Loading...
Resolution No. 2026-024RESOLUTION NO. 2026-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VERNON ADOPTING A POLICY ADDRESSING THE DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE DURING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS SECTION 1. Recitals. A. The Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.) establishes requirements for open and public meetings of local legislative bodies. B. Senate Bill (SB 707, 2025) amended the Brown Act to update teleconferencing and accessibility requirements, including a requirement to provide for remote public participation in applicable public meetings. This includes offering teleconferencing and two-way communication options that allow members of the public to both observe meetings and provide real-time public comment during City Council meetings. C. Government Code Section 54950(b)(1)(A) requires eligible legislative bodies, on or before July 1, 2026, to adopt at a noticed public meeting in open session, and not on the consent calendar, a policy addressing disruption of telephonic or internet service during meetings conducted with remote participation. D. The required policy must address procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of disruption and the efforts of the legislative body will make to attempt to restore service. E. In the event of a disruption preventing members of the public from observing or participating in the meeting through a two-way telephonic or audiovisual platform, the legislative body shall recess the open session for at least one hour and make a good faith effort to restore service, and may not reconvene open session until at least one hour has passed or service has not been restored, whichever occurs first. F. If telephonic or internet service has not been restored upon reconvening, the legislative body must make findings by roll call vote that good faith efforts to restore service have been made and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access. G. Adoption of a technology disruption policy is required to ensure compliance with state law and to promote transparency and continuity of public meetings. H. The City Council Policy addressing disruption of telephonic or internet service during the City Council meetings has been prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 54953.4 and is attached hereto as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Resolution No. 2026-024 Page 2 of _______________________ OF VERNON AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby finds and determines that the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Vernon hereby adopts the City Council policy entitled “Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service During City Council Meetings,” in the form presented. SECTION 4. All resolutions or parts of resolutions, not consistent with or in conflict with this resolution are hereby repealed. SECTION 5. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. SECTION 6. The City Clerk, or Deputy City Clerk, shall certify the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED June 2, 2026. MELISSA YBARRA, Mayor ATTEST: GENOVEVA ROCHA, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ZAYNAH MOUSSA-MILWARD, City Attorney [1] CITY COUNCIL POLICIES RESOLUTION NO. Resolution No. 2026-024 PAGE 1 of 4 REVISION SUPERSEDES SUBJECT Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service During City Council Meetings APPROVED BY: City Council EFFECTIVE DATE 07-01-2026 SECTION I: PURPOSE OF POLICY Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to require eligible legislative bodies to provide for remote public participation and to adopt, on or before July 1, 2026, a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from participating remotely. This policy establishes procedures for responding to a disruption in the telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote public access to meetings of the City Council of the City of Vernon, as required by the Brown Act (Government Code section 54953.4). The policy ensures transparency, public participation, and the continuation of meetings during technological disruptions. SECTION II: DEFINITIONS 1. Service Disruption means any failure, outage, or other interruption to the agency’s remote access services that prevents members of the public from participating in a City Council meeting through the remote access service. 2. Disrupting means engaging in behavior during a meeting of the City Council that actually disrupts, disturbs, impedes, or renders infeasible the orderly conduct of the meeting and includes, but is not limited to one of the following: a. A failure to comply with reasonable and lawful regulations adopted by the City Council of the City of Vernon. b. Engaging in behavior that constitutes use of force or a true threat of force. 3. Remote access services means the two-way telephonic service and/or two-way audiovisual platform used to provide real-time remote public attendance and observation of meetings. 4. Two-way audiovisual platform means an online platform that provides participants with the ability to participate in a meeting via both an interactive video conference and a two-way telephonic service. 5. Two-way telephonic service means a telephone service that does not require internet access and allows participants to dial a telephone number to listen and verbally participate. Resolution No. 2026-024 Page 4 of 7 2 City Council Policy Meeting Disruption 6. True threat of force means a threat that has sufficient indicia of intent and seriousness, that a reasonable observer would perceive it to be an actual threat to use force by the person making the threat. Section III: POLICY 1. Applicability of Policy This policy applies to all open and public meetings of the City Council at which remote public participation is required under the Brown Act. Consistent with the Brown Act, this policy shall not apply to the following meetings: a. Meetings held to inspect real or personal property, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the real or personal property. b. Meetings held to meet with elected or appointed officials of the United States or the State of California, solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory issue affecting the City of Vernon and over which the federal or state officials have jurisdiction. c. Meetings held to meet in or nearby a facility owned by the City of Vernon, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the facility. d. Meetings held in an emergency situation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.5. 2. Remote Public Access When remote public access is required under the Brown Act, the City Council shall provide members of the public with an opportunity to attend and participate in the meeting using a two-way audiovisual platform or a two-way telephonic service, provided that adequate telephonic or internet service is operational at the meeting location. If adequate telephonic or internet service is not operational at the meeting location, the City Council shall not be required to provide remote access. If adequate telephonic or internet service is operational for only a portion of the meeting, the City Council shall provide remote access during that portion of the meeting. If a two-way audiovisual platform is used, the City Council shall: Publicly post and provide a call-in option as well; and Activate any automatic captioning function that is available in the audiovisual platform. If a two-way audiovisual platform is not provided, the City Council shall provide a two-way telephonic service. Resolution No. 2026-024 Page 5 of 7 3 City Council Policy Meeting Disruption Members of the public participating remotely shall be provided the same opportunity to provide public comment as members of the public attending in person, including the same time allotment. 3. Response to Service Disruption If the Mayor or City Clerk becomes aware of a service disruption: a. The Mayor or City Clerk shall immediately announce the service disruption to the public. b. The Mayor shall call for a recess of the open session and may convene the legislative body in an authorized closed session, consistent with the Brown Act. The recess shall last for one hour or until service is restored, whichever is earlier. c. During the recess, City of Vernon staff shall make a good faith effort to diagnose and restore the disrupted service. 4. Efforts to Restore Service The agency shall make good faith efforts to restore remote access services, which may include: a. Troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software b. Resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment c. Attempting alternative connection methods d. Contacting necessary support staff or service providers e. Switching to back-up equipment or platforms, if available 5. Reconvening the Open Session After the expiration of the hour, if service has not been restored prior, the Mayor or City Clerk shall report on the status of staff’s efforts to restore remote access services, and the City Council may reconvene to: a. Adjourn the meeting; b. Extend the recess to allow staff more time to make a good faith effort to restore remote access services; or c. Continue the open session portion of the meeting by adopting, by roll call vote, the following or a substantially similar finding: Resolution No. 2026-024 Page 6 of 7 4 City Council Policy Meeting Disruption “The City of Vernon has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access.” Upon adoption of the finding, the City Council may continue the open session portion of the meeting despite the fact that remote access services have not been restored. 6. Recordkeeping The City Clerk shall enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including: a. The nature and time of the service disruption; b. The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable); c. Any finding adopted pursuant to Section 7. 7. Response to Members of the Public Disrupting a Meeting Consistent with Government Code Section 54957.95, f the Mayor or City Clerk becomes aware of a member of the public who is attending the meeting through remote access services and is disrupting the meeting or otherwise preventing other members of the public from attending or observing the meeting remotely or in-person: a. The Mayor or City Clerk shall warn the person who is participating through remote access services that he or she is disrupting the meeting and failure to cease that behavior may result in their removal. If the person to whom the Mayor or City Clerk gave the above warning persists in disrupting the meeting, the Mayor or City Clerk shall direct staff to: i.Mute or otherwise limit the individual’s ability to disrupt the meeting, while allowing the individual to continue to observe and attend the meeting; or ii.Remove the individual from the meeting if paragraph (a) does not address the disrupting behavior or is not available using the remote access service. 8. Review and Updates This policy may be amended by the City Council at a noticed public meeting in open session and may not be placed on the consent calendar. Resolution No. 2026-024 Page 7 of 7 City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date:June 2, 2026 From:Genoveva Rocha, City Clerk Department:City Clerk Submitted by:Sandra Dolson, Deputy City Clerk Subject Brown Act Updates Related to Senate Bill 707 Recommendation A. Receive a presentation on Brown Act updates related to the teleconferencing and accessibility provisions under Senate Bill 707 (SB 707); B. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-024 Approving a Technology Disruption Policy; and C. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-025 Determining “reasonable efforts” for outreach to encourage participation in City Council meetings. Background On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 707 (SB 707), which amends the Brown Act. The Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.) establishes requirements for open meetings of local legislative bodies. SB 707 updates provisions related to teleconferencing, including requirements for remote participation, accessibility, and procedures for addressing disruptions to meeting access for City Council meetings. Among other requirements, SB 707 requires the City Council to adopt a technology disruption policy and to determine what constitutes reasonable efforts for outreach to encourage public participation in City Council meetings, particularly among underrepresented and non-English-speaking communities. These policies must be adopted by July 1, 2026. Remote Public Participation Among other new requirements under SB 707, all qualified legislative bodies, including City Councils, must offer remote participation through a two-way phone or video platform for public meetings. This includes offering teleconferencing and two-way communication options that allow members of the public to both observe meetings and provide real-time public comment. The City has already been allowing remote observation of public meetings via Zoom for several years and will continue to do so. Pursuant to SB 707, effective July 1, 2026, the City will make available two-way remote participation via Zoom, during applicable meetings. Teleconferencing The Brown Act now expressly allows teleconferencing by a member as an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as well as a limited number of instances of remote participation due to “just cause,” which may be used up to five to seven times per calendar year, depending on the number of regular meetings held per month. ADA-related teleconferencing must be provided when applicable legal requirements are met, whereas participation based on “just cause” is subject to the statutory annual limit. “Just cause” includes circumstances such as childcare or caregiving needs; a contagious illness; a physical or mental condition; travel on official business; the need to care for an immunocompromised family member; a personal or family medical emergency; or military service obligations that prevent in-person attendance. Technology Disruption Policy – Resolution No. 2026-024 Government Code Section 54953.4 requires the City Council to adopt, by July 1, 2026, a technology disruption policy. The policy must address procedures for responding to disruptions of telephonic or internet service during a meeting and the efforts the legislative body will make to restore service. The statute further requires that if a disruption occurs that prevents members of the public from observing or participating in a City Council meeting through the two-way telephonic or audiovisual platform, the City Council must recess the open session for at least one hour and staff must make a good faith effort to restore service. During this time, the City Council may meet in closed session, as permitted by law. The City Council may not reconvene open session until at least one hour has passed or service has been restored, whichever occurs first. If service has not been restored upon reconvening, the City Council must make findings by roll call vote that good faith efforts were made to restore access and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in providing remote access. Alternatively, the meeting may be adjourned. The proposed policy incorporates these requirements and establishes procedures to ensure transparency and continuity of meetings in the event of a technology disruption during a City Council meeting, while maintaining flexibility to respond based on the specific circumstances. Consistent with SB 707, the policy also provides for the removal of an individual from a meeting or limitation of their remote participation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.95 if they engage in disruptive conduct following a specific warning by the Mayor or City Clerk. Reasonable Efforts for Outreach – Resolution No. 2026-025 Government Code Section 54953.4 requires the City Council to determine and adopt what constitutes “reasonable efforts” to encourage participation in City Council meetings, particularly among underrepresented communities and non-English-speaking communities. The proposed resolution establishes the City’s approach to outreach, which may include inviting participation in City Council meetings from media organizations serving the City, including those serving non- English-speaking communities, as well as civic, neighborhood, community-based, civil rights, and good government organizations. The statute provides the City Council with broad discretion in defining these reasonable efforts and clarifies that failure to provide notice to any specific group does not create a basis for legal action. The proposed policy is intended to provide flexibility while supporting expanded public awareness and participation. Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 2026-024 2. Resolution No. 2026-025