Resolution No. 2015-035RESOLUTION NO. 2015-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VERNON ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE
2015-2016 FISCAL YEAR, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 7910
WHEREAS, Section 7910, of the Government Code requires the
governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution,
an appropriation limit for each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the appropriation limit for fiscal year 2014-2015,
was $988,993,313; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California passed
Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990; and
WHEREAS, under Proposition 111, a City is allowed to use
either, (a) the change in California per capita income from the
preceding year, or (b) the percentage change in the local assessment
roll from the preceding year due to increases in nonresidential
construction; and
WHEREAS, the documentation used in the determination of the
appropriation limit provided for herein has been made available for
inspection by the public fifteen (15), days prior to this meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
intends to establish the appropriation limit for fiscal year
2015-2016.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon finds
that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule
that CEQA only applies to projects that may have an effect on the
environment.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
establishes $1,032,001,666 as the amount of the appropriation limit for
fiscal year 2015-2016, in accordance with the provisions of
Proposition 111. The computation is attached hereto as Exhibit A,
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Vernon has
approved a budget by adopting a Resolution, which did not exceed the
appropriation limit for fiscal year 2015-2016.
SECTION 5: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
declares that the budget established by Resolution complies with the
requirements of Government Code, Sections 7900, et seg.
- 2 -
SECTION 6: The City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the
City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of
this resolution, and the City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the City
of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's, or Deputy
City Clerk's, certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of
the Council of this City.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June, 2015.
ATTEST:
! aria E . Ayala
City Clerk / nep;at r; "., ri a,)Ve
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Hema Patel, Cio Attorney
Name: W. Michael McCormick
Title: Mayor / nr�
- 3 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Maria E. Ayll$ City Clerk ^"1 of the City
of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being
Resolution No. 2015-35, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City
Council duly held on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, and thereafter was duly
signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon.
Executed this day of June, 2015, at Vernon, California.
(SEAL)
Maria Ayala
City Clerk / DP �
- 4 -
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
A. CALCULATION OF BASE YEAR 1978-79
STEP 1.
1. Proceeds from Taxes
Property taxes
Othertaxes
Investment earnings
Revenue for Other -Agencies
Less: Railroad Crossing Grant
SUB -TOTAL
Contribution from Enterprise Fund
Miscellaneous
TOTAL PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
2. Non -Proceeds from Taxes
A. User Fees by Function
Public Works
Construction Permits
Streets & Curbs
Engineering Services
SUB -TOTAL
Health
Food Vehicle Permits
Public Health Permits
SUB -TOTAL
Police
Police Services
SUB -TOTAL
TOTAL USER FEES
B. Interfund Service Charges
C. Cost -Reimbursement Items
D. Donations and Grants (non -State) Railroad Crossing Grant
E. Exempt Revenues -(Mandated Cost Reimbursement, Fines,
Proceeds from Bond Issues) Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties
TOTAL NON PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
GRAND TOTAL
STEP 2.
1. Match Cost to User Fees
2. Revenues less than Costs
3. No portion of User Fees considered "Proceeds of Taxes"
STEP 3.
1. All Revenues of the City
2. Non Proceed of Taxes
3. User Fees in excess of Costs
4. Less Debt Service Appropriations
TOTAL
STEP 4.
1. Total all actual Appropriations, as amended for 1978-79
Transfers to Reserves
2. Subtract Non Proceeds of Taxes
BASE YEAR LIMIT (1978-79)
EXHIBIT"A"
A-1
Page 1 of 7
1,061,619
4,890,969
302,913
831,739
9,277
822,462
7,077,963
1,549,490
5,306
8,632,759
121,551
1,604
82,706
205,861
15,516
47,578
63,094
5,944
5,944
274,899
0
0
9,277
67,303
351,479
8,984,238
8,984,238
(351,479)
0
0
8,632,759
8,586,750
3,988,675
12,575,425
(351,479)
12,223,946
CITY OF VERNON Page 2 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
B. 1979-80 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1978-79 Appropriation Limit
12,223,946
CPI change 10.17%
Vernon population change 1.15%
1.1017 X 1.0115 =1.11437
X
1.11437
1979-80 Appropriation Limit
13,621,999
C. 1980-81 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1979-80 Appropriation Limit
13,621,999
CPI change 12.11%
Vernon population change -1.14%
1.1211 X .9886=1.1083
X
1.1083
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
15,097,261
D. 1981-92 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
15,097,261
Per Capita income change 9.12%
Vernon population change 4.60%
1.0912 X 1.0460 = 1.1414
X
1.1414
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
17,232,014
E. 1982-83 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
17,232,014
Per Capital Income change 6.79%
Vernon population change -4.35%
1.0679 X .9565=1.02144635
X
1.02144635
1982-83 Appropriation Limit
17,601,578
F. 1983-84 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1982-83 Appropriation Limit
17,601,578
Per Capita income change 2.35%
Vernon population change 2.30%
1.0235 X 1.0230=1.0470
X
1.0470
1983-84 Appropriation Limit
18,428,852
G. 1984-85 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1983-84 Appropriation Limit
18,428,852
Per Capita income change 4.7491
Vernon population change -5.37%
1.0475 X .9463 = .9912
X
0.9912
1984-85 Appropriation Limit
18,266,678
H. 1995-86 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1984-85 Appropriation Limit
18,266,678
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.74%
Vernon population change-3.46%
1.0374 X .9654=1.0017
X
1.0017
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
18,297,731
EXHIBIT "A"
A-2
CITY OF VERNON Page 3 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
I. 1986-87 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
18,297,731
U.S. Consumer price index change 2.30%
Vernon population change 6.17%
1.0230 X 1.0617=1.0861
X
1.0861
1986-87 Appropriation Limit
19,873,166
J. 1987-88 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1986-87 Appropriation Limit
19,873,166
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.04%
Los Angeles County population change 1.91%
1.0304 X 1.0191 = 1.0501
X
1.0501
1987-88 Appropriation Limit
20,868,812
K. 1988-89 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1987-88 Appropriation Limit
20,868,812
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.93%
Los Angeles County population change 1.62%
1.0393 X 1.0162=1.0562
X
1.0562
1988-89 Appropriation Limit
22,041,639
L. 1989-90 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1988-89 Appropriation Limit
22,041,639
U.S. Consumer price index change 4.98%
Los Angeles County population change 1.14%
1.0498 X 1.0114=1.0618
X
1.0618
1989-90 Appropriation Limit
23,403,812
M. 1990-91 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1989-90 Appropriation Limit
23,403,812
Per Capita income change 4.21%
Los Angeles County population change 1.36%
1.0421 X 1.0136=1.0563
X
1.0563
1990-91 Appropriation Limit
24,721,447
N. 1991-92 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1990-91 Appropriation Limit
24,721,447
Per Capita income change 4.14%
Los Angeles County population change 1.73%
1.0414 X 1.0173=1.0595
X
1.0595
1991-92 Appropriation Limit
26,192,373
0. 1992-93 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1991-92 Appropriation Limit
26,192,373
Increase In Nonresidential Construction 32.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.49%
1.3224 X 1.0149=1.3421
X
1.3421
1992-93 Appropriation Limit
35,152,784
EXHIBIT "A"
A-3
CITY OF VERNON Page 4 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
P. 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1992-93 Appropriation Limit
35,152,784
Per Capita income change 2.72%
Los Angeles County population change .96%
1.0272 X 1.0096 =1.0371
X
1.0371
1993-94 Appropriation Limit
36,456,952
Q. 1994-95 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1993-94 Appropriation Limit
36,456,952
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 4.84%
Los Angeles County population change .75%
1.0484 X 1.0075 =1.05627
X
1.05627
1994-95 Appropriation Limit
38,508,385
R. 1995-96 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1994-95 Appropriation Limit
38,508,385
Per Capita income change 4.72%
Los Angeles County population change .33%
1.0472 X 1.0033=1.0507
X
1.0507
1995-96 Appropriation Limit
40,460,760
S. 1996-97 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1995-96 Appropriation Limit
40,460,760
Per Capita income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change .48%
1.0467 X 1.0049=1.0517
X
1.0517
1996-97 Appropriation Limit
42,552,581
T. 1997-98 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1996-97 Appropriation Limit
42,552,591
Per Capita income change 4,67%
Los Angeles County population change 1.24%
1.0467 X 1.0124=1.0597
X
1.0597
1997-98 Appropriation Limit
45,092,970
U. 1998-99 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1997-98 Appropriation Limit
45,092,970
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 9.91%
Los Angeles County population change 1.39%
1.0991 X 1.0139=1.11
X
1.11
1998-99 Appropriation Limit
50,053,197
V. 1999-2000 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1998-99 Appropriation Limit
50,053,197
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 15.35%
Los Angeles County population change 1.78%
1.1535 X 1.0178=1.17
X
1.17
1999-2000 Appropriation Limit
58,562,240
EXHIBIT "A"
A-4
CITY OF VERNON Page 5 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
W.
2000.2001 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1999-2000 Appropriation Limit
58,562,240
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 10.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.75%
1.1024 X 1.0175 = 1.1217
X
1.1217
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit
65,689,265
X.
2001.2002 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit
65,689,265
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 25.96%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.2596 X 1.0166=1.2805
X
1.2805
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit
84,115,104
Y.
2002-2003 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit
84,115,104
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 27.25%
Los Angeles County population change 1.77%
1.2725 X 1.0177 =1.2950
X
1.2950
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit
108,929,060
Z.
2003-2004 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit
108,929,060
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 19.80%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.1980 X 1.0166 =1.2179
X
1.2179
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit
132,664,702
AA.
2004-2005 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit
132,664,702
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 22.03%
Los Angeles County population change 1.38%
1.2203 X 1.0138=1.2371
X
1.2371
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit
164,119,503
BB.
2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit
164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118 = 1.0650
X
1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit
174,787,271
CC.
2006-2007 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit
174,787,271
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 29.41%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.2941 X 1.0078=1.3042
X
1.3042
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit
227,957,559
EXHIBIT "A"
A-5
CITY OF VERNON Page 6 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
DD.
2007-2008 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit
227,957,559
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change .72%
1,0944 X 1.0072=1.1023
X
1.1023
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit
251,277,617
EE.
2008-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit
251,277,617
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 11.82%
Los Angeles County population change .86%
1.1182 X 1.0086=1.1278
X
1.1278
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit
293,390,896
FF.
2009.2010 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit
283,390,896
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 6.36%
Los Angeles County population change .90%
1.0636 X 1.0090=1.0732
X
1.0732
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit
304,135,110
GG.
2010-2011 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit
304,135,110
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 21.45%
Los Angeles County population change .83%
1.2145 X 1.0083=1.22458
X
1.22458
2010-2011 Appropriation Limit
372,437,773
HH.
2011-2012 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2010-2011 Appropriation Limit
372,437,773
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 67.70%
Los Angeles County population change .38%
1.6770 X 1.0038=1.683373
X
1.683373
2011-2012 Appropriation Limit
626,951,691
ll.
2012-2013 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2011-2012 Appropriation Limit
626,951,691
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 62.40%
Los Angeles County population change .38%
1.6240 X 1.0038=1.630171
X
1.630171
2012-2013 Appropriation Limit
1,022,038,465
JJ.
2013-2014 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2012-2013 Appropriation Limit
1,022,038,465
Increase in Nonresidential Construction -6.51%
Los Angeles County population change .69%
0.9349 X 1.0069 = 0.941351
X
0.941351
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit
962,096,932
EXHIBIT"A"
A-6
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION U MIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
KK. 2014-2015 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 2.00%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.0200 X 1.0078=1.027956
2014-2015 Appropriation Limit
Lt. 2015-2016 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2014-2015 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 3.50%
Los Angeles County population change .82%
1.0350 X 1.0082 = 1.043487
2015-2016 Appropriation Limit
EXHIBIT "A"
A-7
Page 7 of 7
962,096,932
X 1.027956
988,993,313
988,993,313
X 1.043487
1,032,001,666
TRANSMITTAL COMMUNICATION
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 24, 2015
TO: William Fox, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Masami Higa, Assistant Finance Director
Joaquin Leon, Deputy City Treasurer
FROM: Deborah Juarez, Records Management Assistant J�
RE: Resolution No. 2015-35 — A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Vernon Adopting
an Appropriation Limit for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year, Pursuant to Government Code
Section 7910
Transmitted herewith is a copy of Resolution No. 2015-35 referenced above, which was approved by the
City Council on June 16, 2015.
Thank you.
Attachment
c: Resolution No. 2015-35
p'"�®if®
IC % tip\
�vN 1
DATE: June 16, 2015
STAFF REPORT
Finance Department
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William Fox, Finance Director `Jq*f
JUN 0 9 2015
CITY ADMINISTRATION
RE: Recommendation for Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Appropriation Limit
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council:
A. Find that adoption of the proposed Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Appropriation Limit in this staff
report is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance
with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to projects that may have
an effect on the environment; and
B. Establish the City's Appropriation Limit for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 in the amount of
$1,032,001,666 based on the percentage growth in the State Per Capita Personal Income and
County Population.
Background
California voters approved an initiative on November 6, 1979 that added Article XIIIB to the State
Constitution. The provisions of this article place limits on the amount of revenue that can be
appropriated by all entities of government. This State Appropriation Limit is often referred to as the
Gann Limit, after Paul Gann, the author of the measure placing the limit in the State constitution.
The Appropriation Limit is based on actual appropriations during the 1978-1979 fiscal years, as
increased each year using specified population and inflationary growth factors.
The original legislation implementing the provisions of Article XIIIB became effective January 1,
1981. In accordance with that legislation, the governing body of each government jurisdiction
must, by resolution, establish its annual Appropriation Limit for the coming year at a regularly
scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting.
The original Article XIIIB (Proposition 4) and its implementing legislation, Chapter 1205/80, was
modified in June 1990 by Proposition 111 and SB 88 (Chapter 60/90). Significant changes imposed
by Proposition I I I include the following:
• The provision of a choice in methodologies for determining the annual inflation factor
between (1) growth in California per capita income, or (2) growth in non-residential
assessed valuation due to new construction within the City.
• The provision of a choice in methodologies for determining the annual population growth
factor between (1) City population growth, or (2) County population growth.
• Regulations allowing the exclusion of "qualified capital outlay" expenditures from
calculation of the Limit.
• Provision of a process for avoiding tax refunds if a city falls sufficiently below the Limit in
the next fiscal year. The revised language provides two years, beyond the second year, to
refund any remaining excess during which jurisdictions can seek to obtain a successful
override vote.
As a result of Proposition 111, the City is required to choose between two annual inflation factors
and two population factors.
• The choice offered for the annual inflation factor is (1) the growth in California per capita
income or (2) the growth in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction
within the City.
• The choice offered for the annual population growth factor is (1) the growth in City or (2)
County population.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the non-residential assessed valuation due to
new construction as its annual inflation factor and the County's population growth as its annual
population growth factors for the eight (8) years prior to Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the State per capita personal income as its
annual inflation factor and the County's population growth as its annual population growth factors
for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 and Fiscal Year 2015-2016.
When the City prepares its annual budget each year, the appropriations subject to the Appropriation
Limit is typically well below the Appropriation Limit as shown below:
Fiscal Year
Appropriation Limit
Appropriation Subject to
the Limit
Amount Under Limit
2006-2007
$228 million
$44 million
$184 million
2007-2008
$251 million
$50 million
$201 million
2008-2009
$283 million
$77 million
$206 million
2009-2010
$304 million
$48 million
$256 million
2010-2011
$372 million
$41 million
$331 million
2011-2012
$627 million
$62 million
$565 million
2012-2013
$1,022 million
$47 million
$975 million
2013-2014
$962 million
$55 million
$907 million
2014-2015
$989 million
$52 million
$937 million
2015-2016
$1,032 million
$57 million
$975 million
Over the last ten (10) years, and including 2015-2016, the City's appropriations subject to the
Appropriation Limit have remained well below the Appropriation Limit. Given the size of this gap,
it is unlikely that the City will exceed the Appropriation Limit in the upcoming years without
significant changes to the City's tax structure.
The notice indicating the documentation used in the determination of the appropriation limit
provided herewith was posted on the City's website on June 6, 2015 and said documentation is
available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact since the City continues to remain well below the Appropriation Limit.
Attachment 1: Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Appropriation Limit Calculation
Attachment 2: Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Alternative Adjustment Factors
WF/MH:
Attachment 1
City of Vernon
Fiscal Year 2015-2016
Appropriation Limit Calculation
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VERNON ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE
2015-2016 FISCAL YEAR, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 7910
WHEREAS, Section 7910, of the Government Code requires the
governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution,
an appropriation limit for each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the appropriation limit for fiscal year 2014-2015,
was $988,993,313; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California passed
Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990; and
WHEREAS, under Proposition 111, a City is allowed to use
either, (a) the change in California per capita income from the
preceding year, or (b) the percentage change in the local assessment
roll from the preceding year due to increases in nonresidential
construction; and
WHEREAS, the documentation used in the determination of the
appropriation limit provided for herein has been made available for
inspection by the public fifteen (15), days prior to this meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
intends to establish the appropriation limit for fiscal year
2015-2016.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon finds
that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3), the general rule
that CEQA only applies to projects that may have an effect on the
environment.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
establishes $1,032,001,666 as the amount of the appropriation limit for
fiscal year 2015-2016, in accordance with the provisions of
Proposition 111. The computation is attached hereto as Exhibit A,
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Vernon has
approved a budget by adopting a Resolution, which did not exceed the
appropriation limit for fiscal year 2015-2016.
SECTION 5: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
declares that the budget established by Resolution complies with the
requirements of Government Code, Sections 7900, et sec..
- 2 -
SECTION 6: The City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the
City of Vernon shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of
this resolution, and the City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, of the City
of Vernon shall cause this resolution and the City Clerk's, or Deputy
City Clerk's, certification to be entered in the File of Resolutions of
the Council of this City.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June, 2015.
ATTEST:
City Clerk / Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Hema Patel, Ci Attorney
Name:
Title: Mayor / Mayor Pro-Tem
- 3 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, , City Clerk / Deputy City Clerk of the City
of Vernon, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being
Resolution No. , was duly passed, approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City
Council duly held on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, and thereafter was duly
signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon.
Executed this day of June, 2015, at Vernon, California.
(SEAL)
City Clerk / Deputy City Clerk
- 4 -
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
A. CALCULATION OF BASE YEAR 1978-79
STEP 1.
1. Proceeds from Taxes
Propertytaxes
Othertaxes
Investment earnings
Revenue for Other -Agencies
Less: Railroad Crossing Grant
SUB -TOTAL
Contribution from Enterprise Fund
Miscellaneous
TOTAL PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
2. Non -Proceeds from Taxes
A. User Fees by Function
Public Works
Construction Permits
Streets & Curbs
Engineering Services
SUB -TOTAL
Health
Food Vehicle Permits
Public Health Permits
SUB -TOTAL
Police
Police Services
SUB -TOTAL
TOTAL USER FEES
B. Interfund Service Charges
C. Cost -Reimbursement Items
D. Donations and Grants (non -State) Railroad Crossing Grant
E. Exempt Revenues -(Mandated Cost Reimbursement, Fines,
Proceeds from Bond Issues) Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties
TOTAL NON PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
GRAND TOTAL
STEP 2.
1. Match Cost to User Fees
2. Revenues less than Costs
3. No portion of User Fees considered "Proceeds of Taxes"
STEP 3.
1. All Revenues of the City
2. Non Proceed of Taxes
3. User Fees in excess of Costs
4. Less Debt Service Appropriations
TOTAL
STEP 4.
1. Total all actual Appropriations, as amended for 1978-79
Transfers to Reserves
2. Subtract Non Proceeds of Taxes
BASE YEAR LIMIT (1978-79)
EXHIBIT "A"
A-1
Page 1 of 7
1,061,619
4,890,969
302,913
831,739
9,277
822,462
7,077,963
1,549,490
5,306
8,632,759
121,551
1,604
82,706
205,861
15,516
47,578
63,094
5,944
5,944
274,899
0
0
9,277
67,303
351,479
8,984,238
8,984,238
(351,479)
0
0
8,632,759
8,586,750
3,988,675
12,575,425
(351,479)
12,223,946
CITY OF VERNON Page 2 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
B. 1979-80 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1978-79 Appropriation Limit
12,223,946
CPI change 10.17%
Vernon population change 1.15%
1.1017 X 1.0115 = 1.11437
X
1.11437
1979-80 Appropriation Limit
13,621,999
C. 1980-81 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1979-80 Appropriation Limit
13,621,999
CPI change 12.11%
Vernon population change-1.14%
1.1211 X .9886 = 1.1083
X
1.1083
1980.81 Appropriation Limit
15,097,261
D. 1991-82 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
15,097,261
Per Capita income change 9.12%
Vernon population change 4.60%
1.0912 X 1.0460=1.1414
X
1.1414
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
17,232,014
E. 1982-83 APPROPRIATION LI MIT CALCULATION
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
17,232,014
Per Capita I income change 6.79%
Vernon population change -4.35%
1.0679 X .9565=1.02144635
X
1.02144635
1982-83 Appropriation Limit
17,601,578
F. 1983-84 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1982-83 Appropriation Limit
17,601,578
Per Capita income change 2.35%
Vernon population change 2.30%
1.0235 X 1.0230 = 1.0470
X
1.0470
1983-94 Appropriation Limit
18,428,852
G. 1984-85 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1983-84 Appropriation Limit
18,428,852
Per Capita income change 4.74%
Vernon population change -5.37%
1.0475 X .9463 = .9912
X
0.9912
1984-85 Appropriation Limit
18,266,678
H. 1985-86 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1984-85 Appropriation Limit
18,266,678
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.74%
Vernon population change -3.46%
1.0374 X .9654 = 1.0017
X
1.0017
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
18,297,731
EXHIBIT"A"
A-2
CITY OF VERNON Page 3 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
I. 1986-87 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
18,297,731
U.S. Consumer price index change 2.30%
Vernon population change 6.17%
1.0230 X 1.0617=1.0861
X
1.0861
1986-87 Appropriation Limit
19,873,166
J. 1987.88 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1986-87 Appropriation Limit
19,873,166
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.04%
Los Angeles County population change 1.91%
1.0304 X 1.0191 = 1.0501
X
1.0501
1987-88 Appropriation Limit
20,868,812
K. 1988-89 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1987-88 Appropriation Limit
20,868,812
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.93%
Los Angeles County population change 1.62%
1.0393 X 1.0162=1.0562
X
1.0562
1988-89 Appropriation Limit
22,041,639
L. 1989-90 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1988-89 Appropriation Limit
22,041,639
U.S. Consumer price index change 4.98%
Los Angeles County population change 1.14%
1.0498 X 1.0114=1.0618
X
1.0618
1989-90 Appropriation Limit
23,403,812
M. 1990-91 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1989-90 Appropriation Limit
23,403,812
Per Capita income change 4.21%
Los Angeles County population change 1.36%
1.0421 X 1.0136=1.0563
X
1.0563
1990-91 Appropriation Limit
24,721,447
N. 1991-92 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1990-91 Appropriation Limit
24,721,447
Per Capita income change 4.14%
Los Angeles County population change 1.73%
1.0414 X 1.0173=1.0595
X
1.0595
1991-92 Appropriation Limit
26,192,373
O. 1992-93 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1991-92 Appropriation Limit
26,192,373
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 32.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.49%
1.3224 X 1.0149 = 1.3421
X
1.3421
1992-93 Appropriation Limit
35,152,784
EXHIBIT"A"
A-3
CITY OF VERNON Page 4 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
P. 1993-94 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1992-93 Appropriation Limit
35,152,794
Per Capita Income change 2.72%
Los Angeles County population change .96%
1.0272 X 1.0096=1.0371
X
1.0371
1993-94 Appropriation Limit
36,456,952
O. 1994-95 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1993-94 Appropriation Limit
36,456,952
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 4.84%
Los Angeles County population change .75%
1.0484 X 1.0075=1.05627
X
1.05627
1994-95 Appropriation Limit
38,508,385
R. 1995-96 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1994-95 Appropriation Limit
38,508,385
Per Capita income change 4.72%
Los Angeles County population change .33%
1.0472 X 1.0033=1.0507
X
1.0507
1995-96 Appropriation Limit
40,460,760
S. 1996-97 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1995-96 Appropriation Limit
40,460,760
Per Capita income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change .48%
1.0467 X 1.0048 = 1.0517
X
1.0517
1996-97 Appropriation Limit
42,552,582
T. 1997-98 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1996-97 Appropriation Limit
42,552,581
Per Capita income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change 1.24%
1.0467 X 1.0124=1.0597
X
1.0597
1997-98 Appropriation Limit
45,092,970
U. 1998-99 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1997-98 Appropriation Limit
45,092,970
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 9.91%
Los Angeles County population change 1.39%
1.0991 X 1.0139=1.11
X
1.11
1998-99 Appropriation Limit
50,053,197
V. 1999-2000 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1998-99 Appropriation Limit
50,053,197
Increase In Nonresidential Construction 15.35%
Los Angeles County population change 1.78%
1.1535 X 1.0178 =1.17
X
1.17
1999-2000 Appropriation Limit
58,562,240
EXHIBIT "A"
A-4
CITY OF VERNON Page 5 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
W.
2000-2001 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1999-2000 Appropriation Limit
58,562,240
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 10.24%
Los Angeles County population change 1.75%
1.1024 X 1.0175 = 1.1217
X
1.1217
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit
65,689,265
X.
2001-2002 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit
65,689,265
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 25.96%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.2596 X 1.0166 = 1.2805
X
1.2805
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit
84,115,104
Y.
2002-2003 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2001-2002 Appropriation Limit
84,115,104
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 27.25%
Los Angeles County population change 1.77%
1.2725 X 1.0177 = 1.2950
X
1.2950
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit
108,929,060
Z.
2003-2004 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2002-2003 Appropriation Limit
108,929,060
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 19.80%
Los Angeles County population change 1.66%
1.1980 X 1.0166=1.2179
X
1.2179
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit
132,664,702
AA.
2004-2005 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit
132,664,702
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 22.03%
Los Angeles County population change 1.38%
1.2203 X 1.0138=1.2371
X
1.2371
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit
164,119,503
Be.
2005-2006 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2004-2005 Appropriation Limit
164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.26%
Los Angeles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118=1.0650
X
1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit
174,787,271
CC.
2006-2007 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2005-2006 Appropriation Limit
174,787,271
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 29.41%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.2941 X 1.0078=1.3042
X
1.3042
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit
227,957,559
EXHIBIT "A"
A-5
CITY OF VERNON Page 6 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
DD.
2007-2008 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit
227,957,559
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change .72%
1.0944 X 1.0072=1.1023
X
1.1023
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit
251,277,617
EE.
2008-2009 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2007-2008 Appropriation Limit
251,277,617
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 11.82%
Los Angeles County population change .86%
1.1182 X 1.0086=1.1278
X
1.1278
2008-2009 Appropriation Limit
283,390,896
FF.
2009-2010 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2009-2009 Appropriation Limit
283,390,896
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 6.36%
Los Angeles County population change .90%
1.0636 X 1.0090-1.0732
X
1.0732
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit
304,135,110
GG.
2010-2011 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit
304,135,110
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 21.45%
Los Angeles County population change .83%
1.2145 X 1.0083=1.22458
X
1.22458
2010-2011 Appropriation Limit
372,437,773
HH.
2011-2012 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2010-2011 Appropriation Limit
372,437,773
Increase In Nonresidential Construction 67.70%
Los Angeles County population change .38%
1.6770 X 1.0038=1.683373
X
1.683373
2011-2012 Appropriation Limit
626,951,691
II.
2012-2013 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2011-2012 Appropriation Limit
626,951,691
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 62.40%
Los Angeles County population change .38%
1.6240 X 1.0038=1.630171
X
1.630171
2012-2013 Appropriation Limit
1,022,038,465
JJ.
2013-2014 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2012-2013 Appropriation Limit
1,022,038,465
Increase in Nonresidential Construction -6.51%
Los Angeles County population change .69%
0.9349 X 1.0069 = 0.941351
X
0.941351
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit
962,096,932
EXHIBIT "A"
A-6
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
KK. 2014-2015 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2013-2014 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 2.00%
Los Angeles County population change .78%
1.0200 X 1.0078 = 1.027956
2014-2015 Appropriation Limit
LL. 2015-2016 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2014-2015 Appropriation Limit
Per Capita Income change 3.50%
Los Angeles County population change .82%
1.0350 X 1.0082 = 1.043487
2015-2016 Appropriation Limit
EXHIBIT "A"
A-7
Page 7 of 7
962,096,932
X 1.027956
988,993,313
988,993,313
X 1.043487
1,032,001,666
Attachment 2
City of Vernon
Fiscal Year 2015-2016
Alternative Adjustment Factors
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Under Proposition 111, there are two options available for each of the major adjustment factors.
The values of these factors for the purpose of calculating the Gann Limit are as follows:
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Price Factors:
(A) Percent growth in State per Capita Personal Income: 4.1% 2.0% 3.5%
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Price Factor A 2.041 2.020 1.035
(B) Percent change in Assessed Valuation in new
non-residential construction -6.51 -56.74 23.73
(Source: Los Angeles County Assessor's Office)
Price Factor B 0.9349 0.4326 1.2373
Population Factors:
(C) Percentage growth in County Population 0.69 0.78 0.82
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Population Factor C 1.0069 1.0078 1.0082
(D) Percent growth in City Population 0.83 0.83 0.82
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Population Factor D 1.0083 1.0083 1.0082
Annual Adiustment Factors
Based upon the actual data, the four alternative adjustment factors are as follows:
A x C
1.048183
1.027956
1.043487
A x D
1.049640
1.028466
1.043487
B x C
0.941351
0.435974
1.247446
B x D
0.942660
0.436191
1.247446
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) Page l of
Go
Home National International Regional Industry Interactive Data
Contact Us FAQs About BEA
National Data Industry Data _
.._. ---
GDP & Personal Income Fixed Assets l GDP -by -industry Input -Output
International Data
Int'I Transactions, Services, & IIP l Direct Investment & MNEs 1
Regional Data
GDP & Personal Income
Regional Data Sign In Register Help
GDP & Personal Income
Table Table ID Area/Statistic Time Period
Selected Data
Selected Data
Modify
Chart
Download
Print
Share
SA1 Personal Income Summary: Personal Income, Population, Per Capita
Personal Income
Per capita personal income (Percent change from preceding period) 2/
State or DC
GeoFips GeoName 2013-
2014
06000 California 3.5
Legend/Footnotes
2/ Per capita personal income is total personal income divided by total midyear population.
Note-- All dollar estimates are in current dollars (not adjusted for inflation).
Last updated: March 25, 2015-- new estimates for 2014.
http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=l&isuri=l&acrdn=4 5/13/2015
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
Page 2 of 2
Contact Us
Frequently Asked
Questions
About BEA
Policies
Privacy Policy
Accessibility
Information Quality
Guidelines
Data Dissemination Practices
Open Data
ESR System
USA.gov
COMMERCE.gov
More
Director's Page
Conferences
U.S. Economic Accounts
National
International
Regional
Industry
Publications
Survey of Current Business
Papers by Topic
BEA Customer Guide
News
U.S. Economy at a Glance
Current Releases
News Release Archive
Information For...
Media
Congressional Users
eFile Users
Job Seekers
Resources
Interactive Data
Research at BEA
FAQs
http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=70&step=I&isuri=I&acrdn=4 5/13/2015
4 Q a� ri
39F111MY PRANG
Asxnaso,
Masami Higa
Assistant Finance Director
City of Vernon
4305>Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
Dear Masami Higa,
OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR
COUNTY OF WS ANGELES
S00 WEST Wh1PLE STHCCT
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 8 018-£710
:d5Va50r IdCW(�Iy.pOv
I,aBa)BOP 2111
May.12, 2015
Assn sc�iF ft-.
1 aA i les
L �QT171�11
Valuing People
aM ProPa+ty
Your agency, the City of Vernon, in order to effect an adjustment of its Gann Limit,
has requested that the Assessor's Office supply the percentage change in total
assessed valuation for the city over that of the preceding year, due to nonresidential
new construction.
For the City of Vernon, the 2014-2015 net change in nonresidential new
construction, applicable to the 2015-2016 budget, is 23.73%..
If we can be of further service, please call Kimberly Jackson at (213) 893-1169.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Jackson
Appraiser
Business Solutions Group
Enclosures
m
0
U'
''w^
'V'^/
VJ
a
w
LL
W
U
LL
0
w
J
w
z
00
LL
0
Z
Z)
0O
' N
� O lN7
W
O
r
W M
N
R
e
O
1
• � �
�
�-
r.. N
dl
r
.
a
10
0 0
•
0f9
pp
p
�
4
:M
M
CbD.
• o
co
N
06
r
y M
H�
�/i
• 1/j
(�
O..
M 49
X
t
O
•
o
b O
O
O
O
��p • • M
F
• to
40
` w
o
w
N
S
E
d
ncoo:
o
r
•;;
ly
LL
z
go
0
�,
v
0
d d
o
U
U
o
m
z
Q
a
to
E.
m
w mm
C
N
c
w _
V
nID
4D
E
• '
72
d
r
LL
«
«
`.
o
5
m
E
ci
z
I it I &
S
N
c
Q
L
S
�,NT pA
4VZ
DEPARTMENT OF EDMUND G. BROWN JR. • GOVERNOR
41t,�wN1r F I N A N C E BTATe QAPITGL R ROOM 1 145 ■ BMCRAM[NTO MA ■ 95B 14.4998 ■ www.00r.CA.GOV
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
May 2015
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
The California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 2227, mandates the Department of Finance
(Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments.
Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2015,
in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations
limit for fiscal year 2015-16. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal
income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to
calculate the 2015-16 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides city and unincorporated county
population percentage change. Attachment C provides population percentage change for
counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes
federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and
Taxation Code section 2228 for further information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XIII
B, section 9(C), of the State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations
limit calculation mandate. The Code and the California Constitution can be accessed at the
following website: htto:/://leoinfo.legislature.cagov/faces/codes.xhtml/faces/codes.xhtml.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation
as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this issue should be referred
to their respective county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself. No
state agency reviews the local appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation
Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that
exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify
the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2015.
Please Note: Prior year's city population estimates may be revised.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at
(916)323-4086.
MICHAEL COHEN
Director
By:
KEELY M.BOSLER
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
May 2015
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XI II B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living
factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost
of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage
change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used
in setting the fiscal year 2015-16 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2015-16 3.82
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2015-16
appropriation limit.
2015-16:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 3.82 percent
Population Change = 0.93 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio:
Population converted to a ratio:
Calculation of factor for FY 2015-16:
3.82 + 100 = 1.0382
100
0.93 + 100 = 1.0093
100
1.0382 x 1.0093 = 1.0479
Fiscal Year 2015-16
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2015 and Total Population, January 1, 2015
Total
County Percent Chanae -- Population Minus Exclusions -- Population
City 2014.2015 1-1-14 1.1-15 1.1.2015
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills
0.64
20,635
20,767
20,767
Alhambra
0.95
84,736
85,545
85,545
Arcadia
0.41
57,526
57,761
57.761
Artesia
0.41
16,695
16,763
16,849
Avalon
0.47
3,822
3,840
3,840
Azusa
2.11
48,405
49,425
49,425
Baldwin Park
0.39
76,749
77,047
77,047
Bell
0.41
35,987
36,135
36,135
Bellflower
0.42
77,777
78,106
78,106
Bell Gardens
0.45
42,685
42,875
42,875
Beverly Hills
0.40
34,693
34,833
34,833
Bradbury
0.46
1,082
1,087
1,087
Burbank
0.46
105.595
106,084
106,084
Calabasas
1.08
23,953
24,212
24,212
Carson
0.51
92,677
93,148
93,148
Cerritos
0.42
49,761
49,968
49,968
Claremont
0.97
35,932
36,282
36,282
Commerce
0.38
13,010
13,060
13,060
Compton
0.39
98.126
98,506
98,506
Covina
0.49
48,640
48,876
48,876
Cudahy
0.49
24,152
24,270
24,270
Culver City
0.44
39,597
39,773
39,773
Diamond Bar
0.43
56,426
56,668
56,668
Downey
0.43
113,417
113,900
113,900
Duarte
0.75
21,677
21,839
21,839
El Monte
0.57
115,118
115,774
115,774
El Segundo
0.57
16,903
17,000
17,000
Gardena
0.51
60,110
60,414
60,414
Glendale
1.67
195,903
199,182
199,182
Glendora
0.29
51,313
51,463
51,463
Hawaiian Gardens
0.57
14,462
14,545
14,545
Hawthorne
1.12
86,685
87,657
87,657
Hermosa Beach
0.07
19,758
19,772
19,772
Hidden Hills
-0.05
1,902
1,901
1,901
Huntington Park
0.43
59,058
59,312
59,312
Industry
0.23
439
440
440
Inglewood
0.43
111,847
112,333
112,333
Irwindale
0.41
1,467
1,473
1,473
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state
and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2015-16
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus
Exclusions"
January 1, 2014 to January
1, 2015 and Total Population, January 1, 2015
Total
County
Percent Chanae
- Population Minus
Exclusions ---
Population
City
2014.2015
1.1.14
1-1.15
1-1-2015
La Canada Flintridge
0.23
20,544
20,592
20,592
La Habra Heights
0.31
5,422
5,439
5,439
Lakewood
0.42
81,261
81,601
81,601
La Mirada
0.66
49,198
49,521
49,521
Lancaster
0.65
155,090
156,099
160,784
La Puente
0.48
40,496
40,690
40,690
La Verne
2.48
32.241
33,042
33,042
Lawndale
0.48
33,242
33,403
33,403
Lomita
0.45
20,640
20,733
20,733
Long Beach
0.48
470,501
472,779
472,779
Los Angeles
1.09
3,911,307
3,953,775
3,957,022
Lynwood
0.52
71.012
71,381
71.381
Malibu
0.50
12.871
12,935
12.935
Manhattan Beach
0.36
35,633
35,763
35,763
Maywood
0.41
27,769
27,884
27,884
Monrovia
0.61
37,179
37,406
37.406
Montebello
0.86
63,555
64,104
64,104
Monterey Park
0.42
61,805
62,063
62,063
Norwalk
0.42
105,997
106,439
107,166
Palmdale
0.82
155,734
157,009
157,009
Palos Verdes Estates
0.44
13,670
13,730
13,730
Paramount
0.41
55.076
55,302
55,302
Pasadena
0.40
140,949
141,510
141,510
Pico Rivera
0.44
63,902
64,182
64,182
Pomona
0.49
151.683
152,419
152,419
Rancho Palos Verdes
0.44
42,360
42,547
42,564
Redondo Beach
0.51
67,749
68,095
68,095
Rolling Hills
0.42
1,896
1,904
1,904
Rolling Hills Estates
0.42
8,189
8,223
8,223
Rosemead
0.42
54,786
55,017
55,017
San Dimas
1.84
34,086
34,713
34,713
San Fernando
1.35
24,232
24,558
24,558
San Gabriel
0.46
40,332
40,517
40,517
San Marino
0.50
13,347
13,414
13,414
Santa Clarita
1.91
209,231
213,231
213,231
Santa Fe Springs
1.57
17,311
17,582
17,627
Santa Monica
1.14
92,229
93,283
93,283
Sierra Madre
0.32
11,098
11,133
11,133
Signal Hill
1.49
11,415
11,585
11,585
South El Monte
1.99
20,435
20,841
20,841
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, slate
and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2015-16
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2014 to January
1, 2015 and Total Population, January
1, 2015
Total
County
Percent Chanae
-- Population Minus
Exclusions ••
Population
city
2014.2015
1-1-14
1.1.15
1-1-2015
South Gate
0.46
96,101
96,547
96,547
South Pasadena
0.58
26,022
26,174
26,174
Temple City
0.34
36,152
36,275
36,275
Torrance
0.44
147,782
148,427
148,427
Vernon
0.82
122
123
123
Walnut
0.44
30,124
30,257
30,257
West Covina
0.48
107,879
108,401
108,401
West Hollywood
2.09
35,090
35,825
35,825
Westlake Village
0.41
8,389
8,423
8,423
Whittier
0.43
86,577
86,948
86,948
Uninwrporaled
0.45
1,046,288
1,050,987
1,051,872
County Total
0.82
10,044,719
10,126,867
10,136,559
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, stale
and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
City of Vernon
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
(323)583-8811
The City Council of the City of Vernon will conduct the following Public Hearing, which you
may attend.
PLACE: Vernon City Hall
City Council Chambers
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
DATE & TIME: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
(or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard)
SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 proposed
Governmental Gann Appropriation Limit.
REQUEST: All invited parties are invited to be present and to submit statements
orally or in writing before or during the meeting
REVIEW OF THE Subject documents are available for inspection by the public at the
FILE: Vernon City Hall, City Clerk Department, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue,
Vernon, California 90058, Monday thru Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30
p.m. and on the City's website at:
http://www.citvofvemon.ore,/govemment/publie-meetings
PROPOSED CEQA Staff plans to recommend that the Vernon City Council determine
FINDING: that the proposals will not have a significant effect on the
environment and are exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). The conditions imposed on the conditional use
permit are designed to protect the environment, public health, safety
and general welfare.
If you desire to challenge the actions taken by the City Council or any portion thereof in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the hearings
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon at, or prior
to, the meeting.
The hearings may be continued or adjourned or cancelled and rescheduled to a stated
time and place without further notice of th blic hearing.
Dated: 51, / S
Maria E. A} da, City Clerk