 1359 108 200 813 273 207 387 109 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 67 1121 271 265 1359 108 200 813 273 207 387 109 ---------------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2497 703 ------------ I---------------II----------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.35 0.17 0.17 0.42 0.07 0.12 0.25 0.17 0.07 0.16 0.16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.974 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 20 8 131 42 93 101 703 20 1 1134 455 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 11 27 11 174 56 124 134 935 27 1 1508 605 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 27 11 174 56 124 134 935 27 1 1508 605 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 11 27 11 174 56 124 134 935 27 1 1508 605 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 11 27 11 174 56 124 134 935 27 1 1508 605 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 11 27 11 174 56 124 134 935 27 1 1508 605 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.94 0.06 0.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 498 1102 1600 3111 89 2 2282 916 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.66 0.66 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.970 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 29 45 398 25 158 112 1068 4 1 829 153 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 24 39 60 529 33 210 149 1420 5 1 1103 203 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 39 60 529 33 210 149 1420 5 1 1103 203 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 24 39 60 529 33 210 149 1420 5 1 1103 203 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 24 39 60 529 33 210 149 1420 5 1 1103 203 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 24 39 60 529 33 210 149 1420 5 1 1103 203 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.86 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.69 0.31 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 219 1381 1600 3188 12 3 2699 498 ------------ I---------------II----------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.33 0.15 0.15 0.09 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.543 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 93 661 1149 22 622 717 178 519 139 200 236 170 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 124 879 1528 29 827 954 237 690 185 266 314 226 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 124 879 1528 29 827 954 237 690 185 266 314 226 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 124 879 1528 29 827 0 237 690 185 266 314 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 124 879 1528 29 827 0 237 690 185 266 314 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 124 879 1528 29 827 0 237 690 185 266 314 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 1600 4124 676 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II--------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.14 0.96 0.02 0.13 0.00 0.15 0.17 0.27 0.17 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.433 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 710 798 34 1025 260 449 582 404 279 152 476 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 70 944 1061 45 1363 346 597 774 537 371 202 633 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 70 944 1061 45 1363 346 597 774 537 371 202 633 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 70 944 1061 45 1363 0 597 774 537 371 202 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 70 944 1061 45 1363 0 597 774 537 371 202 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 70 944 1061 45 1363 0 597 774 537 371 202 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.31 1.87 0.82 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 2090 2998 1311 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.15 0.66 0.03 0.21 0.00 0.29 0.26 0.41 0.23 0.13 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:10 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.858 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 279 1132 4 122 670 934 510 62 32 3 249 94 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 371 1506 5 162 891 1242 678 82 43 4 331 125 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 371 1506 5 162 891 1242 678 82 43 4 331 125 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 371 1506 5 162 891 0 678 82 43 4 331 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 371 1506 5 162 891 0 678 82 43 4 331 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 371 1506 5 162 891 0 678 82 43 4 331 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4783 17 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 38 3162 1600 ------------ I---------------II----------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.19 0.00 0.24 0.05 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:30 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Existing Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.975 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 717 4 84 1158 351 1025 259 218 4 49 90 Growth Adj: 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 Initial Bse: 94 954 5 112 1540 467 1363 344 290 5 65 120 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 94 954 5 112 1540 467 1363 344 290 5 65 120 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 94 954 5 112 1540 0 1363 344 290 5 65 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 94 954 5 112 1540 0 1363 344 290 5 65 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 94 954 5 112 1540 0 1363 344 290 5 65 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4773 27 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 242 2958 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------il---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.32 0.00 0.47 0.22 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Current General Plan Year 2035 Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 2-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.617 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II---------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 1279 42 100 984 52 119 640 47 85 605 241 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.30 1.59 0.12 0.18 1.30 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 3098 102 1600 3039 161 472 2541 187 292 2079 828 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.43 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 2-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.671 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II---------------1 Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 1063 59 119 1008 74 201 639 93 128 718 235 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1584 88 177 1502 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1584 88 177 1502 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1584 88 177 1502 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1584 88 177 1502 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1584 88 177 1502 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.43 1.37 0.20 0.24 1.33 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3032 168 1600 2981 219 689 2192 319 379 2125 696 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ----- ---Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.50 0.50 0.50 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.217 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 202 60 68 141 11 44 630 108 9 892 79 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.70 0.21 0.31 0.64 0.05 0.11 1.61 0.28 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 154 1114 331 495 1025 80 180 2578 442 32 3168 1600 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.07 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.317 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 244 46 65 161 10 30 762 25 1 1056 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.28 0.68 0.04 0.07 1.87 0.06 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 79 1280 241 441 1092 68 118 2985 98 3 3197 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 0.04 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.482 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 36 1315 38 80 660 90 119 362 27 11 171 65 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 54 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 54 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 54 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 54 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.76 0.24 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.04 0.69 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3110 90 1600 2816 384 396 1204 1600 71 1108 421 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.45 0.45 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length s) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.692 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 957 16 82 1066 139 102 246 42 48 533 146 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.77 0.23 0.29 0.71 1.00 0.07 0.73 0.20 Final Sat.: 1600 3147 53 1600 2831 369 469 1131 1600 106 1173 321 ------------I---------II-------11---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.68 0.68 0.68 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.811 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I----------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 54 14 5 13 38 199 257 24 2 201 13 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.71 0.18 0.09 0.23 0.68 0.41 0.54 0.05 0.01 0.99 1.00 Final Sat.: 168 1137 295 143 371 1086 663 857 80 16 1584 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.19 0.19 0.01 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.153 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II --------------- il--------------- 11---------- I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 41 9 24 35 206 44 288 12 1 515 8 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.73 0.16 0.09 0.13 0.78 0.13 0.84 0.03 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 171 1171 257 145 211 1244 205 1340 56 3 1597 1600 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.48 0.01 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.986 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II-------- 11---------------{ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 1177 113 77 1016 45 23 71 70 142 160 103 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 115 1754 168 115 1514 67 34 106 104 212 238 153 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 115 1754 168 115 1514 67 34 106 104 212 238 153 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 115 1754 0 115 1514 0 34 106 104 212 238 153 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 115 1754 0 115 1514 0 34 106 104 212 238 153 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 115 1754 0 115 1514 0 34 106 104 212 238 153 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 973 627 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------II---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.55 0.00 0.07 0.47 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.124 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 1072 133 105 1108 21 253 244 93 117 138 68 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 119 1597 198 156 1651 31 377 364 139 174 206 101 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 119 1597 198 156 1651 31 377 364 139 174 206 101 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 119 1597 0 156 1651 0 377 364 139 174 206 101 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 119 1597 0 156 1651 0 377 364 139 174 206 101 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 119 1597 0 156 1651 0 377 364 139 174 206 101 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1072 528 ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.50 0.00 0.10 0.52 0.00 0.24 0.23 0.09 0.11 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 5-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.059 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 1304 178 94 967 151 28 167 61 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.73 0.27 0.14 0.86 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2816 384 1600 2768 432 230 1370 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.69 0.69 0.09 0.52 0.52 0.03 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 5-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.121 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 978 219 151 1346 122 20 247 80 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.07 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2615 585 1600 2934 266 120 1480 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.56 0.56 0.14 0.68 0.68 0.02 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.077 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1517 109 79 962 4 2 10 3 142 4 138 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.13 0.67 0.20 1.00 0.03 0.97 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 3187 13 213 1067 320 1600 45 1555 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.07 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.022 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 1199 108 122 1245 1 24 20 6 165 7 117 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.83 0.17 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.48 0.40 0.12 1.00 0.19 0.81 Final Sat.: 1600 2936 264 1600 3197 3 768 640 192 1600 304 1296 ------------ I---------------II----------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.11 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.15 0.03 0.13 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - # ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.017 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Protected Protected Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 997 19 94 770 240 142 235 90 26 384 482 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 ------------ --------------- II--------------- I1----------II--------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3140 60 1600 2440 760 1600 3471 1329 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I ---------------II--------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.18 0.22 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - # ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.061 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Protected Protected Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 100 863 26 170 1083 155 170 358 64 30 285 267 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 2.55 0.46 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3106 94 1600 2799 401 1600 4072 728 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.16 0.58 0.58 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.12 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.118 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------- II----------II---------------II--------------- Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 121 1203 56 117 1069 104 39 92 43 27 240 96 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 180 1792 83 174 1593 155 58 137 64 40 358 143 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 180 1792 83 174 1593 155 58 137 64 40 358 143 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 180 1792 0 174 1593 155 58 137 64 40 358 143 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 180 1792 0 174 1593 155 58 137 64 40 358 143 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 180 1792 0 174 1593 155 58 137 64 40 358 143 ---------------------------il---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.32 1.00 0.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1090 510 1600 1143 457 ------------ I --------------- II----------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.56 0.00 0.11 0.50 0.10 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:56 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection 47 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.311 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 1178 46 225 1407 51 97 385 65 36 112 149 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 88 1755 69 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 1755 69 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 1755 0 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 1755 0 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 88 1755 0 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1369 231 1600 687 913 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.21 0.66 0.05 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.053 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 69 1166 84 56 966 127 102 303 59 165 619 103 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 ------------1----------II---------------11---------------II---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.77 0.23 1.00 2.51 0.49 1.00 2.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 2828 372 1600 4018 782 1600 4115 685 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.111 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II-------I Control: Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------I-------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 39 1033 130 116 1348 75 170 574 60 124 377 62 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112 253 855 89 185 562 92 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112 253 855 89 185 562 92 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112 253 855 89 185 562 92 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112 253 855 89 185 562 92 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112 253 855 89 185 562 92 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.72 0.28 1.00 2.58 0.42 Final Sat.: 1600 2842 358 1600 3031 169 1600 4346 454 1600 4122 678 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.54 0.54 0.11 0.66 0.66 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.953 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 62 1028 20 63 899 112 53 83 39 9 168 241 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.78 0.22 0.61 0.95 0.45 0.04 0.96 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3139 61 1600 2845 355 969 1518 713 69 1531 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.16 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.050 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 872 14 141 1268 48 106 204 76 22 98 121 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 158 304 113 33 146 180 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 158 304 113 33 146 180 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 158 304 113 33 146 180 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 158 304 113 33 146 180 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 158 304 113 33 146 180 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.93 0.07 0.55 1.06 0.39 0.18 0.82 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3149 51 1600 3083 117 879 1691 630 292 1308 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.61 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.969 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 880 46 81 635 62 76 212 21 88 494 132 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.58 0.42 Final Sat.: 1600 3041 159 1600 2915 285 1600 2912 288 1600 2525 675 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.899 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II --------------- II ---------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 674 93 124 1069 59 84 384 43 62 281 98 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 28 1004 139 185 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 146 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1004 139 185 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 146 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 28 1004 139 185 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 146 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 28 1004 139 185 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 146 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 28 1004 139 185 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 146 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2812 388 1600 3033 167 1600 2878 322 1600 2373 827 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.12 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.891 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 798 25 44 509 184 85 140 23 28 235 74 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.47 0.53 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3103 97 1600 2350 850 1600 1374 226 1600 1217 383 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.973 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II---------------1 Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 544 36 86 862 93 169 335 49 25 169 52 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 0.87 0.13 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3001 199 1600 2888 312 1600 1396 204 1600 1224 376 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.199 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 280 909 235 19 162 22 59 688 129 181 859 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2543 657 1600 2817 383 1600 2695 505 1600 3041 159 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.53 0.53 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.42 0.42 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.335 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 1{---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 224 122 55 771 42 30 860 219 248 855 23 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 1600 2072 1128 1600 3035 165 1600 2551 649 1600 3116 84 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.23 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.960 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I - Volume Module: Base Vol: 199 960 36 35 656 208 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 Ov1AdjVol: ------------ 1--------------- 11--------- Saturation Flow Module: 131 108 133 79 531 87 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 195 161 198 118 791 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 161 198 118 791 130 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 195 161 198 118 791 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 195 161 198 118 791 130 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 195 161 198 118 791 130 0 Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.45 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.19 0.12 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.25 0.08 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.019 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ------------ --II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------I ----------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 838 73 109 964 188 172 688 290 29 240 30 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 Ov1AdjVol: 235 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.39 0.07 0.10 0.45 0.18 0.16 0.32 0.27 0.03 0.11 0.03 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.15 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:45 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.998 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ---------------------------II----------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 846 109 51 481 173 50 258 45 167 740 141 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.68 0.32 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2688 512 ------------ I---------------II---------II-------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.22 0.16 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.09 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.043 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II--------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 843 204 199 1022 81 150 611 205 156 291 82 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2497 703 ------------ I---------------II---------II---------------II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.19 0.19 0.48 0.08 0.14 0.28 0.19 0.08 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.079 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11---------------II---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II-- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 20 8 131 42 93 101 703 20 1 1134 455 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.94 0.06 0.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 498 1102 1600 3111 89 2 2282 916 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- H--------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.74 0.74 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.075 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 29 45 398 25 158 112 1068 4 1 829 153 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II-------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.86 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.69 0.31 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 219 1381 1600 3188 12 3 2699 498 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.46 0.46 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 17-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.717 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 93 661 1149 22 622 717 178 519 139 200 236 170 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 139 985 1712 33 927 1068 265 773 207 298 352 253 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 139 985 1712 33 927 1068 265 773 207 298 352 253 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 139 985 1712 33 927 0 265 773 207 298 352 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 139 985 1712 33 927 0 265 773 207 298 352 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 139 985 1712 33 927 0 265 773 207 298 352 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 1600 4124 676 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.15 1.07 0.02 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.19 0.31 0.19 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.594 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II-------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 710 798 34 1025 260 449 582 404 279 152 476 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 387 669 867 602 416 226 709 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 387 669 867 602 416 226 709 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 0 669 867 602 416 226 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 0 669 867 602 416 226 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 0 669 867 602 416 226 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.31 1.87 0.82 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 2090 2998 1311 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I---------------II--------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.74 0.03 0.24 0.00 0.32 0.29 0.46 0.26 0.14 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:46 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.949 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 279 1132 4 122 670 934 510 62 32 3 249 94 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 416 1687 6 182 998 1392 760 92 48 4 371 140 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 416 1687 6 182 998 1392 760 92 48 4 371 140 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 416 1687 6 182 998 0 760 92 48 4 371 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 416 1687 6 182 998 0 760 92 48 4 371 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 416 1687 6 182 998 0 760 92 48 4 371 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4783 17 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 38 3162 1600 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.21 0.00 0.26 0.06 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:48:57 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Current General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.081 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 717 4 84 1158 351 1025 259 218 4 49 90 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 106 1068 6 125 1725 523 1527 386 325 6 73 134 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 106 1068 6 125 1725 523 1527 386 325 6 73 134 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 106 1068 6 125 1725 0 1527 386 325 6 73 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1068 6 125 1725 0 1527 386 325 6 73 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 106 1068 6 125 1725 0 1527 386 325 6 73 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4773 27 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 242 2958 1600 ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.36 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 2-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.617 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I--------------- II --------------- ll--------------- II --------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 1279 42 100 984 52 119 640 47 85 605 241 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 79 1906 63 149 1466 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 79 1906 63 149 1468 77 177 954 70 127 901 359 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.90 0.10 0.30 1.59 0.12 0.18 1.30 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 3098 102 1600 3040 160 472 2541 187 292 2079 828 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.62 0.62 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.43 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 2-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - West (EW) - #la ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.671 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 1063 59 119 1008 74 201 639 93 128 718 235 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1584 88 177 1502 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 Added Vol: 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1583 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1583 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1583 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1583 88 177 1503 110 299 952 139 191 1070 350 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.43 1.37 0.20 0.24 1.33 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3032 168 1600 2981 219 689 2192 319 379 2125 696 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.50 0.50 0.50 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 19-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report IC_U 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.217 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I ---------------II---------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 202 60 68 141 11 44 630 108 9 892 79 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 301 89 101 210 16 66 939 161 13 1329 118 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.70 0.21 0.31 0.64 0.05 0.11 1.61 0.28 0.02 1.98 1.00 Final Sat.: 154 1114 331 495 1025 80 180 2578 442 32 3168 1600 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.07 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 19-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #101 Alameda Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue - East (EW) - #lb ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.317 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II --------II--------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 ------------I---------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 244 46 65 161 10 30 762 25 1 1056 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 22 364 69 97 240 15 45 1135 37 1 1573 67 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.05 0.80 0.15 0.28 0.68 0.04 0.07 1.87 0.06 0.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 79 1280 241 441 1092 68 118 2985 98 3 3197 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 0.04 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - West (EW) - #2a ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.482 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 36 1315 38 80 660 90 119 362 27 11 171 65 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 54 1959 57 119 983 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 54 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 54 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 54 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 54 1959 57 119 985 134 177 539 40 16 255 97 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.76 0.24 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.04 0.69 0.26 Final Sat.: 1600 3110 90 1600 2817 383 396 1204 1600 71 1108 421 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.45 0.45 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 3-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street- West (EW) - #2a ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.692 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (West) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 32 957 16 82 1066 139 102 246 42 48 533 146 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 48 1426 24 122 1588 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 Added Vol: 0 -1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 1425 24 122 1589 207 152 367 63 72 794 218 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.77 0.23 0.29 0.71 1.00 0.07 0.73 0.20 Final Sat.: 1600 3147 53 1600 2831 369 469 1131 1600 106 1173 321 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.45 0.45 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.68 0.68 0.68 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.811 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II-------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11-------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 54 14 5 13 38 199 257 24 2 201 13 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 80 21 7 19 57 297 383 36 3 299 19 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.71 0.18 0.09 0.23 0.68 0.41 0.54 0.05 0.01 0.99 1.00 Final Sat.: 168 1137 295 143 371 1086 663 857 80 16 1584 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.19 0.19 0.01 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 20-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #102 Alameda Street (NS) at 55th Street - East (EW) - #2b ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.153 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Alameda Street (East) 55th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 6 41 9 24 35 206 44 288 12 1 515 8 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 9 61 13 36 52 307 66 429 18 1 767 12 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.73 0.16 0.09 0.13 0.78 0.13 0.84 0.03 0.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 171 1171 257 145 211 1244 205 1340 56 3 1597 1600 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.48 0.01 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.988 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 77 1177 113 77 1016 45 23 71 70 142 160 103 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 115 1754 168 115 1514 67 34 106 104 212 238 153 Added Vol: -14 6 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 101 1760 171 115 1515 67 34 108 104 212 238 153 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 101 1760 0 115 1515 0 34 108 104 212 238 153 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 101 1760 0 115 1515 0 34 108 104 212 238 153 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 101 1760 0 115 1515 0 34 108 104 212 238 153 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 973 627 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.55 0.00 0.07 0.47 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 4-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 25th Street (EW) - #3 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.125 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 25th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II----------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 1072 133 105 1108 21 253 244 93 117 138 68 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 119 1597 198 156 1651 31 377 364 139 174 206 101 Added Vol: -8 4 2 0 -4 0 0 1 -7 -2 -1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 111 1601 200 156 1647 31 377 365 132 172 205 101 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 111 1601 0 156 1647 0 377 365 132 172 205 101 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 1601 0 156 1647 0 377 365 132 172 205 101 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 1601 0 156 1647 0 377 365 132 172 205 101 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.33 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1070 530 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.50 0.00 0.10 0.51 0.00 0.24 0.23 0.08 0.11 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 5-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.055 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 1304 178 94 967 151 28 167 61 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 152 1943 265 140 1441 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 -14 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 152 1929 265 141 1443 225 42 249 91 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.73 0.27 0.14 0.86 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2813 387 1600 2768 432 230 1370 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.69 0.69 0.09 0.52 0.52 0.03 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 5-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at 38th Street (EW) - #4 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.119 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue 38th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------------1 Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 95 978 219 151 1346 122 20 247 80 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 142 1457 326 225 2006 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 -9 0 0 -5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 142 1448 326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 142 1448 326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 142 1448 326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 142 1448 326 225 2001 182 30 368 119 0 0 0 ------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 1.00 1.83 0.17 0.07 0.93 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1600 2612 588 1600 2933 267 120 1480 1600 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II ----------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.55 0.55 0.14 0.68 0.68 0.02 0.25 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.076 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- f1---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1517 109 79 962 4 2 10 3 142 4 138 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 3 2260 162 118 1433 6 3 15 4 212 6 206 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 2 0 -14 0 0 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 -11 15 4 214 6 206 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 0 15 4 214 6 206 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 0 15 4 214 6 206 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 2260 162 118 1435 6 0 15 4 214 6 206 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.03 0.97 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 3187 13 0 1231 369 1600 52 1548 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.07 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.11 0.13 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 6-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #5 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.018 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------- II --------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 1199 108 122 1245 1 24 20 6 165 7 117 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 4 1787 161 182 1855 1 36 30 9 246 10 174 Added Vol: 0 -1 -1 0 2 -7 -8 0 0 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 1786 160 182 1857 -5 28 30 9 248 10 174 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 1786 160 182 1857 0 28 30 9 248 10 174 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 4 1786 160 182 1857 0 28 30 9 248 10 174 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 4 1786 160 182 1857 0 28 30 9 248 10 174 ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.42 0.45 0.13 1.00 0.19 0.81 Final Sat.: 1600 2937 263 1600 3200 0 668 717 215 1600 310 1290 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.11 0.58 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.03 0.14 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - # ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.017 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Protected Protected Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 997 19 94 770 240 142 235 90 26 384 482 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 133 1486 28 140 1147 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1486 28 140 1151 358 212 350 134 39 572 718 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ----------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.53 0.47 1.00 2.17 0.83 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3140 60 1600 2442 758 1600 3471 1329 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.02.0.18 0.22 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 7-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection 46 Santa Fe Avenue (NS) at Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard (EW) - # ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.062 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Santa Fe Avenue Vernon Avenue/Pacific Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ------- I Control: Prot+Permit Protected Protected Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 100 863 26 170 1083 155 170 358 64 30 285 267 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 149 1286 39 253 1614 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 Added Vol: 0 -2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 149 1284 39 253 1617 231 253 533 95 45 425 398 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 2.55 0.46 1.00 2.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3106 94 1600 2800 400 1600 4072 728 1600 3200 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.16 0.58 0.58 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.13 0.12 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.127 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 121 1203 56 117 1069 104 39 92 43 27 240 96 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 180 1792 83 174 1593 155 58 137 64 40 358 143 Added Vol: 0 14 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 180 1806 83 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 180 1806 0 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 180 1806 0 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 180 1806 0 174 1594 155 62 138 64 40 358 146 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.32 1.00 0.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1093 507 1600 1136 464 ------------ I --------------- II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.56 0.00 0.11 0.50 0.10 0.04 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 8-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Soto Street (NS) at 26th Street (EW) - #7 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.314 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street 26th Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II---------------II----------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Ignore Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ---------------------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 59 1178 46 225 1407 51 97 385 65 36 112 149 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 88 1755 69 335 2096 76 145 574 97 54 167 222 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 -7 -3 3 1 0 0 -1 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 1764 69 335 2089 73 148 575 97 54 166 225 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 88 1764 0 335 2089 73 148 575 97 54 166 225 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 88 1764 0 335 2089 73 148 575 97 54 166 225 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 88 1764 0 335 2089 73 148 575 97 54 166 225 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.42 0.58 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 1369 231 1600 679 921 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.21 0.65 0.05 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.060 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I--------------- II---------------II--------II---------------I Control: Protected Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 69 1166 84 56 966 127 102 303 59 165 619 103 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 103 1737 125 83 1439 189 152 451 88 246 922 153 Added Vol: 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 9 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 103 1740 125 89 1439 189 152 452 88 248 922 162 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.77 0.23 1.00 2.51 0.49 1.00 2.55 0.45 Final Sat.: 1600 2985 215 1600 2828 372 1600 4019 781 1600 4081 719 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.06 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 9-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Soto Street (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #8 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.111 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 39 1033 130 116 1348 75 170 574 60 124 377 62 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 58 1539 194 173 2009 112 253 855 89 185 562 92 Added Vol: 0 1 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 58 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 186 562 95 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 58 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 186 562 95 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 58 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 186 562 95 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 58 1540 193 172 2008 112 253 855 89 186 562 95 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.72 0.28 1.00 2.56 0.44 Final Sat.: 1600 2844 356 1600 3031 169 1600 4346 454 1600 4103 697 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.54 0.54 0.11 0.66 0.66 0.16 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:49 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.953 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 62 1028 20 63 899 112 53 83 39 9 168 241 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 92 1532 30 94 1340 167 79 124 58 13 250 359 Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 -1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 92 1535 30 94 1339 169 79 124 58 13 250 359 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.96 0.04 1.00 1.78 0.22 0.61 0.95 0.45 0.04 0.96 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3139 61 1600 2841 359 969 1518 713 69 1531 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.49 0.49 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.16 0.22 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 10-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Soto Street (NS) at Vernon Avenue (EW) - #9 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.050 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Vernon Avenuie Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 872 14 141 1268 48 106 204 76 22 98 121 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 72 1299 21 210 1889 72 158 304 113 33 146 180 Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 -1 2 -1 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 1300 21 210 1888 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 72 1300 21 210 1888 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1300 21 210 1888 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 1300 21 210 1888 74 157 304 113 33 146 180 ------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.93 0.08 0.55 1.06 0.39 0.18 0.82 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3149 51 1600 3080 120 875 1694 631 292 1308 1600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.61 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.969 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II----------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 880 46 81 635 62 76 212 21 88 494 132 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 61 1311 69 121 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 197 Added Vol: 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 61 1311 69 120 946 92 113 316 31 131 736 200 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ----I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.82 0.18 1.00 1.57 0.43 Final Sat.: 1600 3041 159 1600 2915 285 1600 2912 288 1600 2517 683 ------------ I ---------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 11-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Soto Street (NS) at Leonis Boulevard (EW) - #10 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.899 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Leonis Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 19 674 93 124 1069 59 84 384 43 62 281 98 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 28 1004 139 185 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 146 Added Vol: 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 28 1004 139 184 1593 88 125 572 64 92 419 147 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 1.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1600 2812 388 1600 3033 167 1600 2878 322 1600 2368 832 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.11 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.891 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 89 798 25 44 509 184 85 140 23 28 235 74 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 133 1189 37 66 758 274 127 209 34 42 350 110 ------------ 1--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.47 0.53 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3103 97 1600 2350 850 1600 1374 226 1600 1217 383 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.29 0.29 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 12-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Soto Street (NS) at Fruitland Avenue (EW) - #11 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.973 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Soto Street Fruitland Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------II--------------- II---------------II--------------- Control: Prot+permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 51 544 36 86 862 93 169 335 49 25 169 52 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 76 811 54 128 1284 139 252 499 73 37 252 77 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 0.87 0.13 1.00 0.76 0.24 Final Sat.: 1600 3001 199 1600 2888 312 1600 1396 204 1600 1224 376 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.16 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.199 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------------------- II --------------- II---------------II---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 280 909 235 19 162 22 59 688 129 181 859 45 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1280 67 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 417 1354 350 28 241 33 88 1025 192 270 1284 67 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II -----I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.90 0.10 Final Sat.: 1600 2543 657 1600 2817 383 1600 2695 505 1600 3041 159 ------------ I --------------- II ------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.53 0.53 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.42 0.42 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 13-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Boyle Avenue/State Street (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #12 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.334 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Boyle Avenue/State Street Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- 11---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes- 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 224 122 55 771 42 30 860 219 248 855 23 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1281 326 370 1274 34 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 2 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1279 326 370 1276 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1279 326 370 1276 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1279 326 370 1276 34 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 197 334 182 82 1149 63 45 1279 326 370 1276 34 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11----------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 ;600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.29 0.71 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 1.95 0.05 Final Sat.: 1600 2072 1128 1600 3035 165 1600 2550 650 1600 3116 84 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ----------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.50 0.50 0.23 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.963 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 199 960 36 35 656 208 131 108 133 79 531 87 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 297 1430 54 52 977 310 195 161 198 118 791 130 Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 1 0 2 4 2 1 3 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 297 1436 54 52 978 310 197 165 200 119 794 131 Ov1AdjVol: 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II-------- II --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.45 0.03 0.03 0.31 0.19 0.12 0.05 0.13 0.07 0.25 0.08 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 14-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Lcss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Downey Road (NS) at Washington Boulevard (EW) - #13 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.019 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Washington Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 132 838 73 109 964 188 172 688 290 29 240 30 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 197 1249 109 162 1436 280 256 1025 432 43 358 45 Added Vol: -1 4 -1 -1 -3 -1 2 2 2 1 -1 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 196 1253 108 161 1433 279 258 1027 434 44 357 46 OvlAdjVol: 238 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.39 0.07 0.10 0.45 0.17 0.16 0.32 0.27 0.03 0.11 0.03 Ov1AdjV/S: 0.15 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.002 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 846 109 51 481 173 50 258 45 167 740 141 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1261 162 76 717 258 75 384 67 249 1103 210 Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 3 0 4 24 0 0 3 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 249 1106 210 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 249 1106 210 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 249 1106 210 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1262 162 76 720 258 79 408 67 249 1106 210 ------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.68 0.32 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2689 511 ------------ I---------------II---------------II-------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.22 0.16 0.05 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.41 0.41 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:00 Page 15-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Downey Road (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #14 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.048 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ----------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 50 843 204 199 1022 81 150 611 205 156 291 82 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 75 1256 304 297 1523 121 224 910 305 232 434 122 Added Vol: 0 -1 0 0 2 -2 3 18 0 0 -11 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 75 1255 304 297 1525 119 227 928 305 232 423 122 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.55 0.45 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 2880 2482 718 ------------ I --------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.39 0.19 0.19 0.48 0.07 0.14 0.29 0.19 0.08 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection *15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.081 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 8 20 8 131 42 93 101 703 20 1 1134 455 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 12 30 12 195 63 139 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 30 12 195 63 143 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 12 30 12 195 63 143 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 12 30 12 195 63 143 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 12 30 12 195 63 143 150 1047 30 1 1690 678 ---------------------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 1.00 1.94 0.06 0.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 488 1112 1600 3111 89 2 2282 916 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.74 0.74 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 16-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 Downey Road (NS) at Slauson Avenue (EW) - #15 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.073 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Downey Road Slauson Avenue Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- LI---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 29 45 398 25 158 112 1068 4 1 829 153 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 27 43 67 593 37 235 167 1591 6 1 1235 228 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 27 43 67 593 37 237 165 1591 6 1 1235 228 ------------I----------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.14 0.86 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.69 0.31 Final Sat.: 1600 1600 1600 1600 217 1383 1600 3188 12 3 2699 498 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.46 0.46 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 17-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #16 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.725 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------------------------II---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 93 661 1149 22 622 717 178 519 139 200 236 170 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 139 985 1712 33 927 1068 265 773 207 298 352 253 Added Vol: 1 19 3 0 -1 0 6 3 15 1 1 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 140 1004 1715 33 926 1068 271 776 222 299 353 255 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 140 1004 1715 33 926 0 271 776 222 299 353 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 140 1004 1715 33 926 0 271 776 222 299 353 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 140 1004 1715 33 926 0 271 776 222 299 353 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 2.56 0.44 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 1600 4088 712 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I---------------II---------------II--------------- H---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.16 1.07 0.02 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.19 0.31 0.19 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 17-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection 416 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at Bandini Boulevard (EW) - #16 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.598 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard Bandini Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II----------II---------------II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 53 710 798 34 1025 260 449 582 404 279 152 476 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 79 1058 1189 51 1527 387 669 867 602 416 226 709 Added Vol: -7 5 0 0 0 -1 5 0 12 1 -1 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 386 674 867 614 417 225 711 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 0 674 867 614 417 225 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 0 674 867 614 417 225 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 72 1063 1189 51 1527 0 674 867 614 417 225 0 ------------ --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.31 1.86 0.83 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 2099 2974 1326 1600 1600 3200 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.17 0.74 0.03 0.24 0.00 0.32 0.29 0.46 0.26 0.14 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:33:50 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Morning Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.952 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 279 1132 4 122 670 934 510 62 32 3 249 94 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 416 1687 6 182 998 1392 760 92 48 4 371 140 Added Vol: 0 0 -1 -13 3 1 4 -2 0 1 2 14 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 416 1687 5 169 1001 1393 764 90 48 5 373 154 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 416 1687 5 169 1001 0 764 90 48 5 373 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 416 1687 5 169 1001 0 764 90 48 5 373 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 416 1687 5 169 1001 0 764 90 48 5 373 0 ------------ --------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------------{ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 1.97 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4786 14 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 46 3154 1600 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- II --------------- II ---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.21 0.00 0.27 0.06 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA Default Scenario Tue Dec 11, 2012 08:34:01 Page 18-1 Vernon General Plan Circulation Element Update Proposed General Plan Year 2035 Evening Peak Hour -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 Atlantic Boulevard (NS) at District Boulevard (EW) - #17 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.080 Loss Time (sec): 10 (Y+R=0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Atlantic Boulevard District Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ---------------II--------------- II ---------------I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ------------ I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 71 717 4 84 1158 351 1025 259 218 4 49 90 Growth Adj: 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.49 Initial Bse: 106 1068 6 125 1725 523 1527 386 325 6 73 134 Added Vol: 0 -2 0 4 3 4 -2 1 0 0 0 -1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 106 1066 6 129 1728 527 1525 387 325 6 73 133 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 106 1066 6 129 1728 0 1525 387 325 6 73 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1066 6 129 1728 0 1525 387 325 6 73 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 106 1066 6 129 1728 0 1525 387 325 6 73 0 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II ---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 1.85 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 4773 27 1600 4800 1600 2880 1600 1600 242 2958 1600 ------------ I ---------------II---------- II----------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.36 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.00 Crit Moves **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE www.traffic-engineer.com AsplllwLmw&l®= I'•s zi rr 4-11 . , " j tr w M i. 7 .