Resolution No. 2019-019RESOLUTION NO. 2019-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VERNON ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE
2019-2020 FISCAL YEAR, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 7910
WHEREAS, Section 7910, of the Government Code requires the
governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution,
an appropriation limit for each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the appropriation limit for fiscal year 2018-2019,
was $985,664,603; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the State of California passed
Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990; and
WHEREAS, under Proposition 111, a City is allowed to use
either, (a) the change in California per capita income from the
preceding year, or (b) the percentage change in the local assessment
roll from the preceding year due to increases in nonresidential
construction; and
WHEREAS, the documentation used in the determination of the
appropriation limit provided for herein has been made available for
inspection by the public fifteen (15) days prior to this meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
intends to establish the appropriation limit for fiscal year
2019-2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Vernon finds
that this action is exempt under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), because such Bill, action is a government fiscal activity
that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the
environment, and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined
by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.
SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
establishes $985,664,603 as the amount of the appropriation limit for
fiscal year 2019-2020, in accordance with the provisions of
Proposition 111. The computation is attached hereto as Exhibit A,
which is incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Vernon has
approved a budget by adopting a Resolution, which did not exceed the
appropriation limit for fiscal year 2019-2020.
SECTION 5: The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby
declares that the budget established by Resolution complies with the
requirements of Government Code, Sections 7900, et sec,.
- 2 -
SECTION 6: The Interim City Clerk of the City of Vernon
shall certify to the passage, approval and adoption of this resolution,
and the Interim City Clerk of the City of Vernon shall cause this
resolution and the Interim City Clerk's certification to be entered in
the File of Resolutions of the Council of this City.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 2019.
ATTEST:
Deborah Harrington,
Interim City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�T&
B ' n Byun ,
Senior Deputy City Attorney
- 3 -
Name: Melissa' A. Ybarra
Title: Mayor / Mayer- Pre-Tef-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Deborah Harrington, Interim City Clerk of the City of Vernon,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution
No. 2019-19, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Vernon at a regular meeting of the City Council duly
held on Tuesday, July 2, 2019, and thereafter was duly signed by the
Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tem of the City of Vernon.
Executed this ?I',- day of July, 2019, at Vernon, California.
(SEAL)
- 4 -
Deborah Harrington,
Interim City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A
City of Vernon
Fiscal Year 2019-2020
Appropriation Limit Calculation
CITY OF VERNON
APPROPRIATK)N I IMIT UNDER PRUPOSl I1Irs 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMFNT COOF
A. CALCJJLATION OF BASE YEAR 1978 '9
STEP 1,
1. Proceedl,frum rax.
Property taxes
Othertaxes
Investment earnings
Revenue for Other -Agencies
less: Railroad Crossing Grant
SUB -TOTAL
Contribution (rum f ntwprise Fund
Miscellaneous
TOTAL PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
2. N20-eroceeds from I axes
A. User Eces by Functi�s
Emblic Works
Construction Permit.
Streets & Curbs
Engineerift Services
StrB-TOTAL
F"21
foal Vehicle ee(mits
Public Health Permits
SUS -TOTAL
Polite
Police ServKe5
SUB-10"TAI
TOTAL USER FEES
S. Interfund Service Charges
C Cost -Reimbursement Items
D. Donation and Grants (non -State) Railroad Crossing Grant
E Exempt Revenues (Mandated "st Reimbursement, Fines,
Proceeds from Bond Issues) *Ines, Forfeits, and Penalties
TOTAL NON PROCEEDS FROM TAXES
GRAND TOTAL
STEP,
1. Match Cost to User Fees
2. Revenues less than Costs
3. No portion of User Fees cunsidere i "Proceeds of Taxes'
STEP S.
1. AR Revenues of the City
2. Non Proceed of faxes
3. User Fees in excess of Costs
4. Less Debt Service Appropriations
TOTAL
STEP 4-
l. Total all actual Appropriations, as amended for 1978 79
'ransfersto Reserves
2. Subtfact Non Proceeds of Taxes
BASF YEAR LIMIT (1978-79)
EXHIBIT "A'
A-1
Page 1 of 7
-,061,619
4,890 969
302,913
831,739
9,1"t!
822,462
7,077,963
1,S49,490
5,306
8,532.,759
121,551
1,604
$2,106
205,861
15'i16
47,578
5,944
63,094
5,944
274,It99
0
0
9,277
67,303
351,479
8,984,238
..mow.
8,984, 238
(351,479)
0
0
8,632,759
8 586, 750
3,988,675
12,5 75,425
i3.1,4 '9)
12,223,946
.sue
CITY OF VERNON
Page 2 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF 1HE GOVF.RNMEN CODE
8. 1979 80 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1978 `9 Appropriation Limit
12,223,946
CP: change 10.171A
Vernon population change 1.15
1.1L1' X 1.0115 a 1.11437
X
1.11437
1979.80Appropoation 'mit
13,621,999
C. 1980.81 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1979.80 Appropriation Limit
13,621,999
CPI change 12.1I*A
Vernon p )pulation change -I.W,
1.1211 X .9886=1.1083
X
1.1083
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
15,097,261
0. 1981.82 APPROPRIATIJN LIMIT CALCULATION
1980-81 Appropriation Limit
15,097,261
Per Capita Incom- change 9.17%
Vernon population change 4.60%
1.0912 X 1.0460 - 1.2414
X
1.1414
1981-82 Appropriation Limit
17,232,014
E. 1982-83 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1981-82 Appropriation limit
17,232,014
Per Capital income change 6.79%
Vernon population change-4.3$.,
1.0679 X .9565. 1.02144635
X
1.02144635
198:1.83 Appropriation Limit
17,601,578
F, 1983.84APPROPRIA,ION LIMIT CALCULATION
1982-83 Appropriation Limit
17,601,578
Per Capita income change 2.3`"-
Vernon populaton change 2.30%
1.0235 X 1.0?30-1.0470
X
1.0470
1983.94 Appropriation Limit
18,428,65a
G. 1984-85 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1983.34 Appropriation Limit
18,428,852
Per Capita income change 4., c
Vernon population change -5 37%
1.047S X .9463 .9912
X
0.9912
1984-85 Appropriation . .t
28,266,678
M. 1935-96 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULAI ION
1984.85 Appropriation omit
18,266,678
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.7k
Vernon population change 3.46 L
1.0374 X .9654.1.0017
x
1.0017
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
18_ )97, r31
EXHIBIT 'A,
A•2
CITY Of VERNON
Page 3 of 7
APPROPRIATION LINT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
I. 1986 87 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1985-86 Appropriation Limit
18,297,731
U.S. Consumer price index change 2.30%
Vernon population change 6.17°i,
V0230 X 1.0617 1.0961
X
1.0861
1986.87.4ppropriation Limit
19,873,266
J. 1987.88 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1986-87 Appropriation limit
19,873,166
U.S. Consumer price index change 3.04s-
Los Angeles County population change 1.91%
1.0304 X 1.0191-1.0501
X
1.0501
1987-88 Appropriation Limit
20�2
K. 1989-89 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1987-88 Appropriation Limit
20AM312
U.S. Consumer price Index change 3.93%
Los Angeles County population change 1,62%
1.0393 X 1.0162 = 1.0562
X
1.0562
1988-89 Appropriation Limit
22,041,639
L 1989.90 APPROPRIATION LIMIL CALCULATION
1989-89 Appropriation Limit
22,042,639
U.S. Consumer price Index change 4.9890
Los Angeles County population change 1A41%
1.0498 X 1.0114 - 1,0618
X
1.0618
1989-90 Appropriation Umit
23,403,812
M. 1990.91 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1984-90 Appropriation Limit
23,403,812
Pe Capita Income change 4.21%
Los Angeles County population change 1.361R
1.0421 X 1.0136 =1.0S63
X
1.0563
'991,-91 Appropriation Limit
24,721.447
N. 1991.92 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1990-91 Appropriation Limit
24,721,447
Per Capita income change 4.14°
Los Angeles County population change 1. )3%
1.0414 X 1.0173 = 1.0595
X
1.0595
1991 92 Appropriation Limit
26,192,373
0. 1:,;,J-93 APPROPRIA7fON LIMIT CALCULATION
1991-92 Appropriation Limit
26,192,373
Increase In Nonresidential Construction 32.24a.
Los Angeles County population change IAA.,,-.
1.3224 X 1.0149 - L3421
X
1.3421
1992.93 Appropriation Limit
35,152,794
EXHIBIT W
A-3
CITY OF VERNON
Page 4 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSIT1,0M 4 ANO
SECTION 1901 Of 11HE GOVERNMI N+ WOE
P i.993 94 APPROPRIATION I IMI'r CALCULATION
1997.93 Appropriation Limit
35,157,794
Per Capita imome change 2 72`K
Los Angeles County population change .%Vo
1.0272 X 1.0096. 1.0371
X
1.0371
1993.94 Appropriation Limit
36,456,952
Q. 1994.95 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULAI ION
1993-94 Appropriation Limit
36 456,,W
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 4.64%
Los Angeles County populatlon change 7555
1,0484 X 1.0075 - 1.05617
X
1.05627
1994 95Appropriation IWIT
38,508,385
R. 1995.96 APPROPRIATION LMMI CALCULATION
1994-95 Appropriation limit
38,509,395
Per Capita income change 4 i 2)4
Ins Angeles County population change .33%
1.0472 X 1,0033 = 1.0507
X
LOBO/
1995 96 A.pprupriation Limit
40,460,760
5 1996-3APPROPR01I1ON LIMIT C 4CUtATION
1995-1'r. Appropriation Limit
40,460,760
Pe- capita income change 4-67
L . Angeles county population change .48I,
1.0467 X 1.0048 1,0517
X
1.0517
1996-97 Appropriation Limit
42,557,581
T. 2997-U APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1996.97 Appropriation I imlt
42,552,581
Per Capita income change 4.67%
Los Angeles County population change 1.24"<0
1 Lift / X 1.0124 s 1.059 t
X
1.0597
1991-`78 Appropriation LIMIt
45,092,970
L' 1' 98-99APPRCPRIAIION LIMIT CALCULATION
1997-98Appropriation limit
45,092,970
icrease in Nonresidential Construction 9.91%
Los Angeles County population change 1.39%
1.0991 X 1.0139 • 1.11
X
1.11
19W-99 Approprtal,an tiny!
50,053,191
V. 19y j -? 00U APPROPRIATION L I MIT CALCULATION
1998.99 Appropriation I unit
50,053,197
increase in Nonresidential Construction 15.35%
Los Angeles County population change 1 16%
1.1S3S X 1.0179 - 1.11
X
1.17
1999.2000'lpproprialion Limit
53,567,240
EXHIBIT'A'
A-4
CITY Of VERNON
Page 5 of
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
W.
2000-2001 APPROPPu1TI0N LIMIT CALCULA' ION
2999.2000 Appropriation Limit
58,552,240
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 10.24a
Los Angeles County population change 1.75%
1.1024X1.0115-1.1217
X 1.121!
2000-2001 Appropriation Limit
65,689,z65
X.
2001.20UI APPROPRIATION LIMI I CALCULATION
2000.2001 Appropriation Limit
65,689.265
increase in Nonresidential Construction 25.96%
Los Angeles County population change IA
1.2596 X 1.0166 = 1.2805
X 1.2805
2001.2002 Appropriation Limit
84,115,104
ram.
Y.
2002.2003 APPROPRIAtION LIMIT CALCULATION
2001.2002 Appropriation Limit
84,115,104
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 27 25%
Los Angeles County population change 1 ' 1%
1.2725 X 1.0177. 1.2950
X 1.2950
2002-2003 4ppropriation limit
109,929,060
Z
2003.2004 APPROPRIATION UPdIT CALCULA I ION
2002 2003 Appropriation Limit
100.929ID60
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 19.80%
Los Angeles County, populatrn cho rige 1.66%
1.198O X 1.0166 = 1.I' 9
X 1.2179
2003-2004 Appropriation Limit
132.664,702
AA.
2U04.2005 APPROPR1A110N LIMIT CALCULATION
2003-2004 Appropriation U"t
132,664;102
increase in Nonresidential Construction 22.03%
Los Angeles County population cha, Qe 1.3g o
1.22U3 X 1.0138 - 1.7371
X 1.2371
2004.2005 Appropriation , rnit
164,119,503
88.
2005.2006 APPROPRLAT10N LIMIT CALCULA r IC N
2004.200S Appropriation Limit
164,119,503
Per Capita Income change 5.2635
Los Ai%eles County population change 1.18%
1.0526 X 1.0118 = 1,0650
X 1.0650
2005-2006 Appropriation '_imit
174, 787,271
CC.
2011E 200! APPROPRIATION LIMIT LALWAI VJN
2005 2006AppropriationLimit
114,78-1,271
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 29.41%
Los Angeles Countypopul4bon chiinge IVA
2.2%1 X 1.U078 - 1.3042
X 1.3042
2006.2001 Appropriation Limit
227,957,559
EXHIBIT 'A
A-5
Ct 1 Y Of VERNON
wage 8 or 7
APPROPRIATION UMiI UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
5FC'1CIN 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT LODE
Oft.
2007-2G 1 APO ROPRIATrON LIMIT CALCULATION
2006-2007 Appropriation Limit
227,J51,559
increase in Nonresidential Construction 9.44%
Los Angeles County population change 721e
1.0944 X 1.0072 1.1023
X
1.1023
2007.2008 Appropriation Lirrit
251,21),617
Ef.
2008 1009 APPROPRIATION LIMI I LALCUtA IION
2001 2008 Appropriation link
:51,277,61
i rrcrease in Nonresidential Construction 11,82%
Lus Angeles County population change .815%
1.1182 X 1.0086. 1.1278
X
1,1278
2008-2009 Appropriation I Imit
283, 390,896
FF.
2009-2010 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2008.2009 Appropriation Umit
283, 390,896
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 6.36s;,
Los Angeles County population change .9C'
1.0636 X 1.0050. 10132
X
1.0132
2009-2010 Appropriation Limit
304,135,120
GG.
2010.2011 APPRGPRIATION OMll CALCULATION
2009 2010 Appropriation Limit
304,135,210
increase in Nonresidenbal Construction 21.453o
,.cis Angeles County population change .83%
1.2145 X 1.0083. 1.22458
X
1.22459
2010.2011 Appropriation limit
.moo
372,437,773
HH.
2011-2012 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2010.2011 Appropriation Limit
372.437,773
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 67 ?0%
tos Angeles County population change .38%
1.6770 X 1.0038 = 1.693373
X
1.693373
2011.2012 Appropriation Limit
626,9$1,691
ter_
II.
2012.2013 APPROPRIATION LIMN CALCULATION
2011.2012 Appropriation Limit
626,951,691
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 52.40%
Los Angeles County population change .38%
1.62411 X 1.0038 - 1.630111
X
1,630171
2012.2013 Appropriation Limn
1,022,038,465
2013-2014 A- PROPRIAi ION LIMI I CALCULATION
2012-2013 Appropriation Limit
1,022 03R 465
lncrea�r in Nunresidential Construction -6.51
I os Angeles County population change .69%
0 9349 X 1.0069 = 0.941352
X
0.941351
2013-2014 Appropriation LknR
962 096,912
EXHtWT W
A-6
CITY OF VERNON
Page 7 of 7
APPROPRIATION LIMIT UNDER PROPOSITION 4 AND
SECTION 7901 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
KK.
2014-2015 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
1013-2014 Appropriation limit
962,096,932
Per Capita Income ch,,3nge 2.00 ,
.os Angeles County population change .781.
1.0200 X 2.0079. 1.027956
X
1.027956
2014.2015 Appropriation rink
988,993,313
LL,
2015-2016 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2014-2015 Appropuadon Limit
988,993,313
Per Capita Income change 3.W,
Los Angeles County population change .82`n
1.0350 X 1.0082 a 1.043487
X
1.043487
2015-2036 Appropriation Limit
1,037,001,666
MM.
2016.2017 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCUlAT10N
2015-2016 Appropriation Limit
1,032,( 11,666
Per Capita income change 5.37,a
Los Angeles County population change .85�
1.0537 X 1.0085 = 1.062656
X
1.062656
2016-2017 Appropriation Limit
1,096,662,762
NN.
2017-2018 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULA ION
7016=012 Appropriat�,n limit
1,096,66: 762
Increase in Nonresidential Construction •13.27�-
Los Angeles County pop., at:;,n ,.hange .57:e
0,8673 X 11 )S7 ■ 0.972244
x
C,.872244
201 t-2018 Appropriation Limit
956,557,514
00.
2018.2019 APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
2017.2018 Appropriation Limit
956,557,514
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 7.52%
Los Angeles County popAadon change .51 ,>
1.0252 X 1.0051- 1.030429
X
1.030429
2018.2019 Appropriation Limit
985,664,603
PP.
2019-2020 APPROPRIAI?ON LIMIT CALCULATION
2018.2019 Appropriation Limit
985,664,603
Increase in Nonresidential Construction 23.25%
-os Angeles C ity population change -0.01+
1.2352 X 0.1999 - 1.23SO76
X
1.23SO76
2019-2020 Appropriation Limit
1,217,370,695
EXHIBIT 'A
A-7
STAFF REPORT
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19. SD
City Council Agenda Item Report
Agenda Item No. COV-281-2019
Submitted by: William Fox
Submitting Department: Finance/ Treasury
Meeting Date: July 2, 2019
SUBJECT
Recommendation for Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Gann Governmental Appropriation Limit
Recommendation:
A. Find that adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Appropriation Limit proposed in this staff report is exempt under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because such action is a government fiscal activity that will not result
in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore does not constitute a "project" as defined by
CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and
B. Conduct a Public Hearing; and
C. Adopt the attached resolution establishing the City's Appropriation Limit for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 in the
amount of$1,217,370,695 based on the percentage change in the Nonresidential Construction and County Population.
Background:
California voters approved an initiative on November 6, 1979 that added Article XIIIB to the State Constitution. The
provisions of this article place limits on the amount of revenue that can be appropriated by all entities of government.
This State Appropriation Limit is often referred to as the Gann Limit, after Paul Gann, the author of the measure placing
the limit in the State constitution. The Appropriation Limit is based on actual appropriations during the 1978-1979 fiscal
years, as increased each year using specified population and inflationary growth factors.
The original legislation implementing the provisions of Article XIIIB became effective January 1, 1981. In accordance
with that legislation, the governing body of each government jurisdiction must, by resolution, establish its annual
Appropriation Limit for the coming year at a regularly scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting.
The original Article XIIIB (Proposition 4) and its implementing legislation, Chapter 1205/80, was modified in June 1990
by Proposition i I i and SB 88 (Chapter 60/90). Significant changes imposed by Proposition 111 include the following:
• The provision of a choice in methodologies for determining the annual inflation factor between (1) growth in
California per capita income, or (2) growth in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction within the City.
• The provision of choice in methodologies for determining the annual population growth factor between (1) City
population growth, or (2) County population growth.
0 Regulations allowing the exclusion of"qualified capital outlay" expenditures from calculation of the Limit.
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
• Provision of a process for avoiding tax refunds if a city falls sufficiently below the Limit in the next fiscal year. The
revised language provides two years, beyond the second year, to refund any remaining excess during which jurisdictions
can seek to obtain a successful override vote.
As a result of Proposition 111, the City is required to choose between two annual inflation factors and two population
factors.
• The choice offered for the annual inflation factor is (1) the growth in California per capita income or (2) the growth
in non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction within the City.
• The choice offered for the annual population growth factor is (1) the growth in City or (2) County population.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction as its
annual inflation factor and the County's population growth as its annual population growth factors for the eight (8) years
prior to Fiscal Year 2014-2015.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the State per capita personal income as its annual inflation factor and
the County's population growth as its annual population growth factors for Fiscal Year 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and
2016-2017.
The City calculated its appropriation limit based on the non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction as its
annual inflation factor and the County's population growth as its annual population growth factors for Fiscal Year
2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020.
When the City prepares its annual budget each year, the appropriations subject to the Appropriation Limit is typically
well below the Appropriation Limit as shown below:
Fiscal
Appropriation
Appropriation
Amount
Year
Limit
Subject to Limit
Under Limit
2010-2011
$372 million
$41 million
$331 million
2011-2012
$627 million
$62 million
$565 million
2012-2013
$1,022 million
$47 million
$975 million
2013-2014
$962 million
$55 million
$907 million
2014-2015
$989 million
$52 million
$937 million
2015-2016
$1,032 million
$57 million
$975 million
2016-2017
$1,097 million
$55 million
$1,042 million
2017-2018
$957 million
$56 million
$901 million
2018-2019
$986 million
$60 million
$926 million
2019-2020
$1,217 million
$60 million
$1,157 million
Over the last ten (10) years, and including 2019-2020, the City's appropriations subject to the Appropriation Limit
have remained well below the Appropriation Limit. Given the size of this gap, it is unlikely that the City will exceed the
Appropriation Link in the upcoming years without significant changes to the City's tax structure.
The notice indicating the documentation used in the determination of the appropriation limit provided herewith was
posted on the City's website on or around June 13, 2019 and is available for public inspection.
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact since the City continues to remain below the Appropriation Limit.
ATTACHMENTS
• 1. Public Hearing Notice - FY 2019/2020 Gann Appropriation Limit
• 2. Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Alternative Adjustment Factors
• 3. Resolution - Appropriation Unit 2019-2020
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION ADOPT
City of Vernon
ION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
4305 SQYP9/l8•A%cnue
Vernon. CA 90058
(323)583-8811
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CITY WIDE BUDGET AND THE GANN
GOVERNMENTAL APPROPRIATION LIMIT
The City of Vernon will conduct two (2) Public Hearings, which you may attend.
PLACE: Vernon City Hall
City Council Chamber
4305 Santa Fe Avenue
Vernon. CA 90058
DATE & TIME: Tuesday, July 2, 2019, at 9:00 a.m.
(or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard)
PURPOSE/SUBJECT: Consider Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020
1) Proposed City Wide Budget
2) Gann Governmental Appropriation Limit
DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW:
All relevant documents will be made available for inspection by the public at the Vernon City I -tall, City Clerk Department,
4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, California 90058, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and will be made
available on the City's website at: 1ittf7. �N���.�.it,\-�,lr��rr,nn 01 ijgov crrnlicut.�p1J ,u1etln 5'c irk-_4-,sui7- it
Please send your comments or questions to:
William Fox, Finance Director
City of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon, CA 90058
(323) 583-8811 Ext. 849 Entail: wfox,cuci.vernon.ca.us
PROPOSED CEQA FINDING:
Staff plans to recommend that the Vernon City Council determine that the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed
City Wide Budget and the adoption of the FY 2019/2020 Gann Governmental Appropriation Limit will not have a significant
elect on the environment and that each are exempt front the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Adoption of the
budget and/or the appropriation limit is aligned with the creation of government finlding mechanism or other government
fiscal activity that does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant
physical impact on the environment and is therefore not a `'project" as defined under Section 15378(b)(4). Further, even if
adoption of either were considered a *-project." it would be cxennpt from CEQA review in accordance with Section
15061(b)(3), the general rule that CEQA only applies to prcliects that may have a significant effect on the environment.
Ifyou challenge the adoption/approval of the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Proposed City Wide Budget and/or the Gann
Governmental Appropriation Limit or any provision thereof in cows, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon at, or
prior to, the meeting.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): In compliance with ADA. ifyou need special assistance to participate in the meeting,
please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (323) 583-881 1 ext. 546.
The hearing may be continued or adjourned or cancelled and rescheduled to a stated time and place without further
notice of a public hearing.
Dated: 64
Maria E. Aye a, City Clerk
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
Mailing Address : 915 E FIRST ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
Telephone (800) 788-7840 / Fax (800) 464-2839
Visit us @ iwvw.Leg alAdstore.corn
MARIA AYALA
CITY OF VERNON CITY CLERK
4305 SANTA FE AVE
VERNON, CA 90058
COPY OF NOTICE
Notice Type: GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE
Ad Description
PUBLIC NOTICE - Budget & GANN Limit
To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the
HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN. Please read this notice carefully and call us
with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County
Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication
date(s) for this notice is (are):
06/13/2019
An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this
order in full. you will not receive an invoice.
IIIPI'I I IIII VG IIIII IIII II II I I911111I11i1 IIII IVII 181111III
PRE# 3263497
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING
THE PROPOSED CITY WIDE BUDGET AND
THE GANN GOVERNMENTAL
APPROPRIATION LIMIT
The City of Vernon will conduct two (2) Public
Hearings, which you may attend.
PLACE. Vernon City Hall
Cityy Council Chamber
4305 Sonto Fe Avenue
Vernon, CA 90058
DATE 8 TIME Tuesday, July 2, 2019, at 9,00
am
(or as soon thereafter as the matter can be
heard)
PURPOSE/SUBJECT Consider Adoption of the
Fiscal Year 201912020
11
Proposed City wide Budget
21 Gann Governmental Appropralion Limit
DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW
All relevant documents will be made available for
inspection by the public at the Vernon City Hall,
City Clerk Department, 4305 Santa Fe Avenue.
Vernon, California 900.58, Monday through
Thursday. 700 a.m. to 530 p.m. and will be
made availabre on the Cily's websne al.
hffQ 11%~ citvofvernon orolboyernmintloudic-
meetinos
Please send your comments or questions to
Wiliam Fox. Finance Director
Cityy� of Vernon
4305 Santa Fe Avenue, Vernon. CA W058
(323) 583.8811 Exit 849 Emil
wfoxoa:Vernon caul
PROPOSED CEOA FINDING.
Staff plans to recommend that the VernonCity
Council determine that the adoption of the Fiscal
Year 201WO20 Proposed City Wide Budget and
the adoption of the FY 2019f2O2O Gann
Governmental Appropriation Lir nit will not have a
significant effect on the environment and that
each are exempt from the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEOA). Adoption of
the budget andlor the appropriation limit is
aligned wrtn the creation of a government funding
mechanism or other government fiscal activity
,,,at
,,,as not involve any conunitrnent to any
specific protect which may result in a potentially
significant physical impact on the environment
and is therefore not a 'pdject" as defined under
Section 15378(b)(4) Further, even if adoption of
:liner were considered a -project." it would be
exempt from CEQA review in accordance with
Section 15061(b)(3). the general rula that CEOA
only applies to projects that may have a
significant effect on the environment
If you challenge the adopnorJapproval or the
Fiscal Year 20190020 Proposed City Wide
Budget and/or the Gann Govornmen"
Appropriation Limit or any provision thereof in
court, you may be limited l0 raisingg Ofty those
issues you or someone else rased ai the hearing
described in this notice or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Vernon
at, or prior to, the meeting.
Americans win Disabilities Act (ADA) In
compliance with ADA it you nett special
assistance l0 anicipate in the meeting please
contact the Office of the City Clerk at (3231 583•
881 t ext 546
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION' ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
The hearing may be continued or ad ow ned or
canoed and rescheduled to a stated time and
Place without further notice of a public hearing
Dated 061111'2019
IS/ Maria E. Apia Cny Clerk
6t13/19
PRE-32634970
HUNTINGTON PARK BULLETIN
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
Attachment 2
City of Vernon
Fiscal Year 2019-2020
Alternative Adjustment Factors
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
ALTERNATIVE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Under Proposition 111, there are two options available for each of the major adjustment factors.
The values of these factors for the purpose of calculating the Gann Limit are as follows:
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
Price Factors:
(A) Percent growth in State per Capita Personal income: 3.69% 3.67% 3.85%
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Price Factor A 1.037 1.037 1.039
(B) Percent change in Assessed Valuation in new
non-residential construction -13.27 2.52 23.52
(Source: Los Angeles County Assessor's Office)
Price Factor B 0.8673 1.0252 1.2352
Population Factors:
(C) Percentage growth in County Population 0.57 0.51 -0.01
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Population Factor C 1.0057 1.0051 0.9999
(D) Percent growth in City Population
0.00
0.00
0.00
(Source: California Department of Finance)
Population Factor D
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
Annual Adjustment Factors:
Based upon the actual data, the four alternative adjustment factors are as follows:
A x C
1.042810
1.041987
1.039396
A x D
1.036900
1.036700
1.038500
B x C
0.872244
1.030429
1.235076
B x D
0.867300
1.025200
1.235200
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
6 NT as
W III n
O /q
x DEPARTMENT OF
C P[3'—C.T NEWSQM 0 GOVERNOre
F I N A N C E
glIF4NN� 91 5 L STRf Ie.T � SACAYAMGNTC CA 0 BSB 74.7706 6 \VW W.CCG.CA.C3 CIV
May 2019
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price Factor and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance to
transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local
jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2019, in
conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit
for fiscal year 2019-20. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal
income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to
calculate the 2019-20 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated
county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change
for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data
excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and
Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit.
Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the
appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can be
accessed at the following website: httr?://Ie_qinfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/code.s.xhtmt.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation
as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be
directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local
appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and
Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population
estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance
will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2019.
Please Note: The prior year's city population estimates may be revised.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at
(916) 323-4086.
KEELY BOSLER
Director
By:
Vivek Viswanathan
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
May 2019
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XI I I B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living
factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost
of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage
change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used
in setting the fiscal year 2019-20 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2019-20 3.85
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2019-20
appropriation limit.
2019-20:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 3.85 percent
Population Change = 0.47 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio
Population converted to a ratio:
3.85 + 100 = 1.0385
100
0.47 + 100 = 1,0047
100
Calculation of factor for FY 2019-20: 1.0385 x 1.0047 = 1.0434
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
Fiscal Year 2019-20
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions*
January 1, 2018 to January 1, 2019 and Total Population, January 1, 2019
Total
County Percent Change -- Population Minus Exclusions - Poo Matson
City 2018-2019 1-1-18 1-1-19 1-1-2019
Los Angeles
Agoura Hills
-0.15
20,874
20,842
20,842
Alhambra
-0.16
87,070
86,931
86,931
Arcadia
0.64
58,516
58,891
58,891
Artesia
0.05
16,824
16,833
16,919
Avalon
-0.29
3.&%
3,845
3,845
Azusa
2.14
50,237
51,313
51,313
Baldwin Park
0.16
77,161
77,286
77,286
Bell
0,69
36,307
36,556
36,566
Bellflower
0,04
78,279
78,308
78,308
Bell Gardens
-0.35
43,123
42,972
42,972
Beverly Hills
-0.20
34,697
34,627
34,627
Bradbury
-0.65
1,084
1,077
1,077
Burbank
-0.21
106,175
105,952
105,952
Calabasas
-0.19
24,284
24,239
24,239
Carson
-0.01
93,609
93,604
93,604
Cerritos
0.86
50,280
50,711
50,711
Claremont
0.09
36,479
36,511
36,511
Commerce
-0.25
13,054
13,021
13,021
Compton
-0.28
98,985
98,711
98,711
Covina
-0.08
48,914
48,876
48,876
Cudahy
-0.28
24,s33
24,264
24,264
Culver City
0.96
39,790
40,173
40,173
Diamond Bar
-0.13
57,572
57,495
57,495
Downey
-0.18
114,413
114,212
114,212
Duarte
-0.25
22,007
21,952
21,952
El Monte
0.76
116,315
117,204
117,204
ElSegundo
.0.01
17,067
17,066
17,066
Gardena
-0.19
61,158
61,042
61,042
Glendale
0.73
204,782
206,283
206.283
Glendora
0.07
52,086
52,122
52,122
Hawaiian Gardens
-0.22
14,723
14,690
14,690
Hawthorne
-0,16
87,996
87,854
87,854
Hermosa Beach
0.17
19.614
19,847
19,847
Hidden Hills
-0.79
1,900
1,885
1,885
Huntington Park
-0.06
59,386
59.350
59,350
Industry
0.00
432
432
432
Inglewood
-0.19
112,759
112,549
112,549
Irwindale
4,08
1,447
1,506
1,506
`Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state
and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
Fiscal Year 2019-20
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions"
January 1, 2018 to January
1, 2019 and Total Population, January 1, 2019
Total
County
Percent ChaWM
--- Population Minus
Exclusions -
Population
City
2018-2019
1.1-18
1-1-19
1-1-2019
La Canada Flintridge
-0.10
20,623
20,602
20,602
La Habra Heights
-0.07
5,489
5,485
6,485
Lakewood
-0.13
B1,459
81,352
81,352
La Mirada
-0.05
49,585
49,558
49,558
Lancaster
0.28
156,841
157,273
161,604
La Puente
0.19
40,719
40,795
40,795
La Verne
-0.11
33,239
33,201
33,201
Lawndale
-0.27
33,527
33,436
33,436
Lomita
-0.06
20,776
20,763
20,763
Long Beach
-0.21
475,921
474,941
475,013
Los Angeles
0.05
4,035,356
4,037,190
4,040,079
Lynwood
-0,22
71,497
71,343
71,343
Malibu
-7.42
13,011
12,046
12,046
Manhattan Beach
-0.24
36,010
35,922
35,922
Maywood
-0.21
28,029
27,971
27,971
Monrovia
-0,14
38,582
38,529
38,529
Montebello
-0.11
64,316
64,247
64,247
Monterey Park
-0.38
62,061
61,828
61,828
Norwalk
-0.12
106,077
105,950
106,744
Palmdale
0.06
157,782
157,854
157,854
Palos Verdes Estates
-0.26
13,579
13,544
13,544
Paramount
-0.01
55,503
55.497
55,497
Pasadena
0.90
145,003
146,312
146,312
Pico Rivera
-0.42
64,306
64.033
64,033
Pomona
0.08
154,189
154,310
154,310
Rancho Palos Verdes
-0,24
42,647
42,543
42,660
Redondo Beach
0.16
68,361
68,473
68,473
Rolling Hills
-0,32
1,898
1,892
1,892
Rolling Hills Estates
-0.08
8,254
8.247
8,247
Rosemead
-0.25
55,237
55,097
55,097
San Dimas
-0.25
34,669
34,584
34,584
San Fernando
1.32
24,593
24,918
24,918
San Gabriel
-0.22
41,270
41,178
41,178
San Marino
-0.06
13,360
13,352
13,352
Santa Clarity
2,70
212,378
218,103
218,103
Santa Fe Springs
0.04
18,208
18,216
18,261
Santa Monica
-0.' 1
93.698
93,593
93.593
Sierra Madre
-0.27
11,165
11,135
11,135
Signal Hill
0.31
11,758
11,795
11,795
South El Monte
0.95
21,092
21,293
21,293
"Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state
and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
AG. ITEN NO. 2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02/19, SD
Fiscal Year 2019-20
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions'
January 1, 2018 to January
1, 2019 and Total
Population, January
1, 2019
Total
County
Percent Chance
.-- Population Minus
Exclusions -•
Population
City
2018-2019
1-1.18
1-1-19
1.1-2019
South Gate
-0.25
97,019
96,777
96,777
South Pasadena
-0.12
26,276
26,245
26,245
Temple City
0.37
36,447
36,583
36,583
Torrence
-0.24
148,408
148,054
148,054
Vernon
-0.33
302
301
301
Walnut
-0.02
30,557
30,551
30,551
West Covina
-0.25
108,388
108,116
108,116
West Hollywood
-0.17
36.723
36,660
36,660
Westlake Village
-0.86
8,451
8,378
8,378
Whittier
-0.26
87,756
87,526
87,526
Unincorporated
-0.87
1,055,092
1,045,918
1,046,858
County Total
-0.01
10,245,275
10,244,542
10,253,716
r
'Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state
and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
AG. ITEN NO-2- ACTION: ADOPT RESO-CITY'S APPROPRIATION LIMIT IN THE SAME AMOUNT AS FY 2018/2019
07/02119, SD
OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR
/ `\
COUNTY OF LOS ANGUI..ES
ASSESSOH,soo
f
(*`—
west TEMPLE STREET�
LOS ANGELES, CALWORNIA 9W12.2770
Angeles
C C)ln' y
assaanor.lacounty.gov
JPF4FOEiY f'MANC7
1 (989) 80-2111
Valuing People
Assrsaar
mid Property
May 9, 2019
Masami Higa
Assistant Finance Director
City of Vernon I�
4305 Santa Fe Avei le
Vernon, California 90058
Dear Ms. Masami 1-liga,
Your agency, the City of Vernon, in order to effect an adjustment of its Gann Limit, has
requested that the ',Assessor's Office supply the percentage change in total assessed
valuation for the g1ty over that of the preceding year, due to nonresidential new
construction.
For the City of Vernon, the 2018-2019 net change in nonresidential new construetion,
applicable to the 20 i 9-2020 budget, is 23.25%.
If we can be of furtl # service, please call Tia Nguyen at (213) 974-3229.
Sincerely,
Tia Nguyen
Appraiser Specialist
Appraisal Standards
Enclosures
O) Q
O co
N Oj
00 _
O N
N �
} r`
LL
d
z
Z
Z)
O
d
w
co
w
h
Z
H
Z
O
F-
d
cr
a
O
x
0-
0
w
Of
d
O
0
d
O
z
z
w
h
0
cn
V�
LLB
U)
co
Q
LU
LL
O
LL
LL
O
CO
H.)
1
w
Q
U)
0
LL
C)
z
D
O
U
T
t'
CO
CT
N
T co
O
r.,
OS
C1
C )
IYy
W
a
T
o
coT
t�
a)InCO
e
N
O
to
ti
oo
lam!
CEO
* • r
N
M
14
COIn
Ei}
(fi
Efi
3
Lft
k4 +
40
w
to
to
i
M
P-
Ln
h
Co
o
N
T
ct
to
Co
M
00
co
Ei3
(n
N
UU)
Up}
d'
ri
o
C)
Ln
�
M
C7 )
64
fig►
L6
•
i
!I
N
_
LD
r
r
O
W
C)
64
•
N
vs
h
Ln
a
QQ}
,
T
IF,
T
tq
X
w
3
0
r
tn
• N
O
O
N
N
r
tD
M
+�
to
r
tD
CO
N
r
tC M
O + C',
F
•
to
>-
N
{��
I�
fA
�
0
O
'S
CL
O
i
N
co
E
T
C
c
X
rn
O
a
u-
LL.
Q
�y
O
.Q
o
:C
L.
• �Q
U
Q
U
Q
N
O
O
O
fl
11
w
_
Q
z
d
Q
Q
4-,
W
co
=
�T
T
�
r
Q
m
>
>
m
Z
* `
U
ai
•
n
Q
N
as
u.
tL
i
O
v
U
•
p
O
N
O
v
O
N
v
E--
Q
J
z
z U
d
z
CL
d
c
O
c
E
0
0
I